Next Article in Journal
The Evaluation of Amino Acid Profiles in Gluten-Free Mini Sponge Cakes Fortified with Broccoli By-Product
Next Article in Special Issue
A High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatographic Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Curcumin I, Curcumin II and Curcumin III in Curcuma longa and Herbal Formulation
Previous Article in Journal
Adverse Effects of Arsenic Uptake in Rice Metabolome and Lipidome Revealed by Untargeted Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) and Regions of Interest Multivariate Curve Resolution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systematic Identification of Bioactive Compositions in Leaves of Morus Cultivars Using UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS and Comprehensive Screening of High-Quality Resources
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fractional Separation and Characterization of Cuticular Waxes Extracted from Vegetable Matter Using Supercritical CO2

by
Mariarosa Scognamiglio
,
Lucia Baldino
* and
Ernesto Reverchon
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2022, 9(3), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9030080
Submission received: 15 February 2022 / Revised: 14 March 2022 / Accepted: 16 March 2022 / Published: 20 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction and Analysis of Plant Active Ingredients)

Abstract

:
Cuticular waxes can be used in high-value applications, including cosmetics, foods and nutraceuticals, among the others. The extraction process determines their quality and purity that are of particular interest when biocompatibility, biodegradability, flavor and fragrance are the main features required for the final formulations. This study demonstrated that supercritical fluid extraction coupled with fractional separation can represent a suitable alternative to isolate cuticular waxes from vegetable matter that preserve their natural properties and composition, without contamination of organic solvent residues. Operating in this way, cuticular waxes can be considered as a fingerprint of the vegetable matter, where C27, C29 and C31 are the most abundant compounds that characterize the material; the differences are mainly due to their relative proportions and the presence of hydrocarbon compounds possessing other functional groups, such as alcohols, aldehydes or acids. Therefore, selectivity of supercritical fluid extraction towards non-polar or slightly polar compounds opens the way for a possible industrial approach to produce extracts that do not require further purification steps.

1. Introduction

Cuticular waxes are compounds ubiquitously present on the surface of all kinds of vegetable matter. They cover leaves, flowers, seeds and other vegetable structures, exerting the main functions of (i) controlling the perspiration, (ii) insulating the plant from external water and (iii) protecting it from pathogens [1,2], biotic and abiotic stresses and plant-insect interaction [3,4,5]. A cuticular wax is a complex mixture of long-chain alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, aldehydes, alkyl esters, fatty acids and other compound families [2,4,5]; although the large majority is represented by long-chain hydrocarbons [2]. Depending on the plant species, the total amount and composition of cuticular waxes can vary widely [4,6]: i.e., every vegetable species (and even organs from the same vegetable) can exhibit a unique composition. Cuticular waxes are not only interesting from an analytical point of view; they can have industrial applications in the field of cosmetic formulations and healthcare products [7,8], since they show a very large affinity with human skin thanks to the prevalence of odd long-chain hydrocarbons with respect to the analogous products coming from fossil feedstocks [8,9].
The current methods for extracting natural waxes from vegetable matter use large quantities of toxic organic solvents [10]. Guo and Jetter [11] studied cuticular waxes coming from potato leaves and other potato organs, after extraction using chloroform; the samples were extracted twice for 30 s. The same procedure was adopted by Jetter et al. [12] to process Prunus laurocerasus L. leaves. Cheng et al. [1] extracted cuticular waxes from rose petals and leaves using chloroform as the extraction solvent, in which the samples were immersed three times for 30 s. Trivedi et al. [2] used the same organic solvent to extract cuticular waxes from bilberry fruits; the immersion was 1 min long. Pimentel et al. [13] processed Croton leaves using three consecutive immersions of 30, 20 and 10 s duration in dichloromethane. They systematically identified C19 to C33 alkanes and C18 to C34 alcohols.
Therefore, the extraction of cuticular waxes is carried out, as a rule, by liquid solvent extraction and chloroform is the most frequently used solvent. Moreover, the process is performed in a very fast manner to minimize the co-extraction of other undesired compounds [14]. However, when other extraction techniques are used, as in the case of Soxhlet method that can last some hours, other compounds and intracuticular waxes can be also extracted and the authors generally do not give indications about these co-extracts. In particular, cuticular waxes represent interfering compounds that are extracted together with the desired ones, since the target compounds generally have a biological/industrial interest, such as essential oil, coloring matter, antioxidants and active principles for pharmaceutical applications [8]. However, they are systematically co-extracted during solvent extraction, as previously discussed [15], and during alternative processes [16], like ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE), microwave assisted extraction (MAE), pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). Therefore, they have to be eliminated by post-processing procedures, such as the so-called winterization [17], in which the extract, dissolved in the organic solvent, is cooled at very low temperatures (e.g., from −10 °C to −40 °C) for several hours to precipitate cuticular waxes that are subsequently separated by filtration [18].
CO2 at supercritical conditions (SC-CO2) is largely used to extract the compounds of interest from vegetable matter. In particular, above its critical point (Pc = 73.8 bar and Tc = 31 °C), CO2 shows a liquid-like density and a gas-like diffusivity that favor the extraction of chemically affine compounds from solid matrices. Several studies [19,20,21,22,23,24] reported in the scientific literature describe the main advantages of using this green technique instead of the traditional ones, such as lower operative temperatures and higher selectivity. Moreover, post-processing steps, adopted to purify the extracts from cuticular waxes, are not required when winterization is performed in series to the extraction process in the same operative plant. In particular, Reverchon and co-workers demonstrated in several papers [25,26,27] that, by using SC-CO2 extraction coupled with high-pressure fractional separation, it is possible to separate cuticular waxes during the extraction process by the selective precipitation from the overall extract [28]. Specifically speaking, the compounds of interest for extraction are generally located well inside the vegetable structure; whereas cuticular waxes are located on the surface of the vegetable material and show a non-negligible solubility in SC-CO2 [28]. For this reason, they are inevitably co-extracted at all SC-CO2 processing conditions due to the overlap of mass transfer limitations and thermodynamic (solubility) limits [28]. However, since they are generally considered as an interfering matter that reduces the quality (purity) of the extracts, a procedure has been developed that allows the selective separation of cuticular waxes from the extract by cooling the mixture CO2 plus overall extract at the exit of the extractor down to temperatures lower than 0 °C [25,26,27,29,30]. Operating at these process conditions, the solubility of cuticular waxes reduces to near zero in SC-CO2 and, therefore, they can be precipitated in a separator before the final collection of the extract of interest.
Therefore, according to the previous discussion of the literature, the scope of this work is to attempt, for the first time, a systematic analysis of cuticular waxes extracted by SC-CO2 plus fractional separation from several vegetables. After performing the specific SC-CO2 extraction processes, several high-resolution gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) identifications are carried out on cuticular waxes obtained from more than ten different vegetable species, to analyze their composition and dependence on the vegetable tested, and to show that their composition can be specific for the different vegetable species and tissue analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Basil leaves (Ocimum basilicum L.), cannabis inflorescence (Cannabis sativa L.), chamomile flower heads (Chamomilla recutita L. Rausch.), clove buds (Eugenia caryophyllata Thun.), ginger rhizomes (Zingiber officinale Roscoe), lavender inflorescence, marjoram leaf (Origanum Majorana L.), rosemary leaf (Rosmarinus officinalis L.), tangerine peels and tobacco leaves were supplied by Planta Medica srl (Pistrino di Citerna (PG), Italy). Jasmine concrete (Jasminum grandiflorum L.) was supplied by Chauvet (Seillans, France). Vegetable materials (except for jasmine concrete) were dried and ground using an electric stainless-steel grinder (KYG, mod. 304, China); mean particle size was determined by mechanical sieving. Carbon dioxide (CO2, 99.9% purity, Morlando Group srl, Naples, Italy) was used to carry out SFE processing.

2.2. SFE Plant Description

SC-CO2 extraction experiments were carried out in a homemade laboratory apparatus equipped with a 490 cm3 internal volume extractor. One hundred grams of vegetable matter, with a mean particle size of 600 µm, were used in all the experiments. In the case of jasmine concrete, since it was a semi-solid material and can produce undesired caking/channeling phenomena during extraction, it was mixed with glass beads (3 mm diameter) to create an inert core surrounded by a thin shell of jasmine concrete. Extracts were recovered using two separation vessels with an internal volume of 200 cm3 each, operated in series. The first separator was cooled down to −10 °C using a thermostated bath (Julabo, mod. F38-EH, Milan, Italy); the second one allowed the continuous discharge of the extract using a valve located at the bottom of the vessel. It was operated at 25 bar and 15 °C. A high-pressure pump (Lewa, mod. LDB1 M210S, Leonberg, Germany) pumped liquid CO2 at the desired flow rate. CO2 was then heated to the extraction temperature in a thermostated bath (Julabo, mod. CORIO C-B27, Milan, Italy). CO2 flow rate was monitored by a calibrated rotameter (ASA, mod. d6, Sesto San Giovanni (MI), Italy), located after the last separator, coupled with a volumetric meter (Sacofgas 1927 SpA, mod. G.4, Milan, Italy). Temperature and pressure along the plant were measured by thermocouples and test gauges, respectively. More details about the apparatus and the experimental procedure are published elsewhere [25,27,30,31].
The operative conditions selected for the experiments carried out in this work were 90 bar and 50 °C (ρCO2 ≈ 0.280 g/cm3) in the extractor, 90 bar and −10 °C in the first separator and 25 bar and 15 °C in the second one. CO2 flow rate was fixed at 0.8 kg/h for all the experiments. The first separator, used for cuticular waxes precipitation, was operated at the same extraction pressure and at a temperature lower than 0 °C since, operating in this way, the solubility of cuticular waxes in CO2 drastically reduced [25,27,28,30,31].

2.3. Characterization of Cuticular Waxes

Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis was carried out using a Varian 3900 apparatus (Varian, Inc., San Fernando, CA, USA), equipped with a fused-silica capillary column (mod. DB-5, J & W, Folsom, CA, USA) of 30 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness, and connected to a Varian Saturn Detector 2100T (Varian, Inc., San Fernando, CA, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas, at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Column temperature was set at 120 °C and held for 5 min; then, it was ramped up to 320 °C, at 2 °C/min, where it was held for 10 min. An injection step was performed using 1 μL of a 1:10 n-hexane solution in split mode; the injector temperature was set at 320 °C. The mass spectrometer operated at an ionization voltage of 70 eV in the 40–650 a.m.u. range, at a scanning speed of 5 scans/s. The retention indices (RI) were determined considering the retention time (Rt) values of homologous series of n-alkanes (C21-C40) obtained at the same operating conditions. The various components were also identified by a comparison of their RI with published data in the scientific literature. Further identifications were performed, by comparison, of the mass spectra with those stored in the NIST 02 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) library. The relative amounts of the components were evaluated as a percentage of normalized peak area.

3. Results and Discussion

As reported in the literature, the major constituents of cuticular waxes extracted by SFE processing plus high-pressure fractionation of the vegetable matter were paraffinic compounds and, among them, heptacosane, nonacosane, hentriacontane and tritriacontane showed the larger percentages [32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Moreover, odd-carbon-atom hydrocarbons were largely more represented than the homologous, even-carbon atoms. This is an interesting characteristic from an applicative point of view; indeed, differently from paraffins coming from fossil fractions, odd-carbon-atom hydrocarbons are largely more compatible with the human skin and can be applied in cosmetics and health care products [9,39,40,41,42].
A photograph of the cuticular waxes extracted during SFE processing of cannabis inflorescence is reported in Figure 1. In all cases, the precipitated material looks like a white powder, sometimes with a light smell, similar to that of the starting vegetable species.
Eleven GC-MS traces of the produced cuticular waxes are summarized in Figure 2, for overall comparison purposes. These traces can give a qualitative perspective of the compounds present in the various plants tested and their relative abundance.
The prevalence of long-chain alkanes is confirmed, and they range from C23 to C33, with a prevalence of odd paraffins, as C27, C29 and C31, that largely confirm as the major components, though their relative proportions vary from one vegetable species to another [43,44]. Some small quantities of paraffinic alcohols, aldehydes and fatty acids are also identified, as expected. They all show the same carbon atoms’ skeleton of the identified paraffins, with the further presence of a functional group: i.e., alcoholic, aldehydic or acid group.
Extensive identification of the cuticular waxes extracted and analyzed in this work is reported in Table 1. In particular, Figure 2 and Table 1 confirm that the most abundant compounds present in the cuticular waxes extracted by SC-CO2 are C27, C29 and C31 for all the vegetable species studied. These results are in agreement with the previous literature related to the same vegetable matter [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. However, data in the literature are referred only to straight paraffins. Analysis performed in this work demonstrates, instead, the presence of some high-molecular-weight paraffinic alcohols (namely, C24, C26, C28 and C30). The largest percentages of these compounds are found in marjoram (16.22%), tobacco (5.94%) and lavender (5.48%). Additionally, aldehydes and traces of a paraffinic acid, namely octacosanoic acid, are detected in jasmine and tobacco. More specifically, C28 and C30 aldehydes are the most widespread compounds and the largest percentage of C28 aldehyde is found in tobacco (6.57%) and marjoram (6.40%).

4. Conclusions

In the present work, a detailed study on the composition of cuticular waxes extracted and fractionated by SFE is reported. GC-MS analysis confirmed that the separation from the other extractable materials was accurate, and these products can be considered a sort of fingerprint of the specific vegetable matter. C27, C29 and C31 were the most abundant compounds found in the investigated vegetable materials, in line with the previous findings reported in the literature. Moreover, the specific selectivity of SC-CO2 extraction towards non-polar or slightly polar compounds makes these cuticular waxes suitable for higher added-value applications, such as in the medical and pharmaceutical field, in which purity and biocompatibility are key features that justify the selection of a more complex extraction process with respect to the traditional ones.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.; methodology, M.S.; validation, L.B. and E.R.; formal analysis, M.S.; investigation, L.B. and M.S.; resources, E.R.; data curation, L.B. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.B. and E.R.; writing—review and editing, L.B.; supervision, E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, G.; Huang, H.; Zhou, L.; He, S.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, X. Chemical composition and water permeability of the cuticular wax barrier in rose leaf and petal: A comparative investigation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Trivedi, P.; Nguyen, N.; Klavins, L.; Kviesis, J.; Heinonen, E.; Remes, J.; Jokipii-Lukkari, S.; Klavins, M.; Karppinen, K.; Jaakola, L.; et al. Analysis of composition, morphology, and biosynthesis of cuticular wax in wild type bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and its glossy mutant. Food Chem. 2021, 354, 129517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Ahmad, H.M.; Rahman, M.-U.; Ali, Q.; Awan, S.I. Plant cuticular waxes: A review on functions, composition, biosyntheses mechanism and transportation. Life Sci. J. 2015, 12, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  4. Busta, L.; Jetter, R. Moving beyond the ubiquitous: The diversity and biosynthesis of specialty compounds in plant cuticular waxes. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 1275–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, X.; Kong, L.; Zhi, P.; Chang, C. Update on cuticular wax biosynthesis and its roles in plant disease resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5514. [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin, L.B.B.; Rose, J.K.C. There’s more than one way to skin a fruit: Formation and functions of fruit cuticles. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4639–4651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Al Bulushi, K.; Attard, T.M.; North, M.; Hunt, A.J. Optimisation and economic evaluation of the supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of waxes from waste date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) leaves. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 186, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Attard, T.M.; Bukhanko, N.; Eriksson, D.; Arshadi, M.; Geladi, P.; Bergsten, U.; Budarin, V.L.; Clark, J.H.; Hunt, A.J. Supercritical extraction of waxes and lipids from biomass: A valuable first step towards an integrated biorefinery. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 684–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Trivedi, P.; Nguyen, N.; Hykkerud, A.L.; Häggman, H.; Martinussen, I.; Jaakola, L.; Karppinen, K. Developmental and environmental regulation of cuticular wax biosynthesis in fleshy fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sin, E.H.K.; Marriott, R.; Hunt, A.J.; Clark, J.H. Identification, quantification and Chrastil modelling of wheat straw wax extraction using supercritical carbon dioxide. C. R. Chim. 2014, 17, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, Y.; Jetter, R. Comparative analyses of cuticular waxes on various organs of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3926–3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jetter, R.; Schäffer, S.; Riederer, M. Leaf cuticular waxes are arranged in chemically and mechanically distinct layers: Evidence from Prunus laurocerasus L. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Silvestroni Pimentel, B.; Negri, G.; Cordeiro, I.; Barbosa Motta, L.; Salatino, A. Taxonomic significance of the distribution of constituents of leaf cuticular waxes of Croton species (Euphorbiaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2020, 92, 104106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Simões, R.; Rodrigues, A.; Ferreira-Dias, S.; Miranda, I.; Pereira, H. Chemical composition of cuticular waxes and pigments and morphology of leaves of Quercus suber trees of different provenance. Plants 2020, 9, 1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Canizares, D.; Angers, P.; Ratti, C. Organogelation capacity of epicuticular and cuticular waxes from flax and wheat straws. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2021, 98, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lefebvre, T.; Destandau, E.; Lesellier, E. Selective extraction of bioactive compounds from plants using recent extraction techniques: A review. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1635, 461770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Costa, R.; Albergamo, A.; Arrigo, S.; Gentile, F.; Dugo, G. Solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography and ultra-highperformance liquid chromatography applied to the characterizationof lemon wax, a waste product from citrus industry. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1603, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pham, T.-C.-T.; Angers, P.; Ratti, C. Extraction of wax-like materials from cereals. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 96, 2273–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sökmen, M.; Demir, E.; Alomar, S.Y. Optimization of sequential supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of caffeine and catechins from green tea. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 133, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pimentel-Moral, S.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Arráez-Román, D.; Martínez-Férez, A.; Segura-Carretero, A. Supercritical CO2 extraction of bioactive compounds from Hibiscus sabdariffa. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 147, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fuentes-Gandara, F.; Torres, A.; Fernández-Ponce, M.T.; Casas, L.; Mantell, C.; Varela, R.; Martínez de la Ossa-Fernández, E.J.; Macías, F.A. Selective fractionation and isolation of allelopathic compounds from Helianthus annuus L. leaves by means of high-pressure techniques. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 143, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Campalani, C.; Chioggia, F.; Amadio, E.; Gallo, M.; Rizzolio, F.; Selva, M.; Perosa, A. Supercritical CO2 extraction of natural antibacterials from low value weeds and agro-waste. J. CO2 Utiliz. 2020, 40, 101198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gomes Silva, S.; Santana de Oliveira, M.; Neves Cruz, J.; Almeida da Costa, W.; da Silva, S.H.M.; Barreto Maia, A.A.; Lopes de Sousa, R.; Carvalho Junior, R.N.; de Aguiar Andrade, E.H. Supercritical CO2 extraction to obtain Lippia thymoides Mart. & Schauer (Verbenaceae) essential oil rich in thymol and evaluation of its antimicrobial activity. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2021, 168, 105064. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yousefi, M.; Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M.; Mirsadeghi, S.; Mahdi Pourmortazavi, S. Supercritical fluid extraction of pesticides and insecticides from food samples and plant materials. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2021, 51, 482–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shukla, A.; Naik, S.N.; Goud, V.V.; Das, C. Supercritical CO2 extraction and online fractionation of dry ginger for production of high-quality volatile oil and gingerols enriched oleoresin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 130, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baldino, L.; Reverchon, E. Artemisia annua organic solvent extract, processed by supercritical CO2. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 3171–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baldino, L.; Reverchon, E. Supercritical fluid extraction of compounds of pharmaceutical interest from Wendita calysina (Burrito). Processes 2020, 8, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gaspar, F. Extraction of essential oils and cuticular waxes with compressed CO2: Effect of extraction pressure and temperature. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 2497–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sovova, H.; Stateva, R.P. New approach to modeling supercritical CO2 extraction of cuticular waxes: Interplay between solubility and kinetics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 4861–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baldino, L.; Della Porta, G.; Reverchon, E. Supercritical CO2 processing strategies for pyrethrins selective extraction. J. CO2 Utiliz. 2017, 20, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baldino, L.; Adami, R.; Reverchon, E. Concentration of Ruta graveolens active compounds using SC-CO2 extraction coupled with fractional separation. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2018, 131, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Subra, P.; Vega-Bancel, A.; Reverchon, E. Breakthrough curves and adsorption isotherms of terpene mixtures in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 1998, 12, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reverchon, E.; Della Porta, G. Supercritical CO2 extraction and fractionation of Lavender essential oil and waxes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 1654–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reverchon, E.; Senatore, F. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Chamomile essential oil and its analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reverchon, E.; Sesti Osseo, L. Supercritical CO2 extraction of basil oil: Characterization of products and process modelling. J. Supercrit. Fluids 1994, 7, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Reverchon, E.; Della Porta, G. Supercritical CO2 fractionation of Jasmine concrete. J. Supercrit. Fluids 1995, 8, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reverchon, E. Fractional separation of SCF extracts from Marjoram leaves: Mass transfer and optimization. J. Supercrit. Fluids 1992, 5, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baldino, L.; Scognamiglio, M.; Reverchon, E. Supercritical fluid technologies applied to the extraction of compounds of industrial interest from Cannabis sativa L. and to their pharmaceutical formulations: A review. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 165, 104960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karğılı, U.; Aytaç, E. Supercritical fluid extraction of cannabinoids (THC and CBD) from four different strains of cannabis grown in different regions. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2022, 179, 105410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Szakiel, A.; Pączkowski, C.; Pensec, F.; Bertsch, C. Fruit cuticular waxes as a source of biologically active triterpenoids. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 263–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Han, N.; Bakovic, M. Biologically active triterpenoids and their cardioprotective and antiInflammatory effects. J. Bioanal. Biomed. 2015, S12, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  42. Francini, A.; Pintado, M.; Manganaris, G.A.; Ferrante, A. Editorial: Bioactive compounds biosynthesis and metabolism in fruit and vegetables. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Haliński, Ł.P.; Paszkiewicz, M.; Gołębiowski, M.; Stepnowski, P. The chemical composition of cuticular waxes from leaves of the gboma eggplant (Solanum macrocarpon L.). J. Food Compos. Anal. 2012, 25, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.; Su, S.; Chen, G.; Mao, H.; Jiang, Y. Relationship between cuticular waxes and storage quality parameters of Korla pear under different storage methods. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 1152–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Macroscopic and qualitative example of cuticular waxes extracted by SFE processing of cannabis inflorescence.
Figure 1. Macroscopic and qualitative example of cuticular waxes extracted by SFE processing of cannabis inflorescence.
Separations 09 00080 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of GC−MS traces of cuticular waxes extracted by SC−CO2 plus fractional separation from different vegetable matter, studied in this work.
Figure 2. Comparison of GC−MS traces of cuticular waxes extracted by SC−CO2 plus fractional separation from different vegetable matter, studied in this work.
Separations 09 00080 g002
Table 1. Percentage (area %) of the compounds identified by GC−MS of cuticular waxes extracted by SC−CO2 plus fractional separation from different vegetable matter, studied in this work.
Table 1. Percentage (area %) of the compounds identified by GC−MS of cuticular waxes extracted by SC−CO2 plus fractional separation from different vegetable matter, studied in this work.
Compound IdentifiedChamomileBasilGingerJasmineLavenderTobaccoMarjoramTangerineCannabisRosemaryClove Buds
Tricosane, C23H4810.690.10-1.25--0.05-0.040.07-
Tetracosane, C24H500.990.15-0.18-0.080.12-0.510.07-
Pentacosane, C25H5215.125.38-6.882.323.973.532.1712.043.415.80
1-Tetracosanol, C24H50O0.65---0.69-2.81-2.360.09-
Hexacosane, C26H541.261.76-1.75-0.391.410.733.081.451.50
Methylhexacosane, C27H56------1.38-0.440.62-
Heptacosane, C27H5620.9422.528.3328.7020.403.6912.9328.4561.8523.0165.80
1-Hexacosanol, C26H54O0.65--2.522.321.699.780.414.061.41-
Octacosane, C28H581.633.331.073.192.74-1.853.562.881.873.90
Octacosanal, C28H56O-1.510.381.42-6.576.400.230.141.74-
Nonacosane, C29H6016.4721.5319.0133.2431.6018.3411.5441.0915.7322.2522.30
Methylhexacosanoate, C17H34O20.78-0.73--------
1-Octacosanol, C28H58O0.333.46-2.945.485.9416.221.65-2.46-
Triacontane, C30H621.363.342.091.612.543.111.402.930.351.67-
Octacosanoic acid, C28H56O2---0.86-0.09-----
Methylheptacosanoate, C29H58O20.692.401.740.51-4.022.360.34-2.14-
Triacontanal, C30H60O-0.57-0.19-1.142.840.12-0.32-
Hentriacontane, C31H649.6816.6919.277.1213.4527.848.5711.410.2613.20-
1-Triacontanol, C30H62O1.034.142.852.123.921.894.242.34-2.22-
Dotriacontane, C32H660.610.960.760.170.520.890.300.160.070.38-
Tritriacontane, C33H681.131.231.060.520.841.360.540.490.560.62-
Methyldotriacontane, C33H68-0.500.16-1.410.340.300.82-0.13-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scognamiglio, M.; Baldino, L.; Reverchon, E. Fractional Separation and Characterization of Cuticular Waxes Extracted from Vegetable Matter Using Supercritical CO2. Separations 2022, 9, 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9030080

AMA Style

Scognamiglio M, Baldino L, Reverchon E. Fractional Separation and Characterization of Cuticular Waxes Extracted from Vegetable Matter Using Supercritical CO2. Separations. 2022; 9(3):80. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9030080

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scognamiglio, Mariarosa, Lucia Baldino, and Ernesto Reverchon. 2022. "Fractional Separation and Characterization of Cuticular Waxes Extracted from Vegetable Matter Using Supercritical CO2" Separations 9, no. 3: 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9030080

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop