The Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors for Treatment Outcomes of Dematiaceous Fungal Keratitis over 9 Years at a Tertiary Eye Care in Northern Thailand
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Dematiaceous Fungal Identification Using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Technique and Sequencing Analysis
2.2. DNA Extraction
2.3. Amplification and Sequencing of D1/D2 Domains of the Large Subunit Ribosomal DNA (Lsurdna) and Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Region of the Ribosomal rDNA
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Epidemiological Features
3.2. Clinical Characteristics
3.3. Laboratory Finding
3.4. Final Treatment Outcomes
3.5. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Top 3 Most Common Dematiaceous Fungi Causing Keratitis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chowdhary, A.; Singh, K. Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis in North India. Cornea 2005, 24, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lalitha, P.; Prajna, N.V.; Manoharan, G.; Srinivasan, M.; Mascarenhas, J.; Das, M.; D’Silva, S.S.; Porco, T.C.; Keenan, J.D. Trends in bacterial and fungal keratitis in South India, 2002–2012. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 99, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FlorCruz, N.V.; Evans, J.R. Medical interventions for fungal keratitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, CD004241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garg, P.; Gopinathan, U.; Choudhary, K.; Rao, G.N. Keratomycosis: Clinical and microbiologic experience with dematiaceous fungi. Ophthalmology 2000, 107, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Hao, J.; Gao, S.; Wan, X.; Wang, W.; Shan, Q.; Wang, L. Etiological Analysis of Fungal Keratitis and Rapid Identification of Predominant Fungal Pathogens. Mycopathologia 2015, 181, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sengupta, S.; Rajan, S.; Reddy, P.R.; Thiruvengadakrishnan, K.; Ravindran, R.D.; Lalitha, P.; Vaitilingam, C.M. Comparative study on the incidence and outcomes of pigmented versus non pigmented keratomycosis. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 59, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shapiro, B.L.; Lalitha, P.; Loh, A.R.; Fothergill, A.W.; Prajna, N.V.; Srinivasan, M.; Kabra, A.; Chidambaram, J.; Acharya, N.R.; Lietman, T.M. Susceptibility testing and clinical outcome in fungal keratitis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2010, 94, 384–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tananuvat, N.; Punyakhum, O.; Ausayakhun, S.; Chaidaroon, W. Etiology and clinical outcomes of microbial keratitis at a tertiary eye-care center in northern Thailand. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. Chotmaihet Thangphaet 2012, 95, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
- Watson, S.L.; Cabrera-Aguas, M.; Keay, L.; Khoo, P.; McCall, D.; Lahra, M.M. The clinical and microbiological features and outcomes of fungal keratitis over 9 years in Sydney, Australia. Mycoses 2019, 63, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandt, M.; Warnock, D. Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Therapy of Infections Caused by Dematiaceous Fungi. J. Chemother. 2003, 15, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ansari, Z.; Miller, D.; Galor, A. Current Thoughts in Fungal Keratitis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2013, 7, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tananuvat, N.; Salakthuantee, K.; Vanittanakom, N.; Pongpom, M.; Ausayakhun, S. Prospective comparison between conventional microbial work-up vs PCR in the diagnosis of fungal keratitis. Eye 2012, 26, 1337–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tananuvat, N.; Upaphong, P.; Tangmonkongvoragul, C.; Niparugs, M.; Chaidaroon, W.; Pongpom, M. Fungal keratitis at a tertiary eye care in Northern Thailand: Etiology and prognostic factors for treatment outcomes. J. Infect. 2021, 83, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abliz, P.; Fukushima, K.; Takizawa, K.; Nishimura, K. Identification of pathogenic dematiaceous fungi and related taxa based on large subunit ribosomal DNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 40, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumar, A.; Khurana, A.; Sharma, M.; Chauhan, L. Causative fungi and treatment outcome of dematiaceous fungal keratitis in North India. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 67, 1048–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fothergill, A.W. Identification of Dematiaceous Fungi and Their Role in Human Disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1996, 22, S179–S184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gajjar, D.U.; Pal, A.K.; Ghodadra, B.K.; Vasavada, A.R. Microscopic Evaluation, Molecular Identification, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Clinical Outcomes in Fusarium, Aspergillusand, Dematiaceous Keratitis. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Garg, P.; Vemuganti, G.K.; Chatarjee, S.; Gopinathan, U.; Rao, G.N. Pigmented Plaque Presentation of Dematiaceous Fungal Keratitis. Cornea 2004, 23, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, S.T.; Katsev, D.A.; Mondino, B.J.; Pettit, T.H. Macroscopic Pigmentation in a Dematiaceous Fungal Keratitis. Cornea 1991, 10, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, H.S.; Fung, S.S.; MacLeod, D.; Dart, J.K.; Tuft, S.J.; Burton, M. Altered Patterns of Fungal Keratitis at a London Ophthalmic Referral Hospital: An Eight-Year Retrospective Observational Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 168, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ghosh, A.K.; Gupta, A.; Rudramurthy, S.; Paul, S.; Hallur, V.K.; Chakrabarti, A. Fungal Keratitis in North India: Spectrum of Agents, Risk Factors and Treatment. Mycopathologia 2016, 181, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mada, P.; Castano, G.; Gutierrez-Roberts, M.; Chandranesan, A. A Case of Rhizopus Keratitis. Clin. Med. Rev. Case Rep. 2018, 5, 224. [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh, A.; Kaur, H.; Gupta, A.; Singh, S.; Rudramurthy, S.M.; Gupta, S.; Chakrabarti, A. Emerging Dematiaceous and Hyaline Fungi Causing Keratitis in a Tertiary Care Centre from North India. Cornea 2020, 39, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paty, B.; Dash, P.; Mohapatra, D.; Chayani, N. Epidemiological profile of mycotic keratitis in a tertiary care center of eastern Odisha. J. Dr. NTR Univ. Heal. Sci. 2018, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rai, M.; Ingle, A.P.; Ingle, P.; Gupta, I.; Mobin, M.; Bonifaz, A.; Alves, M. Recent advances on mycotic keratitis caused by dematiaceous hyphomycetes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Wilhelmus, K.R.; Jones, D.B. Curvularia keratitis. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2001, 99, 111–130, discussion 130. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Donnio, A.; Desbois, N.; Boiron, P.; Théodose, R.; Mouniee, D.; Thoumazet, F.; Merle, H. Kératomycose et endophtalmie d′étiologie exceptionnelle: Lasiodiplodia theobromae. J. Français d’Ophtalmologie 2006, 29, 196.e1–196.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gopinathan, U.; Garg, P.; Fernandes, M.; Sharma, S.; Athmanathan, S.; Rao, G.N. The Epidemiological Features and Laboratory Results of Fungal Keratitis. Cornea 2002, 21, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saha, S.; Sengupta, J.; Banerjee, D.; Khetan, A. Lasiodiplodia theobromae Keratitis: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Mycopathologia 2012, 174, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, M.; Gonzales, A.C.; George, C.; Cevallos, V.; Mascarenhas, J.M.; Asokan, B.; Wilkins, J.; Smolin, G.; Whitcher, J.P. Epidemiology and aetiological diagnosis of corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1997, 81, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lekhanont, K.; Nonpassopon, M.; Nimvorapun, N.; Santanirand, P. Treatment with Intrastromal and Intracameral Voriconazole in 2 Eyes with Lasiodiplodia theobromae Keratitis. Medicine 2015, 94, e541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khurana, A.; Chanda, S.; Bhagat, P.; Aggarwal, S.; Sharma, M.; Chauhan, L. Clinical characteristics, predisposing factors, and treatment outcome of Curvularia keratitis. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 68, 2088–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oldenburg, E.C.; Prajna, V.N.; Prajna, L.; Krishnan, T.; Mascarenhas, J.; Vaitilingam, C.M.; Srinivasan, M.; See, C.W.; Cevallos, V.; Zegans, E.M.; et al. Clinical signs in dematiaceous and hyaline fungal keratitis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 95, 750–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Demographics and Baseline Clinical Characteristics | Cases |
---|---|
Age (mean, SD) | 55, 11 |
Sex (male: female) | 41:9 |
Season at onset (n, %) | |
- Monsoon (Jun to Sep) | 24/50, 48 |
- Winter (Oct to Jan) | 17/50, 34 |
- Summer (Feb to May) | 9/50, 18 |
Underlying ocular disease (n, %) | 11/50, 22 |
- Previous globe rupture (n, %) | 3/50, 6 |
Previous use of topical steroid (n, %) | 11/50, 22 |
Time to the presentation (days) (mean, SD) | 11, 12 |
Visual acuity at presentation (LogMAR) (mean, SD) | 1.80, 0.98 |
Primary diagnosis as fungal keratitis (n, %) | 15/50, 30 |
Initiation of antifungal therapy from the primary hospital (n, %) | 10/50, 20 |
Predisposing Factors | Cases (%) |
---|---|
Ocular | |
Trauma | |
- Foreign body exposure | |
- Organic foreign body | 36 (72%) |
- Non-organic foreign body | 1 (2%) |
- Penetrating globe injury | 3 (6%) |
Non-Trauma | |
- Previous surgery | 8 (16%) |
- Topical steroid use | 11 (22%) |
Systemic | |
- Diabetes mellitus | 7 (14%) |
- HIV infection | 1 (2%) |
Clinical Characteristics of the Lesion | Cases (%) |
---|---|
Area of infiltrate (mm2) (mean, SD) | 27.61, 34.05 |
Location (N, %) | |
- Paracentral | 21 (42) |
- Central | 17 (34) |
- Total | 8 (16) |
- Limbus | 4 (8) |
Color (N, %) | |
- White | 25 (50) |
- Yellow | 25 (50) |
Pigmentation (N, %) | |
- None | 37 (74) |
- Brown | 13 (26) |
- Black | 0 (0) |
The appearance of the lesion (N, %) | |
- Wet | 27 (54) |
- Dry | 23 (46) |
Raised/Elevated (N, %) | 21 (42) |
Epithelial plaque (N, %) | |
- None | 31 (62) |
- Raised/Elevated | 13 (26) |
- Pigmentation | 6 (12) |
Feathery edge (N, %) | 39 (78) |
Ring infiltrate (N, %) | 12 (24) |
Dendritic (N, %) | 17 (34) |
Satellite (N, %) | 12 (24) |
Depth (N, %) | |
- Full corneal thickness | 26 (52) |
- Anterior two-thirds of corneal thickness | 19 (38) |
- Anterior one-third of corneal thickness | 5 (10) |
Endothelial plaque (N, %) | 16 (32) |
Perforation (N, %) | 6 (12) |
Endophthalmitis (N, %) | 2 (4) |
Hypopyon (N, %) | 33 (66) |
Identified Dematiaceous Species | Cases | PCR | KOH Examination | Calcofluor White-KOH Staining |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alternaria alternata | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Bipolaris hawaiiensis | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Curvularia lunata | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Exophiala jeanselmei | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Exserohilum rostratum | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Fonsecaea pedrosoi | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Lasiodiplodia theobromae | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
Microsphaeropsis arundinis | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Papulaspora equi | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Phaeoacremonium parasiticum | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Phialophora verrucosa | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Torula chromolaenae | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Cladosporium spp.1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Graphium spp.2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Pleosporales spp.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Unidentified spp. | 19 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Summary | 50 | 22 | 28 | 30 |
Treatment Outcomes | Cases (%) |
---|---|
Medication success | 24 (48%) |
Medication failure | 26 (52%) |
- Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty | 17 (34%) |
- Evisceration/enucleation | 6 (12%) |
- Scleral or corneal button patching | 3 (6%) |
Parameters | Medication Success Group (N = 24) | Medical Failure Group (N = 26) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) (mean, SD) | 56.08, 11.66 | 54.69, 11.59 | 0.5797 |
Sex (male: female) | 21:4 | 21:5 | 1.00 |
Diabetes mellitus (N, %) | 4/24, 17% | 5/26, 19% | 0.9091 |
Underlying ocular disease (N, %) | 5/24, 21% | 6/26, 23% | 1.00 |
- Previous globe rupture (N, %) | 0/24, 0% | 3/26, 11% | 0.2625 |
Previous use of topical steroid (N, %) | 5/24, 21% | 6/26, 23% | 1.00 |
Time to the presentation (days) (mean, SD) | 9.96, 7.54 | 12.89, 15.78 | 0.1219 |
Visual acuity at presentation (LogMAR) (mean, SD) | 1.33, 1.06 | 2.22, 0.68 | 0.002 |
Primary diagnosis as fungal keratitis (N, %) | 7/24, 29% | 8/26, 31% | 0.7718 |
Trauma with foreign body exposure (N, %) | 20/24, 83% | 18/26, 69% | 0.633 |
Area of infiltrate (mm2) (mean, SD) | 12.84, 11.58 | 41.26, 41.79 | 0.0021 |
Depth (N, %) | 0.0072 | ||
- One-third | 4/24, 17% | 1/26, 4% | |
- Two-thirds | 13/24, 54% | 6/26, 23% | |
- Full-thickness | 7/24, 29% | 19/26, 73% | |
Perforation (N, %) | 0/24, 0% | 5/26, 19% | 0.3816 |
Endophthalmitis (N, %) | 0/24, 0% | 2/26, 8% | 0.5064 |
Hypopyon (N, %) | 10/24, 42% | 23/26, 88% | 0.0014 |
Location of an ulcer (N, %) | 0.0025 | ||
- Limbus | 3/24, 12% | 1/26, 4% | |
- Central | 15/24, 62% | 6/26, 23% | |
- Paracentral | 6/24, 25% | 11/26, 42% | |
- Total | 0/24, 0% | 8/26, 31% |
Cladosporium spp. (N = 4) | Curvularia spp. (N = 4) | Lasiodiplodia spp. (N = 6) | |
---|---|---|---|
Visual acuity at presentation (logMAR) (mean, SD) | 2.43, 0.44 | 1.55, 1.17 | 2.01, 0.69 |
Exposure to an organic foreign body (N, %) | 2/4, 50% | 3/4, 75% | 4/6, 67% |
Time to the presentation (days) (mean, SD) | 19.75, 7.59 | 4, 2.58 | 13, 9.51 |
Primary diagnosis with fungal keratitis (N, %) | 0/4, 0% | 1/4, 25% | 1/6, 17% |
Clinical characteristics (N, %) | |||
- Pigmentation | 0/4, 0% | 1/4, 25% | 1/6, 17% |
- Raised/elevated | 0/4, 0% | 3/4, 75% | 1/6, 17% |
- Epithelial plaque | 0/4, 0% | 2/4. 50% | 1/6, 17% |
- Feathery edge | 1/4, 25% | 2/4, 50% | 5/6, 83% |
- Hypopyon | 4/4, 100% | 2/4, 50% | 4/6, 67% |
Area of infiltrate (mm2) (mean, SD) | 24, 23 | 27, 19 | 37, 46 |
Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty or Corneal button patch (N, %) | 0/4, 0% | 2/4, 50% | 5/6, 83% |
Enucleation/evisceration (N, %) | 2/4, 50% | 0/4, 0% | 0/6, 0% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tangmonkongvoragul, C.; Chokesuwattanaskul, S.; Tananuvat, N.; Pongpom, M.; Upaphong, P.; Saysithidej, S.; Niparugs, M.; Chongkae, S. The Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors for Treatment Outcomes of Dematiaceous Fungal Keratitis over 9 Years at a Tertiary Eye Care in Northern Thailand. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7070526
Tangmonkongvoragul C, Chokesuwattanaskul S, Tananuvat N, Pongpom M, Upaphong P, Saysithidej S, Niparugs M, Chongkae S. The Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors for Treatment Outcomes of Dematiaceous Fungal Keratitis over 9 Years at a Tertiary Eye Care in Northern Thailand. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(7):526. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7070526
Chicago/Turabian StyleTangmonkongvoragul, Chulaluck, Susama Chokesuwattanaskul, Napaporn Tananuvat, Monsicha Pongpom, Phit Upaphong, Sinthirath Saysithidej, Muanploy Niparugs, and Siriporn Chongkae. 2021. "The Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors for Treatment Outcomes of Dematiaceous Fungal Keratitis over 9 Years at a Tertiary Eye Care in Northern Thailand" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 7: 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7070526