Next Article in Journal
Stabilization of Movement along an Optimal Trajectory and Its Solution
Previous Article in Journal
Nanoparticle/DNAzyme Based Biosensors for Heavy-Metal Ion Detection: Effect of DNAzyme Surface Modifications on Device Sensitivity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Biodegradable Mats for the Design of Bifunctional Biosensors for Glucose Detection in Urine †

by
Nathalia O. Gomes
1,
Rafaella T. Paschoalin
2,
Stanley Bilatto
2,
Amanda R. Sorigotti
2,
Cristiane S. Farinas
2,
Luiz H. C. Mattoso
2,
Sergio A. S. Machado
1,
Osvaldo N. Oliveira Jr.
3 and
Paulo A. Raymundo-Pereira
3,*
1
São Carlos Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil
2
Nanotechnology National Laboratory for Agribusiness (LNNA), Embrapa Instrumentation, São Carlos 13560-970, Brazil
3
São Carlos Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 8–21 May 2023; Available online: https://iecb2023.sciforum.net.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 35(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2023-14580
Published: 8 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Electronic Conference on Biosensors)

Abstract

:
We introduce a bifunctional architecture to construct biosensors on solution-blow spinning fiber mats of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). PLA/PEG mats acted as substrate for printing electrodes and as matrix to immobilize glucose oxidase (GOx). Prussian Blue nanoparticles (PB) decorated working electrodes to detect H2O2 from enzymatic catalysis at a low applied potential (0 V vs. Ag/AgCl) with detection limit of 0.197 mM. The inexpensive bifunctional device (<US $0.25 per unit) exhibited a rapid response, long lifetime, and performance similar to the standard method for glucose monitoring in human urine samples. The PLA/PEG mats are sustainable alternative for biosensing and wearable applications.

1. Introduction

Flexible (bio)sensors are a new generation of electronic devices that, since the glucose biosensor invention in 1962, have attracted much attention [1] due to the need of monitoring relevant biomarkers of status health using smartphones, laptops, and smartwatches [2]. Electrochemical (bio)sensors are now becoming popular due to the several efforts made in plenty of applications including forensic analyses [3], wearable sensors [4], potentiometry [5], clinical analyses, personalized medicine [6], the environment [7], and the food industry [8].
Diabetes mellitus is a severe disease reaching about 422 million people in the world and is still a cause of death [9]. The commercial glucometer used to detect glucose levels in blood samples is an indispensable tool for diabetes management [1,10]. Currently, glucose biosensors are pursuing less invasive tests for clinical analyses using biological fluids including saliva [11], tears [12], urine [13], and sweat [14] samples and with different approaches in the sensing layer to improve analytical performance [1,10]. The electrochemical (bio)sensors existent has been made onto plastic support, e.g., polyimide, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyurethane (PU), and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [15,16]. The massive use of (bio)sensors can generate an expressive amount of electronic waste because these materials are not easily degradable in the environment [16]. Still, there is an urgent demand for alternative materials for the design of eco-friendly, biodegradable, and sustainable flexible bioelectronics [16].
Herein, we proposed a bifunctional support of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) prepared by the solution-blow spinning technique to design an electrochemical biosensor. The PLA/PEG nanofibers are degradable, free of waste, low-cost, and considered a sustainable material, making them promising for electrochemical biosensor projection. The substrate was namely bifunctional because they were employed as support for screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPE) and as a matrix for covalent immobilization of glucose oxidase (GOx). The GOx was incorporated directly onto the PLA/PEG surface and was responsible for hydrogen peroxide production which is detected on the SPCE surface. Prussian Blue nanoparticles (PB) were electrodeposited on the SPCE surface to decrease the cathodic potential for hydrogen peroxide detection allowing the performance of chronoamperometric measurements with a low applied potential of 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl directly in undiluted human urine.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of PLA/PEG Mats

The PLA/PEG mats (mol. wt., 76.000:8.000) were made using the solution-blow spinning technique. The specific protocol and setup used for PLA/PEG preparation can be found in Paschoalin et al. [17] and Gomes et al. [9].

2.2. Deposition of Electrodes on PLA/PEG Mats

The PLA/PEG sensor was fabricated using screen-printed technology illustrated in Figure 1A,B [18]. The carbon paste (ELETRODAG 423SS E&C) was deposited in a polyester screen (77-mesh) followed by transfer to PLA/PEG mats using a polyurethane squeegee (75 sh) as indicated in Figure 1A,B. The printed device in Figure 1(Ci) was cured at 90 °C for 30 min followed by the manual painting of the pseudo-reference electrode using a commercial silver/silver chloride paste (TICON®, (CODE: 90701)) and cured at 90 °C for 30 min. The PLA/PEG sensor contain a reference (RE), counter (CE), and working electrodes (WE) being the thickness of the device about 400 µm (see Figure 1(Cii)). The WE have a geometric area of 0.1256 cm2.

2.3. Electrochemical Deposition of Prussian Blue Nanoparticles (PLA: PEGSPE//PB)

Before use, as prepared PLA/PEG sensors were submitted to an electrochemical pretreatment as detailed in our previous work [18,19]. The deposition of the PB nanoparticles on the PLA/PEG/SPE surface was made using cyclic voltammetry experiments in a potential range from −0.2 to 1V (100 mV s−1) for 10 cycles using 200 µL of the solution containing 1.5 mM FeCl3 + 1.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] + 1 mM CTAB (prepared in 0.1 M KCl, pH = 1.66) [9,20].

2.4. Glucose Oxidase (GOx) Immobilization

The acid carboxylic group onto PLA/PEG/SPE/PB was activated by drop-cast 40 µL of EDC/NHS (0.4/0.1 M) solution and kept for 30 min [21]. The unreacted EDC/NHS was removed from the PLA/PEG surface by rinsing the device with ultra-pure water and dried with nitrogen air [9]. Then, 20 µL of 10 mg mL−1 glucose oxidase solution was drop-casted on the PLA/PEG mats (not on ink surface), and the biosensor was kept in the refrigerator overnight (4 °C) [9]. Before use, the PLA/PEG biosensor was immersed in BR buffer solution (pH = 6.0) to remove glucose oxidase weakly adsorbed at the PLA/PEG surface [9]. Figure 2 summarizes the fabrication principle of the bifunctional surface.

2.5. Electrochemical Measurements

All electrochemical measurements were conducted in an electrochemical cell containing 20 mL of artificial urine (pH = 6.0 containing 0.1 M of KCl solution) as a supporting electrolyte [9]. Chronoamperometric measurements of glucose detection were made by applying 0 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for 30 seconds with an incubation time of 60 seconds between the analyses [9]. All the experiments using undiluted human urine samples were conducted in strict agreement with the ethical committee of Brazil (project# 54796721.8.0000.5422) [9].

3. Results

Figure 1(Ciii) displayed the SEM-FEG images of the PLA/PEG mats composed by fibers with a diameter of 351 (±118) nm. The working electrode image in Figure 1(Ciii) shows a well-distributed ink layer composed by graphitic and carbon black nanoparticles on PLA/PEG mats indicating a successful printing process. Figure 1(Civ) depicted small nanoparticles of Prussian Blue (PB) covering homogeneously WE surface.
Figure 3A indicates the working principle of the bifunctional surface. Glucose oxidase enzyme catalytically converts glucose in the presence of molecular oxygen into gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide. PBs electrodeposited on WE are reduced at 0.0 V to PW form [22,23]. The hydrogen peroxide produced by the enzymatic reaction is reduced by PW form [24,25]. Figure 3B,C show the chronoamperometric response obtained at 0 V for increasing concentrations of glucose in artificial urine (pH = 6.0) using PLA/PEG/SPE/PB (without GOx enzyme) and with the biosensor, respectively. The control experiments using PLA/PEG/SPE/PB reveal no increase in the current signal with successive glucose additions (Figure 3B). On the other hand, when the GOx enzyme was attached to PLA/PEG fibers there was a current increment with a glucose concentration between 0 and 5.5 mM indicating the catalytic production of hydrogen peroxide and the electrochemical reduction using the biosensor. The current response using biosensor was proportional to glucose concentration, resulting in two linear calibrations curves expressed as I (A) = −5.93 × 10−9 + 0.003 Cglucose (M), R2 = 0.998 and I (A) = 3.91 × 10−6 + 0.0018 Cglucose (M), R2 = 0.999. The detection limit was estimated with the Miller and Miller [26,27] method yielding a value of 0.197 mM. Our approach opens a new scenario to explore the properties and applications of the bifunctional surfaces based on sustainable PLA/PEG mats.

Real Sample Analysis, Interference, and Stability

The glucose determination in undiluted human urine was made using the standard addition method. Figure 4A shows the glucose concentration found using the biosensor and the spectrophotometric gold standard method. Both methods estimated concentrations of glucose close to 0.9 mM indicating good precision and agreement between the analytical methods. The selectivity test of the biosensor consisted of recording the chronoamperometry response of 2 mM glucose solution followed by the individual addition of uric acid (0.22 mM), lactic acid (0.22 mM), paracetamol (40 µM), dopamine (40 µM), and ascorbic acid (40 µM). The compounds exhibited a slight change in the current signal (<8%) as indicated in Figure 4B. The high specificity achieved by the biosensor was owing to the PB transducer allowing for operation at a low potential of 0 V. The storage stability of the biosensor shown in Figure 4C was evaluated over 60 days yielding a standard deviation of 12% (n = 8) for the current values. All those outcomes indicate the potential of the bifunctional device for glucose monitoring using noninvasive method.

4. Conclusions

We offered a bifunctional surface based on PLA/PEG mats used as support for printing flexible sensors and as matrix for glucose oxidase immobilization. The design allowed the modification of WE with PB nanoparticles to be free from biofouling effects and improve the efficiency of the biodevice for detecting hydrogen peroxide at low potential (0 V vs. Ag/AgCl). The PLA/PEG biosensor showed a LOD of 197 µM and high sensitivity of 0.024 A M−1 cm−2 for selective monitoring of glucose in undiluted urine samples with long-term stability over 60 days. PLA/PEG mats are promising support for designing eco-friendly, sustainable, and biodegradable electronic devices being a green option to reduce the use of petroleum-based plastic materials.

Author Contributions

N.O.G.: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing; R.T.P.: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, and resources; A.R.S.: Formal analysis, investigation, resources, and writing—review and editing; S.B.: Investigation, resources, and writing—review and editing; C.S.F.: Resources and writing—review and editing; L.H.C.M.: Resources, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition; S.A.S.M.: Resources, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition; O.N.O.J.: Resources and writing—review and editing; P.A.R.-P.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant numbers 2017/18725-2, 2020/09587-8, 2018/10899-4, 2022/02164-0, 2016/01919-6, 2019/01777-5 and 2018/22214-6; Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) Grant numbers: 151200/2022-0, 307070/2022-0, 423952/2018-8 and 164569/2020-0.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of São Paulo University (protocol code 54796721.8.0000.5422 and date of approval 16 January 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [grant numbers 2017/18725-2, 2020/09587-8, 2018/10899-4, 2016/01919-6, 2019/01777-5 and 2018/22214-6], Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Grant 423952/2018-8), Embrapa AgroNano research network and CAPES for the financial support. The authors are especially grateful to Marcio de Paula (CAQI/IQSC/USP) for the SEM images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J. Glucose biosensors: 40 Years of advances and challenges. Electroanalysis 2001, 13, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Luo, Y.; Abidian, M.R.; Ahn, J.H.; Akinwande, D.; Andrews, A.M.; Antonietti, M.; Bao, Z.; Berggren, M.; Berkey, C.A.; Bettinger, C.J.; et al. Technology Roadmap for Flexible Sensors. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 5211–5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chabaud, K.R.; Thomas, J.L.; Torres, M.N.; Oliveira, S.; McCord, B.R. Simultaneous colorimetric detection of metallic salts contained in low explosives residue using a microfluidic paper-based analytical device (µPAD). Forensic Chem. 2018, 9, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sempionatto, J.R.; Montiel, V.R.-V.; Vargas, E.; Teymourian, H.; Wang, J. Wearable and Mobile Sensors for Personalized Nutrition. ACS Sensors 2021, 6, 1745–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Onor, M.; Gufoni, S.; Lomonaco, T.; Ghimenti, S.; Salvo, P.; Sorrentino, F.; Bramanti, E. Potentiometric sensor for non invasive lactate determination in human sweat. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 989, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, S.; Yu, W.; Wang, B.; Zhao, Y.; En, K.; Zhu, J.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, C.; Lin, H.; Wang, Z.; et al. Noninvasive wearable electroactive pharmaceutical monitoring for personalized therapeutics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 19017–19025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mishra, R.K.; Hubble, L.J.; Martín, A.; Kumar, R.; Barfidokht, A.; Kim, J.; Musameh, M.M.; Kyratzis, I.L.; Wang, J. Wearable Flexible and Stretchable Glove Biosensor for On-Site Detection of Organophosphorus Chemical Threats. ACS Sensors 2017, 2, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Westmacott, K.L.; Crew, A.; Doran, O.; Hart, J.P. A novel electroanalytical approach to the measurement of B vitamins in food supplements based on screen-printed carbon sensors. Talanta 2018, 181, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gomes, N.O.; Paschoalin, R.T.; Bilatto, S.; Sorigotti, A.R.; Farinas, C.S.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Machado, S.A.S.; Oliveira, O.N., Jr.; Raymundo-Pereira, P.A. Flexible, Bifunctional Sensing Platform Made with Biodegradable Mats for Detecting Glucose in Urine. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 2209–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Newman, J.D.; Turner, A.P.F. Home blood glucose biosensors: A commercial perspective. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20, 2435–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Soni, A.; Jha, S.K. A paper strip based non-invasive glucose biosensor for salivary analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 67, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sempionatto, J.R.; Brazaca, L.C.; García-Carmona, L.; Bolat, G.; Campbell, A.S.; Martin, A.; Tang, G.; Shah, R.; Mishra, R.K.; Kim, J.; et al. Eyeglasses-based tear biosensing system: Non-invasive detection of alcohol, vitamins and glucose. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 137, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, H.Y.; Jang, K.J.; Veerapandian, M.; Kim, H.C.; Seo, Y.T.; Lee, K.N.; Lee, M.-H. Reusable urine glucose sensor based on functionalized graphene oxide conjugated Au electrode with protective layers. Biotechnol. Rep. 2014, 3, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, H.; Song, C.; Hong, Y.S.; Kim, M.S.; Cho, H.R.; Kang, T.; Shin, K.; Choi, S.H.; Hyeon, T.; Kim, D.-H. Wearable/disposable sweat-based glucose monitoring device with multistage transdermal drug delivery module. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1601314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, H.; Xiang, H.; Li, Z.; Meng, Q.; Li, P.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, H.; Huang, W. Flexible and Degradable Multimodal Sensor Fabricated by Transferring Laser-Induced Porous Carbon on Starch Film. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miao, J.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X. Biodegradable Transparent Substrate Based on Edible Starch-Chitosan Embedded with Nature-Inspired Three-Dimensionally Interconnected Conductive Nanocomposites for Wearable Green Electronics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 23037–23047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paschoalin, R.T.; Gomes, N.O.; Almeida, G.F.; Bilatto, S.; Farinas, C.S.; Machado, S.A.S.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Oliveira, O.N.; Raymundo-Pereira, P.A. Wearable sensors made with solution-blow spinning poly(lactic acid) for non-enzymatic pesticide detection in agriculture and food safety. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 199, 113875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gomes, N.O.; Mendonça, C.D.; Machado, S.A.S.; Oliveira, O.N.; Raymundo-Pereira, P.A. Flexible and integrated dual carbon sensor for multiplexed detection of nonylphenol and paroxetine in tap water samples. Mikrochim. Acta 2021, 188, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raymundo-Pereira, P.A.; Gomes, N.O.; Machado, S.A.S.; Oliveira, O.N. Simultaneous, ultrasensitive detection of hydroquinone, paracetamol and estradiol for quality control of tap water with a simple electrochemical method. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 848, 113319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Salazar, P.; Martín, M.; O’Neill, R.D.; Roche, R.; González-Mora, J.L. Surfactant-promoted Prussian Blue-modified carbon electrodes: Enhancement of electro-deposition step, stabilization, electrochemical properties and application to lactate microbiosensors for the neurosciences. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2012, 92, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Oliveira, T.R.; Erbereli, C.R.; Manzine, P.R.; Magalhães, T.N.C.; Balthazar, M.L.F.; Cominetti, M.R.; Faria, R.C. Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease in Blood Using a Disposable Electrochemical Microfluidic Platform. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 1010–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cao, L.; Han, G.C.; Xiao, H.; Chen, Z.; Fang, C. A novel 3D paper-based microfluidic electrochemical glucose biosensor based on rGO-TEPA/PB sensitive film. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1096, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lai, G.; Zhang, H.; Yu, A.; Ju, H. In situ deposition of Prussian blue on mesoporous carbon nanosphere for sensitive electrochemical immunoassay. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ricci, F.; Palleschi, G. Sensor and biosensor preparation, optimisation and applications of Prussian Blue modified electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21, 389–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahmadalinezhad, A.; Kafi, A.K.M.; Chen, A. Glucose biosensing based on the highly efficient immobilization of glucose oxidase on a Prussian blue modified nanostructured Au surface. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 2048–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Miller, J.N. Basic statistical methods for analytical chemistry. Part 2. calibration and regression methods. A review. Analyst 1991, 116, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miller, J.C.M.; Miller, J.N. Basic Statistical Methods for Analytical Chemistry Part I; Statistics of Repeated Measurements. Analyst 1988, 113, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representation of the materials used for the fabrication of the device in (A). Scheme of the screen-printing protocol in (B). Photo of the PLA/PEG electrodes in (Ci) and (Cii). SEM-FEG images of the PLA/PEG mat and bare surface of WE in (Ciii). Images of WE modified with PB nanoparticles in (Civ). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [9]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. Representation of the materials used for the fabrication of the device in (A). Scheme of the screen-printing protocol in (B). Photo of the PLA/PEG electrodes in (Ci) and (Cii). SEM-FEG images of the PLA/PEG mat and bare surface of WE in (Ciii). Images of WE modified with PB nanoparticles in (Civ). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [9]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Engproc 35 00018 g001
Figure 2. Fabrication principle of the bifunctional surface.
Figure 2. Fabrication principle of the bifunctional surface.
Engproc 35 00018 g002
Figure 3. (A) Schematic representation of the operational principle of bifunctional surface based on PLA/PEG mat. Chronoamperograms obtained for increasing glucose concentration between 0.5 and 5.24 mM using PLA/PEG/SPE/PB (without GOx enzyme) in (B) and biosensor in (C). (D) The resulting calibration curve from the surfaces. All experiments were conducted in artificial urine (pH = 6.0, 0.1 M of KCl) with Eappl = 0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for 30 seconds. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [9]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic representation of the operational principle of bifunctional surface based on PLA/PEG mat. Chronoamperograms obtained for increasing glucose concentration between 0.5 and 5.24 mM using PLA/PEG/SPE/PB (without GOx enzyme) in (B) and biosensor in (C). (D) The resulting calibration curve from the surfaces. All experiments were conducted in artificial urine (pH = 6.0, 0.1 M of KCl) with Eappl = 0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for 30 seconds. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [9]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Engproc 35 00018 g003
Figure 4. Bar plot of glucose determination in undiluted human urine using the biosensor and standard method in (A). Interference percentage in (B). Stability study during 60 days in (C). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [9]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. Bar plot of glucose determination in undiluted human urine using the biosensor and standard method in (A). Interference percentage in (B). Stability study during 60 days in (C). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [9]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Engproc 35 00018 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomes, N.O.; Paschoalin, R.T.; Bilatto, S.; Sorigotti, A.R.; Farinas, C.S.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Machado, S.A.S.; Oliveira Jr., O.N.; Raymundo-Pereira, P.A. Biodegradable Mats for the Design of Bifunctional Biosensors for Glucose Detection in Urine. Eng. Proc. 2023, 35, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2023-14580

AMA Style

Gomes NO, Paschoalin RT, Bilatto S, Sorigotti AR, Farinas CS, Mattoso LHC, Machado SAS, Oliveira Jr. ON, Raymundo-Pereira PA. Biodegradable Mats for the Design of Bifunctional Biosensors for Glucose Detection in Urine. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 35(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2023-14580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomes, Nathalia O., Rafaella T. Paschoalin, Stanley Bilatto, Amanda R. Sorigotti, Cristiane S. Farinas, Luiz H. C. Mattoso, Sergio A. S. Machado, Osvaldo N. Oliveira Jr., and Paulo A. Raymundo-Pereira. 2023. "Biodegradable Mats for the Design of Bifunctional Biosensors for Glucose Detection in Urine" Engineering Proceedings 35, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2023-14580

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop