Next Article in Journal
Analytical Techniques for the Characterization of Bioactive Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants
Next Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of CK2 Reduces NG2 Expression in Juvenile Angiofibroma
Previous Article in Journal
Towards Personalized Antioxidant Use in Female Infertility: Need for More Molecular and Clinical Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
CK2 Regulation: Perspectives in 2021
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/biomedicines9121932
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Immune Regulatory Role of Protein Kinase CK2 and Its Implications for Treatment of Cancer

by
Huixian Hong
and
Etty N. Benveniste
*
Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(12), 1932; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121932
Submission received: 25 October 2021 / Revised: 15 December 2021 / Accepted: 16 December 2021 / Published: 17 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CK2 Regulation of Cell Death and Targeting in Cancer Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Protein Kinase CK2, a constitutively active serine/threonine kinase, fulfills its functions via phosphorylating hundreds of proteins in nearly all cells. It regulates a variety of cellular signaling pathways and contributes to cell survival, proliferation and inflammation. CK2 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hematologic and solid cancers. Recent data have documented that CK2 has unique functions in both innate and adaptive immune cells. In this article, we review aspects of CK2 biology, functions of the major innate and adaptive immune cells, and how CK2 regulates the function of immune cells. Finally, we provide perspectives on how CK2 effects in immune cells, particularly T-cells, may impact the treatment of cancers via targeting CK2.

1. Introduction

The notion that CK2 is implicated in the pathogenesis of a plethora of diseases is well-established [1]. First discovered by George Burnett and Eugene P. Kennedy more than 6 decades ago [2], the field of CK2 biology has exploded with studies investigating phosphorylation targets of CK2, the cellular biology of CK2, and the important roles of CK2 in normal biological processes and disease pathogenesis. The importance of CK2 in tumorigenesis has been revealed in solid and hematologic tumors [3]. CK2 is consistently highly expressed in cancer cells and its anti-apoptotic, pro-migration and pro-proliferation functions contribute to the development of various types of cancers [4]. Recent studies on the involvement of CK2 in cells of the immune system indicates that CK2 plays a critical role not only in normal physiological functions of innate and adaptive immune cells, but also immune cells in aberrant pathological conditions [5]. There is increasing interest in using CK2 inhibitors for the treatment of various cancers. In this regard, an appreciation of how CK2 regulates the function of immune cells that are important for mounting immune responses against cancers needs to be considered to understand the implications of treatment strategies such as CK2 inhibition.

2. Protein Kinase CK2

2.1. CK2 Structure and Function

CK2 is usually a tetrameric kinase consisting of two catalytic (CK2α and/or CK2α′) and two regulatory (CK2β) subunits [6]. The catalytic subunits, CK2α and CK2α′, are encoded by CSNK2A1 and CSNK2A2 genes, respectively, while the regulatory subunit is encoded by the CSNK2B gene. CK2α and CK2α′ share 90% similarity within their catalytic domains [7]. There is only one form of CK2β characterized thus far, which is quite conserved among species [8,9,10]. The structural backbone of the tetrameric CK2 holoenzyme is a combination of two catalytic subunits (αα′, α′α′ or αα) and a dimer of two regulatory β subunits [6]. The β subunit is unstable and can dissociate from the tetrameric holoenzyme under physiological conditions [6]. CK2β plays a role in maintaining the stability of the tetramer, specificity towards target substrates and the ability of the CK2 tetramer to transit through cell membranes [11,12].
CK2 is constitutively active and can phosphorylate either serine/threonine or tyrosine residues, and the number of its target substrates are more than five hundred [1,11]. The phosphorylation function of CK2 occurs via recognizing its consensus sequence (S-X-X-E/D/Yp/Sp) [13,14]. CK2 is essential for embryonic development as mice with deletion of CK2α or CK2β are not viable [15,16,17]. CK2 is involved in a variety of physiological and pathological cellular processes and signaling pathways. These include transcription, translation, cell cycle progression, cell growth, cell survival, cell proliferation, cell morphology changes, protein stability and degradation, tumor progression and suppression and angiogenesis [18,19]. In addition, CK2 is implicated in the pathogenesis of neoplastic disorders, inflammatory diseases, autoimmune and infectious disorders [1,5].

2.2. Signaling Pathways Regulated by CK2

CK2 regulates a number of signaling pathways involved in immune cell development and function, including (1) the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K)/AKT/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway; (2) the Nuclear Factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway; and (3) the Janus Kinase (JAK)/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT) pathway [1].
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is essential for cell growth, survival, proliferation, metabolism, angiogenesis and cancer metastasis [20,21]. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is activated by binding of growth factors to receptors on the cell surface, which results in the phosphorylation of PI3K and activation of downstream molecules AKT and mTOR. mTOR then translocates into the nucleus and regulates target gene transcription [22]. Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog deleted on Chromosome 10 (PTEN) functions as a negative regulator to inhibit PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling [23] (Figure 1A). CK2 is involved in activating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in several ways. CK2α and CK2β subunits physically interact with AKT, which results in enhanced activity of AKT [24]. Di Maira et al., demonstrated that CK2 can directly phosphorylate AKT at Ser129 which results in AKT activation [25,26]. Another critical role of CK2 in modulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is via regulating the activity of PTEN [11]. CK2 phosphorylates Ser370, Thr366 and Ser385 of the PTEN carboxy-terninus, which causes degradation of PTEN and suppresses PTEN phosphatase activity [27,28,29], thus promoting activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling. In addition, mTOR is a direct target of CK2 in human glioblastoma cells, and inhibition of CK2 by siRNA results in subsequent autophagic cell death [30]. Zheng et al., demonstrated that inhibition of CK2 using the inhibitor CX-4945 suppressed AKT activation and diminished adhesion and migration of human glioblastoma cells [31].
The NF-κB signaling pathway is activated by variety of stimuli, i.e., cytokines and growth factors binding their cell surface receptors [32]. The IκB kinase (IKK) complex triggers the phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of IκBα, resulting in the translocation of NF-κB transcription factors (p65 and p50) into the nucleus and subsequent gene transcription [32]. The NF-κB signaling pathway is indispensable for inflammatory responses and plays a critical role in the development and progression of cancers, both solid cancers and hematologic malignancies [33]. In addition, NF-κB signaling is important for the survival, activation, and differentiation of innate and adaptive immune cells, and deregulation of the NF-κB pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases [32]. CK2α promotes the phosphorylation of IκBα, an NF-κB inhibitor [1,34], which causes the degradation of IκBα, resulting in the release of p65 and/or p50 and translocation into the nucleus [1]. Moreover, CK2 directly phosphorylates the NF-κB p65 subunit on Ser529, which enhances its transcriptional activity [1,35] (Figure 1B).
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is essential for incorporating signals from cell surface receptors to the nucleus [36]. JAKs are tyrosine kinases which bind to the cytoplasmic domains of many cytokine/growth factor receptors [36]. When cytokines and growth factors bind to and activate their receptors, JAKs phosphorylate each other and phosphorylate tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmatic domain of the receptor. STAT transcription factors are then recruited to the receptor complex, phosphorylated by JAKs, form dimers, translocate into the nucleus and initiate gene transcription [37,38]. The initiation, duration and termination of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway are regulated by Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) proteins, which function in a negative feedback loop to suppress the JAK/STAT pathway [36] (Figure 1C). JAK/STAT signaling is involved in various cellular events, i.e., development of the immune system [39], cell survival, cell proliferation and angiogenesis [1,40]. CK2 has been shown to be involved in regulating the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Inhibition of CK2 using CX-4945 resulted in decreased phospho-STAT3 levels in multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma cells as well as suppression of STAT3 target genes (Cyclin D1, IL-6) [41]. Zheng et al., demonstrated that inhibition of CK2 by small interfering RNAs or the CK2 inhibitor TBB inhibited STAT3, STAT1, STAT5, and JAK2 phosphorylation/activation as well as expression of the SOCS3 gene [42]. Furthermore, JAK2 is a substrate for CK2 as CK2 directly phosphorylates human JAK2 at sites T308, T310, and T817 [42]. Another study demonstrated that CK2 is essential for the activation of STAT3 which contributes to the survival of glioblastoma cells [31]. Taken together, CK2 is a critical activator of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.

2.3. CK2 Inhibitors

Currently available CK2 inhibitors can be divided into ATP-competitive CK2 inhibitors, allosteric compounds and bi-functional inhibitors based on their mechanisms of action [1].
The development of ATP-competitive CK2 inhibitors is based on the feature that the ATP pocket of CK2 is very small and narrow which makes it easy to make a stable interaction with small compounds [43,44]. The most representative of ATP-competitive CK2 inhibitors are CX-4945 [(5-(3-chlorophenyl)amino)-benzo(c)-2,6-naphthyridine-8-carboxylic acid)] and CIGB-300, which are in clinical trials for cancer therapy [1]. ATP-competitive CK2 inhibitors also include TBB (4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H- benzotriazole), DMAT (2-dimethylamino-4,5,6,7-tetrabromo- 1H-benzimidazole), Apigenin (4′,5,7,-trihydroxyflavone) and Emodin (1,3,8-trihydroxy-6-methyl-antraquinone), although these have some off-target effects. Table 1 lists commonly used ATP-competitive CK2 inhibitors and their clinical trial status, if applicable.
Allosteric compounds, i.e., BPN14770 [45], act at the interface between α and β subunits and disrupt their normal functions, however, the exact mechanism of this inhibitor is still unclear [1,46,47]. Bi-functional inhibitors suppress CK2 by competing for both the phosphate donor nucleotide and the phosphate acceptor peptide [1,48,49].
Table
Table 1. Commonly Used ATP-competitive CK2 Inhibitors.
Table 1. Commonly Used ATP-competitive CK2 Inhibitors.
CompoundClinical TrialsReferences
CX-4945Phase I/II for basal cell carcinoma and medulloblastoma[1,44]
CIGB-300Phase I/II for cervical cancer[1,44,50]
TBB N/A[44]
DMATN/A[44]
ApigeninN/A[44]
EmodinN/A[44]
N/A: Not Applicable.

3. Role of the Immune System in Health and Disease

The mammalian immune system protects the host from pathogenic microbes via effector mechanisms to eliminate invading microbes, while at the same time avoiding the destruction of self-tissues [51]. The immune system is broadly classified into innate and adaptive immune systems [52]. The main immune cells of the innate immune system are neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells (DC) [53,54], while the main immune cell types in the adaptive immune system are T-cells and B-cells [51] (Figure 2).

3.1. Innate Immune Cells

3.1.1. Neutrophils

As primary responders during infection and inflammation [55,56], neutrophils are the most abundant of circulating innate immune cells and are essential for defense against invading microorganisms [57]. Neutrophils execute their anti-infectious functions via the activation of specific receptors, migration into tissues, pathogen sensing, and ultimate killing of pathogens [56]. In addition, neutrophils phagocytose bacteria and other microorganisms and subsequently kill them via the production of reactive oxygen species [58]. Neutrophils also regulate the function of other immune cells by the production of pro- inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as IL-1b, TNF-a, IL-6, CXCL2 and CCL2 [59]. Thus, neutrophils play an essential role in regulating inflammatory and immune responses.

3.1.2. Monocytes and Macrophages

Monocytes are a type of mononuclear phagocyte that mainly resides in the circulation [60]. Monocytes develop in the bone marrow from hematological precursors [61]. Circulating monocytes have many functions, including pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory, antigen presentation and tissue remodeling and are essential innate cells in pathological conditions, i.e., inflammation [61]. Macrophages are generated and differentiated from circulating monocytes upon entry into inflamed tissues [62]. Macrophages have both detrimental and protective functions that are ascribed to polarization to different phenotypes based on the cytokine microenvironment, broadly termed pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) [63]. In vitro, macrophages can be polarized to the pro-inflammatory phenotype by IFN-γ and GM-CSF, express high levels of MHC Class II, IL-12, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α IL-23, CXCL10, CCL2 and iNOS, and participate in the induction of pathogenic responses [64,65,66]. Stimulation with IL-4, IL-13 and M-CSF in vitro induces anti-inflammatory macrophages, which express mannose receptors (CD206), Arginase 1, and high levels of IL-10 and TGF-β [67,68]. Pro-inflammatory macrophages have pathogen killing functions, promote tissue injury and have anti-tumorigenic properties, while anti-inflammatory macrophages promote clearance of apoptotic cells, are involved in wound healing, and promote tumor progression and metastasis [67,69,70]. These anti-inflammatory macrophages in the tumor setting are referred to as tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) [70].

3.1.3. Dendritic Cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are a subset of monocyte-derived immune cells with diverse plasticity, which differentiate from circulating monocytes once they enter tissues [71]. DCs are professional antigen presenting cells and play an essential part in initiating and regulating innate and adaptive immune responses [71]. Their primary function is to integrate biological signals from injured tissues and capture, process, and present antigen from injured sites to naïve T-cells within secondary lymphoid organs [72,73]. A new classification system divides DCs into conventional DCs, plasmacytoid DCs, monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs) and Langerhans cells, based on the ontogeny of the cells [72].

3.2. Adaptive Immune Cells

3.2.1. T-Cells

T-cells are the central effector cells in adaptive immune responses, including CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cells [74]. CD4+ T-cells, also called CD4+ helper T-cells, recognize exogenous antigen via MHC class II molecules [75]. Based on the transcription factors and cytokines expressed, CD4+ T-cells are divided into different subsets: T helper 1 (Th1), Th2, Th17 and T Regulatory (Tregs) (Figure 3). The key transcription factors and signature cytokines of each CD4+ T-cell subset are as follows: Th1: T-bet, IFN-γ; Th2: GATA3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13; Th17: RORγt, IL-17, IL-22; and Treg: Foxp3, IL-10 [76,77]. Th1 cells are essential for host defense against intracellular pathogens and contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases [78]. Th2 cells function to fight against parasite infections and also are critical in the development of allergy and asthma. Th17 cells are involved in autoimmunity as well as host defense against extracellular bacteria and fungi [76]. Tregs maintain immune tolerance, have immunosuppressive functions, and in the context of cancer, Tregs suppress anti-tumor immune responses [77].

3.2.2. B-Cells

B-cells are responsible for humoral immune responses [79]. In addition to antibody formation, B-cell functions also include: antigen presentation [80], regulation of T-cell differentiation and survival [81], and production of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines [82]. B-cells are generated from hematopoietic precursor cells within the bone marrow. Once development is complete, B-cells circulate into the periphery and enter secondary lymphoid organs, i.e., spleen, lymph nodes, tonsils, Peyer’s patches, and mucosal tissues [83]. Naïve B-cells are categorized into B-1 B-cells, follicular (FO) B-cells, and marginal zone (MZ) B-cells, based on their location, migration potential, and activation fashion [84] (Figure 4). Dysfunction of B-cells contributes to autoimmunity and immunological disorders [85].

4. CK2 Regulates Immune Cell Function

4.1. Innate Immunity

4.1.1. CK2 Function in Neutrophils, Monocytes and Macrophages

The role of CK2 in regulating the function of innate immune cells is not well understood. To address this, the Lenz group generated a conditional deletion model (Csnk2 floxed Lyz2-Cre mice), in which the catalytic CK2α subunit was deleted in myeloid cells (neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages) [86]. First, this study revealed that CK2α does not affect the development of myeloid cells, as determined by evaluating the numbers of F4/80+ macrophages, Ly6C+ monocytes and neutrophils. Next, they investigated the impact of CK2α deficiency with respect to response to pathogens, utilizing systemic Listeria monocytogenes infection. It was demonstrated that the recruitment and anti-bacterial activity of myeloid cells was enhanced in the absence of CK2α, resulting in reduced bacterial burden. This was associated with an increased accumulation of neutrophils, macrophages and monocytes early after Listeria monocytogenes infection. The impact of CK2α on the activation and bactericidal potential of myeloid cells was then assessed. Class II MHC expression was enhanced in the absence of CK2α, as was phagosome maturation. These two functional changes may account for the improved bactericidal function of myeloid cells lacking CK2α. The authors were not able to precisely elucidate how CK2α influences these functions, other than to suggest that CK2α blunts early myeloid cell activation and accumulation at sites of infection. This study demonstrated that expression of CK2α in myeloid cells was detrimental to the host in the setting of systemic Listeria monocytogenes infection, suggesting that targeting CK2 may be beneficial in the context of pathogenic infections [86].
The study described above is the only one to examine the role of CK2α in myeloid cells by conditional deletion in vivo. Other studies have examined various functions of CK2 utilizing in vitro experiments. IL-1β is a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in many pathological conditions [87]. Cells of the macrophage/monocyte lineage are the major sources of IL-1β in vivo. The Nikolajczyk group demonstrated that CK2 is critically involved in transcription of the IL-1β gene in monocytes in response to a variety of stimuli [88,89]. The IL-1β promoter is packaged into a non-transcribed “poised” configuration in the absence of any stimulation, which includes the association of two transcription factors, PU.1 and C/EBPβ. Upon LPS stimulation, a third transcription factor, IRF-4, is recruited to the promoter, allowing for transcription of the IL-1β promoter and subsequent IL-1β expression [88]. Importantly, the phosphorylation of PU.1 at serine 148 by CK2 is indispensable for the recruitment of IRF-4 to the IL-1β promoter in monocytes, and CK2 itself associates with the IL-1β promoter upon cell stimulation [88]. Inclusion of CK2 inhibitors such as apigenin or emodin abrogated IL-1β induction, demonstrating a critical role for CK2 in driving IL-1β expression in monocytes. In another study, Jung et al., demonstrated that diosgenin, a precursor of steroid hormones, inhibited CK2α expression in the nucleus of LPS/IFN-γ treated murine peritoneal macrophages and inhibited LPS/IFN-γ induction of a number of pro-inflammatory mediators including iNOS, ROS, IL-1 and IL-6 [90]. Diosgenin inhibited CK2 activation as well as JNK, NF-κB and AP-1 activation, and the authors speculate that inhibition of these kinases and transcription factors contributed to decreased production of pro-inflammatory mediators by macrophages [90]. Collectively, these two in vitro studies indicate that CK2 activation in monocytes/macrophages in response to cell stimulation leads to the induction of pro-inflammatory responses.
A study by Hashimoto et al., examined the impact of CK2 on modulating myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment [91]. Utilizing BMS-211, a prodrug of the parent pan-CK2 inhibitor BMS-699, they demonstrated potent anti-tumor effects in combination with immunotherapy in a number of pre-clinical tumors models. The beneficial effect of CK2 inhibition was not the result of direct tumor toxicity, rather, due to effects on myeloid cells, especially TAMs and polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC). CK2 inhibition resulted in a decrease of TAMs and PMN-MDSC with tumor-promoting properties in the tumor microenvironment, in part by interfering with myeloid cell differentiation. This study concludes that targeting CK2 may be a valuable addition to immune-based therapeutics in the treatment of cancer.

4.1.2. CK2 Function in Dendritic Cells (DCs)

Findings from de Bourayne et al., highlight the role of CK2 in regulating human MoDCs in response to chemicals involved in the pathogenesis of allergic contact dermatitis [92]. This study demonstrated that CK2 kinase activity is essential for the maturation of MoDCs in response to allergic contact dermatitis related chemicals as assessed by the expression of surface markers including CD86, CD83, CD40, PD-L1 and MHC Class II. This response was abrogated by the inclusion of the CK2 inhibitor CX-4945. In addition, CK2 drives the production of numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines by MoDCs in response to allergic contact dermatitis related chemicals, including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, CCL4 and CXCL8. Co-incubation of DCs with CD4+ T-cells induces their activation and polarization to the Th1 phenotype, which is also inhibited by the inclusion of CX-4945 [92]. Reverendo et al., recently elucidated a critical role of CK2 in regulating the immune-stimulatory functions of DCs [93]. They demonstrated that CK2 phosphorylation of MAF1 homolog negative regulator of Poll III (MAF1), and its subsequent exit from the nucleus, contributed to a strong elevation of RNA polymerase III, which then promoted the translation of DC mRNAs coding for a number of co-stimulatory molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines. These activities are essential for DC functionality, especially as related to naïve T-cell priming [93]. These two studies highlight the importance of CK2 in DC functionality by regulating aspect of important inflammatory processes.

4.2. Adaptive Immunity

4.2.1. CK2 Function in CD4+ T-Cells

The most detailed information on CK2 in the context of the immune system comes from work examining its influence on CD4+ T-cells. CD5 is a transmembrane receptor that regulates a number of T-cell functions [94]. There is a signaling domain within the cytoplasmic tail of CD5 which is a CK2 binding/activation domain (CD5-CK2BD). The Raman group demonstrated that disruption of CD5-CK2 signaling diminished the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a pre-clinical model of Multiple Sclerosis, which is T-cell dependent [95]. This was due to a decreased frequency of pathogenic CD4+ T-cells expressing both IFN-γ and IL-17 [95]. Subsequently, the Raman group generated a knock-in mouse that expressed a CD5 protein containing a microdeletion with selective inability to interact with CK2 [96]. Intact CD5-CK2 signaling was critical for the development of CD4+ Th2 and Th17 cells, but not CD4+ Th1 cells, by regulating the threshold for T-cell responsiveness [96]. These studies demonstrated the essential role of the CD5-CK2 pathway in regulating the development and differentiation of CD4+ T-cells.
The direct involvement of CK2 in CD4+ T-cells was first demonstrated by Ulges el. al., in 2015. They generated a murine model in which the regulatory subunit CK2β was specifically deleted in CD4+ Treg cells [97]. This study revealed that CK2β was required for a specific population of Tregs to suppress CD4+ Th2-cell mediated allergic immune responses in the lung [97]. In subsequent studies, Ulges et al., as well as the Benveniste group explored the effect of CK2 in regulating the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T-cells into different functional subsets. First, the levels of CK2 subunits and kinase activity were examined. Naïve CD4+ T-cells constitutively express very low levels of CK2α, CK2α′ and CK2β, however, expression was induced upon T-cell stimulation [98]. Furthermore, CK2 kinase activity was also induced upon T-cell stimulation [98]. As mentioned previously, Th17 cells in general are pro-inflammatory, while Tregs exhibit immunosuppressive functions [77]. Both groups found that inhibition of CK2 kinase activity in CD4+ T-cells using CX-4945 promoted the differentiation of Treg cells at the expense of Th17 cells [98,99], in part by suppression of PI3K/Akt/mTOR activation and STAT3 phosphorylation [98]. These findings indicate that CK2 promotes Th17 cell differentiation while suppressing the generation of Treg cells, thus skewing CD4+ T-cells to have pro-inflammatory functions. In addition, both groups found that systemic inhibition of CK2 using CX-4945 ameliorated the severity of EAE due to the suppression of pathogenic Th17 cells and expansion of Treg cells [98,99]; Figure 3.
To elucidate the role of CK2 in the EAE model, genetic approaches were utilized. Ulges et al., demonstrated that deletion of CK2β specifically in CD4+ T-cells resulted in significant protection in the EAE model, which was associated with suppression of Th17 cells and promotion of Treg cells in vivo [99]. Gibson et al., generated a mouse model in which CK2α was specifically deleted in CD4+ T-cells [98,100]. The severity of EAE was significantly decreased in mice lacking CK2α in CD4+ T-cells, and this was associated with a significant defect in Th17 cell polarization and a reciprocal increase in Tregs in vivo [98,100]. These in vivo genetic models indicate that both subunits of CK2, CK2α and CK2β, are involved in promoting Th17 cell differentiation and suppressing Tregs, leading to autoimmune neuroinflammation; Figure 3.
To further explore the influence of CK2α in a different inflammatory disease setting, Yang et al., utilized a T-cell induced colitis model, which serves as a pre-clinical model for Crohn’s Disease (CD) [101]. Results from this study demonstrated that the absence of CK2α in CD4+ T-cells resulted in significantly less colitis disease severity and intestinal inflammation, which was associated with decreased Th17 cells producing IL-17A, Th1 cells producing IFN-γ and double positive IL-17A, IFN-γ producing CD4+ T-cells in the spleen and colon. CK2α was shown to be essential for the phosphorylation of STAT4 in CD4+ T-cells upon T-cell activation and control expression of the IL-12 receptor, thus regulating IL-12/STAT4 pathway activation and promoting Th1 cell differentiation [101]. In addition, CK2α was shown to be important in controlling CD4+ T-cell responses by regulating NFAT2, which is vital for T-cell activation and proliferation. These findings indicate that CK2α contributes to the pathogenesis of colitis by promoting CD4+ T-cell proliferation and Th1 and Th17 cell responses (Figure 3), and that targeting CK2 may be a novel therapeutic treatment for patients with CD.

4.2.2. CK2 Function in B-Cells

The effect of CK2 on normal B-cell function has not been studied until recently, when Wei et al., generated mice lacking CK2α specifically in B-cells (using CD19-driven Cre recombinase) [102]. First, Wei et al., reported that CK2 subunit expression and kinase activity in naïve B-cells was very low, and inducible upon different stimulation conditions suggesting the involvement of CK2 in B-cell functions. In vivo, CK2α deficiency in B-cells resulted in an expansion of MZ B-cells and a reduction of transitional B-cells in murine spleen. CK2α promotes transitional B-cell development into MZ B-cells in spleen through regulating the magnitude of B-cell receptor (BCR) and Notch2 signaling. As such, in the absence of CK2α, reduced BCR signaling and elevated Notch2 signaling activation increased MZ B-cell differentiation. This study identifies the involvement of CK2α in normal B-cell development and differentiation, which may have implications for B-cell dysfunction in settings of cancer or inflammatory diseases.

5. Perspectives on the Use of CK2 Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy

It is well documented that CK2 expression is substantially enhanced in many solid tumors compared to normal tissues or cells, and this is also the case for hematologic tumors, including leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma [103]. For the most part, expression of CK2 subunits is elevated, there is prominent nuclear localization of CK2 subunits, and CK2 kinase activity is enhanced [104,105,106,107,108]. This results in activation of oncogenic signaling pathways that are regulated by CK2, leading to many of the classical hallmarks of cancer, including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis, and resistance to cell death [109]. As such, there is much interest in targeting CK2 as a multi-therapeutic approach in both hematologic and solid tumors. Beneficial effects of various CK2 inhibitors have been observed in in vitro experiments, including suppressing proliferation and promoting apoptosis of transformed cells [110,111,112].
Another hallmark of cancer is the ability of cancer cells to evade the immune system [113]. Both innate and adaptive immune cells are found in the tumor microenvironment, and depending on their phenotype, can have anti-tumorigenic properties or suppress anti-tumor immune responses [114]. In this regard, a cautionary note on the use of CK2 inhibitors is raised given the role of CK2 on cells of the immune system. One example is the effect of CK2 inhibition in cells of the innate immune system. Inhibition of CK2 combined with immunotherapy in pre-clinical cancer models has a beneficial effect by affecting myeloid cells (PMN-MDSC and TAMs) in a manner that has an indirect anti-tumor effect [91]. In this case, CK2 inhibition would be viewed as favorable. However, inhibition of CK2 in DCs appears to suppress some of the immune-stimulatory functions of DCs that are anti-tumorigenic (proinflammatory cytokine production, T-cell polarization) [92,93]. Innate immune cells play important roles in the context of the tumor microenvironment with respect to inhibiting tumor growth [70,115], and CK2 has differential effects on these anti-tumorigenic properties that must be taken into consideration regarding CK2 inhibition. Another example is CK2 regulation of the CD4+ Th17/Treg axis. CK2α and CK2β promote the differentiation and function of Th17 cells at the expense of Tregs, which is associated with autoimmunity [98,100]. As such, CK2 inhibition in the autoimmune setting inhibits the differentiation of pathogenic Th17 cells and promotes the expansion of immunosuppressive Tregs, which is beneficial given the critical role of Tregs in self-tolerance [98,99,100]. However, Tregs suppress anti-tumor immune responses, promote tumor cell growth and enhance cell survival, and infiltration of large numbers of Tregs into tumor tissues is often associated with poor prognosis [116]. Systemic CK2 inhibition may have a beneficial effect on tumor cells themselves, but can promote the differentiation of Tregs, thereby having a deleterious influence in the setting of cancers. Another example of potential differential effects of CK2 on immune cells and cancer cells involves the Ikaros/CK2 axis. Ikaros, a transcription factor, represses expression of the BCL2L1 gene, which encodes the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-XL, in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). CK2, via phosphorylation of Ikaros, impairs this function of Ikaros, leading in part to resistance to doxorubicin treatment [117]. Inhibition of CK2 restores Ikaros-mediated repression of BCL2L1 and enhances sensitivity of B-ALL cells to doxorubicin, demonstrating a beneficial effect of CK2 inhibition in this setting. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that in T-cells, Ikaros functions as a negative regulator of the cytokines GM-CSF and IFN-γ, thereby suppressing the development of pro-inflammatory CD4+ T-cells [118]. Given our findings of CK2 kinase activity in CD4+ T-cells [98,100], it will be of interest to study how CK2 affects the functionality of Ikaros in T-cells, how this may affect the polarization and function of these cells to have anti-or-pro-tumorigenic activity, and the consequences of CK2 inhibition. These studies provide more evidence on the complexity of the regulatory role of CK2 in normal immune cells and cancer therapy. In clinical trials utilizing CK2 inhibitors, it will be important to monitor the effect on immune cells in the tumor microenvironment to assess overall efficacy. Clearly, the biologic functions of CK2 are complex, and a deeper understanding of its function in immune and cancer cells will aid in establishing the effective use of CK2 inhibitors in solid and hematologic tumors.

Author Contributions

H.H. and E.N.B. developed the concept of this review and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grant CA194414 to E.N.B.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

B-ALLB-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
CX-4945(5-(3-chlorophenyl)amino)-benzo(c)-2,6-naphthyridine-8-carboxylic acid)
CDCrohn’s Disease
DMAT2-dimethylamino-4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H-benzimidazole
DCsDendritic Cells
FOFollicular
IL-1βInterleukin-1β
IKKIκB Kinase
JAKJanus Kinase
MoDCsMonocyte-derived DCs
MZMarginal Zone
mTORMammalian Target of Rapamycin
NF-κBNuclear Factor-κB
PI3KPhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase
PTPsProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases
PTENPhosphatase and Tensin Homolog deleted on Chromosome 10
STATSignal Transducers and Activators of Transcription
SOCSSuppressors of Cytokine Signaling
TBB4,5,6,7-tetrabromo-1H-benzotriazole
Th1T helper 1
Th17T helper 17
TregsT Regulatory Cells
TAMsTumor Associated Macrophages

References

  1. Borgo, C.; D’Amore, C.; Sarno, S.; Salvi, M.; Ruzzene, M. Protein kinase CK2: A potential therapeutic target for diverse human diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Burnett, G.; Kennedy, E.P. The enzymatic phosphorylation of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1954, 211, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Husain, K.; Williamson, T.T.; Nelson, N.; Ghansah, T. Protein kinase 2 (CK2): A potential regulator of immune cell development and function in cancer. Immunol. Med. 2021, 44, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Borgo, C.; Ruzzene, M. Role of protein kinase CK2 in antitumor drug resistance. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gibson, S.A.; Benveniste, E.N. Protein kinase CK2: An emerging regulator of immunity. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pinna, L.A. Protein kinase CK2: A challenge to canons. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 3873–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lozeman, F.J.; Litchfield, D.W.; Piening, C.; Takio, K.; Walsh, K.A.; Krebs, E.G. Isolation and characterization of human cDNA clones encoding the alpha and the alpha’ subunits of casein kinase II. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 8436–8447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Allende, J.E.; Allende, C.C. Protein kinases. 4. Protein kinase CK2: An enzyme with multiple substrates and a puzzling regulation. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Litchfield, D.W.; Luscher, B. Casein kinase II in signal transduction and cell cycle regulation. Mol. Cell Biochem. 1993, 127–128, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bibby, A.C.; Litchfield, D.W. The multiple personalities of the regulatory subunit of protein kinase CK2: CK2 dependent and CK2 independent roles reveal a secret identity for CK2β. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2005, 1, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gotz, C.; Montenarh, M. Protein kinase CK2 in development and differentiation. Biomed. Rep. 2017, 6, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rodriguez, F.A.; Contreras, C.; Bolanos-Garcia, V.; Allende, J.E. Protein kinase CK2 as an ectokinase: The role of the regulatory CK2β subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5693–5698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Meggio, F.; Pinna, L.A. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB J. 2003, 17, 349–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marin, O.; Meggio, F.; Draetta, G.; Pinna, L.A. The consensus sequences for cdc2 kinase and for casein kinase-2 are mutually incompatible. A study with peptides derived from the β-subunit of casein kinase-2. FEBS Lett. 1992, 301, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lou, D.Y.; Dominguez, I.; Toselli, P.; Landesman-Bollag, E.; O’Brien, C.; Seldin, D.C. The alpha catalytic subunit of protein kinase CK2 is required for mouse embryonic development. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 28, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Dominguez, I.; Degano, I.R.; Chea, K.; Cha, J.; Toselli, P.; Seldin, D.C. CK2α is essential for embryonic morphogenesis. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2011, 356, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Buchou, T.; Vernet, M.; Blond, O.; Jensen, H.H.; Pointu, H.; Olsen, B.B.; Cochet, C.; Issinger, O.G.; Boldyreff, B. Disruption of the regulatory β subunit of protein kinase CK2 in mice leads to a cell-autonomous defect and early embryonic lethality. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23, 908–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Nunez de Villavicencio-Diaz, T.; Rabalski, A.J.; Litchfield, D.W. Protein kinase CK2: Intricate relationships within regulatory cellular networks. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chua, M.M.; Ortega, C.E.; Sheikh, A.; Lee, M.; Abdul-Rassoul, H.; Hartshorn, K.L.; Dominguez, I. CK2 in cancer: Cellular and biochemical mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ersahin, T.; Tuncbag, N.; Cetin-Atalay, R. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR interactive pathway. Mol. Biosyst. 2015, 11, 1946–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Porta, C.; Paglino, C.; Mosca, A. Targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in cancer. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. LoRusso, P.M. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 3803–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, R.; Chen, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, C.; Song, Y.; Cao, Z.; Li, W.; Hu, J.; Lu, C.; Liu, Y. PI3K/AKT pathway as a key link modulates the multidrug resistance of cancers. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guerra, B. Protein kinase CK2 subunits are positive regulators of AKT kinase. Int. J. Oncol. 2006, 28, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Di Maira, G.; Salvi, M.; Arrigoni, G.; Marin, O.; Sarno, S.; Brustolon, F.; Pinna, L.A.; Ruzzene, M. Protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates and upregulates Akt/PKB. Cell Death Differ. 2005, 12, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Di Maira, G.; Brustolon, F.; Pinna, L.A.; Ruzzene, M. Dephosphorylation and inactivation of Akt/PKB is counteracted by protein kinase CK2 in HEK 293T cells. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 3363–3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Torres, J.; Pulido, R. The tumor suppressor PTEN is phosphorylated by the protein kinase CK2 at its C terminus. Implications for PTEN stability to proteasome-mediated degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Miller, S.J.; Lou, D.Y.; Seldin, D.C.; Lane, W.S.; Neel, B.G. Direct identification of PTEN phosphorylation sites. FEBS Lett. 2002, 528, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vazquez, F.; Grossman, S.R.; Takahashi, Y.; Rokas, M.V.; Nakamura, N.; Sellers, W.R. Phosphorylation of the PTEN tail acts as an inhibitory switch by preventing its recruitment into a protein complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 48627–48630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Olsen, B.B.; Svenstrup, T.H.; Guerra, B. Downregulation of protein kinase CK2 induces autophagic cell death through modulation of the mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways in human glioblastoma cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 41, 1967–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zheng, Y.; McFarland, B.C.; Drygin, D.; Yu, H.; Bellis, S.L.; Kim, H.; Bredel, M.; Benveniste, E.N. Targeting protein kinase CK2 suppresses prosurvival signaling pathways and growth of glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 6484–6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.C. NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Taniguchi, K.; Karin, M. NF-kappaB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: Coming of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dominguez, I.; Sonenshein, G.E.; Seldin, D.C. Protein kinase CK2 in health and disease: CK2 and its role in Wnt and NF-kappaB signaling: Linking development and cancer. Cell Mol. Life. Sci. 2009, 66, 1850–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, D.; Westerheide, S.D.; Hanson, J.L.; Baldwin, A.S., Jr. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced phosphorylation of RelA/p65 on Ser529 is controlled by casein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 32592–32597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Seif, F.; Khoshmirsafa, M.; Aazami, H.; Mohsenzadegan, M.; Sedighi, G.; Bahar, M. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017, 15, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rawlings, J.S.; Rosler, K.M.; Harrison, D.A. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. J. Cell. Sci. 2004, 117, 1281–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. O’Shea, J.J.; Murray, P.J. Cytokine signaling modules in inflammatory responses. Immunity 2008, 28, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Liongue, C.; O’Sullivan, L.A.; Trengove, M.C.; Ward, A.C. Evolution of JAK-STAT pathway components: Mechanisms and role in immune system development. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Villarino, A.V.; Kanno, Y.; O’Shea, J.J. Mechanisms and consequences of Jak-STAT signaling in the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Manni, S.; Brancalion, A.; Mandato, E.; Tubi, L.Q.; Colpo, A.; Pizzi, M.; Cappellesso, R.; Zaffino, F.; Di Maggio, S.A.; Cabrelle, A.; et al. Protein kinase CK2 inhibition down modulates the NF-κB and STAT3 survival pathways, enhances the cellular proteotoxic stress and synergistically boosts the cytotoxic effect of bortezomib on multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zheng, Y.; Qin, H.; Frank, S.J.; Deng, L.; Litchfield, D.W.; Tefferi, A.; Pardanani, A.; Lin, F.T.; Li, J.; Sha, B.; et al. A CK2-dependent mechanism for activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Blood 2011, 118, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Battistutta, R.; De Moliner, E.; Sarno, S.; Zanotti, G.; Pinna, L.A. Structural features underlying selective inhibition of protein kinase CK2 by ATP site-directed tetrabromo-2-benzotriazole. Protein. Sci. 2001, 10, 2200–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Borgo, C.; Ruzzene, M. Protein kinase CK2 inhibition as a pharmacological strategy. Adv. Protein. Chem. Struct. Biol. 2021, 124, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, X.; Li, C.; Wang, D.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, N. Recent advances in the discovery of CK2 allosteric inhibitors: From traditional screening to structure-based design. Molecules 2020, 25, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Laudet, B.; Barette, C.; Dulery, V.; Renaudet, O.; Dumy, P.; Metz, A.; Prudent, R.; Deshiere, A.; Dideberg, O.; Filhol, O.; et al. Structure-based design of small peptide inhibitors of protein kinase CK2 subunit interaction. Biochem. J. 2007, 408, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Prudent, R.; Moucadel, V.; Laudet, B.; Barette, C.; Lafanechere, L.; Hasenknopf, B.; Li, J.; Bareyt, S.; Lacote, E.; Thorimbert, S.; et al. Identification of polyoxometalates as nanomolar noncompetitive inhibitors of protein kinase CK2. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Viht, K.; Saaver, S.; Vahter, J.; Enkvist, E.; Lavogina, D.; Sinijarv, H.; Raidaru, G.; Guerra, B.; Issinger, O.G.; Uri, A. Acetoxymethyl ester of tetrabromobenzimidazole-peptoid conjugate for inhibition of protein kinase CK2 in living cells. Bioconjug Chem. 2015, 26, 2324–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cozza, G.; Zanin, S.; Sarno, S.; Costa, E.; Girardi, C.; Ribaudo, G.; Salvi, M.; Zagotto, G.; Ruzzene, M.; Pinna, L.A. Design, validation and efficacy of bisubstrate inhibitors specifically affecting ecto-CK2 kinase activity. Biochem. J. 2015, 471, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosales, M.; Perez, G.V.; Ramon, A.C.; Cruz, Y.; Rodriguez-Ulloa, A.; Besada, V.; Ramos, Y.; Vazquez-Blomquist, D.; Caballero, E.; Aguilar, D.; et al. Targeting of protein kinase CK2 in acute myeloid leukemia cells using the clinical-grade synthetic-peptide CIGB-300. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chaplin, D.D. 1. Overview of the immune response. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111, S442–S459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Vivier, E.; Malissen, B. Innate and adaptive immunity: Specificities and signaling hierarchies revisited. Nat. Immunol. 2005, 6, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gasteiger, G.; D’Osualdo, A.; Schubert, D.A.; Weber, A.; Bruscia, E.M.; Hartl, D. Cellular innate immunity: An old game with new players. J. Innate. Immun. 2017, 9, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cronkite, D.A.; Strutt, T.M. The regulation of inflammation by innate and adaptive lymphocytes. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 1467538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mayadas, T.N.; Cullere, X.; Lowell, C.A. The multifaceted functions of neutrophils. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2014, 9, 181–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Liew, P.X.; Kubes, P. The neutrophil’s role during health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1223–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Borregaard, N. Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 2010, 33, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Winterbourn, C.C.; Kettle, A.J.; Hampton, M.B. Reactive oxygen species and neutrophil function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2016, 85, 765–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tecchio, C.; Micheletti, A.; Cassatella, M.A. Neutrophil-derived cytokines: Facts beyond expression. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Jakubzick, C.V.; Randolph, G.J.; Henson, P.M. Monocyte differentiation and antigen-presenting functions. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guilliams, M.; Mildner, A.; Yona, S. Developmental and functional heterogeneity of monocytes. Immunity 2018, 49, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gordon, S.; Taylor, P.R. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 953–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Prinz, M.; Erny, D.; Hagemeyer, N. Ontogeny and homeostasis of CNS myeloid cells. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mantovani, A.; Sica, A.; Locati, M. New vistas on macrophage differentiation and activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. van der Does, A.M.; Beekhuizen, H.; Ravensbergen, B.; Vos, T.; Ottenhoff, T.H.; van Dissel, J.T.; Drijfhout, J.W.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Nibbering, P.H. LL-37 directs macrophage differentiation toward macrophages with a proinflammatory signature. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 1442–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Krausgruber, T.; Blazek, K.; Smallie, T.; Alzabin, S.; Lockstone, H.; Sahgal, N.; Hussell, T.; Feldmann, M.; Udalova, I.A. IRF5 promotes inflammatory macrophage polarization and TH1-TH17 responses. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Krzyszczyk, P.; Schloss, R.; Palmer, A.; Berthiaume, F. The role of macrophages in acute and chronic wound healing and interventions to promote pro-wound healing phenotypes. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Arango Duque, G.; Descoteaux, A. Macrophage cytokines: Involvement in immunity and infectious diseases. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Atri, C.; Guerfali, F.Z.; Laouini, D. Role of human macrophage polarization in inflammation during infectious diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Duan, Z.; Luo, Y. Targeting macrophages in cancer immunotherapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cabeza-Cabrerizo, M.; Cardoso, A.; Minutti, C.M.; Pereira da Costa, M.; Reis, E.S.C. Dendritic cells revisited. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 39, 131–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Eisenbarth, S.C. Dendritic cell subsets in T cell programming: Location dictates function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Martin-Gayo, E.; Yu, X.G. Role of dendritic cells in natural immune control of HIV-1 infection. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kumar, B.V.; Connors, T.J.; Farber, D.L. Human T cell development, localization, and function throughout life. Immunity 2018, 48, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Luckheeram, R.V.; Zhou, R.; Verma, A.D.; Xia, B. CD4(+)T cells: Differentiation and functions. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2012, 2012, 925135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Dong, C. Cytokine regulation and function in T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 39, 51–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhu, X.; Zhu, J. CD4 T helper cell subsets and related human immunological disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sun, B.; Zhang, Y. Overview of orchestration of CD4+ T cell subsets in immune responses. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 841, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sanz, I.; Wei, C.; Jenks, S.A.; Cashman, K.S.; Tipton, C.; Woodruff, M.C.; Hom, J.; Lee, F.E. Challenges and opportunities for consistent classification of human B cell and plasma cell populations. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Adler, L.N.; Jiang, W.; Bhamidipati, K.; Millican, M.; Macaubas, C.; Hung, S.C.; Mellins, E.D. The other function: Class II-restricted antigen presentation by B cells. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Petersone, L.; Edner, N.M.; Ovcinnikovs, V.; Heuts, F.; Ross, E.M.; Ntavli, E.; Wang, C.J.; Walker, L.S.K. T cell/B cell collaboration and autoimmunity: An intimate relationship. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Lund, F.E. Cytokine-producing B lymphocytes-key regulators of immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Pieper, K.; Grimbacher, B.; Eibel, H. B-cell biology and development. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Allman, D.; Pillai, S. Peripheral B cell subsets. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Hoffman, W.; Lakkis, F.G.; Chalasani, G. B cells, antibodies, and more. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 11, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Larson, S.R.; Bortell, N.; Illies, A.; Crisler, W.J.; Matsuda, J.L.; Lenz, L.L. Myeloid cell CK2 regulates inflammation and resistance to bacterial infection. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 590266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dinarello, C.A. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood 2011, 117, 3720–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Liang, M.D.; Zhang, Y.; McDevit, D.; Marecki, S.; Nikolajczyk, B.S. The interleukin-1β gene is transcribed from a poised promoter architecture in monocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 9227–9237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Zhang, Y.; Saccani, S.; Shin, H.; Nikolajczyk, B.S. Dynamic protein associations define two phases of IL-1β transcriptional activation. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jung, D.H.; Park, H.J.; Byun, H.E.; Park, Y.M.; Kim, T.W.; Kim, B.O.; Um, S.H.; Pyo, S. Diosgenin inhibits macrophage-derived inflammatory mediators through downregulation of CK2, JNK, NF-κB and AP-1 activation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2010, 10, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hashimoto, A.; Gao, C.; Mastio, J.; Kossenkov, A.; Abrams, S.I.; Purandare, A.V.; Desilva, H.; Wee, S.; Hunt, J.; Jure-Kunkel, M.; et al. Inhibition of casein kinase 2 disrupts differentiation of myeloid cells in cancer and enhances the efficacy of immunotherapy in mice. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 5644–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. de Bourayne, M.; Gallais, Y.; El Ali, Z.; Rousseau, P.; Damiens, M.H.; Cochet, C.; Filhol, O.; Chollet-Martin, S.; Pallardy, M.; Kerdine-Romer, S. Protein kinase CK2 controls T-cell polarization through dendritic cell activation in response to contact sensitizers. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2017, 101, 703–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Reverendo, M.; Arguello, R.J.; Polte, C.; Valecka, J.; Camosseto, V.; Auphan-Anezin, N.; Ignatova, Z.; Gatti, E.; Pierre, P. Polymerase III transcription is necessary for T cell priming by dendritic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 22721–22729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Voisinne, G.; Gonzalez de Peredo, A.; Roncagalli, R. CD5, an undercover regulator of TCR signaling. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Axtell, R.C.; Xu, L.; Barnum, S.R.; Raman, C. CD5-CK2 binding/activation-deficient mice are resistant to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: Protection is associated with diminished populations of IL-17-expressing T cells in the central nervous system. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 8542–8549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Sestero, C.M.; McGuire, D.J.; De Sarno, P.; Brantley, E.C.; Soldevila, G.; Axtell, R.C.; Raman, C. CD5-dependent CK2 activation pathway regulates threshold for T cell anergy. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 2918–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ulges, A.; Klein, M.; Reuter, S.; Gerlitzki, B.; Hoffmann, M.; Grebe, N.; Staudt, V.; Stergiou, N.; Bohn, T.; Bruhl, T.J.; et al. Protein kinase CK2 enables regulatory T cells to suppress excessive TH2 responses in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gibson, S.A.; Yang, W.; Yan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Rowse, A.L.; Weinmann, A.S.; Qin, H.; Benveniste, E.N. Protein kinase CK2 controls the fate between Th17 cell and regulatory T cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 4244–4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ulges, A.; Witsch, E.J.; Pramanik, G.; Klein, M.; Birkner, K.; Buhler, U.; Wasser, B.; Luessi, F.; Stergiou, N.; Dietzen, S.; et al. Protein kinase CK2 governs the molecular decision between encephalitogenic TH17 cell and Treg cell development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 10145–10150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Gibson, S.A.; Yang, W.; Yan, Z.; Qin, H.; Benveniste, E.N. CK2 controls Th17 and regulatory T cell differentiation through inhibition of FoxO1. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Yang, W.; Gibson, S.A.; Yan, Z.; Wei, H.; Tao, J.; Sha, B.; Qin, H.; Benveniste, E.N. Protein kinase 2 (CK2) controls CD4(+) T cell effector function in the pathogenesis of colitis. Mucosal. Immunol. 2020, 13, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wei, H.; Yang, W.; Hong, H.; Yan, Z.; Qin, H.; Benveniste, E.N. Protein kinase CK2 regulates B cell development and differentiation. J. Immunol. 2021, 207, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Shimada, A. Hematological malignancies and molecular targeting therapy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 862, 172641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Phan-Dinh-Tuy, F.; Henry, J.; Boucheix, C.; Perrot, J.Y.; Rosenfeld, C.; Kahn, A. Protein kinases in human leukemic cells. Am. J. Hematol. 1985, 19, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Roig, J.; Krehan, A.; Colomer, D.; Pyerin, W.; Itarte, E.; Plana, M. Multiple forms of protein kinase CK2 present in leukemic cells: In vitro study of its origin by proteolysis. Mol. Cell Biochem. 1999, 191, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Piazza, F.A.; Ruzzene, M.; Gurrieri, C.; Montini, B.; Bonanni, L.; Chioetto, G.; Di Maira, G.; Barbon, F.; Cabrelle, A.; Zambello, R.; et al. Multiple myeloma cell survival relies on high activity of protein kinase CK2. Blood 2006, 108, 1698–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Silva, A.; Yunes, J.A.; Cardoso, B.A.; Martins, L.R.; Jotta, P.Y.; Abecasis, M.; Nowill, A.E.; Leslie, N.R.; Cardoso, A.A.; Barata, J.T. PTEN posttranslational inactivation and hyperactivation of the PI3K/Akt pathway sustain primary T cell leukemia viability. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 3762–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Pizzi, M.; Piazza, F.; Agostinelli, C.; Fuligni, F.; Benvenuti, P.; Mandato, E.; Casellato, A.; Rugge, M.; Semenzato, G.; Pileri, S.A. Protein kinase CK2 is widely expressed in follicular, Burkitt and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and propels malignant B-cell growth. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 6544–6552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Trembley, J.H.; Chen, Z.; Unger, G.; Slaton, J.; Kren, B.T.; Van Waes, C.; Ahmed, K. Emergence of protein kinase CK2 as a key target in cancer therapy. Biofactors 2010, 36, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Shehata, M.; Schnabl, S.; Demirtas, D.; Hilgarth, M.; Hubmann, R.; Ponath, E.; Badrnya, S.; Lehner, C.; Hoelbl, A.; Duechler, M.; et al. Reconstitution of PTEN activity by CK2 inhibitors and interference with the PI3-K/Akt cascade counteract the antiapoptotic effect of human stromal cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2010, 116, 2513–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mishra, S.; Reichert, A.; Cunnick, J.; Senadheera, D.; Hemmeryckx, B.; Heisterkamp, N.; Groffen, J. Protein kinase CKIIalpha interacts with the Bcr moiety of Bcr/Abl and mediates proliferation of Bcr/Abl-expressing cells. Oncogene 2003, 22, 8255–8262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Mishra, S.; Pertz, V.; Zhang, B.; Kaur, P.; Shimada, H.; Groffen, J.; Kazimierczuk, Z.; Pinna, L.A.; Heisterkamp, N. Treatment of P190 Bcr/Abl lymphoblastic leukemia cells with inhibitors of the serine/threonine kinase CK2. Leukemia 2007, 21, 178–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Gajewski, T.F.; Schreiber, H.; Fu, Y.X. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 1014–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Veglia, F.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Dendritic cells in cancer: The role revisited. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2017, 45, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Ohue, Y.; Nishikawa, H. Regulatory T (Treg) cells in cancer: Can Treg cells be a new therapeutic target? Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 2080–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Song, C.; Ge, Z.; Ding, Y.; Tan, B.H.; Desai, D.; Gowda, K.; Amin, S.; Gowda, R.; Robertson, G.P.; Yue, F.; et al. IKAROS and CK2 regulate expression of BCL-XL and chemosensitivity in high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2020, 136, 1520–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bernardi, C.; Maurer, G.; Ye, T.; Marchal, P.; Jost, B.; Wissler, M.; Maurer, U.; Kastner, P.; Chan, S.; Charvet, C. CD4(+) T cells require Ikaros to inhibit their differentiation toward a pathogenic cell fate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2023172118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 09 01932 g001 550
Figure 1. Signaling Pathways Regulated by CK2. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR (A), NF-κB (B) and JAK/STAT (C) signaling pathways are shown. CK2 involvement is shown as arrows (enhanced function) or bars (suppressive function). P: Phosphorylation.
Figure 1. Signaling Pathways Regulated by CK2. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR (A), NF-κB (B) and JAK/STAT (C) signaling pathways are shown. CK2 involvement is shown as arrows (enhanced function) or bars (suppressive function). P: Phosphorylation.
Biomedicines 09 01932 g001
Biomedicines 09 01932 g002 550
Figure 2. Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells. Development of innate and adaptive immune cells as well as their key functions are shown.
Figure 2. Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells. Development of innate and adaptive immune cells as well as their key functions are shown.
Biomedicines 09 01932 g002
Biomedicines 09 01932 g003 550
Figure 3. Differentiation of CD4+ T-cell Subsets. Differentiation conditions by cytokines, key transcription factors expressed and main functions are shown. CK2 involvement in CD4+ T-cell subsets is shown at the bottom. Arrows represent enhanced function and bars represent suppressive function.
Figure 3. Differentiation of CD4+ T-cell Subsets. Differentiation conditions by cytokines, key transcription factors expressed and main functions are shown. CK2 involvement in CD4+ T-cell subsets is shown at the bottom. Arrows represent enhanced function and bars represent suppressive function.
Biomedicines 09 01932 g003
Biomedicines 09 01932 g004 550
Figure 4. Development of B-cell Subsets. Differentiation of different B-cell subsets is shown. Abbreviations: HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; MZ, marginal zone; FO, follicular; and GC, germinal center.
Figure 4. Development of B-cell Subsets. Differentiation of different B-cell subsets is shown. Abbreviations: HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; MZ, marginal zone; FO, follicular; and GC, germinal center.
Biomedicines 09 01932 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, H.; Benveniste, E.N. The Immune Regulatory Role of Protein Kinase CK2 and Its Implications for Treatment of Cancer. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121932

AMA Style

Hong H, Benveniste EN. The Immune Regulatory Role of Protein Kinase CK2 and Its Implications for Treatment of Cancer. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(12):1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121932

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Huixian, and Etty N. Benveniste. 2021. "The Immune Regulatory Role of Protein Kinase CK2 and Its Implications for Treatment of Cancer" Biomedicines 9, no. 12: 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9121932

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop