Next Article in Journal
Gene Expression Datasets for Two Versions of the Saccharum spontaneum AP85-441 Genome
Previous Article in Journal
Blockchain for Patient Safety: Use Cases, Opportunities and Open Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Data Descriptor

Reduction Data Obtained from Cyclic Voltammetry of Benzophenones and Copper-2-Hydroxyphenone Complexes

by
Emmie Chiyindiko
1,
Ernst H. G. Langner
1,* and
Jeanet Conradie
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemistry, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa
2
Department of Chemistry, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Data 2022, 7(12), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/data7120183
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Chemoinformatics)

Abstract

:
This article provides detailed redox data on nine differently substituted benzophenones and ten square planar copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenones obtained by cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments. The information provided is related to the published full research articles “An electrochemical and computational chemistry study of substituted benzophenones” (Electrochim. Acta 2021, 373, 137894) and “Electrochemical behaviour of copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenones” (Electrochim. Acta 2022, 424, 140629), where the CVs and electrochemical data at mainly one scan rate, namely at 0.100 Vs−1, are reported. CVs and the related peak current and voltage values, not reported in the related research article, are provided in this article for nine differently substituted benzophenones and ten differently substituted copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes at various scan rates over more than two orders of magnitude. The redox data presented are the first reported complete set of electrochemical data of nine 2-hydroxyphenones and ten copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenone ligands.
Dataset: 10.38140/ufs.21731591; 10.38140/ufs.21731636
Dataset License: CC-BY

1. Summary

More than 300 natural benzophenones with a large variety in structure and biological activities exist [1]. Both natural and synthetic benzophenones are continuously being tested as potential sources of new drugs for their cytotoxicity and effects on cancer cells, antibacterial activity, antimicrobial activity, antifungal activity, antioxidant activity, anti-viral activity, anti-parasitic activity, anti-inflammatory activity, anti-anaphylactic activity, hepatoprotective activity, anti-diabetic, and vascular effects [1]. Since benzophenone derivatives absorb UV light, they are used as a UV curing agent in coating additives, plastics [2], and ink [3]. Oxybenzophenone is widely used as a UV filter in sunscreens and many other personal care products and cosmetics [4]. Benzophenones showed good performance as an anolyte in organic redox flow batteries [5]. In all applications, knowledge of benzophenones’ stability against reduction is important. The many industrial applications of benzophenone lead to pollution risk [6]. Therefore, the reduction potentials of benzophenones are needed to determine if oxidising or reducing conditions are favoured in water or soil.
Redox data obtained from cyclic voltammetry of differently substituted benzophenones and copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenones are provided in the article. Redox data are important for many applications, including energy storage devices (batteries), photographic processing, energy production, photosynthesis, respiration, combustion, corrosion, extraction of metals from polluted water, production of chemicals, and medicine. Information regarding peak current and voltage values obtained from cyclic voltammetry experiments are reported at only one scan rate (normally 0.100 V s−1), and no, or only selected, cyclic voltammograms (CVs) are shown. The advantage of having redox data and the related cyclic voltammograms at different scan rates is to (i) to ensure that the observed electrochemical behaviour at 0.100 V s−1 does not change at higher scan rates, (ii) to be able to determine if the reduction process is diffusion-controlled by application of the Randles–Ševčík equation, and (iii) to be able to determine diffusion coefficients of the analyte by application of the Randles–Ševčík equation (important for understanding the reactivity of the species under investigation). Apart from the related research articles [7,8], the limited reported scan rate data on substituted benzophenones and copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes are available, as will be explained in the next two paragraphs. Therefore, this article provides CVs and reports the cyclic voltammetry peak current and voltage values (at scan rates over 2 orders of magnitude) of the reduction of nine substituted benzophenones and ten copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenones, shown in Scheme 1.
While the redox behaviour obtained from cyclic voltammograms of benzophenone in non-aqueous solvents is well-reported in the literature [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], only a few reports could be found on the redox data obtained from cyclic voltammograms on substituted benzophenones. One article provided redox data obtained from cyclic voltammograms (without showing the CVs) of ortho and para methyl and tertiary butyl substituted benzophenones [11]. Another article reported cyclic voltammetry data (showing selected CVs at one scan rate) of halogen-substituted benzophenones [16]. A third article provided redox data obtained from cyclic voltammograms of four benzophenones (showing the CV of only benzophenone at one scan rate) [17]. A fourth article mentioned the reduction potential of benzophenone and two para-substituted benzophenones [5]. While comprehensive electrochemical data on hydroxybenzophenones are available [18,19,20], no comprehensive scan rate study on the redox behaviour of benzophenone or other substituted benzophenones could be found in the literature, except that for benzophenone and 2-amino-5-nitrobenzophenone reported in the related research article [7]. Due to limited reported scan rate studies on substituted benzophenones, in this article, we provide CVs and electrochemical data describing the chemical and electrochemical reversibility of the benzophenone/[benzophenone] redox couple. Results on the peak current ratio, peak current voltage separation, and relationship between peak current and the square root of the scan rate are presented. The benzophenones contain different substituent groups. To determine the influence of electron donating and electron withdrawing groups on the reduction potential of benzophenone, see Scheme 1. The shift in the reduction potential of the first reversible reduction peak of the benzophenones presented here, Figure 1, demonstrates the dependence of the reduction process on the position and type of substituents on the aromatic rings of the benzophenone, also confirming that there is excellent communication between the benzophenone backbone and the various substituent groups. In this article, a large amount of data not reported in the related research article, “An electrochemical and computational chemistry study of substituted benzophenones” [7] are, thus, presented.
Regarding the copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes, again, limited results are available in the literature on the synthesis, characterization, and redox properties of these copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenones [21,22,23]. Except for the related research article [8], electrochemical results of only one of the complexes of this study, namely of Cu(HBP)2 (14), at only one scan rate (no CV shown), are available in the literature [22]. Due to the limited published CVs and reduction data on these complexes, this article also provides CVs, current-voltage values and extensive electrochemical information obtained at eleven different scan rates varying from 0.02 V s−1 to 10.24 V s−1 (500 times increase in scan rate), for ten copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenones, see Scheme 1 for the complexes. The CVs obtained for the Cu(II/I) reduction are similar to those obtained for related square planar (CuII(β-diketonato)2) complexes, also containing two bidentate ligands with oxygen donor atoms, that form 6-membered rings with copper [24,25,26,27,28]. The reduction of a square planar Cu(II) complex leads to a tetrahedral Cu(I) complex [29]. The distortion in the geometry upon reduction could be a reason for the quasi-reversible to irreversible nature of the Cu(II/I) redox process. This article provides a large amount of data, obtained at different scan rates, not previously reported in the literature or in the related research article “Electrochemical behaviour of copper(II) complexes containing 2-hydroxyphenones” [8], where electrochemical data obtained at a scan rate of 0.100 V s−1 are provided and a few selected CVs are shown.

2. Data Description

Molecules containing electron-donating groups and ligands are oxidised at a lower potential than molecules containing electron-withdrawing groups and ligands. The influence of different electron donating and electron withdrawing groups on the reduction potential of structure benzophenones (19) and copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes (1019) are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. This trend is as expected and in agreement with the trends observed for the reduction of enolised 1,3-diketones [30], para-substituted nitrobenzenes [31], bis(cyclopentadienyl)mono(β-diketonato) titanium(IV) complexes [32,33], tris(β-diketonato)metal(III) complexes (metal = Co [34], Cr [35], Mn [36], and Fe [37]), and octahedral bis(β-diketonato)-titanium(IV) complexes [38]. The amount of shift to lower (due to electron-donating substituents) or higher (due to electron-withdrawing substituents) potentials, however, depends on the resonance and inductive electronic effects of the substituents [31,39].

2.1. Benzophenones (19)

Reports on the reduction of benzophenone in non-aqueous solvents [9,10,40] indicate that the reduction occurs in two successive one-electron steps [41,42]. Cyclic voltammograms of the benzophenones (18), obtained in dimethylformamide as solvent, showing the first reduction step, are given in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10. In Figure 11, cyclic voltammograms of the benzophenone (9), showing both reduction steps, are given. The first reduction peak on the cyclic voltammograms provides the energy needed (in volt) to reduce benzophenone and to re-oxidise the reduced benzophenone radical, namely the data related to the benzophenone/[benzophenone] redox process. The second irreversible one-electron reduction step is reported to correspond to the formation of an unstable benzhydrol dianion Bzph2 [12,43,44]. Data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms are given in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9, while the raw current-voltage values are provided in the supplementary information. The cyclic voltammograms and data presented provide additional electrochemical data to the reduction potential at the 0.10 V s−1 scan rate, provided in the related research article [7]. The additional data illustrate that the observed electrochemical behaviour at 0.100 V s−1 does not change at higher scan rates and that the reduction process is diffusion controlled.

2.2. Copper-2-Hydroxyphenone Complexes (1019)

Cyclic voltammograms of the Cu(II) complexes (1019) are given in Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20 and Figure 21. Data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms are given in Table 10, Table 11, Table 12, Table 13, Table 14, Table 15 and Table 16 (values at scan rate 0.100 V/s from the related research article [8]).

3. Methods

The benzophenone ligands were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and used as is. The copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes 1019 were synthesised, cleaned, and characterised as described in the related research article [8]. The CVs were obtained using a BAS100B Electrochemical Analyzer connected to a desktop computer (with BAS100W version 2.3 software) under similar conditions as those described in the related research articles [7,8] and our previous work [45]. The obtained current-voltage values of the CVs were exported as CSV files to be opened in Excel to visualise the results. The BAS100W version 2.3 software also provides the peak current ip and peak current voltage Ep of the observed redox peaks. To obtain ip and Ep data from a CV is well-described in the literature [46,47]. Figure 22 shows the determination of ip and Ep from a CV of 2-NH2,5-Cl-bz (6).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/data7120183/s1, Excel files with current-voltage data

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; methodology, J.C.; validation, J.C.; formal analysis, J.C. and E.C; investigation, E.C.; resources, J.C. and E.H.G.L.; data curation, E.C.; writing—original draft preparation, E.C.; writing—review and editing, J.C. and E.H.G.L.; visualisation, J.C. and E.C.; supervision, J.C.; project administration, J.C.; funding acquisition, J.C. and E.H.G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the South African National Research Foundation, grant numbers 129270 and 132504, and Central Research Fund of the University of the Free State, Bloemfontein. The APC was funded by the Open Access Publications Fund (OAPF) of the University of the Free State.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Within the article and the Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, S.-B.; Long, C.; Kennelly, E.J. Structural Diversity and Bioactivities of Natural Benzophenones. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1158–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Porosa, L.; Caschera, A.; Bedard, J.; Mocella, A.; Ronan, E.; Lough, A.J.; Wolfaardt, G.; Foucher, D.A. UV-Curable Contact Active Benzophenone Terminated Quaternary Ammonium Antimicrobials for Applications in Polymer Plastics and Related Devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 27491–27503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cheng, L.; Shi, W. Synthesis and Photoinitiating Behavior of Benzophenone-Based Polymeric Photoinitiators Used for UV Curing Coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2011, 71, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, S.; Choi, K. Occurrences, Toxicities, and Ecological Risks of Benzophenone-3, a Common Component of Organic Sunscreen Products: A Mini-Review. Environ. Int. 2014, 70, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huo, Y.; Xing, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Li, Y. An All Organic Redox Flow Battery with High Cell Voltage. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 13128–13132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. DiNardo, J.C.; Downs, C.A. Dermatological and Environmental Toxicological Impact of the Sunscreen Ingredient Oxybenzone/Benzophenone-3. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018, 17, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chiyindiko, E.; Conradie, J. An Electrochemical and Computational Chemistry Study of Substituted Benzophenones. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 373, 137894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chiyindiko, E.; Langner, E.H.G.; Conradie, J. Electrochemical Behaviour of Copper(II) Complexes Containing 2-Hydroxyphenones. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 424, 140629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsierkezos, N.G. Investigation of the Electrochemical Reduction of Benzophenone in Aprotic Solvents Using the Method of Cyclic Voltammetry. J. Solut. Chem. 2007, 36, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsierkezos, N.G.; Ritter, U. Application of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for Characterisation of the Reduction of Benzophenone in Acetonitrile Solutions. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2011, 49, 729–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grimshaw, J.; Hamilton, R. Steric and Electronic Effects on the Redox Potentials of Benzophenone Radical Anions. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1980, 106, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Degrand, C.; Prest, R.; Compagnon, P. louis Electrochemical Synthesis of (Phenylseleno)Benzophenones and (Phenyltelluro)Benzophenones by the SRN1 Mechanism, Using a Redox Catalyst. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 5229–5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jensen, B.S.; Parker, V.D. Reversible Anion Radical–Dianion Redox Equilibria Involving Ions of Simple Aromatic Compounds. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1974, 167, 367–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fawcett, W.R.; Fedurco, M. Medium Effects in the Electroreduction of Benzophenone in Aprotic Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 7075–7080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Curphey, T.J.; Trivedi, L.D.; Layloff, T. Electrochemical Reductive Acylation of Benzophenone. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3831–3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Isse, A.A.; Galia, A.; Belfiore, C.; Silvestri, G.; Gennaro, A. Electrochemical Reduction and Carboxylation of Halobenzophenones. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 526, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bewick, A.; Jones, V.W.; Kalaji, M. Spectroscopic and Electrochemical Properties of Substituted Benzophenones and Their Related Ketyls. Electrochim. Acta 1996, 41, 1961–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chiyindiko, E.; Langner, E.H.G.; Conradie, J. Cyclic Voltammetry Data of 2-Hydroxybenzophenones and Related Molecules. Chem. Data Collect. 2022, 40, 100897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chiyindiko, E.; Langner, E.H.G.; Conradie, J. Electrochemical Behaviour of 2-Hydroxybenzophenones and Related Molecules. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adeniyi, A.A.; Ngake, T.L.; Conradie, J. Cyclic Voltammetric Study of 2-Hydroxybenzophenone (HBP) Derivatives and the Correspondent Change in the Orbital Energy Levels in Different Solvents. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 2659–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gonçalves, C.B.; Marinho, M.V.; Dias, D.F.; Dos Santos, M.H.; Martins, F.T.; Doriguetto, A.C. Synthesis, Characterization, and Structural Determination of Copper(II) Complexes with Alkyl Derivatives of Hydroxybenzophenones. J. Coord. Chem. 2017, 70, 898–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zianna, A.; Psomas, G.; Hatzidimitriou, A.; Lalia-Kantouri, M. Copper(II) Complexes of Salicylaldehydes and 2-Hydroxyphenones: Synthesis, Structure, Thermal Decomposition Study and Interaction with Calf-Thymus DNA and Albumins. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 37495–37511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mao, G.Z.; Nong, X.L.; Zhang, S.H. Bis(2-Methoxy-Phenolato-2O,O′)Copper(II). Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Reports Online 2009, 65, m1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chiyindiko, E.; Conradie, J. Redox Behaviour of Bis(β-Diketonato)Copper(II) Complexes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 837, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chiyindiko, E.; Stuurman, N.N.F.; Langner, E.H.G.; Conradie, J. Electrochemical Behaviour of Bis(β-Diketonato)Copper(II) Complexes Containing γ-Substituted β-Diketones. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 860, 113929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nunes, P.; Nagy, N.V.; Alegria, E.C.B.A.; Pombeiro, A.J.L.; Correia, I. The Solvation and Electrochemical Behavior of Copper Acetylacetonate Complexes in Ionic Liquids. J. Mol. Struct. 2014, 1060, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Anderson, C.W.; Lung, K.R.; Nile, T.A. Electrochemistry of Homogeneous Catalysts: Correlation of the Electrochemistry and the Ziegler—Natta Catalytic Activity of Metal Acetylacetonate Complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1984, 85, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Al-Anber, M.A. Electrochemical Behaviour and Electronic Absorption of the Metal β- Diketonates Complexes. Am. J. Phys. Chem. 2013, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Conradie, J. Bis(Acetylacetonato)Copper(II)–Structural and Electronic Data of the Neutral, Oxidized and Reduced Forms. Data Br. 2019, 26, 104511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuhn, A.; von Eschwege, K.G.; Conradie, J. Electrochemical and Density Functional Theory Modeled Reduction of Enolized 1,3-Diketones. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 6211–6218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kuhn, A.; von Eschwege, K.G.; Conradie, J. Reduction Potentials of Para-Substituted Nitrobenzenes-an Infrared, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Density Functional Theory Study. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2012, 25, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kuhn, A.; Conradie, J. Electrochemical and Density Functional Theory Study of Bis(Cyclopentadienyl) Mono(β-Diketonato) Titanium(IV) Cationic Complexes. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 56, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kuhn, A.; Conradie, J. Orbital Control over the Metal vs. Ligand Reduction in a Series of Neutral and Cationic Bis(Cyclopentadienyl) Ti(Iv) Complexes. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 662–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Conradie, J. Redox Chemistry of Tris(β-Diketonate)Cobalt(III) Complexes: A Molecular View. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 046522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, R.; Conradie, J. Tris(β-Diketonato)Chromium(III) Complexes: Effect of the β-Diketonate Ligand on the Redox Properties. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 185, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Freitag, R.; Conradie, J. Electrochemical and Computational Chemistry Study of Mn(β-Diketonato)3 Complexes. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 158, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Conradie, M.M.; Conradie, J. Electrochemical Behaviour of Tris(β-Diketonato)Iron(III) Complexes: A DFT and Experimental Study. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 152, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kuhn, A.; Conradie, J. Synthesis, Electrochemical and DFT Study of Octahedral Bis(β-Diketonato)-Titanium(IV) Complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2016, 453, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Conradie, J.; Mateyise, N.G.S.; Conradie, M.M. Reduction Potential of β-Diketones: Effect of Electron Donating, Aromatic and Ester Groups. South African J. Sci. Technol. 2019, 38, 1. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nadjo, L.; Savéant, J.M. Electrochemical Reduction of Substituted Benzophenones and Fluorenones in Media of Low Proton Availability Mechanism of the Reductive Cleavage of Bromo and Chloro Benzophenones. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1971, 30, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Elving, P.J.; Leone, J.T. Mechanism of the Electrochemical Reduction of Phenyl Ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Suzuki, M.; Elving, P.J. Kinetics and Mechanism for the Electrochemical Reduction of Benzophenone in Acidic Media. J. Phys. Chem. 1961, 65, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Geske, D.H.; Maki, A.H. Electrochemical Generation of Free Radicals and Their Study by Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy; the Nitrobenzene Anion Radical. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 2671–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kemula, W.; Grabowski, Z.R.; Kalinowski, M.K. Electrochemical Method of Studying the Reactions of Free Ketyl Radicals. Naturwissenschaften 1960, 47, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mtshali, Z.; von Eschwege, K.G.; Conradie, J. Redox Data of Tris(Polypyridine)Manganese(II) Complexes. Data 2022, 7, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Elgrishi, N.; Rountree, K.J.; McCarthy, B.D.; Rountree, E.S.; Eisenhart, T.T.; Dempsey, J.L. A Practical Beginner’s Guide to Cyclic Voltammetry. J. Chem. Educ. 2018, 95, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kissinger, P.T.; Heineman, W.R. Cyclic Voltammetry. J. Chem. Educ. 1983, 60, 702–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Naming, numbering, and structure benzophenones (19) and copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes (1019).
Scheme 1. Naming, numbering, and structure benzophenones (19) and copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes (1019).
Data 07 00183 sch001
Figure 1. Reduction potential of benzophenones (18) containing electron-donating (CH3, OCH3, NH2) and electron withdrawing (Cl, CH2Br) groups, relative to unsubstituted benzophenone (H-bz, 9). Data were obtained at a scan rate of 0.100 V s−1 in dimethylformamide as solvent from the related research article [1].
Figure 1. Reduction potential of benzophenones (18) containing electron-donating (CH3, OCH3, NH2) and electron withdrawing (Cl, CH2Br) groups, relative to unsubstituted benzophenone (H-bz, 9). Data were obtained at a scan rate of 0.100 V s−1 in dimethylformamide as solvent from the related research article [1].
Data 07 00183 g001
Figure 2. Reduction potential of copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes (1019) containing electron-donating (OEt, OCH3) and electron withdrawing (Cl, Br) groups, relative to the copper-2-hydroxybenzophenone containing unsubstituted 2-hydroxybenzophenone (14). Data were obtained at a scan rate of 0.100 V s−1 in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent from the related research article [8].
Figure 2. Reduction potential of copper-2-hydroxyphenone complexes (1019) containing electron-donating (OEt, OCH3) and electron withdrawing (Cl, Br) groups, relative to the copper-2-hydroxybenzophenone containing unsubstituted 2-hydroxybenzophenone (14). Data were obtained at a scan rate of 0.100 V s−1 in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent from the related research article [8].
Data 07 00183 g002
Figure 3. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-methylbenzophenone, 2-Me-bz (1) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 3. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-methylbenzophenone, 2-Me-bz (1) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g003
Figure 4. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 3-methylbenzophenone, 3-Me-bz (2) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 4. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 3-methylbenzophenone, 3-Me-bz (2) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g004
Figure 5. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methylbenzophenone, 4-Me-bz (3) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 5. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methylbenzophenone, 4-Me-bz (3) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g005
Figure 6. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methoxybenzophenone, 4-OMe-bz (4) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 6. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methoxybenzophenone, 4-OMe-bz (4) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g006
Figure 7. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4,4′-dimethoxybenzophenone, 4,4′-OMe-bz (5) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 7. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4,4′-dimethoxybenzophenone, 4,4′-OMe-bz (5) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g007
Figure 8. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone, 2-NH2,5-Cl-bz (6) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 8. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone, 2-NH2,5-Cl-bz (6) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the oxidation (top graph) and reduction peak (bottom graph). (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g008
Figure 9. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-chlorobenzophenone, 2-Cl-bz (7) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the second reduction peak, as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for and reduction peak. (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 9. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-chlorobenzophenone, 2-Cl-bz (7) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the second reduction peak, as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for and reduction peak. (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g009
Figure 10. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-(Bromomethyl)benzophenone 4-CH2Br-bz (8) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the second reduction peak, as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for and reduction peak. (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Figure 10. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-(Bromomethyl)benzophenone 4-CH2Br-bz (8) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the second reduction peak, as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for and reduction peak. (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Data 07 00183 g010
Figure 11. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 benzophenone bz (10) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (CV at 0.01 Vs−1 from related research article [7]). (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the second reduction peak, as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for and reduction peak. (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]). Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the first reduction peak, is available in the related research article [7].
Figure 11. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 benzophenone bz (10) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (CV at 0.01 Vs−1 from related research article [7]). (Right) Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the second reduction peak, as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for and reduction peak. (CV at 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]). Linear relationship between the peak current (ip) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), for the first reduction peak, is available in the related research article [7].
Data 07 00183 g011
Figure 12. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(3,5-Cl-HBP)2 (10) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak. CVs at scan rates 0.02–0.70 V/s from the related research article [8]. The peak oxidation current, ipa, did not follow the Randles–Ševčík equation.
Figure 12. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(3,5-Cl-HBP)2 (10) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak. CVs at scan rates 0.02–0.70 V/s from the related research article [8]. The peak oxidation current, ipa, did not follow the Randles–Ševčík equation.
Data 07 00183 g012
Figure 13. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Br-HBP)2 (11) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak. The peak oxidation current, ipa, did not follow the Randles–Ševčík equation.
Figure 13. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Br-HBP)2 (11) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak. The peak oxidation current, ipa, did not follow the Randles–Ševčík equation.
Data 07 00183 g013
Figure 14. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4′,5-Cl-HBP)2 (12) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ) (Randles–Ševčík equation), for the reduction peak.
Figure 14. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4′,5-Cl-HBP)2 (12) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ) (Randles–Ševčík equation), for the reduction peak.
Data 07 00183 g014
Figure 15. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Cl-HBP)2 (13) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak.
Figure 15. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Cl-HBP)2 (13) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak.
Data 07 00183 g015
Figure 16. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(HBP)2 (14) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak.
Figure 16. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(HBP)2 (14) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak.
Data 07 00183 g016
Figure 17. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-allyloxy-HBP)2 (15) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak. CVs at scan rates 0.02–0.70 V/s from the related research article [8].
Figure 17. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-allyloxy-HBP)2 (15) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation, for the reduction peak. CVs at scan rates 0.02–0.70 V/s from the related research article [8].
Data 07 00183 g017
Figure 18. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-OMe-HBP)2 (16) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Figure 18. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-OMe-HBP)2 (16) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Data 07 00183 g018
Figure 19. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(HAP)2 (17) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Figure 19. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(HAP)2 (17) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Data 07 00183 g019
Figure 20. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu (HPP)2 (18) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Figure 20. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu (HPP)2 (18) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Data 07 00183 g020
Figure 21. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-Oct-HBP)2 (19) in dichloromethane as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Figure 21. (Left) Cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-Oct-HBP)2 (19) in dichloromethane as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+. Scan rates are indicated. (Right) Linear relationship between the peak reduction current (−ipc) and the square root of the scan rate ( v 1 / 2 ), as predicted by the Randles–Ševčík equation for the reduction peak.
Data 07 00183 g021
Figure 22. Illustration of how to obtain ip and Ep data from a CV using CV of the reduction of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone, 2-NH2,5-Cl-bz (6) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, scan rate ν = 0.050 Vs−1. Epa = peak anodic potential, Epc = peak cathodic potential, ipa = anodic peak current, ipc = cathodic peak current. Peak potential separation ΔEp = EpaEpc and half-wave potential E1/2 = (EpaEpc)/2.
Figure 22. Illustration of how to obtain ip and Ep data from a CV using CV of the reduction of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone, 2-NH2,5-Cl-bz (6) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, scan rate ν = 0.050 Vs−1. Epa = peak anodic potential, Epc = peak cathodic potential, ipa = anodic peak current, ipc = cathodic peak current. Peak potential separation ΔEp = EpaEpc and half-wave potential E1/2 = (EpaEpc)/2.
Data 07 00183 g022
Table 1. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-methylbenzophenone, 2-Me-bz (1) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 1. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-methylbenzophenone, 2-Me-bz (1) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.05−2.342−2.269−2.3060.073320.875
0.10−2.350−2.260−2.3050.090440.841
0.15−2.350−2.260−2.3050.090520.885
0.20−2.350−2.260−2.3050.090600.900
0.25−2.353−2.258−2.3060.095660.894
0.30−2.356−2.252−2.3040.104720.903
0.50−2.362−2.244−2.3030.118950.895
1.00−2.366−2.241−2.3040.1251200.933
5.12−2.414−2.195−2.3050.2192380.916
Table 2. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 3-methylbenzophenone, 3-Me-bz (2) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 2. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 3-methylbenzophenone, 3-Me-bz (2) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.05−2.291−2.207−2.2490.084400.850
0.10−2.299−2.200−2.2500.099560.857
0.15−2.300−2.200−2.2500.100660.848
0.20−2.300−2.200−2.2500.100750.813
0.25−2.305−2.193−2.2490.112850.776
0.30−2.307−2.193−2.2500.114920.815
0.50−2.317−2.178−2.2480.1391150.870
1.00−2.330−2.170−2.2500.1601520.855
5.12−2.381−2.118−2.2500.2632980.879
Table 3. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methylbenzophenone, 4-Me-bz (3) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 3. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methylbenzophenone, 4-Me-bz (3) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.05−2.309−2.233−2.2710.076280.750
0.10−2.320−2.229−2.2750.091390.769
0.15−2.320−2.226−2.2730.094440.795
0.20−2.320−2.226−2.2730.094500.800
0.25−2.323−2.223−2.2730.100540.833
0.30−2.324−2.221−2.2730.103590.831
0.50−2.327−2.219−2.2730.108670.866
1.00−2.335−2.215−2.2750.120900.867
5.12−2.379−2.164−2.2720.2152000.860
Table 4. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methoxybenzophenone, 4-Ome-bz (4) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 4. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-methoxybenzophenone, 4-Ome-bz (4) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.05−2.269−2.209−2.2390.060240.875
0.10−2.266−2.206−2.2360.060330.848
0.15−2.266−2.206−2.2360.060400.850
0.20−2.272−2.196−2.2340.076470.851
0.25−2.272−2.196−2.2340.076490.878
0.30−2.270−2.194−2.2320.076560.857
0.50−2.287−2.189−2.2380.098690.855
1.00−2.284−2.182−2.2330.102900.889
5.12−2.320−2.146−2.2330.1741660.916
Table 5. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4,4′-dimethoxybenzophenone, 4,4′-Ome-bz (5) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 5. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4,4′-dimethoxybenzophenone, 4,4′-Ome-bz (5) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.05−2.425−2.356−2.3910.069210.762
0.10−2.425−2.356−2.3910.069260.769
0.15−2.425−2.356−2.3910.069320.813
0.20−2.433−2.356−2.3950.077380.737
0.25−2.438−2.354−2.3960.084430.744
0.30−2.440−2.352−2.3960.088460.783
0.50−2.440−2.336−2.3880.104560.750
1.00−2.447−2.339−2.3930.108800.775
5.00−2.475−2.301−2.3880.1741380.768
Table 6. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone, 2-NH2,5-Cl-bz (6) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 6. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone, 2-NH2,5-Cl-bz (6) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.05−2.204−2.140−2.1720.064210.76
0.10−2.213−2.135−2.1740.078280.79
0.15−2.207−2.138−2.1730.069330.91
0.20−2.211−2.131−2.1710.080380.89
0.25−2.216−2.126−2.1710.090440.86
0.30−2.214−2.134−2.1740.080450.89
0.50−2.228−2.118−2.1730.110580.91
1.00−2.236−2.106−2.1710.130860.91
5.12−2.278−2.064−2.1710.2141640.91
Table 7. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-chlorobenzophenone, 2-Cl-bz (7) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 7. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 2-chlorobenzophenone, 2-Cl-bz (7) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.05−2.200---29-
0.10−2.217---39-
0.15−2.223−2.166−2.1950.057450.244
0.20−2.224−2.166−2.1950.058520.240
0.25−2.225−2.166−2.1960.059580.241
0.30−2.231−2.165−2.1980.066630.254
0.50−2.254−2.164−2.2090.090780.256
1.00−2.257−2.163−2.2100.0941050.267
5.12−2.332−2.158−2.2450.1741800.361
Table 8. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-(Bromomethyl)benzophenone 4-CH2Br-bz (8) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 8. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 4-(Bromomethyl)benzophenone 4-CH2Br-bz (8) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)106 ipc (A)
0.05−2.02329
0.10−2.04240
0.15−2.04347
0.20−2.04954
0.25−2.05359
0.30−2.05764
0.50−2.06281
1.00−2.093111
5.12−2.154222
Table 9. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 benzophenone bz (10) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Table 9. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 benzophenone bz (10) in dimethylformamide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article [7]).
Peak1st2nd
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)∆E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipcEpc (V)106 ipc (A)
0.05−2.256−2.192−2.2240.064270.89−2.72518
0.10−2.262−2.185−2.2240.077390.81−2.74824
0.15−2.262−2.184−2.2230.078450.90−2.7530
0.20−2.263−2.184−2.2240.079530.90−2.76733
0.25−2.265−2.180−2.2230.085560.93−2.77738
0.30−2.266−2.175−2.2210.091610.95−2.78041
0.50−2.276−2.169−2.2230.107800.93−2.81852
1.00−2.287−2.159−2.2230.1281080.95−2.83872
5.12−2.345−2.105−2.2250.2402180.96−2.932150
Table 10. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(3,5-Cl-HBP)2 (10) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1).
Table 10. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(3,5-Cl-HBP)2 (10) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.020−0.695−0.605−0.6500.09020.500
0.050−0.681−0.600−0.6410.08130.500
0.100−0.684−0.605−0.6450.07940.500
0.200−0.695−0.592−0.6440.10360.333
0.300−0.700−0.587−0.6440.11380.333
0.500−0.708−0.571−0.6400.137100.211
0.700−0.714−0.574−0.6440.140120.125
1.000−0.756−0.548−0.6520.208150.533
2.007−0.778−0.547−0.6630.231220.318
5.120−0.790−0.578−0.1061.368360.083
10.240−0.859−0.514−0.6870.34552-
Table 11. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Br-HBP)2 (11) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
Table 11. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Br-HBP)2 (11) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.020–0.787–0.728–0.7580.05920.667
0.050–0.796–0.728–0.7620.06830.800
0.100–0.800−0.728–0.7640.07230.667
0.200–0.802–0.720–0.7610.08250.600
0.300–0.811–0.715–0.7630.09660.667
0.500–0.818–0.711–0.7650.10780.625
0.700–0.818–0.706–0.7620.11290.556
1.000–0.830–0.698–0.7640.132120.500
2.007–0.851–0.676–0.7640.17518
5.120–0.886–0.643–0.7650.24330
10.240–0.916–0.626–0.7710.29042
Table 12. E Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4′,5–Cl–HBP)2 (12) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1).
Table 12. E Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4′,5–Cl–HBP)2 (12) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.020–0.778–0.685–0.7320.09330.667
0.050–0.791–0.680–0.7360.11150.600
0.100–0.803–0.667–0.7350.13680.625
0.200–0.809–0.662–0.7360.147100.300
0.300–0.827–0.658–0.7430.169120.250
0.500–0.849–0.671–0.7600.178150.133
0.700–0.853–0.645–0.7490.208180.111
1.000–0.883–0.631–0.7570.252220.045
2.007–0.906–0.618–0.7620.28830
5.120–0.913–0.620–0.7670.29346
10.240–0.940–0.600–0.7700.34064
Table 13. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Cl-HBP)2 (13) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
Table 13. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(5-Cl-HBP)2 (13) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.020–0.821–0.73–0.7760.09150.800
0.050–0.827–0.72–0.7740.10780.625
0.100–0.827–0.715–0.7710.112120.500
0.200–0.831–0.714–0.7730.117150.533
0.300–0.841–0.714–0.7780.127180.444
0.500–0.846–0.714–0.7800.132240.333
0.700–0.861–0.714–0.7880.147290.276
1.000–0.877–0.711–0.7940.166360.222
2.007–0.909–0.693–0.8010.21650
5.120−0.941−0.658−0.8000.28378
10.240–0.950–0.635–0.7930.315106
Table 14. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(HBP)2 (14) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
Table 14. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(HBP)2 (14) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.020−0.979–0.839–0.9090.14020.750
0.050–0.979–0.817–0.8980.16230.500
0.100–0.985–0.825–0.9050.16040.500
0.200–0.977–0.822–0.9000.15550.600
0.300–1.014–0.764–0.8890.25060.500
0.500–1.043–0.751–0.8970.29280.188
0.700–1.087–0.777–0.9320.3109.5
1.000–1.074–0.728–0.9010.34611
2.007−1.137−0.693−0.9150.44416-
5.120−1.179−0.675−0.9270.50425-
10.240−1.150−0.631−0.8910.51935-
Table 15. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-OMe-HBP)2 (15) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
Table 15. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-OMe-HBP)2 (15) in dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent, 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)Epa (V)E1/2 (V)E (V)106 ipc (A)ipa/ipc
0.020–1.052–0.963–1.0080.08950.60
0.050–1.065–0.958–1.0120.10780.63
0.100–1.075–0.941–1.0080.134100.50
0.200–1.087–0.932–1.0100.155130.38
0.300–1.105–0.914–1.0100.191160.25
0.500–1.123–0.901–1.0120.222200.10
0.700–1.131–0.901–1.0160.23024
1.000–1.140–0.5701.14029
2.007–1.180–0.5901.18042
5.120–1.226–0.6131.22669
10.240–1.307–0.6541.307
Table 16. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-allyloxy-HBP)2 (16), Cu(HAP)2 (17), Cu(HPP)2 (18), and Cu(4-Oct-HBP)2 (19) in the indicated solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO or dichloromethane DCM), 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
Table 16. Electrochemical data obtained from the cyclic voltammograms of ca 0.002 mol dm−3 Cu(4-allyloxy-HBP)2 (16), Cu(HAP)2 (17), Cu(HPP)2 (18), and Cu(4-Oct-HBP)2 (19) in the indicated solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO or dichloromethane DCM), 0.100 mol dm−3 TBAPF6 as supporting electrolyte, reported versus Fc/Fc+, at indicated scan rates ν (Vs−1). (Potential data of 0.100 Vs−1 from related research article).
Cu(4-Allyloxy-HBP)2 (16) in DMSOCu(HAP)2 (17) in DMSOCu(HPP)2 (18) in DMSOCu(4-Oct-HBP)2 (19) in DCM
ν (Vs−1)Epc (V)106 ipc (A)Epc (V)106 ipc (A)Epc (V)106 ipc (A)Epc (V)106 ipc (A)
0.020–1.1012.5–1.0132–1.0444–1.2335
0.050–1.0364–1.0634–1.1086–1.2517
0.100–1.0435–1.1096–1.1189–1.2609
0.200–1.0657–1.1119–1.12313–1.27713
0.300–1.1099–1.12711–1.13216–1.28216
0.500–1.11811–1.14914–1.15420–1.29320
0.700–1.12314–1.16718–1.15824–1.32724
1.000–1.12716–1.19023–1.17435–1.32828
2.007–1.17023–1.23433–1.21355–1.37644
5.120–1.20237–1.30860–1.272100–1.494104
10.240–1.24153–1.30684–1.320155–1.233
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiyindiko, E.; Langner, E.H.G.; Conradie, J. Reduction Data Obtained from Cyclic Voltammetry of Benzophenones and Copper-2-Hydroxyphenone Complexes. Data 2022, 7, 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/data7120183

AMA Style

Chiyindiko E, Langner EHG, Conradie J. Reduction Data Obtained from Cyclic Voltammetry of Benzophenones and Copper-2-Hydroxyphenone Complexes. Data. 2022; 7(12):183. https://doi.org/10.3390/data7120183

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiyindiko, Emmie, Ernst H. G. Langner, and Jeanet Conradie. 2022. "Reduction Data Obtained from Cyclic Voltammetry of Benzophenones and Copper-2-Hydroxyphenone Complexes" Data 7, no. 12: 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/data7120183

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop