Next Article in Journal
Increase the Performance of Wind Energy Systems Using Optimal Layout Planning
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing the Potential of the Feasible Combination for Electrification through Renewable Resources in Commercial and Urban Areas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Engineering Proceedings
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/engproc2022015023
engproc-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Russel Torah
1,*,
Kai Yang
2 and
Stephen Beeby
1
1
School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
2
Winchester School of Art, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the 3rd International Conference on the Challenges, Opportunities, Innovations and Applications in Electronic Textiles (E-Textiles 2021), Manchester, UK, 3–4 November 2021.
Eng. Proc. 2022, 15(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022015023
Published: 1 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on the Challenges, Opportunities, Innovations and Applications in Electronic Textiles)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: double open reviews
  • Conference submission management system: Web form + Excel
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 32
  • Number of submissions accepted: 30 (13 Oral, 17 Posters)
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 94% overall, 41% Oral.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 12
  • Any additional information on the review process: None.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torah, R.; Yang, K.; Beeby, S. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2022, 15, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022015023

AMA Style

Torah R, Yang K, Beeby S. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2022; 15(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022015023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torah, Russel, Kai Yang, and Stephen Beeby. 2022. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 15, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022015023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop