Next Article in Journal
Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Predicting the Injury Time of Rib Fractures in Gemstone Spectral Imaging Scans
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Application of Bioresorbable, Synthetic, Electrospun Matrix in Wound Healing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) as a Cost-Effective Tool for Vaccine Production for Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Engineering Biology of Yeast for Advanced Biomanufacturing

1
The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
2
College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2023, 10(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010010
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Yeast to Biotechnology)
Advanced biomanufacturing has been widely involved in people’s daily life, such as the production of molecules used as pharmaceuticals, in foods and beverages, and in bio-fuels [1]. Yeast is a micro-organism that has been used by humans for thousands of years for the production of food and beverages. Its versatility and robustness under fermentation conditions, along with its generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status and ease of culture, have made it a valuable tool in biotechnology [2,3]. Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the best-studied and most widely used yeast species in industrial applications [4]. However, other species, such as Pichia pastoris, Hansenula polymorpha, Yarrowia lipolytica, and Kluyveromyces marxianus, are also emerging as valuable tools in engineering biology. These species have unique characteristics that make them suitable for specific applications, such as the ability to grow at low temperatures or the production of certain compounds [5,6]. Overall, the diversity of yeast species and their ability to be genetically modified make them valuable tools in advanced biomanufacturing.
To provide a forum for scientific dissemination, the Special Issue, ‘From Yeast to Biotechnology’, compiles the most relevant papers in yeast biotechnology, which not only provide the latest progress of yeast in biotechnology but also gives readers an excellent insight into this field.
Yeast has been the crucial model organism for both academia and industry for more than 40 years. With the exploitation of increasingly novel strategies and skills, yeast-based biotechnology is constantly boosted. The development of genetic engineering achieved the writing of DNA in yeast S. cerevisiae. The Sc2.0 project is drawing to a close, providing a precious reference for synthetic genomics. This also opens new horizons to tackle many challenges of humankind and breaks the limits of science [7]. In addition, omics analysis has become a powerful technology to characterize and understand the metabolic network in yeast. Based on omics analysis, some complex biological systems can be better manipulated to establish robust biomanufacturing platforms [8]. For example, the ability of S. cerevisiae to produce ethanol and utilize the fermented carbon source plays a key role in the industries of brewing, winemaking, and ethanol production. The proteomic study of S. cerevisiae related to different fermentation processes revealed the differences in protein expression levels between processes, which shows that different typical genes respond to different technological environments. These data can be further applied to strengthen the industrial yeast strain to adapt to different biotechnological environments [9]. Interestingly, optogenetics is also introduced to dynamically control yeast cellular processes in recent years, aiming to improve poor productivity. The metabolic flux is directed toward production through establishing the optogenetic systems in yeast. This new system brings in a new field of vision for optimizing yeast-based microbial cell factories [10].
Gene regulatory network modeling is another vital tool to improve the bioproduction ability of yeast. Triacylglyceride (TAGs) biosynthesis-related genes were classified in the oleaginous yeast Lipomyces starkeyi, which was subsequently used to construct the different gene regulatory network modeling. The modeling was used to analyze the oil- and TAG-related regulatory factors that could be further engineered in Lipomyces starkeyi to improve its lipids production ability [11]. Yeast is also an ideal model micro-organism to investigate various molecular mechanisms that are applicable from yeast to mammals. To reveal how mammals cope with copper as an essential metal element for life, yeast S. cerevisiae was used as a model to study this mechanism. It is found that S. cerevisiae cells could form deposits on the cell wall to tolerate high copper concentration, especially the copper-containing deposits accumulated on media, with reducing sugars as the sole carbon source rather than nonreducing carbon sources. The vigorous agitation could prevent copper-containing deposits at the cell wall. The copper deposits on the cell wall could be increased by disrupting the low-affinity copper intake through the plasma membrane. Based on this mechanism, we could propose a helpful approach for removing excess copper from different contaminated solids [12].
In addition to exploiting different synthetic and system biology and analysis tools for the manipulation of yeast to boost yeast-based technology, broadening downstream products is also indispensable. For decades, demand has been rising for various commodities involving health, food, fuel, etc. Facing the shortage of market supply, more and more products are attempting to be produced using biotechnology due to the advantages of being fast, environmentally friendly, and low cost.
Advanced yeast cell factories have been used for the production of natural products. Lycopene, a natural colorant with antioxidant properties, has been used as a common food additive [13]. Although B. trispora [14] and E. coli [15] have been engineered for lycopene production, the potential food safety issues could not be ignored in these two microorganisms. In comparison, yeast S. cerevisiae with GRAS is more promising as the lycopene microbial cell factory. Zhang et al. employed the genome-editing tool SCRaMbLE to evolve yeast S. cerevisiae to be compatible with the heterologous lycopene biosynthesis pathway. The expression of the optimized lycopene biosynthesis pathway improved the lycopene by 129.5 fold compared to the parental strain [16]. In addition, a semi-synthetic yeast strain harboring a synthetic chromosome II was evolved through SCRaMbLE, generating a new genotype of hygromycin B resistance [17]. These approaches could not only accelerate the process of optimizing yeast genotype, but also demonstrate that yeast mechanisms have a substantial effect on yeast phenotype. In addition to lycopene, isoprenoids, another typical secondary natural product, are important ingredients for flavored fragrance industries, pharmaceutical products, and natural rubber [18,19]. To enable yeast S. cerevisiae to efficiently produce farnesyl diphosphate (FPP)-derived isoprenoids, a combinatorial metabolic engineering strategy was adopted by improving the availability of the upstream FPP combined with removing the competitive reactions in the downstream, which significantly increased the product yield [20].
In addition to different metabolic engineering and synthetic and system biology strategies applied to modify yeast phenotypes, cultivation media directly influence strain analysis and strain performance in industrial applications [21]. In addition, with the increasing emphasis on safe and environmental issues, hazardous chemicals should be reduced or avoided in culture media based on the REACH regulation (EuropeanChemicalsAgency. Understanding REACH. Available online: https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/reach/understanding-reach, accessed on 20 December 2022). Therefore, optimizing the culture medium or fermentation broth is an indispensable step for applying yeast in biomanufacturing. For example, Basal Salt Medium (BSM) is a popular culture media for high-cell-density cultivations of K. phaffii. However, this defined culture media contains the harmful ingredients of boric acid and cobalt. Unfortunately, only a little knowledge of cultivations without cobalt or boric acid can be found. Therefore, Pekarsky et al. studied the impact of the depletion of boric acid and cobalt on high-cell-density cultivation, cellular morphology, viability, and recombinant protein production with K. phaffii, which provides a reference for future optimization of yeast media [22].
What is more, the application of yeast biotechnology should meet the requirements of modern society. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic once again reminded people of the importance of vaccine development. However, low- and middle-income countries face the issues of the limited availability and affordability of vaccines. The yeast Pichia pastoris, with its robust recombinant protein system, is one of the most promising hosts for vaccine production, which is promising to help low- and middle-income countries overcome these barriers to vaccination [23]. Another example is the wine industry; compared with traditional wine, the innovation in yeast-based wine-brewing technology could potentially address the challenges of the wine industry and provide the produced wine with freshness, a healthy flavor, and fragrances [24].
Yeast is a fantastic host being used for the development of engineering biology tools and strategies. Yeasts’ versatility, robustness, and ease of culture make them a valuable tool for advanced biomanufacturing. With the rapid development of genome-editing tools such as SCRaMbLE, synthetic biology tools, and artificial intelligence-guided machine learning models, yeast-based biotechnology will create more miracles in the near future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, W.J.; writing—review and editing, H.P.; proofreading and revision, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

H.P. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 899987.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nielsen, J.; Tillegreen, C.B.; Petranovic, D. Innovation trends in industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1160–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nielsen, J. Yeast systems biology: Model organism and cell factory. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, 1800421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mosttafiz, S.; Rahman, M.; Rahman, M. Biotechnology: Role of microbes in sustainable agriculture and environmental health. Internet J. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Peng, H.; He, L.; Haritos, V.S. Metabolic engineering of lipid pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and staged bioprocess for enhanced lipid production and cellular physiology. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 45, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mattanovich, D.; Sauer, M.; Gasser, B. Yeast biotechnology: Teaching the old dog new tricks. Microb. Cell Factories 2014, 13, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Park, Y.-K.; Ledesma-Amaro, R. What makes Yarrowia lipolytica well suited for industry? Trends Biotechnol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schindler, D. Genetic engineering and synthetic genomics in yeast to understand life and boost biotechnology. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baidoo, E.E.; Teixeira Benites, V. Mass spectrometry-based microbial metabolomics: Techniques, analysis, and applications. In Microbial Metabolomics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 11–69. [Google Scholar]
  9. Davydenko, S.; Meledina, T.; Mittenberg, A.; Shabelnikov, S.; Vonsky, M.; Morozov, A. Proteomics answers which yeast genes are specific for baking, brewing, and ethanol production. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pouzet, S.; Banderas, A.; Le Bec, M.; Lautier, T.; Truan, G.; Hersen, P. The promise of optogenetics for bioproduction: Dynamic control strategies and scale-up instruments. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aburatani, S.; Ishiya, K.; Itoh, T.; Hayashi, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Takaku, H. Inference of Regulatory System for TAG Biosynthesis in Lipomyces starkeyi. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruta, L.L.; Farcasanu, I.C. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Concentrates Subtoxic Copper onto Cell Wall from Solid Media Containing Reducing Sugars as Carbon Source. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Agarwal, A.; Shen, H.; Agarwal, S.; Rao, A. Lycopene content of tomato products: Its stability, bioavailability and in vivo antioxidant properties. J. Med. Food 2001, 4, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pegklidou, K.; Mantzouridou, F.; Tsimidou, M.Z. Lycopene production using Blakeslea trispora in the presence of 2-methyl imidazole: Yield, selectivity, and safety aspects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 4482–4490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, Z.; Sun, J.; Yang, Q.; Yang, J. Metabolic engineering Escherichia coli for the production of lycopene. Molecules 2020, 25, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Chiu, T.-Y.; Zhang, J.-T.; Wang, S.-J.; Wang, S.-W.; Liu, L.-Y.; Ping, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, A.; Zhang, W.-W. Systematical Engineering of Synthetic Yeast for Enhanced Production of Lycopene. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ong, J.Y.; Swidah, R.; Monti, M.; Schindler, D.; Dai, J.; Cai, Y. SCRaMbLE: A study of its robustness and challenges through enhancement of hygromycin B resistance in a semi-synthetic yeast. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Daviet, L.; Schalk, M. Biotechnology in plant essential oil production: Progress and perspective in metabolic engineering of the terpene pathway. Flavour Fragr. J. 2010, 25, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gronover, C.S.; Wahler, D.; Prüfer, D. Natural rubber biosynthesis and physic-chemical studies on plant derived latex. Biotechnol. Biopolym. 2011, 75, 88. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bröker, J.N.; Müller, B.; Prüfer, D.; Schulze Gronover, C. Combinatorial metabolic engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the enhanced production of the FPP-derived sesquiterpene germacrene. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hahn-Hägerdal, B.; Karhumaa, K.; Larsson, C.U.; Gorwa-Grauslund, M.; Görgens, J.; Van Zyl, W.H. Role of cultivation media in the development of yeast strains for large scale industrial use. Microb. Cell Factories 2005, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Pekarsky, A.; Mihalyi, S.; Weiss, M.; Limbeck, A.; Spadiut, O. Depletion of boric acid and cobalt from cultivation media: Impact on recombinant protein production with Komagataella phaffii. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. de Sá Magalhães, S.; Keshavarz-Moore, E. Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) as a cost-effective tool for vaccine production for low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Bioengineering 2021, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Molina-Espeja, P. Next generation winemakers: Genetic engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for trendy challenges. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, W.; Li, Y.; Peng, H. Engineering Biology of Yeast for Advanced Biomanufacturing. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010010

AMA Style

Jiang W, Li Y, Peng H. Engineering Biology of Yeast for Advanced Biomanufacturing. Bioengineering. 2023; 10(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Wei, Yanjun Li, and Huadong Peng. 2023. "Engineering Biology of Yeast for Advanced Biomanufacturing" Bioengineering 10, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10010010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop