Next Article in Journal
Morphological Characteristics and Occurrence of an Important Stem-Boring Pest, Nassophasis sp. (Coleoptera: Rhynchophorinae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Nutrient Solution from Aqueous Extracts as an Alternative to Fertigation in Hydroponic
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Genotype and Environment on Fruit Phenolic Composition of Olive
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Use of Sewage Sludge for Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) Cultivation: Experimental and Predictive Modeling Studies on Heavy Metal Accumulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Frass on Sweet-Potato (Ipomea batatas) Slip Production with Aquaponics

1
Virginia Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture, Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA 23806, USA
2
USDA-ARS Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center, Stuttgart, AR 72160, USA
3
Department of Fisheries Resource Management, College of Fisheries, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana 141004, India
4
Department of Aquatic Resource Management, Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Udayana University, Kuta Selatan 80361, Bali, Indonesia
5
Department of Aquaculture & Fisheries, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, 1200 N University Dr., Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA
6
1890 Cooperative Extension Program, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, 1200 N University Dr., Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2023, 9(10), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101088
Submission received: 25 August 2023 / Revised: 27 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 29 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Fertilizers in Horticulture)

Abstract

:
Nutrient supplementations are often added to aquaponic systems to optimize plant production, and black soldier fly larvae frass is a promising organic fertilizer. However, the mineral composition of the frass is substantially influenced by the initial substrate. In an 8-week study, sweetpotato slips were cultured at commercial stocking densities in an aquaponic system which received weekly additions of either BSFL frass made from high-nitrogen expired fish diets or low-nitrogen fruits/vegetables. The sweetpotato slips (≥8 nodes) were harvested weekly. Despite differences in the mineral composition between the frass types, the water quality as well as slip production/sugar content were unaffected by frass type. The results indicate that a wide array of substrates may be suitable for producing black soldier fly larvae frass as a fertilizer in aquaponic systems. Lastly, aquaponics is a viable system to commercially produce sweetpotato slips.

1. Introduction

Sweetpotatoes (Ipomea batatas) are the sixth-most produced crop in the world and are increasingly being recognized as a ‘super food’ due to their high content of health-promoting carotenoids, vitamins, and minerals [1,2]. The storage roots are grown in soil and while the roots can be used again as planting material, there is a point when this practice is no longer viable due to the accumulation of viruses and mutations that limit their production [3]. In response, virus-indexed planting material, known as ‘slips’, are produced via apical meristem culture and are then vegetatively multiplied [4]. These first-generation slips are often cultured in greenhouses in order to accelerate their growth and thus allow a longer growing season for their later storage root production. Sweetpotato farmers rely on obtaining a sufficient amount of slips and thus, sweetpotato slip production is itself an industry. Nevertheless, shortages are still common, and it has been suggested that the nutritional requirements of sweetpotato slips are not fully known and further research on the most appropriate fertilizer is an area that could be improved to optimize production [5,6].
One promising method to grow slips under controlled conditions is with aquaponics, which is the symbiotic fusion of aquaculture with hydroponics [7]. In aquaponics, the waste excreted from the fish acts as nutrients for plants to enhance sustainability and profitability due to the production of two marketable food items. Recently, it was shown that sweetpotato slips grown in an aquaponic system led to a five-fold and thousand-fold increase in the amount of slips and total weight, respectively, compared to those grown in soil [8]. The constant supply of water and nutrients, particularly dissolved nitrogen, were suggested as the contributors to this result. However, it is common practice to supplement additional minerals, most notably iron (Fe), calcium (Ca), and potassium (K), to the system to enhance plant production. Aquaponic supplements are often added in synthetic forms, such as potash, rock phosphate, Epsom salt (magnesium sulfate), and CalMag (calcium magnesium), but farmers interested in organic farming could be interested in an organic fertilizer that contains a variety of essential nutrients.
A by-product of insect farming is ‘frass’, which is the mineral-rich excrement of insects [9]. In particular, BSFL frass is relatively high in essential minerals compared to the frass of other edible insect species [10], while the accumulated chitin in the frass may also act as a plant prebiotic [11]. The use of BSFL frass on terrestrial plants has, in some cases, exceeded production compared to synthetic fertilizers [10,12,13]. In an aquaponic context, adding BSFL frass tea enhanced the sugar content in sweet banana peppers and the manganese content in sweetpotato slips grown aquaponically but had no influence on the overall production [14]. However, the growth of collard greens significantly increased when higher amounts of BSFL frass were added in an aquaponic system [15]. While the amount of BSFL frass additions likely plays a role in plant growth, the type of the initial substrate used to produce the frass may also be a factor. This is because the initial substrate greatly influences the mineral composition of the BSFL frass [16]. For example, the use of vegetable waste led to significantly higher phosphorus and potassium content in BSFL frass compared to either fruit waste or starches [17].
Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is a tropical cichlid native to the Middle East (Jordan, Egypt, and Israel) and parts of Africa and is the third-most cultured fish in the world [18]. The fish has many highly desirable culture traits which include rapid growth rate, excellent flesh taste and quality, resistance to numerous diseases, ability to reproduce easily in captivity, possession of dietary requirements on the lower end of the food chain (herbivorous/omnivorous), and the ability to tolerate varied environmental and production conditions [19]. As Nile tilapia are a popular choice for use in aquaponic systems, growth and survival of the fish can serve as a benchmark when conducting aquaponic research.
The aim of this study was to compare the growth and mineral composition of sweetpotato slips under commercial stocking conditions in an aquaponic system receiving supplementations of BSFL frass produced with expired fish diets (EFD) or from fruits/vegetables (FV). It was hypothesized that the different frass types would have a different elemental composition and thus additions of these to an aquaponic system would influence the production and/or composition of the sweetpotato slips.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Source of Plants, Fish, and BSFL Frass

Virus-indexed sweetpotato slips were produced and provided by the Agriculture Department at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (UAPB), which had at least 7 nodes. The all-male tilapia used in this study were purchased from AZGardens and upon arriving at UAPB, these were kept in a 1000 L acclimation tank. The fish were fed once daily with a floating commercial pellet (32% protein) designed for tilapia. The BSFL frass were produced in the lab according to Fischer et al. [20]. Briefly, the eggs of BSFL were placed on top of spoiled fish feeds designed for catfish (Rangen; 32% protein) or a combination of fruits (orange peels, banana peels, apple cores, and strawberries) and vegetables (sweetpotato and peas). The approximate composition of the SF and FV was measured using the standard Association of Official Analytical Chemists [21] methods and results are presented in Table 1. Hereafter, the frass made from spoiled feeds or fruits/vegetables will be referred to as SF frass and FV frass, respectively.
The BSFL converted these into frass, which took approximately three weeks. The frass was then dried in a forced air oven (Despatch; LBB Series 2–12-3, Illinois Tool Works, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 100 °C for two days and then ground into a fine powder with a hammer mill. Frass nitrogen was measured using a Leco N analyzer while the mineral content was measured at the Fayetteville Agricultural Diagnostic Laboratory at the University of Arkansas with inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis. The results are shown in Table 2.

2.2. Aquaponic Systems and Experimental Design

There were a total of six identical aquaponic systems (5110 L capacity) that are described in detail in Romano et al. [14]. A total of 40 tilapia (initial weight of 45.7 g) were added into each aquaponic system and fed twice daily to apparent satiation with commercial floating feeds (Rangen; 32% protein). Each tank received gentle aeration with an air stone and the tanks were covered with netting to provide shade (to minimize algae growth) and prevent any escapees. The amount of food provided to each system was recorded.
After one week of feeding the fish, a total of 200 sweetpotato slips were planted in each of the aquaponic media beds and each slip was spaced 2.5 cm (or 1 inch) apart from each other in media bed (145 cm × 75 cm) filled with expanded lava rock. This stocking density is the same used in commercial settings [5]. After adding the slips, a total of 10 g of SF frass or FV frass were sprinkled on top of the media bed containing the slips. This was performed to potentially encourage frass mineralization but also because, based on past experience, adding frass to the sump encouraged filamentous algae growth. Every week, waste that settled in the sump was siphoned out followed by adding 5 mL of iron chelate (Iron-gluconate; SEACHEM Flourish, Root 98 Warehouse, Lakeland, Florida). No buffers were added to adjust pH.

2.3. Water Quality Analysis

The ammonia-N, nitrite-N, and nitrate-N levels were measured with an API master test kit once a week. The water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH were measured with a digital multimeter probe (YSI Professional Plus). On week 2, 4, 6, and 8, a water sample was collected from the sump for later mineral analysis and stored at −20 °C. The minerals were measured with a flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS, iCE 3000 series, Thermo Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with deuterium lamp background correction. Calibrations were made using single element standard solutions (CPI International, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). However, for phosphorus (P), the persulfate digestion method (HACH method 8190) was used because the concentrations were too low for the AAS.

2.4. Aquaponic Sampling

By week 2 of adding the cuttings, the majority grew to be considered a slip (≥6 nodes) and were harvested to allow at least 2 nodes remaining in the media bed. The total biomass of all the slips were weighed among the treatments while 40 were used to measure the total length, number of nodes, and stem diameter. These were then placed in a zip lock plastic bag and stored at −20 °C for later mineral and sugar analysis. After 8 weeks, the slips were harvested 7 times in total and all the remaining slips were counted to determine the overall survival. The tilapia were also harvested after 8 weeks, counted, and were individually measured for weight and length using a digital scale and metric ruler, respectively.

2.5. Mineral and Sugar Analysis

For mineral analysis, the sweetpotato leaves from each replicate were oven-dried at 60 °C for 24 h then digested in a heat block (Environmental Express, Charleston, SC, USA) at 115 °C for 30 min in 4.0 mL trace metal-grade HNO3 (69%; Sigma-Aldrich). After digestion, 0.1 mL of H2O2 (30%) was added and then 40 mL of Milli-Q water was added. Samples were measured for iron, calcium, zinc, magnesium, and manganese using a flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) (iCE 3000 series, Thermo Scientific, Santa Clara, CA, USA), while phosphorus was measured using the persulfate digestion method (HACH method 8190) as described above. Each replicate sample was measured in triplicate.
For sugar analysis, total sugar was estimated from 100 mg of sweetpotato leaves from each replicate that were ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Ground samples were transferred to 1 mL 100% acetone and kept overnight at 4 °C. Samples were centrifuged and the residue was repeatedly washed with hot 80% ethanol to remove all traces of soluble sugars. This filtrate was used for the determination of soluble sugars while the residue/pellet was used for the determination of the insoluble sugar content. To the residue, 2 mL of 0.2 N H2SO4 was added, followed by heating at 100 °C in a water bath for 30 min, which was then centrifuged and the supernatant was collected. Anthrone reagent (150 μL) was added to each microplate well containing 50 mL of glucose standard solutions, blanks, and samples (soluble and insoluble sugars). Plates were then placed for 10 min at 4 °C and then incubated for 20 min at 100 °C. A cooling step for 20 min at room temperature was completed before reading absorbance at 620 nm triplicate in a microplate reader (PowerWave XS, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). A standard curve was obtained with different concentrations of glucose. Each replicate sample was measured in triplicate.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Sweetpotato slip composition and performance in response to frass type (SF vs. FV) and harvest period (first versus final composition, or slip performance among harvests 1–7) were analyzed by factorial mixed model (MIXED) analysis of variance (SAS version 9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Aquaponic system water quality and tilapia growth performance in response to frass type were analyzed by one-way mixed model analysis of variance. All response values were natural log-transformed prior to analyses. Differences among response means were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Frass Characteristics

The approximate compositions of the two initial substrates and subsequent frass are presented in Table 1. The frass made from the expired fish diet (EFD) contained 30.79% protein, 7.69% lipid, and 24.83% ash. This is in contrast to the frass made from fruits/vegetables (FV) which contained 22.73% protein, 4.03% lipid, and 31.16% ash.
The analyzed mineral compositions of each BSFL frass is shown in Table 2. There were differences in the mineral compositions for each frass with FV frass having higher levels of N, P, Mg, S, Na, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu compared to EFD frass, while EFD frass had higher levels of K, Ca, and B than FV frass.

3.2. Water Quality and Chemistry

The addition of the two types of BSFL frass to media beds led to only one difference in measured water quality parameters and all were within acceptable limits for fish. The aquaponic system water quality was optimum for tilapia culture and did not differ markedly in response to frass type (Table 3). Averages during the study were as follows: temperature, 27.4 °C; dissolved oxygen, 5.31 mg/L; hardness, 47.4 mg/L; total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), 0.33 mg/L; nitrite, 0.05 mg/L; nitrate, 42.08 mg/L. Only the pH was statistically higher in beds receiving the FV frass (7.54) compared to the SF frass (7.49), which was not biologically significant.

3.3. Fish Growth

The tilapia growth performance was typical for this species and initial size grown in optimum conditions, and there were no significant differences between frass types (Table 4). The averages for length (cm), final weight (g), weight gain (%), specific growth rate (SGR; %/day), feed intake (g diet/fish), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were: 21.09 cm, 193.1 g, 147.35 g, 322.2%, 2.95%/day, 162.15 g diet/fish, and 1.11, respectively.

3.4. Sweetpotato Slip Production and Mineral Composition

The sweetpotato slip production and quality were unaffected by the frass type but differed among partial harvests (Table 5). Generally, the slip diameter decreased, whereas the node length and number of nodes per slips increased between the initial (#1) and final harvests (#7). The slip length and weight differed by harvest with no discernible pattern.
The sweetpotato slip mineral and sugar composition was unaffected by the frass type but differed between the initial and final harvests (Table 6). The concentrations of Fe, Mn, and Zn increased at the final harvest from the initial content, whereas the Ca and Na concentrations decreased at the final harvest. The concentrations of Mg, P, and K in the slips were unchanged between the initial and final harvests and were unaffected by frass type. The soluble and insoluble sugars decreased significantly by three-fold and six-fold, respectively, from the initial concentrations.

4. Discussion

One of the criticisms of aquaponics is that the production of plants is often limited in scale compared to terrestrial farming, where hundreds or thousands of acres of crops can be grown outside and subsequently harvested with tractors and other heavy machinery. Thus, aquaponics is often viewed as being more suitable for growing niche crops and/or farming in an urban environment where space is limited [7]. However, in the case of virus-indexed sweetpotato slips, these are often cultivated anyway under controlled environmental conditions, like greenhouses, to optimize growth before being transplanted outdoors in the soil [5]. Consequently, obtaining a sufficient amount of slips is a bottleneck in the sweetpotato industry and any method to optimize slip growth would help extend the season for storage root production in soil [4].
Aquaponics appears to be a viable method for sweetpotato slip production in which it has been previously shown that sweetpotato slips grew substantially faster in aquaponic conditions compared to those grown in soil [8]. It is known that an abundance and consistent supply of water and nitrogen in aquaponic systems can promote leafy growth in a variety of plants [7], and inhibit storage root production in sweetpotatoes [6,22]. Indeed, under aquaponic conditions, storage root growth was not observed and thus it was suggested that more energy could be diverted to leafy growth [14]. However, the stocking density used in Romano et al. [14] was low (three cuttings in a 145 cm × 75 cm plant culture bed) and not representative of commercial conditions. Thus, a higher stocking density of cuttings was adopted in this study in which a total of 200 cuttings were planted in each of the media beds (145 cm × 75 cm).
After the cuttings were planted in this study, it took about a week before these began to discernibly start growing, which indicates a period of acclimation to the new culture conditions. By the second week, the cuttings were sufficiently long enough to be considered slips because they had at least six nodes; thus, the slips were subsequently harvested by week two of this study. Each week thereafter the slips were harvested another six times (for a total of seven harvests) until the study concluded when the fall season was approaching. Typically, sweetpotato slips grown in soil are harvested between 10 to 14 days to provide a total of nine harvests in a year, first starting in April [6]. In this study, harvesting was up to two-fold faster where it could be possible to harvest up to 18 or more times before the season ends. Additionally, the number of nodes on each slip gradually increased with each harvest, which is considered desirable because more nodes means more planting material for storage root production in the soil.
While nitrogen is generally abundant in aquaponics systems, the most common limiting nutrients include K, Ca, and Fe and these are often added in the forms of potassium bicarbonate, CalMag, and iron chelate, respectively [14,20,23]. However, there are other essential macro- and micro-nutrients that may be at insufficient levels for the optimal growth and well-being of plants in aquaponic systems. In this common scenario, adding a mineral-rich fertilizer consisting of various essential minerals may be effective. It was previously shown that directly adding BSFL frass tea to the water of an aquaponic system had no effect on sweetpotato slip production [14], but when added in a quantity more than two-fold higher this significantly increased collard green growth [15]. More recently, dietary inclusions of BSFL frass at 10% increased the growth of catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) as well as stevia (Stevia rebaudiana), and lavender (Lavaridula angustifolia) in an aquaponic system [24].
While there appears to be strong indications that adding BSFL frass can provide benefits to aquaponic plants, it is known that the composition of BSFL frass greatly depends on the initial substrate provided. However, to date, the efficacy of BSFL frass made from different substrates has not been compared in aquaponics. The two different types of BSFL frass that were compared in this study were produced with high-nitrogen expired fish diets (EFD) while the other with low-nitrogen fruits/vegetables (FV). The EFD frass did indeed have a higher nitrogen content, but the difference was not as remarkable as the difference between the initial substrates. In terms of the limiting nutrients in aquaponic systems, the EFD frass had less K and Ca, but more Fe than the FV frass. Despite the different mineral composition of the BSFL frass, additions of these different frass types led to no difference in sweetpotato slip production. It could be argued that the amounts added were insufficient to make a difference. While this could be a factor, it is perhaps worthy to note that 10 g of BSFL was added weekly in this study compared to 2.5 g each week which was sufficient to enhance collard green growth in the same system with similar stocking densities of fish [15]. Even though higher amounts were added in this study, the mean ammonia levels did not exceed 0.5 mg/L, while the other water quality parameters were similar.
Among the tested minerals in the water, P was significantly higher in the EFD treatment at week 8. It is tempting to attribute the higher P to the EFD frass having an over two-fold higher P content. However, this would not explain the K water content being significantly lower in both the water and slips from the FV frass treatment at week 6, because the K content was higher in the FV frass. Moreover, the Fe content of the slips was significantly higher in FV frass treatment, despite the FV frass having almost two-fold less Fe. Nevertheless, Fe as well as Mn were consistently at undetectable levels in the water. This was despite the weekly additions of iron chelate (along with the BSFL frass), indicating that Fe was being absorbed by the slips at a faster rate than the inputs of this nutrient. Indeed, this seems to be supported by the increased Fe and Mn (as well as Zn) content of the sweetpotato slips compared to their initial values. It is conceivable that sweetpotato slip production could be further enhanced by ensuring Fe is not limiting and perhaps should be monitored more closely. It is important to point out, however, that chlorosis, which is yellowing of the leaves and a symptom of Fe deficiency, was not observed in this study.
It has been demonstrated that fish grown in an aquaponic system have normal growth and survival compared to traditional production methods. Some of the species successfully grown aquaponically include largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) [20], channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [24], Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) [25], rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [26,27], goldfish (Carassius auratus) [28], and white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [29]. In this study, the fish growth was acceptable and similar to the production parameters in other reports [30,31,32,33] and the tilapia growth was not adversely affected by the frass type.

5. Conclusions

Inclusions of BSFL frass, either directly to the water or in aquafeeds, has been previously shown to benefit plant production in an aquaponic system. The results of this study appear to indicate that the initial substrate used to make BSFL frass is not a major factor in sweetpotato slip production. Considering that the farming of BSFL is expected to increase in the coming years, this could also increase the availability of BSF frass as an option to aquaponic farmers, particularly those interested in using an organic fertilizer rather than traditionally relying on synthetic ones. Finally, the production of sweetpotato slips at commercially stocking densities appears to be a viable farming method that may improve slip availability and help extend the duration for storage root production. Further studies on optimizing the BSFL frass dose and potential ways to enhance the Fe and Mn in the BSFL frass may further improve plant production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, and writing original draft preparation, N.R.; formal analysis, S.N.D., G.S.J.P., G.H. and A.K.S.; data curation and final editing, N.R., S.D.R. and C.W.; assistance with conceptualization, H.F.; provide virus-index slips and technical assistance, S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by 1890’s Institutional Global Food and Nutritional Security Grant and a non-assistance Cooperative Agreement (58-6028-2-005). This research was supported, in part, by funds provided by the USDA/ARS CRIS Project 6028-31630-009-00D and is a research component of the USDA-ARS Grand Challenge project entitled “Debugging a new mini livestock commodity: Developing a model of insect production to demonstrate their value as a safe solution for food waste and sustainable fish and livestock production”.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be made available with reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank John Brewer for the technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alam, M.K. A compreshensive review of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam): Revisiting the associated health benefits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 512–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Laveriano-Santos, E.P.; López-Yerena, A.; Jaime-Rodríguez, C.; González-Coria, J.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M.; Vallverdú-Queralt, A.; Romanyá, J.; Pérez, M. Sweet potato is not simply an abundant food crop: A comprehensive review of its phytochemical constituents, biological activities, and the effects of processing. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clark, C.A.; Valverde, R.A.; Fuentes, S.; Salazar, L.F.; Moyer, J.W. Research for improved management of sweetpotato pests and diseases: Cultivar decline. Acta Hortic. 2002, 583, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Loebenstein, G. Chapter two—Control of sweet potato virus diseases. Adv. Virus Res. 2015, 91, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Tedesco, D.; Moreira, B.R.D.A.; Barbosa Júnior, M.R.; Maeda, M.; Silva, R.P.D. Sustainable management of sweet potatoes: A review on practices, strategies, and opportunities in nutrition-sensitive agriculture, energy security, and quality of life. Agric. Syst. 2023, 210, 103693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jiang, C.; Pesic-VanEsbroeck, Z.; Osborne, J.A.; Schultheis, J.R. Factors affecting greenhouse sweetpotato slip production. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2017, 23, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hager, J.; Bright, L.A.; Dusci, J.; Tidwell, J. Aquaponics Production Manual. A Practical Handbook for Growers; Kentucky State University: Frankfort, KY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  8. Romano, N.; Francis, S.; Islam SPowell, A.; Fischer, H. Aquaponics substantially improved sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) slip production compared to soil but decreased phenol and antioxidant capacity. Aquac. Int. 2022, 30, 2603–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fischer, H.; Romano, N.; Sinha, A.K. Conversion of spent coffee and donuts by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae into potential resources for animal and plant farming. Insects 2021, 12, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Beesigamukama, D.; Subramanian, S.; Tanga, C.M. Nutrient quality and maturity status of frass fertilizer from nine edible insects. Sci. Rep. 2002, 12, 7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Quilliam, R.S.; Nuku-Adeku, C.; Pierre-Olivier, M.; Little, D.C. Integrating insect frass biofertilisers into sustainable peri-urban agro-food systems. J. Insects Food Feed 2020, 6, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Agustiyani, D.; Agandi, R.; Nugroho, A.A.; Antonius, S. The effect of application of compost and frass from black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) on growth of pakchoi (Brassica rapa L.). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 762, 012036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Romano, N.; Fischer, H.; Powell, A.; Sinha, A.K.; Islam, S.; Deb, U.; Francis, S. Applications of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass on sweetpotato slip production, mineral content and benefit-cost analysis. Agronomy 2022, 12, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Romano, N.; Powell, A.; Islam, S.; Fischer, H.; Renukdas, N.; Sinha, A.K.; Francis, S. Supplementing aquaponics with black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass tea: Effects on the production and composition of sweetpotato slips and sweet banana peppers. Aquaculture 2022, 555, 738160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Romano, N.; Islam, S. Productivity and elemental/chlorophyll composition of collard greens in an aquaponic system at different combinations of media and black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass supplementations. Aquac. Res. 2023, 2023, 3308537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chia, S.Y.; Tanga, C.M.; Osuga, I.M.; Cheseto, X.; Ekesi, S.; Dicke, M.; van Loon, J.J.A. Nutritional composition of black soldier fly larvae feeding on agro-industrial by-products. Entomol. Exper. Appl. 2020, 168, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fischer, H.; Romano, N. Fruit, vegetable, and starch mixtures on the nutritional quality of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae and resulting frass. J. Insects Food Feed 2021, 7, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Geletu, T.T.; Zhao, J. Genetic resources of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) in its native range and aquaculture. Hydrobiologia 2023, 850, 2425–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lim, C.E.; Webster, C.D. Nutrient requirements. In Tilapia, Biology, Culture, and Nutrition; Lim, C., Webster, C.D., Eds.; Haworth Press: Binghamton, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 469–501. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fischer, H.; Romano, N.; Jones, J.; Howe, J.; Renukdas, N.; Sinha, A.K. Comparing water quality/bacterial composition and productivity of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides juveniles in a recirculating aquaculture system versus aquaponics as well as plant growth/mineral composition with or without media. Aquaculture 2021, 538, 736554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th, 211st ed.; Cunniff, P.A., Ed.; AOAC International: Arlington, VA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tucker, M.R. Essential Plant Nutrients: Their Presence in North Carolina Soils and Role in Plant Nutrition; North Carolina Agronomic Services Division, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services: Raleigh, NC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, T.; Kim, H.-J. Characterizing nutrient composition and concentration in tomato-, basil-, and lettuce-based aquaponic and hydroponic systems. Water 2020, 12, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Romano, N.; Datta, S.N.; Pande, G.S.J.; Sinha, A.K.; Yamamoto, F.Y.; Beck, B.H.; Webster, C.D. Dietary inclusions of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass enhanced production of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) juveniles, stevia (Stevia rebaudiana), and lavender (Lavaridula angustifolia) in an aquaponic system. Aquaculture 2023, 575, 739742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al-Zahrani, M.S.; Hassanien, H.A.; Alsaade, F.W.; Wahsheh, H.A.M. Effect of stocking density on sustainable growth performance and water quality of Nile tilapia-spinach in NFT aquaponic system. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Birolo, M.; Bordignon, F.; Trocino, A.; Fasulato, L.; Pascual, A.; Godoy, S.; Nicoletto, C.; Maucier, C.; Xicato, G. Effects of stocking density on the growth and flesh quality of rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) reared in a low-tech aquaponic system. Aquaculture 2020, 529, 735653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bordignon, F.; Gasco, L.; Birolo, M.; Trocino, A.; Caimi, C.; Ballarin, C.; Bortoletti, M.; Nicoletto, C.; Maucieri, C. Performance and fillet traits of rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) fed different levels of Hermetia illucens meal in a low-tech aquaponic system. Aquaculture 2022, 546, 737279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nuwansi, K.K.T.; Verma, A.K.; Prakash, C.; Tiwari, V.K.; Chandrakant, M.H.; Shete, A.P.; Prabhata, G.P.W.A. Effect of water flow on polyculture of koi carp (Cyprinus carpio var. koi) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) with water spinach (Iponopa aquatica) in recirculating aquaponic system. Aquac. Int. 2016, 24, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fierro-Sañudo, J.F.; Rodriguez-Montes de Oca, G.A.; León-Cañedo, J.A.; Alacrón-Silvas, S.G.; Mariscal-Lagarda, M.M.; Díaz-Valdés Páez-Osuna, F. Production and management of shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) in co-culture with basil (Ocimum basilicum) using two sources of low-salinity water. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2017, 46, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Azaza, M.S.; Khiari, N.; Dhraief, M.N.; Aloui, N.; Kraiem, M.M.; Elfeki, A. Growth performance, oxidative stress indices and hepatic carbohydrate metabolic enzymes activities of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L., in response to dietary starch to protein ratios. Aquac. Res. 2015, 46, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El-Naggar, K.; Mohamed, R.; El-Katcha, M.I.; Abdo, S.E.; Soltan, M.A. Plant ingredient diet supplemented with lecithin as fish meal and fish oil alternative affects growth performance, serum biochemical, lipid metabolism and growth-related gene expression in Nile tilapia. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 6308–6321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qin, Y.; Naumovski, N.; Ranadheera, C.S.; D’Cunha, N.M. Nutrition-related health outcomes of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) consumption: A systematic review. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 102208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Sayed, A.-F.M.; Figueiredo-Silva, C.; Zeid, S.M.S.; Makled, S.O. Metal-amino acid complexes (Zn, Se, Cu, Fe, and Mn) as a replacement of inorganic trace minerals in commercial diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared under field conditions: Effects on growth, feed efficiency, gut microbiota, intestinal histology, and economic return. Aquaculture 2023, 567, 739223. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Approximate composition (% dry matter) of expired fish diets (EFD) and fruit/vegetables (FV) that were provided to the black soldier fly larvae.
Table 1. Approximate composition (% dry matter) of expired fish diets (EFD) and fruit/vegetables (FV) that were provided to the black soldier fly larvae.
EFDFV
Moisture5.2385.95
Crude protein32.139.32
Crude lipid8.473.28
Crude ash7.6414.52
Crude fiber4.319.27
Table 2. Nutrient composition of black soldier fly larvae frass produced with expired fish diets (EFD frass) or fruits/vegetable (FV frass).
Table 2. Nutrient composition of black soldier fly larvae frass produced with expired fish diets (EFD frass) or fruits/vegetable (FV frass).
%mg/kg
NPKCaMgSNaFeMnZnCuB
EFD frass4.642.542.955.280.440.7513,5614638720030.723
FV frass3.371.164.126.380.380.5011,8152956310422.233
Table 3. Mean (±SE) water quality parameters in an aquaponic system receiving frass by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae fed expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (FV) over 8 weeks.
Table 3. Mean (±SE) water quality parameters in an aquaponic system receiving frass by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae fed expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (FV) over 8 weeks.
ParameterEFDFV
Temperature (°C)27.3 ± 0.0527.5 ± 0.09
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)5.14 ± 0.335.47 ± 0.01
pH7.49 ± 0.01 b7.54 ± 0.01 a
Hardness (mg/L)45.5 ± 0.1449.3 ± 0.27
TAN 1 (mg/L)0.34 ± 0.000.31 ± 0.02
Nitrite (mg/L)0.08 ± 0.04 0.03 ± 0.00
Nitrate (mg/L)42.08 ± 0.4142.08 ± 0.12
1 Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN). Different superscripted letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Growth performance of Nile tilapia (n = 3) in an aquaponics system receiving frass by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae fed expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (FV) after 8 weeks.
Table 4. Growth performance of Nile tilapia (n = 3) in an aquaponics system receiving frass by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae fed expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (FV) after 8 weeks.
ResponseEFDFV
Length (cm)21.23 ± 0.1920.95 ± 0.29
Final weight (g)197.3 ± 4.6188.9 ± 8.0
Weight gain (%) 1332.6 ± 13.8311.8 ± 13.4
SGR 23.00 ± 0.562.89 ± 0.42
Feed intake (g/fish)164.6 ± 5.8159.7 ± 2.3
FCR 31.09 ± 0.061.12 ± 0.04
1 Percent gain from initial weight. 2 Specific growth rate (SGR) = (ln final weight—ln initial weight)/time. 3 Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = g dry feed fed/g gained.
Table 5. Mean (±SE) production parameters of sweetpotato slips (n = 3) grown in an aquaponics system with Nile tilapia for 8 weeks when black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass was produced from expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (F/V). Main effects of least squares means with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Mean (±SE) production parameters of sweetpotato slips (n = 3) grown in an aquaponics system with Nile tilapia for 8 weeks when black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass was produced from expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (F/V). Main effects of least squares means with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
TreatmentsResponse Variables
FrassHarvestLength (cm)Weight
(g)
Diameter (mm)Nodes/SlipNodes/Length
EFD131.15912.74.377.690.263
227.75259.73.218.880.343
350.181029.73.109.350.213
429.52381.73.068.690.333
539.89644.62.9710.330.300
622.23205.12.908.780.420
731.03633.32.8811.140.397
FV130.28758.74.247.570.260
231.81486.63.308.880.310
348.031102.93.119.490.213
430.30413.73.248.740.310
542.85649.92.9810.080.273
629.68299.32.899.500.367
731.41828.52.9511.590.393
Pooled SE4.44138.70.120.450.026
Main effects of means
EFD 33.11581.03.219.270.324
FV 34.91648.53.249.400.304
130.72 bc835.7 a4.31 a7.63 d0.262 bc
229.78 c373.2 c3.25 b8.88 bc0.327 ab
349.11 a1066.3 a3.10 bc9.40 bc0.213 c
429.91 c397.7 bc3.15 bc8.72 cd0.322 b
541.37 ab647.3 ab2.97 bc10.20 a0.287 b
625.95 c252.2 c2.89 c9.14 bc0.393 a
731.22 bc730.9 ab2.91 c11.36 a0.395 a
ANOVA Source, Pr > F
Frass0.6380.6940.7920.7770.463
Harvest<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
F × H0.8180.9220.8810.9070.838
Table 6. Mean (±SE) mineral (mg/g dry weight) and sugar composition (mg/g dry weight) of sweetpotato slips (n = 3) grown in an aquaponics system with Nile tilapia for 8 weeks when black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass was produced from expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (F/V). Main effects of least squares means with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Mean (±SE) mineral (mg/g dry weight) and sugar composition (mg/g dry weight) of sweetpotato slips (n = 3) grown in an aquaponics system with Nile tilapia for 8 weeks when black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae frass was produced from expired fish feeds (EFD) or fruits/vegetables (F/V). Main effects of least squares means with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
TreatmentsMacronutrients (mg/g)Micronutrients (mg/g)Sugar (mg/g)
HarvestFrassPKCaMgNaFeMnZnSolubleInsoluble
FirstEFD9.47109.247.4910.940.0710.1210.1370.07130.0826.20
FV9.50109.807.4711.170.0900.1180.1340.09037.6335.29
LastEFD9.7992.736.7110.780.1750.1481.5000.1758.835.55
FV9.1790.956.8910.460.1870.1421.4990.18713.556.01
Pooled SE0.3858.360.1650.210.0470.0060.0140.0154.254.83
First 9.48109.527.48 a11.050.080 b0.120 b0.135 b0.080 b33.86 a30.75 a
Last 9.4891.846.80 b10.620.181 a0.145 a1.499 a0.181 a11.19 b5.78 b
EFD9.63100.997.1010.860.1230.1340.8190.12349.4615.87
FV9.33100.387.1810.820.1380.1300.8160.13825.5920.65
ANOVA Source, Pr > F
Time 0.9340.0620.0030.0710.0350.004<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Frass 0.4560.4560.6460.8370.1650.5280.8600.3240.0960.422
T X F 0.4270.7520.5580.8930.5370.8260.8930.7740.7570.506
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romano, N.; Webster, C.; Datta, S.N.; Pande, G.S.J.; Fischer, H.; Sinha, A.K.; Huskey, G.; Rawles, S.D.; Francis, S. Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Frass on Sweet-Potato (Ipomea batatas) Slip Production with Aquaponics. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101088

AMA Style

Romano N, Webster C, Datta SN, Pande GSJ, Fischer H, Sinha AK, Huskey G, Rawles SD, Francis S. Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Frass on Sweet-Potato (Ipomea batatas) Slip Production with Aquaponics. Horticulturae. 2023; 9(10):1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romano, Nicholas, Carl Webster, Surjya Narayan Datta, Gde Sasmita Julyantoro Pande, Hayden Fischer, Amit Kumar Sinha, George Huskey, Steven D. Rawles, and Shaun Francis. 2023. "Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Frass on Sweet-Potato (Ipomea batatas) Slip Production with Aquaponics" Horticulturae 9, no. 10: 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9101088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop