Next Article in Journal
Sex, Allergic Diseases and Omalizumab
Next Article in Special Issue
Potentials of Neuropeptides as Therapeutic Agents for Neurological Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Tempol Preserves Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Male Mice with Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Exposure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Serpinin in the Skin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Asymmetric Interaction of Neuropeptidase Activities between Cortico-Limbic Structures, Plasma and Cardiovascular Function after Unilateral Dopamine Depletions of the Nigrostriatal System

by
Inmaculada Banegas
1,
Isabel Prieto
1,
Ana Belén Segarra
1,
Francisco Vives
2,
Magdalena Martínez-Cañamero
1,
Raquel Durán
2,
Juan de Dios Luna
3,
Marc de Gasparo
4,
Germán Domínguez-Vías
2 and
Manuel Ramírez-Sánchez
1,*
1
Department of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaen, Spain
2
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
3
Department of Biostatistic, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
4
Cardiovascular & Metabolic Syndrome Adviser, Rue es Planches 5, 2842 Rossemaison, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(2), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020326
Submission received: 25 December 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 29 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuropeptides in Biomedicines)

Abstract

:
In emotional processing, dopamine (DA) plays an essential role, and its deterioration involves important consequences. Under physiological conditions, dopamine exhibits brain asymmetry and coexists with various neuropeptides that can coordinate the processing of brain functions. Brain asymmetry can extend into a broader concept of asymmetric neurovisceral integration, including behavior. The study of the activity of neuropeptide regulatory enzymes (neuropeptidases, NPs) is illustrative. We have observed that the left and right brain areas interact intra- and inter-hemispherically, as well as with peripheral tissues or with physiological parameters such as blood pressure or with behaviors such as turning preference. To obtain data that reflect this integrative behavior, we simultaneously analyzed the impact of left or right brain DA depletion on the activity of various NPs in corticolimbic regions of the left and right hemispheres, such as the medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus, as well as on the plasma activity of the same aminopeptidase activities (APs) and on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Intra- and inter-hemispheric interactions as well as the interactions of NPs from the left or right hemispheres were analyzed with the same plasma APs and the SBP obtained from sham and from left or right lesioned rats. The results demonstrate a complex profile depending on the hemisphere considered. They definitively confirm an asymmetric neurovisceral integration and reveal a higher level of inter-hemispheric corticolimbic interactions including with SBP after left dopamine depletion.

1. Introduction

The 1970s were a turning point in brain research: the work of Pert and Snyder [1] and of Hughes and Kosterlitz [2] unleashed a revolution in which new peptide neurotransmitters called neuropeptides were discovered [3]. The analysis of the brain’s functional regulation of neuropeptides was in part carried out through the study of its proteolytic processing [4] as a result of the action of neuropeptidases (NPs) [5,6].
In emotional processing, dopamine (DA) plays an essential role: its deterioration, for example in Parkinson’s disease, may involve important emotional consequences that implicate, more particularly, corticolimbic regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), hippocampus (HC) or the amygdala (AM) [7,8]. Dopamine coexists and interacts with other neurotransmitters, including various neuropeptides [9] that may participate in the pathogenesis of classic disorders that implicate DA (such as Parkinson’s disease and others). Under physiological conditions, DA shows an inter-hemispheric asymmetry [10], which is also obvious in pathological processes such as the first stages of development in Parkinson’s disease [11]. However, the response must be comprehensive, as it involves not only the unilateral intra-hemispheric interaction between corticolimbic structures, but also the inter-hemispheric interaction between such structures, as well as the correlation of all of them with plasma elements or with peripheral functions such as cardiac function, as recently reviewed [12]. In particular, the analysis of neuropeptidases and some biochemical factors in the brain as a whole or considering left and right brain hemispheres, in peripheral tissues and fluids together with cardiovascular or renal physiological functions, demonstrated asymmetrical effects and interactions between them under different experimental conditions. For example, captopril treatment changed the left predominance of correlations between neuropeptidases of the frontal cortex and aminopeptidases of ventricular tissue observed in untreated animals, and to the right in the treated ones. Genetically hypertensive rats radically increased blood pressure levels after DA depletion of the left hemisphere with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) but not by depletion of the right. Additionally, there was a left predominance of correlations between frontal cortex and blood pressure, heart rate or water balance functions. Although correlation is not causation, all these results (and others) are suggestive of a dynamic brain asymmetry that we can extend to an asymmetric neurovisceral integration (reviewed in [12]). The present work essentially analyzes a possible pattern of asymmetrical neurovisceral interaction that involves intra- and inter-hemispheric interactions between some corticolimbic structures and between such structures and systolic blood pressure (SBP), as a peripheral functional parameter, and plasma aminopeptidase activities in controls and left or right DA-depleted animals.
Some limited data have been provided on the asymmetric distribution of various neuropeptidases such as oxytocinase [13], enkephalinase [14] or neuropeptidases hydrolyzing angiotensins and cholecystokinin [15] in specific regions similar to the ones analyzed in the present work, such as prefrontal cortex of animals unilaterally depleted of DA. However, an integrative neurovisceral interaction such as the simultaneous intra- and inter-hemispheric interaction of these activities has not yet been analyzed, neither between these activities of the left or right hemispheres versus plasma or between them and cardiac function.
In order to obtain data that help us to understand this integral functioning of the organism, we simultaneously analyzed the effect of left or right brain DA depletion on the activity of various NPs such as alanyl-(AlaAP), cystinyl-(CysAP), glutamyl-(GluAP) and aspartyl-aminopeptidase (AspAP) reported as hydrolyzing NPs, respectively, of enkephalins, oxytocin, angiotensin and cholecystokinin peptides [13,14,15], in corticolimbic regions of the left and right hemispheres, such as the mPFC, AM and HC, as well as on the plasma activity of the same aminopeptidase activities (APs) and on SBP. Intra- and inter-hemispheric interactions are analyzed, as well as the interactions of NPs from the left or right hemispheres with the same plasma APs and the SBP obtained from left or right sham animals and from left or right lesioned animals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

A total of 40 adult male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats (Charles River Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain), divided into four groups of 10 each, were used in this study. Depending on the hemisphere considered, the groups were: sham left (SL), sham right (SR), lesioned left (LL) and lesioned right (LR). The degeneration of the left or right nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway, and consequently, the left or right hemispheric depletion of dopamine, was carried out using the neurotoxin 6-OHDA injected stereotaxically into the left or right striatum [16]. Sham groups were obtained by the left or right injection of saline into the striatum (Figure 1). The animals that were lesioned demonstrated, four weeks after 6-OHDA injections, a striking turning behavior towards the hemisphere with less dopamine content [15]. At the end of the experimental period, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by plethysmographic method as previously reported in detail [17] (Figure 2). The rats were then sacrificed on the same day and blood samples as well as samples from the left or right medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), hippocampus (HC) and amygdala (AM) were obtained from each group and frozen until assayed. All the experiments and the care of animals were performed in agreement with the European Communities Council Directive 86/609/EEC. Approved by the bioethic committee of the University of Jaén on 20 November 2006 with number 140.

2.2. 6-Hydroxydopamine and Saline Intrastriatal Injections

Under equithensin (42.5 g/L chloral hydrate dissolved in 19.76 mL ethanol, 9.72 g/L Nembutal®, 0.396 g/L propylenglycol and 21.3 g/L magnesium sulfate in distilled water) anesthesia (2 mL/kg body weight), the animals were positioned stereotaxically (David Kopf Instruments, Palo Alto, CA, USA). A 2 mm burr hole was drilled just through the skull at horizontal coordinates approximating the position of the striatum, that is, AP 0 mm, L or R 3 mm and H-5 mm, according to the stereotaxic atlas of Paxinos and Watson [18]. For the groups of lesioned animals, 4 μL of 6-OHDA (8 mg dissolved in 1 mL of cold saline with 0.02% ascorbic acid to inhibit oxidation) was administered into the left or right striatum. Sham groups were handled in the same way, but, instead of 6-OHDA, they received 4 μL of saline with 0.02% ascorbic acid. (Figure 1). The injection of 6-OHDA into the striatum was selected as the most appropriate in order to lesion only neurons of the nigrostriatal pathway and perform the unilateral depletions of DA [16,19].

2.3. Obtaining Blood and Brain Samples

Blood samples were obtained through the left cardiac ventricle under equithensin anesthesia four weeks after intrastriatal injections of 6-OHDA or saline, once the turning motor behavior was determined [15]. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation for 10 min at 3000× g and used to determinate aminopeptidase activities and proteins in triplicate. After blood sample collection, the rats were perfused with saline through the left cardiac ventricle and the brain was quickly removed (less than 60 s) and cooled on dry ice. Left and right samples of the mPFC, HC and AM were dissected according to the stereotaxic atlas of Paxinos and Watson [18]. The mPFC was dissected between 12.70 mm and 11.20 anterior to the interaural line (AIL), the HC between 7.12 and 5.40 mm AIL, and the AM between 7.12 and 5.40 mm AIL.

2.4. Enzymatic and Protein Determinations

The procedures for enzymatic and protein determinations were previously described in detail [6]. Briefly, brain samples were defrosted and homogenized in 400 μL of 10 mM HCl–Tris buffer (pH 7.4) and ultracentrifuged at 100,000× g for 30min at 4 °C. To solubilize membrane proteins, the pellets were re-homogenized in HCl–Tris buffer (pH 7.4) plus 1% Triton-X-100. After centrifugation (100,000× g, 30 min, 4 °C), the supernatants were shaken in an orbital rotor for 2 h at 4 °C with the polymeric adsorbent Bio-Beads SM-2 (100 mg/mL) to remove the detergent from the sample. After the biobeads’ removal, the supernatants were used to measure membrane-bound neuropeptidase activities (NPs) and protein content in triplicate. Neuropeptidase activities, in the selected brain regions, were fluorometrically measured using aminoacyl-naphthylamide (aaNNap) as substrates, as previously described [6]. Briefly, AlaAP and CysAP were fluorometrically determined, using AlaNNap and CysNNap as substrates; 10 μL of each supernatant was incubated for 30 min at 25 °C with 1 mL of the substrate solution: 2.14 mg/100 mL AlaNNap or 5.63 mg/100 mL CysNNap, 10 mg/100 mL bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 10 mg/100 mL dithiothreitol (DTT) in 50mM of phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, for AlaAP; and 50 mM HCl–Tris buffer, pH 6, for CysAP. AspAP was determined using AspNNap as substrate: 10μL of each supernatant was incubated for 120 min at 37 °C with 1 mL of the substrate solution (2.58 mg/100 mL AspNNap, 10 mg/100 mL BSA and 39.4 mg/100 mL MnCl2 in 50 mmol/L HCl–Tris buffer, pH 7.4). GluAP was measured using GluNNap as substrate: 10 μL of each supernatant was incubated for 120 min at 37 °C with 1 mL of the substrate solution (2.72 mg/100 mL GluNNap, 10 mg/100 mL BSA, 10 mg/100 mL DTTand 0.555 g/100 mL CaCl2 in 50 mmol/L HCl–Tris, pH 7.4). To stop enzymatic reactions, 1 mL of 0.1 mol/L of acetate buffer, pH 4.2, was added. The amount of β-naphthylamine (released as a consequence of enzymatic activity) was measured fluorometrically at 412 nm emission wavelengths with an excitation wavelength of 345 nm. The sensitivity of the method allows for measurements of enzymatic activities in the pmolar range. Proteins were quantified in triplicate by the method of Bradford [20], using BSA as a standard. Specific membrane-bound aminopeptidase activities were expressed as nmol of AlaNNap, CysNNap, AspNNap, or GluNNap hydrolyzed per min per mg of protein. Fluorogenic assays were linear with respect to time of hydrolysis and protein content.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

To study the intra- and inter-hemispheric levels of correlation between NPs of the mPFC, HC and AM, between them and plasma APs and between them and SBP, Pearson’s coefficient of correlation was computed. Computations were performed using SPSS 13.0 and STATA 9.0. p-values below 0.05 were considered significant. Comparisons between means in the different locations (Figure 3) are included for informative purposes but they are not discussed. Some results have already been previously reported and evaluated using two-way analysis of variance [13,14,15,17]. The present work is essentially aimed toward a simultaneous correlation analysis between the various central and peripheral locations and SBP values, in the different groups, as reported below.

3. Results

3.1. Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure in left or right lesioned animals does not differ from the pressure observed in their corresponding left or right sham controls (Figure 2).

3.2. Brain Neuropeptidase and Plasma Aminopeptidase Activities

The bilateral behavior of neuropeptidase activities differs depending on the brain location and the enzyme studied. In plasma, the behavior is similar for all the activities analyzed. A significant decrease is observed after the left lesion in comparison with their corresponding left sham controls (p < 0.001). However, there is a tendency to increase after the right lesion, which does not reach statistical significance (Figure 3).
The most significant results indicate that an increase in GluAP is observed in the amygdala on the right side after the left lesion and a decrease on the left side after the right lesion. However, AspAP decreases on the right side in both the left and right lesions.
In mPFC, AlaAP and CysAP have a similar behavior: they decrease both on the left side and increase on the right after the left lesion and increase only on the right side after the right lesion. GluAP decreases on the left side in both the left and right lesions and does not vary on the right side, whereas AspAP decreases on the left side after the left lesion and increases on the right side after the right lesion.

3.3. Sham Left Correlations

In the group of SL, only positive correlations between NPs of the different regions analyzed were observed in the left hemisphere. In contrast, only negative correlations between plasmatic APs and left hemisphere NPs were observed in this group. Moreover, only one negative correlation between CysAP of the left amygdala and SBP (p < 0.05) was observed.
There were diverse positive and negative correlations between NPs in the right hemisphere. No correlations were observed between plasma APs and right hemisphere NPs but there were significant correlations between SBP and NPs of the right hemisphere.
Inter-hemispheric correlations were diverse, positive and negative. However, intra-plasmatic correlations between APs were only positive (Table 1, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3.4. Sham Right Correlations

Sham right animals also demonstrated only positive correlations between NPs in the left hemisphere and only one positive correlation was observed between plasma CysAP and AlaAP activity of the left amygdala (p < 0.05). No correlations were observed between NPs of the left hemisphere and SBP.
Intra-hemispheric correlations in the right hemisphere (as occurred in the right one in SL) were also diverse, positive as well negative. Plasma APs vs. NPs of the right hemisphere only demonstrated one negative correlation between plasma AlaAP vs. AlaAP of the right amygdala (p < 0.05). GluAP of the right amygdala correlated positively with SBP (p < 0.05).
As occurred in SL, intra-hemispheric correlations in the right side were variably positive as well as negative. Similar to that occurring in SL, intra-plasmatic correlations were always positive (Table 2, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3.5. Lesioned Left Correlations

In LL animals, the significant left intra-hemispheric correlations were both positive and negative. The significant correlations between plasma APs and NPs from left regions were also positive and negative. CysAP activity from left hippocampus correlated negatively with SBP (p < 0.01).
Only positive correlations were observed between NPs in the right hemisphere. Plasma AspAP activity correlated negatively (p < 0.05) with AlaAP in the right hippocampus. GluAP activity of the right amygdala correlated negatively (p < 0.05) with SBP levels. A highly significant correlation (p < 0.001) was also observed between CysAP activity of the right amygdala and SBP levels.
In the present LL group, a high number of inter-hemispheric correlations, both positive and negative, were observed, but only a positive intra-plasmatic correlation (p < 0.01) was observed between GluAP and CysAP (Table 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3.6. Lesioned Right Correlations

In the left hemisphere of LL GluAP demonstrated a significant positive correlation (p < 0.05) between GluAP of the mPFC and AlaAP of the hippocampus. No correlations between plasma APs and NPs of left hemisphere were observed. Similar to LL, CysAP of the left hippocampus correlated significantly and negatively (p < 0.05) with SBP.
In the right hemisphere, a higher number of significant correlations, both positive and negative, were observed compared to the left hemisphere. In contrast to what happened in the left hemisphere, a higher number of correlations, all of them negative, were observed between plasma APs and NPs of the right hemisphere. In addition, AspAP activity from the right mPFC correlated positively (p < 0.05) with SBP.
Inter-hemispheric correlations between NPs were also positives and negatives. However, as occurred in the rest of the groups, correlations between plasmatic APs were always positive (Table 4, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3.7. Comparisons between Groups

In the comparisons between groups, the correlations were similar between SL and SR. However, the most significant contrasts occur in the comparison between plasma APs vs. left hemisphere NPs, which exhibited only negative correlations in SL (see Table 1 vs. Table 2).
Compared with SL, in LL, whereas intra-left hemisphere correlations increase, intra-right correlations decrease. Additionally, inter-hemispheric correlations increase and intra-plasma correlations decrease. In contrast, if we compare SR with LR, the intra-left and inter-hemispheric correlations decrease, but the plasmatic APs of SR vs. right hemisphere of LR increase and the intra-plasma of SR vs. the intra-plasma of LR also increase (Figure 4).
Comparing LL vs. LR, there was a higher number of inter-hemispheric correlations in LL than in LR and there was a lower number of intra-plasma correlations in LL than in LR. LL vs. LR comparison demonstrated an inverse behavior in the frequency of intra-hemispheric correlations: the lower LR vs. LL for intra-left, the higher LR vs. LL for intra-right. Additionally, the same inverse behavior was observed between plasma and the left or right hemisphere: the lower in LR than LL in plasma vs. left hemisphere, the higher in LR than LL in plasma vs. right hemisphere.
In LR, the correlations with SBP are similar to those observed in LL, although with a lower level of significance. In the left hemisphere of LR, hippocampal CysAP correlated negatively (p < 0.05) with SBP and in the right side of LR, AspAP of mPFC correlated positively (p < 0.05) with SBP. In LR, the total number of inter-hemispheric correlations (both positive and negative) is less than in LL. However, the total number of correlations between plasma APs (all positive) is much higher than what we obtained in LL (Figure 4).
In Figure 5, we can observe that the number of intra-hemispheric correlations was always lower than the number of inter-hemispheric ones in all the groups studied. They were higher in the lesioned groups, especially after the left lesion. The intra-plasmatic correlations were always positive and, in contrast to the inter-hemispheric, the number of intra-plasmatic correlations decreased dramatically in LL. The highest number of hemispheric unilateral correlations of NPs with plasma APs was observed in LR with the right hemisphere. Interestingly, they were all negative in contrast to the left side in which they did not appear. Plasma APs correlated mainly with diverse left hemisphere locations in LL, but especially with the right amygdala in LR. In Sham animals, SBP correlated with the amygdala of the saline-injected hemisphere, whereas in lesioned animals, SBP correlated with diverse locations, mainly with the non-lesioned hemisphere (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

In emotional processing, dopamine (DA) plays an essential role: its deterioration, for example in Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia or attention deficit hyperactive disorder [21], can lead to significant emotional consequences that implicate, among others, corticolimbic regions such as medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), hippocampus (HC) or the amygdala (AM) [7,8]. Under basal physiological conditions, DA shows an inter-hemispheric asymmetry [10], and a possible abnormal brain asymmetry may be part of the pathogenesis of neural disorders involving DA [5,22,23].
Dopamine coexists and interacts with other neurotransmitters, including various neuropeptides such as enkephalins, oxytocin, cholecystokinin or angiotensins, that also may participate in the pathogenesis of the above-mentioned disorders that implicate DA. These neuropeptides are in part regulated by the proteolytic enzymes analyzed in the present investigation.
The most notable results of this research are: (1) Left or right nigrostriatal lesions differentially affect both intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations as well as plasma APs and SBP. (2) It involves significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between corticolimbic regions, mostly in animals lesioned in the left hemisphere: The dynamics of significant interactions increases and diversifies after lesions, especially after the left lesion.
Particularly noteworthy is the asymmetry observed in the significant correlations between oxytocinase activity (CysAP) in the left or right hemispheres of animals with left lesion and systolic blood pressure (Figure 6). While CysAP in the right amygdala correlates positively with SBP (r = +0.882, p = 0.0007) (the higher SBP, the higher CysAP), CysAP in the left hippocampus correlates negatively with SBP (r = −0.723, p = 0.01) (the higher SBP, the lower the CysAP, and vice versa). These results demonstrate an inverse behavior in the neurovisceral brain–cardiac interaction in animals with left DA depletion, but not in those with right DA depletion. Interestingly, it has been proposed that part of the actions of oxytocin are due to the fragments of the nonapeptide after the action of oxytokinases such as CysAP [24]. This asymmetrical response suggests important behavioral differences between animals with left or right lesions. The results also indicate differences in cardiovascular consequences depending on the side of the lesion.
The left lesions condition a greater number and level of significance in the inter-hemispheric correlations, in the correlations between NPs with plasma APs and with SBP. Therefore, these results would be in agreement with what was observed in left brain injuries and brain pathologies that affect mainly the left hemisphere in some periods of its evolution [12]. In neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, which manifest brain asymmetry, there is predominantly a greater involvement of the left hemisphere [25]. More severe sensory–motor and cognitive problems were produced after accidents involving the left hemisphere than those produced in the right one [26]. In addition, the brain processing of pain, closely related with emotion-related regions, also exhibits an increase in intra-hemispheric correlations in the left hemisphere [27].
Interestingly, the neuropeptidase activities of the left and right hemispheres (of these same animals) also correlate differentially with the left or right turning behavior of the animal, depending on whether the DA depletion is left or right. [15]. Particularly, in comparison with the rest of groups (SL, SR and LR), there was a predominance of significant correlations between striatum and mPFC and also between the striatum of the left side with the right turning behavior in right lesioned animals [15]. Therefore, the present data together with the previous ones definitely demonstrate an asymmetric neurovisceral response that integrally involves not only visceral processes but also the behavior of the animal in which asymmetric neurochemical modifications, in this case of DA and neuropeptidases, are implicated.
The results support the dynamic character of neurovisceral asymmetry, which involves intracerebral neurochemical correlations: correlations of brain NPs with plasma APs, as well as brain NPs with cardiovascular function, which, together with the existence of significant interactions with motor behavior in these same animals, strongly support the dynamic concept of an asymmetric neurovisceral integration. This implies a neurochemical substrate and suggests that the emotional processes in which the studied areas are involved are also carried out asymmetrically.
In conclusion, the fact that a clear systematic response appears to depend on the side of the lesion supports the concept that we are facing a functionally compensatory physiological response. It remains to be analyzed whether the central and peripheral processes could be related to the changes in NPs, APs and SBP, observed in the present research, after left or right dopamine depletions. These results could be important to understand pathologies with an important asymmetric component such as Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, depression, attention deficit hyperactive disorder and others in which a dopaminergic alteration is underlying.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.-S. and F.V.; investigation, I.B., I.P., A.B.S., F.V., R.D. and M.R.-S.; statistical analysis, J.d.D.L. and M.R.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.-S.; writing—review and editing, I.B., I.P., A.B.S., F.V., M.M.-C., R.D., J.d.D.L., M.d.G., G.D.-V. and M.R.-S.; funding acquisition, M.R.-S., I.P., I.B., A.B.S., F.V. and R.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Junta de Andalucía through the research groups PAI CVI-221 (Peptides and Peptidases) and CTS 438 (Group for Neurological Diseases Research in Southern Spain).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All the experiments and the care of animals were performed in agreement with the European Communities Council Directive 86/609/EEC. Approved by the bioethic committee of the University of Jaén on 20 November 2006 with number 140.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pert, C.B.; Snyder, S.H. Opiate receptor: Demonstration in nervous tissue. Science 1973, 179, 1011–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hughes, J.; Smith, T.W.; Kosterlitz, H.W.; Fothergill, L.A.; Morgan, B.A.; Morris, H.R. Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity. Nature 1975, 258, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Merighi, A. Neuropeptides; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; ISSN 1064-3745. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rawlings, N.; Auld, D. Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; ISBN 9780128235874. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramírez, M.; Prieto, I.; Vives, F.; de Gasparo, M.; Alba, F. Neuropeptides, neuropeptidases and brain asymmetry. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2004, 5, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramírez, M.; Prieto, I.; Banegas, I.; Segarra, A.B.; Alba, F. Neuropeptidases; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 789, pp. 287–294. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chinta, S.J.; Andersen, J.K. Dopaminergic neurons. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 942–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, L.N.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.B.; Sun, Y.N.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.M.; Zhang, Q.J.; Liu, J. Activation of serotonin(2C) receptors in the lateral habenular nucleus increases the expression of depression-related behaviors in the hemiparkinsonian rat. Neuropharmacology 2015, 93, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Merighi, A. Costorage and coexistence of neuropeptides in the mammalian CNS. Prog. Neurobiol. 2002, 66, 161–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Molochnikov, I.; Cohen, D. Hemispheric differences in the mesostriatal dopaminergic system. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Djaldetti, R.; Ziv, I.; Melamed, E. The mystery of motor asymmetry in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006, 5, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ramírez-Sánchez, M.; Prieto, I.; Segarra, A.B.; Banegas, I.; Martínez-Cañamero, M.; Domínguez-Vías, G.; de Gasparo, M. Brain Asymmetry: Towards an Asymmetrical Neurovisceral Integration. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Banegas, I.; Prieto, I.; Vives, F.; Alba, F.; de Gasparo, M.; Duran, R.; Segarra, A.B.; Ramírez, M. Lateralized response of oxytocinase activity in the medial prefrontal cortex of a unilateral rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 213, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Banegas, I.; Prieto, I.; Segarra, A.B.; Vives, F.; de Gasparo, M.; Duran, R.; de Dios Luna, J.; Ramírez-Sánchez, M. Bilateral distribution of enkephalinase activity in the medial prefrontal cortex differs between WKY and SHR rats unilaterally lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 75, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Banegas, I.; Segarra, A.B.; Prieto, I.; Vives, F.; de Gasparo, M.; Duran, R.; de Dios Luna, J.; Ramírez-Sánchez, M. Asymmetrical response of aminopeptidase A in the medial prefrontal cortex and striatum of 6-OHDA-unilaterally-lesioned Wistar Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2019, 182, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jolicoeur, F.B.; Rivest, R. Rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. In Animal Models of Neurological Disease, I; Boulto, A.A., Bakerand, G.B., Butterworth, R.F., Eds.; Neuromethods 21; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1992; pp. 135–158. [Google Scholar]
  17. Banegas, I.; Prieto, I.; Vives, F.; Alba, F.; De Gasparo, M.; Duran, R.; Luna, J.D.D.; Segarra, A.B.; Hermoso, F.; Ramírez, M. Asymmetrical response of aminopeptidase A and nitric oxide in plasma of normotensive and hypertensive rats with experimental hemiparkinsonism. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Paxinos, G.; Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 4th ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  19. Deumens, R.; Blokland, A.; Prickaerts, J. Modeling Parkinson’s disease in rats: An evaluation of 6-OHDA lesions of the nigrostriatal pathway. Exp. Neurol. 2002, 175, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arias-Carrión, O.; Stamelou, M.; Murillo-Rodríguez, E.; Menéndez-González, M.; Pöppel, E. Dopaminergic reward system: A short integrative review. Int. Arch. Med. 2010, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rentería, M.E. Cerebral asymmetry: A quantitative, multifactorial, and plastic brain phenotype. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2012, 15, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Löscher, W. Abnormal circling behavior in rat mutants and its relevance to model specific brain dysfunctions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Uvnäs Moberg, K.; Handlin, L.; Kendall-Tackett, K.; Petersson, M. Oxytocin is a principal hormone that exerts part of its effects by active fragments. Med. Hypotheses 2019, 133, 109394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lubben, N.; Ensink, E.; Coetzee, G.A.; Labrie, V. The enigma and implications of brain hemispheric asymmetry in neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Commun. 2021, 3, fcab211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, R.; Xie, Q.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ren, M.; Chen, H.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Wang, J. Animal models of cerebral ischemia: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 131, 110686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Toutain, T.G.L.O.; Alba, G.; Miranda, J.G.V.; do Rosário, R.S.; Munõz, M.; de Sena, E.P. Brain Asymmetry in Pain Affective Modulation. Pain Med. 2021, pnab232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Three-dimensional representation of the brain dopaminergic system in which the areas involved in the present investigation are considered: the substantia nigra and ventrosegmental area, as origin of dopaminergic pathways and their projection to the striatum, amygdala, hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex. Likewise, the figure also includes the anterior face of the slices from which the analyzed left and right brain areas were obtained (gray areas). The stereotaxic injection of saline or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the left or right striatum is performed to generate, respectively, left or right control groups (sham operated) or left or right lesioned groups.
Figure 1. Three-dimensional representation of the brain dopaminergic system in which the areas involved in the present investigation are considered: the substantia nigra and ventrosegmental area, as origin of dopaminergic pathways and their projection to the striatum, amygdala, hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex. Likewise, the figure also includes the anterior face of the slices from which the analyzed left and right brain areas were obtained (gray areas). The stereotaxic injection of saline or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the left or right striatum is performed to generate, respectively, left or right control groups (sham operated) or left or right lesioned groups.
Biomedicines 10 00326 g001
Figure 2. Systolic blood pressure values after saline injection into the left (Sham left; SL) or right (Sham right; SR) or 6-hydroxydopamine into the left (Lesioned left; LL) or right (Lesioned right; LR) striatum of Wistar-Kyoto adult male rats. The values represent the mean ± SEM of the SBP expressed in mmHg (modified from [17]).
Figure 2. Systolic blood pressure values after saline injection into the left (Sham left; SL) or right (Sham right; SR) or 6-hydroxydopamine into the left (Lesioned left; LL) or right (Lesioned right; LR) striatum of Wistar-Kyoto adult male rats. The values represent the mean ± SEM of the SBP expressed in mmHg (modified from [17]).
Biomedicines 10 00326 g002
Figure 3. Membrane-bound glutamyl-(GluAP), alanyl-(AlaAP), cystinyl-(CysAP) and aspartyl-(AspAP) aminopeptidase activities expressed, respectively, as nmols of L-Glu-β-naphthylamide, L-Ala-β-naphthylamide, L-Cys-β-naphthylamide and L-Asp-β-naphthylamide hydrolyzed per min per mg of proteins in the left (open bars) or right (gray bars) side of the amygdala, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex and plasma of sham left (SL) or sham right (SR) and lesioned left (LL) or lesioned right (LR) adult male normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats. In plasma, unfilled bars represent sham groups (SL, SR) and gray bars represent lesioned groups (LL, LR). Each group represents the mean ± SEM values for 10 animals. (*) level of statistical significance between the left and right side in brain or between sham vs. lesioned animals in plasma. (+) statistical difference, in the same side, between sham vs. lesioned rats. * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01) or *** (p < 0.001). + (p < 0.05), ++ (p < 0.01) or +++ (p < 0.001). Preliminary data of AlaAP from mPFC [14], CysAP from mPFC [13] and GluAP from plasma [17] and mPFC [15] were previously reported.
Figure 3. Membrane-bound glutamyl-(GluAP), alanyl-(AlaAP), cystinyl-(CysAP) and aspartyl-(AspAP) aminopeptidase activities expressed, respectively, as nmols of L-Glu-β-naphthylamide, L-Ala-β-naphthylamide, L-Cys-β-naphthylamide and L-Asp-β-naphthylamide hydrolyzed per min per mg of proteins in the left (open bars) or right (gray bars) side of the amygdala, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex and plasma of sham left (SL) or sham right (SR) and lesioned left (LL) or lesioned right (LR) adult male normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats. In plasma, unfilled bars represent sham groups (SL, SR) and gray bars represent lesioned groups (LL, LR). Each group represents the mean ± SEM values for 10 animals. (*) level of statistical significance between the left and right side in brain or between sham vs. lesioned animals in plasma. (+) statistical difference, in the same side, between sham vs. lesioned rats. * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01) or *** (p < 0.001). + (p < 0.05), ++ (p < 0.01) or +++ (p < 0.001). Preliminary data of AlaAP from mPFC [14], CysAP from mPFC [13] and GluAP from plasma [17] and mPFC [15] were previously reported.
Biomedicines 10 00326 g003
Figure 4. Number of significant intra- (Intra-Left or Intra-Right) and inter-hemispheric (Inter L vs. R) correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities (Brain), between plasma aminopeptidase activities and left (Plasma-Left) or right (Plasma-Right) brain neuropeptidase activities and Intra-Plasma aminopeptidase activities between themselves (Plasma) as well as between left (Left-SBP) or right (Right-SBP) neuropeptidase activities and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in Sham Left (SL), Sham Right (SR), Lesioned Left (LL) or Lesioned Right (LR) WKY rats.
Figure 4. Number of significant intra- (Intra-Left or Intra-Right) and inter-hemispheric (Inter L vs. R) correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities (Brain), between plasma aminopeptidase activities and left (Plasma-Left) or right (Plasma-Right) brain neuropeptidase activities and Intra-Plasma aminopeptidase activities between themselves (Plasma) as well as between left (Left-SBP) or right (Right-SBP) neuropeptidase activities and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in Sham Left (SL), Sham Right (SR), Lesioned Left (LL) or Lesioned Right (LR) WKY rats.
Biomedicines 10 00326 g004
Figure 5. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between (a) brain neuropeptidase activities, (b) plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities and (c) brain neuropeptidase activities and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the four groups studied. Positive correlations in red and negative correlations in blue. Continue lines: significant correlations between brain locations and between brain and SBP. Dotted lines: significant correlations between brain and plasma. The thickness of lines is proportional to the degree of significance. Above rat brain: A, intra-hemispheric correlations, B, inter-hemispheric correlations. The hemisphere injected with saline for sham animals is in grey. The hemisphere injected with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) for lesioned animals is in light orange. P, medial prefrontal cortex; A, amygdala; H, hippocampus.
Figure 5. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between (a) brain neuropeptidase activities, (b) plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities and (c) brain neuropeptidase activities and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the four groups studied. Positive correlations in red and negative correlations in blue. Continue lines: significant correlations between brain locations and between brain and SBP. Dotted lines: significant correlations between brain and plasma. The thickness of lines is proportional to the degree of significance. Above rat brain: A, intra-hemispheric correlations, B, inter-hemispheric correlations. The hemisphere injected with saline for sham animals is in grey. The hemisphere injected with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) for lesioned animals is in light orange. P, medial prefrontal cortex; A, amygdala; H, hippocampus.
Biomedicines 10 00326 g005
Figure 6. Significant correlations between CysAP of the right amygdala or CysAP of the left hyppocampus, with systolic blood pressure levels in left lesioned animals (n = 10). Red color denotes positive correlation. Blue color indicates negative correlation. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) and p values are indicated in the figure.
Figure 6. Significant correlations between CysAP of the right amygdala or CysAP of the left hyppocampus, with systolic blood pressure levels in left lesioned animals (n = 10). Red color denotes positive correlation. Blue color indicates negative correlation. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) and p values are indicated in the figure.
Biomedicines 10 00326 g006
Table 1. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in sham left WKY rats.
Table 1. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in sham left WKY rats.
SHAM LEFT WKY
Sham Left WKY Left SideSham Left WKY Right SideSham Left WKY Left Side vs
Brain vs BrainBrain vs BrainLPAla vs RPCys r = −0.654 p = 0.04
LHAla vs LHCys r = +0.705 p = 0.022RPGlu vs RPAla r = +0.710 p = 0.021LPCys vs RAAla r = −0.679 p = 0.03
LPAla vs LAAsp r = +0.632 p = 0.049RPAsp vs RAGlu r = −0.641 p = 0.045LAGlu vs RHCys r = +0.772 p = 0.0089
LPGlu vs LPAsp r = +0.670 p = 0.034RAGlu vs RACys r = −0.839 p = 0.0024LAAla vs RAAla r = +0.760 p = 0.01
RACys vs RHAsp r = −0.644 p = 0.044LHGlu vs LPGlu r = −0.680 p = 0.03
RHAla vs RHCys r = +0.725 p = 0.017LHAla vs RHCys r = +0.827 p = 0.0031
LHAsp vs RHCys r = −0.701 p = 0.023
Plasma vs Brain Left Side Plasma vs Brain Right SideSham Left WKY Plasma
PlAla vs LAGlu r = −0.789 p = 0.0066NO CORRELATIONS Plasma vs Plasma
PlCys vs LAGlu r = −0.733 p = 0.0157 PlGlu vs PlAla r = +0.888 p = 0.0006
Pl Glu vs LAGlu r = −0.756 p = 0.0113 PlGlu vs PlCys r = +0.812 p = 0.0043
PlGlu vs PlAsp r = +0.705 p = 0.0226
Brain Left Side vs SBPBrain Right Side vs SBPPlAla vs PlCys r = +0.782 p = 0.0074
LACys vs SBP r = −0.699 p = 0.02 NO CORRELATIONSPlAla vs PlAsp r = +0.734 p = 0.0155
PlCys vs PlAsp r = +0.649 p = 0.04
The p-values and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) are indicated. Significant negative correlations in blue italics. Significant positive correlations in red. (L) left, (R) right, (H) hippocampus, (P) medial prefrontal cortex, (A) amygdala, (Glu) GluAP, (Ala) AlaAP, (Cys) CysAP and (Asp) AspAP.
Table 2. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in sham right WKY rats.
Table 2. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in sham right WKY rats.
SHAM RIGHT WKY
Sham Right WKY Left SideSham Right WKY Right SideSham Right WKY Left Side vs
Right Side
Brain vs BrainBrain vs BrainLPGlu vs RPAla r = +0.667 p = 0.034
LPGlu vs LPAsp r = +0.673 p = 0.032RPGlu vs RPCys r = −0.635 p = 0.048LPGlu vs RAAla r = −0.670 p = 0.034
LPAla vs LPCys r = +0.838 p = 0.0024RPGlu vs RHGlu r = +0.650 p = 0.041LPAla vs RAAla r = −0.639 p = -0.046
LPAla vs LHCys r = +0.669 p = 0.034RPCys vs RHGlu r = −0.719 p = 0.018LPAla vs RHAsp r = +0.705 p = 0.022
LAAla vs LACys r = +0.914 p = 0.0002RPAsp vs RAAla r = +0.650 p = 0.041LAGlu vs RPGlu r = +0.649 p = 0.042
RAGlu vs RAAsp r = +0.644 p = 0.044LACys vs RHAla r = +0.640 p = 0.046
LHGlu vs RPGlu r = +0.687 p = 0.028
LHGlu vs RAGlu r = −0.664 p = 0.035
LHGlu vs RAAla r = −0.652 p = 0.04
LHGlu vs RAAsp r = −0.684 p = 0.028
Plasma vs Brain Left SidePlasma vs Brain Right SideSham Right WKY Plasma
PlCys vs LAAla r = +0.651 p = 0.041PlAla vs RAAla r = −0.636 p = 0.047Plasma vs Plasma
PlGlu vs PlAla r = +0.685 p = 0.028
Brain Left Side vs SBPBrain Right Side vs SBPPlGlu vs PlAsp r = +0.692 p = 0.026
NO CORRELATIONSRAGlu vs SBP r = +0.650 p = 0.04PlAla vs PlAsp r = +0.815 p = 0.004
The p-values and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) are indicated. Significant negative correlations in blue italics. Significant positive correlations in red. (L) left, (R) right, (H) hippocampus, (P) medial prefrontal cortex, (A) amygdala, (Glu) GluAP, (Ala) AlaAP, (Cys) CysAP and (Asp) AspAP.
Table 3. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in lesioned left WKY rats.
Table 3. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in lesioned left WKY rats.
LESIONED LEFT WKY
Lesioned Left WKY Left SideLesioned Left WKY Right SideLesioned Left WKY Left Side vs
Right Side
Brain vs BrainBrain vs BrainLPGlu vs RPGlu r = −0.760 p = 0.01
LPAla vs LHAsp r = +0.688 p = 0.027RPAsp vs RHAla r = +0.667 p = 0.034LPGlu vs RAAsp r = +0.698 p = 0.024
LPAsp vs LACys r = −0.871 p = 0.001RAGlu vs RHGlu r = +0.724 p = 0.017LPAla vs RHCys r = +0.635 p = 0.048
LPAsp vs LHGlu r = −0.641 p = 0.045RHAla vs RHCys r = +0.745 p = 0.013LPAsp vs RPCys r = +0.714 p = 0.02
LAGlu vs LHGlu r = +0.737 p = 0.014 LPAsp vs RAGlu r = +0.796 p = 0.005
LAAla vs LACys r = +0.643 p = 0.044 LACys vs RPCys r = −0.718 p = 0.019
LACys vs RAGlu r = −0.658 p = 0.038
LAAsp vs RHAsp r = +0.843 p = 0.0022
LHAla vs RAAsp r = −0.658 p = 0.038
LHAla vs RHAla r = +0.775 p = 0.0084
LHCys vs RAGlu r = +0.703 p = 0.023
LHCys vs RHAsp r = −0.646 p = 0.043
LHAsp vs RHAsp r = +0.655 p = 0.039
Plasma vs Brain Left SidePlasma vs Brain Right SideLesioned Left WKY Plasma
PlAla vs LPAla r = +0.635 p = 0.048PlAsp vs RHAla r = −0.687 p = 0.027Plasma vs Plasma
PlAla vs LHAsp r = +0.843 p = 0.0021 PlGlu vs PlCys r = +0.854 p = 0.0016
PlCys vs LAGlu r = −0.665 p = 0.035
PlAsp vs LHAla r = −0.715 p = 0.019
Brain Left Side vs SBPBrain Right Side vs SBP
LHCys vs SBP r = −0.723 p = 0.01RAGlu vs SBP r = −0.688 p = 0.02
RACys vs SBP r = +0.882 p = 0.0007
The p-values and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) are indicated. Significant negative correlations in blue italics. Significant positive correlations in red. (L) left, (R) right, (H) hippocampus, (P) medial prefrontal cortex, (A) amygdala, (Glu) GluAP, (Ala) AlaAP, (Cys) CysAP and (Asp) AspAP.
Table 4. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in lesioned right WKY rats.
Table 4. Significant intra- and inter-hemispheric correlations between brain neuropeptidase activities, between plasma aminopeptidase activities and brain neuropeptidase activities as well as between neuropeptidase activities and SBP in lesioned right WKY rats.
LESIONED RIGHT WKY
Lesioned Right WKY Left SideLesioned Right WKY Right SideLesioned Right WKY Left Side vs
Right Side
Brain vs BrainBrain vs BrainLPAla vs RAAla r = +0.662 p = 0.051
LPGlu vs LHAla r = +0.742 p = 0.021RPAla vs RPCys r = +0.736 p = 0.023LPCys vs RPAsp r = −0.787 p = 0.011
LPAla vs LPAsp r = −0.647 p = 0.059RPAla vs RPAsp r = +0.741 p = 0.022LPAsp vs RAAla r = −0.762 p = 0.016
RPCys vs RACys r = +0.748 p = 0.02LAGlu vs RPCys r = +0.741 p = 0.022
RAAla vs RHCys r = −0.651 p = 0.057LAGlu vs RACys r = +0.741 p = 0.022
RAAsp vs RHGlu r = −0.688 p = 0.04LHGlu vs RHAsp r = +0.667 p = 0.049
LHAsp vs RAAla r = −0.659 p = 0.053
LHAsp vs RHAsp r = +0.747 p = 0.02
Plasma vs Brain Left SidePlasma vs Brain Right SideLesioned Right WKY Plasma
NO CORRELATIONSPlGlu vs RPGlu r = −0.901 p = 0.0008Plasma vs Plasma
PlGlu vs RAGlu r = −0.773 p = 0.014PlGlu vs PlAla r = +0.847 p = 0.003
PlAla vs RPGlu r = −0.690 p = 0.039PlGlu vs PlCys r = +0.839 p = 0.004
PlAla vs RAGlu r = −0.767 p = 0.015PlGlu vs PlAsp r = +0.817 p = 0.007
PlCys vs RPGlu r = −0.653 p = 0.056PlAla vs PlCys r = +0.986 p < 0.0001
PlCys vs RAGlu r = −0.802 p = 0.009PlAla vs PlAsp r = +0.855 p = 0.003
PlAsp vs RPGlu r = −0.637 p = 0.064PlCys vs PlAsp r = +0.871 p = 0.002
PlAsp vs RAGlu r = −0.745 p = 0.021
Brain Left Side vs SBPBrain Right Side vs SBP
LHCys vs SBP r = −0.722 p = 0.02RPAsp vs SBP r = +0.676 p = 0.04
The p-values and Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) are indicated. Significant negative correlations in blue italics. Significant positive correlations in red. (L) left, (R) right, (H) hippocampus, (P) medial prefrontal cortex, (A) amygdala, (Glu) GluAP, (Ala) AlaAP, (Cys) CysAP and (Asp) AspAP. Correlations of p = 0.049 or slightly above p = 0.05 were included to reflect the tendency in the corresponding comparison but were not included in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banegas, I.; Prieto, I.; Segarra, A.B.; Vives, F.; Martínez-Cañamero, M.; Durán, R.; Luna, J.d.D.; de Gasparo, M.; Domínguez-Vías, G.; Ramírez-Sánchez, M. Asymmetric Interaction of Neuropeptidase Activities between Cortico-Limbic Structures, Plasma and Cardiovascular Function after Unilateral Dopamine Depletions of the Nigrostriatal System. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020326

AMA Style

Banegas I, Prieto I, Segarra AB, Vives F, Martínez-Cañamero M, Durán R, Luna JdD, de Gasparo M, Domínguez-Vías G, Ramírez-Sánchez M. Asymmetric Interaction of Neuropeptidase Activities between Cortico-Limbic Structures, Plasma and Cardiovascular Function after Unilateral Dopamine Depletions of the Nigrostriatal System. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(2):326. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020326

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banegas, Inmaculada, Isabel Prieto, Ana Belén Segarra, Francisco Vives, Magdalena Martínez-Cañamero, Raquel Durán, Juan de Dios Luna, Marc de Gasparo, Germán Domínguez-Vías, and Manuel Ramírez-Sánchez. 2022. "Asymmetric Interaction of Neuropeptidase Activities between Cortico-Limbic Structures, Plasma and Cardiovascular Function after Unilateral Dopamine Depletions of the Nigrostriatal System" Biomedicines 10, no. 2: 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020326

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop