Next Article in Journal
The Influence of the Bottle’s Price and Label Reported Information on the Perception of the Minerality Attribute in White Wines
Next Article in Special Issue
Use of Fumaric Acid to Inhibit Malolactic Fermentation in Bottled Rioja Wines: Effect in pH and Volatile Acidity Control
Previous Article in Journal
Milk Reduces Enamel Staining Caused by Black Tea and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Sweetener Type on Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Activity and Rheology of Guava Nectar during Storage Time
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Metabolomics of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in Fermented Beverages

by Daniel J. Ellis 1, Edward D. Kerr 1, Gerhard Schenk 1,2 and Benjamin L. Schulz 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 15 July 2022 / Accepted: 18 July 2022 / Published: 20 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Wine and Beverage: Fermentation and Conservation Technologies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for their comments and suggestions. Detailed responses to each comment are included below.

Comment:

This review is interesting because it highlights the use of metabolomic analyses on the characterization of aromatic substances produced by non-Saccharomyces yeasts currently used in the beer and wine industry.

However, this review lacks a summary table that relates the major metabolites produced by non-Saccharomyces to chromatographic or other techniques using mass spectrometry.

The title of the article is centered on metabolomics and the authors put forward some technical approaches for targeted and non-targeted metabolomic studies, and apart from the two summary figures, no numerical support is accessible as range of concentrations, limit of detection, etc.

For all these reasons, the manuscript may be accepted if the authors add summary tables to the manuscript and respond to the reviewer's comments.

Response:

We thank the reviewer for this helpful comment. We have revised the manuscript by including an additional Table to highlight the connections between the metabolites produced by various yeasts and the analytical techniques used for their measurement.

 

Table 1. Analytical methods suitable for analysis of important metabolites produced by non-Saccharomyces yeasts.

Yeast

Metabolite of Interest 

Analytical Method Used

Reference

Torulaspora delbreuckii

1,1-Diethoxyethane

SBSE-TD-GCMS

[29]

Limonene

SBSE-TD-GCMS

 

Isoamyl alcohol

GC-FID

 

Acetoin

GC-FID

 

Ethyl isobutyrate

SBSE-TD-GCMS

 

Ethyl butyrate

SBSE-TD-GCMS

 

Brettanomyces bruxellensis

4-Ethylphenol

SPME-GCMS 

[30]

4-Ethylguaiacol

SPME-GCMS 

 

4-Vinylphenol

SPME-GCMS 

 

4-Vinylguaiacol

SPME-GCMS 

 

Lachancea thermotolerans

Lactic acid

HPLC-RI 

[31]

Ethyl lactate

HS-SPME-GCMS

 

Ethyl acetate

HS-SPME-GCMS

 

Glycerol

HPLC-RI

 

Saccharomycodes ludwigii

Ethyl acetate

SPME-GCMS

[32]

Isoamyl acetate

SPME-GCMS

 

Acetaldehyde

SPME-GCMS

 

Spontaneous fermentation

Cadaverine

UPLC-MS/MS

[33]

Acetic acid

HPLC-RI

 

Histamine

UPLC-MS/MS

 

Acetoin

GC-FID

 

 

 

Minor comments.

Abstract.

4-vinylguaiacol

Lachancea

 

Response: We have corrected these typographical errors.

 

Comment:

“HPLC was used to measure glycerol, lactic acid, malic acid, and acetic acid”. Lachancea forms L-lactic acid from sugars, with HPLC analysis can you separate the two isomers of lactic acid, D and L?

You quote in the manuscript "Sequential ferments using first S. cerevisiae and then L. thermotolerans resulted in the lowest ethanol and highest concentrations of lactic acid", I think it is necessary to specify the isomerism of lactic acid for Lachancea because lactic acid bacteria also produce L-lactic acid from L-malic acid.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this comment.  We agree that distinguishing between L- and D- forms is analytically critical.  However, as this was not highlighted in the relevant study we have not further emphasised this at this point in the review.

Reviewer 2 Report

The review is interesting. I suggest some minor changes. It should be interesting to prepare a paragraph concerning the main metabolites produced by yeasts and their impact on the analysed beverages. Moreover, the authors should specify why they focus their attention of those species. Finally, the effect of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed fermentation should be better underlined.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for their suggestions. To address these suggestions, we have revised the manuscript and included additional text in Section 3:

 

"While many non-Saccharomyces yeasts have been investigated for their use in the production of fermented beverages, yeast of the genera Brettanomyces, Lachancea, Torulaspora, and Saccharomycodes have seen the greatest interest. Spontaneous or mixed ferments are also increasingly of interest in a consumer market looking for a variety of flavours, aromas, and other unusual sensory characteristics. Ethanol and carbon dioxide are the main metabolites produced by yeasts during fermentation, and while these are responsible for key aspects of the sensory characteristics of fermented beverages, yeasts also produce hundreds of secondary metabolites which impact the sensory profiles of fermented beverages [9]. Secondary metabolites such as esters and higher alcohols, which are regularly associated with fruity descriptors, often make important contributions to the flavour and aroma of beer and wine [34,35]. Vicinal diketones are another group of important secondary metabolites, such as diacetyl which imparts unwanted buttery flavours when present in high concentrations [34,35]. The following sections review the use of yeasts from these genera and the metabolites they produce which impact the sensory characteristics of controlled and spontaneous fermentations. "

Back to TopTop