Next Article in Journal
Pr@C82 Metallofullerene: Calculated Isomeric Populations
Next Article in Special Issue
Applicability of Transition State Theory to the (Proton-Coupled) Electron Transfer in Photosynthetic Water Oxidation with Emphasis on the Entropy of Activation
Previous Article in Journal
MoO3 Solubility and Chemical Durability of V2O5-Bearing Borosilicate Glass
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ligand Tuning in Cu(pyalk)2 Water Oxidation Electrocatalysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/inorganics11070312
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure–Function Relationship within Cu-Peptoid Electrocatalysts for Water Oxidation

by
Guilin Ruan
,
Natalia Fridman
and
Galia Maayan
*
Schulich Faculty of Chemistry, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology Technion City, Haifa 3200008, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(7), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070312
Submission received: 12 July 2023 / Revised: 20 July 2023 / Accepted: 21 July 2023 / Published: 24 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series in “Water Oxidation Catalysts”)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Water oxidation (WO) is the first step in the water-splitting process aiming at the production of hydrogen as a green renewable fuel. To successfully perform WO, potent strategies for overcoming the high energetic barrier and slow kinetics of this reaction are urgently required. One such strategy is the use of molecular catalysis. Specifically, Cu-based catalysts have been highlighted over the last decade due to their stability and fast kinetics. Among them, Cu-peptoids, where peptoids are peptidomimetics akin to peptides and are N-substituted glycine oligomers, can act as stable and active catalysts for oxidation transformations including electrocatalytic WO. Previously, we suggested that a benzyl group incorporated as a side chain near the catalytic site within a Cu-peptoid electrocatalyst for WO has a structural role in the activity of the electrocatalyst in phosphate buffer (PBS). Herein, we aimed to test this hypothesis and understand how an incorporated structural element side chain affects WO. To this aim, we prepared a set of peptoid trimers each with a different structural element replacing the benzyl group by either naphthyl, cyclohexyl, benzyl, propyl chloride, or propyl side chains as well as a peptoid lacking a structural element. We studied the structure of their Cu complexes and tested these complexes as electrocatalysts for WO. We discovered that while all the peptoids self-assemble to form dinuclear Cu-peptoid complexes, the duplex that has no structural side chain, Cu2(BE)2, is structurally different from the others in the solid state. Moreover, Cu2(BE)2 remains dinuclear in a PBS at pH 11, while all the other duplexes are mononuclear in the PBS. Finally, though most of the complexes showed low electrocatalytic activity for WO, the dinuclear complex Cu2(BE)2 performed with the highest turnover frequency of 484 s−1. Nevertheless, this dinuclear complex slowly decomposes to the corresponding mononuclear complex as a more stable species during WO, while the other mononuclear complexes retain their structure in solution but display much slower kinetics (ca. 5 to 8 s−1) under the same conditions. Overall, our results demonstrate that bulkier side chains hamper the stability of dinuclear Cu-peptoids in a PBS, and hence, their efficiency as WO electrocatalysts is also hampered.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Remarkable progress in the development of earth-abundant-metal-based water oxidation catalysts has been made over the last two decades [1,2,3,4], and electrocatalytic water oxidation (WO) has become a potent strategy for producing hydrogen gas as a renewable energy source and green fuel [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Yet, the poor thermodynamic driving force, i.e., overpotential, of WO requires a profound understanding of the molecular scale in order to overcome it [11,12,13]. Studies of molecular catalysts and homogeneous catalytic reactions are used to reveal insights for improving reaction efficiency [14,15,16]. In particular, their well-defined structures can be precisely tailored to gain more knowledge of how to develop efficient electrocatalysts for WO [17,18,19,20]. This includes the study of weak-bonding interactions, electronic inductive and conjugative effects, steric hindrance, self-assembly, and more [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
Pioneering research from 2012 shed light on the high-rate kinetics of Cu(BPy)(OH)2 (BPy = 2,2′-bipyridine) as the first Cu-based homogeneous WO catalyst. Since then, numerous small-molecule-based Cu-BPy or Cu-polypyridyl WO catalysts have been reported [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Apart from them, Cu-peptide-based WO electrocatalysts, which are inspired by the natural Cu-oxygen active species in enzyme environments, have also been developed, and they exhibit relatively low overpotentials [49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. However, a drawback of using peptides as ligands is that the metal binding is pH-dependent due to the pKa value of the N-H in amide bonds, which is also susceptible to oxidation, and therefore they have low stability [56,57,58]. To address this issue, peptoids, N-substituted glycine oligomers [59,60], were developed as metal chelators [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71] and biomimetic catalysts [72,73,74,75,76,77]. In addition to their stability toward various pH and oxidation conditions, peptoids are highly versatile as innumerable primary amines can be incorporated as functional side chains or structural elements, making the peptoid sequence and structure also tunable [78,79,80]. Recent work from our laboratory introduced BEBenzyl, a peptoid trimer having the side chains BPy (B) and hydroxyl (E) and a benzyl group as a structural element, which forms a Cu-peptoid complex as an efficient homogeneous WO electrocatalyst [74]. After complexation with a Cu salt, a self-assembled dinuclear Cu architecture (Cu:peptoid = 2:2, mode I in Scheme 1) is generated [81]. Interestingly, it decomposes into mononuclear (Cu:peptoid = 1:1, CuBEBenzyl) once the solution environment is changed from pure water to 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 11~11.5, in which it can be used for electrocatalytic WO [74]. DFT calculations suggested that the benzyl side chain structurally directs the hydroxyl side chain to bind the Cu center, assisting in stabilizing the high-oxidation state intermediates during WO. However, this hypothesis was not examined experimentally.
To test this hypothesis and understand how a structural element affects WO, we replaced the benzyl group with either naphthyl, cyclohexyl, benzyl, propyl chloride, or propyl side chains forming a set of peptoid trimers, each with a different structural element, namely BENapthyl, BECyclohexyl, BEBenzyl, BEPropylCl, or BEPropyl, or eliminated the benzyl group side chain to form the peptoid BE, which lacks a structural element. This set of peptoids underwent complexation with Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O, the newly formed complexes were recrystallized, their structures were characterized both in the solid state and in a phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at pH 11, the media in which electrocatalytic WO was studied, and their ability to perform as WO electrocatalysts in these conditions was examined. We discovered that upon Cu binding, all the trimers self-assembled into di-Cu-peptoid complexes having one type of architecture, “mode I”, which dissociated in the PBS at pH 11 to the mononuclear complexes, which show poor WO electrocatalytic activity (Figure 1). In contrast, the dimer BE formed the complex Cu2(BE)2 in a different type of architecture, “mode I”, which is stable in a PBS at pH 11. In these conditions, it is an efficient electrocatalyst for WO, performing with the lowest overpotential and with a 100-fold higher turnover frequency (TOF) compared with the mononuclear complexes tested in this study. These results suggest that the structural element side chain does affect the electrocatalytic performance in WO but hampers it rather than facilitating it.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural Characterization of Cu-peptoid Complexes in 0.1 M PBS pH 11

All the peptoids described in this study were synthesized using the submonomer solid-phase method [60], cleaved from the solid support, and purified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, >95% purity) (Figures S1–S3). The molecular weights measured by electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) were consistent with the calculated mass for the corresponding sequences (Figures S4–S6). The corresponding data of BENapthyl, BEBenzyl, and BE have been reported [77,81,82]. The purified peptoids were treated with 1 equiv. of Cu(ClO4)2·6H2O in methanol or n-propanol, and after 4 h of stirring, greenish-blue or blue precipitates were expected to be obtained. The precipitated solids were isolated and washed three times. The remaining solids were further dried and recrystallized in specific solvent environments (details in Section 3.3). Among them, the characterizations and crystal structural details of Cu2(BE)2, Cu2(BEBenzyl)2, and Cu2(BENapthyl)2 have been reported recently from our laboratory [77,81,82]. The new solid structures of Cu2(BECyclohexyl)2, Cu2(BEPropylCl)2, and Cu2(BEPropyl)2 were characterized by X-ray crystallography (CCDC number: 2253528, 2253526, and 2253527, respectively). The structure of these complexes resembles the structures of Cu2(BEBenzyl)2 and Cu2(BENapthyl)2, which showed centrosymmetric self-assembled architectures (Figures S7–S9): each CuII is penta-coordinated and adopts a distorted square-pyramidal geometry [81]. The two BPy N atoms from one peptoid ligand and the carbonyl O atom (C=O) and terminal N atom (NH) from the other peptoid ligand construct the equatorial square base of each Cu2+ center, while the O atom (OH) of the ethanolic side chain occupies the apical position of the pyramid. We defined these structures as “mode I” self-assemblies. In mode I, the intramolecular cooperative interaction between the two CuII centers seems impossible because both pyramid-like coordination geometries are separated from each other, and the distance Cu···Cu is 6.757~6.921 Å. On the contrary, the structure of Cu2(BE)2, defined here as “mode II” self-assembly, is different; the two bipyridine groups are on the same side of the assembly, and the distance between the two Cu ions is much shorter—only 4.270 Å. Therefore, Cu2(BE)2 is likely to bridge a H2O (or OH− in basic conditions) molecule to perform cooperative interaction between two CuII centers [77]. Although each CuII is penta-coordinated with the same atoms from the peptoid ligand and adopts a distorted square-pyramidal geometry, in mode I, the equatorial planes of CuII centers face each other with an offset π-π interaction between two BPy groups (3.246~3.396 Å) (Table 1) [83,84,85,86]. Apart from the solid state, all the prepared Cu-peptoids were also characterized as dinuclear complexes in a pure water solvent by ESI-MS and UV-Vis (Figures S10–S21).
All Cu-peptoid complexes were further characterized in a PBS at pH 11. ESI-MS showed the mass signals representing the corresponding mononuclear complexes (Cu:peptoid = 1:1) CuBENapthyl, CuBECyclohexyl, CuBEBenzyl, CuBEPropylCl, and CuBEPropyl at 667.7 m/z, 623.7 m/z, 617.6 m/z, 603.7 m/z, and 569.8 m/z in a 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 (Figures S22–S26). The mass signals for the self-assembled complexes (Cu:peptoid = 2:2) were not observed except for Cu2(BE)2 (Figure S27). The instability of the dinuclear self-assembled Cu-peptoids in a PBS at pH 11 compared to their stability in pure water was also observed in the comparison of UV-Vis absorbance bands of the complexes in each solvent. While in pure water, the spectrum showed absorbance bands near 320 nm and 248 nm, indicating the presence of the intact self-assembled dinuclear Cu-peptoid complexes, in a PBS at pH 11, these two bands are not present, and instead, two new absorbance bands near 300 nm and 236 nm appear, indicating a significant structural change (Figures S28–S32). These results support the results from the MS, suggesting that the self-assembled complexes are not stable in a PBS at pH 11. Interestingly, only the UV-Vis spectrum of Cu2(BE)2 showed absorbance bands near 320 nm and 248 nm, and no other bands were observed, suggesting that this dinuclear Cu-peptoid complex is stable in a PBS at pH 11 (Figure S33). These results suggest that the structural element has a key role not only in the self-assembly of the peptoids upon Cu binding and in the final structure of the dinuclear Cu-peptoid complexes but also in the stability of these complexes in a PBS at pH 11. Thus, when the peptoid sequence includes a structural element as a side chain, the peptoids are self-assembled upon Cu binding to one type of structure (mode I, Figure 1), which is instable in a PBS at pH 11, where it dissociates to the monomeric Cu-peptoid complex, while the peptoid dimer that does not include a structural element side chain self-assembles upon Cu binding to a second type of structure (mode II, Figure 1), which is maintained in a PBS pH 11.

2.2. Electrocatalytic Activities of the Cu-Peptoid Complexes in PBS toward Water Oxidation

2.2.1. Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical properties of the complexes in a 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 were examined for WO. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) were probed under air using a glassy carbon (GC) working electrode and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode. All the potential values are transferred and reported versus the normal hydrogen electrode (vs. NHE). Each complex (0.5 mM based on the molecular weight of mononuclear Cu-peptoids, unless noted differently) was dissolved in a 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, and its CV was measured. In the scanning window between 0 and +0.4 V (Figure S34), an oxidation wave was observed consistent with CuI to CuII [87,88,89]. However, the CV scan of Cu2(BE)2 in the same oxidation window showed an oxidation potential of Ep = +0.15 V, which is broader, suggesting that more than one electron transfer is taking place at this potential (consistent with the existence of two Cu centers in this complex) [31,32,77] and about 120 mV lower than those of the mononuclear complexes (for CuBECyclohexyl, CuBEPropylCl, and CuBEPropyl, Ep = +0.27 V, and for CuBENapthyl, Ep = +0.29 V). These differences are rationally relevant to their structural divergence (di- vs. mononuclear). Extending the scanning window up to +1.5 V, the CV scans of all the mononuclear complexes showed a broad irreversible oxidation wave Ep from +1.40 V to +1.30 V, with the CuBENapthyl showing the highest potential, thereafter CuBECyclohexyl, CuBEBenzyl, CuBEPropylCl, and finally CuBEPropyl showing the lowest oxidation potential (Figure 2a). This cathodic shift in both CVs and DPVs (Figure S35) matches the order of the bulkiness of the structural element side chains, which are from the bulkiest to the least bulky. Notwithstanding this, these oxidation currents of the mononuclear complexes remain similar (ip = ca. 18 µA). In the same potential window, at Ep = +1.36 V, the irreversible oxidation of Cu2(BE)2 reveals that the corresponding current intensity increases up to 155 µA, which is nearly 9-fold higher than that of the mononuclear complexes (Figure 2b). This irreversible oxidation is recognized as a catalytic event and a typical curve representing the EC mechanism observed in the plots of normalized current vs. scan rates (Figure S36) [90].

2.2.2. Kinetics Studies

The CV results suggest that Cu2(BE)2 is a much more efficient electrocatalyst for WO than the mononuclear complexes. The rate constant (kobs), known as TOF, is a significant parameter for quantifying the efficiency of WO electrocatalysts [91,92]. To calculate the kobs, of all the Cu-peptoid complexes, a series of CVs at different scan rates (Figure S37) using Cu2(BE)2 or CuBENapthyl were examined and applied to foot-of-the-wave analysis (FOWA), which represents the intrinsic TOF at zero overpotential [93]. This method was selected also to be consistent with our previous studies [74] in order to enable comparison of the obtained values. To calculate the TOF, we followed the equation shown as follows in Equation (1), where icat is the catalytic current of the catalyst, ip is the oxidative wave of CuII/CuI (Figure S37) as the approximated diffusion current, R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, F is the Faraday constant, 𝑣 is the scan rate, Ecat is the catalytic potential, and E is the applied potential. icat/ip vs. 1/(1 + exp[(F/RT)(Ecat − E)]) was plotted, and a straight line could be obtained, where the kobs could be calculated according to the linear slope (Figure 3a and Figure S38) [94,95,96].
i c a t i p = 2.24 n R T k o b s F 𝑣 1 + e x p ⁡ [ F R T E c a t − E ]
Subsequently, the kobs (TOF) values of Cu2(BE)2 and CuBENapthyl were calculated to be 484 s−1 and 5.2 s−1, respectively (Figure 3b). Notably, the TOF of CuBENapthyl is consistent with that of CuBEBenzyl, previously calculated at pH 11.5 which is 5.8 s−1 [74], while the TOF of Cu2(BE)2 is almost 100-fold higher than that of CuBENapthyl, as well as CuBEBenzyl. As the concentration of Cu centers in Cu2(BE)2 is double the concentration of Cu centers in CuBENapthyl, but the TOF is 100-fold higher rather than 2-fold higher, we suggest that there might be some cooperativity between the two Cu centers in Cu2(BE)2 that is playing a key role in enhancing the kinetic rate of WO [34,77,97,98,99].

2.2.3. Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation and Homogeneity Studies

As Cu2(BE)2 had a high TOF toward WO, it was subjected to a controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) experiment applying a constant potential of E = +1.25 V using 0.5 mM Cu2(BE)2 in a 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 using ITO as working electrode (Figure 4 and Figure S39). After 2 h of the CPE experiment, 7.32 C of charge was accumulated, and 19 µmol of O2 was probed with an oxygen sensor. Subtracted by the amount of oxygen (1 µmol) and charge (0.26 C) accumulated within 2 h of CPE in the absence of a catalyst, a Faradaic efficiency (FE%) of 98% was calculated. Despite this high FE%, the current density dropped slowly from about 2.2 mA/cm2 to 0.22 mA/cm2 within 2 h, which indicates either the instability of the catalyst or the influence of the pH change (from 11.0 to 9.5) during the reaction. UV-Vis analysis of the catalyst before and after CPE showed that the absorbance bands near 320 nm and 248 nm shifted to 305 nm and 239 nm in UV-Vis spectroscopy, respectively (Figure S40). More importantly, the catalytic wave at Ep = +1.36 V disappeared, and only the peak at Ep = +1.43 V was obtained (Figure S41). Re-adjusting the pH back to 11 did not lead to the recovery of the catalytic oxidative wave at Ep = +1.36 V (Figure S41). Moreover, the current density was 0.30 mA/cm2 during the entire CPE experiment, which is similar to the current density obtained after the 2 h CPE experiment using Cu2(BE)2 before pH adjustment (0.22 mA/cm2), excluding the possibility that the decay of the current density was attributed to pH change (Figure 4). These results indicate that Cu2(BE)2 is capable of catalyzing WO at a high current density, consistent with the calculated TOF, and indicating a fast kinetic rate in these conditions (Figure 3). However, slow decay of the kinetic rate occurred during electrolysis leading to a sharp decrease in the TOF from 484 s−1 to 43 s−1 (after adjusting pH), implying that Cu2(BE)2 decomposes during the WO reaction.
The instability of Cu2(BE)2 can be attributed to the following: (1) its decomposition on the working electrode surface, forming less active or inactive heterogeneous species, or (2) its decomposition to a different, less active (or inactive) homogeneous species in the solution during electrocatalysis. To probe the homogeneity of Cu2(BE)2 in the reaction, we carried out 10 continuous CV scans from +0.4 to +1.5 V in a solution [100]. Interestingly, the catalytic peak significantly decreased during these scans, and the intensity of the last scan was similar to that obtained in the CV scans performed after CPE (Figure S42). The glassy carbon working electrode was then removed from the solution and rinsed with deionized water (the electrode was not polished), then placed in a fresh 0.1 M PBS without Cu2(BE)2. The CV scan of this solution showed only the buffer response (Figure S43). In other words, no active species was formed on the surface of the working electrode. To clearly observe the electrode surface, both the ITO working electrode after CPE for 2 h and a clean ITO electrode as control were analyzed by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). No particles on the electrode’s surface were found in HR-SEM (Figure S44), and no Cu element was found attached during EDS after electrolysis (Figure S45). Therefore, we can exclude assumption (1) and conclude that no heterogeneous process took place during electrocatalysis. Considering that the CV and UV-Vis analysis of Cu2(BE)2 after 2 h CPE was strikingly different from those performed before CPE, but akin to those of the fresh mononuclear complexes, assumption (2) is probable. To probe whether Cu2(BE)2 decomposes to its corresponding mononuclear complex during electrolysis, we tested the behavior of 1.0 mM CuBENapthyl under CPE conditions, as well as the solution of 0.5 mM Cu2(BE)2 after 2 h CPE with re-adjusted pH. Both reactions were conducted at an applied potential of +1.4 V, which is near their catalytic oxidation peaks (Figure 5). The obtained current densities in both cases were below 0.5 mA/cm2—strikingly lower than the current density obtained from the CPE catalyzed by fresh Cu2(BE)2, in which a 150 mV lower overpotential was applied (Figure 4). Collectively, the similarities in the analysis and catalytic properties between CuBENapthyl and re-used Cu2(BE)2 strongly suggest that the self-assembled dinuclear Cu2(BE)2 complex, although stable in a PBS at pH 11, decomposes to the more stable corresponding mononuclear complex during electrocatalytic WO.

2.3. Structure–Function Relationship

The structural and electrocatalytic performances toward the WO of all six complexes involved in this study are summarized in Table 1. From this table, it is clear that (1) all the Cu-peptoid complexes, self-assembled in both mode I and mode II to dinuclear structures, are stable both in the solid state and in pure water; (2) all the dinuclear complexes self-assembled in mode I decompose to a mononuclear complex in a 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, while Cu2(BE)2, self-assembled in mode II, is also stable in these conditions; (3) the kinetics (TOF) of Cu2(BE)2 are much faster than those of the mononuclear complexes, and among the mononuclear ones, the TOF value gets higher when the incorporated structural element is less bulky; and (4) the thermodynamic requirement (onset potential) for Cu2(BE)2 to catalyze WO is lower than that required for the mononuclear complexes—among them, this value becomes lower when the incorporated structural element is less bulky. Therefore, we can conclude that the dinuclear complex Cu2(BE)2 is a much more efficient WO electrocatalyst than the mononuclear complexes in the same conditions. Similar observations and conclusions are also supported in other catalyst studies and are detailed in Table 2. However, it is unstable and loses its activity in 2 h of CPE because it decomposes to the mononuclear complex during water oxidation in a 0.1 M PBS at pH 11.
The efficiency of the Cu-peptoid catalysts highly depends on their structures in the WO condition. We suggest that the ability of Cu2(BE)2 to maintain the self-assembled dinuclear complex in a 0.1 PBS at pH 11 is attributed to the offset π-π interaction of two Bipy ligands from the two peptoid ligands in mode II [83,84,85,86] and to the short Cu···Cu distance (4.270 Å) that allows the two penta-coordinated CuII to coordinate to the µ-OH anion bridge from the basic solution [31,77,96,103]. Having a structural element within their sequences, the self-assembled duplexes in mode I lack this π-π stacking between the two BPy ligands located opposite to each other. Instead, they might prefer to coordinate OH− individually, leading to the formation of mononuclear complexes with two coordinated OH−.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Rink Amide resin was purchased from Novabiochem; ethanolamine and 6-bromo-2,2′-bipyridine were purchased from Acros organics, Israel; N,N’-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) and bromoacetic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. The other chemicals used in this work were purchased from commercial sources and used without additional purification. 2-(2,2′-bipyridine-6-yloxy) ethylamine (B) was prepared according to a literature method [62], and –OH (E) group of ethanolamine was protected using a reported procedure [77]. The used solvents were of HPLC grade. High-purity deionized water was obtained by passing distilled water through a nanopore Milli-Q water purification system. Aqueous basic buffer solutions at pH 11 were prepared using specific concentrations of sodium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium hydrogen phosphate with added 0.1 M NaOH or HCl solution such that the final ionic strength equaled 0.1 M.

3.2. Instrumentation

Peptoid oligomers were analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC (analytical C18 column, 5 µm, 100 Å, 2.0 × 50 mm) on a Jasco UV-2075 instrument. A linear gradient of 5–95% ACN in water (0.1% TFA) over 10 min was used at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. Preparative HPLC was performed using a Phenomenex C18 column (15 µm, 100 Å 21.20 × 100 mm) on a Jasco UV-2075 instrument. Peaks were eluted with a linear gradient of 5–95% ACN in water (0.1% TFA) over 60 min at a flow rate of 5 mL/min. Mass spectrometry for peptoids and Cu-peptoid complexes was performed on a Waters LCT Premier mass and Advion expression mass under electrospray ionization (ESI), direct probe ACN:H2O (70:30), flow rate 0.2 mL/min. UV-Vis measurements were recorded on an Agilent Technologies Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer using a 1 cm path-length quartz cuvette. For high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM) imaging we used a Zeiss Ultra Plus high-resolution SEM, equipped with a Schottky field-emission gun. Specimens were imaged at low acceleration voltages of 1 kV and working distances of approx. 4 mm. We used the Everhart Thornley (“SE2”) secondary electron imaging detector. For confirmation of sample composition, we used a Quantax energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS, Bruker) at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV.

3.3. Synthesis of Cu-peptoids

The peptoid (0.1 mmol) was dissolved in 1 mL methanol (BEBenzyl, BENapthyl, or BE) or 1 mL 1-propanol (BECyclohexyl, BEPropylCl, or BEPropyl), and the mixture was stirred for 10 min. This mixture was treated with copper perchlorate hexahydrate (0.1 mmol as solid) and stirred for 4 h. A greenish-blue solid precipitate was obtained and was isolated by centrifugation, washed three times with corresponding methanol or 1-propanol, and dried in vacuum overnight. Then, the solid compounds were dissolved in specific mixed salts and solvents for crystallization at room temperature: blue crystal Cu2(BECyclohexyl)2 was obtained from slow evaporation of ACN/1-propanol with adding 2 equiv. ammonium hexafluorophosphate; blue crystal Cu2(BEPropylCl)2 was obtained from slow evaporation of ACN/1-propanol; blue crystal Cu2(Propyl)2 was obtained from slow evaporation of ACN/1-propanol; Cu2(BEBenzyl)2, Cu2(BENapthyl)2, and Cu2(BE)2 were reported previously from our laboratory.

3.4. Electrochemical Methods

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) experiments were carried out on an EmStat3 potentiostat. Solutions of the complexes were placed in one-compartment three-electrode cells. Glassy carbon (GC) was used as a working electrode, Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode, and Pt wire as a counter electrode. Working electrode pretreatment before each measurement included polishing with 0.05 μm alumina paste, followed by rinsing with water, and finally drying in air. All potentials in the present work are reported versus NHE by adding 0.20 V to the measured potential (Ag/AgCl vs. NHE). CVs were collected at 100 mV/s, except for other specifications. DPV was obtained with following parameters: amplitude = 200 mV, E-step = 10 mV, pulse width = 0.02 s.

3.5. Oxygen Evolution Experiments

Controlled potential experiments (CPEs) were performed using a two-compartment cell closed with septum. Large-surface porous carbon (spongy shape) as working electrode together with an Ag/AgCl (NaCl sat.) as reference electrode were placed in one of the compartments that was filled with buffer solution containing certain concentration of catalyst (0.1 M PBS at pH 11). In the other compartment, containing only the fresh buffer solution, a mesh platinum counter electrode was used. Before starting the experiment, nitrogen gas was purged for 10 min to remove the oxygen from the system. Oxygen evolution was monitored in the gas phase with a Fixed Needle-Type Oxygen Minisensor (from PyroScience) placed in the headspace of the reaction vassal (working electrode side). The CPE started as soon as the oxygen sensor signal was stable. During the experiment, solutions of both compartments were vigorously stirred. The results of the water oxidation catalysis with copper complex were compared with the blank experiment in the same conditions but in the absence of the catalyst. The Faraday efficiency was determined according to the total charge passed during the CPE and the total amount of generated oxygen as a four-electron oxidation process. The oxygen was measured with the oxygen sensor in % and converted to µmol using a calibration curve. This was constructed by the gradual addition of the known amount of pure oxygen (µL) into the cell containing buffer solution using a Hamilton syringe while measuring the oxygen in % by the oxygen sensor and then by plotting the amount of pure oxygen added (µL) vs. the amount of oxygen (%) shown by oxygen sensor to get the total amount of oxygen evolved in µL during electrolysis (Figure S46). This was further converted to µmol via the following equation: y μmol = x μL/(24.5 L/mol), T = 298 K. Faradaic efficiency (FE%) was calculated using following equation: FE% = n O 2 /(Q/nF) * 100%, where n O 2 is the mole of oxygen from CPE experiment, mol; Q is accumulated charge from CPE experiment, C; n is the number of electrons transferred, 4; and F is Faraday constant, 96,485 C/mol.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we designed and characterized six Cu-peptoid complexes: five with structural elements, Cu2(BENapthyl)2, Cu2(BECyclohexyl)2, Cu2(BEBenzyl)2, Cu2(BEPropylCl)2, and Cu2(BEPropyl)2, which self-assemble in mode I, and one without introducing a structural element, Cu2(BE)2, which self-assembles in mode II. They are all stable as duplexes in the solid state and in pure water. However, the dinuclear structure Cu2(BE)2 is also stable in a 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, which are suitable conditions for WO, where the other dinuclear complexes decompose to their corresponding mononuclear complexes, CuBENapthyl, CuBECyclohexyl, CuBEBenzyl, CuBEPropylCl, and CuBEPropyl, respectively, in these conditions. We suggest that a π-π stacking interaction and a short Cu···Cu distance enhance the stability of the dinuclear complex Cu2(BE)2 in basic conditions. Thus, in comparison to the mononuclear Cu-peptoids, Cu2(BE)2 is a much better electrocatalyst for WO, exhibiting a lower onset potential and a 100-fold faster TOF. Nevertheless, Cu2(BE)2 was shown to slowly decompose to the mononuclear species during homogeneous WO, leading to a sharp decrease in its TOF. These results shed light on the benefits of using dinuclear catalysts with intrinsic cooperativity between the metal centers. Our results also demonstrate that an incorporated structural element has a key role in controlling the self-assembly mode (I or II) of the peptoid upon Cu binding, and the stability of the self-assembled complexes in a PBS at a basic pH. These sequence–structure–function relationships within Cu-peptoid electrocatalysts for WO should expand the molecular design of metallo-biomimetic oligomers as electrocatalysts for WO.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics11070312/s1, Figures S1–S3: Analytical HPLC data of peptoid ligands, Figures S4–S6: ESI-MS data of peptoid ligands, Figures S7–S9: Crystal structures of Cu-peptoids, Figures S10–S15: ESI-MS data of Cu-peptoids in water, Figures S16–S21: UV-Vis data of Cu-peptoids in water, Figures S22–S27: ESI-MS data of Cu-peptoids in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, Figures S28–S33: UV-Vis data of peptoids and corresponding Cu-peptoids in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, Figure S34: CV data of Cu-peptoids with a scanning window from −0.4 to 0.6 V in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, Figure S35: DPV data of Cu-peptoids in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, Figure S36: Normalized CV data of Cu-peptoid, Figure S37: CVs with various scan rates of Cu-peptoids in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, Figure S38: FOWA data of Cu-peptoid in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, Figure S39: CPE data of Cu-peptoid in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11, Figures S40–S41: Characterization of the solution before and after CPE experiment, Figures S42–45: Homogeneity test data including CV, SEM, and EDX, Figure S46: Calibration curve for the measure of oxygen, Tables S1–S7: Structural information of Cu-peptoids including crystallography data, bond length, and angles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.R. and G.M.; methodology, G.R., N.F. and G.M.; software, G.R.; formal analysis, G.R. and N.F.; investigation, G.R.; data curation, G.R. and N.F.; writing—original draft preparation, G.R. and G.M.; writing—review and editing, G.R. and G.M.; project administration, G.M.; funding acquisition, G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Israel Ministry of Energy, grant number 221-11-090.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not relevant.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

CCDC numbers 2253526, 2253527, and 2253528 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 11 July 2023).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yeshayahu Talmon and Inbal Weisbord from the Wolfson Department of Chemical Engineering for HR-SEM and EDX measurements and analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Matheu, R.; Garrido-Barros, P.; Gil-Sepulcre, M.; Ertem, M.Z.; Sala, X.; Gimbert-Surinach, C.; Llobet, A. The development of molecular water oxidation catalysts. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2019, 3, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chatenet, M.; Pollet, B.G.; Dekel, D.R.; Dionigi, F.; Deseure, J.; Millet, P.; Braatz, R.D.; Bazant, M.Z.; Eikerling, M.; Staffell, I.; et al. Water electrolysis: From textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 4583–4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kondo, M.; Tatewaki, H.; Masaoka, S. Design of molecular water oxidation catalysts with earth-abundant metal ions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 6790–6831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Q.F.; Guo, Y.H.; Yu, Y.H.; Zhang, M.T. Bioinspired molecular clusters for water oxidation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 448, 214164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blakemore, J.D.; Crabtree, R.H.; Brudvig, G.W. Molecular Catalysts for Water Oxidation. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12974–13005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ardo, S.; Rivas, D.F.; Modestino, M.A.; Greiving, V.S.; Abdi, F.F.; Alarcon Llado, E.; Artero, V.; Ayers, K.; Battaglia, C.; Becker, J.P.; et al. Pathways to electrochemical solar-hydrogen technologies. Energ. Env. Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2768–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kibsgaard, J.; Chorkendorff, I. Considerations for the scaling-up of water splitting catalysts. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 430–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Luque-Urrutia, J.A.; Ortiz-Garcia, T.; Sola, M.; Poater, A. Green Energy by Hydrogen Production from Water Splitting, Water Oxidation Catalysis and Acceptorless Dehydrogenative Coupling. Inorganics 2023, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chavan, H.S.; Lee, C.H.; Inamdar, A.I.; Han, J.; Park, S.; Cho, S.; Shreshta, N.K.; Lee, S.U.; Hou, B.; Im, H.; et al. Designing and Tuning the Electronic Structure of Nickel-Vanadium Layered Double Hydroxides for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis. Acs Catal. 2022, 12, 3821–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Inamdar, A.I.; Chavan, H.S.; Seok, J.H.; Lee, C.H.; Shin, G.; Park, S.; Yeon, S.; Cho, S.; Park, Y.; Shrestha, N.K.; et al. Optimal rule-of-thumb design of NiFeMo layered double hydroxide nanoflakes for highly efficient and durable overall water-splitting at large currents. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 20497–20508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McEvoy, J.P.; Brudvig, G.W. Water-splitting chemistry of photosystem II. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4455–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hsu, W.C.; Wang, Y.H. Homogeneous Water Oxidation Catalyzed by First-Row Transition Metal Complexes: Unveiling the Relationship between Turnover Frequency and Reaction Overpotential. Chemsuschem 2022, 15, e202102378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, M.; Wu, L.; Zhang, F.; Gao, L.L.; Geng, L.; Ge, J.B.; Tian, K.G.; Chai, H.; Niu, H.L.; Liu, Y.; et al. Doping with Rare Earth Elements and Loading Cocatalysts to Improve the Solar Water Splitting Performance of BiVO4. Inorganics 2023, 11, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, J.; Triana, C.A.; Wan, W.; Saseendran, D.P.A.; Zhao, Y.; Balaghi, S.E.; Heidari, S.; Patzke, G.R. Molecular and heterogeneous water oxidation catalysts: Recent progress and joint perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 2444–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, B.B.; Sun, L.C. Artificial photosynthesis: Opportunities and challenges of molecular catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2216–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Francke, R.; Schille, B.; Roemelt, M. Homogeneously Catalyzed Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide-Methods, Mechanisms, and Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4631–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dau, H.; Limberg, C.; Reier, T.; Risch, M.; Roggan, S.; Strasser, P. The Mechanism of Water Oxidation: From Electrolysis via Homogeneous to Biological Catalysis. Chemcatchem 2010, 2, 724–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chalkley, M.J.; Garrido-Barros, P.; Peters, J.C. A molecular mediator for reductive concerted proton-electron transfers via electrocatalysis. Science 2020, 369, 850–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garrido-Barros, P.; Derosa, J.; Chalkley, M.J.; Peters, J.C. Tandem electrocatalytic N-2 fixation via proton-coupled electron transfer. Nature 2022, 609, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nitopi, S.; Bertheussen, E.; Scott, S.B.; Liu, X.Y.; Engstfeld, A.K.; Horch, S.; Seger, B.; Stephens, I.E.L.; Chan, K.; Hahn, C.; et al. Progress and Perspectives of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Copper in Aqueous Electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7610–7672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gil-Sepulcre, M.; Garrido-Barros, P.; Oldengott, J.; Funes-Ardoiz, I.; Bofill, R.; Sala, X.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Llobet, A. Consecutive Ligand-Based Electron Transfer in New Molecular Copper-Based Water Oxidation Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 18639–18644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Matheu, R.; Ertem, M.Z.; Gimbert-Surinach, C.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Sala, X.; Llobet, A. Hydrogen Bonding Rescues Overpotential in Seven-Coordinated Ru Water Oxidation Catalysts. Acs Catal. 2017, 7, 6525–6532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wasylenko, D.J.; Ganesamoorthy, C.; Henderson, M.A.; Koivisto, B.D.; Osthoff, H.D.; Berlinguette, C.P. Electronic modification of the [Ru(II)(tpy)(bpy)(OH(2))](2+) scaffold: Effects on catalytic water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16094–16106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhan, S.Q.; Zhang, B.B.; Sun, L.C.; Ahlquist, M.S.G. Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Directionality Affects the Mechanism of Ru-Catalyzed Water Oxidation Reaction. Acs Catal. 2020, 10, 13364–13370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yi, J.J.; Zhan, S.Q.; Chen, L.; Tian, Q.; Wang, N.; Li, J.; Xu, W.H.; Zhang, B.B.; Ahlquist, M.S.G. Electrostatic Interactions Accelerating Water Oxidation Catalysis via Intercatalyst O-O Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2484–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dang, L.L.; Feng, H.J.; Lin, Y.J.; Jin, G.X. Self-Assembly of Molecular Figure-Eight Knots Induced by Quadruple Stacking Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 18946–18954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Guo, X.; Wang, N.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Ren, W.; Ding, S.; Xu, G.; Li, J.; Apfel, U.P.; et al. Homolytic versus Heterolytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Steered by a Steric Effect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 8941–8946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, T.Q.; Zhan, S.Q.; Shen, N.N.; Wang, L.Q.; Szabo, Z.; Yang, H.; Ahlquist, M.S.G.; Sun, L.C. Bioinspired Active Site with a Coordination-Adaptive Organosulfonate Ligand for Catalytic Water Oxidation at Neutral pH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 11818–11828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, T.Q.; Li, G.; Shen, N.N.; Wang, L.Q.; Timmer, B.J.J.; Zhou, S.Y.; Zhang, B.B.; Kravchenko, A.; Xu, B.; Ahlquist, M.S.G.; et al. Isolation and Identification of Pseudo Seven-Coordinate Ru(III) Intermediate Completing the Catalytic Cycle of Ru-bda Type of Water Oxidation Catalysts. Ccs Chem. 2022, 4, 2481–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barnett, S.M.; Goldberg, K.I.; Mayer, J.M. A soluble copper-bipyridine water-oxidation electrocatalyst. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Su, X.J.; Gao, M.; Jiao, L.; Liao, R.Z.; Siegbahn, P.E.; Cheng, J.P.; Zhang, M.T. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by a dinuclear copper complex in a neutral aqueous solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015, 54, 4909–4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hu, Q.Q.; Su, X.J.; Zhang, M.T. Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation by an Unsymmetrical Di-Copper Complex. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 10481–10484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Su, X.J.; Zheng, C.; Hu, Q.Q.; Du, H.Y.; Liao, R.Z.; Zhang, M.T. Bimetallic cooperative effect on O-O bond formation: Copper polypyridyl complexes as water oxidation catalyst. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 8670–8675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, Q.F.; Cheng, Z.Y.; Liao, R.Z.; Zhang, M.T. Bioinspired Trinuclear Copper Catalyst for Water Oxidation with a Turnover Frequency up to 20000 s(-1). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 19761–19768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fisher, K.J.; Materna, K.L.; Mercado, B.Q.; Crabtree, R.H.; Brudvig, G.W. Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation by a Copper(II) Complex of an Oxidation-Resistant Ligand. Acs Catal. 2017, 7, 3384–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, T.T.; Zheng, Y.Q. Electrocatalytic water oxidation using a chair-like tetranuclear copper(II) complex in a neutral aqueous solution. Dalton T 2016, 45, 12685–12690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, T.; Wang, C.; Liu, S.B.; Wang, J.L.; Lin, W.B. A Biomimetic Copper Water Oxidation Catalyst with Low Overpotential. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ruan, G.; Fridman, N.; Maayan, G. Borate Buffer as a Key Player in Cu-Based Homogeneous Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation. Chem-Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202202407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, J.Q.; Wang, N.N.; Chen, X.; Yang, X.L.; Hong, L.; Ruan, Z.J.; Ye, H.; Chen, Y.M.; Liang, X.M. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by copper(II) complexes with a pentadentate amine-pyridine ligand. Sustain. Energ. Fuels 2022, 6, 1312–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jian, J.X.; Liao, J.X.; Zhou, M.H.; Yao, M.M.; Chen, Y.J.; Liang, X.W.; Liu, C.P.; Tong, Q.X. Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting of Black Silicon Photoanode with pH-Dependent Copper-Bipyridine Catalysts. Chem-Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202201520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mao, Q.Y.; Pang, Y.J.; Li, X.C.; Chen, G.J.; Tan, H.W. Theoretical Study of the Mechanisms of Two Copper Water Oxidation Electrocatalysts with Bipyridine Ligands. Acs Catal. 2019, 9, 8798–8809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Akbari, M.S.A.; Nandy, S.; Chae, K.H.; Bikas, R.; Kozakiewicz-Piekarz, A.; Najafpour, M.M. Water Oxidation by a Copper(II) Complex with 6,6?-Dihydroxy-2,2?-Bipyridine Ligand: Challenges and an Alternative Mechanism. Langmuir 2023, 39, 5542–5553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gerlach, D.L.; Bhagan, S.; Cruce, A.A.; Burks, D.B.; Nieto, I.; Truong, H.T.; Kelley, S.P.; Herbst-Gervasoni, C.J.; Jernigan, K.L.; Bowman, M.K.; et al. Studies of the Pathways Open to Copper Water Oxidation Catalysts Containing Proximal Hydroxy Groups During Basic Electrocatalysis. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 12689–12698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Koepke, S.J.; Light, K.M.; VanNatta, P.E.; Wiley, K.M.; Kieber-Emmons, M.T. Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation by a Homogeneous Copper Catalyst Disfavors Single-Site Mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8586–8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shen, J.Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, P.L.; Jiang, J.; Sun, L.C. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by copper(II) complexes containing a tetra- or pentadentate amine-pyridine ligand. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 4374–4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shen, J.Y.; Wang, M.; Gao, J.S.; Han, H.X.; Liu, H.; Sun, L.C. Improvement of Electrochemical Water Oxidation by Fine-Tuning the Structure of Tetradentate N-4 Ligands of Molecular Copper Catalysts. Chemsuschem 2017, 10, 4581–4588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lee, H.; Wu, X.J.; Sun, L.C. Copper-based homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts for electrochemical water oxidation. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 4187–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lukacs, D.; Szyrwiel, L.; Pap, J.S. Copper Containing Molecular Systems in Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation-Trends and Perspectives. Catalysts 2019, 9, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhang, M.T.; Chen, Z.; Kang, P.; Meyer, T.J. Electrocatalytic water oxidation with a copper(II) polypeptide complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2048–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Pap, J.S.; Szyrwiel, L.; Sranko, D.; Kerner, Z.; Setner, B.; Szewczuk, Z.; Malinka, W. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by Cu(II) complexes with branched peptides. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6322–6324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Szyrwiel, L.; Lukacs, D.; Ishikawa, T.; Brasun, J.; Szczukowski, L.; Szewczuk, Z.; Setner, B.; Pap, J.S. Electrocatalytic water oxidation influenced by the ratio between Cu(2+)and a multiply branched peptide ligand. Catal. Commun. 2019, 122, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lukacs, D.; Nemeth, M.; Szyrwiel, L.; Illes, L.; Pecz, B.; Shen, S.H.; Pap, J.S. Behavior of a Cu-Peptide complex under water oxidation conditions—Molecular electrocatalyst or precursor to nanostructured CuO films? Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C 2019, 201, 110079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. dos Santos, L.; Climent, V.; Blanford, C.F.; Armstrong, F.A. Mechanistic studies of the ‘blue’ Cu enzyme, bilirubin oxidase, as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 13962–13974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Goldfeder, M.; Kanteev, M.; Isaschar-Ovdat, S.; Adir, N.; Fishman, A. Determination of tyrosinase substrate-binding modes reveals mechanistic differences between type-3 copper proteins. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Fujieda, N.; Umakoshi, K.; Ochi, Y.; Nishikawa, Y.; Yanagisawa, S.; Kubo, M.; Kurisu, G.; Itoh, S. Copper-Oxygen Dynamics in the Tyrosinase Mechanism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 13385–13390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, M.K.; Martell, A.E. Copper(2) Complexes of Triglycine and Tetraglycine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 914–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sanna, D.; Micera, G.; Kallay, C.; Rigo, V.; Sovago, I. Copper(II) complexes of N-terminal protected tri- and tetrapeptides containing histidine residues. Dalton Trans. 2004, 2702–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Szyrwiel, L.; Szczukowski, L.; Pap, J.S.; Setner, B.; Szewczuk, Z.; Malinka, W. The Cu2+ Binding Properties of Branched Peptides Based on L-2,3-Diaminopropionic Acid. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 7951–7959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Simon, R.J.; Kania, R.S.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Huebner, V.D.; Jewell, D.A.; Banville, S.; Ng, S.; Wang, L.; Rosenberg, S.; Marlowe, C.K.; et al. Peptoids: A modular approach to drug discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 9367–9371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zuckermann, R.N.; Kerr, J.M.; Kent, S.B.H.; Moos, W.H. Efficient Method for the Preparation of Peptoids [Oligo(N-Substituted Glycines)] by Submonomer Solid-Phase Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10646–10647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baskin, M.; Maayan, G. Water-Soluble Chiral Metallopeptoids. Biopolymers 2015, 104, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baskin, M.; Maayan, G. A rationally designed metal-binding helical peptoid for selective recognition processes. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 2809–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Baskin, M.; Panz, L.; Maayan, G. Versatile ruthenium complexes based on 2,2′-bipyridine modified peptoids. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10350–10353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tigger-Zaborov, H.; Maayan, G. Nanoparticles assemblies on demand: Controlled aggregation of Ag(0) mediated by modified peptoid sequences. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2017, 508, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Baskin, M.; Maayan, G. Chiral Cu(ii), Co(ii) and Ni(ii) complexes based on 2,2′-bipyridine modified peptoids. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 10767–10774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Baskin, M.; Zhu, H.; Qu, Z.W.; Chill, J.H.; Grimme, S.; Maayan, G. Folding of unstructured peptoids and formation of hetero-bimetallic peptoid complexes upon side-chain-to-metal coordination. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. D’Amato, A.; Ghosh, P.; Costabile, C.; Della Sala, G.; Izzo, I.; Maayan, G.; De Riccardis, F. Peptoid-based siderophore mimics as dinuclear Fe3+ chelators. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 6020–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ghosh, P.; Maayan, G. A Water-Soluble Peptoid that Can Extract Cu2+ from Metallothionein via Selective Recognition. Chem-Eur. J. 2021, 27, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Behar, A.E.; Sabater, L.; Baskin, M.; Hureau, C.; Maayan, G. A Water-Soluble Peptoid Chelator that Can Remove Cu2+ from Amyloid-beta Peptides and Stop the Formation of Reactive Oxygen Species Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 24588–24597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jiang, L.H.; Hu, C.T.; De Riccardis, F.; Kirshenbaum, K. Elaborate Supramolecular Architectures Formed by Co-Assembly of Metal Species and Peptoid Macrocycles. Cryst. Growth Des. 2021, 21, 3889–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. D’Amato, A.; Schettini, R.; Pierri, G.; Izzo, I.; Grisi, F.; Tedesco, C.; De Riccardis, F.; Costabile, C. Synthesis and characterization of new Na+ complexes of N-benzyl cyclic peptoids and their role in the ring opening polymerization of l-lactide. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 5410–5420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maayan, G.; Ward, M.D.; Kirshenbaum, K. Folded biomimetic oligomers for enantioselective catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13679–13684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Prathap, K.J.; Maayan, G. Metallopeptoids as efficient biomimetic catalysts. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11096–11099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ghosh, T.; Ghosh, P.; Maayan, G. A Copper-Peptoid as a Highly Stable, Efficient, and Reusable Homogeneous Water Oxidation Electrocatalyst. Acs Catal. 2018, 8, 10631–10640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Darapaneni, C.M.; Ghosh, P.; Ghosh, T.; Maayan, G. Unique beta-Turn Peptoid Structures and Their Application as Asymmetric Catalysts. Chem-Eur. J. 2020, 26, 9573–9579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ruan, G.; Engelberg, L.; Ghosh, P.; Maayan, G. A unique Co(III)-peptoid as a fast electrocatalyst for homogeneous water oxidation with low overpotential. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 939–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ruan, G.; Ghosh, P.; Fridman, N.; Maayan, G. A Di-Copper-Peptoid in a Noninnocent Borate Buffer as a Fast Electrocatalyst for Homogeneous Water Oxidation with Low Overpotential. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 10614–10623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Culf, A.S.; Ouellette, R.J. Solid-Phase Synthesis of N-Substituted Glycine Oligomers (alpha-Peptoids) and Derivatives. Molecules 2010, 15, 5282–5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zborovsky, L.; Smolyakova, A.; Baskin, M.; Maayan, G. A Pure Polyproline Type I-like Peptoid Helix by Metal Coordination. Chem-Eur. J. 2018, 24, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ghosh, P.; Torner, J.; Arora, P.S.; Maayan, G. Dual Control of Peptide Conformation with Light and Metal Coordination. Chem-Eur. J. 2021, 27, 8956–8959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ghosh, T.; Fridman, N.; Kosa, M.; Maayan, G. Self-Assembled Cyclic Structures from Copper(II) Peptoids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7703–7708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ghosh, P.; Ruan, G.; Fridman, N.; Maayan, G. Amide bond hydrolysis of peptoids. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 9922–9925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Sun, J.Y.; Xu, H.Z. Synthesis, Structures and Properties of Cu(II) and Mn(II) Complexes with 1,10-Phenanthroline-2-carboxylic acid and 2,2′-Bipyridine Ligands. Molecules 2010, 15, 8349–8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. Packing Motifs in [M(bpy)(2)X-2] Coordination Compounds (bpy=2,2′-bipyridine; X = F, Cl, Br, I). Crystals 2023, 13, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mishra, B.K.; Sathyamurthy, N. pi-pi interaction in pyridine. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hohenstein, E.G.; Sherrill, C.D. Effects of Heteroatoms on Aromatic pi-pi Interactions: Benzene-Pyridine and Pyridine Dimer. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 878–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yu, F.S.; Li, F.; Hu, J.X.; Bai, L.C.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, L.C. Electrocatalytic water oxidation by a macrocyclic Cu(II) complex in neutral phosphate buffer. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10377–10380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Xiang, R.J.; Wang, H.Y.; Xin, Z.J.; Li, C.B.; Lu, Y.X.; Gao, X.W.; Sun, H.M.; Cao, R. A Water-Soluble Copper-Polypyridine Complex as a Homogeneous Catalyst for both Photo-Induced and Electrocatalytic O-2 Evolution. Chem-Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1602–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kafentzi, M.C.; Papadakis, R.; Gennarini, F.; Kochem, A.; Iranzo, O.; Le Mest, Y.; Le Poul, N.; Tron, T.; Faure, B.; Simaan, A.J.; et al. Electrochemical Water Oxidation and Stereoselective Oxygen Atom Transfer Mediated by a Copper Complex. Chem-Eur. J. 2018, 24, 5213–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Shahadat, H.M.; Younus, H.A.; Ahmad, N.; Zhang, S.G.; Zhuiykov, S.; Verpoort, F. Macrocyclic cyanocobalamin (vitamin B-12) as a homogeneous electrocatalyst for water oxidation under neutral conditions. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 1968–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Costentin, C.; Drouet, S.; Robert, M.; Savéant, J.-M. Correction to Turnover Numbers, Turnover Frequencies, and Overpotential in Molecular Catalysis of Electrochemical Reactions. Cyclic Voltammetry and Preparative-Scale Electrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19949–19950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Martin, D.J.; Mercado, B.Q.; Mayer, J.M. Combining scaling relationships overcomes rate versus overpotential trade-offs in O-2 molecular electrocatalysis. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Artero, V.; Saveant, J.M. Toward the rational benchmarking of homogeneous H-2-evolving catalysts. Energ. Env. Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3808–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Garrido-Barros, P.; Funes-Ardoiz, I.; Drouet, S.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Maseras, F.; Llobet, A. Redox Non-innocent Ligand Controls Water Oxidation Overpotential in a New Family of Mononuclear Cu-Based Efficient Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6758–6761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Matheu, R.; Neudeck, S.; Meyer, F.; Sala, X.; Llobet, A. Foot of the Wave Analysis for Mechanistic Elucidation and Benchmarking Applications in Molecular Water Oxidation Catalysis. Chemsuschem 2016, 9, 3361–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gentil, S.; Molloy, J.K.; Carriere, M.; Hobballah, A.; Dutta, A.; Cosnier, S.; Shaw, W.J.; Gellon, G.; Belle, C.; Artero, V.; et al. A Nanotube-Supported Dicopper Complex Enhances Pt-free Molecular H-2/Air Fuel Cells. Joule 2019, 3, 2020–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, X.F.; Li, Y.Y.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, R.; Liao, R.Z.; Wang, M. A Dinuclear Copper Complex Featuring a Flexible Linker as Water Oxidation Catalyst with an Activity Far Superior to Its Mononuclear Counterpart. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 5424–5432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Geer, A.M.; Musgrave, C.; Webber, C.; Nielsen, R.J.; McKeown, B.A.; Liu, C.; Schleker, P.P.M.; Jakes, P.; Jia, X.F.; Dickie, D.A.; et al. Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation by a Trinuclear Copper(II) Complex. Acs Catal. 2021, 11, 7223–7240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhong, D.C.; Gong, Y.N.; Zhang, C.; Lu, T.B. Dinuclear metal synergistic catalysis for energy conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52, 3170–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kaeffer, N.; Morozan, A.; Fize, J.; Martinez, E.; Guetaz, L.; Artero, V. The Dark Side of Molecular Catalysis: Diimine-Dioxime Cobalt Complexes Are Not the Actual Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalyst in Acidic Aqueous Solutions. Acs Catal. 2016, 6, 3727–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wickramasinghe, L.D.; Zhou, R.W.; Zong, R.F.; Vo, P.; Gagnon, K.J.; Thummel, R.P. Iron Complexes of Square Planar Tetradentate Polypyridyl-Type Ligands as Catalysts for Water Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13260–13263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chen, Q.F.; Xiao, Y.; Liao, R.-Z.; Zhang, M.T. Trinuclear Nickel Catalyst for Water Oxidation: Intramolecular Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Triggered Trimetallic Cooperative O–O Bond Formation. CCS Chem. 2023, 5, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cao, R.; Saracini, C.; Ginsbach, J.W.; Kieber-Emmons, M.T.; Siegler, M.A.; Solomon, E.I.; Fukuzumi, S.; Karlin, K.D. Peroxo and Superoxo Moieties Bound to Copper Ion: Electron-Transfer Equilibrium with a Small Reorganization Energy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7055–7066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Inorganics 11 00312 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Summary of the self-assembled Cu-peptoids studied in this work and their WO activity.
Scheme 1. Summary of the self-assembled Cu-peptoids studied in this work and their WO activity.
Inorganics 11 00312 sch001
Inorganics 11 00312 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular structures and ORTEP views (thermal ellipsoids set at 50% probability) of peptoids, corresponding self-assembled dinuclear architectures, and the complexes in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11. For crystal structures, the counter anions and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Gray: C; blue: N; red: O; green: Cl; cyan: Cu. Bond lengths and angles are listed in supporting information.
Figure 1. Molecular structures and ORTEP views (thermal ellipsoids set at 50% probability) of peptoids, corresponding self-assembled dinuclear architectures, and the complexes in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11. For crystal structures, the counter anions and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Gray: C; blue: N; red: O; green: Cl; cyan: Cu. Bond lengths and angles are listed in supporting information.
Inorganics 11 00312 g001
Inorganics 11 00312 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) CVs of 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution at pH 11 in the absence (gray dash line) or presence of 0.5 mM CuBENapthyl, CuBECyclohexyl, CuBEBenzyl, CuBEPropylCl, and CuBEPropyl. (b) CVs of 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution at pH 11 in the absence (gray dash line) or presence of 0.5 mM CuBENapthyl or Cu2(BE)2 (according to the molecular weight of dinuclear complex). Scan rate = 100 mV/s, glassy carbon electrode as the working electrode.
Figure 2. (a) CVs of 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution at pH 11 in the absence (gray dash line) or presence of 0.5 mM CuBENapthyl, CuBECyclohexyl, CuBEBenzyl, CuBEPropylCl, and CuBEPropyl. (b) CVs of 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution at pH 11 in the absence (gray dash line) or presence of 0.5 mM CuBENapthyl or Cu2(BE)2 (according to the molecular weight of dinuclear complex). Scan rate = 100 mV/s, glassy carbon electrode as the working electrode.
Inorganics 11 00312 g002
Inorganics 11 00312 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The experimental data of CVs of Cu2(BE)2 and CuBENapthyl in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 used for FOWA at scan rate 100 mV/s. The straight lines represent the fitting line to calculate the TOF with corresponding slope values. (b) The TOF values of Cu2(BE)2 and CuBENapthyl were calculated by FOWA at various scan rates. The horizontal lines represent the overall average TOF values.
Figure 3. (a) The experimental data of CVs of Cu2(BE)2 and CuBENapthyl in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 used for FOWA at scan rate 100 mV/s. The straight lines represent the fitting line to calculate the TOF with corresponding slope values. (b) The TOF values of Cu2(BE)2 and CuBENapthyl were calculated by FOWA at various scan rates. The horizontal lines represent the overall average TOF values.
Inorganics 11 00312 g003
Inorganics 11 00312 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Current density j, and (b) oxygen evolution of the CPE experiments using 0.5 mM Cu2(BE)2 or without any catalyst as blank in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 using ITO as working electrode at applied potential +1.25 V vs. NHE. The orange curve represents another CPE of the same solution responsive to the red curve but with re-adjusted pH from 9.5 to 11.
Figure 4. (a) Current density j, and (b) oxygen evolution of the CPE experiments using 0.5 mM Cu2(BE)2 or without any catalyst as blank in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 using ITO as working electrode at applied potential +1.25 V vs. NHE. The orange curve represents another CPE of the same solution responsive to the red curve but with re-adjusted pH from 9.5 to 11.
Inorganics 11 00312 g004
Inorganics 11 00312 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Current density, j, and (b) oxygen evolution of the CPE experiments of 1.0 mM CuBENapthyl or solution containing Cu2(BE)2 in which the pH was re-adjusted after previous CPE at +1.25 V, in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 using ITO as working electrode at applied potential +1.4 V vs. NHE.
Figure 5. (a) Current density, j, and (b) oxygen evolution of the CPE experiments of 1.0 mM CuBENapthyl or solution containing Cu2(BE)2 in which the pH was re-adjusted after previous CPE at +1.25 V, in 0.1 M PBS at pH 11 using ITO as working electrode at applied potential +1.4 V vs. NHE.
Inorganics 11 00312 g005
Table
Table 1. Summary of structure–function relationships of a series of designed Cu-peptoid complexes toward electrocatalytic water oxidation.
Table 1. Summary of structure–function relationships of a series of designed Cu-peptoid complexes toward electrocatalytic water oxidation.
Complex aSolid State or in Pure Water Cu···Cu Distance in Dinuclear FormIn 0.1 M PBS (pH 11)TOF (s−1)Onset Potential (V vs. NHE)
CuBENapthylDinuclear (mode I)6.787 ÅMononuclear5.2+1.26
CuBECyclohexylDinuclear (mode I)6.757 ÅMononuclear5.3+1.26
CuBEBenzylDinuclear (mode I)6.805 ÅMononuclear5.8+1.24
CuBEPropylClDinuclear (mode I)6.912 ÅMononuclear6.1+1.20
CuBEPropylDinuclear (mode I)6.921 ÅMononuclear7.7+1.18
Cu2(BE)2Dinuclear (mode II)4.270 ÅDinuclear
(mode II)		484 (43) b+1.08
a: the order of the entry is following the bulkiness of the structural elements, from napthyl to none (-H); b: this value is calculated after pH adjustment following 2 h CPE.
Table
Table 2. Summary and comparison of WO performance with reported dinuclear vs. mononuclear catalysts.
Table 2. Summary and comparison of WO performance with reported dinuclear vs. mononuclear catalysts.
Complex aNuclearityOnset Potential (V vs. NHE) aTOF (s−1)Reference
Cu2(BE)2Dinuclear+1.08 484 (43) bThis work
CuBENapthylMononuclear+1.265.2
TNC-CuTrinuclear~+1.6 *20,000[34] b
HappCu2Dinuclear~+1.65 *1375
F-N2O2CuMononuclear~+1.85 *131.6
cat 1Dinuclear~+1.25 *144[97] c
cat 2Mononuclear~+1.35 *4.86
Fe(dpa)Dinuclear~+1.2 *2.2[101] d
Fe(ppq)Mononuclear~+1.4 *0.23
TNC-Ni3Trinuclear+1.240.54[102] e
TNC-Ni2Dinuclear~+1.44 *0.02
(a): the onset potential values with symbol “*” are measured roughly; the electrochemical studies are performed in (b) 1.0 M NaHCO3 at pH 8.4, (c) 0.1 M PBS at pH 12, (d) 0.1 M nitric acid buffer at pH 1, (e) 0.1 M PBS at pH 7.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruan, G.; Fridman, N.; Maayan, G. Structure–Function Relationship within Cu-Peptoid Electrocatalysts for Water Oxidation. Inorganics 2023, 11, 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070312

AMA Style

Ruan G, Fridman N, Maayan G. Structure–Function Relationship within Cu-Peptoid Electrocatalysts for Water Oxidation. Inorganics. 2023; 11(7):312. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070312

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruan, Guilin, Natalia Fridman, and Galia Maayan. 2023. "Structure–Function Relationship within Cu-Peptoid Electrocatalysts for Water Oxidation" Inorganics 11, no. 7: 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070312

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop