Next Article in Journal
Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Future of Immunotherapy and Natural Products
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting High Blood Pressure Using DNA Methylome-Based Machine Learning Models
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/biomedicines10061408
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Circulating microRNAs Suggest Networks Associated with Biological Functions in Aggressive Refractory Type 2 Celiac Disease

by
Nicoletta Bianchi
1,
Luisa Doneda
2,
Luca Elli
3,*,
Cristian Taccioli
4,
Valentina Vaira
5,6,
Alice Scricciolo
3,
Vincenza Lombardo
3,
Anna Terrazzan
1,
Patrizia Colapietro
6,
Leonardo Terranova
7,
Carlo Bergamini
8,
Maurizio Vecchi
3,6,
Lucia Scaramella
3,
Nicoletta Nandi
3,6 and
Leda Roncoroni
2
1
Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Street L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
2
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Street Pascal 36, 20133 Milan, Italy
3
Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
5
Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Street F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
6
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Street F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
7
Respiratory Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Adult Center, Internal Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Street F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
8
Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Street L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(6), 1408; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061408
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 9 June 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Therapies and Biomarkers for Celiac Disease and Gluten-Related Disorders)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Despite following a gluten-free diet, which is currently the only effective therapy for celiac disease, about 5% of patients can develop serious complications, which in the case of refractory type 2 could evolve towards intestinal lymphoma. In this study, we have identified a set of 15 microRNAs in serum discriminating between the two types of refractory disease. Upregulated miR-770-5p, miR-181b-2-3p, miR-1193, and miR-1226-3p could be useful for the better stratification of patients and the monitoring of disease development, while miR-490-3p was found to be dysregulated in patients with refractory type 1. Finally, by using bioinformatic tools applied to the analysis of the targets of dysregulated microRNAs, we have completed a more precise assessment of their functions. These mainly include the pathway of response to Transforming Growth Factor β cell–cell signaling by Wnt; epigenetic regulation, especially novel networks associated with transcriptional and post-transcriptional alterations; and the well-known inflammatory profiles.

1. Introduction

Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune enteropathy that occurs in genetically susceptible individuals characterized by HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 haplotypes after the ingestion of gluten. The disease proceeds through an inflammatory process in the bowel mucosa, leading to villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, and the infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells in the lamina propria. The antigenic trigger is gluten, a protein complex present in grains of wheat, barley, and rye and consisting of two major protein types, gliadins and glutenins. A lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only currently available treatment for CD [1]. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), which are short non-coding RNAs (19–24 nucleotides) implicated in post-transcriptional gene regulation, may be candidate biomarkers for the early detection of CD, could be useful to monitor GFD adherence, and are also associated with disease-stage-specificity [2]. Several studies have discussed the role of miRNAs in autoimmune disorders. Currently, the dysregulation of some miRNAs, such as miRNA-146a, miRNA-155, miRNA-21, and miRNA-125b, is detected mainly in the intestinal mucosa but has also been found in the peripheral blood cells and plasma of CD patients [3]. However, these miRNAs have also been demonstrated in several autoimmune diseases (e.g., in Alzheimer’s, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis), but they do not seem to be specific as they are associated with an inflammatory state rather than a particular diagnosis [3]. Buoli Comani et al. described two types of miRNAs, miR-21-3p and miR-21-5p, which are strongly upregulated in the small intestine of CD patients, as well as in the circulation [4]. Moreover, Bascuñán et al. demonstrated that miR-21 is not useful for monitoring the response to a GFD because it did not normalize after the patient had started therapy [3], while six downregulated miRNAs (e.g., miR-150-3p and miR-150-5p) showed an increasing trend upon GFD. These data suggest that miRNAs are potential markers for CD and could be effective for supervising the response to a GFD. In addition, 53 circulating miRNAs were identified as possible early novel biomarkers, eight of which (miR-21-3p, miR-374a-5p, miR-144-3p, miR-500a-3p, miR-486-3p, let-7d-3p, let-7e-5p, and miR-3605-3p) have been detected at levels above the upper limits of normal and more than 2 years before the increase in transglutaminase antibodies (TGA) [2]. Another relevant aspect of miRNAs in CD patients concerns their expression in association with specific clinical features and in the pathogenesis of intestinal barrier dysfunction [1,5]. Approximately 5% of CD patients may develop serious and life-compromising complications such as refractory CD (RCD) and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) [6], characterized by villous atrophy and persistent malabsorption symptoms, even after a GFD is followed for at least 12 months. RCD is classified into type 1 RCD (RCD1), which presents a normal intraepithelial lymphocyte phenotype with the surface expression of CD3 and CD8 markers and polyclonal T-cell receptors (TCRs), and into type 2 RCD (RCD2), which is more aggressive with aberrant intraepithelial T-cell clone (IEL), without expression of surface CD3 but with expression of intracytoplasmic CD3. Aberrant IELs frequently present TCR clonality. The diagnosis of RCD1 and RCD2 requires small bowel investigations, such as videocapsule endoscopy and enteroscopy, together with specific IEL analyses (immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and molecular biology) [7,8]. MiRNA profiling identified 38 miRNAs distinctive for these CD phenotypes, highlighting that the miR-192/215 family was down-regulated in CD patients despite a GFD [9], but miR-192/215 and miR-200 were consecutively lost in RCD2 and in intestinal T-cell lymphoma (ITL)-CD, whereas miR-19/92 and C19MC miRNAs were up-regulated [10]. In our study, we have extended the research on miRNAs as biomarkers in CD by focusing on the response to a GFD, to improve the stratification and follow-up of patients for the identification of RCD2, which can easily evolve towards malignant pathological phenotypes. Furthermore, to identify their putative targets, we have utilized bioinformatics tools, which are helpful for understanding the impact of miRNAs on gene networks and pathways with the aim to provide a more precise assessment of their functions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population of Celiac Patients

In our investigations, we considered a total of 16 samples from celiac patients; among them there were 5 patients responsive to a GFD, and 11 refractory patients (n = 6 RCD1 and n = 5 RCD2). The study was registered on http://clinicaltrials.gov/ (accessed on 4 January 2022) (ref. no. NCT04655495). The diagnosis of RCD1 and RCD2 was made according to internationally adopted criteria and based upon the duodenal T-cell receptor rearrangement (monoclonal in RCD2) and the percentage of aberrant T-cells (CD3s−/CD3cyt+) at cytofluorimetry [6]. The University of Milan’s Institutional Review Board checked and approved the study protocol in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki; the Project Identification Code of the Local Ethics Committee’s approval of our study is 89_2019. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Milan/Area B on 6 February 2019. All the patients gave and signed their informed consent before participation in this study.
We performed two types of comparison with RNA samples from celiac patients. First, we compared RCD patients (random type 1 and 2) with responsive patients to define possible markers of refractory CD, and second, we compared RCD2 with RCD1 samples to identify an association with more severe disease. We have reported the anamnestic and clinical information of the enrolled individuals in Supplementary Material Table S1.

2.2. Sample Collection and Extraction of RNA

Total RNA was extracted from serum obtained from celiac patients, previously separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C until extraction. A 300 μL sample of serum was mixed with 1.5 mL of TRIzol® Reagent (Merck Life Science, Milan, Italy); after 3 min at room temperature, 300 μL of chloroform was added to the samples, and the aqueous phase was separated by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. RNA was precipitated with 750 μL of 2-propanol at −80 °C overnight, then recovered by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, washed in 75% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in RNase-free water. RNA was quantified by the NanoDrop spectrophotometer.

2.3. miRNA Profiling from Serum of Celiac Patients

A 300 ng aliquot of RNA from each sample was analyzed using human v3 miRNA CSO.12 assays as immunology panels (Diatech Lab Line, Jesi (AN), Italy and nCounter System NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA, USA). Data were analyzed using nSolver Analysis Software 4.0 (https://www.nanostring.com/products/analysis-solutions/ncounter-analysis-solutions/ (accessed on 4 January 2022)). Before evaluating dysregulated miRNAs, we carried out a quality control analysis to detect any anomalies during the processing of samples and to verify the performance of the reactions. After the background subtraction of the geometric average of all the negative controls, we used the geometric average of all the positive controls as a normalization factor and normalized all miRNAs on the basis of the codeSet content by selecting ‘all gene function’ (excluding Housekeeping, SpikeIn, Ligation). A different miRNA expression was defined using fold change (FC) estimation of the groups, and the t-test was performed considering a p value < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval as significant. In addition, we calculated the false discovery rate (FDR) and Bonferroni correction [11].

2.4. Data Processing of Targets of miRNAs

The predictive targets of miRNAs were identified using the database miRDB (http://mirdb.org/ (accessed on 4 January 2022)) thanks to the MirTarget bioinformatic tool, which is based on sequencing experiments [12].

2.5. Functional Enrichment Analysis and Network Construction

Enrichment and gene ontology (GO) analyses were carried out using the WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt) (http://www.webgestalt.org/ (accessed on 4 January 2022)) selecting over-representation analysis (ORA) (as the method for Homo sapiens) and gene ontology (as the functional database) [13]. The schemes of miRNAs and their targets, or the target genes and their referred GO, were obtained by Cytoscape_v3.9.0 (https://cytoscape.org/ (accessed on 4 January 2022)) [14]. For protein–protein interaction analysis, we employed NetworkAnalyst (https://www.networkanalyst.ca/ (accessed on 4 January 2022)) [15].

3. Results

3.1. Details of the Populations Enrolled in the Study

We have investigated miRNA expression in the serum of three cohorts of CD patients composed of responsive to GFD, RCD1, and RCD2. In the first analysis, we compared 5 GFD and 7 RCD, while in the second analysis we compared 5 RCD2 and 6 RCD1 subjects. In Supplementary Material Table S1, we recorded for each patient the following clinical and demographic data: age, age at the diagnosis of CD and RCD, sex, type of RCD, last duodenal histology (Marsh–Oberhuber classification), TG2 antibodies, the presence of aberrant IELs, comorbidities, TCRγ rearrangement, ongoing treatment, and compliance with GFD (urine gluten peptide detection). Five CD patients responsive to GFD were analyzed: 4 females, age 42.4 ± 10.43 years, and age at diagnosis of CD 9.2 ± 12.21 years. Eleven RCD patients were analyzed: 7 females, age 54.73 ± 14.79 years, age at diagnosis of CD 46.55 ± 14.40 years, and age at RCD diagnosis 48.55 ± 13.60 years. Six of them were classified as RCD1 and five as RCD2. No differences in terms of sex distribution and age, age at CD, and RCD diagnosis have been evidenced between the two groups. All duodenal histology presented atrophy without differences in terms of the Marsh–Oberhuber classification between RCD1 and 2. Comorbidity was present in at least 33.3% (2/6) of RCD1 patients and 60% (3/5) of RCD2; globally, 45% (5/11) of immunological disorders were present in RCD.

3.2. Identification of Marker miRNAs Predictive of Refractoriness in Celiac Patients

We performed the miRNA profiling of serum from CD patients with the aim to identify a panel of miRNAs useful for the screening and monitoring of RCD individuals. In the first analysis, we compared seven RCD patients with five patients responsive to a GFD using Nanostring Technologies and nSolver™ Analysis Software 4.0 to evaluate the serum levels of dysregulated miRNAs. This comparison revealed 264 miRNAs differently expressed with a p-value < 0.05. Of these, 141 miRNAs displaying adjusted FDR and Bonferroni correction < 0.05 have been clustered in the heatmap shown in Figure 1 and are listed in Supplementary Material Table S2.
Five miRNAs (miR-27b-3p, miR-206, miR-216b-5p, miR-4536-5p, and miR-548g-3p) were increased with FC > 1.5, whereas the other 136 miRNAs were decreased slightly, although only significantly. Believing that upregulated miRNAs are better suited for diagnostic and prognostic applications, we validated the top five miRNAs in additional samples (2 RCD patients vs. four subjects responsive to GFD) associated from a clinical point of view with the refractory condition. Additional details of the analysis carried out on dysregulated miRNAs in CD patients can be found in Supplementary Material File S1.

3.3. Identification of Marker miRNAs Predictive of Refractoriness to Distinguish RCD1 from RCD2

In the second analysis, we focused on finding possible markers linked to the RCD2 subset. Therefore, we recruited additional patients with RCD for a total of 11 subjects, 5 of whom had RCD2 and 6 RCD1. The search for differentially expressed miRNAs in serum revealed 15 miRNAs with a p value < 0.05. Their hierarchical clustering dendrogram is shown in Figure 2, and the FC is reported in Table 1: eight of them were increased (miR-770-5p, miR-181b-2-3p, miR-1193, miR-1226-3p, miR-490-3p, miR-302c-3p, miR-371a-5p, and miR-320e), while seven were decreased in RCD2 (let-7d-5p, miR-606, miR-1306-5p, miR-101-3p, miR-345-5p, miR-935, and miR-107). In addition, we underline that miR-490-3p, let-7d-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-935 were already dysregulated with respect to the GFD-responsive samples; the levels of miR-490-3p were further raised in RCD2; and the levels of let-7d-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-935 dropped slightly.
Note that the analysis of the median and the distribution in quartiles plotted in Figure 3 lets us better appreciate the differences in the expression of these miRNAs in relation to the group. Among those showing FC > 2 (as absolute value), that is, miR-770-5p, miR-181b-2-3p, miR-1193, miR-1226-3p, miR-490-3p, and miR-107, the most relevant candidates are miR-770-5p, miR-181b-2-3p, miR-1193, and miR-1226-3p.

3.4. Analysis of Targets of miRNAs Dysregulated in RDC2 Patients and Networks of Genes Engaged in Biological Functions

Identified miRNAs in serum can also easily function as modulators of target genes in tissular regions far from their point of release. Hence, the study of their possible targets can be relevant to define networks of transcriptionally modulated genes. Consequently, these targets might play a role in the pathophysiology of alterations occurring in celiac patients, as well as being useful in research on other types of biomarkers. The first goal was to identify targets of miRNAs dysregulated in RCD2. For this purpose, we have used a similar approach to that described by Garcia-Moreno et al. [16], performing an enrichment analysis of the targets of all 15 miRNAs resulting from the findings reported above (Figure 3 and Table 1) using the database miRDB (http://mirdb.org/ (accessed on 4 January 2022)). We considered all the significant miRNAs in order not to lose important information for the subsequent steps to define the affected pathways. We have chosen targets with a score greater than 90%, obtaining a list of 915 genes (some targeted by several miRNAs), reported along with additional information in Supplementary Material File S2. Further, we carried out an enrichment analysis using WebGestalt to restrict the list to 751 relevant ‘Entrez Gene IDs’, which are annotated within the selected functional categories and in the reference list, as shown by the bar chart of the main macro-categories (Figure 4A).
Focused on biological process not redundant (as category), we set a range of Entrez Gene IDs in the category between 5 and 500 and the Multiple Test Adjustment Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 0.05 as the significance level. In this manner, we identified 71 enriched categories that we have further filtered to restrict redundancy by choosing weighted set parameters that maximize gene coverage. In this manner, we have obtained 20 GO annotations (reported in Figure 4B and listed in Table 2 based on decreasing enrichment ratio), which describe the major number of relevant genes with respect to those contained in the specific set. There were 397 overlapping genes.
Note that the best categories, taking as the threshold an enrichment ratio > 2, were in response to transforming growth factor β with 32/238 genes of the set; cytoskeleton-dependent intracellular transport with 21/170; the regulation of gene expression with 30/258; in utero embryonic development with 36/345; and, finally, cell–cell signaling by Wnt with 47/460 (see Supplementary Material File S2). As a miRNA can target multiple genes, and the same gene can also be affected by more than one miRNA, we focused the succeeding investigations into 39 genes targetable by more than one miRNA. In our opinion, these represent the core of possible impacted transcripts. As summarized in Supplementary Material Table S3 [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], we have associated each target gene with putative specific functions, with 29 of them being validated in the literature.
To better understand the relationship between target genes and corresponding miRNAs, we have used Cytoscape_v3.9.0 and schematized the most important relationships in Figure 5. MiR-7d-5p, miR-101-3p, miR-107, and miR-302c-3p were connected with the greatest number of validated targets. Indeed, their relationship was confirmed by miRTarbase and/or Tarbase (DIANA). The following seven validated genes were simultaneously targeted by three miRNAs (usually represented by two downregulated miRNAs and one upregulated miRNA): TNRC6B (trinucleotide repeat-containing gene 6B protein), CPEB3 (cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 3), MYCN (MYCN proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor), FZD6 (frizzled class receptor 6), FBXW7 (F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7), TET3 (Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 3), and TGFBR3 (transforming growth factor β receptor 3).
Except for the last gene, which is regulated by decreased miRNAs in serum, for the others the effect on expression is more complex because of the opposite activities of miRNAs. Many of the proteins encoded by these target genes are regulatory factors.
For instance, TET3 is engaged by REST to regulate gene expression by hydroxymethylation; CPEB3 is a translational regulator; TNRC6B is a factor playing a role in miRNA- and siRNA-dependent post-transcriptional gene silencing; MYCN encodes the well-known proto-oncogene; FBXW7 is a tumor suppressor controlling proteasome-mediated degradation of oncoproteins and is mutated in tumors, including acute myeloid leukemia [38] and 25% of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma [39]; and FZD6 belongs to G-protein-coupling receptors playing a role in the non-canonical Wnt. Using Cytoscape_v3.9.0, we demonstrated the relationship between the 39 genes targeted by more than one miRNA and the best 20 GO annotations. As reported in Figure 6, TGFBR3 belongs to the functional process GO:0071559 (the response to transforming growth factor β) along with ACVR2B (the activin receptor type 2B) and the transcription factor ONECUT2 (one cut domain family member 2) involved, respectively, in cell signaling and tumor growth. TNRC6B and MYC are also active in gene-expression regulation [10,40], defined by GO:0040029, SMARCA5 (the SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 5), and TRIM71 (the tripartite motif containing 71). In this context, SMARCA5 regulates the access to DNA and is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia [41], while TRIM71 is a post-transcriptional repressor involved in the cell cycle maintaining embryonic stem cell growth and in the processing of the presentation of class I MHC-mediated antigen [42]. CPEB3 is another post-transcriptional regulator that controls the polyadenine tail of mRNA and interferes with different biological functions (GO:0001101, GO:0010608, and GO:0050769) [43]. Again, the functional category GO:0016569 (covalent chromatin modification) includes TET3 and TET2 (Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2), with the latter altered in patients with several myeloid malignancies [44,45]; DR1 (the down-regulator of transcription 1), forming the well-known DR1/DRAP1 heterodimer [46]; and ELK4 (ETS transcription factor ELK4), forming ternary complexes with the serum response elements in the promoter of the c-Fos oncogene [47]. Interestingly, FZD6 is involved in GO:0198738 (cell–cell signaling by Wnt) [48] and GO:0002009 (the morphogenesis of an epithelium) [49], functions that may be strongly associated with CD. Finally, FBXW7 and BTG1 (BTG anti-proliferation factor 1) are linked to chromosomal translocation in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia [50,51], and RORA (RAR related orphan receptor A) has an impact on angiogenesis (GO:0001525) and is crucial for the development of type 2 innate lymphoid cells and cytokine production [52,53].
To complete our analysis, we made use of NetworkAnalyst 3.0 to better understand the networks in which the relevant genes are involved. We defined four pathways (Figure 7): (a) the main one is centered on RELA, which is required for NF-κB activation, to which are connected most of the 39 genes targeted by multiple dysregulated miRNAs in the serum of RCD2 patients; (b) the second includes TNRC6B, TRIM71, and AGO4 (protein argonaute-4), which are associated with functions affecting transcript stability; (c) the third includes FZD6 and FZD3, regarding NF-κB-mediated Wnt signaling; and (d) the fourth includes CPEB3 and BTG1, which are relevant for controlling neoplastic proliferation.

3.5. Additional Information about the Top miRNAs and GOs

We investigated further target genes of miR-181b-2-3p, miR-1226-3p, and miR-1193 because they are not recognized by multiple miRNAs also excluded by the previous analysis, although they belong to the top five categories (see Table 2). Concerning the genes recognized by miR-181b-2-3p, we found, in the GO:0071559 category (the response to transforming growth factor β), FGFR2 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) and nuclear receptor NR3C1 (nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1) acting as receptors of glucocorticoids; in GO:0198738 (cell–cell signaling by Wnt), we found FGFR2, the X-linked gene DDX3X (DEAD-box helicase 3 X-linked), and FBXW11 (the F-box and WD repeat domain containing 11) associated with lymphocytic leukemia [38,54] and ROR1 (receptor-tyrosine-kinase-like orphan receptor 1), which is essential during embryogenesis and upregulated in tumors; while CCN1 (cellular communication network factor 1) and the gene coding the new factor VASH1 (vasohibin-1) belong to the GO:0001701 pathway (in utero embryonic development)—they inhibit angiogenesis and are enhanced by VEGF-A and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF)-2 [55] (which is a target of the other miR-1226-3p). Considering the genes interacting with miR-1193, one is included in the GO:0071559 category and encodes cysteine protease USP15 (ubiquitin-specific protease 15), which is significantly expressed at low levels in the chronic myelogenous leukemia cell lines and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of affected patients [56]. The other genes were neuronal targets, such as PLPPR5 (phospholipid phosphatase-related 5), which is associated with filopodia and neurite growth and GSG1L (germ cell-specific gene 1-like) [57], a transmembrane auxiliary protein suppressing current flow acting on neuronal calcium-permeable AMPA receptors responsible for excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain. Their putative involvement in this pathological context obviously needs further investigation.

4. Discussion

Celiac disease (CD) usually has a favorable prognosis and a good response to a gluten-free diet (GFD), but in a limited number of patients, severe complications can occur if they are unresponsive to a GFD. Previous results indicated the deregulation of seven miRNAs (miR-31-5p, miR-192-3p, miR-194-5p, miR-551a, miR-551b-5p, miR-638, and miR-1290) in a larger series of CD patients with specific clinical phenotypes [9]. These seven miRNAs were studied in duodenal mesenchymal cells obtained from CD patients and treated with gliadin peptides (13- and 33-mer). Again, the miRNA cluster miR-192/194, involved in matrix remodeling, was deregulated in CD with different clinical presentations, and the miR-192-3p levels were modulated by gliadin peptides in vitro. In refractory CD (RCD), small bowel malignancies, enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL), or non-Hodgkin lymphoma are serious complications with a high mortality rate. RCD can be further classified as RCD1 or RCD2 depending on the IEL phenotype. Actually, RCD2 is considered a preneoplastic condition and treated with chemotherapy or immunosuppressive agents, although with a low response rate. Furthermore, the absence of biomarkers indicating the patients at a high risk of developing malignancies reduces the efficacy of diagnostic interventions. Previous studies indicated that miRNAs could play a relevant role as diagnostic biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets [58,59]. For example, the miR-200 and miR-192/215 families were progressively undetectable in RCD2 and lymphomas, while miR-17/92 and C19MC were up-regulated. These miRNAs are decreased in IL15-transgenic mice after Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition. According to miRNA expression, SMAD3, MDM2, c-Myc, and activated-STAT3 were inversely regulated and increased in RCD2 and EATL, after JAK inhibition restoring their baseline levels. These findings suggested the miRNA-related activation of STAT3 and c-Myc oncogenic signaling in RCD2, contributing to lymphomagenesis [10].
We have performed the present study employing 7 versus 5 and 6 vs. 5 subjects to compare different groups of RCD individuals against GFD and RCD2 against RCD1 respectively. The size of the samples is not completely respective of the indications found in the literature [60], suggesting at least 6 vs. 6 biological replicates, but, in any case, they are indicative and close to them, considering the rarity of these clinical conditions. For these reasons, we also applied FDR and Bonferroni correction < 0.05. Firstly, we identified a set of 141 circulating miRNAs deregulated in RCD compared with subjects responsive to a GFD, and 15 miRNAs specifically deregulated in RCD2 compared with RCD1. Among the latter set, eight miRNAs showed increased levels (miR-770-5p, miR-181b-2-3p, miR-1193, miR-1226-3p, miR-490-3p, miR-302c-3p, miR-371a-5p, and miR-320e), while the other seven were decreased in RCD2 (let-7d-5p, miR-606, miR-1306-5p, miR-101-3p, miR-345-5p, miR-935, and miR-107). Some of them (miR-490-3p, let-7d-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-935) were already differentially expressed in the comparison between RCD and GFD-responsive samples, but note that the levels of miR-490-3p (targeting the KDM7A histone demethylase) were further raised in RCD2, while the levels of let-7d-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-935 dropped slightly. Focusing on those increasing selectively in RCD2, we point to miR-770-5p, miR-181b-2-3p, miR-1193, and miR-1226-3p as the most relevant candidates. Notably, miR-181b is strongly associated with inflammation, but only a little information has been reported in the literature on the specific miR-181b-2-3p, which seems more appropriately linked to drug response/resistance than to doxorubicin in cancer [61,62]. miR-1193 inhibits fibroblast proliferation, is associated with the apoptosis of fibroblasts exposed to interleukin-1β in a rheumatoid arthritis model [63], and plays a role as an oncosuppressor in human T-cell leukemia cells [64]; monitoring changes in their levels could be relevant as it may possibly be related to the appearance of malignant pathologies. In contrast, functionally miR-770-5p and miR-1226-3p promote tumorigenicity in several types of cancers [65,66]. We further carried out our investigations using bioinformatic tools to define the possible networks of genes engaged in the category ‘biological process’ and the target of the regulated set of miRNAs in RCD2. We obtained 20 GO annotations containing the main relevant genes (n = 397), among which the top five GO were ‘response to transforming growth factor β’ (including 32/238 genes of the set); ‘cytoskeleton-dependent intracellular transport’ (21/170); ‘the regulation of gene expression’ (30/258); ‘in utero embryonic development’ (36/345); and, finally, ‘cell–cell signaling by Wnt’ (47/460). Among the targets of the 15 dysregulated miRNAs in RCD2, we focused on those that have more than one target gene and are validated in the literature. Several of the evidenced genes are notoriously linked with CD, belonging to the ‘response to Transforming Growth Factor β’ pathway [1,2], or ‘cell–cell signaling by Wnt’ [67] and ‘the regulation of gene expression, epigenetic’ [68] or interconnected in the network of RELA. Concerning the putative targets of the best miRNA candidates, the genes recognized by miR-181b-2-3p are involved in mitotic processes (CEP135) [43] or bind RNA and are active in P-body and nucleoplasm (TNRC6B) [40] and angiogenesis (DR1) [46], as well as being the target of miR-1226-3 (the oncosuppressor FBXW7) [38,39,50], while miR-1193 specifically affects the genes of the TGF-β pathways. We want to also highlight the ‘covalent chromatin modification’ network, containing TET2 [37,44,45], which is reversibly modulated by miR-302c-3p and miR-101-3p, because it is a potential oncogene and is affected by mutations associated with EATL in RCD2 patients [69]. From this perspective, the miRNAs related to specific genetic features interfering with chromatin structure and affecting transcriptional regulation assume increasing importance. Analogously, we underline as crucial another regulatory network of genes, including AGO2 [21,28], AGO4 (associated with downregulation of miR-107 and miR-let-7d-5p), and DICER1, belonging to the machinery associated with post-transcriptional control.
For a clearer understanding, we have summarized these conclusions in the scheme below (Table 3). With this study, we highlight that to understand the shift from RCD1 to RDC2, it is not enough to consider the wide range of genes related to inflammation; alterations and the dysregulation of the indicated genes (oncogenes, tumour suppressors, regulators) responsible of reprogramming and promoting changes through pre- and post-transcriptional mechanisms need to be examined as well.

5. Conclusions

We have identified a set of miRNAs characterizing the RCD2 trait that can be monitored in the serum of patients. Some of them are associated with an increase in inflammation, while others signal the progression of pathology as they are closely linked to oncogenesis. Interestingly, some deregulated miRNAs could reflect altered conditions derived from epigenetic or post-transcription modifications that could be better investigated by whole-genome analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines10061408/s1, Table S1: Patient description; Table S2: Dysregulated miRNAs in serum samples obtained from unresponsive subjects and subjects responsive to a GFD; Table S3: The main functional target genes common to several dysregulated miRNAs involved in biological processes and identified in serum from RCD2 patients; Supplementary Material File S1: Data p value analysis UNRESP vs. RESP-RCD2 vs. RCD1; Supplementary Material File S2: Target 90%.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.R., N.B., and L.E.; methodology, V.V., L.D., C.B. and M.V.; software, C.T.; validation, L.R. and L.E.; formal analysis, A.S., V.L., P.C. and L.T.; investigation, A.T., A.S. and V.L.; data curation, N.B. and C.T.; writing—original draft preparation, L.R., N.B., C.T., A.S. and C.B.; writing—review and editing, L.D., C.B. and M.V.; visualization, P.C., L.T., L.S. and N.N.; supervision, L.R., L.E. and N.B.; project administration, L.E.; and funding acquisition, L.E. and M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Schär Institute Nutrition Project Award 2018 (Leda Roncoroni) and Io e il glutine Onlus—Associazione per il sostegno e la cura della malattia celiaca e delle patologie glutine correlate, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano (parere 170_2021, 3 March 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

celiac disease (CD), gluten-free diet (GFD), microRNAs (miRNAs), transglutaminase antibodies (TGA), refractory CD (RCD), enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL), polyclonal T-cell receptors (TCRs), aberrant intraepithelial T-cell clone (IEL), intestinal T-cell lymphoma (ITL), fold change (FC), false discovery rate (FDR), gene ontology (GO), over-representation analysis (ORA), TNRC6B (trinucleotide repeat-containing gene 6B protein), CPEB3 (cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 3), MYCN (MYCN proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor), FZD6 (frizzled class receptor 6), FBXW7 (F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7), TET3 (Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 3), TGFBR3 (transforming growth factor β receptor 3), ACVR2B (activin receptor type 2B), ONECUT2 (one cut domain family member 2), SMARCA5 (SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 5), TRIM71 (tripartite motif containing 71), TET2 (Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2), DR1 (the down-regulator of transcription 1), ELK4 (ETS transcription factor ELK4), BTG1 (BTG anti-proliferation factor 1), RORA (RAR related orphan receptor A), AGO4 (protein argonaute-4), FGFR2 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2), NR3C1 (nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1), DDX3X (DEAD-box helicase 3 X-linked), FBXW11 (F-box and WD repeat domain containing 11), ROR1 (receptor-tyrosine-kinase-like orphan receptor 1), CCN1 (cellular communication network factor 1), USP15 (ubiquitin-specific protease 15), PLPPR5 (phospholipid phosphatase-related 5), and GSG1L (germ cell-specific gene 1-like).

References

  1. Felli, C.; Baldassarre, A.; Masotti, A. Intestinal and Circulating MicroRNAs in Coeliac Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Tan, I.L.; de Almeida, R.C.; Modderman, R.; Stachurska, A.; Dekens, J.; Barisani, D.; Meijer, C.R.; Roca, M.; Martinez-Ojinaga, E.; Shamir, R.; et al. Circulating miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Celiac Disease Development. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 734763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bascuñán, K.A.; Pérez-Bravo, F.; Gaudioso, G.; Vaira, V.; Roncoroni, L.; Elli, L.; Monguzzi, E.; Araya, M. A miRNA-Based Blood and Mucosal Approach for Detecting and Monitoring Celiac Disease. Am. J. Dig. Dis. 2019, 65, 1982–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Comani, G.B.; Panceri, R.; Dinelli, M.; Biondi, A.; Mancuso, C.; Meneveri, R.; Barisani, D. miRNA-regulated gene expression differs in celiac disease patients according to the age of presentation. Genes Nutr. 2015, 10, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.; Fan, X.-M. MicroRNAs: New therapeutic targets for intestinal barrier dysfunction. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5818–5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rubio-Tapia, A.; A Murray, J. Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease. Gut 2010, 59, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Malamut, G.; Cellier, C. Refractory Celiac Disease. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 2018, 48, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Woodward, J. Improving outcomes of refractory celiac disease—Current and emerging treatment strategies. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2016, 9, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Vaira, V.; Roncoroni, L.; Barisani, D.; Gaudioso, G.; Bosari, S.; Bulfamante, G.; Doneda, L.; Conte, D.; Tomba, C.; Bardella, M.T.; et al. microRNA profiles in coeliac patients distinguish different clinical phenotypes and are modulated by gliadin peptides in primary duodenal fibroblasts. Clin. Sci. 2013, 126, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vaira, V.; Gaudioso, G.; Laginestra, M.A.; Terrasi, A.; Agostinelli, C.; Bosari, S.; Di Sabatino, A.; Vanoli, A.; Paulli, M.; Ferrero, S.; et al. Deregulation of miRNAs-cMYC circuits is a key event in refractory celiac disease type-2 lymphomagenesis. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 1151–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.; Wang, X. miRDB: An online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 48, D127–D131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, B.; Kirov, S.; Snoddy, J. WebGestalt: An integrated system for exploring gene sets in various biological contexts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W741–W748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xia, J.; Benner, M.J.; Hancock, R.E.W. NetworkAnalyst—Integrative approaches for protein–protein interaction network analysis and visual exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W167–W174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Garcia-Moreno, A.; Carmona-Saez, P. Computational Methods and Software Tools for Functional Analysis of miRNA Data. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gottwein, E.; Corcoran, D.L.; Mukherjee, N.; Skalsky, R.L.; Hafner, M.; Nusbaum, J.D.; Shamulailatpam, P.; Love, C.L.; Dave, S.S.; Tuschl, T.; et al. Viral MicroRNA Targetome of KSHV-Infected Primary Effusion Lymphoma Cell Lines. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 10, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kishore, S.; Jaskiewicz, L.; Burger, L.; Hausser, J.; Khorshid, M.; Zavolan, M. A quantitative analysis of CLIP methods for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Methods 2011, 8, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lipchina, I.; Elkabetz, Y.; Hafner, M.; Sheridan, R.; Mihailovic, A.; Tuschl, T.; Sander, C.; Studer, L.; Betel, D. Genome-wide identification of microRNA targets in human ES cells reveals a role for miR-302 in modulating BMP response. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 2173–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, X.; Schulz, R.; Edmunds, S.; Krueger, E.; Markert, E.; Gaedcke, J.; Cormet-Boyaka, E.; Ghadimi, M.; Beissbarth, T.; Levine, A.J.; et al. MicroRNA-101 Suppresses Tumor Cell Proliferation by Acting as an Endogenous Proteasome Inhibitor via Targeting the Proteasome Assembly Factor POMP. Mol. Cell 2015, 59, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. A Farazi, T.; Hoeve, J.J.T.; Brown, M.; Mihailovic, A.; Horlings, H.M.; Van De Vijver, M.J.; Tuschl, T.; A Wessels, L.F. Identification of distinct miRNA target regulation between breast cancer molecular subtypes using AGO2-PAR-CLIP and patient datasets. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Boudreau, R.; Jiang, P.; Gilmore, B.L.; Spengler, R.; Tirabassi, R.; Nelson, J.A.; Ross, C.A.; Xing, Y.; Davidson, B.L. Transcriptome-wide Discovery of microRNA Binding Sites in Human Brain. Neuron 2014, 81, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Memczak, S.; Jens, M.; Elefsinioti, A.; Torti, F.; Krueger, J.; Rybak, A.; Maier, L.; Mackowiak, S.D.; Gregersen, L.H.; Munschauer, M.; et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature 2013, 495, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Whisnant, A.; Bogerd, H.P.; Flores, O.; Ho, P.; Powers, J.G.; Sharova, N.; Stevenson, M.; Chen, C.-H.; Cullen, B.R. In-Depth Analysis of the Interaction of HIV-1 with Cellular microRNA Biogenesis and Effector Mechanisms. mBio 2013, 4, e00193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kameswaran, V.; Kaestner, K.H. The Missing lnc(RNA) between the pancreatic β-cell and diabetes. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Skalsky, R.L.; Corcoran, D.; Gottwein, E.; Frank, C.L.; Kang, D.; Hafner, M.; Nusbaum, J.; Feederle, R.; Delecluse, H.-J.; Luftig, M.A.; et al. The Viral and Cellular MicroRNA Targetome in Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines. PLOS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haecker, I.; Gay, L.A.; Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; Morse, A.M.; McIntyre, L.M.; Renne, R. Ago HITS-CLIP Expands Understanding of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus miRNA Function in Primary Effusion Lymphomas. PLOS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Karginov, F.V.; Hannon, G.J. Remodeling of Ago2–mRNA interactions upon cellular stress reflects miRNA complementarity and correlates with altered translation rates. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 1624–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hafner, M.B.; Zanatta, J.; Zotelli, V.L.R.; Batista, M.J.; Sousa, M.D.L.R. Perception of toothache in adults from state capitals and interior cities within the Brazilian geographic regions. BMC Oral Health 2013, 13, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pillai, M.M.; Gillen, A.; Yamamoto, T.M.; Kline, E.; Brown, J.; Flory, K.; Hesselberth, J.; Kabos, P. HITS-CLIP reveals key regulators of nuclear receptor signaling in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2014, 146, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grosswendt, S.; Filipchyk, A.; Manzano, M.; Klironomos, F.; Schilling, M.; Herzog, M.; Gottwein, E.; Rajewsky, N. Unambiguous Identification of miRNA:Target Site Interactions by Different Types of Ligation Reactions. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 1042–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Frankel, L.B.; Wen, J.; Lees, M.; Høyer-Hansen, M.; Farkas, T.; Krogh, A.; Jäättelä, M.; Lund, A.H. microRNA-101 is a potent inhibitor of autophagy. EMBO J. 2011, 30, 4628–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Xue, Y.; Ouyang, K.; Huang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ouyang, H.; Li, H.; Wang, G.; Wu, Q.; Wei, C.; Bi, Y.; et al. Direct Conversion of Fibroblasts to Neurons by Reprogramming PTB-Regulated MicroRNA Circuits. Cell 2013, 152, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Balakrishnan, I.; Yang, X.; Brown, J.; Ramakrishnan, A.; Torok-Storb, B.; Kabos, P.; Hesselberth, J.R.; Pillai, M.M. Genome-Wide Analysis of miRNA-mRNA Interactions in Marrow Stromal Cells. Stem Cells 2013, 32, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Buechner, J.; Tømte, E.; Haug, B.H.; Henriksen, J.R.; Løkke, C.; Flægstad, T.; Einvik, C. Tumour-suppressor microRNAs let-7 and mir-101 target the proto-oncogene MYCN and inhibit cell proliferation in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 105, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lewis, B.P.; Shih, I.-H.; Jones-Rhoades, M.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Burge, C.B. Prediction of Mammalian MicroRNA Targets. Cell 2003, 115, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cheng, J.; Guo, S.; Chen, S.; Mastriano, S.J.; Liu, C.; D’Alessio, A.C.; Hysolli, E.; Guo, Y.; Yao, H.; Megyola, C.M.; et al. An Extensive Network of TET2-Targeting MicroRNAs Regulates Malignant Hematopoiesis. Cell Rep. 2013, 5, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sadigh, S.; Morrissette, J.J.D.; Bagg, A. FBXW7 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2019, 60, 1601–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yeh, C.-H.; Bellon, M.; Pancewicz-Wojtkiewicz, J.; Nicot, C. Oncogenic mutations in the FBXW7 gene of adult T-cell leukemia patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6731–6736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, Z.; Johnson, S.T.; Zhang, Z.; Corey, D.R. Expression of TNRC6 (GW182) Proteins Is Not Necessary for Gene Silencing by Fully Complementary RNA Duplexes. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2019, 29, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zikmund, T.; Paszekova, H.; Kokavec, J.; Kerbs, P.; Thakur, S.; Turkova, T.; Tauchmanova, P.; Greif, P.A.; Stopka, T. Loss of ISWI ATPase SMARCA5 (SNF2H) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Inhibits Proliferation and Chromatid Cohesion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Chang, H.-M.; Martinez, N.J.; Thornton, J.E.; Hagan, J.P.; Nguyen, K.D.; Gregory, R.I. Trim71 cooperates with microRNAs to repress Cdkn1a expression and promote embryonic stem cell proliferation. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 923–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Fu, X.; Liu, J.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Han, D.; Zhang, Z.; Yuan, B.; Gao, Y.; et al. CPEB3 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of bovine cumulus cells. Anim. Sci. J. 2020, 91, e13416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Abdel-Wahab, O.; Mullally, A.; Hedvat, C.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Patel, J.; Wadleigh, M.; Malinge, S.; Yao, J.J.; Kilpivaara, O.; Bhat, R.; et al. Genetic characterization of TET1, TET2, and TET3 alterations in myeloid malignancies. Blood 2009, 114, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Delhommeau, F.; Dupont, S.; Della Valle, V.; James, C.; Trannoy, S.; Massé, A.; Kosmider, O.; Le Couedic, J.-P.; Robert, F.; Alberdi, A.; et al. Mutation inTET2in Myeloid Cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 2289–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, S.; Na, J.G.; Hampsey, M.; Reinberg, D. The Dr1/DRAP1 heterodimer is a global repressor of transcription in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 820–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Peng, C.; Zeng, W.; Su, J.; Kuang, Y.; He, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, J.; Ma, W.; Bode, A.M.; Dong, Z.; et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) is a key mediator for EGF-induced cell transformation mediated through the ELK4/c-Fos signaling pathway. Oncogene 2015, 35, 1170–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cassaro, A.; Grillo, G.; Notaro, M.; Gliozzo, J.; Esposito, I.; Reda, G.; Trojani, A.; Valentini, G.; Di Camillo, B.; Cairoli, R.; et al. FZD6 triggers Wnt-signalling driven by WNT10BIVS1 expression and highlights new targets in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 39, 364–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Yin, F.; Xin, C.; Zeng, X.; Chen, Q. MiR-302b Suppresses Tumor Metastasis by Targeting Frizzled 6 in OSCC. J. Dent. Res. 2021, 100, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kar, R.; Jha, S.K.; Ojha, S.; Sharma, A.; Dholpuria, S.; Raju, V.S.R.; Prasher, P.; Chellappan, D.K.; Gupta, G.; Singh, S.K.; et al. The FBXW7-NOTCH interactome : A ubiquitin proteasomal system-induced crosstalk modulating oncogenic transformation in human tissues. Cancer Rep. 2021, 4, e1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rimokh, R.; Rouault, J.-P.; Wahbi, K.; Gadoux, M.; Lafage, M.; Archimbaud, E.; Charrin, C.; Gentilhomme, O.; Germain, D.; Samarut, J.; et al. A chromosome 12 coding region is juxtaposed to theMYC protooncogene locus in a t(8; 12) (q24;q22) translocation in a case of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 1991, 3, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Halim, T.Y.F.; MacLaren, A.; Romanish, M.T.; Gold, M.J.; McNagny, K.M.; Takei, F. Retinoic-Acid-Receptor-Related Orphan Nuclear Receptor Alpha Is Required for Natural Helper Cell Development and Allergic Inflammation. Immunity 2012, 37, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lo, B.C.; Gold, M.J.; Hughes, M.R.; Antignano, F.; Valdez, Y.; Zaph, C.; Harder, K.W.; McNagny, K.M. The orphan nuclear receptor RORα and group 3 innate lymphoid cells drive fibrosis in a mouse model of Crohn’s disease. Sci. Immunol. 2016, 1, eaaf8864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, L.; Feng, W.; Yang, X.; Yang, F.; Wang, R.; Ren, Q.; Zhu, X.; Zheng, G. Fbxw11 promotes the proliferation of lymphocytic leukemia cells through the concomitant activation of NF-κB and β-catenin/TCF signaling pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Zhao, G.; Na, R.; Li, L.; Xiao, H.; Ding, N.; Sun, Y.; Han, R. Vasohibin-1 inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses tumor growth in renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Nie, Z.-Y.; Yao, M.; Yang, Z.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.-J.; Yu, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Liu, M.-H.; et al. De-regulated STAT5A/miR-202-5p/USP15/Caspase-6 regulatory axis suppresses CML cell apoptosis and contributes to Imatinib resistance. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Broggini, T.; Nitsch, R.; Savaskan, N.E. Plasticity-related Gene 5 (PRG5) Induces Filopodia and Neurite Growth and Impedes Lysophosphatidic Acid– and Nogo-A–mediated Axonal Retraction. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21, 521–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Giuffrida, P.; Di Sabatino, A. MicroRNAs in Celiac Disease Diagnosis: A miR Curiosity or Game-Changer? Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 1877–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chamani, E.; Sargolzaei, J.; Tavakoli, T.; Rezaei, Z. microRNAs: Novel Markers in Diagnostics and Therapeutics of Celiac Disease. DNA Cell Biol. 2019, 38, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schurch, N.J.; Schofield, P.; Gierliński, M.; Cole, C.; Sherstnev, A.; Singh, V.; Wrobel, N.; Gharbi, K.; Simpson, G.G.; Owen-Hughes, T.; et al. How many biological replicates are needed in an RNA-seq experiment and which differential expression tool should you use? RNA 2016, 22, 839–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zeng, C.; Fan, D.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Yuan, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, X.; Lu, J.; Zhang, C.; Han, J.; et al. Curcumol enhances the sensitivity of doxorubicin in triple-negative breast cancer via regulating the miR-181b-2-3p-ABCC3 axis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 174, 113795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Tektemur, A.; Tektemur, N.K.; Güzel, E.E. The therapeutic effect of hesperetin on doxorubicin-induced testicular toxicity: Potential roles of the mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) and dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2021, 435, 115833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liu, B.; Ren, B. MiR-1193 represses the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of interleukin-1β-treated fibroblast-like synoviocytes via targeting JAK3. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 23, 1066–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shen, L.; Du, X.; Ma, H.; Mei, S. miR-1193 Suppresses the Proliferation and Invasion of Human T-Cell Leukemia Cells Through Directly Targeting the Transmembrane 9 Superfamily 3 (TM9SF3). Oncol. Res. Featur. Preclin. Clin. Cancer Ther. 2017, 25, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, X.; Tan, W.; Li, W.; Li, W.; Zhu, S.; Zhong, J.; Shang, C.; Chen, Y. miR-1226-3p Promotes Sorafenib Sensitivity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Downregulation of DUSP4 Expression. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 2745–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Li, X.-Y.; Zhou, L.-Y.; Luo, H.; Zhu, Q.; Zuo, L.; Liu, G.-Y.; Feng, C.; Zhao, J.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Li, X. The long noncoding RNA MIR210HG promotes tumor metastasis by acting as a ceRNA of miR-1226-3p to regulate mucin-1c expression in invasive breast cancer. Aging 2019, 11, 5646–5665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Domsa, E.M.; Berindan-Neagoe, I.; Budisan, L.; Braicu, C.; Para, I.; Tantau, A.I.; Orasan, O.H.; Ciobanu, L.; Pop, T.A.; Filip, G.A.; et al. Expression of Selected Genes and Circulating microRNAs in Patients with Celiac Disease. Medicina 2022, 58, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gnodi, E.; Meneveri, R.; Barisani, D. Celiac disease: From genetics to epigenetics. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cording, S.; Lhermitte, L.; Malamut, G.; Berrabah, S.; Trinquand, A.; Guegan, N.; Villarese, P.; Kaltenbach, S.; Meresse, B.; Khater, S.; et al. Oncogenetic landscape of lymphomagenesis in coeliac disease. Gut 2022, 71, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 01408 g001 550
Figure 1. An expression heatmap of deregulated miRNAs in unresponsive patients vs. patients responsive to a GFD. The upregulated miRNAs are indicated in Red, and the downregulated miRNAs are indicated in Green. p value < 0.05, and FDR and Bonferroni correction < 0.05.
Figure 1. An expression heatmap of deregulated miRNAs in unresponsive patients vs. patients responsive to a GFD. The upregulated miRNAs are indicated in Red, and the downregulated miRNAs are indicated in Green. p value < 0.05, and FDR and Bonferroni correction < 0.05.
Biomedicines 10 01408 g001
Biomedicines 10 01408 g002 550
Figure 2. An expression heatmap of the deregulated miRNAs in RCD2 (n = 5) vs. RCD1 (n = 6) patients. The upregulated miRNAs are indicated in Red, and the downregulated miRNAs are indicated in Green. p value < 0.05.
Figure 2. An expression heatmap of the deregulated miRNAs in RCD2 (n = 5) vs. RCD1 (n = 6) patients. The upregulated miRNAs are indicated in Red, and the downregulated miRNAs are indicated in Green. p value < 0.05.
Biomedicines 10 01408 g002
Biomedicines 10 01408 g003 550
Figure 3. The expression of dysregulated miRNAs in serum from RCD2 and RCD1 patients. The box plot showed the levels of expression of 15 miRNAs analyzed by Nanostring Technologies and by nSolver Analysis Software 4.0. The black boxes indicate samples from RCD2 subjects, and the grey boxes, the samples from RCD1 patients. The median and quartile distribution are plotted.
Figure 3. The expression of dysregulated miRNAs in serum from RCD2 and RCD1 patients. The box plot showed the levels of expression of 15 miRNAs analyzed by Nanostring Technologies and by nSolver Analysis Software 4.0. The black boxes indicate samples from RCD2 subjects, and the grey boxes, the samples from RCD1 patients. The median and quartile distribution are plotted.
Biomedicines 10 01408 g003
Biomedicines 10 01408 g004 550
Figure 4. An enrichment analysis by the WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt) and main gene ontology (GO) annotations of the biological process category. (A) A GO Slim summary of the uploaded Entrez Gene IDs. The following categories were represented: biological process in red; cellular component in blue, and molecular function in green. The number of IDs present in the category are listed on top of the bar. (B) The GO annotations resulting from enrichment and maximizing gene coverage of the non-redundant biological process category displayed with respect to the enrichment ratio.
Figure 4. An enrichment analysis by the WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt) and main gene ontology (GO) annotations of the biological process category. (A) A GO Slim summary of the uploaded Entrez Gene IDs. The following categories were represented: biological process in red; cellular component in blue, and molecular function in green. The number of IDs present in the category are listed on top of the bar. (B) The GO annotations resulting from enrichment and maximizing gene coverage of the non-redundant biological process category displayed with respect to the enrichment ratio.
Biomedicines 10 01408 g004
Biomedicines 10 01408 g005 550
Figure 5. The network of genes targeted by more than one miRNA, characterizing RCD2. An analysis performed using the tool Cytoscape_v3.9.0. The miRNAs upregulated in the serum of patients are indicated in red, and the downregulated miRNAs are indicated in green. The targets genes of miRNAs reported in the literature and validated using other bioinformatic tools, miRTarbase and/or Tarbase (DIANA), are indicated in yellow, while the predicted target previously analyzed by the database miRDB is indicated in white.
Figure 5. The network of genes targeted by more than one miRNA, characterizing RCD2. An analysis performed using the tool Cytoscape_v3.9.0. The miRNAs upregulated in the serum of patients are indicated in red, and the downregulated miRNAs are indicated in green. The targets genes of miRNAs reported in the literature and validated using other bioinformatic tools, miRTarbase and/or Tarbase (DIANA), are indicated in yellow, while the predicted target previously analyzed by the database miRDB is indicated in white.
Biomedicines 10 01408 g005
Biomedicines 10 01408 g006 550
Figure 6. The network describing the relationships between the genes targeted by more than one miRNA and the gene ontology (GO) associated with biological processes. The analysis was performed using the tool Cytoscape_v3.9.0. The network is reported at the top (the validated targets are shown in yellow), while the GO annotations are shown at the bottom.
Figure 6. The network describing the relationships between the genes targeted by more than one miRNA and the gene ontology (GO) associated with biological processes. The analysis was performed using the tool Cytoscape_v3.9.0. The network is reported at the top (the validated targets are shown in yellow), while the GO annotations are shown at the bottom.
Biomedicines 10 01408 g006
Biomedicines 10 01408 g007 550
Figure 7. The pathways of protein–protein interactions among the targets of miRNAs dysregulated in the serum of RCD2 patients. The network was generated using NetworkAnalyst 3.0. The target genes representing our input are shown in red, while the remaining genes present in the database are shown in blue.
Figure 7. The pathways of protein–protein interactions among the targets of miRNAs dysregulated in the serum of RCD2 patients. The network was generated using NetworkAnalyst 3.0. The target genes representing our input are shown in red, while the remaining genes present in the database are shown in blue.
Biomedicines 10 01408 g007
Table
Table 1. The dysregulated miRNAs evaluated in serum samples obtained from RCD2 and RCD1 patients.
Table 1. The dysregulated miRNAs evaluated in serum samples obtained from RCD2 and RCD1 patients.
miRNA NameFold Change, RCD2 vs. RCD1p Value
hsa-miR-770-5p3.020.04
hsa-miR-181b-2-3p2.620.01
hsa-miR-11932.190.00
hsa-miR-1226-3p2.100.02
hsa-miR-490-3p2.010.00
hsa-miR-302c-3p1.980.02
hsa-miR-371a-5p1.810.02
hsa-miR-320e1.410.01
hsa-let-7d-5p−1.200.04
hsa-miR-606−1.200.04
hsa-miR-1306-5p−1.220.03
hsa-miR-101-3p−1.230.04
hsa-miR-345-5p−1.230.04
hsa-miR-935−1.290.01
hsa-miR-107−2.290.04
Table
Table 2. The gene ontology (GO) annotations derived from genes targeted by miRNAs detected in serum from RCD2 patients. The analysis was post-processed using a weighted set cover method to reduce redundancy. The GO are listed with respect to the enrichment ratio.
Table 2. The gene ontology (GO) annotations derived from genes targeted by miRNAs detected in serum from RCD2 patients. The analysis was post-processed using a weighted set cover method to reduce redundancy. The GO are listed with respect to the enrichment ratio.
AnnotationDescriptionGenes in the SetExpected
Value		Enrichment Ratiop Value
< 0.05		FDR
< 0.05
GO:0071559Response to transforming growth factor β32/23812.0702.65130.004380.00037
GO:0030705Cytoskeleton-dependent intracellular transport21/17086.2112.43590.000140.00809
GO:0040029Regulation of gene expression, epigenetic31/25813.0842.29290.000020.00399
GO:0001701In utero embryonic development36/34517.4962.05760.000030.00399
GO:0198738Cell–cell signaling by Wnt47/6023.3282.01480.000000.00158
GO:0032409Regulation of transporter activity25/24712.5261.99590.000790.02165
GO:0001101Response to acid chemical33/33216.8371.96000.000170.00885
GO:0044772Mitotic cell cycle phase transition46/48724.6971.86260.000040.00399
GO:0002009Morphogenesis of an epithelium45/48024.3421.84870.000050.00439
GO:0001525Angiogenesis45/48724.6971.82210.000070.00562
GO:0050769Positive regulation of neurogenesis41/44722.6681.80870.000180.00885
GO:0061564Axon development43/49024.8491.73040.000320.01315
GO:0043087Regulation of GTPase activity41/47223.9361.71290.000550.01856
GO:0048545Response to steroid hormone33/38819.6761.67710.002570.03705
GO:1902532Negative regulation of intracellular signal transduction42/49525.1031.67310.000750.02137
GO:0016311Dephosphorylation39/46123.3781.66820.001210.02707
GO:0071900Regulation of protein serine/threonine kinase activity42/49725.2041.66640.000820.02170
GO:0016569Covalent chromatin modification39/46823.7331.64330.001600.02954
GO:0090066Regulation of anatomical structure size40/48724.6971.61960.001830.03028
GO:0010608Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression39/48624.6461.58240.003110.04135
Table
Table 3. A scheme of the relations between miRNAs and targets genes with an impact on cancer. Here are reported the only validated genes targeted by more than one miRNA. (*) Already present in GFD-responsive. In Red, the best candidates as markers of RCD2 trait. Up-arrows indicate an increase and down-arrows indicate a decrease of the miRNA in RCD2.
Table 3. A scheme of the relations between miRNAs and targets genes with an impact on cancer. Here are reported the only validated genes targeted by more than one miRNA. (*) Already present in GFD-responsive. In Red, the best candidates as markers of RCD2 trait. Up-arrows indicate an increase and down-arrows indicate a decrease of the miRNA in RCD2.
miRTargetFunctionSpecific Role
↓ miR-101-3p *CPEB3Translational repressorRepresses the transcription of the STAT5B target gene EGFR
↑ miR-770-5p
↓ miR-107
↓ miR-935 *FBXW7Phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitinationColorectal cancer and ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, which are involved in the NOTCH signaling
↑ miR-1226-3p
↓ miR-107
↓ miR-935 *FZD6Negative regulatorThe inhibition of the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling cascade
↓ miR-101-3p *
↑ miR-302c-3p
↓ miR-101-3p *MYCNProto-oncogene, DNA-binding transcription factor Involved in the apoptosis, autophagy, and NOTCH pathways
↑ miR-302c-3p
↓ miR-107
↓ let-7d-5p *TET3Methylcytosine dioxygenasePlays a role in the DNA methylation process
↑ miR-302c-3p
↓ miR-1306-5p
↓ let-7d-5p *TGFBR3Binds to TGF-βInhibits TGFB signaling
↓ miR-101-3p *
↓ miR-107
↓ miR-101-3p *TNRC6BMediated gene silencing by miRNAs and siRNAsRET signaling, PI3K/AKT activation
↑ miR-181b-2-3p
↓ miR-107
↓ miR-101-3p *ACVR2BTransforming growth factor-beta familyIGF1-Akt signaling
↓ miR-107
↓ let-7d-5p*AGO4Mediated gene silencing by miRNAsPost-transcriptional control
↓ miR-107
↑ miR-302c-3pBTG1Putative tumor suppressorB cell lymphocytic leukemia
↑ miR-770-5p
↓ let-7d-5p *CEP135Centrosomal proteinThe regulation of PLK1 activity at G2/M transition
↑ miR-181b-2-3p
↓ miR-101-3p *DR1DR1/DRAP1 heterodimer with TBP, repressorRepresses class II genes, chromatin regulation/acetylation
↑ miR-181b-2-3p
↑ miR-302c-3pELK4Transcriptional factorBinding c-fos proto-oncogene promoter, ERK signaling
↓ miR-107
↓ let-7d-5p *FZD3Phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitinationThe inhibition of GSK-3 kinase, the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, and the activation of Wnt target genes
↑ miR-302c-3p
↓ miR-935 *ONECUT2Transcription factorsStimulates expression
↓ let-7d-5p *
↑ miR-302c-3pRELAMulti-ligand endocytic receptorCritical for the reuptake of numerous ligands, (lipoproteins, sterols, vitamin-binding proteins, and hormones)
↓ miR-1306-5p
↓ miR-935 *RORAOrphan receptorA regulator of embryonic development, cellular differentiation, and cytokine signaling in the immune system
↓ miR-101-3p *
↓ miR-101-3pSMARCA5Actin-dependent regulator of chromatinRegulates the access to DNA and is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia
↓ miR-606
↓ miR-101-3p *TET2Methylcytosine dioxygenaseInvolved in myelopoiesis
↓ let-7d-5p *TRIM71E3 ubiquitin-protein ligaseBinds miRNAs, which are involved in the G1-S phase of the cell cycle of embryonic stem cells; prevents premature differentiation, Class I MHC-mediated antigen processing, and the presentation pathway
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bianchi, N.; Doneda, L.; Elli, L.; Taccioli, C.; Vaira, V.; Scricciolo, A.; Lombardo, V.; Terrazzan, A.; Colapietro, P.; Terranova, L.; et al. Circulating microRNAs Suggest Networks Associated with Biological Functions in Aggressive Refractory Type 2 Celiac Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061408

AMA Style

Bianchi N, Doneda L, Elli L, Taccioli C, Vaira V, Scricciolo A, Lombardo V, Terrazzan A, Colapietro P, Terranova L, et al. Circulating microRNAs Suggest Networks Associated with Biological Functions in Aggressive Refractory Type 2 Celiac Disease. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(6):1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061408

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bianchi, Nicoletta, Luisa Doneda, Luca Elli, Cristian Taccioli, Valentina Vaira, Alice Scricciolo, Vincenza Lombardo, Anna Terrazzan, Patrizia Colapietro, Leonardo Terranova, and et al. 2022. "Circulating microRNAs Suggest Networks Associated with Biological Functions in Aggressive Refractory Type 2 Celiac Disease" Biomedicines 10, no. 6: 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061408

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop