Next Article in Journal
Dechlorination of Polyvinyl Chloride via Solvothermal Treatment with Glycerol
Next Article in Special Issue
Ternary Inclusion Complex of Sinapic Acid with Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and Hydrophilic Polymer Prepared by Microwave Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Wellbore Temperature and Pressure Calculation of Offshore Gas Well Based on Gas–Liquid Separated Flow Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin for Delivery of Sinapic Acid via Inclusion Complex Prepared by Solvent Evaporation Method

Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(10), 2046; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102046
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 4 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 October 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supramolecular Hosts: Design and Applications)

Abstract

:
The goal of this study was to increase the aqueous solubility and dissolution rate of sinapic acid (SA) by formulating binary inclusion complex (BIC) of SA with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) using solvent evaporation (SE) technology. The phase solubility and dissolution studies were conducted to determine the solubility and in vitro release rate of SA. In addition, the prepared inclusion complex was characterized for solid state characterization using techniques such as DSC, PXRD, SEM, and FTIR. Moreover, the prepared SA-BIC was evaluated for its antioxidant activity. Results revealed that the SA solubility can be shown to improve with a change in HPβCD concentration. About 2.59 times higher solubility of SA in water was noticed in the presence of HPβCD (10 mM). Dissolution study demonstrated that the 34.11 ± 4.51% of SA was released from binary physical mixture (BPM), while the maximum release of 46.27 ± 2.79% of SA was observed for SA-BIC prepared by SE method. The prepared SA-BIC demonstrated distinctive properties when compared to pure SA, which was demonstrated by different analytical methods, such as DSC, PXRD, SEM, and FTIR, as evidence of SA inclusion into HPβCD cavity. Further, it was observed that SA-BIC displayed stronger DPPH radical scavenging activity than SA. In conclusion, SE technology considerably enhanced the complexity of SA with HPβCD, and these observations could help to heighten the SA solubility, which may lead to a better bioavailability.

1. Introduction

Hydroxycinnamic acids refer to the category of phenolic acids containing bioactive carboxylic acids. They primarily consist of sinapic acid (SA, Figure 1A), caffeic acid, and ferulic acid [1,2,3]. SA may be present in free form but also in the ester forms. It is yellow-brown crystalline powder with the molecular weight of 224.21 g/mol [2]. It is a phytochemical that is present in various plant sources, such as berry fruits, cereals, citrus, oilseed crops, spices, and vegetables [4,5,6,7]. Previously, SA has shown activity against different conditions, such as oxidative stress [8], inflammation [9,10], anxiety [10], infections [11], diabetes [12], neurodegeneration [13], and cancer [14]. SA is a poorly soluble bioactive compound in water and, due to its limited dissolution rate, it restricts its permeability via the biological membranes, leading to decreased bioavailability [15,16,17].
Cyclodextrin (CD) inclusion complex is among the most popular strategies for augmenting the solubility of poorly soluble drugs. CDs reflect the family of cyclic oligosaccharide, and the parent CDs are referred to as alpha, beta, and gamma CDs comprising of six, seven, and eight units of glucopyranose, respectively. The cone form of the CD has lipophilic cavity inside and hydrophilic surface on the outside [18]. Its distinctive configuration is capable of influencing drug molecules, which could improve the stability, solubility, and enhance the permeability of the drug to the biological membrane. CD derivatives have become much more focused as the parent CDs themselves have quite low aqueous solubility, in particular βCD [19,20]. It is generally documented that the introduction of certain water-soluble polymers could considerably improve the solubility of drugs in aqueous solutions through the development of ternary complexes [21,22]. A beneficial increase in drug solubilization was observed using the combination of CDs and polymers [23]. Water-soluble polymers play a leading role in the stabilization of complex aggregates and numerous forms of pharmaceutical particulate systems. By modifying the hydration characteristics of CD molecules, they could also decrease CD mobility and enhance the solubility of complexes [24].
It has been demonstrated that chemically modified CDs can be used for enriching the pharmaceutical properties of pharmaceuticals, food, and cosmetics [25]. Hydroxypropyl-β-CD (HPβCD, Figure 1B) is a derivate of β-CD and it possesses high water solubility, excellent stability, excellent absorption, strong solubilization, and low toxicity [26]. This makes it a common ingredient for pharmaceuticals as solubilizers, excipients, etc. [27]. HPβCD has attracted extensive research interest and has excessive application prospects in future [28].
In the present study, solvent evaporation (SE) procedure was applied to produce binary inclusion complex (BIC) of SA/HPβCD. The phase solubility of SA/HPβCD mixture and the in vitro dissolution profile of binary physical mixture (BPM) and BIC were assessed. In addition, the prepared inclusion complex was characterized for solid-state characterization and antioxidant property.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

SA was acquired from “Carbosynth limited, Berkshire, UK”. HPβCD was sourced from “Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA”. Analytical reagents were used for all other materials. Water from “Millipore (Molsheim, Cedex, France)” was used for preparing all solutions.

2.2. Formulation of Physical Mixture and Inclusion Complex

The binary physical mixture (BPM, 1:1 ratio) was prepared by proper mixing of each component of SA-BPM (SA:HPβCD) in mortar and pestle. The prepared PM mixture was stored in a desiccator for any further assessment. The SA-BIC (1:1 ratio) was prepared by SE method. In this procedure, the quantities of SA and HPβCD were precisely weighed for the preparation of binary complex, then SA and HPβCD were separately dissolved in organic phase (ethanol, 7 parts) and aqueous phase (water, 3 parts), respectively. Later, the solution of both SA and HPβCD were mixed slowly together with stirring [29]. Further, the solvent was evaporated at higher temperature with agitation till a damp mass was formed. Consequently, in order to remove the traces of solvent remaining in the mass, the formed damp mass was transferred to oven for 24 h, which was maintained at 50 °C. The dried mass was ground by mortar and pestle and passed through the sieve (#80). The prepared dried binary complex was stored in a well-sealed desiccator for further examination.

2.3. Measurements of Physical Properties

2.3.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Assessment of DSC was carried out by the “DSC, Perkin Elmer, Pyris 6 System, Shelton, CT, USA”. As a reference, an empty aluminum pan was utilized. The test sample of 5 mg was mounted in a crimped aluminum pan and the DSC system heated throughout a range of temperatures of 50 °C to 300 °C at a steady rate of 10 °C/min.

2.3.2. Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)

An X-ray diffractometer was used to determine the physical state of SA in the prepared inclusion complex. In the study, “Ultima IV Diffractometer (Rigaku Inc., Tokyo, Japan)” performed the PXRD analysis, and the PXRD trend of all tests samples was evaluated from the 3° to 60° 2-theta range.

2.3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The surface characteristics of pure SA, BPM, and prepared complex were analyzed using a “Zeiss EVO LS10 microscope”. Each sample was initially mounted on a ribbon of carbon and applied to a vacuum for further examination and SEM photomicrographs were acquired [30,31].

2.3.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

The prepared inclusion complex, BPM, and pure SA samples were analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy. The potassium bromide (KBr) and test sample mixture pellets were analyzed throughout a spectral region from 400 to 4000 cm−1 using “Bruker Alpha FTIR spectrometer”.

2.4. Measurements of Phase Solubility and Dissolution Rate

A phase solubility analysis was performed to analyze the binary mixture’s stability constant (Kc) and complexation efficiency (CE). The phase solubility analysis was conducted as reported by Higuchi and Connors [32]. A surplus quantity of SA was placed in aqueous solution of HPβCD (2–10 mM) [33]. The flasks were shaken continually at 25 °C for 3 days. Consequently, the samples were removed, filtered using a “0.45 µm membrane filter”, and filtrate was “spectrophotometrically assayed at 322 nm (Jasco V 530, Tokyo, Japan)” [34,35]. The Kc and CE was determined using Equation (1) [36,37,38,39] and Equation (2) [37,40], respectively. S0 was the equilibrium solubility of SA in water per se [41,42,43].
K c = S l o p e I n t e r c e p t   ( 1 S l o p e )
C E = S 0 K c
In vitro dissolution experiments were undertaken utilizing USP dissolution apparatus II paddle system. Dissolution profile was determined for SA per se, BPM, and for BIC (equivalent to 100 mg of SA). Phosphate-buffered pH 6.8 (900 mL) maintained at 37.0 ± 0.5 °C was used as the dissolution medium, which was agitated with a paddle rotating speed of 50 rpm. At each time interval of 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min, sample (5 mL) was pipetted out from each dissolution vessel and replenished with equivalent volume of fresh dissolution medium. The pipetted samples were filtered and analyzed for drug content using UV spectrophotometer at 322 nm. In order to identify the best drug release kinetic from inclusion complex, the dissolution data obtained were fitted to the “zero order, first order, Korsmeyer–Peppas, Hixson–Crowell, and the Higuchi drug release models” [43]. For the purpose of determining the best model, the r2 (correlation coefficient) value was taken into consideration [44,45,46].

2.5. Assesment of Antioxidant Activity

The “DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)” assay process was employed in this study to evaluate the antioxidant activity of prepared SA-BIC (SE). The SA per se (control) and SA-BIC (SE) were separately dissolved in methanol to attain various concentrations in the range of 0–100 µg/mL. The resultant absorbance was noted down at 517 nm by spectrophotometer [43]. The percentage scavenging of DPPH free radical by samples was calculated by the formula:
Radical   Scavenging   ( % ) = ( Absorbance   of   control Absorbance   of   sample ) Absorbance   of   control × 100

2.6. Statistical Analysis

“The results of phase solubility and dissolution study were compared statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett test and Tukey test while the unpaired t-test was used for comparing means of antioxidant activity. The GraphPad InStat® 3.06 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis and *,# p < 0.05 was considered significant”.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Figure 2 illustrates the DSC graph for SA, BPM, and BIC prepared by SE method. The SA thermal curve demonstrated a strong endothermic melting peak at 193.52 °C, referring to the SA’s transition temperature. The HPβCD DSC thermogram demonstrated a wide peak.
The peak observed corresponding to the melting point of SA is very negligible in BIC; this could be due to the enclosure of the guest molecule into the cavity of the host. This indicated that the inclusion complex was established among the drug and CD [46,47].

3.2. Powder X-ray Diffraction

The PXRD graph of SA, BPM, and BIC are presented in Figure 3. On comparison of the PXRD pattern, it was noticed that the SA-BIC PRXD pattern (Figure 3D) is nearly comparable to that of the PXRD pattern of HPβCD (Figure 3B) and supports the possibility that the SA was contained in the HPβCD cavity, which fully obscured the SA molecule from X-rays.
On the other hand, the pure SA sample had a high degree of crystallinity, as demonstrated by the much-defined peaks in its PXRD image. The PXRD pattern of the BPM (Figure 3C) indicates the existence of both the guest and host molecules of the mixture, and that was basically a mixture of SA/HPβCD. The peaks originating from SA were invisible from the BIC prepared by SE method. The X-ray diffraction pattern of BIC sample indicates that the guest molecule SA complexed in the grid of the host molecule, i.e., HPβCD. The outcomes are correlated with DSC’s findings on the complexes.

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy

As seen from SEM images (Figure 4), pure SA particles identified as irregularly formed crystals, while HPβCD particles (Figure 4B) consisted of irregularly sized crystals.
Analysis of BPM (SA/HPβCD) (Figure 4C) reported the existence of mixed and adhered SA crystals on the surface of HPβCD particles, showing no obvious solid-state interaction between the constituents of BPM. The products of BIC prepared by SE method (Figure 4D) demonstrated tiny and irregular pieces, with a transition from crystalline to amorphous form. It was reported earlier that a shift in drug particles’ form was representative of a new solid state [45]. Consequently, modifications in the morphology of SA-BIC in comparison to the SA indicated an interaction among the SA and HPβCD.

3.4. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Pure SA displayed a strong stretching at 620.84, 1107.99, 1208.45, and 1261.87 cm−1. In addition to this, the typical vibrations also were detected at 819.33, 1426.45, 1511.17, 1657.41, and 2830.64 cm−1 (Figure 5A).
The displayed frequencies for HPβCD were identified at 3332.04 and 1020.70 cm−1 that represent the stretching vibration of the C-O-C and O-H moiety. Further, the stretching vibration at 848.35 and 703.82 cm−1 was the other main noticeable peak for HPβCD (Figure 5B). In the BIC, the HPβCD vibration bands concealed the absorption peaks of SA from 1261.87 to 1657.41 cm−1 (Figure 5D). The major spectra changes of C=O and C-H groups corresponding to SA could indicate the formation of hydrogen bonds among the carbonyl groups of SA and hydrogen groups located outside of HPβCD. It was noted that the distinctive band corresponding to SA at 620.84, 1107.99, and 1657.41 cm−1 is dramatically diminished and relocated for BIC system. Transitions and declines in carbonyl band strength imply the creation of hydrogen bonds between both the SA carbonyl groups and the HPβCD hydrogen groups. The findings indicate that there has been interaction among SA and HPβCD, which could suggest the creation of complex formation by the SE approach used for the development of BIC.

3.5. Phase Solubility and Dissolution Rate

The phase solubility analysis was executed to examine the solubility of SA in HPβCD. The SA solubility can be shown to improve with a change in HPβCD concentration (Figure 6).
About 2.59 times higher solubility (p < 0.05) of SA in water was noticed in the presence of HPβCD (10 mM). The stability constant (Kc) and CE value was found to be 258.50 M−1 and 681.68, respectively [33,48,49,50,51,52]. The above results suggested the prepared binary complex of SA/HPβCD was found to be stable. It was reported that the stability constant (Kc) value from 50 to 5000 M−1 was more appropriate for enhancing the solubility and stability of poorly water-soluble drugs [53]. The findings suggest that the inclusion complex has been established, and it is evident from the calculated Kc value that such inclusion complex is relatively stable [44,45].
Figure 7 demonstrates the SA, SA-BPM, and SA-BIC dissolution profile. The SA showed the slowest rate of dissolution (28.01 ± 2.33%) in comparison to other formulations SA-BPM and SA-BIC, which could be owing to poor solubility of SA. The prepared BIC greatly increased (p < 0.05) the rate of dissolution of SA, as contrasted to pure SA dissolution. It was observed through the dissolution study that around 34.11 ± 4.51% of SA was released from BPM at 1 h.
SA-BIC further improves the release of SA considerably (p < 0.05). The maximum release of 46.27 ± 2.79% of SA was observed for SA-BIC prepared by SE method (Figure 7).
As per Table 1, a Peppas type drug release model was found to be best suited for the release of SA from BIC prepared by SE method (r2 = 0.9807).

3.6. Antioxidant Activity

It is reported that the antioxidants contribute hydrogen or electron to DPPH and transform it to DPPH-H in the DPPH radical scavenging process, so the antioxidant behavior of substances relies primarily on the electron or hydrogen donating potential.
In our study, the findings of the experiment revealed that the DPPH radical scavenging behavior of both SA and BIC increased considerably on increasing their concentrations. The DPPH radical scavenging activity demonstrated by SA and BIC at their maximum concentration was 93.65% and 97.73%, respectively (p < 0.05, Figure 8). It was observed that BIC sample displayed stronger DPPH radical scavenging activity than SA. The research finding indicates that the development of inclusion complex BIC demonstrated considerable radical scavenging and antioxidant properties, undoubtedly owing to the increment of SA solubility by BIC prepared by SE method. Antecedently, Jo et al. reported that the complexation of β-CD augmented the solubility of trans cinnamaldehyde, as well as upsurged its antioxidant activity [54]. In another study, the inclusion complex of mangiferin and β-CD exhibited higher antioxidant activity toward DPPH [55]. In another study, significant enhancement in the antioxidant activity of piperine inclusion complex was observed as compared to piperine alone. Authors concluded that the increase in antioxidant activity could be due to enhanced solubility of piperine in the presence of HPβCD and auxiliary substance [56].

4. Conclusions

In this study, the SE was effectively used to prepare the inclusion complex of SA. Results showed that SA was solubilized more readily by HPβCD. The formation of inclusion complex was supported by solid characterization techniques, such as DSC, PXRD, SEM, and FTIR. Additionally, the in vitro dissolution profile of SA was enhanced by the binary complex. It was observed through the dissolution study that 34% of SA was released from BPM. The maximum release of 46.27% of SA was observed for SA-BIC prepared by SE method. Further, it was observed that SA-BIC displayed stronger DPPH radical scavenging activity than SA. In summary, SE technology considerably enhanced the complexity of SA and HPβCD, resulting in an improved solubility of SA in binary compound.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and F.I.A.-J.; Formal analysis, A.A.; Funding acquisition, Y.A.B.J.; Writing—original draft, A.A.; Writing—review and editing, F.I.A.-J., A.M.A.-M. and M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by Research supporting project (RSP2022R457), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated from the experiments have been presented in the results.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Researchers Supporting Project (RSP2022R457) at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for funding this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, C. Sinapic Acid and Its Derivatives as Medicine in Oxidative Stress-Induced Diseases and Aging. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 3571614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Niciforovic, N.; Abramovic, H. Sinapic Acid and Its Derivatives: Natural Sources and Bioactivity. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bunzel, M.; Ralph, J.; Kim, H.; Lu, F.; Ralph, S.A.; Marita, J.M.; Hatfield, R.D.; Steinhart, H. Sinapate dehydrodimers and sinapate-ferulate heterodimers in cereal dietary fiber. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1427–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sawa, T.; Nakao, M.; Akaike, T.; Ono, K.; Maeda, H. Alkylperoxyl radical-scavenging activity of various flavonoids and other phenolic compounds: Implications for the antitumor-promoter effect of vegetables. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kuwahara, H.; Kanazawa, A.; Wakamatu, D.; Morimura, S.; Kida, K.; Akaike, T.; Maeda, H. Antioxidative and antimutagenic activities of 4-vinyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol (canolol) isolated from canola oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 4380–4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Engels, C.; Schieber, A.; Gänzle, M.G. Sinapic acid derivatives in defatted Oriental mustard (Brassica juncea L.) seed meal extracts using UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn and identification of compounds with antibacterial activity. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2012, 234, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koski, A.; Pekkarinen, S.; Hopia, A.; Wähälä, K.; Heinonen, M. Processing of rapeseed oil: Effects on sinapic acid derivative content and oxidative stability. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 217, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kikuzaki, H.; Hisamoto, M.; Hirose, K.; Akiyama, K.; Taniguchi, H. Antioxidant properties of ferulic acid and its related compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2161–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zou, Y.; Kim, A.R.; Kim, J.E.; Choi, J.S.; Chung, H.Y. Peroxynitrite scavenging activity of sinapic acid (3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) isolated from Brassica juncea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5884–5890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yun, K.J.; Koh, D.J.; Kim, S.H.; Park, S.J.; Ryu, J.H.; Kim, D.G.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, K.T. Anti-inflammatory effects of sinapic acid through the suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygase-2, and proinflammatory cytokines expressions via nuclear factor-kappaB inactivation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 10265–10272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maddox, C.E.; Laur, L.M.; Tian, L. Antibacterial activity of phenolic compounds against the phytopathogen Xylella fastidiosa. Curr. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Cherng, Y.G.; Tsai, C.C.; Chung, H.H.; Lai, Y.W.; Kuo, S.C.; Cheng, J.T. Antihyperglycemic action of sinapic acid in diabetic rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 12053–12059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, X.L.; Ito, H.; Masuoka, T.; Kamei, C.; Hatano, T. Effect of Polygala tenuifolia root extract on scopolamine-induced impairment of rat spatial cognition in an eight-arm radial maze task. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 1727–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hudson, E.A.; Dinh, P.A.; Kokubun, T.; Simmonds, M.S.; Gescher, A. Characterization of potentially chemopreventive phenols in extracts of brown rice that inhibit the growth of human breast and colon cancer cells. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2000, 9, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hameed, H.; Aydin, S.; Basaran, N. Sinapic Acid: Is It Safe for Humans? FABAD J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 41, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Demurtas, M.; Onnis, V.; Zucca, P.; Rescigno, A.; Lachowicz, J.I.; De Villiers Engelbrecht, L.; Nieddu, M.; Ennas, G.; Scano, A.; Mocci, F.; et al. Cholinium-based ionic liquids from hydroxycinnamic acids as new promising bioactive agents: A combined experimental and theoretical investigation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 2975–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sinha, A.S.; Rao Khandavilli, U.B.; O’Connor, E.L.; Deadman, B.J.; Maguireb, A.R.; Lawrence, S.E. Novel co-crystals of the nutraceutical sinapic acid. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2015, 17, 4832–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Soe, H.M.H.; Chamni, S.; Mahalapbutr, P.; Kongtaworn, N.; Rungrotmongkol, T.; Jansook, P. The investigation of binary and ternary sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes with asiaticoside in solution and in solid state. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 498, 108190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Loftsson, T.; Brewster, M.E. Cyclodextrins as functional excipients: Methods to enhance complexation efficiency. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 101, 3019–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jansook, P.; Ogawa, N.; Loftsson, T. Cyclodextrins: Structure, physicochemical properties and pharmaceutical applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 535, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hirlekar, R.S.; Sonawane, S.N.; Kadam, V.J. Studies on the effect of water-soluble polymers on drug-cyclodextrin complex solubility. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2009, 10, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Faucci, M.T.; Mura, P. Effect of water-soluble polymers on naproxen complexation with natural and chemically modified beta-cyclodextrins. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2001, 27, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Valero, M.; Perez-Revuelta, B.I.; Rodriguez, L.J. Effect of PVP K-25 on the formation of the naproxen:beta-ciclodextrin complex. Int. J. Pharm. 2003, 253, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Loftsson, T.; Jarho, P.; Masson, M.; Jarvinen, T. Cyclodextrins in drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2005, 2, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miyake, K.; Arima, H.; Hirayama, F.; Yamamoto, M.Y.; Horikawa, T.; Sumiyoshi, H.; Noda, S.; Uekama, K. Improvement of solubility and oral bioavailability of rutin by complexation with 2-hydroxypropyl-?-cyclodextrin. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2000, 5, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jun, S.W.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, J.S.; Park, H.J.; Lee, S.; Woo, J.S.; Hwang, S.J. Preparation and characterization of simvastatin/hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complex using supercritical antisolvent (SAS) process. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2007, 66, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ding, X.; Zheng, M.; Lu, J.; Zhu, X. Preparation and evaluation of binary and ternary inclusion complexes of fenofibrate/hydroxypropyl-?-cyclodextrin. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2018, 91, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; He, Z.-D.; Zheng, Q.-E.; Hu, C.; Lai, W.-F. Hydroxypropyl-?-cyclodextrin for delivery of baicalin via inclusion complexation by supercritical fluid encapsulation. Molecules 2018, 23, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Patel, M.; Hirlekar, R. Multicomponent cyclodextrin system for improvement of solubility and dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drug. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 14, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Braca, A.; De Tommasi, N.; Di Bari, L.; Pizza, C.; Politi, M.; Morelli, I. Antioxidant principles from Bauhinia tarapotensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 892–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oliveira, C.B.; Meurer, Y.S.; Oliveira, M.G.; Medeiros, W.M.; Silva, F.O.; Brito, A.C.; Pontes Dde, L.; Andrade-Neto, V.F. Comparative study on the antioxidant and anti-Toxoplasma activities of vanillin and its resorcinarene derivative. Molecules 2014, 19, 5898–5912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Higuchi, T.; Connors, K.A. Phase solubility techniques. Adv. Anal. Chem. Instrum. 1965, 4, 117–212. [Google Scholar]
  33. Loh, G.O.; Tan, Y.T.; Peh, K.K. Effect of HPMC concentration on beta-cyclodextrin solubilization of norfloxacin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Khattab, R.; Eskin, M.; Aliani, M.; Thiyam, U. Determination of Sinapic Acid Derivatives in Canola Extracts Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2010, 87, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Cai, R.; Arntfield, S.D. A rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of sinapine and sinapic acid in canola seed and meal. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2001, 78, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ajit Shankarrao, K.; Dhairysheel Mahadeo, G.; Pankaj Balavantrao, K. Formulation and In-vitro Evaluation of Orally Disintegrating Tablets of Olanzapine-2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2010, 9, 335–347. [Google Scholar]
  37. Maeda, H.; Tanaka, R.; Nakayama, H. Inclusion complexes of trihexyphenidyl with natural and modified cyclodextrins. Springerplus 2015, 4, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pal, A.; Roy, S.; Kumar, A.; Mahmood, S.; Khodapanah, N.; Thomas, S.; Agatemor, C.; Ghosal, K. Physicochemical Characterization, Molecular Docking, and In Vitro Dissolution of Glimepiride-Captisol Inclusion Complexes. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 19968–19977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Talegaonkar, S.; Khan, A.Z.; Khar, R.K.; Ahmad, F.J.; Khan, Z.I. Development and characterization of paracetamol complexes with hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2007, 6, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  40. Brewster, M.E.; Vandecruys, R.; Peeters, J.; Neeskens, P.; Verreck, G.; Loftsson, T. Comparative interaction of 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin with itraconazole: Phase-solubility behavior and stabilization of supersaturated drug solutions. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 34, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jansook, P.; Loftsson, T. CDs as solubilizers: Effects of excipients and competing drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 379, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Loftsson, T.; Hreinsdóttir, D.; Másson, M. The complexation efficiency. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2007, 57, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. da Silva Mourao, L.C.; Ribeiro Batista, D.R.M.; Honorato, S.B.; Ayala, A.P.; de Alencar Morais, W.; Barbosa, E.G.; Raffin, F.N.; de Lima e Moura, T.F.A. Effect of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose on beta cyclodextrin complexation of praziquantel in solution and in solid state. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2016, 86, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zingone, G.; Rubessa, F. Preformulation study of the inclusion complex warfarin-beta-cyclodextrin. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 291, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hirlekar, R.; Kadam, V. Preformulation study of the inclusion complex irbesartan-beta-cyclodextrin. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2009, 10, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fernandes, C.M.; Teresa Vieira, M.; Veiga, F.J. Physicochemical characterization and in vitro dissolution behavior of nicardipine-cyclodextrins inclusion compounds. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002, 15, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shirwaikar, A.; Rajendran, K.; Punitha, I.S. In vitro antioxidant studies on the benzyl tetra isoquinoline alkaloid berberine. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 1906–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Patel, R.; Patel, M. Preparation and evaluation of inclusion complex of the lipid lowering drug lovastatin with ?-Cyclodextrin. Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 6, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Sapkal, N.P.; Kilor, V.A.; Shewale, B.D.; Bhusari, K.P.; Daud, A.S. Study of the Complexation Behaviour of Fexofenadine with beta-Cyclodextrin. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 72, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Batt, D.K.; Garala, K.C. Preparation and evaluation of inclusion complexes of diacerein with ?-cyclodextrin and hydroxypropyl ?-cyclodextrin. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2013, 77, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pu, H.; Sun, Q.; Tang, P.; Zhao, L.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, H. Characterization and antioxidant activity of the complexes of tertiary butylhydroquinone with beta-cyclodextrin and its derivatives. Food Chem. 2018, 260, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Loftsson, T.; Hreinsdottir, D.; Masson, M. Evaluation of cyclodextrin solubilization of drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 302, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Heydari, A.; Iranmanesh, M.; Doostan, F.; Hassan, S. Preparation of inclusion complex between nifedipine and ethylenediamine-?-Cyclodextrin as nanocarrier agent. Pharm. Chem. J. 2015, 49, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jo, Y.J.; Cho, H.S.; Chun, J.Y. Antioxidant activity of beta-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes containing trans-cinnamaldehyde by DPPH, ABTS and FRAP. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ferreira, F.D.; Valentim, I.B.; Ramones, E.L.C.; Trevisan, M.T.S.; Olea-Azar, C.; Perez-Cruz, F.; de Abreu, F.C.; Goulart, M.O.F. Antioxidant activity of the mangiferin inclusion complex with beta-cyclodextrin. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 51, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Imam, S.S.; Alshehri, S.; Alzahrani, T.A.; Hussain, A.; Altamimi, M.A. Formulation and Evaluation of Supramolecular Food-Grade Piperine HP beta CD and TPGS Complex: Dissolution, Physicochemical Characterization, Molecular Docking, In Vitro Antioxidant Activity, and Antimicrobial Assessment. Molecules 2020, 25, 4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The chemical structure of (A) SA and (B) HPβCD.
Figure 1. The chemical structure of (A) SA and (B) HPβCD.
Processes 10 02046 g001
Figure 2. DSC thermogram of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Figure 2. DSC thermogram of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Processes 10 02046 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Processes 10 02046 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Figure 4. SEM image of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Processes 10 02046 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of (A) SA, (B) HPβCD, (C) BPM, and (D) BIC.
Processes 10 02046 g005
Figure 6. Phase solubility graph of SA in presence of HPβCD. * p < 0.05 as compared to S0.
Figure 6. Phase solubility graph of SA in presence of HPβCD. * p < 0.05 as compared to S0.
Processes 10 02046 g006
Figure 7. Dissolution profile of SA, BPM, and BIC. * p < 0.05 as compared to SA, # p < 0.05 as compared to BPM.
Figure 7. Dissolution profile of SA, BPM, and BIC. * p < 0.05 as compared to SA, # p < 0.05 as compared to BPM.
Processes 10 02046 g007
Figure 8. Antioxidant activity profile of pure SA and BIC. * p < 0.05 as compared to SA.
Figure 8. Antioxidant activity profile of pure SA and BIC. * p < 0.05 as compared to SA.
Processes 10 02046 g008
Table 1. Correlation coefficients calculated by fitting in vitro data to different release models.
Table 1. Correlation coefficients calculated by fitting in vitro data to different release models.
Release ModelSABPMBIC
r2 Valuer2 Valuer2 Value
Zero order0.93020.94570.8907
First order0.94620.96470.9286
Higuchi’s Model0.98970.99520.9698
Korsmeyer-Peppas0.99600.99740.9807
Hixon–Crowell0.94100.95880.9166
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahad, A.; Bin Jardan, Y.A.; Raish, M.; Al-Mohizea, A.M.; Al-Jenoobi, F.I. Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin for Delivery of Sinapic Acid via Inclusion Complex Prepared by Solvent Evaporation Method. Processes 2022, 10, 2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102046

AMA Style

Ahad A, Bin Jardan YA, Raish M, Al-Mohizea AM, Al-Jenoobi FI. Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin for Delivery of Sinapic Acid via Inclusion Complex Prepared by Solvent Evaporation Method. Processes. 2022; 10(10):2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahad, Abdul, Yousef A. Bin Jardan, Mohammad Raish, Abdullah M. Al-Mohizea, and Fahad I. Al-Jenoobi. 2022. "Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin for Delivery of Sinapic Acid via Inclusion Complex Prepared by Solvent Evaporation Method" Processes 10, no. 10: 2046. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop