Next Article in Journal
Ibrexafungerp: A First-in-Class Oral Triterpenoid Glucan Synthase Inhibitor
Previous Article in Journal
High Frequency of Enterocytozoon bieneusi Genotype WL12 Occurrence among Immunocompromised Patients with Intestinal Microsporidiosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening and Virulence of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Associated with Chilo suppressalis Walker
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Host–Pathogen Interactions: Insects vs. Fungi

by
Ivan M. Dubovskiy
1,2
1
Laboratory of Biological Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, 630039 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Siberian Federal Scientific Centre of Agro-BioTechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630501 Krasnoobsk, Russia
J. Fungi 2021, 7(3), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030162
Submission received: 18 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 24 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host-Pathogen Interactions: Insects vs Fungi)
Although many insects successfully live in dangerous environments exposed to diverse communities of microbes, they are often exploited and killed by specialist pathogens. In the process of co-evolution of insects and entomopathogenic microorganisms, they develop various adaptive systems that determine the sustainable existence of dynamic host–parasite interactions at both the organismic and population levels. Many different species of fungi are associated with insects. It should be noted that the diversity of fungi largely depends on the specific insect–fungus system. Thus, in the population of Chilo suppressalis, a serious pest of rice, in northern Iran Beauveria bassiana, Akanthomyces lecanii, Akanthomyces muscarious, Metarhizium anisopliae, Hirsutella subulata, and Trichoderma sp. persisted [1]. Lepidopteran forest-pest species Ematurga atomaria, Cabera pusaria, Hypomecis punctinalis, and Orthosia gothica were associated with members of Cordycipitaceae (Akanthomyces muscarius and Cordyceps farinosa) and fungi from families Aspergillaceae, Nectriaceae, Mortierellaceae, Hypocreaceae, etc. [2]. The host defences are designed to exclude the pathogen or mitigate the damage inflicted, while the pathogen counters with immune evasion and utilization of host resources. Transcriptome (RNAseq) analysis of immune response uncovers new abilities to study host–parasite systems. Study of cricket Gryllus bimaculatus transcriptome demonstrated high tissue-specific variety in inducing antifungal immune factors [3]. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) neutralize their immediate surroundings on the insect integument and benefit from the physiochemical properties of the cuticle and its compounds that exclude competing microbes. Interestingly, in some cases EPF have low virulence because plant phytochemicals can demonstrate antimicrobial activity on insects cuticle [4]. EPF interplay host defence with factors which regulate adhesion to the cuticle, cuticle degradation, stress management and toxins [5]. Thus B. bassiana express bassianolide and beauvericin toxins during infection of the bug Triatoma infestans [6] and proteases, chitinases and lipase in the presence of C. suppressalis cuticle probably to pass the insects defence faster [1]. It was found that EPF peroxisome-type and hexagonal crystal-like organelles (Woronin bodies) are required for appressorium differentiation and the topical infection of insect hosts [7]. Insects’ immune, detoxification, and antioxidant systems work synergistically to combat infections and mitigate stress. Some proteins demonstrate multifunctional properties, participating in metabolism, homeostasis, and pathogen recognition [8]. Besides, insect hormones such as juvenile hormone [9] and dopamine [10] have been suggested to be a potential mediator in the insects’ immunity against fungi.
The application of EPF in the field needs high-quality scientific support to establish the mechanisms of action and ways to improve fungal biological preparations [11,12]. There are some cases in which an insect’s microbiota [13] and nematodes [14] may influence the development of fungal infections. These facts could open new abilities for the development of a complex approach to plant biological protection.
I would like to thank all contributors to this Special Issue on “Host–Pathogen Interactions: Insects vs. Fungi” for their significant contributions to this Special Issue and for making it a highly successful and timely collection of studies. I am extremely happy that we received eleven reviews/original papers for publication.

Funding

Supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project 19-16-00019).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shahriari, M.; Zibaee, A.; Khodaparast, S.A.; Fazeli-Dinan, M. Screening and virulence of the entomopathogenic fungi associated with chilo suppressalis walker. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gielen, R.; Meister, H.; Tammaru, T.; Põldmaa, K. Fungi recorded on folivorous lepidoptera: High diversity despite moderate prevalence. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hussain, A.; Ali, M.W.; Aljabr, A.M.; Al-Kahtani, S.N. Insights into the gryllus bimaculatus immunerelated transcriptomic profiling to combat naturally invading pathogens. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zemek, R.; Konopická, J.; Abdin, Z.U. Low efficacy of isaria fumosorosea against box tree moth cydalima perspectalis: Are host plant phytochemicals involved in herbivore defence against fungal pathogens? J. Fungi 2020, 6, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Grizanova, E.V.; Coates, C.J.; Dubovskiy, I.M.; Butt, T.M. Metarhizium brunneum infection dynamics differ at the cuticle interface of susceptible and tolerant morphs of Galleria mellonella. Virulence 2019, 10, 999–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Baldiviezo, L.V.; Pedrini, N.; Santana, M.; Mannino, M.C.; Nieva, L.B.; Gentile, A.; Cardozo, R.M. Isolation of Beauveria Bassiana from the Chagas disease vector Triatoma Infestans in the gran Chaco region of Argentina: Assessment of gene expression during host-pathogen interaction. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tang, G.; Shang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, C. Mrhex1 is required for woronin body formation, fungal development and virulence in metarhizium robertsii. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Butt, T.M.; Coates, C.J.; Dubovskiy, I.M.; Ratcliffe, N.A. Entomopathogenic Fungi: New Insights into Host-Pathogen Interactions. Adv. Genet. 2016, 94, 307–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rantala, M.J.; Dubovskiy, I.M.; Pölkki, M.; Krama, T.; Contreras-Garduño, J.; Krams, I.A. Effect of juvenile hormone on resistance against entomopathogenic fungus metharizium robertsii differs between sexes. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chertkova, E.A.; Grizanova, E.V.; Dubovskiy, I.M. Bacterial and fungal infections induce bursts of dopamine in the haemolymph of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata and greater wax moth Galleria mellonella. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2018, 153, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Putnoky-Csicsó, B.; Tonk, S.; Szabó, A.; Márton, Z.; Bogdányi, F.T.; Tóth, F.; Abod, É.; Bálint, J.; Balog, A. Effectiveness of the entomopathogenic fungal species metarhizium anisopliae strain ncaim 362 treatments against soil inhabiting melolontha melolontha larvae in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). J. Fungi 2020, 6, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Karthi, S.; Vasantha-Srinivasan, P.; Ganesan, R.; Ramasamy, V.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Khater, H.F.; Radhakrishnan, N.; Amala, K.; Kim, T.J.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; et al. Target activity of isaria tenuipes (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) fungal strains against dengue vector aedes aegypti (linn.) and its non-target activity against aquatic predators. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kryukov, V.Y.; Kosman, E.; Tomilova, O.; Polenogova, O.; Rotskaya, U.; Tyurin, M.; Alikina, T.; Yaroslavtseva, O.; Kabilov, M.; Glupov, V. Interplay between fungal infection and bacterial associates in the wax moth galleria mellonella under different temperature conditions. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Li, H.; Wang, R.; Zhang, K.Q.; Xu, J. Fungi–nematode interactions: Diversity, ecology, and biocontrol prospects in agriculture. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dubovskiy, I.M. Host–Pathogen Interactions: Insects vs. Fungi. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030162

AMA Style

Dubovskiy IM. Host–Pathogen Interactions: Insects vs. Fungi. Journal of Fungi. 2021; 7(3):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dubovskiy, Ivan M. 2021. "Host–Pathogen Interactions: Insects vs. Fungi" Journal of Fungi 7, no. 3: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop