Next Article in Journal
Bioprospecting of a Metschnikowia pulcherrima Indigenous Strain for Chasselas Winemaking in 2022 Vintage
Previous Article in Journal
Modelling Polyphenol Extraction through Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction by Machine Learning in Olea europaea Leaves
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pilot Study for the Dietary Assessment of Xenobiotics Derived from Food Processing in an Adult Spanish Sample
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unlocking Flavor Potential Using Microbial β-Glucosidases in Food Processing

by
Mariam Muradova
1,2,*,
Alena Proskura
1,2,
Francis Canon
1,
Irina Aleksandrova
2,
Mathieu Schwartz
1,
Jean-Marie Heydel
1,
Denis Baranenko
2,
Liudmila Nadtochii
2 and
Fabrice Neiers
1,*
1
Molecular Mechanisms of Flavor Perception, Center for Taste and Feeding Behavior, INRAE, CNRS, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
2
International Research Center “Biotechnologies of the Third Millennium”, Faculty of Biotechnologies (BioTech), ITMO University, 191002 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(24), 4484; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244484
Submission received: 20 November 2023 / Revised: 7 December 2023 / Accepted: 12 December 2023 / Published: 14 December 2023

Abstract

:
Aroma is among of the most important criteria that indicate the quality of food and beverage products. Aroma compounds can be found as free molecules or glycosides. Notably, a significant portion of aroma precursors accumulates in numerous food products as nonvolatile and flavorless glycoconjugates, termed glycosidic aroma precursors. When subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis, these seemingly inert, nonvolatile glycosides undergo transformation into fragrant volatiles or volatiles that can generate odor-active compounds during food processing. In this context, microbial β-glucosidases play a pivotal role in enhancing or compromising the development of flavors during food and beverage processing. β-glucosidases derived from bacteria and yeast can be utilized to modulate the concentration of particular aroma and taste compounds, such as bitterness, which can be decreased through hydrolysis by glycosidases. Furthermore, oral microbiota can influence flavor perception by releasing volatile compounds that can enhance or alter the perception of food products. In this review, considering the glycosidic flavor precursors present in diverse food and beverage products, we underscore the significance of glycosidases with various origins. Subsequently, we delve into emerging insights regarding the release of aroma within the human oral cavity due to the activity of oral microbial glycosidases.

1. Introduction

Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) hydrolyze the glycosidic bond between two or more carbohydrates or between a carbohydrate and a noncarbohydrate moiety. These ubiquitous enzymes play a pivotal role in numerous physiological functions, such as the metabolism of cell-wall polysaccharides and glycolipids, glycan biosynthesis and remodulation, energy mobilization, defense mechanisms, and symbiotic interactions [1]. In the carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZY), GHs are classified into a growing number of families indicated by GH for glycoside hydrolases followed by a number for each specific family, such as GH1, GH2, GH3, GH5, GH9, GH30, and GH116 [2]. Multiple types of these enzymes are found due to the intricate nature of their glycoside substrates, which may comprise mono- or disaccharides. The terminal sugar of these glycosides can be β-d-glucopyranoside, α-l-rhamnopyranoside, α-l-arabinofuranoside, β-d-apiofuranoside, or β-d-xylopyranoside, while the central sugar in disaccharides is invariably β-d-glucopyranoside [3]. Enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of beta-linked polymers of glucose are called β-glucosidases (β-D-glucopyranoside glucohydrolases, E.C. 3.2.1.21). The GH1 and GH3 families include the most relevant β-glucosidase enzymes for biotechnological applications; GH1 contains the largest number of characterized β-glucosidases [2]. β-glucosidases can be classified into the following distinct classes based on their substrate specificity: aryl-β-D-glucosidases, which exhibit a high binding affinity for aryl-β-D-glucosides; cellobiases, which exclusively hydrolyze disaccharides; and broad-specificity glucosidases, which possess enzymatic activity toward a wide range of substrates and are the most frequently encountered β-glucosidases [4].
Microorganisms, particularly fungi and bacteria, are a large source of β-glucosidases [3]. Various species of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Trichoderma, and Rhizopus have been found to produce a multitude of β-glucosidases that have practical applications in the food and beverage industry to improve aroma [5]. In addition, glycosidases synthesize yeasts, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which are utilized in the production of beer, bread, and wine [6]. Yeasts have been observed to produce β-glucosidase in various locations, including the cytosol, cell membrane, and cell wall [7]. However, the intracellular β-glucosidase activity of yeasts is not very valuable for industrial purposes. As a result, scientific investigations concerning yeast β-glucosidase activity predominantly target the enzyme’s presence in the whole cell and yeast supernatant, emphasizing the extracellular β-glucosidase activity [8].
The ability of β-glucosidases to release aromatic compounds from flavorless precursors is used in an increasing number of food products [9]. β-glucosidases are additionally widely utilized for the hydrolysis of flavanone glycoside, which is perceived as bitter. Naringin is a flavanone glycoside and one of the main compounds perceived as bitter in citrus juice. Naringin is hydrolyzed by β-glucosidases into naringenin and the disaccharide rutinose during juice extraction; as a result, bitterness can be reduced. The bitter threshold of naringin is lower than that of naringenin [10,11]. Within the flavor industry, β-glucosidases are the main enzymes involved in the enzymatic release of aromatic compounds from glucosidic precursors found in fruits and fermenting products, including wine, tea, and fruit juice [12,13].
Glycosides of volatile aromatic compounds that are water soluble and odorless are a useful source of flavor compounds [14]. Volatile aglycones can be released from glycoconjugates during fermentation via enzymatic catalysis as well as chemical methods, such as acid hydrolysis processes; thus, the aroma profile of foods is enhanced [9]. Some key aromas, such as terpenes, are unstable in acidic environments, limiting this approach to the release of terpene glycosides [9]. An alternative method employs rapid acid–heat hydrolysis, although undesirable aromas may be generated. While thermal hydrolysis can increase glycoside breakdown by up to 33%, elevated temperatures can also induce conformational alterations in the glycoside native structure [15]. In contrast, enzymatic hydrolysis specifically cleaves the glycosidic bond without altering the aglycone structure, making it a more convenient method [16]. Thus, efforts have been directed toward enhancing the flavor of juices and wines by hydrolyzing glycosidic aroma precursors with glycosidic enzymes, particularly β-glucosidase. The potential industrial applications of β-glucosidases have led to the exploration of new microbial enzyme sources that can be obtained with high structural stability in inexpensive fermentation media [17].
Food flavor results from the integration of information from various chemical senses, including olfaction (promoted by odorant molecules or aroma molecules when odorant molecules are perceived by the retronasal smell), gustation, and trigeminal [18]. The diversity of oral microbiota has been linked to individual differences in flavor perception [19,20]. Recent research has provided evidence that β-glucosidases originating from oral microbiota can enzymatically hydrolyze aroma precursors in various products, thereby releasing aroma molecules. These findings suggest that oral bacteria play a significant role in modulating aroma perception [21]. More than 750 bacterial species have been identified in the human mouth [22]. Among them, Prevotella, Streptococcus, Veillonella, Neisseria, and Haemophilus were proposed to produce the β-glucosidases involved in the release of aroma from food product during chewing [21,23,24]. The diversity of oral bacteria may influence the metabolization of aroma compounds and their precursors, leading to different retronasal olfactory responses [25]. Despite the importance of the oral microbiota in flavor perception, research on the connection between microbial communities, β-glucosidase activity, and the release of volatiles from flavor precursors is limited.
In this article, we will provide an overview of the applications of β-glucosidases in the food flavor industry and their microbial sources. We will also discuss the impact of these enzymes on human aroma perception. New knowledge on oral microbial enzymes could provide reasonable insights and help researchers design molecular tools that are optimized to produce aroma compounds or enhance the flavor intensity of specific food products. In addition, this knowledge could help food manufacturers optimize and modulate food processing.

2. Occurrence of Aroma Glycosides in Common Food

Glycosides are essential for the aroma of diverse plant-based food products, such as vanilla, fruit products, or beverages, such as tea, wine, and beer [26,27,28]. In many products, more aroma glycosides are present than their free aroma counterparts; for example, in many fruits, the level of glycosides was two to eight times greater than that of their free counterparts [29,30]. Given the low threshold and sensory characteristics of some aromas constituting aglycones, glycosidic compounds constitute a significant potential reservoir of flavor volatiles in fruit juice production [31].
In fruit products, the aroma precursors can be converted into volatile compounds during storage and processing, increasing the overall aroma of the resulting product [32,33]. Glycoconjugate-containing compounds are present in numerous fruits, such as grapes [34], apples [35], apricots [36], litchis [37], papayas [38], citrus fruits [39], pineapples [40], raspberries [41], kiwis [42], and peaches [43]. Depending on the type of glycoside, these compounds can generate citrus, green, floral, and sweet scents [44]. The fruit flavor is a result of a complex mixture of volatile compounds such as esters, ketones, terpenes, alcohols, and aldehydes [45]. Terpenoids, mainly C10 (monoterpenes) and C15 (sesquiterpenes), have been identified in the flavor profiles of many fruits [45]. Furthermore, most norisoprenoids, which are precursors of highly potent flavor compounds, are mainly present in fruit in glycosidic forms. In the green fruit of vanilla, fifteen aroma compounds in glucosyl form have been identified [46], and most of the vanillin is in glucosyl form [47]. The free vanilla aroma is increased during the development of the fruit and during the curing of vanilla beans [48]. In green tea, the hydrolysis of glycosides contributes to essential floral and sweet aromas of white teas, such as geraniol, linalool, and ionones [26,27,49,50,51]. Cis-3-hexenol is a widely recognized leafy alcohol in tea flavor, and this compound is found across all three tea varieties (black, oolong, and green teas); however, this compound is notably more abundant in green tea [52,53].
Ester compounds usually exhibit a sweet, floral, and fruity aroma. For instance, the nonalcoholic volatile glucoside methyl salicylate generates fresh and minty odors in green, oolong, and black teas [49,50]. Aldehydes can provide green, fresh, and citrus-like notes in foods [54]. A combination of these compounds was identified as important odor molecules that contribute to the distinctive rice flavor in rice koji [55]. The odor of 3-methylbutanal contributed to a pungent aroma in aged sake [56]. Additionally, the terpene 1,8-cineole could impart a fresh and mint-like aroma to red wines [57]. Infusion of spray-dried instant oolong tea led to a notable alteration in the tea’s scent profile via glycosides hydrolysis, resulting in an intensified expression of floral, fruity, and grassy notes. The primary odorants responsible for this effect were identified as furfural, cis-3-hexenol, geraniol, 2-methylbutanal, and 2-ethylfuran [58].
Glycosides significantly influence the sensory attributes of plant-based food products. This is primarily because a fraction of volatile compounds in these products are glycosidically bound, which is crucial for their application in the food processing sector [44]. In plants, aroma glycosides are generated through a process termed glycosylation. During this process, a sugar molecule (either an O-β-D-glucoside or a disaccharide, such as O-D-glycosides) binds to an aglycone compound that can generate an aroma [59]. This glycosidic linkage is established in a multistep enzymatic procedure. Initially, enzymes such as α-L-rhamnosidase, α-L-arabinosidase, or β-D-apiosidase hydrolyze the terminal sugar—such as rhamnose, arabinose, or apiose—resulting in the release of the corresponding β-D-glucosides. Following this, monoterpenol is released through the catalytic activity of β-D-glucosidase. Research on certain plant-based products, such as wine and fruit juices, has investigated the hydrolysis of monoterpenes due to their crucial role as flavor sources [60,61]. For instance, monoterpenes contribute to the floral and fruity aroma characteristics of wines [62] and cherry juice [14]. Furthermore, glycoside molecules in beverages, such as wine and beer, have been extensively studied.
Over 800 volatile and aromatic compounds have been identified in wine, encompassing those that originate from fruits (varietal aroma), those generated by yeast and bacteria during fermentation (enzymatic aroma), and those that develop during aging (post-enzymatic aroma). As a result, the flavor and aroma profile of a wine can vary widely due to many variations in winemaking [63]. Wine aroma is a multifaceted attribute influenced by numerous compounds that arise at different stages of winemaking. The aroma can be broadly categorized into the groups described below.
Primary aroma: this aroma is determined by the grape variety and is influenced by aromatic glycosides present in the grape skins as nonvolatile and odorless glycoconjugates [63]. Several authors highlight the prominent role of terpenes in the varietal aroma due to their transformative capabilities [64].
Fermentation or secondary aroma: this fermentative aroma arises from various precursors during alcoholic and malolactic fermentation. During these processes, glycosides undergo enzymatic hydrolysis, releasing volatile aroma compounds that contribute to the distinct flavors of wine. Notably, wines contain flavor precursors such as linear or cyclic alcohols, including hexanol, phenylethanol, and benzyl alcohol [65].
Bouquet or tertiary aroma: this post-fermentative aroma originates from enzymatic and physicochemical processes, including oxidation and reduction, throughout the conservation and aging phases of wine [64].
The complex and unique flavor profiles of wines are due to aromatic glycosides that occur as nonvolatile and odorless glycoconjugates in the skin of grapes [65]. Considering the glycoside content, most aromatic aglycones are associated with apiosyl glycosides, which are prevalent in grape juice, constituting up to 50% of the grape variety. Following this, rutinosides range from 6% to 13% and glucosides from 4% to 9%. The glycoside concentrations and their variations are largely contingent upon the specific grape variety. Glycosides in wine originate from grapes during ripening and may correlate with the concentration of their respective aglycones [66]. During the fermentation and aging processes, these glycosides are enzymatically hydrolyzed, releasing volatile aroma compounds that contribute to the wine’s characteristic flavors. In a separate but related process, terpenes play a significant role in the varietal aroma of wines due to their ability to transform into other compounds [67]. These terpenes, which may influence the flavor of wine, can generate other flavor precursors, such as linear or cyclic alcohols (hexanol, phenylethanol, benzyl alcohol) [45].
Humulus lupulus of the family Cannabaceae is a major raw material for beer. Among the aroma compounds responsible for the aroma of beer, those derived from Humulus lupulus include monoterpenes typified by linalool. On the cone surface of Humulus lupulus, there are trichomes called lupulin, which are specifically differentiated to accumulate aroma components therein. Many aroma compounds accumulate within lupulin [68]. The female cones of hops are used to impart flavor, aroma, antimicrobial properties, and foam stability to beer [69]. Studies of hop aroma have mostly focused on volatile compounds in the essential oil. While these volatiles are the main contributors to hop aroma in beer, glycosidically bound aroma precursor compounds also play a role [70]. Hops contain several classes of aglycone volatile molecules, including monoterpene alcohols, monoterpene polyols, norisoprenoids, aliphatic alcohols, and volatile phenols. Terpenes and monoterpene alcohols are found in hops in free form as well as bound to other molecules [71]. Extensive research on the glycosidic composition of hop cones has focused mainly on monoterpene alcohols, compounds often considered to generate aroma in some hop varieties, and norisoprenoids such as β-damascenone [72]. Hop aroma glycosides play a role in the aroma development of beer [73]. In brewing, hops (Humulus lupulus) are an important component and contain α-acids, which prevent spoilage and give the beer a special characteristic flavor [74]. Linalool, 3-methylbutanoic acid, myrcene, and dimethyl trisulfide are the most influential aromatic compounds, and other glycosides, such as geraniol, also play an important role [75]. These aroma glycosides are odorless but release volatile aromatic compounds when hydrolyzed by high temperature, low pH, and yeast enzymes [76]. The compounds promote aroma development at various stages of brewing and beer storage [77].

2.1. Yeast β-Glucosidases

Yeast, as one of the primary microorganisms responsible for the production of glucosidase enzymes in the food industry, plays a pivotal role [78]. Yeasts can be used during the fermentation of fruit juices, wine, and other plant-based products [79]. Yeast contributes to the aroma development of many products, such as chocolate [80] or sake [81], which require fermentation processes, through glycosidase activities. However, the yeast glycosidases involved in aroma development have been mainly studied for wine and beer.
The yeasts that are present during spontaneous fermentation can be classified into the following categories: Saccharomyces yeasts, primarily Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and non-Saccharomyces yeasts, which encompass members of the genera Rhodotorula, Pichia, Candida, Debaryomyces, Metschtnikowia, Hansenula, and Hanseniaspora [82]. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is widely used in the conversion of grape aroma precursors to varietal wine aromas [83]. β-Glucosidase production has also been observed in yeasts belonging to the genera Candida [84], Debaryomyces [85], Hanseniaspora/Kloeckera [86], Kluyveromyces [87], Metschnikowia [88], Pichia [89], Saccharomycodes, Schizosaccharomyces, and Zygosaccharomyces [90]. For instance, Kai Hu et al., showed that isolates of Hanseniaspora uvarum, Pichia membranifaciens, and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa among 493 non-Saccharomyces isolates exhibited high β-glycosidase activity. The Hanseniaspora uvarum strain was shown to exhibit catalytic specificity for aromatic C13-norisoprenoid glycosides and some terpenes, enhancing fresh floral, sweet, berry, and nutty aroma characteristics in wine production [91]. Non-Saccharomyces species, such as Candida lusitaniae, Hanseniaspora guilliermondii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, and Pichia anomala, exhibited the highest β-glucosidase activity to improve wine aroma complexity [92]. β-glucosidases from strains Hanseniaspora sp. and Pichia anomala were used to release glucoside-linked monoterpenes, which are the major contributors to floral and fruity aromas in Muscat-type wines, at the final stage of alcoholic fermentation [93]. Additionally, β-glucosidase from Sporidiobolus pararoseus was purified and characterized with potential application for terpene compound release in wine [94]. β-Glucosidase from the yeast Brettanomyces anomalus hydrolyzed glycosides from cherry beers to produce more benzyl alcohol and eugenol, resulting in a typical cherry beer aroma. The enzyme also hydrolyzed forest fruit milk glycosides to release more methyl salicylate, which imparted a more desirable spicy flavor to the beverage compared with that of commercial almond β-glucosidase [95].
Furthermore, non-Saccharomyces species are strategically used to create multistarter, mixed, or sequential cultures in combination with Saccharomyces cerevisiae [96,97,98]. This combination can improve the flavor complexity and characteristics of wines because non-Saccharomyces yeasts are rich in various enzymes that can hydrolyze and release abundant aroma compounds [99,100]. For example, Wen-Ke Shi et al. found that cofermentation with Pichia kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae enhanced wine flavor and quality. This enhancement was attributed to a reduction in volatile acidity and an increase in aroma compound content when compared with fermentation using only Saccharomyces cerevisiae [101]. Recent studies have verified that the elevated levels of terpenes in wines resulting from mixed cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/Hanseniaspora guilliermondii with sequential fermentation could considerably boost the polyphenol and volatile aroma component contents in Nanfeng tangerine wines [102]. Additionally, cocultivation of the β-D-glucosidase-producing strain Debaryomyces pseudopolymorphus with Saccharomyces cerevisiae VIN13 during Chardonnay juice fermentation was observed to significantly elevate the concentrations of citronellol, nerol, and geraniol [103]. Equally, mixed cultures of Sauvignon Blanc grape juice with Candida zemplinina/Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Torulaspora delbrueckii/Saccharomyces cerevisiae generated wines with high concentrations of terpenols compared with wines fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae [104]. However, some studies have shown that non-Saccharomyces yeasts can be inhibited by Saccharomyces cerevisiae or the vinification environment [105,106,107].
The complexity of detecting enzyme activity is further demonstrated by the in vitro substrates used for β-glucosidase detection in yeasts. These substrates undergo hydrolysis by glucanases; thus, the potential overlap of these two enzymatic activities must be considered [108]. Saccharomyces is known to exhibit diverse exo-1,3-β-glucanases encoded by genes such as EXG1 and its paralogs SPR1 and EXG2. The catalytic activities of these enzymes have been associated with glycoside hydrolysis [109]. According to the Saccharomyces Genome Database, the EGH1 gene encodes a β-glucosidase with a broad specificity for aglycones. This enzyme has shown the capability of hydrolyzing flavonoid glucosides such as 7-O-β-glucosides or 4′-O-β-glucosides of flavanones, such as NAR 7-gluc, flavones, flavonols, and isoflavones [110]. This activity could contribute to aroma enhancements.

2.2. Bacterial β-Glucosidases

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) represent a noteworthy group of microorganisms that play an important role in food production [111]. LAB grow in diverse nutrient-rich environments, such as animal (milk, meat) or plant-based products (fruits, cereals). Incubation with lactic acid bacterial strains increases the nutritional value and improves the organoleptic qualities of these products, such as fruit juices such as blueberry, citrus, apple, and elderberry [112,113,114,115]. Microbial strains possess the ability to metabolize sugar for the production of lactic acid and display diverse catalytic activities, leading to the generation of distinct aroma-active compounds derived from their precursors [116]. The main aroma compounds released by bacteria include aldehydes, organic acids, higher alcohols, esters, carboxylic acids, and ketones [117,118]. Multiple bacterial species, such as Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, and Pediococcus, exhibit glucosidase activity and are commonly used in the food industry to improve flavors and aromas in fermented foods and beverages (Table 1). The Lactobacillus genus is widely used in the fermentation of various food products, including cheese [119], yogurt [120], and pickles [121], since it possesses a diverse range of enzymes, such as alpha-amylase, beta-glucosidase, and beta-galactosidase. For example, Lactobacillus pentosus can metabolize complex carbohydrates, such as starch, cellulose, galactan, xylan, pullulan, pectin, and gums [122]. Lactobacillus harbinensis and Pediococcus pentosaceus with a high content of β-glucosidase have been applied to improve the antioxidant properties, flavor profile, and quality of functional bread; the high content of LAB-producing β-glucosidase increases the functionality of the kiwi fruit substrate [123].
There is considerable interest in the β-glucosidase activities of LAB that conduct the malolactic fermentation of wine. Secondary fermentation by Lactobacillus can modify the aromatic profile of wines by releasing significant concentrations of diacetyl-(2,3-butanedione) and other carbonyl compounds derived from citric acid, which contribute to the oiliness and aroma of wines [124]. However, since high ethanol content often causes inhibition and slows the process of MLF in wine, the selection of highly ethanol-tolerant strains is a significant goal for wine producers. For example, Xiaonan Li et al. produced a β-glucosidase, Lb0241, derived from Lactobacillus brevis T61, which exhibits strong resistance to acids and ethanol and inhibited β-glucosidase activity. This β-glucosidase was shown to effectively hydrolyze aromatic precursors and increase the level of aromatic compounds in strawberry wine [125]. β-Glucosidase with high hydrolytic efficiency for terpenyl glycoside has been reported from Sporidiobolus pararoseus [94] and Aureobasidium pullulans [126], suggesting their potential application for the development of wine aroma. The genus Oenococcus is also widely used in the malolactic fermentation of wines. The Oenococcus oeni species is generally beneficial for the final aroma compounds in wine. This bacterium is involved in malolactic fermentation (MLF) due to its resistance to ethanol and low pH. The selection of strains of Oenococcus oeni that exhibit glycosidase activity may promote flavor enhancements in winemaking [127]. Strains Oenococcus oeni MS20 and MS46 were revealed to show higher activity of β-glucosidase to degrade synthetic glycoside (eriodictyol 7-O-β-rutinoside), while low alpha-L-rhamnose activity was induced, representing better performance of MS46 in a wine-like medium containing 6% ethanol at pH 4 [128].
Table 1. Applications of bacterial β-glucosidase in foods.
Table 1. Applications of bacterial β-glucosidase in foods.
FoodMicroorganismEffectReference
Soymilk fermented with kombucha and fructo-oligosaccharidesLactobacillus rhamnosusThe increased β-glucosidase activity promoted favorable flavor substances, such as citric acid and linalool.[129]
Cashew apple juice
(CAJ)
Lactobacillus plantarum,
Lactobacillus casei,
Lactobacillus acidophilus
During CAJ fermentation by lactic Bacteria, the fruity odor decreased, while whiskey and acid odors were elevated. This activity is referring to β-glucosidase action derived from lactic acid species.[130]
Peanut milkLactobacillus delbrueckii ssp.
bulgaricus and Streptococcus
salivarius ssp. thermophilus
A significant decrease in green/beany flavor and a significant increase in creamy flavor occurred due to the action of β-glucosidase derived from lactic acid bacteria.[131]
Chickpea milkLactobacillus plantarumThe hydrolysis of glucosides of soy-based products using β-glucosidase increased their bioavailability, resulting in changed aroma profiles that impart fruity and creamy characteristics[132]
SoymilkLactobacillus plantarum 70810In comparison with original soymilk base, the concentrations of the characteristic flavor compounds for fermented soymilk using L. plantarum 70810 increased, whereas hexanal, 2-pentylfuran, and 2-pentanone in relation to the beany flavor of soymilk decreased.[133]
Sicilian table olivesLactobacillus paracasei,
Lactobacillus plantarum
These reduced the debittering time during the fermentation of Sicilian table olives and caused an increase in hydoxytyrosol, tyrosol, and verbascoside compounds.[134]
Tannat wineOenococcus oeniUnder the action of β-glucosidase, a significant increase in 2-phenylethanol and the sum of terpenols (linalool, R-terpineol, nerol, and geraniol) brought a flavor richness to wine.[135]
Peeled frozen tomatoesLactobacillus plantarumSeveral terpenes important for aroma profiles released included (Z)-geraniol, 6,7-dihydrogeraniol, melonol, linalool, and D-limonene after β-glucosidase treatment.[136]
Some strains of Leuconostoc bacteria are known to produce diacetyl, which generates buttery and creamy flavors, and 2,3-butanedione, which gives a nutty and caramel-like flavor. Yu Geon Lee et al., found that Leuconostoc mesenteroides enhanced flavonoid aglycone content during the fermentation of onion via β-glucosidase action [137]. Marta Acin-Albiac et al. produced and characterized 6-phospho-β-glucosidases from Leuconostoc pesudomesenteroides and Lactobacillus plantarum during fermentation of brewers’ spent grain (BSG). Researchers observed increased metabolic activity of conjugates of gentiobiose, cellobiose, and β-glucoside with phenolic compounds, achieving efficient reduction/modification of cellulose derivatives and phenolic compounds in BSG [138].
Additionally, other non-lactic species, such as Bacillus spp., demonstrated β-glucosidase activity to hydrolyze β-glucosidic linkages between carbohydrate residues in aryl-amino- or alkyl-β-D-glucosides, cyanogenic glucosides, short-chain oligosaccharides, and disaccharides [139]. For instance, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus licheniformis released monoterpenoids and benzoids, of which the most released compounds were neric acid and 2-phenylethanol in grapes, respectively [140]. Other research on Bacillus subtilis contributed to knowledge on the complex factors that influence the unique flavor and nutritional value of natto by hydrolyzing isoflavone glycosides [141].

2.3. Other Fungal β-Glucosidases

Mushrooms, which are mostly saprophytic fungi, derive their nutrition from the adjacent cellulosic material and hence contain lignocellulolytic enzymes, such as cellulases, β-glucosidases, lignin peroxidases, and laccases [142], in addition to a high number of detoxification enzymes, such as glutathione transferases [143,144,145]. β-glucosidases are primarily present in the cellulase enzyme system in fungi and are responsible for hydrolyzing short-chain oligosaccharides and cellobiose into glucose. This hydrolysis process is a rate-limiting step facilitated by the synergistic action of endoglucanases and cellobiohydrolases [146].
The application of fungal enzymes in food production due to the presence of β-glucosidase offers a promising approach to enhance the organoleptic and nutritional content of foods [147]. Furthermore, glycosidases from fungi are more resistant to heat than those from plant and yeast origin. The activity of fungal β-glucosidase is subject to inhibition by glucose; however, the exoglycosidase activities of the enzyme remain relatively stable when exposed to the concentrations of glucose found in fruit juices [148,149]. Some fungal species exhibit strong activity even at low pH, making them particularly useful for applications in plant-based products and wine processing. The ability of these enzymes to work efficiently under acidic conditions is advantageous for maintaining the flavor and aroma of different foods [150]. In the context of flavor enhancement, β-glucosidase enzymes have been produced, purified, and characterized across numerous fungal species. The preeminent contributors to this body of research encompass a wide taxonomic range, including, but not limited to, representatives of Aspergillus spp. [11,151], Candida molischiana [152], Trichosporon asahii [153], Rhizopus stolonifer [154], Mucor plumbeus [155], Aureobasidium pullulans [126], Trichoderma [156], and Penicillium italicum [157]. Some examples of food applications of β-glucosidase are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Applications of fungal β-glucosidase in foods.
Table 2. Applications of fungal β-glucosidase in foods.
FoodMicroorganismEffectReference
Passion fruit juiceAspergillus nigerLinalool, benzyl alcohol, and benzaldehyde levels increased in a passion fruit juice.[158]
Fruit juices and winesCandida molischianaIncreased the levels of linalool, benzyl alcohol, and 2-phenylethanol in wine and some fruit juices under β-glucosidase action.[152]
Red grape Cabernet Gernischt
(Vitis vinifera L. cv.)
Trichosporon asahiiVolatile flavor compounds in the β-glucosidase-treated samples were significantly increased.[159]
Strawberry glycosidic extractAspergillus aculeatus,
Aspergillus foetidus,
Aspergillus japonicus,
Aspergillus niger,
Aspergillus tubingensis
Liberated volatiles (2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone (furaneol)) or cinnamic acid contributed to the flavor of fresh strawberries.[160]
Fermented glutinous riceAspergillus cristatum,
Aspergillus niger,
Aspergillus oryzae
Modified the flavor metabolism in rice by releasing linalool oxides, β-ionone, and geraniol compounds.[161]
Fu brick teaAspergillus, Candida,
Debaryomyces,
Penicillium,
Unclassified_k_Fungi,
Unclassified_o_
Saccharomycetales
Linalool, acetophenone, and methyl salicylate were identified as key volatiles contributors to the “fungal flower”, “flower”, and “mint” attributes; cedrol contributed to the “woody” attribute, and twelve alcohols and aldehydes were related to the “green” attribute during the manufacturing process.[162]
Green teaAspergillus nigerIncreased concentrations of cis-3-hexenol, hexanol, geraniol, and benzyl alcohol.[163]
Craft beerCandida glabrataGlucoside-binding terpenes provided the final beer product with unique floral and fruity characteristics.[164]
Soy sauceAspergillus oryzaeFormation of flavors such as alcohols, acids, esters, aldehydes, furans, and pyrazines during soy sauce fermentation.[165]
Modulating coffee aroma via fermentation by Rhizopus oligosporus led to positive impacts on coffee aroma, imparting it with desirable fruity notes [166]. Fermentation with Rhizopus oligosporus has been determined to improve the flavor characteristics of sweet potato. In particular, the released alcohols, aldehydes, and esters increased the characteristic fatty odor, floral, fruit, and sweet flavors of sweet potato residue [167]. High levels of 1-hexanol, hexanal, 3-octanone, and methyl linoleate were also observed in the moromi fermentation product, with Aspergillus sojae synthesizing soy-sauce-specific flavors [168]. Candida and Issatchenkia fungal species were shown to release β-glucosidase to elevate terpenes, esters, and fatty acids and thus enhance flavor complexity in wines [84,169]. Another recent study showed that Issatchenkia and Candida were positively correlated with 1-hexanoic acid, caprylic acid, 2-methoxy-4-methylphenol, 5-pentyldihydro-2(3H)-furanone, 1-nonanoic acid, acetic acid, (2Z)-2-phenyl-2-butenal, and 4-sec-butylphenol in Hongqu aromatic vinegar [170]. This is probably due to the β-glucosidase activity exhibited by these fungal species.
It has been observed that solid-state fermentation with filamentous fungi can enhance the total polyphenol content in matrices of beans, grains, and fruits, which is attributed to the production of enzymes that facilitate the release of phenolic compounds bound to the cell wall [171]. For instance, solid-state fermentation (SSF) by Aspergillus oryzae and Mucor plumbeus in green canephora coffee could produce caffeylquinic acid (CQA) and polyphenols in fermented beans for the modulation and improvement of coffee flavor [155].

2.4. Plant β-Glucosidases

β-Glucosidases are ubiquitous among plants and are responsible for the hydrolysis of complex carbohydrates, including starch and cellulose, into simple sugars. Plants contain β-glucosidases belonging to GH1, GH3, and GH5 [58,172,173], of which GH1 is the most characterized [2]. These enzymes play a crucial role in several biological processes in plants, including growth, development, and response to environmental stress [174]. During endosperm germination, β-glucosidases and other glycosidases and glycanases degrade the plant cell wall, leading to the formation of intermediates for cell-wall lignification. Additionally, β-glucosidases are involved in plant defense mechanisms by catalyzing the hydrolysis of glycosides and releasing several chemical defense compounds, including phytohormones, flavonoids, and cyanogenic glucosides [2].
β-Glucosidase is common in plant-based products, such as grape [175], almond [176], maize [177], melon [178], orange [179], papaya [180], sweet cherry [181], wheat [182], and rice [183]. The enzymatic activities of endogenous β-glucosidase tend to increase progressively as fruits ripen [32]. Plant β-glucosidases play an important role in diverse biochemical transformations that occur during food processing. Specifically, endogenous β-glucosidases act as catalysts in the conversion of aroma precursors present in vanilla beans, leading to the formation of aromatic aglycones throughout the treatment process [184,185]. Similarly, in the context of tea processing, endogenous β-glucosidases participate in the development of the characteristic floral aroma by facilitating the hydrolysis of glycosides of monoterpenes and aryl alcohols, thereby yielding the corresponding aglycones. These enzymatic activities substantially contribute to the overall flavor profile of the final food products and underscore the significant role of plant β-glucosidases in food science and technology [186]. In grapes, the most abundant glucosidase activity is that of β-glucosidase, which is present alongside other endogenous grape glycosidases, such as α-arabinosidase, α-rhamnosidase, and possibly β-apiosidase [60]. Ziya Günata and coauthors carried out a comprehensive and pioneering study into the pivotal roles played by apiosidases and acuminosidases (either sequentially or in cooperation with exogenously introduced and endogenous β-glucosidases) in the intricate process of aroma formation during wine production [32,148,187].
Plant glucosidases typically exhibit their optimal pH activities within the range of 4.0 to 6.0. However, in fruit juices with lower pH levels, the observed activity of most glycosidases is approximately 5% to 15% of their maximum potential [175]. Nevertheless, the activity of glucosidase produced by most plants can be inhibited in low pH conditions, with glucose, and by thermal treatment [188,189]. However, a glucose-tolerant β-glucosidase has recently been characterized in black plum and Prunus domestica seeds. This enzyme exhibited its highest activity at a temperature of 55 °C and a pH of 5.0 [190]. Almond β-glucosidase has been well investigated to evaluate the potential application of the enzyme as a biocatalyst under high pressure conditions. Scientists have shown that almond β-glucosidase is relatively more thermostable than other β-glucosidases derived from vanilla [184], grape [175], maize [177], and tea leaf [186]. Furthermore, in comparison to β-glucosidases derived from microbial sources, β-glucosidases of plant origin show distinctive attributes, such as exceptional glucose tolerance, a wide range of substrate specificity, and remarkable selectivity [191]. As a result, an array of β-glucopyranosides has been successfully synthesized by employing β-glucosidases sourced from plants [192,193].

2.5. Oral β-Glucosidases in Glycoside Metabolization

Scientific investigations have substantiated the presence of β-glucosidase within the oral cavity, indicating the potential hydrolysis of aroma glycosides to modulate flavor perception by the liberation of glycoconjugates. In humans, several β-glucosidases were identified, as well as some of their physiological substrates. Additionally, a β-glucosidase termed cytosolic β-glucosidase was shown to catalyze the hydrolysis of a broad range of dietary xenobiotic glycosides [194]. However, this human enzyme is present in the liver, kidney, intestine, and spleen and was not found in human saliva. Moreover, recent publications highlight the significant involvement of the human oral microbiota glycosidase in the modulation of flavor perception and sensitivity [195,196,197]. Odorless fruit glucosides have been shown to release active odorant molecules when incubated with oral microorganisms (terpenes, benzenic compounds, and lipid derivatives) [23].
Different bacterial species can produce β-glucosidase to metabolize precursor compounds present in foods to generate aroma molecules in the mouth. The most abundant bacterial taxa in the oral cavity are classified into the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria [23]. However, the diversity of bacteria varies across different oral cavity regions; saliva and tongue microbiota exhibit the greatest diversity and are dominated by genera such as Rothia, Prevotella, Streptococcus, Veillonella, Fusobacterium, Neisseria, and Haemophilus [198,199]. In recent years, several studies have provided evidence for a strong link between flavor perception and human oral microbiota [200]. Different enzymatic activities promoted by these oral bacteria, including glycoside hydrolysis, contribute to the modulation of food product flavors [201].
Glycoside conjugates can be metabolized by bacteria such as Prevotella and Veillonella species, which are consequently associated with increased glycoside hydrolysis [25]. This reaction leads to the release of aroma compounds, such as terpenes, aromatic derivatives, or alcohols [202,203]. Actinomyces naeslundii produced linalool and its associated oxides, indicating that this microorganism may play a significant role in the biosynthesis of floral aromas derived from grape glycosides [23]. It has been shown that eugenyl-β-D-glucoside can be hydrolyzed by oral microorganisms, resulting in the release of the free form of eugenol-aglycone. The authors propose that their results may indicate that not only eugenyl β-D-glucoside but also all glycosides with a β-D bond can undergo a similar hydrolysis process upon incubation with oral microorganisms [204]. A recent study on the microbiome of the tongue dorsum has revealed that a greater prevalence of Actinomyces bacteria is positively associated with heightened taste sensitivity in wine tasters. Additionally, a negative correlation has been observed between the abundance of the genus Gemella and career length in wine tasters, indicating a potential inhibitory effect on wine taste perception [205].
Saliva activity can lead to the release of monoglucosides and disaccharide glycosides, which is very dependent on the glycoside type and the individual. For example, it was shown that flavonoid glycosides were hydrolyzed when incubated with saliva within minutes [206]. The hydrolysis process is also greatly influenced by a low pH and high alcohol or glucose concentrations [203]. Despite the buffering and alcohol-diluting properties of saliva, coupled with the rapid temperature elevation post-ingestion, glycoside hydrolysis may continue as long as residual wine remains within the oral cavity. The relatively brief residence time of wine in the oral cavity suggests that oral microbiota have a limited impact on the perception of wine aroma. However, recent research findings suggest that nonvolatile wine matrix compounds and oral and pharyngeal mucosa may interact, which may increase the residence time of aroma precursors and free aroma compounds in the oral and pharyngeal cavities; as a result, their susceptibility to oral factors, such as saliva and oral microbiota, is increased [207]. The continuous replenishment of wine during in vivo consumption suggests that oral microbiota might indeed modulate wine aroma perception [208]. Moreover, the composition of the wine matrix significantly influences the intraoral aroma release of specific odorants under physiological conditions [209].
Another study of guaiacyl glucoside, geranyl glucoside, and glycosides extracted from Gewürztraminer grapes also revealed significant interindividual variation in glycoside flavor perception [210]. The considerable individual variability in response to these glycosides confirms earlier reports that a key factor contributes to differences in sensory perception among individuals. This variation was attributed by the authors to oral microbiota, which produce the majority of glycosidase enzymes in the mouth [211], as well as variations in the prevalence and degree of activity of mouth β-glucosidase [212]. Olfactory detection thresholds are the principal factor that governs flavor perception from these glucosides [25].
Due to the potential association between microbiota composition and an individual’s changes in olfactory and gustatory perception, exploring the relationship between microbiota and chemoperception is a significant challenge. Therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate these complex interrelationships. Additionally, identification of the enzymes responsible for the release of aromatic aglycones by microbial enzyme hydrolysis will be valuable.

3. Trends and Prospects

β-Glucosidases typically originate from endogenous sources within plant tissues and function as catalysts for the hydrolysis of flavor precursors, liberating the aglycone moiety. Glycosidase enzymes can hydrolyze the glycosidic linkage to release the aglycone. This enzymatic process provides opportunities for the incorporation of exogenous enzymes into food and beverage production processes at various stages, with the aim of enhancing aroma and flavor characteristics.
In the flavor industry, β-glucosidases play an indispensable role as enzymatic facilitators in the hydrolysis of glucosidic precursors, prominently encountered in fruits and fermented products, thereby culminating in the liberation of aromatic compounds. This enzymatic cascade holds substantial potential for applications within the food processing sector, particularly as a pivotal flavor-enhancing enzyme in products such as wine, tea, and fruit juice.
The β-glucosidase enzyme has emerged as a linchpin for flavor enhancement, with a multitude of β-glucosidic flavor precursors being widespread across diverse biological domains, including plants, bacteria, fungi, and yeasts. The hydrolytic action of β-glucosidases on these compounds is paramount in elevating the quality of foods and beverages derived from these sources. This process entails the enzymatic cleavage of glucoside bonds and the liberation of aglycones, which are aromatic precursors that are intricately bound to sugar molecules; as a result, the compounds are accessible for flavoring foods and beverages. Given the extensive diversity of glycosidases, a significant challenge lies in deciphering the specificities related to the various potential glycoside substrates. Identifying the respective genes and corresponding enzymes is crucial in fermentative and oral microorganisms. This endeavor not only expands our comprehension of glycosidase functionality but also establishes a foundation for further investigations into the complex interactions and roles these enzymes perform within microbial communities.
Although food and beverage manufacturers extensively employ glucosidases to enhance flavor during production processes, the comprehensive extent of these enzymes’ presence and their potential functions within the human oral cavity continue to be subjects of investigation. Glycosidases have emerged as promising subjects of study to decipher the intricate mechanisms that govern flavor perception within the oral cavity. Regrettably, research on oral microbiota enzymes within individual subjects and their direct impact on flavor perception has been limited.
Based on the knowledge acquired concerning oral microbial glucosidases, these compounds show substantial potential, particularly for the design of tailored molecular tools to improve the flavor intensity of specific food products or specifically augment the production of aroma compounds. Further investigation is imperative to elucidate the distinctions between the roles played by saliva and tongue microbiota in shaping flavor perception. It is reasonable to posit that metabolites situated in close proximity to taste buds may exert a more pronounced influence on taste perception.
Future studies should aim to characterize the glycosidases of the oral microbiota, especially those produced in sufficient quantities to act rapidly on the glycoside substrates present in foods. Each of these glycosidases is likely active on a specific set of substrates, different from others that remain to be characterized. These analyses will certainly help better anticipate, on one side, the aroma release in the mouth based on the nature and quantity of aromatic glycosides present in the food, and on the other side, the specific microbiota of each individual.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and F.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M., M.S. and F.N.; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors received funding for this work: F.N., Agence Nationale de la Recherche grant numbers FN ANR-20-CE21-0002 and ANR-22-CE21-0009, M.S., ANR-22-CE21.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Minic, Z. Physiological Roles of Plant Glycoside Hydrolases. Planta 2008, 227, 723–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ketudat Cairns, J.R.; Esen, A. β-Glucosidases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 3389–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Esen, A. (Ed.) SS-Glucosidases: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; Volume 533, ISBN 978-0-8412-2697-5. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rajan, S.S.; Yang, X.; Collart, F.; Yip, V.L.Y.; Withers, S.G.; Varrot, A.; Thompson, J.; Davies, G.J.; Anderson, W.F. Novel Catalytic Mechanism of Glycoside Hydrolysis Based on the Structure of an NAD+/Mn2+-Dependent Phospho-α-Glucosidase from Bacillus Subtilis. Structure 2004, 12, 1619–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Singhal, G.; Meshram, A.; Bhagyawant, S.S.; Srivastava, N. Technology Prospecting on Microbial Enzymes: Engineering and Application in Food Industry. In Enzymes in Food Technology; Kuddus, M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 213–241. ISBN 9789811319327. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hirst, M.B.; Richter, C.L. Review of Aroma Formation through Metabolic Pathways of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Beverage Fermentations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2016, 67, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arevalo Villena, M.; Ubeda Iranzo, J.F.; Cordero Otero, R.R.; Briones Perez, A.I. Optimization of a Rapid Method for Studying the Cellular Location of Beta-Glucosidase Activity in Wine Yeasts. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, P.; Zhang, R.; Sirisena, S.; Gan, R.; Fang, Z. Beta-Glucosidase Activity of Wine Yeasts and Its Impacts on Wine Volatiles and Phenolics: A Mini-Review. Food Microbiol. 2021, 100, 103859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dziadas, M.; Jeleń, H.H. Comparison of Enzymatic and Acid Hydrolysis of Bound Flavor Compounds in Model System and Grapes. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shin, K.-C.; Nam, H.-K.; Oh, D.-K. Hydrolysis of Flavanone Glycosides by β-Glucosidase from Pyrococcus furiosus and Its Application to the Production of Flavanone Aglycones from Citrus Extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11532–11540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Riou, C.; Salmon, J.M.; Vallier, M.J.; Günata, Z.; Barre, P. Purification, Characterization, and Substrate Specificity of a Novel Highly Glucose-Tolerant Beta-Glucosidase from Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3607–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tran, T.N.A.; Son, J.-S.; Awais, M.; Ko, J.-H.; Yang, D.C.; Jung, S.-K. β-Glucosidase and Its Application in Bioconversion of Ginsenosides in Panax Ginseng. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Srivastava, N.; Rathour, R.; Jha, S.; Pandey, K.; Srivastava, M.; Thakur, V.K.; Sengar, R.S.; Gupta, V.K.; Mazumder, P.B.; Khan, A.F.; et al. Microbial Beta Glucosidase Enzymes: Recent Advances in Biomass Conversation for Biofuels Application. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wilkowska, A.; Pogorzelski, E. Aroma Enhancement of Cherry Juice and Wine Using Exogenous Glycosidases from Mould, Yeast and Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zoecklein, B.W.; Marcy, J.; Jasinski, Y. Effect of Fermentation, Storage Sur Lie or Post-Fermentation Thermal Processing on White Riesling (Vitis vinifera L.) Glycoconjugates. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1997, 48, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, L.; Wu, M.; Xia, G.; Tam, J.P.; Yu, J.; Teng, X.; et al. Eco-Efficient Biphasic Enzymatic Hydrolysis for the Green Production of Rare Baohuoside I. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2019, 131, 109431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thapa, S.; Li, H.; OHair, J.; Bhatti, S.; Chen, F.-C.; Nasr, K.A.; Johnson, T.; Zhou, S. Biochemical Characteristics of Microbial Enzymes and Their Significance from Industrial Perspectives. Mol. Biotechnol. 2019, 61, 579–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Canon, F.; Belloir, C.; Bourillot, E.; Brignot, H.; Briand, L.; Feron, G.; Lesniewska, E.; Nivet, C.; Septier, C.; Schwartz, M.; et al. Perspectives on Astringency Sensation: An Alternative Hypothesis on the Molecular Origin of Astringency. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3822–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Neiers, F.; Gourrat, K.; Canon, F.; Schwartz, M. Metabolism of Cysteine Conjugates and Production of Flavor Sulfur Compounds by a Carbon–Sulfur Lyase from the Oral Anaerobe Fusobacterium nucleatum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 9969–9979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Frank, D.; Piyasiri, U.; Archer, N.; Jenifer, J.; Appelqvist, I. Influence of Saliva on Individual In-Mouth Aroma Release from Raw Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var. Capitata f. Rubra L.) and Links to Perception. Heliyon 2018, 4, e01045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Cuadrado-Silva, C.T.; Muñoz-González, C.; Giraldo, R.; Del Pozo-Bayón, M.Á.; Osorio, C. Bioconversion of Glycosidic Precursors from Sour Guava (Psidium friedrichsthalianum Nied.) Fruit by the Oral Microbiota into Odor-Active Volatile Compounds. Molecules 2022, 27, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Verma, D.; Garg, P.K.; Dubey, A.K. Insights into the Human Oral Microbiome. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 200, 525–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Muñoz-González, C.; Cueva, C.; Ángeles Pozo-Bayón, M.; Victoria Moreno-Arribas, M. Ability of Human Oral Microbiota to Produce Wine Odorant Aglycones from Odourless Grape Glycosidic Aroma Precursors. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sakamoto, M.; Suzuki, M.; Huang, Y.; Umeda, M.; Ishikawa, I.; Benno, Y. Prevotella shahii sp. nov. and Prevotella salivae sp. nov., Isolated from the Human Oral Cavity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parker, M.; Onetto, C.; Hixson, J.; Bilogrevic, E.; Schueth, L.; Pisaniello, L.; Borneman, A.; Herderich, M.; de Barros Lopes, M.; Francis, L. Factors Contributing to Interindividual Variation in Retronasal Odor Perception from Aroma Glycosides: The Role of Odorant Sensory Detection Threshold, Oral Microbiota, and Hydrolysis in Saliva. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10299–10309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, D.; Kurasawa, E.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Kubota, K.; Kobayashi, A. Analysis of Glycosidically Bound Aroma Precursors in Tea Leaves. 2. Changes in Glycoside Contents and Glycosidase Activities in Tea Leaves during the Black Tea Manufacturing Process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1900–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, D.; Yoshimura, T.; Kubota, K.; Kobayashi, A. Analysis of Glycosidically Bound Aroma Precursors in Tea Leaves. 1. Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Glycosides with Aglycons as Aroma Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 5411–5418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Feng, Z.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Yin, J.; Wan, X.; Yang, X. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in Infusions of Four White Teas by the Sensomics Approach. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2022, 248, 1299–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gunata, Y.Z.; Bayonove, C.L.; Baumes, R.L.; Cordonnier, R.E. The Aroma of Grapes I. Extraction and Determination of Free and Glycosidically Bound Fractions of Some Grape Aroma Components. J. Chromatogr. A 1985, 331, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Krammer, G.; Winterhalter, P.; Schwab, M.; Schreier, P. Glycosidically Bound Aroma Compounds in the Fruits of Prunus Species: Apricot (P. armeniaca, L.), Peach (P. persica, L.), Yellow Plum (P. domestica, L. ssp. Syriaca). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 778–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maicas, S.; Mateo, J.J. Hydrolysis of Terpenyl Glycosides in Grape Juice and Other Fruit Juices: A Review. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67, 322–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sarry, J.-E.; Gunata, Z. Plant and Microbial Glycoside Hydrolases: Volatile Release from Glycosidic Aroma Precursors. Food Chem. 2004, 87, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodríguez Valerón, N.; Mak, T.; Jahn, L.J.; Arboleya, J.C.; Sörensen, P.M. Derivation of Kokumi γ-Glutamyl Peptides and Volatile Aroma Compounds from Fermented Cereal Processing By-Products for Reducing Bitterness of Plant-Based Ingredients. Foods 2023, 12, 4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van der Hulst, L.; Munguia, P.; Culbert, J.A.; Ford, C.M.; Burton, R.A.; Wilkinson, K.L. Accumulation of Volatile Phenol Glycoconjugates in Grapes Following Grapevine Exposure to Smoke and Potential Mitigation of Smoke Taint by Foliar Application of Kaolin. Planta 2019, 249, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liaudanskas, M.; Viškelis, P.; Kviklys, D.; Raudonis, R.; Janulis, V. A Comparative Study of Phenolic Content in Apple Fruits. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 945–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jang, G.H.; Kim, H.W.; Lee, M.K.; Jeong, S.Y.; Bak, A.R.; Lee, D.J.; Kim, J.B. Characterization and Quantification of Flavonoid Glycosides in the Prunus Genus by UPLC-DAD-QTOF/MS. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 1622–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, X.; Xie, H.; Hao, J.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, X. Flavonoid Glycosides from the Seeds of Litchi chinensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Simirgiotis, M.J.; Caligari, P.D.S.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G. Identification of Phenolic Compounds from the Fruits of the Mountain Papaya Vasconcellea pubescens A. DC. Grown in Chile by Liquid Chromatography–UV Detection–Mass Spectrometry. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Frydman, A.; Liberman, R.; Huhman, D.V.; Carmeli-Weissberg, M.; Sapir-Mir, M.; Ophir, R.; Sumner, L.W.; Eyal, Y. The Molecular and Enzymatic Basis of Bitter/Non-Bitter Flavor of Citrus Fruit: Evolution of Branch-Forming Rhamnosyltransferases under Domestication. Plant J. 2013, 73, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Steingass, C.B.; Glock, M.P.; Lieb, V.M.; Carle, R. Light-Induced Alterations of Pineapple (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.) Juice Volatiles during Accelerated Ageing and Mass Spectrometric Studies into Their Precursors. SI Phytochem. Profiles 2017, 100, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, X.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, J.; Jackson, A. Characterization of Carotenoids and Phenolics during Fruit Ripening of Chinese Raspberry (Rubus chingii Hu). RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 10804–10813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, X.; Peng, M.; Wu, D.; Cai, G.; Yang, H.; Lu, J. Physicochemical Indicators and Sensory Quality Analysis of Kiwi Wines Fermented with Different Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e17132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, X.; Su, M.; Du, J.; Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Hu, Y.; Ye, Z. Profiling of Naturally Occurring Proanthocyanidins and Other Phenolic Compounds in a Diverse Peach Germplasm by LC-MS/MS. Food Chem. 2023, 403, 134471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liang, Z.; Fang, Z.; Pai, A.; Luo, J.; Gan, R.; Gao, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhang, P. Glycosidically Bound Aroma Precursors in Fruits: A Comprehensive Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 215–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. El Hadi, M.; Zhang, F.-J.; Wu, F.-F.; Zhou, C.-H.; Tao, J. Advances in Fruit Aroma Volatile Research. Molecules 2013, 18, 8200–8229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Odoux, É. Glucosylated Aroma Precursors and Glucosidase(s) in Vanilla Bean (Vanilla planifolia G. Jackson). Fruits 2006, 61, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Arana, F.E. Action of A Β-Glucosidase IX the Curing of Vanilla. J. Food Sci. 1943, 8, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Odoux, E. Changes in Vanillin and Glucovanillin Concentrations during the Various Stages of the Process Traditionally Used for Curing Vanilla fragrans Beans in Reunion. Fruits 2000, 55, 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, K.; Ruan, J. Analysis of Chemical Components in Green Tea in Relation with Perceived Quality, a Case Study with Longjing Teas. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 2476–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, K.; Liu, F.; Liu, Z.; Huang, J.; Xu, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Gong, Y.; Yang, X. Comparison of Catechins and Volatile Compounds among Different Types of Tea Using High Performance Liquid Chromatograph and Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer: Catechins and Volatile Compounds of Tea. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 1406–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, C.; Zhou, C.; Tian, C.; Xu, K.; Lai, Z.; Lin, Y.; Guo, Y. Volatilomics Analysis of Jasmine Tea during Multiple Rounds of Scenting Processes. Foods 2023, 12, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yamanishi, T.; Kobayashi, A. Progress of Tea Aroma Chemistry: 30 Years of Progress. In Flavor Chemistry; Teranishi, R., Wick, E.L., Hornstein, I., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1999; pp. 135–145. ISBN 978-1-4613-7125-0. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kobayashi, A.; Kubota, K.; Joki, Y.; Wada, E.; Wakabayashi, M. (Z)-3-Hexenyl-β-d-Glucopyranoside in Fresh Tea Leaves as a Precursor of Green Odor. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994, 58, 592–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ribeaucourt, D.; Bissaro, B.; Lambert, F.; Lafond, M.; Berrin, J.-G. Biocatalytic Oxidation of Fatty Alcohols into Aldehydes for the Flavors and Fragrances Industry. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 56, 107787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yoshizaki, Y.; Yamato, H.; Takamine, K.; Tamaki, H.; Ito, K.; Sameshima, Y. Analysis of Volatile Compounds in Shochu Koji, Sake Koji, and Steamed Rice by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. J. Inst. Brew. 2010, 116, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Isogai, A.; Utsunomiya, H.; Kanda, R.; Iwata, H. Changes in the Aroma Compounds of Sake during Aging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4118–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Poitou, X.; Thibon, C.; Darriet, P. 1,8-Cineole in French Red Wines: Evidence for a Contribution Related to Its Various Origins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jiang, Q.; Li, L.; Chen, F.; Rong, B.; Ni, H.; Zheng, F. β-Glucosidase Improve the Aroma of the Tea Infusion Made from a Spray-Dried Oolong Tea Instant. LWT 2022, 159, 113175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Caffrey, A.J.; Lerno, L.A.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Ebeler, S.E. Direct Analysis of Glycosidic Aroma Precursors Containing Multiple Aglycone Classes in Vitis vinifera Berries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 3817–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liu, J.; Zhu, X.-L.; Ullah, N.; Tao, Y.-S. Aroma Glycosides in Grapes and Wine: Aroma Glycosides in Grapes and Wine. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Z.; Chen, K.; Liu, C.; Ma, L.; Li, J. Effects of Glycosidase on Glycoside-Bound Aroma Compounds in Grape and Cherry Juice. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rubio-Bretón, P.; Salinas, M.R.; Nevares, I.; Pérez-Álvarez, E.P.; del Álamo-Sanza, M.; Marín-San Román, S.; Alonso, G.L.; Garde-Cerdán, T. Recent Advances in the Study of Grape and Wine Volatile Composition: Varietal, Fermentative, and Aging Aroma Compounds. Food Aroma Evol. 2019, 22, 439–463. [Google Scholar]
  63. Swiegers, J.H.; Bartowsky, E.J.; Henschke, P.A.; Pretorius, I.S. Yeast and Bacterial Modulation of Wine Aroma and Flavour. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2005, 11, 139–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhu, F.; Du, B.; Li, J. Aroma Compounds in Wine. In Grape and Wine Biotechnology; Morata, A., Loira, I., Eds.; InTech: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 978-953-51-2692-8. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pogorzelski, E.; Wilkowska, A. Flavour Enhancement through the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Glycosidic Aroma Precursors in Juices and Wine Beverages: A Review. Flavour Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mateo, J.; Maicas, S. Application of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts to Wine-Making Process. Fermentation 2016, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tetik, M.A.; Sevindik, O.; Kelebek, H.; Selli, S. Screening of Key Odorants and Anthocyanin Compounds of Cv. Okuzgozu (Vitis vinifera L.) Red Wines with a Free Run and Pressed Pomace Using GC-MS-Olfactometry and LC-MS-MS. J. Mass Spectrom. 2018, 53, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Patzak, J.; Krofta, K.; Henychová, A.; Nesvadba, V. Number and Size of Lupulin Glands, Glandular Trichomes of Hop (Humulus lupulus L.), Play a Key Role in Contents of Bitter Acids and Polyphenols in Hop Cone. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 1864–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Almaguer, C.; Schönberger, C.; Gastl, M.; Arendt, E.K.; Becker, T. Humulus lupulus—A Story That Begs to Be Told. A Review: Humulus lupulus—Story That Begs to Be Told. J. Inst. Brew. 2014, 120, 289–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cibaka, M.-L.K.; Ferreira, C.S.; Decourrière, L.; Lorenzo-Alonso, C.-J.; Bodart, E.; Collin, S. Dry Hopping with the Dual-Purpose Varieties Amarillo, Citra, Hallertau Blanc, Mosaic, and Sorachi Ace: Minor Contribution of Hop Terpenol Glucosides to Beer Flavors. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2017, 75, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Svedlund, N.; Evering, S.; Gibson, B.; Krogerus, K. Fruits of Their Labour: Biotransformation Reactions of Yeasts during Brewery Fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 4929–4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Caffrey, A.; Ebeler, S.E. The Occurrence of Glycosylated Aroma Precursors in Vitis vinifera Fruit and Humulus lupulus Hop Cones and Their Roles in Wine and Beer Volatile Aroma Production. Foods 2021, 10, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sharp, D.C.; Vollmer, D.M.; Qian, Y.; Shellhammer, T.H. Examination of Glycoside Hydrolysis Methods for the Determination of Terpenyl Glycoside Contents of Different Hop Cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2017, 75, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Intelmann, D.; Hofmann, T. On the Autoxidation of Bitter-Tasting Iso-α-Acids in Beer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 5059–5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Brendel, S.; Hofmann, T.; Granvogl, M. Characterization of Key Aroma Compounds in Pellets of Different Hop Varieties (Humulus lupulus L.) by Means of the Sensomics Approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 12044–12053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lafontaine, S.R.; Shellhammer, T.H. Investigating the Factors Impacting Aroma, Flavor, and Stability in Dry-Hopped Beers. MBAA Tech. Q. 2019, 56, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kollmannsberger, H.; Biendl, M.; Nitz, S. Occurrence of Glycosidically Bound Flavour Compounds in Hops, Hop Products and Beer. Monatsschr. Brauwiss 2006, 5, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  78. Rai, A.K.; Pandey, A.; Sahoo, D. Biotechnological Potential of Yeasts in Functional Food Industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 83, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Maicas, S. The Role of Yeasts in Fermentation Processes. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Crafack, M.; Keul, H.; Eskildsen, C.E.; Petersen, M.A.; Saerens, S.; Blennow, A.; Skovmand-Larsen, M.; Swiegers, J.H.; Petersen, G.B.; Heimdal, H.; et al. Impact of Starter Cultures and Fermentation Techniques on the Volatile Aroma and Sensory Profile of Chocolate. Food Res. Int. 2014, 63, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, K.; Wu, W.; Yan, Q. Research Advances on Sake Rice, Koji, and Sake Yeast: A Review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 2995–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gschaedler, A. Contribution of Non-Conventional Yeasts in Alcoholic Beverages. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2017, 13, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Denat, M.; Pérez, D.; Heras, J.M.; Querol, A.; Ferreira, V. The Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Carrying Alcoholic Fermentation on the Fermentative and Varietal Aroma Profiles of Young and Aged Tempranillo Wines. Food Chem. X 2021, 9, 100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Thongekkaew, J.; Fujii, T.; Masaki, K.; Koyama, K. Evaluation of Candida easanensis JK8 β-Glucosidase with Potentially Hydrolyse Non-Volatile Glycosides of Wine Aroma Precursors. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 3563–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Guneser, O.; Yuceer, Y.K.; Hosoglu, M.I.; Togay, S.O.; Elibol, M. Production of Flavor Compounds from Rice Bran by Yeasts Metabolisms of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Debaryomyces hansenii. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2022, 53, 1533–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Medina, K.; Boido, E.; Fariña, L.; Gioia, O.; Gomez, M.E.; Barquet, M.; Gaggero, C.; Dellacassa, E.; Carrau, F. Increased Flavour Diversity of Chardonnay Wines by Spontaneous Fermentation and Co-Fermentation with Hanseniaspora vineae. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 2513–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Reyes-Sánchez, F.J.; Páez-Lerma, J.B.; Rojas-Contreras, J.A.; López-Miranda, J.; Soto-Cruz, N.Ó.; Reinhart-Kirchmayr, M. Study of the Enzymatic Capacity of Kluyveromyces marxianus for the Synthesis of Esters. Microb. Physiol. 2019, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lin, X.; Hu, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, C. Improved Flavor Profiles of Red Pitaya (Hylocereus lemairei) Wine by Controlling the Inoculations of Saccharomyces bayanus and Metschnikowia agaves and the Fermentation Temperature. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 4469–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Batra, J.; Beri, D.; Mishra, S. Response Surface Methodology Based Optimization of β-Glucosidase Production from Pichia pastoris. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 380–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fia, G.; Giovani, G.; Rosi, I. Study of Beta-Glucosidase Production by Wine-Related Yeasts during Alcoholic Fermentation. A New Rapid Fluorimetric Method to Determine Enzymatic Activity. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hu, K.; Qin, Y.; Tao, Y.-S.; Zhu, X.-L.; Peng, C.-T.; Ullah, N. Potential of Glycosidase from Non- Saccharomyces Isolates for Enhancement of Wine Aroma: Wine Aroma Improvement by Glycosidase. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, M935–M943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Huang, R.; Zhang, F.; Yan, X.; Qin, Y.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Y.; Song, Y. Characterization of the β-Glucosidase Activity in Indigenous Yeast Isolated from Wine Regions in China. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 2327–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Swangkeaw, J.; Vichitphan, S.; Butzke, C.E.; Vichitphan, K. The Characterisation of a novel Pichia anomala β-Glucosidase with Potentially Aroma-Enhancing Capabilities in Wine. Ann. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Baffi, M.A.; Martin, N.; Tobal, T.M.; Ferrarezi, A.L.; Lago, J.H.G.; Boscolo, M.; Gomes, E.; Da-Silva, R. Purification and Characterization of an Ethanol-Tolerant β-Glucosidase from Sporidiobolus pararoseus and Its Potential for Hydrolysis of Wine Aroma Precursors. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 171, 1681–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Vervoort, Y.; Herrera-Malaver, B.; Mertens, S.; Guadalupe Medina, V.; Duitama, J.; Michiels, L.; Derdelinckx, G.; Voordeckers, K.; Verstrepen, K.J. Characterization of the Recombinant Brettanomyces anomalus β-Glucosidase and Its Potential for Bioflavouring. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 121, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Maicas, S.; Mateo, J. Microbial Glycosidases for Wine Production. Beverages 2016, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Van Wyk, N.; Grossmann, M.; Wendland, J.; Von Wallbrunn, C.; Pretorius, I.S. The Whiff of Wine Yeast Innovation: Strategies for Enhancing Aroma Production by Yeast during Wine Fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 13496–13505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Tufariello, M.; Fragasso, M.; Pico, J.; Panighel, A.; Castellarin, S.D.; Flamini, R.; Grieco, F. Influence of Non-Saccharomyces on Wine Chemistry: A Focus on Aroma-Related Compounds. Molecules 2021, 26, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wei, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ju, H.; Niu, C.; Song, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, T. Assessment of Chemical Composition and Sensorial Properties of Ciders Fermented with Different Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in Pure and Mixed Fermentations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 318, 108471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Oliveira, I.; Ferreira, V. Modulating Fermentative, Varietal and Aging Aromas of Wine Using Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in a Sequential Inoculation Approach. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shi, W.-K.; Wang, J.; Chen, F.-S.; Zhang, X.-Y. Effect of Issatchenkia terricola and Pichia kudriavzevii on Wine Flavor and Quality through Simultaneous and Sequential Co-Fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. LWT 2019, 116, 108477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Xu, A.; Xiao, Y.; He, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, B.; Chang, J.; Zhu, D. Use of Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Co-Fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Improve the Polyphenol and Volatile Aroma Compound Contents in Nanfeng Tangerine Wines. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cordero Otero, R.R.; Ubeda Iranzo, J.F.; Briones-Perez, A.I.; Potgieter, N.; Villena, M.A.; Pretorius, I.S.; Rensburg, P. van Characterization of the β-Glucosidase Activity Produced by Enological Strains of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 2564–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sadoudi, M.; Tourdot-Maréchal, R.; Rousseaux, S.; Steyer, D.; Gallardo-Chacón, J.-J.; Ballester, J.; Vichi, S.; Guérin-Schneider, R.; Caixach, J.; Alexandre, H. Yeast–Yeast Interactions Revealed by Aromatic Profile Analysis of Sauvignon Blanc Wine Fermented by Single or Co-Culture of Non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces Yeasts. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Curiel, J.A.; Morales, P.; Gonzalez, R.; Tronchoni, J. Different Non-Saccharomyces Yeast Species Stimulate Nutrient Consumption in S. cerevisiae Mixed Cultures. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Villalba, M.L.; Susana Sáez, J.; del Monaco, S.; Lopes, C.A.; Sangorrín, M.P. TdKT, a New Killer Toxin Produced by Torulaspora Delbrueckii Effective against Wine Spoilage Yeasts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 217, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Sun, S.Y.; Gong, H.S.; Jiang, X.M.; Zhao, Y.P. Selected Non-Saccharomyces Wine Yeasts in Controlled Multistarter Fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on Alcoholic Fermentation Behaviour and Wine Aroma of Cherry Wines. Food Microbiol. 2014, 44, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Manzanares, P.; Vallés, S.; Viana, F. Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in the Winemaking Process. In Molecular Wine Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 85–110. ISBN 978-0-12-375021-1. [Google Scholar]
  109. Gamero, A.; Hernández-Orte, P.; Querol, A.; Ferreira, V. Effect of Aromatic Precursor Addition to Wine Fermentations Carried out with Different Saccharomyces Species and Their Hybrids. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Schmidt, S.; Rainieri, S.; Witte, S.; Matern, U.; Martens, S. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Glucosidase That Hydrolyzes Flavonoid Glucosides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 1751–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. du Toit, M.; Engelbrecht, L.; Lerm, E.; Krieger-Weber, S. Lactobacillus: The Next Generation of Malolactic Fermentation Starter Cultures—An Overview. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2011, 4, 876–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Di Cagno, R.; Coda, R.; De Angelis, M.; Gobbetti, M. Exploitation of Vegetables and Fruits through Lactic Acid Fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2013, 33, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ji, G.; Liu, G.; Li, B.; Tan, H.; Zheng, R.; Sun, X.; He, F. Influence on the Aroma Substances and Functional Ingredients of Apple Juice by Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ricci, A.; Cirlini, M.; Levante, A.; Dall’Asta, C.; Galaverna, G.; Lazzi, C. Volatile Profile of Elderberry Juice: Effect of Lactic Acid Fermentation Using L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus and L. casei Strains. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yuasa, M.; Shimada, A.; Matsuzaki, A.; Eguchi, A.; Tominaga, M. Chemical Composition and Sensory Properties of Fermented Citrus Juice Using Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food Biosci. 2021, 39, 100810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Smid, E.J.; Kleerebezem, M. Production of Aroma Compounds in Lactic Fermentations. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Allgeyer, L.C.; Miller, M.J.; Lee, S.-Y. Sensory and Microbiological Quality of Yogurt Drinks with Prebiotics and Probiotics. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 4471–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tang, S.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, T.; Hu, F.; Pan, S.; Xu, X. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum-Fermented Mulberry Pomace on Antioxidant Properties and Fecal Microbial Community. LWT 2021, 147, 111651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yang, W.; Hao, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, G.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Sun, Y.; Pan, Y. Identification of Antioxidant Peptides from Cheddar Cheese Made with Lactobacillus helveticus. LWT 2021, 141, 110866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shori, A.B.; Aljohani, G.S.; Al-zahrani, A.J.; Al-sulbi, O.S.; Baba, A.S. Viability of Probiotics and Antioxidant Activity of Cashew Milk-Based Yogurt Fermented with Selected Strains of Probiotic Lactobacillus spp. LWT 2022, 153, 112482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhou, M.; Zheng, X.; Zhu, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, M.; Liu, Z.; Peng, M.; Wang, C.; Li, Q.; et al. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum Enriched with Organic/Inorganic Selenium on the Quality and Microbial Communities of Fermented Pickles. Food Chem. 2021, 365, 130495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Abriouel, H.; Pérez Montoro, B.; Casimiro-Soriguer, C.S.; Pérez Pulido, A.J.; Knapp, C.W.; Caballero Gómez, N.; Castillo-Gutiérrez, S.; Estudillo-Martínez, M.D.; Gálvez, A.; Benomar, N. Insight into Potential Probiotic Markers Predicted in Lactobacillus pentosus MP-10 Genome Sequence. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Liang, L.; Omedi, J.O.; Huang, W.; Zheng, J.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, L.; Li, N.; Gao, T.; et al. Antioxidant, Flavor Profile and Quality of Wheat Dough Bread Incorporated with Kiwifruit Fermented by β-Glucosidase Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains. Food Biosci. 2022, 46, 101450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bartowsky, E.J.; Henschke, P.A. The ‘Buttery’ Attribute of Wine—Diacetyl—Desirability, Spoilage and Beyond. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 96, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Li, X.; Xia, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Yin, L.; Xu, Z.; Zhou, J. Cloning and Expression of Lactobacillus brevis β-glucosidase and Its Effect on the Aroma of Strawberry Wine. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e16368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Baffi, M.A.; Tobal, T.; Lago, J.H.G.; Boscolo, M.; Gomes, E.; Da-Silva, R. Wine Aroma Improvement Using a β-Glucosidase Preparation from Aureobasidium pullulans. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 169, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fia, G.; Millarini, V.; Granchi, L.; Bucalossi, G.; Guerrini, S.; Zanoni, B.; Rosi, I. Beta-Glucosidase and Esterase Activity from Oenococcus oeni: Screening and Evaluation during Malolactic Fermentation in Harsh Conditions. LWT 2018, 89, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Maturano, C.; Saguir, F.M. Influence of Glycosides on Behavior of Oenococcus oeni in Wine Conditions: Growth, Substrates and Aroma Compounds. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Peng, X.; Yang, S.; Liu, Y.; Ren, K.; Tian, T.; Tong, X.; Dai, S.; Lyu, B.; Yu, A.; Wang, H.; et al. Application of Kombucha Combined with Fructo-Oligosaccharides in Soy Milk: Colony Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, and Flavor Relationship. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kaprasob, R.; Kerdchoechuen, O.; Laohakunjit, N.; Sarkar, D.; Shetty, K. Fermentation-Based Biotransformation of Bioactive Phenolics and Volatile Compounds from Cashew Apple Juice by Select Lactic Acid Bacteria. Process Biochem. 2017, 59, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lee, C.; Beuchat, L.R. Changes in Chemical Composition and Sensory Qualities of Peanut Milk Fermented with Lactic Acid Bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1991, 13, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zhang, P.; Tang, F.; Cai, W.; Zhao, X.; Shan, C. Evaluating the Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation on Quality, Aroma, and Metabolites of Chickpea Milk. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1069714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, C.; Li, W.; Chen, X.; Feng, M.; Rui, X.; Jiang, M.; Dong, M. Microbiological, Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Fermented Soymilk Produced with Exopolysaccharide (EPS) Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 57, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Pino, A.; Vaccalluzzo, A.; Solieri, L.; Romeo, F.V.; Todaro, A.; Caggia, C.; Arroyo-López, F.N.; Bautista-Gallego, J.; Randazzo, C.L. Effect of Sequential Inoculum of Beta-Glucosidase Positive and Probiotic Strains on Brine Fermentation to Obtain Low Salt Sicilian Table Olives. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Boido, E.; Lloret, A.; Medina, K.; Carrau, F.; Dellacassa, E. Effect of β-Glycosidase Activity of Oenococcus oeni on the Glycosylated Flavor Precursors of Tannat Wine during Malolactic Fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2344–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lorn, D.; Nguyen, T.-K.-C.; Ho, P.-H.; Tan, R.; Licandro, H.; Waché, Y. Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Their Potential Use as Aromatic Starters in Fermented Vegetables. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 350, 109242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Lee, Y.G.; Cho, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-M.; Moon, J.-H. Change in Flavonoid Composition and Antioxidative Activity during Fermentation of Onion (Allium cepa L.) by Leuconostoc mesenteroides with Different Salt Concentrations: Onion Fermentation with NaCl. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, C1385–C1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Acin-Albiac, M.; Filannino, P.; Arora, K.; Da Ros, A.; Gobbetti, M.; Di Cagno, R. Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria Phospho-β-Glucosidases during the Fermentation of Cereal by-Products. Foods 2021, 10, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Li, Z.; Zheng, M.; Zheng, J.; Gänzle, M.G. Bacillus Species in Food Fermentations: An under-Appreciated Group of Organisms for Safe Use in Food Fermentations. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023, 50, 101007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Haure, M.; Chi Nguyen, T.K.; Cendrès, A.; Perino, S.; Waché, Y.; Licandro, H. Identification of Bacillus Strains Producing Glycosidases Active on Rutin and Grape Glycosidic Aroma Precursors. LWT 2022, 154, 112637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, A.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X. Quantitative Analyses for Several Nutrients and Volatile Components during Fermentation of Soybean by Bacillus Subtilis Natto. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fen, L.; Xuwei, Z.; Nanyi, L.; Puyu, Z.; Shuang, Z.; Xue, Z.; Pengju, L.; Qichao, Z.; Haiping, L. Screening of Lignocellulose-Degrading Superior Mushroom Strains and Determination of Their CMCase and Laccase Activity. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 763108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Schwartz, M.; Didierjean, C.; Hecker, A.; Girardet, J.-M.; Morel-Rouhier, M.; Gelhaye, E.; Favier, F. Crystal Structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ECM4, a Xi-Class Glutathione Transferase That Reacts with Glutathionyl-(Hydro)Quinones. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Perrot, T.; Schwartz, M.; Saiag, F.; Salzet, G.; Dumarçay, S.; Favier, F.; Gérardin, P.; Girardet, J.-M.; Sormani, R.; Morel-Rouhier, M.; et al. Fungal Glutathione Transferases as Tools to Explore the Chemical Diversity of Amazonian Wood Extractives. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 13078–13085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Perrot, T.; Schwartz, M.; Deroy, A.; Girardet, J.-M.; Kohler, A.; Morel-Rouhier, M.; Favier, F.; Gelhaye, E.; Didierjean, C. Diversity of Omega Glutathione Transferases in Mushroom-Forming Fungi Revealed by Phylogenetic, Transcriptomic, Biochemical and Structural Approaches. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2021, 148, 103506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Isorna, P.; Polaina, J.; Latorre-García, L.; Cañada, F.J.; González, B.; Sanz-Aparicio, J. Crystal Structures of Paenibacillus Polymyxa β-Glucosidase B Complexes Reveal the Molecular Basis of Substrate Specificity and Give New Insights into the Catalytic Machinery of Family I Glycosidases. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 1204–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. da Silva, R.R. Enzyme Technology in Food Preservation: A Promising and Sustainable Strategy for Biocontrol of Post-Harvest Fungal Pathogens. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 531–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Günata, Z.; Dugelay, I.; Vallier, M.J.; Sapis, J.C.; Bayonove, C. Multiple Forms of Glycosidases in an Enzyme Preparation from Aspergillus niger: Partial Characterization of a β-Apiosidase. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1997, 21, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Williams, P.J.; Allen, M.S. The Analysis of Flavouring Compounds in Grapes. In Fruit Analysis; Linskens, H.F., Jackson, J.F., Eds.; Modern Methods of Plant Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; Volume 18, pp. 37–57. ISBN 978-3-642-79662-3. [Google Scholar]
  150. Souza, F.H.M.; Nascimento, C.V.; Rosa, J.C.; Masui, D.C.; Leone, F.A.; Jorge, J.A.; Furriel, R.P.M. Purification and Biochemical Characterization of a Mycelial Glucose- and Xylose-Stimulated β-Glucosidase from the Thermophilic Fungus Humicola insolens. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Mase, T.; Mori, S.; Yokoe, M. Purification, Characterization, and a Potential Application of β-Glucosidase from Aspergillus pulverulentus YM-80. J. Appl. Glycosci. 2004, 51, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Gueguen, Y.; Chemardin, P.; Janbon, G.; Arnaud, A.; Galzy, P. A Very Efficient β-Glucosidase Catalyst for the Hydrolysis of Flavor Precursors of Wines and Fruit Juices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 2336–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, J. A Novel Extracellular β-Glucosidase from Trichosporon Asahii: Yield Prediction, Evaluation and Application for Aroma Enhancement of Cabernet Sauvignon. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, M505–M515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Navya, P.N.; Bhoite, R.; Murthy, P. Improved β-Glucosidase Production from Rhizopus stolonifer Utilizing Coffee Husk. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2012, 4, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
  155. Tang, V.C.Y.; Sun, J.; Cornuz, M.; Yu, B.; Lassabliere, B. Effect of Solid-State Fungal Fermentation on the Non-Volatiles Content and Volatiles Composition of Coffea canephora (Robusta) Coffee Beans. Food Chem. 2021, 337, 128023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Tiwari, P.; Misra, B.N.; Sangwan, N.S. β-Glucosidases from the Fungus Trichoderma: An Efficient Cellulase Machinery in Biotechnological Applications. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 203735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Park, A.-R.; Hong, J.H.; Kim, J.-J.; Yoon, J.-J. Biochemical Characterization of an Extracellular β-Glucosidase from the Fungus, Penicillium italicum, Isolated from Rotten Citrus Peel. Mycobiology 2012, 40, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Shoseyov, O.; Bravdo, B.A.; Siegel, D.; Goldman, A.; Cohen, S.; Shoseyov, L.; Ikan, R. Immobilized Endo-β-Glucosidase Enriches Flavor of Wine and Passion Fruit Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 1387–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, J.; Xu, Y. Different Influences of β-Glucosidases on Volatile Compounds and Anthocyanins of Cabernet Gernischt and Possible Reason. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Decker, C.H.; Visser, J.; Schreier, P. β-Glucosidases from Five Black Aspergillus Species: Study of Their Physico-Chemical and Biocatalytic Properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 4929–4936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Xu, X.; Zhou, S.; Julian McClements, D.; Huang, L.; Meng, L.; Xia, X.; Dong, M. Multistarter Fermentation of Glutinous Rice with Fu Brick Tea: Effects on Microbial, Chemical, and Volatile Compositions. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Luo, Y.; Xiao, L.; Wang, K.; Huang, J.; Liu, Z. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds and Microorganisms during the Manufacturing Process of Fu Brick Tea. LWT 2020, 127, 109355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ni, H.; Hao, S.; Zheng, F.; Zhang, L.; Lee, B.; Wang, Y.; Chen, F. Effects of Two Enzyme Extracts of Aspergillus niger on Green Tea Aromas. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Han, X.; Qin, Q.; Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Song, F.; An, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, W.; Zhan, J.; et al. Application of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts with High β-Glucosidase Activity to Enhance Terpene-Related Floral Flavor in Craft Beer. Food Chem. 2023, 404, 134726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Zhao, G.; Ding, L.-L.; Yao, Y.; Cao, Y.; Pan, Z.-H.; Kong, D.-H. Extracellular Proteome Analysis and Flavor Formation during Soy Sauce Fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lee, L.W.; Cheong, M.W.; Curran, P.; Yu, B.; Liu, S.Q. Modulation of Coffee Aroma via the Fermentation of Green Coffee Beans with Rhizopus oligosporus: I. Green Coffee. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 916–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Yin, L.; Liu, Z.; Lu, X.; Cheng, J.; Lu, G.; Sun, J.; Yang, H.; Guan, Y.; Pang, L. Analysis of the Nutritional Properties and Flavor Profile of Sweetpotato Residue Fermented with Rhizopus oligosporus. LWT 2023, 174, 114401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Li, J.; Sun, C.; Shen, Z.; Tian, Y.; Mo, F.; Wang, B.; Liu, B.; Wang, C. Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of Aspergillus sojae 3.495 and Aspergillus oryzae 3.042 Fermented Soy Sauce Koji and Effect on Moromi Fermentation Flavor. LWT 2023, 184, 115027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhang, W.; Zhuo, X.; Hu, L.; Zhang, X. Effects of Crude β-Glucosidases from Issatchenkia terricola, Pichia kudriavzevii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima on the Flavor Complexity and Characteristics of Wines. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Li, W.-L.; Tong, S.-G.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Xiao, Y.-Q.; Lv, X.-C.; Weng, Q.; Yu, K.; Liu, G.-R.; Luo, X.-Q.; Wei, T.; et al. The Dynamics of Microbial Community and Flavor Metabolites during the Acetic Acid Fermentation of Hongqu Aromatic Vinegar. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Bhanja Dey, T.; Chakraborty, S.; Jain, K.K.; Sharma, A.; Kuhad, R.C. Antioxidant Phenolics and Their Microbial Production by Submerged and Solid State Fermentation Process: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhou, Y.; Zeng, L.; Gui, J.; Liao, Y.; Li, J.; Tang, J.; Meng, Q.; Dong, F.; Yang, Z. Functional Characterizations of β-Glucosidases Involved in Aroma Compound Formation in Tea (Camellia sinensis). Food Res. Int. 2017, 96, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Xu, Z.; Escamilla-Treviño, L.; Zeng, L.; Lalgondar, M.; Bevan, D.; Winkel, B.; Mohamed, A.; Cheng, C.-L.; Shih, M.-C.; Poulton, J.; et al. Functional Genomic Analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana Glycoside Hydrolase Family 1. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 55, 343–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Mishra, S.; Goyal, D.; Kumar, A.; Dantu, P.K. Biotechnological Applications of β-Glucosidases in Biomass Degradation. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi; Yadav, A.N., Singh, S., Mishra, S., Gupta, A., Eds.; Fungal Biology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 257–281. ISBN 978-3-030-25505-3. [Google Scholar]
  175. Lecas, M.; Gunata, Z.Y.; Sapis, J.-C.; Bayonove, C.L. Purification and Partial Characterization of β-Glucosidase from Grape. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Terefe, N.S.; Sheean, P.; Fernando, S.; Versteeg, C. The Stability of Almond β-Glucosidase during Combined High Pressure–Thermal Processing: A Kinetic Study. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 2917–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Esen, A. Purification and Partial Characterization of Maize (Zea mays L.) β-Glucosidase. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chokki, M.; Cudălbeanu, M.; Zongo, C.; Dah-Nouvlessounon, D.; Ghinea, I.O.; Furdui, B.; Raclea, R.; Savadogo, A.; Baba-Moussa, L.; Avamescu, S.M.; et al. Exploring Antioxidant and Enzymes (A-Amylase and B-Glucosidase) Inhibitory Activity of Morinda Lucida and Momordica Charantia Leaves from Benin. Foods 2020, 9, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Barbagallo, R.N.; Palmeri, R.; Fabiano, S.; Rapisarda, P.; Spagna, G. Characteristic of β-Glucosidase from Sicilian Blood Oranges in Relation to Anthocyanin Degradation. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 41, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hartmann-Schreier, J.; Schreier, P. Purification and Partial Characterization of β-Glucosidase from Papaya Fruit. Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 2271–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Gerardi, C.; Blando, F.; Santino, A.; Zacheo, G. Purification and Characterisation of a β-Glucosidase Abundantly Expressed in Ripe Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.) Fruit. Plant Sci. 2001, 160, 795–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Sue, M.; Ishihara, A.; Iwamura, H. Purification and Characterization of a Hydroxamic Acid Glucoside β-Glucosidase from Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings. Planta 2000, 210, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Baiya, S.; Hua, Y.; Ekkhara, W.; Ketudat Cairns, J.R. Expression and Enzymatic Properties of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Monolignol β-Glucosidases. Plant Sci. 2014, 227, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Márquez, O.; Waliszewski, K.N. The Effect of Thermal Treatment on β-Glucosidase Inactivation in Vanilla Bean (Vanilla planifolia Andrews). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 1993–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Sreedhar, R.V.; Roohie, K.; Venkatachalam, L.; Narayan, M.S.; Bhagyalakshmi, N. Specific Pretreatments Reduce Curing Period of Vanilla (Vanilla planifolia) Beans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 2947–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Li, Y.-Y.; Jiang, C.-J.; Wan, X.-C.; Zhang, Z.-Z.; Li, D.-X. Purification and Partial Characterization of β-Glucosidase from Fresh Leaves of Tea Plants (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2005, 37, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Gunata, Z.; Bitteur, S.; Brillouet, J.-M.; Bayonove, C.; Cordonnier, R. Sequential Enzymic Hydrolysis of Potentially Aromatic Glycosides from Grape. Carbohydr. Res. 1988, 184, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Yeoman, C.J.; Han, Y.; Dodd, D.; Schroeder, C.M.; Mackie, R.I.; Cann, I.K.O. Thermostable Enzymes as Biocatalysts in the Biofuel Industry. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 70, pp. 1–55. ISBN 978-0-12-380991-9. [Google Scholar]
  189. Kim, I.J.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Nam, K.H. Biochemical and Structural Analysis of a Glucose-Tolerant β-Glucosidase from the Hemicellulose-Degrading Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum. Molecules 2022, 27, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Bi, Y.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Z.; Luo, H.; Fu, R.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, L. Purification and Characterization of a Glucose-Tolerant β-Glucosidase from Black Plum Seed and Its Structural Changes in Ionic Liquids. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Cao, L.; Wang, Z.; Ren, G.; Kong, W.; Li, L.; Xie, W.; Liu, Y. Engineering a Novel Glucose-Tolerant β-Glucosidase as Supplementation to Enhance the Hydrolysis of Sugarcane Bagasse at High Glucose Concentration. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Lu, W.-Y.; Lin, G.-Q.; Yu, H.-L.; Tong, A.-M.; Xu, J.-H. Facile Synthesis of Alkyl β-d-Glucopyranosides from d-Glucose and the Corresponding Alcohols Using Fruit Seed Meals. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2007, 44, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Yang, R.; Wang, Z.; Bi, Y.; Jia, J.; Zhao, X.; Liu, X.; Du, W. Convenient Synthesis of Alkyl and Phenylalkyl β-d-Glucopyranosides Using Facile and Novel Biocatalysts of Plant Origin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 918–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Berrin, J.-G.; McLauchlan, W.R.; Needs, P.; Williamson, G.; Puigserver, A.; Kroon, P.A.; Juge, N. Functional Expression of Human Liver Cytosolic β-Glucosidase in Pichia pastoris: Insights into Its Role in the Metabolism of Dietary Glucosides. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Fluitman, K.S.; Van Den Broek, T.J.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Visser, M.; Ijzerman, R.G.; Keijser, B.J.F. Associations of the Oral Microbiota and Candida with Taste, Smell, Appetite and Undernutrition in Older Adults. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Besnard, P.; Christensen, J.E.; Bernard, A.; Collet, X.; Verges, B.; Burcelin, R. Fatty Taste Variability in Obese Subjects: The Oral Microbiota Hypothesis. OCL 2020, 27, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Besnard, P.; Christensen, J.E.; Bernard, A.; Simoneau-Robin, I.; Collet, X.; Verges, B.; Burcelin, R. Identification of an Oral Microbiota Signature Associated with an Impaired Orosensory Perception of Lipids in Insulin-Resistant Patients. Acta Diabetol. 2020, 57, 1445–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Altayb, H.N.; Chaieb, K.; Baothman, O.; Alzahrani, F.A.; Zamzami, M.A.; Almugadam, B.S. Study of Oral Microbiota Diversity among Groups of Families Originally from Different Countries. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 103317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, C.; Song, Z. The Oral Microbiota: Community Composition, Influencing Factors, Pathogenesis, and Interventions. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 895537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Schwartz, M.; Neiers, F.; Charles, J.; Heydel, J.; Muñoz-González, C.; Feron, G.; Canon, F. Oral Enzymatic Detoxification System: Insights Obtained from Proteome Analysis to Understand Its Potential Impact on Aroma Metabolization. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 5516–5547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Schwartz, M.; Canon, F.; Feron, G.; Neiers, F.; Gamero, A. Impact of Oral Microbiota on Flavor Perception: From Food Processing to In-Mouth Metabolization. Foods 2021, 10, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Muñoz-González, C.; Feron, G.; Guichard, E.; Rodríguez-Bencomo, J.J.; Martín-Álvarez, P.J.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Pozo-Bayón, M.Á. Understanding the Role of Saliva in Aroma Release from Wine by Using Static and Dynamic Headspace Conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8274–8288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Mayr, C.M.; Parker, M.; Baldock, G.A.; Black, C.A.; Pardon, K.H.; Williamson, P.O.; Herderich, M.J.; Francis, I.L. Determination of the Importance of In-Mouth Release of Volatile Phenol Glycoconjugates to the Flavor of Smoke-Tainted Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 2327–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Dziadas, M.; Junka, A.; Jeleń, H. Human Saliva-Mediated Hydrolysis of Eugenyl-β-D-Glucoside and Fluorescein-Di-β-D-Glucoside in In Vivo and In Vitro Models. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Duarte-Coimbra, S.; Forcina, G.; Pérez-Pardal, L.; Beja-Pereira, A. Characterization of Tongue Dorsum Microbiome in Wine Tasters. Food Res. Int. 2023, 163, 112259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Walle, T.; Browning, A.M.; Steed, L.L.; Reed, S.G.; Walle, U.K. Flavonoid Glucosides Are Hydrolyzed and Thus Activated in the Oral Cavity in Humans. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Esteban-Fernández, A.; Rocha-Alcubilla, N.; Muñoz-González, C.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Pozo-Bayón, M.Á. Intra-Oral Adsorption and Release of Aroma Compounds Following in-Mouth Wine Exposure. Food Chem. 2016, 205, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Muñoz-González, C.; Martín-Álvarez, P.J.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Pozo-Bayón, M.Á. Impact of the Nonvolatile Wine Matrix Composition on the in Vivo Aroma Release from Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Esteban-Fernández, A.; Muñoz-González, C.; Jiménez-Girón, A.; Pérez-Jiménez, M.; Pozo-Bayón, M.Á. Aroma Release in the Oral Cavity after Wine Intake Is Influenced by Wine Matrix Composition. Food Chem. 2018, 243, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Parker, M.; Black, C.A.; Barker, A.; Pearson, W.; Hayasaka, Y.; Francis, I.L. The Contribution of Wine-Derived Monoterpene Glycosides to Retronasal Odour during Tasting. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Kamonpatana, K.; Failla, M.L.; Kumar, P.S.; Giusti, M.M. Anthocyanin Structure Determines Susceptibility to Microbial Degradation and Bioavailability to the Buccal Mucosa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6903–6910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Stradwick, L.; Inglis, D.; Kelly, J.; Pickering, G. Development and Application of Assay for Determining β-Glucosidase Activity in Human Saliva. Flavour 2017, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muradova, M.; Proskura, A.; Canon, F.; Aleksandrova, I.; Schwartz, M.; Heydel, J.-M.; Baranenko, D.; Nadtochii, L.; Neiers, F. Unlocking Flavor Potential Using Microbial β-Glucosidases in Food Processing. Foods 2023, 12, 4484. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244484

AMA Style

Muradova M, Proskura A, Canon F, Aleksandrova I, Schwartz M, Heydel J-M, Baranenko D, Nadtochii L, Neiers F. Unlocking Flavor Potential Using Microbial β-Glucosidases in Food Processing. Foods. 2023; 12(24):4484. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muradova, Mariam, Alena Proskura, Francis Canon, Irina Aleksandrova, Mathieu Schwartz, Jean-Marie Heydel, Denis Baranenko, Liudmila Nadtochii, and Fabrice Neiers. 2023. "Unlocking Flavor Potential Using Microbial β-Glucosidases in Food Processing" Foods 12, no. 24: 4484. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12244484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop