Medium-Energy Proton Detector Onboard the FY-4B Satellite
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Mission Requirements
3. Instrument Design
3.1. System Composition
3.2. Electronic Design
3.3. Sensor System
3.3.1. Light-Blocking Layer
3.3.2. Proton Transportation Simulation
3.3.3. Deflecting Magnet
3.4. Geometrical Factor
4. Ground Calibration
4.1. Calibration Method
4.2. Calibration Results
4.2.1. Energy Linearity and Energy Resolution
4.2.2. Energy Channel Division
4.2.3. Flux Calibration
5. Observation Results in Orbit
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lu, F.; Zhang, X.H.; Chen, B.Y.; Liu, H.; Wu, R.H.; Han, Q.; Feng, X.H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.Q. FY-4 geostationary meteorological satellite imaging characteristics and its application prospects. J. Mar. Meteorol. 2017, 37, 1–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.G.; Wang, J.B.; Xie, L.H. A Brief Introduction to the Belt and Road Initiative; China Intercontinental Press: Beijing, China, 2019; ISBN 9787508534220. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Tian, T.; Pan, Y. Causal Analysis between Geosynchronous Satellite Anomalies and Space Environment. J. Astronaut. 2017, 38, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matéo-Vélez, J.-C.; Sicard, A.; Payan, D.; Ganushkina, N.; Meredith, N.P.; Sillanpäa, I. Spacecraft surface charging induced by severe environments at geosynchronous orbit. Space Weather 2018, 16, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagai, T.; Shinohara, I.; Singer, H.J.; Rodriguez, J.; Onsager, T.G. Proton and Electron Injection Path at Geosynchronous Altitude. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2019, 124, 4083–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsurutani, B.; Arballo, J.; Zhou, X.-Y.; Galvan, C.; Chao, J. Electromagnetic electron and proton cyclotron waves in geospace: A cassini snapshot. COSPAR Colloq. Ser. 2002, 12, 97–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, D.N.; Belian, R.D.; Higbie, P.R.; Hones, E.W., Jr. High-Energy Magnetospheric Protons and Their Dependence on Geomagneticand Interplanetary Conditions. J. Geophys. 1979, 84, 7138–7154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, G.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Huang, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Sun, Y. Development and Calibration of a Three-Directional High-Energy Particle Detector for FY-3E Satellite. Aerospace 2023, 10, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Huang, C.; Li, J.; Zong, W.; Shen, G.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P. Design and Development of Medium Energy Proton Detector Onboard FY-3E Satellite. Aerospace 2023, 10, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, L.; Liu, W. Design of RS-422 Bus Data Processing Software. Meas. Control Technol. 2012, 31, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.; Zhang, N.; Xian, J. Design and implementation of time synchronization system of 1553B and RS-422 bus. Electron. Meas. Technol. 2018, 41, 86–90. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Geant4 Collaboration. Geant4’s Guide for Application Developers, Version Geant4.10.0. 2013. Available online: https://geant4.web.cern.ch/ (accessed on 7 May 2020).
- Geant4 Collaboration. Physics Reference Manual, Version Geant4.9.1. 2007. Available online: https://geant4.web.cern.ch/ (accessed on 7 May 2020).
- Allison, J.; Amako, K.; Apostolakis, J.; Arce, P.; Asai, M.; Aso, T.; Bagli, E.; Bagulya, A.; Banerjee, S.; Barrand, G.; et al. Recent developments in Geant4. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2015, 82, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.Y.; Wang, S.J. Design of the sweeping magnet in the space particle detector. Chin. J. Geophys. 2007, 50, 684–690. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.Y.; Zhang, X.G.; Wang, C.Q.; Shen, G.; Jing, T.; Zhang, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, G.; Liang, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. The geometrical factor of high energy protons detector on FY-3 satellite. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2014, 57, 2558–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yando, K.; Millan, R.M.; Green, J.C.; Evans, D.S. A Monte Carlo simulation of the NOAA POES Medium Energy Proton and Electron Detector instrument. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2011, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, D.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Zong, W. Design Optimization of Novel Collimator for Detector of Space High Energy Electron: A Simulation Study. Chin. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 965–970. [Google Scholar]
- Grupen, C.; Shwartz, B. Particle Detectors (Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Series Number 26), 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Mcfadden, J.P.; Evans, D.S.; Kasprzak, W.T.; Brace, L.H.; Chornay, D.J.; Coates, A.J.; Dichter, B.K.; Hoegy, W.R.; Holeman, E.; Kadinsky-Cade, K.; et al. In-flight instrument calibration and performance verification. ISSI Sci. Rep. 2007, SR–007, 277–385. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez, J.V.; Michael, H.D.; Henderson, M.G. On-orbit calibration of geostationary electron and proton flux observations for augmentation of an existing empirical radiation model. J. Space Weather Space Clim. J. 2020, 10, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jo, G.-B.; Sohn, J.; Choi, C.R.; Yi, Y.; Min, K.-W.; Kang, S.-B.; Na, G.W.; Shin, G.-H. Development of High Energy Particle Detector for the Study of Space Radiation Storm. J. Astron. Space Sci. 2014, 31, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morton, T. Estimation of The Radiation Environment Based On The NASA Ap-8 and Ae-8 Models. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Radiation Effects on Semiconductor Devices for Space Applications, Takasaki, Japan, 9–11 October 2002. [Google Scholar]
No. | Parameter | MEPD on FY-4B | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Energy range | 30 keV–5 MeV 12 channels: Low energy section: P1: 30 keV–48 keV; P2: 48 keV–80 keV; P3: 80 keV–120 keV; P4: 120 keV–170 keV; P5: 170 keV–240 keV; P6: 240 keV–350 keV. High energy section: P7: 240 keV–350 keV; P8: 350 keV–500 keV; P9: 500 keV–800 keV; P10: 800 keV–1500 keV; P11: 1500 keV–3000 keV; P12: 3000 keV–5000 keV. | Channel P6 and channel P7 are overlapping in order to verify the long-term consistency of the two energy sections |
2 | Detection directions and field of view | 18 (20° × 20° for each direction) | Detector A: directions 1–9 Detector B: directions 10–18 |
Detector | Direction | Energy Linearity | Energy Resolution |
---|---|---|---|
A | 1 | 1.69% | 4.55% (@280 keV) |
2 | 1.57% | 4.62% (@280 keV) | |
3 | 1.54% | 4.27% (@280 keV) | |
4 | 2.43% | 4.19% (@280 keV) | |
5 | 3.57% | 8.16% (@280 keV) | |
6 | 2.19% | 5.08% (@280 keV) | |
7 | 1.67% | 4.11% (@280 keV) | |
8 | 3.94% | 7.42% (@280 keV) | |
9 | 1.74% | 4.2% (@280 keV) | |
B | 10 | 1.10% | 4.86% (@280 keV) |
11 | 0.79% | 6.50% (@280 keV) | |
12 | 1.11% | 6.27% (@280 keV) | |
13 | 2.78% | 10.56% (@280 keV) | |
14 | 1.84% | 6.44% (@280 keV) | |
15 | 0.94% | 6.72% (@280 keV) | |
16 | 1.20% | 5.98% (@280 keV) | |
17 | 0.40% | 4.77% (@280 keV) | |
18 | 0.76% | 4.86% (@280 keV) |
Energy Channel | Designed Boundary (keV) | Actual Boundary (keV) | Error Range (%) |
---|---|---|---|
P1 | 30–48 | 48.2 | 0.42% |
P2 | 48–80 | 48.2–79.9 | 0.42%/0.12% |
P3 | 80–120 | 79.9–120.9 | 0.21%/0.75% |
P4 | 120–170 | 120.9–171.8 | 0.75%/1.06% |
P5 | 170–240 | 171.8–243.6 | 1.06%/1.50% |
P6 | 240–350 | 243.6–355.8 | 1.50%/1.66% |
P7 | 240–350 | 244.2–356.3 | 1.75%/1.80% |
P8 | 350–500 | 356.3–502.3 | 1.80%/0.46% |
P9 | 500–800 | 502.3–790.7 | 0.46%/1.16% |
P10 | 800–1500 | 790.7–1495.8 | 1.16%/0.28% |
P11 | 1500–3000 | 1495.8–2997.5 | 0.28%/0.08% |
P12 | 3000–5000 | 2997.5–4996.3 | 0.08%/0.03% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, H.; Zhang, S.; Shen, G.; Zhang, X.; Zong, W.; Guo, J.; Chen, A.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R. Medium-Energy Proton Detector Onboard the FY-4B Satellite. Aerospace 2023, 10, 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100889
Zhang H, Zhang S, Shen G, Zhang X, Zong W, Guo J, Chen A, Zhang L, Zhang R. Medium-Energy Proton Detector Onboard the FY-4B Satellite. Aerospace. 2023; 10(10):889. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100889
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Huanxin, Shenyi Zhang, Guohong Shen, Xin Zhang, Weiguo Zong, Jianguang Guo, Anqin Chen, Liguo Zhang, and Ruyi Zhang. 2023. "Medium-Energy Proton Detector Onboard the FY-4B Satellite" Aerospace 10, no. 10: 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10100889