Next Article in Journal
Impact of Chilling Rate on the Evolution of Volatile and Non-Volatile Compounds in Raw Lamb Meat during Refrigeration
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Cork Closures on the Volatile Profile of Sparkling Wines during Bottle Aging
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship between Sensory Attributes, (Dis) Liking and Volatile Organic Composition of Gorgonzola PDO Cheese
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Gaseous Ozone on Microbiological Quality of Andean Blackberries (Rubus glaucus Benth)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/foods10112789
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Multifunctional Pullulan/Chitosan-Based Composite Films Reinforced with ZnO Nanoparticles and Propolis for Meat Packaging Applications

by
Swarup Roy
†,
Ruchir Priyadarshi
† and
Jong-Whan Rhim
*
Department of Food and Nutrition, BioNanocomposite Research Center, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2789; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112789
Submission received: 28 October 2021 / Revised: 9 November 2021 / Accepted: 9 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Strategies to Preserve Quality and Extend Shelf Life of Foods)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pullulan/chitosan-based multifunctional edible composite films were fabricated by reinforcing mushroom-mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) and propolis. The ZnONPs were synthesized using enoki mushroom extract and characterized using physicochemical methods. The mushroom-mediated ZnONPs showed an irregular shape with an average size of 26.7 ± 8.9 nm. The combined incorporation of ZnONPs and propolis pointedly improved the composite film’s UV-blocking property without losing transparency. The reinforcement with ZnONPs and propolis improved the mechanical strength of the pullulan/chitosan-based film by ~25%. Additionally, the water vapor barrier property and hydrophobicity of the film were slightly increased. In addition, the pullulan/chitosan-based biocomposite film exhibited good antioxidant activity due to the propolis and excellent antibacterial activity against foodborne pathogens due to the ZnONPs. The developed edible pullulan/chitosan-based film was used for pork belly packaging, and the peroxide value and total number of aerobic microorganisms were significantly reduced in meat wrapped with the pullulan/chitosan/ZnONPs/propolis film.

1. Introduction

Currently, food spoilage is a growing concern of the global food industry, and food spoilage has a significant impact on food supply and demand. The main cause of food quality degradation due to the oxidation and deterioration of food is the contamination and proliferation of micro-organisms during food storage. Such food spoilage has significantly impacted the quality and safety of perishable foods, especially animal products, due to the high fat content of meat products. In recent years, the intake of processed meat products has been very high, causing a serious spoilage problem in production and consumption. According to reports, ~23% of meat produced is lost or wasted [1]. As consumers demand safe food, there is a growing interest in developing and using edible packaging to preserve meat quality to keep food safe and extend its shelf life [2]. The most important challenge in this situation is to manufacture suitable packaging materials that can extend the shelf life of food. For this purpose, active packaging with antibacterial/antioxidant functions is emerging as one of the tools to control the deterioration of food [3,4,5].
Active packaging has an advantage over the direct use of antioxidant/antibacterial ingredients in foods because this type of packaging allows for the controlled release of active ingredients from the food packaging surface [6,7,8]. In this regard, renewable and degradable bio-based polymers of natural origin are suitable candidates to replace synthetic plastics in reducing environmental pollution [9,10,11]. Currently, various bio-based polymers such as polysaccharides and proteins are being studied. Although they have disadvantages such as low strength and gas barrier properties, they attract great attention as substitutes for petroleum-based plastics [12,13,14]. Another way to address the limitations of bio-based polymer matrices is to combine biopolymers to create blend films or to create composite materials with functional nanofillers or bioactive compounds [15,16,17,18,19]. For this, the blend of pullulan and chitosan can be an ideal choice as a solid base polymer matrix. Both pullulan and chitosan are edible polysaccharide-based biopolymers known for their excellent film-making potential. Additionally, previous reports have shown that these combinations create a highly compatible film that compensates for the imperfections of each matrix [20,21,22,23,24].
Nanofillers and bioactive natural ingredients are known to enhance the functional properties (antimicrobial and antioxidant) of active packaging films. As one of the commonly used nanofillers, zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs) are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) to be used in the food sector [25,26,27,28]. Adding ZnONPs improves the antimicrobial properties and helps enhance the physical properties, like the mechanical and water vapor barrier properties, of the packaging films [29,30,31]. As a potential antioxidant filler, the bioactive natural compound propolis plays a useful role due to its flavonoids, essential oils, waxes, and pollen [32,33,34,35]. Propolis is a complex mixture mainly obtained from honey bees, and it is a well-known, naturally occurring multifunctional material used since ancient times. The combination of nanofillers (ZnONPs) and natural bioactive compound (propolis) can be a good combination to enhance the physical and functional properties of edible active packaging films. A combination of antibacterial/antioxidant functional fillers in bio-based packaging films can be particularly useful to control the spoilage of meat products.
Therefore, the current work aimed to fabricate multifunctional active packaging films based on a pullulan/chitosan blend film integrated with ZnONPs and propolis. The pullulan/chitosan-based composite film was prepared, the film properties were characterized using analytical methods, and film’s applicability to pork loin packaging was tested.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The pullulan was procured from Korea Bio Polymer Co. Ltd. (Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). The zinc chloride, potassium hydroxide, and glycerol were acquired from Daejung Chemicals & Metals Co., Ltd. (Siheung, Korea). The chitosan (viscosity: 200–800 cP at 1% acetic acid, MW: 190,000–310,000 based on viscosity, degree of deacetylation: 75–85%), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), and potassium persulfate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The alcoholic extracts of propolis and enoki mushrooms were procured from a local supermarket in Seoul, Korea.

2.2. Preparation of Mushroom-Mediated ZnONP

For the preparation of the ZnONPs, the enoki mushroom extract (ME) was first prepared. For this, 10 g of enoki mushroom was cut into tiny pieces, mixed with 100 mL of DI water, heated at 80 °C for 10 min while being stirred at 500 rpm, and then cooled to room temperature. The undissolved solids were removed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 15 min. The collected extract was stored at −20 °C until further use [36,37]. A total of 6.8 g of ZnCl2 was added (0.1 M) to 500 mL of 10% ME, mixed well, and heated until the temperature reached 70 °C. Then, 500 mL of KOH solution (0.2 M) was slowly added to the mixture with vigorous agitation for one hour. The white principate formed was collected by filtration, and the filtrate was washed with DI water until it reached a pH of 7 and then dried at 50 °C overnight to attain powdered ZnONPs.

2.3. Preparation of Pullulan/Chitosan-Based Films

The pullulan/chitosan-based film was prepared using a solution casting method [22], as presented in Scheme 1. For this, 1.5 g of chitosan was dissolved in 100 mL of 1% acetic acid solution with vigorous stirring. A total of 1.5 g of pullulan was dissolved in 100 mL of DI water by heating it at 70 °C with continuous agitation. Then, the chitosan and pullulan solutions were mixed, glycerol 0.9 g (30 wt% of polymer) was added, and then 0.08 g of ZnONPs and 0.2 g of propolis (2 and 5 wt% based on biopolymer, respectively) were added with vigorous stirring. The film-forming solutions were cast on Teflon film-coated glass plates. The dried films were conditioned at 25 °C and 50% RH for 72 h. For evaluation, neat films of pullulan/chitosan, pullulan/chitosan/ZnONPs, and pullulan/chitosan/propolis were also fabricated following an identical process. The prepared films were designated as PLN/CTS, PLN/CTS/ZnO, PLN/CTS/PPS, and PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS, respectively, depending on the composite materials.
The details of the characterization methods of mushroom-mediated ZnONPs and the biocomposite films are provided in Supporting Information.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of ZnONPs

The appearance of white residue demonstrated the formation of ZnONPs. The formation of ME-capped ZnONPs was examined by the UV-vis spectra (Figure 1a), and the results showed a clear, typical absorption band around 350 nm due to the ZnONPs. The XRD patterns of the ZnONPs (Figure 1b) showed a distinctive pattern of diffraction peaks at (110), (002), (100), (102), (110), (103), (201), (004), and (202), representing the crystalline ZnONPs. The obtained results are well matched with the earlier reports indicating the formation of ZnONPs [30]. The chemical structure of the ZnONPs capped by ME was studied using FTIR analysis, and the FTIR results of the ZnONPs and ME are shown in Figure 1c. The wideband at 3265 cm−1 was owing to the primary amine and O-H stretching, while the peak detected at 2930 cm−1 was ascribed to the stretching vibration of the C-H groups [38]. The peak found at 1650 cm−1 was owing to the amide peak. Peaks at 1410 and 1035 cm−1 were accredited to the O-H bending and stretching vibrations, respectively [39]. The stretching vibration of primary amines and O-H is most likely associated with the bioactive components (proteins, flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, and carbohydrates) of the mushroom extract responsible for capping the ZnONPs [40]. The FTIR data established that the ZnONPs were efficaciously capped with several polyphenolic and biomolecules present in the mushroom extract. The observed results are also in line with the formerly available report [41].
For further characterization of the ZnONPs, the hydrodynamic particle size (Zavg) and polydispersity index (PDI) were analyzed using dynamic light scattering. The Zavg and PDI were 451.3 ± 24.8 nm and 0.36 ± 0.01, respectively (Figure S1, Supporting Information), demonstrating the development of monodispersed nano-sized particles. The stability of the nanoparticles in an aqueous condition was checked by zeta potential, and the obtained data (−25.2 ± 0.5 mV, Figure S1, Supporting Information) revealed the moderate stability of the nanoparticles [42,43]. The stability of the ME-capped ZnONPs solution was very similar to the earlier reported melanin-mediated ZnONPs [30]. For the morphology of the particles, FESEM analysis was performed, and the results are presented in Figure 1d. The microscopic analysis showed irregular-shaped ZnONPs with a size of ~10–40 nm, with an average size of 26.7 ± 8.9 nm. The presence of elemental Zn and O was also further verified from the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) (Figure 1e). The elemental analysis was further confirmed by the XPS spectrum (Figure 2). The scan survey spectrum of ME-capped ZnONPs and C1s, N1s, O1s, and Zn2p are shown in Figure 2. The XPS spectra exhibited the binding energies of C1s, N1s, O1s, and Zn2p at about 284, 399, 530, and 1020 eV, respectively. Apart from the peaks of Zn and O, supplementary peaks of C and N were detected, most likely owing to the capping of ME. The results of the binding energy values for Zn2p and O1s are consistent with formerly described data [44]. Thus, the resulting characterization established the formation of ME-capped nano-sized particles.

3.2. Properties of the Pullulan/Chitosan-Based Composite Films

3.2.1. Apparent Color and Optical Properties

The appearance and light transmittance spectra of pullulan/chitosan-based binary biocomposite films are presented in Figure 3. The neat pullulan/chitosan (PLN/CTS) film and the ZnONPs-added (PLN/CTS/ZnO) film were slightly yellowish and transparent, while the film with propolis was yellowish due to the color of propolis. The light transmittance spectra of the film showed that all the films were see-through to visible light. The control films also exhibited a peak at 280 nm owing to the UV-light absorption of chitosan. The reinforcement of the film with ZnONPs slightly reduced the UV light transmittance. Nevertheless, the addition of propolis pointedly condensed the UV transmittance of the pullulan/chitosan film. The combined use of ZnONPs and propolis showed a somewhat synergistic effect in the reduction of the UV-light transmittance of the film. The film’s UV-light barrier and transparency were assessed, and the results are presented in Table 1. The neat film showed excellent transparency with more than 91% of the T660. The alloying of ZnONPs and propolis alone or in combination in pullulan/chitosan did not reflect any significant reduction of the transparency of the film. Nonetheless, the alloying of ZnONPs slightly reduced the UV-light transmittance (T280), while the mixing of propolis showed a sharp decrease in UV-light transmittance (24.7% to 7.0%) due to the polyphenolic compounds present in the propolis. The ZnONPs and propolis together somewhat synergistically decreased T280 to 6.4%. Hence, it can be inferred that adding the fillers makes a highly transparent film and enhances its UV-light barrier properties.
The surface color data and related color parameters are shown in Table 1. As anticipated from the UV-vis spectra, the lightness (L-value) of all the films was over 87%, indicating that the lightness was not considerably altered due to the reinforcement with fillers. The a-value was also not much transformed, although the b-value was amplified in the case of propolis, demonstrating increased yellowness. Accordingly, the total color difference (ΔE) of the films also increased significantly (p < 0.05) when reinforced with propolis, even if adding ZnONPs alone had shown a reduction in ΔE. The whiteness index (WI) showed a slight increase in the presence of ZnONPs but showed a decreasing trend in the presence of propolis, which is presumably due to the yellowness of propolis. As expected, the yellowness index (YI) of the film was significantly increased by the addition of propolis.

3.2.2. Morphology

The morphological structure of the film was observed using the FE-SEM (surface and cross-section) and AFM, and the data are shown in Figure 4. The SEM surface images showed all films were smooth surfaced, without any outward defects. By alloying, pullulan and chitosan produce a compatible film [22]. The reinforcement with ZnONPs or propolis did not meaningly transform the morphology of the film, indicating their appropriate miscibility in the binary polymer matrices. The cross-section morphology low and high magnification also showed a proper distribution of fillers in the polymers without significantly altering the morphology of the control films. Interestingly, incorporating ZnONPs did not induce any agglomerated particles, suggesting the proper blending of nanofillers in the polymer matrices could contribute to the good adhesion of the filler and the pullulan/chitosan matrix. For more insight into the nanofillers’ distribution, elemental mapping was carried out (Figure S2, Supporting Information), and the results showed a uniform distribution of the nanoparticles in the polymer matrices. Moreover, the morphology of the films was checked by AFM micrographs (Figure 4), and the results showed a good dispersion of the fillers analogous to the SEM data. The surface roughness of the film was also determined from the AFM micrographs, and the obtained Ra and Rq values (data not shown) indicate that the increase in roughness was observed only for ZnONPs while adding propolis did not significantly alter the roughness of the pullulan/chitosan films.

3.2.3. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the pullulan/chitosan-based films were determined in terms of the tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (EB), and elastic modulus (EM), and the results are shown in Table 2. The thickness of the control blend film was 43.1 μm, which slightly decreased to 41.6 μm with the mixing of ZnONPs. This might be due to the formation of H-bonding between ZnONPs and chitosan, which may have pulled the polymer chains closer, resulting in enhanced compactness and decreased thickness [45]. However, when propolis was added to the neat blend films, the thickness increased to 47 μm. The reason for this may be the high molecular weight of polyphenols in propolis, which occupy the interchain spaces in the polymer matrix, pushing them farther apart [46,47]. Also, this phenomenon designates the absence of any chemical interaction among propolis and the polymer chains. When both ZnONPs and propolis were added, the effect of both the additives balanced each other, resulting in a thickness of 45.5 μm. Nevertheless, the variation in the thickness among different films was not statistically significant.
The TS values confirm the H-bonding interaction of the ZnONPs with the biopolymer chains. The TS of the PLN/CTS/ZnO and PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS films were 61.5 MPa and 62.6 MPa, respectively, indicating statistically significant ~24% and ~26% increments compared to neat PLN/CTS blends. However, the PLN/CTS/PPS film showed an insignificant increase (by 4%) in the TS value. Likewise, the EM values of the the ZnONPs-incorporated films also increased to 2.6 GPa compared to 2.2 GPa for films without ZnONPs. Additionally, the EB values were decreased more for the ZnONPs-incorporated films. Nevertheless, the difference in the EM and EB values was not statistically significant, indicating minor variations in the flexibility and stiffness of the films [48].

3.2.4. Water Vapor Permeability (WVP) and Water Contact Angle (WCA)

The changes in the WVP and WCA values upon incorporating ZnONPs and propolis are shown in Table 2. No statistically meaningful change in the WVP value was observed due to incorporating ZnONPs in the blend films. Although it is reported that nanoparticles, when added to the polymer matrix, generally enhance the water vapor barrier properties by occupying the vacant interchain spaces and creating a tortuous path for the water molecules to pass through [45], some reports also indicate the opposite effect due to the hydrophilicity of the ZnO nanoparticles capped with biomolecules [49]. The unperturbed WVP values may be the result of the balance between both these attributes of ZnONPs. Conversely, adding propolis enhanced the water vapor barrier properties, which is attributed to the decreased hygroscopicity of the films resulting from the increased content of hydrophobic components in the propolis [50]. The WCA values displayed a similar trend where the films with propolis displayed high hydrophobicity compared to the neat blend films. However, the ZnONPs-incorporated films displayed increased interaction with water due to their hydrophilic nature. Despite this, all the films displayed substantial increments in the WCA values. However, the films could not be classified as hydrophobic as the WCA values were not above 65°, which is the recommended WCA value for hydrophobic films [51]. Nevertheless, the PLN/CTS/PPS films exhibited a WCA value of 64.6°, making them the most hydrophobic of their counterparts.

3.2.5. FTIR and Thermal Analysis

The results of the structural characterization of the films and their thermal analysis are provided in the Supplementary Information, Figures S3 and S4, respectively.

3.3. Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial activity of the pullulan/chitosan-based films was studied against Gram-positive L. monocytogenes and Gram-negative E. coli bacteria, and the results are presented in Figure 5. The neat PLN/CTS film displayed significant antimicrobial activity toward the tested bacteria due to chitosan’s antimicrobial action [52]. For both the bacterial strains, the growth after 12 h reached > 9 Log CFU/mL for the control group. However, for the groups exposed to the PLN/CTS films, the growth after 12 h was reduced to ~3 Log CFU/mL against both the bacteria, indicating the strong antimicrobial activity of chitosan. With the addition of propolis, no remarkable difference in the bactericidal action was observed against either bacteria, signifying no antimicrobial activity of the polyphenolic extract. Similar results were obtained previously [34]. However, as expected, the antimicrobial action of the films was boosted with the blending of ZnONPs. Against E. coli, a 100% bactericidal effect was observed for the PLN/CTS/ZnO film after 9 h. Interestingly, the PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS film exerted the same effect at a 6 h interval, indicating the possible synergistic bactericidal effect of ZnONPs and propolis. However, this effect was not observed against L. monocytogenes, and 100% bacterial inhibition was observed after 12 h for the PLN/CTS/ZnO and PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS films. The results also indicated a higher antimicrobial activity of ZnONPs toward Gram-negative bacteria than Gram-positive ones, which is consistent with previous reports [26,28].

3.4. Antioxidant Activity

Figure 6 shows the outcomes of the antioxidant activity of the pullulan/chitosan-based films studied against DPPH and ABTS free radicals. The PLN/CTS film showed ~5% and ~33% antioxidant activity toward DPPH and ABTS free radicals, respectively, due to the presence of chitosan. The antioxidant activity of chitosan has been reported previously and is attributed to the protonated amine group, which stabilizes the free radicals [53]. Additionally, the higher activity against ABTS compared to DPPH occurredbecause hydrophilic chitosan interacts better with ABTS, due to its aqueous solution, than with the methanolic DPPH solution [51]. With the addition of ZnONPs, no variation in the antioxidant activity was detected. However, when propolis was mixed with the pullulan/chitosan films, the antioxidant activity sharply increased to ~30% and ~70% against DPPH and ABTS, respectively. This signifies that propolis imparts a strong antioxidant property to the films due to its polyphenolic composition [34,54]. Previous studies also report the enhanced antioxidant action of bio-based polymer films upon the addition of propolis [34]. Interestingly, for the PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS film, the antioxidant activity was slightly decreased compared to the PLN/CTS/PPS films. This may be owing to the capability of ZnONPs to bring out reactive oxygen species, including oxidative free radicals, which counter the effect of propolis. This observation was previously reported as well [28].

3.5. Meat Packaging Test

The commonly used preservation method for meat products is refrigeration after skin-tight packaging using PE/PP films. However, certain bacteria can grow and contaminate the packed meat even under these conditions [55]. Hence, estimating the total aerobic bacterial count (TABC) on the packed meat offers critical evidence about its hygiene and safety. The total aerobic bacterial count of the pork loin meat stored at 10 °C was estimated for 8 days, and the results are presented in Figure 7a. The initial TABC on the packed pork loin meat sample was <2 Log CFU/g. A rapid increase in the TABC was observed for the control samples while storage reached ~6 Log CFU/g after 6 days and finally ~9 Log CFU/g within 8 days. As per the International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF) regulations, an upper acceptable microbiological limit of 7 Log CFU/g has been proposed for meat products [55,56,57]. According to this proposed limit, the packed meat in the control group was deemed consumable for up to 6 days. However, for the meat samples wrapped with the PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS film before packaging, the TABC value remained at 6.7 Log CFU/g even after 8 days of storage, below the proposed upper acceptable microbiological limit. Additionally, this value was significantly (p > 0.05) lower than that obtained for the control group. Several researchers performed studies on various meat types and determined them to be consumable if the TABC value remained below 7 Log CFU/g [28,55,58,59]. Hence, it can be inferred that the PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS film can act as an extra wrapping material that may expand the shelf life of packed pork meat, acting in the form of hurdle technology.
Besides microbial contamination, the lipid oxidation in the packed meat product is another important factor determining its quality and shelf life. The oxidation of meat lipids is inevitable during storage and transportation and renders the product rancid over time, making it unpalatable [55]. Hydroperoxides are the principal lipid peroxidation compounds that cause the development of off-flavors in food [28]. Hence, their assessment provides important evidence about the packed food quality. The peroxide values (PV) of the packed pork loin meat were determined over time, and the results are reported in Figure 7b. The initial value of lipid peroxidation in the packed meat was 0 meq/kg, which amplified over time, depending on the package type. After 7 days of storage, the control and test samples exhibited peroxide values of ~5 meq/kg and ~4 meq/kg, respectively, which were not considerably different statistically (p < 0.05). However, after 15 days of storing, while the PV of the meat packed in the control group increased abruptly to 22 meq/kg, the meat wrapped in the PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS film exhibited a far lower peroxide value of ~10 meq/kg, showing around 55% decreased lipid oxidation, indicating a statistically significant (p > 0.05) reduction. This result was consistent with the antioxidant test results for the films (Figure 6), which indicate their oxidative free radical scavenging ability.

4. Conclusions

The main aim of this work was to investigate the effects of green-synthesized ZnONPs and propolis on the properties (physical and functional) of the pullulan/chitosan-based film for meat packaging applications. The ZnONPs were developed using enoki mushroom extract, and the obtained nanoparticles were stable and in a size range of 10–40 nm. Adding ZnONPs and propolis significantly enhanced the UV-light blocking and mechanical properties without significantly changing thermal stability. The alloying of fillers also slightly enhanced the water vapor barrier properties and hydrophobicity compared to the neat films. Additionally, the pullulan/chitosan-based binary composite film presented strong antibacterial activity toward E. coli and L. monocytogenes and showed excellent antioxidant activity. The PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS film was used to wrap pork loin meat, and the TABC and PV data clearly showed that the growth of bacteria and lipid peroxidation was hindered in the packaged meat.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods10112789/s1: Experiment, results, and discussion, Figure S1; DLS analysis (size and Zeta potential) of ZnONPs, Figure S2; Elemental mapping of PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS film, Figure S3; FTIR spectra of pullulan/chitosan-based bioactive composite films, Figure S4; TGA and DTG thermograms of pullulan/chitosan-based bioactive composite films, References.

Author Contributions

Data curation, S.R. and R.P.; investigation, S.R. and R.P.; software, S.R.; visualization, S.R. and R.P.; writing—original draft, S.R. and R.P.; writing—review & editing, J.-W.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1A2C2084221) and the Brain Pool Program funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning through the NRF (2019H1D3A1A01070715).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Karwowska, M.; Łaba, S.; Szczepański, K. Food Loss and Waste in Meat Sector—Why the Consumption Stage Generates the Most Losses? Sustainability 2021, 13, 6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Warner, R.D.; Johnson, S. Active and intelligent packaging in meat industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 61, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barone, A.S.; Matheus, J.R.V.; de Souza, T.S.P.; Moreira, R.F.A.; Fai, A.E.C. Green-based active packaging: Opportunities beyond COVID-19, food applications, and perspectives in circular economy—A brief review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 4881–4905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qian, M.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Yin, Z.; Ismail, B.B.; Ye, X.; Guo, M. A review of active packaging in bakery products: Applications and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 114, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Domínguez, R.; Barba, F.J.; Gómez, B.; Putnik, P.; Kovačević, D.B.; Pateiro, M.; Santos, E.M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Active packaging films with natural antioxidants to be used in meat industry: A review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, J.; Hu, Z.; Hu, L.; Li, G.; Yao, Q.; Hu, Y. Pectin-based active packaging: A critical review on preparation, physical properties and novel application in food preservation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wicochea-Rodríguez, J.D.; Chalier, P.; Ruiz, T.; Gastaldi, E. Active Food Packaging Based on Biopolymers and Aroma Compounds: How to Design and Control the Release. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jamróz, E.; Kopel, P. Polysaccharide and Protein Films with Antimicrobial/Antioxidant Activity in the Food Industry: A Re-view. Polymers 2020, 12, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sivakanthan, S.; Rajendran, S.; Gamage, A.; Madhujith, T.; Mani, S. Antioxidant and antimicrobial applications of biopolymers: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 136, 109327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adeyeye, O.A.; Sadiku, E.R.; Reddy, A.B.; Ndamase, A.S.; Makgatho, G.; Sellamuthu, P.S.; Perumal, A.B.; Nambiar, R.B.; Fasiku, V.O.; Ibrahim, I.D.; et al. The Use of Biopolymers in Food Packaging. In Green Biopolymers and Their Nanocomposites; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 137–158. [Google Scholar]
  11. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Anthocyanin food colorant and its application in pH-responsive color change indicator films. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2297–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. New insight into melanin for food packaging and biotechnology applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gnanasekaran, D. Green Biopolymers and Its Nanocomposites in Various Applications: State of the Art; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Singapore, 2019; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sady, S.; Błaszczyk, A.; Kozak, W.; Boryło, P.; Szindler, M. Quality assessment of innovative chitosan-based biopolymers for edible food packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 30, 100756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Fabrication of bioactive binary composite film based on gelatin/chitosan incorporated with cinnamon essential oil and rutin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 204, 111830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rukmanikrishnan, B.; Ramalingam, S.; Rajasekharan, S.K.; Lee, J.; Lee, J. Binary and ternary sustainable composites of gellan gum, hydroxyethyl cellulose and lignin for food packaging applications: Biocompatibility, antioxidant activity, UV and water barrier properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Priyadarshi, R.; Kim, S.-M.; Rhim, J.-W. Pectin/pullulan blend films for food packaging: Effect of blending ratio. Food Chem. 2021, 347, 129022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Roy, S.; Kim, H.-J.; Rhim, J.-W. Effect of blended colorants of anthocyanin and shikonin on carboxymethyl cellulose/agar-based smart packaging film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Fabrication of pectin/agar blended functional film: Effect of reinforcement of melanin nanoparticles and grapefruit seed extract. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 118, 106823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, J.; Zhong, F.; Li, Y.; Shoemaker, C.; Xia, W. Preparation and characterization of pullulan–chitosan and pullulan–carboxymethyl chitosan blended films. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 30, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Yokoyama, W.; Wu, J.; Ma, J.; Zhong, F. Properties of edible films based on pullulan–chitosan blended film-forming solutions at different pH. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105844–105850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Effect of chitosan modified halloysite on the physical and functional properties of pullulan/chitosan biofilm integrated with rutin. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 211, 106205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duan, M.; Yu, S.; Sun, J.; Jiang, H.; Zhao, J.; Tong, C.; Hu, Y.; Pang, J.; Wu, C. Development and characterization of electrospun nanofibers based on pullulan/chitin nanofibers containing curcumin and anthocyanins for active-intelligent food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 187, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, S.; Yi, J.; Yu, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L. Preparation and characterization of pullulan derivative/chitosan composite film for potential antimicrobial applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, I.; Viswanathan, K.; Kasi, G.; Thanakkasaranee, S.; Sadeghi, K.; Seo, J. ZnO Nanostructures in Active Antibacterial Food Packaging: Preparation Methods, Antimicrobial Mechanisms, Safety Issues, Future Prospects, and Challenges. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Roy, S.; Kim, H.; Panicker, P.; Rhim, J.-W.; Kim, J. Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Nanocomposite Films Reinforced with Zinc Oxide Nanorods and Grapefruit Seed Extract. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based antioxidant and antimicrobial active packaging film incorporated with curcumin and zinc oxide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Priyadarshi, R.; Kim, S.-M.; Rhim, J.-W. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based multifunctional film combined with zinc oxide nanoparticles and grape seed extract for the preservation of high-fat meat products. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2021, 29, e00325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, Y.; Pan, Y.; Cai, P. Cellulose-based antimicrobial films incroporated with ZnO nanopillars on surface as biodegradable and antimicrobial packaging. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Carrageenan-based antimicrobial bionanocomposite films incorporated with ZnO nanoparticles stabilized by melanin. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 90, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arfat, Y.A.; Benjakul, S.; Vongkamjan, K.; Sumpavapol, P.; Yarnpakdee, S. Shelf-life extension of refrigerated sea bass slices wrapped with fish protein isolate/fish skin gelatin-ZnO nanocomposite film incorporated with basil leaf essential oil. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 6182–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Woźniak, M.; Mrówczyńska, L.; Waśkiewicz, A.; Rogoziński, T.; Ratajczak, I. Phenolic Profile and Antioxidant Activity of Propolis Extracts from Poland. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suriyatem, R.; Auras, R.A.; Rachtanapun, C.; Rachtanapun, P. Biodegradable Rice Starch/Carboxymethyl Chitosan Films with Added Propolis Extract for Potential Use as Active Food Packaging. Polymers 2018, 10, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Roy, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Preparation of Gelatin/Carrageenan-Based Color-Indicator Film Integrated with Shikonin and Propolis for Smart Food Packaging Applications. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 4, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Galeotti, F.; Maccari, F.; Fachini, A.; Volpi, N. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Propolis Prepared in Different Forms and in Different Solvents Useful for Finished Products. Foods 2018, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Rabeea, M.A.; Owaid, M.N.; Aziz, A.A.; Jameel, M.S.; Dheyab, M.A. Mycosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using the extract of Flammulina velutipes, Physalacriaceae, and their efficacy for decolorization of methylene blue. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Roy, S.; Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.-W. Gelatin/Carrageenan-Based Functional Films with Carbon Dots from Enoki Mushroom for Active Food Packaging Applications. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dai, L.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, F. Effects of starches from different botanical sources and modification methods on physicochemical properties of starch-based edible films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ren, L.; Yan, X.; Zhou, J.; Tong, J.; Su, X. Influence of chitosan concentration on mechanical and barrier properties of corn starch/chitosan films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 1636–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Philip, D. Biosynthesis of Au, Ag and Au–Ag nanoparticles using edible mushroom extract. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2009, 73, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Faisal, S.; Khan, M.A.; Jan, H.; Shah, S.A.; Abdullah, A.; Shah, S.; Rizwan, M.; Ullah, W.; Akbar, M.T.; Redaina, R. Edible mushroom (Flammulina velutipes) as biosource for silver nanoparticles: From synthesis to diverse biomedical and environmental applications. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 065101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Roy, S.; Das, T.K.; Maiti, G.P.; Basu, U. Microbial biosynthesis of nontoxic gold nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2016, 203, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ghosh, S.; Roy, S.; Naskar, J.; Kole, R.K. Process optimization for biosynthesis of mono and bimetallic alloy nanoparticle catalysts for degradation of dyes in individual and ternary mixture. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Al-Gaashani, R.; Radiman, S.; Daud, A.; Tabet, N.; Al-Douri, Y. XPS and optical studies of different morphologies of ZnO nanostructures prepared by microwave methods. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2283–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Priyadarshi, R.; Negi, Y.S. Effect of Varying Filler Concentration on Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Embedded Chitosan Films as Potential Food Packaging Material. J. Polym. Environ. 2016, 25, 1087–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lim, G.-O.; Jang, S.-A.; Bin Song, K. Physical and antimicrobial properties of Gelidium corneum/nano-clay composite film containing grapefruit seed extract or thymol. J. Food Eng. 2010, 98, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mir, S.A.; Dar, B.N.; Wani, A.A.; Shah, M.A. Effect of plant extracts on the techno-functional properties of biodegradable packaging films. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 80, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Riahi, Z.; Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.-W.; Bagheri, R. Gelatin-based functional films integrated with grapefruit seed extract and TiO2 for active food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shankar, S.; Teng, X.; Li, G.; Rhim, J.-W. Preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of gelatin/ZnO nanocomposite films. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 45, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bodini, R.; Sobral, P.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S.; Carvalho, R. Properties of gelatin-based films with added ethanol–propolis extract. LWT 2013, 51, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ezati, P.; Priyadarshi, R.; Bang, Y.-J.; Rhim, J.-W. CMC and CNF-based intelligent pH-responsive color indicator films integrated with shikonin to monitor fish freshness. Food Control. 2021, 126, 108046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Priyadarshi, R.; Kumar, B.; Rhim, J.-W. Green and facile synthesis of carboxymethylcellulose/ZnO nanocomposite hydrogels crosslinked with Zn2+ ions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wan, A.; Xu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Li, H. Antioxidant Activity of High Molecular Weight Chitosan and N,O-Quaternized Chitosans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 6921–6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Priyadarshi, R.; Riahi, Z.; Rhim, J.-W. Antioxidant pectin/pullulan edible coating incorporated with Vitis vinifera grape seed extract for extending the shelf life of peanuts. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 183, 111740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Mohammadian, E.; McClements, D.J. Eco-friendly active packaging consisting of nanostructured biopolymer matrix reinforced with TiO2 and essential oil: Application for preservation of refrigerated meat. Food Chem. 2020, 322, 126782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ellis, D.I.; Goodacre, R. Rapid and quantitative detection of the microbial spoilage of muscle foods: Current status and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Panagou, E.Z.; Papadopoulou, O.; Carstensen, J.M.; Nychas, G.-J.E. Potential of multispectral imaging technology for rapid and non-destructive determination of the microbiological quality of beef filets during aerobic storage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 174, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Camo, J.; Beltrán, J.A.; Roncalés, P. Extension of the display life of lamb with an antioxidant active packaging. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 1086–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saedi, S.; Shokri, M.; Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.-W. Carrageenan-Based Antimicrobial Films Integrated with Sulfur-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (Fe3O4@SNP). ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 4913–4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 10 02789 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic presentation for the fabrication of pullulan/chitosan-based biocomposite films.
Scheme 1. Schematic presentation for the fabrication of pullulan/chitosan-based biocomposite films.
Foods 10 02789 sch001
Foods 10 02789 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) UV-vis spectra, (b) XRD pattern, (c) FTIR spectra, and (d,e) FESEM and EDX of ZnONPs.
Figure 1. (a) UV-vis spectra, (b) XRD pattern, (c) FTIR spectra, and (d,e) FESEM and EDX of ZnONPs.
Foods 10 02789 g001
Foods 10 02789 g002 550
Figure 2. XPS spectra of ZnONPs.
Figure 2. XPS spectra of ZnONPs.
Foods 10 02789 g002
Foods 10 02789 g003 550
Figure 3. The appearance and transmittance spectra of the pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Figure 3. The appearance and transmittance spectra of the pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Foods 10 02789 g003
Foods 10 02789 g004 550
Figure 4. FESEM surface and cross-section micrographs (a) and AFM images (b) of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Figure 4. FESEM surface and cross-section micrographs (a) and AFM images (b) of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Foods 10 02789 g004
Foods 10 02789 g005 550
Figure 5. Antimicrobial activity of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Figure 5. Antimicrobial activity of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Foods 10 02789 g005
Foods 10 02789 g006 550
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films.
Foods 10 02789 g006
Foods 10 02789 g007 550
Figure 7. Application of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films for packaging of pork belly meat. (a) Total aerobic bacterial count, (b) peroxide values stored at 10 °C.
Figure 7. Application of pullulan/chitosan-based composite films for packaging of pork belly meat. (a) Total aerobic bacterial count, (b) peroxide values stored at 10 °C.
Foods 10 02789 g007
Table
Table 1. Surface color and transmittance of pullulan/chitosan-based bioactive composite films.
Table 1. Surface color and transmittance of pullulan/chitosan-based bioactive composite films.
FilmsLabΔEWIYIT280 (%)T660 (%)
PLN/CTS90.7 ± 0.3 c−2.3 ± 0.3 c13.5 ± 1.4 a9.2 ± 1.5 a86.0 ± 1.4 c21.2 ± 2.3 a24.7 ± 1.9 c91.2 ± 0.3 c
PLN/CTS/ZnO90.7 ± 0.1 c−2.1 ± 0.1 c12.2 ± 0.5 a7.9 ± 0.5 b87.2 ± 0.5 c19.2 ± 0.8 b23.1 ± 0.6 c90.6 ± 0.3 b
PLN/CTS/PPS88.1 ± 0.3 b−5.1 ± 0.2 a25.8 ± 1.1 c22.0 ± 1.1 d73.5 ± 1.1 a41.8 ± 1.8 d7.0 ± 0.4 b88.1 ± 0.6 a
PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS87.0 ± 0.3 a−4.0 ± 0.2 b23.2 ± 1.1 b19.7 ± 1.2 c76.1 ± 1.1 b38.1 ± 2.0 c6.4 ± 0.4 a88.6 ± 0.5 a
The data are denoted as a mean ± standard deviation. In the same column, any two means, followed by the same letter, are not meaningfully (p > 0.05) dissimilar from Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table
Table 2. Mechanical properties, water vapor permeability, and water contact angle of pullulan/chitosan-based bioactive films.
Table 2. Mechanical properties, water vapor permeability, and water contact angle of pullulan/chitosan-based bioactive films.
FilmsThickness (μm)TS (MPa)EB (%)EM (GPa)WVP (×10−9 g.m/m2.Pa.s)WCA (deg.)
PLN/CTS43.1 ± 5.0 a49.7 ± 5.3 a5.9 ± 1.0 b2.2 ± 0.2 a0.77 ± 0.01 b56.5 ± 3.8 a
PLN/CTS/ZnO41.6 ± 3.9 a61.5 ± 4.3 c4.8 ± 0.9 a2.6 ± 0.3 b0.79 ± 0.03 b59.6 ± 1.6 ab
PLN/CTS/PPS47.0 ± 5.2 a51.7 ± 4.8 b5.7 ± 0.5 b2.2 ± 0.2 a0.72 ± 0.04 a64.6 ± 4.1 c
PLN/CTS/ZnO/PPS45.5 ± 4.5 a62.6 ± 4.2 c5.2 ± 0.4 ab2.6 ± 0.2 b0.69 ± 0.01 a61.3 ± 2.0 b
The data are denoted as a mean ± standard deviation. In the same column, any two means, followed by the same letter, are not meaningfully (p > 0.05) dissimilar from Duncan’s multiple range tests.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roy, S.; Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.-W. Development of Multifunctional Pullulan/Chitosan-Based Composite Films Reinforced with ZnO Nanoparticles and Propolis for Meat Packaging Applications. Foods 2021, 10, 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112789

AMA Style

Roy S, Priyadarshi R, Rhim J-W. Development of Multifunctional Pullulan/Chitosan-Based Composite Films Reinforced with ZnO Nanoparticles and Propolis for Meat Packaging Applications. Foods. 2021; 10(11):2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roy, Swarup, Ruchir Priyadarshi, and Jong-Whan Rhim. 2021. "Development of Multifunctional Pullulan/Chitosan-Based Composite Films Reinforced with ZnO Nanoparticles and Propolis for Meat Packaging Applications" Foods 10, no. 11: 2789. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop