Next Article in Journal
Physiological Response of Oat (Avena sativa L.) to the Foliar Application of Silicon in Conditions of Increased soil Salinity
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Activity of Essential Oils of Albanian Coniferous Plants on Plant Pests
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

The Effect of Exogenous Copper–Quercetin Complex on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Growth under Drought Stress †

by
Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek
1,*,
Dagmara Migut
1 and
Tomasz Piechowiak
2
1
Department of Crop Production, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland
2
Department of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, University of Rzeszow, Cwiklińskiej 1A, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology (IOCAG2022), 10–25 February 2022; Available online: https://iocag2022.sciforum.net/note.
Chem. Proc. 2022, 10(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12209
Published: 10 February 2022

Abstract

:
Drought is a global problem in agriculture, which reduces the productivity of plants, so it is a major environmental stress factor affecting plant metabolism and growth. Quercetin is a flavonoid with strong antioxidant properties, and it plays an important role in regulating the physiological processes in the plant. The study investigated the effect of the exogenous quercetin–copper complex (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1%) on wheat seedlings subjected to drought (30% f.w.c.). It was shown that drought stress had a negative effect on the photosynthesis process of plants. The application of spraying with a quercetin derivative caused an increase in the values of parameters in wheat plants subjected to drought stress compared to the control, which was manifested by an increase in the values of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter, gas exchange and total antioxidant capacity. It was found that the highest dose of quercetin derivative tested (0.1%) had the best effect on plants subjected to drought stress; therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research on the use of higher doses of this flavonoid.

1. Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a strategic species, which, due to its significant role in the human diet, dominates cultivation all over the world [1]. It is constantly exposed to environmental stresses that negatively affect the reduction in yields. Drought stress, classified as an abiotic stress, is one of the most important environmental stresses of particular importance in the era of global warming and changing climatic conditions [2]. Drought causes a decrease in water potential, water potential in leaves, closure of stomata and inhibition of growth, negatively affecting most of the processes occurring in plants, in particular, photosynthesis, as a result of which, there is a reduction in yield, contributing to a global decline in food security [3,4]. The effect of drought stress is damage to the phospholipid bilayer as a result of lipid peroxidation, leading to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that cause oxidative stress. Plants, in order to minimize the negative effects of drought, developed various signaling pathways and cellular responses changing their growth pattern, up-regulation of antioxidants, accumulation of compatible solutes and the production of stress proteins and chaperons [5]. Phenolic compounds belonging to non-enzymatic antioxidants play a significant role in maintaining the redox balance [6,7]. An example of such compound is quercetin (3,5,7,3′,4′-pentahydroxyflavone), classified as a flavonoid, which, by forming a complex with copper ions, exhibits high antioxidant activity [8,9]. The study investigated the use of various solutions of the copper–quercetin complex on wheat seedlings subjected to drought stress, in particular, the photosynthetic apparatus efficiency and antioxidant properties. Four grains of Artist cultivar winter wheat (breeder: Deutsche Saatveredelung AG, Lippstadt, Germany) were sown in each pot.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Pot Experimental Design

The pot experiment was performed at the University of Rzeszów (Poland). In plastic pots (11 × 11 cm, 3 kg soil/pot), soil with a clay sand grain size composition [10] and slightly acidic pH (pH KCl 6.35; H2O 6.52) was placed. The experiment was carried out in four replications in a growth chamber (Model GC-300/1000, JEIO Tech Co., Ltd., South Korea) at a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C, humidity of 60 ± 3% RH, photoperiod of 16/8 h (L/D) and a maximum light intensity of about 300 µE m−2 s−1. During the experiment in pots, soil moisture was maintained at the level of 70% (control sample) and 30% (under drought stress) of the maximum water-holding capacity (WHC). Plants were sprayed twice with a solution of copper–quercetin at concentrations of 0.01% (Q1), 0.05% (Q2), 0.1% (Q3) with the use of a hand sprayer. The quercetin derivative was diluted in ethanol (20 mL of solution for each pot).

2.2. Measurement of Physiological Parameters

The determination of selected physiological parameters was carried out four times on the first fully developed leaves of wheat, on the first and seventh day after each spraying. During the experiment, the following measurements were carried out: relative chlorophyll content (CCI), chlorophyll fluorescence (the performance index of PS II (PI)) and gas exchange (net photosynthetic rate (PN)).

2.2.1. Relative Chlorophyll Content

Measurements were taken using a hand-held Chlorophyll Content Meter CCM-200plus (Opti-Sciences, Hudson, NH, USA), calculating an index in CCI units based on absorbance at 650 and 940 nm. These measurements were taken on fully expanded wheat leaves. Five leaves per pot were analyzed.

2.2.2. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves were performed with an apparatus (Pocket PEA, Hansatech Instruments, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, UK). The maximal available intensity was 3500 μmol, which was applied for 1 s with light with a peak wavelength of 627 nm. The first fully developed leaves were dark adapted for a period of 30 min using leaf clips, which were applied over adaxial leaf blades [11].

2.2.3. Gas Exchange

A Portable Photosynthesis Measurement System LCpro-SD (ADC BioScientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK) was used to determine the gas exchange parameter (net photosynthetic rate (PN)). When taking measurements, light intensity was 300 µmol m−2 s−1, and the leaf chamber temperature was 22 °C. Two leaves were analyzed for each pot.

2.3. Determination of Catalase (CAT) Activity

To determine the CAT activity, 1 g of frozen tissue was homogenized with 4 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution containing 2% PVP, 0.05% Triton X-100 and a mixture of protease inhibitors. The homogenates were then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 30 min (4° C), and the obtained supernatant was then collected for analysis. Catalase activity was determined with the method using ammonium metavanadate [12]. The enzymatic activity in the extracts was standardized to 1 mg of protein, the amount of which was determined with the Bradford method [13].

3. Results and Discussion

In comparison to the control, the plants treated with drought stress showed a significant decrease in the values of physiological parameters (Figure 1a–c). The application of increasing concentrations of the quercetin derivative resulted in an improvement in values of the tested parameters, except for the relative chlorophyll content, where no significant increase was found as a result of application of the concentration of Q1 compared to Q2. Plants subjected to drought stress, in which the quercetin solution was sprayed, showed higher values compared to plants in which such treatment was not applied. It was shown that the application of the highest concentration of quercetin (Q3) resulted in the highest values of all tested parameters, except for relative chlorophyll content at the time T2, where no significant differences were found between the concentrations of Q2 and Q3. An increase in the value of the tested parameters was demonstrated along with the successive dates of measurements, except for the control. The decrease in relative chlorophyll content due to drought stress is considered a typical symptom of pigment photo oxidation and chlorophyll degradation. The decrease in chlorophyll content in leaves can also be explained by damage to the chloroplasts caused by ROS as a result of drought stress [14]. Water deficit also leads to a progressive inhibition of the photosynthesis process by disrupting the transport of electrons and limiting the penetration of CO2 through the stomata, which in our research resulted in a decrease in the value of the PN parameter [6,15]. The improvement in the value of the PI parameter in connection with the application of quercetin can be explained by the fact that it participates in the light-dependent phase of photosynthesis, during which it improves the transport of electrons [16]. The stimulating effect of the application of exogenous quercetin on the content of chlorophyll in tomato plants not subjected to and exposed to abiotic stress was demonstrated by Parvin et al. [17]. As in the authors’ own research, the application of a higher concentration of quercetin resulted in an increase in the content of chlorophyll in the leaves.
The lowest CAT activity value was found in the control (Figure 2). A significant increase in CAT activity in plants treated with drought stress was demonstrated, as well as an increase in CAT activity along with an increase in the concentration of the quercetin derivative. The application of spraying this flavonoid—plants not subjected to stress caused an increase in the tested parameter, which, in the concentration of Q3, was higher than in Q1 and Q2 by 98.6 and 92.2%, respectively. Additionally, spraying the plants treated with drought stress caused an increase in CAT activity compared to the control plants. This was probably due to the antioxidant properties of the copper–quercetin complex, which are well described by Bukhari et al. [8].

4. Conclusions

The research conducted showed that drought stress had a negative effect on selected physiological indicators. The use of spraying with a solution of copper–quercetin complex in both the control and the stressed drought samples resulted in the improvement of the values of these parameters and the highest CAT activity. The highest values of these parameters were found when the concentration of Q3 was used, which necessitates conducting further research with higher doses of this flavonoid and may contribute to the introduction of sustainable agricultural practices in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.-P. and D.M.; methodology, M.J.-P., D.M. and T.P.; investigation, M.J.-P., D.M. and T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded through resources of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for scientific activities of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, University of Rzeszow.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shewry, P.R.; Hey, S.J. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. 2015, 4, 178–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Anwaar, H.A.; Perveen, R.; Mansha, M.Z.; Abid, M.; Sarwar, Z.M.; Aatif, H.M.; Umar, U.U.D.; Sajid, M.; Aslam, H.M.U.; Alam, M.M.; et al. Assessment of grain yield indices in response to drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1818–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anjum, S.; Xie, X.; Wang, L.; Saleem, M.; Man, C.; Lei, W. Morphological, physiological and Biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 2026–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Akmal, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dindaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kaur, G.; Asthir, B. Molecular responses to drought stress in plants. Biol. Plant. 2017, 61, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Kobayashi, N.; Fujita, D.; Basra, S.M.A. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 29, 185–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sallam, A.; Alqudah, A.M.; Dawood, M.F.A.; Baenziger, P.S.; Börner, A. Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: Advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Bukhari, S.B.; Memon, S.; Mahroof-Tahir, M.; Bhanger, M.I. Synthesis, characterization and antioxidant activity copper-quercetin complex. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2009, 71, 1901–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pękal, A.; Biesaga, M.; Pyrzynska, K. Interaction of quercetin with copper ions: Complexation, oxidation and reactivity towards radicals. Biometals 2011, 24, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. IUSS Working Group WRB. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. In Word Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015; Word Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015; pp. 172–173. [Google Scholar]
  11. Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence-A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hadwan, M.H.; Ali, S.K. New spectrophotometric assay for assessments of catalase activity in biological samples. Anal. Biochem. 2018, 542, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kruger, N.J. The Bradford Method for Protein Quantitation. In The Protein Protocols Handbook; Walker, J.M., Ed.; Springer Protocols Handbooks; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ashraf, M.; Harris, P.J.C. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica 2013, 51, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Obidiegwu, J.E.; Bryan, G.J.; Jones, H.G.; Prashar, A. Coping with drought: Stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mastrangelo, S.; Tomassetti, M.; Caratu, M. Quercetin reduces chromosome aberrations induced by atrazine in the Allium cepa test. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2006, 47, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parvin, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Mohsin, S.M.; Fujita, M. Quercetin mediated salt tolerance in tomato through the enhancement of plant antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Plants 2019, 8, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effect of quercetin derivative concentrations, drought stress and terms of measurement on physiological parameters: (a) relative chlorophyll content; (b) performance index of PSII (PI); and (c) net photosynthesis rate (PN). (T1—first day after the first treatment, T2—seventh day after the first treatment, T3—first day after the second treatment, T4—seventh day after the second treatment). Capital letters indicate significant differences between the means at measurement terms for each quercetin derivative concentration; lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the means at respective measurement terms according to ANOVA (followed by Tukey’s HSD test, p = 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of quercetin derivative concentrations, drought stress and terms of measurement on physiological parameters: (a) relative chlorophyll content; (b) performance index of PSII (PI); and (c) net photosynthesis rate (PN). (T1—first day after the first treatment, T2—seventh day after the first treatment, T3—first day after the second treatment, T4—seventh day after the second treatment). Capital letters indicate significant differences between the means at measurement terms for each quercetin derivative concentration; lower-case letters indicate significant differences between the means at respective measurement terms according to ANOVA (followed by Tukey’s HSD test, p = 0.05).
Chemproc 10 00018 g001aChemproc 10 00018 g001b
Figure 2. Effect of quercetin derivative concentrations and drought stress on CAT activity. Different letters indicate significant differences between each quercetin–Cu complex concentration, according to ANOVA (followed by Tukey’s HSD test, p = 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of quercetin derivative concentrations and drought stress on CAT activity. Different letters indicate significant differences between each quercetin–Cu complex concentration, according to ANOVA (followed by Tukey’s HSD test, p = 0.05).
Chemproc 10 00018 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jańczak-Pieniążek, M.; Migut, D.; Piechowiak, T. The Effect of Exogenous Copper–Quercetin Complex on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Growth under Drought Stress. Chem. Proc. 2022, 10, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12209

AMA Style

Jańczak-Pieniążek M, Migut D, Piechowiak T. The Effect of Exogenous Copper–Quercetin Complex on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Growth under Drought Stress. Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 10(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jańczak-Pieniążek, Marta, Dagmara Migut, and Tomasz Piechowiak. 2022. "The Effect of Exogenous Copper–Quercetin Complex on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings Growth under Drought Stress" Chemistry Proceedings 10, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/IOCAG2022-12209

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop