Next Article in Journal
Morphological and Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Three New Species of Distoseptispora (Distoseptisporaceae, Distoseptisporales) from Yunnan, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Ectomycorrhizal Community Shifts at a Former Uranium Mining Site
Previous Article in Journal
Prognostic Trends and Current Challenges in Candidemia: A Comparative Analysis of Two Multicenter Cohorts within the Past Decade
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Assessment of the Wild Edible Leccinum Mushrooms Consumption According to the Total Mercury Content
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparative Study on Heavy Metal Removal from CCA-Treated Wood Waste by Yarrowia lipolytica: Effects of Metal Stress

1
Institut de Recherche sur les Forêts, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada
2
Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
3
State Key Laboratory of Biobased Material and Green Papermaking, Qilu University of Technology, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Jinan 250353, China
4
Centre Technologique des Résidus Industriels en Abitibi Témiscamingue, 433 Boulevard du Collège, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 0E1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2023, 9(4), 469; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040469
Submission received: 13 February 2023 / Revised: 4 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 13 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heavy Metals in Mushrooms)

Abstract

:
Bioremediation is an effective way to remove heavy metals from pollutants. This study investigated the effects of Yarrowia lipolytica (Y. lipolytica) on the bioremediation of chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood wastes. Copper ions stressed the yeast strains to improve their bioremediation efficiency. A comparison of changes in morphology, chemical composition, and metal content of CCA wood before and after bioremediation was conducted. The amount of arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), and copper (Cu) was quantified by microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The results showed that yeast strains remained on the surface of CCA-treated wood after bioremediation. The morphologies of the strains changed from net to spherical because of the Cu2+ stress. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy showed that carboxylic acid groups of wood were released after removing heavy metals. A large amount of oxalic acid was observed when the optical density (OD600nm) was 0.05 on the 21st day. Meanwhile, the highest removal rate of Cu, As, and Cr was 82.8%, 68.3%, and 43.1%, respectively. Furthermore, the Cu removal from CCA-treated wood increased by about 20% after Cu2+ stress. This study showed that it is feasible to remove heavy metals from CCA-treated wood by Y. lipolytica without destroying the wood structure, especially by copper-induced Y. lipolytica.

1. Introduction

The quality of human life is highly dependent on the conditions of the terrestrial environment. The harmfulness of solid pollutants, such as plastic, batteries, and preservative-treated wood (PTW) wastes, attracts human attention due to their negative impacts on the environment and human health [1]. PTW has been widely used in construction, railway, boardwalk, and electricity poles by humans for many decades. However, heavy metals in wood preservatives are harmful to the environment. Previous reports show that inorganic metal salts leaching from solid pollutants are toxic and damage human health even at low concentrations [1,2]. Therefore, the decontamination of PTW is an important and urgent issue rather than being directly released into the environment.
CCA has historically been one of the most widely used waterborne preservatives for wood due to its efficiency and low cost [3]. Arsenic, copper, and chromium in the CCA preservative have a great risk to human health. They are leached into soil or water when the treated wood is exposed to the environment. Thus, the use of CCA-treated wood has been banned in Europe since 2004 [4]. Additionally, the EPA and the wood industry decided in 2003 to stop using CCA-treated wood in most residential construction because it contained arsenic. However, due to its low cost, much CCA-treated wood waste is still in use, especially in several countries (e.g., India, China, and Brazil). As a result of scientific concerns, finding an economical and feasible way to alleviate environmental contamination is significant when CCA-treated wood is at the end of its service life.
Various approaches, such as landfilling, incineration, pyrolysis, gasification, chemical extraction, electro-dialysis, and bioremediation, have been investigated to deal with CCA-treated wood wastes [5,6,7]. Among those methods, incineration is the most used method. During the incineration of CCA-treated wood, Cr and Cu compounds mostly remain in the ash, while As will be diffused in the air [8]. Therefore, the premise of incineration treatment should be equipped with an advanced filtration system. Pyrolysis is usually performed at 400–800 °C accompanied by the release of harmful traces of arsenic [9]. Worryingly, incineration and gasification will accelerate carbon emissions and are not conducive to realizing carbon neutrality goals. Landfilling may contaminate the groundwater because of the leaching potential of contaminated substances. Thus, landfilling is not a legal option in most countries. Chemical pretreatment may generate intermediate by-products and secondary pollutants even if it can efficiently remove heavy metals from CCA-treated wood. Bioremediation is considered a promising and safe method. It is also the least mature solution and requires further analysis and discussion.
Microorganisms such as fungi can secrete oxalic acids outside the cells, which is important in removing metal compounds in CCA wood. Many wood-rot fungi have been used to treat wood waste by removing toxic metals or bioconverting heavy metals into less toxic or completely harmless forms [10]. In addition to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cryptococcus sp., Candida sp. PS33, and black mold have also been studied to bioremediate CCA-treated wood wastes and pollutants [11,12,13,14,15]. Fungi absorb heavy metals by chemical transformation through redox reactions and bioaccumulation through passive diffusion, facilitated diffusion, or active transport [5]. In addition to the microbes’ biofilm’s metal tolerance, their secondary metabolites play key roles in decontamination [16]. Notably, Y. lipolytica and Aspergillus niger adsorb Pb(II), Cr(III), Cr(VI), Zn(II), Cu(II), As(V), and Ni(II) ions from aqueous solutions and successfully purify sewage [17,18]. Y. lipolytica is a model yeast for organic acid production, especially citric acids [19]. Moreover, the changes in different morphological forms of Y. lipolytica help it easily adapt to new environmental conditions [20]. Numerous studies have investigated the yeast’s response to different domesticated conditions, such as heavy metal stress, temperature, pH, nutrient availability (carbon, nitrogen, trace elements, etc.), dissolved oxygen concentration, electrochemical stress, agitation, and aeration [20,21,22]. Previous literature also found that Y. lipolytica is easy to domesticate using oleic acid as the oxygen vector [23]. In summary, the yeasts were more resistant to heavy metal environments after domestication.
However, studies on removing metal ions from solid contamination (e.g., CCA-treated wood) by Y. lipolytica are rare. Although Y. lipolytica effectively removes heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions, its ability to remove metals from CCA-treated wood is uncertain. Removing metal ions from aqueous environments is much easier than from CCA wood because the metals in CCA wood are bound to the wood components. It is important to reveal the mechanism of the metal removal from CCA-treated wood by Y. lipolytica to provide more theoretical support for the biological decontamination of CCA wood wastes.
Thus, Y. lipolytica was used to remove heavy metals from CCA-treated wood to investigate its decontamination properties in this study. The change in the wood structure and surficial chemicals were explored. Yeast communities are shielded from environmental stress by secreting secondary metabolites and transforming their morphology. Cu2+ solutions with different concentrations were used to induce Y. lipolytica to increase heavy metals removal further. The effect of Cu2+ stress on the morphology of Y. lipolytica and the removal rate of heavy metals were also explored. This study provides a promising potential for further application of Y. lipolytica for toxic metals removal from solid wastes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Microorganisms

Sigma-Aldrich Canada (Oakville, ON, Canada) supplied all reagent-grade chemicals used in this study. The Global Bioresource Center provided the Yarrowia lipolytica 20,460 strain. The cells of activated Y. lipolytica were preserved at −80 °C in a mixture of glycerol and yeast malt (YM) medium. The waste CCA-treated wood used in this study came from shredded poles supplied by Tred’si (North America). They were crushed into small pieces (0.3 mm). The CCA-treated wood waste contained Cu of 2.46 mg·g−1, Cr of 4.54 mg·g−1, and As of 1.57 mg·g−1 before bioremediation.

2.2. Culture Medium and Conditions

The Y. lipolytica strain was first cultivated in a YM medium for 48 h. The YM medium comprised 3 g of yeast extract, 3 g of malt extract, 10 g of glucose anhydrous, 5 g of tryptic soy broth, and 1 L of deionized (DI) water. The pH of the activated strain was 3.5. The activated strain was then transferred to a growth medium and cultivated in a shaker. The growth medium contained 50 g of glucose, 0.25 g of (NH4)2SO4, 1.7 g of KH2PO4, 12 of NaH2PO4, 1.25 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g of yeast extract, and 1 L of DI water. The pH of the growth medium was 4.72.

2.3. Metal Stress of Y. lipolytica

Y. lipolytica was inoculated in the growth medium, and its optical density (OD) was adjusted to 0.6. The OD value was measured using a UV-vis photo spectrometer (GEN10S, Madison, WI, USA) at an excitation wavelength of 600 nm. Growth mediums with high copper ion concentrations of 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 g·L−1 were prepared for metal stress using CuCl2·2H2O. An inoculated growth medium without metal ions served as a control. The above medium of 100 μL was withdrawn and transferred into the solid YM medium at intervals of 1, 4, 8, 12, and 14 days to conveniently observe the growth of the strain with the naked eye. Two replicates were operated the same as above. The domesticated strains were preserved at −80 °C in glycerol medium.

2.4. Bioremediation Procedure

Laboratory experiments explored the effect of metal stress on the bioremediation of CCA-treated wood. The OD600nm value of the growth medium in flasks was adjusted to 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 by adding the activated Y. lipolytica. The pH of OD600nm = 0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 was 4.7, 4.64, 4.62, 4.59, and 4.55, respectively. These strains were cultivated in flasks in a shaker at a rate of 125 rpm for 24 h at 27 °C. CCA-treated wood wastes of 5g were then placed into fermented liquid media of 200 mL. CCA wood samples treated with distilled water and growth medium served as controls. The flasks inoculated with different strain concentrations were sampled at 1, 3, 6, 9, 15, and 21 days compared to the controls. Two replicates of each sample with different OD600nm values and control samples were performed. Flask liquids were dumped into 50 mL tubes to measure their pH using a pH meter (HI-2002, HANNA, Padova, Italy). The wood particles were separated from the solution through a strainer. Furthermore, the treated wood particle was washed with distilled water three times and then placed in an oven overnight at 50 °C for characterization and reuse.
The following experiment was performed with different amounts of wood sawdust instead of strain concentrations. Four different quantities of wood (3, 5, 7, and 9 g) were used, where the OD600nm was 0.6, and the other conditions were kept the same. Two replicates of each sample with different amounts of CCA wood were performed.
The domesticated strains of the sample (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F) were selected to perform the bioremediation tests to investigate the effects of Cu2+ stress on heavy metal removal from CCA-treated wood wastes (Table 1). Samples (A) and (B) were stressed by copper for 4 and 8 days, respectively, with Cu2+ concentrations of 600 mg·LTab−1. Samples (C) and (D) were stressed for 12 and 14 days, respectively, with Cu2+ concentrations of 700 mg·L−1. Samples (E) and (F) were stressed for 12 days with Cu2+ concentrations of 800 and 1000 mg·L−1, respectively. The OD600nm was 0.6, and the other conditions were the same as the abovementioned parameters. The strains with OD600nm = 0.6 without adding Cu2+ were used as a control. The growth medium without any strains was set as a blank control. All samples had two replicates.

2.5. Characterization of CCA-Treated Wood

After bioremediation, the surface chemical properties of the CCA-treated wood samples were analyzed using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrophotometer (IR_Tracer-100, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with an attenuated total reflection. Wood samples were scanned at wavelengths in the range of 500–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1.
The surficial morphology of the wood samples was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (SU1510, HITACHI, Kyoto, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. The wood residue was sputter-coated with gold powder before testing.
Organic acids produced by fungi in the solution were determined by HPLC with a Biorad Aminex HPX-87 H column (300 × 7.8 mm) (Alltech Assoc. Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) at 40 °C using ultraviolet detection (210 nm). The results are the average of three measurements. The eluent was 5 mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 mL·min−1. Liquid supernatants containing Cu and Cr were pretreated with the resin Chelex-100 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to prevent analytical interference by heavy metals. The tested samples were diluted with an equal volume of phosphate buffer (0.08 M, pH 6.5) and supplied with Chelex 100 (0.1 g). The mixture solution was shaken before the HPLC test and passed through a membrane filter (0.45 μm) based on previous literature [24].
The heavy metal content of wood wastes before and after bioremediation was detected to analyze the metal removal efficiency of Y. lipolytica. An Agilent 4100 Microwave Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Melbourne, Australia) equipped with a standard glass concentric nebulizer and cyclonic spray chamber (Agilent Technologies, Melbourne, Australia) was used to analyze the heavy metals in the CCA-treated wood wastes before and after bioremediation. Before each test, 20 s torch stabilization and 10 s uptake were applied. Meanwhile, a 5 s read time with three replicates was used for the emission measurement of each sample. The metal content is the average of three measurements.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology of Bioremediation Wood

The surfaces of waste CCA-treated wood displayed a relatively smooth and intact structure (Figure 1). The microbial strains and medium treatments still need to change the structure of CCA-wood, as depicted in Figure 1A,B. The original structure of the wood was preserved in CCA-treated wood after bioremediation with Y. lipolytica. This result contradicts previous findings where the lignin and cellulose of wood were decomposed [25]. The intact structure of wood facilitates its recycling. However, microbial strains covered the wood samples’ surface after bioremediation. Strains adhered to the CCA wood surface increased with the increase in cultivation time (Figure 2A–C). The SEM results also showed that the cells of Y. lipolytica adhered to CCA-treated wood were ellipsoid with bipolar budding patterns. The size of the ellipsoidal cells was around 5 μm. Meanwhile, some characteristic features of filamentous hyphae were also observed, especially for longer cultivation times.
Compared to the original strains, the Cu2+-domesticated strains had an ellipsoidal shape and partially changed into much smaller particles (Figure 2D–F). These observations agreed with the results of digital images of the fungi, as shown in Figure 3 and Table 2. The morphological characteristics of strain (B) after Cu2+ stress changed from large, oval, and round cells to small ones (Figure 3). These characteristics mainly occurred when the concentration of Cu2+ ranged from 500 to 700 mg·L−1, especially with an increase in cultivation days. This result indicated that the domesticated strains with round cells and small sizes are more adaptable to higher copper ion concentrations than the original strain. A previous report drew a similar conclusion that morphological changes of Y. lipolytica were in response to different heavy metal stress [20]. Like the original strain, microbial remediation with the domesticated strains did not destroy the surface structure of CCA-treated wood. Furthermore, many strains grew on the surface of CCA-treated wood. This observation indicated that the changes in morphological characteristics of strains hardly change the reaction mechanism of bioremediate wood waste.

3.2. Surface Chemical Properties of CCA-Treated Wood Samples

The surface chemical groups of the CCA-treated wood before and after bioremediation were characterized by FTIR, as shown in Figure 4. A broad and intensely sharp band at 3444 to 3330 cm−1 was observed. This band can be attributed to the stretching vibration of the hydroxyl group of bonded water in the CCA-treated wood. The asymmetric and symmetric vibrations of the C–H bonds were located at the 2922 and 2853 cm−1 wavenumbers, respectively. Those results demonstrated the presence of aliphatic structures in the CCA-treated wood. The peaks at 1240 and 1147 to 1031 cm−1 and the continuation spectra between 900 and 700 cm−1 were attributed to C–O, C–C, or C–OH vibrations of aromatic structures and C–H bonds of aromatic structures, respectively. The peaks at about 1650 to 1750 cm−1 indicated the presence of C = O vibrations. Nadaroglu et al. (2015) also observed these characteristic peaks in the FTIR spectrum of CCA-treated wood [26]. Furthermore, the wide absorption band at 1650–1730 cm−1 was attributed to the stretching vibrations of the C = O group in the CCA-treated wood. However, this band was split into two peaks after bioremediation. This result can be explained by copper (II) ions complexed with the acetyl or carboxylic acid bonds in the CCA-treated wood, causing a broad absorption band [27]. The copper ions in the CCA-treated wood were removed by microbial remediation with Y. Lipolytica, releasing carboxylic acid.

3.3. Bioremediation of CCA-Treated Wood

3.3.1. Influence of Initial Strain Concentrations

The CCA-wood was treated with different concentrations of Y. lipolytica to remove heavy metals. An uninoculated medium and distilled water were used as controls, as shown in Figure 5A–C. After 21 days, the minimum content of copper, arsenic, and chromium in the wood was 0.417, 0.522, and 2.55 mg/g, respectively, with the treatment of yeast at OD = 0.05 concentration (Figure S1). The maximum Cu removal (82.8%) was attained after 21 days of incubation with a strain concentration of OD600nm = 0.05. It was observed that almost the same amount of Cu was removed after 21 days when the strain’s concentration was OD600nm = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6. However, OD600nm = 0.9 showed less Cu removal under the same condition. This was attributed to the fact that organic acids have a greater impact on metal removal than colony adsorption. In the early stage of treatment, the strain multiplies rapidly, consuming nutrients. During this period, the removal effect of heavy metals by high-concentration fungi was better than that of low-concentration fungi due to adsorption. The content of oxalic acid increased rapidly after 6 days of treatment (Figure 5C), playing a major role in removing heavy metals. The strains depleted nutrients quickly when the strains’ concentration was high. For strains with OD600nm = 0.9, the lack of nutrients led to low oxalic acid production after 6 days, resulting in a low metal removal rate. This result is consistent with Table 3, where heavy metal mainly passed into the culture medium rather than the yeast, especially for low initial strains concentration. The amount of metals adsorbed by yeast increases with the initial strain concentration of the treatment solution. This increase is because the yield of organic acid is low in the initial stage of treatment, and the removal of metals is mainly by the adsorption of strains. Over time, the metal content in the yeast cells decreased. This decrease is because the organic acids produced in the late fermentation stage, especially oxalic acid, have a stronger binding ability to metals excreted from the cells to the culture solution. However, no matter the initial strain concentration, the metal content in the treated supernatant is higher than in the yeast cells. This finding suggests that metal removal is mainly due to cell secretions (organic acids) rather than the cells’ adsorption. The interactions of strains and Cu elements include extracellular complexation through organic acids, precipitation, and adsorption onto the cell wall [28]. The Y. lipolytica strain treatment led to extensive solubilization of Cu with increasing cultivation days under the same strains’ concentrations. It is worth mentioning that more than half of the Cu ions in the wood were removed after three days in this system. The heavy metal removal was much higher than the control samples (14.3% with water and 34.4% with medium). CCA-treated wood is impregnated with CuO, CrO3, and As2O5 under high pressure. These chemical compositions are water soluble, which can be leached with water or organic acids [16]. Furthermore, the medium in this study mainly consists of glucose that contains hydroxyl functional groups. These hydroxyl groups combine with heavy metals to decontaminate CCA-treated wood [16]. Aspergillus niger, having mature cultivation systems, has also been extensively studied in the bioremediation of treated wood. However, its removal efficiency for Cu is less than 90% after 10 days of remediation [29]. Another study showed that the Cu removal rates from CCA-treated wood treated with Fomitopsis palustris, Coniophora puteana, and Laetiporus sulphureus for 10 days were 71.9%, 66.5% and 50.1%, respectively [30]. Researchers have also explored other fungi to remove heavy metals from CCA-treated wood wastes, as shown in Table 4. Those results indicated the removal ability of copper ions varies with the fungal species. Those observations showed that Y. lipolytica is promising to obtain an excellent Cu removal rate by optimizing the medium compositions and cultivation conditions.
Compared with Cu, Cr, and As, elements in CCA-treated wood are difficult to remove. A previous study indicated that less than 20% of Cr and 30% of As were removed using Alternaria alternata or Cladosporium herbarium treated for 10 days [29]. In the current study, the removal rate of Cr at different strain concentration gradients was lower than that for Cu, where the maximum removal was 43.1%. Meanwhile, the maximum removal rate of As was 68.3%. Like Cu, the Cr and As removal rates increased with increasing incubation time (Figure 5B,C). However, Sierra-Alvarez (2009) found that the removal rate of Cu from the solid-state fermentation of CCA-treated wood by several brown rot fungi was very low (<10.9%), while a high removal rate for Cr was observed in the same system [24]. Similar results were also observed for Fomitopsis palustris and Laetiporus sulphureus, as shown in Table 4. Compared with copper ions, the removal of arsenic ions by these two fungi is more obvious. These observations are different from what has been found in this study. This observation suggests that microorganisms exhibit different tolerances to different metals. Thus, removing heavy metals from treated wood using a combination of different species of microorganisms is a promising exploration strategy. For the CCA-treated wood with uninoculated medium for 21 days, this medium was mainly composed of glucose, which contained hydroxyl structural groups. These hydroxyl groups combine with metal ions, thereby removing the metal ions from the CCA-treated wood [32].
Figure 5F shows that the pH of the medium decreased sharply before 15 days of domesticating, except for strains with OD600nm = 0.6 and 0.9. The decrease in pH was accompanied by a significant increase in oxalic acid accumulation for all the samples with cultivation times up to 15 days. However, the pH values of the mediums increased from 15 to 21 days. This observation is attributed to the lack of a carbon source (i.e., glucose), leading to stagnant growth and strains’ low organic acid production. Oxalic acid in the medium complexed with copper ions further increases Cu removal under the same concentrations. Therefore, organic acids play an important role in the bioremediation process of preservative-treated wood by microorganisms [24,29]. The removal rate of heavy metals (Cu, Cr, and As) from CCA-treated wood increased with a decreased organic acid concentration in the biological system.
The organic acid composition and pH determination were analyzed to explore the metal removal mechanism for CCA-treated wood by Y. lipolytica. Results showed that Y. lipolytica produced oxalic, citric, malic, and acetic acids, as depicted in the HPLC chromatograms (Figure 6).
Inoculum concentration had an important influence on the removal rate of heavy metals from the CCA-treated wood. For instance, during the first 15 days of cultivation, the removal efficiencies of Cu were shifted from low to high as follows, OD600nm = 0.9 < 0.6 < 0.3 < 0.05 < 0.1. Generally, the higher the strain concentration, the increased ability to remove metal. The experimental results of this study were consistent with this rule when the treatment time was less than 6 days. However, this study showed a contrary result after 21 days of treatment. The reason is that organic acids play a major role in metal removal. In the early stage of treatment, the biosorption mechanism is dominant, so the more colonies, the more metals will be adsorbed, and the removal rate will be higher. The medium’s space and nutrients are insufficient to support the normal growth of high-concentration strains to produce oxalic acid after 6 days. The strains with low concentrations are more active and produce more contents of organic acids after 6 days, thereby possessing a higher metal removal efficiency. The removal efficiency of Cr and As was lower than that of Cu. This observation may be explained by oxalic acid being more sensitive to copper than As and Cr metals. Oxalic acid was predominant in the fermentation medium of the Y. lipolytica strains (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Unlike Cu, the acid that can act on chromium or arsenic was not observed. In addition, the amounts and types of organic acids produced by microorganisms vary with operating conditions, such as pH, temperature, and nutrient contents [29]. Thus, the external conditions should be optimized to adjust the removal of heavy metals from preservative-treated wood.

3.3.2. Influence of Wood Amount

The effect of CCA-treated wood dose on the removal of heavy metals using the liquid broth medium of Y. lipolytica (OD600nm = 0.6) was explored. The number of wood wastes affected the removal rate of heavy metals, especially copper (Figure 8A). The percentage of removed Cu gradually decreased with increased CCA-treated wood contents (Figure 8A). Moreover, increasing the cultivation period from 1 to 21 days enhanced heavy metal removal while the pH value decreased. The pH increased with increasing wood amounts (Figure 8D). It was likely attributed to the enhancement of inorganic metal salts in liquid with the increase in CCA-treated wood dose. These observations indicated that copper removal mainly depended on the amount of organic acid. Of note, the effect of wood contents on the concentration of organic acids could have been more obvious.
The effect of wood content on the removal of Cr and As showed a different tendency compared to Cu (Figure 8B,C). The amounts of CCA-treated wood did not affect the removal rates of Cr and As. Nevertheless, they were influenced to some extent by cultivation time. In contrast, a previous study revealed that the initial concentration of ions was highly affected by removing Cr (VI) using Y. lipolytica in aqueous solutions [33]. In addition to the organic acids produced by the yeast, mycelium and proteins effectively decontaminated toxic metals by either biosorption or bioaccumulation [34]. Biomass residues have numerous functional groups, such as hydroxyl and carboxyl, which help absorb metal ions in aqueous solutions compared to a solid matrix. These observations reveal that the ability of yeast to decontaminate CCA-treated wood varies with metal species and the state of the pollutant.

3.3.3. Influence of Copper Ion Stress

A previous study reported that the metal-tolerant properties of Y. lipolytica increased after strains were stressed by Cu2+ solutions [33]. Based on the above report, Y. lipolytica was domesticated by Cu ions to change its form to remove heavy metals in this study. High concentrations of Cu2+ were used to domesticate Y. lipolytica at different intervals to enhance its metal tolerance. Table 2 shows the number of colonies of Y. lipolytica grown on a YM solid medium domesticated by different Cu2+ concentrations. The number of colonies was obtained by counting. The amounts of the strains increased when the concentrations of Cu2+ in solution were 500 and 600 mg·L−1 with the increase in metal stress days. The morphology of the domesticated strains changed from large and round colonies to smaller ones. Kolhe obtained an analogous result that the dimorphic behavior of Y. lipolytica from yeast to mycelial forms was altered in response to metal stress [28]. In addition, biofilm formation is another way to resist metal ion stress. Moreover, the extracellular synthesis of Cu-nanoparticles of Y. lipolytica was also a pathway in response to Cu stress [35].
The change in morphology was significant when the strains were cultivated in a copper concentration of 700 mg·L−1. The number of strains first reduced within eight days and afterward increased. This can be explained by the fact that heavy metals partly inhibited the strains at an early stress stage, and the survived strains were adapted to the metal-based environment after eight days. When the concentrations of Cu2+ were over 800 mg·L−1, it was difficult for the strains to survive more than four days. Even worse, all strains died after 14 days of stress. The results indicated that the change in morphology of Y. lipolytica varied with concentrations of heavy metals. Similarly, previous studies found that different types of Y. lipolytica have differential responses to heavy metals stress [20]. A few eugenic strains were selected to treat CCA-treated wood to determine the tolerance of the domesticated strains to heavy metals.
The metal stress treatment promoted the removal of copper from CCA-treated wood by Y. lipolytica (Figure 9). The metal adsorption performance of the seven domesticated yeasts varied with the processing parameters. The Cu2+ removal rate of the domesticated strains of samples (C) and (D) increased by around 20% compared to the original ones within 1 day. Meanwhile, sample C’s removal rate was 95.9% higher within one day than for the blank control (growth medium). Even though glucose and phosphate in the medium may aid in the diffusion of metals, it is difficult for them to compete for copper ions from cellulose molecules. Both glucose and wood contain a large number of hydroxyl groups. Moreover, wood contains carboxyl groups, which are easier to complex with metal ions than hydroxyl groups. The significant increase in the removal rate of copper ions indicates that Y. lipolytica has played an important role in promoting the removal of copper ions. Phosphatases, metallothionein, and organic acids are reported to play essential roles in overcoming copper ion stress in Y. lipolytica [28]. Y. lipolytica exhibited higher phosphatase levels in a copper-supplemented medium, which increased with metal ion concentrations [36]. The strains’ tolerance to Cu2+ was attributed to the increased phosphatase activity, resulting in the efflux of Cu2+ as phosphate complexes. The presence of phosphatase ensures the survival of fungi in the environment of high metal ions so that more organic acids can be produced to remove heavy metals from wood. Thiol groups that were in cysteine residues connected metallothionein and metal ions. Organic acids, transport proteins, and extracellular proteins secreted by the strains were imperative to the bioremediation of CCA-treated wood. They remove heavy metals by biosorption, biotransformation, bioaccumulation, and organic acid complexation [5]. Thus, the enhancement of metal removal by Cu2+-domesticated strains was attributed to the synergistic effect of multiple enzymes and organic acids.
The domesticated strains did not show regular growth with increasing cultivation time. The effect of sample (C) on metal removal from treated wood showed more efficiency than the original ones for different cultivation intervals. The domesticated strains (B) showed incremental patterns of metal removal with an increase in cultivation days. The metal removal rate from CCA-treated wood using strains (B) was similar to the control sample within nine days of cultivation. It overtook the control sample removal rate after 15 days of cultivation. This may be due to the original strain being adaptable to high copper ion concentrations over time. On the other hand, metal stress treatments make strains better adapt to harsh conditions than the original strain, then shorten their metal removal time.
The response of yeasts to toxic metals depends on the concentrations of heavy metal ions. Generally, yeasts adapt to the pressure of the metal environment in different ways, such as transformation, extracellular precipitation, intracellular compartmentalization, crystallization, organic acid complexation, and adsorption onto cell walls [33,37,38]. Bankar et al. (2018) investigated Y. lipolytica’s tolerance to heavy metals and found that the metals influenced biofilms’ formation [33]. A previous study revealed that changes in its morphological behavior demonstrated the adaption of Y. lipolytica to the stresses of different heavy metals [20]. In this study, strains’ morphology changed when the concentrations of Cu2+ were lower while the strains’ growth was inhibited at a high Cu2+ concentration (Table 2). Moreover, the organic acid produced by strains plays a vital role in heavy metal removal. Therefore, other stress approaches, such as changes in cultivation conditions (pH, temperature, etc.) [39], electrochemical stress [21], UV light radiation [40], and genetic engineering [41], will be further investigated to develop selective strains with better characteristics for heavy metal removal.

4. Conclusions

Y. lipolytica was efficient in the removal of toxic metals from CCA-treated wood. The copper stress of microbial strains enhanced their metal tolerance, further increasing their heavy metal removal abilities. Bioremediation changed the surface morphology and the chemicals of CCA-treated wood because heavy metals and strain residues were removed. The organic acids produced by Y. lipolytica played an important role in removing heavy metals, especially copper. The Cu, Cr, and As removal rates by Y. lipolytica were 82.8%, 43.1%, and 68.3%, respectively. Since Y. lipolytica does not destroy the structure of wood particles, the decontaminated CCA wood particles can be mixed with the original wood particles in a certain proportion to prepare wood pellets. In contrast to the original strains, the removal rate of copper for domesticated strains increased by 20% under fixed conditions. This result indicated that metal stress changed the nature of the strains, increasing their heavy metal removal efficiency for CCA-treated wood. This study proved that Y. lipolytica strains could remove metals from CCA-treated wood, advancing research on the bioremediation of solid waste pollutants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof9040469/s1, Figure S1: The content of copper, chromium and arsenic in wood, treated with different concentrations of yeast for different time.

Author Contributions

D.X.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Original draft preparation, Software; J.Z.: Data curation, Visualization, Reviewing and Editing; A.K. and S.M.: Supervision, Validation, Reviewing and Editing; H.B.: Reviewing and Editing. A.K. and H.B. Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Quebec Consortium for Industrial Bioprocess Research and Innovation (CRIBIQ), Mitacs (IT11796), the Canada Research Chair Program, the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022QC101), and the Ministry of Education (SWZ-ZD202101) funded this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used in this study is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Industrial Waste Technology Centre and the Key Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science & Technology (Northeast Forestry University) for access to their facilities and technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morais, S.; Fonseca, H.M.; Oliveira, S.M.; Oliveira, H.; Gupta, V.K.; Sharma, B.; de Lourdes Pereira, M. Environmental and Health Hazards of Chromated Copper Arsenate-Treated Wood: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Civardi, C.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R.; Wick, P. Micronized copper wood preservatives: An efficiency and potential health risk assessment for copper-based nanoparticles. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 200, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dhillon, G.S.; Lea Rosine, G.M.; Kaur, S.; Hegde, K.; Brar, S.K.; Drogui, P.; Verma, M. Novel biomaterials from citric acid fermentation as biosorbents for removal of metals from waste chromated copper arsenate wood leachates. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 119, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Townsend, T.; Tolaymat, T.; Solo-Gabriele, H.; Dubey, B.; Stook, K.; Wadanambi, L. Leaching of CCA-treated wood: Implications for waste disposal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 114, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zango Usman, U.; Mukesh, Y.; Vandana, S.; Sharma, J.; Sanjay, P.; Sidhartha, D.; Sharma Anil, K. Microbial bioremediation of heavy metals: Emerging trends and recent advances. Res. J. Biotechnol. Vol. 2020, 15, 164–178. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gmar, M.; Bouafif, H.; Bouslimi, B.; Braghiroli, F.L.; Koubaa, A. Pyrolysis of Chromated Copper Arsenate-Treated Wood: Investigation of Temperature, Granulometry, Biochar Yield, and Metal Pathways. Energies 2022, 15, 5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ribeiro, A.; Rodriguez-Maroto, J.; Mateus, E.; Velizarova, E.; Ottosen, L.M. Modeling of electrodialytic and dialytic removal of Cr, Cu and As from CCA-treated wood chips. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 1716–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alam, M.; Alshehri, T.; Wang, J.; Singerling, S.A.; Alpers, C.N.; Baalousha, M. Identification and quantification of Cr, Cu, and As incidental nanomaterials derived from CCA-treated wood in wildland-urban interface fire ashes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 445, 130608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kato, T.; Hatakeyama, T.; Sugawara, K. Release behavior of arsenic, chromium, and copper during heat treatments of CCA-treated wood. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2021, 23, 1636–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Costa, L.G.d.; Brocco, V.F.; Paes, J.B.; Kirker, G.T.; Bishell, A.B. Biological and chemical remediation of CCA treated eucalypt poles after 30 years in service. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Blazhenko, O.V.; Zimmermann, M.; Kang, H.A.; Bartosz, G.; Penninckx, M.J.; Ubiyvovk, V.M.; Sibirny, A.A. Accumulation of cadmium ions in the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. BioMetals 2006, 19, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, J.; Chen, C. Biosorption of heavy metals by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Singh, P.; Raghukumar, C.; Parvatkar, R.R.; Mascarenhas-Pereira, M. Heavy metal tolerance in the psychrotolerant Cryptococcus sp. isolated from deep-sea sediments of the Central Indian Basin. Yeast 2013, 30, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ilyas, S.; Rehman, A.; Ilyas, Q. Heavy metals induced oxidative stress in multi-metal tolerant yeast, Candida sp. PS33 and its capability to uptake heavy metals from wastewater. Pak. J. Zool. 2017, 49, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kartal, S.N.; Kakitani, T.; Imamura, Y. Bioremediation of CCA-C treated wood by Aspergillus niger fermentation. Holz Als Roh-Und Werkst. 2004, 62, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xing, D.; Magdouli, S.; Zhang, J.; Koubaa, A. Microbial remediation for the removal of inorganic contaminants from treated wood: Recent trends and challenges. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bankar, A.V.; Kumar, A.R.; Zinjarde, S.S. Removal of chromium (VI) ions from aqueous solution by adsorption onto two marine isolates of Yarrowia lipolytica. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, B.; Jin, Y.; Cui, C.; Song, X. Enhanced Cr (VI) adsorption using chemically modified dormant Aspergillus niger spores: Process and mechanisms. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 106955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cavallo, E.; Charreau, H.; Cerrutti, P.; Foresti, M.L. Yarrowia lipolytica: A model yeast for citric acid production. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, fox084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bankar, A.; Zinjarde, S.; Telmore, A.; Walke, A.; Ravikumar, A. Morphological response of Yarrowia lipolytica under stress of heavy metals. Can. J. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oliveira, A.; Sousa, T.; Amaral, P.; Coelho, M.; Araujo, O. Study of morphological and physiological parameters of cultures of Yarrowia lipolytica undergone electrochemical stress. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2010, 20, 133–138. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pandharikar, G.; Claudien, K.; Rose, C.; Billet, D.; Pollier, B.; Deveau, A.; Besserer, A.; Morel-Rouhier, M. Comparative Copper Resistance Strategies of Rhodonia placenta and Phanerochaete chrysosporium in a Copper/Azole-Treated Wood Microcosm. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, X.; Xu, J.; Xia, J.; Lv, J.; Wu, Z.; Deng, Y. Improved production of citric acid by Yarrowia lipolytica using oleic acid as the oxygen-vector and co-substrate. Eng. Life Sci. 2016, 16, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sierra-Alvarez, R. Removal of copper, chromium, and arsenic from preservative-treated wood by chemical extraction-fungal bioleaching. Waste Manag. 2009, 29, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schubert, M.; Volkmer, T.; Lehringer, C.; Schwarze, F. Resistance of bioincised wood treated with wood preservatives to blue-stain and wood-decay fungi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2011, 65, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nadaroglu, H.; Kalkan, E.; Celik, H. Equilibrium studies of copper ion adsorption onto a modified kernel of date (Fructus dactylus). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 2079–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gołofit, T.; Zielenkiewicz, T.; Gawron, J. FTIR examination of preservative retention in beech wood (Fagus sylvatica L.). Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2012, 70, 907–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kolhe, N.; Damle, E.; Pradhan, A.; Zinjarde, S. A comprehensive assessment of Yarrowia lipolytica and its interactions with metals: Current updates and future prospective. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 59, 107967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kartal, S.N.; Katsumata, N.; Imamura, Y. Removal of copper, chromium, and arsenic from CCA-treated wood by organic acids released by mold and staining fungi. For. Prod. J. 2006, 56, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kartal, S.N.; Munir, E.; Kakitani, T.; Imamura, Y. Bioremediation of CCA-treated wood by brown-rot fungi Fomitopsis palustris, Coniophora puteana, and Laetiporus sulphureus. J. Wood Sci. 2004, 50, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clausen, C.A. Isolating metal-tolerant bacteria capable of removing copper, chromium, and arsenic from treated wood. Waste Manag. Res. 2000, 18, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, X.; Li, J.; Guo, Q.; Xu, M.; Zhang, X.; Li, T. Cation-π interaction in Mg (OH) 2@ GO-coated activated carbon fiber cloth for rapid removal and recovery of divalent metal cations by flow-through adsorption. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 188, 106648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bankar, A.; Zinjarde, S.; Shinde, M.; Gopalghare, G.; Ravikumar, A. Heavy metal tolerance in marine strains of Yarrowia lipolytica. Extremophiles 2018, 22, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hattori, T.; Hisamori, H.; Suzuki, S.; Umezawa, T.; Yoshimura, T.; Sakai, H. Rapid copper transfer and precipitation by wood-rotting fungi can affect copper removal from copper sulfate-treated wood blocks during solid-state fungal treatment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 97, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El-Sayed, M.T. Bioremediation and Extracellular Synthesis of Copper Nanoparticles from Wastewater using vYarrowia lipolytica AUMC 9256. Egypt. J. Bot. 2018, 58, 563–579. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ito, H.; Inouhe, M.; Tohoyama, H.; Joho, M. Effect of copper on acid phosphatase activity in yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Z. Für Nat. C 2007, 62, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Adamo, G.M.; Brocca, S.; Passolunghi, S.; Salvato, B.; Lotti, M. Laboratory evolution of copper tolerant yeast strains. Microb. Cell Factories 2012, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hosiner, D.; Gerber, S.; Lichtenberg-Fraté, H.; Glaser, W.; Schüller, C.; Klipp, E. Impact of Acute Metal Stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e83330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rywińska, A.; Wojtatowicz, M.; Żarowska, B.; Rymowicz, W. Biosynthesis of citric acid by yeast Yarrowia lipolytica A-101-1.31 under repeated batch cultivation. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ. 2008, 11, #07. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kostina, E.; Wulff, A.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Growth, structure, stomatal responses and secondary metabolites of birch seedlings (Betula pendula) under elevated UV-B radiation in the field. Trees 2001, 15, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rzechonek, D.A.; Dobrowolski, A.; Rymowicz, W.; Mirończuk, A.M. Aseptic production of citric and isocitric acid from crude glycerol by genetically modified Yarrowia lipolytica. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 271, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Micro-morphology of CCA-treated wood before treatment at 100 μm (A) and 50 μm scale (B); after treatment with uninoculated medium for 21 d at 100 μm (C) and 50 μm scale (D).
Figure 1. Micro-morphology of CCA-treated wood before treatment at 100 μm (A) and 50 μm scale (B); after treatment with uninoculated medium for 21 d at 100 μm (C) and 50 μm scale (D).
Jof 09 00469 g001
Figure 2. Micro-morphology of CCA-treated wood treated with the Y. lipolytica: CCA wood treated with OD600nm = 0.05 for 1 d (A), 9 d (B), and 21 d (C), and CCA wood treated with domesticated strains of sample B for 1 d (D), 9 d (E), and 21 d (F).
Figure 2. Micro-morphology of CCA-treated wood treated with the Y. lipolytica: CCA wood treated with OD600nm = 0.05 for 1 d (A), 9 d (B), and 21 d (C), and CCA wood treated with domesticated strains of sample B for 1 d (D), 9 d (E), and 21 d (F).
Jof 09 00469 g002
Figure 3. Digital photos of the growth status of the domesticated Y. lipolytica.
Figure 3. Digital photos of the growth status of the domesticated Y. lipolytica.
Jof 09 00469 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of CCA wood treated with different conditions for 21 days (A) and with the concentrations of Y. lipolytica (OD600nm = 0.1) for different cultivation days (B).
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of CCA wood treated with different conditions for 21 days (A) and with the concentrations of Y. lipolytica (OD600nm = 0.1) for different cultivation days (B).
Jof 09 00469 g004
Figure 5. Removal rates of Cu (A), Cr (B), and As (C) from CCA-treated wood using Y. lipolytica, and the amounts of oxalic acid (D) and glucose (E) in the fermentation medium, the pH value of the fermentation medium (F).
Figure 5. Removal rates of Cu (A), Cr (B), and As (C) from CCA-treated wood using Y. lipolytica, and the amounts of oxalic acid (D) and glucose (E) in the fermentation medium, the pH value of the fermentation medium (F).
Jof 09 00469 g005
Figure 6. HPLC results of the standard samples (A) and the medium supernatant under different conditions: different contents of CCA-treated wood for 21 days (B), different concentrations of Y. lipolytica for 9 days (C), and different concentrations of Y. lipolytica for 21 days (D).
Figure 6. HPLC results of the standard samples (A) and the medium supernatant under different conditions: different contents of CCA-treated wood for 21 days (B), different concentrations of Y. lipolytica for 9 days (C), and different concentrations of Y. lipolytica for 21 days (D).
Jof 09 00469 g006
Figure 7. HPLC results for the medium supernatant with different contents of CCA-treated wood: CCA-treated wood of 3 g (A), CCA-treated wood of 5 g (B), CCA-treated wood of 7 g (C), and CCA-treated wood of 9 g (D).
Figure 7. HPLC results for the medium supernatant with different contents of CCA-treated wood: CCA-treated wood of 3 g (A), CCA-treated wood of 5 g (B), CCA-treated wood of 7 g (C), and CCA-treated wood of 9 g (D).
Jof 09 00469 g007
Figure 8. Removal rate of Cu (A), Cr (B), and As (C) from CCA-treated wood by Y. lipolytica (OD600nm = 0.6) with different wood contents; pH of the fermentation medium with varying contents of CCA-treated wood (D).
Figure 8. Removal rate of Cu (A), Cr (B), and As (C) from CCA-treated wood by Y. lipolytica (OD600nm = 0.6) with different wood contents; pH of the fermentation medium with varying contents of CCA-treated wood (D).
Jof 09 00469 g008
Figure 9. Cu removal rate from CCA-treated wood using domesticated strains compared with untreated ones; samples (A) and (B) were stressed for 4 and 8 days, respectively, with Cu2+ concentrations of 600 mg·L−1; samples (C) and (D) were stressed for 12 and 14 days, respectively, with Cu2+ concentrations of 700 mg·L−1; samples (E) and (F) were stressed for 12 days with Cu2+ concentrations of 800 and 1000 mg·L−1, respectively; the control was strains with OD600nm = 0.6 without the addition of Cu2+; the blank control was the growth medium without any strains.
Figure 9. Cu removal rate from CCA-treated wood using domesticated strains compared with untreated ones; samples (A) and (B) were stressed for 4 and 8 days, respectively, with Cu2+ concentrations of 600 mg·L−1; samples (C) and (D) were stressed for 12 and 14 days, respectively, with Cu2+ concentrations of 700 mg·L−1; samples (E) and (F) were stressed for 12 days with Cu2+ concentrations of 800 and 1000 mg·L−1, respectively; the control was strains with OD600nm = 0.6 without the addition of Cu2+; the blank control was the growth medium without any strains.
Jof 09 00469 g009
Table 1. Domesticated Y. lipolytica strains for bioremediation.
Table 1. Domesticated Y. lipolytica strains for bioremediation.
SampleConcentrations of Cu2+ (mg·L−1)Days of Metal Stress
A6004
B6008
C70012
D70014
E80012
F100012
ControlNo additionNo
Table 2. The number of Yarrowia lipolytica colonies domesticated by different Cu2+ concentrations grew on the YM solid medium (obtained by counting).
Table 2. The number of Yarrowia lipolytica colonies domesticated by different Cu2+ concentrations grew on the YM solid medium (obtained by counting).
Concentrations of Cu2+Number of Days of Metal Stress
1 Day4 Days8 Days12 Days14 Days
500 mg·L−1116 (2.65 *)167 (8.50)------
600 mg·L−1229 (42.77)179 (6.51)------
700 mg·L−1170 (13.65)92 (7.94)21 (2.65)99 (2.65)--
800 mg·L−174 (14.36)80 (6.81)8 (3.51)6 (1.15)1 (0.58)
1000 mg·L−184 (15.72)20 (2.31)7 (2.89)5 (3.06)0 (0.58)
-- Uncountable, (*) standard deviation.
Table 3. The cu ion content in the culture supernatant and cells of Y. lipolytica after treatment.
Table 3. The cu ion content in the culture supernatant and cells of Y. lipolytica after treatment.
OD Values0.050.60.6 (Fungi under Copper Ion Stress)0.05
(Supernatant)
0.6
(Supernatant)
Time
1 day36.8 × 10−3 (mg·g−1)1.53 (mg·g−1)1.55 (mg·g−1)46.0 × 10−3 (mg·g−1)32.3 × 10−3 (mg·g−1)
15 days36.8 × 10−3 (mg·g−1)1.02 (mg·g−1)1.19 (mg·g−1)--
Table 4. Comparison of decontamination effects of different fungi on CCA wood.
Table 4. Comparison of decontamination effects of different fungi on CCA wood.
MicrobesMaximum Metal Removal Rate (%)Reference
CuCrAs
Yarrowia lipolitica834368This study
Aspergillus niger495597[15]
Aureobacterium barkeri506837[31]
Pseudomonas fluorescens50-48[31]
Fomitopsis palustris7287100[30]
Coniophora puteana671918[30]
Laetiporus sulphureus506985[30]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xing, D.; Magdouli, S.; Zhang, J.; Bouafif, H.; Koubaa, A. A Comparative Study on Heavy Metal Removal from CCA-Treated Wood Waste by Yarrowia lipolytica: Effects of Metal Stress. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040469

AMA Style

Xing D, Magdouli S, Zhang J, Bouafif H, Koubaa A. A Comparative Study on Heavy Metal Removal from CCA-Treated Wood Waste by Yarrowia lipolytica: Effects of Metal Stress. Journal of Fungi. 2023; 9(4):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xing, Dan, Sara Magdouli, Jingfa Zhang, Hassine Bouafif, and Ahmed Koubaa. 2023. "A Comparative Study on Heavy Metal Removal from CCA-Treated Wood Waste by Yarrowia lipolytica: Effects of Metal Stress" Journal of Fungi 9, no. 4: 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop