Next Article in Journal
The Enhanced Moisture Absorption and Tensile Strength of PVA/Uncaria gambir Extract by Boric Acid as a Highly Moisture-Resistant, Anti-UV, and Strong Film for Food Packaging Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Aminated Graphene Nanomesh: Theoretical and Experimental Insights into Process of Decorating, Topology and Electron Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Adding Cinnamon, ZnO, and CuO Nanoparticles on the Antibacterial Properties of a Glass Ionomer Cement as the Luting Agent for Orthodontic Bands and Their Cytotoxicity

1
Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran
2
School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran
3
Department of Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177899191, Iran
4
Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177899191, Iran
5
Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948959, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6(11), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6110336
Submission received: 31 August 2022 / Revised: 20 October 2022 / Accepted: 1 November 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Composites Applications)

Abstract

:
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of adding cinnamon nanoparticles (NPs), Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NPs), and Copper oxide (CuO) NPs on the antibacterial property of a luting and lining glass ionomer cement (GIC) that was used for the cementation of orthodontic bands to the tooth. Cinnamon NPs, ZnO NPs, and CuO NPs were added into a luting and lining GIC in weight percentages of 1%, 2%, and 4%, respectively while a non-modified GIC was considered as the control group. Agar disc diffusion test was applied to assess the antimicrobial property of samples against Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). The cytotoxicity of the nanoparticles was examined through the MTT assay for gingival fibroblasts. Data showed that GIC containing cinnamon and ZnO NPs displayed a larger inhibition zone diameter and greater antibacterial activity against S. mutans than CuO NPs. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the inhibition zone diameter of cinnamon NPs and ZnO NPs. The cytotoxicity assessment revealed the lower cytotoxicity of cinnamon NPs and the higher cytotoxicity of CuO NPs while the cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs was observed to be higher than cinnamon NPs and lower than CuO NPs. GIC containing cinnamon NPs exhibited noticeable antibacterial activity against S. mutans and cinnamon NPs revealed less cytotoxicity and it is can be labeled as a favorable option for further assessment to be applied in fixed orthodontic treatments for the cementation of bands to teeth.

1. Introduction

The orthodontic band has been one of the most important components of fixed orthodontic treatments since the beginning of this specialty in the late 19th century [1]. One of the disadvantages of the orthodontic bands is that their application may be lead to higher enamel demineralization, even more than bonded brackets. Its more posterior positioning in the mouth causes difficulties in the process of tooth brushing and eventually results in plaque accumulation [2,3]. According to relevant studies, the occurrence of white spot lesions (WSL) in the course of fixed orthodontic treatment is observed with an incidence and prevalence rate of 45.8% and 68.4%, respectively [4,5]. Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are one of the best choices for the cementation of orthodontic bands due to its biocompatibility, chemical adhesion to teeth, and fluoride ion release and uptake by enamel and dentin. Since the introduction of GICs to the markets, glass-ionomer cements (GICs) have shown the most potent anticaries tendency among the dental materials owing to its fluoride-releasing ability and remineralization potential [6]. However, this cement can display a very low rate of activity against microorganisms upon the appearance of local biofilm accumulation, especially in fixed orthodontic conditions [7,8,9]. One of the solutions to this disadvantage is the addition of antibacterial nanoparticles into the glass ionomer to increase the antimicrobial activity of the cement. Various studies have focused on improving the antibacterial, remineralizing, and mechanical properties of GIC by adding CPP-ACP, bioactive ceramic particles, glass powders, and other chemical materials into the GIC powder [10,11,12,13,14].
The difference between nano materials and their counterpart bulk materials is their uniquely large surface-to-volume ratio that is provided by their small sizes and which can facilitate intimate interactions with microbial membranes and a considerably larger surface area for antimicrobial activity, offering a substantial antimicrobial property over other particles with the same composition [15,16]. One of the challenges of using nanoparticles is the maintenance of human health, since many researchers believe that their enhanced proprieties and nano-size may change the biological metabolic pathways of human cells and ultimately lead to the incidence of cancers and other diseases.
Nowadays, researchers are focused on the application of different plants, traditional substances, and natural products such as spices and herbal extracts against cariogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) [17]. As an anti-cariogenic material, there are several advantages to the usage of cinnamon due to its anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, antioxidative, and antimicrobial properties. It can function as a promising antimicrobial agent in dentistry and be exerted in the production of mouth rinses, toothpastes, or root canal irrigants [18]. The results of previous studies indicated a noticeable antibacterial activity of cinnamon nanoparticles (NPs) against S. mutans [17].
Many studies have confirmed the potent antimicrobial feature of zinc oxide NPs, which also proved to be effective against a wide range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and capable of inhibiting the formation of biofilm through antifungal activities [19]. The literature data indicate that the addition of ZnO NPs to dental materials can improve their antibacterial activity against cariogenic bacteria [20,21]. The nano-sized structure of these nano particles can diffuse into the microbial cell membranes and facilely change their metabolic pathways, which would consequently annihilate or cause a decrease in microbial populations [22]. Next to the exhibition of antimicrobial activity by Copper oxide (CuO) against a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, there are reports on the noticeable antimicrobial effects of CuO NPs on the colonization and plaque formation of oral pathogens [23,24]. Recently, the attention of many researchers has been towards the incorporation of ZnO NPs, CuO NPs, and cinnamon NPs into dental materials. On the other hand, some herbal compounds, such as cinnamon NPs, have proven to be economically beneficial in addition to providing high antibacterial properties. Therefore, this study attempted to synthesize and add cinnamon NPs into a luting and lining GIC (which was used for the cementation of orthodontic bands). We also performed a comparison between cinnamon NPs-containing GIC antibacterial property and ZnO NPs-containing GIC and CuO NPs-containing GIC to investigate their effects in the course of reducing dental caries in orthodontic banding. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no assessments on the impacts of the addition of these nanoparticles on the antimicrobial properties of conventional luting and lining GICs up to this date. As the last step, we investigated the cytotoxicity of each of the three nanoparticles and presented the gathered outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

To begin the process, cinnamon NPs were produced through a hydrothermal synthesis method. For this purpose, 0.3 g of ground cinnamon powder was weighed to be mixed with 100 cc of distilled water. Then, the resulting mixture was thoroughly dispersed to be transferred into an autoclave and placed in the oven at 180 °C for 4 h. Once the resultant product was cooled down, it was centrifuged and freeze-dried to produce the powder of cinnamon nanoparticles. The obtained cinnamon NPs were examined by the application of a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) (Leo 912 AB, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Different weight percentages of 1%, 2%, and 4% of cinnamon NPs, ZnO NPs (US Research Nanomaterials, Houston, TX, USA), and CuO NPs (US Research Nanomaterials, Houston, TX, USA) were added into a luting and lining GIC (Gold label, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), while a non-modified GIC was considered as the control group. Three disk-shaped samples were prepared for each group by the usage of a mold with a height of 3 mm and a diameter of 6 mm. Agar Disc diffusion test was exerted to assess the antimicrobial property of samples. The disks were placed on the Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) that was inoculated with 0.5 McFarland of S. mutans (Persian Type Culture Collection, Tehran, Iran). Subsequent to being incubated at the temperature of 37 °C for 24 h, the antimicrobial activity of the specimens was evaluated by determining the diameter of clear inhibition zone that surrounded the specimen discs.
In this study, we evaluated the effects of different concentrations of each nanoparticle on human gingival fibroblasts. Initially, gingival fibroblasts were cultured in culture media with high glucose (GIBCO, Invitrogen), 1:100 streptomycin/penicillin, and 10% HI-FBS. In brief, the cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at 5000 cells/well to be cultured overnight, while containing 100 μL aliquots of growth medium, which were then incubated for 48 h with different concentrations of nano particles in triplicate. Subsequently, 5 mg/mL of MTT solution was added to every plate to be incubated at 37 °C for 4 h as the last step. The addition of 100 μL of Dimethyl Sulfoxide solution was considered to dissolve the Formosan crystals. Then, a microplate reader (Anthos, Australia) was used to measure the absorbance at 570 and 630 nm. Once the middle–maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of every group was calculated, the concentration of NPs that reached 50% of cell annihilation with each compound was also determined and, thus, the IC50 was calculated from the cell mortality curves.

3. Results

In conformity to the exhibited TEM image and size distribution of cinnamon nanoparticles in Figure 1, the average size of these particles was observed to be 153.5 nm.
The results of the addition of cinnamon NPs and their effects on the antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cement are displayed in Table 1, which also presents the diameter of inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria (Figure 2).
The outcomes of the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated the existence of a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). Figure 3 provides the results of the performed Mann–Whitney pairwise comparison test on the groups. As can be observed, the addition of 4% cinnamon NPs caused a significant increase and achieved the highest inhibition zone diameter and also empowered the antibacterial property against S. mutans bacteria.
The results of measuring the diameter of inhibition zone (Figure 4) for the CuO NPs-containing GIC are demonstrated in Table 2. The Kruskal–Wallis test showed that there was a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05).
The outcomes of the Mann–Whitney pairwise comparison test are shown in Figure 5. The GIC that contained 4% of CuO NPs displayed the largest diameter of the inhibition zone and antimicrobial properties against S. mutans bacteria.
Table 3 shows the effects of incorporating ZnO NPs on the diameter of the inhibition zone (Figure 6). The outcomes of the Kruskal–Wallis test were indicative of a significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05).
The results of the Mann–Whitney pairwise comparison test are presented in Figure 7, which displays the inducement of a significant increase in the diameter of inhibition zone against S. mutans bacteria upon the addition of ZnO NPs up to percentage of 4%.
The Kruskal–Wallis test was indicative of a significant difference in the inhibition zone diameter of glass ionomers that contained cinnamon, CuO, and ZnO NPs at the percentage of 4%, which resulted in achieving the largest diameter of inhibition zone (P < 0.05). Moreover, the Mann–Whitney pairwise comparison (Table 4) of GIC containing cinnamon and ZnO NPs displayed a larger inhibition zone diameter and greater antibacterial activity against S. mutans than CuO NPs. Meanwhile, there was a lack of any significant differences in the inhibition zone diameter of cinnamon NPs and ZnO NPs (P = 0.617).
The results of cytotoxicity assessment of the three nanoparticles obtained by the means of MTT assay for gingival fibroblasts are presented in Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10.
According to figures, the IC50 value of cinnamon NPs, ZnO NPs, and CuO NPs were 1060, 460, and 380 µg/mL, respectively. In other words, cinnamon NPs induced a lowest cytotoxicity and CuO NPs displayed a highest cytotoxicity, while the cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs was higher than cinnamon NPs and lower than CuO NPs.

4. Discussions

For the very first time, this study attempted the addition of cinnamon NPs to the GIC that was used for the cementation of orthodontic bands to the teeth. Although the results indicated the effectiveness of each GIC that contained cinnamon, ZnO, and CuO NPs against S. mutans, the samples of cinnamon and ZnO NPs displayed a larger inhibition zone diameter and consequently more antibacterial activity than CuO NPs.
According to the outcomes, the addition of 4% cinnamon NPs induced a significant increase and achieved the highest inhibition zone diameter and also exhibited the strongest antibacterial property against S. mutans bacteria. Generally, the antimicrobial property of cinnamon NPs is caused by the presence of Cinnamaldehyde, Eugenol, benzoic acid, and cinnamic acid in this material [25,26,27]. The in vitro study of Yaseen et al. [17] investigated the effect of adding 1% and 3% cinnamon nanoparticles to the orthodontic composite that was used for the bonding of brackets to teeth. As a result, they observed the inducement of a significant antimicrobial effect by the composite that contained 3% of cinnamon NPs against S. mutans bacteria. Their experimental cinnamon NPs were produced through the mechanical attrition method; however, this study exerted a hydrothermal method for the production of cinnamon NPs. In conformity to the report of Zainal-Abidin et al. [28], the minimal inhibitory concentration of cinnamon oil against cariogenic bacteria was in the range of 0.21 to 0.63 mg/mL. Additionally, Bersy et al. [29] investigated the antibacterial effect of a mouthwash that contained cinnamon in children with an age range of 6 to 12 years, which resulted in reducing the S. mutans population in saliva by 96.99% after 30 min.
The outcomes of present study confirmed the ability of GIC containing 4% of ZnO NPs in achieving the largest inhibition zone diameter and displaying the strongest antimicrobial properties against S. mutans bacteria in different percentages. ZnO NPs can destroy the cell wall and produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide to prevent the growth of bacteria and result in their death. According to the report of Malekhoseini et al. [20], the addition of ZnO NPs to the resin modified glass ionomer Fuji II LC resin (GC Corporation, Tokyo, (Japan) caused a significant increase in its antibacterial property against S. mutans. Moreover, the study of Vanajassu et al. [30] indicated that the addition of 3% ZnO NPs to Fuji IX GIC (GC, Tokyo Japan) led to the exhibition of a significant antibacterial property.
Considering the different percentages of CuO NPs, the results of our study determined that the glass ionomer cement with 4% of CuO NPs displayed the largest diameter of inhibition zone and the strongest antimicrobial property against S. mutans bacteria.
Regarding the antibacterial mechanism of CuO NPs, they were mentioned to release Cu2+ that can trigger the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the bacteria and result in cell injury and apoptosis [31]. The report of Toodehzaeim et al. [32] indicated that adding up to 1% of CuO NPs to Transbond XT orthodontic composite can cause significant antibacterial properties against S. mutans [33]. Additionally, the observations of Argueta et al. [34] suggested the antibacterial features of the orthodontic adhesive that contained CuO nanofillers against S. mutans, S. sanguineus, and S. aureus bacteria.
According to the comparison of our results of the three nanoparticles, cinnamon NPs displayed the least cytotoxicity and CuO nanoparticles induced the highest, while the cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs was less than CuO NPs. Cinnamaldehyde is known as one of the main causes of cinnamon cytotoxicity [35]. The discoveries of LeBel et al. indicated that the usage of effective concentrations against S. moorei induced a negligible loss of viability in gingival keratinocytes after 1 h of exposure, while Marcouxet al. [36] reported the observance of some cytotoxicity from cinnamon oil.
The outcomes of our study indicated that CuO NPs displayed a higher rate of cytotoxicity than the other two nanoparticles. A possible reason for the cytotoxicity of metal-based nanoparticles is their production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that lead to oxidative stress [37]. In comparison to chlorhexidine (CHX), Eslami et al. [38] evaluated the biocompatibility of colloidal solutions that contained ZnO, CuO, titanium dioxide (TiO2), and silver (Ag) NPs in a culture of human gingival fibroblasts. Their results showed that CHX and CuO-containing solution displayed the highest rate of apoptosis among the groups. Apparently, the cytotoxicity of CuO NPs, which is mainly caused by oxidative stress [33,39,40], occurs in human cell lines such as human lung epithelial A549, human cardiac microvascular endothelial, kidney, and neuronal cells.
Our data indicated that the cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs is higher than cinnamon NPs and lower than CuO NPs. Chen et al. [41] investigated the effect of ZnO NPs on the proliferation and toxicity of human gingival cells and observed the inducement of toxicity by the high concentrations of ZnO NPs in human gingival fibroblast cells. Furthermore, the discoveries of Wang et al. reported the lack of any damaging occurrence by ZnO NPs in human normal keratinocytes (HaCaT cells) and gingival fibroblasts (HGF-1 cells). In another study, Kim et al. [42] investigated and compared the toxicity of four different oxide nanoparticles (Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2, and ZnO NPs) on two cell lines and reported that ZnO NPs displayed the highest cytotoxicity in terms of cell proliferation, cell viability, membrane integrity, and colony formation in both cell lines. Ng et al. [43] investigated the in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity and genetic toxicity of ZnO NPs in regards to human lung fibroblasts and fruit fly, which resulted in observing the annihilation of human lung fibroblasts by ZnO NPs. It was also noteworthy that oxidative stress damaged the DNA of these cells.
The limitations of this research are that the study was designed as an in vitro evaluation, which does not fully represent oral conditions. For more meaningful results, future in vivo studies could be performed. For example, a double-blind randomized clinical trial study could be carried out in patients who were candidates for fixed orthodontic treatment and the effects of the addition of these nanoparticles could be evaluated by the measurement of the S. mutans counts around the orthodontic bands through the usage of real-time PCR.

5. Conclusions

The noticeable antibacterial activity of the GIC that contained cinnamon NPs against S. mutans was confirmed to be much more superior to the exhibited properties by ZnO and CuO NPs-containing GICs. In addition, since cinnamon NPs revealed a considerably lower value of cytotoxicity than ZnO and CuO NPs, they constitute a favorable option for further research in regards to the potential application in fixed orthodontic treatments for the cementation of bands to teeth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R., H.S., H.K. and H.R.; methodology, H.S., H.K., M.D., H.R. and A.R.; validation, A.R., H.S., H.K., M.D. and H.R.; formal analysis, A.R., H.S., H.K., M.D. and H.R.; investigation, H.K., A.R., H.S., M.D. and H.R.; resources, A.R., H.S. and H.R.; data curation, A.R., H.S., M.D. and H.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D., A.R., H.S., M.D. and H.K.; writing—review and editing, H.K., A.R., H.S., M.D. and H.R.; supervision, A.R. and H.S.; project administration, H.S.; funding acquisition, H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Research Vice Chancellor of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Grant number: 991577).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bandeira, A.M.; Martinez, E.F.; Demasi, A.P.D. Evaluation of toxicity and response to oxidative stress generated by orthodontic bands in human gingival fibroblasts. Angle Orthod. 2020, 90, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Al-Banaa, L.R. Evaluation of microleakage for three types of light cure orthodontic band cement. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2022, 12, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Al Qassar, S.S.S.; Taqa, A.A.; Mohiaalden, H.K. Can the Static Magnetic Field Improve Orthodontic Adhesive Polymerization? J. Int. Dent. Med. Res. 2021, 14, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  4. Erbe, C.; Hartmann, L.; Schmidtmann, I.; Ohlendorf, D.; Wehrbein, H. A novel method quantifying caries following orthodontic treatment. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sundararaj, D.; Venkatachalapathy, S.; Tandon, A.; Pereira, A. Critical evaluation of incidence and prevalence of white spot lesions during fixed orthodontic appliance treatment: A meta-analysis. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 433. [Google Scholar]
  6. Enan, E.T.; Ashour, A.A.; Basha, S.; Felemban, N.H.; El-Rab, S.M.G. Antimicrobial activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles, amoxicillin, and glass-ionomer cement against Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 215101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Aguilar-Perez, D.; Vargas-Coronado, R.; Cervantes-Uc, J.M.; Rodriguez-Fuentes, N.; Aparicio, C.; Covarrubias, C.; Alvarez-Perez, M.; Garcia-Perez, V.; Martinez-Hernandez, M.; Cauich-Rodriguez, J.V. Antibacterial activity of a glass ionomer cement doped with copper nanoparticles. Dent. Mater. J. 2020, 39, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lacerda-Santos, R.; de Morais Sampaio, G.A.; de Fátima Liberato de Moura, M.; de Carvalho, F.G.; Dos Santos, A.; Melo Pithon, M.; Muniz Alves, P. Effect of Different Concentrations of Chlorhexidine in Glass-ionomer Cements on In Vivo Biocompatibility. J. Adhes. Dent. 2016, 18, 325–330. [Google Scholar]
  9. dos Santos Araújo, J.L.; Alvim, M.M.A.; da Silva Campos, M.J.; Apolônio, A.C.M.; Carvalho, F.G.; Lacerda-Santos, R. Analysis of chlorhexidine modified cement in orthodontic patients: A double-blinded, randomized, Controlled Trial. Eur. J. Dent. 2021, 15, 639–646. [Google Scholar]
  10. Heravi, F.; Bagheri, H.; Rangrazi, A.; Zebarjad, S.M. Incorporation of CPP-ACP into luting and lining GIC: Influence on wear rate (in the presence of artificial saliva) and compressive strength. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 1867–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heravi, F.; Bagheri, H.; Rangrazi, A.; Zebarjad, S.M. An in vitro study on the retentive strength of orthodontic bands cemented with CPP-ACP-containing GIC. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 125401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moheet, I.A.; Luddin, N.; Ab Rahman, I.; Kannan, T.P.; Abd Ghani, N.R.N. Evaluation of mechanical properties and bond strength of nano-hydroxyapatite-silica added glass ionomer cement. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 9899–9906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Soygun, K.; Soygun, A.; Dogan, M.C. The effects of chitosan addition to glass ionomer cement on microhardness and surface roughness. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 2021, 19, 2280800021989706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Heravi, F.; Bagheri, H.; Rangrazi, A.; Zebarjad, S.M. Effects of the addition of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) on mechanical properties of luting and lining glass ionomer cement. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 075405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Urnukhsaikhan, E.; Bold, B.-E.; Gunbileg, A.; Sukhbaatar, N.; Mishig-Ochir, T. Antibacterial activity and characteristics of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized from Carduus crispus. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shahabi, M.; Movahedi Fazel, S.; Rangrazi, A. Incorporation of Chitosan Nanoparticles into a Cold-Cure Ortho-Dontic Acrylic Resin: Effects on Mechanical Properties. Biomimetics 2021, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yaseen, S.N.; Taqa, A.A.; Al-Khatib, A.R. The effect of incorporation Nano Cinnamon powder on the shear bond of the orthodontic composite (an in vitro study). J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2020, 10, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yanakiev, S. Effects of cinnamon (Cinnamomum spp.) in dentistry: A review. Molecules 2020, 25, 4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barma, M.D.; Muthupandiyan, I.; Samuel, S.R.; Amaechi, B.T. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans, antioxidant property and cytotoxicity of novel nano-zinc oxide varnish. Arch. Oral Biol. 2021, 126, 105132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malekhoseini, Z.; Rezvani, M.B.; Niakan, M.; Atai, M.; Bassir, M.M.; Alizade, H.S.; Siabani, S. Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on physical and antimicrobial properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Dent. Res. J. 2021, 18, 73. [Google Scholar]
  21. Comeau, P.; Burgess, J.; Malekafzali, N.; Leite, M.L.; Lee, A.; Manso, A. Exploring the Physicochemical, Mechanical, and Photocatalytic Antibacterial Properties of a Methacrylate-Based Dental Material Loaded with ZnO Nanoparticles. Materials 2022, 15, 5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tiwari, A.K.; Jha, S.; Singh, A.K.; Mishra, S.K.; Pathak, A.K.; Ojha, R.P.; Yadav, R.S.; Dikshit, A. Innovative Investigation of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Used in Dentistry. Crystals 2022, 12, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ansarifard, E.; Zareshahrabadi, Z.; Sarafraz, N.; Zomorodian, K. Evaluation of antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of copper oxide nanoparticles within soft denture liners against oral pathogens. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2021, 2021, 9939275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Amiri, M.; Etemadifar, Z.; Daneshkazemi, A.; Nateghi, M. Antimicrobial effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on some oral bacteria and candida species. J. Dent. Biomater. 2017, 4, 347. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Suresh, P.; Ingle, V.; Vijayalakshmi, V. Antibacterial activity of eugenol in comparison with other antibiotics. J. Food Sci. Technol. (Mysore) 1992, 29, 254–256. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cliford, R.-N.M.; Adams, M. Quantitative structure activity relationship for the effect of benzoic acid, cinnamic acids and benzaldehydes on Listeria monocytogenes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1996, 80, 303–310. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wendakoon, C.N.; Sakaguchi, M. Inhibition of amino acid decarboxylase activity of Enterobacter aerogenes by active components in spices. J. Food Prot. 1995, 58, 280–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zainal-Abidin, Z.; Mohd-Said, S.; Adibah, F.; Majid, A.; Mustapha, W.A.W.; Jantan, I. Anti-bacterial activity of cinnamon oil on oral pathogens. Open Conf. Proc. J. 2013, 4, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bersy, D.A.; Mostafa, M.H.; El-Araby, S.M. Evaluation of the Antibacterial Effect of Cinnamon Extract on Streptococcus Mutans. Al-Azhar Dent. J. Girls 2021, 8, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vanajassun, P.P.; Nivedhitha, M.; Nishad, N.; Soman, D. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles in combination with conventional glass ionomer cement: In vitro study. Adv. Hum. Biol. 2014, 4, 31. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kung, M.-L.; Tai, M.-H.; Lin, P.-Y.; Wu, D.-C.; Wu, W.-J.; Yeh, B.-W.; Hung, H.-S.; Kuo, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-W.; Hsieh, S.-L. Silver decorated copper oxide (Ag@ CuO) nanocomposite enhances ROS-mediated bacterial architecture collapse. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 155, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Toodehzaeim, M.H.; Zandi, H.; Meshkani, H.; Firouzabadi, A.H. The effect of CuO nanoparticles on antimicrobial effects and shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. J. Dent. 2018, 19, 1. [Google Scholar]
  33. Berntsen, P.; Park, C.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Tsuda, A.; Sager, T.; Molina, R.; Donaghey, T.; Alencar, A.; Kasahara, D.; Ericsson, T. Biomechanical effects of environmental and engineered particles on human airway smooth muscle cells. J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7 (Suppl. S3), S331–S340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Argueta-Figueroa, L.; Scougall-Vilchis, R.J.; Morales-Luckie, R.A.; Olea-Mejía, O.F. An evaluation of the antibacterial properties and shear bond strength of copper nanoparticles as a nanofiller in orthodontic adhesive. Aust. Orthod. J. 2015, 31, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  35. Swales, N.; Caldwell, J. Studies on trans-cinnamaldehyde II: Mechanisms of cytotoxicity in rat isolated hepatocytes. Toxicol. Vitr. 1996, 10, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marcoux, E.; Lagha, A.B.; Gauthier, P.; Grenier, D. Antimicrobial activities of natural plant compounds against endodontic pathogens and biocompatibility with human gingival fibroblasts. Arch. Oral Biol. 2020, 116, 104734. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramasamy, M.; Das, M.; An, S.S.A.; Yi, D.K. Role of surface modification in zinc oxide nanoparticles and its toxicity assessment toward human dermal fibroblast cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 3707. [Google Scholar]
  38. Eslami, N.; Fasihi, F.; Jamalinasab, A.; Ahrari, F. Biocompatibility of several colloidal solutions containing nanoparticles on human gingival fibroblasts. Dent. Res. J. 2021, 18, 8. [Google Scholar]
  39. Fahmy, B.; Cormier, S.A. Copper oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in airway epithelial cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2009, 23, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Naz, S.; Gul, A.; Zia, M. Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles: A review study. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 14, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, F.-C.; Huang, C.-M.; Yu, X.-W.; Chen, Y.-Y. Effect of nano zinc oxide on proliferation and toxicity of human gingival cells. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2022, 41, 09603271221080236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, I.-S.; Baek, M.; Choi, S.-J. Comparative cytotoxicity of Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles to human lung cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 3453–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ng, C.T.; Yong, L.Q.; Hande, M.P.; Ong, C.N.; Liya, E.Y.; Bay, B.H.; Baeg, G.H. Zinc oxide nanoparticles exhibit cytotoxicity and genotoxicity through oxidative stress responses in human lung fibroblasts and Drosophila melanogaster. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) TEM image, (b) size distribution of cinnamon NPs.
Figure 1. (a) TEM image, (b) size distribution of cinnamon NPs.
Jcs 06 00336 g001
Figure 2. Inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC containing cinnamon NPs.
Figure 2. Inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC containing cinnamon NPs.
Jcs 06 00336 g002
Figure 3. The result of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for cinnamon NPs addition into the GIC.
Figure 3. The result of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for cinnamon NPs addition into the GIC.
Jcs 06 00336 g003
Figure 4. Inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC contained CuO NPs.
Figure 4. Inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC contained CuO NPs.
Jcs 06 00336 g004
Figure 5. The results of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for addition of CuO NPs into the GIC.
Figure 5. The results of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for addition of CuO NPs into the GIC.
Jcs 06 00336 g005
Figure 6. Inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC containing ZnO NPs.
Figure 6. Inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC containing ZnO NPs.
Jcs 06 00336 g006
Figure 7. The results of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for the addition of ZnO NPs into the GIC.
Figure 7. The results of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for the addition of ZnO NPs into the GIC.
Jcs 06 00336 g007
Figure 8. Graph of the percentage of cell viability of gingival fibroblasts in different concentrations of cinnamon NPs.
Figure 8. Graph of the percentage of cell viability of gingival fibroblasts in different concentrations of cinnamon NPs.
Jcs 06 00336 g008
Figure 9. Graph of the percentage of cell viability of gingival fibroblasts in different concentrations of CuO NPs.
Figure 9. Graph of the percentage of cell viability of gingival fibroblasts in different concentrations of CuO NPs.
Jcs 06 00336 g009
Figure 10. Graph of the percentage of cell viability of gingival fibroblasts in different concentrations of ZnO NPs.
Figure 10. Graph of the percentage of cell viability of gingival fibroblasts in different concentrations of ZnO NPs.
Jcs 06 00336 g010
Table 1. Diameter of inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC in in different weight percentages of cinnamon NPs.
Table 1. Diameter of inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC in in different weight percentages of cinnamon NPs.
GroupsMean (mm)Standard DeviationStandard Error
GIC000
GIC + 1% Cinnamon NPs101.731
GIC + 2% Cinnamon NPs1100
GIC + 4% Cinnamon NPs12.330.570.33
Table 2. Diameter of inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC in in different weight percentages of CuO NPs.
Table 2. Diameter of inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC in in different weight percentages of CuO NPs.
GroupsMean (mm)Standard DeviationStandard Error
GIC000
GIC + 1% CuO NPs1000
GIC + 2% CuO NPs10.331.550.66
GIC + 4% CuO NPs1100
Table 3. Diameter of the inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC in in different weight percentages of ZnO NPs.
Table 3. Diameter of the inhibition zone of S. mutans bacteria for GIC in in different weight percentages of ZnO NPs.
GroupsMean (mm)Standard DeviationStandard Error
GIC000
GIC + 1%ZnO NPs9.331.530.88
GIC + 2% ZnO NPs1100
GIC + 4% ZnO NPs1200
Table 4. The results of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for the addition of 4% cinnamon, 4% CnO, and 4% ZnO NPs into the GIC.
Table 4. The results of the pairwise comparison test on the groups for the addition of 4% cinnamon, 4% CnO, and 4% ZnO NPs into the GIC.
(I) Group(J) GroupP-Value
GIC + 4% cinnamon NPsGIC + 4% CnO NPs0.012
GIC + 4% ZnO NPs0.617
GIC + 4% CuO NPsGIC + 4% ZnO NPs0.046
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shafaee, H.; Khosropanah, H.; Rahimi, H.; Darroudi, M.; Rangrazi, A. Effects of Adding Cinnamon, ZnO, and CuO Nanoparticles on the Antibacterial Properties of a Glass Ionomer Cement as the Luting Agent for Orthodontic Bands and Their Cytotoxicity. J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6, 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6110336

AMA Style

Shafaee H, Khosropanah H, Rahimi H, Darroudi M, Rangrazi A. Effects of Adding Cinnamon, ZnO, and CuO Nanoparticles on the Antibacterial Properties of a Glass Ionomer Cement as the Luting Agent for Orthodontic Bands and Their Cytotoxicity. Journal of Composites Science. 2022; 6(11):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6110336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shafaee, Hooman, Haida Khosropanah, Hamidreza Rahimi, Majid Darroudi, and Abdolrasoul Rangrazi. 2022. "Effects of Adding Cinnamon, ZnO, and CuO Nanoparticles on the Antibacterial Properties of a Glass Ionomer Cement as the Luting Agent for Orthodontic Bands and Their Cytotoxicity" Journal of Composites Science 6, no. 11: 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6110336

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop