Next Article in Journal
Combination of Sodium Bicarbonate (SBC) with Bacterial Antagonists for the Control of Brown Rot Disease of Fruit
Next Article in Special Issue
RNA-Seq Provides Insights into the Mechanisms Underlying Ilyonectria robusta Responding to Secondary Metabolites of Bacillus methylotrophicus NJ13
Previous Article in Journal
A Perilipin Affects Lipid Droplet Homeostasis and Aerial Hyphal Growth, but Has Only Small Effects on Virulence in the Insect Pathogenic Fungus Beauveria bassiana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermo-Mechanical and Fungi Treatment as an Alternative Lignin Degradation Method for Bambusa oldhamii and Guadua angustifolia Fibers
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Recent Advances in Directed Yeast Genome Evolution

J. Fungi 2022, 8(6), 635; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060635
by Zhen Yao 1,2, Qinhong Wang 1,2,* and Zongjie Dai 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
J. Fungi 2022, 8(6), 635; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060635
Submission received: 27 May 2022 / Revised: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 15 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Opportunities in Fungal Biotechnology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The review by Yao, Wang and Dai presents a good overview of the methods and contemporary approaches to directed genome evolution. While the verbiage can be sometimes overly sophisticated and it can slow down the reading flow, that doesn't take away from the very good breadth and detail of the discussed approaches such as CRISPR and SCRAMBLE. The only aspect that I find lacking is mentioning and discussing automated methods for directed evolution such as ACE, PRANCE or MAGE. While they are targeted towards bacteria more than yeast, I think those approaches are still worth at least mentioning, since they could be ported over to the model eukaryotic system too.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript, Yao, Wang, and Dai present a comprehensive review of the recent advances in genome editing and evolution technology applied to the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae with the scope to obtain tailor-made yeast strains for the precise determination of relevant gene targets that regulate physiological functions relevant to important functions such as stress resistance or metabolic pathway optimization.

The review is very well written, covering important aspects and techniques used for precise evolutionary engineering, as the primary step for synthetic biology and metabolic engineering applications. In the context of Synthetic Yeast Genome Projects, the authors focus on reviewing the use of cutting-edge techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9 or SCRaMbLE applied to yeast for laboratory and industrial purposes.

In this reviewer's eyes, the manuscript can be accepted for publication. One minor issue: the last paragraph before Summary and Outlook (lines 376-380) requires a reference. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

 

Yao, Wang, and Dai have conceived and written an accurate review on the current state of genome manipulation aimed at modulating or investigating genetic functions in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The manuscript “Recent advances in directed yeast genome evolution” is interesting and properly depicts the current tools and approaches suitable for dissecting the links between genetics and phenotype as well as for tuning specific traits.

 

I have only a couple of very minor comments:

L12 (abstract): what do the authors mean by “evolution technology”?

L382: I am not sure the verb “interrogate” is appropriate here.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop