Next Article in Journal
The Efficiency of Selected Green Solvents and Parameters for Polyphenol Extraction from Chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx)) Pomace
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Association Analysis of Copy Number Variations for Meat Quality in Beef Cattle
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Thymol Vapors to Control Postharvest Decay Caused by Penicillium digitatum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae in Grapefruit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marinades Based on Natural Ingredients as a Way to Improve the Quality and Shelf Life of Meat: A Review

by
Agnieszka Latoch
1,
Ewa Czarniecka-Skubina
2,* and
Małgorzata Moczkowska-Wyrwisz
2
1
Department of Animal Food Technology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 8 Skromna St., 20-704 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Food Gastronomy and Food Hygiene, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS), 166 Nowoursynowska St., 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(19), 3638; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193638
Submission received: 10 September 2023 / Revised: 28 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 1 October 2023

Abstract

:
Marinating is a traditional method of improving the quality of meat, but it has been modified in response to consumer demand for “clean label” products. The aim of this review is to present scientific literature on the natural ingredients contained in marinades, the parameters of the marinating process, and certain mechanisms that bring about changes in meat. A review was carried out of publications from 2000 to 2023 available in Web of Science on the natural ingredients of meat marinades: fruit and vegetables, seasonings, fermented dairy products, wine, and beer. The review showed that natural marinades improve the sensory quality of meat and its culinary properties; they also extend its shelf life. They affect the safety of meat products by limiting the oxidation of fats and proteins. They also reduce biogenic amines and the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This is possible due to the presence of biologically active substances and competitive microflora from dairy products. However, some marinades, especially those that are acidic, cause a slightly acidic flavour and an unfavourable colour change. Natural compounds in the ingredients of marinades are accepted by consumers. There are no results in the literature on the impact of natural marinades on the nutritional value and health-promoting potential of meat products, so it can be assumed that this is a future direction for scientific research.

1. Introduction

Marinating is a commonly used process that improves the sensory quality of meat and its culinary properties (e.g., its yields). It is also a preservation method [1,2,3,4]. Marination involves adding liquids infused with flavourings, spices, and functional additives to meat products. Marinades are usually a mixture of various ingredients including water/oil emulsions, organic acids, extracts, mineral salts, chemical tenderizers, aromatic vegetables, fruit juices and vinegars, lemon juice, wine, soy sauce, essential oils, fermented dairy products, herbs, and spices [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Marination is a nonthermal technology, and some marinade components act against microbes and autooxidation [4,5,12,13]. The marinating process is applied to various types of meat, such as pork, beef, lamb, rabbit, poultry, and wild game [11,14].
Meat marinating is carried out by various methods: dipping (soaking), tumbling, and injection into the product [1,5,15,16,17,18]. The dipping method entails immersing the meat into the marinade at a low temperature for a specific period. This method is used by meat companies of various sizes and in households. The injection method involves the use of needles to apply pressure and introduce a precise amount of marinade liquid into the meat. Tumbling involves rotating the meat in a horizontally tilted drum while the marination liquid is added [19]. At home, consumers generally use the immersion technique to marinate their meats. Commercial marinades have an alkaline pH, while acidic marinades are also used in the food industry and at home [20,21]. Alkaline marinades contain phosphates, while acid marinades are usually prepared with the addition of—or are based on—organic acids or their salts [22].
Low pH values in acidic marinades increase the tenderness of the meat by lowering the pH, which in turn leads to a weakening of the muscle structure [8,9,10,11,21,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Marinades increase the meat’s water-holding capacity (WHC), reduce cooking losses, and improve the meat’s colour and juiciness [29,30]. Studies have reported that marination improves meat’s flavour and can reduce off-flavours [2,31,32,33]. The overall quality of marinated meat products is influenced by the marination method, the ingredients in the composition of the marinade, and the marination conditions (pH, time, and temperature) [1,34]. The use of marinades has been reported to improve meat’s microbiological quality by inhibiting the growth of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms, thereby enhancing its safety [5,7,8,9,11,21,26,27,28,35,36].
Marinating has been used in the meat industry for several decades, but the process continues to be improved through ingredient selection for marinade formulation, process control, and technological approaches to improve the quality characteristics of the final meat products, especially the most desirable one, which is tenderness. To increase meat tenderness, other strategies, such as chemical and mechanical methods, are adopted [37], but recently consumers have been demanding that different products, including meat and meat products, have clean labels and their production does not involve preservatives or synthetic components [38,39].
In this review, we provide a critical appraisal of the meat marination process, including different natural ingredients and the relationship between meat quality, its physicochemical and sensory indicators, and microbiological quality. The aim of this study is to present certain natural ingredients used to prepare marinades, the parameters of the marinating process, and the mechanisms of changes in meat through marination for the desired features of products and the extension of their shelf life.

2. Materials and Methods

On July 2023, the online database Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was accessed with the following search string: “marinating” OR “meat quality*”. The search string was applied to the title, abstract, and author keywords fields of 708 indexed publications. After adding an additional filter, “marinade”, 298 publications were returned. Other bibliographic aspects were used, such as publication year (2000–2023) or publication language (English) (Figure 1). The search yielded 272 publications, which were used for our analysis. The exclusion criteria were paid articles, articles not available to read in full, and articles about rarely consumed meat. This review compiled research articles, including types of marinade based on natural ingredients, marinade methods, marinade mechanisms, and its effects on sensory quality, safety, and shelf life (Figure 1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Traditional Marinades on the Quality of Meat

Water solutions with sodium chloride and sugars [40] and NaCl with sodium tripolyphosphate [41,42], with bicarbonate [43], or with a combination of all these ingredients [43,44] are especially important in the production of traditional marinades applied to poultry [31,41,42,43,44,45] and beef [40]. Some authors indicate a more complex marinade composition for poultry, including water (80%), NaCl (3%), a sugar mixture (dextrose, lactose, and saccharose, 9.5%), wheat flour (4%), and milk proteins (3.5%) [46], as well as phosphates and polyphosphates (60%), salt (27%), carrageenan (10%), and 3% guar gum (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2%) [47].
Marinating in a traditional way improves the tenderness and flavour of meat, as well as its juiciness. It has also been used as a tenderization method because the dispersion of ions, such as sodium and phosphate, in marinades results in a tenderizing effect due to the association of the ions with the protein. The addition of phosphate salts, particularly pyrophosphate and tripolyphosphate, increases the water-holding capacity (WHC) of meat, improves the texture and product yield, and reduces cooking losses [31,45,48]. A phosphate concentration of about 0.3% or higher is believed to act on muscle proteins by increasing the pH and ionic strength, as well as specifically by complexing protein-bound Mg and Ca, which results in increased solubilization of myosin and actin (actomyosin dissociation and depolymerization of thick and thin filaments) [49]. Although phosphates have been shown to improve meat quality, several countries have banned their use in meat production [50].
Some ingredients, such as sodium bicarbonate, have been used in marinades for pork and poultry to minimize the problem of PSE (pale, soft, and exudative) meat [44,51,52,53]. Additionally, they reduce shear force and improve meat yield [43,54,55]. The effect of bicarbonates may be due to their higher buffering capacity and ionic strength than those of phosphates [51].
The WHC of meat is minimal when the pH is close to the isoelectric point of myofibrillar proteins (about 5.2–5.3 in poultry meat) [21]. Sodium chloride plays a key role in the solubilization of myofibrillar proteins for subsequent denaturation and aggregation to improve water retention and the acceptable rigidity and elasticity of the meat gels. A sodium chloride concentration of 4.6 to 5.8% is known to produce maximum swelling of myofibrils and a high level of water absorption [56].
Marinade ingredients and their pH can influence the physicochemical properties of the meat and also reduce the level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in grilled products. Studies [57] have shown that a marinade with an alkaline pH based on sodium bicarbonate increases the PAH content, particularly heavy PAHs, in grilled chicken meat. In turn, the addition of juices lowers the pH and inhibits PAH formation reactions [58].
Marination is a slow process in which sufficient time is required to get the maximum output, and the incorporation of chemicals is not in line with the emerging trend of consuming natural food products. The use of chemicals as tenderizing agents improves flavour and aroma to a certain extent [59]; however, too high a concentration of these can result in a bitter, sour, and metallic taste [60,61].

3.2. Effect of Plant-Based Marinades on Quality of Meat

Various sour fruits or fruit juice, vegetables (Table 1), and fruit vinegar (Table 2) as well as enzymes derived from plants have also been used as meat marinades.
Fruit and vegetables marinade. Marination using fruit and vegetable juices affects the water-holding capacity of the meat, and the cooking efficiency of the product is increased [1]. Incorporating fruit and vegetable juice into marinades can enhance the aroma, flavour, juiciness, and tenderness of the meat due to the denaturation of proteins [1,73]. Reducing the meat’s pH to below the isoelectric point can increase positive charge of the myofibrillar proteins, thus causing more repulsion forces between the thick and thin filaments, which bring about the expansion of the protein network [8,21,56,83].
The low pH and proteolytic enzymes from plants have the potential to improve the textural properties of the meat by affecting myofibrillar proteins [10,11,21,23,24,80,84,85,86]. Several studies [73,87,88] have reported that organic acids, e.g., lemon or citrus juice in the marinating solution, derived from fruit can play a crucial role in the tenderization of marinated meat. They contribute to the degradation and solubilization of connective tissues, resulting in a reduction in muscle fibre diameter and thickness, leading to meat fibre swelling and enhancing proteolysis by cathepsins (the optimal pH for this activity is in the range of 3.5–5.0). There is also an increased conversion of collagen to gelatin at a low pH during thermal treatment. This process weakens the electrostatic interactions between myofibrillar protein chains and connective tissues, while increasing proteolysis mediated by cathepsin [23,73,85,89]. Marinades containing proteolytic enzymes or characterized by a low pH could be used as tenderizers in jerky produced from initially tough meat, such as wild boar. Marinades based on lemon and honey and also vinegar can be used for flavouring tender meat with an intense aroma [71]. The marination of pork loin slices using a solution with a mix of extra virgin olive oil, beer, and lemon juice produces an overall improvement in the technological and sensory properties of the meat, extending the shelf life to six days [68]. Marination with fruit juice affected the water-holding properties of chicken and turkey meat samples. As for textural properties, marination affected the tenderness of turkey meat positively. Turkey breast samples marinated with black grape juice were determined to be the most tender. In addition, marination with natural fruit juices significantly inhibited lipid oxidation in chicken and turkey meats compared to an unmarinated group [75].
According to Samant et al. [90], acidic marinades may have a negative impact on the sensory characteristics of the product. Other authors [91,92] have stated that the addition of citric and acetic acids did not cause any negative changes to their products studied, apart from a slight acidic flavour and an intense odour after long marinating times in some cases. The type of marinade, especially marinades based on fruit and fruit juices, affects the colour of meat, such as chicken and turkey, and in particular increases the lightness L* and b* values, which are related, for example, to the presence of carotenoids [11,21,63,74,93,94].
Marinating meat samples with fruit juices generally decreased the pH values compared to those of the controls (unmarinated), and this reduction varied among different treatments [29]. According to other authors, the effect of fruit juice extract does not significantly affect the pH of meat. For example, pomegranate juice extract applied to chicken patties did not cause significant changes [95]. However, a slight increase in pH was observed after storage when a pomegranate fruit juice phenolic solution was used on chicken breast [96]. Other authors [29,75] have reported that the cooking losses of meat samples treated with citric acid and grapefruit juice ranged from 22.4 to 33.3%. According to Nadzirah et al. [97], the cooking loss of bromelain-treated beef was higher than that of an untreated meat sample. As lemon juice contains citric acid, this ingredient is often included within marinade solutions to improve meat WHC by lowering its pH [12].
Authors reported that mulberry polyphenol significantly decreased the TBARS values of dried minced pork slices [98], and pomegranate fruit juice could delay the TBARS values in chicken samples stored at 4 °C for 28 days [96]. These effects are a result of the antioxidant character of phenolic acids, flavanols, and anthocyanins from mulberry pulp [99]; catechins, quercetin and its derivatives (flavanols), and anthocyanidins from grape pomace [100]; and polyphenols (tannins and flavonoids) and anthocyanins from pomegranate juice [67,96,101,102]. Polyphenols can act as antioxidants or pro-oxidants, depending on their concentration and interactions with the food matrix [103].
According to Jongberg et al. [104], antioxidants break free radical chains of oxidation by the donation of hydrogen atoms from the phenolic groups, thereby preventing lipid or protein oxidation. Natural antioxidants from plants have been employed to prolong the shelf life of meat by reducing lipid oxidation [39].
Some studies [105] suggest that marinating ingredients can reduce foodborne pathogens after application and during storage. However, certain marinade formulations have been shown to have little to no effects in reducing the microbial load of poultry products during storage.
Citric acid and acetic acid derived from fruit are added to marinades to meet food safety and quality requirements. Weak acids exhibit antimicrobial activity mainly in their undissociated form, which penetrates the cell membrane, acidifies the cytoplasm, and increases the toxic level of the dissociated acid anion. In addition, the chelating properties of organic acids (such as citric and malic acid) can also destabilize the cell’s outer membrane [106]. Other researchers [107,108] also have shown that organic acids not only have the ability to pass the outer membrane of Gram (−) bacteria [109] but they can also act as permeabilizers, enabling other hydrophobic molecules to enter the membrane. The rate at which lemon juice or citric acid deactivates pathogens depends on the acid concentration, pH, and temperature [110].
In previous studies, the higher antimicrobial activity of acetic acid was compared to that of citric acid [92,106,111,112,113]. Its lower molecular weight as well as its greater hydrophobicity increase its ability to penetrate bacterial membranes at a higher rate under aerobic conditions at pH values greater than 4.5 [114]. Anaerobic rather than aerobic conditions prevail during marination, which may affect the microbial inhibitory dynamics of organic acids [115].
Several authors [36,67,116,117] have reported the antimicrobial effect of marinating solution components regardless of the type of marination. The combination of organic acids, ethanol, and sodium chloride can strongly inhibit several microorganisms, including pathogens such as Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus [118,119]. In turn, Pseudomonas spp. counts are of great importance for the shelf life and quality of marinated products, as this microbial group dominates the spoilage population of meat, producing intense off-odours and flavours [67]. Authors observed a decrease in the population of Pseudomonas spp. after marinating meat in lemon juice [120], in pomegranate marinade [121], and after treatment in citric acid [67], as well as the inhibition of the multiplication of lactic bacteria associated with gaseous spoilage of modified atmosphere-packaged raw chicken meat after the use of a tomato base marinade [122].
The lower total mesophilic aerobic and total psychrophilic aerobic counts in marinated pork samples were due to the presence of organic acids (mainly citric acid) and phenolic compounds (mainly flavonoids, tannins, anthocyanins, and gallic acid) in fruit juice. These compounds possess antimicrobial properties and can damage the bacterial cell membrane, disrupt energy production mechanisms, and disturb the intracellular ion balance, leading to increased bacterial permeability [93,123].
Vegetable marinades are less popular for the tenderization of meat (Table 3). The antioxidant activity of compounds, such as the sulphur and flavonoids of garlic and onion and their extracts, are concentration-dependent. Garlic and onion juices have demonstrated an antioxidant effect in meat and improved the flavour of pork and broilers. In one study, all the pork marinated with garlic (3%, 6%) and onion (3%) juice had significantly higher juiciness and tenderness scores than those of the control samples. In countries where garlic and onion are commonly used, there is less resistance to having strong flavours in foods. Pork marinated with garlic juice has a higher muscle pH and lower TBARS values as well as receives higher ratings for flavour, juiciness, and tenderness compared to other treatments. The addition of garlic did not result in a strong flavour, but did produce an antioxidant effect and extended the shelf life of the pork product up to 7 days [82,124].
Wang et al. [125] stated that marinades based on green, white, and yellow teas decrease PAH levels in grilled chicken wings by about 57%, 30.7%, and 23.3%, respectively. The PAH content reduction stemmed from the phenolic compounds present in teas, which can scavenge free radicals and inhibit PAH-forming reactions.
Enzymes from fruit and vegetables. Plant-based exogenous proteolytic enzymes, such as papain, bromelain, and ficin, play a dominant role in meat (beef and venison meat) tenderization. These natural tenderizers are extracted from various plant origins, such as fruits and vegetables (stems and leaves) [80,126,127,128,129,130,131,132]. The final texture and appearance of meat can differ according to the type, amount of enzyme, and the way of introducing it into the muscle: dipping in a solution, pumping the enzyme solution into blood vessels, or the rehydration of freeze-dried meat. However, the dipping and pumping methods were found to be unsatisfactory because of their over-tenderizing effect [78,133].
Kadıoğlu et al. [24] concluded that samples marinated with pineapple fruit juice for 160 min. were recommended because the tissue fibre changed to a greater extent which resulted in a better overall quality and greater economic profits. Gokoglu et al. [134] implied that the acceptance of meats treated with vegetable proteases depended on consumers’ level of familiarity with the plants and the difference in consumer tastes in different cultures.
An endogenous tenderization mechanism is activated in animal flesh and controlled by calpain systems, and this action is temperature-dependent. There are major differences in tenderized meat quality depending upon the type of enzyme [135]. Papain is extracted from papaya latex (EC 3.4.22.2) and is one of the most common plant enzymes employed for meat tenderization due to its ability to break down both myofibrillar proteins and connective tissues [136]. Bromelain from pineapple peel or juice can extensively degrade the collagen from beef, giant catfish skin [137], and wild boar [78]. According to various authors [138,139], bromelain exhibits a more essential hydrolytic action on collagen than on myofibrillar proteins, which leads to the better tenderization of tough meat.
Increases in temperature during cooking can enhance enzyme action; e.g., papain’s optimal activity occurs at 65–80 °C [16,136]. During heating, different meat proteins denature and cause structural changes in meat, such as the destruction of cell membranes, shrinkage of meat fibres, the aggregation and gel formation of myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic protein shrinkage, and the solubilization of connective tissue. It also diminishes their water-holding capacity and therefore increases water loss [140]. Specifically at 80 °C, the hardness increases due to the denaturation of myofibrillar protein [141].
Exogenous proteases should be used under controlled conditions to achieve optimum results, and their excessive usage may deteriorate product quality. The majority of exogenous enzymes are plant-based and mainly extracted through solvents [142].
Fruit vinegards. It has been observed that studies examining the effects of vinegar-based marination on meat quality have increased in recent years [10,80,143]. Examples of vinegar-based marinades are presented in Table 2.
Vinegar is a fermented product obtained from the oxidation of ethyl alcohol by acetic acid bacteria [144].
Table 2. Selective examples of marinades based on vinegar from fruit.
Table 2. Selective examples of marinades based on vinegar from fruit.
Marinade Based on Fruit VinegarMarinating ConditionMeatSource
organic fruit vinegars: blackberry (pH 3.32),
pomegranate (pH 3.30), rosehip (pH 3.24), and grape (pH 3.22) vinegars.
24 h at 4 °Cbeef[10]
olive oil/balsamic vinegar (5%, 10%)3, 9, and 15 days, 2–4 °C,
1:1 (ratio of meat to marinade), vacuum
pork[68]
apple cider vinegar (70%)
apple cider vinegar and pomegranate juice
(35% + 35%) + olive oil, honey, thyme
1, 3, 6, and 9 h at 4, 10, and 20 °Cchicken[67]
balsamic vinegar marinade (pH 4.4)24 h at 4 °Cdeer, wild boar[71]
asparagus juice + traditional balsamic vinegar4, 24, and 48 h at 4 °Cbeef[80]
aronia vinegar, grape vinegar,
hawthorn vinegar
24 h at 4 °Cchicken[85]
black chokeberry vinegar (pH: 3.75),
grape vinegar (pH: 2.95), and
hawthorn vinegar (pH: 3.20)
24 h at 4 °C
1:1 (ratio of meat to marinade)
beef[145]
Vinegars can be made from various raw materials, such as fruits (aronia, grape, hawthorn), vegetables, and cereals, and are named according to these materials. The composition of vinegar can change depending on the raw material and production process used [146,147,148]. Fruit vinegars are rich in organic acids, such as acetic, tartaric, formic, lactic, citric, and malic acids, but also contain high levels of phenolic compounds, vitamins, and minerals [149,150].
Many authors [75,151,152,153,154] have pointed to the rise in moisture content (the water-holding capacity) of buffalo meat, beef chunk, chicken breast, and pork loin treated with plant-derived extracts and salt solutions. The significant space between the thin and thick filaments caused by myofibrillar disintegration, the degradation of the connective tissues (the perimysium and endomysium), and the dissolution of collagen affect the level of water retention by the muscles [155], resulting in the softening of the texture of the meat, for example, for beef meat samples marinated with asparagus juice and traditional balsamic vinegar. Authors [156,157] have stated that the more moisture the meat absorbs during marination, the less it loses during roasting, which improves its sensory properties and Warner–Bratzler shear force results, including its juiciness and tenderness.
The presence of organic acids in vinegars is thought to be responsible for the lower pH of marinated meat samples [80,85], which decreases the cooking losses of meat. In these cases, meat proteins could be affected by marination with vinegar due to the low pH values. Marination with fruit vinegars causes significant deterioration in muscle fibres and irregular muscle fibres, which makes the meat more tender [10,23,75,158]. Vinegar marinades decrease the meat’s hardness and chewiness and, as a result, reduce the thickness and fibre diameter of muscle samples, which can be seen in microstructure images. In conducted tests, the marinade using grape vinegar was the most effective, in terms of the meat’s sensory properties, while marination with aronia and hawthorn vinegars negatively affected the odour properties of the samples, but it had a positive effect on the texture of poultry [10,85,145,159].
Marinating meat in vinegar (white wine, red wine, apple cider, elderflower, and apple cider with raspberry juice) led to significant PAH content reductions in grilled meat compared to control samples of meat: about a 82% PAH reduction with elderberry vinegar and a 79% reduction with white wine vinegar [160].

3.3. Effect of Marinades Based on Seasonings on the Quality of Meat

Various seasonings have also been used as a marinade for meat (Table 3). Marinade solutions including “natural” ingredients (e.g., spices, herbs, essential oils extracted from flowers, fruits, roots, buds and leaves through distillation processes, etc.) are widespread in the meat industry for poultry, beef, and pork meat, due to their organoleptic, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties [5,35,116,161,162,163]. Spices and extracts with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties are also added in marinades to add flavour and to increase the shelf life of meat products [1].
Table 3. Selective examples of marinades based on seasoning plants.
Table 3. Selective examples of marinades based on seasoning plants.
Seasoning Used to MarinadeMarinating ConditionMeatSource
NaCl (6%, wt/vol), food-grade sodium tripolyphosphate (3%, wt/vol), thyme (0.5%), orange oil (50:50), and water (91%)marinated for 20 min in vacuum with 10% (wt/vol) of a prechilled (4 °C) marination solution.chicken[15]
extract from dried sagevacuum or assisted by ultrasound impregnation; 4 °C; rotated at 75 rpm; 180 min impregnation processbeef[19]
red pepper, garlic, onion,
red pepper, tomato,
pepper, garlic, or pepper, red pepper, and garlic
24 h at 4 °Cbeef[26]
olive oil and rosemary, pumpkin oil and fresh oregano, sunflower oil and thyme, walnut oil and fresh basil, sesame oil and ginger plant120 h at 4 °Cbeef[27]
water, 2% salt, 0.5% sugar, 0.5% soy sauce, and spices: paprika, clove root, ladybug anise, tangerine, long pepper Chinese cinnamon, muscatel spice, trifoliate orange, fennel, Dahurian angelica, Cinnamomum cassia, liquorice, green cardamom, hawthorn2 h tumbling at 4 °C; vacuum.beef[40]
sugar, onion, water, lemongrass, salt, turmeric, cinnamon, coriander, and oil0, 4, 8, and 12 h at 4 °C (immersion)beef[58]
(I) seasoning (marjoram, thyme, lemon pepper, oregano, basil, and garlic powder);
(II) lemon and honey marinade (pH 4.8) (honey, fresh lemon juice, soy sauce, black pepper, and water);
(III) balsamic vinegar marinade (pH 4.4) (light soy sauce, Dijon mustard, balsamic vinegar, water, brown sugar, and black pepper);
(IV) pineapple marinade (pH 4.1) (fresh pineapple juice, soy sauce, balsamic vinegar, water black pepper, red pepper flakes, and garlic powder);
(V) ginger marinade (pH 4.7) (soy sauce, lime juice, fresh grated, ginger, water, and crushed red pepper).
24 h at 4 °Cdeer, wild boar[71]
ginger1 h tumbling at 4 °Cchicken[164]
garlic24 to 48 h at 4 to 7 °Cpork[165]
soy sauce and hot pepper pasteovernight at 4 °Cpork[166]
oregano, liquid smoke (as base and salt, phosphate, nitrate, soy sauce, meat broth, black pepper, lemon pepper, cayenne pepper, red curry paste, mild Tabasco, mustard, fructose, xylose, honey, garlic powder, extract from onion, oregano and paprika, tomato purée, lemon juice, lime juice, cognac aroma, fermented milk, beer, and bacon aroma)not statedpork[167]
spices and flavourings, salt, and oil24 h at 4 °Cpork[168]
nanoparticle paprika oleoresin (1 and 3 g/100 mL) and water/milktumbling for 20 min at 4 °Cpoultry[169]
tomato paste, red pepper paste, sunflower oil, red pepper, black pepper, cumin, salt, fresh lemon juice, and garlic rind24 h at 4 °C; stored 1–10 dayschicken[170]
lacto-fermented garlic3 days at 4 °Clamb[171]
thyme, rosemary, basil, marjoram, cinnamaldehyde, linalool, and lactic acid7 days at 4 °Cchicken[172]
turmeric, curry leaf, torch ginger, and lemongrass8 h at 4 °C; PE bagsbeef[173]
coriander leaf extract and coriander root extract4 h at 4 °Cduck[174]
Marinade 1 (45.5% pomegranate syrup,
23% water, 17% honey, 11.5% mustard powder, 2% NaCl, and 1% pepper; pH 2.45);
Marinade 2 (73% lemon juice, 18% honey,
2% garlic, 2% NaCl, and 1% pepper; pH 2.10);
Marinade 3 (52% white wine vinegar, 24% sugar, 2.5% estragon, 18.5% onion, 2% NaCl, and 1% pepper; pH 2.87).
not statedchicken[175]
341 mL beer, 1 g oregano, 1 g parsley, 4 g mustard, 2 g salt, 8 g pepper, 1 g garlic, 25 mL olive oil, 15 mL vinegar, and 25 g fresh onions12 h at 4 °C;
Ziploc closed plastic bags.
beef, moose[176]
[177]
sodium chloride, 3% of a commercial blend of polyphosphates; EO mixture (1:1) of thyme and orange20 min tumbling (20 rpm) at room temperature; vacuum (78 kPa)chicken[178]
hibiscus extractnot statedbeef[179]
dry ground marjoram and thyme, garlic powder, fresh horseradish, lime tree honey, and red wine12 days at 4 °Cbeef[180]
fresh turmeric, torch ginger flower, curry leaves, and lemongrass8 h at 4 °C
24 h at 4 °C
24 h at 4 °C
beef
lamb
beef
[6]
[181]
[182]
cinnamon powder, and green tea powdernot statedpork[183]
salt, white pepper, and garlic powdernot statedpork[184]
sage leaf (Salvia fruticosa), hops (Humulus lupulus), licorice root (Glycyrrhiza uralensis), curcuma (Curcuma xanthorrhiza), clove bud (Syzygium aromaticum), oregano leaf, and ajowain seed (Trachyspermum ammi)not statedchicken[185]
red pepper powder, red pepper seasoning (red pepper powder, sea salt, garlic, and onion)24 h at 5 °Cpork[186]
rosemary, sage, and thyme7 days at 4 °Cturkey[187]
soy sauce, pepper, garlic, oregano, rosemary, and chili5 h at 4 °Cbeef, pork[188]
black pepper, garlic, salt, canola oil, and aromas24 h at 4 °Cbeef [189]
Spices and herbs in marinades can have a significant impact on the quality of meat in terms of its flavour, tenderness, and overall quality [190,191,192] and can help balance the flavours of marinade ingredients (e.g., chili powder or black pepper balanced with sweet ingredients such as honey) and harmonize the taste profile. They are responsible for enhancing the meat’s flavour and creating the unique sensory profile of the meat [67]. Marination with spices and herbs has been used to improve the functionality and safety of meat [40]. Nassu et al. [193] reported that an antioxidant, such as rosemary, retarded the development of oxidized aromas and flavours. Spices are central to marinades as they provide a wide range of flavours and aromas [40,127,191,194,195,196,197].
Common spices such as paprika, pepper, chilli powder, garlic, ginger, cumin, and turmeric can add depth and complexity to the meat’s taste [40,127,184,185,191,192,195,197,198]. In meat marinades, pepper (black, white, and green) is a popular spice often used to add flavours, aromas, and a hint of spiciness [184,196]. The selection between types of pepper depends on one’s culinary preferences and the specific flavour to be obtained. Each type has its unique characteristics that can enhance different types of meat and other products. In addition, black pepper (Piper nigrum) is enriched with phenolic compounds [198], mainly piperine, an alkaloid which is responsible for the pungency of black pepper. The antioxidant properties of the polyphenolic compounds contained in black pepper have been confirmed in studies conducted on beef hamburgers. The addition of black pepper had a significant effect, lowering the malondialdehyde (MDA) content of the hamburgers studied compared to that of the control group. In addition, this study demonstrated the synergistic effect of black pepper on turmeric, as their combination significantly reduced the MDA values in the samples, compared to those of the spices used alone [198].
The use of paprika in the form of nanoparticle paprika oleoresin in a marinade carrier system, as a function of the water-to-milk ratio (water, milk, and NaCl), had a significant impact on the sensory quality of chicken [169]. It was observed that the amount of paprika had a significant effect on all sensory colour attributes (surface orange and red intensity and colour penetration). The most beneficial effect was shown with 3 g/100 mL of paprika in the marinade. This resulted in a cooked meat product with a higher red and orange intensity as well as deeper colour penetration. A similar relationship was shown for paprika’s flavour and overall acceptability. However, considering the paprika carrier in the marinade, the highest colour penetration was observed for the water-based carrier (100:0 ration of water: milk). In contrast, the highest absorption of the marinade was shown for the milk-only carrier system (0:100 ratio of water to milk) [169]. The use of a marinade of onion juice or garlic also had a positive effect on the juiciness and tenderness of pork meat [82].
Studies have shown a significant effect of herb- and spice-based marinades on the sensory quality of meat, as well as its flavour, aroma, and freshness [27,67,176,177,199]. Marinades based on turmeric and lemongrass (52.42%:47.57%) significantly improved the colour and flavour as well as the overall quality of grilled beef samples [173]. In addition, marinades with both aromatic herbs and cold-pressed oils have a positive effect on beef tenderness and juiciness after longer marination times. The use of herbal and spice extracts also causes changes in the pH of the meat, limiting its rise. This is reflected in the slowing down of the process of protein degradation, thus extending the meat’s shelf life [200].
The addition of spice extracts, such as bay leaf, black pepper, turmeric, jalapeno pepper, and tamarind paste, to marinades increased the proportion of the colour components L* and b* and lowered the hardness and pH of the meat [201]. However, herbs are a common ingredient in meat marinades not only for their flavourful qualities. They are also used because of their antioxidant [143,199,202,203,204] and antimicrobial properties [66,143,178,205]. Rohod et al. [204] demonstrated that rosemary and oregano have similar efficiencies to synthetic antioxidants such as BHT in inhibiting the development of Staphylococcus aureus in marinated chicken breast. The use of marinades with thyme and orange blends effectively reduced lipid oxidation in chicken meat, without a negative effect on the meat’s sensory quality or colour parameters [178]. Studies conducted by Pathania et al. [35] also showed that teriyaki and lemon pepper marinades could both reduce the Salmonella load on chicken skin and red meat during aerobic storage.
Natural antioxidants, such as the phenolic compounds in extracts, can contribute to the inhibition of cyclisation and oxidation reactions by quenching or scavenging free radicals, thereby increasing the safety and shelf life of grilled meat products [201]. The herbs and spices used in marinades improved the meat quality by affecting the pH, textural properties, colour, PAH profile (reducing the formation of PAHs), and volatile compounds in grilled meat [174,201,206]. Using an oolong tea infusion (1%) for a marinade, Caliskan et al. [81] achieved a 94.4% reduction in the total heterocyclic aromatic amine (HAA) content in chicken meat, and similar findings were recorded by Gibis and Weiss [179] regarding the use of hibiscus extract. Combinations of spices, such as turmeric, lemongrass, torch ginger, and curry leaves, also effectively inhibit the formation of HCAs in grilled beef [6,181] and also in lamb meat [182]. Lai et al. [183] showed that the addition of cinnamon powder (0.5%) or green tea powder (0.5%) reduced HAA and PAH formation in marinated pork.
A study by Pathania et al. [35] showed the positive effect of using a lemon pepper marinade (ground black pepper, lemon peel granules, lemon oils, and some extracts of spices) in reducing the growth of Salmonella bacteria in chicken meat. This has to do with the lower pH of the lemon pepper marinade due to the presence of lemon oils, which resulted in more effective antimicrobial activity [35]. Furthermore, the use of a marinade with a suitable composition of spices can effectively exhibit antimicrobial activity against Campylobacter jejuni and Enterobacteriacea, as well as provide desirable organoleptic characteristics in chicken meat [175].
Oregano essential oil has been found to display antimicrobial activity against pathogenic microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enteritidis, in beef and pork meat [163]; rosemary essential oil (0.05%) was found to be able to inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus in beef and chicken meat [204,207,208]; and thyme essential oil (0.08%) added to meat inhibits the growth of Pseudomonas spp. and Staphylococcus aureus [163].
The addition of essential oils improved the sensory quality and increased the overall acceptability of samples, especially at the end of storage, and was preferred among consumers [209,210,211,212,213]. Essential oils, including rosemary, thyme, oregano, basil, coriander, ginger, garlic, clove, juniper, and fennel, are characterised by their strong antioxidant activity [214,215]. Essential oils used alone or in combination have been shown to extend the shelf life of meat and meat products, and this has been associated with a reduction in lipid oxidation [209,211,212,216]. It is worth mentioning that due to the low sensory thresholds characteristic of essential oils [161], their sensory compatibility and impact on other ingredients on the sensory profile of the final product should be carefully considered [217,218].

3.4. Effect of Marinades Based on Fermented Dairy Products on the Quality of Meat

Natural fermented dairy products (FDPs) such as kefir, yoghurt, buttermilk, acid whey, and acid milk are also used as marinades (Table 4).
FDPs have a low pH (4.6) and contain live cultures of microorganisms, mainly lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Fermentation processes of dairy products generally increase the nutritional value and bioavailability of nutrients [227], and the action of certain strains of LAB can lead to the removal of milk components such as lactose and galactose [228]. The conversion of lactose leads to the production of lactic acid in the fermented product. LABs also exhibit casein proteolytic activity and cause the release of amino acids and peptides. In addition, bacterial enzymes convert milk carbohydrates into oligosaccharides, some of which have prebiotic properties [229].
Buttermilk (BM) is rich in polar lipids, including phospholipids and sphingolipids. It has lower concentrations of neutral lipids, such as mono-, di-, and triglycerides, as well as cholesterol and its esters [230]. Additionally, BM contains lecithin and a small amount of protein with high biological value [69]. Acid whey (AW), a by-product of cottage cheese and yogurt (YO) [14,224] production, is a source of whey proteins (α-lactalbumins, β-lactoglobulins, lactoperoxidase, serum albumins, lactoferrin, and immunoglobulins), vitamins B and A, significant amounts of tryptophan (a serotonin precursor) and cysteine (a glutathione precursor), and minerals. These products are a valuable source of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and have antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. They also help to limit the addition of chemical preservatives to food [175,231]. In the process of the fermentation of kefir (KE), in addition to LAB, yeast is also produced. KE contains fermentation products and metabolites such as kefiran and exopolysaccharides, which have additional health benefits [227,232].
The results of studies [3,25,220,225,226,231,233] show that the presence of live LAB cultures in FDP can extend the shelf life of different types of marinated meat, inhibit oxidative processes, improve colour stability after heat treatment, and also improve the physicochemical properties of meat products.
Many authors report the beneficial effect of acid marinades on the sensory quality of meat products [3,30,191,219,222]. For example, marinating pheasant breasts in AW and BM significantly increased their juiciness and tenderness; additionally, BM improved the taste, and AW significantly reduced the intensity of the specific meat aroma [69]. Wild boar meat marinated for 7 days in KE was characterised as having high levels of tenderness, juiciness, and overall attractiveness compared to those of meat marinated in calcium chloride, wine, or a pineapple marinade [219]. Extending the marination time of meat in FDP had a negative impact on its sensory characteristics. In the study by Latoch et al. [220], pork loin marinated for 3 days in FDP had a higher sensory rating than when it was marinated for 6 days. The best ratings were given to meat marinated in BM. Similarly, extending the marinating time of chicken breasts in BM or AW from 24 to 48 h had a negative impact on the intensity of the flavour of heat-treated products [222].
Instrumental measurements of texture parameters are one of the most frequently performed analyses of meat products marinated in FDP, and many authors confirm the beneficial effects of this process [29,30,224]. Marinating meat at low temperatures (0–4 °C) causes its further, although limited, maturation. Proteolysis leads to the structural weakening of myofibrils as well as the endomysium and perimysium of connective tissue, resulting in increased meat tenderness [234].
The addition of calcium-containing ingredients, such as kefir, has been shown to increase proteolysis caused by calpains [78,219]. Żochowska-Kujawska et al. [78,219] showed that marinating wild boar and deer meat in KE for several days (4 or 7 days) causes structural changes, such as increasing the cross-sectional area of the muscle fibre, improving its shape, and reducing the thickness of connective tissue. This reduces the meat’s hardness and springiness and increases its tenderness and juiciness.
Marinating pork for 6 or 9 days in BM or YO reduced its hardness and chewiness and, regardless of the type of marinade, reduced its cohesiveness. There was no effect of the type of marinade or the marinating time on the springiness of the meat [7,25,220,221]. However, other studies [14,224,235] prove that marinating pork, lamb, and rabbit meat in AW for too short a time, i.e., for 5 h, does not affect its tenderness. However, marinating the meat for 10–24 h improves its tenderness (reduces the cutting force), without negatively affecting its other quality features. At the same time, these studies did not demonstrate the effect of a longer marinating time on the tenderness of chicken meat. The authors attribute the different levels of effectiveness of AW as a tenderizer in pork and poultry to the fact that acidic marination seems to be more effective in tenderizing muscles with a high content of connective tissue. This was not confirmed by other authors [3,69,70,175,191,222], who found that marinating the breast muscles of chickens, pheasants, and turkeys in AW or BM for 12–48 h reduced the cutting force, springiness, and chewiness.
Many authors [7,25,69,220,221] have found no influence of the type of FDP marinade on the colour lightness (L* parameter). Other authors [14,175,191,222,224] have noticed a lightening of the colour of marinated meat, both raw and heat-treated.
Proteolysis by meat proteases (calpains and cathepsins) and AW-derived endopeptidases may affect the meat’s water-binding capacity. Water introduced into the meat during marination may affect its ability to reflect light from its surface [29]. In the case of cooked pork loin marinated in FDP, other authors [7,25,220,221] found a darkening of colour, which may be the result of water loss during cooking [236] or may result from the presence of minerals and sugars in FDP or those added during marination [69]. Wójciak et al. [226] hypothesized that β-lactoglobulin, which is the main AW protein, may serve as a source of glutathione and thiol amino acids, which protect meat products against discoloration.
In the case of heat-treated meat products, the intensity of redness is inversely proportional to the degree of myoglobin denaturation during marination and processing. Karageorgou et al. [224] found that the redness (a*) was reduced by marinating pork and chicken meat in yogurt whey in both raw and cooked meat. This was confirmed by other studies with FDP marinades, but this effect depended on the marination time and cooking temperature [3,7,25,191,220,221]. Wójciak et al. [226] demonstrated the influence of AW on the formation and stabilization of the pink/red colour of uncured products. Similarly, Augustyńska-Prejsnar et al. [69,175,222] showed the effect of marination with AW on the redness of heat-treated chicken and pheasant breasts.
The beneficial effect of marination on the redness (a*) of meat can be explained by the fact that the hydrolysis of milk proteins can generate bioactive peptides with antioxidant properties [237]. An important factor shaping the colour of meat is the redox potential, which determines the redox status of the iron located centrally in the porphyrin ring of the myoglobin molecule [238]. A low redox potential also helps keep heme pigments in a reduced form. The use of FDP can limit the oxidation of myoglobin and increase its thermal stability, thus minimising changes in the a* parameter and increasing redness [7,25,220,221]. The presence of microflora in AW leads to higher redox potential values [226].
The influence of marinating meat in FDP on the b* parameter is not clear. Some authors [7,25,220,221,225] have found no effect of FDP on the value of the b* parameter in raw and heat-treated meat. Other studies [69,175,191,222] indicate a reduction in the level of yellowness after marinating meat in BM and AW. In turn, other authors [14,224] have found an increase in yellowness in raw chicken meat marinated in yogurt whey, but they did not observe significant differences in samples after heat treatment. The same authors noted a decrease in the value of the b* parameter in raw pork marinated in yogurt whey.
Marinating meat in FDP does not affect the oxidation of fats in raw material, but it prevents [14,25,221,224] or has little effect [225] on fat oxidation in finished meat products. This is due to the fact that LAB do not have lipase activity [232], and some LAB have antioxidant effects and are able to reduce the risk of the accumulation of reactive oxygen species [239]. Additionally, LAB can decompose superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide. Peptides with antioxidant activity have been identified in FDP [240], including casein calcium peptides [241]. Diaz and Decker [242] report that cooking increases the catalytic activity of iron in meat, while milk proteins have a strong chelating effect, which can also effectively limit oxidation.
Kęska et al. [243] showed that AW contributes to the production of peptide fractions in meat products, which may have a beneficial physiological effect on the human body. AW, which is rich in LAB, is an additional source of enzymes, facilitating the extraction of more peptides and free amino acids in marinated meat. The action of LAB in meat results in the better colonization and better activation of LAB enzymatic mechanisms, including proteases [243]. Research by Wójciak et al. [225] showed that beef marinated in AW for 48 h contained more peptides than beef marinated for 24 h. The addition of AW, probably due to the presence of Lactobacillus plantarum in the whey, which has a proven ability to produce amine oxidase enzymes and degrade biogenic amines, reduces the amount of biogenic amines [244].
Acidic marinades effectively inhibit the growth of microorganisms [245] due to their low pH and the substances contained in FDP, such as organic acids, LAB, and other metabolites produced by LAB (including whey proteins, bacteriocins, and polyphenols) [1,3,69,70,175,226]. A large amount of LAB in raw meat guarantee its microbiological stability and product safety.
Factors affecting the number of microorganisms in meat products, in addition to the concentration of hydrogen ions, may be the water activity, the presence of oxygen, the redox potential of the environment, the activity of enzymes of microbial origin, and the presence of compounds and microflora that inhibit the development of specific groups of microorganisms [246]. Brik and Knøchel [175] found that yoghurt used for marinating pork was not as effective as red wine in reducing bacterial viability, but C. jejuni is extremely sensitive to YO compared to other bacteria. The use of buttermilk and acid whey as a marinade for meat increases the microbiological safety of the product compared to that of a product marinated in lemon juice, while maintaining its good technological features [70]. It significantly reduced the number of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, Pseudomonas spp., and bacteria from the Enterobacteriaceae family in raw chicken, pheasant, and turkey meat. According to the authors, the main factor influencing the reduction in microorganisms in this case was the lowering of pH, caused mainly by the presence of lactic acid, but the type of marinade does not affect the pH of the meat [14,29,30,69,70,191,221,222,224].
Eldaly et al. [247] investigated the effect of a yoghurt-based marinade on the levels of five PAHs in grilled beef (kebab and kofta). In addition to yoghurt, individual ingredients, such as salt, turmeric, curry, cardamom, vinegar, mustard, and onion, were examined. Marinating the meat before grilling it reduced the PAH levels to 57.93 µg/kg in grilled kebab (about 50.6%) and 30.2 µg/kg in grilled kofta (about 49%).

3.5. Effect of Marinades Based on Other Fermented Drinks on the Quality of Meat

Nowadays, alcoholic beverages, such as wine and beer, can also be used for the marination of meat [67]. Examples of the use of wine and beer for marinating meat are presented in Table 5.
Beer is used to season meat and used as a marinade, alone or in combination with other spices, to counteract oxidative processes and limit the formation of harmful compounds, such as HAAs and PAHs during high-temperature thermal treatment. Beer is a natural food ingredient rich in antioxidants that can protect meat lipids from oxidation [259]. Antioxidant activity results mainly from the presence of phenolic compounds that are capable of donating hydrogen radicals and pairing with lipid radicals formed at oxidation [103].
Unfiltered beers, compared to filtered beers, are generally richer in antioxidants and polyphenols, such as hydroxybenzoic acid and hydroxycinnamic acid. Research by Manful et al. [248] showed that marinating meat in these beers significantly inhibited the formation of HAAs during grilling. India dark beer contains antioxidant melanoidins [260], and wheat beers contain lemon and lime, which are a source of antioxidant limonoids and vitamin C [248]. In many studies [248,249,259,261], it has been shown that beer marinades in combination with herbs have an inhibitory effect on the oxidation of functional lipid components in grilled meats, such as the following: phosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylethanolamines, plasmalogen, fatty acids, diglycerides and monoacetyl diacylglycerides, conjugated fatty acids, and the formation of HAAs.
Beer-based marinades increase the total antioxidant activity, total phenolic content, and total oxidized terpene content, and they reduce the total oxidant content in marinated grilled elk meat and beef. It is also an effective technique for the protection of MUFA- and PUFA-enriched plasmalogens. However, India-ale-based marinated meats were found to be more effective compared to wheat-ale-based marinated meats [176,177,248,249,250]. Herbal and spice marinades based on unfiltered beer improve the quality, safety, and sensory attributes of grilled elk and beef meats, in line with the preferences of consumers [249]. Marinating meat reduced the number and content of volatile compounds originating from lipid oxidation processes and reduced the content of Maillard reaction products, especially pyrazine, which is a precursor of some heterocyclic amines. Consumers preferred meats marinated with beer rather than unmarinated ones, and sulphur derivatives and volatile terpenes resulted in better evaluations of aroma and taste.
Żochowska-Kujawska et al. [78,219] showed that marinating wild boar and deer meat for 4 or 7 days in dry red wine and then cooking them reduces their hardness and springiness and increases their tenderness and juiciness. Other authors [103,252] have observed that the use of beer- and wine-based marinades for marinating grilled pork reduces the amount of thermal loss, depending on the heat treatment time.
Studies conducted using red wine marinades [103], white wine [261], and Pilsner beer [103,261] have indicated that the strongest inhibitor of HAA formation in fried beef was beer marinade (Pilsner beer), reducing their level by over 80% compared to those of unmarinated meat.
Although beer marinades have lower antioxidant activity compared to wine marinades, their inhibition of HAA formation is more effective. Sugar and dextrins present in beer may also have a stronger inhibitory effect [103]. Fried, beer-marinated beef also received high notes in the sensory evaluation. Similar results were achieved by Viegas et al. [260] who investigated the effect of marinating pork in different types of beer on the formation of PAHs in charcoal-grilled pork. Black beer showed the greatest effect, reducing the PAHs in meat by approximately 90%. A non-alcoholic pilsner was less effective than one containing alcohol, which reduced PAHs by about 58% and 70%, respectively. Important components of marinades are additives, which influence and enhance the taste of meat, especially spices. A strong positive correlation was observed between the inhibitory effect of beer on the formation of total HAAs and its antioxidant activity [251].
Vidal et al. [249] found that the use of beer and wine in marinades increased the PAH content in grilled meat products. The authors of [252] suggest that this may be due to the high content of polyphenolic compounds contained in wine, such as anthocyanins and tannins, which play an important role in the formation of Maillard compounds and constitute an additional organic substrate subject to pyrolysis. The use of aluminium trays in the grilling process, constituting a barrier between the fire and the raw material, reduced the content of benzo[a]pyrene to a level below the detection limit of the method, and the PAHs were reduced by 86.3% and 70% in grilled meat marinated in wine and beer, respectively [252].
Wine, mainly red, is commonly used as an ingredient in marinades. Wine consists mainly of water, ethanol, organic acids, sugars, pigments, and various aromatic components, such as polyphenols, but it is a complex product containing over 600 substances [175]. There are several studies on which wine fraction (organic acids, ethanol, or polyphenols) is responsible for specific bioactive activities. Wine has a low pH (3.0–3.6) due to the presence of organic acids such as tartaric, malic, succinic, lactic, and acetic acids [262]. The high concentration of wine may be responsible for a significant reduction in pH, but at the same time, it provides meat products with antioxidants (phenolic compounds). Research by Brik and Knøchel [175] indicates that marinating meat in wine can improve its taste and texture as well as ensure safer food. The addition of wine can inhibit microbial growth and delay the oxidation of lipids and proteins [5,263].
The varietal diversity of wines, and therefore their composition, may influence the quality parameters of marinated meats in various ways. For example, Arcanjo et al. [84] found that Carbernet and Tempranillo wines, rich in procyanidins, are more effective against lipid oxidation than Isabel wine, rich in hydroxycinnamic acids (mainly caftaric acid), which better protect proteins against oxidation.
Compared to white wines, red wines have similar or slightly stronger antimicrobial effects [264]. In several studies [36,257,265], it has been shown that red wine has a pronounced antibacterial effect against Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Shigella sonnei, and Helicobacter pylori. Individual organic acids typical of wine, such as malic acid and tartaric acid, showed inhibitory effects on Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhimurium, and a synergistic effect of the combination of ethanol, organic acids, and a low pH was observed [264].
Just and Daeschel [266] showed that pathogenic bacteria survive much longer in grape juice than in red wine despite having the same pH, which indicates the influence of the type of acid and other metabolites formed during fermentation. Arcanjo et al. [84] showed that the specific phenolic composition and high organic acid content of Isabel wine may explain its effect on Enterobacteriaceae, while the presence of sugars in Carbernet and Tempranillo wines may promote the growth of LAB in wine-marinated beef. McKee et al. [267] reported that using red wine as a rinsing agent for chicken breasts significantly reduced the total counts of aerobic bacteria and coliforms.
Research by Brik and Knøchel [175] showed that marinating meat in red wine has an antibacterial effect on B. thermosphacta and C. jejuni and, to a lesser extent, on C. maltaromaticum and L. monocytogenes. The microbial procedure was more effective when the meat was immersed in red wine at 42 °C for 15 min before storage at 4 °C than when the meat was immersed in red wine at 4 °C throughout the experiment.
Marinating beef in red wine can increase the shelf life by reducing the total live count (TVC) and the Pseudomonas spp. that cause spoilage in raw meat [5].
Mantzourani et al. [254] showed that wine-based marinades containing the ethanol extract of pomegranate (Punica imprezaum L.), alone or in combination with thyme and oregano essential oils, increase the resistance of pork to spoilage. Even though the antibacterial or bactericidal activity of wine has been reported by scientists, its exact mechanism has not been explained [254].
A positive correlation was found [253] between the antioxidant properties of wine and the content of some HAAs. Red wine marinades reduce the formation of certain HAAs. However, the marinating time had a variable effect on the formation or inhibition of individual HAAs in wine-marinated fried chicken. Melo et al. [103] found that although wine marinades have higher antioxidant activity compared to beer marinades, the inhibition of HAA formation is less effective.
Antioxidant phenolic compounds in red wine can prevent the oxidation of heme pigments, but increasing the addition of wine to 10% did not enhance this effect. Istrati et al. [180,256] found marination had no effect on colour parameters, but their treatment had a significant impact on the percentage of Mb (myoglobin), MMb (metmyoglobin), and MbO2 (oxymyoglobin). The oxymyoglobin content increased after 14 days of marination, while the metmyoglobin level decreased.
Marinating beef in wine-based marinades with the addition of spice plants significantly reduced thermal losses and increased tenderness [180,256], which is related to changes in myofibrillar proteins. The electrophoretic pattern of muscle proteins showed a decrease in the molecular weight and relative density (%) of some protein fractions for marinated meat compared to those of a control sample. The mechanism of the tenderizing effect of acidic marinades, such as dry wine, involves several factors, including the weakening of structures due to the swelling of meat, increased proteolysis by cathepsins, and increased conversion of collagen to gelatin at low pH levels during thermal treatment [87]. The marinades affected connective tissue and myofibril proteins, causing an increase in the content of protein nitrogen, free amino acids, and hydroxyproline in cooked cuts of beef. Żochowska-Kujawska et al. [78,219] found that 4 or 7 days of marinating wild boar and deer meat in dry red wine slightly reduced the cross-sectional area of the fibres and the thickness of the endomysium and perimysium of the connective tissue, causing a significant reduction in hardness and an increase in tenderness and juiciness.

3.6. Effect of Marinades Based on Natural Ingredients on Meat Quality

In order to summarize the impact of marination with marinades based on natural ingredients, Figure 2 was prepared.

4. Conclusions

Marinating meat is a traditional process to improve the quality of meat (Figure 1). However, recently, due to the “clean label” trend, natural ingredients are being used instead of synthetic ingredients. In this review, they have been divided into four groups according to their origin: plant-based marinades; marinades based on seasonings; fermented dairy products; and other fermented drinks. The published research results show that the following are important: the proper selection of marinade ingredients for a specific type of meat, the marination method and conditions (time, temperature, and ratio of meat to marinade), and knowledge of the interactions between the ingredients in marinades. Marinades based on natural ingredients improve meat’s sensory quality, culinary properties, shelf life, and safety. This is possible due to the chemical compounds naturally present in marinade ingredients, such as the following: organic acids, phenolic compounds, and plant exogenous proteolytic enzymes, which are acceptable to consumers.
The addition of acidic, natural marinades increases the tenderness of the meat and thus makes it easier to consume, especially by the elderly. The utilization of natural ingredients may also enhance consumers’ willingness to buy, in light of the recent increasingly popular attitude towards the consumption of ‘clean-label’ products.
The gaps and future trends of this topic were identified. The literature lacks research results on the impact of marinades with the addition of natural ingredients on the nutritional value and biological potential of marinated meat products and dishes, including their health-promoting (functional) aspects. Limited data indicate a negative impact on sensory quality. Future research will probably include studies on the impact of marination with the use of other, so far unused natural ingredients, and the use of post-production waste for the composition of marinades, e.g., fruit pomace, which will reduce food waste and are in line to the “no waste” trend, while also potentially reducing marinade production costs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.C.-S. and A.L.; methodology, E.C.-S.; investigation, A.L., E.C.-S. and M.M.-W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L., E.C.-S. and M.M.-W.; writing—review and editing, A.L., E.C.-S. and M.M.-W.; visualization, E.C.-S.; supervision, E.C.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article. The data used to support the findings of this study can be made available by the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alvarado, C.; McKee, S. Marination to improve functional properties and safety of poultry meat. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2007, 16, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yusop, S.M.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Kerry, J.F.; Kerry, J.P. Effect of marinating time and low pH on marinade performance and sensory acceptability of poultry meat. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vlahova-Vangelova, D.B.; Balev, D.K.; Dragoev, S.G.; Kirisheva, G.D. Improvement of the technological and sensory properties of meat by whey marinating. Sci. Works Univ. Food Technol. 2016, 63, 7–13. Available online: http://uft-plovdiv.bg/site_files/file/scienwork/scienworks_2016/docs/original%20SWUFT201601103%20(final).pdf (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  4. González-González, L.; Luna-Rodríguez, L.; Carrilo-López, L.M.; Alarcón-Rojo, A.D.; García-Galicia, I.; Reyes-Villagrana, R. Ultrasound as an alternative to conventional marination: Acceptability and mass transfer. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 8675720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kargiotou, C.; Katsanidis, E.; Rhoades, J.; Kontominas, M.; Koutsoumanis, K. Efficacies of soy sauce and wine base marinades for controlling spoilage of raw beef. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jinap, S.; Hasnol, N.; Sanny, M.; Jahurul, M. Effect of organic acid ingredients in marinades containing different types of sugar on the formation of heterocyclic amines in grilled chicken. Food Control 2018, 84, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Latoch, A. Effect of meat marinating in kefir, yoghurt and buttermilk on the texture and color of pork steaks cooked sous-vide. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2020, 65, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Babikova, J.; Hoeche, U.; Boyd, J.; Noci, F. Nutritional, physical, microbiological, and sensory properties of marinated Irish sprat. Int. J. Gastr. Food Sci. 2020, 22, 100277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lawrence, M.T.; Lawrence, T.E. At-home methods for tenderizing meat using blade tenderisation, lime juice and pineapple puree. Meat Sci. 2021, 176, 08487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sengun, I.Y.; Turp, G.Y.; Cicek, S.N.; Avci, T.; Ozturk, B.; Kilic, G. Assessment of the effect of marination with organic fruit vinegars on safety and quality of beef. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 336, 108904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ünal, K.; Alagöz, E.; Çelik, I.; Sarıçoban, C. Marination with citric acid, lemon, and grapefruit affects the sensory, textural, and microstructure characteristics of poultry meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2022, 63, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mozuriene, E.; Bartkiene, E.; Krungleviciute, V.; Zadeike, D.; Juodeikiene, G.; Damasius, J.; Baltusnikiene, A. Effect of natural marinade based on lactic acid bacteria on pork meat quality parameters and biogenic amine contents. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 69, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Demir, H.; Celik, S.; Sezer, Y.C. Effect of ultrasonication and vacuum impregnation pretreatments on the quality of beef marinated in onion juice, a natural meat tenderizer. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2022, 28, 340–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Simitzis, P.; Zikou, F.; Progoulakis, D.; Theodorou, G.; Politis, I. A note on the effects of yoghurt acid whey Marination on the tenderness and oxidative stability of different meat types. Foods 2021, 10, 2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thanissery, R.; Smith, D.P. Marinade with thyme and orange oils reduces Salmonella Enteritidis and Campylobacter coli on inoculated broiler breast fillets and whole wings. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 1258–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, P.; Yadav, S.; Pathera, A.; Sharma, D. Effect of vacuum tumbling and red beetroot juice incorporation on quality characteristics of marinated chicken breast and leg meats. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 50, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aykin-Dinçer, E. Application of ultrasound-assisted vacuum impregnation for improving the diffusion of salt in beef cubes. Meat Sci. 2021, 176, 108469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rahman, S.M.E.; Sharmeen, I.; Pan, J.; Kong, D.; Xi, Q.; Du, Q.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Of, D.H.; Han, R. Marination ingredients on meat quality and safety—A review. Food Qual. Saf. 2023, 7, fyad027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aykin-Dinçer, E.; Dinçer, C. Modeling of sage (Salvia fruticosa miller) phenolics diffusion in meat cubes during ultrasound assisted vacuum impregnation. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karam, L.; Roustom, R.; Abiad, M.G.; El-Obeid, T.; Savvaidis, I.N. Combined effects of thymol, carvacrol and packaging on the shelf-life of marinated chicken. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 291, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Şengün, I.Y.; Goztepe, E.; Ozturk, B. Efficiency of marination liquids prepared with koruk (Vitis vinifera L.) on safety and some quality attributes of poultry meat. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 113, 108317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Balestra, F.; Petracci, M. Technofunctional ingredients for meat products: Current challenges. In Sustainable Meat Production and Processing; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 45–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chang, H.J.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, G.H.; Xu, X.L.; Li, C.B. Influence of weak organic acids and sodium chloride marination on characteristics of connective tissue collagen and textural properties of beef semitendinosus muscle. J. Texture Stud. 2010, 41, 279–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kadioğlu, P.; Karakaya, M.; Unal, K.; Babaoğlu, A.S. Technological and textural properties of spent chicken breast, drumstick and thigh meats as affected by marinating with pineapple fruit juice. Br. Poult. Sci. 2019, 60, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Latoch, A.; Libera, J. Quality and safety of pork steak marinated in fermented dairy products and sous-vide cooked. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tkacz, K.; Modzelewska-Kapituła, M.; Petracci, M.; Zduńczyk, W. Improving the quality of sous-vide beef from Holstein-Friesian bulls by different marinades. Meat Sci. 2021, 182, 108639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vişan, V.-G.; Chiş, M.S.; Păucean, A.; Mureșan, V.; Pușcaș, A.; Stan, L.; Vodnar, D.C.; Dulf, F.V.; Țibulcă, D.; Vlaic, B.A.; et al. Influence of marination with aromatic herbs and cold pressed oils on black angus beef meat. Foods 2021, 10, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abdel-Naeem, H.H.S.; Talaat, M.M.; Imre, K.; Morar, A.; Herman, V.; El-Nawawi, F.A.M. Structural changes, electrophoretic pattern, and quality attributes of camel meat treated with fresh ginger extract and papain powder. Foods 2022, 11, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Serdaroğlu, M.; Abdraimov, K.; Oenenc, A. The effects of marinating with citric acid solutions and grapefruit juice on cooking and eating quality of turkey breast. J. Muscle Foods 2007, 18, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, Y.; Singh, P.; Pandey, A.; Tanwar, V.K.; Kumar, R.R. Augmentation of meat quality attributes of spent hen breast muscle (Pectoralis major) by marination with lemon juice vis-a-vis ginger extract. J. Anim. Res. 2017, 7, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smith, D.P.; Action, J.C. Marination, cooking, and curing of poultry products. In Poultry Meat Processing; Owens, C.M., Alvarado, C.Z., Sams, A.R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 311–336. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yusop, S.M.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Kerry, J.F.; Kerry, J.P. Sensory evaluation of Indian-style marinated chicken by Malyasian and European naïve assessors. J. Sens. Stud. 2009, 24, 269–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Goli, T.; Ricci, J.; Bohuon, P.; Marchesseau, S.; Colligan, A. Influence of sodium chloride and pH during acidic margination on water retention and mechanical properties of turkey breast meat. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yusop, S.M.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Kerry, J.P. Marinating and enhancement of the nutritional content of processed meat products. In Processed Meats; Kerry, J.P., Kerry, J.F., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 421–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pathania, A.; Mckee, S.R.; Bilgili, S.F.; Sigh, M. Antimicrobial activity of commercial marinades against multiple strains of Salmonella spp. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nisiotou, A.; Chorianopoulos, N.G.; Gounadaki, A.; Panagou, E.Z.; Nychas, G.J.E. Effect of wine-based marinades on the behavior of Salmonella typhimurium and background flora in beef fillets. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 164, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bolumar, T.; Bindrich, U.; Toepfl, S.; Toldrá, F.; Heinz, V. Effect of electrohydraulic shockwave treatment on tenderness, muscle cathepsin and peptidase activities and microstructure of beef loin steaks from Holstein young bulls. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gómez, I.; Janardhanan, R.; Ibañez, F.C.; Beriain, M.J. The effects of processing and preservation technologies on meat quality: Sensory and nutritional aspects. Foods 2020, 9, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Munekata, P.E.S.; Pateiro, M.; Domínguez, R.; Nieto, G.; Kumar, M.; Dhama, K.; Lorenzo, J.M. Bioactive compounds from fruits as preservatives. Foods 2023, 12, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Al-Dalali, S.; Li, C.; Xu, B. Effect of frozen storage on the lipid oxidation, protein oxidation, and flavor profile of marinated raw beef meat. Food Chem. 2022, 376, 131881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alvarado, C.Z.; Sams, A.R. Early postmortem injection and tumble marination effects on broiler breast meat tenderness. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1035–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhuang, H.; Bowker, B. Effect of marination on lightness of broiler breast fillets varies with raw meat color attributes. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 69, 233–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Petracci, M.; Laghi, L.; Rocculi, P.; Rimini, S.; Panarese, V.; Cremonini, M.A.; Cavani, C. The use of sodium bicarbonate for marination of broiler breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barbut, S.; Zhang, L.; Marcone, M. Effects of pale, normal, and dark chicken breast meat on microstructure, extractable proteins, and cooking of marinated fillets. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Smith, D.M. Functional properties of muscle proteins in processed poultry products. In Poultry Meat Processing; Owens, C.M., Alvarado, C.Z., Sams, A.R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 231–244. [Google Scholar]
  46. Barbanti, D.; Pasquini, M. Influence of cooking conditions on cooking loss and tenderness of raw and marinated chicken breast meat. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fellenberg, M.A.; Espinoza, S.; Peña, I.; Alarcón, J. Antioxidant and bacteriostatic effects of the addition of extract of quillay polyphenols (Quillaja Saponaria) in the marinade of broiler chicken. Br. J. Poult. Sci. 2011, 13, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Smith, D.P.; Young, L.L. Marination pressure and phosphate effects on broiler breast fillet yield, tenderness, and color. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 2666–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Xiong, Y.L. Muscle protein. In Proteins in Food Processing; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publ. Ltd.: London, UK, 2004; pp. 100–122. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sebranek, J.G. Basic curing ingredients. In Ingredients in Meat Products; Tarté, R., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wynveen, E.J.; Browker, A.L.; Grant, A.L.; Lamkey, J.M.; Fennewalk, K.J.; Henson, L.; Gerrard, D.E. Pork quality is affected by early postmortem phosphate and bicarbonate injection. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Woelfel, R.L.; Sams, A.R. Marination performance of pale broiler breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2001, 80, 1519–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alvarado, C.Z.; Sams, A.R. Injection marination strategies for remediation of pale, exudative broiler breast meat. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 1332–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sheard, P.R.; Tali, A. Injection of salt, tripolyphosphate, and bicarbonate marinade solutions to improve the yield and tenderness of cooked pork loin. Meat Sci. 2004, 68, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sen, A.R.; Naveena, B.M.; Muthukumar, M.; Babji, Y.; Murthy, T.R.K. Effect of chilling, polyphosphate, and bicarbonate on quality characteristics of broiler breast meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aktaş, N.; Aksu, M.İ.; Kaya, M. The influence of marination with different salt concentrations on the tenderness, water holding capacity and bound water content of beef. Tur. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2003, 27, 1207–1211. Available online: https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/veterinary/vol27/iss5/24 (accessed on 27 September 2023).
  57. Wongmaneepratip, W.; Vangnai, K. Effects of oil types and pH on carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in grilled chicken. Food Control 2017, 79, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Farhadian, A.; Jinap, S.; Faridah, A.; Zaidul, I.S.M. Effects of marinating on the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (benzo[a]pyrene. benzo[b]fluoranthene and fluoranthene) in grilled beef meat. Food Control 2012, 28, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bhat, Z.F.; Morton, J.D.; Mason, S.L.; Bekhit, A.E.D.A. Applied and emerging methods for meat tenderization: A comparative perspective. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 841–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Scanga, J.A.; Delmore, R.J., Jr.; Ames, R.P.; Belk, K.E.; Tatum, J.D.; Smith, G.C. Palatability of beef steaks marinated with solutions of calcium chloride, phosphate, and (or) beef-flavoring. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yoon, Y.; Geornaras, I.; Mukherjee, A.; Belk, K.E.; Scanga, J.A.; Smith, G.C.; Sofos, J.N. Effects of cooking methods and chemical tenderizers on survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in ground beef patties. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rupasinghe, R.A.; Alahakoon, A.U.; Alakolanga, A.W.; Jayasena, D.D.; Jo, C. Oxidative stability of vacuum-packed chicken wings marinated with fruit juices during frozen storage. Food Sci. Anim. Res. 2022, 42, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nour, V. Effect of sour cherry or plum juice marinades on quality characteristics and oxidative stability of pork loin. Foods 2022, 11, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Beltran-Cotta, L.A.; Trevisan Passos, R.S.F.; Costa, N.P.; Barreto, B.G.; Veloso, A.C.; Costa, M.; da Silva, A.; da Costa, M.P.; Cavalheiro, C.P. Use of yellow mombin (Spondias mombin L.) in marination: Effect on quality properties of Boston butt pork during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2023, 24, 109257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yang, J.; Lee, D.; Afaisen, S.; Gadi, R. Inactivation by lemon juice of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Listeria monocytogenes in beef marinating for the ethnic food kelaguen. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 16, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fouladkhah, A.; Geornaras, I.; Nychas, G.-J.; Sofos, J.N. Anitilisterial properties of marinades during refrigerated storage and microwabe oven reheating against post-cooking inoculated chicken breast meat. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, M285–M289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lytou, A.E.; Panagou, E.Z.; Nychas, G.-J.N. Effect of different marinating conditions on the evolution of spoilage microbiota and metabolomic profile of chicken breast fillets. Food Microbiol. 2017, 66, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Siroli, L.; Baldi, G.; Soglia, F.; Bukvicki, D.; Patrignani, F.; Petracci, M.; Lanciotti, R. Use of essential oils to increase the safety and the quality of marinated pork loin. Foods 2020, 9, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Augustyńska-Prejsnar, A.; Ormian, M.; Hanus, P.; Kluz, M.; Sokołowicz, Z.; Rudy, M. Effects of marinating breast muscles of slaughter pheasants with acid whey, buttermilk, and lemon juice on quality parameters and product safety. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 5313496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Augustyńska-Prejsnar, A.; Hanus, P.; Sokołowicz, Z.; Kačániová, M. Assessment of technological characteristics and microbiological quality of marinated turkey meat with the use of dairy products and lemon juice. Anim. Biosci. 2021, 34, 2003–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Żochowska-Kujawska, J.; Kotowicz, M.; Lachowicz, K.; Sobczak, M. Influence of marinades on shear force, structure and sensory properties of home-style jerky. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2017, 16, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jeong, K.; O, H.; Shin, S.Y.; Kim, Y.S. Effects of different marination conditions on quality, microbiological properties, and sensory characteristics of pork ham cooked by the sous-vide method. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2018, 38, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Burke, R.M.; Monahan, F.J. The tenderization of shin beef using a lemon juice marinade. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cho, J.; Kim, H.J.; Kwon, J.S.; Kim, H.J.; Jang, A. Effect of marination with black currant juice on the formation of biogenic amines in pork belly during refrigerated storage. Food Sci. Anim. Res. 2021, 41, 763–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ünal, K.; Alp, H.; Babaoğlu, A.S.; Karakaya, M. Different properties of chicken and turkey breast fillets marinated with fruit juices. Fleischwirtschaft 2020, 2, 88–93. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ali-Babaoglu/publication/342624251_Different_properties_of_chicken_and_turkey_breast_fillets_marinated_with_fruit_juices/links/5efd8685a6fdcc4ca4449c2e/Different-properties-of-chicken-and-turkey-breast-fillets-marinated-with-fruit-juices.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  76. Ozturk, B.; Sengun, I.Y. Inactivation effect of marination liquids prepared with koruk juice and dried koruk pomace on Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes inoculated on meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 304, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Khan, M.R.; Busquets, R.; Azam, M. Blueberry, raspberry, and strawberry extracts reduce the formation of carcinogenic heterocyclic amines in fried camel, beef and chicken meats. Food Control 2021, 123, 107852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Żochowska-Kujawska, J.; Lachowicz, K.; Sobczak, M. Effects of fibre type and kefir, wine lemon, and pineapple marinades on texture and sensory properties of wild boar and deer longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Borodai, A.B.; Khomych, G.P.; Horobets, O.M.; Levchenko, Y.V.; Matsuk, Y.A. Use of fruit raw materials as sources of oraganic acids in the technology of small flat semi-finished. J. Chem. Technol. 2022, 30, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kalahrodi, M.M.; Baghaei, H.; Emadzadeh, B.; Bolandi, M. Degradation of myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic proteins as a function of marinating time and marinade type and their impact on textural quality and sensory attributes of m. semitendinosus beefsteak. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Caliskan, H.; Gümüş, D.; Kizil, M. Reducing effects of tea marinades on heterocyclic aromatic amines formation in chicken thigh meat: Focus on white and oolong tea. J. Food Measurem. Characteriz. 2023, 17, 2688–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kim, Y.J.; Jin, S.K.; Park, W.Y.; Kim, B.W.; Joo, S.T.; Yang, H.S. The effect of garlic or onion marinade on the lipid oxidation and meat quality of pork during cold storage. J. Food Qual. 2010, 33, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. He, F.; Kim, H.W.; Hwang, K.E.; Song, D.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Ham, Y.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Yeo, I.J.; Jung, T.J.; Kim, C.J. Effect of ginger extract and citric acid on the tenderness of duck breast muscles. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2015, 35, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Arcanjo, N.M.O.; Morcuende, D.; Andrade, M.J.; Padilla, P.; Madruga, M.S.; Estévez, M. Bioactivities of wine components on marinated beef during aging. J. Func. Foods 2019, 57, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dilek, N.M.; Babaoğlu, A.S.; Unal, K.; Ozbek, C.; Pırlak, L.; Karakaya, M. Marination with aronia, grape and hawthorn vinegars affects the technological, textural, microstructural and sensory properties of spent chicken meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2023, 64, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mohd Azmi, S.I.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, N.; Sazili, A.Q.; Lee, S.-J.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R. Application of plant proteases in meat tenderization: Recent trends and future prospects. Foods 2023, 12, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Berge, P.; Ertbjerg, P.; Larsen, L.M.; Astruc, T.; Vignon, X.; Møller, A.J. Tenderization of beef by lactic acid injected at different times postmortem. Meat Sci. 2001, 57, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Komoltri, P.; Pakdeechanuan, P. Effects of marinating ingredients on physicochemical, microstructural and sensory properties of golek chicken. Int. Food Res. J. 2012, 19, 1449–1455. Available online: http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/19%20(04)%202012/23%20IFRJ%2019%20(04)%202012%20Pakdeechanuan%20(023).pdf (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  89. Goli, T.; Bohuon, P.; Ricci, J.; Trystram, G.; Collignan, A. Mass transfer dynamics during the acidic margination of turkey meat. J. Food Eng. 2011, 104, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Samant, S.S.; Crandall, P.G.; O’Bryan, C.; Lingbeck, J.M.; Martin, E.M.; Seo, H.S. Sensory impact of chemical and natural antimicrobials on poultry products: A review. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. González-Fandos, E.; Herrera, B.; Maya, N. Efficacy of citric acid against Listeria monocytogenes attached to poultry skin during refrigerated storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Schirmer, B.C.; Langsrud, S. A dissolving CO2 headspace combined with organic acids prolongs the shelf-life of fresh pork. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tiburski, J.H.; Rosenthal, A.; Deliza, R.; Godoy, R.L.; Pacheco, S. Nutritional properties of yellow mombin (Spondias mombin L.) pulp. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 2326–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Maldonado-Astudillo, Y.I.; Alia-Tejacal, I.; Núñez-Colín, C.A.; Jiménez-Hernández, J.; Pelayo-Zaldívar, C.; López-Martínez, V.; Valle-Guadarrama, S. Postharvest physiology and technology of Spondias purpurea L. and S. mombin L. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 174, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Naveena, B.M.; Sen, A.R.; Vaithiyanathan, S.; Babji, Y.; Kondaiah, N. Comparative efficacy of pomegranate juice, pomegranate rind powder extract and BHT as antioxidants in cooked chicken patties. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 1304–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Vaithiyanathan, S.; Naveena, B.M.; Muthukumar, M.; Girish, P.S.; Kondaiah, N. Effect of dipping in pomegranate (Punica granatum) fruit juice phenolic solution on the shelf life of chicken meat under refrigerated storage (4 °C). Meat Sci. 2011, 88, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nadzirah, K.; Zainal, S.; Noriham, A.; Normah, I. Application of bromelain powder produced from pineapple crowns in tenderising beef round cuts. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 1590–1599. Available online: http://ifrj.upm.edu.my/23%20(04)%202016/(32).pdf (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  98. Xu, L.; Zhu, M.J.; Liu, X.M.; Cheng, J.R. Inhibitory effect of mulberry (Morus alba) polyphenol on the lipid and protein oxidation of dried minced pork slices during heat processing and storage. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 91, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Espada-Bellido, E.; Ferreiro-González, M.; Carrera, C.; Palma, M.; Barroso, C.G.; Barbero, G.F. Optimization of the ultrasound-assisted extraction of anthocyanins and total phenolic compounds in mulberry (Morus nigra) pulp. Food Chem. 2017, 219, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhu, M.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, T.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Xie, M. Comparison of (poly) phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of pomace extracts from kiwi and grape juice. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Al-Zoreky, N.S. Antimicrobial activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit peels. Int. J. Microbiol. 2009, 134, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bazargani-Gilani, B.; Aliakbarlu, J.; Tajik, H. Effect of pomegranate juice dipping and chitosan coating enriched with Zataria multiflora Boiss essential oil on the shelf-life of chicken meat during refrigerated storage. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 29, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Melo, A.; Viegas, O.; Petisca, C.; Pinho, O.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Effect of beer/red wine marinades on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in pan-fried beef. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 10625–10632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Jongberg, S.; Tørngren, M.A.; Gunvig, A.; Skibsted, L.H.; Lund, M.N. Effect of green tea or rosemary extract on protein oxidation in Bologna type sausages prepared from oxidatively stressed pork. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Perko-Makela, P.; Koljonen, M.; Miettinen, M.; Hanninen, M. Survival of Campylobacter jejuni in marinated and nonmarinated chicken products. J. Food Saf. 2000, 20, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mani-Lόpez, E.; García, H.S.; Lόpez-Malo, A. Organic acids as antimicrobials to control Salmonella in meat and poultry products. Food Res. Int. 2012, 45, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Helander, I.M.; Mattila-Sandholm, T. Fluorometric assessment of Gram-negative bacterial permeabilization. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Alakomi, H.L.; Paananen, A.; Suihko, M.L.; Helander, I.M.; Saarela, M. Weakening effect of cell permeabilizers on gram-negative bacteria causing biodeterioration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 4695–4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Lund, P.; Tramonti, A.; De Biase, D. Coping with low pH: Molecular strategies in neutralophilic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 1091–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Nogueira, M.C.L.; Oyarzabal, O.A.; Gombas, D.E. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella in cranberry, lemon, and lime juice concentration. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 1637–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Jung, Y.S.; Beuchat, L.R. Sensitivity of multidrug-resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 to organic acids and thermal inactivation in liquid egg products. Food Microbiol. 2000, 17, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Álvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Fernández, A.; Bernardo, A.; López, M. Acid tolerance in Salmonella typhimurium induced by culturing in the presence of organic acids at different growth temperatures. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Olaimat, A.N.; Osaili, T.M.; Shaker, R.R.; Elabedeen, N.Z.; Jaradat, Z.W.; Abushelaibi, A.; Holley, R.A. Use of acetic and citric acids to control Salmonella typhimurium in tahini (sesame paste). Food Microbiol. 2014, 42, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Fernández, A.; Álvarez-Ordóñez, A.; López, M.; Bernardo, A. Effects of organic acids on thermal inactivation of acid and cold stressed Enterococcus faecium. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lu, H.J.; Breidt, F.; Pérez-Díaz, I.M.; Osborne, J.A. Antimicrobial effects of weak acids on the survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 under anaerobic conditions. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 893–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Björkroth, J. Microbiological ecology of marinated meat products. Meat Sci. 2005, 70, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Vaquero, M.J.R.; Alberto, M.R.; de Nadra, M.C.M. Antibacterial effect of phenolic compounds from different wines. Food Control 2007, 18, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Theron, M.M.; Lues, J.F.R. Organic acids and meat preservation: A review. Food Rev. Int. 2007, 23, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Friedman, M.; Henika, P.R.; Levin, C.E.; Mandrell, R.E. Recipes for antimicrobial wine marinades against Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, M207–M213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Bolton, D.J.; Meredith, H.; Walsh, D.; McDowell, D.A. The effect of chemical treatments in laboratory and broiler plant studies on the microbial status and shelf-life of poultry. Food Control 2014, 36, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Del Rio, E.; Panizo-Morán, M.; Prieto, M.; Alonso-Calleja, C.; Capita, R. Effect of various chemical decontamination treatments on natural microflora and sensory characteristics of poultry. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 115, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bjorkroth, K.J.; Geisen, R.; Schillinger, U.; Weiss, N.; De Vos, P.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Korkeala, H.J.; Vandamme, P. Characterization of Leuconostoc gasicomitatum sp. nov., associated spoiled raw tomato-marinated broiler meat strips packaged under modified-atmosphere condition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3764–3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Cueva, C.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Martín-Álvarez, P.J.; Bills, G.; Vicente, M.F.; Basilio, A.; Rivas, C.L.; Requena, T.; Rodríguez, J.M.; Bartolomé, B. Antimicrobial activity of phenolic acids against commensal, probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kim, Y.J.; Jin, S.K.; Yang, H.S. Effect of dietary garlic bulb and husk on the physicochemical properties of chicken meat. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, C.; Xie, Y.; Qi, J.; Yu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Dai, C.; Zhou, G. Effect of Tea Marinades on the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in charcoal-grilled chicken wings. Food Control 2018, 93, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wada, M.; Suzuki, T.; Yaguti, Y.; Hasegawa, T. The effect of pressure treatments with kiwi fruit protease on adult cattle semitendinosus muscle. Food Chem. 2002, 78, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cheok, C.Y.; Chin, N.L.; Yusof, Y.A.; Mustapa Kamal, S.M.; Sazili, A.Q. Effect of marinating temperatures on physical changes of traditionally marinated beef satay. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2011, 35, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Eom, S.H.; Lee, S.H.; Chun, Y.G.; Kim, B.K.; Park, D.J. Texture softening of beef and chicken by enzyme injection process. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2015, 35, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Takei, R.; Hayashi, M.; Umene, S.; Narita, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Masunaga, H. Changes in physical properties of enzyme-treated beef before and after mastication. J. Texture Stud. 2015, 46, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Toldrá, F.; Reig, M. Enzymes in meat and fish. In Improving and Tailoring Enzymes for Food Quality and Functionality; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2015; pp. 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Botinestean, C.; Keenan, D.F.; Kerry, J.P.; Hamill, R.M. The effect of thermal treatments including sous-vide, blast freezing and their combinations on beef tenderness of M. semitendinosus steaks targeted at elderly consumers. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 74, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tantamacharik, T.; Carne, A.; Agyei, D.; Birch, J.; Bekhit, A.E.D.A. Use of plant proteolytic enzymes for meat processing. In Biotechnological Applications of Plant Proteolytic Enzymes; Guevara, M., Daleo, G., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 43–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gerelt, B.; Ikeuchi, Y.; Suzuki, A. Meat tenderization by proteolytic enzymes after osmotic dehydration. Meat Sci. 2000, 56, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gokoglu, N.; Yerlikaya, P.; Ucak, I.; Yatmaz, H.A. Effect of bromelain and papain enzymes addition on physicochemical and textural properties of squid (Loligo vulgaris). J. Food Meas. Charact. 2016, 11, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bekhit, A.A.; Hopkins, D.L.; Geesink, G.; Bekhit, A.A.; Franks, P. Exogenous proteases for meat tenderization. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 1012–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Barekat, S.; Soltanizadeh, N. Improvement of meat tenderness by simultaneous application of high-intensity ultrasonic radiation and papain treatment. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 39, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ketnawa, S.; Rawdkuen, S.; Chaiwut, P. Two phase partitioning and collagen hydrolysis of bromelain from pineapple peel Nang Lae cultivar. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 52, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ashie, I.N.A.; Sorensen, T.L.; Nielsen, P.M. Effect of papain and a microbial enzyme on meat proteins and beef tenderness. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 2138–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ionescu, A.; Aprodu, I.; Pascaru, G. Effect of papain and bromelin on muscle and collagen proteins in beef meat. Annal. Univ. Dunarea Galati Fascicle VI Food Technol. 2008, 31, 9–16. Available online: https://www.gup.ugal.ro/ugaljournals/index.php/food/article/view/3681 (accessed on 6 September 2023).
  140. Tornberg, E. Effects of heat on meat proteins—Implications on structure and quality of meat products. Meat Sci. 2005, 70, 493–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Becker, A.; Boulaaba, A.; Pingen, S.; Krischek, C.; Klein, G. Low temperature cooking of pork meat—Physicochemical and sensory aspects. Meat Sci. 2016, 118, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Madhusankha, G.G.M.P.; Thilakarathna, R.C.N. Meat tenderization mechanism and the impact of plant exogenous proteases: A review. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 102967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Karam, L.; Chehab, R.; Osaili, T.M.; Savvaidis, I.N. Antimicrobial effect of thymol and carvacrol added to a vinegar-based marinade for controlling spoilage of marinated beef (Shawarma) stored in air or vacuum packaging. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 332, 108769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sengun, I.Y.; Kilic, G.; Ozturk, B. Screening physicochemical, microbiological and bioactive properties of fruit vinegars produced from various raw materials. Food Sci. Biotech. 2020, 29, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ünal, K.; Babaoğlu, A.S.; Karakaya, M. Improving the textural and microstructural quality of cow meat by black chokeberry, grape, and hawthorn vinegar-based marination. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Özen, M.; Ozdemir, N.; Ertekin-Filiz, B.; Budak, N.H.; Kök-Tas, T. Sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) vinegars produced from fresh fruit or juice concentrate: Bioactive compounds, volatile aroma compounds and antioxidant capacities. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 12566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Choi, Y.S.; Hwang, K.E.; Jeong, T.J.; Kim, Y.B.; Jeon, K.H.; Kim, E.M.; Sung, J.M.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, C.J. Comparative study on the effects of boiling, steaming, grilling, microwaving and superheated steaming on quality characteristics of marinated chicken steak. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Samad, A.; Azlan, A.; Ismail, A. Therapeutic effects of vinegar: A review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2016, 8, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhu, H.; Zhu, J.; Wang, L.; Li, Z. Development of a SPME-GC-MS method for the determination of volatile compounds in Shanxi aged vinegar and its analytical characterization by aroma wheel. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Bakir, S.; Devecioglu, D.; Kayacan, S.; Toydemir, G.; Karbancioglu-Guler, F.; Capanoglu, E. Investigating the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of different vinegars. Europ. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 2083–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hazra, S.; Biswas, S.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Kumar Das, S.; Khan, A. Quality of cooked ground buffalo meat treated with the crude extracts of Moringa oleifera (Lam.) leaves. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Ismail, M.A.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R. Application of Ziziphus Jujube (Red Date), Camellia Sinensis (Black Tea) and Aleurites Moluccana (Candle Nut) marinades as beef meat tenderizer. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. U-Chupaj, J.; Malila, Y.; Petracci, M.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W. Effect of tumbling marination on marinade uptake of chicken carcass and parts quality. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2017, 19, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kim, H.; Ramachandraiah, K.; Yun, Y.C.; Kwon, I.S.; Park, H.N.; Kim, H.-Y.; Lee, E.-J.; Hong, G.-P. Advanced tenderization of brine injected pork loin as affected by ionic strength and high pressure. Food Sci. Anim. Res. 2020, 40, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Yogesh, K.; Jha, S.N.; Yadav, D.N. Antioxidant activities of Murraya koenigii (L.) spreng berry extract: Application in refrigerated (4 ± 1 °C) stored meat homogenates. Agric. Res. 2012, 1, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Gök, V.; Bor, Y. Effect of marination with fruit and vegetable juice on the some quality characteristics of Turkey breast meat. Br. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 18, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Gamage, H.C.; Mutucumarana, R.K.; Andrew, M.S. Effect of marination method and holding time on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of broiler meat. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 12, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Aziz, M.; Karboune, S. Natural antimicrobial/antioxidant agents in meat and poultry products as well as fruits and vegetables: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 486–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Roudbari, Z.; Coort, S.L.; Kutmon, M.; Eijssen, L.; Melius, J.; Sadkowski, T.; Evelo, C.T. Identification of biological pathways contributing to marbling in skeletal muscle to improve beef cattle breeding. Front. Genet. 2020, 10, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Cordeiro, T.; Viegas, O.; Silva, M.; Martins, Z.E.; Fernandes, I.; Ferreira, I.M.L.P.V.O.; Pinho, O.; Mateus, N.; Calhau, C. Inhibitory effect of vinegars on the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in charcoal-grilled pork. Meat Sci. 2020, 176, 108083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Patrignani, F.; Siroli, L.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Innovative strategies based on the use of essential oils and their components to improve safety, shelf-life and quality of minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 46, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Siroli, L.; Patrignani, F.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Effects of sub-lethal concentrations of thyme and oregano essential oils, carvacrol, thymol, citral and trans-2-hexenal on membrane fatty acid composition and volatile molecule profile of Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis. Food Chem. 2015, 182, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Grant, A.; Parveen, S. All natural and clean-label preservatives and antimicrobial agents used during poultry processing and packaging. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Kaewthong, P.; Wattanachant, C.; Wattanachant, S. Improving the quality of barbecued culled-dairy-goat meat by marination with plant juices and sodium bicarbonate. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 58, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Linares, M.B.; Garrido, M.D.; Martins, C.; Patarata, L. Efficacies of garlic and L. sakei in wine-based marinades for controlling Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in chouriço de vinho, a dry sausage made from wine-marinated pork. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, M719–M724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Choi, Y.M.; Bae, Y.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, B.C.; Rhee, M.S. Effects of supercritical carbon dioxide treatment against generic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhimurium, and E.coli 0157:H7 in marinades and marinated pork. Meat Sci. 2009, 82, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Lunde, K.; Egelandsdal, B.; Choinski, J.; Mielinik, M.; Flåtten, A.; Kubberød, E. Marinating as a technology to shift sensory thresholds in ready-to-eat entire male pork meat. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 1264–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. O’Neill, C.M.; Cruz-Romero, M.C.; Duffy, G.; Kerry, J.P. Improving marinade absorption and shelf life of vacuum packed marinated pork chops through the application of high pressure processing as a hurdle. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 21, 100350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yusop, S.M.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Preuß, M.; Weber, H.; Kerry, J.F.; Kerry, J.P. Assessment of nanoparticle paprika oleoresin on marinating performance and sensory acceptance of poultry meat. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. İncili, G.K.; Akgöl, M.; Aydemir, M.E.; Alan, S.; Mutlu, M.; İlhak, O.İ.; Öksüztepe, G. Fate of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Typhimurium in homemade marinade and on marinated chicken drumsticks, wings and breast meat. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 134, 110231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Hajar-Azhari, S.; Daud, N.; Muhialdin, B.J.; Joghee, N.; Kadum, H.; Hussin, A.S.M. Lacto-fermented garlic sauce improved the quality and extended the shelf life of lamb meat under the chilled condition. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2023, 395, 110190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Zakariené, G.; Rokaityté, A.; Ramonaité, S.; Novoslavskij, A.; Mulkyté, K.; Zaborskiené, G.; Malakauskas, M. The antimicrobial effect of spice-based marinades against campylobacter jejuni on contaminated fresh broiler wings. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M627–M634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Sepahpour, S.; Selamat, J.; Khatib, A.; Manap, M.Y.A.; Razis, A.F.A.; Hajeb, P. Inhibitory effect of mixture herbs/spices on formation of heterocyclic amines and mutagenic activity of grilled beef. Food Addit. Contam. 2018, 35, 1911–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Yu, Y.; Chenga, Y.; Wanga, C.; Huanga, S.; Leia, Y.; Huanga, M.; Zhang, X. Inhibitory effect of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) extract marinades on the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in roasted duck wings. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 1128–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Birk, T.; Knøchel, S. Fate of food-associated bacteria in pork as affected by marinade, temperature, and ultrasound. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Manful, C.F.; Pham, T.H.; Nadeem, M.; Wheeler, E.; Warren, K.J.; Vidal, N.P.; Thomas, R.H. Assessing unfiltered beer-based marinades effects on ether and ester linked phosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylethanolamines in grilled beef and moose meat. Meat Sci. 2021, 171, 108271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Manful, C.F.; Pham, T.H.; Vidal, N.P.; Nadeem, M.; Wheeler, E.; Adigun, O.A.; Ayinla, O.A.; Keough, D.N.; Thomas, R.H. Effects of beer-based marinades on the plasmalogen content and composition of grilled ruminant meats. J. Food Drug Anal. 2021, 29, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Rimini, S.; Petracci, M.; Smith, D.P. The use of thyme and orange essential oils blend to improve quality traits of marinated chicken meat. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2096–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Gibis, M.; Weiss, J. Inhibitory effect of marinades with hibiscus extract on formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines and sensory quality of fried beef patties. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Istrati, D.; Ciuciu, A.M.; Vizireanu, C.; Ionescu, A.; Carballo, J. Impact of spices and wine-based marinades on tenderness, fragmentation of myofibrillar proteins and color stability in bovine biceps femoris muscle. J. Texture Stud. 2015, 46, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Jinap, S.; Iqbal, S.Z.; Selvam, R.M.P. Effect of selected local spices marinades on the reduction of heterocyclic amines in grilled beef (satay). LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Jinap, S.; Iqbal, S.Z.; Talib, N.H.; Hasnol, N.D.S. Heterocyclic aromatic amines in deep fried lamb meat: The influence of spices marination and sensory quality. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1411–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Lai, Y.-W.; Lee, Y.-T.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Chen, B.-H. Formation and inhibition of heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ground pork during marinating. Foods 2022, 11, 3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Liu, X.; Xing, W.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; Cai, K.; Xu, B.; Chen, C. Assessing impacts of additives on particulate matter and volatile organic compounds produced from the grilling of meat. Foods 2022, 11, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Alakomi, H.-L.; Maukonen, J.; Honkapaa, K.; Storgards, E.; Quirin, K.-W.; Yang, B.; Saarela, M. Effect of plant antimicrobial agents containing marinades on storage stability and microbiological quality of broiler chicken cuts packed with modified atmosphere packaging. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 1689–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kim, H.J.; Cho, J.; Kim, D.; Park, T.S.; Jin, S.K.; Hur, S.J.; Lee, S.K.; Jang, A. Effects of gochujang (Korean red pepper paste) marinade on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation in charcoal-grilled pork belly. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2021, 41, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Mielnik, M.B.; Sem, S.; Egelandsdal, B.; Skrede, G. By-products from herbs essential oil production as ingredient in marinade for turkey thighs. LWT 2008, 41, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Mutegi, R.T.; Patimakorn, P. Application of probiotic strains to extend shelf-life of marinated beef and pork meats. Int. Food Res. J. 2020, 27, 1067–1075. Available online: http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/27%20(06)%202020/DONE%20-%2010%20-%20IFRJ19873.R3.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2023).
  189. Tkacz, K.; Tylewicz, U.; Pietrzak-Fiećko, R.; Modzelewska-Kapituła, M. The Effect of marinating on fatty acid composition of sous-vide semimembranosus muscle from holstein-friesian bulls. Foods 2022, 11, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Al-Dalali, S.; Li, C.; Xu, B. Evaluation of the effect of marination in different seasoning recipes on the flavor profile of roasted beef meat via chemical and sensory analysis. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 46, e13962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Sokołowicz, Z.; Augustyńska-Prejsnar, A.; Krawczyk, J.; Kačániová, M.; Kluz, M.; Hanus, P.; Topczewska, J. Technological and sensory quality and microbiological safety of RIR chicken breast meat marinated with fermented milk products. Animals 2021, 11, 3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Okpala, C.O.R.; Juchniewicz, S.; Leicht, K.; Korzeniowska, M.; Guiné, R.P.F. Antioxidant, Organoleptic and Physicochemical Changes in Different Marinated Oven-Grilled Chicken Breast Meat. Foods 2022, 11, 3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Nassu, R.T.; Goncalves, A.G.; Pereira, M.A.A.; Beserra, J.F. Oxidative stability of fermented goat meat sausage with different levels of natural antioxidant. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Zhang, H.; Wu, J.; Guo, X. Effects of antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of spice extracts on raw chicken meat quality. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2016, 5, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Shahidi, F.; Hossain, A. Bioactives in spices, and spice oleoresins: Phytochemicals and their beneficial effects in food preservation and health promotion. J. Food Bioact. 2018, 3, 8–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Martini, S.; Cattivelli, A.; Conte, A.; Tagliazucchi, D. Black, green, and pink pepper affect differently lipid oxidation during cooking and in vitro digestion of meat. Food Chem. 2021, 350, 129246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Okpala, C.O.R.; Juchniewicz, S.; Leicht, K.; Skendrović, H.; Korzeniowska, M.; Guiné, R.P.F. Quality attributes of different marinated oven-griller pork neck meat. Int. J. Food Prop. 2023, 26, 453–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zhang, Y.; Henning, S.M.; Lee, R.-P.; Huang, J.; Zerlin, A.; Li, Z.; Heber, D. Turmeric and black pepper spices decrease lipid peroxidation in meat patties during cooking. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 66, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Boskovic, M.; Djordjevic, J.; Glisic, M.; Ciric, J.; Janjic, J.; Zdravkovic, N.; Krnjaic, D.; Baltic, M.Z. The effect of oregano (Origanum vulgare) essential oil on four Salmonella serovars and shelf life of refrigerated pork meat packaged under vacuum and modified atmosphere. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 44, e14311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wei, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhao, S.; Li, S.; Zhang, J. Research Note: Preservative effect of compound spices extracts on marinated chicken. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Onopiuk, A.; Kołodziejczak, K.; Marcinkowska-Lesiak, M.; Wojtasik-Kalinowska, I.; Szpicer, A.; Stelmasiak, A.; Poltorak, A. Influence of plant extract addition to marinades on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation in grilled pork meat. Molecules 2022, 27, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Boskovic, M.; Djordjevic, J.; Ivanovic, J.; Janjic, J.; Zdravkovic, N.; Glisic, M.; Glamoclija, N.; Baltic, B.; Djordjevic, V.; Baltic, M. Inhibition of Salmonella by thyme essential oil and its effect on microbiological and sensory properties of minced pork meat packaged under vacuum and modified atmosphere. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 258, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Fellenberg, M.A.; Carlos, F.; Peña, I.; Ibáñez, R.A.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E. Oxidative quality and color variation during refrigeration (4 °C) of rainbow trout fillets marinated with different natural antioxidants from oregano, quillaia and rosemary. Agric. Food Sci. 2020, 29, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Rohod, R.V.; de Moraes Garcia, E.R.; Jorge de Lara, A.F. Natural extracts marination in chicken breast fillets. Food Technol. Cienc. Rural 2023, 53, e20210813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Marmion, M.; Soro, A.B.; Whyte, P.; Scannell, A.G.M. Green label marinades: A solution to salmonella and campylobacter in chicken products? Heliyon 2023, 9, e17655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Hasyimah, A.K.N.; Jinap, S.; Sanny, M.; Ainaatul, A.I.; Sukor, R.; Jambari, N.N.; Nordin, N.; Jahurul, M.H.A. Effects of honey-spices marination on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic amines formation in gas-grilled beef satay. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2022, 42, 1620–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Ruiz, A.; Williams, S.K.; Djeri, N.; Hinton, A.; Rodrick, G.E. Nisin, rosemary, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid affect the growth of Listeria monocytogenes on ready-to-eat turkey ham stored at four degrees Celsius for sixty-three days. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 1765–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Lucera, A.; Costa, C.; Conte, A.; Del Nobile, M.A. Food applications of natural antimicrobial compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Jayasena, D.D.; Jo, C. Essential oils as potential antimicrobial agents in meat and meat products: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 34, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Van Haute, S.; Raes, K.; Van der Meeren, P.; Sampers, I. The effect of cinnamon, oregano and thyme essential oils in marinade on the microbial shelf life of fish and meat products. Food Control 2016, 68, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Pateiro, M.; Barba, F.J.; Domínguez, R.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A.; Gavahian, M.; Gómez, B.; Lorenzo, J.M. Essential oils as natural additives to prevent oxidation reactions in meat and meat products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Domínguez, R.; Pateiro, M.; Gagaoua, M.; Barba, F.J.; Zhang, W.; Lorenzo, J.M. A comprehensive review on lipid oxidation in meat and meat products. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Posgay, M.; Greff, B.; Kapcsándi, V.; Lakatos, E. Effect of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil and thymol on the microbiological properties of meat and meat products: A review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Hyldgaard, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Essential oils in food preservation: Mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Prakash, B.; Kedia, A.; Mishra, P.K.; Dubey, N.K. Plant essential oils as food preservatives to control moulds, mycotoxin contamination and oxidative deterioration of agri-food commodities—Potentials and challenges. Food Control 2015, 47, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Aminzare, M.; Hashemi, M.; Hassanzad Azar, H.; Hejazi, J. The use of herbal extracts and essential oils as a potential antimicrobial in meat and meat products: A review. J. Hum. Environ. Health Promot. 2016, 1, 63–74. Available online: https://applications.emro.who.int/imemrf/J_Hum_Environ_Health_Promot/J_Hum_Environ_Health_Promot_2015_1_2_63_74.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2023). [CrossRef]
  217. Lanciotti, R.; Gianotti, A.; Patrignani, F.; Belletti, N.; Guerzoni, M.; Gardini, F. Use of natural aroma compounds to improve shelf life and safety of minimally processed fruits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Ghaderi-Ghahfarokhi, M.; Barzegar, M.; Sahari, M.A.; Ahmadi Gavlighi, H.; Gardini, F. Chitosan-cinnamon essential oil nano-formulation: Application as a novel additive for controlled release and shelf life extension of beef patties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Żochowska-Kujawska, J.; Lachowicz, K.; Sobczak, M. The tenderization of wild boar meat using a calcium chloride, kefir, wine and pineapple marinade. EJPAU 2010, 13, 2. Available online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume13/issue4/abs-02.html (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  220. Latoch, A.; Moczkowska-Wyrwisz, M.; Sałek, P.; Czarniecka-Skubina, E. Effect of marinating in dairy-fermented products and sous-vide cooking on the protein profile and sensory quality of pork longissimus muscle. Foods 2023, 12, 3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Latoch, A.; Libera, J.; Stasiak, D.M. Physicochemical properties of pork loin marinated in kefir, yoghurt or buttermilk and cooked sous vide. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2019, 18, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Augustyńska-Prejsnar, A.; Sokołowicz, Z.; Hanus, P.; Ormian, M.; Kačániová, M. Quality and safety of marinating breast muscles of hens from organic farming after the laying period with buttermilk and whey. Animals 2020, 10, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Augustyńska-Prejsnar, A.; Ormian, M.; Kluz, M.; Sokołowicz, Z. Effect of using acid whey for marinating chicken breast muscles in organic production. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2019, 31, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Karageorgou, A.; Paveli, A.; Goliomytis, M.; Theodorou, G.; Politis, I.; Simitzis, P. The effects of yoghurt acid whey marination on quality parameters of pork and chicken meat. Foods 2023, 12, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Wójciak, K.M.; Kęska, P.; Okoń, A.; Solska, E.; Libera, J.; Dolatowski, Z.J. The influence of acid whey on the antioxidant peptides generated to reduce oxidation and improve colour stability in uncured roast beef. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 3728–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Wójciak, K.M.; Karwowska, M.; Dolatowski, Z.J. Use of acid whey and mustard seed to replace nitrites during cooked sausage production. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 750–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Chen, M.; Ye, X.; Shen, D.; Ma, C. Modulatory effects of gut microbiota on constipation: The commercial beverage yakult shapes stool consistency. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2019, 25, 475–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Shiby, V.K.; Mishra, H.N. Fermented milks and milk products as functional foods—A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 482–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Granier, A.; Goulet, O.; Hoarau, C. Fermentation products: Immunological effects on human and animal models. Pediatr. Res. 2013, 74, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Liutkevičius, A.; Speičienė, V.; Alenčikienė, G.; Mieželienė, A.; Narkevičius, R.; Kaminskas, A.; Abaravičius, J.A.; Vitkus, D.; Jablonskienė, V.; Sekmokienė, D. Fermented buttermilk-based beverage: Impact on young volunteers’ health parameters. Czech J. Food Sci. 2016, 34, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Smithers, G.W. Whey and whey proteins—From ‘gutter-togold’. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. García-Burgos, M.; Moreno-Fernández, J.; Alférez, M.J.M.; Díaz-Castro, J.; López-Aliaga, I. New perspectives in fermented dairy products and their health relevance. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 72, 104059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Kim, J. Effects of Acid Whey Marination on Tenderness, Sensory and Other Quality Parameters of Beef Eye of Round. Master’s Thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA, 2018. Available online: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/6758 (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  234. Koohmaraie, M.; Kent, M.P.; Shackelford, S.D.; Veiseth, E.; Wheeler, T.L. Meat tenderness and muscle growth is there any relationship. Meat Sci. 2002, 62, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Zavistanaviciute, P.; Klementaviciute, J.; Klupsaite, D.; Zokaityte, E.; Ruzauskas, M.; Buckiuniene, V.; Viskelis, P.; Bartkiene, E. Effects of marinades prepared from food industry by-products on quality and biosafety parameters of lamb meat. Foods 2023, 12, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Sánchez del Pulgar, J.; Gazquez, A.; Ruiz-Carrascal, J. Physico-chemical, textural and structural characteristics of sous-vide cooked pork cheeks as affected by vacuum, cooking temperature, and cooking time. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Brandelli, A.; Daroit, D.J.; Folmer Corrêa, A.P. Whey as a source of peptides with remarkable biological activities. Food Res. Int. 2015, 73, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Holownia, K.; Chinnan, M.S.; Reynolds, A.E. Pink color defect in poultry white meat as affected by endogenous conditions. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Kullisaar, T.; Songisepp, E.; Mikelsaar, M.; Zilmer, K.; Vihalemm, T.; Zilmer, M. Antioxidative probiotic fermented goats’ milk decreases oxidative stress-mediated atherogenicity in human subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 2003, 90, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Kudoh, Y.; Matsuda, S.; Igoshi, K.; Oki, T. Antioxidative peptide from milk fermented with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus IFO13953. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kaishi 2001, 48, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Sakanaka, S.; Tachibana, Y.; Ishihara, N.; Juneja, L.R. Antioxidant properties of casein calcium peptides and their effects on lipid oxidation in beef homogenates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Diaz, M.; Decker, E.A. Antioxidant mechanisms of caseinophosphopeptides and casein hydrolysates and their application in ground beef. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 8208–8213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Kęska, P.; Wójciak, K.M.; Stadnik, J. Effect of marination time on the antioxidant properties of peptides extracted from organic dry-fermented beef. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Karwowska, M.; Kononiuk, A.D.; Borrajo, P.; Lorenzo, J.M. Comparative studies on the fatty acid profile and volatile compounds of fallow deer and beef fermented sausages without nitrite produced with the addition of acid whey. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Rzepkowska, A.; Zielińska, D.; Ołdak, A.; Kołożyn-Krajewska, D. Organic whey as a source of Lactobacillus strains with selected technological and antimicrobial properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1983–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Kačániová, M.; Mellen, M.; Vukovic, N.L.; Kluz, M.; Puchalski, C.; Haščík, P.; Kunová, S. Combined effect of vacuum packaging, fennel and savory essential oil treatment on the quality of chicken thighs. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Eldaly, E.; Hussein, M.; El-Gaml, A.; El-Hefny, D.; Mishref, M. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in charcoal grilled meat (kebab) and Kofta and the effect of marinating on their existence. Zagazig Vet. J. 2016, 44, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Manful, C.F.; Vidal, N.P.; Pham, T.H.; Nadeem, M.; Wheeler, E.; Hamilton, M.C.; Doody, K.M.; Thomas, R.H. Unfiltered beer-based marinades reduced exposure to carcinogens and suppressed conjugated fatty acid oxidation in grilled meats. Food Control 2020, 111, 107040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Vidal, N.P.; Manful, C.; Pham, T.H.; Wheeler, E.; Stewart, P.; Keough, D.; Thomas, R. Novel unfiltered beer-based marinades to improve the nutritional quality, safety, and sensory perception of grilled ruminant meats. Food Chem. 2020, 302, 125326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Manful, C.F.; Pham, T.H.; Wheeler, E.; Nadeem, M.; Adigun, O.A.; Walsh, N.; Thomas, R.H. Assessing the fate of fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids, diglycerides and monoacetyldiacylglycerides in grilled ruminant meats marinated with unfiltered beer-based marinades. J. Food Drug Anal. 2022, 30, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Viegas, O.; Moreira, P.S.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Influence of beer marinades on the reduction of carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines in charcoal-grilled pork meat. Food Addit. Contam. 2015, 32 Pt A, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Tkacz, K.; Więk, A.; Kubiak, M.S. Influence of marinades on the level of PAHs in grilled meat products. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2012, 24, 270–278. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258899785_Influence_of_marinades_on_the_level_of_pahs_in_grilled_meat_products (accessed on 10 August 2023).
  253. Busquets, R.; Puignou, L.; Galceran, M.T.; Skog, K. Effect of red wine marinades on the formation of heterocyclic amines in fried chicken breast. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 8376–8384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Mantzourani, I.; Daoutidou, M.; Nikolaou, A.; Kourkoutas, Y.; Alexopoulos, A.; Tzavellas, I.; Dasenaki, M.; Thomaidis, N.; Plessas, S. Microbiological stability and sensorial valorization of thyme and oregano essential oils alone or combined with ethanolic pomegranate extracts in wine marinated pork meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2023, 386, 110022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Istrati, D.; Ionescu, A.; Vizireanu, C.; Ciuciu, A.M.S.; Dinică, R. The tenderization of bovine Biceps femoris muscle using marinades on the basis of wine. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2012, 17, 7787–7795. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285985929_The_tenderization_of_bovine_Biceps_femoris_muscle_using_marinades_on_the_basis_of_wine (accessed on 10 August 2023).
  256. Istrati, D.; Ciuciu, A.M.S.; Ionescu, A.; Vizireanu, C.; Dinică, R. Influence of spice and wine-based marinades on bovine Biceps femoris muscle tenderness. Afr. J. Biotech. 2012, 11, 14461–14467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Rhoades, J.; Kargiotou, C.; Katsanidis, E.; Koutsoumanis, K.P. Use of marination for controlling Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in raw beef. Food Microbiol. 2013, 36, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Moon, H.; Kim, N.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.; Ryu, J.H.; Rhee, M.S. Teriyaki sauce with carvacrol or thymol effectively controls Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhimurium, and indigenous flora in marinated beef and marinade. Meat Sci. 2017, 129, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Yashin, A.; Yashin, Y.; Xia, X.; Nemzer, B. Antioxidant activity of spices and their impact on human health: A review. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Viegas, O.; Yebra-Pimentel, I.; Martínez-Carballo, E.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Ferreira, I.M. Effect of beer marinades on formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in charcoal-grilled pork. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 2638–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Viegas, O.; Amaro, L.F.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Pinho, O. Inhibitory effect of antioxidant-rich marinades on the formation of heterocyclic aromatic amines in pan-fried beef. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6235–6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Volschenk, H.; van Vuuren, H.M.; Viljoen-Bloom, M. Malic acid in wine: Origin, function and metabolism during vinification. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2006, 27, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Coloretti, F.; Tabanelli, G.; Chiavari, C.; Lanciotti, R.; Grazia, L.; Gardini, F.; Montanari, C. Effect of wine addition on microbiological characteristics, volatile molecule profiles and biogenic amine contents in fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1395–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Møretrø, T.; Daeschel, M.A. Wine is bactericidal to foodborne pathogens. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Likotrafiti, E.; Smirniotis, P.; Nastou, A.; Rhoades, J. Effect of relative humidity and storage temperature on the behavior of Listeria monocytogenes on fresh vegetables. J. Food Saf. 2013, 33, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Just, J.R.; Daeschel, M.A. Antimicrobial effects of wine on Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium in a model stomach system. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. McKee, L.H.; Neish, L.; Pottenger, A.; Flores, N.; Weinbrenner, K.; Remmenga, M. Evaluation of consumable household products for decontaminating retail skinless, boneless chicken breasts. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 534–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Procedure for searching and selecting manuscripts for review.
Figure 1. Procedure for searching and selecting manuscripts for review.
Foods 12 03638 g001
Figure 2. Natural marinades and their effect on meat quality.
Figure 2. Natural marinades and their effect on meat quality.
Foods 12 03638 g002
Table 1. Selective examples of plant-based marinades.
Table 1. Selective examples of plant-based marinades.
Marinade Based onMarinating ConditionMeatSource
beetroot2 h at 4 °Cchicken[16]
koruk juice1, 2, and 18 h at 4 °Cpoultry[21]
mango or pineapple juice
June plum juice (tumbled)
12 and 24 h at 4 °Cchicken[62]
sour cherry and plum juice24 h at 4 °C,
1:1 (meat: marinade)
pork[63]
yellow mombin (50, 75 or 100% pulp with water)7, 14, and 21 days at 4 °Cpork[64]
lemon juice0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h at 4 °C various ratio meat: marinadebeef[65]
(I) lemon juice (100%, water, lemon juice and oil, sodium bisulfate, sodium benzoate, pH = 2.58)
(II) tomato juice (water, tomato concentrate, salt, ascorbic acid, pH 4.03), soy sauce (water, wheat, soybean, salt, sodium benzoate, pH 4.59)
48 h at 4 °C
1:1 (meat: marinade)
chicken[66]
lemon juice (70%), pomegranate juice (70%) or mix in ratio (35% + 35%)
+olive oil, honey, thyme
1, 3, 6, and 9 h at 4, 10, and 20 °Cchicken[67]
lemon juice (5%, 10%), water/olive oil3, 9 and 15 days at 4 °C,
1:1 (meat: marinade)
pork[68]
lemon juice (pH 4.52)24 h at 4 °C,
1:1 (meat: marinade)
pheasants[69]
lemon juice12 h at 4 °C
1:2 (meat: marinade)
turkey[70]
lemon and honey marinade (pH 4.8)
pineapple (with seasonings, pH 4.1)
24 h at 4 °Cjerky roe deer, wild boar[71]
lemon juice, olive oil, dried thyme, salt1 h 4 ℃ or 20 ℃, 98.81% vacuum or atmospheric pressurepork[72]
citrus juice (31% orange juice, 31% lemon juice, and 38% water)20 h at 4 °C
marinade (10 ml/g meat)
beef[73]
black currant juice24 h at 5 °Cpork[74]
black mullbery juice (pH 3.96)
grape juice (pH 3.86),
pomegranate juice (pH 3.19)
72 h at 4 °Cchicken and turkey[75]
koruk juice and dried koruk pomace2, 24, 48 h at 4 °Cbeef[76]
blueberry, raspberry, and strawberry1, 6, 12, 24 h at 4 °Ccamel, beef, chicken[77]
pineapple juice4 days at 4 °Cwild boar, deer[78]
fruit juices (chaenomeles and cranberries)not statedpork, beef[79]
asparagus juice4, 24, 48 h at 4 °Cbeefsteak[80]
white tea and oolong tea leaves16 h at 4 °C (immersing)chicken[81]
onion juice, garlic juice (3%, 6%)24 h at 4 °Cpork[82]
Table 4. Selective examples of marinades based on fermented dairy products (FDPs).
Table 4. Selective examples of marinades based on fermented dairy products (FDPs).
FDP Used to MarinadeMarinating ConditionMeatSource
kefir4 days at 4 °C; vacuumwild boars and deer[78]
kefir7 days at 4 °C; vacuumwild boars[219]
kefir, yoghurt, or buttermilk3, 6, 9, or 12 days at 4 °C; vacuumpork[7]
[25]
[220]
kefir, yoghurt, or buttermilk48 h at 4 °C, vacuumpork[221]
buttermilk or acid whey (salt, cane sugar)24 h at 4 °C
24 and 48 h at 4 °C
12 h at 4 °C
pheasant
chicken
turkey
[69]
[70]
[222]
buttermilk or sour milk12 h at 4 °Cchicken[191]
yoghurt3 days at 4 °Cpork[175]
yoghurt acid whey20 h at 4 °Cpork, lamb, rabbit, chicken[14]
acid whey (salt, cane sugar)24 h at 4 °Cchicken[223]
yoghurt acid whey (with or without hesperidin)5 h at 4 and 20 °Cpork[224]
10 or 15 h at 4 °Cpork and chicken[225]
acid whey (salt, glucose)24 h at 4 °Cbeef
acid whey (salt or salt, mustard)immediately before heat treatmentpork (sausage)[226]
acid whey (salt)12 and 24 h at 4 °Cpoultry[3]
Table 5. Selective examples of marinades based on beer and wine.
Table 5. Selective examples of marinades based on beer and wine.
Beer and Wine Used to MarinadeMarinating ConditionMeatSource
dry red wine (with or without oregano essential oil and garlic powder, dried onion, and freshly crushed black pepper)12 h at 5 °C and 10 days at 5 °C
or 5 days at 15 °C
beef[5]
red or white wine (10%)/olive oil
beer (10%)/olive oil
beer/lemon juice/olive oil
1:2/1:3 (meat: marinade)
1:2/1:3
1:2:1/1:1:1
pork[68]
red dry wine4 days at 4 °C; vacuumwild boars and deer[78]
red wineStep 1. 48 h at 4 °C
Step 2. 7 days at 4 °C; without marinate
beef[84]
red dry wine7 days at 4 °C; vacuumwild boars[219]
red wine (dipping, immersing)Step 1. Marination
Variant 1. 15 min at 42 °C or 4 h at 4 °C;
vacuum
Variant 2. 4 °C during the entire experiment, or 15 min at 42 °C and storage at 4 °C.
Step 2. Sonication: 25 kHz (300 W) and 1 MHz (150 W); 12 °C; 10 min
pork[175]
unfiltered beers: India session ale and wheat ale (as base and oregano, parsley mustard, salt, pepper, garlic, olive oil, vinegar, and fresh onions)12 h at 4 °Cmoose and beef[176,177,248,249,250]
pilsner beer, non-alcoholic pilsner, and black beer4 h at 5 °Cpork[251]
beer or red wine (as base and salt, garlic, sweet and hot paprika, sugar, coriander, mustard, marjoram, black pepper, juniper, onion, rosemary, clove, bay leaves, and monosodium glutamate)12 h at 4 °Cpork[252]
red wines (water or ethanol/water)0.5, 3, and 24 h at 20 °Cchicken[253]
red wine (as base and salt with various combinations of pomegranate ethanolic extract, or oregano and thyme essential oils)24 h at 4 °Cpork[254]
dry red wine (as base with lime tree honey, garlic, pepper, salt; with or without thyme, marjoram, or horseradish)Step 1. 48 h at 4 °C
Step 2. 3, 6, 9, and 12 days at 4 °C; vacuum
beef[180]
[255]
[256]
red wine0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days at 5 °C
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days at 15 °C
beef[257]
soy sauce, wine, high-fructose corn syrup, water, vinegar, salt, spices, onion powder, and garlic powder7 days at 4 °Cbeef[258]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Latoch, A.; Czarniecka-Skubina, E.; Moczkowska-Wyrwisz, M. Marinades Based on Natural Ingredients as a Way to Improve the Quality and Shelf Life of Meat: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193638

AMA Style

Latoch A, Czarniecka-Skubina E, Moczkowska-Wyrwisz M. Marinades Based on Natural Ingredients as a Way to Improve the Quality and Shelf Life of Meat: A Review. Foods. 2023; 12(19):3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Latoch, Agnieszka, Ewa Czarniecka-Skubina, and Małgorzata Moczkowska-Wyrwisz. 2023. "Marinades Based on Natural Ingredients as a Way to Improve the Quality and Shelf Life of Meat: A Review" Foods 12, no. 19: 3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop