Next Article in Journal
Parental Views of Social Worker and Chaplain Involvement in Care and Decision Making for Critically Ill Children with Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
A Health Equity Implementation Approach to Child Health Literacy Interventions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of Amblyopia Treatment Effect with Dichoptic Method Using Polarizing Film and Occlusion Therapy Using an Eye Patch

Children 2022, 9(9), 1285; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9091285
by Yo Iwata 1,*, Tomoya Handa 1 and Hitoshi Ishikawa 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Children 2022, 9(9), 1285; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9091285
Submission received: 3 August 2022 / Revised: 21 August 2022 / Accepted: 24 August 2022 / Published: 26 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall the manuscript is well written and conveys the particular meaning of Your research 

There are a few corrections which should be carried out :

line 27: It is recommended to change the definition of amblyopia deleting the term “disease”

line 80: it is recommended to highlight that using “polarizing film” compared to “eye patch” the peripheral binocular vision stimulus remains

line 114-116: It is recommended to move these lines in the results section at line 146

line 114-116: it would be useful to explain why the two patient groups did not have the same number of participants

line 119: it is recommended to change “for accommodation paralysis with” with “in cycloplegia using”

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In my opinion, it is an interesting paper, which provides new knowledge and also proposes a simple and economical therapy.

It is well developed and explained so, I do not recommend changes.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

General comments

The manuscript is well written and structured and presents relevant information that may assist practitioners in the choice of treatment for amblyopia.

I offer some comments and suggestions to the authors for their consideration.

 

Introduction

The introduction would benefit from hypotheses providing a rationale.

Materials and Methods

Sample size calculation details need to be provided.

Add a flow diagram to population and their distribution.

Results

You must include a table that provides a description of the experimental results and their interpretation.

Discussion

I would like to be able to distinguish a first paragraph with a summary of what was sought and what was found in this work, a discussion of the relevant findings together with what was found in other works, an explanation of the meaning of these findings and explanation of the implications for practice clinic.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop