Next Article in Journal
Engineered Skin Substitute Regenerates the Skin with Hair Follicle Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
Interactions between Autophagy, Proinflammatory Cytokines, and Apoptosis in Neuropathic Pain: Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor as a Multipotent Therapy in Rats with Chronic Constriction Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Effect of Endothelin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor on Chronic Kidney Disease through the Inhibition of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and the NLRP3 Inflammasome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Chronic Oral Probiotic Treatment in Paclitaxel-Induced Neuropathic Pain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Emerging Role of C5 Complement Pathway in Peripheral Neuropathies: Current Treatments and Future Perspectives

1
Dompé Farmaceutici SpA, 80131 Napoli, Italy
2
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 Coppito, Italy
3
Paolo Procacci Foundation, 00193 Rome, Italy
4
Dompé Farmaceutici SpA, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors equally contributed to the manuscript.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(4), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040399
Submission received: 8 March 2021 / Revised: 30 March 2021 / Accepted: 1 April 2021 / Published: 7 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuropathic Pain: Therapy and Mechanisms)

Abstract

:
The complement system is a key component of innate immunity since it plays a critical role in inflammation and defense against common pathogens. However, an inappropriate activation of the complement system is involved in numerous disorders, including peripheral neuropathies. Current strategies for neuropathy-related pain fail to achieve adequate pain relief, and although several therapies are used to alleviate symptoms, approved disease-modifying treatments are unavailable. This urgent medical need is driving the development of therapeutic agents for this condition, and special emphasis is given to complement-targeting approaches. Recent evidence has underscored the importance of complement component C5a and its receptor C5aR1 in inflammatory and neuropathic pain, indicating that C5a/C5aR1 axis activation triggers a cascade of events involved in pathophysiology of peripheral neuropathy and painful neuro-inflammatory states. However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of this signaling in peripheral neuropathy are not fully known. Here, we provide an overview of complement pathways and major components associated with dysregulated complement activation in peripheral neuropathy, and of drugs under development targeting the C5 system. C5/C5aR1 axis modulators could represent a new strategy to treat complement-related peripheral neuropathies. Specifically, we describe novel C5aR allosteric modulators, which may potentially become new tools in the therapeutic armory against neuropathic pain.

1. Introduction

The complement system is a crucial element of the innate immune response that works in concert with antibodies and phagocytic cells to clear pathogens [1]. It consists of a number of precursor proteins that are cleaved by specific proteases to generate various complement peptides and fragments, ultimately leading to the formation of the Membrane Attack Complex (MAC) [2]. One of the key components of the complement system is the Complement 5 (C5) protein, the cleavage of which is mediated by the serine proteases C5 convertases to generate two different fragments [3]: C5a, which is a potent chemoattractant and pro-inflammatory modulator [4,5], and C5b, which initiates the formation of MAC, mediating cell lysis and triggering inflammation [6]. When properly activated, C5a is crucial for host defence system and clearance of pathogens; however, its inappropriate activation is involved in a wide range of disorders, including peripheral neuropathic diseases [7,8].
Here, we provide an overview of complement pathways and key components that are associated with the dysregulated complement activation in the onset and progression of peripheral neuropathies. Specifically, we describe the involvement of C5a and C5a receptor 1 (C5aR1) signalling in several peripheral neuropathies, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP), and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). We also discuss emerging anti C5-targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, peptidomimetics and small molecules that are currently under pre-clinical development or that are already used in clinical practice, highlighting how anti-C5 treatments may provide an alternative and selective approach to the challenging treatment of neurological conditions that respond poorly to current therapies.

2. Complement Pathways

The complement is a major component of the innate immune system and acts as a bridge between innate and acquired immunity. Over the years, it has become clear that the complement has various functions, ranging from the mediation of inflammatory responses to the regulation of host cell clearance after their programmed cell death [9], and takes part in nearly every step of the immune reaction. It is composed of over 50 proteins [10]. Among these, the soluble ones are produced mainly by the liver and can be detected in the plasma and on cell surfaces as inactive precursors (zymogens) [1]; their cleavage by serine proteases activates a cascade of enzymatic reactions that is tightly regulated to assure complement activation is triggered only at specific locations, thus avoiding host tissue damage.
Activation of the complement system occurs through three distinct pathways: the classical (CP), lectin (LP), and alternative (AP) pathways [2] (Figure 1).
Although each of them is differentially initiated and is characterised by unique and specific factors, they all include the activation of C3 and C5 and lead to a common pathway, which results in the formation of the MAC, ultimately inducing cell lysis by binding to the target cell membrane [11]. The CP is activated by the binding between Immunoglobulins M or G (IgM or IgG), and several other proteins such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid P protein [12], and C1 complex, which is constituted by the sensing molecule C1q and two heterodimers formed by the zymogens C1r and C1s [12]. C1q activates C1r, which in turn cleaves C1s [13]. Once activated, C1 enzyme complex mediates the cleavage of native C4, which is followed by cleavage of C2 and the subsequent formation of the C3 convertase C4bC2a. The C3 convertase activates C3, triggering the dissociation of C3 into C3a and C3b. C3b then binds to the existing C3 convertase to form the C5 convertase C4bC3bC2a complex, which cleaves C5 to generate two different fragments, namely C5a and C5b [14]. The LP is very similar to the CP. The activated LP complex has an oligomer structure similar to the pentamolecular C1 complex [15] and is triggered by serine proteases associated with mannose-binding lectins (MBLs) and with ficolins, another family of lectins, which are able to recognize pathogens [16]. Upon activation by these signals, the enzymes of the complex mannan-binding lectin serine protease (MASP) 1 and 2 mediate the formation of the C3 convertase C4bC2a, which activates the same downstream pathways as occurs in CP [17]. In contrast to the classic and lectin pathways, the AP can autoactivate using a process termed “tickover” of C3 [18]. Initially, a spontaneously generated thioester- hydrolysed form of C3 (C3(H2O)) interacts with factor B and factor D to form the fluid phase alternative pathway C3 convertase C3(H2O)Bb [19]. C3(H2O)Bb cleaves native C3 to generate C3a and C3b, and the latter binds to its receptor on the lipid membrane. On the membrane, C3b combines with factor B, which is cleaved by factor D to form the alternative pathway C3 convertase C3bBb [14]. Properdin (P), a positive regulator of the complement system, stabilizes C3bBb, and the binding of additional C3b (amplification loop) to the existing alternative pathway C3 convertase generates a C5 convertase, thus leading to the production of C5a and C5b [14].
As it is a very complex system, various mechanisms can interfere with the complement cascade leading to over-activation and consequent neuronal damage and disease [20]. Dysregulated complement mechanisms, such as those involving C5 components, contribute to the initiation and progression of several neuropathies [21,22].

3. Peripheral Neuropathies and C5a/C5aR1 Axis

The term “neuropathy”, or also peripheral neuropathy (PN), refers to a group of conditions characterized by damage and loss of function of nerve cells in the brain or peripheral nervous system (PNS). The population prevalence is about 2400 per 100,000 rising with age to 8000 per 100,000 [23]. Although the damage occurs most frequently in the PNS, also brain injuries, such as stroke, can result in neuropathic symptoms [24]. Moreover, neuropathies can be expressions of neurodegenerative diseases [25], where the degeneration of sensory nerve fibres is due to a wide variety of insults, including diabetes, infectious diseases and nutritional deficiencies, and chemotherapy treatments [26]. Symptoms usually include numbness and paresthesia and are often accompanied by weakness and pain [27,28].
So far, progress in developing treatments for neuropathies has been frustratingly slow. In fact, despite the availability of therapies that can alleviate symptoms—as, for example, in the case of mild pain, which may be relieved by over the counter analgesics and topical patches—and can address conditions associated with PN [29,30,31,32], no treatments have been approved to date that directly modulate the underlying mechanisms of neuropathies. Current pharmacological therapies are only partially effective, and prolonged exposure to such agents can cause unwanted side effects. Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify and label specific molecular targets and to develop agents to treat pain by exploiting alternative biological pathways.
Over the last few years, evidence has indicated that C5a activation triggers a cascade of events that are involved in the pathophysiology of PN and in the genesis of painful states of neuro-inflammation [8]. C5a exerts its biological functions by binding two receptors, C5a receptor-like 1 (C5aR1, also referred to as CD88), a class A seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), and C5a receptor-like 2 (C5aR2, also known as C5L2 or GPR77) [33], a homolog of C5aR1, but which is not coupled to intracellular heterotrimeric G-proteins due to a mutation in G-protein recognition sequence. C5aR1 is expressed by a broad range of cell types, including all cells of myeloid origin (neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells), lymphocytes, and non-myeloid cells, such as lung, liver, kidney, skin, and central nervous system (CNS) cells [5,34]. C5aR2 is highly expressed in human tissues, such as bone marrow, spleen, and lung, as well as in immune cells, including most myeloid cells and specific T cell subsets [35]. C5aR1 is well-known for its pro-inflammatory effect [36]; conversely, the role of C5aR2 is poorly understood and still controversial [37]. Although C5aR2 can independently induce and modulate C5a biological functions through α-arrestin signalling, further investigations are needed to better understand its actual role [38].
By contrast, the C5a/C5aR1 axis triggers leukocyte recruitment and pro-inflammatory cytokines production, which drive inflammatory and neuropathic pain [39,40,41]. Up-regulated levels of C5a and C5aR were found in spinal cord microglia in animals subjected to spared nerve injury (SNI), a model of neuropathic pain [42], while local activation of C5aR1 was found to be implicated in the mechanical nociceptive sensitization in an in vivo model of postoperative pain [43]. In a similar model, PMX-53, a C5aR1 antagonist, decreased mechanical allodynia, oedema, and the levels of several inflammatory mediators present in incised skin [44]. Moreover, local pre-treatment of rats with PMX-53, attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia induced by zymosan, carrageenan, lipopolysaccharide, and ovalbumin, suggesting its role in the control of inflammatory pain [45]. In addition, oral administration of DF2593A, a non-competitive allosteric C5a inhibitor, effectively reduced mechanical hyperalgesia in a carrageenan and complete Freund’s adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain model. Furthermore, DF2593A reduced mechanical hypersensitivity in a model of neuropathic pain induced by SNI [40]. Notably, C5aR1 disruption in knock-out (KO) mice suppressed thermal hyperalgesia compared to wild-type (WT) mice and decreased mechanical sensitization after paw incision [40,41,43], suggesting a major involvement of C5a/C5aR1 axis in pain and inflammation after surgery.
In sum, the administration of C5aR1 antagonists produce analgesic effects in various models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain, highlighting the therapeutic potential of pharmacologically targeting the C5a/C5aR1 axis for chronic pain management.

4. Disease of the Peripheral Nervous System (PNS)

The role of C5a/C5aR axis activation in pain generation in neuropathies has been widely investigated in several pharmacological studies. The following paragraphs describe the more recent major findings in the field of PNS and discuss possible implications of the complement system in the pathogenesis of different neuropathic disorders.

4.1. Guillain-Barré Syndrome

GBS is a clinically heterogeneous spectrum of rare post-infectious neuropathies that usually occur in otherwise healthy patients and encompasses acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN), Miller–Fisher syndrome (MFS) and some other regional variants [46,47,48]. GBS is estimated to affect about 1 in 100,000 people each year and it can strike at any age and both sexes [49]. The exact cause of GBS is not known; it is characterized by symptoms that often affect the arms, breathing muscles, and even the face, reflecting widespread nerve damage. Several pathologic and etiologic subtypes of GBS exist, and in many cases it develops subsequently to minor infections but is not associated with other autoimmune or systemic disorders. Usually, GBS occurs after an infectious disease, during which antibodies that cross-react with gangliosides at nerve membranes-with anti-GQ1b ganglioside antibodies being the principal biomarkers of GBS [50]—are aberrantly generated and directed against the PNS, causing nerve damage or impairment of nerve conduction [51]. Anti-GQ1b ganglioside antibodies are principal biomarkers of GBS [50]. The concept of infection-triggered antibody cross-reactivity is well established in axonal GBS and this mechanism is suspected to play a key role in demyelinating GBS. Intravenous administration of immunoglobulins and plasma exchange are effective in treating GBS [52,53]; other therapeutic strategies have been tested in animal models, but their bench-to-bedside transfer is still lacking [54].
Inhibition of C5 complement component activation in experimental ex vivo and in vivo GBS models was extensively used to investigate the pathogenesis of GBS and to evaluate complement deposition in the nerve membrane [55,56,57,58,59]. Specifically, the complement inhibitor APT070 (Mirococept), which regulates C5 and C3 convertases, was shown to be efficacious in an anti-GQ1b-mediated mouse model of the GBS variant MFS, inhibiting the formation of MAC complexes and protecting nerve terminals [57]. Similarly, the anti-C5a monoclonal antibody eculizumab, which inhibits formation of C5a and C5b-9, was reported to prevent complement damage and respiratory paralysis in another severe in vivo mouse model of MFS generated via anti-GQ1b antibody and normal human serum injection as a complement source [58]. Together, these findings have raised the possibility of developing clinical trials using anti-C5a in GBS and in other antibody-mediated terminal motor neuropathies involving complement activation.

4.2. Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

CIDP is the most common chronic inflammatory neuropathy, and it is usually characterized by slow progressive, symmetric, proximal and distal paresis and sensory dysfunction. Symptoms develop in few months and the disease course can be either chronically progressive or relapsing with stepwise progression [60]. Prevalence is about 1 in 200,000 in children and 1–7 in 100,000 in adults, but it is recently accepted that the frequency is underestimated [61]. Although CIDP has been classified as an autoimmune disorder, in which an aberrant immune response is directed towards components of peripheral nerves causing segmental and multifocal demyelination, axonal degeneration and perivascular or endoneurial inflammatory infiltrates of macrophages and T cells, the exact mechanisms underlying the development of its immunopathology is still far from to be defined.
Individuals with CIDP lack a detectable antibody titer specific for major compact myelin proteins, thus suggesting that serum constituents, such as cytokines or components of the complement cascade, rather than myelin-directed antibodies might contribute to peripheral nerve injury [60,62,63]. Supporting the hypothesis that complement activation can be a potential pathogenic mechanism for this disease, complement component C3d deposition has been detected on the outer surface of PNS Schwann cells in biopsies from patients with CIDP [60,64,65]. Moreover, clinical studies demonstrated that CIDP patients have increased serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of C5a [66], which is the result of the proinflammatory function of C3d aimed at recruiting myeloid cells, such as macrophages, to inflammation sites through complement receptors and inducing tissue injury through formation of the MAC. These findings suggest that systemic and local terminal complement activation is a characteristic feature of inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies and support a role of complement activation in the pathogenesis of CIDP.

4.3. Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

FAP, or transthyretin (TTR) amyloid polyneuropathy, is a progressive sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathy of adult onset, which is characterized by systemic accumulation of amyloid fibrils constituted of aberrant TTR protein [67]. The global prevalence is unknown, but in Japan it has been recently estimated to be around 1 person per million in the general population [68]. FAP is a heterogeneous disorder with a clinical presentation that varies based on the genotype and geographic origin [69,70]. To date, more than 40 TTR mutations have been identified and associated with different patterns of organ involvement, age of onset and disease progression [71,72]. The most common type of mutation is a substitution of valine for methionine at position 30 (ATTRV30M) [73]. The symptoms depend on the site of protein accumulation in the body and, although each TTR variant leads to a different phenotype, PN and cardiomyopathy are predominant hallmarks [74]. The disease usually worsens over 5 to 15 years, and often leads to death caused by heart failure due to TTR protein deposits. Liver transplantation is currently the only treatment for preventing synthesis of the amyloidogenic variants of TTR [75].
Nerve biopsies of individuals with amyloidogenic TTR revealed that in amyloid deposits, transthyretin is aggregated with several other proteins, such as apolipoprotein E, serum amyloid P, and complement C1q [76], suggesting a role for C1q in the pathogenesis of the disease. C1q protein has been shown to be involved also in other amyloidosis, such as Alzheimer’s disease, activating the complement pathway leading to neuronal loss [77]. It is speculated that the complement plays a dual role: although it is known that C1q is able to exert a neuroprotective function against toxic concentrations of soluble pre-amyloid aggregates [78,79], C5a is recognized as having a detrimental neuro-inflammatory effect [80]. However, the impact of C5aR/C5a axis activation in ATTRV30M amyloidosis remains to be clarified.

4.4. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

CIPN is the most common neurologic complication of chemotherapy, often limiting the efficacy of cancer treatments [81]. Between 30% and 40% of patients receiving chemotherapy are reported to experience CIPN, and this number is expected to grow as more aggressive pharmacological agents emerge and survival rates increase [82]. The incidence of CIPN varies from 10% to 100%, depending upon the specific anticancer drug or drug combination administered and upon the dosing regimen [83]. CIPN causes pain, sensory loss and poor dexterity, with a significant impact on patient quality of life. When pain is too severe, a change in chemotherapy regimen may be required, with risk of reducing the therapeutic efficacy, or patients may choose to discontinue the treatment [84]. For example, both oxaliplatin and paclitaxel, two widely used chemotherapeutics, have been shown to cause neurotoxicity and alterations in sensory neurons, triggering CIPN [85,86].
Current CIPN management is far from satisfactory, and this is largely due to an inadequate understanding of the complexity of CIPN pathophysiology. The main neurobiological mechanisms involved in CIPN include impaired immune cell signalling and ion channel expression, neurotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and axon degeneration [87]. Emerging evidence suggests that the immune system and immune-mediated neuro-inflammation are crucial events in the development of CIPN [88]. In particular, a recent study reported that in paclitaxel-induced mechanical allodynia the complement cascade is reduced in C3 KO rats compared to WT animals, and that MAC is tightly involved in the damage of neuronal cells, suggesting that complement may be a novel target for the treatment of CIPN [89]. However, since C3 deficiency almost completely abolishes the release of C5a and MAC, which are crucial for the physiological protection against pathogens, and thus exposes the patient to an increased risk of infections and related side effects, the role of C5a-mediated signalling in CIPN models should be further investigated with the aim to develop more targeted treatment.

5. C5 Component Targeted Therapies

Several findings indicate that C5 exerts a potent nociceptive activity and contributes to the genesis of both inflammatory and neuropathic pain [8,90,91]. Identifying modulators able to inhibit the C5 cascade may, thus, pave the way toward the development of improved treatments for neuropathic pain.
To date, advances have been made in the characterization of molecular mechanisms underlying C5 signalling, and several C5 inhibitors and modulators have been developed [92]. Currently, the most encouraging therapeutic approaches include monoclonal antibodies modulating C5 component pathways or peptidomimetics that mimic specific portions of C5aR, as well as small molecules targeting specific C5aR binding sites, and potent and selective C5aR inhibitors.
In the following sections, we describe C5- and C5aR-targeting drugs and discuss the importance of the allosteric mechanism of action of novel C5aR antagonists as well as their potential in the treatment of neuropathies such as those previously described.

6. Targeting C5

Most of the new molecules identified and developed against C5 are monoclonal antibodies. Among these, eculizumab (Soliris®), a monoclonal antibody against C5, binds to C5 and blocks its cleavage into C5a and C5b, ultimately preventing the formation of the MAC matrix [93,94,95] (Table 1).
Eculizumab was the first drug approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [96] for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) [97] and atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) [98], and it is currently under clinical evaluation for its application in several other diseases and conditions, such as GBS [99], neuromyelitis optica [100], kidney and liver transplant rejection [101], systemic lupus erythematosus [102], chemotherapy-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) [103], and generalized myasthenia gravis [104]. Biosimilars of eculizumab, such as ABP 959 (NCT03818607), BCD-148 (NCT04060264) and SB12 (NCT04058158), are in phase 3 of evaluation for treatment of patients with PNH.
Since treatment with eculizumab was shown to be not completely effective in PNH, new optimized antibodies, follow up compounds of eculizumab, have been developed in recent years [105]. Among these, crovalimab, a novel anti-C5 sequential monoclonal antibody recycling technology, is currently under investigation for PNH (NCT03157635) as promising results were obtained after its administration once every 4 weeks in patients with PNH [106]. Nomacopan, formerly known as rVA576 (Coversin), a second-generation C5 complement inhibitor, is a bi-functional recombinant small protein which is currently in phase 3 of clinical development for PNH (NCT03588026). Like eculizumab, nomacopan prevents cleavage and activation of C5 but it binds C5 at a different site, and this makes it a potentially useful agent to treat PNH patients who are resistant to eculizumab therapy because of C5 genetic variants [107]. Ravulizumab (Ultomiris®), also known as ALXN1210, is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to bind to and prevent the activation of C5. The molecule is a long-acting C5 inhibitor, which was engineered from eculizumab with increased elimination and half-life, thus allowing an extended dosing interval from two to eight weeks [108]. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with PNH (NCT03406507), aHUS (NCT01522183) and for the inhibition of complement-mediated TMA [108]. Ravulizumab is under current development for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (NCT04248465), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) (NCT04201262) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19) (NCT04570397). Zilucoplan is a small (3.5 kDa), 15–amino acid macrocyclic peptide that binds to C5 with high affinity and specificity [109], and it is currently under clinical development for the generalized myasthenia gravis (NCT04115293) and COVID-19 (NCT04590586). Pozelimab is a fully human anti-complement C5, designed for the potential treatment of PNH and CD-55 deficient protein-losing enteropathy (CHAPLE disease) (NCT04209634). The molecule showed to be more potent in decreasing C5 levels and hemolysis in humans and animal models compared to eculizumab and ravulizumab [110], pushing its further investigation for the treatment of PNH and other complement-mediated diseases. Finally, a PEGylated anti-C5 aptamer, avacincaptad pegol sodium (Zimura®), is also under active development in a phase 2/3 trial in patients with geographic atrophy secondary to dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [111].

7. Targeting C5aR

One of the most studied C5aR antagonists, avacopan (Vynpenta®), previously called CCX-168, is an orally available selective small molecule optimized for the treatment of orphan and rare renal conditions, primarily anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic auto-antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis [112]. Based on promising results from the phase 3 ADVOCATE trial, FDA approval was requested in July 2020.
Avdoralimab, also known as IPH5401, is a human monoclonal antibody that targets C5aR expressed on neutrophils and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), reducing the release of pro-inflammatory factors and the proliferation of cancer cells [113,114,115]. Blocking C5a/C5aR1 axis is now being investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NCT03665129), advanced/metastatic cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection (NCT04333914), and bullous pemphigoid (NCT04563923). As previously mentioned, no C5aR inhibitors are currently under development for the treatment of neuropathies.

8. Allosteric C5a Receptor Inhibitors

Over the last few decades, a plethora of molecules targeting C5, C5a, and/or C5a receptors have been described [95,116]. However, despite the number of preclinical and clinical studies reported, few C5 and C5a receptor inhibitors have been tested in clinical trials and approved for clinical use, mainly as a result of unclear disease mechanisms and unwanted side effects [117].
The dysregulation of complement components contributes to the pathogenesis of various diseases, including neuropathy [21]. Although targeting C5 cleavage was shown to be the most successful strategy in complement-targeted therapies [92,95], developing more selective approaches targeting only one of the two products deriving from C5 cleavage and exploiting alternative mechanisms could be preferable. Considering the crucial role that complement system plays in the innate defense against common pathogens and in immune signalling, caution should be taken when using complement-targeted therapeutics, especially in the treatment of chronic diseases [118]. As observed in patients treated with anti-complement therapy, prolonged complement suppression through the chronic use of immunomodulators can increase susceptibility of patients to certain pyogenic infection or result in adverse events [119]. Eculizumab, for example, impairs host defense against meningococcal infection and increases susceptibility to various infectious pathogens, making vaccination necessary two weeks before the first administration of the compound to avoid this risk [120,121]. Thus, a good and clear safety profile must be a priority in the development of new candidate drugs.
To date, many strategies have been proposed to design more promising complement-specific drugs with the aim of improving the treatment of complement component-mediated disorders. Several studies have suggested a two-site binding mechanism for C5a, with C-terminal segment responsible for activating C5aR2, leading to the development of C5aR antagonists such as peptidomimetics mimicking the structure of C-terminal segment of C5a [122]. The cyclic hexapeptide PMX-53 was developed as a competitive antagonist of C5aR1, with activity at nanomolar concentrations [123]. The molecule blocks C5aR1 at an earlier stage of the immune and inflammatory process compared to the targets of currently available anti-inflammatory drugs and was found efficacious when given by intravenous, intraperitoneal, and subcutaneous injection, as well as by transdermal administration in several rat models of inflammatory diseases [123]. In humans, PMX-53 resulted safe and well tolerated both as an oral formulation for the treatment of inflammatory disorders and as a topical formulation for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis [124]. Discouragingly, the molecule displayed several drawbacks, mainly due to its peptide nature and low bioavailability, which significantly limit its use. PMX-205, a lipophilic analogue of PMX-53, was found to have greater in vivo efficacy and stability than its parent molecule [123], and has thus been suggested as an ideal drug candidate for several human diseases, including neurological disorders. Many other small molecules with improved drug-like properties exerting reversible and competitive action on C5aR were subsequently developed [122,125]. However, their limited translation to humans is probably due to an insufficient understanding of disease mechanisms and the main parameters influencing their efficacy, such as lifetime of the receptor-ligand complex, which determines the duration of the inhibitory action on C5aR functions [125,126].
An alternative strategy to design more specific C5aR inhibitors could be to develop allosteric modulators of C5aR that, due to their structurally-driven design, generally show improved drug-likeness properties and consequently improved safety characteristics [94,127]. In this context, promising results have been achieved with the non-competitive allosteric inhibitor DF2593A in a SNI animal model of chronic neuropathic pain [40], in the pathogenesis of which C5a/C5aR axis is known to play a role. The molecule was originally identified from a drug discovery approach based on a bio- and chemo-informatic platform targeting GPCRs, including C5aR, aimed at selecting and characterizing new chemical classes of allosteric modulator. Due to the unavailability of the crystal structure of C5aR protein, the design of this novel class of allosteric small-molecular-weight C5aR inhibitors was conducted using a homology modelling approach by exploiting combined information on structural and functional features of allosteric sites in homologous chemokine receptors [40]. Starting from the results on DF2593A, additional medicinal chemistry, in vitro, and in vivo pharmacological studies led to the identification and characterization of novel chemical classes of C5aR allosteric inhibitors, thus allowing the selection of a second generation and new lead compound, DF3966A, with optimized pharmacokinetic and safety profiles but with the same activity and selectivity previously observed [128].
With these data, a new paradigm is emerging for the development of complement-targeted drugs in which the use of allosteric C5aR inhibitors could represent a new strategy to treat and mitigate pain in different neuropathies induced by a dysregulation of complement component response.

9. Conclusions

Neuropathy-related pain is a challenging condition to treat and current therapeutic strategies fail to achieve adequate pain relief primarily because the main causes of pain are complex, knowledge of the underlying mechanisms is poor, and the selection of treatment options is often incorrect [29]. Even if patients can find some relief when the underlying cause is addressed, they require careful monitoring and follow-up. Developing drugs to treat any type of nerve pain or to prevent it from getting worse relies on a clear understanding of the mechanisms involved.
The field of complement-targeted therapeutics is developing rapidly and holds promise for the treatment of several neuropathies in the pathogenesis of which the complement is an important factor. Studies investigating a variety of novel drugs—either approved or in late-stage of clinical development—have confirmed that anti-complement approaches can provide new insights into disease mechanisms and enhanced therapies in a growing number of diseases [117,129]. However, several challenges remain to be addressed. For example, the different role of C5aR1 and C5aR2 inhibition in these diseases is poorly understood, and inhibition of C5 activation for prolonged time periods results in increased susceptibility to infectious diseases and other undesired effects. By gaining a greater understanding of the specific mechanisms underlying drug action and optimizing functional selectivity, the use of allosteric inhibitors could speed up the development of anti-complement therapeutic strategies and potentially yield new complement-targeted therapies to treat neuropathic diseases for which no cure is yet available.

Author Contributions

C.G., M.Z. and P.C. wrote the manuscript; V.C. and G.V. analyzed documented results; L.B., M.C.C., A.A. and M.A. substantially revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Italian Ministry of Economic Development, grant number F/090033/01-03-04/X36.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Rubina Novelli for editing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors C.G., M.Z., P.C., A.A., M.A., L.B. and M.C.C. declare conflicts of interest. The authors V.C. and G.V. declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nesargikar, P.; Spiller, B.; Chavez, R. The complement system: History, pathways, cascade and inhibitors. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2012, 2, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Merle, N.S.; Church, S.E.; Fremeaux-Bacchi, V.; Roumenina, L.T. Complement System Part I—Molecular Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ricklin, D.; Lambris, J.D. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: Pathophysiological mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 3831–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Manthey, H.D.; Woodruff, T.M.; Taylor, S.M.; Monk, P.N. Complement component 5a (C5a). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 41, 2114–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, R.F.; Ward, P.A. Role of C5a in inflammatory responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 23, 821–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Heesterbeek, D.A.; Bardoel, B.W.; Parsons, E.S.; Bennett, I.; Ruyken, M.; Doorduijn, D.J.; Gorham, R.D., Jr.; Berends, E.T.; Pyne, A.L.; Hoogenboom, B.W.; et al. Bacterial killing by complement requires membrane attack complex formation via surface-bound C5 convertases. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e99852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fritzinger, D.C.; Benjamin, D.E. The Complement System in Neuropathic and Postoperative Pain. Open Pain J. 2016, 9, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Quadros, A.U.; Cunha, T.M. C5a and pain development: An old molecule, a new target. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 112, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Merle, N.S.; Noe, R.; Halbwachs-Mecarelli, L.; Fremeaux-Bacchi, V.; Roumenina, L.T. Complement System Part II: Role in Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mamidi, S.; Hone, S.; Kirschfink, M. The complement system in cancer: Ambivalence between tumour destruction and promotion. Immunobiology 2017, 222, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cedzynski, M.; Swierzko, A.S. Components of the Lectin Pathway of Complement in Haematologic Malignancies. Cancers 2020, 12, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mortensen, S.A.; Sander, B.; Jensen, R.K.; Pedersen, J.S.; Golas, M.M.; Thiel, S.; Andersen, G.R. Models of the complement C1 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E3866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gaboriaud, C.; Thielens, N.M.; Gregory, L.A.; Rossi, V.; Fontecilla-Camps, J.C.; Arlaud, G.J. Structure and activation of the C1 complex of complement: Unraveling the puzzle. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zwarthoff, S.A.; Berends, E.T.M.; Mol, S.; Ruyken, M.; Aerts, P.C.; Jozsi, M.; de Haas, C.J.C.; Rooijakkers, S.H.M.; Gorham, R.D., Jr. Functional Characterization of Alternative and Classical Pathway C3/C5 Convertase Activity and Inhibition Using Purified Models. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kjaer, T.R.; Jensen, L.; Hansen, A.; Dani, R.; Jensenius, J.C.; Dobo, J.; Gal, P.; Thiel, S. Oligomerization of Mannan-binding Lectin Dictates Binding Properties and Complement Activation. Scand. J. Immunol. 2016, 84, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Takahashi, M.; Iwaki, D.; Kanno, K.; Ishida, Y.; Xiong, J.; Matsushita, M.; Endo, Y.; Miura, S.; Ishii, N.; Sugamura, K.; et al. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine protease (MASP)-1 contributes to activation of the lectin complement pathway. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 6132–6138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mortensen, S.; Kidmose, R.T.; Petersen, S.V.; Szilagyi, A.; Prohaszka, Z.; Andersen, G.R. Structural Basis for the Function of Complement Component C4 within the Classical and Lectin Pathways of Complement. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 5488–5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Thurman, J.M.; Holers, V.M. The central role of the alternative complement pathway in human disease. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 1305–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Chen, Z.A.; Pellarin, R.; Fischer, L.; Sali, A.; Nilges, M.; Barlow, P.N.; Rappsilber, J. Structure of Complement C3(H2O) Revealed By Quantitative Cross-Linking/Mass Spectrometry And Modeling. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2016, 15, 2730–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hernandez, M.X.; Namiranian, P.; Nguyen, E.; Fonseca, M.I.; Tenner, A.J. C5a Increases the Injury to Primary Neurons Elicited by Fibrillar Amyloid Beta. ASN Neuro 2017, 9, 1759091416687871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ramaglia, V.; Daha, M.R.; Baas, F. The complement system in the peripheral nerve: Friend or foe? Mol. Immunol. 2008, 45, 3865–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dalakas, M.C.; Alexopoulos, H.; Spaeth, P.J. Complement in neurological disorders and emerging complement-targeted therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hughes, R.A. Peripheral neuropathy. BMJ 2002, 324, 466–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Costigan, M.; Scholz, J.; Woolf, C.J. Neuropathic pain: A maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 32, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Reichling, D.B.; Levine, J.D. Pain and death: Neurodegenerative disease mechanisms in the nociceptor. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 69, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jin, H.W.; Flatters, S.J.; Xiao, W.H.; Mulhern, H.L.; Bennett, G.J. Prevention of paclitaxel-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy by acetyl-L-carnitine: Effects on axonal mitochondria, sensory nerve fiber terminal arbors, and cutaneous Langerhans cells. Exp. Neurol. 2008, 210, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Head, K.A. Peripheral neuropathy: Pathogenic mechanisms and alternative therapies. Altern. Med. Rev. 2006, 11, 294–329. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Hanewinckel, R.; Ikram, M.A.; Van Doorn, P.A. Peripheral neuropathies. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2016, 138, 263–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Colloca, L.; Ludman, T.; Bouhassira, D.; Baron, R.; Dickenson, A.H.; Yarnitsky, D.; Freeman, R.; Truini, A.; Attal, N.; Finnerup, N.B.; et al. Neuropathic pain. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 170002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Girach, A.; Julian, T.H.; Varrassi, G.; Paladini, A.; Vadalouka, A.; Zis, P. Quality of Life in Painful Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review. Pain Res. Manag. 2019, 2019, 2091960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Liampas, A.; Rekatsina, M.; Vadalouca, A.; Paladini, A.; Varrassi, G.; Zis, P. Non-Pharmacological Management of Painful Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review. Adv. Ther. 2020, 37, 4096–4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liampas, A.; Rekatsina, M.; Vadalouca, A.; Paladini, A.; Varrassi, G.; Zis, P. Pharmacological Management of Painful Peripheral Neuropathies: A Systematic Review. Pain Ther. 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nabizadeh, J.A.; Manthey, H.D.; Panagides, N.; Steyn, F.J.; Lee, J.D.; Li, X.X.; Akhir, F.N.M.; Chen, W.; Boyle, G.M.; Taylor, S.M.; et al. C5a receptors C5aR1 and C5aR2 mediate opposing pathologies in a mouse model of melanoma. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 11060–11071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Allegretti, M.; Moriconi, A.; Beccari, A.R.; Di Bitondo, R.; Bizzarri, C.; Bertini, R.; Colotta, F. Targeting C5a: Recent advances in drug discovery. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 217–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, X.X.; Lee, J.D.; Kemper, C.; Woodruff, T.M. The Complement Receptor C5aR2: A Powerful Modulator of Innate and Adaptive Immunity. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 3339–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peng, Q.; Li, K.; Sacks, S.H.; Zhou, W. The role of anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a in regulating innate and adaptive immune responses. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Targets 2009, 8, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, T.; Garstka, M.A.; Li, K. The Controversial C5a Receptor C5aR2: Its Role in Health and Disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 8193932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Croker, D.E.; Monk, P.N.; Halai, R.; Kaeslin, G.; Schofield, Z.; Wu, M.C.; Clark, R.J.; Blaskovich, M.A.; Morikis, D.; Floudas, C.A.; et al. Discovery of functionally selective C5aR2 ligands: Novel modulators of C5a signalling. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2016, 94, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Wiese, A.V.; Ender, F.; Quell, K.M.; Antoniou, K.; Vollbrandt, T.; Konig, P.; Kohl, J.; Laumonnier, Y. The C5a/C5aR1 axis controls the development of experimental allergic asthma independent of LysM-expressing pulmonary immune cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Moriconi, A.; Cunha, T.M.; Souza, G.R.; Lopes, A.H.; Cunha, F.Q.; Carneiro, V.L.; Pinto, L.G.; Brandolini, L.; Aramini, A.; Bizzarri, C.; et al. Targeting the minor pocket of C5aR for the rational design of an oral allosteric inhibitor for inflammatory and neuropathic pain relief. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 16937–16942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Shutov, L.P.; Warwick, C.A.; Shi, X.; Gnanasekaran, A.; Shepherd, A.J.; Mohapatra, D.P.; Woodruff, T.M.; Clark, J.D.; Usachev, Y.M. The Complement System Component C5a Produces Thermal Hyperalgesia via Macrophage-to-Nociceptor Signaling That Requires NGF and TRPV1. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 5055–5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Griffin, R.S.; Costigan, M.; Brenner, G.J.; Ma, C.H.; Scholz, J.; Moss, A.; Allchorne, A.J.; Stahl, G.L.; Woolf, C.J. Complement induction in spinal cord microglia results in anaphylatoxin C5a-mediated pain hypersensitivity. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 8699–8708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Liang, D.Y.; Li, X.; Shi, X.; Sun, Y.; Sahbaie, P.; Li, W.W.; Clark, J.D. The complement component C5a receptor mediates pain and inflammation in a postsurgical pain model. Pain 2012, 153, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Clark, J.D.; Qiao, Y.; Li, X.; Shi, X.; Angst, M.S.; Yeomans, D.C. Blockade of the complement C5a receptor reduces incisional allodynia, edema, and cytokine expression. Anesthesiology 2006, 104, 1274–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ting, E.; Guerrero, A.T.; Cunha, T.M.; Verri, W.A., Jr.; Taylor, S.M.; Woodruff, T.M.; Cunha, F.Q.; Ferreira, S.H. Role of complement C5a in mechanical inflammatory hypernociception: Potential use of C5a receptor antagonists to control inflammatory pain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hafer-Macko, C.; Hsieh, S.T.; Li, C.Y.; Ho, T.W.; Sheikh, K.; Cornblath, D.R.; McKhann, G.M.; Asbury, A.K.; Griffin, J.W. Acute motor axonal neuropathy: An antibody-mediated attack on axolemma. Ann. Neurol. 1996, 40, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kuwabara, S.; Yuki, N. Axonal Guillain-Barre syndrome: Concepts and controversies. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12, 1180–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jasti, A.K.; Selmi, C.; Sarmiento-Monroy, J.C.; Vega, D.A.; Anaya, J.M.; Gershwin, M.E. Guillain-Barre syndrome: Causes, immunopathogenic mechanisms and treatment. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2016, 12, 1175–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McGrogan, A.; Madle, G.C.; Seaman, H.E.; de Vries, C.S. The epidemiology of Guillain-Barre syndrome worldwide. A systematic literature review. Neuroepidemiology 2009, 32, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jacobs, B.C.; O’Hanlon, G.M.; Bullens, R.W.; Veitch, J.; Plomp, J.J.; Willison, H.J. Immunoglobulins inhibit pathophysiological effects of anti-GQ1b-positive sera at motor nerve terminals through inhibition of antibody binding. Brain 2003, 126, 2220–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fokke, C.; van den Berg, B.; Drenthen, J.; Walgaard, C.; van Doorn, P.A.; Jacobs, B.C. Diagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome and validation of Brighton criteria. Brain 2014, 137, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Schaller, B.; Radziwill, A.J.; Steck, A.J. Successful treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome with combined administration of interferon-beta-1a and intravenous immunoglobulin. Eur. Neurol. 2001, 46, 167–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Raphael, J.C.; Chevret, S.; Hughes, R.A.; Annane, D. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2002, 7, CD001798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Meyer zu Horste, G.; Hartung, H.P.; Kieseier, B.C. From bench to bedside--experimental rationale for immune-specific therapies in the inflamed peripheral nerve. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2007, 3, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. O’Hanlon, G.M.; Plomp, J.J.; Chakrabarti, M.; Morrison, I.; Wagner, E.R.; Goodyear, C.S.; Yin, X.; Trapp, B.D.; Conner, J.; Molenaar, P.C.; et al. Anti-GQ1b ganglioside antibodies mediate complement-dependent destruction of the motor nerve terminal. Brain 2001, 124, 893–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Halstead, S.K.; O’Hanlon, G.M.; Humphreys, P.D.; Morrison, D.B.; Morgan, B.P.; Todd, A.J.; Plomp, J.J.; Willison, H.J. Anti-disialoside antibodies kill perisynaptic Schwann cells and damage motor nerve terminals via membrane attack complex in a murine model of neuropathy. Brain 2004, 127, 2109–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Halstead, S.K.; Humphreys, P.D.; Goodfellow, J.A.; Wagner, E.R.; Smith, R.A.; Willison, H.J. Complement inhibition abrogates nerve terminal injury in Miller Fisher syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 58, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Halstead, S.K.; Zitman, F.M.; Humphreys, P.D.; Greenshields, K.; Verschuuren, J.J.; Jacobs, B.C.; Rother, R.P.; Plomp, J.J.; Willison, H.J. Eculizumab prevents anti-ganglioside antibody-mediated neuropathy in a murine model. Brain 2008, 131, 1197–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. McGonigal, R.; Cunningham, M.E.; Yao, D.; Barrie, J.A.; Sankaranarayanan, S.; Fewou, S.N.; Furukawa, K.; Yednock, T.A.; Willison, H.J. C1q-targeted inhibition of the classical complement pathway prevents injury in a novel mouse model of acute motor axonal neuropathy. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2016, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Dalakas, M.C. Medscape. Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment of CIDP. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011, 7, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Broers, M.C.; Bunschoten, C.; Nieboer, D.; Lingsma, H.F.; Jacobs, B.C. Incidence and Prevalence of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuroepidemiology 2019, 52, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Koller, H.; Kieseier, B.C.; Jander, S.; Hartung, H.P. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1343–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Mathey, E.K.; Park, S.B.; Hughes, R.A.; Pollard, J.D.; Armati, P.J.; Barnett, M.H.; Taylor, B.V.; Dyck, P.J.; Kiernan, M.C.; Lin, C.S. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: From pathology to phenotype. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 973–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Dalakas, M.C.; Engel, W.K. Immunoglobulin and complement deposits in nerves of patients with chronic relapsing polyneuropathy. Arch. Neurol. 1980, 37, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hays, A.P.; Lee, S.S.; Latov, N. Immune reactive C3d on the surface of myelin sheaths in neuropathy. J. Neuroimmunol. 1988, 18, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Quast, I.; Keller, C.W.; Hiepe, F.; Tackenberg, B.; Lunemann, J.D. Terminal complement activation is increased and associated with disease severity in CIDP. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2016, 3, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cakar, A.; Durmus-Tekce, H.; Parman, Y. Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy. Arch. Neurol. 2019, 56, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kato-Motozaki, Y.; Ono, K.; Shima, K.; Morinaga, A.; Machiya, T.; Nozaki, I.; Shibata-Hamaguchi, A.; Furukawa, Y.; Yanase, D.; Ishida, C.; et al. Epidemiology of familial amyloid polyneuropathy in Japan: Identification of a novel endemic focus. J. Neurol. Sci. 2008, 270, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ando, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Araki, S. Transthyretin-related familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Arch. Neurol. 2005, 62, 1057–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Plante-Bordeneuve, V.; Said, G. Familial amyloid polyneuropathy. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 1086–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rowczenio, D.; Quarta, C.C.; Fontana, M.; Whelan, C.J.; Martinez-Naharro, A.; Trojer, H.; Baginska, A.; Ferguson, S.M.; Gilbertson, J.; Rezk, T.; et al. Analysis of the TTR gene in the investigation of amyloidosis: A 25-year single UK center experience. Hum. Mutat. 2019, 40, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Manganelli, F.; Fabrizi, G.M.; Luigetti, M.; Mandich, P.; Mazzeo, A.; Pareyson, D. Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis overview. Neurol. Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ohmori, H.; Ando, Y.; Makita, Y.; Onouchi, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Saraiva, M.J.; Terazaki, H.; Suhr, O.; Sobue, G.; Nakamura, M.; et al. Common origin of the Val30Met mutation responsible for the amyloidogenic transthyretin type of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. J. Med. Genet. 2004, 41, e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ando, Y.; Coelho, T.; Berk, J.L.; Cruz, M.W.; Ericzon, B.G.; Ikeda, S.; Lewis, W.D.; Obici, L.; Plante-Bordeneuve, V.; Rapezzi, C.; et al. Guideline of transthyretin-related hereditary amyloidosis for clinicians. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2013, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Benson, M.D. Liver transplantation and transthyretin amyloidosis. Muscle Nerve 2013, 47, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hafer-Macko, C.E.; Dyck, P.J.; Koski, C.L. Complement activation in acquired and hereditary amyloid neuropathy. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2000, 5, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fonseca, M.I.; Zhou, J.; Botto, M.; Tenner, A.J. Absence of C1q leads to less neuropathology in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 6457–6465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Pisalyaput, K.; Tenner, A.J. Complement component C1q inhibits beta-amyloid- and serum amyloid P-induced neurotoxicity via caspase- and calpain-independent mechanisms. J. Neurochem. 2008, 104, 696–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Galvan, M.D.; Foreman, D.B.; Zeng, E.; Tan, J.C.; Bohlson, S.S. Complement component C1q regulates macrophage expression of Mer tyrosine kinase to promote clearance of apoptotic cells. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 3716–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Fonseca, M.I.; Chu, S.H.; Berci, A.M.; Benoit, M.E.; Peters, D.G.; Kimura, Y.; Tenner, A.J. Contribution of complement activation pathways to neuropathology differs among mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2011, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Quasthoff, S.; Hartung, H.P. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. J. Neurol. 2002, 249, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pike, C.T.; Birnbaum, H.G.; Muehlenbein, C.E.; Pohl, G.M.; Natale, R.B. Healthcare costs and workloss burden of patients with chemotherapy-associated peripheral neuropathy in breast, ovarian, head and neck, and nonsmall cell lung cancer. Chemother. Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 913848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Balayssac, D.; Ferrier, J.; Descoeur, J.; Ling, B.; Pezet, D.; Eschalier, A.; Authier, N. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies: From clinical relevance to preclinical evidence. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2011, 10, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kolb, N.A.; Smith, A.G.; Singleton, J.R.; Beck, S.L.; Stoddard, G.J.; Brown, S.; Mooney, K. The Association of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Symptoms and the Risk of Falling. JAMA Neurol. 2016, 73, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Salat, K. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: Part 1-current state of knowledge and perspectives for pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol. Rep. 2020, 72, 486–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Salat, K. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy-part 2: Focus on the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Pharmacol. Rep. 2020, 72, 508–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lees, J.G.; Makker, P.G.; Tonkin, R.S.; Abdulla, M.; Park, S.B.; Goldstein, D.; Moalem-Taylor, G. Immune-mediated processes implicated in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Eur. J. Cancer 2017, 73, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Brandolini, L.; d’Angelo, M.; Antonosante, A.; Allegretti, M.; Cimini, A. Chemokine Signaling in Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Xie, M.; Li, Y.; Huang, P.; Saunders, T.L.; Fox, D.A.; Rosenquist, R.; Lin, F. Role of Complement in a Rat Model of Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. J. Immunol. 2018, 200, 4094–4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Jang, J.H.; Clark, D.J.; Li, X.; Yorek, M.S.; Usachev, Y.M.; Brennan, T.J. Nociceptive sensitization by complement C5a and C3a in mouse. Pain 2010, 148, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Jang, J.H.; Liang, D.; Kido, K.; Sun, Y.; Clark, D.J.; Brennan, T.J. Increased local concentration of complement C5a contributes to incisional pain in mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2011, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Ricklin, D.; Lambris, J.D. New milestones ahead in complement-targeted therapy. Semin. Immunol. 2016, 28, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Matis, L.A.; Rollins, S.A. Complement-specific antibodies: Designing novel anti-inflammatories. Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 839–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Schatz-Jakobsen, J.A.; Zhang, Y.; Johnson, K.; Neill, A.; Sheridan, D.; Andersen, G.R. Structural Basis for Eculizumab-Mediated Inhibition of the Complement Terminal Pathway. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Horiuchi, T.; Tsukamoto, H. Complement-targeted therapy: Development of C5- and C5a-targeted inhibition. Inflamm. Regen. 2016, 36, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. US Food and Drug Administration. Soliris® (Eculizumab) [Prescribing Information]; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Cheshire, CT, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  97. Dmytrijuk, A.; Robie-Suh, K.; Cohen, M.H.; Rieves, D.; Weiss, K.; Pazdur, R. FDA report: Eculizumab (Soliris) for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Oncologist 2008, 13, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Palma, L.M.; Langman, C.B. Critical appraisal of eculizumab for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. J. Blood Med. 2016, 7, 39–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Misawa, S.; Kuwabara, S.; Sato, Y.; Yamaguchi, N.; Nagashima, K.; Katayama, K.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Iwai, Y.; Amino, H.; Suichi, T.; et al. Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in Guillain-Barre syndrome: A multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pittock, S.J.; Berthele, A.; Fujihara, K.; Kim, H.J.; Levy, M.; Palace, J.; Nakashima, I.; Terzi, M.; Totolyan, N.; Viswanathan, S.; et al. Eculizumab in Aquaporin-4-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Tan, E.K.; Bentall, A.; Dean, P.G.; Shaheen, M.F.; Stegall, M.D.; Schinstock, C.A. Use of Eculizumab for Active Antibody-mediated Rejection That Occurs Early Post-kidney Transplantation: A Consecutive Series of 15 Cases. Transplantation 2019, 103, 2397–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. De Holanda, M.I.; Porto, L.C.; Wagner, T.; Christiani, L.F.; Palma, L.M.P. Use of eculizumab in a systemic lupus erythemathosus patient presenting thrombotic microangiopathy and heterozygous deletion in CFHR1-CFHR3. A case report and systematic review. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017, 36, 2859–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Schulte-Kemna, L.; Reister, B.; Bettac, L.; Ludwig, U.; Furst, D.; Mytilineos, J.; Bergmann, C.; van Erp, R.; Schroppel, B. Eculizumab in chemotherapy-induced thrombotic microangiopathy. Clin. Nephrol. Case Stud. 2020, 8, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Dhillon, S. Eculizumab: A Review in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis. Drugs 2018, 78, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Nishimura, J.I. Antibody therapy for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Rinsho Ketsueki 2020, 61, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Roth, A.; Nishimura, J.I.; Nagy, Z.; Gaal-Weisinger, J.; Panse, J.; Yoon, S.S.; Egyed, M.; Ichikawa, S.; Ito, Y.; Kim, J.S.; et al. The complement C5 inhibitor crovalimab in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Blood 2020, 135, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Schols, S.; Nunn, M.A.; Mackie, I.; Weston-Davies, W.; Nishimura, J.I.; Kanakura, Y.; Blijlevens, N.; Muus, P.; Langemeijer, S. Successful treatment of a PNH patient non-responsive to eculizumab with the novel complement C5 inhibitor coversin (nomacopan). Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 188, 334–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rondeau, E.; Scully, M.; Ariceta, G.; Barbour, T.; Cataland, S.; Heyne, N.; Miyakawa, Y.; Ortiz, S.; Swenson, E.; Vallee, M.; et al. The long-acting C5 inhibitor, Ravulizumab, is effective and safe in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome naive to complement inhibitor treatment. Kidney Int. 2020, 97, 1287–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Howard, J.F., Jr.; Nowak, R.J.; Wolfe, G.I.; Freimer, M.L.; Vu, T.H.; Hinton, J.L.; Benatar, M.; Duda, P.W.; MacDougall, J.E.; Farzaneh-Far, R.; et al. Clinical Effects of the Self-administered Subcutaneous Complement Inhibitor Zilucoplan in Patients With Moderate to Severe Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Results of a Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Latuszek, A.; Liu, Y.; Olsen, O.; Foster, R.; Cao, M.; Lovric, I.; Yuan, M.; Liu, N.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Inhibition of complement pathway activation with Pozelimab, a fully human antibody to complement component C5. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jaffe, G.J.; Westby, K.; Csaky, K.G.; Mones, J.; Pearlman, J.A.; Patel, S.S.; Joondeph, B.C.; Randolph, J.; Masonson, H.; Rezaei, K.A. C5 Inhibitor Avacincaptad Pegol for Geographic Atrophy Due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Pivotal Phase 2/3 Trial. Ophthalmology 2020, 128, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Merkel, P.A.; Jayne, D.R.; Wang, C.; Hillson, J.; Bekker, P. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Avacopan, a C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2020, 9, e16664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. World Health Organization. International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INN): Proposed INN: List 121; No. 2; WHO Drug Inf.: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 33. [Google Scholar]
  114. Llaudo, I.; Fribourg, M.; Medof, M.E.; Conde, P.; Ochando, J.; Heeger, P.S. C5aR1 regulates migration of suppressive myeloid cells required for costimulatory blockade-induced murine allograft survival. Am. J. Transplant. 2019, 19, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ghouse, S.M.; Vadrevu, S.K.; Manne, S.; Reese, B.; Patel, J.; Patel, B.; Silwal, A.; Lodhi, N.; Paterson, Y.; Srivastava, S.K.; et al. Therapeutic Targeting of Vasculature in the Premetastatic and Metastatic Niches Reduces Lung Metastasis. J. Immunol. 2020, 204, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Woodruff, T.M.; Nandakumar, K.S.; Tedesco, F. Inhibiting the C5-C5a receptor axis. Mol. Immunol. 2011, 48, 1631–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Harris, C.L. Expanding horizons in complement drug discovery: Challenges and emerging strategies. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018, 40, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Ricklin, D.; Lambris, J.D. Complement-targeted therapeutics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1265–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Vignesh, P.; Rawat, A.; Singh, S. An Update on the Use of Immunomodulators in Primary Immunodeficiencies. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2017, 52, 287–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. McNamara, L.A.; Topaz, N.; Wang, X.; Hariri, S.; Fox, L.; MacNeil, J.R. High Risk for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Among Patients Receiving Eculizumab (Soliris) Despite Receipt of Meningococcal Vaccine. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2017, 66, 734–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Langereis, J.D.; van den Broek, B.; Franssen, S.; Joosten, I.; Blijlevens, N.M.A.; de Jonge, M.I.; Langemeijer, S. Eculizumab impairs Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B killing in whole blood despite 4CMenB vaccination of PNH patients. Blood Adv. 2020, 4, 3615–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Liu, H.; Kim, H.R.; Deepak, R.; Wang, L.; Chung, K.Y.; Fan, H.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, C. Orthosteric and allosteric action of the C5a receptor antagonists. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kumar, V.; Lee, J.D.; Clark, R.J.; Noakes, P.G.; Taylor, S.M.; Woodruff, T.M. Preclinical Pharmacokinetics of Complement C5a Receptor Antagonists PMX53 and PMX205 in Mice. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 2345–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Kohl, J. Drug evaluation: The C5a receptor antagonist PMX-53. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2006, 8, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. Dumitru, A.C.; Deepak, R.; Liu, H.; Koehler, M.; Zhang, C.; Fan, H.; Alsteens, D. Submolecular probing of the complement C5a receptor-ligand binding reveals a cooperative two-site binding mechanism. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Seow, V.; Lim, J.; Cotterell, A.J.; Yau, M.K.; Xu, W.; Lohman, R.J.; Kok, W.M.; Stoermer, M.J.; Sweet, M.J.; Reid, R.C.; et al. Receptor residence time trumps drug-likeness and oral bioavailability in determining efficacy of complement C5a antagonists. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Fredslund, F.; Laursen, N.S.; Roversi, P.; Jenner, L.; Oliveira, C.L.; Pedersen, J.S.; Nunn, M.A.; Lea, S.M.; Discipio, R.; Sottrup-Jensen, L.; et al. Structure of and influence of a tick complement inhibitor on human complement component 5. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Brandolini, L.; Grannonico, M.; Bianchini, G.; Colanardi, A.; Sebastiani, P.; Paladini, A.; Piroli, A.; Allegretti, M.; Varrassi, G.; Di Loreto, S. The Novel C5aR Antagonist DF3016A Protects Neurons Against Ischemic Neuroinflammatory Injury. Neurotox. Res. 2019, 36, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Harris, C.L.; Pouw, R.B.; Kavanagh, D.; Sun, R.; Ricklin, D. Developments in anti-complement therapy; from disease to clinical trial. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 102, 89–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. C5a complement activation pathways. The C5a complement system can be activated through three pathways: classical (CP), lectin (LP), and alternative (AP). CP begins with antibody-mediated activation of C1 complex, which leads to formation of the C4bC2a complex, the C3 convertase. This C3 convertase cleaves C3 to produce C3b, which forms a complex with C4b and C2a. This complex is the C5 convertase, which cleaves C5 to produce C5a and C5b. The LP begins with signal recognition by oligomeric structures of mannose- binding lectin (MBL), ficolins and collectins, which activate mannan-binding lectin serine proteases (MASP) 1 and 2, which in turn mediate the production of C4b. From this point, the LP follows the same steps as the CP. In the AP, C3 interacts with factor B (B) and factor D (D), leading to cleavage of further C3, and this process is perpetuated through an amplification loop. In the final step of this pathway, even properdin (P) is involved. Additional C3b binds to the C3 convertase and forms a C5 convertase, which cleaves C5 to form C5a and C5b. C5a activates on C5aR1, a prototypical G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) recruiting immune cells to the site of inflammation. Drugs targeting C5 or C5aR1 in different stage of development are reported in the gray rectangles. T-arrow indicates inhibition of pathway at point of intersection.
Figure 1. C5a complement activation pathways. The C5a complement system can be activated through three pathways: classical (CP), lectin (LP), and alternative (AP). CP begins with antibody-mediated activation of C1 complex, which leads to formation of the C4bC2a complex, the C3 convertase. This C3 convertase cleaves C3 to produce C3b, which forms a complex with C4b and C2a. This complex is the C5 convertase, which cleaves C5 to produce C5a and C5b. The LP begins with signal recognition by oligomeric structures of mannose- binding lectin (MBL), ficolins and collectins, which activate mannan-binding lectin serine proteases (MASP) 1 and 2, which in turn mediate the production of C4b. From this point, the LP follows the same steps as the CP. In the AP, C3 interacts with factor B (B) and factor D (D), leading to cleavage of further C3, and this process is perpetuated through an amplification loop. In the final step of this pathway, even properdin (P) is involved. Additional C3b binds to the C3 convertase and forms a C5 convertase, which cleaves C5 to form C5a and C5b. C5a activates on C5aR1, a prototypical G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) recruiting immune cells to the site of inflammation. Drugs targeting C5 or C5aR1 in different stage of development are reported in the gray rectangles. T-arrow indicates inhibition of pathway at point of intersection.
Biomedicines 09 00399 g001
Table 1. List of compounds under development targeting the complement system.
Table 1. List of compounds under development targeting the complement system.
DrugIndicationTrial Phase/Study TypeRecruitment StatusNCT Number
Eculizumab, C5-targeting antibodyPNHPhase 2/3Only recruiting
Trials are listed
NCT04079257
aHUS-associated multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipientsPhase 2NCT03518203
Refractory GMGPhase 3NCT03759366
COVID-19Phase 2NCT04346797
CHAPLE diseaseProspective CohortNCT03950804
PNHPhase 3NCT04432584
PNHPhase 3NCT03818607
PNHPhase 3NCT04434092
End Stage Liver DiseasePhase 1NCT03468140
PNHObservational StudyNCT01374360
aHUSObservational StudyNCT01522183
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorderPhase 2/3NCT04155424
ABP959, C5-targeting antibody (eculizumab biosimilar)PNHPhase 3RecruitingNCT03818607
SB12 C5-targeting antibody (eculizumab biosimilar)PNHPhase 3Active, not recruitingNCT04058158
BCD-148, C5-targeting antibody (eculizumab biosimilar)PNHPhase 3Active, not recruitingNCT04060264
Healthy subjectsPhase 1CompletedNCT04027803
Nomacopan, C5-targeting proteinPNH, aHUSPhase 3RecruitingNCT03829449
BPPhase 2CompletedNCT04035733
PNHPhase 3CompletedNCT03588026
PNHPhase 2Enrolling by invitationNCT03427060
PNHPhase 2CompletedNCT02591862
AKCPhase 1/2Active, not recruitingNCT04037891
Ravulizumab, C5-targeting antibodyCOVID-19, thrombotic microangiopathies acute kidney injuryPhase 3Only recruiting
Trials are listed
NCT04570397
Neuromyelitis optica Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorderPhase 3NCT04201262
TMAPhase 3NCT04557735
ALSPhase 3NCT04248465
COVID-19 severe pneumonia, acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome pneumonia, ViralPhase 3NCT04369469
TMA Phase 3NCT04543591
PNHPhase 3NCT03406507
COVID-19Phase 4NCT04390464
Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndromeObservational StudyNCT01522183
PNHObservational StudyNCT01374360
PNHPhase 3NCT04432584
Pozelimab, C5-targeting antibodyHealthy volunteerPhase 1Active, not recruitingNCT04491838
Healthy subjects (in combination with cemdisiran)Phase 1RecruitingNCT04601844
CHAPLEPhase 2/3RecruitingNCT04209634
Crovalimab, C5-targeting antibodyPNHPhase 3Not yet recruitingNCT04654468
PNHPhase 3RecruitingNCT04432584
PNHPhase 3RecruitingNCT04434092
PNHPhase 1/2Active, not recruitingNCT03157635
Cemdisiran, C5 targeting RNAi therapeuticIgAN, Berger disease, glomerulonephritisPhase 2RecruitingNCT03841448
HealthyPhase 1RecruitingNCT04601844
aHUSPhase 2WithdrawnNCT03303313
PNHPhase 1CompletedNCT02352493
TMAPhase2Not yet recruitingNCT03999840
IFX-1, C5a targeting antibodyPyoderma gangrenosumPhase 2RecruitingNCT03971643
Severe COVID-19 pneumoniaPhase 2/3RecruitingNCT04333420
GPA, MPAPhase 2Active, not recruitingNCT03712345
GPA, MPAPhase 2Active, not recruitingNCT03895801
HSPhase 2CompletedNCT03487276
HSPhase 2CompletedNCT03001622
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, C.surgical procedure, cardiacPhase 2CompletedNCT02866825
Severe sepsis, septic shockPhase 2CompletedNCT02246595
Drug SafetyPhase 1CompletedNCT01319903
BDB-001, C5a targeting antibodyCOVID-19 pneumoniaPhase 2/3RecruitingNCT04449588
Solid tumorPhase 1RecruitingNCT04196530
Solid tumorPhase 1RecruitingNCT03486301
Solid tumor, pancreatic cancer, virus associated tumors, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, bladdder cancer, triple negative breast cancerPhase 2Not yet recruitingNCT03915678
ALXN1007, C5a targeting antibodyAntiphospholipid (aPL)-positivePhase 2TerminatedNCT02128269
Acute (GVHD), GIGVHDPhase 2TerminatedNCT02245412
HealthyPhase 1CompletedNCT01883544
HealthyPhase 1CompletedNCT01454986
Zilucoplan, C5-targeting peptideGMGPhase 3RecruitingNCT04115293
ALSPhase 2/3Enrolling by invitationNCT04436497
ALSPhase 2/3RecruitingNCT04297683
GMGPhase 3RecruitingNCT04225871
COVID-19Phase 2Active, not recruitingNCT04382755
COVID-19Phase 3RecruitingNCT04590586
IMNMPhase 2RecruitingNCT04025632
PNHPhase 2Active, not recruitingNCT03225287
PNHPhase 2CompletedNCT03030183
PNHPhase 2CompletedNCT03078582
GMGPhase 2CompletedNCT03315130
Tesidolumab, C5-targeting proteinWet AMD, Exudative MDPhase 2CompletedNCT01535950
PNHPhase 2Active, not recruitingNCT02534909
Transplant associate microangiopathyPhase 2TerminatedNCT02763644
Kidney transplantationPhase 1CompletedNCT02878616
Geographic atrophy, AMDPhase 2CompletedNCT01527500
Advanced AMDPhase 1CompletedNCT01255462
Geographic atrophyPhase 1CompletedNCT02515942
Neovascular AMDPhase 2TerminatedNCT01624636
Non-infectious intermediate uveitis, non-infectious posterior uveitis, non-infectious panuveitisPhase 2CompletedNCT01526889
Avacopan, C5aR1-targeting small moleculeANCA-associated vasculitisPhase 3CompletedNCT02994927
ANCA-associated vasculitisPhase 2CompletedNCT02222155
VasculitisPhase 2CompletedNCT01363388
aHUSPhase 2TerminatedNCT02464891
IgANPhase 2CompletedNCT02384317
Hidradenitis, suppurativa acne inversaPhase 2Active, not recruitingNCT03852472
C3 GlomerulopathyPhase 3RecruitingNCT03301467
Avacincaptad, C5-targeting oligonucleotideGeographic atrophy secondary to AMDPhase 2/3CompletedNCT02686658
IPCVPhase 2CompletedNCT02397954
AMDPhase 2CompletedNCT03362190
IPCVPhase 2WithdrawnNCT03374670
Stargardt disease 1Phase 2RecruitingNCT03364153
Geographic atrophysecondary to MDPhase 3RecruitingNCT04435366
Avdoralimab, C5aR1-targeting antibodyBPPhase 2RecruitingNCT04563923
COVID-19, infection advanced and metastatic hematological or solid tumorPhase 2RecruitingNCT04333914
COVID-19Phase 2Active, not recruitingNCT04371367
Advanced solid tumorsPhase 1RecruitingNCT03665129
Abbreviations: NCT, national clinical trial; aHUS, atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; AKC, atopic keratoconjunctivitis; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; AMD, age-related macular degeneration; ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody; BP, Bullous pemphigoid; CHAPLE, complement hyperactivation, angiopathic thrombosis, protein losing enteropathy; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; GIGVHD, gastrointestinal graft versus host disease; GMG, generalized myasthenia gravis; GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis IgAN, IgA nephropathy; GVHD, graft versus host disease; HS, hidradenitis suppurativa; IMNM, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy; IPCV, idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; MD, macular degeneration; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis; PNH, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; TMA, complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giorgio, C.; Zippoli, M.; Cocchiaro, P.; Castelli, V.; Varrassi, G.; Aramini, A.; Allegretti, M.; Brandolini, L.; Cesta, M.C. Emerging Role of C5 Complement Pathway in Peripheral Neuropathies: Current Treatments and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040399

AMA Style

Giorgio C, Zippoli M, Cocchiaro P, Castelli V, Varrassi G, Aramini A, Allegretti M, Brandolini L, Cesta MC. Emerging Role of C5 Complement Pathway in Peripheral Neuropathies: Current Treatments and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(4):399. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giorgio, Cristina, Mara Zippoli, Pasquale Cocchiaro, Vanessa Castelli, Giustino Varrassi, Andrea Aramini, Marcello Allegretti, Laura Brandolini, and Maria Candida Cesta. 2021. "Emerging Role of C5 Complement Pathway in Peripheral Neuropathies: Current Treatments and Future Perspectives" Biomedicines 9, no. 4: 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop