Next Article in Journal
Influence of Orchard Cultural Practices during the Productive Process of Cherries through Life Cycle Assessment
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Lemon Myrtle: Comparison of Modern and Conventional Extraction Techniques Based on Bioactivity and Total Polyphenols in Dry Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
A Computational Approach for Pathway-Based Systemic Drug Influence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Composition and Antioxidant Activity, Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction Extracts, and Residue after Extraction of Biologically Active Compounds from Freeze-Dried Tomato Matrix
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/pr9061064
Review Report
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Olive Oil Dregs as a Novel Source of Natural Antioxidants: Extraction Optimization towards a Sustainable Process

Processes 2021, 9(6), 1064; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061064
by Giuseppe Squillaci 1,*, Alice Marchetti 2, Orsolina Petillo 1, Michela Bosetti 2, Francesco La Cara 1, Gianfranco Peluso 1 and Alessandra Morana 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2021, 9(6), 1064; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061064
Submission received: 31 May 2021 / Revised: 11 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 18 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction Optimization Processes of Antioxidants)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this manuscript, the authors evaluated the potential usage of olive oil mill by-product. Overall, the manuscript is well-written and valuable. My minor comments are as follows:

 

  1. Page 1, line 15 or 17: Is it necessary to capitalize “Total Phenolic Content” or “Gallic Acid Equivalents”? If yes, you don’t have to correct it.

 

  1. Page 1, lines 27-28: The same question, three keywords are uppercased.

 

  1. Page 8, line 347-348: Can authors provide reference(s) to support their finding?

 

  1. Page 8, lines 357-359: The authors mentioned other authors’ result. Please provide reference(s).

 

  1. Page 8, line 359: OP stands for olive pomace, right? I can find it from the first page; however, it’s easy to get confused here.

 

  1. Page 8, lines 632-364: Chanioti and Tzia….. Please provide the reference.

 

  1. Page 9, line 398: I don’t not sure if 36.63 ± 0.11% is better than 36.63% ± 0.11.

 

  1. Page 10, line 453-454: Be careful the format.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript is a great addition to the  literature on Olive oil industry. and it's highly recoommended to be published after carefully revising the text for grammers and typos. Quality of Figures must be higher than presented currently, for instance figure 1 is poorly presented. 

Tables must be presented as diagrams or bar graphs as much as possible.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop