Next Article in Journal
Maintenance Strategy Selection Based on FMEA/FMECA Approach Using Time Dependent Failure Probability
Previous Article in Journal
Retrofit of a Heat Pump Unit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Development of a Nonmotorized Mechanism for Ankle Rehabilitation †

by
Rogério Sales Gonçalves
1,*,
Lucas Antônio Oliveira Rodrigues
1,
René Humbert
2 and
Giuseppe Carbone
3
1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38408-100, Brazil
2
Department of Applied Mechanics, École Nationale Supérieure de Mécanique et des Microtechniques de Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
3
Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, Università della Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Machines and Applications, 15–30 September 2022; Available online: https://iecma2022.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2022, 24(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMA2022-12899
Published: 15 September 2022

Abstract

:
The objective of this paper is to present the development of a novel nonmotorized mechanism for ankle rehabilitation. The mechanism is based on the four-bar linkage. The mechanism transmits angular movement generated by the patient’s hand to an oscillatory movement on the ankle joint. The design of the device used a differential evolution algorithm to find the mechanism dimensions. To validate the system, a virtual tridimensional model was constructed to verify the angular outputs, check the existence of singularities, and execute movements with a virtual wooden test dummy.

1. Introduction

Robotics has a wide area of application which it can include the development of equipment for the rehabilitation of the human body for different types of patients with neurological problems [1,2]. Brain injuries can impair the necessary movements of the lower limb, influencing human gait [3,4]. The use of robotic structures can generate benefits such as reducing costs with active labor for movement-based rehabilitation treatments, as well as expanding the range of exercises performed, thus helping patients to maintain mobility through continuous therapy [5].
The objective of this paper is to develop a non-motorized device for the rehabilitation of the human ankle. Equivalent devices are available on the market but are motorized [6]. The system proposed in this paper aims to explore a purely mechanical mechanism and hopes to obtain a system easily operated by patients and health professionals. Being a purely mechanical mechanism, the costs of the equipment with actuators and control systems are reduced. It is noteworthy that being a purely mechanical device, the system can be more robust and easier to handle.
The actuation of the mechanism is performed by the patient’s upper limb force. So, it is possible to stimulate both the upper and lower limbs. In [7,8], it was shown that self-operated systems can generate positive effects in terms of mobility in the treatment of brain injuries.
In this way, this paper seeks to associate the advantages of using a nonmotorized and self-operated structure to accelerate the recovery process of patients with possible mobility gains in the upper and lower limbs applied to the ankle.
This work is divided into a brief review of the kinesiology of the human ankle followed by mathematical modeling of the device and three-dimensional simulations in CAD/CAE software, finishing with the conclusions.

2. Ankle Kinesiology

The movements of the ankle joint are: plantar flexion and dorsiflexion, occurring in the sagittal plane; abduction/adduction, occurring in the transverse plane; and inversion/eversion, occurring in the frontal plane [9,10].
The ankle ranges of motion are characterized by a significant variability between individuals in function of geographical/cultural differences, anatomical structures, and different ways to measure the angles [11].
In this paper the limit to the dorsiflexion movement goes from 0° to 30°, as shown in Figure 1a, and the plantar phase goes from 0° to 50°, Figure 1b. The abduction/adduction has a range of ±10° and the inversion/eversion of ±12° [11].
The main action of the ankle joint is to allow dorsiflexion and plantar flexion of the foot, and this information was used to design the proposed novel ankle device [12].

3. Mathematical Model of the Ankle Device

To design the mechanism for ankle rehabilitation, an analytical method was used to find the dimensions that make it possible to obtain the angular output of the ankle flexion joint, as well as to ensure that the stresses produced are supported by the components.
The method based on static balance for planar four-bar mechanisms [13] was used considering that the movement performed has low velocity and acceleration due to the nature of the rehabilitation exercises.
The objective of the designed mechanism is to convert a 360° angular input turn from the subject’s hand to an oscillatory angle output in the ankle joint to be rehabilitated. One device that satisfies these conditions is a crank–rocker four-bar mechanism.
The links and angles of a crank–rocker model are shown in Figure 2. The angle θ 2 needs to turn 360° in a complete rotation, and the angle θ 4 needs to have the angular displacement of the ankle joint, as shown in Figure 1.
The geometric relations are obtained using the law of cosines and are described in (1) to (5).
s = r 1 2 + r 2 2 2 r 1 r 2 cos θ 2
β = cos 1 [ r 1 2 + s 2 r 2 2 2 r 1 s ]
ψ = cos 1 [ r 3 2 + s 2 r 4 2 2 r 3 s ]
λ = cos 1 [ r 4 2 + s 2 r 3 2 2 r 4 S ]
γ = ± cos 1 [ r 4 2 + r 3 2 s 2 2 r 4 r 3 ]
Using the relations from (1) to (5), and angles θ 3 and θ 4 , the output of the system can be obtained by applying (6) to (9).
θ 3 = ψ β , 0 ° θ 2 < 180 °
θ 3 = ψ + β ,   180 ° θ 2 < 360 °
θ 4 = 180 ° λ β , 0 ° θ 2 < 180 °
θ 4 = 180 ° λ + β , 180 ° θ 2 < 360 °
The length of links r 1 , r 2 , r 3 , r 4 and the angle θ 4 are set on an evolutional algorithm, and the values for each link vary until the relations (1) to (5) are complacent. We constrained the variables to obtain a mechanism suitable for a 1.80 m height person. The evolutional algorithm [14] uses a population of 50 individuals, with link lengths ranging from 100 to 300 mm, converging into the minimal link lengths, respecting the constraints (1) to (5)
The calculated link lengths are r1 = 273 mm; r2 = 104 mm; r3 = 235 mm and r4 = 164 mm.
The mechanism obtained has no singularities, and the mathematical model development to obtain the singularities is detailed in [6].
Generally, in the rehabilitation exercises, the speed and acceleration are considered low, and a static model for calculating the forces on each link and to select the transversal section is considered. We used an individual of 1.80 m height with a 150 kg weight as the external load, and a factor of safety equal to 1.5 was used to compensate simplification factors in the model such as link frictions, load variations, and orthosis weight.
The links are made of aluminum alloy with a strength of 276 MPa [15].
The used transversal sections with the maximum stress values of each link of the proposed mechanism are given in Table 1.
To transmit the input movement from the subject’s upper arm to the link r 2 and to decrease the necessary torque to an acceptable level, a chain drive is used, as shown in Figure 3.

4. CAD/CAE Simulations and Results

The Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) models of the proposed device were built and submitted to simulations of the complete cycle of motion.
Figure 4 shows the CAD/CAE model of the proposed device. To simulate the movement of the structure, we used a 3D wooden puppet of 1.8 m height.
Figure 5 presents the variation of the output angle θ 4 and the angle θ 3 found for the link lengths obtained for the ankle.
The angular amplitude obtained for the ankle mechanism is 78.89°, against 80° for the joint, with a relative error of 1.39%.
Figure 6 presents the Finite Elements Analysis of the proposed device at the angle θ 2   = 44°. The used aluminum transversal section, Table 1, resisted the food weight.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a simple and innovative device for ankle rehabilitation using a crank–rocker mechanism is proposed, combined with a chain drive transmission. This novel device will be a tool for the simultaneous rehabilitation of the upper and lower limb, focusing on the ankle joint.
The proposed device was modeled mathematically, and the dimensions were obtained with the aid of an evolutional algorithm.
Static analysis showed that the device can be built using easy-to-find aluminum materials, leading to a low-cost device.
The CAD/CAE simulations showed that the designed device can make the ankle joint movements in function of the upper limb action.
The next step will be the construction of the prototype and to realize of experimental tests with patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S.G. and L.A.O.R.; methodology, R.S.G., L.A.O.R., G.C.; software, L.A.O.R. and R.H.; validation, R.S.G., L.A.O.R., R.H. and G.C.; formal analysis, R.S.G., L.A.O.R., R.H. and G.C.; investigation, R.S.G., L.A.O.R., R.H. and G.C.; resources, R.S.G., L.A.O.R., R.H. and G.C.; data curation, R.S.G., L.A.O.R., R.H. and G.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S.G. and G.C.; writing—review and editing, R.S.G. and G.C.; visualization, R.S.G., L.A.O.R., R.H. and G.C.; supervision, R.S.G. and G.C.; funding acquisition, R.S.G. and G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Federal University of Uberlândia, FAPEMIG, CNPq (process 303511/2021-4), and CAPES—Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alves, T.; Gonçalves, R.S.; Carbone, G. Serious Games Strategies with Cable-Driven Robots for Bimanual Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Post-Stroke Patients. Front. Robot. AI 2022, 9, 739088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Laribi, M.A.; Ceccarelli, M.; Sandoval, J.; Bottin, M.; Rosati, G. Experimental Validation of Light Cable-Driven Elbow-Assisting Device L-CADEL Design. J. Bionic Eng. 2022, 19, 416–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dever, A.; Powell, D.; Graham, L.; Mason, R.; Das, J.; Marshall, S.J.; Vitorio, R.; Godfrey, A.; Stuart, S. Gait Impairment in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gonçalves, R.S.; Soares, G.; Carvalho, J.C. Conceptual design of a rehabilitation device based on cam-follower and crank-rocker mechanisms hand actioned. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2019, 41, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gonçalves, R.S.; Krebs, H.I. MIT-Skywalker: Considerations on the Design of a Body Weight Support System. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2017, 14, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gonçalves, R.S.; Rodrigues, L.A.O. Development of nonmotorized mechanisms for lower limb rehabilitation. Robotica 2021, 40, 102–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, H.J.; Ferris, D. Neural coupling between upper and lower limbs during recumbent stepping. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 97, 1299–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Klarner, T.; Barss, T.S.; Sun, Y.; Kaupp, C.; Loadman, P.M.; Zehr, E.P. Exploiting Interlimb Arm and Leg Connections for Walking Rehabilitation: A Training Intervention in Stroke. Neural Plast. 2016, 2016, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rodrigues, L.A.O.; Moraes, V.P.; Gonçalves, R.S. ReGear: An upper and lower limb simultaneous system for stroke rehabilitation. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2021, 43, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gonçalves, R.S.; Carvalho, J.C.M. Robot Modeling for Physical Rehabilitation. In Service Robots and Robotics: Design and Application; Engineering Science Reference (an Imprint of IGI Global); Hershey: Derry Township, PA, USA, 2012; pp. 154–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Russo, M.; Ceccarelli, M. Analysis of a Wearable Robotic System for Ankle Rehabilitation. Machines 2020, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brockett, C.L.; Chapman, G.J. Biomechanics of the ankle. Orthop. Trauma 2016, 30, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Uicker, J.J.; Pennock, G.R.; Shigley, J.E.; McCarthy, J.M. Theory of machines and mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 2003, 125, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gonçalves, R.S.; Carvalho, J.C.M.; Lobato, F.S. Design of a robotic device actuated by cables for human lower limb rehabilitation using self-adaptive differential evolution and robust optimization. Biosci. J. 2016, 32, 1689–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Davis, J.R. Volume 2: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials. In ASM Handbook; ASM International: Almere, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ankle flexion. (a) Dorsiflexion movement; (b) plantar flexion movement.
Figure 1. Ankle flexion. (a) Dorsiflexion movement; (b) plantar flexion movement.
Engproc 24 00019 g001
Figure 2. Variables used for the links and angles of a crank–rocker mechanism.
Figure 2. Variables used for the links and angles of a crank–rocker mechanism.
Engproc 24 00019 g002
Figure 3. A scheme of the mechanism’s design, including an adjustment oblong hole on bar r 4 , the receiving patient’s leg weight load FE and a chain drive transmitting torque T from the patient’s hand on bar a 2 to input bar r 2 .
Figure 3. A scheme of the mechanism’s design, including an adjustment oblong hole on bar r 4 , the receiving patient’s leg weight load FE and a chain drive transmitting torque T from the patient’s hand on bar a 2 to input bar r 2 .
Engproc 24 00019 g003
Figure 4. The sequence of images representing the simulation of the motion ankle device.
Figure 4. The sequence of images representing the simulation of the motion ankle device.
Engproc 24 00019 g004
Figure 5. Output angles of the proposed ankle device.
Figure 5. Output angles of the proposed ankle device.
Engproc 24 00019 g005
Figure 6. Finite Element Analysis. (a) Initial conditions; (b) stress results.
Figure 6. Finite Element Analysis. (a) Initial conditions; (b) stress results.
Engproc 24 00019 g006
Table 1. Maximum stress calculated on the links of the proposed device.
Table 1. Maximum stress calculated on the links of the proposed device.
Stress on Bar
r 1 (MPa)
Stress on Bar
r 2 (MPa)
Stress on Bar
r 3 (MPa)
Stress on Bar
r 4 (MPa)
Transversal Section
(Width/Height/Thickness)
0.860.931.0218.601/2” × 1” × 2 mm
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gonçalves, R.S.; Rodrigues, L.A.O.; Humbert, R.; Carbone, G. Development of a Nonmotorized Mechanism for Ankle Rehabilitation. Eng. Proc. 2022, 24, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMA2022-12899

AMA Style

Gonçalves RS, Rodrigues LAO, Humbert R, Carbone G. Development of a Nonmotorized Mechanism for Ankle Rehabilitation. Engineering Proceedings. 2022; 24(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMA2022-12899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gonçalves, Rogério Sales, Lucas Antônio Oliveira Rodrigues, René Humbert, and Giuseppe Carbone. 2022. "Development of a Nonmotorized Mechanism for Ankle Rehabilitation" Engineering Proceedings 24, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECMA2022-12899

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop