Next Article in Journal
Surgical Lip Cancer Reconstruction in the COVID-19 Era: Are Free Flaps or Loco-Regional Flaps Better?
Next Article in Special Issue
Management of Large Subcardial Diverticula in Sleeve Gastrectomy: Technical Tips
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Innovative Comparative Analysis Approach for the Assessment of Laparoscopic Surgical Skills
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM): Short- and Long-Term Results in a Single Center

Surgeries 2023, 4(1), 98-107; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4010011
by Mario Giuffrida *, Matteo Rossini, Lorenzo Pagliai, Paolo Del Rio and Federico Cozzani
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Surgeries 2023, 4(1), 98-107; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4010011
Submission received: 27 December 2022 / Revised: 22 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 20 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laparoscopic Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for giving  me a chance to review this article. Currently, IPOM is well-established, on the other hand, EHS have already published a guidelines for abdominal hernia with recommendation of eTEP. Current manuscript does not reach the level of publication.

1. Too many paragrapghs make difficult to read.

2.  The classification of hernia orifice should be also provided by EHS classification. 

3. Did you employ IPOM-plus procedure in small hernia?

4. As I mentioned, IPOM and IPOM-plus have been established, therefore, you should discuss about eTEP. And, if you have some cases of eTEP, please compare the results.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Congratulations on a well presented surgical experience and a sound scientific method.

Two minor suggestions:

1.In the Era of robotic repairs it would be appropriate to give a mention of this approach.

2. there is a typo in the LOS 33days I  believe is 3.3 days

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for giving me a chance to review this article. The authors have revised their article along with my suggestion. 

Back to TopTop