Next Article in Journal
Genetic Variation in Response to N, P, or K Deprivation in Baby Leaf Lettuce
Previous Article in Journal
The Bacterial Soft Rot Pathogens, Pectobacterium carotovorum and P. atrosepticum, Respond to Different Classes of Virulence-Inducing Host Chemical Signals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suitability of Hydroponically-Grown Rumex acetosa L. as Fresh-Cut Produce
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis of Fruit and Agronomic Traits of Tropical Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) in an Organic Production System

by
Angel R. Del Valle Echevarria
1,
Alexandra Campbell
1,
Theodore J. K. Radovich
1,
Tia Silvasy
1,
Sarah Moore
2 and
Michael B. Kantar
1,*
1
Department of Tropical Plants and Soil Sciences, University of Hawai’i-Mānoa, 3190 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
2
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2020, 6(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6010014
Submission received: 5 January 2020 / Revised: 3 February 2020 / Accepted: 24 February 2020 / Published: 2 March 2020

Abstract

:
Interest in the development of organically grown vegetable crops has risen over the past decades due to consumer preferences. However, most crops that have desirable consumer traits have been bred in conventional growing conditions, and their transfer to an organic setting is challenging. Here, the organically grown Hawaiian pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) accession ‘Shima’ was crossed with the conventionally grown Puerto Rican variety ‘Taina Dorada’ to develop a backcross (BC1) population, where ‘Shima’ was the recurrent parent. A total of 202 BC1 (‘Shima’ X F1) progenies were planted in a certified organic field, and twelve traits were evaluated. We used genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) to identify the Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) associated with insect tolerance along with commercially desirable traits. A total of 1582 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified, from which 711 SNPs were used to develop a genetic map and perform QTL mapping. Reads associated with significant QTLs were aligned to the publicly available Cucurbita moschata genome and identified several markers linked to genes that have been previously reported to be associated with that trait in other crop systems, such as melon (Cucumis melo L.). This research provides a resource for marker-assisted selection (MAS) efforts in Cucurbita moschata, as well as serving as a model study to improve cultivars that are transitioning from a conventional to an organic setting.

1. Introduction

Conventional breeding efforts have focused on selecting in high levels of inorganic fertilizer and crop protection inputs. Consequently, crops that are bred in conventional farming practices often struggle when they are transferred to low-input organic systems [1]. Organic farming looks for resilient crops that have adapted to agroecosystems containing different levels of inputs, diverse soil microorganisms, increased weed pressure, and insect pressure [2]. Plant breeding efforts in organic farming conditions has become increasingly popular due to consumer preference and the urgency of producing food in somewhat unstable environments, while still maximizing its yield [3].
The use of molecular markers has become a viable way to identify genetic loci associated with desired phenotypes in parallel with successful establishment in an organic setting [4,5]. However, most of these approaches focus on major crops such as wheat [6], sweet corn [4], tomato [7], and barley [8], and few studies are focused on smaller crops such as pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata: 2n = 2x = 40). Hawai’i presents a unique opportunity to focus on molecular characterization for plant breeding on small crops due to its fertile soils [9], year-round growing environment [10], and consumer demand for organic products [11].
Tropical pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) is an important crop worldwide due to its nutritional value and wide adaptability [12]. Unfortunately, pumpkin is susceptible to insect damage from the Lepidoptera species, mainly Diaphania nitidalis (pickleworm) [13]. Pickleworm is major cucurbit pest [14], which is very common worldwide and in Hawai’i [15]. Pickleworm burrows into the blossom, as well as the immature fruit, negatively impacting the overall yield, fruit quality, and perishability of the mature fruit [14]. Biocontrol measures against pickleworm provides mixed results and often is not reliable [16].
‘Shima’ is a locally collected accession observed to have some pickleworm tolerance and has a slightly ribbed, flattened shape with yellowish flesh and weighing between 1–3 kg, traits desired by southeast Asian consumers but lacking broader market acceptance. ‘Taina Dorada’ is a cultivar developed in Puerto Rico [17] that has a smooth, spheroid-to-oblate spheroid shape, and high-quality flesh that is darker orange than ‘Shima’, with fruit weighing about twice that of ‘Shima’. The darker orange color of ‘Taina Dorada’ is more broadly preferred in some markets than the yellowish flesh of ‘Shima’, while the putative insect tolerance of ‘Shima’ has obvious benefits for organic systems.
The purpose of this study was to determine genetic associations on pumpkin fruit marketability and insect tolerance in a certified organic production setting. These two parental lines that show insect tolerance (‘Shima’) and consumer appeal (‘Taina Dorada’) were used to develop a mapping population. A backcross population with ‘Shima’ as the recurrent parent was genotyped using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) to identify Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) associated with insect tolerance and fruit marketability. Our study has two main contributions: (1) seed that can be used to develop new lines that are insect tolerant and appealing to the consumer and (2) give genetic information that can be used to study other similar traits in organic environments for vegetables transitioning from conventional to organic farming.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Development of the Mapping Population

‘Shima’ was crossed to ‘Taina Dorada’ as the seed parent to develop the F1 population. The F1 was then crossed as the pollen parent to ‘Shima’. The BC1 population was grown at the University of Hawai’i Waimanalo Agricultural Research Station (see Field Conditions).

2.2. Field Conditions

The University of Hawai’i Waimanalo Agricultural Research Station (UH-WARS) is located at the island of Oahu (21.3355° N, 157.7148° W) in the State of Hawai’i. This tropical environment has varying temperatures from 20–29 degrees Celsius (68–84 degrees Fahrenheit), an average annual rainfall of 140 cm (55 in), and a mollisols soil type. The BC1 population was planted on 9 September 2016 (96 individual) and 5 January 2017 (106 individuals). The organic plots were 15 × 30.5 m (50 × 100 ft), and standard organic practices were implemented. Tropical pumpkin has about a 150 day growing period, and flowering time is approximately eight weeks. Seedlings were planted in the UH-WARS greenhouse and transplanted to the field at two weeks of age. We applied granular organic fertilizer (Sustane; Sustane Corp., Cannon Falls, MN at a rate of 150 lbs/acre) two weeks before planting and incorporated it into the top 6” of soil. An organic pesticide rotation program was implemented starting at the 5th leaf growth stage until flowering was complete, applied every 10 days. Fruit fly traps were hung in empty modified 2-L plastic bottles at time of flowering and fruit set. Weed control was performed by hand hoeing.

2.3. Evaluation of Traits

A total of twelve traits were evaluated in the BC1 population. These traits include: fresh pumpkin weight, Diaphania nitidalis (pickleworm) damage, pumpkin height, cavity volume, thickness of the flesh outside and inside the rib, height of the pumpkin cavity inside and outside rib, cavity width, overall flesh color intensity, flesh red color intensity, and flesh yellow color intensity. Fresh pumpkin weight was measured in pounds (lbs) using a weight scale. Pickleworm damage was visually determined by using the following rubric: 0 = no damage, 1 = some damage (~one worm scar), 2 = two scars, 3 = three scars, and 4 = four or more scars. Flesh thickness, cavity height, and cavity width measurements were done with a ruler in cm. Color intensity measurements were used with a Nix color sensor (Nix Sensor Ltd., Hamilton, Ontario,) using black (overall intensity), red (red intensity), and yellow (yellow intensity) cards to calibrate the colorimeter to then measure the pumpkin flesh.

2.4. DNA Extraction and Genotype-by-Sequencing (GBS)

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaf tissue BC1 individuals using the E.N.Z.A. SP Plant DNA Kit (Omega BioTek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. DNA was quantified and assessed for quality by using Nanodrop 1000 Spectrophotometer V3.8 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmilton, DE, USA). DNA samples were sent to Data2Bio, LLC (Ames, IA, USA) for tGBS® Genotype by Sequencing technology (2-bp selection); they provided a full report of sequencing, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) calling, and linkage map creation using R/qtl [18,19]. Briefly, Data2Bio generated consensus sequences that could be used to call SNPs without a reference by using quality trimmed reads from all samples, which were combined and normalized to a maximum of 50× coverage. Briefly, quality trimmed reads from all samples were combined and normalized to a maximum of 50× coverage. The sequencing errors in the reads were then corrected using Fiona [20]. Coverage-normalized and error-corrected reads were then condensed using CD-HIT-454 with ≥96% identity to form consensus clusters. Clusters with <10 component reads and <50 bp in length were discarded. A total of 356,440 consensus sequences were obtained with a total sequence length of 35.5 Mb. SNPs were filtered using stringent criteria, where the minimum call rate was ≥50%, the allele number was 2, the number of genotypes was ≥2, the minor Allele Frequency (MAF) was >10%, and the heterozygosity rate was between 25 and 75%. Raw reads are available within the NCBI Short read achieve with project number SRX4484561.

2.5. Linkage Map Development and Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping

In order to create the linkage map, the following parameters were used in R/qtl software, a recombination frequency of 0.35, a LOD cut off of 8, and a minimum number of SNPs per linkage group of 10, with the Haldane mapping function. While there are 20 chromosomes, attempts to combine linkage groups to match the number of chromosomes were unsuccessful as there were not enough linked markers to achieve this. R/qtl was used in R software version 3.5.0 [18] following Broman et al. [19] suggestions for QTL identification. All traits were evaluated for the identification of QTLs based on their phenotypic distribution (Figures S1–S3) using the “scanone” function, in which 10,000 permutations were performed using the “n.perm” argument to determine the significance threshold at alpha = 0.05. Traits that showed a normal distribution such as fresh pumpkin weight, pumpkin height, thickness of the flesh outside and inside the rib, and height of the pumpkin cavity inside and outside rib were analyzed using the “hk”, Haley–Knott regression method (Figure S1). Traits that showed bimodal distribution such as cavity width, overall flesh color intensity, flesh red color intensity, and flesh yellow color intensity were analyzed using the “2part” method (Figure S2). Finally, traits that showed a nonparametric distribution, such as Diaphania nitidalis (pickleworm) damage and cavity volume, were analyzed using the “np” method (Figure S3). Traits that showed peaks that were greater than the calculated threshold were determined as significant, and markers were identified using the “summary” function that had the permutation (perm) and alpha (0.05) arguments. Coordinates in the genetic map are provided, and by using the “find.marker” function, the significant read (or SNP) was identified.

2.6. Genomic Analysis

Individual GBS reads that contained a SNP that showed a statistically significant association with any given trait in the QTL analysis were aligned against the pumpkin genome [21] that is publicly available through the Cucurbit Genomics Database [22] using the BLAST tool [23]. Coordinates and annotations are summarized in Table S1. GBS marker reads that seem to have a positive hit on a gene model were compared with the melon (Cucumis melo L.) genome [24] to identify possible gene functions and find associations with the evaluated traits of this study (Table S2).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Genotype-by-Sequencing

A total of 560.8 million reads were processed from the BC1 plants after sequencing with an average of 2.8 million reads per sample. After quality filter checks, 483.8 million reads at 106 bp in length were obtained with an average of 2.4 million reads per sample. A total of 356,440 consensus sequences were generated that could be used in lieu of a reference genome for alignment and SNP calling. Subsequently, all SNPs identified were filtered to explore different missing data rates used for genotyping across the samples. The resulting numbers of SNPs remaining, missing data points, and detected polymorphism rate for each minimum calling rate (MCR) level are displayed in Table 1.

3.2. Linkage Map

Subsequently, a subset of 1582 SNPs that had less than 50% missing data across the BC1 population was used to construct a genetic map from the 202 individuals in the population. Of the 1582 MCR50 SNPs, 711 (i.e., 44.9%) were successfully mapped. The resulting genetic map consisted of 24 linkage groups with an overall genetic length of 2665 cM and an average spacing of 3.7 cMs (Figure 1). The mapping was unable to achieve a chromosome level resolution as in recent studies [21] due to an insufficient number of markers, but the map did provide close to a chromosome-level number of linkage groups that provide utility in tropical pumpkin breeding.

3.3. QTL Mapping and Genomic Analysis.

The 202 BC1 progeny were evaluated for 12 agronomically important traits relevant to marketability and organic production (Table 2). We observed variability among the traits, so we analyzed their distribution to determine the appropriate model for QTL analysis. Four traits showed statistically significant QTLs across the pumpkin genome (Figure 2). Among these four traits, eight markers were associated with at least one trait, and one marker, Pumpkin_164349 in linkage group 9, was associated with three of the four traits (Table S1). We used the publicly available pumpkin genome to evaluate the reads that were significantly associated with the evaluated traits (Table S1; [22,23,24]). Two markers, Pumpkin_89537 and Pumpkin_216447, showed multiple hits in the pumpkin genome, very likely associated with repetitive regions in the genome, and were disregarded for further analysis. Six of the eight markers were homologous to a region in the pumpkin genome that had a gene model. We took the sequence of these gene models and compared them to the Melon genome [25] by sequence analysis (Tables S1 and S2; [23,24]). We decided to analyze our data against the melon genome, because there have been several QTL and genomic studies on melon fruit quality that are similar to our study [26,27,28]. Markers associated with fruit flesh color intensity Pumpkin_282381, Pumpkin_93626, Pumpkin_164349, Pumpkin_46427, Pumpkin_210956, and Pumpkin_221779 aligned with pumpkin gene models whose orthologs in melon have been measured to be differentially regulated in green versus orange fruit color [26] and fruit flesh tissue [27]. In parallel, Pumpkin_164349, which our study showed to be associated with pickleworm tolerance, aligns with CmoCh15G001520, a clathrin heavy chain protein encoding gene orthologous to MELO3C008306 that has been observed to be upregulated in Fusarium infections [28]. These markers may serve for future molecular breeding efforts to develop cultivars well adapted to organic production systems with broad consumer acceptance.

4. Conclusions

Although we focused on molecular pumpkin breeding from conventional to organic farming in Hawai’i, this strategy can be applied to any crop whose main production occurs in a conventional setting and consumers demand an organically grown alternative. Indeed, we found that new technologies were as successful in this understudied system as in others [29,30]. Furthermore, our genetic and genomic information can be used to improve the genome assembly of pumpkin. Initially, we compared our 1582 marker reads against the genome and identified that 325 (20%) marker reads mapped to chromosome 0 (data not shown). We identified large effect QTL for agronomic and quality traits that are important for the Hawaiian pumpkin market. The populations and markers developed here are currently being used in the further development of tropical pumpkin. Further, studies using segregating populations, GBS, and higher sequence depth could produce high-quality genomes that could serve for future genetic and genomic studies for crop improvement.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/6/1/14/s1, Figure S1: Phenotypic distribution of traits evaluated by the Harley-Knott (hk) regression method in R/qtl, Figure S2: Phenotypic distribution of traits evaluated by 2-part, also known as bimodal, method in R/qtl, Figure S3: Figure S3. Phenotypic distribution of traits evaluated by non-parametric method in R/qtl. Table S1: Sequence analysis between significant reads in this study and the pumpkin genome, Table S2: Table S2. Genomic comparison between C. moshata gene models and Cucumis melo genome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.K. and T.J.K.R.; methodology, S.M., A.C., T.S.; formal analysis, A.C., A.R.D.V.E.; investigation, data curation, M.B.K., A.R.D.V.E.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C., A.R.D.V.E.; writing—review and editing, M.B.K., T.J.K.R., S.M., T.S.; project administration, S.M., T.S.; funding acquisition, M.B.K., T.J.K.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by USDA-ARS cooperative agreement 58-5320-4-020 the Control of Pests and Diseases and Adding Value to Specialty Crops.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.; Jones, S.S.; Tamm, L.; Murphy, K.M.; Myers, J.R.; Leifert, C.; Messmer, M.M. The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2011, 58, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.; Struik, P.C.; Jacobsen, E. Ecological concepts in organic farming and their consequences for an organic crop ideotype. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2002, 50, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lammerts van Bueren, E.T.; Struik, P.C.; van Eekeren, N.; Nuijten, E. Towards resilience through systems-based plant breeding. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 38, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Andersen, M.M.; Landes, X.; Xiang, W.; Anyshchenko, A.; Falhof, J.; Østerberg, J.T.; Olsen, L.I.; Edenbrandt, A.K.; Vedel, S.E.; Thorsen, B.J.; et al. Feasibility of new breeding techniques for organic farming. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Nuijten, E.; Messmer, M.; Lammerts van Bueren, E. Concepts and strategies of organic plant breeding in light of novel breeding techniques. Sustainability 2016, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zou, J.; Semagn, K.; Iqbal, M.; N’Diaye, A.; Chen, H.; Asif, M.; Navabi, A.; Perez Lara, E.; Pozniak, C.J.; Yang, R.-C.; et al. Mapping QTLs controlling agronomic traits in the ‘Attila’בCDC Go’spring wheat population under organic management using 90K SNP array. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lammerts van Bueren, E.; Backes, G.; De Vriend, H.; Østergård, H. The role of molecular markers and marker assisted selection in breeding for organic agriculture. Euphytica 2010, 175, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wolfe, M.S.; Baresel, J.P.; Desclaux, D.; Goldringer, I.; Hoad, S.; Kovacs, G.M.; Löschenberger, F.; Miedaner, T.; Østergård, H.; Lammerts van Bueren, E.T. Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture. Euphytica 2008, 163, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ahmad, A.A.; Radovich, T.J.; Nguyen, H.V.; Uyeda, J.; Arakaki, A.; Cadby, J.; Paull, R.; Sugano, J.; Teves, G. Use of organic fertilizers to enhance soil fertility, plant growth, and yield in a tropical environment. In Organic Fertilizers-From Basic Concepts to Applied Outcomes; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 85–108. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones, A.M.P.; Murch, S.J.; Ragone, D. Diversity of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis, Moraceae) seasonality: A resource for year-round nutrition. Econ. Bot. 2010, 64, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Loke, M.K.; Xu, X.; Leung, P. Estimating organic, local, and other price premiums in the Hawaii fluid milk market. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 2824–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Radovich, T. Pumpkin and Squash (Cucurbita spp). In Farm and Forestry Production and Marketing Profiles for Pacific Islands; Elevitch, C.R., Ed.; Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR): Hōlualoa, HI, USA, 2011; pp. 341–354. [Google Scholar]
  13. Elsey, K.D. Resistance mechanisms in Cucurbita moschata to pickleworm and melonworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 1985, 78, 1048–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leiner, R.C.; Spafford, H. Oviposition Preferences of Pickleworm (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Relation to a Potential Push–Pull Cropping Management Approach. Environ. Entomol. 2016, 45, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jang, E.B.; Klungness, L.M.; Mcquate, G.T. Extension of the use of Augmentoria for Sanitation in a cropping system susceptible to the alien terphritid fruit flies (Diptera: Terphritidae) in Hawaii. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2007, 11, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rocha Gonring, A.H.; Picanço, M.C.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Puiatti, M.; Semeão, A. Natural biological control and key mortality factors of the pickleworm, Diaphania nitidalis Stoll (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in cucumber. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2003, 20, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wessel-Beaver, L. Release of Tropical Pumpkin ‘Taina Dorada’. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 2013, 97, 97–100. [Google Scholar]
  18. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 24 February 2020).
  19. Broman, K.W.; Wu, H.; Sen, Ś.; Churchill, G.A. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 889–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Schulz, M.H.; Weese, D.; Holtgrewe, M.; Dimitrova, V.; Niu, S.; Reinert, K.; Richard, H. Fiona: A parallel and automatic strategy for read error correction. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, i356–i363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhong, Y.J.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Li, J.X.; Yu, T.; Wu, T.Q.; Luo, J.N.; Luo, S.B.; Huang, H.X. A high-density linkage map and QTL mapping of fruit-related traits in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sun, H.; Wu, S.; Zhang, G.; Jiao, C.; Guo, S.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Gong, G.; Jia, Z.; et al. Karyotype Stability and Unbiased Fractionation in the Paleo- Allotetraploid Cucurbita Genomes. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 1293–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zheng, Y.; Wu, S.; Bai, Y.; Sun, H.; Jiao, C.; Guo, S.; Zhao, K.; Blanca, J.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, S.; et al. Cucurbit Genomics Database (CuGenDB): A central portal for comparative and functional genomics in cucurbit crops. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 47, D1128–D1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Garcia-Mas, J.; Benjak, A.; Sanseverino, W.; Bourgeois, M.; Mir, G.; González, V.M.; Hénaff, E.; Câmara, F.; Cozzuto, L.; Lowy, E.; et al. The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11872–11877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chayut, N.; Yuan, H.; Ohali, S.; Meir, A.; Yeselson, Y.; Portnoy, V.; Zheng, Y.; Fei, Z.; Lewinsohn, E.; Katzir, N.; et al. A bulk segregant transcriptome analysis reveals metabolic and cellular processes associated with Orange allelic variation and fruit β-carotene accumulation in melon fruit. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Latrasse, D.; Rodriguez-Granados, N.Y.; Veluchamy, A.; Mariappan, K.G.; Bevilacqua, C.; Crapart, N.; Camps, C.; Sommard, V.; Raynaud, C.; Dogimont, C.; et al. The quest for epigenetic regulation underlying unisexual flower development in Cucumis melo. Epigenetics Chromatin 2017, 10, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sebastiani, M.S.; Bagnaresi, P.; Sestili, S.; Biselli, C.; Zechini, A.; Orrù, L.; Cattivelli, L.; Ficcadenti, N. Transcriptome Analysis of the melon-Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis race 1.2 pathosystem in susceptible and resistant plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Mahesh, S.; Leelambika, M.; Jaheer, M.; Anithakumari, A.M.; Sathyanarayanam, N. Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of agronomic traits in Indian Mucuna pruriens using an intraspecific F2 population. J. Genet. 2016, 95, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bajgain, P.; Zhang, X.; Turner, M.K.; Curlanf, R.D.; Heim, B.; Dill-Macky, R.; Ishimaru, C.A.; Anderson, J.A.; Ishimaru, C.A.; Anderson, J.A. Characterization of genetic resistance to Fusarium head blight and bacterial leaf streak in intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium). Agronomy 2019, 9, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Genetic map of Cucurbita moschata. R/qtl analysis generated 24 linkage groups based on genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) data from ‘Shima’X [‘Shima’ X ‘Taina Dorada’] population. Of the 1582 MCR50 SNPs, 711 were used to generate the genetic map.
Figure 1. Genetic map of Cucurbita moschata. R/qtl analysis generated 24 linkage groups based on genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) data from ‘Shima’X [‘Shima’ X ‘Taina Dorada’] population. Of the 1582 MCR50 SNPs, 711 were used to generate the genetic map.
Horticulturae 06 00014 g001
Figure 2. Significant QTLs identified in the BC1 pumpkin population. (A) Diaphania nitidalis (pickleworm) damage visible on the pumpkin surface showed one peak in linkage groups: 1, 9, and 15. (B) Cavity width showed one peak in linkage group 1. (C) Flesh color intensity showed one peak in linkage groups 1, 9, 12, and 17. (D) Red color intensity in the fruit flesh showed one peak in linkage groups 1, 9, 12, 15, and 17. Each of the analyses implemented 10,000 permutations to establish a threshold at alpha = 0.05.
Figure 2. Significant QTLs identified in the BC1 pumpkin population. (A) Diaphania nitidalis (pickleworm) damage visible on the pumpkin surface showed one peak in linkage groups: 1, 9, and 15. (B) Cavity width showed one peak in linkage group 1. (C) Flesh color intensity showed one peak in linkage groups 1, 9, 12, and 17. (D) Red color intensity in the fruit flesh showed one peak in linkage groups 1, 9, 12, 15, and 17. Each of the analyses implemented 10,000 permutations to establish a threshold at alpha = 0.05.
Horticulturae 06 00014 g002
Table 1. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) genotyping summary. MCR50 was selected as the appropriate cut-off for this study. At this cut-off, the % polymorphism was ~0.18%.
Table 1. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) genotyping summary. MCR50 was selected as the appropriate cut-off for this study. At this cut-off, the % polymorphism was ~0.18%.
Minimum Calling Rate (MCR)No. SNPsMissing Data Points% Polymorphisms *
MCR50158282,434/314,818 = 26.2%1582/859,838 = 0.18%
MCR60110139,111/219,099 = 17.9%1101/699,932 = 0.16%
MCR7080518,318/160,195 = 11.4%805/578,022 = 0.14%
MCR806178861/122,783 = 7.2%617/460,450 = 0.13%
MCR904153069/82,585 = 3.7%415/346,589 = 0.12%
Table 2. Traits measured in the BC1 population.
Table 2. Traits measured in the BC1 population.
TraitMean +/− Standard Error
Fresh pumpkin weight4.8 +/− 0.18 lbs
Diaphania nitidalis (pickleworm) damage0.9 +/− 0.08 z
Cavity volume392.4 +/− 17.09 mL
Thickness of the flesh outside the rib3.3 +/− 0.09 cm
Thickness of the flesh inside the rib3.2 +/− 0.09 cm
Height of the pumpkin cavity outside rib18.5 +/− 0.25 cm
Height of the pumpkin cavity inside rib17.6 +/− 0.22 cm
Cavity width11.7 +/− 0.51 cm
Overall flesh color intensity63.3 +/− 1.19 y
Flesh red color intensity22.0 +/− 1.20 x
Flesh yellow color intensity46.1 +/− 2.34 w
z Visual evaluation: 0 = no damage, 1 = some damage (~one worm scar), 2 = two worm scars, 3 = three worm scars, and 4 = four or more worm scars. y Colorimeter calibrated with a black background: 0–50 is a darker color and 51–100 is a lighter color intensity. x Colorimeter calibrated with a cherry red piece of paper, where negative values were on the green side of the spectrum and positive values were on the red side of the spectrum. w Colorimeter calibrated with a yellow piece of paper, where negative values were on the blue side of the spectrum and positive values were on the yellow side of the spectrum.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Del Valle Echevarria, A.R.; Campbell, A.; Radovich, T.J.K.; Silvasy, T.; Moore, S.; Kantar, M.B. Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis of Fruit and Agronomic Traits of Tropical Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) in an Organic Production System. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6010014

AMA Style

Del Valle Echevarria AR, Campbell A, Radovich TJK, Silvasy T, Moore S, Kantar MB. Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis of Fruit and Agronomic Traits of Tropical Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) in an Organic Production System. Horticulturae. 2020; 6(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Del Valle Echevarria, Angel R., Alexandra Campbell, Theodore J. K. Radovich, Tia Silvasy, Sarah Moore, and Michael B. Kantar. 2020. "Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis of Fruit and Agronomic Traits of Tropical Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) in an Organic Production System" Horticulturae 6, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae6010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop