Next Article in Journal
Free Fatty Acids from Cow Urine DMSO Fraction Induce Cell Death in Breast Cancer Cells without Affecting Normal GMSCs
Next Article in Special Issue
SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections According to the Immune Response Elicited after mRNA Third Dose Vaccination in COVID-19-Naïve Hospital Personnel
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in the Odyssey of Rare Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Third Dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine Does Not “Boost” Disease Flares and Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

How CD4+ T Cells Transcriptional Profile Is Affected by Culture Conditions: Towards the Design of Optimal In Vitro HIV Reactivation Assays

Biomedicines 2023, 11(3), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030888
by Giuseppe Rubens Pascucci 1,2,†, Elena Morrocchi 1,†, Chiara Pighi 1, Arianna Rotili 2, Alessia Neri 1, Chiara Medri 1, Giulio Olivieri 1,2, Marco Sanna 1, Gianmarco Rasi 1,2, Deborah Persaud 3, Ann Chahroudi 4,5, Mathias Lichterfeld 6,7, Eleni Nastouli 8, Caterina Cancrini 1, Donato Amodio 1, Paolo Rossi 1,2, Nicola Cotugno 1,2,* and Paolo Palma 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2023, 11(3), 888; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030888
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 25 February 2023 / Published: 13 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

"Impact of media culture and PBMCs signaling on CD4+ T cells transcriptional dynamics to inform the optimal design of an in-vitro HIV reactivation assay". The manuscript by Pascucci et al. evaluates the effect of plasma on transcriptional profiles of CD4+ T-lymphocytes. Although the study addresses the important component limitations of in vitro conditions, it has a few limitations.

Overall, all the figures' quality is compromised, making it impossible to read the labels in the images.

Authors should include secondary validation at protein levels of a few markers of the signaling networks. 

Various studies have been published about the culture conditions of PBMCs and their effect on HIV replication. What is the difference in the current study? The authors should clearly state the limitations of related studies and how the present study addresses those limitations. 

Did the authors observe any effect on the viability of the cells in different conditions? It will be nice to have that data.

Authors should include a table of DEGs in the supplementary materials. Also, the data availability statement does not have the link/address.

Minor: Line #72 Within first year of life? Should be within first year of infection

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

Dear editor in chief

The manuscript entitled: “Impact of media culture and PBMCs signalling on CD4+ T cells transcriptional dynamics to inform the optimal design of an in-vitro HIV reactivation assay” addresses a highly interesting topic. The present study is aimed to determine the impact of selecting this artificial medium, largely employed in research, in comparison to human plasma and how the choice of culturing and stimulating a single lymphocyte population (CD4+ T cells) as opposed to bulk PBMCs influences CD4+ T cell gene expression profiles. The article is well designed and well written. I suggest that the authors could greatly enhance the usefulness of this work for the community if they consider the following changes:

 

1-      Authors should explain each of the abbreviations the first time it appears in the main text. Also, it is better to provide a list of abbreviations.

2-      The title needs to be improved. “Impact of media culture”???

3-      The Figures are very small and should be presented with appropriate resolution and magnification. Also, if there is no suitable space in the text, it is better to use them in the supplement.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I thank the authors for their detailed responses and revisions. The figure quality and the manuscript overall are of much better quality. 

Back to TopTop