Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Monitoring Antenatal Care among Pregnant Women in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Towards Non-Invasive and Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring in Neonatal Intensive Care Using Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Family Physician Practitioners in Gulf Countries (Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and UAE)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 11
Issue 19
10.3390/healthcare11192634
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Umbilical Cord Diseases Affecting Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes

by
Gabriele Tonni
1,*,
Mario Lituania
2,
Alessandro Cecchi
3,
Elisa Carboni
3,
Serena Resta
4,
Maria Paola Bonasoni
5 and
Rodrigo Ruano
6
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), AUSL Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
2
Preconceptional and Prenatal Pathophysiology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional Prenatal Diagnostic 2 Level Center, ASUR Loreto Hospital, 60025 Loreto, Italy
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Tor Vegata, 00133 Rome, Italy
5
Department of Pathology, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), AUSL Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
6
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(19), 2634; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192634
Submission received: 5 September 2023 / Revised: 17 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 September 2023 / Published: 27 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The 10th Anniversary of Healthcare—Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: (1) The aim of this article is to describe the physiopathology underlying umbilical cord diseases and their relationship with obstetric and perinatal outcomes. (2) Methods: Multicenter case series of umbilical cord diseases with illustrations from contributing institutions are presented. (3) Results: Clinical presentations of prenatal ultrasound findings, clinical prenatal features and postnatal outcomes are described. (4) Conclusions: Analysis of our series presents and discusses how umbilical cord diseases are associated with a wide variety of obstetric complications leading to a higher risk of poor perinatal outcomes in pregnancies. Knowing the physiopathology, prenatal clinical presentations and outcomes related to umbilical diseases allow for better prenatal counseling and management to potentially avoid severe obstetric and perinatal complications.

1. Introduction

The correct function of the placenta is paramount in providing adequate blood flow to the fetus through the umbilical cord, favoring progressive growth and overall survival. The umbilical cord is formed by three vessels of different sizes: the larger vessel is the umbilical vein (supplying arterial blood) surrounded by two smaller arteries (supplying venous blood) that are characterized by a spiral course along the umbilical vein. These vessels are surrounded by an extracellular matrix (ECM) called Wharton’s jelly, the function of which is to protect the umbilical vessels. The umbilical cord provides the necessary oxygenated blood flow to the fetus. Different diseases may cause alterations in the structure of the cord leading to abnormalities such as stricture, hypo/hypercoiling, or vessel rupture that will generate a perturbation in the gas exchange to the fetus that may jeopardize fetal well-being [1], and cord anomalies can induce stillbirth in 3.4% to 20% of cases [2]. In 2022, the global stillbirth rate was 13.9 stillborn babies per 1000 total births [3]. Many factors contribute to stillbirth, but accurate placental and umbilical cord examination can reveal the cause of death in 11–65% of cases [4]. Adverse fetal or perinatal outcomes may occur in the cases of nuchal cord, cord entanglement, true knot, abnormal coiling and/or length, and cord prolapse [5]. Understanding the underlying causes of umbilical cord pathologies may be helpful in identifying the etiopathogenesis and subsequent treatment of adverse perinatal outcomes [6,7]. Maternal diseases such as preeclampsia (PE) may be associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR), in turn resulting in a higher risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes such as stillbirths or long-term morbidity [8,9,10]. A recent proteomic investigation demonstrated that in fetuses with FGR or PE with superimposed FGR, the most significant changes occurring to the umbilical cord involved proteins associated with Wharton’s jelly and inflammatory and angiovascular processes [11].
In this review, we focused on describing the main umbilical cord diseases, from the etiopathogenesis to the prenatal two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound diagnosis, including the clinical and histological evaluation and outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

This paper describes the clinical presentations of a multicenter case series of umbilical cord diseases that can affect pregnancies. The clinical presentations and illustrations are reported from case series from different obstetric tertiary care centers. The prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and clinical features as well as the obstetric and perinatal outcomes are described. Since the data presented were derived from ultrasound examinations following the national guidelines for ultrasound screening during pregnancy, there is no need for an Institutional Review Board approval at a single center. Electronic search based on keywords has been investigated and conducted on PubMed/Medilne and SCOPUS from inception to 21 September 2023.

3. Umbilical Cord Diseases

3.1. Cord Coiling

The umbilical cord (UC) is the vital connection between the fetus and the placenta, carrying oxygenated blood through the umbilical vein and removing deoxygenated blood via the umbilical arteries. The characteristic helical coiling of the cord helps to prevent twisting, compression, and traction, and it is also involved in regulating the blood flow to and from the placenta. The umbilical coiling index (UCI) specifies the number of coils, which normally is one coil every five centimeters [12,13]. A hypocoiled cord is defined as one coil per 10-cm segment, whereas hypercoiling presents more than three coils per 10 cm. Both conditions may be associated with adverse fetal outcomes, including FGR and intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) [14,15]. The umbilical coil index (UCI) is defined as the total number of vascular coils divided by the cord’s length [16,17]. Hypocoiled cords are defined as UCI < 10th percentile (0.26 coils/cm), while hypercoiled cords are defined as UCI > 90th percentile (0.46 coils/cm) [18]. A low UCI has been significantly associated with stillbirth, preterm labor, and oligohydramnios, while a high UCI has been associated with intrauterine fetal growth restriction (FGR) [19]. Both hypocoiled and hypercoiled cords have been associated with fetal heart rate abnormalities during labor and low birth weight [16,17]. A severe hypercoiled cord can result in IUFD if the umbilical ring is constricted [15] (Figure 1a,b).
Hypercoiling is frequently associated with a long cord, and as an expression of compromised fetal blood flow, fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) is usually seen during placental examination. These histological features include thrombosis in fetal vessels, avascular villi, villous-stromal karyorrhexis, and normoblastemia [14,20]. Massive fibrin deposition has also been observed [21]. Though a hypercoiled cord has been reported as a recurrent finding, no definitive genetic cause has been established [20,21,22]. Although the etiology of abnormal cord coiling is still unknown, hemodynamic changes and fetal movements may be a cause. Short cords and fewer coils are found in conditions associated with reduced fetal movements such as skeletal dysplasia or muscular disorders, as well as intrauterine physiological space limitation (i.e., oligohydramnios, twin pregnancy, prolonged rupture of membranes) [20]. In long and hypercoiled cords, Poiseuille’s equation is applied, considering that blood flow speed is inversely proportional to the vascular length [23]. Therefore, excessive blood flow can possibly be regulated over time by lengthening the hypercoiling of the cord as an adaptive condition. Interestingly, in twin–twin transfusion syndrome, the recipient usually displays a hypercoiled cord, probably having been developed as a protective mechanism against volume overload [24] (Figure 2).
In extreme cases, the umbilical cord can be “uncoiled” and severely reduced or absent coiling may be localized, causing a reduction in the diameter of the cord, which has a constricting and/or twisting effect, leading to fetal vascular malperfusion [23] (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3.2. True Umbilical Cord Knot

A true knot of the umbilical cord is a rare obstetric condition with an incidence of roughly 1.2% of all pregnancies. It significantly increases the rate of stillbirth, with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.96 [18], and it can be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes such as IUGR, preterm birth, low Apgar scores, and stillbirth [25,26]. True knots have been reported to lead to a four-fold increase in IUFD due to vascular compression as long as the knot tightens [27]. They are more common in mothers with an advanced age, multiparity, previous miscarriages, polyhydramnios, and diabetes [18,26]. Co-occurrence of nuchal chord can be a contributory negative prognostic factor [28]. True knots tend to be formed in early pregnancy when the amniotic fluid is abundant and the fetus can move easily. They are more frequently detected in long cords and in male fetuses [29]. Other adverse outcomes related to true knot are SGA, preterm birth, an Apgar score < 7 at the 5th minute, and NICU admission [18]. The visualization of a segment of the umbilical cord closely surrounded by another loop of cord, known as a “hanging noose sign”, is a highly specific finding of a tight knot, while the true knot itself can be easily detected by 3D ultrasound [30] (Figure 6a,b and Figure 7).

3.3. Umbilical Cord Stricture

Umbilical cord stricture is an unusual cause of IUFD. The exact etiology is still unknown, but as the stricture is focally characterized by reduced Wharton’s jelly and the fetal movements induce cord twisting, cord vessels easily undergo stretching and the blood flow is blocked, with consequent fetal demise [31]. This possible explanation goes along with the theory that during the second trimester the fetus is particularly active, favoring localized cord constriction. On the other hand, localized paucity of Wharton’s jelly determines cord weakness and the fetus can easily rotate around this destabilized point. The site of cord torsion is typically at the fetal end and induces vascular restriction. The progressive reduction in fetal blood flow determines firstly hypoxia, acidosis, and then death [32] (Figure 8).
Opposite to what is seen in the case of umbilical cord stricture is a thick cord due to a higher concentration of Wharton’s jelly. Considering that a variation in the amount of Wharton’s jelly in the umbilical cord may be congenital, a thick umbilical cord may also be seen early in gestation, and be associated with maternal diabetes, fetal hydrops, polyhydramnios, and coiling anomalies [33] (Figure 9 and Figure 10).

3.4. Single Umbilical Artery

Single umbilical artery (SUA) is detected in around 0.5% of second trimester morphology screenings, and the left umbilical artery is the one most commonly missing [34]. SUA is typically concomitant with fetal anomalies with the following occurrence: cardiovascular, urogenital, musculoskeletal, and cerebral. In these cases, aneuploidy is frequent [35]. The pathogenesis of SUA involves different proposed mechanisms that may contribute and interact at different times. For example, it may derive from an early vascular accident or a secondary atrophy. In fact, the development of definitive umbilical arteries happens very early in embryogenesis, as demonstrated by the close relationship between SUA and body stalk defects. In the phase of blastogenesis, within the first four weeks after conception, failure or delay of cord formation may explain the occurrence of common anomalies such as esophageal atresia, imperforate anus, and renal and vertebral defects [36,37]. When SUA is seen as an isolated finding during the ultrasound examination, the antenatal and neonatal outcome is usually favorable; if it is detected as associated with other abnormal structural defects, the fetus has a higher risk of chromosomal abnormalities and adverse outcomes during the neonatal period [30,38,39] (Figure 10).

3.5. Supernumerary Vessels

The term “supernumerary vessels” designates more than three vessels in the umbilical cord. The additional vessel may be one artery or one vein. In the case of a supernumerary vein, this vessel derives from the persistence of the right umbilical vein, accompanied by a patent left one. The early venous system appears around the fourth gestational week and is composed of three symmetric paired veins: umbilical, vitelline, and cardinal. Before the sixth week of gestation, the whole right umbilical vein and the proximal segment of the left umbilical vein involute, while there is persistence of the distal part of the left umbilical vein. Failure in regression of the right umbilical vein gives rise to the extra venous vessel [37]. A supernumerary vein has been found to be associated with cleft lip and palate, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal malformations, and fetal hydrops [40]. Embryological development of the umbilical arteries may enlighten the underlying mechanism of the finding of an additional artery in the cord, namely three arteries and one vein. During the third week of gestation, the umbilical arteries emerge as ventral divisions of the paired dorsal aortas. After their fusion, the umbilical arteries fuse with the descending aorta, remaining as two lateral branches in its distal part. Simultaneously, the allantois is surrounded by an arterial plexus that merges in a single artery, lengthening throughout the body stalk. This allantoic artery progressively atrophies as the right and left umbilical arteries grow along the body stalk, and it ultimately unites with the right and left umbilical artery to constitute the interarterial anastomosis at the base of cord insertion. Throughout this process, an additional umbilical artery may result from the failure of fusion of the primitive umbilical arteries with the descending aorta or a deficiency in the coalescence of the arterial plexus to form the allantoic artery. This vessel may also fail to merge with the right and left umbilical artery. Another possibility is the splitting of an umbilical artery during its embryological development [37]. Three arteries and one vein are a highly uncommon combination, and thus the incidence of associated anomalies is difficult to ascertain. It has been described in a stillbirth with no further malformations [41] (Figure 11).

3.6. Umbilical Cord Cysts

Umbilical cord cysts are classified as true cysts or pseudocysts. True cysts can originate from the remnants of the allantois or the omphalomesenteric duct. They are epithelial-lined and are found close to the fetal cord insertion. Within true cysts, amniotic inclusion cysts may coexist [42,43]. Urachal cysts tend to disappear by the end of the third trimester, but exomphalos, persistent urachus, and uropathy may be associated [44]. Large cysts may affect the fetus by cord compression, reducing blood flow and favoring thrombosis [42]. Pseudocysts are typically situated near the fetal cord insertion. They derive from the focal degeneration of Wharton’s jelly and lack epithelial tissue [42,43]. Umbilical cord cysts have been linked to aneuploidies, especially trisomy 13 and 18, and malformations, such as exomphalos, in different series [45] (Figure 12).

3.7. Angiomyxoma/Hemangioma of the Umbilical Cord

Angiomyxoma is a benign vascular neoplasm of the umbilical cord. It is composed of a capillary proliferation enclosed in a fibromyxoid stroma, which is intrinsic to the cord and not produced by the lesion. Degeneration of Wharton’s jelly may occur, resulting in pseudocystic changes [46]. Associated congenital vascular anomalies have been described in association with angiomyxoma, but no causative link has been defined to date. Infantile hemangiomas have been reported, especially of the skin, liver, intestine, abdominal wall, and vulva [47]. Elevated maternal serum alpha-protein (MS-AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (MS-hCG) levels have been reported and in such cases an extended prenatal ultrasound should exclude possible imaging referable to hemangiomas [48,49]. Furthermore, an adverse perinatal outcome is associated with high perinatal mortality and morbidity, with a fetal mortality rate ranging in different case series from 35% to 54% [50,51]. Angiomyxoma may be a risk factor for FGR and IUFD due to impaired umbilical cord circulation. Polyhydramnios and non-immune fetal hydrops may also occur [52]. In congenital hemangioma, syndromic and non-syndromic capillary malformation mutations have been found on the guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit alpha-11 (GNA11) or guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q) subunit alpha (Gαq) (GNAQ) genes [53]. Moreover, in non-syndromic superficial angiomyxoma, the absent or reduced expression of cAMP-dependent protein kinase type I-alpha regulatory subunit (PRKAR1A) has been observed [54]. These genetic correlations should be further analyzed in the case of umbilical cord angiomyxoma (Figure 13).

4. Conclusions

Following analysis of the medical literature and that of our case series, a number of considerations can be drawn. (1) It is important to understand the physiopathology, clinical presentations, and outcomes of different umbilical cord pathologies in order to correctly counsel the parents-to-be during antenatal care. (2) Two-dimensional and 3D ultrasound may enhance the quality of prenatal imaging, improving the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis. (3) An enhanced prenatal sonographic diagnosis is clinically important to prevent or avoid obstetric and perinatal complications and assist physicians in planning and delivering the best antenatal management in the case of umbilical cord diseases. (4) Where necessary, in the case of stillbirths or other obstetric and perinatal adverse outcomes, a fetal pathology is mandatory and may lead to better recognition and understanding of the underlying cord pathologies and potentially prevent medico-legal issues [55].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.T., M.P.B., R.R., and M.L.; methodology, G.T., R.R., and M.L.; software, G.T. and M.L.; validation, G.T., R.R., and M.L.; investigation, G.T., M.P.B., S.R., and M.L.; resources, M.L., G.T., A.C., S.R., and E.C.; G.T. and M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.T., M.P.B., R.R.; writing—review and editing, G.T., M.P.B., M.L., and R.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the fact that the findings were from patients undergoing a screening investigation in pregnancy.

Informed Consent Statement

Oral informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

There are no data associated with this publication.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Gianpaolo Grisolia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy for his kind contribution to Figure 1; Evelina Silvestri, Unit of Pathology, C. Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy for her kind contribution to Figure 4; Debra S. Heller, Emeritus, Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, United States of America for her kind contribution to Figure 5.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dutman, A.C.; Nikkels, P.G.J. Umbilical Hypercoiling in 2nd- and 3rd-Trimester Intrauterine Fetal Death. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2015, 18, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 2011, 306, 2459–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stillbirths and Stillbirth Rates. Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/stillbirths/ (accessed on 1 January 2023).
  4. Ptacek, I.; Sebire, N.; Man, J.; Brownbill, P.; Heazell, A. Systematic review of placental pathology reported in association with stillbirth. Placenta 2014, 35, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hayes, D.J.L.; Warland, J.; Parast, M.M.; Bendon, R.W.; Hasegawa, J.; Banks, J.; Clapham, L.; Heazell, A.E.P. Umbilical cord characteristics and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Redline, R.W. Classification of placental lesions. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, S21–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Po’, G.; Monari, F.; Zanni, F.; Grandi, G.; Lupi, C.; Facchinetti, F. Stillbirth Emilia-Romagna Audit Group. A regional audit system for stillbirth: A way to better understand the phenomenon. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Crispi, F.; Miranda, J.; Gratacós, E. Long-term cardiovascular consequences of fetal growth restriction: Biology, clinical implications, and opportunities for prevention of adult disease. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 218, S869–S879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takahashi, M.; Makino, S.; Oguma, K.; Imai, H.; Takamizu, A.; Koizumi, A.; Yoshida, K. Fetal growth restriction as the initial finding of preeclampsia is a clinical predictor of maternal and neonatal prognoses: A single-center retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tagliaferri, S.; Travaglino, A.; Raffone, A.; Saccone, G.; Campanino, M.R.; Zara, G.; Ammendola, A.; Pini, N.; Maruotti, G.M.; Magenes, G.; et al. Placental dysfunction in uncomplicated and complicated intrauterine growth restriction by preeclampsia and neonatal outcome. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022, 35, 8169–8175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Conrad, M.S.; Gardner, M.L.; Miguel, C.; Freitas, M.A.; Rood, K.M.; Ma’ayeh, M. Proteomic analysis of the umbilical cord in fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Subashini, G.; Anitha, C.; Gopinath, G.; Ramyathangam, K. A Longitudinal Analytical Study on Umbilical Cord Coiling Index as a Predictor of Pregnancy Outcome. Cureus 2023, 15, e35680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chitra, T.; Sushanth, Y.S.; Raghavan, S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: An analytical study. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2012, 2012, 213689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kashanian, M.; Akbarian, A.; Kouhpayehzadeh, J. The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2006, 95, 8e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ernst, L.M.; Minturn, L.; Huang, M.H.; Curry, E.; Su, E.J. Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: Correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta 2013, 34, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hasegawa, J. Ultrasound Assessment of the Umbilical Cord. Donald Sch. J. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 8, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mittal, A.; Nanda, S.; Sem, J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015, 291, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Strong, T.H., Jr.; Jarles, D.L.; Vega, J.S.; Feldman, D.B. The umbilical coiling index. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994, 170 1 Pt 1, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hammad, I.A.; Blue, N.R.; Allshouse, A.A.; Silver, R.M.; Gibbins, K.J.; Page, J.M.; Goldenberg, R.L.; Reddy, U.M.; Saade, G.R.; Dudley, D.J.; et al. Umbilical Cord Abnormalities and Stillbirth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Slack, J.C.; Boyd, T.K. Fetal vascular malperfusion due to long and hypercoiled umbilical cords resulting in recurrent second trimester pregnancy loss: A case series and literature review. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2021, 24, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feist, H.; Hussein, K.; Blöcker, T.; Wohlschlaeger, J. Pathoanatomical lesions in placentas with excessively hypercoiled umbilical cords: Frequent detection of massive perivillous fibrin deposition. Ped Dev. Pathol. 2020, 23, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ayala, N.K.; Ernst, L.M.; Miller, E.S. Is umbilical coiling genetically determined? J. Perinatol. 2018, 38, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Redline, R.W.; Ravishankar, S. Fetal vascular malperfusion, an update. APMIS J. Path Micro Immun. 2018, 126, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bamberg, C.; Diemert, A.; Glosemeyer, P.; Tavares De Sousa, M.; Hecker, K. Discordance of umbilical coiling index between recipients and donors in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Placenta 2019, 76, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Laranjo, M.; Neves, B.M.; Peixinho, C. True double umbilical cord knot. BMJ Case Reports 2022, 15, e251388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Räisänen, S.; Georgiadis, L.; Harju, M.; Keski-Nisula, L.; Heinonen, S. True umbilical cord knot and obstetric outcome. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2013, 122, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stabile, G.; Carlucci, S.; De Bonis, L.; Sorrentino, F.; Nappi, L.; Ricci, G. Umbilical Cord Knots: Is the Number Related to Fetal Risk? Medicina 2022, 58, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sherer, D.M.; Dalloul, M.; Ward, K.; Nakagawa, J.; Joseph, I.; Grube, S.; Abulafia, O. Coexisting true umbilical cord knot and nuchal cord: Possible cumulative increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 404–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ikechebelu, J.; Eleje, G.; Ofojebe, C. True umbilical cord knot leading to fetal demise. Ann. Med. Health Sci. Res. 2014, 4, S155–S158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moshiri, M.; Zaidi, S.F.; Robinson, T.J.; Bhargava, P.; Siebert, J.R.; Dubinsky, T.J.; Katz, D.S. Comprehensive imaging review of abnormalities of the umbilical cord. Radiographics 2014, 34, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blichárová, A.; Verbóová, L.; Benetinová, Z.; Mátyás, T.; Bašista, R.; Tancoš, V.; Kollárová, P. Loss of Wharton’s jelly and fibrosis in umbilical cord stricture area: A case report. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2023, 96, 102512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peng, H.Q.; Levitin-Smith, M.; Rochelson, B.; Kahn, E. Umbilical cord stricture and overcoiling are common causes of fetal demise. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2006, 9, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kadivar, M.; Khamseh, M.E.; Malek, M.; Khajavi, A.; Noohi, A.H.; Najafi, L. Histomorphological changes of the placenta and umbilical cord in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. Placenta 2020, 97, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tica, O.S.; Tica, A.A.; Cojocaru, D.; Tica, I.; Cojocaru, V.; Tica, V.I. Single umbilical artery: A continuous dilemma and challenge in obstetric management. Clin. Exp. Obst Gynecol. 2021, 48, 1200–1205. [Google Scholar]
  35. Friebe-Hoffmann, U.; Hiltmann, A.; Friedl, T.W.P.; Lato, K.; Hammer, R.; Janni, W.; Kozlowski, P. Prenatally Diagnosed Single Umbilical Artery (SUA)—Retrospective Analysis of 1169 Fetuses. Ultraschall Der Medizin. 2019, 40, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martínez-Frías, M.L.; Bermejo, E.; Rodríguez-Pinilla, E.; Prieto, D.; ECEMC Working Group. Does single umbilical artery (SUA) predict any type of congenital defect? Clinical-epidemiological analysis of a large consecutive series of malformed infants. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part. A 2008, 146, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chang, K.T.E.; Aw, S.J. Single Umbilical Artery, Supernumerary Vessels, Segmental Thinning of the Umbilical Cord Vessels and Vascular Calcifications in Umbilical Vessels; Khong, T., Mooney, E., Nikkels, P., Morgan, T., Gordijn, S., Eds.; Pathology of the Placenta; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dagklis, T.; Defigueiredo, D.; Staboulidou, I.; Casagrandi, D.; Nicolaides, K.H. Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 36, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lubusky, M.; Dhaifalah, I.; Prochazka, M.; Hyjanek, J.; Mickova, I.; Vomackova, K.; Santavy, J. Single umbilical artery and its siding in the second trimester of pregnancy: Relation to chromosomal defects. Prenat. Diagn. 2007, 27, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lei, T.; Xie, H.N.; Feng, J.l. Prenatal diagnosis of four-vessel umbilical cord with supernumerary vein varix: A case report and literature review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2017, 43, 1200–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Du, X.; Yuan, Q.; Li, Z.; Li, Y. Three umbilical arteries resulting in a four-vessel umbilical cord in a stillbirth. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 4682–4685. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruiz Campo, L.; Savirón Cornudella, R.; Gámez Alderete, F.; Martínez-Payo, C.; Pérez Pérez, P.; Garrido Fernández, P.; Lerma Puertas, D. Prenatal diagnosis of umbilical cord cyst: Clinical significance and prognosis. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 56, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zangen, R.; Boldes, R.; Yaffe, H.; Schwed, P.; Weiner, Z. Umbilical cord cysts in the second and third trimesters: Significance and prenatal approach. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 36, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Umeda, S.; Usui, N.; Kanagawa, T.; Yamamichi, T.; Nara, K.; Ueno, T.; Owari, M.; Uehara, S.; Oue, T.; Kimura, T.; et al. Prenatal and Postnatal Clinical Course of an Urachus Identified as an Allantoic Cyst in the Umbilical Cord. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2016, 26, 200–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, H.; Jia, M.; Yang, S.; Zou, J.; Xiao, X. Umbilical cord cysts: Classification, diagnosis, prognosis, and pregnancy recommendations. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023. (Online ahead of print). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kaur, N.; Heerema-McKenney, A.; Kollikonda, S.; Karnati, S. Changing course of an umbilical cord mass—Chasing the diagnosis of agiomyxoma. Ped Dev. Pathol. 2022, 25, 558–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Iglesias-Deus, A.; Pérez-Muñuzuri, A.; Urisarri, A.; Bautista-Casasnovas, A.; Couce, M.-L. Umbilical cord and visceral hemangiomas diagnosed in the neonatal period. Medicine. 2016, 95, e5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hara, K.; Fukumura, Y.; Saito, T.; Arakawa, A.; Okabe, H.; Takeda, S.; Yao, T. A giant cord hemangioma with extramedullary hematopoiesis and elevated maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin: A case report and review of the literature. Diagn. Pathol. 2015, 10, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sathiyathasan, S.; Jeyanthan, K.; Hamid, R. Umbilical hemangioma: A case report. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2011, 283 (Suppl. 1), 15–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ben Thayer, M.; Helal, I.; Khanchel, F.; Mbarki, C.; Bettaieb, H.; Ben Brahim, E.; Jouini, R.; Chadli Debbiche, A. Hemangioma of the umbilical cord: A case report on a rare entity. Clin. Case Rep. 2022, 10, e6441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Daniel-Spiegel, E.; Weiner, E.; Gimburg, G. The association of umbilical cord hemangioma with fetal vascular markers. Prenat. Diagn. 2005, 25, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lisovaja, I.; Franckevica, I.; Vedmedovska, N. Large angiomyxoma of the umbilical cord-uncomplicated rupture of tumor membranes at 32 weeks of gestation. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. ISSVA. ISSVA Classification of Vascular Anomalies 2018 International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies. Available online: https://www.Issva.Org/Classification (accessed on 1 January 2023).
  54. Hafeez, F.; Krakowski, A.C.; Lian, C.G.; Nazarian, R.M.; Maleszewski, J.J. Sporadic superficial angiomyxomas demonstrate loss of PRKAR1A expression. Histopathology 2022, 80, 1001–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Scalise, C.; Cordasco, F.; Sacco, M.A.; Ricci, P.; Aquila, I. The Importance of Post-Mortem Investigations in Stillbirths: Case Studies and a Review of the Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2022, 19, 8817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Healthcare 11 02634 g001
Figure 1. (a) Two-dimensional ultrasound with HD-Flow color Doppler showing a hypocoiled umbilical cord and (b) a hypercoiled umbilical cord.
Figure 1. (a) Two-dimensional ultrasound with HD-Flow color Doppler showing a hypocoiled umbilical cord and (b) a hypercoiled umbilical cord.
Healthcare 11 02634 g001
Healthcare 11 02634 g002
Figure 2. Umbilical cord displayed in HDlive Flow. Measurement of sonographic umbilical cord index (UCI): 1/one coil. One coil corresponds to a complete coil of 360° of the umbilical vessels around each other measured in centimeters. Basically, the distance between the inner edge of the umbilical artery wall to the outer edge of the arterial wall itself should be measured up to the next spiral (left–right arrow). Interestingly, in twin–twin transfusion syndrome, the recipient usually displays a hypercoiled cord, probably having been developed as a protective mechanism against volume overload [24] (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Figure 2. Umbilical cord displayed in HDlive Flow. Measurement of sonographic umbilical cord index (UCI): 1/one coil. One coil corresponds to a complete coil of 360° of the umbilical vessels around each other measured in centimeters. Basically, the distance between the inner edge of the umbilical artery wall to the outer edge of the arterial wall itself should be measured up to the next spiral (left–right arrow). Interestingly, in twin–twin transfusion syndrome, the recipient usually displays a hypercoiled cord, probably having been developed as a protective mechanism against volume overload [24] (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Healthcare 11 02634 g002
Healthcare 11 02634 g003
Figure 3. Umbilical cords displayed in HDlive Flow. The cord is hypocoiled if UCI is lower than the 10th centile for gestational age (on the left); hypercoiled if UCI is above the 90th centile for gestational age (on the right).
Figure 3. Umbilical cords displayed in HDlive Flow. The cord is hypocoiled if UCI is lower than the 10th centile for gestational age (on the left); hypercoiled if UCI is above the 90th centile for gestational age (on the right).
Healthcare 11 02634 g003
Healthcare 11 02634 g004
Figure 4. Umbilical cords displayed in HDlive Flow. Uncoiled cord: two straight umbilical arteries with UCI equal to 0.
Figure 4. Umbilical cords displayed in HDlive Flow. Uncoiled cord: two straight umbilical arteries with UCI equal to 0.
Healthcare 11 02634 g004
Healthcare 11 02634 g005
Figure 5. Three-dimensional ultrasound with HDlive Flow can detect hypercoiled and uncoiled cord segments in the same fetus.
Figure 5. Three-dimensional ultrasound with HDlive Flow can detect hypercoiled and uncoiled cord segments in the same fetus.
Healthcare 11 02634 g005
Healthcare 11 02634 g006
Figure 6. True umbilical cord knot diagnosed at 21 weeks of gestation using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) using HD-Flow (a) and “glass-body” mode in iFlow (b).
Figure 6. True umbilical cord knot diagnosed at 21 weeks of gestation using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) using HD-Flow (a) and “glass-body” mode in iFlow (b).
Healthcare 11 02634 g006
Healthcare 11 02634 g007
Figure 7. Umbilical cord knot associated with notching (white arrows) in the umbilical artery (UA) Doppler waveform. The plausible cause for notching in the UA is constriction: UA diameter section: 2.5 mm (red arrows), UV diameter section: 5.3 mm (yellow calipers). Waveform notching is determined by flow separation induced by constriction. The notching is not present in cases of less than 75% constriction and disappears as the vortex wave is attenuated at distances downstream of the constriction. Notching in the UA Doppler waveform should be considered important even in the absence of increased peak systolic velocity of the fetal mean cerebral artery (MCA) because it might indicate impending intrauterine fetal death (IUFD).
Figure 7. Umbilical cord knot associated with notching (white arrows) in the umbilical artery (UA) Doppler waveform. The plausible cause for notching in the UA is constriction: UA diameter section: 2.5 mm (red arrows), UV diameter section: 5.3 mm (yellow calipers). Waveform notching is determined by flow separation induced by constriction. The notching is not present in cases of less than 75% constriction and disappears as the vortex wave is attenuated at distances downstream of the constriction. Notching in the UA Doppler waveform should be considered important even in the absence of increased peak systolic velocity of the fetal mean cerebral artery (MCA) because it might indicate impending intrauterine fetal death (IUFD).
Healthcare 11 02634 g007
Healthcare 11 02634 g008
Figure 8. A reduced or absent coiling may be localized, causing a reduction in the diameter of the cord, with a constricting and/or twisting effect (indicated by the curved arrow). This phenomenon is more frequent near the umbilical ring. The reduced or absent coiling may be associated with a reduction in Wharton’s jelly.
Figure 8. A reduced or absent coiling may be localized, causing a reduction in the diameter of the cord, with a constricting and/or twisting effect (indicated by the curved arrow). This phenomenon is more frequent near the umbilical ring. The reduced or absent coiling may be associated with a reduction in Wharton’s jelly.
Healthcare 11 02634 g008
Healthcare 11 02634 g009
Figure 9. Two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler. Umbilical cord diameter anomaly: a thick cord depends on the amount of Wharton’s jelly that has formed and deposited in the cord (diameter section (yellow calipers): 25.4 mm). It may be associated with maternal diabetes, fetal hydrops, polyhydramnios, and coiling anomalies (uncoiled/hypocoiled).
Figure 9. Two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler. Umbilical cord diameter anomaly: a thick cord depends on the amount of Wharton’s jelly that has formed and deposited in the cord (diameter section (yellow calipers): 25.4 mm). It may be associated with maternal diabetes, fetal hydrops, polyhydramnios, and coiling anomalies (uncoiled/hypocoiled).
Healthcare 11 02634 g009
Healthcare 11 02634 g010
Figure 10. Color Doppler and 3D ultrasound with “glass-body” mode. Absent left umbilical artery. Single umbilical artery (SUA) associated with intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix (UVV) and absence of the ductus venosus. The umbilical vein connects to the inferior vena cava in the suprahepatic area. In the presence of a large varix and bidirectional turbulence flow, the risk of developing a thrombus is higher. (Abbreviation. B: bladder).
Figure 10. Color Doppler and 3D ultrasound with “glass-body” mode. Absent left umbilical artery. Single umbilical artery (SUA) associated with intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix (UVV) and absence of the ductus venosus. The umbilical vein connects to the inferior vena cava in the suprahepatic area. In the presence of a large varix and bidirectional turbulence flow, the risk of developing a thrombus is higher. (Abbreviation. B: bladder).
Healthcare 11 02634 g010
Healthcare 11 02634 g011
Figure 11. Two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler reveals the presence of four vessels in the umbilical cord. Axial plane of the fetal abdomen highlights the left (LUV) and right (RUV) umbilical veins.
Figure 11. Two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler reveals the presence of four vessels in the umbilical cord. Axial plane of the fetal abdomen highlights the left (LUV) and right (RUV) umbilical veins.
Healthcare 11 02634 g011
Healthcare 11 02634 g012
Figure 12. Two-dimensional ultrasound (a) and 3D ultrasound using Crystal Vue showing a fetus with exomphalos associated with a large umbilical cord cyst detected at 16 weeks’ gestation (b).
Figure 12. Two-dimensional ultrasound (a) and 3D ultrasound using Crystal Vue showing a fetus with exomphalos associated with a large umbilical cord cyst detected at 16 weeks’ gestation (b).
Healthcare 11 02634 g012
Healthcare 11 02634 g013
Figure 13. Umbilical cord angiomyxoma detected at 16 weeks’ gestation. Angiomyxoma is located at the level of the cord insertion into the placenta. Multiplanar display color Doppler and 3D ultrasound with “glass-body” rendering mode shows the angiomyxoma and its effects on the cord vessels. It appears as a rounded echogenic area (indicated by yellow curved arrows) which envelops, squeezes, and sometimes stretches the umbilical vessels.
Figure 13. Umbilical cord angiomyxoma detected at 16 weeks’ gestation. Angiomyxoma is located at the level of the cord insertion into the placenta. Multiplanar display color Doppler and 3D ultrasound with “glass-body” rendering mode shows the angiomyxoma and its effects on the cord vessels. It appears as a rounded echogenic area (indicated by yellow curved arrows) which envelops, squeezes, and sometimes stretches the umbilical vessels.
Healthcare 11 02634 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tonni, G.; Lituania, M.; Cecchi, A.; Carboni, E.; Resta, S.; Bonasoni, M.P.; Ruano, R. Umbilical Cord Diseases Affecting Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192634

AMA Style

Tonni G, Lituania M, Cecchi A, Carboni E, Resta S, Bonasoni MP, Ruano R. Umbilical Cord Diseases Affecting Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes. Healthcare. 2023; 11(19):2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tonni, Gabriele, Mario Lituania, Alessandro Cecchi, Elisa Carboni, Serena Resta, Maria Paola Bonasoni, and Rodrigo Ruano. 2023. "Umbilical Cord Diseases Affecting Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes" Healthcare 11, no. 19: 2634. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11192634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop