Next Article in Journal
Quality of Pepper Seed By-Products: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Water–Energy–Food Nexus and Life Cycle Thinking: A New Approach to Environmental and Nutritional Assessment of Potato Chips
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Biological Potential of Himanthalia elongata (L.) S.F.Gray and Eisenia bicyclis (Kjellman) Setchell Subcritical Water Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Pressure Homogenization and Biocontrol Agent as Innovative Approaches Increase Shelf Life and Functionality of Carrot Juice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fruit Juice Spoilage by Alicyclobacillus: Detection and Control Methods—A Comprehensive Review

by
Patra Sourri
1,
Chrysoula C. Tassou
1,*,
George-John E. Nychas
2 and
Efstathios Z. Panagou
2,*
1
Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, Sofokli Venizelou 1, 14123 Lycovrissi, Greece
2
Laboratory of Microbiology and Biotechnology of Foods, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(5), 747; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050747
Submission received: 3 February 2022 / Revised: 22 February 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 3 March 2022

Abstract

:
Fruit juices have an important place in humans’ healthy diet. They are considered to be shelf stable products due to their low pH that prevents the growth of most bacteria. However thermo-acidophilic endospore forming bacteria of the genus Alicyclobacillus have the potential to cause spoilage of commercially pasteurized fruit juices. The flat sour type spoilage, with absence of gas production but presence of chemical spoilage compounds (mostly guaiacol) and the ability of Alicyclobacillus spores to survive after pasteurization and germinate under favorable conditions make them a major concern for the fruit juice industry worldwide. Their special characteristics and presence in the fruit juice industry has resulted in the development of many isolation and identification methods based on cell detection (plating methods, ELISA, flow cytometry), nucleic acid analysis (PCR, RAPD-PCR, ERIC-PCR, DGGE-PCR, RT-PCR, RFLP-PCR, IMS-PCR, qPCR, and 16S rRNA sequencing) and measurement of their metabolites (HPLC, GC, GC-MS, GC-O, GC-SPME, Electronic nose, and FTIR). Early detection is a big challenge that can reduce economic loss in the industry while the development of control methods targeting the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus is of paramount importance as well. This review includes a discussion of the various chemical (oxidants, natural compounds of microbial, animal and plant origin), physical (thermal pasteurization), and non-thermal (High Hydrostatic Pressure, High Pressure Homogenization, ultrasound, microwaves, UV-C light, irradiation, ohmic heating and Pulse Electric Field) treatments to control Alicyclobacillus growth in order to ensure the quality and the extended shelf life of fruit juices.

1. Introduction

Fruit juices are the most popular beverages, representing a significant market share within the food industry, and have an important role in human diet since their particular combination of physical and chemical characteristics render them natural and healthy [1]. They are low calorie foods rich in nutrients and bioactive compounds such as proteins, vitamins, carbohydrates, polyphenols, minerals, enzymes, fibers and antioxidants that can fit in today’s busy life style [2]. The full definition for fruit juice is “the fermentable but unfermented product obtained from the edible part of fruit which is sound and ripe, fresh or preserved by chilling or freezing of one or more kinds mixed together having the characteristic color, flavor and taste typical of the juice of the fruit from which it comes” [3]. Fruit juices can be classified according to their composition as fruit juice, fruit juice from concentrate, concentrated fruit juice, water extracted fruit juice, dehydrated/powdered fruit juice and fruit nectar. Depending on their dispersion system composition they are divided into clear, opalescent, cloudy and pulp enriched juices. According to the preservation method employed in order to prevent spoilage (microbial, chemical and enzymatic), while retaining their quality and nutritional value, they are classified as freshly squeezed, chilled, frozen, pasteurized and concentrated [4,5]. Today consumers prefer fruit juices as an easy way to cover the five servings of fruits and vegetables recommended by the World Health Organization for a healthy diet. The variety of different juice products on the market in combination with the use of new preservation technologies make them even more attractive. Furthermore, due to their low pH value, fruit juices do not favor the survival of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms, making them safer and therefore more attractive to consumers [6,7].

2. Spoilage and Safety Aspects of Fruit Juices

In recent years many outbreaks concerning fruit juice contamination have been reported and the fruit juice industry has suffered financial damage [8,9]. Pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms are a challenge for the fruit juice manufacturers. The type of microorganisms present in fruit juice can originate from the fruits before harvest, therefore fallen fruits or fruits wounded from insects should be avoided. Other sources of microbial contamination could be the added water, flavorings or other chemicals, and finally process machinery and filling lines with deficient hygiene protocols. The relevant microorganisms considered as threats for commercial fruit juices are yeasts, molds and bacteria, while protozoa and viruses can also cause problems to a lesser extent [5,10].
Yeasts are the predominant spoilage microorganisms in fruit juices [11]. Their high acid tolerance and preference for anaerobic conditions, in combination with the sugar content and the refrigeration temperature during distribution and storage of the juice, favor spoilage incidents [12,13]. Contamination of fruit juices with yeasts results in carbon dioxide and alcohol production, increasing turbidity and flocculation, off-odors and changes in color [14]. It has been proved from previous researchers that representatives of Saccharomyces, Candida, Zygosaccharomyces, Torulaspora, Rhodotorula, Hanseniaspora, Pichia and Trichosporon genera are most frequently encountered in fruit juices [5,14,15]. The occurrence of contamination from yeasts in the fruit juice industry could be attributed to highly contaminated raw materials, failure in the pasteurization process and poor hygiene practices [16].
Moulds are microorganisms frequently encountered in fruit juices [11]. They are aerobic microorganisms that prefer low pH and high sugar content for growth [13]. Depending on their response to thermal treatment, moulds can be classified into heat resistant and heat sensitive [14]. The dominant heat resistant molds that have appeared in fruit juices over the years are Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus tamarii, Aspergillus flavus, Byssochlamys nivea, Byssochlamys fulva, Paecilomyces variotii, Neosartorya fischeri, Eupenicillium brefeldianum, Phialophora mustea, Talaromyces flavus, Talaromyces trachyspermus, Thermoascus aurantiacum, Penicillium notatum, Penicillium roquefortii and Cladosporium spp. [17,18,19,20]. These moulds can produce gas, form colonies and floating mycelia on the surface, and change the odor of the juice [13,16]. Furthermore, they can cause disintegration to the fruit juice since they have the ability to produce disintegrative and pectinolytic enzymes [21], such as amylases, cellulases, pectinases and proteinases [5]. The most frequent heat sensitive molds belong to the genera of Aspergillus, Penicillium, Mucor, Alternaria, Cladosporium, and Botrytis [16,22]. Although these moulds can be eliminated with the pasteurization process [23], their presence indicates high contamination in the raw material or insufficient hygiene conditions during the manufacturing process [14]. Moulds are also associated with the production of mycotoxins, which is a serious safety issue for the fruit juice industry. They are secondary metabolites produced by fungi growing on food matrices. A mould has the ability to produce different kinds of mycotoxins and on the other hand one mycotoxin can be produced from different kinds of moulds [24]. The most dominant mycotoxins concerning the fruit juice industry are patulin and ochratoxin A. Patulin is mainly associated with apple juice and ochratoxin A with grape juice [25,26,27]. The maximum level for patulin in apple juice was established as 50 ppb [28], while the European regulation [29] recommends a maximum level of 25 ppb for solid apple products. The maximum concentration of ochratoxin A in grape juice and grape juice ingredients in other drinks has been defined as 2 ppb [30]. These mycotoxins could be a serious threat to human health worldwide due to their toxicity.
Bacteria are another group of microorganisms that has been associated with spoilage in fruit juices [7]. The acidic pH of most fruit juices favors the presence of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and particularly the genera Lactiplantibacillus and Leuconostoc [7]. They produce off flavors similar to buttermilk and metabolic products such as lactic acid, formic acid, acetic acid, ethanol and carbon dioxide [16,31] that can change the juice flavor. Furthermore, their presence can cause haze and gas in the product [16]. Acetic acid bacteria are frequently found on many fruit surfaces and therefore associated with the spoilage of fruit juices, with Acetobacter pasteurianus and Acetobacter aceti being the predominant species [23]. These bacteria produce acetic acid from ethanol, sauerkraut and buttermilk off-flavors and can also cause browning of the juice [14]. Although both LAB and acetic acid bacteria are heat sensitive and can be destroyed with pasteurization [32], their presence indicates insufficient cleaning and sanitization of the equipment throughout the production line [14,33]. In order to avoid contamination, high standard hygiene protocols should be applied throughout processing [34]. Spore forming bacteria are a major issue for the fruit juice industry, since they can cause spoilage and cannot be controlled with standard pasteurization. The main problem from this group is due to Alicyclobacillus spp. and its predominant species Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris [5]. Except from spoilage bacteria, pathogenic bacteria could be also considered as a threat to the fruit juice industry. Although fruit juices have been considered safe throughout the years, several foodborne outbreaks have been reported especially with unpasteurized fruit juices [35]. Escherichia coli O157:H7 [36,37,38,39], Salmonella [37,40,41,42,43] and Staphylococcus aureus [31] are considered to be implicated in many outbreaks of unpasteurized fruit juices including cider, apple juice and orange juice. Although Listeria monocytogenes has not been considered as a pathogen implicated directly in fruit juice outbreaks, it should be taken into consideration since it has the ability to survive throughout the production line of fruit juices [44]. In order to avoid the presence of pathogenic bacteria, the industry must retain high standard protocols of hygiene throughout the production line [17].
Protozoa are another threat for the fruit juice industry. The parasites of concern are Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis that cause diarrhea [7], and the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, which causes Chagas disease affecting the autonomous nervous system in the esophagus, the heart and the colon [45]. Unpasteurized apple juice and cider have been associated with outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis [46,47], while in Brazil Trypanosoma cruzi has been involved in outbreaks associated with consumption of bacaba juice [48] and acai palm fruit juice [49].
Viruses can also contaminate fruit juices. Norovirus and Hepatitis A have been associated with outbreaks involving fruit juices such as orange juice [50,51]. The transmission of the viruses passes through contaminated fruit or water that has come in contact with feces [14]. The presence of protozoa and viruses can be intercepted by good agricultural and manufacturing practices and implementation of HACCP [52].

2.1. Alicyclobacillus spp. General Characteristics

In recent years, Alicyclobacillus has become the most serious threat of the juice industry. The isolation of this bacterium from various acid thermal environments was reported for the first time in the USA by Darland and Brock [53] and in Italy by De Rosa et al. [54]. Based on a previous published work in Japan [55], the characteristics of these bacteria were very similar to thermo-acidophilic microbes containing unusual ω-cycloexane fatty acids as a major component in their membranes. This microorganism was classified as a new species of the genus Bacillus and it was named Bacillus acidocaldarius [53]. In 1981, thermoacidophilic bacteria closely related to Bacillus acidocaldarius were isolated from neutral soils [56]. The first isolates from a non-thermal source of this species were reported by Cerny et al. [57] after a spoilage incident of pasteurized apple juice in Germany in 1982. These isolated strains were similar to those reported by Hippchen et al. [56] but differed from Bacillus acidocaldarius in the use of carbon sources. Thus Deinhard et al. [58] proposed to name the new species Bacillus acidoterrestris. Poralla and König [59] identified another ω-alicyclic fatty acid microorganism that contained mainly ω-cycloeptane and named this bacterium Bacillus cycloheptanicus. However, after sequence analysis on the 16S ribosomal RNA genes of the three species (B. acidocaldarius, B. acidoterrestris and B. cycloheptanicus), results indicated that they were very similar to each other but distinct from any other Bacillus species. Consequently, it was proposed that these three species should be reclassified and the new genus was named Alicyclobacillus, in favor of the ω-alicyclic fatty acids in their membranes [60].
Throughout the years more Alicyclobacillus species have been described (Table 1), but according to many researchers the predominant spoilage species is A. acidoterrestris. Alicyclobacillus species are Gram positive, except for A. sendaiensis [61], non-pathogenic, thermo-acidophilic rod-shaped endospore forming bacteria [62,63]. They have the ability to grow in a temperature range of 20–70 °C, with the optimum between 40–60 °C, and in a wide pH range (2.0–6.0), with an optimum between 3.5 and 4.5 [64]. Although all species are anaerobic and the presence of oxygen is expected to influence the growth of the microorganism, there is no agreement in the literature about the effect of oxygen on bacterial growth. Cerny et al. [65] reported that the presence or absence of the headspace in the container made no essential difference in the growth of A. acidoterrestris and no spoilage was observed in either case. On the contrary, Walker and Philips [66] demonstrated that containers of apple juice without headspace showed significantly lower growth levels in comparison to those containing headspace. Siegmund and Pöllinger-Zierler [67] also verified that the presence of limited oxygen decelerated A. acidoterrestris growth in apple juice without preventing high cell concentrations.
The presence of ω-alicyclic fatty acids in the membranes of Alicyclobacillus species is the dominant characteristic that distinguishes them from other spore forming bacteria. Researchers have claimed that ω-cycloexane and ω-cycloeptane rings in fatty acids contribute to the strong heat and acid resistance of Alicyclobacillus [68]. It has been also stated that the presence of cyclohexane rings in membranes increased the acyl chain density, resulting in a denser packing of the lipids in the membrane core, structural stabilization and lower fluidity and permeability of the membrane. This probably justifies the maintenance of the barrier function of the membrane, thus protecting the microorganisms in acidic and high temperature environments by forming a protective coating with strong hydrophobic bonds [60,68,69]. Another characteristic that may contribute to the resistance to extreme environments is the presence of hopanoids in the cells of most Alicyclobacillus strains [56,70]. The hopane glycolipids are structurally similar to cholesterol, and they affect the membrane lipid organization due to a decreased mobility of the acyl chain lipids. Furthermore, this action is more advantageous at low pH values [70].
The heat resistance of Alicyclobacillus endospores has been associated with several other factors including temperature, pH and water activity. Specifically, the temperature of thermal treatment exerts the greatest influence on the heat resistance of endospores, since the D-value decreases with increasing temperature. In addition, pH and Total Soluble Solids (TSS) also affect the heat resistance with a linear decrease in D-value with decreasing pH, and a linear increase in D-value when the content of TSS increases. Water activity also has an impact, since it has been shown that bacterial spores become more resistant as the values of aw decrease [71]. Moreover, endospore resistance to heat can also be influenced by the presence of heat stable proteins and enzymes and the mineralization of dipicolinic acid (DPA) with divalent cations of calcium or manganese [68,72]. It needs to be noted that different strains even of the same species of Alicyclobacillus may have different D-values [73]. Furthermore, the cell number, the cell age, the sporulation temperature and the state of the endospore protoplast cortex can influence the heat resistance of the endospores [72,74,75].
Throughout the years, Alicyclobacillus species have been isolated from various environments, such as hot springs [60] and soils [76,77], as well as beverages, fruit concentrates and fruit juices [78,79,80,81,82]. The contamination of fruit juices by Alicyclobacillus species is most likely caused by soil, during harvest, as well as by fallen and unwashed or poorly washed fruits [68]. Employees can also transfer spores from the soil in the manufacturing facilities. Researchers have reported that water can also be a source of contamination [83,84,85,86,87] in the processing environment. Spoilage incidents of fruit juices by Alicyclobacillus species have increased considerably in the last years [78,79,81,88,89,90] including concentrated orange juice [6,91,92], apple juice [85,93], mango juice [94], passion fruit juice [95], pear juice [84,86], banana and watermelon juice [75], grapefruit and blueberry juice [96], and lemon juice [62].
The fact that spoilage due to the presence of Alicyclobacillus is difficult to detect makes this microorganism a serious problem for the fruit juice industry. Since there is no gas production or swelling of the container, contamination cannot be perceived until the consumer complains [68]. The evident sign of spoilage after consumption is an off-flavor described as medicinal, phenolic and antiseptic [69,97] associated mainly with the production of guaiacol (2-methoxyphenol), but also with the halophenols 2,6 dibromothenol and 2,6 dichlorophenol [63,98]. Guaiacol, which is the major metabolite associated with off-flavors in fruit juices, can be a product of microbial metabolism [68]. It is a spoilage compound produced during ferulic acid metabolism, from a non-oxidative decarboxylation of vanillic acid, catalyzed by vanillate decarboxylase [99,100].

2.2. Alicyclobacillus Acidoterrestris

Since its first association with spoilage in fruit juices in 1984 [57], Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris has been considered as a challenge for the fruit juice industry worldwide [14]. It is the most important representative of the genus due to the number of reported spoilage incidents [63]. A. acidoterrestris has been isolated from a variety of juices and concentrates including apple, orange, lemon, mango, grapefruit, pear, tomato, white grape, pineapple, passion fruit, blueberry, pomegranate, cherry, strawberry, chokeberry, raspberry, watermelon, blackcurrant, kiwi and banana [82,92,95,118,119,120,121,122,123]. It is a spore forming bacterium that can survive thermal treatment during pasteurization, grow at low pH, germinate, and spoil the juice [124]. Therefore, it has been proposed as a target microorganism to control the effectiveness of the pasteurization process in acid fruit juices. The maximum accepted concentration of A. acidoterrestris spores as defined by the fruit juice industry is 100 CFU/mL of raw material [125]. A. acidoterrestris is an aerobic, Gram-positive, rod-shaped endospore-forming spoilage microorganism [62,63]. It can grow in a wide pH range (2.0–7.0) with the optimum between 3.5 and 4.0, and in a temperature range of 25–60 °C with the optimum between 40 and 45 °C [126,127,128]. A. acidoterrestris spores are very heat resistant and, depending on the conditions of thermal treatment and bacterial strain, D90°C ranges between 5.95 and 23 min [129] and D95°C between 0.06 and 8.55 min [130]. The main characteristic of A. acidoterrestris strains that make them so tolerant to heat is the presence of ω-cycloexane fatty acids in their membranes [60,87].
A. acidoterrestris spores have a slow growth cycle of ca. 5 days [62]. Spoilage is not visible during storage or retail since there is no gas production and swelling of the juice container (flat-sour type spoilage). Only after consumption, flavors described as “smoky”, “antiseptic” or “disinfectant” and possible increased turbidity and sediment formation can lead to the conclusion of spoilage of the juice [87,131,132]. The predominant spoilage compound responsible for this is guaiacol [131]. Although the contamination pathway with guaiacol from A. acidoterrestris has not been clearly elucidated, the most accepted assumption is that it is produced during ferulic acid metabolism [69,133]. Microorganisms usually decarboxylate ferulic acid to 4-vinylguaiacol [134] causing a “rotten” flavor especially in orange juice [135]. However, it can also be directly metabolized to vanillin [136] or vanillic acid [137]. A. acidoterrestris is capable of producing guaiacol from vanillin [138] and vanillic acid [139]. Although tyrosin and lignin have been suggested as precursors for the production of guaiacol from A. acidoterrestris, the pathway has not been studied extensively [69,133]. It has been proved that when the concentration of A. acidoterrestris cells ranges between 105 and 106 CFU/mL it produces enough guaiacol to spoil the juice [75,131]. Considering the substantial economic losses in the fruit juice industry due to the growth of A. acidoterrestris spores, the factors that induce spoilage should be seriously taken into account, specifically since spoilage is not apparent before consumption. The cell concentration of the microorganism, the heat shock treatment, the incubation temperature, the oxygen availability and the growth medium are among the factors influencing spoilage [68]. It must be noted that spore germination and growth is inhibited under 20 °C [140] and even at low oxygen concentration, contamination cannot be completely suppressed [67]. Furthermore, the growth behavior of A. acidoterrestris strains depends on the type of the juice and the isolation source of the strain [76]. However, the presence of A. acidoterrestris in juice is not a threat for human health, since neither the microorganism nor its metabolites have ever been associated with illness from the consumption of contaminated juice [141]. Although A. acidoterrestris is a non-pathogenic bacterium, spoilage incidents are a major concern for the fruit juice industry mostly because of the difficult detection of the bacterium, due to the absence of visible deterioration of the containers and associated spoilage.

3. Isolation and Identification of Alicyclobacillus spp.

Since spoilage from Alicyclobacillus has become a major issue for the fruit juice industry resulting in high economic losses, the need for developing rapid, accurate and sensitive methods for the early detection of the bacterium is of paramount importance. Initially researchers used mainly direct plating and spoilage detection methods, but nowadays detection methods based on instrumental analysis, immunodetection and molecular analysis are becoming more popular. Detection can be separated into three strategies, namely (a) targeting the cell/spore detection, (b) nucleic acid analyses, and (c) metabolites measurement [142]. An overview of the detection and identification methods for Alicyclobacillus is displayed in Table 2.
Plating methods are simple and reliable but cannot detect low populations of the bacterium. Since research findings indicate that A. acidoterrestris spores do not grow on acidified agar such as Brain Heart Infusion agar, Nutrient agar, Standard Plate Count agar, Tryptone Soy agar and Veal Infusion agar, new media have been developed in order to isolate and successfully enumerate these spores [69,171]. Thus, the media that favor the growth of Alicyclobacillus after being acidified to pH 3.5–5.6 by HCl, H2SO4 and malic acid after autoclaving [68,75] are Bacillus acidocaldarius medium (BAM) and Bacillus acidoterrestris thermophilic (BAT) agar [58,92,187,188], Yeast Starch Glucose Agar (YSG) [78,111,189], Orange Serum Agar (OSA) [190], K agar [85], Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) [91,96,118] and SK agar [191]. It has also been suggested that spread plating is more effective than pour plating for bacterial growth [171,188,192], but Yokota et al. [64] reported the opposite on YSG agar. Although several traditional microbiological methods have been employed for the detection of Alicyclobacillus strains, the IFU Method No 12 developed by the Working Group on Microbiology of the International Federation of Fruit Juice Producers (IFU) is considered to be the most effective [193]. This method can distinguish spoilage and non-spoilage species but it is time-consuming. The membrane filtration technique is another method used in combination with the plating method, mainly when high populations of the bacterium must be detected [189]. IFU Method No 12 recommends the use of 0.45 μm filters, while the European Fruit Juice Association (AIJN) recommends 0.2 μm filters. Although this technique is more sensitive and has a lower detection limit [194], it cannot be used for all products [195]. Several isolation methods including the IFU Method No 12, apply heat shock treatment to the endospores of the microorganism in order to destroy the existing vegetative cells and induce the germination of predominant spores [64]. Many heat treatment schemes have been suggested but the predominant include thermal treatment at 80 °C for 10 min (recommended by the IFU) and at 70 °C for 20 min (recommended by the JFJA) (Japan Fruit Juice Association) [69,75,133]. Although these methods have been widely employed for routine analysis by the industry due to their low cost, they are time consuming and demanding, thus novel rapid detection and identification techniques are needed.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a biochemistry assay that has been applied for the detection of Alicyclobacillus mostly in apple juice, using a specific polyclonal anti-Alicyclobacillus antibody [143,144]. This method reduces the detection time to 6–7 h but detects populations higher than 105 CFU/mL. The above procedure has been improved by adding immunomagnetic separation that has shortened the time of analysis to 3 h and the detection limit to 103 CFU/mL [196]. Even though ELISA is rapid and reliable, it has high cost of analysis and legal limitations of animal use for the antibody production [159].
Flow cytometry is another cell detection method based on laser light that scatters samples in order to obtain cell size and corresponding light patterns of DNA density. This method detects cell concentration higher than 103 CFU/mL for Alicyclobacillus strains in fruit juice concentrates within 10 h [141]. Although the detection is achieved within limited time, flow cytometry can only be used for fluid samples [133].
Over the years methods based on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) have been widely employed in research for the rapid identification of microorganisms and were also successfully applied to Alicyclobacillus. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was first used by Yamazaki et al. [197]. Based on shc (squalene-hopene cyclase) gene, a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of hopaniods, researchers managed to detect A. acidoterrestris and A. acidocaldarius with a detection level of 1–2 CFU/mL after 15 h of enrichment. In 2004, Luo et al. [154] developed a Taqman® RT-PCR method also based on sch gene with a detection level less than 100 CFU/mL within 3–5 h for both species. A Taqman® PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene was able to detect more species of Alicyclobacillus within 5 h and with a detection limit lower than 100 CFU/mL [160]. Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR has also been selected as a rapid method in order to distinguish Alicyclobacillus strains [77,82,95,151,152,198,199]. The selected primer and the lysed DNA of the microorganism are mixed with Taq polymerase and after PCR and electrophoresis the bands that appear are further analyzed [200]. Yamazaki et al. [198] reported the identification of A. acidoterrestris from acidic juice by applying RAPD PCR within 6 h. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) PCR is another rapid and low-cost method that differentiates homologous DNA sequences, which are detected by different length fragments after DNA digestion and are then cut by restriction endonuclease. After gel electrophoresis, a unique fingerprint is received. Analysis of 16 S rRNA RFLP has been used for the characterization of Alicyclobacillus strains from concentrated apple juice [85] and orange juice [157].
16 S rRNA sequence analysis has been used widely for identification, because this gene deviates among the closely related Alicyclobacillus bacterial species. Furthermore, the 5′-end hyper-variable region of the gene varies among Alicyclobacillus species and makes it sufficient for discrimination among species [201]. Moreover, the immunomagnetic separation method (IMS), which is based on magnetic beads that capture the microorganism cells improved the sensitivity of PCR and RT-PCR when cooperating with the 16 S rRNA gene for the detection of Alicyclobacillus [164,165,196].
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) has been also proved to be effective not only for the detection of Alicyclobacillus but also for the distinction of guaiacol producing and non-producing species by adding an Alicyclobacillus DNA sequence ladder mix on the DGGE gel [80]. Vermicon Identification Technology (VIT), which is based on fluorescent labelled probes, has been shown to have a detection limit of 1 CFU/mL within 3 h of isolation and can be applied directly to fruit juice concentrate. This method is also capable of differentiating Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris from other Alicyclobacillus species since they glow in different colors [202].
Indirect detection of Alicyclobacillus spoilage can be determined by measuring the metabolites, mainly guaiacol. The determination can be accomplished using sensory, analytical, or chemical methods.
Sensory methods are mostly used for screening the sample for the presence or absence of spoilage compounds. A trained panel is usually asked to describe the taste, aroma, sourness, color, and finally the acceptability of the sample when compared to a control (unspoiled) sample [174]. The published studies concerning the detection of guaiacol by a sensory panel showed that the detection is highly dependent on the sensitivity of the panelists and on the sample matrix, due to the variation of the components in fruit juices [67,171,174,175,180]. Although analytical methods are considered to be more sensitive to the detection limit of guaiacol, other researchers reported that sensory analysis presented greater sensitivity [171,203].
Analytical methods are used for both qualitative and quantitative detection and the most frequently used are chromatographic analysis such as Gas-Chromatography (GC) and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). These methods include three steps: extraction, separation and identification [68,69]. After collecting an adequate quantity of the sample, heat desorption or solvent extraction follows for GC or HPLC, respectively. The separation of the compounds with the use of specific columns depends on their molecular weight, solubility, ion exchange capacity and polarity, which emerge at different retention times. With the use of standards, the method can detect the chemical compound and its quantity [68]. The GC-MS (mass spectrometry) is widely employed due to the sensitivity of the detector [131,171,180] together with GC-O (olfactometry) [131]. Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) has also been successfully combined with GC for the determination of volatile compounds [175,176,180,181]. Apart from GC, the use of HPLC for the detection of Alicyclobacillus spoilage has also been reported [138,167]. Although the former mentioned analytical techniques have been shown to be accurate, they are expensive, time consuming, require skilled personnel for operation and analysis of the results and cannot be adapted easily in the production line [133,142].
Electronic nose (EN) is an artificial sensing system, based on a chemical sensor array of semi selective gas sensors combined with pattern recognition algorithms. With the proper data analysis tools, EN could result in the early detection of Alicyclobacillus contamination. Gobbi et al. [172] detected Alicyclobacillus spp. in peach, orange and apple juice after 24 h from inoculation, while Cagnasso et al. [179] identified spoilage from A. acidoterrestris in orange and pear juice at the same time period. Concina et al. [162] identified the contamination of Alicyclobacillus spp. in commercial flavored drinks at the early stage of growth and Huang et al. [182] reported that EN could perceive a contaminated apple juice beverage after 4 h when coupled to linear discriminant analysis. It is a promising method because it is simple, quick, reliable and of low cost, and can be easily used in the production line [181].
Another rapid method that is widely used for the detection and identification of bacteria is Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). FTIR is based on measuring distinct biochemical characteristics of the cytoplasm and the cell wall components, presenting them as different spectral features at 400–4000 cm−1. The detection limit of this method is 103–104 CFU/mL and it can distinguish different species of Alicyclobacillus and classify them as guaiacol and non-guaiacol producing strains [184,185]. Some drawbacks of this method include the cost of the equipment and an essential extension with comprehensive spectral reference database in order to limit detection time for unclassified Alicyclobacillus strains [133,142].
The chemical method that has been broadly used for the detection of guaiacol is Peroxidase enzyme colorimetric assay (PECA), which can detect and quantify the presence of guaiacol. PECA is based on the oxidation of guaiacol by peroxidase enzymes in the presence of H2O2 with the formation of a brown compound, identified as 3,3′-dimethoxy-4,4′-biphenoquinone [204], which can be measured by spectrophotometry at 420 nm [138,167] or 470 nm [204,205,206]. Τhe guaiacol detection kits that are available in the market are based on this method and besides detecting guaiacol they can also quantify it by using standard concentration curves. Although this method is simple, less time consuming and of low cost, it is imprecise and most frequently used only for the detection of the presence of guaiacol and not for quantification.

4. Control of Alicyclobacillus spp.

The spoilage of fruit juices from Alicyclobacillus spp. has been shown to start from the beginning of the supply chain, since contaminated fruits at harvest can intrude into the production line and cause problems that will appear only after consumption. This observation necessitates the implementation of highly effective measurements in order to avoid spoilage from the beginning and therefore economic loss for the fruit juice industry. Good Manufacturing Practices and systematic use of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) rules throughout the whole supply chain can control contamination from Alicyclobacillus. In order to ensure fruit juices with high safety and extended shelf life, chemical, physical, and combined methods have been developed.

4.1. Chemical Treatments

The first step to control the contamination from this microorganism is to avoid harvesting fallen fruit or at least wash the surface of the fruit properly with the use of disinfectants. The oxidants that are usually diluted in water are sodium chlorite (NaClO2), chlorus acid (HClO2) and chlorine dioxide (ClO2) [175]. Since 1998, the use of ClO2 has been allowed by the Food and Drug Administration [207] as an antimicrobial chemical and therefore it is widely used for the disinfection of fruit, containers, and processing equipment. The effectiveness of this sanitizer on the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus spores is possibly due to the injury of the inner membrane of the spore resulting in germination and outgrowth [208]. Bevilacqua et al. [209] also implied that this oxidizing compound aimed to damage the inner membrane of A. acidoterrestris spores. These disinfectants can also be used as preservatives in the fruit juice processing line [133].
Ozone (O3) is another oxidant also recognized as safe from the FDA that can be used in fruit juices. It also has the potential to eliminate Alicyclobacillus spores, since it has been shown that as the concentration and the treatment time of O3 increases, the inactivation of A. acidoterrestris also increases [210].
The growth of Alicyclobacillus can also be controlled with the use of some organic acids. The effectiveness of acids on bacterial cells, but not on spores, in ascending order was benzoic, butyric-caprylic, acetic, citric-malic-lactic, and tartaric acids [211]. Chemical preservatives like sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate have been allowed to be added in beverages with a limit of 1500 mg/L [212]. It has been reported that they can control A. acidoterrestris growth [103] with the need for higher concentrations for vegetative cells than for spores [213].
The increasing demand of consumers for natural additives in food products has led to the use of natural compounds in fruit juices for the control of Alicyclobacillus. Natural antimicrobials of microbial origin, animal origin and plant origin have been successfully used for the inhibition of the microorganism [133].

4.1.1. Natural Compounds of Microbial Origin

Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides or proteins that are produced from various bacteria, which present antimicrobial activity against closely related species [214]. Nisin is a non-toxic polypeptide used in many countries as a safe food preservative [215,216]. It is obtained from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and has a significant effect especially on the spores of A. acidoterrestris [89,129,217,218,219,220]. Nisin is the only bacteriocin used for the control of A. acidoterrestris in the fruit juice industry at present [214], added either directly in the juice [129,217] or integrated into the biodegradable polylactic and polymer film of the container [221,222]. Studies have revealed more bacteriocins to be effective against Alicyclobacillus including enterocin AS-48 produced from Enterococcus faecalis [223], bificin C6165 from Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. animalis [224], biovicin HC5 purified from Streptococcus bovis [225], warnericin RB4 from Staphylococcus warneri [226], paracin C from Lactiplantibacillus paracasei [227,228] and cyclin A from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum [229]. Although all of them have high potential in inhibiting Alicyclobacillus strains they have limited application in the industry due to the high cost of extraction and purification [133].

4.1.2. Natural Compounds of Animal Origin

Lysozyme is an enzyme present in various biological tissues and fluids like tears, saliva, eggs and milk, often used to inhibit Gram positive bacteria and especially thermophilic spore forming bacteria at a concentration of 20 μg/mL [230,231]. Lysozyme is also considered as a safe preservative [232] and has been applied directly in fruit juices [233] or through the polymeric matrix film in packaging in order to control Alicyclobacillus [234,235]. The efficiency of lysozyme depends on the concentration, the strain of the bacterium and the external conditions applied [233,236,237,238].
Chitosan, the only basic polysaccharide in nature is a derivative of chitin, extracted from the shell of shrimps, crabs and crawfishes; it has the ability to control bacteria, yeasts, and molds [239,240]. When combined with thermal processing it can inhibit A. accidoterrestris spores from germinating at a concentration level of 1.4 g/L [241].

4.1.3. Natural Compounds of Plant Origin

Essential oils (EOs) are aromatic liquids obtained by extraction, distillation, fermentation or enfleurage from plant materials, mostly herbs and spices that are used in the fruit juice industry as food flavorings [133,242,243]. The antimicrobial activity of cinnamaldehyde, eugenol and carvacrol has been reported to be efficient against A. accidoterrestris spores [90,244]. Lemon essential oil and extracts of Eycalyptus maculata also controlled the germination of A. accidoterrestris spores as reported by Maldonado et al. [245] and Takahashi et al. [244]. Fatty acids and esters have also been reported to have antibacterial activity against A. accidoterrestris spores. Manolaurin, which is recognized as a safe compound from the FDA, was effective against the vegetative cells of the microorganism [246]. Sucrose palmitate, sucrose stearates and sucrose laurates have also been reported as efficient antimicrobials against Alicyclobacillus spores [247]. Other plant extracts have been reported to have antimicrobial effectiveness against Alicyclobacillus. Saponin that was extracted from Sapindus saponaria fruits inhibited A. acidoterrestris spore germination, but affected the sensory quality and resulted in foam production [248]. Papain and bromelain enzymes extracted from Carica papaya and Ananas comosus, respectively, also controlled A. acidoterrestris spore germination [249], whereas two formulations of Rosmarinus officinalis were effective against A. acidoterrestris, A. hesperidum and A. cycloheptanicus vegetative cells [250]. An overview of chemical treatments applied for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus species is presented in Table 3.

4.2. Physical Treatments

Thermal pasteurization is a heat treatment successfully employed by the fruit juice industry in order to extend the shelf life of processed fruit juices. It manages to inactivate heat sensitive microorganisms and enzymes that can degrade the quality without influencing the sensory characteristics of the fruit juice. The conventional heat treatment (88–96 °C for 2 min) however is not sufficient against Alicyclobacillus, since its spores can survive pasteurization treatments and germinate under favorable conditions during storage [68,71]. Provided that refrigerated temperatures are ensured throughout the whole supply chain, Alicyclobacillus spores would not grow since germination is inhibited at temperatures below 20 °C. Distribution though does not always take place under refrigerated conditions, due to high cost, therefore spores may induce spoilage during warmer months [68]. In order to control the presence of Alicyclobacillus, the temperature of thermal treatment should be increased, but this would result in quality (vitamin and nutrient loss) and sensory (nonenzymatic browning and flavor compounds) deterioration [251,252,253]. Consequently, the development of nonthermal methods is necessary to retain both safety and quality attributes of fruit juices.

4.3. Nonthermal Treatments

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) is based on two principles, namely the isostatic and the Le Chatelier. The first one secures the homogeneous and instant distribution of the pressure applied equally in all directions of the sample and the second one states that any occurrence of chemical or biochemical reaction, molecular configuration or phase transition that can lead to volume reduction is improved by pressure [254,255]. The food industry uses HHP with pressure ranging from 100 to 800 MPa, duration from milliseconds to more than 20 min, and treatment temperatures from 0 to 90 °C. The main mechanism of HHP that causes the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus is the damage to the noncovalent bonds that are present in lipids, proteins, nucleic acids and polysaccharides. In this way, HHP affects the cell membrane constituents such as proteins, enzymes and ribosomes and therefore damages the genetic material of the microorganism, since it causes denaturation of cell components resulting in the injury and death of the microorganism [256]. HHP has been used extensively for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus because when combined with heat treatment it is very effective against spores that are very resistant to inactivation. HHP can cause the germination of spores, which are less resistant to dormant spores that will be subsequently killed with the simultaneous heat treatment [257,258]. The germination of spores at lower pressures (50 to 300 MPa) proceeds via activation of nutrient receptors (d-sugars, l-amino and purine nucleosides), while at higher pressures (400–800 MPa) germination is triggered by the direct release of Ca-DPA (dipicolinic acid) [259,260]. It has been proved that cycle pressure treatments can enhance the inactivation of the spores for an equivalent duration of a single pressure application. Treatment with the low pressure exposure results in spore germination and the higher pressure inactivates spores and vegetative cells [261]. Relevant research concerning the application of HHP for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus is summarized in Table 4. Although HHP is very effective, some dormant spores have the ability to remain immutable, a fact that must be taken into serious consideration by the fruit juice industry when applying HHP treatments [262]. Juices treated with HHP often exhibit superior quality compared to those treated with thermal processing since HHP has minimum impact on color, flavor and taste while retaining nutrients, vitamins, amino acids and functional properties [263]. Taking into account consumers’ demands for minimally processed products, HPP has many industrial applications and therefore it has been the most popular non-thermal treatment since the late 1980s.
High pressure homogenization (HPH) (150–200 MPa) or Ultra High pressure homogenization (350–400 MPa) is a food processing technology that is based on the principles of conventional homogenization with higher pressures [277] and can be applied only to fluid products. The shear stress distribution across the treated product is responsible for the changes occurring in microorganisms resulting in inactivation [5]. Bevilacqua et al. [126] reported reduction of A. acidoterrestris population with cells being more sensitive than spores when applying HPH (500, 800, 1100, 1400 and 1700 bar) for 2 ms to three different strains inoculated in malt extract broth. The susceptibility was proved to be strain dependent. This treatment has limited industrial applicability because of the need for refrigeration in order to guarantee the safety of final products.
Ultrasound or ultrasonic waves are electromagnetic waves with frequency above 20 kHz that can create cavitation in the cell wall of the microorganism and thus destroy it [278]. A. acidoterrestris vegetative cells in apple juice were inactivated with ultrasonic treatment that seemed to be more effective as the power level and the processing time increased [279]. Wang et al. [280] also reported that ultrasonic waves inhibited Alicyclobacillus vegetative cells and that the effectiveness of the method depended on the matrix, the strain, the power level, and the exposure time. Ultrasound treatment has been proved to be more effective when combined with other processes, in particular high pressure and heat. Although this treatment is considered to improve the quality of many products including fruit juices [281], it affects the sensory characteristics of the fruit juice and thus may not meet consumer’s demand [279].
Microwaves are also electromagnetic waves that have the ability to change the cell membrane permeability, break the hydrogen bonds of RNA and DNA and thus inhibit the cell growth [133]. Microwave sterilization has been employed as a nonthermal treatment since it heats the product faster without influencing the texture and the taste and does not lead to cell cortex swelling like conventional sterilization [133,282].
Ultraviolet (UV-C) light is a form of electromagnetic radiation ranging from 200 to 280 nm [283] that has the ability to damage the DNA of the microorganism and therefore eliminate it [284]. The treatment has been proved effective against A. acidoterrestris spores in grape and apple juice [285,286]. The low energy consumption and the absence of toxic byproducts in the final product makes UV-C light a promising control treatment and for this reason FDA approved its use in order to clear fruit juices (FDA, 2000).
Irradiation treatment uses gamma rays, electrons, or X rays [253,287] targeting the chromosome in order to split the double helix of DNA and thus damage the cell of the microorganism [253]. The use of gamma rays and electrons were reported to be effective against A. acidoterrestris spores in citrus juice in combination with heat treatment (85–95 °C) [288]. In addition, Lee et al. [289] reported the inactivation of A. acidoterrestris spores in apple and orange juice with the use of gamma rays. Irradiation has limited applicability in the fruit juice industry today due to its association with radioactivity that is unacceptable from the consumers’ point of view [277].
Ohmic heating uses an electrical current to generate heat instantly inside the food in order to kill microorganisms [73]. A. acidoterrestris vegetative cells were inactivated in apple juice with the use of an ohmic heating system. When the temperature was above 70 °C the death rate was close to 100% [290]. Moreover, the inactivation of A. acidoterrestris spores was reported to be higher with the use of ohmic heating than with conventional heating in orange and apple juice [291,292]. However, additional studies should be undertaken to verify the effectiveness of this method in the fruit juice industry.
Pulsed electric field generates pulse waves that have enough intensity to cause cell membrane damage that leads to cell destruction [293]. Uemura et al. [294] reported the reduction in the population of A. acidoterrestris in orange juice in a very short time (0.9 s) at 125 °C without influencing the nutritional quality of the juices. This technology has the ability to improve the microbiological quality and preserve the physicochemical and nutritional attributes of juices, but concerning Alicyclobacillus spores, more studies, including sensory assessment, should be performed in order to elucidate the effects of temperature assistance on the organoleptic traits of fruit juices.

5. Conclusions

Fruit juices have gained popularity due to their health benefits resulting in the expansion of the global juice market. Therefore spoilage incidents can cause significant financial losses to the industry. Alicyclobacillus and Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in particular are thermo-acidophilic spore forming bacteria responsible for spoilage that cannot be detected until consumption of the juice, making them a major hazard for the fruit juice industry. The quality of the raw material and the hygiene processing conditions should be taken under consideration to avoid spoilage. Subsequently, various control and prevention methods have been established to inactivate Alicyclobacillus spores and preserve the quality and the shelf life of the fruit juice. The early detection of spoilage using rapid methods is also a requirement of the industry. Consequently, future studies should focus on the improvement of the existing techniques and the development of new methods to ensure the rapid and early detection of Alicyclobacillus and preserve the quality of fruit juices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C.T., G.-J.E.N. and E.Z.P.; investigation, P.S.; writing-original draft preparation, P.S. and E.Z.P.; writing-review and editing, P.S., C.C.T., G.-J.E.N. and E.Z.P.; supervision, C.C.T. and E.Z.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not available.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Patra Sourri would like to thank the Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA for supporting this work as part of her Ph.D.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaur, C.; Kapoor, H.C. Antioxidants in Fruits and Vegetables—The Millennium’s Health. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 36, 703–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bhardway, R.L.; Nandal, U.; Pal, A.; Jain, S. Bioactive Compounds and Medical Properties of Fruit Juices. Fruits 2014, 69, 391–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. The EU Fruit Juice Direcive 2016. Gen. Stand. Fruit Juice Nectars Codex Stan 247-2005. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/es/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B247-2005%252FCXS_247e.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  4. Bates, R.P.; Morris, J.R.; Crandall, P.G. Principles and Practices of Small and Medium Scale Fruit Juice Processing; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2001; Volume 146. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaurav, R.; Brijesh, K.T. Fruit Juices: Extraction, Composition, Quality and Analysis; Elsevier: Dublin, Ireland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Eiroa, M.N.U.; Junqueira, V.C.A.; Schmidt, F.L. Alicyclobacillus in Orange Juice: Occurrence and Heat Resistance of Spores. J. Food Prot. 1999, 62, 883–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Keller, S.A.; Miller, A.J. Microbiological Safety of Fresh Citrus and Apple Juices. In Microbiology of Foods and Vegetables; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 211–230. [Google Scholar]
  8. Outbreak of Salmonella Serotype Muenchen Infections Associated with Unpasteurized Orange Juice—United States and Canada, June 1999. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4827a2.htm (accessed on 30 January 2022).
  9. Griffiths, M. The New Face of Food Born Illness. Can. Meat. Sci. Assoc. 2000, 1, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dewanti-Hariyadi, R. Microbiological Quality and Safety of Fruit Juices. Food Rev. Int. 2013, 1, 54–57. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tournas, V.; Heeres, J.; Burgess, L. Moulds and yeasts in fruit salads and fruit juices. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 684–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mendoza, S.; Montemayor, L.; Boscán, L.A.; Barreiro, J.A. Microflora in pasteurized fruit juices in Venezuela. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 1982, 32, 617–629. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jay, S.; Anderson, J. Fruit Juice and Related Products. In Spoilage of Processed Foods. Causes and Diagnosis; Southwood Press: Marrickville, Australia, 2001; pp. 187–198. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lima Tribst, A.A.; de Souza Sant’Ana, A.; de Massaguer, P.R. Microbiological Quality and Safety of Fruit Juices—Past, Present and Future Perspectives. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 35, 310–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deak, T.; Beuchat, L.R. Yeasts Associated with Fruit Juice Concentrates. J. Food Prot. 1993, 56, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Microorganisms in Foods: Microbial Ecology of Food Commodities (ICMSF Vol. 6) International Commission on Microbiological Specifications. Available online: http://www.lavoisier.eu/books/food-science/microorganisms-in-foods-microbial-ecology-of-food-commodities-icmsf-vol-6-2nd-ed/icmsf/description_1239055 (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  17. Wareing, P.; Davenport, R.R. Microbiology of Soft Drinks and Fruit Juices; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 279–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Nijs, M.; van der Vossen, J.; Van Osenbruggen, T.; Hartog, B. The Significance of Heat Resistant Spoilage Moulds and Yeasts in Fruit Juices-A Review. Fruit Process. 2000, 10, 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pitt, J.I.; Hocking, A.D. Fungi and Food Spoilage; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1997; ISBN 9781461379362. [Google Scholar]
  20. Stratford, M.; Hofman, P.; Cole, M. Fruit Juices, Fruit Drinks, and Soft Drinks. Microbiol. Saf. Qual. Food 2000, 1, 836–869. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ugwuanyi, J.O.; Obeta, J.A.N. Pectinolytic and Cellulolytic Activities of Heat Resistant Fungi and Their Macerating Effects on Mango and African Mango. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1054–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moss, M. Fungi, quality and safety issues in fresh fruits and vegetables. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 1239–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Worobo, R.W.; Splittstoester, D.F. Microbiology of Food Products.Processing Fruits; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. Drusch, S.; Ragab, W. Mycotoxins in Fruits, Fruit Juices, and Dried Fruits. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 1514–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Majerus, P.; Bresch, H.; Otteneder, H. Ochratoxin A in Wines, Fruit Juices and Seasonings. Arch. Für Leb. 2000, 51, 95–97. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bellí, N.; Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J. Review: Ochratoxin A (OTA) in Wines, Musts and Grape Juices: Occurrence, Regulations and Methods of Analysis. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2002, 8, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moake, M.M.; Padilla-Zakour, O.I.; Worobo, R. Comprehensive Review of Patulin Control Methods in Foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2005, 4, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Codex Alimentarius Commission—Report of the Twenty-Sixth Session: Rome, 30 June–7 July 2003. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/Y4800E/y4800e00.htm (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  29. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1425/2003 of 11 August 2003 Amending Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 as Regards Patulin (Text with EEA Relevance). Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2003/1425 (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  30. Fernandez-Cruz, M.L.; Mansilla, M.L.; Tadeo, J.L. Mycotoxins in fruits and their processed products: Analysis, occurrence and health implications. J. Adv. Res. 2010, 1, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Aneja, K.R.; Dhiman, R.; Aggarwal, N.K.; Kumar, V.; Kaur, M. Microbes Associated with Freshly Prepared Juices of Citrus and Carrots. Int. J. Food Sci. 2014, 2014, 408085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Júnior, I.G.; Massaguer, P.R. Generic HACCP System Applied to Fruit Juices Thermal Processes. Fruit Proc. 2003, July–Aug, 282–290. [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveira, J.C.; Setti-Perdigão, P.; Siqueira, K.A.G.; Santos, A.C.; Miguel, M.A.L. Microbiological Characteristics of Orange Juices. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 26, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kumar, C.G.; Anand, S. Significance of microbial biofilms in food industry: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 42, 9–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Harris, L.; Farber, J.; Beuchat, L.; Parish, M.; Suslow, T.; Garrett, E.; Busta, F. Outbreaks Associated with Fresh Produce: Incidence, Growth, and Survival of Pathogens in Fresh and Fresh-Cut Produce. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2003, 2, 78–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vojdani, J.D.; Beuchat, L.R.; Tauxe, R.V. Juice-Associated Outbreaks of Human Illness in the United States, 1995 through 2005. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Krug, M.; Chapin, T.; Danyluk, M.; Goodrich-Schneider, R.; Schneider, K.; Harris, L.; Worobo, R. Outbreaks of Foodborne Disease Associated with Fruit and Vegetable Juices, 1922–2019. EDIS 2020, 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cody, S.H.; Glynn, M.K.; A Farrar, J.; Cairns, K.L.; Griffin, P.M.; Kobayashi, J.; Fyfe, M.; Hoffman, R.; King, A.S.; Lewis, J.H.; et al. An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection from unpasteurized commercial apple juice. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 130, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Besser, R.E. An Outbreak of Diarrhea and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome from Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Fresh-Pressed Apple Cider. JAMA 1993, 269, 2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Duncan, T.G.; Doull, J.A.; Miller, E.R.; Bancroft, H. Outbreak of Typhoid Fever with Orange Juice as the Vehicle, Illustrating the Value of Immunization. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health 1946, 36, 34–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cook, K.A.; Dobbs, T.E.; Hlady, W.G.; Wells, J.G.; Barrett, T.J.; Puhr, N.D.; Lancette, G.A.; Bodager, D.W.; Toth, B.L.; Genese, C.A.; et al. Outbreak of Salmonella serotype Hartford infections associated with unpasteurized orange juice. JAMA 1998, 280, 1504–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Parish, M.E. Coliforms, Escherichia coli and Salmonella Serovars Associated with a Citrus-Processing Facility Implicated in a Salmonellosis Outbreak. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jain, S.; Bidol, S.A.; Austin, J.L.; Berl, E.; Elson, F.; LeMaile-Williams, M.; Deasy, M.; Moll, M.E.; Rea, V.; Vojdani, J.D.; et al. Multistate Outbreak of Salmonellatyphimurium and Saintpaul Infections Associated with Unpasteurized Orange Juice—United States, 2005. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Caggia, C.; Scifò, G.O.; Restuccia, C.; Randazzo, C.L. Growth of acid-adapted Listeria monocytogenes in orange juice and in minimally processed orange slices. Food Control 2009, 20, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Steindel, M.; Pacheco, L.K.; Scholl, D.; Soares, M.; de Moraes, M.H.; Eger, I.; Kosmann, C.; Sincero, T.C.M.; Stoco, P.H.; Murta, S.M.F.; et al. Characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi isolated from humans, vectors, and animal reservoirs following an outbreak of acute human Chagas disease in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2008, 60, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Burnett, S.L.; Beuchat, L.R. Human pathogens associated with raw produce and unpasteurized juices, and difficulties in decontamination. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 25, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Garcia, L.; Henderson, J.; Fabri, M.; Oke, M. Potential Sources of Microbial Contamination in Unpasteurized Apple Cider. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yoshida, N. Trypanosoma cruzi infection by oral route: How the interplay between parasite and host components modulates infectivity. Parasitol. Int. 2008, 57, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Valente, S.A.D.S.; Valente, V.D.C.; Neto, H.F. Considerations on the epidemiology and transmission of Chagas disease in the Brazilian amazon. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1999, 94, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Koopmans, M.; Duizer, E. Foodborne viruses: An emerging problem. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 90, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Frank, C.; Walter, J.; Muehlen, M.; Jansen, A.; Van Treeck, U.; Hauri, A.M.; Zoellner, I.; Rakha, M.; Hoehne, M.; Hamouda, O.; et al. Major Outbreak of Hepatitis A Associated with Orange Juice among Tourists, Egypt, 2004. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guidance for Industry: Juice Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point Hazards and Controls Guidance, First Edition. Available online: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2004/03/03/E4-452/guidance-for-industry-juice-hazard-analysis-critical-control-point-hazards-and-controls-guidance (accessed on 2 February 2022).
  53. Darland, G.; Brock, T.D. Bacillus acidocaldarius sp.nov., an Acidophilic Thermophilic Spore-forming Bacterium. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1971, 67, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. De Rosa, M.; Gambacorta, A.; Minale, L.; Bu’Lock, J.D. Cyclohexane fatty acids from a thermophilic bacterium. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971, 21, 1334a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Uchino, F.; Doi, S. Acido-thermophilic Bacteria from Thermal Waters. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1967, 31, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hippchen, B.; Röll, A.; Poralla, K. Occurrence in soil of thermo-acidophilic bacilli possessing ω-cyclohexane fatty acids and hopanoids. Arch. Microbiol. 1981, 129, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cerny, G.; Hennlich, W.; Poralla, K. Fruchtsaftverderb durch Bacillen: Isolierung und Charakterisierung des Verderbserregers. Z. Lebensm. -Unters. Forsch. 1984, 179, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Deinhard, G.; Blanz, P.; Poralla, K.; Altan, E. Bacillus acidoterrestris sp. nov., a New Thermotolerant Acidophile Isolated from Different Soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1987, 10, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Poralla, K.; König, W. The occurrence of ω-cycloheptane fatty acids in a thermo-acidophilic bacillus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1983, 16, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wisotzkey, J.D.; Jurtshuk, P.; Fox, G.E.; Deinhard, G.; Poralla, K. Comparative Sequence Analyses on the 16S rRNA (rDNA) of Bacillus acidocaldarius, Bacillus acidoterrestris, and Bacillus cycloheptanicus and Proposal for Creation of a New Genus, Alicyclobacillus gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1992, 42, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tsuruoka, N. Alicyclobacillus sendaiensis sp. nov., a novel acidophilic, slightly thermophilic species isolated from soil in Sendai, Japan. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 1081–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Silva, F.; Gibbs, P. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores in fruit products and design of pasteurization processes. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Molva, C.; Baysal, A.H. Evaluation of bioactivity of pomegranate fruit extract against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris DSM 3922 vegetative cells and spores in apple juice. LWT 2015, 62, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yokota, A.; Fujii, T.; Goto, K. Parameters for Detection of Alicyclobacillus and Test Methods: Alicyclobacillus. In Alicyclobacillus: Thermophillic Acidophilic Bacilli; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2007; pp. 49–69. [Google Scholar]
  65. Cerny, G.; Duong, H.-A.; Hennlich, W.; Miller, S. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris: Influence of Oxygen Content on Growth in Fruit Juices. Food Aust. 2000, 52, 289–291. [Google Scholar]
  66. Walker, M.; Phillips, C.A. The effect of intermittent shaking, headspace and temperature on the growth of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in stored apple juice. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Siegmund, B.; Pöllinger-Zierler, B. Growth Behavior of Off-Flavor-Forming Microorganisms in Apple Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 6692–6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chang, S.-S.; Kang, D.-H. Alicyclobacillus spp. in the Fruit Juice Industry: History, Characteristics, and Current Isolation/Detection Procedures. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 30, 55–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Smit, Y.; Cameron, M.; Venter, P.; Witthuhn, R.C. Alicyclobacillus spoilage and isolation—A review. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Poralla, K.; Kannenberg, E.; Blume, A. A glycolipid containing hopane isolated from the acidophilic, thermophilic Bacillus acidocaldarius, has a cholesterol-like function in membranes. FEBS Lett. 1980, 113, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Silva, F. Thermal inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores under different temperature, soluble solids and pH conditions for the design of fruit processes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 51, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jay, J.M.; Loessner, M.J.; Golden, D.A. Food Protection with High Temperatures, and Characteristics of Thermophilic Microorganisms. In Modern Food Microbiology; Food Science Text Series; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 415–441. ISBN 9780387231808. [Google Scholar]
  73. Tianli, Y.; Jiangbo, Z.; Yahong, Y. Spoilage by Alicyclobacillus Bacteria in Juice and Beverage Products: Chemical, Physical, and Combined Control Methods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 771–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jay, J.M.; Loessner, M.J.; Golden, D.A. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Parameters of Foods That Affect Microbial Growth. In Modern Food Microbiology; Food Science Text Series; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 39–59. ISBN 9780387231808. [Google Scholar]
  75. Steyn, C.E.; Cameron, M.; Witthuhn, R.C. Occurrence of Alicyclobacillus in the fruit processing environment—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Goto, K.; Mochida, K.; Kato, Y.; Asahara, M.; Fujita, R.; An, S.-Y.; Kasai, H.; Yokota, A. Proposal of six species of moderately thermophilic, acidophilic, endospore-forming bacteria: Alicyclobacillus contaminans sp. nov., Alicyclobacillus fastidiosus sp. nov., Alicyclobacillus kakegawensis sp. nov., Alicyclobacillus macrosporangiidus sp. nov., Alicyclobacillus sacchari sp. nov. and Alicyclobacillus shizuokensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1276–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Groenewald, W.H.; Gouws, P.A.; Witthuhn, R.C. Isolation and identification of species of Alicyclobacillus from orchard soil in the Western Cape, South Africa. Extremophiles 2007, 12, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Matsubara, H.; Goto, K.; Matsumura, T.; Mochida, K.; Iwaki, M.; Niwa, M.; Yamasato, K. Alicyclobacillus acidiphilus Sp. Nov., a Novel Thermo-Acidophilic, Omega-Alicyclic Fatty Acid-Containing Bacterium Isolated from Acidic Beverages. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 1681–1685. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Spllttstoesser, D.F.; Churey, J.J.; Lee, C.Y. Growth Characteristics of Aciduric Sporeforming Bacilli Isolated from Fruit Juices. J. Food Prot. 1994, 57, 1080–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Osopale, B.A.; Witthuhn, C.R.; Albertyn, J.; Oguntoyinbo, F.A. Culture dependent and independent genomic identification of Alicyclobacillus species in contaminated commercial fruit juices. Food Microbiol. 2016, 56, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yamazaki, K.; Teduka, H.; Shinano, H. Isolation and Identification of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris from Acidic Beverages. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 543–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Zhang, J.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y. Alicyclobacillus Contamination in the Production Line of Kiwi Products in China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. McIntyre, S.; Ikawa, J.Y.; Parkinson, N.; Haglund, J.; Lee, J. Characteristics of an Acidophilic Bacillus Strain Isolated from Shelf-Stable Juices. J. Food Prot. 1995, 58, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wisse, C.A. Isolation and Enumeration of Sporeforming, Thermo-Acidophilic, Rod-Shaped Bacteria from Citrus Processing Environments. Dairy Food Env. Sanit. 1998, 18, 504–509. [Google Scholar]
  85. Chen, S.; Tang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, G.; Hu, X.; Liao, X.; Chen, F.; Wu, J.; Xiang, H. Isolation and characterization of thermo-acidophilic endospore-forming bacteria from the concentrated apple juice-processing environment. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Groenewald, W.; Gouws, P.; Witthuhn, R. Isolation, identification and typification of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris and Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius strains from orchard soil and the fruit processing environment in South Africa. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Walls, I. Alicyclobacillus-Historical Perspective and Preliminary Characterization Study. Dairy Food Environ. Sanit. 1998, 18, 499–503. [Google Scholar]
  88. Jensen, N. Alicyclobacillus in Australia. Food Aust. 2000, 52, 282–285. [Google Scholar]
  89. Walker, M.; Phillips, C.A. The effect of preservatives on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris and Propionibacterium cyclohexanicum in fruit juice. Food Control 2008, 19, 974–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bevilacqua, A.; Corbo, M.; Sinigaglia, M. Inhibition of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores by natural compounds. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 43, 1271–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pinhatti, M.E.M.C.; Variane, S.; Eguchi, S.Y.; Manfio, G.P. Detection of Acidothermophilic Bacilli in Industrialized Fruit Juices. Fruit Process. 1997, 9, 350–353. [Google Scholar]
  92. Eguchi, S.; Manfio, G.; Pinhatti, M.; Azuma, E.; Variane, S. Acidothermophilic Sporeforming Bacteria (ATSB) in Orange Juices: Detection Methods, Ecology, and Involvement in the Deterioration of Fruit Juices. Braz. Assoc. Citrus Export. 1999, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  93. Tayefe, M.; Zade, A.N.; Hashemi, S.A.; Hasannia, F. Isolation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris from Commercial Spoiled Apple Juice and Study on Some Influence Parameters on its Growth in Apple Juice. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. H Bot. 2014, 5, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gouws, P.A.; Gie, L.; Pretorius, A.; Dhansay, N. Isolation and identification of Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius by 16S rDNA from mango juice and concentrate. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 789–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. McKnight, I.; Eiroa, M.; Sant’Ana, A.; Massaguer, P. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in pasteurized exotic Brazilian fruit juices: Isolation, genotypic characterization and heat resistance. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Durak, M.Z.; Churey, J.J.; Danyluk, M.D.; Worobo, R. Identification and haplotype distribution of Alicyclobacillus spp. from different juices and beverages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 142, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Uchida, R.; Silva, F.V. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spore inactivation by high pressure combined with mild heat: Modeling the effects of temperature and soluble solids. Food Control 2017, 73, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hartyáni, P.; Dalmadi, I.; Knorr, D. Electronic nose investigation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris inoculated apple and orange juice treated by high hydrostatic pressure. Food Control 2013, 32, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rosazza, J.P.N.; Huang, Z.; Dostal, L.; Volm, T.; Rousseau, B. Review: Biocatalytic transformations of ferulic acid: An abundant aromatic natural product. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995, 15, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Chow, K.T.; Pope, M.K.; Davies, J. Characterization of a vanillic acid non-oxidative decarboxylation gene cluster from Streptomyces sp. D7 The GenBank accession number for the sequence reported in this paper is AF134589. Microbiology 1999, 145, 2393–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Goto, K.; Mochida, K.; Kato Tanaka, Y.; Asahara, M.; Ozawa, C.; Kasai, H.; Yokota, A. Diversity of Alicyclobacillus Isolated from Fruit Juices and Their Raw Materials, and Emended Description of Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius. Microbiol. Cult. Collect. 2006, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  102. Nicolaus, B.; Improta, R.; Manca, M.C.; Lama, L.; Esposito, E.; Gambacorta, A. Alicyclobacilli from an unexplored geothermal soil in Antarctica: Mount Rittmann. Polar Biol. 1998, 19, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Guo, X.; You, X.-Y.; Liu, L.-J.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Liu, S.-J.; Jiang, C.-Y. Alicyclobacillus aeris sp. nov., a novel ferrous- and sulfur-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a copper mine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2415–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Kusube, M.; Sugihara, A.; Moriwaki, Y.; Ueoka, T.; Shimane, Y.; Minegishi, H. Alicyclobacillus cellulosilyticus sp. nov., a thermophilic, cellulolytic bacterium isolated from steamed Japanese cedar chips from a lumbermill. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 2257–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Glaeser, S.P.; Falsen, E.; Martin, K.; Kampfer, P. Alicyclobacillus consociatus sp. nov., isolated from a human clinical specimen. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 3623–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Nakano, C.; Takahashi, N.; Tanaka, N.; Okada, S. Alicyclobacillus dauci sp. nov., a slightly thermophilic, acidophilic bacterium isolated from a spoiled mixed vegetable and fruit juice product. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Dufresne, S.; Bousquet, J.; Boissinot, M.; Guay, R. Sulfobacillus disulfidooxidans sp. nov., a New Acidophilic, Disulfide-Oxidizing, Gram-Positive, Spore-Forming Bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996, 46, 1056–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Karavaiko, G.I.; Bogdanova, T.I.; Tourova, T.P.; Kondrat’Eva, T.; Tsaplina, I.A.; Egorova, M.A.; Krasil’Nikova, E.N.; Zakharchuk, L.M. Reclassification of ‘Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans subsp. thermotolerans’ strain K1 as Alicyclobacillus tolerans sp. nov. and Sulfobacillus disulfidooxidans Dufresne et al. 1996 as Alicyclobacillus disulfidooxidans comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Alicyclobacillus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Jiang, C.-Y.; Liu, Y.-Y.; You, X.-Y.; Guo, X.; Liu, S.-J. Alicyclobacillus ferrooxydans sp. nov., a ferrous-oxidizing bacterium from solfataric soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 2898–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y. Evaluation of kiwi-fruit juice contaminant capacity of indigenous alicyclobacillus and its biodiversity. Nongye Jixie Xuebao Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2015, 46, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Goto, K.; Matsubara, H.; Mochida, K.; Matsumura, T.; Hara, Y.; Niwa, M.; Yamasato, K. Alicyclobacillus herbarius sp. nov., a novel bacterium containing omega-cycloheptane fatty acids, isolated from herbal tea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Albuquerque, L.; Rainey, F.A.; Chung, A.P.; Sunna, A.; Nobre, M.F.; Grote, R.; Antranikian, G.; Da Costa, M.S. Alicyclobacillus hesperidum sp. nov. and a related genomic species from solfataric soils of São Miguel in the Azores. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. López, G.; Díaz-Cárdenas, C.; Alzate, J.D.; Gonzalez, L.N.; Shapiro, N.; Woyke, T.; Kyrpides, N.; Restrepo, S.; Baena, S. Description of Alicyclobacillus montanus sp. nov., a mixotrophic bacterium isolated from acidic hot springs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 1608–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Imperio, T.; Viti, C.; Marri, L. Alicyclobacillus pohliae sp. nov., a thermophilic, endospore-forming bacterium isolated from geothermal soil of the north-west slope of Mount Melbourne (Antarctica). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Goto, K.; Mochida, K.; Asahara, M.; Suzuki, M.; Kasai, H.; Yokota, A. Alicyclobacillus pomorum sp. nov., a novel thermo-acidophilic, endospore-forming bacterium that does not possess ω-alicyclic fatty acids, and emended description of the genus Alicyclobacillus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 1537–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Kim, M.G.; Lee, J.-C.; Park, D.-J.; Li, W.-J.; Kim, C.-J. Alicyclobacillus tengchongensis sp. nov., a thermo-acidophilic bacterium isolated from hot spring soil. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 884–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Simbahan, J.; Drijber, R.; Blum, P.; Mori, K.; Kakegawa, T.; Higashi, Y.; Nakamura, K.-I.; Maruyama, A.; Hanada, S. Alicyclobacillus vulcanalis sp. nov., a thermophilic, acidophilic bacterium isolated from Coso Hot Springs, California, USA. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1703–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Baumgart, J.; Menje, S. The Impact of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris on the Quality of Juices and Soft Drinks. Fruit Process. 2000, 10, 251–254. [Google Scholar]
  119. Witthuhn, R.C.; Duvange, W.; Gouws, P.A. Isolation and Identification of Species of Alicyclobacillus from South African Fruit Juices and Concentrates. In Proceedings of the Food Micro, Bologna, Italy, 29 August–2 September 2006; p. 309. [Google Scholar]
  120. Oteiza, J.M.; Ares, G.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Soto, S.; Giannuzzi, L. Use of a multivariate approach to assess the incidence of Alicyclobacillus spp. in concentrate fruit juices marketed in Argentina: Results of a 14-year survey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 151, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Sokolowska, B.; Niezgoda, J.; Dekowska, A.; Porebska, I.; Nasilowska, J.; Waldon-Wiewora, E.; Kowalska, M. Incidence of Alicyclobacillus spp. in Polish Apple and Dark Berry Juice Concentrates and the Ability of Isolated A. acidoterrestris Strains to Spoilage of These Juices. Postępy Nauki Technol. Przem. Rolno-Spoż. 2016, 71, 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  122. Danyluk, M.D.; Friedrich, L.M.; Jouquand, C.; Goodrich-Schneider, R.; Parish, M.E.; Rouseff, R. Prevalence, concentration, spoilage, and mitigation of Alicyclobacillus spp. in tropical and subtropical fruit juice concentrates. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Sokolowska, B. Characteristics of Alicyclobacillus Acidoterrestris Strains Isolated from Different Sources and Regions; University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn: Olsztyn, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  124. Bevilacqua, A.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R. Effects of pH, cinnamaldehyde and heat-treatment time on spore viability of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Casas, J.; Valverde, M.; Marín-Iniesta, F.; Calvo, L. Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores by high pressure CO2 in apple cream. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 156, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bevilacqua, A.; Cibelli, F.; Corbo, M.; Sinigaglia, M. Effects of high-pressure homogenization on the survival of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in a laboratory medium. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Evelyn; Silva, F.V. High pressure processing pretreatment enhanced the thermosonication inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores in orange juice. Food Control 2016, 62, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kakagianni, M.; Kalantzi, K.; Beletsiotis, E.; Ghikas, D.; Lianou, A.; Koutsoumanis, K.P. Development and validation of predictive models for the effect of storage temperature and pH on the growth boundaries and kinetics of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris ATCC 49025 in fruit drinks. Food Microbiol. 2018, 74, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Komitopoulou, E.; Boziaris, I.S.; Davies, E.A.; Delves-Broughton, J.; Adams, M.R. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in fruit juices and its control by nisin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 34, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Maldonado, M.C.; Belfiore, C.; Navarro, A.R. Temperature, soluble solids and pH effect on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris viability in lemon juice concentrate. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 35, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Gocmen, D.; Elston, A.; Williams, T.; Parish, M.; Rouseff, R. Identification of medicinal off-flavours generated by Alicyclobacillus species in orange juice using GC-olfactometry and GC-MS. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 40, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Lusardi, C.; Previdi, M.P.; Colla, F.; Barbieri, G.; Bolzoni, L. Ability of Alicyclobacillus Strains to Spoil Fruit Juices and Nectars. Ind. Conserve Italy 2000, 75, 151–161. [Google Scholar]
  133. Huang, X.-C.; Yuan, Y.-H.; Guo, C.-F.; Gekas, V.; Yue, T.-L. Alicyclobacillus in the Fruit Juice Industry: Spoilage, Detection, and Prevention/Control. Food Rev. Int. 2015, 31, 91–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Topakas, E.; Kalogeris, E.; Kekos, D.; Macris, B.; Christakopoulos, P. Bioconversion of ferulic acid into vanillic acid by the thermophilic fungus Sporotrichum thermophile. LWT 2003, 36, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tatum, J.H.; Nagy, S.; Berry, R.E. Degradation Products Formed in Canned Single-Strength Orange Juice during Storage. J. Food Sci. 1975, 40, 707–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Peleg, H.; Naim, M.; Zehavi, U.; Rouseff, R.L.; Nagy, S. Pathways of 4-vinylguaiacol formation from ferulic acid in model solutions of orange juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1992, 40, 764–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Huang, Z.; Dostal, L.; Rosazza, J. Mechanisms of ferulic acid conversions to vanillic acid and guaiacol by Rhodotorula rubra. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 23954–23958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bahçeci, K.S.; Gökmen, V.; Acar, J. Formation of guaiacol from vanillin by Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple juice: A model study. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2004, 220, 196–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Niwa, M. Control of Hazardous Bacteria in Acidic Beverages by Using a Guaiacol Detection Kit (Peroxidase Method). Food process. 2005, 15, 388–392. [Google Scholar]
  140. Jensen, N.; Whitfield, F.B. Role of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in the development of a disinfectant taint in shelf-stable fruit juice. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 36, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Borlinghaus, A. Alicyclobacillus Incidence in Commercial Apple Juice Concentrate (AJC) Supplies-Method Development and Validation. Fruit Process. 1997, 7, 262–266. [Google Scholar]
  142. Osopale, B.A.; Adewumi, G.A.; Witthuhn, R.C.; Kuloyo, O.O.; Oguntoyinbo, F.A. A review of innovative techniques for rapid detection and enrichment of Alicyclobacillus during industrial processing of fruit juices and concentrates. Food Control 2019, 99, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wang, Z.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Cai, R.; Guo, C.; Wang, X.; Niu, C. Development of Polyclonal Antibody-Based Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Detection of Alicyclobacillus Strains in Apple Juice. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, M643–M649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Wang, Z.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Cai, R.; Niu, C.; Guo, C. Development and evaluation of an immunomagnetic separation–ELISA for the detection of Alicyclobacillus spp. in apple juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 166, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Wang, F.; Song, B. Development of colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic assay for rapid detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple juice. CyTA J. Food 2017, 15, 352–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Shi, Y.; Zhou, L.; Qu, X.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y. Targeting the cell wall: Preparation of monoclonal antibody for accurate identification of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple juice. Food Control 2020, 121, 107596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Li, J.; Xia, K.; Yu, C. Detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple juice concentrate by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Food Control 2012, 30, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Li, J.; Huang, R.; Xia, K.; Liu, L. Double antibodies sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple juice concentrate. Food Control 2014, 40, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mast, S.; Dietrich, R.; Didier, A.; Märtlbauer, E. Development of a Polyclonal Antibody-Based Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Detection of Spores of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in Various Fruit Juices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Chen, J.; Ma, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, W. Sensitive and rapid detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1070–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Osopale, B.A.; Witthuhn, C.R.; Albertyn, J.; Oguntoyinbo, F.A. Inhibitory spectrum of diverse guaiacol-producing Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris by poly dimethyl ammonium chloride disinfectant. LWT 2017, 84, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Bevilacqua, A.; Mischitelli, M.; Pietropaolo, V.; Ciuffreda, E.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R. Genotypic and Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris: A Contribution to Species Characterization. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Félix-Valenzuela, L.; Guardiolaavila, I.; Burgara-Estrella, A.J.; Ibarra-Zavala, M.; Mata-Haro, V. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius isolates. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Luo, H.; Yousef, A.; Wang, H. A real-time polymerase chain reaction-based method for rapid and specific detection of spoilage Alicyclobacillus spp. in apple juice. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 39, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Dekowska, A.; Niezgoda, J.; Sokołowska, B. Genetic Heterogeneity of Alicyclobacillus Strains Revealed by RFLP Analysis of Vdc Region and RpoB Gene. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9608756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Chen, S.-Q.; Hu, X.-S.; Shi, W.-N.; Dong, J.-C.; Wang, J. Isolation and identification Alicyclobacillus from concentrated apple juice processing. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2004, 44, 816–819. [Google Scholar]
  157. Sourri, P.; Doulgeraki, A.I.; Tassou, C.C.; Nychas, G.-J.E. A single enzyme PCR-RFLP assay targeting V1-V3 region of 16S rRNA gene for direct identification of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris from other Alicyclobacillus species. J. Appl. Genet. 2019, 60, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Funes-Huacca, M.; Regitano, L.C.D.A.; Mueller, O.; Carrilho, E. Semiquantitative determination of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in orange juice by reverse- transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and capillary electrophoresis—laser induced fluorescence using microchip technology. Electrophoresis 2004, 25, 3860–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Hünniger, T.; Felbinger, C.; Wessels, H.; Mast, S.; Hoffmann, A.; Schefer, A.; Märtlbauer, E.; Paschke-Kratzin, A.; Fischer, M. Food Targeting: A Real-Time PCR Assay Targeting 16S rDNA for Direct Quantification of Alicyclobacillus spp. Spores after Aptamer-Based Enrichment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 4291–4296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Connor, C.J.; Luo, H.; Gardener, B.B.M.; Wang, H.H. Development of a real-time PCR-based system targeting the 16S rRNA gene sequence for rapid detection of Alicyclobacillus spp. in juice products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 99, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Wang, Z.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Cai, R. Targeting the vanillic acid decarboxylase gene for Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris quantification and guaiacol assessment in apple juices using real time PCR. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 338, 109006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Concina, I.; Bornšek, M.; Baccelliere, S.; Falasconi, M.; Gobbi, E.; Sberveglieri, G. Alicyclobacillus spp.: Detection in soft drinks by Electronic Nose. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 2108–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Eguiluz, K.I.B.; Salazar-Banda, G.R.; Funes-Huacca, M.E.; Alberice, J.V.; Carrilho, E.; Machado, S.A.S.; Avaca, L.A. Sequence-specific electrochemical detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris DNA using electroconductive polymer-modified fluorine tin oxide electrodes. Analyst 2008, 134, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wang, Z.; Cai, R.; Yuan, Y.; Niu, C.; Hu, Z.; Yue, T. An immunomagnetic separation-real-time PCR system for the detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in fruit products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 175, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Cai, R.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, L.; Yue, T. Detection of Alicyclobacillus spp. in Fruit Juice by Combination of Immunomagnetic Separation and a SYBR Green I Real-Time PCR Assay. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Li, H.; Chen, H.; Liu, B.; Cai, R.; Jiang, N.; Yue, T.; Wang, Z. Establishment of quantitative PCR assays for the rapid detection of Alicyclobacillus spp. that can produce guaiacol in apple juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 360, 109329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Bahçeci, K.S.; Acar, J. Determination of guaiacol produced by Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple juice by using HPLC and spectrophotometric methods, and mathematical modeling of guaiacol production. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 225, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Cai, R.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Yue, T. Discrimination of Alicyclobacillus Strains by Lipase and Esterase Fingerprints. Food Anal. Methods 2015, 9, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Witthuhn, R.C.; van der Merwe, E.; Venter, P.; Cameron, M. Guaiacol production from ferulic acid, vanillin and vanillic acid by Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Cocconi, E.; Franceschini, B.; Previdi, M.P. Identification of spoilage by Alicyclobacillus bacteria in tomato-based products by UHPLC-MS/MS. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 2018, 53, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Pettipher, G.L.; Osmundson, M.E.; Murphy, J.M. Methods for the detection and enumeration of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris and investigation of growth and production of taint in fruit juice and fruit juice-containing drinks. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 24, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Gobbi, E.; Falasconi, M.; Concina, I.; Mantero, G.; Bianchi, F.; Mattarozzi, M.; Musci, M.; Sberveglieri, G. Electronic nose and Alicyclobacillus spp. spoilage of fruit juices: An emerging diagnostic tool. Food Control 2010, 21, 1374–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Witthuhn, R.C.; Smit, Y.; Cameron, M.; Venter, P. Guaiacol production by Alicyclobacillus and comparison of two guaiacol detection methods. Food Control 2013, 30, 700–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Huang, X.-C.; Guo, C.-F.; Yuan, Y.-H.; Luo, X.-X.; Yue, T.-L. Detection of medicinal off-flavor in apple juice with artificial sensing system and comparison with test panel evaluation and GC–MS. Food Control 2015, 51, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Orr, R.V.; Shewfelt, R.L.; Huang, C.J.; Tefera, S.; Beuchat, L.R. Detection of Guaiacol Produced by Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in Apple Juice by Sensory and Chromatographic Analyses, and Comparison with Spore and Vegetative Cell Populations. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 1517–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zierler, B.; Siegmund, B.; Pfannhauser, W. Determination of off-flavour compounds in apple juice caused by microorganisms using headspace solid phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 520, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Siegmund, B.; Pöllinger-Zierler, B. Odor Thresholds of Microbially Induced Off-Flavor Compounds in Apple Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 5984–5989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Farkaš, V.; Dalmadi, I. Detection of a metabolite produced by acidophilic spoilage-causing bacteria using different analytical and sensory methods. Acta Aliment. 2013, 42, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Cagnasso, S.; Falasconi, M.; Previdi, M.P.; Franceschini, B.; Cavalieri, C.; Sberveglieri, V.; Rovere, P. Rapid Screening of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spoilage of Fruit Juices by Electronic Nose: A Confirmation Study. J. Sens. 2010, 2010, 143173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Pérez-Cacho, P.R.; Danyluk, M.D.; Rouseff, R. GC–MS quantification and sensory thresholds of guaiacol in orange juice and its correlation with Alicyclobacillus spp. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Wahia, H.; Zhou, C.; Mustapha, A.T.; Amanor-Atiemoh, R.; Mo, L.; Fakayode, O.A.; Ma, H. Storage effects on the quality quartet of orange juice submitted to moderate thermosonication: Predictive modeling and odor fingerprinting approach. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 64, 104982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Huang, X.-C.; Yuan, Y.-H.; Wang, X.-Y.; Jiang, F.-H.; Yue, T.-L. Application of Electronic Nose in Tandem with Chemometric Analysis for Detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris-Spawned Spoilage in Apple Juice Beverage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2015, 8, 1295–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Xu, C.; Li, E.; Wang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, X.; Pan, S. Detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spoilage of mixed fruit juice beverage by electronic nose. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 15, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Lin, M.; Al-Holy, M.; Chang, S.-S.; Huang, Y.; Cavinato, A.G.; Kang, D.-H.; Rasco, B.A. Rapid discrimination of Alicyclobacillus strains in apple juice by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 105, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Al-Qadiri, H.M.; Lin, M.; Cavinato, A.G.; Rasco, B.A. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, detection and identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Alicyclobacillus strains in apple juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Wang, J.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Lu, X.; Shin, J.-H.; Rasco, B. Discrimination of Alicyclobacillus strains using nitrocellulose membrane filter and attenuated total reflectance fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, M137–M142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Deinhard, G.; Saar, J.; Krischke, W.; Poralla, K. Bacillus cycloheptanicus sp. nov., a New Thermoacidophile Containing ω-Cycloheptane Fatty Acids. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1987, 10, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. IFU Method No 12, 2004/2007; Method on the Detection of Taint Producing Alicyclobacillus in Fruit Juices; International Federation of Fruit Juice Producers, IFU: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007.
  189. Goto, K.; Tanimoto, Y.; Tamura, T.; Mochida, K.; Arai, D.; Asahara, M.; Suzuki, M.; Tanaka, H.; Inagaki, K. Identification of thermoacidophilic bacteria and a new Alicyclobacillus genomic species isolated from acidic environments in Japan. Extremophiles 2002, 6, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Pettipher, G. Alicyclobacillus spp., Their Detection and Control in Fruit Juice. Soft Drinks Int. 2000, 31–32. [Google Scholar]
  191. Chang, S.; Kang, D.-H. Development of novel Alicyclobacillus spp. isolation medium. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 1051–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Murray, M.B.; Gurtler, J.B.; Ryu, J.-H.; Harrison, M.A.; Beuchat, L.R. Evaluation of direct plating methods to enumerate Alicyclobacillus in beverages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 115, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Witthuhn, R.C.; Smit, Y.; Cameron, M.; Venter, P. Isolation of Alicyclobacillus and the influence of different growth parameters. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 146, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Lee, S.-Y.; Chang, S.-S.; Shin, J.-H.; Kang, D.-H. Membrane filtration method for enumeration and isolation of Alicyclobacillus spp. from apple juice. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Jensen, N. Alicyclobacillus: A New Challenge for the Food Industry. Food Aust. 1999, 51, 33–36. [Google Scholar]
  196. Wang, Z.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Cai, R.; Niu, C.; Guo, C. Preparation of immunomagnetic nanoparticles for the separation and enrichment of Alicyclobacillus spp. in apple juice. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Yamazaki, K.; Teduka, H.; Inoue, N.; Shinano, H. Specific primers for detection of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris by RT-PCR. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1996, 23, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Yamazaki, K.; Okubo, T.; Inoue, N.; Shinano, H. Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for Rapid Identification of the Spoilage Bacterium Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1016–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Franceschini, B.; Manganelli, E.; Bloise, C.; Previdi, M. Tomato Products Spoilage by Alicyclobacillus spp: Growing Ability of Spores Naturally Present as a Function of the Total Soluble Solids and Isolates Characterization. J. Food Process Beverages 2015, 3, 6. [Google Scholar]
  200. Jay, J.M. Modern Food Microbiology; Aspen Publishers Inc.: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  201. Goto, K.; Mochida, K.; Asahara, M.; Suzuki, M.; Yokota, A. Application of the hypervariable region of the 16S rDNA sequence as an index for the rapid identification of species in the genus Alicyclobacillus. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 48, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Thelen, K. Specific Rapid Detection of Alicyclobacillus by Fluorescently-Labeled Gene Probes in Fruit Juices. Fruit Process. 2003, 6, 416–418. [Google Scholar]
  203. Eisele, T.A.; Semon, M.J. Best Estimated Aroma and Taste Detection Threshold for Guaiacol in Water and Apple Juice. J. Food Sci. 2006, 70, S267–S269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Doerge, D.R.; Divi, R.L.; Churchwell, M.I. Identification of the Colored Guaiacol Oxidation Product Produced by Peroxidases. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 250, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Niwa, M.; Kawamoto, A. Development of a Rapid Detection Method of A. acidoterrestris, Hazardous Bacteria to Acidic Beverage. Fruit Process. 2003, 13, 102–107. [Google Scholar]
  206. Niwa, M.; Kuriyama, A.A. acidoterrestris Rapid Detection Kit. Fruit Process. 2003, 13, 328–331. [Google Scholar]
  207. FDA Guidance for Industry: Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-guide-minimize-microbial-food-safety-hazards-fresh-fruits-and-vegetables (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  208. Podolak, R.; Elliott, P.H.; Taylor, B.; Khurana, A.; Black, D.G. Destruction of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores in Apple Juice on Stainless Steel Surfaces by Chemical Disinfectants. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Bevilacqua, A.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris: New methods for inhibiting spore germination. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 125, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Torlak, E. Efficacy of ozone against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores in apple juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 172, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Hsiao, C.-P.; Siebert, K.J. Modeling the inhibitory effects of organic acids on bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 47, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. European Union Directive 2003/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2003 Amending Directive 95/2/EC on Food Additives Other than Colours and Sweeteners. 2003; Volume 024. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0114 (accessed on 1 February 2022).
  213. Walker, M.; Phillips, C.A. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris: An increasing threat to the fruit juice industry? Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 43, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Cleveland, J.; Montville, T.J.; Nes, I.F.; Chikindas, M.L. Bacteriocins: Safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 71, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Gharsallaoui, A.; Oulahal, N.; Joly, C.; Degraeve, P. Nisin as a Food Preservative: Part 1: Physicochemical Properties, Antimicrobial Activity, and Main Uses. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 1262–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Delves-Broughton, J.; Blackburn, P.; Evans, R.J.; Hugenholtz, J. Applications of the bacteriocin, nisin. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 1996, 69, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Yamazaki, K.; Murakami, M.; Kawai, Y.; Inoue, N.; Matsuda, T. Use of nisin for inhibition of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in acidic drinks. Food Microbiol. 2000, 17, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Peña, W.E.L.; De Massaguer, P.R. Microbial Modeling of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris CRA 7152 Growth in Orange Juice with Nisin Added. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1904–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Penã, W.E.L.; De Massaguer, P.R.; Teixeira, L.Q. Microbial modeling of thermal resistance of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris CRA7152 spores in concentrated orange juice with nisin addition. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2009, 40, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Huertas, J.-P.; Esteban, M.-D.; Antolinos, V.; Palop, A. Combined effect of natural antimicrobials and thermal treatments on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores. Food Control 2014, 35, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Jin, T.; Zhang, H. Biodegradable Polylactic Acid Polymer with Nisin for Use in Antimicrobial Food Packaging. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, M127–M134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Barbosa, A.A.T.; de Araújo, H.G.S.; Matos, P.N.; Carnelossi, M.A.G.; de Castro, A.A. Effects of nisin-incorporated films on the microbiological and physicochemical quality of minimally processed mangoes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 164, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Grande, M.J.; Lucas, R.; Abriouel, H.; Ben Omar, N.; Maqueda, M.; Martínez-Bueno, M.; Martínez-Cañamero, M.; Valdivia, E.; Gálvez, A. Control of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in fruit juices by enterocin AS-48. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 104, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Pei, J.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y. Control of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in fruit juices by a newly discovered bacteriocin. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. De Carvalho, A.; Vanetti, M.; Mantovani, H. Bovicin HC5 reduces thermal resistance of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in acidic mango pulp. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 1685–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Minamikawa, M.; Kawai, Y.; Inoue, N.; Yamazaki, K. Purification and Characterization of Warnericin RB4, Anti-Alicyclobacillus Bacteriocin, Produced by Staphylococcus warneri RB4. Curr. Microbiol. 2005, 51, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Pei, J.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, T. Primary characterization of bacteriocin paracin C—A novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus paracasei. Food Control 2013, 34, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Pei, J.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Dai, L. Activity of paracin C from lactic acid bacteria against Alicyclobacillus in apple juice: Application of a novelty bacteriocin. J. Food Saf. 2017, 37, e12350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Borrero, J.; Kelly, E.; O’Connor, P.M.; Kelleher, P.; Scully, C.; Cotter, P.D.; Mahony, J.; van Sinderen, D. Plantaricyclin A, a Novel Circular Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus plantarum NI326: Purification, Characterization, and Heterologous Production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e01801-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Beuchat, L.R. Antimicrobials Occurring Naturally in Foods. Food Technol. 1989, 43, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
  231. Voundi, S.O.; Nyegue, M.; Bougnom, B.P.; Etoa, F.-X. The Problem of Spore-Forming Bacteria in Food Preservation and Tentative Solutions. In Foodborne Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Antolinos, V.; Munoz, M.; Ros-Chumillas, M.; Aznar, A.; Periago, P.M.; Fernández, P.S. Combined effect of lysozyme and nisin at different incubation temperature and mild heat treatment on the probability of time to growth of Bacillus cereus. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Bevilacqua, A.; Ciuffreda, E.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R. Effects of lysozyme on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris under laboratory conditions. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 49, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Bevilacqua, A.; Corbo, M.R.; Buonocore, G.G.; Del Nobile, M.A.; Sinigaglia, M. Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Lysoyme against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. Adv. Food Sci. 2007, 29, 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  235. Conte, A.; Sinigaglia, M.; Del Nobile, M.A. Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Lysozyme Immobilized on Polyvinylalcohol-Based Film against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 861–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Takahashi, K.; Goto, K.; Tanaka, T.; Tanada, S.; Sawaki, T.; Yamamoto, R. Factors of spoilage caused by Alicyclobacillus and prevention measures. In Alicyclobacillus; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2007; pp. 117–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Sokołowska, B.; Skąpska, S.; Fonberg-Broczek, M.; Niezgoda, J.; Chotkiewicz, M.; Dekowska, A.; Rzoska, S. The Combined Effect of High Pressure and Nisin or Lysozyme on the Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores in Apple Juice. High Press. Res. 2012, 32, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Molva, C.; Baysal, A.H. Modeling growth of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris DSM 3922 type strain vegetative cells in the apple juice with nisin and lysozyme. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 3, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Liu, H.; Du, Y.; Wang, X.; Sun, L. Chitosan kills bacteria through cell membrane damage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 95, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Sivakumar, D.; Bill, M.; Korsten, L.; Thompson, K. Integrated Application of Chitosan Coating with Different Postharvest Treatments in the Control of Postharvest Decay and Maintenance of Overall Fruit Quality. In Chitosan in the Preservation of Agricultural Commodities; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 127–153. ISBN 9780128027356. [Google Scholar]
  241. Falcone, P.; Campaniello, D.; Altieri, C.; Sinigaglia, M.; Corbo, M.R.; Anese, M.; Del Nobile, M.A. Effectiveness of Pasteurization on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores in the Presence of Low Molecular Weight Chitosan. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2003, 15, 142–151. [Google Scholar]
  242. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Bevilacqua, A.; Corbo, M.R.; Campaniello, D.; D’Amato, D.; Gallo, M.; Speranza, B.; Sinigaglia, M.G.R. Shelf Life Prolongation of Fruit Juices through Essential Oils and Homogenization: A Review. In Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2011; pp. 1157–1166. [Google Scholar]
  244. Takahashi, T.; Kokubo, R.; Sakaino, M. Antimicrobial activities of eucalyptus leaf extracts and flavonoids from Eucalyptus maculata. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 39, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Maldonado, M.C.; Aban, M.P.; Navarro, A.R. Chemicals and lemon essential oil effect on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris viability. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Altieri, C.; Bevilacqua, A.; Cardillo, D.; Sinigaglia, M.G.R. Modeling Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris under Monolaurin Action. Adv. Food Sci. 2006, 28, 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  247. Shearer, A.E.H.; Dunne, C.P.; Sikes, A.; Hoover, D.G. Bacterial Spore Inhibition and Inactivation in Foods by Pressure, Chemical Preservatives, and Mild Heat. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Alberice, J.V.; Funes-Huacca, M.E.; Guterres, S.B.; Carrilho, E. Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in orange juice by saponin extracts combined with heat-treatment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 159, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Dos Anjos, M.M.; da Silva, A.A.; de Pascoli, I.C.; Mikcha, J.M.G.; Machinski, M., Jr.; Peralta, R.M.; de Abreu Filho, B.A. Antibacterial Activity of Papain and Bromelain on Alicyclobacillus spp. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 216, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Piskernik, S.; Klančnik, A.; Demšar, L.; Možina, S.S.; Jeršek, B. Control of Alicyclobacillus spp. vegetative cells and spores in apple juice with rosemary extracts. Food Control 2016, 60, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Qin, B.; Pothakamury, U.R.; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V.; Swanson, B.G.; Peleg, M. Nonthermal pasteurization of liquid foods using high-intensity pulsed electric fields. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996, 36, 603–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Lado, B.H.; Yousef, A.E. Alternative food-preservation technologies: Efficacy and mechanisms. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Mañas, P.; Pagán, R. Microbial inactivation by new technologies of food preservation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 1387–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Rovere, P.; Miglioli, L.; Lonneborg, N.G.; Scaramuzza, N.; Gola, S. Modeling and Calculation of the Sterilizing Effect in High Pressure Heat Treatments. Ind. Conserve Italy 1998, 73, 303–315. [Google Scholar]
  255. Balasubramaniam, V.M.B.; Martínez-Monteagudo, S.I.; Gupta, R. Principles and Application of High Pressure–Based Technologies in the Food Industry. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 6, 435–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Georget, E.; Sevenich, R.; Reineke, K.; Mathys, A.; Heinz, V.; Callanan, M.; Rauh, C.; Knorr, D. Inactivation of microorganisms by high isostatic pressure processing in complex matrices: A review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 27, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Margosch, D.; Gänzle, M.G.; Ehrmann, M.A.; Vogel, R.F. Pressure Inactivation of Bacillus Endospores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 7321–7328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  258. Raso, J.; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V. Nonthermal Preservation of Foods Using Combined Processing Techniques. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2003, 43, 265–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Wuytack, E.Y.; Soons, J.; Poschet, F.; Michiels, C. Comparative Study of Pressure- and Nutrient-Induced Germination of Bacillus subtilis Spores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  260. Paidhungat, M.; Setlow, B.; Daniels, W.B.; Hoover, D.; Papafragkou, E.; Setlow, P. Mechanisms of Induction of Germination of Bacillus subtilis Spores by High Pressure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3172–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  261. Ludwig, H.; Van Almsick, G.; Sojka, B. High Pressure Inactivation of Microorganisms. In High Pressure Bioscience and Biotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; Volume 13, pp. 237–244. ISBN 09210423. [Google Scholar]
  262. Setlow, P. Effects of High Pressure on Bacterial Spores. In High-Pressure Microbiology; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 35–52. ISBN 9781683671473. [Google Scholar]
  263. Silva, F.V.; Tan, E.K.; Farid, M. Bacterial spore inactivation at 45–65 °C using high pressure processing: Study of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in orange juice. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Lee, S.-Y.; Dougherty, R.H.; Kang, D.-H. Inhibitory Effects of High Pressure and Heat on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores in Apple Juice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 4158–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Alpas, H.; Alma, L.; Bozoglu, F. Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris vegetative cells in model system, apple, orange and tomato juices by high hydrostatic pressure. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 19, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Buzrul, S.; Alpas, H.; Bozoglu, F. Use of Weibull frequency distribution model to describe the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris by high pressure at different temperatures. Food Res. Int. 2005, 38, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Lee, S.-Y.; Chung, H.-J.; Kang, D.-H. Combined Treatment of High Pressure and Heat on Killing Spores of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in Apple Juice Concentrate. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1056–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Vercammen, A.; Vivijs, B.; Lurquin, I.; Michiels, C. Germination and inactivation of Bacillus coagulans and Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores by high hydrostatic pressure treatment in buffer and tomato sauce. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 152, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Sokołowska, B.; Skąpska, S.; Fonberg-Broczek, M.; Niezgoda, J.; Chotkiewicz, M.; Dekowska, A.; Rzoska, S.J. Factors influencing the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores exposed to high hydrostatic pressure in apple juice. High Press. Res. 2013, 33, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Sokołowska, B.; Skapska, S.; Fonberg-Broczek, M.; Niezgoda, J.; Porebska, I.; Dekowska, A.; Rzoska, S.J. Germination and Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores Induced by Moderate Hydrostatic Pressure. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  271. Porębska, I.; Rutkowska, M.; Sokolowska, B. Decrease in optical density as a results of germination of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores under high hydrostatic pressure. High Press. Res. 2015, 35, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. De Jesus, A.L.T.; Cristianini, M.; dos Santos, N.M.; Júnior, M.R.M. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on the microbial inactivation and extraction of bioactive compounds from açaí (Euterpe oleracea Martius) pulp. Food Res. Int. 2019, 130, 108856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Ribeiro, L.R.; Cristianini, M. Effect of high pressure processing combined with temperature on the inactivation and germination of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores: Influence of heat-shock on the counting of survivors. LWT 2019, 118, 108781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Van Luong, T.S.; Moir, C.; Chandry, P.S.; Pinfold, T.; Olivier, S.; Broussolle, V.; Bowman, J.P. Combined high pressure and heat treatment effectively disintegrates spore membranes and inactivates Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores in acidic fruit juice beverage. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 66, 102523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Sourri, P.; Argyri, A.A.; Panagou, E.Z.; Nychas, G.-J.E.; Tassou, C.C. Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Strain Variability in the Inactivation Kinetics of Spores in Orange Juice by Temperature-Assisted High Hydrostatic Pressure. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Ribeiro, L.R.; Cristianini, M. Effect of high pressure combined with temperature on the death kinetics of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores and on the quality characteristics of mango pulp. LWT 2021, 152, 112266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Pornpukdeewattana, S.; Jindaprasert, A.; Massa, S. Alicyclobacillus Spoilage and Control—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Chen, D. Applications of Ultrasound in Water and Wastewater Treatment. In Handbook on Applications of Ultrasound; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 373–406. [Google Scholar]
  279. Yuan, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yue, T.; Chen, T.; Lo, Y.M. Effect of Ultrasonic Treatments on Thermoacidophilic Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in Apple Juice. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2009, 33, 370–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Wang, J.; Hu, X.; Wang, Z. Kinetics models for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidiphilus DSM14558T and Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris DSM 3922T in apple juice by ultrasound. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Chemat, F.; Zill-e-Huma; Khan, M.K. Applications of ultrasound in food technology: Processing, preservation and extraction. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 813–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Celandroni, F.; Longo, I.; Tosoratti, N.; Giannessi, F.; Ghelardi, E.; Salvetti, S.; Baggiani, A.; Senesi, S. Effect of microwave radiation on Bacillus subtilis spores. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 1220–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Bintsis, T.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E.; Robinson, R.K. Existing and Potential Applications of Ultraviolet Light in the Food Industry—A Critical Review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Caminiti, I.M.; Palgan, I.; Muñoz, A.; Noci, F.; Whyte, P.; Morgan, D.J.; Cronin, D.A.; Lyng, J.G. The Effect of Ultraviolet Light on Microbial Inactivation and Quality Attributes of Apple Juice. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010, 5, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Baysal, A.H.; Molva, C.; Unluturk, S. UV-C light inactivation and modeling kinetics of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores in white grape and apple juices. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 166, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  286. Tremarin, A.; Brandão, T.R.; Silva, C.L. Inactivation kinetics of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in apple juice submitted to ultraviolet radiation. Food Control 2017, 73, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Mahapatra, A.K.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Julson, J.L. Applications of Ozone, Bacteriocins and Irradiation in Food Processing: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 447–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Nakauma, M.; Saito, K.; Katayama, T.; Tada, M.; Todoriki, S. Radiation-Heat Synergism for Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores in Citrus Juice. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 2538–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Lee, S.-Y.; Park, S.-H.; Kang, D.-H. Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores in Apple and Orange Juice Concentrates by Gamma Irradiation. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Geng, J.; Qiu, N. Germicidal Effects of Ohmic Heating on Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in Apple Juice. Food Sci. 2007, 28, 298–301. [Google Scholar]
  291. Baysal, A.H.; Icier, F. Inactivation Kinetics of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris Spores in Orange Juice by Ohmic Heating: Effects of Voltage Gradient and Temperature on Inactivation. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  292. Kim, N.; Ryang, J.; Lee, B.; Kim, C.; Rhee, M. Continuous ohmic heating of commercially processed apple juice using five sequential electric fields results in rapid inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 246, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Balasa, A.; Knorr, D.; Martín-Belloso, O. Effects of pulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds in foods: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 544–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Uemura, K.; Kobayashi, I.; Inoue, T. Inactivation of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in Orange Juice by High Electric Field Alternating Current. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2009, 15, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. Alicyclobacillus species isolated from various sources.
Table 1. Alicyclobacillus species isolated from various sources.
Alicyclobacillus SpeciesSourceReference
A. acidiphilusAcidic beverage [78]
A. acidocaldariusThermal acid waters [53,55,60]
A. acidocaldarius subsp. cidocaldariusFruit juice or soft drink [101]
A. acidocaldarius subsp. rittmanniiGeothermal soil of Mount Rittmann, Antarctica[102]
A. acidoterrestrisSoil/apple juice[56,58,60,87]
A. aerisCopper mine, China[103]
A. cellulocilyticusSteamed Japanese cedar chips[104]
A. consociatusHuman clinical specimen[105]
A. contaminansSoil, Fuji city Japan[76]
A. cycloheptanicusSoil[58,59,60]
A. dauciMixed vegetable/fruit juices[106]
A. disulffidooxidansWater sludge, Canada[107,108]
A. fastidiosusApple juice[76]
A. ferrooxydansSolfataric soil[109]
A. fodiniaquatilisAcid mine water, China [110]
A. herbariusHibiscus herbal tea[111]
A. hesperidumSolfataric soil[112]
A. kakegawensisSoil, Japan[76]
A. macrosporangiidusSoil, Japan[76]
A. montanusHot spring[113]
A. pohliaeGeothermal soil, Antarctica[114]
A. pomorumMixed fruit juice [115]
A. sacchariLiquid sugar[76]
A. sendaiensisSoil, Japan[61]
A. shizuokensisSoil in crop fields, Japan[76]
A. tengchongensisSoil in hot spring, China[116]
A. toleransOxidizable lead-zink ores[108]
A. vulcanalisHot spring, United States[117]
Table 2. Detection methods of Alicyclobacillus species.
Table 2. Detection methods of Alicyclobacillus species.
Detection MethodIsolation Source/MediumReference
Cell/Spore-Based Methods
ELISAApple juice[143,144,145,146]
Apple juice concentrate[147,148]
Orange, clear apple, unfiltered apple, pear, tomato, pink grapefruit, and white grape[149]
Flow CytometryApple juice concentrate[141]
Molecular Methods
PCRIsotonic water, lemonade, fruit juice blend, fruit carrot juice blend[81]
Orchard soil[77]
Mango juice[94]
Fruit concentrates and soils[122]
Various food and soil[150]
PCR/RAPD-PCROrchard soil, soil on the fruit (pear, peach, apricot and apples) and samples of water and materials through the production line [86]
Soil from lemon orchard[151]
Soil of Foggia and pear juice [152]
RAPD-PCRPassion fruit juice[95]
N/A[149]
PCR/ERIC-PCROrchard soil[153]
PCR/PCR-DGGEFruit juices and fruit juice blends from Ghana and Nigeria[80]
PCR/RT-PCRApple juice and saline [154]
PCR-RFLPVarious juices and concentrates, drinks and intermediates [155]
Concentrated apple juice[156]
Concentrated apple juice and processing environment[85]
Orange juice[157]
RT-PCROrange juice[158,159]
Orange juice, sports drink, lemonade and NaCl solution [160]
Apple juice[161]
Flavored non-carbonated drinks[162]
Acid buffer[163]
IMS-PCRApple juice[144]
Sterile water, apple juice and kiwi juice[164]
IMS-RT-PCRApple and kiwi fruit orchard and fruit juice production line[165]
qPCR(quantitative)Apple juice[166]
16S rRNA sequencingN/A[60]
Soil and water[111]
Various orchards[76]
Kiwi juice, fruit, soil and air of orchards and fresh cut and frozen fruit[82]
Analytical Methods
HPLCApple juice[138,167,168]
Flavored non-carbonated drinks[162]
Pear concentrate[169]
Fruit juices and fruit juice blends from Ghana and Nigeria[80]
Soil from lemon orchard[151]
Tomato puree[170]
GCMixed fruit drink[140]
GC-MSApple drinks, apple juice concentrate and orange juice[171]
Apple, orange and peach juice[172]
Fruit concentrate, flume water and vinegar flies[173]
Kiwi juice and fruit[110]
Apple juice[174]
GC-MS/GC-OlfactometryOrange juice[131]
Fruit concentrates and soils[122]
GC-MS/SPMEApple juice [67,161,175,176,177,178]
Apple, pear and orange juice[179]
Orange juice[180,181]
Electronic NoseApple, pear and orange juice[179]
Flavored non-carbonated drinks[162]
Apple, orange and peach juice[172]
Apple and orange juice[98]
Apple juice[178,182]
Concentrated apple juice[174]
Mixed fruit juice beverage[183]
Orange juice[181]
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)Apple juice[184,185,186]
N/A: Not Available.
Table 3. Overview of chemical treatments applied for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus species.
Table 3. Overview of chemical treatments applied for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus species.
Chemical TreatmentsCompoundsReferences
OxidantsClO2[133,207,208,209]
Ozone[210]
Sodium benzoate, Potassium sorbate[103]
Natural compounds of
microbial origin
(bacteriocins)
Nisin[89,129,217,218,219,220]
Enterocin A5-48[223]
Bificin C6165[224]
Biovicin HC5[225]
Warnericin RB4[226]
Paracin C[227,228]
Cyclin A[229]
Natural compounds of animal originLysozyme[234,235]
Chitosan[241]
Natural compounds of plant originEssential Oils[90,244,245]
Fatty acids and esters[246,247]
Plant extracts[248,249,250]
Table 4. Overview of HHP conditions applied for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus species.
Table 4. Overview of HHP conditions applied for the inactivation of Alicyclobacillus species.
Alicyclobacillus SpeciesMediumExperimental ConditionsReference
A. acidoterrestris ATCC49025
A. acidoterrestris NFPA 1013 (apple juice isolate)
Apple juice207, 414 and 621 MPa/1, 5 and 10 min/22, 45, 71 and 90 °C[264]
A. acidoterrestris DSMZ 2492 BAM broth
Orange juice
Tomato juice
Apple juice
Broth
350 and 450 MPa/5, 10 and 20 min/35, 45 and 50 °C
Juices
350 MPa/20 min/50 °C and storage 3 weeks/30 °C
[265]
A. acidoterrestris DSMZ 2492BAM broth350 and 450 MPa/35, 45 and 50 °C[266]
A. acidoterrestris NFPA 1101 (apple juice isolate)
A. acidoterrestris NFPA 1013 (apple juice isolate)
Apple Juice concentrate207, 414 and 621 MPa/1, 5 and 10 min/22, 45, 71 and 90 °C
Various concentrations of juice (17.5, 35 and 70 °Brix)
[267]
A. acidoterrestris LMG 16906Citric acid buffer (pH 4.0 and 5.0)
Potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0)
Tomato sauce (pH 4.2 and 5.0)
HHP and combined treatment HHP + heat
Buffers
100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 MPa/40 °C/10 min + heat 80 °C/10 min
Tomato sauce
100, 200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 MPa/25, 40 and 60 °C/10 min + heat 80 °C/10 min
[268]
A. acidoterrestris TO-29/4/02 (apple juice isolate)Apple juice
  • 200, 300 and 500 MPa/30 min/50 °C continuously
  • 100, 200, 300 and 500 MPa/2, 4 and 6 cycles of 5 min with 5 min pause/50 °C
  • 100, 200 MPa × 6 cycles and 200 MPa x 4 cycles/5 min with 5 min pause/50 °C incubation 60 min at 50 °C/pressure 500 MPa/30 min 50 °C
  • Combined treatment of HHP + lysozyme: 300 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 30 min/50 °C + 0.05 and 0.1 mg/mL lysozyme
  • Combined treatment of HHP +nisin:
    300 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 30 min/50 °C + 500, 750 and 1000 IU/mL nisin
    200 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 20 min/50 °C + 250 IU/mL nisin
[237]
A. acidoterrestris NZRM 4098Orange juice200 and 600 MPa/1–15 min/45, 55 and 65 °C[263]
A. acidoterrestris DSMZ 2498Apple juice
Orange juice
200, 400 and 600 MPa/10 min/20, 50 and 60 °C and storage for 28 days[98]
A. acidoterrestris TO-29/4/02 (apple juice isolate)
A. acidoterrestris TO-117/02 (apple juice isolate)
Apple juice
(11.2, 23.6, 35.7 and 71.1 °Brix)
200 MPa/5, 10, 15, 30 and 45 min/50 °C
200 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 30 min/50 °C for 11 days/11 and 16 months spores of TO-29/4/02
200 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 30 min/50 °C for 10 days/2, 10, 11 and 23 months spores of 117/02
200 MPa/1, 5, 10, 15 and 30 min/50 °C × 3 subsequent treatments
[269]
A. acidoterrestris TO-117/02 (apple juice isolate)Mcllvain buffer
(pH 4.0 and 7.0)
Apple juice
Germination and Inactivation
  • 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 MPa/20 min/50 °C (buffers and juice)
  • 200 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 30 min/20, 50 and 70 °C (juice)
  • 200 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 30 min/11.3, 23.7, 35.5 and 70.7 °Brix
  • 200 and 500 MPa/20 min/50 and 70 °C (juice)
  • 200 MPa/5, 10, 15 and 30 min/50 °C (buffers and juice)
  • 200 MPa/50 °C for 2, 4 and 6 cycles/5 min with 5 min pause
[270]
A. acidoterrestris TO-117/02 (apple juice isolate)Apple juice
Buffer (pH 4.0)
200, 300, 400 and 500 MPa/15 min/4, 20 and 50 °C
Determination with optical density
[271]
A. acidoterrestris NZRM 4447Orange juice200 and 600 MPa/15 min/39 °C + thermosonication 20.2 W/mL/78 °C[127]
A. acidoterrestris NZRM 4447Malt Extract Broth
(10, 20 and 30 °Brix)
600 MPa/up to 45 min/35, 45, 55 and 65 °C
600 MPa/up to 45 min/45 °C Validation for apple juice, lime juice concentrate and Blackcurrant juice concentrate
[97]
A. acidoterrestris CCT 7547Acai pulp600 MPa/5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 min/65 °C [272]
A. acidoterrestris CCT 7547Deionized Water300 and 600 MPa/5 min/25 and 70 °C + heat shock[273]
A. acidoterrestris AJA 66 (apple juice isolate)
A. acidoterrestris ATCC 49025
Apple juice
Potassium Phosphate Buffer (pH 3.7 and 7.0)
600 MPa/1, 3 and 5 min/70, 80 and 90 °C[274]
A. acidoterrestris (apple juice isolate)
A. acidoterrestris DSMZ 2498
Orange juice500 and 600 MPa/1, 3, 5, 15 and 30 min/25, 45, 60 and 70 °C[275]
A. acidoterrestris CCT 7547Mango pulp600 MPa
  • 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 min/65 °C
  • 0, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 min/70 °C
  • 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 min/75 °C
  • 0, 1.5, 3, 4.5, 6 and 7.5 min/80 °C
  • 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 min/90 °C
[276]
Alicyclobacillus spp. N1089 (canned tomatoes isolate)
Alicyclobacillus spp. N1098 (apple juice isolate)
Tomato juice
Apple juice
Combined treatment of HHP + Sucrose laurate L1695
392 MPa/10 min/45 °C + 0.005% and 0.01% for N1089
392 MPa/10 min/45 °C + 0.025, 0.04 and 0045% for N1098
[247]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sourri, P.; Tassou, C.C.; Nychas, G.-J.E.; Panagou, E.Z. Fruit Juice Spoilage by Alicyclobacillus: Detection and Control Methods—A Comprehensive Review. Foods 2022, 11, 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050747

AMA Style

Sourri P, Tassou CC, Nychas G-JE, Panagou EZ. Fruit Juice Spoilage by Alicyclobacillus: Detection and Control Methods—A Comprehensive Review. Foods. 2022; 11(5):747. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sourri, Patra, Chrysoula C. Tassou, George-John E. Nychas, and Efstathios Z. Panagou. 2022. "Fruit Juice Spoilage by Alicyclobacillus: Detection and Control Methods—A Comprehensive Review" Foods 11, no. 5: 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050747

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop