Next Article in Journal
Deep Feature Stability Analysis Using CT Images of a Physical Phantom across Scanner Manufacturers, Cartridges, Pixel Sizes, and Slice Thickness
Previous Article in Journal
Diffusion-Weighted Echo Planar Imaging Using Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding and Reverse Polarity Gradient in Head Andneck Cancer: An Initial Study
 
 
Tomography is published by MDPI from Volume 7 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Grapho, LLC.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

4D-CT Attenuation Correction in Respiratory-Gated PET for Hypoxia Imaging: Is It Really Beneficial?

by
Brandon Driscoll
1,*,
Douglass Vines
2,3,
Tina Shek
1,
Julia Publicover
1,
Ivan Yeung
1,2,3,
Stephen Breen
2,3 and
David Jaffray
1,2,3
1
Quantitative Imaging for Personalized Cancer Medicine Program—Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
2
Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2020, 6(2), 241-249; https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00027
Submission received: 4 March 2020 / Revised: 7 April 2020 / Accepted: 2 May 2020 / Published: 1 June 2020

Abstract

Previous literature has shown that 4D respiratory-gated positron emission tomography (PET) is beneficial for quantitative analysis and defining targets for boosting therapy. However the case for addition of a phase-matched 4D-computed tomography (CT) for attenuation correction (AC) is less clear. We seek to validate the use of 4D-CT for AC and investigate the impact of motion correction for low signal-to-background PET imaging of hypoxia using radiotracers such as FAZA and FMISO. A new insert for the Modus Medicals' QUASAR™ Programmable Respiratory Motion Phantom was developed in which a 3D-printed sphere was placed within the “lung” compartment while an additional compartment is added to simulate muscle/blood compartment required for hypoxia quantification. Experiments are performed at 4:1 or 2:1 signal-to-background ratio consistent with clinical FAZA and FMISO imaging. Motion blur was significant in terms of SUVmax, mean, and peak for motion ≥1 cm and could be significantly reduced (from 20% to 8% at 2-cm motion) for all 4D-PET-gated reconstructions. The effect of attenuation method on precision was significant (σ2 hCT-AC = 5.5%/4.7%/2.7% vs σ2 4D-CT-AC = 0.5%/0.6%/0.7% [max%/peak%/mean% variance]). The simulated hypoxic fraction also significantly decreased under conditions of 2-cm amplitude motion from 55% to 20% and was almost fully recovered (HF = 0.52 for phase-matched 4D-CT) using gated PET. 4D-gated PET is valuable under conditions of low radiotracer uptake found in hypoxia imaging. This work demonstrates the importance of using 4D-CT for AC when performing gated PET based on its significantly improved precision over helical CT.
Keywords: 4D-PET; phantom; quality assurance; hypoxia; respiratory gating 4D-PET; phantom; quality assurance; hypoxia; respiratory gating

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Driscoll, B.; Vines, D.; Shek, T.; Publicover, J.; Yeung, I.; Breen, S.; Jaffray, D. 4D-CT Attenuation Correction in Respiratory-Gated PET for Hypoxia Imaging: Is It Really Beneficial? Tomography 2020, 6, 241-249. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00027

AMA Style

Driscoll B, Vines D, Shek T, Publicover J, Yeung I, Breen S, Jaffray D. 4D-CT Attenuation Correction in Respiratory-Gated PET for Hypoxia Imaging: Is It Really Beneficial? Tomography. 2020; 6(2):241-249. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Driscoll, Brandon, Douglass Vines, Tina Shek, Julia Publicover, Ivan Yeung, Stephen Breen, and David Jaffray. 2020. "4D-CT Attenuation Correction in Respiratory-Gated PET for Hypoxia Imaging: Is It Really Beneficial?" Tomography 6, no. 2: 241-249. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2019.00027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop