Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Studies of Novel Imidazoles
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidant Capacity with Physical Property Variations of Morinda citrifolia L. Juice in Traditional Fermentation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Effect of Exogenous Application of an Aqueous Quercetin Solution on the Physiological Properties of Andropogon gerardi Plants †

by
Dagmara Migut
1,*,
Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek
1,
Tomasz Piechowiak
2 and
Karol Skrobacz
3
1
Department of Crop Production, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland
2
Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, University of Rzeszow, Ćwiklińskiej 1A, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
3
Department of Soil Science, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 8B, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology, 10–25 February 2022; Available online: https://iocag2022.sciforum.net/.
Chem. Proc. 2022, 10(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12341
Published: 3 March 2022

Abstract

:
The issues related to the deepening problem of soil salinity constitute an important aspect of the protection of the natural environment globally. Therefore, new plant species and innovative solutions supporting the efficient cultivation of plants on saline lands are sought. This research aimed to assess the effect of a quercetin water dilution used in various concentrations on the photosynthetic apparatus performance of Andropogon gerardi plants grown under salt stress. The foliar application of the aqueous quercetin solution significantly changed the relative chlorophyll content in the green part of leaves, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and the gas exchange parameters.

1. Introduction

Because of the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with particular emphasis on CO2, plants produced for special energy purposes are increasingly important in the share of renewable biomass energy, and renewable fuels obtained from biomass can reduce our dependence on fossil fuel resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions [1]. Big bluestem (Andropogon gerardi) is a perennial prairie grass with C4 photosynthesis type. Big bluestem biomass is intended for direct combustion or processing into briquettes or pellets. It is also a valuable raw material suitable for fermentation and biogas production [2]. Energy crops should be characterized by efficient conversion of solar radiation energy into biomass, as well as a high dry matter content. Therefore, lignocellulosic biomass, including special energy crops such as big bluestem, can effectively supplement the production of biofuels because they require low production inputs and less competition with food production [3]. In addition, plantations of energy crops allow the management of areas excluded from typical agricultural production: wasteland, marginal land, or land degraded by salinity, which is one of the main threats to agricultural productivity [4,5]. It affects metabolic processes in plants, and their level of tolerance and the accommodation to stress varies depending on the species and cultivar. Crops treated by stress factors react by starting up their defense systems. Any visible symptoms are not observed on the first levels of stress, but the physiology of these plants may change significantly [6,7,8,9]. Genetic self-defense ability is not enough to protect plants at a sufficient level. Therefore, for protection and stimulation, various chemical compounds are used more and more often. Quercetin (Q) is one of the flavonoids found in plants in the form of glycosides. One of their most important functions is to ensure communication with the environment and save plants from photosynthetic stress ROS, which can damage cell DNA, by protecting antioxidant activity [10,11,12]. There is little information about the use of Q in plant production; therefore, an attempt was made to determine whether it can act as a biostimulator and positively affect the physiological characteristics and growth of plants, including energy plants. This study aimed to evaluate the result of the water solution of Q used in various concentrations (1%, 3%, and 5%) on the efficiency of the big bluestem photosynthetic apparatus cultivated under salt stress. The research hypothesis assumes that Q can be successfully used as a biostimulant and positively influence plant growth. Foliar spraying Q had a positive effect on the physiological parameters of big bluestem plants grown under salt stress and did not adversely affect the plant status while allowing for a higher yield of green mass, which could be used for energy purposes.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiment was performed in the vase experiments laboratory at the University of Rzeszów (Poland). Big bluestem seeds were sown in pots with a diameter of 15 cm, in a clay–sand particle size composition soil with a light-acidic pH (pH: 1 M KCI = 6.35; H2O = 6.52). The experiments were conducted in growth chambers (Model GC-300/1000, JEIO Tech Co., Ltd., Seoul, South Korea) at a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C, humidity 60 ± 3% RH, photoperiod 16/8 h (L/D), and a maximum light intensity of about 300 μmol∙m−2∙s−1. The substrate humidity level was set as 60% of the field water capacity. The experiment was carried out in four replications with 10 pots per variant (n = 80), and the positions of the pots in the experiment were randomized every 5 days. After emergence, the density of the experiment was set at three plants in one pot. In the two-leaf phase, the plants were watered with a 220 mM water dilution of sodium chloride (NaCl). Plants not treated with NaCl were used as controls. Twenty and 27 days after emergence, the plants were sprayed with an aqueous solution of derivative Q at concentrations of 1.0%, 3.0%, and 5.0% at 50 mL per pot by completely covering the plant’s surface. On the control sample, deionized water was used in the same volume.
Measurements of physiological processes: the net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductivity (gs) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), relative chlorophyll (CCI) content, and chlorophyll fluorescence (the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm), maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (Fv/F0), and photosynthesis yield index (PI)) were performed four times on the first or second fully developed leaves: on the next day and seven days after each treatment following the methodology presented by Migut et al. [13].
Statistical analysis was carried out using TIBCO Statistica 13 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). A repeated-measures ANOVA (with time assessment as a factor) was then performed. Tukey’s post hoc test was performed with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05 to determine and verify the relationship.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Gas Exchange Measurement

The plants’ first response to abiotic stress is the closing of the stomata [14]. Antioxidants, including quercetin, belong to the group of organic compounds that, through osmotic regulation, may play an important role in alleviating stress related to environmental factors, like salinity [15,16], and have a positive impact on the gas exchange process. In this research, it was found that the highest concentration of Q used (5%) had the most favorable effect on PN, E, and gs (Figure 1). Smaller differences in the values of the analyzed parameters were observed with the passage of time. The plants’ strongest response to the spraying application of Q was observed in the first and second measurement periods. A lower increase in the analyzed parameters was observed after the next application of Q. This may suggest that the first dose of the derivative has a strong stimulatory effect, and the subsequent dose may support the beneficial Q effect. The increase in gs, seen by the quercetin derivative, lowered the intracellular CO2 accumulation in the mesophyll and caused a reduction in Ci values. This phenomenon was associated with an increase in PN intensity; therefore, it seems warranted to determine a single dose of quercetin in the environmental stress presence. The concentration of Ci increases with longer exposure to stress factors, which indicates a reduction in the ability to bind CO2 in the Calvin–Benson cycle, and thus a significant reduction in photosynthesis efficiency may indicate degradation of the photosynthetic apparatus [17].

3.2. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Photosynthesis is related to all plant cell metabolic and physiological processes, and environmental changes modifying them will have an impact on the photosynthetic process. Nutrient deficiency and abiotic stresses occurring during plant vegetation directly affect the photosynthetic apparatus [18,19]. The parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence in big bluestem plants were stimulated by the foliar application of the aqueous solution of Q. The increase in the value of these parameters was related to the increasing concentration of Q and the duration of the experiment (Figure 2).

3.3. Relative Chlorophyll Content

Chlorophyll, reflecting the health condition of plants, is one of the most important biochemical features connected to the availability of water and the level of plant nutrition [20,21]. A reduction in its content in plants subjected to abiotic stress may result from the breakdown of thylakoid membranes, which is more degraded than the synthesis of chlorophyll through the formation of proteolytic enzymes. The use of an aqueous solution of Q positively influenced the growth of the relative content of Chl in big bluestem leaves (Figure 3). Aqueous Q solution can stimulate and improve plant tolerance to abiotic stresses by strengthening antioxidant enzymes and preserving photosynthetic activity, as well as pre-venting membrane peroxidation or strengthening the plant’s defense system against oxidative damage.

4. Conclusions

An aqueous solution of Q used in the presented experiment positively affected the physiological properties of big bluestem plants and, at the same time, no deterioration of their condition was observed. The most stimulating effect on the course of physiological processes had 3% and 5% solutions. There was an increase in PN, E, gs, CCI, Fv/Fm, Fv/F0, and PI values and a decrease in Ci values. The conducted research may contribute to increasing the yield of the above-ground mass of big bluestem plants, and thus increasing the profitability of establishing and running a plantation. In addition, these results can be used as a prime study for developing a strategy to reduce the negative impact of abiotic stresses on the productivity of agriculture, including crops intended for energy purposes. Foliar application of Q can be used as an effective and environmentally friendly way of limiting the soil salinity impact on crops and initiating the development of resistance of big bluestem plants to stress, and can lead to an increase in the potential and stability of its yield.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.M. and M.J.-P.; methodology, D.M. and M.J.-P.; formal analysis, D.M.; investigation, D.M., M.J.-P., T.P. and K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for scientific activities of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management, and Environmental Protection, University of Rzeszow.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dien, B.S.; Jung, H.J.G.; Vogel, K.P.; Casler, M.D.; Lamb, J.F.S.; Iten, L.; Mitchell, R.B.; Sarath, G. Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30, 880–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gan, J.; Yuan, W.; Johnson, L.; Wang, D.; Nelson, R.; Zhang, K. Hydrothermal conversion of big bluestem for bio-oil production: The effect of ecotype and planting location. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 116, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, K.; Johnson, L.; Prasad, V.P.V.; Pei, Z.; Wang, D. Big bluestem as a bioenergy crop: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2015, 52, 740–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ashraf, M.; Harris, J.C. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hussain, K.; Majeed, A.; Nawaz, K.; Khizar, H.B.; Nisar, M.F. Effect of different levels of salinity on growth and ion contents of black seeds (Nigella sativa L.). Curr. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 1, 135–138. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferrante, A.; Mariani, L. Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses: High and low values of temperature, light intensity, and relative humidity. Horticulturae 2018, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zandalinas, S.I.; Mittler, R.; Balfagón, D.; Arbona, V.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 162, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mariani, L.; Ferrante, A. Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses—drought, salinity, hypoxia, and lodging. Horticulturae 2017, 3, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Stojaković, M.; Mitrović, B.; Zorić, M. Grouping pattern of maize test locations and its impact on hybrid zoning. Euphytica 2015, 204, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sánchez-Rodríguez, E.; Moreno, D.A.; Ferreres, F.; Mar Rubio-Wilhelmi, M.D.; Ruiz, J.M. Differential responses of five cherry tomato varieties to water stress: Changes on phenolic metabolites and related enzymes. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, P.; Arif, Y.; Bajguz, A.; Hayat, S. The role of quercetin in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dobrikova, A.G.; Apostolova, E.L. Damage and protection of the photosynthetic apparatus from UV-Bradiation. II. Effect of quercetin at different pH. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 184, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Migut, D.; Jańczak-Pieniążek, M.; Piechowiak, T.; Buczek, J.; Balawejder, M. Physiological Response of Maize Plants (Zea mays L.) to the Use of the Potassium Quercetin Derivative. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ainsworth, E.A. Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. Plant J. 2016, 90, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mastrangelo, S.; Tomassetti, M.; Caratu, M.R. Quercetin reduces chromosome aberrations induced by atrazine in the Allium cepa test. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2006, 47, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shah, A.; Smith, D.L. Flavonoids in Agriculture: Chemistry and Roles in, Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses, and Microbial Associations. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dann, M.S.; Pell, E.J. Decline of Activity and Quantity of Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase and Net Photosynthesis in Ozone-Treated Potato Foliage. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kalaji, H.M.; Cetner, M.D.; Dąbrowski, P.; Samborska, I.A.; Łukasik, I.; Swoczyna, T.; Pietkiewicz, S.; Bąba, W. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements in environmental studies. Kosmos 2016, 65, 197–205. Available online: http://psjd.icm.edu.pl/psjd/element/bwmeta1.element.bwnjournal-article-ksv65p197kz (accessed on 25 November 2021). (In Polish).
  19. Murchie, E.H.; Lawson, T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: A guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3983–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rady, M.M.; Taha, R.S.; Mahdi, A.H.A. Proline enhances growth, productivity and anatomy of two varieties of Lupinus terms L. grown under salt stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 102, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dawood, M.G.; Taie, H.A.A.; Nassar, R.M.A.; Abdelhamid, M.T.; Schmidhalter, U. The changes induced in the physiological; biochemical and anatomical characteristics of Vicia faba by the exogenous application of proline under seawater stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 93, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effect of different aqueous concentrations of Q on big bluestem gas exchange parameters: (A) PN, (B) E, (C) gs, and (D) Ci. Lowercase: significant differences between the averages of the respective measurement times; capital letters: significant differences between the averages of the measurement dates for the concentrations (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of different aqueous concentrations of Q on big bluestem gas exchange parameters: (A) PN, (B) E, (C) gs, and (D) Ci. Lowercase: significant differences between the averages of the respective measurement times; capital letters: significant differences between the averages of the measurement dates for the concentrations (p < 0.05).
Chemproc 10 00023 g001
Figure 2. Effect of different aqueous concentrations of Q on Chl fluorescence parameters in the big bluestem leaves (A) Fv/Fm, (B) Fv/F0, and (C) PI. Lowercase: significant differences between the averages of the respective measurement times; capital letters: significant differences between the averages of the measurement dates for the concentrations (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of different aqueous concentrations of Q on Chl fluorescence parameters in the big bluestem leaves (A) Fv/Fm, (B) Fv/F0, and (C) PI. Lowercase: significant differences between the averages of the respective measurement times; capital letters: significant differences between the averages of the measurement dates for the concentrations (p < 0.05).
Chemproc 10 00023 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different aqueous concentrations Q on CCI in big bluestem leaves. Lowercase: significant differences between the averages of the respective measurement times; capital letters: significant differences between the averages of the measurement dates for the concentrations (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of different aqueous concentrations Q on CCI in big bluestem leaves. Lowercase: significant differences between the averages of the respective measurement times; capital letters: significant differences between the averages of the measurement dates for the concentrations (p < 0.05).
Chemproc 10 00023 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Migut, D.; Jańczak-Pieniążek, M.; Piechowiak, T.; Skrobacz, K. Effect of Exogenous Application of an Aqueous Quercetin Solution on the Physiological Properties of Andropogon gerardi Plants. Chem. Proc. 2022, 10, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12341

AMA Style

Migut D, Jańczak-Pieniążek M, Piechowiak T, Skrobacz K. Effect of Exogenous Application of an Aqueous Quercetin Solution on the Physiological Properties of Andropogon gerardi Plants. Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 10(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Migut, Dagmara, Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek, Tomasz Piechowiak, and Karol Skrobacz. 2022. "Effect of Exogenous Application of an Aqueous Quercetin Solution on the Physiological Properties of Andropogon gerardi Plants" Chemistry Proceedings 10, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12341

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop