Next Article in Journal
Combined Band and Plate Fixation as a New Individual Option for Patients at Risk of Sternal Complications after Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Therapy Based on the Exploration of Biological Events Underlying the Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immunomodulatory Properties of Human Breast Milk: MicroRNA Contents and Potential Epigenetic Effects
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/biomedicines11071945
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Intratumoral i-tRF-GlyGCC Expression Predicts Short-Term Relapse and Poor Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients, Independent of the TNM Stage

by
Spyridon Christodoulou
1,
Katerina Katsaraki
2,
Panteleimon Vassiliu
1,
Nikolaos Danias
1,
Nikolaos Michalopoulos
1,
Georgios Tzikos
3,
Diamantis C. Sideris
2 and
Nikolaos Arkadopoulos
1,*
1
Fourth Department of Surgery, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15701 Athens, Greece
3
Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, University General Hospital “AHEPA”, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(7), 1945; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11071945
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 22 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 8 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection MicroRNAs, tRNA Fragments, Long Non-coding and Circular RNAs: Pivotal Regulators of Gene Expression and Their Roles in Human Physiology and Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the most prevalent types of cancer, requires the discovery of new tumor biomarkers for accurate patient prognosis. In this work, the prognostic value of the tRNA fragment i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC was examined. Total RNA extraction from 211 CRC patient cancer tissue specimens and 83 adjacent normal tissues was conducted. Each RNA extract was subjected to in vitro polyadenylation and reverse transcription. A real-time quantitative PCR assay was used to quantify i-tRF-GlyGCC in all samples. Extensive biostatics analysis showed that i-tRF-GlyGCC levels in CRC tissues were significantly lower than in matched normal colorectal tissues. Additionally, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) time intervals were considerably shorter in CRC patients with high i-tRF-GlyGCC expression. i-tRF-GlyGCC expression maintained its prognostic value independently of other established prognostic factors, as shown by the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Additionally, survival analysis after TNM stage stratification revealed that higher i-tRF-GlyGCC levels were linked to shorter DFS time intervals in patients with TNM stage II tumors, as well as an increased probability of having a worse OS for patients in TNM stage II. In conclusion, i-tRF-GlyGCC has the potential to be a useful molecular tissue biomarker in CRC, independent of other clinicopathological variables.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant issue for public health, accounting for the third most prevalent cancer diagnosis and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally [1]. Less than half of cases are diagnosed when the cancer is locally advanced. Nowadays, most cases are often discovered at a later stage due to the extensive use of semi-invasive endoscopic techniques and fecal blood testing, both of which have subpar diagnostic accuracy [1,2]. Despite progress in understanding the molecular and cellular underpinnings of CRC, early identification remains difficult due to the lack of symptoms in the early stages, even though the prevalence of early onset colorectal cancer, or colon cancer diagnosed in patients under the age of 50, has been rising [3,4]. Moreover, the general global incidence of CRC is anticipated to increase in the upcoming decade despite improvements in diagnostic tools and treatment approaches, highlighting the urgent need for new prognostic markers and customized therapy approaches based on molecular biomarkers [5].
The most accurate prognostic indicator for CRC patients continues to be the TNM staging system, which is based on the extent of tumor invasion depth (T), lymph node infiltration (N), and presence or absence of distant metastasis (M) [6]. Tumors that are confined to the innermost layers of the colon or rectum and have not spread to the surrounding tissues are referred to as stage I CRC [7]. Because the cancer is confined and has not yet moved past the initial site, stage I CRC has a good prognosis [8]. The migration of the tumor into adjacent tissues through the colon or rectum wall is a hallmark of stage II CRC. Due to the possibility of microscopic cancer cell spread, stage II CRC has a higher chance of recurrence than stage I [9]. Stage III CRC denotes the absence of distant metastases but the presence of local lymph node involvement. In comparison to earlier stages, stage III CRC has a higher chance of recurrence and a worse prognosis [7,9].
However, the usefulness of TNM staging in actual clinical practice, particularly in detecting high-risk stage II patients, is constrained [10]. Moreover, precise biomarkers capable of discriminating between stage II and stage III cancers and accurately predicting patient relapse are severely lacking [11,12]. Furthermore, it is critical to accurately predict patient relapse in order to inform postsurgical therapy choices and surveillance strategies. Current prognostic indicators have some predictive value but fall short of accurately predicting the chance of relapse [13]. A very promising area with several benefits is real-time prognosis using liquid samples, such as circulating tumor cells or circulating free DNA in the blood [14,15]. Nonetheless, given the especially heterogeneous nature of CRC among cancer patients, there is an urgent need for additional research to identify novel prognostic, diagnostic, and predictive biomarkers [16].
The importance of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the fine tuning of protein-coding gene expression has attracted the interest of many researchers in recent years, rendering them promising molecular biomarkers in various cancers [17,18,19,20], including CRC [21,22,23]. Besides mRNAs that compose a rich source of molecular tumor biomarkers in CRC, with the prominent examples of kallikrein-related peptidases [24,25,26,27,28] and apoptosis-related [29,30,31] or stress-induced molecules [32,33], many examples of ncRNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and circular transcripts have already been suggested as effective tumor biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets for this malignancy [34,35]. Particular miRNAs have been shown to assist diagnosis of the disease at early stages and predict patient outcomes [36,37,38,39,40], due to their implication in biological processes such as tumorigenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance [41,42].
Recently, tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs) have also emerged as a novel frontier with potential diagnostic and prognostic importance among the numerous classes of ncRNAs [43,44]. These fragments are endogenous single-stranded ncRNAs ranging in length from 14 to 40 nucleotides. Notably, tRFs appear as significant regulators of gene expression acting similarly to other members of ncRNAs class, such as miRNAs. Furthermore, they post-transcriptionally regulate stability or translation of carcinogenic transcripts, leading to tumor suppression [45,46]. tRFs have been shown to significantly regulate cancer, hematologic malignancies, disorders of metabolism, inflammation, infections from viruses, and diseases of the nervous system [44]. Their expression is deregulated in cancer and hematological malignancies; this fact, along with their abundant presence in bodily fluids, renders them as molecular biomarkers in CRC [43,47]. Recent evidence suggests that particular tRFs are deregulated in this malignancy, impacting important pathways involved in cancer development. For instance, tRF-3022b regulates colorectal cell apoptosis and M2 macrophage polarization by binding to cytokines, and tRF3008A inhibits colorectal cancer development and metastasis by disrupting FOXK1 in an AGO-dependent way [48,49]. An intriguing tRF that derives from the internal part of the mature tRNA (internal tRF, i-tRF), bearing the glycine “GCC” anticodon, is i-tRF-GlyGCC. The oncogenic role of this tRF has already been established in ovarian cancer, where it is associated with early progression and poor overall survival, and in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, where its significance as an independent unfavorable biomarker was uncovered [50,51].
The aforementioned evidence prompted us to assess the potential of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression in colorectal tumors as a prognostic molecular biomarker. To achieve this goal, we applied a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay for the relative quantification of i-tRF-GlyGCC levels in colorectal cancer tissue specimens and adjacent normal colorectal tissues, using the comparative Ct method for calculations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Colorectal Tissue Samples

The present study included tissue specimens from 211 patients with primary CRC, operated at the University General Hospital “Attikon”, from 2009 to 2019. All tissue samples were histologically evaluated by a pathologist and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Normal colorectal tissue samples were acquired from 83 cases.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University General Hospital “Attikon” (number of approval: 13; date 29 January 2009), according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients were informed about the scope of the research and provided their consent.

2.2. Clinical Characteristics of CRC Patients

This study included 211 tissue samples of primary CRC and 83 adjacent normal colorectal tissue samples. In total, 108 male and 103 female CRC patients were included in this study. Patients had a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 57–72 years) at the time of diagnosis. The clinical features of CRC patients shown in Table 1 include tumor size, histological grade, and TNM stage. According to the revised TNM classification system, patients are classified by taking into account the invasion of tumor (T), the infiltration of regional lymph nodes (N), and the potential presence of distant metastases (M) [52]. Moreover, information about treatment of CRC patients is presented in Table 1.
Survival data were available for all patients included in the current study; however, 28 of them presented distant metastasis (M1) at the time of surgery and were hence excluded from DFS analysis. The follow-up information included the date of disease recurrence diagnosis; the date and cause of death were also recorded for those patients who succumbed to their disease during the follow-up period.

2.3. Total RNA Extraction and Polyadenylation, Followed by First-Strand cDNA Synthesis

The DLD-1 colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC®) and cultured according to the ATCC guidelines. Colorectal tissue homogenization followed, and total RNA extraction was performed from DLD-1 cells and each tissue specimen using TRI Reagent® (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA). RNA was diluted in Storage Solution (Life Technologies Ltd., Carlsbad, CA, USA), and its concentration and purity were assessed spectrophotometrically at 260 and 280 nm with a BioSpec-nano microvolume UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadju, Kyoto, Japan). All total RNA extracts were stored at −80 °C prior to their polyadenylation with E. coli poly(A) polymerase and reverse transcription into first-strand cDNA starting next to an oligo-dT adapter primer [53].

2.4. SYBR Green Based Real-Time Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

A real-time quantitative PCR method, based on SYBR Green chemistry, was applied as previously described, to perform relative quantification of i-tRF-GlyGCC. The comparative Ct (2−ΔΔCt) method was applied for all calculations to determine the tissue levels of this small ncRNA in each tissue sample [54]. SNORD43 and SNORD48 were used as internal reference genes to normalize the i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels; the DLD-1 cell line extract served as a calibrator in the real-time qPCR. All primers that were used were gene-specific, as previously described [51,55]. Normalized expression values of this tRF were expressed in relative quantification units (RQU).

2.5. Extended Biostatistics, including Disease-Free and Overall Survival Analyses

Non-parametric statistical tests were used in the biostatistics analysis. In particular, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the statistical significance of difference of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels in pairs of CRC and normal adjacent tissues; differences of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels among subgroups of patients (based on each clinicopathological factor) were checked with the Jonckheere–Terpstra test.
A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was built by plotting sensitivity versus (1-specificity), and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was also performed to assess the potential of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression to predict CRC occurrence.
In order to assess the prognostic value of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression in CRC, we constructed Kaplan–Meier disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) curves; for this purpose, this continuous variable was split at the median value. Stratified Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were also conducted. The differences between the curves were evaluated with the Mantel–Cox (log-rank) test. To evaluate the prognostic potential of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression and determine the hazard ratio (HR) for patients’ relapse and disease-related death, bootstrapped Cox regression analyses were carried out with 1000 bootstrap samples. The bootstrap bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) method was implemented to calculate bootstrap p values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each estimated HR. Furthermore, multivariate prognostic models were built and adjusted for the most important clinicopathological characteristics and type of treatment each patient received. Only p values lower than 0.050 (p < 0.050) were considered as statistically significant in each statistical test.

3. Results

3.1. i-tRF-GlyGCC Expression Is Downregulated in CRC Tissues, Compared to Adjacent Normal Colorectal Tissues

i-tRF-GlyGCC levels in CRC specimens ranged from 0.001 to 3.4 RQU with a mean ± SEM of 0.44 ± 0.036, and from 0.002 to 1.1 RQU with a mean ± SEM of 0.36 ± 0.031 in noncancerous specimens (Table 2). Although the distribution in the two cohorts is quite similar, i-tRF-GlyGCC levels were downregulated in the vast majority (58 out of 83) of the malignant tumors, compared to their matched normal tissue specimens, unraveling the utility of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels for screening purposes (Figure 1).

3.2. i-tRF-GlyGCC Overexpression Represents a Reliable Indicator of Poor Prognosis in CRC

A total of 61 (33.3%) out of the 183 patients who were included in the disease-free survival (DFS) analysis exhibited tumor recurrence observed during the accrual follow-up period. Similarly, 94 (44.5%) deaths associated with CRC occurred during the follow-up period. The median follow-up time was 93 months.
In order to assess the prognostic value of i-tRF-GlyGCC, we categorized the CRC patients into two groups, those with low i-tRF-GlyGCC levels and those with higher ones, by splitting at the median the i-tRF-GlyGCC expression in cancerous samples (cut-off point: 0.50 RQU). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with high i-tRF-GlyGCC levels have significantly shorter DFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.007) intervals, compared to patients with low i-tRF-GlyGCC levels (Figure 2). These results were also confirmed by univariate Cox regression analysis, in which a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.39 (p < 0.001) was calculated for disease recurrence in patients with high i-tRF-GlyGCC expression (Table 3), with an HR of 1.79 (p = 0.003) for CRC-related death in the same group of patients (Table 4), compared to CRC patients presenting with low intratumoral i-tRF-GlyGCC expression.

3.3. The Prognostic Signficance of i-tRF-GlyGCC Expression Is Independent of Other Classical Prognostic Factors Applied in CRC

In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the importance of the i-tRF-GlyGCC expression status in the prognosis of the patients’ DFS remained unaffected (HR = 2.64; p = 0.004), even when combined with the tumor size, histological grade, depth of tumor invasion, regional lymph node status, and treatment with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (Table 3). i-tRF-GlyGCC retained its prognostic significance regarding OS, as well (HR = 1.56; p = 0.046), when combined with the aforementioned classical prognosticators plus the presence or absence of distant metastases (Table 4).

3.4. i-tRF-GlyGCC Overexpression Predicts Tumor Recurence and Poor Prognostic Outcome in CRC Patients in TNM Stage II

After stratification, according to the most important prognostic factor used for CRC prognosis, namely, the TNM stage, patients with TNM stage II colorectal tumors overexpressing i-tRF-GlyGCC showed remarkably shorter DFS intervals (p = 0.003) compared to patients in the same TNM stage and with low i-tRF-GlyGCC levels (Figure 3A).
Furthermore, patients of TNM stage II with increased i-tRF-GlyGCC levels showed an elevated probability of a poorer OS (p < 0.001), in comparison with patients of the same TNM stage and low i-tRF-GlyGCC expression (Figure 3B). However, no statistically significant results were obtained for patients in other TNM stages.

4. Discussion

Given that stage I colon cancer patients have a high five-year relative survival rate, early identification of CRC is essential for patient survival. According to the American Cancer Society, this ratio lowers significantly for later-stage CRC patients. Moreover, a lot of therapeutic efforts have been directed towards developing a better and more precise classification of patients due to the variable survival outcomes and treatment responses [56]. During the last 5 years, four consensus molecular CRC subtypes (CMS) were characterized by an international collaboration of expert groups, demonstrating considerable interconnectedness between six independent classification systems [57]. Additionally, clinical researchers have focused on identifying molecular biomarkers that could potentially be employed in clinical practice for early diagnosis and reliability in CRC prognosis.
Despite being in its infancy, research on tRNA derivatives represents a research subject that has attracted scientific interest since the advent of small RNA sequencing and other innovative methods. Their involvement in numerous molecular and cellular processes that lead to the cancerous phenotype and include the dysfunctionality of transcription, cell proliferation, and differentiation has emphasized their role as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets [58]. Furthermore, several studies have sought to link their abnormally expressed levels in cancer with the malignant phenotype [59].
It is hypothesized that tRFs, like other small ncRNAs, constitute key players in the epigenetic regulation of the protein-coding genes [60]. This observation has been proposed by several studies that showed a close association between particular tRFs and AGO or PIWI proteins in the time when gene silencing occurred in a variety of types of human specimens [61,62,63]. As a result, there is growing curiosity about their biomarker utility in solid tumors and hematological malignancies [43,51,64,65,66,67]. High-throughput genomic studies that specifically examined CRC have found significant changes in tRNA-derived small RNA levels between malignant and benign colorectal cancers [68,69]. In one of the aforementioned works, the authors discovered two distinct tRF signatures that may distinguish between colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas. Another study noted that 5′-tiRNA-ProTGG is associated with poor survival of CRC patients and disease recurrence [70].
The tRNA molecules bearing the glycine “GCC” anticodon represent the origin of the internal tRF investigated in this original study. The biomarker utility of the i-tRF-GlyGCC molecule has been previously proposed for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma [51,67], while 5′-tRF-GlyGCC, which derives from the same tRNAs, has been proposed as a putative discriminatory biomarker for CRC [71]. Prompted by these, in this study, we explored the biomarker potential of i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC, since it is a malignancy for which the identification of reliable biomarkers would improve patients’ prognosis and individualized treatment options [72].
Our findings showed that i-tRF-GlyGCC levels were considerably lower in CRC tissues compared to paired noncancerous tissues. Considering that the majority of malignant tumors had lower levels of i-tRF-GlyGCC, this discovery implies that it could be used as a discriminatory biomarker for CRC. Furthermore, high i-tRF-GlyGCC levels were related to a poor prognosis in CRC patients. When compared to patients with lower i-tRF-GlyGCC levels, those with greater i-tRF-GlyGCC levels had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) intervals. These data suggest that i-tRF-GlyGCC could be used as a valid prognostic biomarker for CRC, assisting in the identification of patients at increased risk of disease recurrence and mortality from CRC.
Additionally, we investigated the prognostic utility of i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC patients according to their TNM stage. After grouping the patients based on TNM stage, we found that patients in TNM stage II had significantly shorter DFS intervals when the intratumoral i-tRF-GlyGCC levels were high. Similar to this, patients with higher i-tRF-GlyGCC levels and TNM stage II were more likely to have inferior OS, compared to those with TNM stage II tumors with low levels of this tRF. These results imply that i-tRF-GlyGCC may be an effective prognostic marker for the course of the disease, particularly in specific stages of CRC. Patients with CRC at the TNM II stage frequently have considerably different survival probabilities. In order to develop stratification systems that more effectively define the clinical stratification and predict the course of the disease, studies have concentrated on the molecular pathways underlying CRC. CMS was developed as a first step towards the development of a new stratification system, as a recently developed stratification technique that is based on the biological characteristics of CRC patients [57]. CMS has recently been proposed by Purcell et al. since it improves the prognosis for CRC patients at the TNM II stage [73]. These data highlight the necessity for novel biomarkers, able to further stratify CRC patients, especially in groups with high heterogeneity [74].
Moreover, our findings provide significant insights both for the scientific community and regarding the clinical utility of i-tRF-GlyGCC. Firstly, these results add to the expanding body of evidence supporting the importance of tRNA-derived fragments as possible biomarkers in cancer. We provide valuable insights into the discriminatory and prognostic importance of the i-tRF-GlyGCC fragment in CRC by particularly examining its expression levels in CRC and paired normal samples, as well as its prognostic value. This contributes to a better understanding of the complicated molecular pathways that underpin CRC formation and progression. In terms of clinical application, i-tRF-GlyGCC levels in CRC patients might be measured as part of normal discriminatory procedures. The downregulation of i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC tissues implies that it could be used as a noninvasive biomarker for CRC identification and screening [75]. Furthermore, the predictive value of i-tRF-GlyGCC emphasizes its usefulness in stratifying patients based on their risk of disease recurrence and CRC-related death. More specifically, incorporating i-tRF-GlyGCC into existing prognostic models may improve their accuracy and allow for more precise risk categorization of CRC patients, allowing for tailored treatment methods and surveillance approaches.
Despite these promising findings, it is important to note several limitations of this study. First, although this study reveals the link between i-tRF-GlyGCC levels and CRC, it does not provide mechanistic insights into the functional involvement of i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC development and progression. Understanding the underlying biological mechanisms and molecular pathways impacted by i-tRF-GlyGCC would support its usage as a biomarker. In order to determine the functional significance of i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC, more functional investigations, such as in vivo tests, are required. Secondly, this study’s findings would benefit from independent confirmation in other CRC patient groups. Cross-validation across several populations and centers is critical for determining the robustness and reproducibility of the results. Furthermore, validation in cohorts with varying stages of CRC and clinical features would give a more comprehensive assessment of the biomarker’s performance. Lastly, this study focused solely on the discriminatory and prognostic potential of i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC. While the findings are encouraging, it is crucial to note that CRC is a complicated disease with various molecular alterations. A single biomarker may not reflect the whole complexities of CRC biology, limiting its clinical utility. To improve the accuracy and reliability of CRC diagnosis and prognosis, future research should consider incorporating numerous biomarkers or a panel of biomarkers.
Overall, our findings provide novel evidence for the utility of i-tRF-GlyGCC as a discriminatory and prognostic biomarker in CRC. The downregulation of i-tRF-GlyGCC in CRC tissues, as well as its association with a poor prognosis, emphasizes its clinical importance. Further studies should focus on verifying these findings in bigger cohorts, explaining the underlying processes, and investigating the clinical value of i-tRF-GlyGCC. In this challenging disease, incorporating i-tRF-GlyGCC evaluation into normal CRC management has the potential to improve patient outcomes and better individualized treatment regimens.

5. Conclusions

According to our study, high i-tRF-GlyGCC expression is associated with poor survival and higher relapse rates in CRC patients. Therefore, independent of other clinicopathological variables, the expression status of this tRF may be utilized to evaluate the prognosis of CRC patients in addition to TNM staging.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, design, and supervision of the study, N.A.; methodology, S.C.; investigation, S.C.; data curation, S.C.; formal analysis, S.C.; validation, S.C. and G.T.; visualization, S.C. and K.K.; resources, S.C., P.V., N.D., N.M. and N.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.C. and K.K.; writing—review and editing, D.C.S. and N.A.; funding acquisition, S.C.; project administration, N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional Ethics Committee of the University General Hospital “Attikon”, Athens, Greece (approval number: 13; date of approval: 29 January 2009).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Paraskevi Karousi and Maria Papatsirou for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, S.G.; Karlitz, J.J.; Yen, T.; Lieu, C.H.; Boland, C.R. The rising tide of early-onset colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review of epidemiology, clinical features, biology, risk factors, prevention, and early detection. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 7, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sinicrope, F.A. Increasing Incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1547–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, H.; Ming, T.; Tang, S.; Ren, S.; Yang, H.; Liu, M.; Tao, Q.; Xu, H. Wnt signaling in colorectal cancer: Pathogenic role and therapeutic target. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Eng, C.; Jácome, A.A.; Agarwal, R.; Hayat, M.H.; Byndloss, M.X.; Holowatyj, A.N.; Bailey, C.; Lieu, C.H. A comprehensive framework for early-onset colorectal cancer research. Lancet Oncol. 2022, 23, e116–e128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zygulska, A.L.; Pierzchalski, P. Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mahmoud, N.N. Colorectal Cancer: Preoperative Evaluation and Staging. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 31, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Poston, G.J. Staging of advanced colorectal cancer. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2008, 17, 503–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jin, M.; Frankel, W.L. Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 27, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lea, D.; Håland, S.; Hagland, H.R.; Søreide, K. Accuracy of TNM staging in colorectal cancer: A review of current culprits, the modern role of morphology and stepping-stones for improvements in the molecular era. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 49, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Delattre, J.-F.; Selcen Oguz Erdogan, A.; Cohen, R.; Shi, Q.; Emile, J.-F.; Taieb, J.; Tabernero, J.; André, T.; Meyerhardt, J.A.; Nagtegaal, I.D.; et al. A comprehensive overview of tumour deposits in colorectal cancer: Towards a next TNM classification. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2022, 103, 102325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lech, G.; Slotwinski, R.; Słodkowski, M.; Krasnodębski, I.W. Colorectal cancer tumour markers and biomarkers: Recent therapeutic advances. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 1745–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luo, X.-J.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, J.; Zheng, J.-B.; Qiu, M.-Z.; Ju, H.-Q.; Xu, R.-H. Novel Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers of Prognostic and Predictive Significance in Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ciardiello, F.; Ciardiello, D.; Martini, G.; Napolitano, S.; Tabernero, J.; Cervantes, A. Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 372–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Malla, M.; Loree, J.M.; Kasi, P.M.; Parikh, A.R. Using Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer: Current and Evolving Practices. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 2846–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, H.; Zhao, Q.; Wei, W.; Zheng, L.; Yi, S.; Li, G.; Wang, W.; Sheng, H.; Pu, H.; Mo, H.; et al. Circulating tumor DNA methylation profiles enable early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and screening for colorectal cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eaax7533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Artemaki, P.I.; Papatsirou, M.; Boti, M.A.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Christodoulou, S.; Vassilacopoulou, D.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. Revised Exon Structure of l-DOPA Decarboxylase (DDC) Reveals Novel Splice Variants Associated with Colorectal Cancer Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kontos, C.K.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Scorilas, A. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in prostate cancer. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2015, 15, 1567–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Papanota, A.-M.; Karousi, P.; Kontos, C.K.; Artemaki, P.I.; Liacos, C.-I.; Papadimitriou, M.-A.; Bagratuni, T.; Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou, E.; Malandrakis, P.; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I.; et al. A Cancer-Related microRNA Signature Shows Biomarker Utility in Multiple Myeloma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Papatsirou, M.; Artemaki, P.I.; Karousi, P.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. Circular RNAs: Emerging Regulators of the Major Signaling Pathways Involved in Cancer Progression. Cancers 2021, 13, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skeparnias, I.; Anastasakis, D.; Grafanaki, K.; Kyriakopoulos, G.; Alexopoulos, P.; Dougenis, D.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K.; Stathopoulos, C. Contribution of miRNAs, tRNAs and tRFs to Aberrant Signaling and Translation Deregulation in Lung Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Artemaki, P.I.; Kontos, C.K. Editorial for the Special Issue “Molecular Biomarkers in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kontos, C.K.; Avgeris, M.; Vassilacopoulou, D.; Ardavanis, A.; Scorilas, A. Molecular Effects of Treatment of Human Colorectal Cancer Cells with Natural and Classical Chemotherapeutic Drugs: Alterations in the Expression of Apoptosis-related BCL2 Family Members, Including BCL2L12. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2018, 19, 1064–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Artemaki, P.I.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. Circular RNAs: A New Piece in the Colorectal Cancer Puzzle. Cancers 2020, 12, 2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alexopoulou, D.K.; Kontos, C.K.; Christodoulou, S.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. KLK11 mRNA expression predicts poor disease-free and overall survival in colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. Biomark. Med. 2014, 8, 671–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Christodoulou, S.; Alexopoulou, D.K.; Kontos, C.K.; Scorilas, A.; Papadopoulos, I.N. Kallikrein-related peptidase-6 (KLK6) mRNA expression is an independent prognostic tissue biomarker of poor disease-free and overall survival in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 4673–4685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kontos, C.K.; Chantzis, D.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. Kallikrein-related peptidase 4 (KLK4) mRNA predicts short-term relapse in colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. Cancer Lett. 2013, 330, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kontos, C.K.; Mavridis, K.; Talieri, M.; Scorilas, A. Kallikrein-related peptidases (KLKs) in gastrointestinal cancer: Mechanistic and clinical aspects. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 110, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kontos, C.K.; Scorilas, A. Kallikrein-related peptidases (KLKs): A gene family of novel cancer biomarkers. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2012, 50, 1877–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kontos, C.K.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Fragoulis, E.G.; Scorilas, A. Quantitative expression analysis and prognostic significance of L-DOPA decarboxylase in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 102, 1384–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kontos, C.K.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. Quantitative expression analysis and prognostic significance of the novel apoptosis-related gene BCL2L12 in colon cancer. Biol. Chem. 2008, 389, 1467–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kontos, C.K.; Christodoulou, M.-I.; Scorilas, A. Apoptosis-related BCL2-family members: Key players in chemotherapy. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 353–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Artemaki, P.I.; Sklirou, A.D.; Kontos, C.K.; Liosi, A.-A.; Gianniou, D.D.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Trougakos, I.P.; Scorilas, A. High clusterin (CLU) mRNA expression levels in tumors of colorectal cancer patients predict a poor prognostic outcome. Clin. Biochem. 2020, 75, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalioraki, M.A.; Artemaki, P.I.; Sklirou, A.D.; Kontos, C.K.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Trougakos, I.P.; Scorilas, A. Heat shock protein beta 3 (HSPB3) is an unfavorable molecular biomarker in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Mol. Carcinog. 2020, 59, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Papatsirou, M.; Artemaki, P.I.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. The role of circular RNAs in therapy resistance of patients with solid tumors. Pers. Med. 2020, 17, 469–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Papatsirou, M.; Diamantopoulos, M.A.; Katsaraki, K.; Kletsas, D.; Kontos, C.K.; Scorilas, A. Identification of Novel Circular RNAs of the Human Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) Gene, Expressed in Breast Cancer Cells. Genes 2022, 13, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Adamopoulos, P.G.; Kontos, C.K.; Rapti, S.-M.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. miR-224 overexpression is a strong and independent prognosticator of short-term relapse and poor overall survival in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kontos, C.K.; Tsiakanikas, P.; Avgeris, M.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. miR-15a-5p, A Novel Prognostic Biomarker, Predicting Recurrent Colorectal Adenocarcinoma. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2017, 21, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rapti, S.-M.; Kontos, C.K.; Christodoulou, S.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. miR-34a overexpression predicts poor prognostic outcome in colorectal adenocarcinoma, independently of clinicopathological factors with established prognostic value. Clin. Biochem. 2017, 50, 918–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rapti, S.-M.; Kontos, C.K.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. Enhanced miR-182 transcription is a predictor of poor overall survival in colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2014, 52, 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rapti, S.-M.; Kontos, C.K.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. High miR-96 levels in colorectal adenocarcinoma predict poor prognosis, particularly in patients without distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 11815–11824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Skourti, E.; Logotheti, S.; Kontos, C.K.; Pavlopoulou, A.; Dimoragka, P.T.; Trougakos, I.P.; Gorgoulis, V.; Scorilas, A.; Michalopoulos, I.; Zoumpourlis, V. Progression of mouse skin carcinogenesis is associated with the orchestrated deregulation of mir-200 family members, mir-205 and their common targets. Mol. Carcinog. 2016, 55, 1229–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferraro, A.; Kontos, C.K.; Boni, T.; Bantounas, I.; Siakouli, D.; Kosmidou, V.; Vlassi, M.; Spyridakis, Y.; Tsipras, I.; Zografos, G.; et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-21 in colorectal cancer: ITGB4 as a novel miR-21 target and a three-gene network (miR-21-ITGBeta4-PDCD4) as predictor of metastatic tumor potential. Epigenetics Off. J. DNA Methylation Soc. 2014, 9, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Karousi, P.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Papageorgiou, S.G.; Pappa, V.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. A novel, mitochondrial, internal tRNA-derived RNA fragment possesses clinical utility as a molecular prognostic biomarker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin. Biochem. 2020, 85, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Krishna, S.; Raghavan, S.; DasGupta, R.; Palakodeti, D. tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs): Establishing their turf in post-transcriptional gene regulation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 2607–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Katsaraki, K.; Karousi, P.; Artemaki, P.I.; Scorilas, A.; Pappa, V.; Kontos, C.K.; Papageorgiou, S.G. MicroRNAs: Tiny Regulators of Gene Expression with Pivotal Roles in Normal B-Cell Development and B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Cancers 2021, 13, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kuscu, C.; Kumar, P.; Kiran, M.; Su, Z.; Malik, A.; Dutta, A. tRNA fragments (tRFs) guide Ago to regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally in a Dicer-independent manner. RNA 2018, 24, 1093–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kishore, C.; Karunagaran, D. Non-coding RNAs as emerging regulators and biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2022, 477, 1817–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lu, S.; Wei, X.; Tao, L.; Dong, D.; Hu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Tao, Y.; Yu, C.; Sun, D.; Cheng, H. A novel tRNA-derived fragment tRF-3022b modulates cell apoptosis and M2 macrophage polarization via binding to cytokines in colorectal cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 15, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Han, Y.; Peng, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Cai, C.; Guo, C.; Chen, Y.; Gao, L.; Huang, Q.; He, M.; et al. tRF3008A suppresses the progression and metastasis of colorectal cancer by destabilizing FOXK1 in an AGO-dependent manner. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Panoutsopoulou, K.; Dreyer, T.; Dorn, J.; Obermayr, E.; Mahner, S.; Gorp, T.V.; Braicu, I.; Zeillinger, R.; Magdolen, V.; Avgeris, M.; et al. tRNA(GlyGCC)-Derived Internal Fragment (i-tRF-GlyGCC) in Ovarian Cancer Treatment Outcome and Progression. Cancers 2021, 14, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Karousi, P.; Katsaraki, K.; Papageorgiou, S.G.; Pappa, V.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. Identification of a novel tRNA-derived RNA fragment exhibiting high prognostic potential in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 37, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nagtegaal, I.D.; Quirke, P.; Schmoll, H.-J. Has the new TNM classification for colorectal cancer improved care? Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 9, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kerimis, D.; Kontos, C.K.; Christodoulou, S.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. Elevated expression of miR-24-3p is a potentially adverse prognostic factor in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Clin. Biochem. 2017, 50, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Diamantopoulos, M.A.; Kontos, C.K.; Kerimis, D.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. Upregulated miR-16 expression is an independent indicator of relapse and poor overall survival of colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2017, 55, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tsiakanikas, P.; Kontos, C.K.; Kerimis, D.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Scorilas, A. High microRNA-28-5p expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma predicts short-term relapse of node-negative patients and poor overall survival of patients with non-metastatic disease. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018, 56, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cronin, K.A.; Scott, S.; Firth, A.U.; Sung, H.; Henley, S.J.; Sherman, R.L.; Siegel, R.L.; Anderson, R.N.; Kohler, B.A.; Benard, V.B.; et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: National cancer statistics. Cancer 2022, 128, 4251–4284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guinney, J.; Dienstmann, R.; Wang, X.; de Reyniès, A.; Schlicker, A.; Soneson, C.; Marisa, L.; Roepman, P.; Nyamundanda, G.; Angelino, P.; et al. The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 1350–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yu, M.; Lu, B.; Zhang, J.; Ding, J.; Liu, P.; Lu, Y. tRNA-derived RNA fragments in cancer: Current status and future perspectives. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, S.-Q.; Sun, B.; Xiong, Z.-P.; Shu, Y.; Zhou, H.-H.; Zhang, W.; Xiong, J.; Li, Q. The dysregulation of tRNAs and tRNA derivatives in cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Haussecker, D.; Huang, Y.; Lau, A.; Parameswaran, P.; Fire, A.Z.; Kay, M.A. Human tRNA-derived small RNAs in the global regulation of RNA silencing. RNA 2010, 16, 673–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ivanov, P.; Emara, M.M.; Villen, J.; Gygi, S.P.; Anderson, P. Angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments inhibit translation initiation. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Maute, R.L.; Schneider, C.; Sumazin, P.; Holmes, A.; Califano, A.; Basso, K.; Dalla-Favera, R. tRNA-derived microRNA modulates proliferation and the DNA damage response and is down-regulated in B cell lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1404–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pekarsky, Y.; Balatti, V.; Palamarchuk, A.; Rizzotto, L.; Veneziano, D.; Nigita, G.; Rassenti, L.Z.; Pass, H.I.; Kipps, T.J.; Liu, C.G.; et al. Dysregulation of a family of short noncoding RNAs, tsRNAs, in human cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 5071–5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Balatti, V.; Pekarsky, Y.; Croce, C.M. Role of the tRNA-Derived Small RNAs in Cancer: New Potential Biomarkers and Target for Therapy. Adv. Cancer Res. 2017, 135, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Katsaraki, K.; Artemaki, P.I.; Papageorgiou, S.G.; Pappa, V.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. Identification of a novel, internal tRNA-derived RNA fragment as a new prognostic and screening biomarker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, using an innovative quantitative real-time PCR assay. Leuk. Res. 2019, 87, 106234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Katsaraki, K.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Papageorgiou, S.G.; Pappa, V.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. A 3′ tRNA-derived fragment produced by tRNALeuAAG and tRNALeuTAG is associated with poor prognosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, independently of classical prognostic factors. Eur. J. Haematol. 2021, 106, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Karousi, P.; Papanota, A.-M.; Artemaki, P.I.; Liacos, C.-I.; Patseas, D.; Mavrianou-Koutsoukou, N.; Liosi, A.-A.; Kalioraki, M.-A.; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I.; Gavriatopoulou, M.; et al. tRNA Derivatives in Multiple Myeloma: Investigation of the Potential Value of a tRNA-Derived Molecular Signature. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Balatti, V.; Nigita, G.; Veneziano, D.; Drusco, A.; Stein, G.S.; Messier, T.L.; Farina, N.H.; Lian, J.B.; Tomasello, L.; Liu, C.-G.; et al. tsRNA signatures in cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 8071–8076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xiong, W.; Wang, X.; Cai, X.; Xiong, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, Q.; Qin, J.; Li, Y. Identification of tRNA-derived fragments in colon cancer by comprehensive small RNA sequencing. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 42, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tsiakanikas, P.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Tsirba, D.; Artemaki, P.I.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Kontos, C.K.; Scorilas, A. High Expression of a tRNA(Pro) Derivative Associates with Poor Survival and Independently Predicts Colorectal Cancer Recurrence. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, Y.; Yang, X.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, H.; Ge, L.; Chen, F.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, H. 5′-tRF-GlyGCC: A tRNA-derived small RNA as a novel biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Genome. Med. 2021, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Piawah, S.; Venook, A.P. Targeted therapy for colorectal cancer metastases: A review of current methods of molecularly targeted therapy and the use of tumor biomarkers in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 2019, 125, 4139–4147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Purcell, R.V.; Schmeier, S.; Lau, Y.C.; Pearson, J.F.; Frizelle, F.A. Molecular subtyping improves prognostication of Stage 2 colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Karousi, P.; Artemaki, P.I.; Sotiropoulou, C.D.; Christodoulou, S.; Scorilas, A.; Kontos, C.K. Identification of Two Novel Circular RNAs Deriving from BCL2L12 and Investigation of Their Potential Value as a Molecular Signature in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Duran-Sanchon, S.; Herrera-Pariente, C.; Moreira, L. New non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer screening. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2020, 112, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 11 01945 g001 550
Figure 1. Graphical illustration of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels in cancerous vs. normal adjacent colorectal tissues, after comparing 83 pairs of tissue specimens. The i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels were lower in most colorectal tumors. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to calculate the p value.
Figure 1. Graphical illustration of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels in cancerous vs. normal adjacent colorectal tissues, after comparing 83 pairs of tissue specimens. The i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels were lower in most colorectal tumors. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to calculate the p value.
Biomedicines 11 01945 g001
Biomedicines 11 01945 g002 550
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients. Patients with tumors highly expressing i-tRF-GlyGCC had significantly shorter DFS (A) and OS (B) time intervals than patients bearing tumors with low i-tRF-GlyGCC levels. The p values were calculated using the Mantel–Cox (log-rank) test.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients. Patients with tumors highly expressing i-tRF-GlyGCC had significantly shorter DFS (A) and OS (B) time intervals than patients bearing tumors with low i-tRF-GlyGCC levels. The p values were calculated using the Mantel–Cox (log-rank) test.
Biomedicines 11 01945 g002
Biomedicines 11 01945 g003 550
Figure 3. Stratified Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients, according to TNM stage. TNM stage II patients with tumors highly expressing i-tRF-GlyGCC had shorter DFS (A) and OS (B) time intervals than patients bearing tumors with low i-tRF-GlyGCC levels. The p values were calculated using the Mantel–Cox (log-rank) test.
Figure 3. Stratified Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients, according to TNM stage. TNM stage II patients with tumors highly expressing i-tRF-GlyGCC had shorter DFS (A) and OS (B) time intervals than patients bearing tumors with low i-tRF-GlyGCC levels. The p values were calculated using the Mantel–Cox (log-rank) test.
Biomedicines 11 01945 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and treatment of CRC patients included in the current study.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and treatment of CRC patients included in the current study.
Number of Patients (%)
Histological grade
I26 (12.3%)
II154 (73.0%)
III31 (14.7%)
T (tumor invasion)
T19 (4.3%)
T237 (17.5%)
T3116 (55.0%)
T449 (23.2%)
N (nodal status)
N0123 (58.3%)
N160 (28.4%)
N228 (13.3%)
M (distant metastasis)
M0183 (86.7%)
M128 (13.3%)
TNM stage
I40 (19.0%)
II77 (36.5%)
III66 (31.3%)
IV28 (13.2%)
Treatment with radiotherapy
(207/211 patients)
No165 (79.7%)
Yes42 (20.3%)
Treatment with chemotherapy
(207/211 patients)
No83 (40.1%)
Yes124 (59.9%)
Abbreviation: TNM: tumor, node, and metastasis.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels and other features of CRC patients.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of i-tRF-GlyGCC expression levels and other features of CRC patients.
VariableMean ± SEMRangeQuartiles
1st2nd (Median)3rd
Normalized i-tRF-GlyGCC expression (RQU)
 in cancerous tissues (n = 211)0.44 ± 0.0360.001–3.40.110.300.59
 in normal tissues (n = 83)0.36 ± 0.0310.002–1.10.120.320.52
Patient age (years)65 ± 0.835–93576672
Tumor size (cm2)19.3 ± 1.10.8–1329.814.024.0
Abbreviations: RQU, relative quantification units; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Table
Table 3. i-tRF-GlyGCC expression and disease-free survival (DFS) of CRC patients.
Table 3. i-tRF-GlyGCC expression and disease-free survival (DFS) of CRC patients.
Univariate Analysis (n = 183)Multivariate Analysis (n = 181)
CovariateHR 1BCa 2 95% CI 3p Value 4HR 1BCa 2 95% CI 3p Value 4
i-tRF-GlyGCC expression (high vs. low)2.391.40–4.29<0.0012.641.45–5.330.004
Tumor size0.990.96–1.000.13
Histological grade (ordinal)2.511.46–4.540.0032.201.13–4.800.027
T (ordinal)1.691.22–2.590.0081.590.97–2.810.065
N (ordinal)1.470.98–2.160.0511.060.61–1.780.82
Treatment with radiotherapy (yes vs. no)1.340.72–2.390.360.840.38–1.610.60
Treatment with chemotherapy (yes vs. no)1.720.99–3.330.0621.170.55–2.500.69
1 Hazard ratio, estimated from proportional hazard Cox regression. 2 Bias-corrected and accelerated. 3 Confidence interval of the estimated HR. 4 Statistically significant bootstrap p values are shown in italics.
Table
Table 4. i-tRF-GlyGCC expression and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients.
Table 4. i-tRF-GlyGCC expression and overall survival (OS) of CRC patients.
Univariate Analysis (n = 211)Multivariate Analysis (n = 207)
CovariateHR 1BCa 2 95% CI 3p Value 4HR 1BCa 2 95% CI 3p Value 4
i-tRF-GlyGCC expression (high vs. low)1.791.18–2.680.0031.560.98–2.430.046
Tumor size1.000.99–1.020.53
Histological grade (ordinal)1.911.21–3.040.0081.240.73–2.070.41
T (ordinal)1.881.34–2.740.0021.420.93–2.310.12
N (ordinal)1.991.48–2.75<0.0011.460.96–2.140.047
M (M1 vs. M0)7.174.13–13.52<0.0014.712.21–12.48<0.001
Treatment with radiotherapy (yes vs. no)0.940.53–1.540.841.160.57–2.080.63
Treatment with chemotherapy (yes vs. no)1.150.75–1.860.530.570.33–0.980.033
1 Hazard ratio, estimated from proportional hazard Cox regression. 2 Bias-corrected and accelerated. 3 Confidence interval of the estimated HR. 4 Statistically significant bootstrap p values are shown in italics.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Christodoulou, S.; Katsaraki, K.; Vassiliu, P.; Danias, N.; Michalopoulos, N.; Tzikos, G.; Sideris, D.C.; Arkadopoulos, N. High Intratumoral i-tRF-GlyGCC Expression Predicts Short-Term Relapse and Poor Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients, Independent of the TNM Stage. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11071945

AMA Style

Christodoulou S, Katsaraki K, Vassiliu P, Danias N, Michalopoulos N, Tzikos G, Sideris DC, Arkadopoulos N. High Intratumoral i-tRF-GlyGCC Expression Predicts Short-Term Relapse and Poor Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients, Independent of the TNM Stage. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(7):1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11071945

Chicago/Turabian Style

Christodoulou, Spyridon, Katerina Katsaraki, Panteleimon Vassiliu, Nikolaos Danias, Nikolaos Michalopoulos, Georgios Tzikos, Diamantis C. Sideris, and Nikolaos Arkadopoulos. 2023. "High Intratumoral i-tRF-GlyGCC Expression Predicts Short-Term Relapse and Poor Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients, Independent of the TNM Stage" Biomedicines 11, no. 7: 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11071945

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop