Next Article in Journal
A Dark Septate Endophyte Improves Cadmium Tolerance of Maize by Modifying Root Morphology and Promoting Cadmium Binding to the Cell Wall and Phosphate
Next Article in Special Issue
Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization and Antifungal Susceptibility of Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto Isolated from a Feline Sporotrichosis Outbreak in Bangkok, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Histone Acetyltransferase Rtt109 Regulates Development, Morphogenesis, and Citrinin Biosynthesis in Monascus purpureus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preservation Methods in Isolates of Sporothrix Characterized by Polyphasic Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/jof9050533
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Progress in Sporothrix brasiliensis Basic Aspects

by
Manuela Gómez-Gaviria
,
José A. Martínez-Álvarez
and
Héctor M. Mora-Montes
*
Departamento de Biología, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Campus Guanajuato, Universidad de Guanajuato, Noria Alta s/n, col. Noria Alta, Guanajuato 36050, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(5), 533; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050533
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 28 April 2023 / Published: 29 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Sporothrix and Sporotrichosis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sporotrichosis is known as a subacute or chronic infection, which is caused by thermodimorphic fungi of the genus Sporothrix. It is a cosmopolitan infection, which is more prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions and can affect both humans and other mammals. The main etiological agents causing this disease are Sporothrix schenckii, Sporothrix brasiliensis, and Sporothrix globosa, which have been recognized as members of the Sporothrix pathogenic clade. Within this clade, S. brasiliensis is considered the most virulent species and represents an important pathogen due to its distribution and prevalence in different regions of South America, such as Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Paraguay, and Central American countries, such as Panama. In Brazil, S. brasiliensis has been of great concern due to the number of zoonotic cases that have been reported over the years. In this paper, a detailed review of the current literature on this pathogen and its different aspects will be carried out, including its genome, pathogen-host interaction, resistance mechanisms to antifungal drugs, and the caused zoonosis. Furthermore, we provide the prediction of some putative virulence factors encoded by the genome of this fungal species.

1. Introduction

Mycoses, particularly those caused by dimorphic fungi, are considered a constant threat to public health [1]. Sporotrichosis is a mycosis that affects humans and other animals and is regarded as the most frequent subcutaneous fungal infection in Latin America [2]. Many types of clinical manifestations have been described for sporotrichosis; among them, the lymphocutaneous form is the most common in immunocompetent individuals, while the deep-seated infection is common in immunocompromised patients, increasing both morbidity and mortality rates [3,4]. For many years this disease was attributed to a single etiological agent, the species known as Sporothrix schenckii. However, phylogenetic studies revealed that this organism was a complex of cryptic species, four of which are of medical interest, Sporothrix globosa, Sporothrix luriei, Sporothrix brasiliensis, and S. schenckii [5,6]. Later, by molecular phylogenetic studies, these four species were grouped in the Sporothrix pathogenic clade [7]. The most studied species of this clade is S. schenckii. However, it was recently shown that the zoonotic outbreaks in Brazil are caused by S. brasiliensis, which has been recognized as the prevalent etiological agent of both feline and human sporotrichosis in the country. It is more thermotolerant than the other species of the genus [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Sporothrix species are characterized by showing a thermodimorphic phenotype; that is, in their saprophytic state, they can grow into a filamentous form, which is characterized by hyaline and septate hyphae that produce conidia, and during the parasitic phase when infecting the host tissues, fungal cells can be found as yeast-like cells (Figure 1) [14,15,16]. This dimorphism is known to be essential for fungal virulence in mammalian hosts [17].
Since 2015, the genome sequence of S. brasiliensis (strain 5110) has been available in the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/data-hub/genome/GCF_000820605.1/, accessed on 2 March 2023) and the Genbank with access number AWTV00000000 [16]. The genome has a size of 33.2 Mbp, a GC percentage of 54.5%, and 9231 genes, of which 9091 code for proteins and 140 for functional RNAs [16]. When the S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis genomes were aligned in pairs, it was found that both species share a 97.5% identity [16]. The S. brasiliensis 5110 mitochondrial genome has 36 Kbb; however, it only covers 71–75% of the three previously reported S. schenckii genomes [16]. One of the differences between the S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii mitochondrial genomes is that the former contains homing endonucleases (HE’s), which encode parasitic group-I introns, providing a possible explanation for the larger size of its mitochondrial genome [16]. Fungal mitochondrial genomes are known to have constant genetic mobility, which can be attributed to HE activity. Introns encoding HE have been associated with changes in genomic size and mitochondrial parasitism, leading to genomic instability. These findings could explain some biological differences between S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis [16].
In recent years, the disease caused by S. brasiliensis has gained importance due to the reported epidemic outbreaks, especially those in Brazil [12]. The information available regarding the pathogen-host interaction and the S. brasiliensis virulence factors is until now limited, but in recent years this is gaining momentum. Although some fungal traits that affect pathogen-host interaction are known, such as the ability to generate melanin, susceptibility to antifungal drugs, adhesive properties, and cell wall composition and organization [18], more information is required to have a full picture of both basic and clinical aspects of S. brasiliensis. Therefore, in this review, we will focus on these characteristics and address aspects related to virulence factors, immune response, and antifungal drug resistance.

2. Virulence Factors

In different pathogenic fungi, various virulence factors have been described and are recognized as elements that the organism use during the host damage and whose absence can lead to a decrease in virulence [19]. Among the best-described virulence factors are adhesins, biofilm formation, hydrolytic enzymes, dimorphism, thermotolerance, immune evasion, melanin production, and proteins involved in cell wall synthesis [18,20]. The study of these virulence factors in S. brasiliensis is limited; however, to determine which of these factors could be found in this species, reference organisms such as Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cryptococcus neoformans, and the most phylogenetically similar species, S. schenckii, were selected and used to perform a Blastp analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 2 March 2023), to predict S. brasiliensis putative genes encoding virulence factors (Table 1).
The protein names are the accession codes of the sequences in the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 2 March 2023). The putative protein encoded by the Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Cryptococcus neoformans genes were subjected to protein BLAST analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastp&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome, accessed on 2 March 2023). The best hit was reported in the Sporothrix schenckii column, as previously reported [18]. The E-value and similarity columns refer to the comparison of amino acid sequences of the encoded proteins from S. schenckii with the putative S. schenckii ortholog.
Cell adhesion is considered an important characteristic of pathogens since it helps colonization and spread within the host [21]. In Sporothrix, the cell wall proteins have not been fully characterized; however, some reports have shown that this organism has some adhesins that can bind to the host extracellular matrix proteins, such as fibronectin, laminin, and type II collagen [22,23,24]. The adhesin most characterized in the genus Sporothrix is Gp70, which is found in the three most important species, S. brasiliensis, S. schenckii, and S. globosa (Table 2) [3,25,26]. This adhesin mediates Sporothrix adhesion to host tissues and basal lamina proteins [3]. The Gp70 expression has been related to the virulence of different Sporothrix species. Experiments carried out with high-virulence isolates of S. brasiliensis reported the limited presence of this adhesin; however, in low-virulent isolates of S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii, higher levels of this protein were observed [27]. This observation led to conclude that the adhesin properties may not be as relevant during the pathogenic process as its immunogenicity; i.e., the abundance of this protein on the cell surface could be detrimental to host colonization and invasion [27]. In silico comparative analyzes of the S. brasiliensis genome identified 54 proteins with adhesin function; however, these are currently annotated as hypothetical proteins or belong to a family of proteins with unknown functions [16]. It is necessary to carry out proteomic studies to validate the expression of these proteins and corroborate their cellular function [28]. Of the proteins found in this analysis, eight are exclusive of S. brasiliensis. The relevance of these proteins lies in the fact that they are not specific to human pathogenic fungi, but rather some of them show homology with proteins found in phytopathogens and entomopathogens [28]. These putative adhesins identified and predicted by ProFASTA and FungalRV were classified as proteins of cell wall maintenance, carbohydrate processing, proteolysis, nucleotidases, redox homeostasis, hydrolases, and ATPase-stabilizing factors [28]. Thus, if any of them have adhesion properties, they are likely to be moonlighting proteins [29]. It was recently determined that the S. schenckii chaperonin GroEl/Hsp60 and the uncharacterized protein Pap1 have adhesive properties to extracellular matrix proteins, such as laminin, elastin, fibrinogen, and fibronectin. The Pap1 can also bind to type I and type II collagen [23]. Through bioinformatic analysis, it was found that S. brasiliensis has putative functional orthologs for both proteins, SPBR_03666 and SPBR_07403, respectively (Table 2). Interestingly, Pap1 is found in S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii but not in S. globosa, which could provide a possible explanation for the low virulence associated with S. globosa strains [23].
Although some adhesins have been predicted in S. brasiliensis, the information is still scarce. Thus, bioinformatics analyses are important tools to elucidate the putative proteins related to cell adhesion in this species. The S. brasiliensis genome encodes several putative functional orthologs of adhesins from C. albicans, A. fumigatus, and C. neoformans (Table 1). Different adhesins have been described for C. albicans, and so far, the best-described adhesins in this species are agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) proteins, which belong to a gene family [33]. However, no functional orthologs for these ALS proteins were found within the S. brasiliensis genome (Table 1). No obvious functional orthologs for other C. albicans adhesins, such as Eap1, Hwp1, and Iff4, were found within the S. brasiliensis genome; however, for Ecm33, Int1, and Mp65 putative orthologs were identified (Table 1) [34]. The Als, Eap1, Hwp1, and Iff4 proteins play an important role in fungal adherence, biofilm formation, and antifungal resistance mechanisms [35,36]. The fact that S. brasiliensis does not have any obvious putative ortholog of these proteins could suggest that this species contains other adhesins that could be supplying these functions. Regarding A. fumigatus and C. neoformans, putative orthologs for the CalA, Scw11, Gel1, Gel2, and Mp98 genes were also found within the S. brasiliensis genome. For other adhesins such as RodA, RodB, AspF2, Mp1, AfCalAp, Cfl1, and Cpl1 [37], no obvious ortholog was found in S. brasiliensis, which could be related to the specific function that these proteins fulfill within these two fungal species.
Biofilms contribute to many aspects of the fungal life cycle. The formation of this begins with cell adhesion to biotic or abiotic surfaces, then fungal growth that goes in parallel with extracellular matrix production, and finally dispersion from biofilm to other surfaces [38]. Sporothrix spp. biofilms are structurally complex, showing a network of hyphae associated with the presence of an extracellular polymeric matrix and water channels. The hyphal network contributes to the structural maintenance of the biofilm architecture, and the water channel allows the transport of nutrients to cells found in the biofilm [39]. Compared to other microbial biofilms, biofilms formed by Sporothrix spp. have a slow growth rate [39]. Recent studies suggest that biofilm formation could be one of the most important factors involved in Sporothrix virulence [18]. The filamentous form of S. brasiliensis is capable of developing biofilms in vitro [39]. The S. brasiliensis yeast-like cell has a thick bilayered cell wall with high rhamnose and chitin content and long microfibrils, providing it with the adherence required to form biofilms [40]. The ability of S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii to form biofilms on pieces of cat’s claw has been evaluated. Both species showed different growth kinetics during the biofilm formation, and S. schenckii had higher metabolic activity during the first incubation time [41]. It was observed that S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis have different susceptibility profiles to antifungal drugs, the former being more susceptible in vitro than S. brasiliensis. These observations make it feasible to hypothesize that Sporothrix, especially S. brasiliensis, can form biofilms in the cat’s claws, representing a fundamental factor for the transmission of Sporothrix spp. [41]. Although biofilm formation could show structural variations among fungal species, it is known that in most of the medically relevant fungal species, this structure fulfills the same function, contributing to the virulence and survival of these organisms [42]. In C. albicans, biofilm formation is regulated through several genes such as BCR1, BRG1, EFG1, HSP90, NDT80, ROB1, and CSR1, while in C. neoformans this is controlled by LAC1, URE1, and CAP59 [43,44,45,46]. According to our bioinformatic analysis carried out, these genes could be found within the S. brasiliensis genome (Table 1). As mentioned, both S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis can form biofilms [39], which is an indicator that these genes participate in this process. However, other genes found within the Sporothrix genome may also regulate this metabolic process.
Similar to other fungal pathogens, dimorphism is a highly important virulence factor for Sporothrix spp. [18]. Dimorphism gives it the ability to change from its saprophytic to the parasitic phase; that is, it changes from mycelial morphology to yeast morphology, adapting to the host milieu and spreading to different tissues [47]. For S. brasiliensis, it has been reported that thermal dimorphism is essential for infection establishment [16]. In other dimorphic fungi, such as Histoplasma capsulatum and Talaromyces marneffei, different genes have been described that are involved in dimorphism, including RYP1, RYP2, RYP3, VEA1, PAKB, and HGRA [48,49], these genes were also found in the S. brasiliensis genome [16]. In S. schenckii, it has been shown that calcium is related to dimorphism, which stimulates the fungal morphological transition to adapt to environmental changes [30,50]. In this species, a Ca2+/calmodulin (CaMK)-dependent protein, called Sscmk1, was found to be involved in the control of morphogenetic and proliferative processes [31,51]. This protein is also present in S. brasiliensis (SPBR_08459), and taking into account the percentage of similarity is 99% and an E-value of 0, this protein could fulfill the same function in this species (Table 2). Although some interesting characteristics of the dimorphism associated with S. brasiliensis are known, more studies are needed to elucidate the proteins related to dimorphism fully. Several transcriptional regulators of dimorphism have been studied in C. albicans and C. neoformans, including Cph1, Hgc1, Nrg1 and Tup1, Mob2, Cbk1, Tao3, and Sog2 [52,53]. According to our bioinformatic analysis, the S. brasiliensis genome contains genes encoding putative functional orthologs of these proteins (Table 1). The process that controls dimorphism in S. brasiliensis may likely be regulated by these genes and others that have not yet been identified in this organism.
Another phenotypic characteristic associated with virulence is thermotolerance. Sporothrix thermotolerance has long been considered an important virulence factor and is behind various clinical manifestations of sporotrichosis [54]. This virulence factor facilitates fungal cells to grow and colonize host cells at a controlled body temperature, which is generally higher than the optimum temperature, to maintain cell division in fungal pathogens [54]. For example, strains that grow at 35 °C but not at 37 °C are unlikely to be able to spread through the host lymphatic system [54]. Previous studies have reported that the thermotolerance of S. schenckii and S. brasiliensis is similar. In addition, it is mentioned that the thermotolerance of the latter does not seem to be related to the clinical forms of sporotrichosis, the spontaneous regression of the infection, or the state serology of the patients or sites of infection [54]. However, more recent studies have shown that severe forms of sporotrichosis are associated with host immunity, the size of the inoculum, thermotolerance, and virulence of the strain. S. brasiliensis is often associated with more severe cases of the disease and with atypical manifestations in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients [55]. Even though S. brasiliensis is more thermotolerant than the other Sporothrix species, it is necessary to gather more information to support the notion that this trait is behind fungal aggressiveness [27]. Currently, our knowledge about thermotolerance control in S. brasiliensis is limited. Through our Blastp analysis, it was possible to make an approximation of the possible genes that could be involved in thermotolerance in this species. This analysis suggests that the S. brasiliensis genome contains orthologs of genes involved in thermotolerance in the fungal species C. albicans, A. fumigatus, and C. neoformans, such as HSP60, HSP104, SSA1, SSB1, CGRA, SCH9, HSF1, BIP/KAR2, SSC70, HSP88, BIP, LHS1/ORP150, HSP90 and CCR4 (Table 1), which mostly code for heat shock proteins. In S. schenckii, the Hsp90 protein has already been studied, and it is known that together with Sscmk1, they contribute to thermotolerance in this species. Both proteins are also present in S. brasiliensis (Table 2), implying they could fulfill the same functions in this species.
The production of hydrolases, such as SAPs, lipases, phospholipases, and secreted hemolysins, is an important factor for fungal pathogenicity when interacting with the host since they contribute to the invasion of cells and tissues [56,57]. Some proteases, such as collagenase, gelatinase, and proteinase I and II, which hydrolyze human stratum corneum, collagen type I, and elastin, play an important role during the pathogen-host interaction, contributing to skin invasion and avoiding the anti-Sporothrix immune response [32,58,59]. Despite the importance of hydrolytic enzymes in pathogen-host interaction, little is known about these molecules in S. brasiliensis. Through our bioinformatic analysis, it was possible to identify putative S. brasiliensis orthologs of C. albicans and A. fumigatus genes that code for phospholipases, lipases, and proteinases (Table 1). According to the results of the Blast analysis, orthologs of Lip5-8, Sap1-8, Plb1-3, Pep1-2, Ap1, CtsD, and PlaA proteins are likely present in S. brasiliensis and used to carry out specific functions, as the invasion of host cells and evasion of the immune response, as has been reported for C. albicans and A. fumigatus [60,61]. However, it is necessary to carry out more experiments that help to elucidate the function of these genes in this species. The S. schenckii SPSK_06273 gene is upregulated in yeast cells, which could suggest that this is an important gene in protein degradation during host invasion [18]. Through the Blastp analysis, it was possible to establish that this gene is also found in S. brasiliensis, which could indicate that it may fulfill a similar function in this species (Table 1).
Immune evasion is a strategy that contributes to fungal virulence and involves several processes, such as biofilm formation, protease production, morphological changes, and protein synthesis [62]. For S. brasiliensis, proteins differentially expressed in the yeast form have been analyzed, focusing mainly on proteins involved in immune evasion [63]. The proteins identified have known roles in dimorphic transition, extracellular vesicle production, aerobic respiration, immunogenicity, and invasiveness. These proteins were described as aminopeptidase I, manganese superoxide dismutase, heat shock protein 70 kDa, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA lyase, progesterone-binding protein, acetyl-CoA hydrolase, and rhamnolipid biosynthesis 3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase [63]. Aminopeptidase I is a protein that weakens mammal defenses, and the differential expression of this protein in S. brasiliensis could be related to the high virulence of this species [3,63]. The 3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] reductase protein is involved in rhamnolipid biosynthesis, and purified rhamnolipids are known to interact with immune cells directly [63]. Although several proteins are known to be involved in S. brasiliensis immune evasion, more studies are needed to determine the identity of all the players in complex strategies. The Blastp analysis carried out here contributes to the elucidation of more proteins involved in this process, including putative orthologs of C. albicans Hgt1, Msb2, and Sit1, A. fumigatus Pksp/Alb1, and C. neoformans Rim 101 (Table 1).
Melanin is a fungal cell wall pigment that can mask the fungus against host immunity, contributing to pathogenesis and virulence [54,64]. The different morphologies of Sporothrix spp. can produce three different types of melanin: DHN-melanin, eumelanin, and pyomelanin. In addition to the already mentioned function, Sporothrix melanins also protect the fungus against different antifungal agents, such as amphotericin B, terbinafine, and nitrogen-derived oxidants [65]. In S. brasiliensis, the production of this pigment is associated with resistance to phagocytosis [54]. Under different experimental conditions, S. brasiliensis strains produce a higher amount of DHN-melanin than S. schenckii and tend to be more virulent for in vivo models of sporotrichosis [5,13,27,54,65,66]. Through the bioinformatics search, it was possible to elucidate the S. brasiliensis putative orthologs of the genes present in A. fumigatus that code for melanin synthesis, such as polyketide synthases and phenoloxidases FET3, TILA, and dihydrogeodin oxidase/laccase (Table 1).
The cell surface of pathogenic fungi plays an important role in the interaction with the host. The fungal cell wall is composed of glycoconjugates, structural polysaccharides, such as chitin and β-glucans, and cell wall glycoproteins [67]. Although the relevance of this structure for fungal biology is known, the information about the proteins that compose the S. brasiliensis cell wall is scarce. In silico analyses determined that S. brasiliensis may contain 117 different kinds of cell wall proteins, and analysis of its genome indicated that there is a unique FKS ortholog [16]. Moreover, our bioinformatics analysis identified putative orthologs to cell wall-encoding genes from C. albicans and A. fumigatus (Table 1). Some of these proteins have already been studied in S. schenckii [18]; thus, it is likely they may have similar roles during the biosynthesis of the cell wall. In the case of chitin synthesis, it is known that this wall component is regulated by multigenic families, which encode chitin synthase isoenzymes [68]. Within these families, mainly 7, Chs1 to Chs7, are recognized. According to our Blastp analysis carried out, S. brasiliensis may contain different members of the chitin synthase family (Table 1).
S. brasiliensis is the species with the highest virulence among the members of the Sporothrix pathogenic clade, followed by S. schenckii and S. globosa [5]. Some of the traits behind this observation have already been mentioned in this section, and these include better adhesion due to the characteristics conferred by the external structure of the cell wall and the production of melanin. Works based on the overexpression of enzymes involved in the metabolism of amino acids, lipids, and the positive regulation of glycolytic enzymes and trehalose synthase in S. brasiliensis, suggest that this species can make better use of nutrients during parasitism than S. globosa. In addition, it has better resistance to osmotic stress and cell wall remodeling, which are factors that positively influence the infectious process and that can contribute to S. brasiliensis virulence [47,69,70].

3. Zoonosis Caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis

Sporotrichosis is commonly known as “gardener’s disease.” However, the infection caused by S. brasiliensis goes beyond this typical definition [71]. S. brasiliensis is an emerging fungal pathogen associated with cat-to-human (zoonosis) and cat-to-cat/dog transmissions and has become a strong epidemic and epizootic infectious agent [12,71]. Frequently, sapronotic transmission, which is associated with the environment, is the most common form of human sporotrichosis; however, it has been reported that zoonotic infections have become more common due to the emergence of S. brasiliensis [10]. Unlike S. schenckii, where transmission occurs through traumatic inoculation of the fungus from contaminated plant material, S. brasiliensis is also transmitted through bites, scratches, or contact with exudates from skin lesions of an infected cat [72,73,74]. Moreover, atypical routes of infection, such as outdoor tattooing, have also been documented [75].
Sporotrichosis has acquired zoonotic potential, and concern about this infection is growing due to the different outbreaks in different geographical regions [76,77,78]. Recent studies indicate that South America is the subcontinent with the highest prevalence of animal sporotrichosis, comprising 81%, followed by Asia and Europe. In the case of North America and Africa, they report similar low proportions [79,80]. In regions of Brazil, such as Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, and São Paulo, feline sporotrichosis has increased, and due to its alarming proportions, it is considered an emerging zoonotic fungal disease [71]. From 1997 to 2001, 178 clinical cases were reported in Rio de Janeiro and neighboring municipalities [81]. In 1998, the first epidemic of sporotrichosis in Brazil (Rio de Janeiro) transmitted by cats was recorded, which was caused by S. brasiliensis [73,81]. From 2002 to 2004, the number of clinical cases tripled and reached 572 [81,82]. In the last 20 years, the infection caused by this pathogen in Rio de Janeiro spread out and affected 4700 cats and around 5400 humans [73,83,84]. Between 2010 and 2016, in Rio Grande do Sul, 374 cases of sporotrichosis were diagnosed in cats and 83 cases in humans [76]. In both Brazilian regions, the species that predominated was S. brasiliensis [73,76]. In urban areas with a high density of feline population, important cases of epizootics have been reported and associated with S. brasiliensis [10,11]. Although this infection is more common in Brazil, other countries, such as Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Chile, and Panama, have reported cases caused by S. brasiliensis (Figure 2) [77,83,85,86,87]. In the United Kingdom (UK), a country where S. brasiliensis is considered a rare pathogen, a single case of infection was reported by a veterinarian. The veterinarian had direct contact one month earlier with a cat imported from Brazil, which presented ulcerated pustular skin lesions [88]. In addition, two other cases of S. brasiliensis transmitted by cats were recently reported in the same country. The patients with confirmed sporotrichosis had previously been scratched by their cat, which had been moved from Brazil to the UK. Considering that the UK is a country where this organism has never been reported, one of the possibilities is that the cat acquired this pathogen in Brazil and that an acquired immunodeficiency event from a virus such as FIV triggered a more invasive disease. The cat may have been asymptomatic upon arrival in this country, or the skin lesions were so small that during border control inspection, they could not be observed [89].
Zoonotic sporotrichosis has been documented in countries such as the United States, Malaysia, India, and Mexico; however, in these cases, the causative agent has been identified as S. schenckii [90,91,92]. Although most cases associated with this type of sporotrichosis are caused by S. brasiliensis, cases have been reported where the histopathological analysis determined that the infection may be caused by S. schenckii [88]. However, this could be related to an error in the identification of the causative agent since most of the cases reported for zoonosis are attributed to S. brasiliensis. Records of travel-associated S. brasiliensis infections are increasingly common, and this problem indicates the potential for this pathogen to spread to new areas, mainly through traveling with cats [92].
Based on information collected in recent years, it is clear that animal sporotrichosis caused by S. brasiliensis is more common in cats. The most frequent clinical signs in these animals are associated with the cutaneous form, which is characterized by erosions, ulcers, and fistulas, which are accompanied by bloody serous or purulent exudates [83,87]. These wounds are located mainly on the head, face, neck, and extremities [83,87,93]. The incidence in cats is related to several factors: the first is that cats are generally outdoors, in constant contact with nature. In addition, due to their biological characteristics, cats tend to scratch the vegetation, which facilitates fungal spread in the environment, and finally, due to their instinct, they tend to fight between males, which promotes direct contact of open wounds between them [87,94,95]. It is important to mention that although cats are the main source of infection, other mammals can also be affected (Figure 3) [74].
In the case of dogs, it has been shown that they are not an important source of human infections by S. brasiliensis [73]. Previous studies in Rio de Janeiro found that up to 84% of dogs with sporotrichosis had contact with cats before the manifestation of the infection [96]. From 1998 to 2014, 244 dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) were diagnosed with sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro; however, infection statistics in cats are much higher compared to these figures [10,73]. These cases were taken from a single institution, which does not reflect the real panorama of this disease in this Brazilian region. Dogs are reportedly not directly involved in the transmission of Sporothrix spp., which in most cases may be due to the low fungal load on their lesions [96]. Currently, the transmission of Sporothrix spp. by contact with infected dogs is anecdotic [97].
In a study where 103 clinical cases of animal sporotrichosis were analyzed, it was determined that of these, 92 were cats and 11 dogs. Both dogs and cats showed the cutaneous form of the disease, with respiratory and systemic complications. In dogs, the most frequent clinical form was fixed cutaneous infection in 54.5% of cases, followed by disseminated cutaneous and respiratory sporotrichosis in 18.2% of cases, and finally, lymphocutaneous infection in 9.2% of cases [97]. Dogs with the respiratory form of the disease showed sneezing and nasal discharge with no skin lesions, and one dog had a nasal plane deformity. This form of disease in dogs is the first reported in Brazil [97]. A general characteristic of the dogs that developed the disease is that they had free access to the outdoors and were in direct contact with other animals [97]. In other Brazilian states, such as Espírito Santo, Rio Grande do Norte, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Paraná, and Santa Catarina, cases of canine sporotrichosis have also been described [94]. Several reports have proposed that other animals, such as armadillos, bats, rats, and squirrels, may also be potential carriers of Sporothrix propagules [10,98]. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) may play a role in the transmission of S. brasiliensis between cats [74,99]. This could potentiate outbreaks among humans, although it is necessary to have more evidence to confirm this affirmation. In Brazil and Argentina, cases of human sporotrichosis have been reported after rat bites [74,99]. Due to the constant interaction between rats and cats in urban environments, the appearance and spread of S. brasiliensis could be common [74]. In 2003, S. brasiliensis was isolated from a soil sample that was taken from an armadillo burrow (Dasypus novemcinctus) in Argentina [99]. Analysis of the stomach content of cats determined the presence of S. brasiliensis, and it was also found in cat feces collected from sand in São Paulo [71]. This feces can contaminate the soil, creating an environmental reservoir for S. brasiliensis, and thus developing a new possible source of contamination for both animals and humans [71]. Although sapronotic transmission of S. brasiliensis is poorly documented, recent studies have determined that this species can be found in the environment, contributing to this type of transmission [71].
Immunosuppression is a factor that influences the severity of the infection caused by Sporothrix. In the case of humans, disseminated sporotrichosis frequently occurs in immunocompromised persons; and this same phenomenon has recently been reported in feline sporotrichosis [100]. Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) or feline leukemia virus (FeLV) coinfections have been associated in some studies with a higher incidence of sporotrichosis or worse clinical outcomes [100]. Cats coinfected with these viruses show some differences in cytokine levels, showing higher levels of IL-10 and lower levels of IL-4, IL-12, and CD4+/CD8+, compared to other cats with sporotrichosis without coinfection with these viruses [100]. All the cats analyzed in this study had severe forms of the disease, were in poor health, and the main characteristic was that they were co-infected with FIV and FeLV [100,101]. It was further reported that cats with severe sporotrichosis but negative for FIV and FeLV could have other comorbidities and immunosuppressive conditions [100]. When histological analyzes of the samples were carried out, changes were found in the samples of skin lesions from cats with coinfection, suggesting a less efficient immune response compared to immunocompetent cats [101]. These changes could be associated with a reduced ability to eliminate fungal cells. Cats with viral co-infection had lower numbers of neutrophils and macrophages, a higher fungal burden, and an absence of well-formed granulomas [101]. These findings could be related to the fact that both FIV and FeLV are immunosuppressive viruses, which can cause neutropenia [101]. FeLV virus can cause changes in the phagocytic and chemotactic functions of neutrophils, resulting in poor healing of skin lesions [102]. When fewer neutrophils and a higher fungal load are present, the healing of skin lesions in cats with sporotrichosis may be impaired [101]. Some differences occur between young and adult cats. In cats older than five years, greater infiltration of lymphocytes and a greater frequency of well-formed granulomas were observed compared to younger cats. These results suggest that the immune response against Sporothrix might be less effective in young cats [101].
The population of stray cats in various countries of the world is large, and other morbidities apart from the mentioned viruses cannot be ruled out, such as tapeworms. Infection caused by tapeworms immunosuppresses cats and therefore increases their susceptibility to sporotrichosis [103]. Parasites, such as helminths, are inducers of immune anergy and defects in anti-inflammatory responses and are important agents that can drive a Th2-biased immune response [103].
Recent findings have shown that S. brasiliensis can maintain in environmental material for years [104]. Environmental studies were carried out in an area within the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, where cases of human and feline sporotrichosis had occurred for 10 years. Wood samples were collected inside the house, and wood was found in the garden since it has been described that sporotrichosis in Brazil is associated with areas that have poor sanitary conditions [104]. The presence of S. brasiliensis in the analyzed house could be related to the surrounding forests that are being demolished, and it is possible that S. brasiliensis was already found in these and that a mammalian host could have been infected from the organic matter [104]. These data reported in Brazil are similar to those described in Argentina, where many cats with sporotrichosis were rescued from abandoned houses, which had wooden floors, and which could be a probable source of infection [86]. Previously, attempts had been made to isolate S. brasiliensis from organic matter; however, the isolation had not been successful, which could be related to the moderate growth of Sporothrix and the abundant growth of other saprophytic microorganisms [11,76].
To control the infection caused by this pathogen, cats must not be allowed to roam the streets freely, overcrowding must be avoided, and all sources of infection must be minimized. Cats showing symptoms of sporotrichosis should be tested with a variety of tests, beginning with retrovirus tests. Early identification of the FIV and FeLV viruses could bring benefits to patients with both diseases since antiviral therapy could avoid aggravating the problem.

4. Antifungal Resistance

S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii cell walls show differences, among them the amount of glycoprotein 70 kDa (gp70); S. brasiliensis has a thicker cell wall with higher rhamnose and chitin contents and longer wall microfibrils that contribute to the biofilm formation [27,40,74]. These characteristics could contribute to increased resistance to conventional antifungal drugs and virulence [8,27,40]. Few studies have focused on the mechanism of antifungal resistance in this fungal species [105]. Although these are not entirely clear, the development of resistance in S. brasiliensis could be related to several factors, such as the ability to produce melanin, genetic diversity, and mutations in cytochrome P450 [105].
Sporothrix species produce three types of melanin, DHN-melanin (I), L-DOPA-melanin (II), and pyomelanin (III). In the host, Sporothrix spp. can synthesize DHN and L-DOPA, which protect the fungus against the immune and antifungal response; and it is known that both can inhibit phagocytosis and macrophage death [106,107]. In S. brasiliensis, the biosynthesis of melanin is not fully elucidated, but it is known that its production is faster than in S. schenckii [105]. The production of the three types of melanin is related to lower susceptibility to the antifungal amphotericin B [65]. Melanin also protects Sporothrix species against the effect of terbinafine, an antifungal that can be used in some sporotrichosis cases [108].
In the case of genetic diversity, this has important consequences at the population, community, and ecosystem levels [109]. It is related to better adaptability under selection pressure in Sporothrix species [110,111]. In the Sporothrix clinical clade, high degrees of antifungal resistance have been reported, and phylogenetic analyzes of these species show that there is a selection process in the evolutionary past of S. brasiliensis and S. globosa, which are species that present less polymorphism compared to S. schenckii [112,113,114,115]. In vitro, antifungal susceptibility studies have revealed that S. brasiliensis and S. schenckii are more susceptible to antifungal drugs than S. globosa and S. mexicana [112]. In clinical cases associated with S. brasiliensis, it has been observed that they respond well to antifungal drugs with low MIC values [115,116]. However, considering selective pressure, several fungal isolates have shown polymorphisms in chromosome number and size, which is thought to play a role in the development of antifungal resistance genes [105]. Abnormal chromosome number could be another reason which offers extra copies of resistance genes that contribute to a resistant phenotype [117,118]. In southern Brazil, S. brasiliensis isolates are resistant to drugs such as ITZ, which could be associated with the genetic diversity of the species in this country [115]. Another source of antifungal resistance could be related to constant exposure to antifungals and host immunity, factors that can exert selective pressure on this organism [108,111].
Mutations in cytochrome P450 are another possible factor leading to antifungal resistance in S. brasiliensis. It is known that azoles fulfill the function of inhibiting cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, especially CYP51, which is directly involved in ergosterol synthesis [119]. In silico analyses focused on CYP51 revealed that mutations in the ITZ T230N binding site, which is the first-line antifungal to treat sporotrichosis, are associated with greater resistance to azoles, as has been shown in other fungi such as Candida albicans [105,119].
Although some antifungal resistance mechanisms are known, more studies are needed to elucidate these pathways fully and to establish differences that may occur between Sporothrix species.

5. Immune Response against S. brasiliensis

The host’s immune cells recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), a hallmark of the pathogenic invader, via the pattern-recognition receptors (PPRs). Once the host recognizes the invading agent, it triggers a series of reactions aimed at controlling or eliminating it.
Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2) is an important receptor involved in the recognition of pathogens, such as Aspergillus, Pneumococcus, and Staphylococcus [116]. S. brasiliensis is also recognized by TLR-2, and this receptor plays a key role in the protection against the fungus since the tlr-2−/− mice bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) displayed limited phagocytosis capacity, indicating its importance in this process [120]. Nitric oxide (NO), a critical molecule to stimulate neutrophils and macrophages for killing and clearance of the pathogen, also shows decreased levels in tlr-2−/− mice, emphasizing its importance in S. brasiliensis sensing [120]. The elimination of the invading agent depends, to a large extent, on the recruitment of immune cells through chemotaxis, which is favored by the release of cytokines and interleukins. TLR-2 loss caused a decrease in TNF-α, IL-6, and INF-γ levels during S. brasiliensis infection, which indicates that this receptor is involved in the production of proinflammatory cytokines [120]. Similar results were observed when human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs) were challenged with S. brasiliensis yeast-like cells, where TLR-2 participated in the production of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β [121].
An immunoproteomic approach has shown that some S. brasiliensis peptides (ZR8 and ZR3) stimulate the production of INF-γ, IL-1β, and IL-17A in CD4+ T cells, demonstrating that these peptides may be candidates for a possible vaccine against sporotrichosis, especially that caused by the zoonotic route [122].
TLR-4 also participates in the immune recognition of human pathogenic fungi [123], and for S. brasiliensis, it is also an important PPR since the BMDMs from tl4 −/− mice are affected by its ability to engulf the fungus, and the NO levels are diminished [124], allowing fungal persistence at the infection site. The close relationship observed between high fungal burden and decreased levels of TNF-α, INF-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 in tlr-4−/− mice demonstrate the importance of this receptor in the S. brasiliensis immune sensing [124]. Similarly, it has been demonstrated that the TLR-4 receptor participates in the recognition of S. brasiliensis by hPBMCs, where the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-1β decreased when the receptor was blocked [121].
The S. brasiliensis cell wall peptide-rhamnomannan is an important glycoconjugate that stimulates cytokine production by hPBMCs. The induction of IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-22, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β is mediated by CR3, dectin-1 and TLR-4 receptors. The inflammasome, caspase-1, and the IL-1 receptor are also involved in the T-helper cytokines production [125]. Mannose receptor in hPBMCs is another important receptor to the proper production of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 during the interaction with the pathogen [121].

6. The Cat’s Immune Response against S. brasiliensis

The feline inflammatory immune response to combat an advanced sporotrichosis infection is inefficient, and the fungal load in the infection site is high. Immune cells, such as lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, have been found in deficient quantity when the mycosis is advanced, while in fungal granulomas that are not extensive, the quantity of immune cells is higher, in particular macrophages, which helps in controlling the infection [126,127]. Plasmocytes and mast cells have also been found in granuloma samples [101]. An important feature that may be related to feline susceptibility to Sporothrix spp., especially S. brasiliensis, is the minimal or lack of lymphoplasmacytic reaction that has been observed in these animals [128].
There are also other immune cells involved in feline sporotrichosis, such as monocytes, CD4+, CD8low subset, and CD14+. In sporotrichosis cases, high levels of IL-4 have been found, which stimulate CD8 cell activation [129]. In the most severe cases of feline sporotrichosis, co-infection with FIV or FLV has been reported, which is known to cause feline immunosuppression with low CD4+/CD8+ ratio and decreased levels of IL-4 and IL-12 and high levels of the anti-inflammatory interleukin IL-10. This condition is similar to what has been observed in humans co-infected with Sporothrix and the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) [71,100,130]. Currently, the humoral immune response in cats infected with S. brasiliensis has not been studied, so there is little information available on this topic.

7. Concluding Remarks

Over the years, important advances have been made in the different biological aspects of the species belonging to the Sporothrix pathogenic clade. Although most of the attention has focused on S. schenckii, current knowledge of S. brasiliensis is increasing. As of 2015, the genome of this species is available in the NCBI database. Access to this information helps to continue elucidating important aspects of this species, such as proteins involved in different biological processes, possible virulence factors, and the interaction of this species with the host. In addition, the availability of this information may contribute to explaining the differences with other species of the Sporothrix pathogenic clade.
Although significant advances have been made in the study of the immune response of this species during sporotrichosis, much remains to be elucidated. To obtain more precise information about S. brasiliensis, it is necessary to know aspects such as virulence factors, which play an important role in host damage. Since these have not been experimentally elucidated, bioinformatics tools have become key to understanding these aspects. These tools make it possible to generate genetic predictions, which contribute to the detection of differences and similarities related to virulence, resistance to antifungal drugs, and relevant biological information when compared with other Sporothrix species. The possible virulence factors elucidated in this article could be useful in developing new diagnostic and treatment strategies and finding new therapeutic targets that help control sporotrichosis caused by S. brasiliensis. Finally, it is important to mention that more molecular, immunological, genetic, and epidemiological studies are needed to learn more about this species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G.-G. and H.M.M.-M.; investigation M.G.-G., J.A.M.-Á. and H.M.M.-M.; resources, H.M.M.-M.; data curation, M.G.-G., J.A.M.-Á. and H.M.M.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.-G., J.A.M.-Á. and H.M.M.-M.; supervision, H.M.M.-M.; project administration, H.M.M.-M.; funding acquisition, H.M.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (ref. FC 2015-02-834, Ciencia de Frontera 2019-6380), and Red Temática Glicociencia en Salud (CONACYT-México). The funding sources that supported this work did not have any involvement in the design, acquisition, and analysis of data and writing of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Gow, N.A.; Levitz, S.M.; Netea, M.G.; White, T.C. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Bonifaz, A. Sporothrix and sporotrichosis. In Current Progress in Medical Mycology; Mora-Montes, H.M., Lopes-Bezerra, L.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 309–331. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lopez-Romero, E.; Reyes-Montes, M.d.R.; Perez-Torres, A.; Ruiz-Baca, E.; Villagomez-Castro, J.C.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Flores-Carreon, A.; Toriello, C. Sporothrix schenckii complex and sporotrichosis, an emerging health problem. Future Microbiol. 2011, 6, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arenas, R.; Sánchez-Cardenas, C.D.; Ramirez-Hobak, L.; Ruíz Arriaga, L.F.; Vega Memije, M.E. Sporotrichosis: From KOH to molecular biology. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arrillaga-Moncrieff, I.; Capilla, J.; Mayayo, E.; Marimon, R.; Mariné, M.; Gené, J.; Cano, J.; Guarro, J. Different virulence levels of the species of Sporothrix in a murine model. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marimon, R.; Cano, J.; Gené, J.; Sutton, D.A.; Kawasaki, M.; Guarro, J. Sporothrix brasiliensis, S. globosa, and S. mexicana, three new Sporothrix species of clinical interest. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3198–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Beer, Z.W.; Duong, T.A.; Wingfield, M.J. The divorce of Sporothrix and Ophiostoma: Solution to a problematic relationship. Stud. Mycol. 2016, 83, 165–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Zhang, Y.; Nino-Vega, G.; Rodrigues, A.M.; de Camargo, Z.P.; de Hoog, S. Sporotrichosis between 1898 and 2017: The evolution of knowledge on a changeable disease and on emerging etiological agents. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, S126–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Hoog, G.S.; Camargo, Z.P. Genotyping species of the Sporothrix schenckii complex by PCR-RFLP of calmodulin. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 78, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Hoog, G.S.; de Camargo, Z.P. Sporothrix species causing outbreaks in animals and humans driven by animal-animal transmission. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Hoog, G.S.; Zhang, Y.; Camargo, Z.P. Emerging sporotrichosis is driven by clonal and recombinant Sporothrix species. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Hoog, S.; de Camargo, Z.P. Emergence of pathogenicity in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Melo Teixeira, M.; de Hoog, G.S.; Schubach, T.M.P.; Pereira, S.A.; Fernandes, G.F.; Bezerra, L.M.L.; Felipe, M.S.; de Camargo, Z.P. Phylogenetic analysis reveals a high prevalence of Sporothrix brasiliensis in feline sporotrichosis outbreaks. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mora-Montes, H.M.; Dantas Ada, S.; Trujillo-Esquivel, E.; de Souza Baptista, A.R.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Current progress in the biology of members of the Sporothrix schenckii complex following the genomic era. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, fov065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tamez-Castrellón, A.K.; van der Beek, S.L.; López-Ramírez, L.A.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; van Sorge, N.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Disruption of protein rhamnosylation affects the Sporothrix schenckii-host interaction. Cell Surf. 2021, 7, 100058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Teixeira, M.M.; de Almeida, L.G.; Kubitschek-Barreira, P.; Alves, F.L.; Kioshima, E.S.; Abadio, A.K.; Fernandes, L.; Derengowski, L.S.; Ferreira, K.S.; Souza, R.C.; et al. Comparative genomics of the major fungal agents of human and animal sporotrichosis: Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klein, B.S.; Tebbets, B. Dimorphism and virulence in fungi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007, 10, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tamez-Castrellón, A.K.; Romeo, O.; García-Carnero, L.C.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Virulence factors in Sporothrix schenckii, one of the causative agents of sporotrichosis. Curr. Protein. Pept. Sci. 2020, 21, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rementeria, A.; López-Molina, N.; Ludwig, A.; Vivanco, A.B.; Bikandi, J.; Pontón, J.; Garaizar, J. Genes and molecules involved in Aspergillus fumigatus virulence. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2005, 22, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. García-Carnero, L.C.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A. Virulence factors of Sporothrix schenckii. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Teixeira, P.A.C.; de Castro, R.A.; Nascimento, R.C.; Tronchin, G.; Pérez Torres, A.; Lazéra, M.; de Almeida, S.R.; Bouchara, J.P.; Loureiro, Y.P.C.V.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Cell surface expression of adhesins for fibronectin correlates with virulence in Sporothrix schenckii. Microbiology 2009, 155, 3730–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lima, O.C.; Figueiredo, C.C.; Pereira, B.A.; Coelho, M.G.; Morandi, V.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Adhesion of the human pathogen Sporothrix schenckii to several extracellular matrix proteins. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 1999, 32, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. García-Carnero, L.C.; Salinas-Marín, R.; Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; Wrobel, K.; Wrobel, K.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Niño-Vega, G.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. The Heat shock protein 60 and Pap1 participate in the Sporothrix schenckii-host interaction. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lima, O.C.; Bouchara, J.P.; Renier, G.; Marot-Leblond, A.; Chabasse, D.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M. Immunofluorescence and flow cytometry analysis of fibronectin and laminin binding to Sporothrix schenckii yeast cells and conidia. Microb. Pathog. 2004, 37, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ruiz-Baca, E.; Toriello, C.; Perez-Torres, A.; Sabanero-Lopez, M.; Villagomez-Castro, J.C.; Lopez-Romero, E. Isolation and some properties of a glycoprotein of 70 kDa (Gp70) from the cell wall of Sporothrix schenckii involved in fungal adherence to dermal extracellular matrix. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rodrigues, A.M.; Kubitschek-Barreira, P.H.; Fernandes, G.F.; de Almeida, S.R.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; de Camargo, Z.P. Immunoproteomic analysis reveals a convergent humoral response signature in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. J. Proteom. 2015, 115, 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Castro, R.A.; Kubitschek-Barreira, P.H.; Teixeira, P.A.; Sanches, G.F.; Teixeira, M.M.; Quintella, L.P.; Almeida, S.R.; Costa, R.O.; Camargo, Z.P.; Felipe, M.S.; et al. Differences in cell morphometry, cell wall topography and gp70 expression correlate with the virulence of Sporothrix brasiliensis clinical isolates. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Taveira, G.B.; Mathias, L.S.; da Motta, O.V.; Machado, O.L.; Rodrigues, R.; Carvalho, A.O.; Teixeira-Ferreira, A.; Perales, J.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Gomes, V.M. Thionin-like peptides from Capsicum annuum fruits with high activity against human pathogenic bacteria and yeasts. Biopolymers 2014, 102, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arvizu-Rubio, V.J.; García-Carnero, L.C.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Moonlighting proteins in medically relevant fungi. PeerJ 2022, 10, e14001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodriguez-Caban, J.; Gonzalez-Velazquez, W.; Perez-Sanchez, L.; Gonzalez-Mendez, R.; Rodriguez-del Valle, N. Calcium/calmodulin kinase1 and its relation to thermotolerance and HSP90 in Sporothrix schenckii: An RNAi and yeast two-hybrid study. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Valle-Aviles, L.; Valentin-Berrios, S.; Gonzalez-Mendez, R.R.; Rodriguez-del Valle, N. Functional, genetic and bioinformatic characterization of a calcium/calmodulin kinase gene in Sporothrix schenckii. BMC Microbiol. 2007, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Da Rosa, D.; Gezuele, E.; Calegari, L.; Goñi, F. Excretion-secretion products and proteases from live Sporothrix schenckii yeast phase: Immunological detection and cleavage of human IgG. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2009, 51, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cota, E.; Hoyer, L.L. The Candida albicans agglutinin-like sequence family of adhesins: Functional insights gained from structural analysis. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1548–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Modrzewska, B.; Kurnatowski, P. Adherence of Candida sp. to host tissues and cells as one of its pathogenicity features. Ann. Parasitol. 2015, 61, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Staab, J.F.; Bradway, S.D.; Fidel, P.L.; Sundstrom, P. Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science 1999, 283, 1535–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kean, R.; Delaney, C.; Sherry, L.; Borman, A.; Johnson, E.M.; Richardson, M.D.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G. Transcriptome assembly and profiling of Candida auris reveals novel insights into biofilm-mediated resistance. mSphere 2018, 3, e00334–e00418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Garcia-Rubio, R.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Rivera, J.; Trevijano-Contador, N. The fungal cell wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mayer, F.L.; Wilson, D.; Hube, B. Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence 2013, 4, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brilhante, R.S.N.; de Aguiar, F.R.M.; da Silva, M.L.Q.; de Oliveira, J.S.; de Camargo, Z.P.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Pereira, V.S.; Serpa, R.; Castelo-Branco, D.; Correia, E.E.M.; et al. Antifungal susceptibility of Sporothrix schenckii complex biofilms. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lopes-Bezerra, L.M.; Walker, L.A.; Niño-Vega, G.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Neves, G.W.P.; Villalobos-Duno, H.; Barreto, L.; Garcia, K.; Franco, B.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; et al. Cell walls of the dimorphic fungal pathogens Sporothrix schenckii and Sporothrix brasiliensis exhibit bilaminate structures and sloughing of extensive and intact layers. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dos Santos, G.M.P.; Borba-Santos, L.P.; Vila, T.; Ferreira Gremião, I.D.; Pereira, S.A.; De Souza, W.; Rozental, S. Sporothrix spp. biofilms impact in the zoonotic transmission route: Feline claws associated biofilms, itraconazole tolerance, and potential repurposing for miltefosine. Pathogens 2022, 11, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Du, H.; Bing, J.; Hu, T.; Ennis, C.L.; Nobile, C.J.; Huang, G. Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, C.G.; Yang, Y.L.; Shih, H.I.; Su, C.L.; Lo, H.J. CaNdt80 is involved in drug resistance in Candida albicans by regulating CDR1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 4505–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nobile, C.J.; Mitchell, A.P. Regulation of cell-surface genes and biofilm formation by the C. albicans transcription factor Bcr1p. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1150–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Burt, E.T.; Daly, R.; Hoganson, D.; Tsirulnikov, Y.; Essmann, M.; Larsen, B. Isolation and partial characterization of Hsp90 from Candida albicans. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2003, 33, 86–93. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cleary, I.A.; Lazzell, A.L.; Monteagudo, C.; Thomas, D.P.; Saville, S.P. BRG1 and NRG1 form a novel feedback circuit regulating Candida albicans hypha formation and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 85, 557–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Silva-Bailão, M.G.; Lima, P.S.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; Oliveira, L.C.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Borges, C.L.; Bailão, A.M.; Coelho, A.S.G.; Soares, C.M.A.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Comparative proteomics in the three major human pathogenic species of the genus Sporothrix. Microbes Infect. 2021, 23, 104762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nguyen, V.Q.; Sil, A. Temperature-induced switch to the pathogenic yeast form of Histoplasma capsulatum requires Ryp1, a conserved transcriptional regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4880–4885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nemecek, J.C.; Wüthrich, M.; Klein, B.S. Global control of dimorphism and virulence in fungi. Science 2006, 312, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Serrano, S.; Rodríguez-del Valle, N. Calcium uptake and efflux during the yeast to mycelium transition in Sporothrix schenckii. Mycopathologia 1990, 112, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hanks, S.K.; Hunter, T. Protein kinases 6. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: Kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 576–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Braun, B.R.; Johnson, A.D. TUP1, CPH1 and EFG1 make independent contributions to filamentation in Candida albicans. Genetics 2000, 155, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Walton, F.J.; Heitman, J.; Idnurm, A. Conserved elements of the RAM signaling pathway establish cell polarity in the basidiomycete Cryptococcus neoformans in a divergent fashion from other fungi. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17, 3768–3780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Almeida-Paes, R.; de Oliveira, L.C.; Oliveira, M.M.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Phenotypic characteristics associated with virulence of clinical isolates from the Sporothrix complex. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 212308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Queiroz-Telles, F.; Buccheri, R.; Benard, G. Sporotrichosis in immunocompromised hosts. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Polke, M.; Hube, B.; Jacobsen, I.D. Candida survival strategies. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 91, 139–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rossato, L.; Colombo, A.L. Candida auris: What Have We Learned About Its Mechanisms of Pathogenicity? Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tsuboi, R.; Sanada, T.; Takamori, K.; Ogawa, H. Isolation and properties of extracellular proteinases from Sporothrix schenckii. J. Bacteriol. 1987, 169, 4104–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sabanero López, M.; Flores Villavicencio, L.L.; Soto Arredondo, K.; Barbosa Sabanero, G.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C.; Cruz Jiménez, G.; Sandoval Bernal, G.; Torres Guerrero, H. Proteases of Sporothrix schenckii: Cytopathological effects on a host-cell model. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2018, 35, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pichová, I.; Pavlícková, L.; Dostál, J.; Dolejsí, E.; Hrusková-Heidingsfeldová, O.; Weber, J.; Ruml, T.; Soucek, M. Secreted aspartic proteases of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis and Candida lusitaniae. Inhibition with peptidomimetic inhibitors. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 2669–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Vickers, I.; Reeves, E.P.; Kavanagh, K.A.; Doyle, S. Isolation, activity and immunological characterisation of a secreted aspartic protease, CtsD, from Aspergillus fumigatus. Protein Expr. Purif. 2007, 53, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hernández-Chávez, M.J.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Niño-Vega, G.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Fungal Strategies to Evade the Host Immune Recognition. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rossato, L.; Moreno, L.F.; Jamalian, A.; Stielow, B.; de Almeida, S.R.; de Hoog, S.; Freeke, J. Proteins potentially involved in immune evasion strategies in Sporothrix brasiliensis elucidated by ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry. mSphere 2018, 3, e00514–e00517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jacobson, E.S. Pathogenic roles for fungal melanins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Almeida-Paes, R.; Figueiredo-Carvalho, M.H.G.; Brito-Santos, F.; Almeida-Silva, F.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Melanins protect Sporothrix brasiliensis and Sporothrix schenckii from the antifungal effects of terbinafine. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fernandes, G.F.; dos Santos, P.O.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Sasaki, A.A.; Burger, E.; de Camargo, Z.P. Characterization of virulence profile, protein secretion and immunogenicity of different Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto isolates compared with S. globosa and S. brasiliensis species. Virulence 2013, 4, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Latgé, J.P. Tasting the fungal cell wall. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lenardon, M.D.; Munro, C.A.; Gow, N.A. Chitin synthesis and fungal pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lozoya-Pérez, N.E.; Clavijo-Giraldo, D.M.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; García-Carnero, L.C.; López-Ramírez, L.A.; Niño-Vega, G.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Influences of the culturing media in the virulence and cell wall of Sporothrix schenckii, Sporothrix brasiliensis, and Sporothrix globosa. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nava-Pérez, N.; Neri-García, L.G.; Romero-González, O.E.; Terrones-Cruz, J.A.; García-Carnero, L.C.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Biological and clinical attributes of Sporothrix globosa, a causative agent of sporotrichosis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 2067–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Montenegro, H.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Dias, M.A.; da Silva, E.A.; Bernardi, F.; de Camargo, Z.P. Feline sporotrichosis due to Sporothrix brasiliensis: An emerging animal infection in São Paulo, Brazil. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Almeida-Paes, R.; de Oliveira, M.M.; Freitas, D.F.; do Valle, A.C.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C. Sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Sporothrix brasiliensis is associated with atypical clinical presentations. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gremião, I.D.F.; Miranda, L.H.M.; Reis, E.G.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Pereira, S.A. Zoonotic epidemic of sporotrichosis: Cat to human transmission. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rossow, J.A.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Caceres, D.H.; Beer, K.D.; Jackson, B.R.; Pereira, J.G.; Ferreira Gremião, I.D.; Pereira, S.A. A one health approach to combatting Sporothrix brasiliensis: Narrative review of an emerging zoonotic fungal pathogen in South America. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Poester, V.R.; Severo, C.B.; da Silva, C.A.E.; Stevens, D.A.; Trápaga, M.R.; Xavier, M.O. Tattooing as a gateway to Sporothrix brasiliensis infection. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2022, 37, 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Poester, V.R.; Mendes, J.F.; Groll, A.V.; Klafke, G.B.; Brandolt, T.M.; Xavier, M.O. Sporothrix spp. evaluation in soil of a hyperepidemic area for sporotrichosis in southern Brazil. Ciência Anim. Bras. 2018, 19, e-52571. [Google Scholar]
  77. Etchecopaz, A.N.; Lanza, N.; Toscanini, M.A.; Devoto, T.B.; Pola, S.J.; Daneri, G.L.; Iovannitti, C.A.; Cuestas, M.L. Sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis in Argentina: Case report, molecular identification and in vitro susceptibility pattern to antifungal drugs. J. Mycol. Med. 2020, 30, 100908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Rios, M.E.; Suarez, J.M.; Moreno, J.; Vallee, J.; Moreno, J.P. Zoonotic sporotrichosis related to cat contact: First case report from Panama in Central America. Cureus 2018, 10, e2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Han, H.S.; Kano, R. Feline sporotrichosis in Asia. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Morgado, D.S.; Castro, R.; Ribeiro-Alves, M.; Corrêa-Moreira, D.; Castro-Alves, J.; Pereira, S.A.; Menezes, R.C.; Oliveira, M.M.E. Global distribution of animal sporotrichosis: A systematic review of Sporothrix sp. identified using molecular tools. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 100140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Barros, M.B.; Schubach Ade, O.; do Valle, A.C.; Gutierrez Galhardo, M.C.; Conceição-Silva, F.; Schubach, T.M.; Reis, R.S.; Wanke, B.; Marzochi, K.B.; Conceição, M.J. Cat-transmitted sporotrichosis epidemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Description of a series of cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 38, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Barros, M.B.; Costa, D.L.; Schubach, T.M.; do Valle, A.C.; Lorenzi, N.P.; Teixeira, J.L.; Schubach Ade, O. Endemic of zoonotic sporotrichosis: Profile of cases in children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2008, 27, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gremião, I.D.; Menezes, R.C.; Schubach, T.M.; Figueiredo, A.B.; Cavalcanti, M.C.; Pereira, S.A. Feline sporotrichosis: Epidemiological and clinical aspects. Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Izoton, C.F.G.; de Brito Sousa, A.X.; Valete, C.M.; Schubach, A.O.; Procópio-Azevedo, A.C.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; de Macedo, P.M.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Castro-Alves, J.; Almeida-Paes, R.; et al. Sporotrichosis in the nasal mucosa: A single-center retrospective study of 37 cases from 1998 to 2020. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2023, 17, e0011212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. García Duarte, J.M.; Wattiez Acosta, V.R.; Fornerón Viera, P.M.L.; Aldama Caballero, A.; Gorostiaga Matiauda, G.A.; Rivelli de Oddone, V.B.; Pereira Brunelli, J.G. Esporotricosis trasmitida por gato doméstico. Reporte de un caso familiar. Rev. Nac. 2017, 9, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  86. Etchecopaz, A.; Toscanini, M.A.; Gisbert, A.; Mas, J.; Scarpa, M.; Iovannitti, C.A.; Bendezú, K.; Nusblat, A.D.; Iachini, R.; Cuestas, M.L. Sporothrix brasiliensis: A review of an emerging South American fungal pathogen, its related disease, presentation and spread in Argentina. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Thomson, P.; González, C.; Blank, O.; Ramírez, V.; Río, C.D.; Santibáñez, S.; Pena, P. Sporotrichosis outbreak due to Sporothrix brasiliensis in domestic cats in Magallanes, Chile: A one-health-approach study. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rachman, R.; Ligaj, M.; Chinthapalli, S.; Serafino Wani, R. Zoonotic acquisition of cutaneous Sporothrix braziliensis infection in the UK. BMJ Case Rep. 2022, 15, e248418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Barnacle, J.R.; Chow, Y.J.; Borman, A.M.; Wyllie, S.; Dominguez, V.; Russell, K.; Roberts, H.; Armstrong-James, D.; Whittington, A.M. The first three reported cases of Sporothrix brasiliensis cat-transmitted sporotrichosis outside South America. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2023, 39, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yegneswaran, P.P.; Sripathi, H.; Bairy, I.; Lonikar, V.; Rao, R.; Prabhu, S. Zoonotic sporotrichosis of lymphocutaneous type in a man acquired from a domesticated feline source: Report of a first case in southern Karnataka, India. Int. J. Dermatol. 2009, 48, 1198–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tang, M.M.; Tang, J.J.; Gill, P.; Chang, C.C.; Baba, R. Cutaneous sporotrichosis: A six-year review of 19 cases in a tertiary referral center in Malaysia. Int. J. Dermatol. 2012, 51, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kaadan, M.I.; Dennis, M.; Desai, N.; Yadavalli, G.; Lederer, P. One health education for future physicians: A case report of cat-transmitted sporotrichosis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Schubach, T.M.; Schubach, A.; Okamoto, T.; Barros, M.B.; Figueiredo, F.B.; Cuzzi, T.; Fialho-Monteiro, P.C.; Reis, R.S.; Perez, M.A.; Wanke, B. Evaluation of an epidemic of sporotrichosis in cats: 347 cases (1998–2001). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2004, 224, 1623–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Hoog, G.S.; de Camargo, Z.P. Feline sporotrichosis. In Emerging and Epizootic Fungal Infections in Animals; Seyedmousavi, S., de Hoog, G.S., Guillot, J., Verweij, P.E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 199–231. [Google Scholar]
  95. de Oliveira Bento, A.; de Sena Costa, A.S.; Lima, S.L.; do Monte Alves, M.; de Azevedo Melo, A.S.; Rodrigues, A.M.; da Silva-Rocha, W.P.; Milan, E.P.; Chaves, G.M. The spread of cat-transmitted sporotrichosis due to Sporothrix brasiliensis in Brazil towards the Northeast region. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Schubach, T.M.; Schubach, A.; Okamoto, T.; Barros, M.B.; Figueiredo, F.B.; Cuzzi, T.; Pereira, S.A.; Dos Santos, I.B.; Almeida Paes, R.; Paes Leme, L.R.; et al. Canine sporotrichosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis and therapeutic response in 44 cases (1998–2003). Med. Mycol. 2006, 44, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Madrid, I.M.; Mattei, A.S.; Fernandes, C.G.; Nobre Mde, O.; Meireles, M.C. Epidemiological findings and laboratory evaluation of sporotrichosis: A description of 103 cases in cats and dogs in southern Brazil. Mycopathologia 2012, 173, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, Y.; Hagen, F.; Stielow, B.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Samerpitak, K.; Zhou, X.; Feng, P.; Yang, L.; Chen, M.; Deng, S.; et al. Phylogeography and evolutionary patterns in Sporothrix spanning more than 14,000 human and animal case reports. Persoonia 2015, 35, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Córdoba, S.; Isla, G.; Szusz, W.; Vivot, W.; Hevia, A.; Davel, G.; Canteros, C.E. Molecular identification and susceptibility profile of Sporothrix schenckii sensu lato isolated in Argentina. Mycoses 2018, 61, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. de Miranda, L.H.M.; Meli, M.; Conceição-Silva, F.; Novacco, M.; Menezes, R.C.; Pereira, S.A.; Sugiarto, S.; Dos Reis É, G.; Gremião, I.D.F.; Hofmann-Lehmann, R. Co-infection with feline retrovirus is related to changes in immunological parameters of cats with sporotrichosis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. de Souza, E.W.; Borba, C.d.M.; Pereira, S.A.; Gremião, I.D.F.; Langohr, I.M.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; de Oliveira, R.d.V.C.; da Cunha, C.R.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; de Miranda, L.H.M.; et al. Clinical features, fungal load, coinfections, histological skin changes, and itraconazole treatment response of cats with sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hartmann, K. Clinical aspects of feline immunodeficiency and feline leukemia virus infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011, 143, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Maizels, R.M.; Balic, A.; Gomez-Escobar, N.; Nair, M.; Taylor, M.D.; Allen, J.E. Helminth parasites—Masters of regulation. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 201, 89–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rabello, V.B.S.; Almeida-Silva, F.; Scramignon-Costa, B.d.S.; Motta, B.d.S.; de Macedo, P.M.; Teixeira, M.d.M.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Irinyi, L.; Meyer, W.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Environmental isolation of Sporothrix brasiliensis in an area with recurrent feline sporotrichosis cases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 894297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Waller, S.B.; Dalla Lana, D.F.; Quatrin, P.M.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; Fuentefria, A.M.; Mezzari, A. Antifungal resistance on Sporothrix species: An overview. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Almeida-Paes, R.; Frases, S.; Araújo Gde, S.; de Oliveira, M.M.; Gerfen, G.J.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Biosynthesis and functions of a melanoid pigment produced by species of the Sporothrix complex in the presence of L-tyrosine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 8623–8630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Romero-Martinez, R.; Wheeler, M.; Guerrero-Plata, A.; Rico, G.; Torres-Guerrero, H. Biosynthesis and functions of melanin in Sporothrix schenckii. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 3696–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Almeida-Paes, R.; Oliveira, M.M.E.; Freitas, D.F.S.; Valle, A.; Gutierrez-Galhardo, M.C.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M. Refractory sporotrichosis due to Sporothrix brasiliensis in humans appears to be unrelated to in vivo resistance. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. de Oliveira, M.M.; Veríssimo, C.; Sabino, R.; Aranha, J.; Zancopé-Oliveira, R.M.; Sampaio, P.; Pais, C. First autochthone case of sporotrichosis by Sporothrix globosa in Portugal. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 78, 388–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Huang, L.; Gao, W.; Giosa, D.; Criseo, G.; Zhang, J.; He, T.; Huang, X.; Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, J.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing and in silico analysis of two strains of Sporothrix globosa. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 3292–3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gong, J.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, R.; He, L.; Wan, Z.; Li, F.; Zhang, J. Population structure and genetic diversity of Sporothrix globosa in China according to 10 novel microsatellite loci. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Marimon, R.; Serena, C.; Gené, J.; Cano, J.; Guarro, J. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of five species of Sporothrix. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 732–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rangel-Gamboa, L.; Martínez-Hernandez, F.; Maravilla, P.; Arenas-Guzmán, R.; Flisser, A. Update of phylogenetic and genetic diversity of Sporothrix schenckii sensu lato. Med. Mycol. 2015, 54, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sasaki, A.A.; Fernandes, G.F.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Lima, F.M.; Marini, M.M.; Dos, S.F.L.; de Melo Teixeira, M.; Felipe, M.S.; da Silveira, J.F.; de Camargo, Z.P. Chromosomal polymorphism in the Sporothrix schenckii complex. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Rodrigues, A.M.; de Hoog, G.S.; de Cássia Pires, D.; Brihante, R.S.; Sidrim, J.J.; Gadelha, M.F.; Colombo, A.L.; de Camargo, Z.P. Genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility profiles in causative agents of sporotrichosis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Koedel, U.; Angele, B.; Rupprecht, T.; Wagner, H.; Roggenkamp, A.; Pfister, H.W.; Kirschning, C.J. Toll-like receptor 2 participates in mediation of immune response in experimental pneumococcal meningitis. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hill, J.A.; Ammar, R.; Torti, D.; Nislow, C.; Cowen, L.E. Genetic and genomic architecture of the evolution of resistance to antifungal drug combinations. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Harrison, B.D.; Hashemi, J.; Bibi, M.; Pulver, R.; Bavli, D.; Nahmias, Y.; Wellington, M.; Sapiro, G.; Berman, J. A tetraploid intermediate precedes aneuploid formation in yeasts exposed to fluconazole. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12, e1001815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Matowane, R.G.; Wieteska, L.; Bamal, H.D.; Kgosiemang, I.K.R.; Van Wyk, M.; Manume, N.A.; Abdalla, S.M.H.; Mashele, S.S.; Gront, D.; Syed, K. In silico analysis of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in chronic granulomatous infectious fungus Sporothrix schenckii: Special focus on CYP51. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2018, 1866, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Rossato, L.; Silvana Dos Santos, S.; Ferreira, L.G.; Rogério de Almeida, S. The impact of the absence of Toll-like receptor-2 during Sporothrix brasiliensis infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Pérez-García, L.A.; Mellado-Mojica, E.; López, M.G.; Martínez-Duncker, I.; Lópes-Bezerra, L.M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto and Sporothrix brasiliensis are differentially recognized by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. de Almeida, J.R.F.; Jannuzzi, G.P.; Kaihami, G.H.; Breda, L.C.D.; Ferreira, K.S.; de Almeida, S.R. An immunoproteomic approach revealing peptides from Sporothrix brasiliensis that induce a cellular immune response in subcutaneous sporotrichosis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Netea, M.G.; Warris, A.; Van der Meer, J.W.; Fenton, M.J.; Verver-Janssen, T.J.; Jacobs, L.E.; Andresen, T.; Verweij, P.E.; Kullberg, B.J. Aspergillus fumigatus evades immune recognition during germination through loss of toll-like receptor-4-mediated signal transduction. J. Infect. Dis. 2003, 188, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rossato, L.; Santos, S.S.D.; Ferreira, L.G.; de Almeida, S.R. The importance of Toll-like receptor 4 during experimental Sporothrix brasiliensis infection. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kischkel, B.; Lopes-Bezerra, L.; Taborda, C.P.; Joosten, L.A.B.; Dos Santos, J.C.; Netea, M.G. Differential recognition and cytokine induction by the peptidorhamnomannan from Sporothrix brasiliensis and S. schenckii. Cell. Immunol. 2022, 378, 104555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Miranda, L.H.; Conceição-Silva, F.; Quintella, L.P.; Kuraiem, B.P.; Pereira, S.A.; Schubach, T.M. Feline sporotrichosis: Histopathological profile of cutaneous lesions and their correlation with clinical presentation. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 36, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Xavier, J.R.B.; Waller, S.B.; Osório, L.D.G.; Vives, P.S.; Albano, A.P.N.; Aguiar, E.S.V.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; Conceição, F.R.D.; Faria, R.O.; Meireles, M.C.A.; et al. Human sporotrichosis outbreak caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis in a veterinary hospital in Southern Brazil. J. Mycol. Med. 2021, 31, 101163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Marques, S.A.; Franco, S.R.V.S.; Camargo, R.M.P.d.; Dias, L.D.F.; Haddad Júnior, V.; Fabris, V.E. Esporotricose do gato doméstico (Felis catus): Transmissão humana. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 1993, 35, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Miranda, L.H.M.; Santiago, M.A.; Schubach, T.M.P.; Morgado, F.N.; Pereira, S.A.; Oliveira, R.V.C.; Conceição-Silva, F. Severe feline sporotrichosis associated with an increased population of CD8low cells and a decrease in CD4⁺ cells. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lima, M.A.; Freitas, D.F.S.; Oliveira, R.V.C.; Fichman, V.; Varon, A.G.; Freitas, A.D.; Lamas, C.C.; Andrade, H.B.; Veloso, V.G.; Almeida-Paes, R.; et al. Meningeal sporotrichosis due to Sporothrix brasiliensis: A 21-year cohort study from a brazilian reference center. J. Fungi 2022, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 09 00533 g001 550
Figure 1. Microscopic morphology of Sporothrix brasiliensis. (A) Mycelium was grown in a liquid medium at 28 °C and pH 4.5 in the presence of conidia and branching septate hyphae. (B) Yeast-like cells growing at 37 °C and pH 7.8, with the typical elongated cigar shape. Scale bars 10 µm.
Figure 1. Microscopic morphology of Sporothrix brasiliensis. (A) Mycelium was grown in a liquid medium at 28 °C and pH 4.5 in the presence of conidia and branching septate hyphae. (B) Yeast-like cells growing at 37 °C and pH 7.8, with the typical elongated cigar shape. Scale bars 10 µm.
Jof 09 00533 g001
Jof 09 00533 g002 550
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of Sporothrix brasiliensis isolates. This species is distributed mainly in the American continent, in countries such as Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Panama, and Chile. Red dots indicate countries where S. brasiliensis has been isolated. The yellow dots are cases of sporotrichosis where the causative agent is yet to be confirmed, but the responsible species is likely S. brasiliensis.
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of Sporothrix brasiliensis isolates. This species is distributed mainly in the American continent, in countries such as Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Panama, and Chile. Red dots indicate countries where S. brasiliensis has been isolated. The yellow dots are cases of sporotrichosis where the causative agent is yet to be confirmed, but the responsible species is likely S. brasiliensis.
Jof 09 00533 g002
Jof 09 00533 g003 550
Figure 3. Transmission routes of Sporothrix brasiliensis. Sporothrix brasiliensis can be found in decomposing vegetal matter in the mycelial morphology (conidia and hyphae), and the cat, due to its biological and behavioral characteristics, can easily acquire it. This fungal species has been associated with epizootic outbreaks, mainly in dogs, cats, and rats. Feline sporotrichosis can be transmitted to humans (zoonosis) through scratches, bites, and contact with exudates from wounds, through which large amounts of yeast-like cells are inoculated into the host tissue.
Figure 3. Transmission routes of Sporothrix brasiliensis. Sporothrix brasiliensis can be found in decomposing vegetal matter in the mycelial morphology (conidia and hyphae), and the cat, due to its biological and behavioral characteristics, can easily acquire it. This fungal species has been associated with epizootic outbreaks, mainly in dogs, cats, and rats. Feline sporotrichosis can be transmitted to humans (zoonosis) through scratches, bites, and contact with exudates from wounds, through which large amounts of yeast-like cells are inoculated into the host tissue.
Jof 09 00533 g003
Table
Table 1. Putative virulence factors encoded within the Sporothrix brasiliensis and Sporothrix schenckii genomes.
Table 1. Putative virulence factors encoded within the Sporothrix brasiliensis and Sporothrix schenckii genomes.
Virulence FactorsOrganismProteinSporothrix schenckiiSporothrix brasiliensisE-ValueSimilarity (%)
AdhesinsCandida albicansAls1
Als2		No foundNo found--
Als5No foundNo found--
Eap1No foundNo found
Ecm33SPSK_05317SPBR_07321099
Hwp1No foundNo found--
Iff4No foundNo found--
Int1SPSK_07346SPBR_02186099
Mp65SPSK_05120SPBR_06946099
Aspergillus fumigatusRodA
RodB		No foundNo found--
AspF2No foundNo found--
CalASPSK_05470SPBR_076643e−11476
Scw11SPSK_04001SPBR_05627097
Gel1SPSK_05276SPBR_07245099
Gel2SPSK_04169SPBR_05893099
Mp1No foundNo found--
AfCalApNo foundNo found--
Cryptococcus neoformansCfl1No foundNo found--
Cpl1No foundNo found
Mp98SPSK_03393SPBR_00699098
BiofilmsC. albicansBcr1SPSK_01505SPBR_04121096
Brg1SPSK_05129SPBR_070969e−9799
Efg1SPSK_07078SPBR_02388098
Hsp90SPSK_08698SPBR_08225099
Ndt80SPSK_09140SPBR_01757099
Rob1SPSK_03010SPBR_00136097
Csr1SPSK_08605SPBR_08179097
C. neoformansLac1SPSK_03091SPBR_00252097
Ure1SPSK_00695SPBR_06609099
Cap59SPSK_09241SPBR_08456097
Hydrolytic enzymesC. albicansLip5-8SPSK_03375SPBR_00635097
Sap1-8SPSK_06273SPBR_05010097
Plb1-3SPSK_01063SPBR_06837097
A. fumigatusPep1SPSK_02149SPBR_03405098
Pep2SPSK_00526SPBR_072360100
Ap1SPSK_07865SPBR_030221e−114100
CtsDSPSK_01559SPBR_03923093
PlaASPSK_02253SPBR_035386e−12786
DimorphismC. albicansCph1SPSK_07311SPBR_023470100
Hgc1SPSK_05321SPBR_07336099
Nrg1SPSK_00519SPBR_07150096
Tup1SPSK_02314SPBR_00318093
C. neoformans Mob2 SPSK_01925SPBR_038352e−169100
Cbk1 SPSK_06025SPBR_04750099
Tao3 SPSK_02910SPBR_00004099
Sog2 SPSK_03988SPBR_05624099
ThermotoleranceC. albicans Hsp60 SPSK_01586SPBR_03666099
Hsp104 SPSK_08586SPBR_08170098
Ssa1 SPSK_08625SPBR_01381097
Ssb1 SPSK_03121SPBR_00285087
A. fumigatus CgrA SPSK_09995SPBR_087465e−8898
Sch9 SPSK_10850SPBR_08428099
Hsf1 SPSK_08498SPBR_01315097
BiP/Kar2 SPSK_04019SPBR_05650098
Ssc70 SPSK_03148SPBR_003270100
Hsp88 SPSK_00430SPBR_06639099
BiP SPSK_06078SPBR_04806099
Lhs1/Orp150 SPSK_02198SPBR_03415098
Hsp90 SPSK_08698SPBR_08225099
C. neoformans Ccr4 SPSK_07136SPBR_02436096
Immune evasionC. albicans Hgt1 SPSK_06192SPBR_04908099
Msb2 SPSK_07127SPBR_02423097
Pra1 No foundNo found--
Rbt5 No foundNo found--
Sit1 SPSK_02970SPBR_00416098
A. fumigatus Hyp1/RodA No foundNo found--
Pksp/Alb1 SPSK_00653SPBR_06313097
C. neoformans Rim101 SPSK_07198SPBR_02496099
Melanin productionA. fumigatus Fet3 SPSK_07279SPBR_02574098
TilA SPSK_04101SPBR_05738099
Dihydrogeodin oxidase/laccaseSPSK_07219SPBR_02517098
Cell wall synthesisC. albicans Fks1 SPSK_01365SPBR_04029098
Dpm3 SPSK_02816SPBR_045007e−6298
Pmt2 SPSK_08548SPBR_01344097
A. fumigatus ChsG SPSK_06989SPBR_02297099
ChsA SPSK_08492SPBR_08106099
ChsF SPSK_04841SPBR_06424099
Dpm2 SPSK_08145SPBR_033306e−54100
Pmt1 SPSK_05892SPBR_04624098
Pmt4 SPSK_08628SPBR_08186099
Kre2/Mnt1 SPSK_09069SPBR_08384098
Ktr4 SPSK_05332SPBR_073600100
Och1 SPSK_03245SPBR_00480097
Mnn9SPSK_09403SPBR_085210100
Table
Table 2. Prediction of putative virulence factors in S. brasiliensis based on S. schenckii known virulence factors.
Table 2. Prediction of putative virulence factors in S. brasiliensis based on S. schenckii known virulence factors.
S. schenckii Virulence FactorsProteinS. brasiliensisE-ValueSimilarity (%)FunctionReferences
AdhesinsGp70SPBR_08225099Adhesin with the binding capacity to fibronectin, laminin, and type II collagen[25,27]
Hsp60SPBR_03666099Adhesin that binds to laminin, elastin, fibrinogen, and fibronectin[23]
Pap1SPBR_074031 × 10−10679Adhesin that binds to laminin, elastin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, and types I and II collagen[23]
ThermotoleranceHsp90SPBR_08225099Response to heat shock and proteotoxic stress[30]
Sscmk1SPBR_08459099Morphological switching and thermotolerance[31]
ProteasesProteinase ISPBR_05754099Proteases that hydrolyze human stratum corneum, type I collagen, and elastin. They play an important role in pathogen-host interaction.[32]
Proteinase IISPBR_00540096
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Gaviria, M.; Martínez-Álvarez, J.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Current Progress in Sporothrix brasiliensis Basic Aspects. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050533

AMA Style

Gómez-Gaviria M, Martínez-Álvarez JA, Mora-Montes HM. Current Progress in Sporothrix brasiliensis Basic Aspects. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(5):533. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050533

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Gaviria, Manuela, José A. Martínez-Álvarez, and Héctor M. Mora-Montes. 2023. "Current Progress in Sporothrix brasiliensis Basic Aspects" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 5: 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9050533

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop