Next Article in Journal
Use of Thermal Imaging to Assess Water Status in Citrus Plants in Greenhouses
Next Article in Special Issue
Dehydrins and Soluble Sugars Involved in Cold Acclimation of Rosa wichurana and Rose Cultivar ‘Yesterday’
Previous Article in Journal
Selection on BrFLC1 Is Related to Intraspecific Diversity of Brassica rapa Vegetables
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Senescence-Associated Endonuclease, PhENDO1, Is Upregulated by Ethylene and Phosphorus Deficiency in Petunia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Horticulturae
Volume 7
Issue 8
10.3390/horticulturae7080248
horticulturae-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological Characterization of Tetraploids of Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Produced by Oryzalin Treatment of Seeds

by
Shiro Mori
1,*,
Masaki Yahata
2,
Ayano Kuwahara
1,
Yurina Shirono
1,
Yasufumi Ueno
1,
Misaki Hatanaka
1,
Yoshimi Honda
1,
Keita Sugiyama
3,
Naho Murata
3,
Yoshihiro Okamoto
1 and
Takahiro Wagatsuma
1
1
College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Sciences, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu 069-8501, Japan
2
Academic Institute, College of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan
3
Hokkaido Agricultural Research Center, NARO, Sapporo 062-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2021, 7(8), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080248
Submission received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 3 August 2021 / Accepted: 10 August 2021 / Published: 15 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breeding, Genetics and Genomics of Ornamental Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. (2n = 2x = 16) is a popular ornamental plant with dimorphism of pollen grains (type A and type B) and stigmas (papilla and cob-like). We applied polyploidy breeding to this species in order to introduce desirable traits. Tetraploid and mixoploid L. sinuatum plants were successfully obtained with oryzalin treatment of L. sinuatum ‘Early Blue’ seeds. All three tetraploids had increased leaf width, stomatal size, flower length, and pollen width compared to those of the diploid, and tetraploids had four germinal pores of pollen grains, whereas the diploid had three. All tetraploids had type A pollen grains and cob-like stigmas. Furthermore, the growth of cultivated tetraploid plants was slow, with later bolting and flowering times. Mixoploids Mixo-1 and Mixo-3 were estimated to be polyploidy periclinal chimeric plants consisting of a tetraploid L1 layer and diploid L2 layer, and Mixo-2 was estimated to be a polyploidy periclinal chimeric plant consisting of the diploid L1 layer and tetraploid L2 layer. Mixo-4 had tetraploid L1 and L2 layers. Mixoploids, except Mixo-4, had type A pollen grains and cob-like stigmas, whereas Mixo-4 had type B pollen grains and papilla stigmas. These polyploids will be useful as polyploidy breeding materials.

1. Introduction

Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill., commonly known as statice, which belongs to the family Plumbaginaceae native to the Mediterranean area, is a popular ornamental plant because of its wide range of flower colors and long vase life. This species is diploid with 2n = 16 [1]. In the genus Limonium, pollen- and stigma-dimorphism can be observed and is related to the self-incompatibility system. L. sinuatum produces type A and type B pollen as well as papilla stigmas and cob-like stigmas. The combination of type A pollen and cob-like stigma and the combination of type B pollen and papilla stigma do not lead to fertilization [2,3,4,5].
Generally, polyploids grow vigorously and their organs are larger than those of diploids. Polyploidization is commonly carried out to introduce novel attractive features to ornamental plants such as plant size, flower enlargement, and intense color of leaves and flowers [6,7]. Phenotypic changes due to chromosome doubling are thought to be caused by increased cell size, allele diversification, gene silencing, and gene dosage effects [6]. Chromosome doubling of plants can be achieved by treatment with polyploidizing agents including colchicine, oryzalin, amiprophos-methyl, and trifluralin. Among them, colchicine is the most commonly used agent [8], whereas oryzalin is recognized as an alternative because of its high chromosome doubling efficiency and low toxicity [9,10,11,12,13]. To date, polyploids of ornamental plants including Agastache foeniculum [14], Alocasia sp. [10], Gerbera jamesonii [15], Lychnis senno [9], Rhododendron spp. [16,17], and Rosa spp. [12,13] have been obtained by oryzalin treatment.
L. sinuatum is difficult to crossbreed with different species except for some, and polyploid breeding is expected as a method to drastically change the morphology of this species. In the genus Limonium, there are a few reports regarding chromosome doubling using polyploidizing agents [18]. Morgan et al. [19] produced allotetraploids of an interspecific hybrid between L. perezii and L. sinuatum by oryzalin treatment of in vitro shoots. Mori et al. [20] treated the seeds of L. bellidifolium with colchicine and obtained autotetraploids, which tended to produce wider, thicker leaves and larger flowers than diploid plants. To the best of our knowledge in the related literature, there are no reports on the production of autotetraploids or detailed morphological characterization of tetraploid plants in L. sinuatum.
Enhancing the desired traits in L. sinuatum polyploids is a way to create new cultivars with novel attractive traits. Thus, in the present study, we examined the concentration and treatment time of oryzalin required for chromosome doubling in the seeds of L. sinuatum in order to achieve polyploidy breeding in L. sinuatum. We also investigated the morphology of L. sinuatum polyploids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Oryzalin Treatments

We used the seeds of L. sinuatum ‘Early Blue’ (Fukukaen Nursery & Bulb Co. Ltd., Nagoya, Japan). The treatment of seeds with oryzalin was carried out in February 2017. The seeds were surface-disinfected with 70% ethanol for 30 s, immersed in a 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution for 10 min, and then rinsed with distilled water. They were treated with 0, 0.0005, 0.001, or 0.005% oryzalin (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan), which was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 24, 48, or 72 h at 25 °C in the dark on a device (Triple shaker NR-80; Taitec Corporation, Koshigaya, Japan) for shaking culture (80 rpm). Forty seeds were used in one treatment, and five independent experiments were performed. The treated seeds washed with tap water were sown in soil in the cell trays. The cell trays were placed in a greenhouse heated to 20 °C. The grown plants were potted into 7.5-cm plastic pots two months after cultivation, and their survival rate was recorded.

2.2. Flow Cytometry Analysis and Chromosome Count

A flow cytometer (CyFlow PA; Partec GmbH, Görlitz, Germany) was used in flow cytometry (FCM) analysis to estimate the ploidy level of the plants according to the method described by Mori et al. [20] with some modifications. For the analysis, a leaf disc of approximately 1 cm was cut out from a young leaf of plants potted in 7.5-cm pots. Extraction of nuclear DNA and DAPI staining were carried out using a commercial kit (CyStain UV Precise P; Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). The sample solution filtered using a 40-μm mesh filter was analyzed using a flow cytometer.
To confirm the ploidy level, the chromosomes in the root tip cells of diploid and putative tetraploid plants were observed by using previously reported methods [20]. The prepared samples were examined under a light microscope (CX41; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Morphological Characterization

The polyploids potted in 7.5-cm pots were sequentially transferred to 24-cm clay pots from the summer until the autumn of 2017, and then replanted into 45-cm large plastic pots in the summer of 2018.
Morphological characterization of the leaves was performed in October 2017. Five leaves were randomly selected from each plant, and their leaf length, leaf width, leaf soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value, stomatal size, and stomatal density were examined. A chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502 plus; Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure leaf SPAD values. Guard cells that make up the stomata were observed under a scanning electron microscope (Miniscope® TM3030Plus; Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The growth of tetraploids at the flowering stage was examined in March 2018. The plant height, number of shoots per plant, stem wing width, flower length, calyx length, pollen size, pollen shape, stigma shape, and its pollen fertility were examined. Pollens and stigmas were observed under a scanning electron microscope (Miniscope® TM3030Plus). Carmine acetate staining was used for pollen fertility testing.
In June 2019, morphological characterization of mixoploids cultivated for two years in a greenhouse was carried out by examining its stomatal size, stomatal density, pollen size, pollen shape, and stigma shape. The methods of examination were described as above. In addition, the leaf ploidy level was investigated again using a flow cytometer.

2.4. Spike Culture and Growth Characteristics of Regenerated Tetraploid Plants

Spikes were cultured to reproduce the tetraploids of L. sinuatum according to a previous report [21]. Since the spikes are larger than the axillary buds, they are easy to handle and have high reproductive efficiency. The younger the spike, the higher the differentiation rate. Spikes with uncolored calyxes, approximately 1 cm in length, were excised from the bolted flower stalk and surface-disinfected with 70% ethanol for 60 s and immersed in a 2% (w/v) NaClO solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 for 20 min. After three rinses with sterile distilled water, the spikes were cut to approximately 2 mm in length and placed on a shoot regeneration medium, which consisted of the MS medium [22], 1 mg L−1 6-benzyladenine, 30 g L−1 sucrose, and 8 g L−1 agar, in a test tube. They were cultured in a growth chamber at 20 °C under a 16 h day length (photosynthetic photon flux density 35 μmol m−2 s−1) with light-emitting diode lights. Multiple regenerated shoots were subcultured every four weeks with the shoot regeneration medium under the conditions described above. Each shoot excised from multiple shoots was placed on the MS medium without plant growth regulators for four weeks and was then placed on the root regeneration medium, which consisted of the MS medium, 1 mg L−1 α-naphthaleneacetic acid, 30 g L−1 sucrose, and 8 g L−1 agar, in a test tube. Diploid or tetraploid plantlets were cultured for four or six weeks, respectively, under the same culture conditions as those for shoot regeneration.
The regenerated plants were acclimated in a growth chamber at 15 °C under 12 h day length (photosynthetic photon flux density 35 μmol m−2 s−1) with fluorescent lights for three weeks. The cultured plants were potted in 24-cm pots on 15 June 2020, and cultivated in a greenhouse at a ventilation temperature of 10 °C. The number of flower stalks and leaves were recorded every two weeks, and the bolting and flowering days were recorded. Three plants from each strain were investigated.

3. Results

3.1. Oryzalin Treatment

The survival rate of seedlings treated with oryzalin tended to decrease with the increase in treatment time regardless of the treatment concentration (Table 1). The DNA levels of all surviving plants were analyzed using a flow cytometer. Figure 1 presents the histograms from the FCM analysis of the control diploid, tetraploid, and mixoploid plants. A peak of tetraploid was the position with twice that in diploid. Mixoploid plants showed double peaks.
The root tip cells of tetraploid plants had 32 chromosomes, which was twice as high than that of diploid plants. Our analysis showed that three tetraploids were obtained by the seed treatments of oryzalin at 0.001% for 24 h, 0.001% for 72 h, and 0.005% for 48 h. In addition, seven mixoploids were obtained (Table 1).

3.2. Morphological Characteristics of Tetraploid Leaves

A comparison of the morphological characteristics of leaves in tetraploids, which were named Tetra-1, 2, and 3, is shown in Table 2. The leaf width of all three tetraploids was significantly greater than that of the control plant, Cont-A, and the leaves of tetraploids were rounder (Figure 2A). The leaf SPAD values of tetraploids Tetra-2 and Tetra-3 were significantly higher than those of the diploid. The stomatal size of three tetraploids was significantly greater than that of diploids, and the stomatal density of tetraploids was significantly lower than that of the control plant (Figure 2B).

3.3. Morphological Characteristics of Tetraploids at the Flowering Stage

A comparison of the morphological characteristics of tetraploids at the flowering stage is shown in Table 3. The stem wings of tetraploids Tetra-1 and Tetra-2 were more than three times wider than those of the control plant. Although the flower length of all tetraploids was significantly longer than that of the diploid plant, there was no difference in calyx length, which is the main part for ornamental use, between the diploids and tetraploids (Figure 3A,B).
Pollen and stigma types are involved in cross-compatibility. This information is important when using the obtained polyploids for future breeding. There are two pollen types in L. sinuatum: type A with coarse pollen surface, and type B with fine pollen surface. All pollen grains of tetraploids investigated in the present study coincidentally belonged to type A. The pollen width of tetraploids was significantly higher than that of the control, and the tetraploid pollen grains was close to a spherical shape. The pollen grains of diploids were tricolpate with three germinal pores, whereas some observed pollen grains of tetraploids were stephanocolporate with four germinal pores (Figure 3C). There are two types of stigmas in this species: cob-like stigmas and papilla stigmas. Both control diploids and tetraploid stigmas investigated in the present study were cob-like stigmas (Figure 3D). The pollen fertility of Cont-A, Tetra-1, Tetra-2, and Tetra-3 was 86, 66, 82, and 87%, respectively, and the pollen fertility of Tetra-1 was significantly lower than that of the others (data not shown).

3.4. Morphological Characteristics of Mixoploids

The morphological characteristics of survived mixoploids, which were named Mixo-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, at the flowering stage in the second year are shown in Table 4. Ploidy levels in the leaves were analyzed by FCM again at the flowering stage in the second year; Mixo-1, Mixo-2, Mixo-3, Mixo-5, and Mixo-6 were polyploid chimeras consisting of diploid and tetraploid cells, and Mixo-4 was detected only in tetraploid cells. Mixoploids investigated in this study, except for Mixo-4, had type A pollen grains and cob-like stigmas. However, Mixo-4 contained type B pollen grains and papilla stigmas (Figure 4A,B). The stomatal sizes of Mixo-1, Mixo-3, and Mixo-4 were significantly greater than those of the control diploid, and the stomatal density of Mixo-1 and Mixo-3 was significantly lower than that of the diploid. Mixo-2 had a wide range of pollen grains with four germinal pores. Mixo-4 had large pollen grains with four germinal pores.

3.5. Growth of Cultivated Tetraploid Plants

Diploid- and tetraploid-derived cultures except Tetra-2, which were propagated by spike culture, were successfully acclimatized and planted in pots. Tetra-2 could not be successfully cultivated due to complications. In the Cont-A-derived strain (i.e., in the control diploid plants), the leaves were vigorously differentiated, and the plants developed early and produced a large number of flower stalks. The number of leaves and flower stalks of tetraploid Tetra-1- and Tetra-3-derived strains were significantly lower than that of diploids after the middle stage of growth. The number of days from planting to flowering in the Tetra-3-derived strain was high. In the Tetra-1-derived strain, there were few flower stalks, and none reached flowering during the experimental period because of physiological disorders (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Our in vivo seed treatments with oryzalin successfully produced polyploids of L. sinuatum (Table 1). Morgan et al. [19,23] produced interspecific hybrids of L. perezii and L. sinuatum and obtained allotetraploids after an oryzalin treatment of their embryos. These findings indicate that oryzalin treatment is effective for producing polyploid plants in Limonium spp. However, Mori et al. [20] produced tetraploids using in vivo colchicine treatment in L. bellidifolium, and the production rate of tetraploids was higher than that in the present study using in vivo oryzalin treatment in L. sinuatum. In the future, it is necessary to consider the use of colchicine in chromosome doubling of L. sinuatum for its further improvement. In addition, in vitro treatments of spindle toxins may increase the efficiency of chromosome doubling in this species because this treatment has been successfully used to produce tetraploids in various ornamental plant species [9,10,24,25].
Tetraploids of L. sinuatum have wide leaves, large stomata, low stomata density, and large flowers, and these morphological characteristics were consistent with those of polyploid L. bellidifolium [20]. In addition, leaf ovalization [10], stomatal enlargement [26,27,28], and flower enlargement [29,30,31,32,33,34] as a consequence of chromosome doubling has been reported in other ornamental plants. Thick stem wings and inflorescence clogging in the tetraploids obtained in this study are not desirable from an ornamental point of view. The ornamental value of the tetraploids is low, and we consider that these need to be improved by breeding. On the other hand, chromosomal doubling is known to bring resistance to environmental stresses such as drought, salt stress, cold, and heat, in addition to morphological changes [35]. Drought tolerance of tetraploids will be associated with low stomatal density [25]. Environmental stress tolerance is also a desirable trait in ornamental plants and future research is expected to explore this aspect deeper.
Generally, pollen grains of the genus Limonium have three germinal pores. In this study, the pollen grains of diploids had three germinal pores, whereas those of tetraploids had four germinal pores. An increase in the germinal pore number by chromosome doubling has been widely reported in plants [36,37]. In L. sinuatum, the number of germinal pores as well as pollen size in pollen grains is useful as an index to determine the ploidy of pollen.
The cultured Limonium tetraploid strains grew slowly and had a later bolting and flowering times. Polyploid plants have lower growth rates and tend to flower later than the related diploids [38]. Pei et al. [39] reported that tetraploid radishes have later bolting and flowering times than those of diploid radishes, and the levels of endogenous phytohormones gibberellin (GA) 1 and GA4, which are presumed to promote flowering, were higher in diploids than in tetraploids, whereas the amount of abscisic acid, which is considered as a floral repressor, was higher in tetraploids than in diploids. Such physiological changes may also occur in tetraploid Limonium species.
The shoot apical meristem of many higher plants consists of three cell layers: the outermost epidermal layer (L1), the subepidermal layer (L2), and the inner corpus region (L3) [40,41,42]. Cells of the L1 layer form the epidermis, those of the L2 layer form the subepidermal mesophyll and germ cells, and those of the L3 layer form the internal and vascular tissues [40,41,43]. In the present study, we estimated the ploidy of the L1 and L2 layers in Limonium mixoploids based on morphological observations. Mixo-1 and Mix-3 were estimated to be polyploidy periclinal chimeric plants consisting of tetraploid L1 tissue and diploid L2 tissue (layer constitution: L1-L2 = 4x − 2x), because they had larger stomata, and their pollen grains had three germinal pores and were about the same size as those of diploids. Mixo-2 was estimated to be a polyploidy periclinal chimeric plant consisting of diploid L1 tissue and tetraploid L2 tissue (L1-L2 = 2x − 4x) because the stomatal sizes were approximately the same as those of the diploids, and the pollen grains had four germinal pores and were larger than those of diploids. The second FCM analysis and observation indicated that Mixo-4 had tetraploid leaves and flower stalks. This plant was determined to be a mixoploid according to the first FCM analysis in the early growth period, but it was estimated that tetraploid tissue grew more vigorously than diploid tissue during the two-year cultivation period. In Mixo-5 and Mixo-6, no tetraploid tissues were found in our morphological observations, and detailed investigation is required in the future. The mixoploids obtained in the present study will be useful as breeding materials in Limonium polyploidy breeding programs.
In conclusion, tetraploid and mixoploid L. sinuatum plants were successfully obtained by oryzalin treatment of the seeds. However, the chromosomal doubling in L. sinuatum did not provide a sufficient improvement in ornamental value. In the future, we would like to cross a tetraploid with a diploid to create a triploid with desirable traits such as voluminous inflorescence. On the other hand, it is known that chromosomal doubling may affect resistance to stress [38]. We want to investigate the physiological characteristics of polyploidy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and M.Y.; Formal analysis, S.M. and M.Y.; Investigation, S.M., M.Y., A.K., Y.S., Y.U., M.H., Y.H. and N.M.; Resources, M.Y., K.S., N.M., Y.O. and T.W.; Data curation, S.M. and M.Y.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.M.; Writing—review and editing, S.M., M.Y., K.S., N.M., Y.O. and T.W.; Visualization, S.M., M.Y. and N.M.; Supervision, S.M. and M.Y.; Pro ject administration, S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brullo, S.; Pavone, P. Chromosome numbers in the Sicilian species of Limonium Miller (Plumbaginaceae). An. Jard. Bot. Madr. 1981, 37, 535–555. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, H.G. Dimorphism and monomorphism in the Plumbaginaceae: I. A survey of the family. Ann. Bot. 1948, 12, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baker, H.G. Dimorphism and monomorphism in the Plumbaginaceae. II. Pollen and stigmata in the genus Limonium. Ann. Bot. 1953, 17, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baker, H.G. The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution 1966, 20, 349–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Róis, A.S.; Teixeira, G.; Sharbel, T.F.; Fuchs, J.; Martins, S.; Espírito-Santo, D.; Caperta, A.D. Male fertility versus sterility, cytotype, and DNA quantitative variation in seed production in diploid and tetraploid sea lavenders (Limonium sp., Plumbaginaceae) reveal diversity in reproduction modes. Sex Plant Reprod. 2012, 25, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Manzoor, A.; Ahmad, T.; Bashir, M.A.; Hafiz, I.A.; Silvestri, C. Studies on colchicine induced chromosome doubling for enhancement of quality traits in ornamental plants. Plants 2019, 8, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Niazian, M.; Nalousi, A.M. Artificial polyploidy induction for improvement of ornamental and medicinal plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 142, 447–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hancock, J.F. The colchicine story. HortScience 1997, 32, 1011–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nonaka, T.; Oka, E.; Asano, M.; Kuwayama, S.; Tasaki, H.; Han, D.S.; Godo, T.; Nakano, M. Chromosome doubling of Lychnis spp. by in vitro spindle toxin treatment of nodal segments. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thao, N.T.P.; Ureshino, K.; Miyajima, I.; Ozaki, Y.; Okubo, H. Induction of tetraploids in ornamental Alocasia through colchicine and oryzalin treatments. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 72, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sree Ramulu, K.; Verhoeven, H.A.; Dijkhuis, P. Mitotic blocking, micronucleation, and chromosome doubling by oryzalin, amiprophos-methyl, and colchicine in potato. Protoplasma 1991, 160, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kermani, M.J.; Sarasan, V.; Roberts, A.V.; Yokoya, K.; Wentworth, J.; Sieber, V.K. Oryzalin-induced chromosome doubling in Rosa and its effect on plant morphology and pollen viability. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 107, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Allum, J.F.; Bringloe, D.H.; Roberts, A.V. Chromosome doubling in a Rosa rugosa Thunb. hybrid by exposure of in vitro nodes to oryzalin: The effects of node length, oryzalin concentration and exposure time. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 1977–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Talebi, S.F.; Saharkhiz, M.J.; Kermani, M.J.; Sharafi, Y.; Raouf Fard, F. Effect of different antimitotic agents on polyploid induction of anise hyssop (Agastache foeniculum L.). Caryologia 2017, 70, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tosca, A.; Pandoifi, R.; Citterio, S.; Fasoli, A.; Sgorbati, S. Determination by flow cytometry of the chromosome doubling capacity of colchicine and oryzalin in gynogenic haploids of Gerbera. Plant Cell Rep. 1995, 14, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Väinölä, A. Polyploidization and early screening of Rhododendron hybrids. Euphytica 2000, 112, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mo, L.; Chen, J.H.; Chen, F.; Xu, Q.W.; Tong, Z.K.; Huang, H.H.; Dong, R.H.; Lou, X.Z.; Lin, E.P. Induction and characterization of polyploids from seeds of Rhododendron fortunei Lindl. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 2016–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Morgan, E.R.; Funnell, K.A. Limonium. In Ornamental Crops; Rajcan, I., Vollmann, J., Eds.; Handbook of Plant Breeding 11; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morgan, E.R.; Burge, G.K.; Seelye, J.F. Limonium breeding: New options for a well known genus. Acta Hortic. 2001, 552, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mori, S.; Yamane, T.; Yahata, M.; Shinoda, K.; Murata, N. Chromosome doubling in Limonium bellidifolium (Gouan) Dumort. by colchicine treatment of seeds. Hort. J. 2016, 85, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hoshi, N.; Abe, J. Micropropagation system of Limonium sinuatum “I-star” series. Tohoku Agric. Res. 2002, 55, 255–256. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Morgan, E.R.; Burge, G.K.; Seelye, J.F.; Hopping, M.E.; Grant, J.E. Production of inter-specific hybrids between Limonium perezii (Stapf) Hubb. and Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Euphytica 1998, 102, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cohen, D.; Yao, J.L. In vitro chromosome doubling of nine Zantedeschia cultivars. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1996, 47, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fetouh, M.I.; Deng, Z.; Wilson, S.B.; Adams, C.R.; Knox, G.W. Induction and characterization of tetraploids in Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.). Sci. Hortic. 2020, 271, 109482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, C.; Hou, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; Tian, L. Induction of Anthurium andraeanum “Arizona” tetraploid by colchicine in vitro. Euphytica 2011, 181, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gantait, S.; Mandal, N.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Das, P.K. Induction and identification of tetraploids using in vitro colchicine treatment of Gerbera jamesonii Bolus cv. Sciella. Plant. Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2011, 106, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Otani, M.; Ishibe, M.; Inthima, P.; Supaibulwatana, K.; Mori, S.; Niki, T.; Nishijima, T.; Koshioka, M.; Nakano, M. Horticultural characterization of a tetraploid transgenic plant of Tricyrtis sp. carrying the gibberellin 2-oxidase gene. Plant. Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, C.H.; Goeden-Kallemeyn, Y. In vitro induction of tetraploid plants from colchicine-treated diploid daylily callus. Euphytica 1979, 28, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ishizaka, H.; Uematsu, J. Amphidiploids between Cyclamen persicum Mill. and C.hederifolium Aiton induced through colchicine treatment of ovules in vitro and plants. Breed. Sci. 1994, 44, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lindsay, G.C.; Hopping, M.E.; O’Brien, I.E.W. Detection of protoplast-derived DNA tetraploid Lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum) plants by leaf and flower characteristics and by flow cytometry. Plant. Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 1994, 38, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nakano, M.; Nomizu, T.; Mizunashi, K.; Suzuki, M.; Mori, S.; Kuwayama, S.; Hayashi, M.; Umehara, H.; Oka, E.; Kobayashi, H. Somaclonal variation in Tricyrtis hirta plants regenerated from 1-year-old embryogenic callus cultures. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 110, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nimura, M.; Kato, J.; Horaguchi, H.; Mii, M.; Sakai, K.; Katoh, T. Induction of fertile amphidiploids by artificial chromosome-doubling in interspecific hybrid between Dianthus caryophyllus L. and D. japonicus Thunb. Breed. Sci. 2006, 56, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Takamura, T.; Miyajima, I. Colchicine induced tetraploids in yellow-flowered cyclamens and their characteristics. Sci. Hortic. 1996, 65, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. del Pozo, J.C.; Ramirez-Parra, E. Whole genome duplications in plants: An overview from Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6991–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Laws, H.M. Pollen-grain morphology of polyploid Oenotheras. J. Hered. 1965, 56, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Najčevska, C.M.; Speckmann, G.J. Number of chloroplasts and pollen grain pores in diploid and tetraploid varieties of some Trifolium species. Euphytica 1968, 17, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sattler, M.C.; Carvalho, C.R.; Clarindo, W.R. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 2016, 243, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pei, Y.; Yao, N.; He, L.; Deng, D.; Li, W.; Zhang, W. Comparative study of the morphological, physiological and molecular characteristics between diploid and tetraploid radish (Raphunas sativus L.). Sci. Hortic. 2019, 257, 108739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aida, R.; Sasaki, K.; Yoshioka, S.; Noda, N. Chimerism of chrysanthemum stems changes at the nodes during vegetative growth. Plant. Biotechnol. 2020, 37, 373–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huala, E.; Sussex, I.M. Determination and cell interactions in reproductive meristems. Plant. Cell 1993, 5, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Satina, S.; Blakeslee, A.F.; Avery, A.G. Demonstration of the three germ layers in the shoot apex of Datura by means of induced polyploidy in periclinal chimeras. Am. J. Bot. 1940, 27, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hantke, S.S.; Carpenter, R.; Coen, E.S. Expression of floricaula in single cell layers of periclinal chimeras activates downstream homeotic genes in all layers of floral meristems. Development 1995, 121, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Horticulturae 07 00248 g001 550
Figure 1. Histograms from the flow cytometry (FCM) analysis of nuclear DNA content in diploid, tetraploid, and mixoploid Limonium sinuatum plants.
Figure 1. Histograms from the flow cytometry (FCM) analysis of nuclear DNA content in diploid, tetraploid, and mixoploid Limonium sinuatum plants.
Horticulturae 07 00248 g001
Horticulturae 07 00248 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphological characteristics of leaves (A), bars = 5 cm and guard cells (B), bars = 100 μm in diploid and tetraploid Limonium sinuatum plants.
Figure 2. Morphological characteristics of leaves (A), bars = 5 cm and guard cells (B), bars = 100 μm in diploid and tetraploid Limonium sinuatum plants.
Horticulturae 07 00248 g002
Horticulturae 07 00248 g003 550
Figure 3. Morphological characteristics of flower clusters (A), bars = 10 mm, flowers (B), bar = 10 mm, pollen grains (C), bars = 30 μm, and stigmas (D), bars = 100 μm in diploid and tetraploid Limonium sinuatum plants. Arrows indicate the germinal pore.
Figure 3. Morphological characteristics of flower clusters (A), bars = 10 mm, flowers (B), bar = 10 mm, pollen grains (C), bars = 30 μm, and stigmas (D), bars = 100 μm in diploid and tetraploid Limonium sinuatum plants. Arrows indicate the germinal pore.
Horticulturae 07 00248 g003
Horticulturae 07 00248 g004 550
Figure 4. Pollen grains (A), bar = 30 μm and a stigma (B), bar = 100 μm in mixoploid Mixo-4 of Limonium sinuatum. Pollens are type B, and stigma is papilla. Arrows indicate the germinal pore.
Figure 4. Pollen grains (A), bar = 30 μm and a stigma (B), bar = 100 μm in mixoploid Mixo-4 of Limonium sinuatum. Pollens are type B, and stigma is papilla. Arrows indicate the germinal pore.
Horticulturae 07 00248 g004
Horticulturae 07 00248 g005 550
Figure 5. Plants cultivated from diploid Cont-A (A), tetraploid Tetra-1 (B1,B2), and Tetra-3 (C) of Limonium sinuatum. The photos were taken three months after planting. Scale bars: all except B1 = 10 cm, B2 = 5 cm.
Figure 5. Plants cultivated from diploid Cont-A (A), tetraploid Tetra-1 (B1,B2), and Tetra-3 (C) of Limonium sinuatum. The photos were taken three months after planting. Scale bars: all except B1 = 10 cm, B2 = 5 cm.
Horticulturae 07 00248 g005
Horticulturae 07 00248 g006 550
Figure 6. Number of leaves seven weeks after planting (A) and changes in the number of flower stalks (B) in diploid Cont-A-derived strain, tetraploid Tetra-1-derived strain, and Tetra-3-deribed strain of Limonium sinuatum. Arrows in figure (B) indicate the flowering day. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Values followed by different letters were significantly different at the 0.05 level according to the Tukey–Kramer test.
Figure 6. Number of leaves seven weeks after planting (A) and changes in the number of flower stalks (B) in diploid Cont-A-derived strain, tetraploid Tetra-1-derived strain, and Tetra-3-deribed strain of Limonium sinuatum. Arrows in figure (B) indicate the flowering day. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Values followed by different letters were significantly different at the 0.05 level according to the Tukey–Kramer test.
Horticulturae 07 00248 g006
Table
Table 1. Effect of oryzalin seed treatment on the survival and ploidy level of Limonium sinuatum seedlings 1.
Table 1. Effect of oryzalin seed treatment on the survival and ploidy level of Limonium sinuatum seedlings 1.
Concentration
(%)		Period
(h)		No. of Seeds Treated% of Surviving SeedlingsNo. of Seedlings at Each Ploidy Level 2
DiploidTetraploidMixoploids
(2x)(4x)(2x + 4x)
0 (control)020066.0 a 312300
0.00052420043.5 ab9400
0.00054820026.5 bc5001
0.00057220022.5 bc3102
0.0012420038.5 bc7410
0.0014820033.0 bc6201
0.0017220016.0 cc1611
0.0052420039.0 bc7400
0.0054820028.5 bc4912
0.0057220018.5 bc2500
1 Data were recorded two months after the oryzalin treatment. 2 Ploidy level was determined by flow cytometry using one leaf from each plant. 3 Values represent the means of five independent experiments, each consisting of 40 seeds. Values within the same column followed by different letters were significantly different at the level of 0.05 according to the Tukey–Kramer test.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of leaf morphological characteristics of tetraploid Limonium sinuatum 1.
Table 2. Comparison of leaf morphological characteristics of tetraploid Limonium sinuatum 1.
Plant StrainPloidy LevelLeaf Length
(mm)		Leaf Width
(mm)		Leaf Index 2Leaf SPAD Value 3Stomatal Size (μm)Stomatal Density (no. mm−2)
LengthWidth
Cont-A2x98.2 b 426.2 b0.26 b39.6 b33.4 c23.4 b67.0 a
Tetra-14x119.0 ab51.8 a0.44 a39.3 b46.0 b30.5 a51.7 b
Tetra-24x125.0 a49.4 a0.40 a53.0 a47.2 a30.4 a39.0 c
Tetra-34x133.8 a52.6 a0.39 a52.4 a47.4 a30.3 a26.9 d
1 Five randomly selected leaves were measured from each plant. 2 Leaf index represents leaf width/leaf length. 3 SPAD = Soil Plant Analysis Development. 4 Values within the same column followed by different letters were significantly different at the 0.05 level according to the Tukey–Kramer test.
Table
Table 3. Comparison of the morphological characteristics of tetraploid Limonium sinuatum plants at the flowering stage 1.
Table 3. Comparison of the morphological characteristics of tetraploid Limonium sinuatum plants at the flowering stage 1.
Plant StrainPloidy LevelPlant Height (cm)No. of Shoot per PlantStem Wing (mm) 2Flower Length (mm)Calyx Length (mm)Pollen Size (μm)No. of Germinal Pores 3Type of Pollen GrainType of Stigma in Pistils
LengthWidth
Cont-A2x52142.2 b14.2 b 412.6 a54.4 a39.9 b3Acob-like
Tetra-14x59127.9 a16.5 a11.7 a53.9 a48.5 a4Acob-like
Tetra-24x55108.2 a17.2 a13.4 a56.4 a52.8 a4Acob-like
Tetra-34x45124.5 b17.3 a12.3 a56.7 a51.5 a4Acob-like
1 Five randomly selected shoots, flowers, and pollen grains were investigated from each plant. 2 The stem wing width was measured from the center of the stem to the end of the wing. 3 Number of germinal pores of pollen grains was observed. 4 Values within the same column followed by different letters were significantly different at the 0.05 level according to the Tukey–Kramer test.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of the morphological characteristics of mixoploid Limonium sinuatum plants at the flowering stage in the second year 1.
Table 4. Comparison of the morphological characteristics of mixoploid Limonium sinuatum plants at the flowering stage in the second year 1.
Plant StrainStomatal Size (μm)Stomatal Density (no. mm−2)Pollen Size (μm)No. of Germinal Pores 2Type of Pollen GrainsType of Stigma of PistilsPloidy Level of Leaf 3L1-L2 Putative Ploidy Level
LengthWidthLengthWidth
Cont-A35.1 d 421.1 de77.2 bc52.5 bc42.5 bc3Acob-like2x-
Mixo-145.8 b28.9 b42.7 d56.5 ab46.7 ab3Acob-like2x + 4x4x − 2x
Mixo-233.1 d21.9 cd80.4 bc57.4 ab48.9 a4Acob-like2x + 4x2x − 4x
Mixo-355.8 a31.4 a26.9 d52.0 bc42.3 bc3Acob-like2x + 4x4x − 2x
Mixo-440.6 c24.1 c58.9 cd60.8 a44.9 ab4Bpapilla4x4x − 4x
Mixo-527.8 e19.2 e130.3 a49.6 c39.6 c3Acob-like2x + 4x2x − 2x
Mixo-628.6 e20.3 de100.8 ab52.6 bc42.7 bc3Acob-like2x + 4x2x − 2x
1 Three randomly selected leaves and 12 randomly selected pollen grains were investigated from each plant. 2 Number of germinal pores of pollen grains was observed. 3 Ploidy levels of leaves were analyzed by flow cytometry at the flowering stage in the second year. 4 Values within the same column followed by different letters were significantly different at the 0.05 level according to the Tukey–Kramer test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mori, S.; Yahata, M.; Kuwahara, A.; Shirono, Y.; Ueno, Y.; Hatanaka, M.; Honda, Y.; Sugiyama, K.; Murata, N.; Okamoto, Y.; et al. Morphological Characterization of Tetraploids of Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Produced by Oryzalin Treatment of Seeds. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080248

AMA Style

Mori S, Yahata M, Kuwahara A, Shirono Y, Ueno Y, Hatanaka M, Honda Y, Sugiyama K, Murata N, Okamoto Y, et al. Morphological Characterization of Tetraploids of Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Produced by Oryzalin Treatment of Seeds. Horticulturae. 2021; 7(8):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mori, Shiro, Masaki Yahata, Ayano Kuwahara, Yurina Shirono, Yasufumi Ueno, Misaki Hatanaka, Yoshimi Honda, Keita Sugiyama, Naho Murata, Yoshihiro Okamoto, and et al. 2021. "Morphological Characterization of Tetraploids of Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Produced by Oryzalin Treatment of Seeds" Horticulturae 7, no. 8: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop