Next Article in Journal
Studies of the Application of Electrically Conductive Composite Copper Films to Cotton Fabrics
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving the Anchorage in Textile Reinforced Cement Composites by 3D Spacer Connections: Experimental Study of Flexural and Cracking Behaviors
Previous Article in Journal
Sparsely Cross-Linked Hydrogel with Starch Fragments as a Multifunctional Soil Conditioner
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aminated Graphene Nanomesh: Theoretical and Experimental Insights into Process of Decorating, Topology and Electron Properties
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Seismic Composite Metamaterial: A Review

J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6(11), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6110348
by Al-Shami Qahtan 1,2,3, Jiankun Huang 1,2,*, Mugahed Amran 3,4,*, Diyar N. Qader 5, Roman Fediuk 6,7,* and Al-Dhabir Wael 8
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6(11), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6110348
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 1 November 2022 / Published: 12 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Journal of Composites Science in 2022)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This review article presents a detailed exposition of the recent research progress of seismic metamaterials, including 2D, 3D and the main mechanisms of theoretical backgrounds of energy attenuation. In addition, natural metamaterials and the study of urban environment are surveyed. The authors could consider to cite a recent paper on seismic metamaterial on Love wave, D.K. Guo and T. Chen*, Seismic metamaterials for energy attenuation of shear horizontal waves in transversely isotropic media. Materials Today Communications 28, 102526 2021http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102526. In page 19, the longitudinal wave velocity Vp is not exactly correct, see for example the text book of Graff or Achenbach (1973). There is also a typo of Poisson's ratio in the Abstract.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Addition of mathematical models to explain each mechanism would help offer more context and provide stronger scientific foundation.

2. Images and graphs do not seem to be very clear or legible. Perhaps submitting a higher resolution will help with readability.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revision is satisfactory. I have no further comments. The manuscript can be published as is.

Back to TopTop