Next Article in Journal
Contemporary Management Strategies of Baffle Leaks in Adults with a Failing Systemic Right Ventricle Late after Atrial Switch: A Case Series and Literature Overview
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of the Blood Lipids Levels on Arterial Stiffness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between Abnormal Echocardiography and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in Low-Risk Pregnant Women
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Women’s Cardiovascular Health: Prioritizing the Majority Minority

1
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10467, USA
2
Maternal Fetal Medicine-Cardiology Joint Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
3
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
4
Department of Electrophysiology, Clinic of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, 10000 Prishina, Kosovo
5
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10(3), 128; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10030128
Submission received: 2 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heart Disease in Women)
Women make up the majority of the global population, and are burdened by cardiovascular disease as their most common cause of death [1]. However, women are in the minority of individuals receiving cardiovascular interventions, advanced heart failure therapy and guidelines-based medical therapy for cardiovascular disorders, even in an era of robust diagnostic technology and well-proven therapeutic approaches [2,3]. In this Special Issue of the journal, authors from Europe, Asia, Australia and North America address under-treated and under-researched cardiovascular health concerns unique to women (a summary of some highlights can be found in Table 1). Most address the increased cardiovascular risk in pregnancy, as there has been an alarming increase in maternal deaths in the past two decades in the US, especially among Black and Native American or Alaskan women [4]. Pregnancy is a natural yet powerful stressor of the cardiovascular system, which can unmask or provoke a cardiac condition, and decision-making in these cases can be complex [5]. The broad themes in this Special Issue include cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening, congestive heart failure (CHF), and acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
CVD screening may take the form of risk prediction for gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders, common complications of pregnancy. A combination of demographics, clinical characteristics and vital signs appears to be useful for screening those at risk for cardiovascular decompensation peripartum, with a new CVD algorithm and toolkit that can be built into routine visits [6]. Additionally, echocardiography, even in low-risk individuals and especially in those who have hypertension or obesity, may reveal abnormal findings which could be important in risk stratification or treatment [7]. Lastly, a point-of-care ultrasound of the heart and lungs on the Labor and Delivery ward affords the quicker triaging of cardiac versus non-cardiac diagnoses, such as acute congestive heart failure [8].
CHF is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnant women in the US [4]. Therapy should be optimized for those with preexisting CHF and acute CHF, and they should be treated and monitored closely. There is an increased risk of acute CHF in survivors of childhood or adolescent chemoradiation, which can complicate pregnancy. With more survivors of cancer and congenital heart disease attaining reproductive age, CHF is becoming a complicating factor for pregnancy in these individuals [9]. Arrhythmia is common, and rising due to increased maternal age and increases in hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity. In CHF and arrhythmia, cardioselective beta blockers and diuretics are a mainstay of treatment, provided that the patient is not in cardiogenic shock [10]. Black individuals experience peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) more frequently than their white or Hispanic/Latina counterparts [11]. Individuals with PPCM may need short-term mechanical support until recovery, or as a bridge to left ventricular assist devices or heart transplant. Socioeconomic disadvantage is a compounding factor, in those who progress to advanced heart failure therapies and for global access to ACS care. PAH, either idiopathic or due to chronic thromboembolic disease, is more frequent in women than men [12,13]. PAH hemodynamically stresses the right ventricle, and pregnancy can lead to RV failure and death, which is a reason for pregnancy avoidance or termination. In rare cases, and with subspeciality management, as described in this Special Issue, there are some individuals who have delivered successfully [14,15].
ACS presentation can be due to microvascular disease or plaque rupture in women [16]. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a particular morbid form of ACS associated with arteriopathies, and is most common late in pregnancy or postpartum [17,18]. Unstable patients with ACS should undergo cardiac catheterization, but many barriers to care exist that limit women’s access.
Table 1. A summary of the key points, discussions and implications of publications in this Special Issue.
Table 1. A summary of the key points, discussions and implications of publications in this Special Issue.
AuthorsKey PointsDiscussion and Implications
Hennessey and Taub et al. [7]Background: ECHOs are performed in pregnancy for suspected cardiac disease
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study
Results: Low risk individuals with abnormal ECHO were more likely to have CD or PTD
  • Abnormal ECHO among low-risk pregnant persons is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes
Wu and Hua et al. [13]Background: Women have worse outcomes in CTEPH. The reasons are multifactorial
Study Design: Prospective cohort study of CTEPH 2013–2019
Results: Revascularization, therapy and correction of anemia improved clinical outcomes
  • Understanding sex-specific features of CTEPH may improve outcomes
Wolfe and Bortnick et al. [11]Background: PPCM is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality
Study Design: Retrospective, age- and race-matched case–control 1999–2015
Results: Individuals with PPCM had worse SES and baseline health
  • Addressing social determinants of health is important for PPCM outcomes
Vaidya and Forfia et al. [14]Background: PAH in pregnancy has been associated with maternal morbidity and mortality; new medications and multidisciplinary management may improve outcomes
Study Design: A single center retrospective observational study between 2013–2021
Results: Reported successful maternal and fetal outcomes
  • Pregnant patients with PAH may have good outcomes when managed by a specialized center
Kwampong and Sharma et al. [5]Background: Pregnancy outcomes in moderate hyperglycemia have not been studied
Study Design: Retrospective comparative review of the Boston Birth Cohort 1998–2016
Results: Second and third tertiles of serum glucose had higher birth weight and more hypertension
  • Moderately hyperglycemic patients may be at higher risk for adverse outcomes
Negrea and Pop et al. [16]Background: Atypical presentations of acute coronary syndromes can delay treatment
Study Design: Retrospective review of unstable angina and NSTEMI from 2014 to 2015
Results: Women were more hypertensive with microvascular disease
  • Sex-specific atypical presentations in ACS need to be considered
Bansal and Zhang et al. [9]Background: Cancer survivors are achieving reproductive age
Study Design: Review of risk factors in cancer survivors who seek pregnancy
Results: Cardiotoxicity prior to pregnancy portends higher risk for CHF pre- or postpartum
  • Cancer survivors should be screened for cardiotoxicity prior to pregnancy
Cader and Gulati et al. [9]Background: There are sex differences in presentation and access in ACS globally
Study Design: Review
Results: Sex disparities in ACS management compounded by SES, education, and access
  • Global sex-related barriers to ACS care include access, local practice, cultural differences, SES, education
Tamirisa and Volgman et al. [10]Background: Arrhythmias and CHF co-exist in pregnancy
Study Design: Review
Results: AVNRT, AVRT more common with structurally normal heart. AFIB is increasing
  • Treatment pre-conception is recommended with known arrythmia
O’Kelly and Wood et al. [17]Background: MI during pregnancy is more common in the third trimester and early post-partum
Study Design: Review
Results: SCAD is most common. Imaging is necessary to evaluate for fibromuscular dysplasia
  • In low-risk NSTEMI, consider medical management
Daraz and Wolfe et al. [15]Background: Idiopathic PAH portends high maternal and fetal mortality in pregnancy
Study Design: Review
Results: Adaptive changes during pregnancy can adversely affect the RV
  • Delivery should be at a specialized center with possibility for VA-ECMO
Chambers and Hameed et al. [6] Background: Maternal mortality is rising in the US
Study Design: Review
Results: Universal CVD screening may identify risks, decrease delays and inequities
  • ACOG endorses universal CVD screening antepartum and postpartum
Thong and Enticott et al. [19]Background: Prediction for GDM and HDP is important for avoiding adverse outcomes
Study Design: Review
Results: Biomarkers, clinical risk factors improve accuracy of prediction for preeclampsia
  • Novel biomarkers improved risk prediction for preeclampsia
Thachil and Sokol et al. [12]Background: Sex-specific outcomes of pulmonary embolism are understudied
Study Design: Systematic review
Results: Women with PE tended to be older, with dyspnea, and higher NT-proBNP vs. men
  • PE mortality was higher in women
Algodi and Taub et al. [8]Background: POCUS is useful for heart and lung examination
Study Design: Review
Results: POCUS is useful for cardiac conditions and pulmonary edema in pregnancy
  • Providers should be trained to perform POCUS on L&D
Mantovani and Guiducci et al. [18]Background: SCAD is exceedingly rare in the second trimester of pregnancy
Study Design: Case Report
Results: SCAD in the second trimester successfully treated with PCI
  • Catheterization recommended for unstable SCAD
ACOG = American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; ACS = acute coronary syndromes; AVNRT = atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia; AVRT = atrioventricular reentry tachycardia; CD = C-section delivery; CHF = congestive heart failure; CTEPH = chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; CVD = cardiovascular; ECHO = echocardiogram; GDM = gestational diabetes mellitus; HDP = hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; L&D = labor and delivery; MI = myocardial infarction; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro beta natriuretic peptide; NSTEMI = non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; PAH = pulmonary arterial hypertension; PE = pulmonary embolism; POCUS= Point-of-care ultrasonography; PPCM = peripartum cardiomyopathy; PTD = pre-term delivery; RV = right ventricle; SCAD = spontaneous coronary artery dissection; SES = socioeconomic status; VA-ECMO = venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
As we can see from this Special Issue, specialized care is needed for women due to their unique cardiovascular risk [19]. Knowledge gaps need to be filled to better understand sex-specific pathophysiology and sex-disaggregated data, and to optimize individualized treatment options. Multidisciplinary specialized centers and programs are one way to work towards improving outcomes. Developing new sex-specific approaches, while also delivering proven standard of care to women, is key, until this discrepancy regarding the beneficiaries of modern cardiovascular treatment is resolved.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.E.B. and C.C.T.; Writing: original draft preparation- A.E.B., E.P. and D.S.W.; Writing- review and editing, E.P., D.S.W. and C.C.T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Naghavi, M.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abera, S.F.; Aboyans, V.; Adetokunboh, O.; Afshin, A.; Agrawal, A.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Age-Sex Specific Mortality for 264 Causes of Death, 1980–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1151–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. McSweeney, J.C.; Rosenfeld, A.G.; Abel, W.M.; Braun, L.T.; Burke, L.E.; Daugherty, S.L.; Fletcher, G.F.; Gulati, M.; Mehta, L.S.; Pettey, C.; et al. Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: State of the Science. Circulation 2016, 133, 1302–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cader, F.A.; Banerjee, S.; Gulati, M. Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Global Perspective. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Petersen, E.E. Vital Signs: Pregnancy-Related Deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and Strategies for Prevention, 13 States, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2019, 68, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kwapong, Y.A.; Boakye, E.; Wang, G.; Hong, X.; Lewey, J.; Mamas, M.A.; Wu, P.; Blaha, M.J.; Nasir, K.; Hays, A.G.; et al. Maternal Glycemic Spectrum and Adverse Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes in a Multiracial US Cohort. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chambers, M.E.; De Zoysa, M.Y.; Hameed, A.B. Screening for Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy: Is There a Need? J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hennessey, K.C.; Ali, T.S.; Choi, E.; Ortengren, A.R.; Hickerson, L.C.; Lee, J.M.; Taub, C.C. Association between Abnormal Echocardiography and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in Low-Risk Pregnant Women. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Algodi, M.; Wolfe, D.S.; Taub, C.C. The Utility of Maternal Point of Care Ultrasound on Labor and Delivery Wards. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bansal, N.; Hazim, C.F.; Badillo, S.; Shyam, S.; Wolfe, D.; Bortnick, A.E.; Garcia, M.J.; Rodriguez, C.J.; Zhang, L. Maternal Cardiovascular Outcomes of Pregnancy in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tamirisa, K.P.; Dye, C.; Bond, R.M.; Hollier, L.M.; Marinescu, K.; Vaseghi, M.; Russo, A.M.; Gulati, M.; Volgman, A.S. Arrhythmias and Heart Failure in Pregnancy: A Dialogue on Multidisciplinary Collaboration. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wolfe, D.S.; Liu, C.; Alboucai, J.; Karten, A.; Mushi, J.; Yellin, S.; Berkowitz, J.L.; Vega, S.; Felix, N.; Liaqat, W.; et al. Maternal Outcomes in Women with Peripartum Cardiomyopathy versus Age and Race-Matched Peers in an Urban US Community. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thachil, R.; Nagraj, S.; Kharawala, A.; Sokol, S.I. Pulmonary Embolism in Women: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, Y.; Hu, S.; Yan, X.-X.; Peng, F.-H.; Tan, J.-S.; Guo, T.-T.; Gao, X.; Hua, L. Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in Females: Clinical Features and Survival. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vaidya, A.; Oliveros, E.; Mulla, W.; Feinstein, D.; Hart, L.; Forfia, P. Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Pregnancy: Experience from a Nationally Accredited Center. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Daraz, Y.; Murthy, S.; Wolfe, D. Pregnancy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multidisciplinary Approach. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Negrea, M.O.; Zdrenghea, D.; Teodoru, M.; Neamțu, B.; Cipăian, C.R.; Pop, D. Gender Particularities and Prevalence of Atypical Clinical Presentation in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. O’Kelly, A.C.; Ludmir, J.; Wood, M.J. Acute Coronary Syndrome in Pregnancy and the Post-Partum Period. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mantovani, F.; Navazio, A.; Tortorella, G.; Guiducci, V. Unique Case of Spontaneous Left Main Coronary Dissection in Second Trimester of Pregnancy Successfully Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Happy Ending. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Thong, E.P.; Ghelani, D.P.; Manoleehakul, P.; Yesmin, A.; Slater, K.; Taylor, R.; Collins, C.; Hutchesson, M.; Lim, S.S.; Teede, H.J.; et al. Optimising Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Pregnancy: A Review of Risk Prediction Models Targeting Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disorders. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bortnick, A.E.; Pllana, E.; Wolfe, D.S.; Taub, C.C. Women’s Cardiovascular Health: Prioritizing the Majority Minority. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10030128

AMA Style

Bortnick AE, Pllana E, Wolfe DS, Taub CC. Women’s Cardiovascular Health: Prioritizing the Majority Minority. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2023; 10(3):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10030128

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bortnick, Anna E., Edita Pllana, Diana S. Wolfe, and Cynthia C. Taub. 2023. "Women’s Cardiovascular Health: Prioritizing the Majority Minority" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 10, no. 3: 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10030128

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop