Next Article in Journal
An Improved Graph Isomorphism Network for Accurate Prediction of Drug–Drug Interactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Zeros of Convex Combinations of Elementary Families of Harmonic Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Ratio Test for Mean Changes in Time Series with Heavy-Tailed AR(p) Noise Based on Multiple Sampling Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Initial Coefficient Bounds for Bi-Univalent Functions Related to Gregory Coefficients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Miller–Ross-Type Poisson Distribution Series

by
Basem Aref Frasin
1 and
Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlă
2,*
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq 25113, Jordan
2
Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(18), 3989; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11183989
Submission received: 25 August 2023 / Revised: 15 September 2023 / Accepted: 17 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Analysis and Geometric Function Theory, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
The objective of the current paper is to find the necessary and sufficient conditions for Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution series to be in the classes S T * ( γ , β ) and K T ( γ , β ) of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Furthermore, we investigate several inclusion properties of the class Y σ ( V , W ) associated of the operator I α , c ε defined by this distribution. We also take into consideration an integral operator connected to series of Miller–Ross-type Poisson distributions. Special cases of the main results are also considered.

1. Definitions and Preliminaries

Special functions are very important in the study of geometric function theory, applied mathematics, physics, statistics and many other subjects. In [1], Kenneth S. Miller and Bertram Ross introduced the special function, which is called the Miller–Ross function defined by
E α , c ( ξ ) = ξ ν s = 0 ( c ξ ) s Γ ( s + α + 1 ) , ( α , c , ξ C ) .
Observe that the function E α , c contains many well-known functions as special cases, for example, E 0 , 1 ( ξ ) = ξ e ξ , E 1 , 1 ( ξ ) = e ξ 1 , E 2 , 1 ( ξ ) = 2 ξ e ξ 2 ξ 2 , E 3 , 1 ( ξ ) = 3 ( e ξ ξ 2 2 ξ 2 ) ξ 2 , E 1 2 , 1 2 ( ξ ) = e ξ 2 π 2 ξ e r f ξ 2 , where e r f is the error function defined by e r f ( ξ ) = 2 π 0 ξ e t 2 d t .
Let E ς , μ ( ξ ) be the two parameters Mittag–Leffler function [2] defined by
E ς , μ ( ξ ) = s = 0 ξ s Γ ( ς s + μ ) , ( ξ , ς , μ C , Re ( ς ) > 0 , Re ( μ ) > 0 ) .
Several properties of Mittag–Leffler function and generalized Mittag–Leffler function can be found e.g., in ([3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]).
If μ = 1 , from (2) we get the Mittag–Leffler function of one parameter [12]
E ς ( ξ ) = s = 0 ξ s Γ ( ς s + 1 ) , ( ξ , ς C , Re ( ς ) > 0 ) .
From (1) and (2), the Miller–Ross function can be expressed as
E α , c ( ξ ) = ξ α E 1 , 1 + α ( c ξ ) .
Let U = { ξ C : ξ < 1 } and A denote for the class of analytic functions given by the expansion
f ( ξ ) = ξ + s = 2 a s ξ s , ξ U .
Further, let T be the subclass of A consisting of functions of the form
f ( ξ ) = ξ s = 2 a s ξ s , ξ U .
Given two functions f , g A , where f ( z ) = z + n = 2 a n z n and g ( z ) = z + n = 2 b n z n , their Hadamard product or convolution f ( z ) g ( z ) is defined by (see, [13,14])
f ( z ) g ( z ) = z + n = 2 a n b n z n , ( z U ) .
Let
S * ( γ ) = f A : ξ f ( ξ ) f ( ξ ) > γ , ξ U ,
and
K ( γ ) = f A : 1 + ξ f ( ξ ) f ( ξ ) > γ , ξ U ,
denote the subclasses of A which are starlike and convex of order γ ( 0 γ < 1 ) , respectively. Let S T * ( γ ) and K T ( γ ) be the subfamilies of S * ( γ ) and K ( γ ) , respectively, whose functions are of the form (4).
The generalization of the classes S * ( γ ) and K ( γ ) of functions f A given by the classes S * ( γ , β ) and K ( γ , β ) , which are satisfies the conditions:
S * ( γ , β ) = f A : ξ f ( ξ ) + β ξ 2 f ( ξ ) f ( ξ ) > γ , ξ U , 0 γ < 1 , 0 β < 1
and
K ( γ , β ) = f A : ξ f ( ξ ) + β ξ 2 f ( ξ ) f ( ξ ) > γ , ξ U , 0 γ < 1 , 0 β < 1 ,
respectively. Let
S T * ( γ , β ) = S * ( γ , β ) T and K T ( γ , β ) = K ( γ , β ) T .
Clearly, we have S T * ( γ , 0 ) = S T * ( γ ) and K T ( γ , 0 ) = K T ( γ ) .
For σ C \ { 0 } and 1 W < V 1 , Dixit and Pal [15] introduced the class Y σ ( V , W ) of all analytic functions in U , defined as:
Y σ ( V , W ) = f : f A and f ( ξ ) 1 ( V W ) σ W [ f ( ξ ) 1 ] < 1 , ξ U .
In the recent years, there has been a tremendous lot of interest in the distributions of the random variables. In statistics and probability theory, their probability density functions in the real variable x and the complex variable ξ have been crucial. Distributions have so been the subject of much study. Numerous distribution types, including the Binomial distribution, negative binomial distribution, Poisson distribution and geometric distribution, emerged from real-world circumstances.
If the probability density function is given by:
P ( X = k ) = e ε k ! ε k , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , ,
and ε > 0 is the parameter of the distribution, then a random variable X follows a Poisson distribution.
Recently, with coefficients are Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution Şeker et al. [16] (see also, [17]) defined the following power series
F α , c ε ( ξ ) : = ξ + s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) ξ s , ξ U ,
where α > 1 , c > 0 .
We note that if we put α = 0 and c = 1 in (7), we get the Poisson distribution series introduced by Porwal [18].
Furthermore, Şeker et al. [16] defined the series
k α , c ε ( ξ ) : = 2 ξ F α , c ε ( ξ ) = ξ s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) ξ s , ξ U .
Now by the convolution, we construct the linear operator I α , c ε : A A to be
I α , c ε f ( ξ ) : = F α , c ε ( ξ ) f ( ξ ) = ξ + s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) a s ξ s , ( ξ U , α > 1 , c > 0 ) .
In recent years, several researchers used this distribution series [19,20] and other distribution series such as Poisson distribution series [21,22,23,24,25,26], Pascal distribution series [27,28,29,30], hypergeometric distribution series [31,32,33,34,35,36], and the Mittag–Leffler-type Poisson distribution [37] to obtain some necessary and sufficient conditions for these distributions to belong to certain classes of analytic functions defined in U . In the present paper we obtain some necessary and sufficient conditions for the Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution series k α , c ε to be in our classes S T * ( γ , β ) and K T ( γ , β ) . Furthermore, we associate these subclasses with the class Y σ ( V , W ) , and finally, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the function f such that the operator G α , c ε f ( ξ ) = 0 ξ k α , c ε ( t ) t d t belongs to class Y σ ( V , W ) .

2. Preliminary Lemmas

We require the following Lemmas in order to establish our main results.
Lemma 1
([25]). A function f T in the class S T * ( γ , β ) if and only if
s = 2 s + β s ( s 1 ) γ a s 1 γ ,
where 0 γ < 1 , 0 β < 1 .
Lemma 2
([25]). A function f T in the class K T ( γ , β ) if and only if
s = 2 s s + β s ( s 1 ) γ a s 1 γ ,
where 0 γ < 1 , 0 β < 1 .
Lemma 3
([15]). If f ∈ Y σ ( V , W ) is of the form (4), then
a s ( V W ) σ s , s N { 1 } .
In this paper, we will assume that 0 γ < 1 , 0 β < 1 , σ C \ { 0 } , and 1 W < V 1 unless otherwise stated.

3. Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

The necessary and sufficient condition for k α , c ε to be in the class S T * ( γ , β ) is given by the following
Theorem 1.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 , then k α , c ε S T * ( γ , β ) if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) β ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + 2 β ( 1 α ) + 1 ε E α , c ( ε ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Proof. 
Since k α , c ε is defined by (8), in view of Lemma 1 it suffices to verify that
s = 2 s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) 1 E α , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Writing
s 2 = ( α + s 1 ) ( α + s 2 ) + ( 3 2 α ) ( α + s 1 ) + ( 1 α ) 2
and
s = α + s 1 + 1 α
in (13), we have
s = 2 s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) 1 E α , c ( ε ) = s = 2 β s 2 + s ( 1 β ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) 1 E α , c ( ε ) = 1 E α , c ( ε ) β s = 2 ( α + s 1 ) ( α + s 2 ) ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) + 2 β ( 1 α ) + 1 s = 2 ( α + s 1 ) ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) = 1 E α , c ( ε ) β s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α 2 ) + 2 β ( 1 α ) + 1 s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α 1 ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) = c E ν , c ( ε ) β ε s = 0 ε ν ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + ν ) + 2 β ( 1 ν ) + 1 ε s = 0 ε ν ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + ν + 1 ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ ε s = 0 ε α ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + α + 2 ) = c E α , c ( ε ) β ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + 2 β ( 1 α ) + 1 ε E α , c ( ε ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) ,
which is bounded above by 1 γ if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) β ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + 2 β ( 1 α ) + 1 ε E α , c ( ε ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Now, we obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for k α , c ε to be in the class K T ( γ , β ) .
Theorem 2.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 , then k α , c ε K T ( γ , β ) if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) β ε 3 E α 2 , c ( ε ) + β ( 6 3 α ) + ( 1 β ) ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + β ( 3 α 2 9 α + 7 ) + 1 β ( 3 2 α ) γ ε E α , c ( ε ) + β ( 1 α ) 3 + 1 β ( 1 α ) 2 γ 1 α E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Proof. 
By Lemma 1 we show that
s = 2 s s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) 1 E α , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Writing
s 3 = ( α + s 1 ) ( α + s 2 ) ( α + s 3 ) + ( 6 3 α ) ( α + s 1 ) ( α + s 2 ) ( 3 α 2 9 α + 7 ) ( α + s 1 ) + ( 1 α ) 3 ,
s 2 = ( α + s 1 ) ( α + s 2 ) + ( 3 2 α ) ( α + s 1 ) + ( 1 α ) 2
and
s = α + s 1 + 1 α
in (15), we have
s = 2 s s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) 1 E α , c ( ε ) = s = 2 β s 3 + s 2 ( 1 β ) γ s ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) 1 E α , c ( ε ) = 1 E α , c ( ε ) β s = 2 ( α + s 1 ) ( α + s 2 ) ( α + s 3 ) ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) + β ( 6 3 α ) + ( 1 β ) s = 2 ( α + s 1 ) ( α + s 2 ) ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) + β ( 3 α 2 9 α + 7 ) + 1 β ( 3 2 α ) γ s = 2 ( α + s 1 ) ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) + β ( 1 α ) 3 + 1 β ( 1 α ) 2 γ 1 α s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) = 1 E α , c ( ε ) β s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α 3 ) + β ( 6 3 α ) + ( 1 β ) s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α 2 ) + β ( 3 α 2 9 α + 7 ) + 1 β ( 3 2 α ) γ s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α 1 ) + β ( 1 α ) 3 + 1 β ( 1 α ) 2 γ 1 α s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) = c E α , c ( ε ) β ε s = 0 ε α ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + α 1 ) + β ( 6 3 α ) + ( 1 β ) ε s = 0 ε α ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + α ) + β ( 3 α 2 9 α + 7 ) + 1 β ( 3 2 α ) γ ε s = 0 ε α ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + α + 1 ) + β ( 1 α ) 3 + 1 β ( 1 α ) 2 γ 1 α ε s = 0 ε α ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + α + 2 ) = c E α , c ( ε ) β ε 3 E α 2 , c ( ε ) + β ( 6 3 α ) + ( 1 β ) ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + β ( 3 α 2 9 α + 7 ) + 1 β ( 3 2 α ) γ ε E α , c ( ε ) + β ( 1 α ) 3 + 1 β ( 1 α ) 2 γ 1 α E α + 1 , c ( ε ) ,
but the final phrasing bounded above by 1 γ if and only if (14) holds. □

4. Inclusion Relations

The inclusion relations of the class Y σ ( V , W ) associated of the operator I α , c ε defined by (9) proved in this section.
Theorem 3.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . If f Y σ ( V , W ) and
( V W ) c σ E α , c ( ε ) β ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + 2 β ( 1 α ) + 1 ε E α , c ( ε ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ
is satisfied then I α , c ε f K T ( γ , β ) .
Proof. 
By Lemma 2 it is sufficient to show that
s = 2 s s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) a s 1 γ .
Since f Y σ ( V , W ) , then by Lemma 3, we have
a s ( V W ) σ s .
Therefore, it is enough to show that
s = 2 s s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) a s ( V W ) σ s = 2 s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Using the similar computations like in the proof of in Theorem 1 it follows that the inequality (18) is satisfied whenever (16) holds. □
Theorem 4.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . If f Y σ ( V , W ) and
( V W ) σ c E α , c ( ε ) β ε E α , c ( ε ) + 1 β α E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ
is satisfied then I α , c ε f S T * ( γ , β ) .
Proof. 
By Lemma 1 it is sufficient to show that
s = 2 s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) a s 1 γ .
Since f Y σ ( V , W ) , using the inequality (11) of Lemma 3, we have
s = 2 s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) a s ( V W ) σ s = 2 s β β + 1 γ s ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) ( V W ) σ s = 2 s β β + 1 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) = ( V W ) σ s = 2 β α + s 1 + 1 β α ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) = ( V W ) σ E α , c ( ε ) β s = 2 α + s 1 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) + 1 β α s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) = ( V W ) σ E α , c ( ε ) β s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α 1 ) + 1 β α s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) = ( V W ) σ c E α , c ( ε ) β ε s = 0 ε α ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + α + 1 ) + 1 β α ε s = 0 ε α ( c ε ) s Γ ( s + α + 2 ) = ( V W ) σ c E α , c ( ε ) β ε E α , c ( ε ) + 1 β α E α + 1 , c ( ε ) ,
this final phrasing is bounded above by 1 γ if and only if (19) holds. □

5. The Operator G α , c ε ( ξ )

Theorem 5.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . If the integral operator G α , c ε is given by
G α , c ε ( ξ ) : = 0 ξ k α , c ε ( t ) t d t , ξ U ,
then G α , c ε K T ( γ , β ) , if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) β ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + 2 β ( 1 α ) + 1 ε E α , c ( ε ) + ( 1 α ) ( 1 β α ) γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Proof. 
By (8) it follows that
G α , c ε ( ξ ) = ξ s = 2 ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) ξ s s , ξ U .
Using Lemma 2, the integral operator G α , c ε ( ξ ) belongs to K T ( γ , β ) if and only if
s = 2 s + β s ( s 1 ) γ ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
We omit the remaining part of the proof because the remaining proof of Theorem 5 is similar to that of Theorem 1. □
Theorem 6.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . Then the integral operator G α , c ε given by (20) is in the class S T * ( γ , β ) , if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) β E α , c ( ε ) + 1 β α E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Proof. 
Using Lemma 1, the integral operator G α , c ε ( ξ ) belongs to S T * ( γ , β ) if and only if
s = 2 s β β + 1 γ s ε α ( c ε ) s 1 Γ ( s + α ) E α , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
The complement is similar to proof of Theorem 4. □

6. Corollaries and Consequences

Putting β = 0 in the previous theorems, we get the following special cases.
Corollary 1.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 , then k α , c ε S T * ( γ ) if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) ε E α , c ( ε ) + 1 α γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Corollary 2.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 , then k α , c ε K T ( γ ) if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) ε 2 E α 1 , c ( ε ) + 3 2 α γ ε E α , c ( ε ) + 1 α ( 1 α γ ) E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Corollary 3.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . If f Y σ ( V , W ) and
( V W ) c σ E α , c ( ε ) ε E α , c ( ε ) + 1 α γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ
then I α , c ε f K T ( γ ) .
Corollary 4.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . If f Y σ ( V , W ) and
( V W ) σ c E α + 1 , c ( ε ) E α , c ( ε ) 1 γ
then I α , c ε f S T * ( γ ) .
Corollary 5.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . Then the integral operator G α , c ε given by (20) is in the class K T ( γ ) , if and only if
c E α , c ( ε ) ε E α , c ( ε ) + 1 α γ E α + 1 , c ( ε ) 1 γ .
Corollary 6.
Let α > 1 and c > 0 . Then the integral operator G α , c ε given by (20) is in the class S T * ( γ ) , if and only if
c E α + 1 , c ( ε ) E α , c ( ε ) 1 γ .

7. Conclusions

Several researchers have used certain distribution series such as Poisson distribution series, Pascal distribution series, hypergeometric distribution series, and the Mittag–Leffler-type Poisson distribution to obtain some necessary and sufficient conditions for these distributions to belong to certain classes of analytic functions defined in the open disk U . In our study, necessary and sufficient conditions for Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution series to be in the classes S T * ( γ , β ) and K T ( γ , β ) of analytic functions with negative coefficients is obtained. We also investigate several inclusion properties of the class Y σ ( V , W ) associated of the operator I α , c ε defined by this distribution. This study could inspire researchers to introduce new sufficient conditions for Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution series to be in different classes of analytic functions with negative coefficients defined in U .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.-I.C.; methodology, L.-I.C. and B.A.F.; software, L.-I.C.; validation, B.A.F.; formal analysis, L.-I.C.; investigation, B.A.F.; resources, L.-I.C.; data curation, L.-I.C.; writing-original draft preparation, B.A.F.; writing-review and editing, B.A.F.; visualization, B.A.F.; supervision, L.-I.C.; project administration, L.-I.C.; funding acquisition, L.-I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA; Chichester, UK; Brisbane, Australia; Toronto, ON, Canada; Singapore, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wiman, A. Über die Nullstellun der Funcktionen E(x). Acta Math. 1905, 29, 217–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Attiya, A.A. Some applications of Mittag–Leffler function in the unit disk. Filomat 2016, 30, 2075–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bansal, D.; Prajapat, J.K. Certain geometric properties of the Mittag–Leffler functions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 2016, 61, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garg, M.; Manohar, P.; Kalla, S.L. A Mittag–Leffler-type function of two variables. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2013, 24, 934–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kiryakova, V. Generalized Fractional Calculus and Applications; Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 301; Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, UK; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kiryakova, V. Multiple (multiindex) Mittag–Leffler functions and relations to generalized fractional calculus. Higher transcendental functions and their applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 118, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kiryakova, V. The multi-index Mittag–Leffler functions as an important class of special functions of fractional calculus. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 1885–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mainardia, F.; Gorenflo, R. On Mittag–Leffler-type functions in fractional evolution processes. Higher transcendental functions and their applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 118, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Srivastava, H.M.; Frasin, B.A.; Pescar, V. Univalence of integral operators involving Mittag–Leffler functions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2017, 11, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Srivastava, H.M.; Tomovski, Z. Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag–Leffler function in the kernel. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 211, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mittag–Leffler, G.M. Sur la nouvelle fonction E(x). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1903, 137, 554–558. [Google Scholar]
  13. Duren, P.L. Univalent Functions, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1983; p. 259. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sadykov, T. The Hadamard product of hypergeometric series. Bull. Sci. Math. 2002, 126, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dixit, K.K.; Pal, S.K. On a class of univalent functions related to complex order. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1995, 26, 889–896. [Google Scholar]
  16. Seker, B.; Eker, S.S.; Çekiç, B. On subclasses of analytic functions associated with Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution series. Sahand Commun. Math. Anal. 2022, 19, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  17. Amourah, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Seoudy, T.M. An Application of Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution on certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions subordinate to Gegenbauer polynomials. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Porwal, S. An application of a Poisson distribution series on certain analytic functions. J. Complex Anal. 2014, 2014, 984135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eker, S.S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Şeker, B.; Çekiç, B. Spiral-like functions associated with Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution series. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2023, 29, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seker, B.; Eker, S.S.; Çekiç, B. Certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with Miller–Ross-type Poisson distribution series. Honam Math. J. 2022, 44, 504–512. [Google Scholar]
  21. Alsoboh, A.; Amourah, A.; Darus, M.; Sharefeen, R.I.A. Applications of Neutrosophic q-Poisson distribution Series for Subclass of Analytic Functions and Bi-Univalent Functions. Mathematics 2023, 11, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El-Ashwah, R.M.; Kota, W.Y. Some condition on a Poisson distribution series to be in subclasses of univalent functions. Acta Univ. Apulensis Math. Inform. 2017, 51, 89–103. [Google Scholar]
  23. Frasin, B.A.; Gharaibeh, M.M. Subclass of analytic functions associated with Poisson distribution series. Afr. Mat. 2020, 31, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Frasin, B.A.; Al-Hawary, T. Uniformly convex spiral functions and uniformly spirallike functions associated with Pascal distribution series. Math. Bohem. 2021, 147, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Vijaya, K.; Porwal, S. Some inclusion results of certain subclass of analytic functions associated with Poisson distribution series. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2016, 45, 1101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Porwal, S.; Kumar, M. A unified study on starlike and convex functions associated with Poisson distribution series. Afr. Mat. 2016, 27, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alsoboh, A.; Amourah, A.; Darus, M.; Rudder, C.A. Investigating New Subclasses of Bi-Univalent Functions Associated with q-Pascal Distribution Series Using the Subordination Principle. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. El-Deeb, S.M.; Bulboacă, T.; Dziok, J. Pascal distribution series connected with certain subclasses of univalent functions. Kyungpook Math. J. 2019, 59, 301–314. [Google Scholar]
  29. Frasin, B.A. Subclasses of analytic functions associated with Pascal distribution series. Adv. Theory Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 2020, 4, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shamakhi, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Seoudy, T.M. Subclass of analytic functions related with Pascal distribution series. J. Math. 2022, 2022, 8355285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Merkes, E.; Scott, B.T. Starlike hypergeometric functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1961, 12, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cho, N.E.; Woo, S.Y.; Owa, S. Uniform convexity properties for hypergeometric functions. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2002, 5, 303–313. [Google Scholar]
  33. Porwal, S. Confluent hypergeometric distribution and its applications on certain classes of univalent functions of conic regions. Kyungpook Math. J. 2018, 58, 495–505. [Google Scholar]
  34. Silverman, H. Starlike and convexity properties for hypergeometric functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1993, 172, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Themangani, R.; Porwal, S.; Magesh, N. Generalized hypergeometric distribution and its applications on univalent functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2020, 2020, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yousef, F.; Amourah, A.; Frasin, B.A.; Bulboaca, T. An avant-Garde construction for subclasses of analytic bi-univalent functions. Mathematics 2022, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahmad, M.; Frasin, B.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Al-khazaleh, A. An application of Mittag–Leffler-type Poisson distribution on certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with conic domains. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frasin, B.A.; Cotîrlă, L.-I. On Miller–Ross-Type Poisson Distribution Series. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3989. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11183989

AMA Style

Frasin BA, Cotîrlă L-I. On Miller–Ross-Type Poisson Distribution Series. Mathematics. 2023; 11(18):3989. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11183989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frasin, Basem Aref, and Luminiţa-Ioana Cotîrlă. 2023. "On Miller–Ross-Type Poisson Distribution Series" Mathematics 11, no. 18: 3989. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11183989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop