Next Article in Journal
Effects of κ-Carrageenan and Guar Gum on the Rheological Properties and Microstructure of Phycocyanin Gel
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Synbiotics Administration on Stress-Related Parameters in Thai Subjects—A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Journal
Postmortem Muscle Protein Changes as a Tool for Monitoring Sahraoui Dromedary Meat Quality Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Sensory Quality and the Physical Properties of Functional Green Tea-Infused Yoghurt with Inulin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fate of Bioactive Compounds during Lactic Acid Fermentation of Fruits and Vegetables

by
Spiros Paramithiotis
1,*,†,
Gitishree Das
2,†,
Han-Seung Shin
3 and
Jayanta Kumar Patra
2,*
1
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece
2
Research Institute of Integrative Life Sciences, Dongguk University, Goyangsi 10326, Korea
3
Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Goyangsi 10326, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2022, 11(5), 733; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050733
Submission received: 4 February 2022 / Revised: 27 February 2022 / Accepted: 28 February 2022 / Published: 2 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Future Trends in Fermented and Functional Foods)

Abstract

:
Consumption of lactic acid fermented fruits and vegetables has been correlated with a series of health benefits. Some of them have been attributed to the probiotic potential of lactic acid microbiota, while others to its metabolic potential and the production of bioactive compounds. The factors that affect the latter have been in the epicenter of intensive research over the last decade. The production of bioactive peptides, vitamins (especially of the B-complex), gamma-aminobutyric acid, as well as phenolic and organosulfur compounds during lactic acid fermentation of fruits and vegetables has attracted specific attention. On the other hand, the production of biogenic amines has also been intensively studied due to the adverse health effects caused by their consumption. The data that are currently available indicate that the production of these compounds is a strain-dependent characteristic that may also be affected by the raw materials used as well as the fermentation conditions. The aim of the present review paper is to collect all data referring to the production of the aforementioned compounds and to present and discuss them in a concise and comprehensive way.

1. Introduction

Lactic acid fermentation has been applied for centuries on substrates of plant and animal origin. The seasonal and geographical diversity of the raw materials results in a great variability of products. The qualitative and quantitative composition of the micro ecosystem that is developed during fermentation; the biotic and abiotic factors that direct it, along with the physicochemical changes of the substrate itself, have been in the epicenter of intensive research for many decades. Nowadays, the interest in lactic acid fermentation has been re-fueled, and its value has again been praised due to the health benefits that their consumption may confer. Indeed, a series of health benefits, including anti-allergic, anti-hypertensive, anti-inflammatory, anti-diarrheal, anti-infection, and anti-aging, as well as prevention and control of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cancer, has been associated with the consumption of lactic acid fermented commodities. These health benefits have been attributed to the lactic acid bacteria that drive the fermentation as well as to the bioactive compounds that are present in the final product [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Their presence depends upon the occurrence of the necessary precursor molecules in the raw materials and the capacity of the lactic acid bacteria strains to carry out the required biotransformations.
Lactic acid fermentation of fruits and vegetables is no exception. Indeed, the suitability of fermented fruits and vegetables as probiotic carriers has been adequately exhibited [9,10,11,12,13]. In addition, specific health benefits have been associated with the consumption of specific products, such as the antioxidant, anti-obesity, anti-cancer, anti-hypertensive, and immunomodulatory potential of kimchi [14].
The biotic and abiotic factors that affect the production of vitamins (especially of the B-complex), gamma-aminobutyric acid, bioactive peptides, as well as phenolic and organosulfur compounds during lactic acid fermentation of fruits and vegetables have attracted specific attention over the last decade. In addition, the production of biogenic amines has also been intensively studied due to the adverse health effects that are caused by their consumption. The aim of the present review paper is to collect all relevant information and to present and discuss them in a concise and comprehensive way.

2. Vitamins

The role of vitamins in human life and well-being is very important; they facilitate metabolic reactions, including energy-yielding ones, as well as many physiological processes. Depending on their chemical nature, they may be distinguished into water-soluble (B-complex, C) and fat-soluble (A, D, E, K) vitamins. They are considered essential micronutrients since the human body is not able to synthesize the majority of them. Thus, adequate dietary supply is necessary to prevent deficiency. Biofortification, i.e., the utilization of microorganisms capable of producing them, has been proposed as a strategy to improve the vitamin content of certain commodities. This approach is particularly valuable in the case of fermented fruits and vegetables.
The vitamin content of fruits and vegetables has been extensively studied. Fruits are recommended as sources of vitamin C; they also contain vitamin K and carotenoids, and leafy vegetables contain vitamin C, folate, and carotenoids [15]. More specifically, cucumbers and Chinese cabbage contain vitamins C, B1, B2, B11, B3, B6, A, E, and K, with Chinese cabbage appearing to contain more per 100 g. Olives contain vitamins B1, B3, B6, A, E, and K; black olives also contain vitamin C, while green olives also contain vitamin B11. Green olives appear to contain quantitatively more vitamins than black olives, with the exception of vitamin K, where they both contain 1.4 mg/100 g. Vitamins B12 and D seem to be absent from cucumbers, Chinese cabbage, and olives (data from fdc.nal.usda.gov, accessed on 29 July 2021).
Vitamin production by lactic acid bacteria has been in the epicenter of intensive research over the last decade, particularly vitamins of the B-complex and, more specifically, vitamins B2 (riboflavin), B9 (folate), and B12 (cobalamin). Vitamin production seems to be a strain-dependent property. Strains of Enterococcus faecium, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lm. mucosae, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides have been reported as riboflavin producers [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Extracellular folate production has been reported for strains of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lb. amylovorus, Lp. plantarum, Latilactobacillus sakei, and Lc. lactis. [24,25,26,27,28], while cobalamin production has been verified for strains belonging to the lactic acid bacteria species E. faecium, E. faecalis, La. casei, Furfurilactobacillus rossiae, Lm. reuteri, Lp. plantarum, Loigolactobacillus coryniformis, Lm. Fermentum, and La. rhamnosus [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The capacity of lactic acid bacteria strains to produce vitamin B1 (thiamine), B3 (niacin), as well as K2 has also been reported [36,37,38].
Although fruits and vegetables and, especially, green vegetables have been recognized as the main sources of folates for humans [39] and certain fruits and vegetables and, especially, dark green vegetables are very good sources of riboflavin [40], the fate of vitamins during lactic acid fermentation has only been marginally studied. Jagerstad et al. [41] reported that folate production takes place during lactic acid fermentation, depending on the starter culture. More accurately, the starter culture, consisting of a mixture of Lp. plantarum, Lc. lactis/cremoris and Leuconostoc sp. strains, was able to produce up to 125 μg/kg 5-CH3-H4 folate during fermentation of a mixture of beetroots, turnips, and onions and 110 μg/kg during fermentation of a mixture of roots consisting of carrots, turnips, parsnips, celeriacs, and onions. Thompson et al. [42] used four Lp. plantarum strains to ferment cauliflower, white beans, and their 50:50 mixture and reported a statistically significant increase in riboflavin and folate content. More accurately, after fermentation of the latter at 30 °C for 44 h, riboflavin increased to 75.64–91.60 μg/100 g fresh weight from the 42.83 μg/100 g fresh weight of the unfermented control; folate increased to 48.74–58.82 μg/100 g fresh weight from the 36.84 μg/100 g fresh weight of the unfermented control. In addition, Lp. plantarum strain 299 was able to produce vitamin B12, increasing its concentration to 0.048 μg/100 g fresh weight from the 0.029 μg/100 g fresh weight of the unfermented control.

3. Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid

The occurrence of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in plants, microorganisms, and vertebrates has been adequately exhibited. In plants and humans, GABA is mostly associated with signaling functions. Indeed, its role in plant growth and stress response has been established [43,44,45]. In humans, it acts as the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. The latter has played a decisive role in the ongoing trend of enriching food with this molecule; however, Hepsomali et al. [46] mentioned that although GABA oral intake resulted in various responses [47,48,49], it is still unknown whether brain GABA concentration is increased. On the other hand, it seems to have a different role in microorganisms; it has been associated with resistance to acidic conditions [50] as well as spore germination, at least in Neurospora crassa [51] and Bacillus megaterium [52]. In lactic acid bacteria, GABA production has been reported as a strain-dependent characteristic. It takes place mostly through L-glutamate decarboxylation since it also contributes to acid resistance through proton consumption [53]. L-glutamate supply may be exogenous through the glutamate/GABA antiporter or endogenous through the activity of glutamate synthase on α-ketoglutaric acid. Then, GABA may be transported extracellularly through the aforementioned antiporter or degraded to succinic acid through GABA aminotransferase and succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (Figure 1) Among others, strains belonging to E. durans, La. paracasei, La. rhamnosus, Lp. plantarum, Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis, Le. buchneri, Leu. mesenteroides, Leu. pseudomesenteroides, Lv. brevis, S. salivarius subsp. thermophilus, and Weissella cibaria have been reported as GABA-producers [54,55,56].
The amount of GABA synthesized by a plant depends upon several factors, such as variety, type, and severity of biotic and abiotic stresses; however, its occurrence has been characterized as ubiquitous [57]. Indeed, GABA amount may range from the 0.007 mg/g dry weight in an epicarp/mesocarp mixture of apples and the 0.019 mg/g dry weight of chestnuts to the 1.86 mg/g dry weight of mulberries and the 174.30 mg/g fresh weight of Vitis vinifera L. cultivar Pinot Noir [58,59,60,61]. Regarding the raw materials mostly used as substrates for lactic acid fermentation, the occurrence of GABA has also been reported. In olives and in extra virgin olive oil, the amount of GABA was cultivar-dependent [62,63]. In the latter case, its amount was less than 0.00014 mg/g. Leaves and roots of Chinese cabbage were reported to contain 4.69 and 7.02 μmol/g dry weight, respectively, accounting for the 8% and 26.86% of total free amino acids, respectively [64]. Finally, fresh cucumbers were reported to contain 105 mg/kg GABA [65].
Current evidence shows that lactic acid fermentation may increase GABA content. Indeed, spontaneously fermented cucumbers were reported to contain 150 mg/kg GABA, with the majority of it being formed during the first day of fermentation [65]. Notably, GABA concentration remained stable throughout the 6-month storage period at 28 °C. In the case of spontaneously fermented olives, GABA was formed only upon monosodium glutamate addition [66]. The amount of GABA formed was proportional to the amount of monosodium glutamate added and irrespective of the osmotic dehydration of olives, which was applied as a pre-fermentation treatment. GABA production was also reported during spontaneous kimchi fermentation [67]. In that study, GABA production took place within the first 25 days of storage at 4 °C, reaching approximately 4 mM; this amount of GABA remained stable until the end of storage (120 days). Analysis of the microecosystem identified strains of Leuconostoc spp. and Lt. sakei as the GABA producers. Seok et al. [68], Cho et al. [69], and Lee et al. [70] studied GABA production during kimchi fermentation inoculated with GABA producing strains. Seok et al. [68] used Lactobacillus sp. strain OPK 2–59 and 5 g monosodium glutamate and managed to produce 18 mg/100 g GABA, a notable increase from the initial amount of 2.84–4.06 mg/100 g. Interestingly, rapid GABA production was observed after the 9th day of storage. In the kimchi produced by the addition of either the GABA-producing strain or monosodium glutamate, the GABA amount at the end of storage (21 d) was less than 6 mg/100 g. Cho et al. [69] analyzed commercially available kimchi and Mukeunjee kimchi products and reported that the GABA content ranged from 1.9 to 12.9 mg/100 g and from 18.2 to 99.0 mg/100 g, respectively. Then, a GABA-producing Le. buchneri strain was employed as a starter culture, resulting in kimchi with 61.7 mg/100 g GABA, which was significantly higher than the 8.1 mg/100 g of the spontaneously fermented one. Notably, the sensory scores of the products were comparable. Lee et al. [70] prepared kimchi with the addition of Lv. zymae strain GU240 as a starter culture and evaluated the effect of L-glutamic acid, monosodium glutamate, and kelp extract as GABA precursors. Storage took place at −1 °C for 20 weeks. Monosodium glutamate was the most effective GABA precursor. The most rapid increase was observed between weeks 2 and 4, and the maximum GABA concentration reached 120.3 mg/100 g in week 8. Then, it was reduced to the final amount of 95.6 mg/100 g. The GABA content of the kimchi that was prepared without the addition of starter or precursor, as well as the kimchi prepared with only the addition of a starter, was 47 mg/100 g. The addition of kelp extract resulted in the accumulation of 55 mg/100 g GABA, and the addition of L-glutamate resulted in 62.5 mg/100 g. In all cases, maximum GABA concentration was observed in weeks 8 and 10, which was then reduced until the end of storage (week 20).

4. Bioactive Peptides

Bioactive peptides are short peptides that, upon release from the parent protein molecule, exert a biological function. Decryption from the parent protein molecule may take place during gastrointestinal digestion or due to the proteolytic activity of microorganisms, such as the LAB that direct a fermentation process. Their occurrence depends on the activity of extracellular and cell envelope proteinases, as well as the peptide transportation capacity into the cell, towards their complete hydrolysis to amino acids [71] (Figure 1). A wide range of biological activities has been described for such peptides, including anti-diabetic, antioxidant, anti-microbial, anti-thrombotic, hypocholesteromic, hypotensive, mineral-binding, opioid, and anti-opioid.
The liberation of bioactive peptides through lactic acid fermentation of protein-rich substrates, such as milk and soy, has been extensively studied. Data on the bioactivity of the peptides released by the lactic acid fermentation of meat, fish, grains, and legumes are also available. Thus, the decryption of such peptides through the application of LAB, such as E. faecalis, Lp. plantarum, Lb. helveticus, La. casei, La. rhamnosus, Companilactobacillus farciminis, Fructilactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Lc. lactis, Lb. delbrueckii subsp. lactis, and Pediococcus acidilactici single strains [35,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81], or microbial consortia [82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90], has been reported.
In general, fruits and vegetables are not rich in protein; however, the occurrence of bioactive peptides in some of them has been reported (recently reviewed by Sosalagere et al. [91]). Cucumbers, Chinese cabbage, and green and black olives contain 0.65%, 1.5%, 1.03%, and 0.84% protein, respectively (https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/, accessed on 21 August 2021). In olive seeds, the occurrence of the peptide LLPSY exhibited significant anti-proliferative capacity on prostate cancer cells (PC-3) and breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-468) [92]. Occurrence of bioactive peptides in cucumbers that were raw, acidified, spontaneously fermented, or fermented with the addition of Lp. pentosus strain LA0445 was assessed by Fideler et al. [93]. Five peptides with potential anti-hypertensive activity were detected, namely, IPP, LPP, VPP, KP, and RY. KP was present in all cases; the amount in the fermented ones was significantly higher than the rest. Acidified cucumbers also contained KY, a peptide that was not detected in spontaneously fermented ones. The cucumbers that were fermented with the addition of the starter culture contained all five peptides [93].

5. Phenolic Compounds

The occurrence of phenolic compounds in plants has been extensively assessed. They are the third-largest group of secondary metabolites, after terpenes and alkaloids; they hold a very important physiological role as they participate in processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, and cell development. Regarding the total phenolic content (TPC) of the fruits and vegetables mostly used as a substrate of lactic acid fermentation, it seems to be rather low; it has been reported to vary between 0.58–1.42 mg GAE/g fresh weight for Chinese cabbage, 0.17 mg GAE/g fresh weight for cucumbers, and 82.29–287.29 mg GAE/100 g for olives [94,95]. Their amount depends upon factors associated with the plant type and variety, cultivation conditions, processing, and storage [96,97]. The interest in phenolic compounds is fueled by the correlation that has been achieved between them and antioxidant capacity as well as the prevention of chronic diseases and inflammation [98].
Based on the fact that lactic-acid-fermented fruits and vegetables consist of two phases, namely, a solid and a liquid one, Ciniviz and Yildiz [99] studied the TPC of both juice and pulp portions of 30 kinds of lactic acid fermented fruits and vegetables. In all cases but two, namely, wild pears pickle and sour grapes pickle, the amount of TPC in juice was higher than the respective in the pulp portion. In the latter, TPC ranged from below detection limit in carrots pickle and white cabbage pickle to 135.39 μg GAE/mg in pinecone pickle, while in the juice portion, it ranged from 16.94 μg GAE/mg in tomatoes pickle to 235.19 μg GAE/mg in pinecone pickle. The most common phenolic acid seemed to be sinapic acid, which was detected in all juice and pulp samples at concentrations ranging from 135.91 mg/L in sour grapes pickle to 236.32 mg/L in sweet long green pepper pickle and from 104.25 mg/kg in white cucumber pickle to 107.43 mg/kg in unripe melon pickle, respectively. Vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and chlorogenic acid were present in all juice samples, ranging from 0.08 mg/L in white cabbage pickle to 31.81 mg/L in carrot pickle, from 30.06 mg/L in unripe melon pickle and chard pickle to 74.61 mg/L in hot pepper pickle, and from 62.21 mg/L in cauliflower pickle to 200.30 mg/L in rock samphire pickle, respectively. 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and p-coumaric acid were not detected in any sample.
The fate of phenolic compounds during lactic acid fermentation has only been marginally studied. The mode by which lactic acid fermentation may increase the TPC of the raw materials is either through the lysis of the cell wall of the plant cells with concomitant facilitation of their release from the vacuole, in which they are mainly localized, or by enzymatic conversion of their glycosides into their aglycone form [100]. The latter may take place through β-glycosidase activity, which several lactic acid bacteria strains have exhibited [101,102]. Indeed, several Lp. plantarum strains have been reported to hydrolyze oleuropein, which is the main phenolic glucoside of olives [103]. More accurately, an initial action of β-glycosidase, followed by an esterolytic activity on the aglycone moiety, has been reported to produce olenoic acid and hydroxytyrosol [100]. Moreover, through the production of phenolic acid decarboxylases, some Lp. plantarum strains may decarboxylate phenolic acids [104,105].
A wide range of phenolic compounds have been reported to occur in the brine or the flesh of fermented olives, including apigenin, apigenin-7-O-glucoside, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside, ferulic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, hydroxytyrosol, luteolin, luteolin-4-O-glucoside, luteolin-7-O-glucoside, protocatechuic acid, pyrocathecol, rutin, tyrosol, vanillic acid, vanillin, and verbascoside [106,107,108,109,110]. Their fate during fermentation depends upon the cultivar, the addition and type of starter culture, brine composition, as well as fermentation temperature and time [107,108,109]. Indeed, proper arrangement of the aforementioned conditions may result in the complete decomposition of oleuropein and an increase in hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, p-coumaric acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, verbascoside, and ferulic acid [107,109,110]. Initial concentration increase has also been reported for apigenin-7-O-glucoside, luteolin-4-O-glucoside, and luteolin-7-O-glucoside, which was followed by a decrease until the end of fermentation [110].
In the case of kimchi, Park et al. [111] reported that over-ripened kimchi contained more TPC than short-term fermented ones. Park et al. [112] reported that the TPC of mustard kimchi increased during the first two months to 482.4 mg GAE/g extract powder but then decreased during the third month to 475.3 mg GAE/g extract powder, which had no statistically significant difference from the control. Regarding the specific phenolic compounds assessed, the amount of caffeic acid increased throughout the three months of fermentation; the amount of naringin, catechin gallate, and epigallocatechin gallate initially increased, but after three months of fermentation, their amount was less than that of the control. The amount of chlorogenic acid and epicatechin gallate decreased throughout the three-month fermentation compared to the control; p-coumaric acid and gallocatechin gallate were only detected after one month of fermentation, and catechin was only detected after one and two months of fermentation. Epicatechin and rutin were present in the control, and their amount increased after two months of fermentation. However, they were not detected after three months of fermentation. Finally, gallic acid and epigallocatechin were not detected to the control and throughout fermentation. Oh et al. [113] studied the TPC of Dolsan leaf mustard kimchi and reported that the TPC of leaves decreased during the first 21 days of fermentation but then increased to the initial amount of ca. 100 mg GAE/100 g. On the contrary, the TPC of stems gradually increased from the initial ca. 40 mg GAE/100 g to a final of ca. 110 mg GAE/100 g. A novel insight was provided by Jung et al. [114]. In that study, the increase of TPC over the 24-day fermentation of kimchi made of young Chinese cabbage was reported. However, the initial TPC and the TPC at the end of fermentation were determined at 83.2 and 102.5 mg GAE/100 g, respectively, when the young Chinese cabbage was cultivated using nature-friendly composts. These amounts of TPC were higher than 63.2 and 98.2 mg GAE/100 g, respectively, when the young Chinese cabbage was cultivated using general composts and higher than 57.9 and 81.0 mg GAE/100 g, respectively, when the young Chinese cabbage was cultivated using chemical fertilizers.
Ciska et al. [115] and Kapusta-Duch et al. [116] studied the TPC of sauerkraut. The first study reported that sauerkraut extract contained 8.25 mg/g TPC while white cabbage contained 5.72 mg/g. In white cabbage, only esterified phenolic acids were detected, with sinapic acid being the most prevalent (278 μg/g). On the contrary, apart from esterified phenolic acids, their glycosides were also detected in the sauerkraut extract. As in the previous case, sinapic acid was the prevalent one, with 20 μg/g being quantified as esterified acid and 84 μg/g as its glycoside. Kapusta-Duch et al. [116] assessed the effect of package type, namely, low-density polyethylene and metalized polyethylene terephthalate with polyethylene bags, on the TPC content during four months of chilled storage of white sauerkraut. It was revealed that package type had no effect on the TPC levels as in both cases, the reduction was at ca. 12% and 20% after three and four months of storage, respectively.
The fate of phenolic compounds has also been assessed in less known regional lactic acid fermented fruit and vegetable products, such as African nightshade leaves and kiwi fruit. In the first case, the effect of fermentation that was carried out at 37 °C for 3 days on the phenolic profile of the product was strain-dependent [117]. For example, fermentation with Lp. plantarum strain 75 resulted in an increase of the amount of gallic acid, vanillic acid, 2,5 dihydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, and ellagic acid, as well as the flavonoids assessed, namely, catechin, quercetin, and luteolin. On the contrary, fermentation with Leu. pseudomesenteroides strain 56 resulted in an increase of the amount of ellagic acid and quercetin and a decrease in gallic acid, caffeic acid, vanillic acid, 2,5 dihydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and catechin. The effect of fermentation at 37 °C for 28 h by Lp. plantarum on the phenolic profile of kiwifruit pulp was studied by Zhou et al. [118]. The TPC increased after the 21st hour of fermentation. The amount of protocatechuic acid, esculetin, and p-coumaric acid was increased due to the fermentation, while the amount of gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, catechin, and epicatechin was decreased.

6. Organosulfur Compounds

Vegetables of the family Brassicaceae are very rich in organosulfur compounds in general and glucosinolates in particular. Among others, this family includes all types of cabbage and mustard greens, which are very important raw materials for lactic acid fermentation.
Glucosinolates are secondary metabolites, the stability of which depend upon their contact with myrosinase, a β-thioglucosidase that catalyzes its decomposition. In intact plant cells, they are spatially separated; however, upon conditions that compromise plant tissue integrity, such as infection by herbivores and phytopathogenic microorganisms, the substrate and the enzyme are mixed, leading initially to the formation of the unstable thiohydroximate-O-sulfonate and β-D-glucose. The fate of the former depends on the nature of the side chain present in the glucosinolates molecule as well as the environmental conditions. Especially regarding the latter, neutral pH favors the formation of isothiocyanates while acidic pH in the presence of ferrous ions and epithiospecifier protein favors the formation of nitriles [119,120,121]. The physiological role of glucosinolates and their breakdown products, especially isothiocyanates, against biotic stresses has been verified [122]. Their concentration depends upon plant species, variety, and tissue, as well as environmental conditions and agricultural practices [123]. Although this response may indicate a possible role in abiotic stresses as well, this has not been yet clarified [122].
The interest on glucosinolates and their breakdown products results from their biological activity; many of them have exhibited anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, and anti-proliferative activity against human cancer cells [124]. The biotransformations of glucosinolates during lactic acid fermentation of Brassica vegetables have been studied to some extent. In general, fermentation seems to facilitate glucosinolates decomposition and an increase of the concentration of the breakdown products, the type and concentration of which are related to the glucosinolate type and concentration in the raw material as well as the capacity of the microbial strains that drive the fermentation.
Glucosinolate decomposition during fermentation has been exhibited in the case of sauerkraut [125,126,127,128] and has been primarily attributed to the shredding of the cabbage that precedes fermentation and secondarily to hydrolysis by lactic acid bacteria [129,130]. Interestingly, the capacity of LAB to produce nitriles instead of reduced glucosinolates, which were produced by Enterobacteriaceae, was highlighted by Mullaney et al. [129].
Ciska and Pathak [131] reported that glucobrassicin and sinigrin were the most abundant glucosinolates in the shredded cabbage used for fermentation. Ascorbigen, indole-3-carbinol, and indole-3-acetonitrile were identified as degradation products of the former, while allyl isothiocyanate, allyl cyanide, and 1-cyano-2,3-epithiopropane were identified as degradation products of the latter.
Penas et al. [132] highlighted the importance of the starter culture, cabbage cultivar, and fermentation conditions on the volatile glucosinolate breakdown products. Iberin, iberin nitrile, allyl isothiocyanate, sulforaphane, and allyl cyanide were detected, with the latter being the most abundant, ranging from 65 to 75 μmol/100 g DM. Ascorbigen has been reported as the most abundant glucosinolate degradation product in sauerkraut [126,128,131,133]. Ciska and Pathak [131] reported that ascorbigen concentration could be as high as 14 μmol/100 g. Palani et al. [126] quantified ascorbigen at the end of fermentation at 13 μmol/100 g FW. Indole-3-acetonitrile was also present at the end of fermentation at 4.52 μmol/100 g FW. The concentration of both compounds decreased during storage at 4 °C. These results concur with the ones presented by Penas et al. [133] but only as far as the decrease of ascorbigen concentration is concerned; the concentration of indole-3-carbinol and indole-3-acetonitrile was stable throughout three-month storage at 4 °C. Ascorbigen was also reported by Ciska et al. [128] as the main glucobrassicin breakdown product in sauerkraut, which, at the end of fermentation, reached 9.59 μmol/100 g. The concentration of indole-3-acetonitrile and 3,3′-diindolylmethane also increased during fermentation to 0.036 and 0.0099 μmol/100 g, respectively. After 17 weeks of storage at 5 °C, the concentration of ascorbigen decreased to 8.59 μmol/100 g, but the respective of indole-3-acetonitrile and 3,3′-diindolylmethane increased to 0.057 and 0.0187 μmol/100 g, respectively. Regarding the decomposition products of aliphatic and aryl glucosinolates, an increase in the concentrations of allyl isothiocyanate, but-3-enyl isothiocyanate, 3-(methylthio) propyl isothiocyanate, 1-cyano-3-(methylthio) propane, 4-(methylthio) butyl isothiocyanate, 3-(methylsulfinyl) propyl isothiocyanate, 1-cyano-3-(methylsulfinyl) propane, 4-(methylsulfinyl) butyl isothiocyanate, and 2-phenethyl isothiocyanate was reported at the end of fermentation. Isothiocyanates increased during the first days of fermentation, reaching their peak on the 4th day and then decreasing. Allyl isothiocyanate was the most abundant breakdown product, with 2.848 μmol/100 g, followed by 3-(methylsulfinyl) propyl isothiocyanate, with 2.453 μmol/100 g. The concentration of all compounds decreased after 17 weeks of storage at 5 °C, with the exception of 1-cyano-3-(methylthio) propane, which increased [128].
The significance of starter cultures in the fate of glucosinolates during the fermentation of broccoli puree and juice was highlighted by Cai et al. [134], Ye et al. [135], and Xu et al. [136]. Ye et al. [135] studied the effect of lactic acid fermentation of autoclaved broccoli puree using five Lp. plantarum and 2 Leu. mesenteroides strains on the glucosinolate content. In general, a total of 10 glucosinolates have been detected in broccoli florets, namely, glucoalyssin, glucobrassicanapin, glucobrassicin, 4-hydroxy glucobrassicin, 4-methoxy glucobrassicin, glucoerucin, glucoiberin, glucoraphanin, neoglucobrassicin, and progoitrin [137,138,139]. A strain-dependent increase in the concentration of glucoraphanin, glucoiberin, and progoitrin to 29.0–236.5, 16.1–56.2, and 24.5–65.9 μg/g, respectively, from the initial trace levels, was reported. Notably, the maximum amounts were achieved by Lp. plantarum strain F1. Xu et al. [136] reported an increase of glucoraphanin, a decrease of gluconapin, glucoerucin, 4-hydroxy-glucobrassicin, and neoglucobrassicin, and no statistically significant change in glucobrassicin and 4-methoxy-glucobrassicin when juice made of broccoli florets was fermented with two P. pentosaceus strains at 37 °C for 36 h, in a strain-dependent manner. Finally, Cai et al. [134] reported that the preheating of broccoli florets at 65 °C for 3 min increased the concentration of sulforaphane, a glucoraphanin decomposition product, from the initial 806 to 3536 μmol/kg DW. Fermentation by a mixture of Lp. plantarum and Leu. mesenteroides strains at 30 °C for 15 h further enhanced sulforaphane concentration to 13,121.3 μmol/kg DW, most likely by facilitating the release and accessibility of glucoraphanin for decomposition.
Endogenous myrosinase inactivation and concomitant sinigrin retention after lactic acid fermentation of Indian mustard leaves at 22 °C for 7 d were assessed by Nugrahedi et al. [140]. Although oven heat treatment at 35 °C for 2.5 h and microwave treatment at 180 W for 4.5 min effectively reduced myrosinase activity, complete inactivation was achieved by microwave treatment at 900 W for 2 min, leading to the production of sayur asin with the sinigrin concentration of 11.4 μmol/10 g d.m. Mustard leaves are also the basic ingredient for the production of mustard leaf kimchi. Oh et al. [113] studied the fate of glucosinolates during the fermentation of mustard leaf kimchi at 0 °C for 35 d. Sinigrin, gluconapin, glucobrassicin, and glucoraphanin were detected at day 0 in both mustard leaves and stems; gluconasturtiin was only detected in leaves, while glucoiberin was only detected in stems. Reduction of the total amount of glucosinolates was evident throughout fermentation in both leaves and stems, which is mainly assigned to the reduction of sinigrin concentration, which was the most abundant glucosinolate; it was quantified at 21.43 and 22.47 mg/100 g at day 0 and 12.5 and 10.4 mg/100 g at day 35 in leaves and stems, respectively.

7. Biogenic Amines

Biogenic amines are compounds formed through the amination and transamination of aldehydes and ketones or the decarboxylation of amino acids. Their physiological role is very important. In plants, the role of polyamines in cell division [141], root growth [142,143,144,145], and vegetative propagation [146,147], as well as flower and fruit development [148,149,150,151,152,153,154], has been exhibited. Moreover, their role in abiotic and biotic stress responses has also been claimed [155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168]. Similarly, the contribution of cadaverine and dopamine to signaling stress response as well as plant growth and development has been reported [169,170]. In addition, tyramine and tryptamine are produced as defensive substances against aggressors [171] and serve as precursors for the production of alkaloids [172] and melatonin [173], respectively.
Regarding microbial physiology, the role of biogenic amines in gene expression [174,175], protection against oxidative stress [176,177,178,179], biofilm formation [180,181], signaling [182,183], and virulence [184,185] has been indicated. From a fermentation perspective, the most important role seems to be the response mechanism against acid stress. This mechanism involves a membrane antiport, which couples amino acid uptake with biogenic amine excretion, and intracellular amino acid decarboxylases, which decarboxylate the inserted amino acid with simultaneous proton consumption (Figure 1). Then, the amine is excreted, and ATP synthesis through proton motive force is directed [186,187]. Such mechanisms have been reported for histidine/histamine, lysine/cadaverine, ornithine/putrescine, and tyrosine/tyramine [186,188,189].
Based on the above, the occurrence of biogenic amines in plant tissues seems justified even without microbial infection and proliferation. Indeed, several studies have reported their presence in nonfermented fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, and cereals (reviewed by Sanchez-Perez et al. [190]). Putrescine seems to be commonly occurring and may be accompanied by tyramine, cadaverine, spermine, spermidine, and even histamine [190,191]. This is also the case for white cabbage, Chinese cabbage, and cucumbers, which are commonly used as raw materials for lactic acid fermentation [192,193,194,195,196,197,198]. On the other hand, the occurrence of biogenic amines has not been reported in the flesh of fresh olives at any ripeness stage [199].
In Table 1, the outcome of studies on the quantitative determination of biogenic amines in fermented fruits and vegetables is summarized. Kimchi seems to be the most studied product, most likely due to the variety of raw materials employed, which results in a large diversity of products [14]. Regarding the mean values that have been reported, the highest were 16.81 mg/kg for agmatine [200], 14.3 and 49.8 mg/100 g for cadaverine and histamine, respectively [201], 4.4 mg/kg for phenylethylamine [202], 334.64 mg/kg for putrescine [203], 31.30 mg/kg for spermine [204], and 24.6, 32.3 and 78.0 mg/kg for spermidine, tryptamine and tyramine, respectively [205]. Regarding the highest amounts, agmatine was reported at 86.0 mg/kg [200], phenylethylamine and tyramine at 15.75 and 181 mg/kg, respectively [204], putrescine at 982.32 mg/kg [203], while for cadaverine, histamine, spermidine, spermine, and tryptamine were reported at 155, 535, 8.8, 12.1, and 11.4 mg/100 g, respectively [201].
The level of biogenic amines in sauerkraut was lower than that of kimchi, with the exception of tyramine (Table 1). In the latter case, Kalac et al. [209] analyzed 53 samples of Czech sauerkraut and reported the mean amount at 235 mg/kg and the highest amount at 951 mg/kg. Reports on the biogenic amine content of fermented cucumbers and olives are generally lacking in the literature. Based on the available data (Table 1), fermented cucumbers seem to contain more biogenic amines than fermented olives but less than kimchi and sauerkraut. Regarding fermented olives, they seem to contain less biogenic amines than kimchi, sauerkraut, and fermented cucumbers. Regarding the rest of the fermented fruits and vegetables, the high amounts of agmatine (6.73 mg/kg) and spermidine (74.58 mg/kg) detected in champignon, of histamine (55.60 mg/kg) in white cabbage, of phenylethylamine (9.41 mg/kg), putrescine (252.58 mg/kg), and tyramine (166.58 mg/kg) in Brussels sprouts, of cadaverine (119.42 mg/kg) in broccoli, of spermine (49.63 mg/kg) in pumpkin, and of tryptamine (21.58 mg/kg) in cauliflower should be noticed (Table 1).
The increase in the amount of biogenic amines in fermented foods compared to that of raw materials has been correlated with the microbiota that drive the fermentation. Indeed, the capacity of lactic acid bacteria to decarboxylate amino acids has been adequately exhibited [211]. However, it should be noted that this is a strain-dependent property. Thus, the haphazard nature of the biogenic amine content of spontaneously fermented fruits and vegetables is indicated. On the other hand, qualitative and quantitative control of biogenic amine production is an option that is offered when lactic acid fermentation is performed with the addition of starter cultures.
In the case of sauerkraut, the effect of raw materials on the production of biogenic amines has been highlighted by Majcherczyk et al. [212] and by Satora et al. [213]. In the latter study, eight cabbage varieties were employed to make sauerkraut through spontaneous fermentation; statistically significant differences in tyramine, histamine, cadaverine, putrescine, and tryptamine content were reported. Interestingly, a positive correlation between biogenic amine production and yeast presence was reported. The contribution of yeasts in the accumulation of biogenic amines is already known in products of alcoholic fermentation, such as wine [214]. The addition of ingredients that have an organoleptic impact, such as onion and caraway, affected the accumulation of some biogenic amines; the most pronounced effect was the reduced amounts of cadaverine and tyramine at the end of the 14-day fermentation period [212]. On the other hand, at the end of the 12-month storage at 4 °C, the sauerkraut made at 18 °C, with the addition of onion, accumulated significantly less cadaverine and phenethylamine compared to the control [212]. During spontaneous sauerkraut fermentation, the accumulation of biogenic amines seems to be affected by the aforementioned parameters, along with fermentation temperature and time. Indeed, Rabie et al. [215] reported an accumulation of histamine, tyramine, putrescine, and cadaverine after 10 days of fermentation at 15 °C, while Majcherczyk and Surowka [212] reported accumulation of cadaverine, tryptamine, and tyramine during fermentation at 18 °C for 14 d and of putrescine and tryptamine during fermentation at 31 °C for 14 d. Similarly, accumulation during sauerkraut storage seems to be affected by the same parameters as above. Regarding the effect of cultivar, the accumulation pattern seems to be affected by the cabbage cultivar [216,217,218]; however, no details were provided on the capacity of the members of the microecosystem to perform amino acid decarboxylation. The addition of onion seemed to prohibit the accumulation of cadaverine and phenethylamine but only in sauerkraut fermented at 18 °C and not 31 °C [212]. The paramount effect of a lactic acid bacteria strain’s decarboxylating capacity in the accumulation of biogenic amines has also been adequately exhibited. Indeed, statistically significant differences in the accumulation during storage were observed and assigned to the Lp. plantarum and Leu. mesenteroides strains that were used as inocula [219]. In addition, suppression of biogenic amine accumulation during fermentation and storage through inoculation with Lp. plantarum, Lt. curvatus, and La. casei was reported by Rabie et al. [215]. Interestingly, the importance of the interaction between the selected starter culture and the cabbage cultivar was highlighted by Kalac et al. [216] and Spicka et al. [220].
In the case of kimchi, the accumulation of biogenic amines during fermentation of four kimchi types, namely, Pa, Gat, Kkakdugi, and Chonggak, has been assessed. Lee et al. [204] prepared Pa and Gat kimchi and studied the effect of myeolchi-aekjeot, a fermented anchovy sauce, the addition of which has been correlated with increased biogenic amine content [202,221,222]; tyramine-producing Lv. brevis strains and Lp. plantarum strains were unable to produce biogenic amines. During fermentation of Pa and Gat kimchi, the amount of tryptamine and histamine was reduced. During Pa fermentation, accumulation of tyramine, putrescine, and cadaverine in all experimental cases was noted. Spermine was accumulated only in some cases, while β-phenylethylamine and spermidine amounts were stable throughout fermentation. During Gat fermentation, only the cadaverine amount remained unchanged throughout the fermentation, and the accumulation of tyramine, β-phenylethylamine, putrescine, and spermidine was recorded. Spermine was also accumulated but only in some cases. In general, the addition of myeolchi-aekjeot and the tyramine-producing Lv. brevis strain enhanced biogenic amine accumulation, with the exception of spermine. Jin et al. [203] prepared Kkakdugi and Chonggak kimchi and studied the effect of myeolchi-aekjeot and saeu-jeotgal, a fermented shrimp product, the utilization of which has also been correlated with increased biogenic amine levels [221] in tyramine-producing Lv. brevis strains and Lp. plantarum strains. During fermentation of both products, the histamine amount decreased and the spermidine amount increased. In the case of Kkakdugi, tyramine was accumulated only in the samples inoculated with Lv. brevis, the putrescine amount slightly increased only in the uninoculated sample and the one inoculated with Lv. brevis JCM 1170, and cadaverine accumulated in all samples with the exception of the one that did not contain myeolchi-aekjeot, saeu-jeotgal, and inoculum. The latter sample was the only one in which spermine content increased, while in the rest, it was decreased. In the case of Chonggak, cadaverine remained stable in all samples but seemed to increase in the sample that did not contain the fermented fish condiments and inoculum; the tyramine amount increased in all samples with the exception of the one inoculated with Lp. plantarum, and cadaverine was accumulated only in the sample prepared with the addition of the fish condiments but without inoculum. In the same sample, along with the samples inoculated with Lv. brevis, the amount of spermine decreased. Combining the studies of Lee et al. [204] and Jin et al. [203], it can be concluded that the accumulation of biogenic amines could not always be predicted through the addition of ingredients that have been correlated with increased biogenic amine content (fish condiments) of starter cultures with known capacities. This indicates the existence of additional parameters that, at least in some cases, may affect biogenic amine accumulation. Since biogenic amine accumulation and decomposition are strain-dependent properties, it can be hypothesized that the native microbiota, and especially the proportion of which that manages to participate in the developing microecosystem, may be this additional parameter.
In the case of fermented cucumbers, biogenic amine accumulation during fermentation was assessed by Alan [223]. In the latter study, gherkin fermentation was performed spontaneously or with the addition of Lp. plantarum, Lp. pentosus, or Lp. paraplantarum strains as starter cultures. Spermidine was not detected in any experimental case. On the contrary, putrescine, cadaverine, histamine, and tyramine were detected, and their amount was strain-dependent. More accurately, spontaneously fermented gherkins contained an equal amount of putrescine with the one started with Lp. plantarum strain 49, less than the one started with Lp. plantarum strain 51, and more than the ones started with Lp. plantarum strain 13, Lp. pentosus strain 2, and Lp. paraplantarum strain 16. Cadaverine and histamine were not accumulated in the gherkins started with all three Lp. plantarum strains, but larger amounts were detected in the gherkins started with Lp. pentosus strain 2 and Lp. paraplantarum strain 16 compared to the spontaneously fermented ones. Finally, an equal amount of tyramine was accumulated in the gherkins started with Lp. plantarum strain 13 comapred with spontaneously fermented ones and larger amounts in the ones started with Lp. plantarum strains 49 and 51, Lp. pentosus strain 2, and Lp. paraplantarum strain 16.
The fate of biogenic amines during the fermentation of olives of the Manzanilla cultivar was assessed by Garcia-Garcia et al. [224]. Putrescine, tryptamine, β-phenylethylamine, spermidine, spermine, histamine, and agmatine were not detected during storage at 15, 20, and 28 °C for 12 months. Only cadaverine and tyramine were accumulated. The former was produced only at 20 and 28 °C, and the production rate increased after 7 and 5 months, respectively. Washing was correlated with increased production. Tyramine production followed a similar trend, with the exception that accumulation also occurred during storage at 15 °C.

8. Conclusions

The functional potential of lactic acid fermented fruits and vegetables relies on the interplay between the quality of the raw materials and the capacity of the microbial consortium to carry out certain biotransformations. The former depends on the type and variety of the raw materials, climatic conditions, and agricultural practices, as well as the occurrence and conditions of processing and storage. On the other hand, the production of bioactive compounds by microorganisms is a strain-dependent characteristic that also depends on the fermentation temperature and time. Thus, optimization of the functional potential requires a thorough study of all the aforementioned parameters. Although a lot of information is available in some cases, e.g., the production of biogenic amines, the trophic relationships within the microecosystem are very complex, and, thus, further study is still necessary to enable practical recommendations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P., G.D., H.-S.S., and J.K.P.; resources, S.P., G.D., H.-S.S., and J.K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P., G.D., H.-S.S., and J.K.P.; writing—review and editing, S.P., G.D., H.-S.S., and J.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through a grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1G1A1004667), the Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data related to this manuscript are presented in the form of tables and figures in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to their respective institutions for support. G Das, HS Shin and JK Patra are grateful to Dongguk University, Republic of Korea for support. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through a grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1G1A1004667), the Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ijarotimi, O.S.; Keshinro, O.O. Protein quality, hematological properties and nutritional status of albino rats fed complementary foods with fermented popcorn, African locust bean, and bambara groundnut flour blends. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2012, 6, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Oyewole, O.B. Lactic fermented foods in Africa and their benefits. Food Control 1997, 8, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Das, G.; Shin, H.-S.; Paramithiotis, S.; Sivamaruthi, B.S.; Wijaya, C.H.; Suharta, S.; Sanlier, N.; Patra, J.K. Traditional fermented foods with anti-aging effect: A concentric review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 134, 109269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ishida, Y.; Nakamura, F.; Kanzato, H.; Sawada, D.; Yamamoto, N.; Kagata, H.; Oh-Ida, M.; Takeuchi, H.; Fujiwara, S. Effect of milk fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus strain L-92 on symptoms of Japanese cedar pollen allergy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2005, 69, 1652–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rosa, D.D.; Dias, M.M.; Grześkowiak, Ł.M.; Reis, S.A.; Conceição, L.L.; Maria do Carmo, G.P. Milk kefir: Nutritional, microbiological and health benefits. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2017, 30, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mun, E.-G.; Sohn, H.-S.; Kim, M.-S.; Cha, Y.-S. Antihypertensive effect of Ganjang (traditional Korean soy sauce) on Sprague-Dawley rats. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2017, 11, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kang, D.; Li, Z.; Ji, G.E. Anti-Obesity effects of a mixture of fermented ginseng, Bifidobacterium longum BORI, and Lactobacillus paracasei CH88 in high-fat diet-fed mice. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 688–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, L.-J.; Li, D.; Zou, L.; Dong Chen, X.; Cheng, Y.-Q.; Yamaki, K.; Li, L.-T. Antioxidative activity of douchi (a Chinese traditional salt-fermented soybean food) extracts during its processing. Int. J. Food Prop. 2007, 10, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Blana, V.A.; Grounta, A.; Tassou, C.C.; Nychas, G.J.; Panagou, E.Z. Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactobacillus plantarum starter cultures isolated from industrially fermented olives. Food Microbiol. 2014, 38, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Shawi, S.G.; Swadi, W.A.; Hussein, A.A. Production of probiotic (Turshi) pickled vegetables. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 13, 2287–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Benitez-Cabello, A.; Torres-Maravilla, E.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.; Langella, P.; Martín, R.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.; Arroyo-López, F.N. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from table olive biofilms. Probiot. Antimicrob. 2020, 12, 1071–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Touret, T.; Oliveira, M.; Semedo-Lemsaddek, T. Putative probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from sauerkraut fermentations. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Jeong, C.-H.; Sohn, H.; Hwang, H.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, T.-W.; Kim, D.-S.; Kim, C.-S.; Han, S.-G.; Hong, S.-W. Comparison of the probiotic potential between Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from kimchi and standard probiotic strains isolated from different sources. Foods 2021, 10, 2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Paramithiotis, S.; Shin, H.S. Kimchi and other widely consumed traditional fermented foods of Korea: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Slavin, J.L.; Lloyd, B. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Burgess, C.M.; Smid, E.J.; Rutten, G.; van Sinderen, D. A general method for selection of riboflavin-overproducing food grade micro-organisms. Microb. Cell Factories 2006, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ewe, J.-A.; Wan-Abdullah, W.-N.; Liong, M.-T. Viability and growth characteristics of Lactobacillus in soymilk supplemented with B-vitamins. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 61, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Capozzi, V.; Menga, V.; Digesu, A.M.; De Vita, P.; Van Sinderen, D.; Cattivelli, L.; Fares, C.; Spano, G. Biotechnological production of vitamin B2-enriched bread and pasta. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8013–8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Juarez del Valle, M.; Laino, J.E.; Savoy de Giori, G.; LeBlanc, J.G. Riboflavin producing lactic acid bacteria as a biotechnological strategy to obtain bioenriched soymilk. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 1015–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Thakur, K.; Lule, V.K.; Rajni, C.S.; Kumar, N.; Mandal, S.; Anand, S.; Kumari, V.; Tomar, S.K. Riboflavin producing probiotic Lactobacilli as a biotechnological strategy to obtain riboflavin-enriched fermented foods. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 10, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hati, S.; Patel, M.; Mishra, B.K.; Das, S. Short-chain fatty acid and vitamin production potentials of Lactobacillus isolated from fermented foods of Khasi Tribes, Meghalaya, India. Ann. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 1191–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yepez, A.; Russo, P.; Spano, G.; Khomenko, I.; Biasioli, F.; Capozzi, V.; Aznar, R. In situ riboflavin fortification of different kefir-like cereal-based beverges using selected andean LAB strains. Food Microbiol. 2019, 77, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sabo, S.S.; Mendes, M.A.; Araújo, E.S.; Muradian, L.B.A.; Makiyama, E.N.; LeBlanc, J.G.; Borelli, P.; Fock, R.A.; Knobl, T.; Oliveira, R.P.S. Bioprospecting of probiotics with antimicrobial activities against Salmonella Heidelberg and that produce B-complex vitamins as potential supplements in poultry nutrition. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gangadharan, D.; Nampoothiri, K. Folate production using Lactococcus lactis ssp cremoris with implications for fortification of skim milk and fruit juices. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1859–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Laino, J.E.; LeBlanc, J.G.; Savoy de Giori, G. Production of natural folates by lactic acid bacteria starter cultures isolated from artisanal Argentinean yogurts. Can. J. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carrizo, S.L.; Montes de Oca, C.E.; Hebert, M.E.; Saavedra, L.; Vignolo, G.; LeBlanc, J.G.; Rollan, G.C. Lactic acid bacteria from andean grain amaranth: A source of vitamins and functional value enzymes. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Meucci, A.; Rossetti, L.; Zago, M.; Monti, L.; Giraffa, G.; Carminati, D.; Tidona, F. Folates biosynthesis by Streptococcus thermophilus during growth in milk. Food Microbiol. 2018, 69, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tamene, A.; Baye, K.; Kariluoto, S.; Edelmann, M.; Bationo, F.; Leconte, N.; Humblot, C. Lactobacillus plantarum P2R3FA isolated from traditional cereal-based fermented food increase folate status in deficient rats. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Taranto, M.; Vera, J.; Hugenholtz, J.; De Valdez, G.; Sesma, F. Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098 produces cobalamin. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 5643–5647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Masuda, M.; Ide, M.; Utsumi, H.; Niiro, T.; Shimamura, Y.; Murata, M. Production potency of folate, vitamin B12 and thiamine by lactic acid bacteria isolated from Japanese pickles. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2012, 76, 2061–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. de Angelis, M.; Bottacini, F.; Fosso, B.; Kelleher, P.; Calasso, M.; Di Cagno, R.; Ventura, M.; Picardi, E.; van Sinderen, D.; Gobbetti, M. Lactobacillus rossiae, a vitamin B12 producer, represents a metabolically versatile species within the genus Lactobacillus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Torres, A.C.; Vannini, V.; Bonacina, J.; Font, G.; Saavedra, L.; Taranto, M.P. Cobalamin production by Lactobacillus coryniformis: Biochemical identification of the synthetized corrinoid and genomic analysis of the biosynthetic cluster. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, P.; Gu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, J.V. Novel vitamin B12-producing Enterococcus spp. and preliminary in vitro evaluation of probiotic potentials. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 6155–6164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, P.; Gu, Q.; Yang, L.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y. Characterization of extracellular vitamin B12 producing Lactobacillus plantarum strains and assessment of the probiotic potentials. Food Chem. 2017, 234, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hati, S.; Patel, N.; Sakure, A.; Mandal, S. Influence of whey protein concentrate on the production of antibacterial peptides derived from fermented milk by lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2018, 24, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hamzehlou, P.; Sepahy, A.A.; Mehrabian, S.; Hosseini, F. Production of vitamins B3, B6 and B9 by Lactobacillus isolated from traditional yogurt samples from 3 cities in Iran, winter 2016. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2018, 5, 107–120. [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, Y.; van Bennekom, E.O.; Zhang, Y.; Abee, T.; Smid, E.J. Long-chain vitamin K2 production in Lactococcus lactis is influenced by temperature, carbon source, aeration and mode of energy metabolism. Microb. Cell Factories 2019, 18, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Teran, M.M.; LeBlanc, A.M.; Giori, G.S.; LeBlanc, J.G. Thiamine-producing lactic acid bacteria and their potential use in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 2097–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Delchier, N.; Herbig, A.-L.; Rychlik, M.; Renard, C.M.G.C. Folates in fruits and vegetables: Contents, processing, and stability. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 506–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Powers, H.J. Riboflavin (vitamin B-2) and health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jagerstad, M.; Jastrebova, J.; Svensson, U. Folates in fermented vegetables—A pilot study. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 37, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thompson, H.O.; Onning, G.; Holmgren, K.; Strandler, H.S.; Hultberg, M. Fermentation of cauliflower and white beans with Lactobacillus plantarum—Impact on levels of riboflavin, folate, vitamin B12 and amino acid composition. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2020, 75, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kinnersley, A.M.; Turano, F.J. Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and plant responses to stress. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2000, 19, 479–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Podlesakova, K.; Ugena, L.; Spichal, L.; Dolezal, K.; De Diego, N. Phytohormones and polyamines regulate plant stress responses by altering GABA pathway. New Biotechnol. 2019, 48, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ramos-Ruiz, R.; Martinez, F.; Knauf-Beiter, G. The effects of GABA in plants. Cogent Food Agric. 2019, 5, 1670553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hepsomali, P.; Groeger, J.A.; Nishihira, J.; Scholey, A. Effects of oral gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) administration on stress and sleep in humans: A systematic review. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abdou, A.M.; Higashiguchi, S.; Horie, K.; Kim, M.; Hatta, H.; Yokogoshi, H. Relaxation and immunity enhancement effects of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) administration in humans. Biofactors 2006, 26, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yoto, A.; Murao, S.; Motoki, M.; Yokoyama, Y.; Horie, N.; Takeshima, K.; Masuda, K.; Kim, M.; Yokogoshi, H. Oral intake of g-aminobutyric acid affects mood and activities of central nervous system during stressed condition induced by mental tasks. Amino Acids 2012, 43, 1331–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yamatsu, A.; Yamashita, Y.; Pandharipande, T.; Maru, I.; Kim, M. Effect of oral gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) administration on sleep and its absorption in humans. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C. Surviving the acid test: Responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 429–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hao, R.; Schmit, J.C. Cloning of the gene for glutamate decarboxylase and its expression during conidiation in Neurospora crassa. Biochem. J. 1993, 293, 735–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Foester, C.W.; Foester, H.F. Glutamic acid decarboxylase in spores of Bacillus megaterium and its possible involvement in spore germination. J. Bacteriol. 1973, 114, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wu, Q.; Tun, H.M.; Law, Y.-S.; Khafipour, E.; Shah, N.P. Common distribution of gad operon in Lactobacillus brevis and its GadA contributes to efficient GABA synthesis toward cytosolic near-neutral pH. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Siragusa, S.; De Angelis, M.; Di Cagno, R.; Rizzello, C.G.; Coda, R.; Gobbetti, M. Synthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid by lactic acid bacteria isolated from a variety of Italian cheeses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7283–7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lim, H.S.; Cha, I.-T.; Roh, S.W.; Shin, H.-H.; Seo, M.-J. Enhanced production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by optimizing culture conditions of Lactobacillus brevis HYE1 isolated from kimchi, a Korean fermented food. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Han, M.; Liao, W.-Y.; Wu, S.-M.; Gong, X.; Bai, C. Use of Streptococcus thermophilus for the in situ production of γ-aminobutyric acid-enriched fermented milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ramos-Ruiz, R.; Poirot, E.; Flores-Mosquera, M. GABA, a non-protein amino acid ubiquitous in food matrices. Cogent Food Agric. 2018, 4, 1534323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stines, A.P.; Grubb, J.; Gockowiak, H.; Henschke, P.A.; Høj, P.B.; Heeswijck, R. Proline and arginine accumulation in developing berries of Vitis vinifera L. in Australian vineyards: Influence of vine cultivar, berry maturity and tissue type. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2000, 6, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Oh, S.-H.; Moon, Y.-J.; Oh, C.-H. γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content of selected uncooked foods. Nutraceutical Food 2003, 8, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zazzeroni, R.; Homan, A.; Thain, E. Determination of gamma-Aminobutyric acid in food matrices by isotope dilution hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2009, 47, 564–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Choi, S.W.; Kim, E.O.; Lee, Y.J.; Leem, H.H.; Seo, I.H.; Yu, M.H.; Kang, D.H. Comparison of nutritional and functional constituents, and physicochemical characteristics of mulberrys from seven different Morus alba L. cultivars. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 39, 1467–1475. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sanchez-Hernandez, L.; Marina, M.L.; Crego, A.L. A capillary electrophoresis–Tandem mass spectrometry methodology for the determination of non-protein amino acids in vegetable oils as novel markers for the detection of adulterations in olive oils. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 4944–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Rosati, A.; Cafiero, C.; Paoletti, A.; Alfei, B.; Caporali, S.; Casciani, L.; Valentini, M. Effect of agronomical practices on carpology, fruit and oil composition, and oil sensory properties, in olive (Olea europaea L.). Food Chem. 2014, 159, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cha, Y.-S.; Oh, S.-H. Investigation of γ-aminobutyric acid in Chinese cabbages and effects of the cabbage diets on lipid metabolism and liver function of rats administered with ethanol. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2000, 29, 500–505. [Google Scholar]
  65. Moore, J.F.; DuVivier, R.; Johanningsmeier, S.D. Formation of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) during the natural lactic acid fermentation of cucumber. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 96, 103711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bonatsou, S.; Iliopoulos, V.; Mallouchos, A.; Gogou, E.; Oikonomopoulou, V.; Krokida, M.; Taoukis, P.; Panagou, E.Z. Effect of osmotic dehydration of olives as pre-fermentation treatment and partial substitution of sodium chloride by monosodium glutamate in the fermentation profile of Kalamata natural black olives. Food Microbiol. 2017, 63, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jeong, S.H.; Lee, S.H.; Jung, J.Y.; Choi, E.J.; Jeon, C.O. Microbial succession and metabolite changes during long-term storage of Kimchi. J. Food Sci. 2013, 78, M763–M769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seok, J.-H.; Park, K.-B.; Kim, Y.-H.; Bae, M.-O.; Lee, M.-K.; Oh, S.-H. Production and characterization of kimchi with enhanced levels of γ-aminobutyric acid. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 17, 940–946. [Google Scholar]
  69. Cho, S.Y.; Park, M.J.; Kim, K.M.; Ryu, J.-H.; Park, H.J. Production of high γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) sour kimchi using lactic acid bacteria isolated from mukeunjee kimchi. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lee, K.W.; Shim, J.M.; Yao, Z.; Kim, J.A.; Kim, J.H. Properties of kimchi fermented with GABA-producing lactic acid bacteria as a starter. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Savijoki, K.; Ingmer, H.; Varmanen, P. Proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 71, 394–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rutella, G.S.; Tagliazucchi, D.; Solieri, L. Survival and bioactivities of selected probiotic lactobacilli in yogurt fermentation and cold storage: New insights for developing a bi-functional dairy food. Food Microbiol. 2016, 60, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Aguilar-Toala, J.E.; Santiago-Lopez, L.; Peres, C.M.; Peres, C.; Garcia, H.S.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; Gonzalez-Cordova, A.F.; Hernandez-Mendoza, A. Assessment of multifunctional activity of bioactive peptides derived from fermented milk by specific Lactobacillus plantarum strains. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Skrzypczak, K.W.; Gustaw, W.Z.; Jabłonska-Ryś, E.D.; Michalak-Majewska, M.; Sławińska, A.; Radzki, W.P.; Gustaw, K.M.; Waśko, A.D. Antioxidative properties of milk protein preparations fermented by Polish strains of Lactobacillus helveticus. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2017, 16, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Taha, S.; El Abd, M.; De Gobba, C.; Abdel-Hamid, M.; Khalil, E.; Hassan, D. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of bioactive peptides in buffalo’s yoghurt fermented with different starter cultures. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. El-Fattah, A.A.; Sakr, S.; El-Dieb, S.; Elkashef, H. Developing functional yogurt rich in bioactive peptides and gamma aminobutyric acid related to cardiovascular health. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 98, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ayyash, M.; Liu, S.Q.; Al Mheiri, A.; Aldhaheri, M.; Raeisi, B.; Al-Nabulsi, A.; Osaili, T.; Olaimat, A. In vitro investigation of health-promoting benefits of fermented camel sausage by novel probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum: A comparative study with beef sausages. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 99, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cao, C.C.; Feng, M.Q.; Sun, J.; Xu, X.L.; Zhou, G.H. Screening of lactic acid bacteria with high protease activity from fermented sausages and antioxidant activity assessment of its fermented sausages. CyTA-J. Food 2019, 17, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Sanchez-Lopez, F.; Robles-Olvera, V.J.; Hidalgo-Morales, M.; Tsopmo, A. Characterization of Amaranthus hypochondriacus seed protein fractions, and their antioxidant activity after hydrolysis with lactic acid bacteria. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 95, 103075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Worsztynowicz, P.; Białas, W.; Grajek, W. Integrated approach for obtaining bioactive peptides from whey proteins hydrolysed using a new proteolytic lactic acid bacteria. Food Chem. 2020, 312, 126035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Luti, S.; Mazzoli, L.; Ramazzotti, M.; Galli, V.; Venturi, M.; Marino, G.; Lehmann, M.; Guerrini, S.; Granchi, L.; Paoli, P.; et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of sourdoughs containing selected Lactobacilli strains are retained in breads. Food Chem. 2020, 322, 126710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ademiluyi, A.O.; Oboh, G. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity and hypocholesterolemic effect of some fermented tropical legumes in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Int. J. Diabetes Dev. Ctries. 2015, 35, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ebner, J.; Aşci Arslan, A.; Fedorova, M.; Hoffmann, R.; Kucukcetin, A.; Pischetsrieder, M. Peptide profiling of bovine kefir reveals 236 unique peptides released from caseins during its production by starter culture or kefir grains. J. Proteom. 2015, 117, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dallas, D.C.; Citerne, F.; Tian, T.; Silva, V.L.M.; Kalanetra, K.M.; Frese, S.A.; Robinson, R.C.; Mills, D.A.; Barile, D. Peptidomic analysis reveals proteolytic activity of kefir microorganisms on bovine milk proteins. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Sah, B.N.P.; Vasiljevic, T.; McKechnie, S.; Donkor, O.N. Antioxidant peptides isolated from synbiotic yoghurt exhibit antiproliferative activities against HT-29 colon cancer cells. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 63, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Izquierdo-Gonzalez, J.J.; Amil-Ruiz, F.; Zazzu, S.; Sanchez-Lucas, R.; Fuentes-Almagro, C.A.; Rodriguez-Ortega, M.J. Proteomic analysis of goat milk kefir: Profiling the fermentation time dependent protein digestion and identification of potential peptides with biological activity. Food Chem. 2019, 295, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mushtaq, M.; Gani, A.; Masoodi, F.A. Himalayan cheese (Kalari/Kradi) fermented with different probiotic strains: In vitro investigation of nutraceutical properties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 104, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gallego, M.; Mora, L.; Escudero, E.; Toldra, F. Bioactive peptides and free amino acids profiles in different types of European dry-fermented sausages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 276, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wu, H.; Rui, X.; Li, W.; Xiao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Dong, M. Whole grain oats (Avena sativa L.) as a carrier of lactic acid bacteria and a supplement rich in angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides through solid-state fermentation. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 2270–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ayyash, M.; Johnson, S.K.; Liu, S.Q.; Mesmari, N.; Dahmani, S.; Al Dhaheri, A.S.; Kizhakkayil, J. In vitro investigation of bioactivities of solid-state fermented lupin, quinoa and wheat using Lactobacillus spp. Food Chem. 2019, 275, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sosalagere, C.; Kehinde, B.A.; Sharma, P. Isolation and functionalities of bioactive peptides from fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Chem. 2022, 366, 130494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Vasquez-Villanueva, R.; Muñoz-Moreno, L.; Carmena, M.J.; Marina, M.L.; García, M.C. In vitro antitumor and hypotensive activity of peptides from olive seeds. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 42, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fideler, J.; Johanningsmeier, S.D.; Ekelof, M.; Muddiman, D.C. Discovery and quantification of bioactive peptides in fermented cucumber by direct analysis IR-MALDESI mass spectrometry and LC-QQQ-MS. Food Chem. 2019, 271, 715–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Isabelle, M.; Lee, B.L.; Lim, M.T.; Koh, W.-P.; Huang, D.; Ong, C.N. Antioxidant activity and profiles of common vegetables in Singapore. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 993–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ozcan, M.M.; Fındık, S.; AlJuhaimi, F.; Ghafoor, K.; Babiker, E.E.; Adiamo, O.Q. The effect of harvest time and varieties on total phenolics, antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of olive fruit and leaves. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 2373–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Septembre-Malaterre, A.; Remize, F.; Poucheret, P. Fruits and vegetables, as a source of nutritional compounds and phytochemicals: Changes in bioactive compounds during lactic fermentation. Food Res. Int. 2018, 104, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Babenko, L.M.; Smirnov, O.E.; Romanenko, K.O.; Trunova, O.K.; Kosakivska, I.V. Phenolic compounds in plants: Biogenesis and functions. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2019, 91, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Landete, J.M. Updated knowledge about polyphenols: Functions, bioavailability, metabolism, and health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ciniviz, M.; Yildiz, H. Determination of phenolic acid profiles by HPLC in lacto-fermented fruits and vegetables (pickle): Effect of pulp and juice portions. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Munoz, R.; de las Rivas, B.; López de Felipe, F.; Reverón, I.; Santamaría, L.; Esteban-Torres, M.; Curiel, J.A.; Rodríguez, H.; Landete, J.M. Biotransformation of phenolics by Lactobacillus plantarum in fermented foods. In Fermented Foods in Health and Disease Prevention; Frias, J., Martinez-Villaluenga, C., Peñas, E., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2017; pp. 63–83. [Google Scholar]
  101. Donkor, O.N.; Shah, N. Production of beta-glucosidase and hydrolysis of isoflavone phytoestrogens by Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Lactobacillus casei in soymilk. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, M15–M20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Rekha, C.R.; Vijayalakshmi, G. Isoflavone phytoestrogens in soymilk fermented with betaglucosidase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 62, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zago, M.; Lanza, B.; Rossetti, L.; Muzzalupo, I.; Carminati, D.; Giraffa, G. Selection of Lactobacillus plantarum strains to use as starters in fermented table olives: Oleuropeinase activity and phage sensitivity. Food Microbiol. 2013, 34, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Barthelmebs, L.; Divies, C.; Cavin, J.-F. Knockout of the p-coumarate decarboxylase gene from Lactobacillus plantarum reveals the existence of two other inducible enzymatic activities involved in phenolic acid metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3368–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Rodrigues, H.; Landete, J.M.; Curiel, J.A.; de las Rivas, B.; Mancheno, J.M.; Munoz, R. Characterization of the p-coumaric acid decarboxylase from Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 748T. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3068–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Malheiro, R.; Mendes, P.; Fernandes, F.; Rodrigues, N.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Bioactivity and phenolic composition from natural fermented table olives. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 3132–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kaltsa, A.; Papaliaga, D.; Papaioannou, E.; Kotzekidou, P. Characteristics of oleuropeinolytic strains of Lactobacillus plantarum group and influence on phenolic compounds in table olives elaborated under reduced salt conditions. Food Microbiol. 2015, 48, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pistarino, E.; Aliakbarian, B.; Casazza, A.A.; Paini, M.; Cosulich, M.E.; Perego, P. Combined effect of starter culture and temperature on phenolic compounds during fermentation of Taggiasca black olives. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 2043–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Benincasa, C.; Muccilli, S.; Amenta, M.; Perri, E.; Romeo, F.V. Phenolic trend and hygienic quality of green table olives fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum starter culture. Food Chem. 2015, 186, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Durante, M.; Tufariello, M.; Tommasi, L.; Lenucci, M.S.; Bleve, G.; Mita, G. Evaluation of bioactive compounds in black table olives fermented with selected microbial starters. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Park, J.-M.; Shin, J.-H.; Gu, J.-G.; Yoon, S.-J.; Song, J.-C.; Jeon, W.-M.; Suh, H.-J.; Chang, U.-J.; Yang, C.-Y.; Kim, J.-M. Effect of antioxidant activity in kimchi during a short-term and over-ripening fermentation period. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 112, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Park, S.-Y.; Jang, H.-L.; Lee, J.-H.; Choi, Y.; Kim, H.; Hwang, J.; Seo, D.; Kim, S.; Nam, J.-S. Changes in the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of mustard leaf (Brassica juncea) kimchi extracts during different fermentation periods. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Oh, S.K.; Tsukamoto, C.; Kim, K.W.; Choi, M.R. Investigation of glucosinolates, and the antioxidant activity of Dolsan leaf mustard kimchi extract using HPLC and LC-PDA-MS/MS. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jung, S.J.; Kim, M.J.; Chae, S.W. Quality and functional characteristics of kimchi made with organically cultivated young Chinese cabbage (olgari-baechu). J. Ethn. Foods 2016, 3, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Ciska, E.; Karamac, M.; Kosinska, A. Antioxidant activity of extracts of white cabbage and sauerkraut. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2005, 55, 367–373. [Google Scholar]
  116. Kapusta-Duch, J.; Kusznierewicz, B.; Leszczyńska, T.; Borczak, B. Effect of package type on selected parameters of nutritional quality of chill-stored white sauerkraut. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2017, 67, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Degrain, A.; Manhivi, V.; Remize, F.; Garcia, C.; Sivakumar, D. Effect of lactic acid fermentation on color, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in African Nightshade. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zhou, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, N. Biotransformation of phenolics and metabolites and the change in antioxidant activity in kiwifruit induced by Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 3283–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Halkier, B.A.; Gershenzon, J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 303–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Williams, D.J.; Critchley, C.; Pun, S.; Chaliha, M.; O’Hare, T.J. Differing mechanisms of simple nitrile formation on glucosinolate degradation in Lepidium sativum and Nasturtium officinale seeds. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1401–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lee, M.-K.; Chun, J.-H.; Byeon, D.H.; Chung, S.-O.; Park, S.U.; Park, S.; Arasu, M.V.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Lim, Y.-P.; Kim, S.-J. Variation of glucosinolates in 62 varieties of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) and their antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 58, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Martinez-Ballesta, M.C.; Moreno, D.A.; Carvajal, M. The physiological importance of glucosinolates on plant response to abiotic stress in Brassica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11607–11625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Bischoff, K. Glucosinolates and organosulfur compounds. In Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine; Gupta, R.C., Srivastava, A., Lall, R., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  124. Barba, F.J.; Nikmaram, N.; Roohinejad, S.; Khelfa, A.; Zhu, Z.; Koubaa, M. Bioavailability of glucosinolates and their breakdown products: Impact of processing. Front. Nutr. 2016, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Martinez-Villaluenga, C.; Peñas, E.; Frias, J.; Ciska, E.; Honke, J.; Piskula, M.K.; Kozlowska, H.; Vidal-Valverde, C. Influence of fermentation conditions on glucosinolates, ascorbigen, and ascorbic acid content in white cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata cv. Taler) cultivated in different seasons. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, C62–C67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Palani, K.; Harbaum-Piayda, B.; Meske, D.; Keppler, J.K.; Bockelmann, W.; Heller, K.J.; Schwarz, K. Influence of fermentation on glucosinolates and glucobrassicin degradation products in sauerkraut. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Tolonen, M.; Taipale, M.; Viander, B.; Pihlava, J.-M.; Korhonen, H.; Ryhanen, E.-L. Plant-derived biomolecules in fermented cabbage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6798–6803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ciska, E.; Honke, J.; Drabinska, N. Changes in glucosinolates and their breakdown products during the fermentation of cabbage and prolonged storage of sauerkraut: Focus on sauerkraut juice. Food Chem. 2021, 365, 130498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Mullaney, J.A.; Kelly, W.J.; McGhie, T.K.; Ansell, J.; Heyes, J.A. Lactic acid bacteria convert glucosinolates to nitriles efficiently yet differently from Enterobacteriaceae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3039–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Luang-In, V.; Deeseenthum, S.; Udomwong, P.; Saengha, W.; Gregori, M. Formation of sulforaphane and iberin products from Thai cabbage fermented by myrosinase-positive bacteria. Molecules 2018, 23, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Ciska, E.; Pathak, D.R. Glucosinolate Derivatives in stored fermented cabbage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7938–7943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Penas, E.; Pihlava, J.M.; Vidal-Valverde, C.; Frias, J. Influence of fermentation conditions of Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata on the volatile glucosinolate hydrolysis compounds of sauerkrauts. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 48, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Penas, E.; Limón, R.I.; Vidal-Valverde, C.; Frias, J. Effect of storage on the content of indole-glucosinolate breakdown products and vitamin C of sauerkrauts treated by high hydrostatic pressure. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 53, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Cai, Y.X.; Augustin, M.A.; Jegasothy, H.; Wanga, J.H.; Terefe, N.S. Mild heat combined with lactic acid fermentation: A novel approach for enhancing sulforaphane yield in broccoli puree. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Ye, J.-H.; Huang, L.-Y.; Terefe, N.S.; Augustin, M.A. Fermentation-based biotransformation of glucosinolates, phenolics and sugars in retorted broccoli puree by lactic acid bacteria. Food Chem. 2019, 286, 616–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Xu, X.; Bi, S.; Lao, F.; Chen, F.; Liao, X.; Wu, J. Induced changes in bioactive compounds of broccoli juices after fermented by animal- and plant-derived Pediococcus pentosaceus. Food Chem. 2021, 357, 129767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bhandari, S.R.; Kwak, J.H. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity in different tissues of Brassica vegetables. Molecules 2015, 20, 1228–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Frandsen, H.B.; Markedal, K.E.; Martin-Belloso, O.; Sanchez-Vega, R.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Sorensen, H.; Sorensen, S.; Sorensen, J.C. Effects of novel processing techniques on glucosinolates and membrane associated myrosinases in broccoli. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 64, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Guo, R.F.; Yuan, G.F.; Wang, Q.M. Effect of NaCl treatments on glucosinolate metabolism in broccoli sprouts. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2013, 14, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Nugrahedi, P.Y.; Widianarko, B.; Dekker, M.; Verkerk, R.; Oliviero, T. Retention of glucosinolates during fermentation of Brassica juncea: A case study on production of sayur asin. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 240, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Walker, M.A.; Roberts, D.R.; Shih, C.Y.; Dumbroff, E.B. A requirement for polyamines during the cell division phase of radicle emergence in seeds of Acer saccharum. Plant Cell Physiol. 1985, 26, 967–972. [Google Scholar]
  142. Baraldi, R.; Bertazza, G.; Bregoli, A.M.; Fasolo, F.; Rotondi, A.; Predieri, S.; Serafini-Fracassini, D.; Slovin, J.P.; Cohen, J.D. Auxins and polyamines in relation to differential in vitro root induction on microcuttings of two pear cultivars. J. Plant Growth Regul. 1995, 11, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Bais, H.P.; George, J.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of polyamines on growth of hairy root cultures of witloof chicory (Cichorium intybus L. cv. Lucknow local) and formation of coumarins. J. Plant Growth Regul. 1999, 18, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Bais, H.P.; Sudha, G.; Ravishankar, G.A. Putrescine influences growth and production of coumarins in hairy root cultures of Cichorium intybus L. cv. Lucknow local (witloof chicory). J. Plant Growth Regul. 1999, 18, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Bais, H.P.; Bhagyalakshmi, N.; Rajasekaran, T.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of polyamines on growth and production of secondary metabolites in hairy root cultures of Beta vulgaris and Tagetes patula. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2000, 22, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jirage, D.B.; Ravishankar, G.A.; Suvarnalatha, G.; Venkataraman, L.V. Profile of polyamines during sprouting and growth of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) corms. J. Plant Growth Regul. 1994, 13, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lee, T.M.; Lin, Y.H. Opposite effects of Fusicoccin and IAA on putrescine synthesis of rice coleoptiles. Physiol. Plant. 1996, 97, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Torrigiani, P.; Altamura, M.M.; Pasqua, G.; Monacelli, B.; Serafini-Fracassini, D.; Bagni, N. Free and conjugated polyamines during de novo floral and vegetative bud formation in thin cell layers of tobacco. Physiol. Plant. 1987, 70, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Gerats, A.G.M.; Kaye, C.; Collins, C.; Malmberg, R.L. Polyamine levels in Petunia genotypes with normal and abnormal floral morphologies. Plant Physiol. 1988, 86, 390–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Bais, H.P.; Sudha, G.; Ravishankar, G.A. Putrescine and silver nitrate influences shoot multiplication, in vitro flowering and endogenous titres of polyamines in Cichorium intybus L. cv. Lucknow local. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2000, 19, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Teitel, D.C.; Cohen, E.; Arad, S.; Birnbaum, E.; Mizrahi, Y. The possible involvement of polyamines in the development of tomato fruits in vitro. Plant Growth Regul. 1985, 3, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Biasi, R.; Costa, G.; Bagni, N. Polyamine metabolism is related to fruit set and growth. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1991, 29, 497–506. [Google Scholar]
  153. Alabadi, D.; Aguero, M.S.; Perez-Amador, M.A.; Carbonell, J. Arginase, arginine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase and polyamines in tomato ovaries: Changes in unpollinated ovaries and parthenocarpic fruits induced by auxin or gibberellin. Plant Physiol. 1996, 112, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Alabadi, D.; Carbonell, J. Expression of ornithine decarboxylase is transiently increased by pollination, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, and gibberellic acid in tomato ovaries. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Kusano, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Berberich, T.; Takahashi, Y. Advances in polyamine research in 2007. J. Plant Res. 2007, 120, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kusano, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Berberich, T.; Takahashi, Y. The polyamine spermine rescues Arabidopsis from salinity and drought stresses. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 250–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Capell, T.; Bassie, L.; Christou, P. Modulation of the polyamine biosynthetic pathway in transgenic rice confers tolerance to drought stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9909–9914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Urano, K.; Yoshiba, Y.; Nanjo, T.; Ito, T.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Arabidopsis stress-inducible gene for arginine decarboxylase AtADC2 is required for accumulation of putrescine in salt tolerance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 313, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kasukabe, Y.; He, L.; Nada, K.; Misawa, S.; Ihara, I.; Tachibana, S. Over-expression of spermidine synthase enhances tolerance to multiple environmental stresses and up-regulates the expression of various stress-regulated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Kasukabe, Y.; He, L.; Watakabe, Y.; Otani, M.; Shimada, T.; Tachibana, S. Improvement of environmental stress tolerance of sweet potato by introduction of genes for spermidine synthase. Plant Biotechnol. 2006, 23, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Navakoudis, E.; Lutz, C.; Langebartels, C.; Lutz-Meindl, U.; Kotzabasis, K. Ozone impact on the photosynthetic apparatus and the protective role of polyamines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1621, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wen, X.P.; Pang, X.M.; Matsuda, N.; Kita, M.; Inoue, H.; Hao, Y.-J.; Honda, C.; Moriguchi, T. Over-expression of the apple spermidine synthase gene in pear confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance by altering polyamine titers. Transgenic Res. 2007, 17, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Yamaguchi, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Berberich, T.; Imai, A.; Miyazaki, A.; Takahashi, T.; Michael, A.; Kusano, T. The polyamine spermine protects against high salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Yamaguchi, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Berberich, T.; Imai, A.; Takahashi, T.; Michael, A.; Kusano, T. A protective role for the polyamine spermine against drought stress in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 352, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Takahashi, Y.; Berberich, T.; Miyazaki, A.; Seo, S.; Ohashi, Y.; Kusano, T. Spermine signalling in tobacco: Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases by spermine is mediated through mitochondrial dysfunction. Plant J. 2003, 36, 820–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Cona, A.; Rea, G.; Angelini, R.; Federico, R.; Tavladoraki, P. Functions of amine oxidases in plant development and defence. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Tun, N.N.; Santa-Catarina, C.; Begum, T.; Silveira, V.; Handro, W.; Floh, E.I.; Scherer, G.F. Polyamines induce rapid biosynthesis of nitric oxide (NO) in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Yamasaki, H.; Cohen, M.F. No signal at the crossroads: Polyamine-induced nitric oxide synthesis in plants? Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 522–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Jancewicz, A.L.; Gibbs, N.M.; Masson, P.H. Cadaverine’s functional role in plant development and environmental response. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  170. Liu, Q.; Gao, T.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Ding, K.; Ma, F.; Li, C. Functions of dopamine in plants: A review. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, e1827782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Servillo, L.; Castaldo, D.; Giovane, A.; Casale, R.; D’Onofrio, N.; Cautela, D.; Balestrieri, M.L. Tyramine pathways in citrus plant defense: Glycoconjugates of tyramine and its N-methylated derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Desgagne-Penix, I. Biosynthesis of alkaloids in Amaryllidaceae plants: A review. Phytochem. Rev. 2021, 20, 409–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Nawaz, K.; Chaudhary, R.; Sarwar, A.; Ahmad, B.; Gul, A.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H.; Anjum, S. Melatonin as master regulator in plant growth, development and stress alleviator for sustainable agricultural production: Current status and future perspectives. Sustainability 2021, 13, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Pastre, D.; Pietrement, O.; Landousy, F.; Hamon, L.; Sorel, I.; David, M.O.; Delain, E.; Zozime, A.; Le Cam, E. A new approach to DNA bending by polyamines and its implication in DNA condensation. Eur. Biophys. J. 2006, 35, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Lindemose, S.; Nielsen, P.E.; Mollegaard, N.E. Polyamines preferentially interact with bent adenine tracts in double-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 1790–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Ha, H.C.; Sirisoma, N.S.; Kuppusamy, P.; Zweier, J.L.; Woster, P.M.; Casero, R.A., Jr. The natural polyamine spermine functions directly as a free radical scavenger. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11140–11145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Kim, I.G.; Oh, T.J. SOS induction of the recA gene by UV-, γ-irradiation and mitomycin C is mediated by polyamines in Escherichia coli K-12. Toxicol. Lett. 2000, 116, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Tkachenko, A.; Nesterova, L.; Pshenichnov, M. The role of the natural polyamine putrescine in defence against oxidative stress in Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 2001, 176, 155–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Chattopadhyay, M.K.; Tabor, C.W.; Tabor, H. Polyamines protect Escherichia coli cells from the toxic effect of oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 2261–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Karatan, E.; Duncan, T.R.; Watnick, P.I. NspS, a predicted polyamine sensor, mediates activation of Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation by norspermidine. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 7434–7443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Patel, C.N.; Wortham, B.W.; Lines, J.L.; Fetherston, J.D.; Perry, R.D.; Oliveira, M.A. Polyamines are essential for the formation of plague biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 2355–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Sturgill, G.; Rather, P.N. Evidence that putrescine acts as an extracellular signal required for swarming in Proteus mirabilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 51, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Stevenson, L.G.; Rather, P.N. A novel gene involved in regulating the flagellar gene cascade in Proteus mirabilis. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 7830–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Polissi, A.; Pontiggia, A.; Feger, G.; Altieri, M.; Mottl, H.; Ferrari, L.; Simon, D. Large-scale identification of virulence genes from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 5620–5629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Ware, D.; Jiang, Y.; Lin, W.; Swiatlo, E. Involvement of potD in Streptococcus pneumoniae polyamine transport and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Molenaar, D.; Bosscher, J.S.; Ten Brink, B.; Driessen, A.J.M.; Konings, W.N. Generation of a proton motive force by histidine decarboxylation and electrogenic histidine/histamine antiport in Lactobacillus buchneri. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 2864–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. EFSA. Scientific opinion on risk-based control of biogenic amine formation in fermented foods. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2393–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Soksawatmaekhin, W.; Kuraishi, A.; Sakata, K.; Kashiwagi, K.; Igarashi, K. Excretion and uptake of cadaverine by CadB and its physiological functions in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 51, 1401–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Wolken, W.A.; Lucas, P.M.; Lonvaud-Funel, A.; Lolkema, J.S. The mechanism of the tyrosine transporter TyrP supports a proton motive tyrosine decarboxylation pathway in Lactobacillus brevis. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 2198–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Sanchez-Perez, S.; Comas-Baste, O.; Rabell-Gonzalez, J.; Veciana-Nogues, M.T.; Latorre-Moratalla, M.L.; Vidal-Carou, M.C. Biogenic amines in plant-origin foods: Are they frequently underestimated in low-histamine diets? Foods 2018, 7, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Dala-Paula, B.M.; Starling, M.F.V.; Beatriz, M.; Gloria, A. Vegetables consumed in Brazilian cuisine as sources of bioactive amines. Food Biosci. 2021, 40, 100856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Cipolla, B.G.; Havouis, R.; Moulinoux, J.P. Polyamine contents in current foods: A basis for polyamine reduced diet and a study of its long-term observance and tolerance in prostate carcinoma patients. Amino Acids 2007, 33, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Nishibori, N.; Fujihara, S.; Akatuki, T. Amounts of polyamines in foods in Japan and intake by Japanese. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Moret, S.; Smela, D.; Populin, T.; Conte, L.S. A survey on free biogenic amine content of fresh and preserved vegetables. Food Chem. 2005, 89, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Simon-Sarkadi, L.; Holzapfel, W.H. Determination of biogenic amines in leafy vegetables by amino acid analyser. Z. Lebensm.-Unters. Forsch. 1994, 198, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Bardocz, S.; Grant, G.; Brown, D.S.; Ralph, A.; Pusztai, A. Polyamines in food—Implications for growth and health. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1993, 4, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Eliassen, K.A.; Reistad, R.; Risøen, U.; Rønning, H.F. Dietary polyamines. Food Chem. 2002, 78, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Nishimura, K.; Shiina, R.; Kashiwagi, K.; Igarashi, K. Decrease in polyamines with aging and their ingestion from food and drink. J. Biochem. 2006, 139, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Garcia-Garcia, P.; Brenes-Balbuena, M.; Hornero-Mendez, D.; Garcia-Borrego, A.; Garrido-Fernandez, A. Content of biogenic amines in table olives. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Swider, O.; Roszko, M.Ł.; Wójcicki, M.; Szymczyk, K. Biogenic Amines and Free Amino Acids in Traditional Fermented Vegetables-Dietary Risk Evaluation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 856–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Tsai, Y.-H.; Kung, H.-F.; Lin, Q.-L.; Hwang, J.-H.; Cheng, S.-H.; Wei, C.-I.; Hwang, D.-F. Occurrence of histamine and histamine-forming bacteria in kimchi products in Taiwan. Food Chem. 2005, 90, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Cho, T.-Y.; Han, G.-H.; Bahn, K.-N.; Son, Y.-W.; Jang, M.-R.; Lee, C.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, D.-B.; Kim, S.-B. Evaluation of biogenic amines in Korean commercial fermented foods. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 38, 730–737. [Google Scholar]
  203. Jin, Y.H.; Lee, J.H.; Park, Y.K.; Lee, J.-H.; Mah, J.-H. The occurrence of biogenic amines and determination of biogenic amine-producing lactic acid bacteria in Kkakdugi and Chonggak Kimchi. Foods 2019, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Lee, J.-H.; Jin, Y.H.; Park, Y.K.; Yun, S.J.; Mah, J.-H. Formation of biogenic amines in Pa (green onion) Kimchi and Gat (mustard leaf) Kimchi. Foods 2019, 8, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Kang, K.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, J.G.; Sung, N.-J.; Lim, H.; Chung, M.J. Analysis and risk assessment of N-nitrosodimethylamine and its precursor concentrations in Korean commercial kimchi. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 46, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Hornero-Mendez, D.; Garrido-Fernandez, A. Rapid High-Performance Liquid Chromatography analysis of biogenic amines in fermented vegetable brines. J. Food Prot. 1997, 60, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Garcia-Garcia, P.; Brenes-Balbuena, M.; Romero-Barranco, C.; Garrido-Fernandez, A. Biogenic amines in packed table olives and pickles. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 374–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Shin, S.-W.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-T.; Eum, K.-S.; Hong, S.-R.; Kang, H.-J.; Park, K.-H.; Yoon, M.-H. Biogenic-amine contents of korean commercial salted fishes and cabbage kimchi. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2019, 52, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  209. Kalac, P.; Spicka, J.; Krizek, M.; Steidlova, S.; Pelikanova, T. Concentrations of seven biogenic amines in sauerkraut. Food Chem. 1999, 67, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Tofalo, R.; Schirone, M.; Perpetuini, G.; Angelozzi, G.; Suzzi, G.; Corsetti, A. Microbiological and chemical profiles of naturally fermented table olives and brines from different Italian cultivars. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2012, 102, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G. Biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria: A review. Foods 2019, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  212. Majcherczyk, J.; Surowka, K. Effects of onion or caraway on the formation of biogenic amines during sauerkraut fermentation and refrigerated storage. Food Chem. 2019, 298, 125083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Satora, P.; Skotniczny, M.; Strnad, S.; Piechowicz, W. Chemical composition and sensory quality of sauerkraut produced from different cabbage varieties. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 136, 110325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Restuccia, D.; Loizzo, M.R.; Spizzirri, U.G. Accumulation of biogenic amines in wine: Role of alcoholic and malolactic fermentation. Fermentation 2018, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Rabie, M.A.; Siliha, H.; el-Saidy, S.; el-Badawy, A.A.; Malcata, F.X. Reduced biogenic amine contents in sauerkraut via addition of selected lactic acid bacteria. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1778–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Kalac, P.; Spicka, J.; Krizek, M.; Pelikanova, T. The effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on biogenic amines formation in sauerkraut. Food Chem. 2000, 70, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Kalac, P.; Spicka, J.; Krizek, M.; Pelikanova, T. Changes in biogenic amine concentrations during sauerkraut storage. Food Chem. 2000, 69, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Kosson, R.; Elkner, K. Effect of storage period on biogenic amine content in sauerkraut. Veg. Crop. Res. Bull. 2010, 73, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Penas, E.; Frias, J.; Sidro, B.; Vidal-Valverde, C. Impact of fermentation conditions and refrigerated storage on microbial quality and biogenic amine content of sauerkraut. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Spicka, J.; Kalac, P.; Bover-Cid, S.; Krízek, M. Application of lactic acid bacteria starter cultures for decreasing the biogenic amine levels in sauerkraut. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2002, 215, 509–514. [Google Scholar]
  221. Mah, J.-H.; Kim, Y.J.; No, H.-K.; Hwang, H.-J. Determination of biogenic amines in kimchi, Korean traditional fermented vegetable products. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2004, 13, 826–829. [Google Scholar]
  222. Kang, H.-W. Characteristics of kimchi added with anchovy sauce from heat and non-heat treatments. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2013, 19, 49–58. [Google Scholar]
  223. Alan, Y. Culture fermentation of Lactobacillus in traditional pickled gherkins: Microbial development, chemical, biogenic amine and metabolite analysis. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 3930–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Garcia-Garcia, P.; Romero Barranco, C.; Duran Quintana, M.C.; Garrido Fernandez, A. Biogenic amine formation and “zapatera” spoilage of fermented green olives: Effect of storage temperature and debittering process. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Production of GABA (yellow box), bioactive peptides (green box), and biogenic amines (blue box) by LAB. AAD: amino acid decarboxylase; ABA: amino acid/biogenic amine antiporter; CWBP: cell-wall-bound proteinases; Dpp: peptide (2–9 amino acids) ABC transporter; DtpT: ion linked peptide (2–3 amino acids) transporter; EP: extracellular proteinases; GABA-T: GABA aminotransferase; GAD: glutamate decarboxylase; GltS: glutamate synthase; IP: intracellular peptidases; Opp: oligopeptide (4–18 amino acids) permease; SSADH: succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase.
Figure 1. Production of GABA (yellow box), bioactive peptides (green box), and biogenic amines (blue box) by LAB. AAD: amino acid decarboxylase; ABA: amino acid/biogenic amine antiporter; CWBP: cell-wall-bound proteinases; Dpp: peptide (2–9 amino acids) ABC transporter; DtpT: ion linked peptide (2–3 amino acids) transporter; EP: extracellular proteinases; GABA-T: GABA aminotransferase; GAD: glutamate decarboxylase; GltS: glutamate synthase; IP: intracellular peptidases; Opp: oligopeptide (4–18 amino acids) permease; SSADH: succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase.
Foods 11 00733 g001
Table 1. Occurrence of biogenic amines in fermented fruits and vegetables.
Table 1. Occurrence of biogenic amines in fermented fruits and vegetables.
Product.NAGMCADHISPHEPUTSPDSPMTRPTYR
Kimchi types
Kkakdugi kimchi 15 27.28 (54.44)
[<0.1–124.60]
55.94 (44.45)
[18.75–127.78]
3.61 (6.55)
[<0.1–15.24]
334.64 (427.97)
[10.85–982.32]
9.40 (6.68)
[<0.1–16.76]
1.03 (1.31)
[<0.1–3.10]
<0.125.42 (29.59)
[2.97–76.95]
Chonggak kimchi 15 64.08 (65.51)
[2.00–148.50]
58.73 (46.02)
[8.24–131.20]
0.78 (1.23)
[<0.1–2.80]
269.07 (349.93)
[3.89–853.70]
9.06 (2.99)
[6.10–14.00]
6.23 (8.79)
[<0.1–20.74]
9.02 (9.86)
[<0.1–23.70]
8.49 (6.80)
[0.79–18.70]
Pa kimchi 213 44.07 (42.85)
[<0.1–123.29]
155.85 (139.26)
[8.67–386.03]
1.77 (2.04)
[<0.1–5.97]
78.79 (79.00)
[<0.1–158.33]
9.91 (4.89)
[2.32–18.74]
21.75 (8.94)
[<0.1–33.84]
6.99 (5.74)
[<0.1–14.92]
66.88 (74.91)
[<0.1–181.10]
Gat kimchi 213 20.5 (18.52)
[2.12–48.60]
58.44 (75.77)
[3.30–232.10]
3.44 (4.30)
[<0.1–15.75]
134.96 (220.53)
[1.89–720.82]
20.31 (6.35)
[12.26–28.49]
31.30 (22.35)
[<0.1–58.57]
11.22 (8.23)
[<0.1–26.74]
76.15 (65.91)
[1.28–149.77]
Cabbage kimchi (Korean) 310 15.2
[3.6–44.9]
50.0
[3.4–142.3]
3.0
[nd–6.8]
69.7
[15.1–44.9]
12.0
[7.8–16.5]
2.4
[1.2–3.7]
12.3
[2.3–22.6]
49.4
[9.7–118.2]
Cabbage kimchi (Chinese) 310 12.5
[3.7–31.0]
2.7
[0.6–8.5]
4.4
[2.1–6.7]
70.6
[16.0–240.4]
11.9
[7.7–15.2]
2.1
[nd–3.7]
12.1
[2.4–20.0]
35.1
[10.7–76.0]
Baechu kimchi 414 18.0 (18.6)
[nd–45.0]
64.6 (73.1)
[nd–245.9]
7.8 (5.8)
[nd–14.9]
15.0 (16.1)
[tr–43.9]
44.0 (35.8)
[tr–103.6]
Kkakduki 45 31.0 (26.8)
[nd–56.2]
30.3 (21.7)
[nd–51.6]
6.7 (10.3)
[nd–21.8]
14.2 (6.1)
[5.5–18.6]
4.8 (5.6)
[nd–10.8]
Chonggak kimchi 43 28.6 (49.5)
[nd–85.7]
10.7 (10.2)
[nd–20.3]
nd 7.3 (6.9)
[2.3–15.2]
45.4 (21.9)
[20.2–58.1]
Matkimchi 44 30.5 (35.3)
[nd–64.2]
72.1 (27.7)
[40.2–104.6]
5.2 (4.5)
[nd–10.8]
32.3 (26.9)
[nd–60.5]
78.0 (22.0)
[54.3–105.1]
Ripened Baechu kimchi 44 55.7 (18.9)
[28.0–63.3]
110.3 (44.4)
[57.2–154.6]
24.6 (34.0)
[tr–74.8]
5.5 (6.7)
[nd–13.6]
46.6 (39.6)
[nd–95.6]
Baek kimchi 43 18.5 (7.1)
[11.5–25.6]
20.7 (18.9)
[1.9–39.6]
0.8 (0.9)
[nd–1.7]
tr36.4 (28.6)
[7.8–64.9]
Super market kimchi 520<0.114.3 (9.2)
[<0.1–155]
49.8 (32.5)
[<0.1–535]
<0.12.06 (1.33)
[<0.1–7.3]
0.65 (0.51)
[<0.1–8.8]
1.96 (1.31)
[<0.1–12.1]
1.0 (1.05)
[<0.1–11.4]
0.46 (0.48)
[<0.1–4.2]
Retail market kimchi 517<0.11.59 (1.44)
[<0.1–4.8]
5.59 (4.57)
[<0.1–18.6]
<0.10.67 (0.79)
[<0.1–5.1]
0.48 (0.52)
[<0.1–8.2]
<0.1<0.10.40 (0.65)
[<0.1–3.5]
Cabbage kimchi 620 8.3
[0.9–39.8]
6.3
[nd–21.8]
0.5
[nd–2.0]
47.6
[2.3–148.6]
2.9
[nd–6.7]
1.1
[nd–5.1]
11.6
[nd–74.8]
8.3
[1.1–27.9]
Kimchi 7ud16.81 (30.81)
[<0.14–86.00]
63.51 (69.81)
[1.13–193.00]
18.53 (28.07)
[<0.09–74.94]
2.59 (1.27)
[0.94–4.50]
208.70 (186.90)
[2.25–475.06]
10.35 (4.49)
[5.55–18.25]
1.38 (0.68)
[0.56–2.38]
4.75 (9.41)
[<0.29–24.88]
59.11 (44.70)
[1.25–98.31]
Sauerkaut
Czech 853 64.8 (56.8)
[1.9–293]
12.1 (31.6)
[nd–229]
181 (108)
[2.8–529]
8.2 (7.3)
[nd–47.0]
4.6 (9.0)
[nd–36.5]
235 (213)
[nd–951]
Austrian 810 43.4 (21.0)
[19.3–77.4]
2.1 (2.4)
[nd–8.0]
179 (80.2)
[51.0–295]
6.5 (5.5)
[nd–16.9]
2.4 (3.2)
[nd–7.7]
130 (71.3)
[14.0–214]
Household 829 29.8 (23.0)
[nd–82.7]
4.6 (6.8)
[nd–32.4]
87.3 (72.2)
[4.3–260]
10.2 (7.5)
[nd–28.3]
4.7 (7.9)
[nd–28.1]
117 (113)
[nd–384]
Sterilized 829 45.5 (40.1)
[6.9–167]
4.9 (6.4)
[nd–26.4]
132 (81.5)
[18.4–359]
6.8 (4.0)
[nd–15.2]
7.2 (10.2)
[nd–37.5]
134 (90.4)
[26.3–345]
Sauerkraut 9 3.91.5tr9.20.50.2nd4.8
Cucumbers
Fermented cucumber brine 1013.1945.113.071.8361.7021.169.777.375.24
Pickled cucumbers 1111 ndnd 4.5 (5.0) 2.9 (4.2) 0.7 (0.8)
Cucumber 7ud0.65 (1.05)
[<0.14–2.88]
82.14 (44.03)
[39.60–179.19]
31.54 (7.43)
[18.50–40.85]
3.10 (1.64)
[1.15–6.31]
171.30 (55.46)
[103.13–286.88]
8.08 (3.77)
[2.25–14.05]
1.28 (0.71)
[0.56–2.65]
14.49 (5.82)
[6.00–22.88]
62.24 (20.12)
[28.38–86.75]
Olives
Fermented olive brine 1010.8115.621.141.7842.94 0.516.93
Olives 7ud<0.142.54 (3.28)
[<0.06–6.25]
1.71 (1.58)
[<0.09–3.13]
0.23 (0.40)
[<0.35–0.70]
17.13 (15.00)
[5.75–34.13]
1.21 (0.85)
[0.25–1.88]
1.58 (0.85)
[0.60–2.13]
3.33 (5.77)
[<0.29–10.00]
2.56 (1.29)
[1.75–4.05]
Olives 127 0.80 (0.00)
[<0.4–0.8]
nd 5.00 (2.96)
[<0.5–7.8]
nd
Various products
Beetroot 7ud0.48 (0.94)
[<0.14–2.50]
5.45 (7.96)
[0.10–20.50]
6.84 (12.84)
[<0.09–31.25]
0.63 (0.96)
[<0.35–2.25]
21.25 (33.98)
[1.80–80.65]
2.31 (0.54)
[1.35–3.00]
0.80 (0.84)
[0.45–2.88]
2.46 (5.08)
[<0.29–14.20]
16.76 (20.18)
[1.20–47.80]
Broccoli 7ud0.93 (1.85)
[<0.14–3.70]
119.42 (127.40)
[6.80–302.50]
36.86 (42.95)
[<0.09–98.95]
2.40 (0.56)
[1.88–3.06]
173.32 (121.1)
[72.00–326.38]
15.52 (8.31)
[9.38–27.13]
5.27 (4.77)
[1.13–10.25]
0.69 (0.80)
[<0.29–1.50]
93.04 (62.71)
[47.25–181.88]
Brussel sprout 7ud0.45 (0.78)
[<0.14–1.35]
115.05 (174.71)
[1.60–316.25]
37.39 (43.78)
[1.31–86.10]
9.41 (4.20)
[4.60–12.38]
252.58 (150.91)
[114.31–413.56]
17.08 (7.97)
[10.50–25.94]
2.97 (2.65)
[<0.08–5.10]
10.59 (12.63)
[<0.29–24.56]
166.58 (43.09)
[119.50–204.06]
Carrot 7ud0.90 (1.60)
[<0.14–3.69]
12.13 (16.88)
[<0.06–41.25]
7.03 (9.26)
[<0.09–17.50]
1.88 (1.93)
[<0.35–4.38]
64.66 (83.96)
[4.25–186.63]
5.52 (1.60)
[3.10–7.50]
1.67 (0.86)
[0.44–2.38]
5.39 (8.90)
[<0.29–20.50]
23.35 (31.95)
[<0.07–61.19]
Cauliflower 7ud0.52 (0.25)
[0.38–0.80]
91.98 (110.97)
[0.06–215.25]
32.22 (50.23)
[0.94–90.15]
1.38 (2.40)
[<0.35–4.15]
80.24 (69.17)
[26.75–158.35]
21.27 (5.15)
[17.44–27.13]
5.58 (0.84)
[4.60–6.06]
21.58 (37.38)
[<0.29–64.75]
46.23 (77.28)
[0.31–135.45]
Celery 7ud0.33 (0.58)
[<0.14–1.00]
58.29 (20.18)
[35.50–73.88]
25.33 (21.94)
[<0.09–38.38]
2.13 (0.87)
[1.63–3.13]
93.17 (19.77)
[70.50–106.88]
6.73 (1.29)
[5.38–7.94]
1.46 (0.69)
[1.00–2.25]
1.17 (1.02)
[<0.29–1.88]
51.69 (13.23)
[36.44–60.13]
Champignon 7ud6.73 (1.03)
[5.60–8.15]
1.40 (3.07)
[<0.06–6.90]
<0.090.52 (0.48)
[<0.35–0.90]
1.93 (1.59)
[0.45–4.45]
74.58 (18.71)
[58.65–106.65]
2.10 (0.55)
[1.40–2.65]
<0.2938.56 (37.11)
[0.50–85.20]
Fermented lupine brine 1010.050.400.67nd13.142.905.48 0.21
Garlic 7ud1.75 (2.06)
[<0.14–4.50]
8.46 (7.84)
[<0.06–17.69]
3.04 (4.83)
[<0.09–11.25]
0.69 (1.22)
[<0.35–2.81]
67.65 (105.29)
[4.25–249.44]
18.62 (9.21)
[8.31–33.06]
6.44 (2.06)
[3.94–9.40]
1.47 (2.51)
[<0.29–5.80]
8.44 (7.75)
[1.06–21.45]
Pepper 7ud2.48 (0.50)
[2.00–3.10]
0.08 (0.15)
[<0.06–0.30]
<0.090.88 (0.09)
[0.75–0.95]
9.29 (3.17)
[6.45–13.80]
1.21 (0.14)
[1.10–1.40]
0.99 (0.11)
[0.90–1.15]
<0.2918.98 (2.92)
[15.65–22.75]
Pickled caperberries 119 3.2 (3.1)14.7 (17.2) 13.1 (8.5) 4.9 (4.4) 1.6 (2.6)
Pickled capers 118 nd8.2 (6.7) 2.3 (1.3) 2.3 (2.4) 0.2 (0.6)
Pumpkin 7ud1.08 (1.29)
[<0.14–2.75]
20.97 (0.76)
[20.00–21.69]
29.58 (31.13)
[2.88–73.94]
1.13 (1.44)
[<0.35–3.00]
136.98 (54.51)
[55.44–169.13]
8.68 (1.23)
[7.06–9.75]
49.63 (34.89)
[2.00–83.20]
4.88 (3.95)
[<0.29–9.25]
62.61 (39.09)
[20.06–111.69]
Radish 7ud0.32 (0.55)
[<0.14–0.95]
14.18 (20.27)
[0.88–37.50]
22.37 (22.04)
[<0.09–44.06]
1.77 (0.93)
[0.75–2.56]
32.08 (22.78)
[6.38–49.80]
6.40 (2.92)
[4.40–9.75]
0.93 (0.62)
[0.45–1.63]
10.25 (11.38)
[<0.29–22.50]
22.50 (11.33)
[15.25–35.56]
Red cabbage 7ud3.76 (4.60)
[0.85–9.06]
90.22 (61.65)
[34.75–156.60]
32.00 (52.03)
[0.44–92.05]
1.11 (1.56)
[<0.35–2.90]
124.17 (140.70)
[4.00–278.95]
10.75 (4.77)
[6.25–15.75]
3.23 (0.64)
[2.70–3.94]
9.90 (17.15)
[<0.29–29.70]
59.65 (56.04)
[0.19–111.50]
Sunchoke 7ud<0.144.50 (3.48)
[1.50–8.31]
0.46 (0.79)
[<0.09–1.38]
0.67 (1.15)
[<0.35–2.00]
28.90 (18.15)
[16.69–49.75]
7.83 (2.07)
[5.88–10.00]
3.50 (0.22)
[3.38–3.75]
<0.290.58 (0.71)
[<0.07–1.38]
Tomato 7ud0.06 (0.11)
[<0.14–0.19]
1.58 (1.00)
[0.75–2.69]
1.65 (2.21)
[0.15–4.19]
2.09 (2.47)
[<0.35–4.81]
42.05 (29.97)
[10.95–70.75]
3.79 (1.18)
[2.50–4.81]
1.21 (1.02)
[0.50–2.38]
1.21 (2.09)
[<0.29–3.63]
8.34 (13.30)
[0.45–23.69]
White cabbage 7ud3.14 (3.05)
[<0.14–8.05]
35.76 (45.14)
[<0.06–125.44]
55.60 (21.14)
[32.55–83.81]
1.92 (0.95)
[0.90–3.69]
190.59 (163.47)
[57.50–524.63]
9.08 (2.48)
[5.81–11.85]
2.55 (1.78)
[0.69–5.38]
11.27 (5.89)
[3.10–17.19]
60.69 (29.30)
[29.05–105.13]
White turnip 7ud<0.144.57 (4.31)
[1.13–10.70]
0.02 (0.03)
[<0.09–0.06]
1.31 (2.63)
[<0.35–5.25]
15.49 (12.96)
[2.25–32.63]
6.38 (2.41)
[4.31–9.69]
1.44 (1.37)
[<0.08–3.00]
<0.2916.26 (15.57)
[<0.07–35.31]
The average amounts of the biogenic amines are given. Standard deviation is given in parenthesis, and the range is given in square brackets. Amounts are given in mg/kg unless otherwise stated. CAD: cadaverine; DOP: dopamine; HIS: histamine; NOR: noradrenaline; PHE: 2-phenylethylamine; PUT: putrescine; SER: serotonin; SPD: spermidine; SPM: spermine; TRP: tryptamine; TYR: tyramine; N.: number of samples examined; ud: undefined; nd: not detected; tr: traces. 1 Hornero-Mendez and Garrido-Fernandez [206] (in μg/mL); 2 Garcia-Garcia et al. [207]; 3 Moret et al. [194] (in mg/100 g fresh weight); 4 Jin et al. [203]; 5 Lee et al. [204]; 6 Cho et al. [202]; 7 Kang et al. [205]; 8 Tsai et al. [201] (in mg/100 g); 9 Shin et al. [208]; 10 Swider et al. [200]; 11 Kalac et al. [209]; 12 Tofalo et al. [210].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paramithiotis, S.; Das, G.; Shin, H.-S.; Patra, J.K. Fate of Bioactive Compounds during Lactic Acid Fermentation of Fruits and Vegetables. Foods 2022, 11, 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050733

AMA Style

Paramithiotis S, Das G, Shin H-S, Patra JK. Fate of Bioactive Compounds during Lactic Acid Fermentation of Fruits and Vegetables. Foods. 2022; 11(5):733. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050733

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paramithiotis, Spiros, Gitishree Das, Han-Seung Shin, and Jayanta Kumar Patra. 2022. "Fate of Bioactive Compounds during Lactic Acid Fermentation of Fruits and Vegetables" Foods 11, no. 5: 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050733

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop