Next Article in Journal
Catalytic Pyrolysis of Reed for Bio-Oil and Biochar Production
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Adsorbent Materials for the Remediation of Contaminated Waters with Heavy Metals via Enhanced Adsorption Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Polyurethanes Based on Environmentally Friendly Polyols as a Promising Alternative to HTPB Binder for Composite Propellant Rockets †

by
Sorin-Viorel Dolana
1,*,
Anamaria Zaharia
1,
Tanţa-Verona Iordache
1,
Andrei Sârbu
1,
Celina-Maria Damian
2,
Traian Rotariu
3,
Anita-Laura Chiriac
1,
Ana-Mihaela Gavrilă
1 and
Anton Ficai
2
1
National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry-ICECHIM, 202 Spl. Independentei, 6th District, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7 Gheorghe POLIZU St., 011061 Bucharest, Romania
3
Military Technical Academy, 39-49 George Cosbuc Boulevard, 050141 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 19th International Symposium “Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development”, Bucharest, Romania, 11–13 October 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 90(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090007
Published: 6 December 2023

1. Introduction

Composite propellants used in solid-fuel rockets commonly consists of an oxidizer, the most used being ammonium perchlorate, fuels such as powdered aluminum, compounds that control the burn rate (catalysts or inhibitors), and various other additives. All these powdery materials are held as a one solid piece by a polymeric binder that also serves as fuel [1]. The heavily used binder in this regard is the elastomeric polyurethane based on hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), crosslinked with aromatic or aliphatic diisocyanates. The vast majority of polyols used in polyurethane production, HTPB included, are obtained indirectly from fossil fuels such as crude oil or natural gas. The need to limit the use of petroleum has led to the research and development of polyols made from plant-derived renewable sources, such as vegetable oils [2], starch, proteins, lignocellulosic mass [3], etc., but also by chemical recycling of polymers at the end of their life, namely polyurethanes, polyesters or polyamides. Poly(ethylene terephthalate)-PET, being one of the widely used polymers [4] and also being susceptible to depolymerization via glycolysis to produce polyols [5], is intensively studied in this regard. In the current study, we aimed to show the advantage of novel polyurethanes based on polyols made from plant-derived renewable sources or recycled PET that represent an environmentally friendly system as new binder alternatives for composite propellant rockets. The current study, aims to highlight the advantages of using novel polyurethanes, based on polyols made from plant-derived renewable sources or recycled PET, as new binder alternatives for composite propellant rockets.

2. Materials and Methods

Polyurethanes have been synthesized at varying NCO:OH ratios, using isophorone diisocyanate(IPDI) and three types of polyols: commercial polyether polyols, a polyol synthesized by the glycolysis of PET, and the commonly used HTPB polyol.

3. Results

Elastomeric polyurethanes based on IPDI and commercial polyether polyols, the polyol synthesized from recycled PET, and HTPB were synthesized and their chemical, physical, and mechanical properties were assessed using modern characterization techniques and then comparatively studied. It was shown that the polyurethanes based on commercial polyols and the polyol made from PET possessed mechanical properties comparable to those of the widely-used HTPB elastomer.

4. Conclusions

The study revealed that “green” polyols can be promising candidates for the replacement of petroleum-derived HTPB, with the potential use in composite propellant formulations for rockets used in civilian and military applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-V.I.; methodology, T.-V.I., A.F. and A.Z.; validation, T.-V.I., A.S. and A.F.; formal analysis, S.-V.D. and C.-M.D.; investigation, T.-V.I., A.-L.C. and A.-M.G.; resources, T.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-V.D. and A.Z.; writing—review and editing, T.-V.I.; visualization, C.-M.D.; supervision, A.-L.C. and A.-M.G.; project administration, A.Z. and T.R.; funding acquisition, T.-V.I. and A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Executive Unit for Financing Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation (UEFISCDI), grant. No. 75PTE/2022 E-CORA and Program 1—Development of the national research and development system, Subprogram 1.2-Institutional performance-Projects to finance excellence in RDI, Contract no. 15PFE / 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The supporting data are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chaturvedi, S.; Dave, P.N. Solid Propellants: AP/HTPB Composite Propellants. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 2061–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Petrović, Z.S. Polyurethanes from Vegetable Oils. Polym. Rev. 2008, 48, 109–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malani, R.S.; Malshe, V.C.; Thorat, B.N. Polyols and Polyurethanes from Renewable Sources: Past, Present and Future—Part 1: Vegetable Oils and Lignocellulosic Biomass. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2022, 19, 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Plastics—The Facts 2022. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/ (accessed on 11 September 2023).
  5. Vaidya, U.R.; Nadkarni, V.M. Polyester Polyols for Polyurethanes from Pet Waste: Kinetics of Polycondensation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1988, 35, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dolana, S.-V.; Zaharia, A.; Iordache, T.-V.; Sârbu, A.; Damian, C.-M.; Rotariu, T.; Chiriac, A.-L.; Gavrilă, A.-M.; Ficai, A. Polyurethanes Based on Environmentally Friendly Polyols as a Promising Alternative to HTPB Binder for Composite Propellant Rockets. Proceedings 2023, 90, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090007

AMA Style

Dolana S-V, Zaharia A, Iordache T-V, Sârbu A, Damian C-M, Rotariu T, Chiriac A-L, Gavrilă A-M, Ficai A. Polyurethanes Based on Environmentally Friendly Polyols as a Promising Alternative to HTPB Binder for Composite Propellant Rockets. Proceedings. 2023; 90(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dolana, Sorin-Viorel, Anamaria Zaharia, Tanţa-Verona Iordache, Andrei Sârbu, Celina-Maria Damian, Traian Rotariu, Anita-Laura Chiriac, Ana-Mihaela Gavrilă, and Anton Ficai. 2023. "Polyurethanes Based on Environmentally Friendly Polyols as a Promising Alternative to HTPB Binder for Composite Propellant Rockets" Proceedings 90, no. 1: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop