Impact of Intubator’s Training Level on First-Pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Acute Care Settings: A Four-Center Retrospective Study
by
, and
Jung-Heon Kim
1
,
Jae-Yun Jung
2,
Joong-Wan Park
2,
Se-Uk Lee
3,
Meong-Hi Son
4 and
Jeong-Yong Lee
5,* 1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea
2
Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
4
Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Korea
5
Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2022, 9(7), 960; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9070960
Submission received: 15 June 2022
/
Revised: 22 June 2022
/
Accepted: 24 June 2022
/
Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Global and Public Health)
Abstract
:(1) Background: First-pass success (FPS) of endotracheal intubation is more challenging in children than in adults. We aimed to identify factors associated with FPS of intubation in acute care settings. (2) Methods: We analyzed data of children aged <10 years who underwent intubation within ≤24 h of arrival at four Korean emergency departments (2016–2019). Variables were compared according to FPS. A logistic regression was performed to quantify the association of factors with FPS. An experienced intubator was defined as a senior resident or a specialist. (3) Results: Of 280 children, 169 (60.4%) had FPS. The children with FPS were older (median age, 23.0 vs. 11.0 months; p = 0.018), were less frequently in their infancy (36.1% vs. 50.5%; p = 0.017), and were less likely to have respiratory compromise (41.4% vs. 55.0%; p = 0.030). The children with FPS tended to be more often intubated by experienced intubators than those without FPS (87.0% vs. 78.4%; p = 0.057). Desaturation was rarer in those with FPS. Factors associated with FPS were experienced intubators (aOR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.01–3.67) and children’s age ≥12 months (1.84; 1.13–3.02). (4) Conclusion: FPS of intubation can be facilitated by deploying or developing clinically competent intubators, particularly for infants, in acute care settings.
1. Introduction
Emergency endotracheal intubation is challenging in children, as shown by a lower rate of first-pass success (FPS) than that in adults (51.8–83.2% [1,2,3,4,5] vs. 85.4% [6]). Emergency intubation by itself increases the chances of procedural complications by three times [7]. In addition, an attempt to intubate for longer than 30 s is associated with a 5.7-fold increase in desaturation [8]. This complication develops more frequently in infants prone to hypoxia-induced cardiac arrest. This difficulty may be worsened by intubators’ performance anxiety during resuscitation [9,10]. The procedural risk justifies predicting FPS of intubation at the initial presentation.
In emergency departments (EDs) and intensive care units (ICUs), known factors for FPS of intubation include emergency medicine (EM) as an intubator’s specialty, rapid sequence intubation (RSI), not being infants, and the intubator’s training level (Table 1) [1,2,3,4,5]. The training level has been defined as limited to one or two specialties, such as EM (Table 1) [3,4,5]. The impact of clinical experience has been underestimated, given that 56.3–95.0% of the children were intubated by residents in some studies [1,2,3].
We aimed to identify factors for FPS with an emphasis on the training level. To assess this factor at the intubator level, an experienced intubator was defined as an intubator in post-graduate year (PGY) 4–5 (ie, a senior resident in Korea) or a specialist [1] and it investigated as an independent variable. Of note, the variable was defined regardless of the specialties available in acute care settings.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
This retrospective study was a planned secondary analysis of an emergency intubation dataset-based study on the factors for underuse of RSI that was conducted across four Korean academic hospitals (during writing, in press in another journal). The EDs and ICUs are staffed by pediatric EM (PEM) attending physicians and intensivists or on-duty pediatric residents, respectively (Table S1). Since 2014, members of the Korean Society of PEM have increased from 79 to 339 individuals, thereby indicating a greater availability of specialists in EDs in the country.
In the EDs, children were intubated by the attending physicians or on-duty residents (EM or pediatrics) under the supervision of the attendings. From the EDs, some children were rapidly transferred and intubated at the ICUs by the pediatric intensivists or on-duty residents. In the trauma bay, attending surgeons intubated critically injured children. All providers completed a periodic Pediatric Advanced Life Support provider course or in-house hands-on practice of airway management. During the study, none of the centers implemented uniform pediatric protocols for RSI and video laryngoscopy. In failed airway situations, senior providers or anesthesiologists further attempted intubation or used rescue airways.
2.2. Study Population
This study included consecutive children younger than 10 years undergoing intubation in the EDs, ICUs, or wards within 24 h of arrival at the four EDs from January 2016 through December 2019. The exclusion criteria were as follows: intubation before arrival, dead on arrival, and limited information on the intubator’s training level. As for repeated visits of a child, we analyzed data from the first visit.
2.3. Definitions
FPS was defined as a successful intubation on the first laryngoscopic view [11]. Desaturation, defined as an oxyhemoglobin saturation <90% or a ≥10% decrease during or within 10 min after intubation [3], was a focus among the peri-intubation adverse events [12]. This can be attributed to the clinical relevance of hypoxemia, the most common cause of pediatric cardiac arrest, regardless of the occurrence of immediate or technical events, such as mainstem bronchus intubation. Other definitions are tabulated in Table S2.
2.4. Data Collection
We identified episodes of intubation by a cross-reference of a query for the inclusion criteria with billing codes related to intubation, such as “endotracheal tube measuring 5.5 mm”. The episodes were primarily reviewed by each site investigator. Vague episodes were discussed with the chief investigator for a consensus.
Patient-level variables included the age (months) with proportions of infants, sex, overall and critical comorbidities, high acuity [13], trauma, crash airway, pre-intubation physiologic abnormalities [14], and indications for intubation (respiratory compromise, altered mental status, cardiac arrest, and shock). We analyzed the physiologic abnormalities, considering the rarity of study using such variables.
Intubator-level variables included the first intubator’s training level (PGY 1–5 and specialists), their specialties (EM, pediatrics, and others), the use of RSI, and locations of intubation (ED, ICU, and ward). PEM attendings were categorized by their certified boards, EM, or pediatrics because the subspecialty has not yet been accredited in Korea.
FPS was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included desaturation, the overall success of intubation, the total number of attempts, ED-success time, rescue airways, cardiac arrest, ventilator days, and in-hospital mortality.
2.5. Statistical Analyses
Data are presented as means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges and as numbers and percentages for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The variables were compared using Student’s t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, or Fisher’s exact tests. A logistic regression was conducted to quantify the association of factors with FPS while adjusting for potential confounders. We used variables with p < 0.1 and a priori variables, including age ≥12 months, high acuity, intubation for respiratory compromise, RSI, and EM as the intubator’s specialty [1,2,4]. We used IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
3. Results
3.1. Patient-Level Variables
Of 350 eligible children, 280 were included in this study with a 60.4% rate of FPS (Figure 1). The median age was 16.5 months, and 117 children (41.8%) were infants. Of the 111 children (39.6%) without FPS, 46 (16.4%) underwent three or more attempts of intubation. The FPS rates did not differ across the centers (Table S1). Table 2 summarizes the patient-level findings. Children with FPS showed an older median age and lower frequencies of infants and respiratory compromise than the others. The critical comorbidities that hindered intubation are tabulated in Table S3.
No individual pre-intubation physiologic abnormalities differed according to FPS (Table 2). We further analyzed if the presence of experienced intubators masked the potential hindrance of the abnormalities to intubation. As a result, the experienced intubators showed a higher rate of intubating attempts in the high-acuity (experienced intubators, 51.3% vs. non-experienced intubators, 28.3%; p = 0.004) or crash airway situations (33.3% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.006; Table S4).
3.2. Intubator-Level Variables
Children having FPS tended to be intubated more frequently by the experienced intubators, without statistical significances (Table 3). RSI was implemented in 16.4% of the study population. We observed a non-significant increasing tendency of FPS rates with an increase in the training level (20.0%, 51.2%, 60.2%, 69.6%, and 63.7% in the order of each level), experienced intubators (PGY 2–3, 47.8% vs. experienced intubators, 62.8%), and specialists (residents, 58.1% vs. specialists, 63.7%; Table S5). Experienced intubators recorded less frequent desaturation than their counterparts (24.8% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.046).
3.3. Outcomes
We developed a regression model using the experienced intubators and crash airway, in addition to the five a priori variables. Factors independently associated with FPS of intubation were experienced intubators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–3.67; p = 0.047) and age ≥12 months (1.84; 1.13–3.02; 0.015) (Hosmer–Lemeshow, p = 0.947).
Table 4 shows the other outcomes according to FPS. Desaturation was more common in children without FPS (10.1% vs. 53.2%). This group of children had a larger median number of attempts, a longer median ED-success time, and more frequent use of rescue airways than those with FPS. The overall median number of attempts was 1 (range, 1–7). A comparison of the outcomes for three or more attempts displayed a higher frequency of desaturation with a similar pattern of the other comparisons as that for FPS (Table S6).
4. Discussion
This study has a two-way implication for endotracheal intubation in acute care settings. First, it is technically difficult to intubate infants who are vulnerable to rapid desaturation, thus highlighting the procedural risk in such situations. Second, experienced intubators who can increase the odds of FPS during intubation by nearly twice may improve the procedural outcomes. This finding confirms the importance of training in upgrading intubation skills, particularly for infants.
Table 1 outlines key findings of the relevant literature. The current study population had a younger median age than the 281 intubated children of a Korean 13 ED study [1]. This difference indicates more difficult intubating conditions in our population [8,15]. The age-related aspect was specified by the low-ranked FPS rate (60.4%) in the 51.8–83.2% reported FPS rates (see median ages, Table 1) [1,2,3,4,5]. The proportion of three or more attempts is parallel to equivalent values ranging from 12.8% to 26.3% [1,3,4]. The frequency of RSI is comparable to the 12.1–25.9% reported in Korea and Japan [1,4] but considerably lower than 80.5% in the United States [2].
The factors for FPS in this study partially differed from the reported factors, such as EM, RSI, and not being infants (Table 1) [1,2,3,4]. Unlike other studies [1,4], EM was not a factor in the current work. This difference might be attributed to the more frequent intubation by pediatricians in our study compared to previous ones (59.9% vs. 15.4–24.9% [1,4]). The bigger role of pediatricians was possibly affected by the participation of two free-standing children’s hospitals (Table S1) and the inclusion of the ICUs (≤24 h of ED arrival). Contrary to the U.S. and Japanese studies [2,4], RSI was not a factor in the current study and another Korean study [1]. This gap may be related to the lower age limits of inclusion in the latter works (<10 years [1] vs. <16–18 years [2,4]) and the inadequate implementation of pediatric RSI in Korea. The diffusion of RSI will facilitate intubation in countries with the protocol being translated to practice. As for “not being infants” as a factor for FPS, it is difficult to intubate infants due to their inherently difficult airways, predisposing them to desaturation [16,17].
We defined the experienced intubators regardless of their specialties to broaden the previous discussion of training level in the limited specialties. A video review on RSI shows the association of an attending physician, defined as a PEM attending or an anesthesiologist, with a 10.2-fold increase in FPS [3]. Another study reported an EM physician in PGY 3 or more as a factor for FPS in children younger than 10 years [4]. In an ICU-based study, pediatric fellows had a stronger association with FPS than did pediatric residents [5]. This current study proves the implications of experienced intubators for pediatric intubation across the specialties available in acute care settings.
In the settings, experienced intubators should be available, supported by the impact of training level on FPS [3,4,5]. Their clinical and psychomotor skills could help overcome a potential hindrance of abnormal vital signs to intubation. In this study, such hindrance was blunted by the experienced intubators’ frequent attempts in crash airway situations, which means combinations of extreme vital signs (Table S4).
Relying on experienced intubators may usurp intubating opportunities by novices, suggesting the need for ongoing training for them. Clinical exposure to intubation may lead to a three-fold increase in procedural confidence [18]. However, pediatric intubation is an infrequent procedure, as demonstrated by the 17.5 intubations per institution per year in this study. Thus, technical competence cannot be achieved and maintained by direct experience alone [17]. A supplementation of the insufficient training warrants a high-fidelity simulation that could enhance novices’ intubating skills [19]. Ideally, the simulation should be repeated every 3–8 months [20,21,22,23]. Considering the association of experienced intubators with FPS, successful intubation can be enhanced by deploying experienced intubators to EDs and ICUs in the short term and by developing clinical competence with ongoing simulation in the long term.
The study has several limitations. First, the study setting may restrict the application of the results to more austere settings. Second, the experienced intubators’ procedural outcomes might be underestimated by the lack of information on individual skill levels, regardless of the training levels, and their frequent involvement in complicated situations (Table S4). Third, unmeasured variables might be confounders. To minimize this potential, we listed the critical comorbidities as a surrogate for difficult airway situations (Table S3). We did not assess the effect of video laryngoscopy, which enhances the glottic view [2,24]. Fourth, the ED-success time might overestimate the temporal delays in some children who did not need intubation in the EDs but only deteriorated later in the ICUs. Finally, some peri-intubation adverse events were probably underreported [3]. This flaw was partially offset by the desaturation, which was available in every record (Table 4).
Briefly, endotracheal intubation, particularly in infants, is inherently challenging, potentially leading to desaturation. This procedural risk can be overcome by deploying or developing clinically competent intubators in acute care settings.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/children9070960/s1, Table S1: Participating centers, Table S2: Definitions, Table S3: Critical comorbidities (n = 28), Table S4: High-acuity, crash airway, and pre-intubation physiologic abnormalities according to the training level, Table S5: First-pass success rates according to the training level, Table S6: Outcomes according to three or more attempts.
Author Contributions
J.-H.K. carried out conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, validation, visualization, and writing (original draft, review, and editing) of this study. J.-Y.J. carried out conceptualization, project administration, and writing (review and editing). J.-W.P. carried out data curation, project administration, and writing (review and editing). S.-U.L. and M.-H.S. carried out data curation, project administration, visualization, and writing (original draft). J.-Y.L. carried out conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, validation, visualization, and writing (original draft, review, and editing) of this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest. This study was supported by a grant from Asan Medical Center Children’s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (grant no. 2017-012).
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was performed as per the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the IRBs of four participating centers, including Ajou University School of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, and Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine (IRB numbers: AJIRB-MED-MDB-21-413; 2006-036-1129; SMC 2020-05-062; and 2020-0775, respectively). In addition, the IRBs approved the waiving of informed consents related to the study.
Informed Consent Statement
The consent was waived by the IRBs of four participating centers.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the Korean act of bioethics and biosafety but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the statistical assistance from the Office of Biostatistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Ajou Research Institute for Innovative Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Conflicts of Interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
References
- Choi, H.J.; Je, S.M.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, E. The factors associated with successful paediatric endotracheal intubation on the first attempt in emergency departments: A 13-emergency-department registry study. Resuscitation 2012, 83, 1363–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pallin, D.J.; Dwyer, R.C.; Walls, R.M.; Brown, C.A., 3rd. Techniques and Trends, Success Rates, and Adverse Events in Emergency Department Pediatric Intubations: A Report from the National Emergency Airway Registry. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2016, 67, 610–615.e611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kerrey, B.T.; Rinderknecht, A.S.; Geis, G.L.; Nigrovic, L.E.; Mittiga, M.R. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency patients: Higher frequency of failed attempts and adverse effects found by video review. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2012, 60, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Goto, T.; Gibo, K.; Hagiwara, Y.; Okubo, M.; Brown, D.F.; Brown, C.A., 3rd; Hasegawa, K. Factors Associated with First-Pass Success in Pediatric Intubation in the Emergency Department. West J. Emerg. Med. 2016, 17, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sanders, R.C., Jr.; Giuliano, J.S., Jr.; Sullivan, J.E.; Brown, C.A., 3rd; Walls, R.M.; Nadkarni, V.; Nishisaki, A. Level of trainee and tracheal intubation outcomes. Pediatrics 2013, 131, e821–e828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brown, C.A., 3rd; Kaji, A.H.; Fantegrossi, A.; Carlson, J.N.; April, M.D.; Kilgo, R.W.; Walls, R.M. Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020, 27, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, C.L.; Spinella, P.C.; Corsi, J.M.; Stoltz, P.; Zucker, A.R. Emergent endotracheal intubations in children: Be careful if it’s late when you intubate. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 11, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinderknecht, A.S.; Mittiga, M.R.; Meinzen-Derr, J.; Geis, G.L.; Kerrey, B.T. Factors associated with oxyhemoglobin desaturation during rapid sequence intubation in a pediatric emergency department: Findings from multivariable analyses of video review data. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2015, 22, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eich, C.; Timmermann, A.; Russo, S.G.; Cremer, S.; Nickut, A.; Strack, M.; Weiss, M.; Müller, M.P. A controlled rapid-sequence induction technique for infants may reduce unsafe actions and stress. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2009, 53, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanaris, C.; Murphy, P.C. Fifteen-minute consultation: Intubation of the critically ill child presenting to the emergency department. Arch. Dis. Child Educ. Pract. Ed. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, J.R.; O’Keefe, B.P.; Russell, J.T. Predictors of first pass success without hypoxemia in trauma patients requiring emergent rapid sequence intubation. Trauma Surg. Acute Care Open 2021, 6, e000588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sagarin, M.J.; Chiang, V.; Sakles, J.C.; Barton, E.D.; Wolfe, R.E.; Vissers, R.J.; Walls, R.M. Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency airway management. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2002, 18, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lim, T.; Park, J.; Je, S. Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. Pediatr. Emerg. Med. J. 2015, 2, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ko, Y.; Kim, J.H.; Hwang, K.; Lee, J.; Huh, Y. Comparison of Base Deficit and Vital Signs as Criteria for Hemorrhagic Shock Classification in Children with Trauma. Yonsei Med. J. 2021, 62, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Turner, D.A.; Kamat, P.; Nett, S.; Shults, J.; Nadkarni, V.M.; Nishisaki, A.; for the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) & the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS). The number of tracheal intubation attempts matters! A prospective multi-institutional pediatric observational study. BMC Pediatrics 2016, 16, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hsu, G.; von Ungern-Sternberg, B.S.; Engelhardt, T. Pediatric airway management. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2021, 34, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, K.A.; Nagler, J. Advances in Emergent Airway Management in Pediatrics. Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 37, 473–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagler, J.; Auerbach, M.; Monuteaux, M.C.; Cheek, J.A.; Babl, F.E.; Oakley, E.; Nguyen, L.; Rao, A.; Dalton, S.; Lyttle, M.D.; et al. Exposure and confidence across critical airway procedures in pediatric emergency medicine: An international survey study. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 42, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mills, D.M.; Wu, C.L.; Williams, D.C.; King, L.; Dobson, J.V. High-fidelity simulation enhances pediatric residents’ retention, knowledge, procedural proficiency, group resuscitation performance, and experience in pediatric resuscitation. Hosp. Pediatr. 2013, 3, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ruetzler, K.; Roessler, B.; Potura, L.; Priemayr, A.; Robak, O.; Schuster, E.; Frass, M. Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices—A manikin study. Resuscitation 2011, 82, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, K.M.; Miller, M.P.; Schmidt, K.; Sagy, M. Pediatric residents experience a significant decline in their response capabilities to simulated life-threatening events as their training frequency in cardiopulmonary resuscitation decreases. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 12, e141–e144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andreatta, P.B.; Dooley-Hash, S.L.; Klotz, J.J.; Hauptman, J.G.; Biddinger, B.; House, J.B. Retention Curves for Pediatric and Neonatal Intubation Skills After Simulation-Based Training. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2016, 32, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kendirli, T.; Caltik, A.; Duman, M.; Yilmaz, H.L.; Yildizdaş, D.; Boşnak, M.; Tekin, D.; Atay, N. Effect of pediatric advanced life support course on pediatric residents’ intubation success. Pediatr. Int. 2011, 53, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miller, K.A.; Monuteaux, M.C.; Nagler, J. Technical factors associated with first-pass success during endotracheal intubation in children: Analysis of videolaryngoscopy recordings. Emerg. Med. J. 2021, 38, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Flowchart for study population. ED indicates emergency department; FPS, first-pass success.
Figure 1.
Flowchart for study population. ED indicates emergency department; FPS, first-pass success.
Table 1.
Literature on factors associated with FPS of intubation in acute care settings.
| Author | Study Design/Setting | Factors for FPS * | Training Level | Intubator’s Specialty and Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Choi et al. [1] | Prospective, 13 EDs in Korea, 2006–2010, n = 281, age <10 year (median, 23.8 mo; ≤2 year, 50.2%) | FPS, 67.6% EM (2.94; 1.38–6.26) | Not related | EM (72.2%) and PED (24.9%) ≥3 attempts, 12.8%; RSI, 12.1%; and trauma, 28.5% |
| Kerrey et al. [3] | Video review, single ED in the U.S., Apr 2009–Mar 2010, n = 114, age not specified (median, 2.4 year) | FPS, 51.8% Attending (10.20; 2.10–50.90) | Partially related; only 2 specialties (PEM attending or anesthesiologist) | PED residents (42.9%), PEM attendings/fellows (16.1%/18.8%), and EM residents (13.4%) ≥3 attempts, 26.3%; RSI, 100%; and trauma, 18.4% |
| Goto et al. [4] | Prospective, 17 EDs in Japan, 2010–2014, n = 293, age ≤18 year (median, 6 year) | FPS, 60.1% EM (3.21; 1.78–5.83), age ≥10 year (2.45; 1.23–4.87), and RSI (2.17; 1.31–3.57) In <10 year: EM (4.08;1.92–8.63) and RSI (3.05; 1.63–5.70) | Partially related; only 1 specialty (EM in PGY ≥3) | EM (43.3%) and PED (15.4%) ≥3 attempts, 16.0%; RSI, 25.9%; and trauma, 23.5% |
| Pallin et al. [2] | Prospective, 10 EDs in the U.S., 2002–2012, n = 1053, age <16 year (median, 7 year) | FPS, 83.2% Video laryngoscopy (3.40; 1.50–7.60), infants (0.39; 0.26–0.58), and girls (0.57; 0.46–0.73) If excluding “crash airways”: above 3 factors plus RSI (3.40; 1.50–7.40) | Not related | EM (83.6%), PED (6.5%), and PEM (3.6%) ≥3 attempts, unknown; RSI, 80.5%; and trauma, 50.3% |
| Sanders et al. [5] | Prospective, 15 ICUs in the U.S., 2010–2011, n = 1265, age not specified (median, 1 year) | FPS, 60.3% Fellow (4.29; 3.24–5.68; vs. resident) | Partially related; only 1 specialty (pediatrics) | PED (100%) ≥3 attempts, unknown; RSI, unknown; and trauma, 2.4% |
* The parenthesized values are adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. FPS indicates first-pass success; ED, emergency department; ICU, intensive care unit; EM, emergency medicine; RSI, rapid sequence intubation; PEM, pediatric emergency medicine; PGY, post-graduate year; PED, pediatrics.
Table 2.
Patient-level variables of the study population.
| Variable | Total (n = 280) | FPS (n = 169) | Non-FPS (n = 111) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (month) | 16.5 (5.0–52.3) | 23.0 (7.0–59.5) | 11.0 (4.0–37.0) | 0.018 |
| Infants | 117 (41.8) | 61 (36.1) | 56 (50.5) | 0.017 |
| Girls | 121 (43.2) | 73 (43.2) | 48 (43.2) | 0.994 |
| Overall comorbidity | 168 (60.0) | 100 (59.2) | 68 (61.3) | 0.727 |
| Critical comorbidity * | 28 (10.0) | 14 (8.3) | 14 (12.6) | 0.238 |
| High acuity | 133 (47.5) | 86 (50.9) | 47 (42.3) | 0.161 |
| Trauma | 26 (9.3) | 17 (10.1) | 9 (8.1) | 0.582 |
| Crash airway | 84 (30.0) | 57 (33.7) | 27 (24.3) | 0.093 |
| Hypotension † | 64 (22.9) | 38 (22.5) | 26 (23.4) | 0.855 |
| Tachycardia † | 178 (69.8) § | 106 (71.1) | 72 (67.9) | 0.581 |
| Tachypnea † | 57 (25.7) § | 36 (29.0) | 21 (21.4) | 0.198 |
| Desaturation † | 148 (53.0) § | 89 (53.0) | 59 (53.2) | 0.977 |
| Altered mental status † | 110 (39.4) § | 69 (40.8) | 41 (37.3) | 0.553 |
| Indications for intubation | 0.030 | |||
| Respiratory compromise | 131 (46.8) | 70 (41.4) | 61 (55.0) | |
| Altered mental status | 76 (27.1) | 47 (27.8) | 29 (26.1) | |
| Cardiac arrest | 44 (15.7) | 28 (16.6) | 16 (14.4) | |
| Shock or others ‡ | 29 (10.4) | 24 (14.2) | 5 (4.5) |
The values are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges) or numbers (%). * Refer to the definitions and details in Tables S2 and S3, respectively. † Refer to the definition of the pre-intubation physiologic abnormalities in Table S2 [14]. ‡ Only one 13-month-old febrile boy with pneumomediastinum was intubated at an intensive care unit to prepare endoscopy and later demonstrated a laryngeal injury. § The denominators are 255, 222, 279, and 279 in the order of rows. FPS indicates first-pass success.
Table 3.
Intubator-level variables.
| Variable | Total (n = 280) | FPS (n = 169) | Non-FPS (n = 111) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experienced intubators | 234 (83.6) | 147 (87.0) | 87 (78.4) | 0.057 |
| Specialty of intubators | 0.166 | |||
| Emergency medicine | 92 (33.0) * | 62 (36.9) * | 30 (27.0) | 0.086 § |
| Pediatrics | 167 (59.9) * | 93 (55.4) * | 74 (66.7) | |
| Others | 20 (7.2) *,† | 13 (7.7) *,† | 7 (6.3) | |
| RSI | 46 (16.4) | 26 (15.4) | 20 (18.0) | 0.561 |
| Induction agents | 149 (53.2) | 81 (47.9) | 68 (61.3) | 0.029 |
| Etomidate | 21 (7.5) | 15 (8.9) | 6 (5.4) | 0.002 |
| Ketamine | 22 (7.9) | 17 (10.1) | 5 (4.5) | |
| Fentanyl | 17 (6.1) | 5 (3.0) | 12 (10.8) | |
| Benzodiazepine | 89 (31.8) | 44 (26.0) | 45 (40.5) | |
| None | 131 (46.8) | 88 (52.1) | 43 (38.7) | |
| NMBAs | 57 (20.4) | 30 (17.8) | 27 (24.3) | 0.182 |
| Succinylcholine | 15 (5.4) | 9 (5.3) | 6 (5.4) | NA |
| Rocuronium | 3 (1.1) | 1 (0.6) | 2 (1.8) | |
| Vecuronium | 39 (13.9) | 20 (11.8) | 19 (17.1) | |
| None | 223 (79.6) | 139 (82.2) | 84 (75.7) | |
| Locations of intubation | NA | |||
| Emergency department | 200 (71.9) ‡ | 121 (72.5) ‡ | 79 (71.2) | |
| Intensive care unit | 73 (26.3) ‡ | 45 (26.9) ‡ | 28 (25.2) | |
| Ward | 5 (1.8) ‡ | 1 (0.6) ‡ | 4 (3.6) |
The values are expressed as numbers (%). * The denominators are 279 and 168 in the order of columns. † All but one (by an anesthesiologist) child were intubated by surgeons. ‡ The denominators are 278 and 167 in the order of columns. § According to the presence of emergency medicine physicians. FPS indicates first-pass success; RSI, rapid sequence intubation; NMBA, neuromuscular blocking agent.
Table 4.
Outcomes.
| Variable | Total (n = 280) | FPS (n = 169) | Non-FPS (n = 111) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desaturation | 76 (27.1) | 17 (10.1) | 59 (53.2) | <0.001 |
| Overall success | 277 (98.9) | 169 (100.0) | 108 (97.3) | 0.061 |
| Total no. of attempts | 1.0 (1.0–2.0) | 1.0 (1.0–1.0) | 2.0 (2.0–3.0) | <0.001 |
| ED-success time (min) | 73.5 (22.0–267.8) | 49.0 (18.5–208.5) | 94.0 (32.0–313.0) | 0.008 |
| Rescue airway | 4 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 4 (3.6) | 0.024 |
| Cardiac arrest | 48 (17.1) | 31 (18.3) | 17 (15.3) | 0.511 |
| Ventilator days | 4.0 (1.0–9.0) | 3.0 (1.0–8.0) | 4.0 (2.0–11.0) | 0.217 |
| In-hospital mortality | 50 (17.9) | 31 (18.3) | 19 (17.1) | 0.793 |
The values are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges) or numbers (%). FPS indicates first-pass success; ED, emergency department.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kim, J.-H.; Jung, J.-Y.; Park, J.-W.; Lee, S.-U.; Son, M.-H.; Lee, J.-Y. Impact of Intubator’s Training Level on First-Pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Acute Care Settings: A Four-Center Retrospective Study. Children 2022, 9, 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9070960
AMA Style
Kim J-H, Jung J-Y, Park J-W, Lee S-U, Son M-H, Lee J-Y. Impact of Intubator’s Training Level on First-Pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Acute Care Settings: A Four-Center Retrospective Study. Children. 2022; 9(7):960. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9070960
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Jung-Heon, Jae-Yun Jung, Joong-Wan Park, Se-Uk Lee, Meong-Hi Son, and Jeong-Yong Lee. 2022. "Impact of Intubator’s Training Level on First-Pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Acute Care Settings: A Four-Center Retrospective Study" Children 9, no. 7: 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9070960
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
