Next Article in Journal
Experimental, Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamic Study on Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel by Pyridine Derivatives in Aqueous Perchloric Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Review of the Design of Current Collectors for Improving the Battery Performance in Lithium-Ion and Post-Lithium-Ion Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molybdenum-Suboxide Thin Films as Anode Layers in Planar Lithium Microbatteries

by
Ambadi Lakshmi-Narayana
1,
Obili M. Hussain
1,
Chintalapalle V. Ramana
2,
Marco Camacho-Lopez
3,
Ashraf Abdel-Ghany
4,
Ahmed Hashem
4,
Alain Mauger
5 and
Christian M. Julien
5,*
1
Thin films Laboratory, Department of Physics, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
3
Laboratorio de Investigaci_on y Desarrollo de Materiales Avanzados, Facultad de Química, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Mexico, Toluca 50925, Mexico
4
Inorganic Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth Str. (former El Tahir Str.), Dokki-Giza 12622, Egypt
5
Institut de Minéralogie, de Physique des Matériaux et de Cosmochimie (IMPMC), Sorbonne Université, CNRS-UMR 7590, 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electrochem 2020, 1(2), 160-187; https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1020012
Submission received: 11 April 2020 / Revised: 6 May 2020 / Accepted: 14 May 2020 / Published: 18 May 2020

Abstract

:
In this paper, we investigate the effects of operational conditions on structural, electronic and electrochemical properties on molybdenum suboxides (MoO3-δ) thin films. The films are prepared using pulsed-laser deposition by varying the deposition temperature (Ts), laser fluence (Φ), the partial oxygen pressure (PO2) and annealing temperature (Ta). We find that three classes of samples are obtained with different degrees of stoichiometric deviation without post-treatment: (i) amorphous MoO3-δ (δ < 0.05) (ii) nearly-stoichiometric samples (δ ≈ 0) and (iii) suboxides MoO3-δ (δ > 0.05). The suboxide films 0.05 ≤ δ ≤ 0.25 deposited on Au/Ti/SiO2/flexible-Si substrates with appropriate processing conditions show high electrochemical performance as an anode layer for lithium planar microbatteries. In the realm of simple synthesis, the MoO3-δ film deposited at 450 °C under oxygen pressure of 13 Pa is a mixture of α-MoO3 and Mo8O23 phases (15:85). The electrochemical test of the 0.15MoO3-0.85Mo8O23 film shows a specific capacity of 484 µAh cm−2 µm−1 after 100 cycles of charge-discharge at a constant current of 0.5 A cm−2 in the potential range 3.0-0.05 V.

1. Introduction

Thin-film technology opens the way for the development of micro-electrochemical power sources powering miniaturized devices such as credit cards, chip units, medical implants and devices, stand-alone sensors, etc. It is also useful for understanding the intrinsic properties of the active materials of lithium batteries (cathode, solid electrolyte, and anode) free of carbonaceous additive and polymeric binder [1]. Thin film electrodes have the advantage of shortening the ionic and electronic pathways, which enhances high-rate cycle ability.
Molybdenum oxides (MoO3 and its MoO3-δ suboxides with stoichiometric deviation δ < 1) belong to the class of materials that offer a tunability of their intrinsic electronic properties from wide bandgap semiconductor MoO3 to metallic MoO2 [2]. The varieties of oxidation states from Mo6+ to Mo4+ in MoO3-δ films makes them highly attractive in the field of energy storage and conversion and they have found application in all-solid state thin film microbatteries (TFµBs) [3,4], electrochemical supercapacitors [5], gas sensors [6], electrochromic devices [7], solar cells [8,9], anode interlayers for photovoltaic devices [10], smart windows [11], light-emitting diodes [12], etc. These devices take advantage of the changes in the degree of crystallinity, cationic environment, stoichiometry deviation, band gap energy and electronic conductivity, which can be controlled by the growth conditions.
Regarding their electronic structure, the molybdenum oxide phases can be classified in four groups: (i) the strictly stoichiometric MoO3 (layered structure, orthorhombic, Pnma symmetry) is insulator, (ii) the nearly-stoichiometric MoO3-δ (with δ < 0.03), which retains the orthorhombic symmetry, is unintentionally an n-type semiconductor at ambient conditions, partly due to intrinsic point defects related to oxygen vacancies (VO) and molybdenum interstitials (Moi) [13], (iii) the defective MoO3-δ (with 0.03 < δ < 0.11) and (iv) MonO3n−1 suboxides (Magnéli phases, n = 4–9), which collapse into ReO3-type structures with crystallographic shear planes due to the destabilization of the MoO3 structure by the loss of oxygen [14,15,16,17,18,19]. The schematic representation of the crystal structure of the layered α-MoO3 phase and the vacancies of the three inequivalent oxygen positions O1 (apical), O2 (corner-sharing) and O3 (edge-sharing) are shown in Figure 1 [20]. An O1 vacancy (VO(1)) leads to two localized electrons on the neighboring Mo that are thus in the Mo4+ (4d25s0) configuration; O2 and O3 vacancies create a bipolaron with electrons localized on two separate Mo5+ sites in the first and second coordination spheres for VO(2) and on the opposite side of the vacancy for VO(3) [21]. At higher vacancy concentration, the shear structure is energetically more favorable than the point defects [22]. The known Mo suboxides include Mo4O11, Mo5O14, Mo6O17, Mo8O23, Mo9O26 (Mo18O52) and Mo17O47, which are formed by a mixture of Mo oxidation states between +6 and +4.
Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of the electronic states of molybdenum oxides as a function of the oxygen vacancies. The electronic character varies from insulator (MoO3) to semiconductor (MoO3-δ) and finally to metal-like (Mo9O26), in agreement with conductivity measurements [21]. The electron distribution in pure MoO3 follows the ionic model (Mo6+ and O2−) corresponding to the Mo 4d0 configuration. For non-stoichiometric MoO3 oxides, extended Mo 4d states, which then lie in the bandgap as gap states due to the occurrence of Mo5+ and Mo4+ ions, are filled by electrons donated from oxygen vacancies. The formation of oxygen deficiency (termed also as sub-stoichiometric) not only produces an increase of the electrical conductivity σe [23] owing to the additional gap states, but also increases the surface energy of the particles and promotes electrochemical reactions [21,24]. Magnetic susceptibility measurements showed that MoO3, MoO2 and MonO3n-1 shear suboxides in between are all feebly paramagnetic.
The MoO3-δ suboxide phases (with 0 < δ < 0.25) exhibit Li-insertion capacity much higher than that of stoichiometric MoO3 phase, which justifies the efforts to fabricate them under the form of thin films. For the development of these technologies, oxygen vacancies are easily generated in the MoO3-δ materials prepared in a thin film architecture by optimizing the deposition conditions [25]. Like stoichiometric MoO3, sub-stoichiometric MoO3-δ thin films can be obtained by evaporation in a vacuum at relatively low temperature (T < 500 °C) or in reducing atmosphere. However, few works explore the effect of oxygen deficiency and electrical conduction enhancement on energy storage properties [26,27].
MoO3-δ thin films have been easily prepared using a broad variety of physical vapor deposition (PVD) methods, including thermal evaporation [28,29], flash evaporation [30], electrodeposition [31], d.c. and r.f. magnetron sputtering [3,32,33,34], spay-pyrolysis [35], electron-beam evaporation [36,37], dip-coating [9], spin-coating [38], atomic layer deposition (ALD) [39], pulsed layer deposition (PLD) [4,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51] and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [52,53]. However, few works report the spin-coating deposition of MoO3-δ via a low-temperature solution process [54].
It is well known that PLD, based on the process of the transportation of material (laser ablation), is a powerful technique to fabricate multicomponent oxide dense films with high purity. Generally, the stoichiometry can be easily tuned by a control of growth rate (Rg), laser fluence (Φ), substrate temperature (Ts), oxygen partial pressure (PO2) and morphology of the substrate [55]. Two strategies are used to fabricate well-crystallized MoO3-δ thin films: (i) the deposition is carried out in an O2 atmosphere and at elevated Ts, which provides Mo oxidation inside the chamber during the growth process [53], (ii) the film oxidation is prepared in a vacuum with post-annealing at a moderate temperature (Ta) without the use of reactive O2 and substrate heating [50,51]. In view of the numerous studies of MoO3-δ thin films prepared using the PLD technique, it is important to compare the structural properties of films obtained under different experimental conditions [56]. Hussain et al. optimized the deposition conditions (Ts = 200 °C, PO2 = 13 Pa) for crystalline α−MoO3, while at an oxygen partial pressure less than 13, Pa sub-stoichiometric films with α−β mixed phases were found [43]. Camacho-Lopez investigated the structural transition in PLD films; the as-deposited MoO1.99 is oxidized to MoO2.77 by heat treatment at 200 °C for 14 h in air [43]. Torres et al. [46] studied MoO3 films fabricated using a thermal laser deposition method with a CO2 laser (λ = 10.6 µm) at an intensity of 0.73 W mm−2 under oxygen pressure of 0.5 Pa. For a substrate temperature Ts ≥ 350 °C, the XRD patterns displayed both (0k0) and (0kl) orientations representing α-β mixed MoO3 phases. Robinson-Azariah et al. studied the effect of the repetition rate (Rrl) on the composition of MoOx PLD films deposited at a fluence of 150 mJ cm−2 on fluorine-doped tin-oxide-coated glass substrate kept at 25 °C under O2 gas at a pressure of 5 Pa [49]. While XRD patterns exhibited the orthorhombic α-MoO3 phase for all films, the XPS studies showed the presence of Mo5+ oxidation state giving oxygen-deficient films MoO2.98 and MoO2.75 at Rrl of 2 and 10 Hz, respectively. PLD MoO3-δ suboxide films (~100 nm thick) with different compositions were deposited on fused silica slides using two excimer laser sources, XeF (λex = 351 nm, Φ = 85 mJ) and KrF (λex = 248 nm, Φ = 200 mJ), without introduction of oxygen in the chamber and subjected to post-annealing at a temperature, Ta, in the range of 300–500 °C for 4 h in air [50]. The as-prepared films were amorphous (dark color) and started to be partially crystallized at Ta ≈ 400 °C; the chemical surface state studied using XPS exhibited an O/Mo ratio of 2.95, which decreased to 2.78 upon heating at 500 °C. Subsequent annealing at 300 °C in vacuum reduced the deviation from stoichiometry to MoO2.65 [57].
In this work, we investigate the growth of molybdenum-oxide thin films (oxygen deficient MoO3-δ and MonO3n-1 suboxides) deposited on Au/Ti/SiO2/flexible-Si substrates using a PLD technique with appropriate processing conditions. Relationships are established between structure, texture, cationic environment and deposition conditions such as substate temperature, ablation power and oxygen partial pressure. The electrochemical performance of as-prepared and heat-treated films are examined as anode in TFµBs. Tuning the oxygen vacancies in MoO3-δ suboxide thin films appears to be one of the best engineering strategies to obtain an extended cycling stability and a decrease of the overpotential. The introduction of oxygen vacancies accelerates the electron transport, which can play a positive role in boosting the Li+ diffusivity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the correlation between the nanoscale structure of MoO3-δ thin films and their electrochemical properties. The reversible lithium insertion/deinsertion reaction at ambient temperature makes them a candidate for a negative electrode in lithium microbatteries.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents the experimental techniques (substrate preparation, growth and characterization). In Section 3, detailed results describe the fundamental properties of films including structure, morphology and composition. The next section, Section 4, reports the electrochemical properties of MoO3-δ thin films (charge-discharge profiles and Li+ ions kinetics). Finally, a general discussion is provided in Section 5, comparing the properties of as-prepared PLD MoO3-δ films with those reported in the literature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Au/Ti/SiO2/flexible-Si Substrates

Au/Ti/SiO2/Si stacking multilayers were used as substrates, in which the Si chip is the flexible mechanical support (12 µm thick, ULTRATHIN®Silicon, Virginia Semiconductors Inc., Fredericksburg, VI, USA), the SiO2 film (100 nm thick) has a unique role of electrical insulation between the current collector (Au/Ti) and Si wafer. The gold film acts as current collector, while the titanium layer enhances the mechanical adhesion to the SiO2 layer. The multilayered substrates were fabricated according to the following sequence. (i) Silicon chips were treated according the RCA-type cleaning procedure [58]. (ii) The SiO2 layer (about 100 nm thick) was produced by cleaning the Si chips in H2SO4/H2O2 solution then rinsed in hydrogen fluoride. (iii) the current collector was formed via metallization with a 20-nm thick Ti layer deposited using radio-frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering then metallized with a 20-nm thick Au film. A scheme representing the stack of the different layers is shown in Figure 3a.

2.2. MoOx Thin Films Fabrication

MoO3-δ thin films were deposited on the Au/Ti/SiO2/Si multilayer substrates described above. The target was composed of MoO3 powders synthesized by solid-state reaction from molybdic acid (H2MoO4) as precursor (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 99.99% grade). The product was ground for 3 h and pressed into a pellet at a pressure of 392 MPa. Subsequently, the pellet was heated at 10 °C min−1 and sintered at 650 °C for 3 h in air to yield a target with a density of about 91% of that of dense MoO3 (4.2 g cm−3). MoO3-δ thin films were deposited using PLD on substrates maintained in the range 25 ≤ Ts ≤ 500 °C. The target was ablated using a KrF excimer laser λ = 248 nm (COMPex 201, Coherent, Göttingen, Germany) with laser fluence of 0.2–1.0 J cm−2 and repetition rate of 10 Hz. The target was rotated at 10 rotations min−1 to obtain homogenous thin films and circumvent complete depletion of the material at the same spot. The target-to-substrate distance was 4 cm, and the incident laser beam ablated the target surface with an angle of 45°. The system chamber was evacuated to a base pressure of 0.4 mPa prior to film deposition. During reactive deposition, the chamber was filled with pure oxygen gas maintained at PO2 in the range 0.5–13 Pa to obtain MoO3-δ films with different deviations from stoichiometry. The thickness of the PLD-prepared MoO3-δ films was ~450 ± 5 nm.

2.3. Film Characterization

The phase and structure of as-prepared MoO3-δ films was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman scattering (RS) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. XRD patterns were investigated (X-ray diffractometer 3003 TT, Siefert, Leuven, Belgium) using a CuKα radiation source (λ = 0.15406 nm) in the 2θ-range of 10°–70° with a scan speed of 0.03 degree s−1. The vibrational studies were recorded using Raman spectroscopy at a spectral resolution of ≈ 1 cm−1 (Jobin Yvon HR800UV, Longjumeau, France) using an excitation wavelength of 632.8 nm (He:Ne laser) and using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (VERTEX 80v, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) in the spectral range 100–1000 cm−1. The optical absorption studies were carried out using a UV−visible spectrophotometer (UV-VIS-NIR, Hitachi U3400, Tokyo, Japan). The chemical valence state of Mo and surface chemical composition were probed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha-Thermo Scientific spectrometer, Dreieich, Germany) with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (λ = 1486.68 eV). The surface morphological characteristics of the films were studied using scanning electron microscope (SEM, Carl Zeiss, EVO-MA15, Oberkochen, Germany). The surface crystallography was investigated using reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED, EFZ4 device, Carl Zeiss, Germany). The surface topography was analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM, Park NX10, Park Sytems, Suwon, Korea). Thickness of the films was measured using an optical profilometer (model Profilm3D, Filmetrics, San Diego, CA, USA).
Investigation of the electrochemical properties of MoO3-δ thin film (5 cm2 in area, 450 nm in thickness) was carried out using CR2477-type coin cells (Renata, Brive, France). Particular attention was paid to the coin-cell assembly by addition of an O-ring to avoid the presence of Li with Si and SiO2 materials (Figure 3b). Non-aqueous Li//MoO3-δ cells were assembled in argon-filled glovebox with Li foil as a combined counter and reference electrode and Whatman GF/D borosilicate glass fiber as separator. The aprotic electrolyte was 1 mol L−1 LiPF6 dissolved in ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate (EC:DMC; 1:1 w/w). Data were collected using an electrochemical analyzer CHI 608C (CH Instruments Inc., USA) at a current density of 10–200 µA cm−2. For a transfer of 6 moles of electrons per Mo, the current density of 1.17 A g−1 corresponds to 1C rate. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data were collected in the range 0.1 Hz-1 MHz with a bias voltage of 5 mV.

3. Results

3.1. Structural Properties

The structure of PLD MoO3-δ thin films was investigated using XRD, Raman and FTIR spectroscopy. All the films show uniform thickness, but they vary from dark blue to white in color as a function of the deposition parameters. Figure 4a,b shows the XRD diagrams of PLD MoO3-δ thin films prepared under different conditions of temperature and oxygen partial pressure. When deposited at Ts = 25 °C, at any PO2 the films are amorphous (a-MoO3) in nature. Their XRD spectrum displays a broad band centered at 2θ = 23° characteristic of an amorphous phase. For films deposited at Ts = 100 °C, the XRD spectra display the patterns of the mixed phase with both (0k0) and (0kl) orientations of the α- and β-MoO3, respectively, the β-MoO3 phase being characterized by the (011) and (022) reflections (JCPDS card No. 47-1081). For films prepared in the range 150 < Ts < 380 °C, the XRD reflections are those of the unique α-MoO3-δ phase indexed to the (0k0) plane reflections. They give evidence of a highly preferred orientation, i.e., basal plane parallel to the substrate surface. These lines match well with the standard patterns of the orthorhombic α-MoO3 phase (JCPDS card No. 05-0508). Moreover, in contrast to the crystalline MoO3, the broadened diffraction peak located at 2θ ≈ 25° is related to the nano-size of the crystallites and the distorted layered structure that is in accordance with published results [59,60]. For the single α-MoO3-δ phase, the ratio between intensities of the (020) and (060) lines increases with the increase of the substrate temperature. Their intensities are almost identical for Ts = 350 °C. Similar trends were observed by Julien et al. at a lower temperature of 250 °C for flash-deposited films [31]. The XRD patterns of the MoO3-δ films deposited at Ts > 400 °C contain two distinct sets of reflections attributed to the coexistence of the α-MoO3-δ and Mo8O23 phases. This latter phase is well defined with reflections at 2θ ≈ 19.9, 21.8, 22.4 and 26.1° corresponding, respectively, to the (201), (010), (204) and (302) crystal planes of the monoclinic structure, P2/c space group (JCPDS Card No. 84-1247). In summary, several remarks are worth making: (i) the deposition temperature and the partial oxygen pressure are the preponderant parameters tuning the film stoichiometry, while the laser fluence governs mainly the deposition rate, (ii) the best crystallinity of the single α-MoO3-δ phase is obtained for films deposited at moderate temperature, (iii) with the increase of the adatom mobility, the thermodynamics favor the hierarchy α-MoO3, α-β-MoO3-δ < α-MoO3-δ < Mo8O23, and (iii) an increase in Ts up to 400 °C favors the formation of films with high oxygen deficiency. The change in the oxygen deficiency has also been observed on films fabricated using different techniques. Guerfi et al. reported the growth by electrodeposition of MoO2.8 (Mo5O14) film at room temperature. This metastable tetragonal phase with a strong preferred orientation along the plane (10,10,0) transformed to orthorhombic MoO3 after heat treatment at 260 °C [61]. This behavior has been investigated for MoO3-δ films fabricated using reactive RF-magnetron sputtering [62], electron beam evaporation [37], plasma-assisted activated reactive evaporation [63] and CVD [64]. Note that the deviation from stoichiometry can be evidenced by studying the fundamental absorption edge, which can be evaluated in terms of direct inter-band transitions. The optical band-gap depends on oxygen vacancies as donor centers close to the valence band. Julien et al. showed that the optical band-gap of MoO3-δ films deposited at 25 °C is 3.37 eV (large δ value) and decreases to 2.80 eV for the films prepared at 300 °C (small δ value) [31]. Sivakumar et al. [37] reported a band-gap of 2.8 eV for films deposited on glass substrate maintained at 25 °C (light gray in color), decreasing to 2.35 eV when deposited at 200 °C (deep blue color).
Vibrational spectroscopies, Raman and FTIR, are powerful probes for the analysis of the short-range order in solids. They are used to confirm the presence of O-defects in MoO3-δ films [65,66]. Figure 5a displays the Raman scattering spectra of PLD MoO3-δ thin films deposited at temperature in the range 25–300 °C. Data were collected using the laser excitation wavelength of 632.3 nm. Analysis of spectral features is based on stretching and bending modes of octahedral MoO6 entities building the MoO3 framework. In Figure 5a, there are four intense modes in the range of 600–1100 cm−1, which are the characteristic bands inherent to the fully oxygenated α-MoO3. They are located at 995, 900, 820 and 660 cm−1 corresponding to the asymmetrical (Ag, νas Mo=O) and symmetrical (Ag, νs Mo=O) stretching vibrations of the terminal Mo=O double bonds and to the asymmetrical (B2g, B3g, νas O-Mo–O) stretching vibrations of O–Mo–O bonds, respectively [41,67]. The Raman active modes in the low-frequency region at 283 and 340 cm−1 are attributed to the Mo-O-Mo bending vibrations [68]. The deposition temperature-dependent vibrational properties and changes in the chemical bonds were successfully analyzed based on the concept of group frequency developed by Cotton and Wing [69]. The relative intensities of vibration modes and Raman shifts of MoOx compounds are significantly impacted by the size and shape of crystallites and by the crystal orientation as well [70]. Furthermore, even for a small stoichiometric deviation in MoO3-δ (δ < 0.04) a frequency shift of the vibrational modes is observed in the Raman spectrum, indicating a weaker Mo-O bonding due to oxygen deficiency [71]. The Raman spectra of MoO3-δ thin films show clearly the change in morphology and composition from amorphous a-MoO3 and α-MoO3-δ to single crystal α-MoO3. These structural modifications are visualized by a shift of the three high-frequency stretching modes at 995, 820, and 660 cm−1 for orthorhombic α-MoO3 to 976, 800 and 648 cm−1 for oxygen-deficient MoO3-δ. The presence of Mo5+ defects can be identified by the appearance of new Raman bands compared with the spectrum of stoichiometric MoO3. The Raman peaks located at 771 cm−1 confirm the presence of a localized Mo5+ intermediate oxidation state produced by oxygen vacancies in α-MoO3-δ. The same set of peaks is observed in the Raman spectrum of Mn4O11 (MnO2.75), in which the average oxidation state of Mo is +5.5. Chen et al. [72] investigated the presence of oxygen vacancies in MoO3 nanobelts (20 nm thick) using Raman spectroscopy, which was evidenced by the redshift of the main Raman peaks. Moreover, Lee et al. have assigned the peak at 400 cm−1 to vibrational bonds between Mo5+ and oxygen [73]. The Raman spectrum of films deposited at 450 °C presents the superposition of the α-MoO3 and Mo8O23 vibrational modes. The peaks at 225, 255, 377, 675, 902 and 958 cm1 are assigned to the m-Mo8O23 phase [62,74].
The FTIR absorbance spectra of PLD MoO3-δ thin films grown at various temperatures (25 ≤ Ts ≤ 400 °C) are presented in Figure 5b. In the high-wavenumber region (500–1000 cm−1), the broad absorption band is resolved into several sub-bands at 570, 610, 818, 871, 993 and 1008 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching modes involving (O-Mo2), (O-Mo3) and (Mo=O) bonds. The broader peak at ~650 cm−1 is attributed to bridging Mo-O-Mo bonds of Mo6+ [75,76]. The splitting of the Mo=O stretching at 993 and 1008 cm−1 reflects the good crystallinity of the films. It corresponds to the vibration of the zig-zag rows, which is a typical feature of the layered α-MoO3 phase. The bending infrared modes are observed in the low-frequency region (200–500 cm−1). The presence of Mo5+ defects can be identified by the appearance of new IR bands at 732 cm−1 compared with the spectrum of stoichiometric MoO3. This mode is assigned to the stretching mode of Mo5+. Dun et al. observed the mode characteristic of the bridging O-Mo2 of Mo5+ at 700 cm−1 [77]. Similarly to the Raman patterns, the FTIR spectra of sub-stoichiometric MoO3-δ films display a frequency shift upon oxygen deficiency. This is consistent with the literature reports. Sun et al. reported the ν(O-Mo2) band shifts towards lower wave numbers (868 → 721 → 683 cm−1) for sub-stoichiometric α-MoO3-δ due to the reduction of the MoO3 lattice through the formation of oxygen vacancies in the doubly coordinated oxygen. In contrast, the ν(O=Mo) band shifts towards higher wavenumbers (948 → 973 → 975 cm−1) [78].

3.2. Composition

The composition of as-deposited MoO3-δ thin films was characterized by high-resolution XPS. Figure 6a–c shows the XPS spectra of the Mo 3d core level in MoO3-δ thin films deposited on substrate maintained at 25, 300 and 450 °C under oxygen pressure of 6 Pa. The XPS spectra were analyzed by evaluating the peak area of elements using Gaussian profiles after removing the secondary electron background. All XPS spectra can be deconvoluted using two Mo 3d doublets (3d5/2 and 3d3/2). The first doublet centered at 236 and 232.8 eV is typical of the Mo6+ state with a spin-orbit separation of ~3.2 eV, whereas the second one located at 234.6 and 231.9 eV is due to Mo5+ [79,80]. The film deposited at 25 °C is highly disordered and shows a large stoichiometric deviation (Figure 6a). When deposited at 300 °C, the XPS spectrum is dominated by the Mo6+ doublet that corresponds to nearly MoO3 films (Figure 6b), while the increase of the Mo5+ doublet is observed for films prepared at T > 400 °C (Figure 6c). In the case of film deposited at 450 °C, the combination of XRD and XPS data provides the composition 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3. From the variation of the O/Mo ratio (Figure 6), we can distinguish three regions related with the morphology and composition of the films, i.e., in region (I) the MoO3-δ films are highly disordered and off-stoichiometric, region (II) includes near-stoichiometric films, and region (III) encompasses oxygen deficient lattices. These results show that Mo cation exists in the highest oxidation state in MoO3-δ thin films grown in the range 200 ≤ Ts ≤ 400 °C, which suggests an efficient gas phase reaction in the plume of the laser ablation. When the temperature increases beyond 400 °C, the films contain Mo in lower oxidation state +6 < n < +5 due to dissociation. The re-evaporation from the film surface making the incorporation of oxygen into the lattice more difficult cannot be ruled out.
Taking k as the ratio of the quantity of Mo5+/Mo6+ calculated from the ratio of the integrated peak area, the stoichiometric deviation can be calculated by the relation [81]:
δ = 3 – ½ [5 + (k + 1)−1]
Table 1 reports the composition of MoO3-δ thin films as a function of the deposition temperature calculated using Equation (1) from data in Figure 7. It is well known that the α-MoO3 phase retains the orthorhombic structure until the O/Mo ratio is reduced to about 2.89 with the formation of the shear phase like Mo9O26 or Mo8O23 (monoclinic, P2/c space group) for higher concentrations of oxygen vacancies. However, it is unlikely that oxygen vacancies remain as point defects, as ordering of oxygen vacancies has been observed at very low concentrations [82].
This finding is consistent with previous investigations [45,83,84]. For all films, the minor 3d doublet for Mo5+ in the XPS spectra indicates that the perfectly stoichiometric MoO3 was not reached. These results suggest that the growth of MoO3-δ thin films with tunable oxygen vacancies favors their electrical properties as anode materials for electrochemical micro-systems. The MoO3-δ films thermally deposited at 25 °C are sub-stoichiometric with an O/Mo atomic ratio of 2.73 increasing to 2.91 after annealing at 200 °C, while heat treatment at 400 °C reduces the oxygen vacancy defects [83]. Fernandes-Cauduro et al. investigated the effects of in situ annealing in MoO3-δ thin films prepared using reactive sputtering. The deviation from stoichiometry decreases from 0.125 to 0.11 for film treated at 200 °C but it then increases (δ = 0.20) for the film formed at 500 °C, which is explained by the appearance of the 6% Mo4+ state at the surface [85]. A similar trend was observed by Han et al. [86] for MoO3-δ films prepared using thermal evaporation. It is suggested that the relative amount of Mo5+ states exhibits a minimum for films annealed at 200 °C, i.e., composition MoO2.75. Note that, in most cases, the oxidation state of Mo4+ was not detected except for films in which the MoO2 phase co-exists with α-MoO3.
Recently, Novotny and Lamb [84] prepared MoOx films deposited on α-Al2O3 (0001) at 580 °C using a conventional molecular-beam epitaxy Knudsen cell. The films deposited in a vacuum and in O2 atmosphere at 580 °C were oxygen deficient with an average formula MoO2.67. Their remarkable thermal stability is due to oxygen vacancies. For these films the XPS binding energies are recorded at 530.6 ± 0.1 eV for O 1s and 232.6, 231.0 and 229.2 ± 0.1 eV for Mo 3d5/2 peaks of Mo6+, Mo5+ and Mo4+ oxidation states, respectively. Similar binding energies were obtained by Bhosle et al. [45] for MoO2.75 films grown using the PLD method on sapphire substrates at 500–600 °C under O2 pressure of 0.1 Pa. MoOx films prepared using hot wire the oxidation-sublimation deposition (HWOSD) technique at room temperature under an oxygen pressure of 0.2 Pa were amorphous. XPS analysis showed that the composition MoO2.94 and the oxygen vacancies led to an electrical conductivity of 1.6 × 10−6 S cm−1 [87]. XPS studies of the MoOx (x = 2.64–2.73) films fabricated using RF reactive magnetron sputtering with various oxygen flow rates (1.6–3.6 sccm) under pressure fixed at 0.4 Pa indicated the presence of Mo5+ and Mo6+ oxidation states and excluded the presence of Mo4+ states [88]. These films are semiconductors (n-type) in nature.

3.3. Morphology

The crystallite size (or coherent length) was determined from the full-width at half-maximum β0k0 of the (0k0) XRD reflections, using the Scherrer formula Lc = /β0k0 cosθ0k0. The average crystallite size varied between 23 and 69 nm in the Ts range 200–450 °C. Since surface roughness is an important physical parameter that affects the electrochemical performance, the surface topography was investigated using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Figure 8a shows the SEM image of the substrate surface. The typical surface morphology of a PLD MoO3-δ films grown under PO2 = 13 Pa was investigated using AFM imaging (Figure 8b–d). The AFM results showed that the root-mean-square (RMS) roughness varies from 1.2 to 4.8 nm for the film deposited in the Ts range 100–400 °C. The growth temperature dependence of the grain size is plotted in Figure 9. It is observed that, in the range 100–500 °C, the grain size follows an exponential law with Ts. The surface roughness of films formed at Ts = 450 °C, i.e., 0.85Mo8O23-0.15 MoO3, is about 7.2 nm, which is consistent with the XRD data. This is in contrast with the results reported by Hussain et al. [43]. They determined a surface roughness of 3.4 nm for crystalline MoO3 films deposited using PLD at 200 °C under PO2 of 10 Pa and concluded that the surface roughness of the films decreased and the grain size increased with the increase in Ts. The different behavior is attributed to high stress in the films generated by the growth of films on substrate with different textures (amorphous, crystallized, textured, metallic) [31]. Fernandes-Cauduro et al. [85] studied the effect of oxygen partial pressure and sputtering power on amorphous DC-sputtered MoOx films. It was found that the surface roughness (Rrms) was calculated from AFM relative height profiles for the as-deposited films on commercial ITO decreased from 2.2 to 1.0 nm, when the PO2 increased from 0.1 to ~0.3 Pa.

3.4. Electrochemical Properties

Figure 10 shows the galvanostatic discharge-charge profiles of the MoO3-δ thin-film electrodes vs. Li+/Li at a current rate of 1 A g−1 (~1C) in the potential window 3.0-0.05 V. For all electrodes, the voltage dropped from the open-circuit voltage (OCV) of ~3.0 V during lithiation to reach firstly a small pseudo-plateau at ca. 2.4 V and secondly a large plateau at ca. 0.4–0.5 V. During the charge process, the voltage curve displays a smooth slope region with a loss of capacity. The charge-discharge curves of MoO3-δ thin films display a similar S-shape. For all samples, we observe that the first charge capacities are lower than the first discharge capacities. After the first cycle of cell formation, the charge capacities stabilized. A large irreversible capacity decay of the first cycle is commonly observed for the transition-metal oxides because of the formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SE)I layer and the irreversible phase transformation [89,90,91,92].
The electrochemical activity for Li+ storage of the oxygen-deficient oxides occurs with various degrees of Li+-ion uptake; the initial discharge specific capacity varied between 390 and 484 µAh cm−2 µm−1. For thin-film electrodes, the specific capacity is generally expressed as volumetric capacity (µAh cm−2 µm−1) due to the inaccuracy of the weight and density. Table 2 summarizes the electrochemical characteristics of the different MoO3-δ thin film electrodes, i.e., specific discharge capacity of the 1st and 2nd discharge, Coulombic efficiency (CE) and specific capacity after 100 cycles. The initial CE of MoO3-δ thin film anodes remains almost at ~75% irrespective of the deposition temperature. The high reversible capacity of the MoO2.894 electrode (~484 µAh cm−2 µm1), which corresponds to the insertion of ~5.78 Li+/Mo, is close to the theoretical maximum (5.79 Li+/Mo). After 100 cycles performed at a 1 A g−1 rate, this film delivers a specific capacity of 300 µAh cm−2 µm−1 (~670 mAh g−1). The irreversible insertion is largest for the electrode MoO2.982, which can be attributed to its low conductivity. Note that the theoretical specific capacity of 1117 mAh g−1 (6 Li per Mo) corresponds to a volumetric capacity of 5026 mAh cm−3 (taking a density of 4.5 g cm−3), which is equivalent to 502.6 µAh cm−2 µm−1 for MoO3 thin film.
In the potential window 3-0.05 V, the lithiation in MoO3 is believed to take place in two stages. Stage I occurs up to a potential of 1.5 V, in which Li+ ions intercalate with the orthorhombic framework to form a solid solution according the relation:
MoO3-δ + xLi+ + xe → LixMoO3-δ
In LixMoO3 (Li bronze phase), the inserted lithium content ranges between 1.0 and 1.5, up to a potential of 1.5 V [93]. The Li+ ions are accommodated in the interlayer spacing between octahedral basal Mo−O layers and can be reversibly extracted. The oxidation state of Mo in LixMoO3 decreases with x from +6 to about +4.5 leading to a corresponding fall in enthalpy of insertion. The stage II corresponds to potentials below 0.7 V, for which the further lithiation of LixMoO3 occurs by a mechanism of conversion. The full reduction is expressed by the relation [94]:
LixMoO3-δ + (6 − x − δ)Li+ + (6 − x − δ)e → (3 − δ)Li2O + Mo
During charge following the full conversion reaction, the extracted Mo metal is re-oxidized by Li2O. In the potential range below 0.7 V vs. Li+/Li, the discharge process is a conversion reaction occurring at ca. 0.2 V (Equation (3)); the reduction action of Mo4+ to metallic Mo0 occurs near 0.2 V. Li reacts with the LixMoO3-δ solid solution to form nano-scaled metallic particles nano-dispersed in a Li2O matrix. The reversibility of Li2O is due to the presence of nano-scaled Mo0 particles [95]. Note that MoO3 nanoparticles and films present similarly continuous and smooth discharge curves, unlike the bulk material which does not show significant capacity in the low-potential range. The primary reason for Coulombic efficiencies of ~77% is the reversibility of Li2O in lithiated MoO3-δ thin films studied here.
Figure 11a,b shows the incremental capacity (IC) profiles, i.e., differential capacity (dQ/dV) vs. cell voltage, of the first lithiation-delithiation process in α-MoO3-δ and 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin films deposited at 450 °C. This analysis can be considered as an efficient tool to determine the electrochemical spectroscopy of electrodes [96]. For instance, IC has been successfully applied to analyze the behavior of doped or blended cathodes [97]. The IC curves were extracted from the galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) profiles (Figure 8c) to further characterize the electrochemical lithium insertion and extraction processes showing the transformation after the first lithiation process. Each plot displays broad peaks in the voltage range of 0.05–3.0 V corresponding to the plateaus in GCD curves, related to the redox reactions. These results show clearly the peaks occurring in the first cathodic scan at 2.28, 1.36 and 0.41 V, which indicates the initial Li+-ion insertion reaction given in Equation (2) and the strong peak at ca. 0.41 V corresponding to the conversion reaction expressed in Equation (3). The cathodic peak at 2.28 V is attributed to the irreversible phase transformation from α-MoO3-δ to Li0.25MoO3-δ [42,98,99]. Iriyama et al. [42] reported a TEM analysis of the two-phase reaction in electrochemical lithium insertion within α-LixMoO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.25). The cyclic voltammogram exhibited a sharp peak at 2.77 V in the cathodic potential scan, which has no corresponding redox peak in the anodic scan, indicating the irreversibility of this reaction. As shown in Figure 9, the cathodic peak of the two-phase reaction occurs at lower potential (~2.30 V) due to the sub-stoichiometric composition of our films. The potential peaks in the first anodic scan (delithiation process) occurs at 1.20 and 1.72 V for α-MoO3-δ thin films. The conversion peak shifts slightly toward a lower voltage for the mixed 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin film, which results in more reduced MoO3-δ. This oxygen-deficiency effect was also reported by Jung et al. [94]. Note that the anodic peaks are broad, which is indicative of the nano-size effect of pulverized Mo metallic particles after the full conversion process.
Figure 12 compares the cycling performance of oxygen deficient thin films. The rate capability (Figure 12a) was investigated at different current densities in the range 10–1000 mA g−1. The 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin film exhibits significantly enhanced capacity retention. Figure 12b presents the discharge capacity with cycling at a current rate of 1 A g−1 over 100 cycles in the potential window 0.05–3.0 V for the three PLD thin films. For the amorphous a-MoO3-δ film, the discharge capacity drops rapidly at the rate of 0.43% per cycle, while the discharge capacities of α-MoO3-δ and 85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 films decrease slowly at the rate of 0.19% per cycle. The remarkable cycling performance of the mixed 85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 film is not only due to the higher electronic conductivity induced by oxygen vacancies but also benefits from the blend material composed of the layered MoO3 and the quasi-1D Mo8O23 suboxide. In comparison with the ratio of the discharge capacity at 0.01C and 1C rate, Q1C/Q0.01C (Figure 12a) is found to be 67%, 78% and 76% for a-MoO3, α-MoO3 and 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin films, respectively, which suggests a better Li+ ion kinetics in the layered α-MoO3 material.
The evolution of the surface morphology of α-MoO3-δ thin films after electrochemical cycling has been investigated using scanning electron microscopy. Figure 13 represents the SEM images of the structural properties of the film at the 5th and 50th cycle. It is remarkable that the film surface is maintained after 50 charge-discharge cycles. This picture corroborates the good cyclability of the α-MoO3-δ thin films deposited at 300 °C, showing a small capacity decay upon cycling.
The chemical diffusion coefficients of Li+ ions in the thin film frameworks were evaluated using the potentiostatic intermittent titration technique (PITT). The theoretical and experimental aspects of the kinetic behavior of metal-like anode materials, i.e., Li-alloys LixAl or Li1+ySb, have been extensively studied by Weppner and Huggins [100,101] and further applied to guest ions in insertion electrodes [102,103]. In mixed-conducting electrodes, the apparent chemical diffusion for Li+ ions, DLi, is the product (DLi = D0 W) of the component diffusion D0 by the enhancement factor (or thermodynamic factor) W = (∂ ln aLi/ ln cLi). Note that D0 is an intrinsic property of the material and WTF of thin film differs from WB of the bulk due to the difference in the activity of intercalant species [104]. From the point of view of fundamental studies, the use of thin film electrodes has the advantage of evaluating accurately intrinsic ion transport with known electrode surfaces by eliminating organic binders and conductive additives. The thermodynamic factor can be estimated from the gradient of the open-circuit voltage vs. composition (∂E/∂x) as:
W = ln a L i d ln c L i = x F R T E x .
In PITT, a transient current (It) is recorded within a very small potential step. The local current depends on the concentration gradient at the particle surface using Fick’s first law. The time-dependent electric transient current It at each potential step obeys the following relation [b]:
I t = 2 F A Δ c L i D L i L exp ( π D L i t 4 L 2 ) ,
where F is the Faraday constant, A the surface area of the electrode, L the film thickness and ΔcLi = csc0 the difference of Li+ concentration at the surface at time t and at time t = 0 during each potential step. The primary diffusion parameter is the characteristic diffusion time τ, which is defined for the one-dimensional case as τ = L2/DLi. At short time (τ << L2/DLi), the exponential term reduces to unity and the It obeys the Cottrell’s equation:
I t = 2 F A Δ c L i D L i 1 / 2 π 1 / 2 t 1 / 2
In Figure 14a, the curve It vs. t−1/2 shows a linear part with a slope proportional to the square root of the diffusion coefficient. This part shows primarily a finite-length diffusion behavior due to the interfacial charge-transfer and ohmic potential drop [105,106]. In the long-term domain, Equation (5) can be linearized by taking its logarithmic form:
ln I t = ln ( 2 F A Δ c L i D L i L ) π 2 D L i 4 L 2 t .
This equation describes the semi-infinite planar diffusion in the film and satisfies the condition τ >> L2/DLi. The time differentiation of this equation gives:
D L i = 4 L 2 π 2 ln I t t ,
which allows the determination of the apparent diffusion coefficient from the slope of the linear region of the ln(It) vs. t plot as shown in Figure 14b [96].
Figure 15a presents the typical variation of the thermodynamic factor against the cell voltage (W vs. E) calculated from the 2nd discharge response of a Li//α-MoO3-δ cell using Equation (4). The average value of W at E = 0.5 V is listed in Table 3. As expected for a metal oxide, W is in the range 20–30 [104]. Figure 15b compares the DLi values for PLD MoO3-δ films in direct contact with the aprotic electrolyte. Note that the curves DLi vs. cell voltage have the same features as two minimum values at 0.5 and 1.9 V. The results summarized in Table 3 show that the α-MoO3-δ thin film deposited at Ts = 300 °C exhibits the higher diffusion coefficient in the range from 4 × 10−14 to 6 × 10−12 cm2 s−1. This high value is due to the layered-like structure of α-MoO3-δ, inducing larger open Li sites and favorable transport paths during the discharge-charge processes.

4. Discussion

4.1. Growth Conditions

These results shed light on the growth process of the oxygen-deficient MoO3-δ films prepared via different PLD conditions. The ability to generate these films with various compositions and morphologies is the most significant result of this work. The successful manufacture of sub-stoichiometric films has been optimized by the adjustment of the PLD growth parameters in order to obtain the best electronic properties and the best electrochemical properties for their potential application as electrodes for lithium microbatteries; the growth process of MoO3-δ films has been discussed several times [4,43,44,45,46]. Ramana and Julien [4] suggested that creation of oxygen vacancies in deposited MoO3-δ film is due to the re-evaporation from the surface of the substrate. In this process, energy levels in the energy gap are generated close to the valance band (Ev) considered as donor centers. It is widely recognized that α-MoO3-δ films prepared at low temperature (Ts < 100 °C) are ill-textured and highly disordered with an amorphous contribution. Zhang et al. [50] reported that ITO/spin-coated MoO2.98 films are amorphous and exhibit a deep-blue color. The influence of the partial O2 pressure was discussed by several workers. Carcia and McCarron showed the influence of the partial O2 pressure on the structure of magnetron-sputtered MoO3 films. Using a total argon plus oxygen pressure of 1.3 Pa, α-MoO3 grew under PO2 = 50%, whereas β-MoO3 (monoclinic structure) was formed under PO2 ≈ 10% [107]. Similarly, Altman et al. [108] fabricated MoO3 thin films using a molecular beam epitaxy technique assisted by oxygen plasma under a low O2 pressure of 4 mPa. By manipulating the deposition conditions, i.e., temperature, deposit cycle and deposition rate, epitaxial β-MoO3 (tetragonal phase) thin films were grown on SrLaAlO4 substrates at 400 °C, while the decrease of the deposition temperature to 260 °C resulted in the formation of polycrystalline α-MoO3 (orthorhombic phase) films. To obtain suboxide MoO2.86 thin films using reactive magnetron sputtering at room temperature, the O2 ratio of 15% was fixed in the Ar + O2 gas mixture at a total pressure of ~1 Pa [34]. The band-gap Eg of 2.82 eV was reported for MoO2.86 film (200 nm thick). For 30% O2, a stoichiometric MoO3 film was prepared. Siokou et al. obtained suboxide MoO2.78 films by heat treatment at 300 °C for 3 h in vacuum of stoichiometric MoO3 films (colorless) thermally evaporated on (In2O3:Sn)-coated glass sheets. The deep blue color of MoO2.78 is associated to a continuous distribution between +6 and +5 Mo states [109].
When prepared at high temperature (T >400 °C), oxygen-deficient Mo-O oxides crystallized as a mixture of stoichiometric MoO3 with a Magnéli-type phase, i.e., Mo4O11, Mo8O23, Mo17O47, etc. Ressler et al. [110] observed the formation of crystalline Mo4O11 at temperatures higher than 500 °C. At 500 °C, Anbananthan reported the formation of a lower valent Mo-O oxide, namely the Mo4O11 phase, for an MoO3 electrode deposited on TiO2 foil. It was demonstrated that the Mo4O11 layer promoted the electrochemical Fe3+/Fe2+ reaction [111]. Hashem et al. synthesized 200 nm-thick oxygen deficient MoxOy particles, formed using a blend of α-MoO3 and γ-Mo4O11 [112]. The composition 0.65MoO3-0.35Mo4O11 was obtained by calcination of the precursor (ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate as a source of Mo) heat treated with a small fraction of zirconia under reduced atmosphere at 500 °C for 5 h in a 5% H2/Ar flow. Defective MoOx films grown on glass substrate at 300 °C using spray pyrolysis have been identified as Mo9O26 phase. After annealing at 500 °C for 20 h in a controlled O2 atmosphere, the XRD patterns of the heat-treated films showed the presence of two crystallographic phases: monoclinic Mo9O26 and orthorhombic Mo17O47. The Mo9O26 phase grew preferentially along the (712) plane [113].

4.2. Electronic Properties

MoO3 is known to be an unintentional n-type semiconductor at ambient conditions, due to intrinsic point defects related to oxygen vacancies (VO) and molybdenum interstitials (Moi) [13]. It has been widely recognized that the introduction of oxygen vacancies (VO) is an efficient strategy to promote the specific discharge capacity and rate capability and to boost the Li+-ion diffusion of electrode materials [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Enhancement of the attainable capacity is attributed to extra valence electrons into the delocalized electron cloud. Similarly, in TiO2, due to oxygen vacancies, a narrowed bandgap and change of the Fermi energy level indicates an increase of electron concentration [114]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that anion vacancies in insertion electrode materials can improve the energy storage capacity and reduce the insertion energy and ion diffusion barrier in the host lattice [27,115,116,117,118,119,120].
Figure 16 presents a diagram of the band structure close to the surface of MoO3-δ film. Because of the oxygen vacancies, the Fermi level is enhanced and the concentration of electrons in the conduction band is increased [86]. The increase of Mo5+ (reduction of the O/Mo ratio) induces a decrease of the surface dipole lowering the work function φ (φ ≈ 5.95 eV for Ts= 450 °C). The large work function of MoO3-δ films is attributed to its closed-shell character and the lowered electrostatic potential of the inner Mo-O units due to the dipole layer created by planes of terminal oxygen (O1) sites. Therefore, the oxygen vacancy is a shallow donor, the reason why MoO3-δ easily becomes a n-type degenerate semiconductor [121,122]. Julien et al. also suggested a decrease in optical band gap and attributed the decrease to the formation of oxygen-ion vacancies. The energy gap of MoO3-δ films is located between 2.8 and 3.2 eV depending on the substrate and annealing temperature [31].

4.3. Electrochemistry

Orthorhombic α-MoO3 is an attractive transition-metal oxide as an anode material for Li-ion batteries, owing to its unique layered structure and its high theoretical Li uptake consequently to the high oxidation state (+6) of Mo. It has a theoretical specific capacity of 1117 mAh g−1 based on the full conversion reaction in deep discharge voltages, which is higher than MoO2 (838 mAh g−1). The empty interlayer channels formed by its double-layered structure built from MoO6 octahedra provide rapid accommodation of Li ions. However, the insulating nature of α-MoO3 (band gap of 3.1 eV) and the structural degradation associated to the conversion reaction prevent its utilization as an anode [123]. To overcome this drawback, the design of a material with an oxygen-deficient lattice is the key issue to increase the electronic conductivity by several orders of magnitudes. Moreover, the use of hierarchical nano-structures also helps. Indeed, the implementation of a carbon-free MoO3-δ electrode is possible due to the enhanced electronic transport in oxygen-deficient oxides and the reduction of the Li+-ion pathway in nano-structured materials.
Few studies report the electrochemical features of Mo-oxide thin film anodes, which in contrast with traditional electrodes did not use conductive additive and binder [124,125]. Amorphous films (a-MoOx, 2 < x <3) were prepared using a reactive magnetron sputtering carried out at power of 60 W under a working pressure of 0.8 Pa and total gas flow rate at 40 sccm (Ar + O2 of 80:20) [125]. a-MoOx films are a mixture of MoO2 and MoO3 phase (O/Mo ≈ 2.75) and have the morphology of cauliflower-like protuberances, which consist of ultra-fine particles. After 100 discharge-charge cycles at a current density of 90 µA cm−2 (~225 mA g−1) in the potential window 0.01–3.0 V, the specific capacity was 315 µAh cm−2 µm−1 (mass loading of 0.45 mg). Porous α-MoO3 films were fabricated using electrodeposition on Ni foam substrates. These films are composed of grains of several tens of nm in size with nanoholes of the same size [123]. After 50 cycles, the Li+ insertion/extraction capacity and the Coulombic efficiency of the thin-film electrode was tested at a current density of 3 A g−1 are 650 mAh g−1 and 97%, respectively. The smaller grain size and widespread nanoholes lead to high Li+ insertion kinetics with a diffusion coefficient of 7.1 × 10−11 cm2 s−1, obtained from EIS measurements.
In the following, we compare our results with the electrochemical performance of nanostructured MoO3 anodes. The state of the art of MoOx suboxide anodes is summarized in Table 4 [94,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]. Oxygen-deficient MoOx nanosheets (NSs, 20–30 nm thick) prepared by oxidation of Mo powders in H2O2 were investigated as anode materials in Na-ion batteries and compared to the MoO3 counterpart [134]. XPS analysis showing equal amounts of Mo6+ and Mo5+ cations providing particles with a composition MoO2.75 (Mo4O11) formed by close staking of 20–30 nm thin flakes (nanosheets, NSs) when they are prepared using a polymer-assisted solvothermal method [133]. Remarkable electrochemical performances were obtained for NSs, which delivered a specific capacity of 179 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1 rate after 100 cycles. The advantage of oxygen deficiency in MoO3 is clearly demonstrated by the better Li+ ion transport with a diffusion coefficient of 4.36 × 10−11 cm2 s−1 for intense blue colored MoO2.75 against 8.28 × 10−12 cm2 s−1 for white MoO3. Oxygen-deficient Mo4O11 (MoO2.75) exhibits better transport properties than MoO3, i.e., small electrical resistivity ρ ≈ 104 Ω cm and a Li-ion diffusion coefficient of ~4 × 1012 cm2 s1. Moreover, it can accommodate up to 2.1 Li+/Mo in the potential range 3.6-1.5 V vs. Li+/Li, providing a theoretical specific capacity of 401 mAh g1 [135]. However, the reversible capacity becomes stable at the level of 170–200 mAh g1 [136]. MoO3 nano-spheres (20–30 nm in diameters) were synthesized using electrophoresis deposition on a stainless-steel substrate. When cycled between 3.0 and 0.005 V at a C/2 rate, they delivered an initial discharge capacity of ~630 mAh g−1 (3.4 Li+ per Mo inserted reversibly uptake) with no capacity degradation after 150 cycles [132]. The same group of searchers fabricated MoOx nanoparticles using hot-wire chemical vapor deposition (HWCVD) under Ar + O2 gas mixture at reactor pressures in the range 35–150 Torr consisting of a mixture of crystalline MoO2 + α-MoO3 + β-MoO3 phases, but electrodes using acetylene black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) were not free binder [129,131].
The effect of annealing temperature on electrochemical performance of MoOx nanospheres was studied using binder-rich electrodes. The whitish-blue (indicative for x close to 3) particles deliver a capacity of ~800 mAh g−1 after 40 cycles [131]. MoO3 nanobelts synthesized using a simple hydrothermal route and heat-treated at 265 °C for 3 h in air exhibit an initial discharge capacity of 1250 mAh g−1 being cycled at a current rate of 0.1 C and an initial Coulombic efficiency of 67% [137]. Jung et al. prepared partially reduced Mo oxides, namely MoO2.929, MoO2.903 and MoO2.895, by ball-milling as anode materials with 10% acetylene black. It is shown that the specific discharge capacity slightly increases with the increase of oxygen vacancy in the MoO3 lattice. Remarkably, the MoO2.895 anode can uptake 8Li per Mo in the potential range 0–3 V vs. Li+/Li [94]. MoO3 nanobelts synthesized using a simple hydrothermal route and heat-treated at 265 °C for 3 h in air exhibit an initial discharge capacity of 1250 mAh g−1 at a rate of 0.1C and an initial Coulombic efficiency of 67% [137]. Liu et al. reported an initial discharge capacity of 1200 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1 for a crystalline MoO3 anode containing 15% acetylene black, which fell at ~320 mAh g−1 at the 10th cycle [138]. Ma et al. [139] investigated the electrochemical performance of suboxide-MoO3 synthesized via a surfactant-assisted solvothermal route exhibiting an average valence state of 5.58 for Mo cations. The MoO2.79 anode containing 15% acetylene black delivered a first discharge capacity of 760 mAh g−1 at 0.2 A g−1 rate. Wu et al. [128] reported a specific capacity up to 930 mAh·g−1 over 200 cycles for Mo-O anodes fabricated from slurry spread onto copper foils containing 20 wt.% acetylene black (conducting additive). According to the XRD pattern, the active material was a mixture of three phases, MoO3 + Mo4O11 + MoO2, and the XPS analysis showed the valence state of Mo on the surface as 5.6. In summary, our pulsed laser deposited MoO3-δ suboxide films exhibit high specific capacity and good stability due to the improved Li+ diffusion kinetics [140,141] as compared with films fabricated using electrodeposition [124] and electron-beam evaporation [125].

4.4. Li+-ion Kinetics

The potentiostatic intermittent titration technique has been used successfully to study the lithium ion kinetics in planar MoO3-δ thin films. The chemical diffusion coefficient is found to vary between 10−12 and 10−15 cm2 s−1 in organic electrolyte. DLi+ differs by less than one order of magnitude for amorphous film with respect to crystallized films. This gives evidence that the diffusion of Li+ ions changes importantly with the oxygen deficiency. For MoO3 cathode films prepared using flash- and thermal-evaporation techniques at 250 °C, lithium diffusion coefficients are in the range 10−12–10−11 cm2 s−1 [141]. Halalay et al. determined DLi of 10−11 cm2 s−1 in amorphous MoO3 films (550 nm thick) using an optical method relying on the application of the Beer-Lambert law [142]. In contrast, a low value of 2.88 × 10−21 cm2 s−1 was reported for nano-composites formed using ultra-fine MoO3 anchored in coal-based carbon fibers [143]. Ding et al. [144] fabricated MoO3-δ nanorods (light blue color) through mechanical grinding of bulk powders, which show a diffusion coefficient of Li+ ions of 3.2 × 10−14 cm2 s−1 determined from an EIS experiment. The same amplitudes (1.35 × 10−14 cm2 s−1) were reported for MoO3 nanobelts as anode materials [145]. MoO3/amorphous carbon composite fabricated by calcinating polyaniline with ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate exhibited a low Li diffusion coefficient of 3.4 × 10−14 cm2 s−1 at room temperature [146]. Sun et al. [147] stated that oxygen vacancies in MoO2.86 nanobelts promote a lower energy barrier for Li+ diffusion but did not provide values. On the other hand, the oxygen deficient Mo4O11 (MoO2.75) exhibits better transport properties with an average lithium chemical diffusion coefficient of ~4.5 × 10−12 cm2 s−1 [148].
These data can be compared with the previously reported values for metal-oxide thin films. DLi+ data measured using PITT for PLD LiMn2O4 (LMO) film vary in the range from 3 × 10−13 to 6 × 10−13 cm2 s−1 in the voltage range 3.9–4.3 V [149]. Julien et al. disclosed DLi+ values of 1.5 × 10−12 and 8.0 × 10−12 cm2 s−1 at 4 V with composition-dependent behavior for PLD LMO films deposited at 100 and 300 °C, respectively [150]. Xie et al. investigated the potential dependence of PITT DLi+ of the LiFePO4 thin film, which varies in a range of 10−14 to 10−12 cm2 s−1 [151].
From the results listed in Table 4, listing DLi+ observed for MoO3-δ-based thin film anodes, it is obvious that the apparent diffusion coefficients are strongly dependent on the structure and morphology of MoO3-δ thin films. Generally, bulk materials are composed of secondary particles (agglomerates), which are interconnected nanoparticles (primary particles) forming a mesoporous architecture. The mesopores (few tens of nm in size) are the intraconnecting voids formed between randomly packed nanoparticles favoring the high surface area between the active material and the electrolyte and enhancing the transport pathway. In contrast, thin films are composed of grains linked through grain boundaries, which are amorphous in nature. The absence of mesoporosity makes Li ion transport into the crystallite (29 nm in size) of the MoO3-δ film more difficult. Thus, the morphology (mesoporosity, surface area, surface roughness) is the key parameter for transport of Li+ ions into the active material. Moreover, the apparent diffusion coefficient DLi in thin films depends on the thermodynamic factor WF, which differs from WB of the bulk [99]. For films deposited at Ts < 400 °C, the variation of DLi with the electrode potential exhibits a “W”-type behavior with two minimum regions at ca. 0.5 and 1.9 V, which are related to the strong attractive interactions between Li+ ions and the host lattice [152]. This behavior is quite consistent with the one observed in LixSi anode [153]. As MoO3-δ thin films are oxygen-deficient materials, the model of charge transport in internal defect material can be applied [154]. Defects are Li-interstitials, Li*, and conduction electrons, e’, for example. It has been shown that, in a solid solution where no internal defect reactions occur, the thermodynamic factor is related to the defect concentration (if dilute defects exist). The large increase of W may be also associated with the decrease of the electronic mobility in LixMoO3 film.
The diffusion coefficients of Li+ ions obtained in PLD-prepared MoO3-δ thin films can be compared with other anode materials [141,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163] listed in Table 5. For cathode films prepared using flash evaporation (0.5–0.6 µm thick), DLi values are strongly dependent on Ts and vary in the range 10−12–10−11 cm2 s−1 [141]. Zhao et al. [124] investigated the Li+-ion kinetics in porous MoO3 anode films (150 nm thick) prepared using electrodeposition in acid peroxo-polymolybdate electrolyte. The Li+ diffusion of 7.1 × 10−11 cm2 s−1 is indeed facilitated by the widespread nanoholes (several tens of nm) and by the small grains on the scale of ~100 nm.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we showed that MoO3-δ thin films were successfully fabricated using a PLD technique with good control of the oxygen deficiency. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the correlation between the nanoscale structure of MoO3-δ thin films and their electrochemical properties as anode in lithium microbatteries. The structural properties investigated using XRD, RS and FTIR spectroscopies showed that crystallized films can be formed with a wide range of deviation from stoichiometry (δ). The formation of lattice defects can be explained in terms of oxygen re-evaporation from the surface of the substrate during the PLD process. As-deposited Mo-O films at Ts = 25 °C are amorphous in nature and highly oxygen deficient. The decomposition of the XPS spectra reveals that the Mo 3d spectra can be well fitted by two 3d doublets in the form of a Gaussian function, corresponding to Mo in +6 and +5 oxidation states. The atomic ratio O/Mo shows a small amount of oxygen vacancies in MoO3-δ films deposited at Ts ≈ 200 °C; the Mo sub-states were suppressed, resulting in a further oxidation of the film. The O/Mo ratio reaches the value of 2.982 when the temperature was increased to 300 °C, and a nearly stoichiometric α-MoO3 film resulted. Further increase of Ts (≈ 450 °C) produces a film with O/Mo = 2.894, which corresponds to the composition 0.85 Mo8O23-0.15MoO3. The electrochemical test of the 0.15MoO3-0.85Mo8O23 film shows a specific capacity of 484 µAh cm−2 µm−1 after 100 cycles of charge-discharge at a constant current of 0.5 A cm−2 in the potential range 3.0-0.05 V. So far, it is the best result obtained with MoO3-δ thin films. Studies of the lithium transport in MoO3-δ thin film electrodes have shown that DLi is influenced by the nanostructure, morphology, grain size and gain boundaries. The formation of well-defined channels between slabs of the MoO3 structure provides facile ionic conduction pathways in crystallized films. These channels are ill-defined in films deposited at low temperatures. This is a typical trend between crystalline and disordered networks. For instance, a value DLi = 6 × 10−12 cm2 s−1 is obtained for PLD films deposited at 300 °C.
This work has shown the advantage of PLD films free of conducting additive and binder commonly used in the fabrication of electrodes (i.e., 10% carbon black and 10% PVdF), as the use of these electrochemically inactive substances degrades the specific gravimetric capacity of the electrode. On other hand, the PLD technique has shown unique advantages for the formation of dense films, easy control of the growth rate and production of high purity films with good preservation of the target-phase stoichiometry. The main drawback of PLD films is their limited capacity due to the relative difficulty to grow thick films with good adhesion (as a consequence of the low energy of few eV of molecules falling on the substrate). However, some improvements can be expected by the fabrication of mixed electrodes (for example MoO3-δ + MoO2) or blended electrodes (for example TiO2 + MoO3-δ), in which the electronic conductivity can be adjusted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.J and O.M.H.; investigation, A.L.-N., C.V.R., M.C.-L., A.A.-G., A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.J.; writing—review and editing, C.V.R. and A.M.; supervision, C.M.J and O.M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Acknowledgments

One of us (CVR) acknowledge the support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) with NSF-PREM grant #DMR-1827745.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Julien, C. Solid State Batteries. In Handbook of Solid-State Electrochemistry; Gellings, P.J., Bouwmeester, H.J.M., Eds.; CRC Press: Roca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; Chapter 11; pp. 371–406. [Google Scholar]
  2. Julien, C.M.; Mauger, A.; Vijh, A.; Zaghib, K. Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ramana, C.V.; Atuchin, V.V.; Groult, H.; Julien, C.M. Electrochemical properties of sputter-deposited MoO3 films in lithium microbatteries. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2012, 30, 04D105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramana, C.V.; Julien, C.M. Chemical and electrochemical properties of molybdenum oxide thin films prepared by reactive pulsed-laser assisted deposition. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 428, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saravanakumar, B.; Shobana, R.; Ravi, G.; Ganesh, V.; Yuvakkumar, R. Preparation and electrochemical characterization of Mo9O26 nanopowders for supercapacitors applications. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 19, 100340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sunu, S.S.; Prabhu, E.; Jayaraman, V.; Gnanasekar, K.I.; Gnanasekaran, T. Gas sensing properties of PLD made MoO3 film. Sens. Actuators B 2003, 94, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dillon, A.C.; Mahan, A.H.; Deshpande, R.; Parilla, P.A.; Jones, K.M.; Lee, S.-H. Metal oxide nano-particles for improved electrochromic and lithium-ion battery technologies. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 794–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Simchi, H.; McCandless, B.E.; Meng, T.; Boyle, J.H.; Shafarman, W.N. Characterization of reactively sputtered molybdenum oxide films for solar cell application. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 13503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bullock, J.; Cuevas, A.; Allen, T.; Battaglia, C. Molybdenum oxide MoOx: A versatile hole contact for silicon solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 232109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jacieniak, J.J.; Seifter, J.; Jo, J.; Mates, T.; Heegeer, A.J. A solution-processed MoOx anode interlayer for use within organic photovoltaic devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2594–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gesheva, K.A.; Ivanova, T.M.; Bodurov, G.K. APCVD transition metal oxides—Functional layers in smart windows. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 559, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Vasilopoulou, M.; Palilis, L.C.; Georgiadou, D.G.; Kennou, S.; Kostis, I.; Davazoglou, D.; Argitis, P. Barrierless hole injection through sub-bandgap occupied states in organic light emitting diodes using substoichiometric MoOx anode interfacial layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 013311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hanson, E.D.; Lajaunie, L.; Hao, S.; Myers, B.D.; Shi, F.; Murthy, A.A.; Wolverton, C.; Arenal, R.; Dravid, V.P. Systematic study of oxygen vacancy tunable transport properties of few-layer MoO3−x enabled by vapor-based synthesis. Adv. Func. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kihlborg, L. The crystal structure of Mo18O52 and the existence of homologous series of structures based on MoO3. Ark. Kemi 1963, 21, 443–460. [Google Scholar]
  15. Magnéli, A. The crystal structures of Mo9O26 (beta’-molybdenum oxide) and Mo8O23 (beta-molybdenum oxide). Acta Chem. Scand. 1948, 2, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kihlborg, L. Studies on molybdenum oxides. Acta Chem. Scand. 1959, 13, 954–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kihlborg, L. The crystal structure of Mo17O47. Acta Chem. Scand. 1960, 14, 1612–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Åsbrink, S.; Kihlborg, L. A study of the crystal symmetry and structure of orthorhombic Mo4O11 by least-squares techniques. Acta Chem. Scand. 1964, 18, 1571–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sato, M.; Onoda, O.; Matsuda, Y. Structural transitions in MonO3n-1 (n = 9 and 10). J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1987, 20, 4763–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Inzani, K.; Grande, T.; Vullum-Bruer, F.; Selbach, S.M. A van der Waals density functional study of MoO3 and its oxygen vacancies. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 8959–8968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tahini, H.A.; Tan, X.; Lou, S.N.; Scott, J.; Amal, R.; Ng, Y.H.; Smith, S.C. Mobile polaronic states in α-MoO3: An ab initio investigation of the role of oxygen vacancies and alkali ions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10911–10917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Inzani, K.; Nematollahi, M.; Vullum-Bruer, F.; Grande, T.; Reenaasb, T.W.; Selbach, S.M. Electronic properties of reduced molybdenum oxides. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 9232–9245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mattinen, M.; King, P.J.; Khriachtchev, L.; Heikkilä, M.J.; Fleming, B.; Rushworth, S.; Mizohata, K.; Meinander, K.; Räisänen, J.; Ritala, M.; et al. Atomic layer deposition of crystalline molybdenum oxide thin films and phase control by post-deposition annealing. Mater. Today Chem. 2018, 9, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vasilopoulou, M.; Douvas, A.M.; Georgiadou, D.G.; Palilis, L.C.; Kennou, S.; Sygellou, L.; Soultati, A.; Kostis, I.; Papadimitropoulos, G.; Davazoglou, D. The influence of hydrogenation and oxygen vacancies on molybdenum oxides work function and gap states for application in organic optoelectronics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 16178–16187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hou, Y.; Wang, J.; Hou, C.; Fan, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Li, H.; Dang, F.; Chou, S. Oxygen vacancies promoting the electrocatalytic performance of CeO2 nanorods as cathode materials for Li–O2 batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 6552–6561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kröger, M.; Hamwi, S.; Meyer, J.; Riedl, T.; Kowalsky, W.; Kahn, A. Role of the deep-lying electronic states of MoO3 in the enhancement of hole injection in organic thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 123301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shin, J.Y.; Joo, J.H.; Samuelis, D.; Maier, J. Oxygen-deficient TiO2−δ nanoparticles via hydrogen reduction for high rate capability lithium batteries. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, H.; Cook, J.; Lin, H.; Ko, J.S.; Tolbert, S.H.; Ozolins, V.; Dunn, B. Oxygen vacancies enhance pseudocapacitive charge storage properties of MoO3−x. Nat. Mater. 2016, 16, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Akin, U.; Safal, H. Thickness dependence of dispersion parameters of the MoOx thin films prepared using the vaccum evaporation technique. J. Alloys and Compd 2015, 647, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Borah, D.J.; Mostako, A.T.T.; Saikia, P.K.; Dutta, P. Effect of thickness and post deposition annealing temperature on the structural and optical properties of thermally evaporated molybdenum oxide films. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 93, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Julien, C.; Khelfa, A.; Hussain, O.M.; Nazri, G.A. Synthesis and characterization of flash-evaporated MoO3 thin films. J. Cryst. Growth 1995, 156, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, S.; Sun, Y.; Wen, J.; Zhang, B.; Liao, X.; Yin, G.; Huang, Z.; Pu, X. MoO3−x-deposited TiO2 nanotubes for stable and high-capacitance supercapacitor electrodes. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 21823–21828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Mohamed, S.H.; Kappertz, O.; Ngaruiya, J.M.; Pedersen, T.P.L.; Drese, R.; Wuttig, M. Correlation between structure, stress and optical properties in direct current sputtered molybdenum oxide films. Thin Solid Films 2003, 429, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, D.; Yang, R.; Wu, L.; Shen, K.; Wang, D. Band alignment of CdTe with MoOx oxide and fabrication of high efficiency CdTe solar cells. Solar Energy 2018, 162, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Greiner, M.T.; Helander, M.G.; Wang, Z.B.; Tang, W.M.; Qiu, J.; Lub, Z.H. A metallic molybdenum suboxide buffer layer for organic electronic devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 213302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bouzidi, A.; Benramdane, N.; Tabet-Derraz, H.; Mathieu, C.; Khelifa, B.; Desfeux, R. Effect of substrate temperature on the structural and optical properties of MoO3 thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2003, 97, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sivakumar, R.; Gopalakrishnan, R.; Jayachandran, M.; Sanjeeviraja, C. Characterization on electron beam evaporated MoO3 thin films by the influence of substrate temperature. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2007, 7, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sivakumar, R.; Gopinath, C.S.; Jayachandran, M.; Sanjeeviraja, C. An electrochromic device (ECD) cell characterization on electron beam evaporated MoO3 films by intercalating/deintercalating the H+ ions. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2007, 7, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Macco, B.; Vos, M.; Thissen, N.F.W.; Bol, A.A.; Kessels, W.M.M. Low-temperature atomic layer deposition of MoOx for silicon heterojunction solar cells. Phys. Status Solidi: Rapid Res. Lett. 2015, 9, 393–396. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vos, M.F.J.; Macco, B.; Thissen, N.F.W.; Bol, A.A.; Kessels, W.M.M. Atomic layer deposition of molybdenum oxide from (NtBu)2(NMe2)2Mo and O2 plasma. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2016, 34, 01A103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Haro-Poniatowski, E.; Jouanne, M.; Morhange, J.F.; Julien, C.; Diamant, R.; Fernandez-Guasti, M.; Fuentes, G.A.; Alonso, J.C. Micro-Raman characterization of WO3 and MoO3 thin films obtained by pulsed laser irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1998, 127–129, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Iriyama, Y.; Abe, T.; Inaba, M.; Ogumi, Z. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of two-phase reaction in electrochemical lithium insertion within α-MoO3. Solid State Ionics 2000, 135, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hussain, O.M.; Srinivasa-Rao, K.; Madhuri, K.V.; Ramana, C.V.; Naidu, B.S.; Pai, S.; John, J.; Pinto, R. Growth and characteristics of reactive pulsed laser deposited molybdenum trioxide thin films. Appl. Phys. A 2002, 75, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Camacho-Lopez, M.A.; Escobar-Alarcon, L.; Haro-Poniatowski, E. Structural transformations in MoOx thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition. Appl. Phys. A 2004, 78, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bhosle, V.; Tiwari, A.; Narayan, J. Epitaxial growth and properties of MoOx (2 < x < 2.75) films. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 083539. [Google Scholar]
  46. Torres, J.; Alfonso, J.E.; Lopez-Carreno, L.D. XPS and X-ray diffraction characterization of MoO3 thin films prepared by laser evaporation. Phys. Status Solidi C 2005, 2, 3726–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Puppala, H.K.; Pelton, A.T.; Mayanovic, R.A. A comparative characterization study of molybdenum oxide thin films grown using femtosecond and nanosecond pulsed laser deposition. MRS Adv. 2016, 1, 2585–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Z. Growth of [010] oriented α-MoO3 nanorods by pulsed electron beam deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 223104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Robinson-Azariah, J.C.; Ponmudi-Selvan, T.; Rajasekar, M.S.; Sheebha, I.; Vidhya, B.; Rajesh, S. Pulsed laser deposited molybdenum oxides (MoO3 and MoO2) thin films for nanoelectronics device application. In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICDCS’18), Karunya Nagar, Coimbatore, India, 17–18 March 2018; pp. 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  50. Al-Kuhaili, M.F.; Durrani, S.M.A.; Bakhtiari, I.A. Pulsed laser deposition of molybdenum oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. A 2010, 98, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aoki, T.; Matsushita, T.; Mishiro, K.; Suzuki, A.; Okuda, M. Optical recording characteristics of molybdenum oxide films prepared by pulsed laser deposition method. Thin Solid Films 2008, 517, 1482–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, J.; Yin, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, J.; Guo, W. Chemical vapor deposition of ultra-thin molybdenum dioxide nanosheets. Mater. Lett. 2016, 174, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vorobeva, N.S.; Lipatov, A.; Muratov, D.S.; Sinitskii, A. Chemical vapor deposition and characterization of two-dimensional molybdenum dioxide (MoO2) nanoplatelets. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 505707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, X.; You, F.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, P.; Xue, X.; Xiong, J.; Zhang, J. Solution-processed MoOx hole injection layer towards efficient organic light-emitting diode. Org. Electron. 2016, 39, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Santhosh, S.; Mathankumar, M.; Chandraekaran, S.S.; Nanda-Kumar, A.K.; Murugan, P.; Subramanian, B. Effect of ablation rate on the microstructure and electrochromic properties of pulsed-laser-deposited molybdenum oxide thin films. Langmir 2017, 33, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Julien, C.M.; Mauger, A. Pulsed laser deposited films for microbatteries. Coatings 2019, 9, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Al-Kuhaili, M.F.; Durrani, S.M.A.; Bakhtiari, I.A.; Al-Shukri, A.M. Optical constants and thermocoloration of pulsed laser deposited molybdenum oxide thin films. Opt. Commun. 2010, 283, 2857–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kern, W. The evolution of silicon wafer cleaning technology. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 1887–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xiao, X.; Song, H.; Lin, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhan, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, J.; Yang, B.; Li, T.; et al. Scalable salt-templated synthesis of two-dimensional transition metal oxides. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, S.; Wang, G.; Jin, J.; Zhang, L.; Wen, Z.; Yang, J. Self-catalyzed decomposition of discharge products on the oxygen vacancy sites of MoO3 nanosheets for low-overpotential Li-O2 batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 36, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guerfi, A.; Paynter, R.W.; Dao, L.H. Characterization and stability of electrochromic MoO3 thin films prepared by electrodeposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1995, 142, 3457–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Navas, I.; Vinodkumar, R.; Lethy, K.J.; Detty, A.P.; Ganesan, V.; Sathe, V.; Mahadevan Pillai, V.P. Growth and characterization of molybdenum oxide nanorods by RF magnetron sputtering and subsequent annealing. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 175305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hari-Krishna, K.; Hussain, O.M.; Guillen, C. Photo- and electrochromic properties of activated reactive evaporated MoO3 thin films grown on flexible substrates. Res. Lett. Nanotechnol. 2008, 2008, 217510. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rahman, F.; Ahmed, T.; Walia, S.; Mayes, E.; Sriram, S.; Bhaskaran, M.; Balendhran, S. Reversible resistive switching behavior in CVD grown, large area MoOx. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 19711–19719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Huang, Q.; Hu, S.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, X. MoO3−x-based hybrids with tunable localized surface plasmon resonances: Chemical oxidation driving transformation from ultrathin nanosheets to nanotubes. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 15283–15287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ding, D.; Huang, W.; Song, C.; Yan, M.; Guo, C.; Liu, S. Non-stoichiometric MoO3−x quantum dots as a light-harvesting material for interfacial water evaporation. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6744–6747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Eda, K. Raman spectra of hydrogen molybdenum bronze, H0.30MoO3. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 98, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, D.; Lei, W.; Chen, X.; Hao, J.; Jin, Y.; Cui, Q.; Zou, G. Pressure-induced structural transitions in MoO3−xH2O (x = 1/2, 2) molybdenum trioxide hydrates: A Raman study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 16479–16482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cotton, F.A.; Wing, R.M. properties of metal-to-oxygen multiple bonds, especially molybdenum-to-oxygen bonds. Inorg. Chem. 1965, 4, 867–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Diskus, M.; Nilsen, O.; Fjellvag, H.; Diplas, S.; Beato, P.; Harvey, C.; Lantman, E.S.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Combination of characterization techniques for atomic layer deposition MoO3 coatings: From the amorphous to the orthorhombic α-MoO3 crystalline phase. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2012, 30, 01A107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ni, J.; Wang, G.; Yang, J.; Gao, D.; Chen, J.; Gao, L.; Li, Y. Carbon nanotube-wired and oxygen-deficient MoO3 nanobelts with enhanced lithium-storage capability. J. Power Sources 2014, 247, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, C.Z.; Li, Y.; Tang, X.D. Evidence of oxygen vacancy and possible intermediate gap state in layered α-MoO3 single-crystal nanobelts. Physica B 2016, 481, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lee, S.H.; Seong, M.J.; Tracy, C.E.; Mascarenhas, A.; Pitts, J.R.; Deb, S.K. Raman spectroscopic studies of electrochromic a-MoO3 thin films. Solid State Ionics 2002, 147, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cuando-Espitia, N.; Redenius, J.; Mensink, K.; Camacho-Lopez, M.; Camacho-Lopez, S.; Aguilar, G. Influence of oxygen pressure on the fs laser-induced oxidation of molybdenum thin films. Opt. Mater. Express 2018, 8, 581–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Eda, K. Infrared spectra of hydrogen molybdenum bronze, H0.34MoO3. J. Solid State Chem. 1989, 83, 292–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mizuno, N.; Katamura, K.; Yoneda, Y.; Misono, M. Catalysis by heteropoly compounds: V. The reduction mechanism of H3PMo12O40. J. Catal. 1983, 83, 384–392. [Google Scholar]
  77. Dong, W.; Mansour, A.N.; Dunn, B. Structural and electrochemical properties of amorphous and crystalline molybdenum oxide aerogels. Solid State Ionics 2001, 144, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sun, Y.; Takacs, C.J.; Cowan, S.R.; Seo, J.H.; Gong, X.; Roy, A.; Heeger, A.J. Efficient, air-stable bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells using MoOx as the anode interfacial layer. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2226–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Choi, J.-G.; Thompson, L.T. XPS study of as-prepared and reduced molybdenum oxides. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1996, 93, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gacitua, M.; Boutaleb, Y.; Cattin, L.; Abe, S.Y.; Lare, Y.; Soto, G.; Louarn, G.; Morsli, M.; Rehamnia, R.; Del valle, A.; et al. Electrochemical preparation of MoO3 buffer layer deposited onto the anode in organic solar cells. Phys. Status Solidi A 2010, 207, 1905–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zeng, R.; Liu, H.; Shen, W. A facile and controllable electrochemically fabricated nonstoichiometric MoOx film for novel opto-electronic devices. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2019, 29, 065012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chang, L.L.Y.; Phillips, B. Phase relations in refractory metal–oxygen systems. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1969, 52, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tong, J.; Wan, Y.; Cyi, J.; Lim, S.; Song, N.; Lennon, A. Solution-processed molybdenum oxide for hole-selective contacts on crystalline silicon solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 423, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Novotny, P.; Lamb, H.H. Nanostructured MoOx films deposited on c-plane sapphire. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2019, 37, 051504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fernandes-Cauduro, A.L.; Dos Reis, R.; Chen, G.; Schmid, A.K.; Méthivier, C.; Rubahn, H.G.; Bossard-Giannesini, L.; Cruguel, H.; Witkowski, N.; Madsen, M. Crystalline molybdenum oxide thin-films for application as interfacial layers in optoelectronic devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 7717–7724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Han, B.; Gao, M.; Wan, Y.; Li, Y.; Song, W.; Ma, Z. Effect of post-annealing on the properties of thermally evaporated molybdenum oxide films: Interdependence of work function and oxygen to molybdenum ratio. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2018, 75, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, F.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, M.; Dong, G.; Liu, F.; Wang, W.; Yu, D. Molybdenum oxide hole selective transport layer by hot wire oxidation-sublimation deposition for silicon heterojunction solar cells. Available online: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1902/1902.09127.pdf (accessed on 25 February 2019).
  88. Mehmood, H.; Bektas, G.; Yildiz, I.; Tauqeer, T.; Nasser, H.; Turan, R. Electrical, optical and surface characterization of reactive RF magnetron sputtered molybdenum oxide films for solar cell applications. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2019, 101, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, Z.; Zhao, T.; Zhan, X.; Gao, D.; Xiao, Q.; Lei, G. High capacity three-dimensional ordered microporous CoFe2O4 as anode material for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 4594–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yonekura, D.; Iwama, E.; Ota, N.; Muramatsu, M.; Saito, M.; Orikasa, Y.; Naoi, W.; Naoi, K. Progress of the conversion reaction of Mn3O4 particles as a function of the depth of discharge. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 6027–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Su, Q.; Wang, S.; Du, G.; Xu, B.; Ma, S.; Shang, L. Microstructure evolution and conversion mechanism of Mn3O4 under electrochemical cyclings. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2475–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Huang, S.Z.; Cai, Y.; Jin, J.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wang, H.E.; Chen, L.H.; Su, B.L. Hierarchical mesoporous urchin-like Mn3O4/ carbon microspheres with highly enhanced lithium battery performance by in-situ carbonization of new lamellar manganese alkoxide (Mn-DEG). Nano Energy 2015, 12, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dickens, P.G.; Reynolds, G.J. Transport and equilibrium properties of some oxide insertion compounds. Solid State Ionics 1981, 5, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jung, Y.S.; Lee, S.K.; Ahn, D.J.; Dillon, A.C.; Lee, S.H. Electrochemical reactivity of ball-milled MoO3y as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Bruce, P.G.; Scrosati, B.; Tarascon, J.M. Nanomaterials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2930–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, X.; Jiang, W.J.; Mauger, A.; Gendron, F.; Julien, C.M.; Qilu, R. Minimization of the cation mixing in Li1+x(NMC)1−xO2 as cathode material. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hashem, A.M.; Abdel-Ghany, A.E.; Scheuermann, M.; Indris, S.; Ehrenberg, H.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Doped nanoscale NMC333 as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Materials 2019, 12, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Brezesinski, T.; Wang, J.; Tolbert, S.H.; Dunn, B. Ordered mesoporous α-MoO3 with iso-oriented nanocrystalline walls for thin-film pseudocapacitors. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hashem, A.M.; Groult, H.; Mauger, A.; Zaghib, K.; Julien, C.M. Electrochemical properties of α-MoO3 as cathode materials for Li batteries. J. Power Sources 2012, 219, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Weppner, W.; Huggins, R.A. Determination of the kinetic parameters of mixed-conducting electrodes and application to the system Li3Sb. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1977, 124, 1569–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wen, C.J.; Boukamp, B.A.; Huggins, R.A.; Weppner, W. Thermodynamic and mass transport properties of LiAl. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1979, 126, 2258–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jang, Y.I.; Neudecker, B.J.; Dudney, N.J. Lithium diffusion in LixCoO2 (0.45 <x <0.7 intercalation cathodes. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2001, 4, A74–A77. [Google Scholar]
  103. Tang, S.B.; Lai, M.O.; Lu, L. Li-ion diffusion in highly (003) oriented LiCoO2 thin film cathode prepared by pulsed laser deposition. J. Alloys Compd 2008, 449, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Honders, A.; der Kinderen, J.M.; van Heeren, A.H.; de Wit, J.H.W.; Broers, G.H.J. Bounded diffusion in solid solution electrode powder compacts. Part II. The simultaneous measurement of the chemical diffusion coefficient and the thermodynamic factor in LixTiS2 and LixCoO2. Solid State Ionics 1985, 15, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Levi, M.D.; Aurbach, D. Frumkin intercalation isotherm—A tool for the description of lithium insertion into host materials: Areview. Electrochim. Acta 1999, 45, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Montella, C. Discussion of the potential step method for the determination of the diffusion coefficients of guest species in host materials Part I. Influence of charge transfer kinetics and ohmic potential drop. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 518, 61–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Carcia, P.F.; McCarron, E.M. Synthesis and properties of thin films polymorphs of molybdenum trioxide. Thin Solid Films 1987, 155, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Altman, E.I.; Droubay, T.; Chambers, S.A. Growth of MoO3 films by oxygen plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy. Thin Solid Films 2002, 414, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Siokou, A.; Leftheriotis, G.; Papaefthimiou, S.; Yianoulis, P. Effect of the tungsten and molybdenum oxidation states on the thermal coloration of amorphous WO3 and MoO3 films. Surf. Sci. 2001, 482–485, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ressler, T.; Jentoft, R.E.; Wienold, J.; Günter, M.M.; Timpe, O. In situ XAS and XRD studies on the formation of Mo suboxides during reduction of MoO3. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 6360–6370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Anbananthan, N. Studies on oxygen deficient molybdenum oxide electrodes. Bull. Electrochem. 2003, 19, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
  112. Hashem, A.M.A.; Abbas, S.; Abdel-Ghany, A.; Julien, C.M. Blend formed by oxygen deficient MoO3−δ oxides as lithium-insertion compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 686, 744–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Alfonso, J.E.; Moreno, L.C. Preparation and chemical characterization of neodymium-doped molybdenum oxide films grown using spray pyrolysis. Rev. Mex. Fis. 2014, 60, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  114. Yeh, H.L.; Tai, S.H.; Hsieh, C.M.; Chang, B.K. First-principles study of lithium intercalation and diffusion in oxygen-defective titanium dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 19447–19454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Luo, H.C.; Martin, M. Investigation of the phase diagram and the defect structure of nonstoichiometric Li1+xMn2-xO4-δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.33) spinel. Electrochem. Soc. Proc. 2003, 2003, 281–288. [Google Scholar]
  116. Dong, W.; Xu, J.; Wang, C.; Lu, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Yuan, X.; Wang, Z.; Lin, T.; Sui, M.; et al. A Robust and conductive black tin oxide nanostructure makes efficient lithium-ion batteries possible. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zheng, Y.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, X.; Pang, W.K.; Gao, H.; Li, S.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, H.; Guo, Z. Atomic interface engineering and electric-field effect in ultrathin Bi2MoO6 nanosheets for superior lithium ion storage. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Zhu, J.; Chen, J.; Xu, H.; Sun, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, M.; Gao, X.; Sun, Z. Plasma-introduced oxygen defects confined in Li4Ti5O12 nanosheets for boosting lithium-ion diffusion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 17384–17392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhang, Y.; Tao, L.; Xie, C.; Wang, D.; Zou, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, Y.; Jia, C.; Wang, S. Defect engineering on electrode materials for rechargeable batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1905923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Xiong, T.; Yu, Z.G.; Wu, H.; Du, Y.; Xie, Q.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Pennycook, S.J.; Lee, W.S.; Xue, J. Defect engineering of oxygen-deficient manganese oxide to achieve high-performing aqueous zinc ion battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Qiao, X.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Dongge, M. Observation of hole hopping via dopant in MoOx-doped organic semiconductors: Mechanism analysis and application for high performance organic light-emitting devices. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 104505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Guo, Y.; Robertson, J. Origin of the high work function and high conductivity of MoO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 222110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Meduri, P.; Clark, E.; Kim, J.H.; Dayalan, E.; Sumanasekera, G.U.; Sunkara, M.K. MoO3−x nanowire arrays as stable and high-capacity anodes for lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1784–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhao, G.; Zhang, N.; Sun, K. Electrochemical preparation of porous MoO3 film with a high rate performance as anode for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chen, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Li, Z. In-situ microstructural investigations by electron-beam irradiation induced crystallization of amorphous MoOx thin films with high performance for Li-ion storage. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 144, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Xing, Z.; Qian, Y. Hydrothermal synthesis of α-MoO3 and the influence of later heat treatment on its electrochemical properties. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 9851–9857. [Google Scholar]
  127. Ahmed, B.; Shahid, M.; Nagaraju, D.H.; Anjum, D.H.; Hedhili, M.N.; Alshareef, H.N. Surface passivation of MoO3 nanorods by atomic layer deposition towards high rate durable Li ion battery anodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 13154–13163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Wu, D.; Shen, R.; Yang, R.; Ji, W.; Jiang, M.; Ding, W.; Peng, L. Mixed molybdenum oxides with superior performances as an advanced anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lee, S.H.; Deshpande, R.; Benhammou, D.; Parilla, P.A.; Mahan, A.H.; Dillon, A.C. Metal oxide nanoparticles for advanced energy applications. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 3591–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Xue, X.-Y.; Chen, Z.-H.; Xing, L.-L.; Yuan, S.; Chen, Y.-J. SnO2/α-MoO3 core-shell nanobelts and their extraordinarily high reversible capacity as lithium-ion battery anodes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5205–5207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Riley, L.A.; Lee, S.H.; Gedvilias, L.; Dillon, A.C. Optimization of MoO3 nanoparticles as negative-electrode material in high-energy lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lee, S.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Deshpande, R.; Parilla, P.A.; Whitney, E.; Gillaspie, D.T.; Jones, K.M.; Mahan, A.H.; Zhang, S.B.; Dillon, A.C. Reversible lithium-ion insertion in molybdenum oxide nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3627–3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ette, P.M.; Ramesha, P.G.K. Self-assembled lamellar alpha-molybdenum trioxide as high performing anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 278, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Xu, Y.; Zhou, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Liang, L.; Grote, F.; Wu, M.; Mi, Y.; Lei, Y. Enhancement of sodium ion battery performance enabled by oxygen vacancies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8768–8771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Icovi, M.; Panero, S.; D’Agate, A.; Pistoia, G.; Temperoni, C. Non-Stoichiometric molybdenum oxides as cathodes for lithium cells. Part II. Secondary batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1979, 102, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Feng, C.; Gao, H.; Zhang, C.; Guo, Z.; Liu, H. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of MoO3/C nanocomposite. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 93, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hassan, M.F.; Guo, Z.P.; Chen, Z.; Liu, H.K. Carbon-coated MoO3 nanobelts as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 2372–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, C.-L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.-S.; Dong, W.-S. In situ synthesis of a-MoO3/graphene composites as anode materials for lithium ion battery. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2014, 143, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ma, F.; Yuan, A.; Xu, J.; Hu, P. Porous α-MoO3/MWCNT nanocomposite synthesized via a surfactant-assisted solvothermal route as a lithium-ion-battery high-capacity anode material with excellent rate capability and cyclability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15531–15541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Julien, C.; Khelfa, A.; Guesdon, J.P.; Gorenstein, A. Lithium intercalation in MoO3: A comparison between crystalline and disordered phases. Appl. Phys. A 1994, 59, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Julien, C.; Nazri, G.A.; Guesdon, J.P.; Gorenstein, A.; Khelfa, A.; Hussain, O.M. Influence of the growth conditions on electrochemical features of MoO3 film-cathodes in lithium microbatteries. Solid State Ionics 1994, 73, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Halalay, I.C.; Nazri, G.-A.; Cheng, Y.-T.; Eesley, G.L.; Meyer, M.S. Optical measurement of lithium diffusivity in cathode materials: Amorphous MoO3 films. J. Power Sources 1995, 54, 218–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhao, X.; Jia, W.; Wu, X.; Lv, Y.; Qiu, J.; Guo, J.; Wang, X.; Jia, D.; Yan, J.; Wu, D. Ultrafine MoO3 anchored in coal-based carbon nanofibers as anode for advanced lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 2020, 156, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ding, J.; Abbas, S.A.; Hanmandlu, C.; Lin, L.; Lai, C.S.; Wang, P.C.; Li, L.J.; Chu, C.W.; Chang, C.C. Facile synthesis of carbon/MoO3 nanocomposites as stable battery anodes. J. Power Sources 2017, 348, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Xia, Q.; Zhao, H.; Du, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Z.; Du, X.; Kulka, A.; Swierczek, K. Facile synthesis of MoO3/carbon nanobelts as high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 180, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yu, Z.; Jiang, H.; Gu, D.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Shen, L. A new way to prepare MoO3/C as anode of lithium ion battery for enhancing the electrochemical performance at room temperature. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sun, Z.; Yang, C.; Liu, G.; Lu, H.; Zhang, R.; Wang, L.; Wang, H. Largely enhanced electrochemical performance in MoO3−x nanobelts formed by a “sauna reaction”: Importance of oxygen vacancies. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 239, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Tysyachny, V.P.; Shembel, E.M.; Apostolova, R.D.; Nagirny, V.M.; Kylyvnyk, K.E.; Eskova, N.I. Studies of the lithium ion transport properties in electrolytic molybdenum oxides. Solid State Ionics 2004, 169, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Xie, J.; Kohno, K.; Matsumura, T.; Imanishi, N.; Hirano, A.; Takeda, Y.; Yamamoto, O. Li-ion diffusion kinetics in LiMn2O4 thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 54, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Julien, C.; Haro-Poniatowski, E.; Camacho-Lopez, M.A.; Escobar-Alarcon, L.; Jimenez-Jarquin, J. Growth of LiMn2O4 thin films by pulsed-laser deposition and their electrochemical properties in lithium microbatteries. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2000, 72, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Xie, J.; Imanishi, N.; Zhang, T.; Hirano, A.; Takeda, Y.; Yamamoto, O. Li-ion diffusion kinetics in LiFePO4 thin films prepared by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 4631–4637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ho, C.; Raistrick, I.D.; Huggins, R.A. Application of A-C techniques to the study of lithium diffusion in tungsten trioxide thin films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1980, 127, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ding, N.; Xu, J.; Yao, Y.X.; Wegner, G.; Fang, X.; Chen, C.H.; Lieberwirth, I. Determination of the diffusion coefficient of lithium ions in nano-Si. Solid State Ionics 2009, 180, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Maier, J. Diffusion in materials with ionic and electronic disorder. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1991, 210, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wu, C.; Xie, H.; Li, D.; Liu, D.; Ding, S.; Tao, S.; Chen, H.; Liu, Q.; Chen, S.; Chu, W.; et al. Atomically intercalating tin ions into the interlayer of molybdenum oxide nanobelt toward long-cycling lithium battery. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Julien, C.; Yebka, B.; Ziolkiewicz, S.; Doi, A. Lithium insertion in molybdenum and vanadium oxide films. Electrochem. Soc. Proc. 1997, 97-24, 862–873. [Google Scholar]
  157. Lee, Y.-S.; Ruy, K.-S. Study of the lithium diffusion properties and high rate performance of TiNb6O17 as an anode in lithium secondary battery. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Kulova, T.L.; Skundin, A.M.; Pleskov, Y.V.; Terukov, E.I.; Kon’kov, O.I. Lithium intercalation in thin amorphous-silicon films. Russian J. Electrochem. 2006, 42, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Sivonxay, E.; Aykol, M.; Persson, K.A. The lithiation process and Li diffusion in amorphous SiO2 and Si from first-principles. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 331, 135344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ostadhossein, A.; Kim, S.-Y.; Cubuk, E.D.; Qi, Y.; van Duin, A.C.T. Atomic insight into the lithium storage and diffusion mechanism of SiO2/Al2O3 electrodes of lithium ion batteries: ReaxFF reactive force field modeling. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 120, 2114–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kulova, T.L.; Skundin, A.M.; Nizhnikovskii, E.A.; Fesenko, A.V. Temperature effect on the lithium diffusion rate in graphite. Russ. J. Electrochem. 2006, 42, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gong, J.; Wu, H. Electrochemical intercalation of lithium species into disordered carbon prepared by the heat-treatment of poly (p-phenylene) at 650 °C for anode in lithium-ion battery. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 1753–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Yang, H.; Bang, H.J.; Prakash, J. Evaluation of electrochemical interface area and lithium diffusion coefficient for a composite graphite anode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A1247–A1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Panchmatia, P.M.; Armstrong, A.R.; Bruce, P.G.; Islam, M.S. Lithium-ion diffusion mechanisms in the battery anode material Li1+xV1−xO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 21114–21118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the layered α-MoO3 phase (a) and the vacancies of the three inequivalent oxygen positions O1 (apical) (b), O2 (corner-sharing) (c) and O3 (edge-sharing) (d). Adapted from [20]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. Crystal structure of the layered α-MoO3 phase (a) and the vacancies of the three inequivalent oxygen positions O1 (apical) (b), O2 (corner-sharing) (c) and O3 (edge-sharing) (d). Adapted from [20]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Electrochem 01 00012 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the electronic states of molybdenum oxides as a function of the oxygen vacancies. The electronic character varies from insulator (MoO3, σe >10−9 S cm−1) to semiconductor (defective Mo9O26, σe ≈ 10−2 S cm−1) to metal-like (γ-Mo4O11, σe ≈ 104 S cm−1).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the electronic states of molybdenum oxides as a function of the oxygen vacancies. The electronic character varies from insulator (MoO3, σe >10−9 S cm−1) to semiconductor (defective Mo9O26, σe ≈ 10−2 S cm−1) to metal-like (γ-Mo4O11, σe ≈ 104 S cm−1).
Electrochem 01 00012 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of (a) the cross-sectional view of the MoO3-δ thin film electrode deposited on the multilayer substrate and (b) the modified CR2477-type coin cell.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of (a) the cross-sectional view of the MoO3-δ thin film electrode deposited on the multilayer substrate and (b) the modified CR2477-type coin cell.
Electrochem 01 00012 g003
Figure 4. The X-ray diffraction patterns of MoO3-δ films deposited using the pulsed layer deposition technique under (a) PO2 = 13 Pa and (b) PO2 = 6 Pa. Films were deposited at various substrate temperatures on silicon wafer. Bragg lines have been indexed in the orthorhombic system (Pbnm S.G.). (0kl) reflections of the β-MoO3 phase are marked by β.
Figure 4. The X-ray diffraction patterns of MoO3-δ films deposited using the pulsed layer deposition technique under (a) PO2 = 13 Pa and (b) PO2 = 6 Pa. Films were deposited at various substrate temperatures on silicon wafer. Bragg lines have been indexed in the orthorhombic system (Pbnm S.G.). (0kl) reflections of the β-MoO3 phase are marked by β.
Electrochem 01 00012 g004
Figure 5. Vibrational spectra of PLD MoO3-δ thin films deposited at various temperatures. Each spectrum is shifted vertically for clarity. (a) Raman scattering spectra collected with the laser excitation wavelength of 632.3 nm. Frequencies marked in red are those of Mo8O23. (b) FTIR spectra of MoO3-δ thin films and MoO3 target (bottom).
Figure 5. Vibrational spectra of PLD MoO3-δ thin films deposited at various temperatures. Each spectrum is shifted vertically for clarity. (a) Raman scattering spectra collected with the laser excitation wavelength of 632.3 nm. Frequencies marked in red are those of Mo8O23. (b) FTIR spectra of MoO3-δ thin films and MoO3 target (bottom).
Electrochem 01 00012 g005
Figure 6. XPS patterns of MoO3-δ films grown using the PLD technique under PO2 = 6 Pa. (a) Amorphous MoO3-δ deposited at 25 °C, (b) crystalized MoO3-δ deposited at 300 °C and (c) Mo8O23+MoO3-δ deposited at 425 °C.
Figure 6. XPS patterns of MoO3-δ films grown using the PLD technique under PO2 = 6 Pa. (a) Amorphous MoO3-δ deposited at 25 °C, (b) crystalized MoO3-δ deposited at 300 °C and (c) Mo8O23+MoO3-δ deposited at 425 °C.
Electrochem 01 00012 g006
Figure 7. Variation of the O/Mo ratio as a function of the deposition temperature.
Figure 7. Variation of the O/Mo ratio as a function of the deposition temperature.
Electrochem 01 00012 g007
Figure 8. (a) SEM image of the substrate surface. (bd) AFM images of MoO3-δ films grown using the PLD technique at 25, 300 and 450 °C under PO2 = 13 Pa, respectively.
Figure 8. (a) SEM image of the substrate surface. (bd) AFM images of MoO3-δ films grown using the PLD technique at 25, 300 and 450 °C under PO2 = 13 Pa, respectively.
Electrochem 01 00012 g008
Figure 9. Particle size of MoO3-δ films as a function of the deposition temperature.
Figure 9. Particle size of MoO3-δ films as a function of the deposition temperature.
Electrochem 01 00012 g009
Figure 10. Galvanostatic discharge-charge profiles of Li//Mo-O thin films recorded at 1 A g−1 current density in the voltage range 3.0-0.05 V. (a) Amorphous MoO3-δ film deposited at 25 °C, (b) MoO3-δ film deposited at 200 °C and (c) 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 film deposited at 450 °C.
Figure 10. Galvanostatic discharge-charge profiles of Li//Mo-O thin films recorded at 1 A g−1 current density in the voltage range 3.0-0.05 V. (a) Amorphous MoO3-δ film deposited at 25 °C, (b) MoO3-δ film deposited at 200 °C and (c) 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 film deposited at 450 °C.
Electrochem 01 00012 g010
Figure 11. Incremental capacity curves (dQ/dV) vs. V of the first lithiation-delithiation cycle for (a) α-MoO3-δ and (b) 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin film.
Figure 11. Incremental capacity curves (dQ/dV) vs. V of the first lithiation-delithiation cycle for (a) α-MoO3-δ and (b) 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin film.
Electrochem 01 00012 g011
Figure 12. (a) Rate capability and (b) cyclability of MoO3-δ film in Li cells with 1 mol L−1 LiPF6 dissolved in ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate (EC:DMC; 1:1 w/w) as aprotic electrolyte.
Figure 12. (a) Rate capability and (b) cyclability of MoO3-δ film in Li cells with 1 mol L−1 LiPF6 dissolved in ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate (EC:DMC; 1:1 w/w) as aprotic electrolyte.
Electrochem 01 00012 g012
Figure 13. SEM images of the structural properties of the α-MoO3-δ thin film electrode at (left) the 5th and (right) 50th cycle.
Figure 13. SEM images of the structural properties of the α-MoO3-δ thin film electrode at (left) the 5th and (right) 50th cycle.
Electrochem 01 00012 g013
Figure 14. Time-dependent transient current showing the typical potentiostatic intermittent titration technique (PITT) response for PLD α-MoO3-δ films, (a) at short time (τ << L2/DLi) and (b) at long time (τ >> L2/DLi).
Figure 14. Time-dependent transient current showing the typical potentiostatic intermittent titration technique (PITT) response for PLD α-MoO3-δ films, (a) at short time (τ << L2/DLi) and (b) at long time (τ >> L2/DLi).
Electrochem 01 00012 g014
Figure 15. (a) Typical curve W vs. E for a α-MoO3 thin film. (b) Apparent Li+ ion diffusion coefficients vs. cell voltage determined from PITT measurements for a-MoO3, α-MoO3 and 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin films deposited at 25, 300 and 450 °C, respectively.
Figure 15. (a) Typical curve W vs. E for a α-MoO3 thin film. (b) Apparent Li+ ion diffusion coefficients vs. cell voltage determined from PITT measurements for a-MoO3, α-MoO3 and 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin films deposited at 25, 300 and 450 °C, respectively.
Electrochem 01 00012 g015
Figure 16. Band structure diagram near the MoO3-δ film surface. EF, Eg0, ECBM, EVBM, φ, μe, EV,local and EV,∞ represent the Fermi level, intrinsic band gap, conduction band minimum, valence band maximum, work function, electron chemical potential, local vacuum level and absolute vacuum level, respectively. Reproduced with permission from [86]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 16. Band structure diagram near the MoO3-δ film surface. EF, Eg0, ECBM, EVBM, φ, μe, EV,local and EV,∞ represent the Fermi level, intrinsic band gap, conduction band minimum, valence band maximum, work function, electron chemical potential, local vacuum level and absolute vacuum level, respectively. Reproduced with permission from [86]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Electrochem 01 00012 g016
Table 1. Composition of the PLD MoO3-δ thin films evaluated from the analysis of XPS spectra.
Table 1. Composition of the PLD MoO3-δ thin films evaluated from the analysis of XPS spectra.
Ts (°C)kδComposition
250.550.178a-MoO2.822
3000.040.018α-MoO2.982
4500.270.1060.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3
Table 2. Electrochemical characteristics of MoO3-δ thin film anodes. Data were collected at a current density of 1 A g−1 in the potential window 3-0.05 V.
Table 2. Electrochemical characteristics of MoO3-δ thin film anodes. Data were collected at a current density of 1 A g−1 in the potential window 3-0.05 V.
ElectrodeSpecific Discharge Capacity(µAh cm−2 µm−1)CE (%)Specific Capacity after 100 Cycles(µAh cm−2 µm−1)
1st2nd
MoO2.8224683620.77205
MoO2.9823902950.74209
MoO2.8844843720.77300
Table 3. Calculated DLi+ values of a-MoO3, α-MoO3 and 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin film anodes from the PITT experiments.
Table 3. Calculated DLi+ values of a-MoO3, α-MoO3 and 0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO3 thin film anodes from the PITT experiments.
Thin Film AnodeDLi+ (cm2 s−1)W @ 0.5 V
minmax
a-MoO3-δ2×10−157×10−1434.5
α-MoO3-δ4×10−146×10−1221.8
0.85Mo8O23-0.15MoO37×10−151.1×10−1225.2
Table 4. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of nanostructured anodes materials.
Table 4. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of nanostructured anodes materials.
Material aParticle Size (nm)Electrochemical PerformanceRef.
Mo17O47 NWs~90630 mAhg−1 @ 50 mAg−1 for 20 cycles[123]
MoO3 NRs100–250460 mAhg−1 @ 1.5 Ag−1 for 50 cycles[127]
MoO2.895~1000600 mAhg−1 @ 0.03C for 35 cycles[94]
MoO3 NSs5–20630 mAhg−1 @ C/2 for 150 cycles[132]
MoO3 NRs400450 mAh g−1 @ 25 mA g−1 for 90 cycles[126]
MoO3 NSs b40800 mAh g−1 @ C/10 for 40 cycles[131]
MoO3 NBs150300 mAh g−1 @ C/10 for 50 cycles[137]
MoO3 NFs20–30550 mAh g−1 @ 2C for 75 cycles[123]
MoO3 NBs150300 mAh g−1 @ 50 mA g−1 for 10 cycles[138]
MoO3 NSs~3–50620 mAhg−1 @ C/2 for 150 cycles[129]
α-MoO3 NBs~2201067 mAhg−1 @ C/2 for 50 cycles[130]
MoO3100–500450 mAh g−1 @ 200 mA g−1 for 200 cycles[128]
MoOx100–500900 mAh g−1 @ 200 mA g−1 for 200 cycles[128]
MoO3 TF100650 mAh g−1 @ 3 A g−1 for 50 cycles[124]
MoOx TF1.1 µm thick347 µAh cm−2 @ 90 µA cm−2 for 100 cycles[125]
a-MoO2.822 TFamorphous205 µAh cm−2 µm−1 @ 1 Ag−1 for 100 cyclesthis work
α-MoO2.982 TF69209 µAh cm−2 µm−1 @ 1 Ag−1 for 100 cyclesthis work
MoO3 + Mo8O23 TF72300 µAh cm−2 µm−1 @ 1 Ag−1 for 100 cyclesthis work
a NWs: nanowires, NRs: nanorods, NSs: nanospheres, NBs: nanobelts; NFs: nanoflakes; b electrode containing acetylene black and PVdF binder (70:20:10).
Table 5. Diffusion coefficients of Li+ ions in some anode materials.
Table 5. Diffusion coefficients of Li+ ions in some anode materials.
MaterialSamplingDLi (cm2 s−1)Ref.
LixMoO3thin film10−12–10−11[141]
MoO3/a-Cnanocomposite3.4 × 10−14[149]
α-MoO3nanobelts3.3 × 10−14[155]
MoO3:Sndoped nanobelts7.3 × 10−13[155]
porous MoO3electrodeposited7.1 × 10−11[124]
a-MoO3-δsputtered thin film3.0 × 10−14[156]
Li2.1Sinanopowder 50 nm4.0 × 10−13[153]
Li2.7Sinanopowder 50 nm2.0 × 10−12[153]
TiNb2O7ball-milled 1–5 µm4.6 × 10−14[157]
TiNb6O17ball-milled 1–5 µm1.3 × 10−13[157]
a-Si:Hthin film4.0 × 10−13[158]
LiSiO2DFT calculation2.6 × 10−11[159]
a-Li2.5SiO2ReaxFF calculation1.0 × 10−13[160]
LixC6graphite FG-A1.2 × 10−10[161]
Li1(H0.224C)6disordered carbon6.0 × 10−15[162]
LiC6 (50–250 mV)artificial graphite10−10–10−12[163]
Li1.16V0.93O2atomistic modelling7.5 × 10−10[164]
a-MoO2.822PLD thin film2.0 × 10−15–7.0 × 10−14this work
α-MoO2.982PLD thin film6.0 × 10−14–6.0 × 10−12this work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lakshmi-Narayana, A.; Hussain, O.M.; Ramana, C.V.; Camacho-Lopez, M.; Abdel-Ghany, A.; Hashem, A.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Molybdenum-Suboxide Thin Films as Anode Layers in Planar Lithium Microbatteries. Electrochem 2020, 1, 160-187. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1020012

AMA Style

Lakshmi-Narayana A, Hussain OM, Ramana CV, Camacho-Lopez M, Abdel-Ghany A, Hashem A, Mauger A, Julien CM. Molybdenum-Suboxide Thin Films as Anode Layers in Planar Lithium Microbatteries. Electrochem. 2020; 1(2):160-187. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1020012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lakshmi-Narayana, Ambadi, Obili M. Hussain, Chintalapalle V. Ramana, Marco Camacho-Lopez, Ashraf Abdel-Ghany, Ahmed Hashem, Alain Mauger, and Christian M. Julien. 2020. "Molybdenum-Suboxide Thin Films as Anode Layers in Planar Lithium Microbatteries" Electrochem 1, no. 2: 160-187. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1020012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop