Next Article in Journal
An Abiotic Stress Responsive U-Box E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Is Involved in OsGI-Mediating Diurnal Rhythm Regulating Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Toward Unifying Global Hotspots of Wild and Domesticated Biodiversity
Previous Article in Journal
Subcellular Roles of Glutathione in Mediating Plant Defense during Biotic Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Association Mapping for Stripe Rust Resistance in Pakistani Spring Wheat Genotypes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/plants9091069
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of the Nutritional and Medicinal Potential of Tubers from Hairy Stork’s-Bill (Erodium crassifolium L ’Hér), a Wild Plant Species Inhabiting Arid Southeast Mediterranean Regions

by
Shabtai Cohen
1,
Hinanit Koltai
2,
Gopinath Selvaraj
2,
Moran Mazuz
2,
Moran Segoli
1,
Amnon Bustan
1 and
Ofer Guy
1,*
1
Ramat Negev Desert Agro-Research Center (RN-DARC), Ramat Negev Works Ltd., D.N. Halutza 8551500, Israel
2
Department of Ornamental Horticulture and Biotechnology, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(9), 1069; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091069
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 19 August 2020 / Accepted: 19 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Biodiversity and Genetic Resources)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Emerging needs for diversifying human diet and to explore novel therapeutic procedures have led to increasing attempts to retrieve traditional nourishments and recruit beneficial wild plant species. Species of the genus Erodium (Geraniaceae) harbor medicinal indications and substances known from folklore and scientific research. Hairy stork’s bill (Erodium crassifolium L’Hér), is a small hemicryptophyte that inhabits arid southeast Mediterranean regions. E. crassifolium is among the very few Geraniaceae species known to produce tubers. Traditional knowledge holds that the tubers are edible and used by Bedouin tribes. However, no scientific information was found regarding nutrition or medicinal properties of these tubers. The objectives of our project are to unravel potential nutritional and medicinal benefits of the tubers, conduct initial steps towards domestication and develop agricultural practices enhancing E. crassifolium tuber yield and quality. Tubers show high water content (90%), low caloric value (23 Kcal 100−1 g) and considerable contents of minerals and vitamins. In addition, the tubers contain significant amounts of catechins and epigallocatechin, polyphenolic compounds known for their antioxidative, anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative activities. Furthermore, in vitro experiments demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory effects on human cell cultures. E. crassifolium is highly responsive to environmental changes; fertigation (700 mm) increased tuber yield by 10-fold, compared to simulated wild conditions (50–200 mm). These results indicate a significant potential of E. crassifolium becoming a valuable crop species. Therefore, there is a need for continued efforts in domestication, including ecotype selection, breeding, development of suitable agricultural practices and further exploration of its medicinal benefits.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Human diet and therapy have featured valuable plants gathered from the wild since ancient times. The agricultural civilization developed in the past 12,000 years has been founded on the domestication of many useful species [1]. However, in the modern era, global economic considerations have significantly changed agricultural approaches and scales, which brought about overexploiting of land resources, consistent diminishing of natural biodiversity and negative modifications of human diet and health [2,3]. Globalization and urbanization have accelerated the unification of the current human diet and have led to a further narrow hoard of available useful species [4]. The recent burst of noncommunicative diseases (NCD), including obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disorders and cancer among populations of developing countries as well as lower socioeconomic classes of developed countries, is largely attributed to nutritional and health disorders derived from current human diets [5].
The emerging need for improving human diet has led to increasing interests in traditional nourishments, such as the Mediterranean diet [6] and in primordial therapeutic aids. These are usually based on diverse resources that change through locations, seasons and include numerous wild edible plant species. Attempts to retrieve old beneficial species and recruit them for new commercial use have a vast potential, considering that a very small portion of known plant species has ever been adequately studied for such purposes [7,8]. There is an increasing research activity focused on identifying and characterizing wild plant species with particular attributes to human diet and health [4,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Special attention is paid to edible plants as sources for essential mineral elements [16] and of antioxidative-active compounds [17]. In addition, there is a rising interest in plants encompassing anti-inflammatory activities [18].
Geraniaceae family includes seven genera and about 830 species distributed from temperate to tropic and arid climates. The largest genera are Geranium (430 species), Pelargonium (280 species) and Erodium (80 species). The family is known for the production of essential oils and ornamentals. Many Geraniaceae species are ascribed to have various medicinal values [19,20,21,22,23]. Additionally, Some of the species belonging to the genus Erodium have recognized medicinal indications from folklore and empirical data [24]. Erodium species are used to treat a variety of human ailments such as colds, coughs, diarrhea, hemorrhaging and are used to dress wounds [24,25,26,27,28].
Hairy stork’s bill (HSB) (Erodium crassifolium L’Hér) is a Saharo-Arabian common perennial hemicryptophyte (i.e., buds are at or near the soil surface) that inhabits shrub–steppes of arid southeast Mediterranean regions. The species is distributed from northwest at Crete [29], through few Aegean Sea islands [30], the Libyan [31] and Egyptian [32,33] coasts, north Sinai Peninsula [32,34], Cyprus [35], the Negev Desert of Israel [36], until Edom mountains of Jordan and Saudi Arabian deserts, on southeast [37]. In Israel, HSB can be found in the Negev and Judean deserts, where the annual rainfall is 30–250 mm. The species is most abundant in the stony and arid loess soils and on slopes of limestone hills [36]. Vegetative phase in form of rosette (early season) and 30 cm stems and leaves (late season) starts with the first effective rains. Flowering time is February to May and the flowers are pink to purple with dark color base (Figure 1A,B) that attracts pollinating insects. The ripe ovary splits into five diaspores, each contains one seed covered by the ovary hairy wall with a sharply pointed tip (Figure 1C). The diaspores are carried away from the mother plant by strong winds and react to humidity changes by creating screw-like twists to penetrate the soil [36]. Among all Geraniaceae species, E. crassifolium is among the few known to produce tubers (Figure 1D). The tubers are formed on roots at depth of 5–20 cm and are typically small and spherical (1–2 cm in diameter). HSB tubers have a sweet taste and are best in late winter or early spring when they are whitish in color [36]. Traditional knowledge holds that the tubers are edible and Bedouin tribes are their primary consumers [33]. However, no information exists regarding nutritional value of these tubers. Furthermore, in spite of enduring claims associating some medicinal properties with HSB tubers, no supportive documented evidence have been found so far.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate, for the first time, the nutritive and medicinal potential of E. crassifolium for becoming a useful new crop species. In addition to a moderate nutritive potential, we demonstrate here significant in vitro anti-inflammatory capacities in the tubers, assigned to well-known bioactive compounds. Furthermore, HSB displayed impressive tuber productivity when exposed to agricultural conditions, indicating a promising potential for domestication.

2. Results and Discussion

The domestication of plant species is a complex iterating process, which includes selection according to subjective preferences [38], such as color, palatability and size. In the modern era, however, with the increasing awareness to the potential nutrition benefits or hazards of a given food product, an established list of nutrition facts has become an essential step in the initial evaluation of a candidate species. Here, for the first time, a comprehensive nutrition facts list is presented for HSB tubers (Table 1). The very high water content of HSB tubers makes them highly valuable for nomads in the hot dry desert, supporting the knowledge about their traditional use by Bedouin tribes [33]. Tubers’ caloric content is about half than in carrots, but they provide considerable amounts of essential minerals such as calcium, sulfur, magnesium and iron, as well as phosphorus and potassium. In addition, HSB tubers are a good source of vitamins A and C, harboring about a quarter and a third of their contents in carrot, respectively (Table 1).
Compared to carrots, the attractiveness of the HSB tuber in the fresh product market is quite moderate; it is crunchy, but inadequately sweet with no flavor. HSB tubers improve when served cooked, but further culinary efforts are required. As for any wild species, a long course of selection and breeding would be necessary to bring HSB tubers to a status of a common food produce.
Enduring claims associating some medicinal properties with HSB tubers, so far with no supportive documented evidence, have encouraged our curiosity. Electromechanical analysis of the water-soluble extract from HSB tubers revealed significant reducing power, identifying at least six substances or groups of antioxidants (data not shown). Fractionation of the tubers’ ethanolic extract (EE) into 11 fractions (Figure 2A) and subsequent in vitro evaluations of possible anti-inflammatory capacities revealed significant activity in fractions F3 and F4, as well as in the original EE and the pooled fractions, PF (Figure 2B).
Biochemical analyses showed that fraction F4 comprised mainly of epigallocatechin, trans- and cis-catechin and gallic acid (Table 2), all of which are known for their robust bioactive capacities, including anti-inflammatory activity [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Interestingly, the bioactivity of fraction F4 was significantly greater than that of each compound alone at its corresponding concentration (data not shown), indicating synergic relationships in the natural extract. Furthermore, HSB tubers’ extract displayed significantly stronger anti-inflammatory capacity compared to extracts of green tea (Camellia sinensis) or turmeric (Curcuma longa) [47], well-known sources of antioxidative and bioactive compounds [40,48].
Screening several HSB ecotypes collected from diverse locations in Israeli deserts revealed that they all share a similar range of substantial anti-inflammatory capacity; however, there were considerable differences among the ecotypes (Figure 3), indicating that the natural diversity within the species may offer a promising potential for genetic enhancement of the tubers’ bioactive capacities. Accordingly, in the recent few years, seeds were collected from the wild across the Negev Desert and parts of the Rift Valley in order to broaden this potential.
Beyond selection and breeding, optimization of the growth conditions through irrigation, soil fertilization and weeding are founding principles of agriculture [38,49,50] and positive responses of a given wild plant species to these manipulations are prerequisite to successful domestication.
In the wild, HSB is a classic opportunist desert shrub, the proliferation of which largely depends on the current water availability during a given growth season. In arid conditions, the occurrence and intensity of late autumn rain events determine the rate of seed germination and of young seedlings survival. Later on, during winter and early spring, the extents of canopy development, reproductive phase and the duration of the growing season are governed by the intermittent desert precipitation regime [51].
Simulation of various natural scenarios of the precipitation regime from November to May showed that in a relatively dry winter (50 mm), HSB exhibited low seed germination and seedlings survival rates. Conversely, many more plants persisted and grew in a rainy (200 mm) season (data not shown). Interestingly, the effects of water availability on tuber production per plant were very limited within the low precipitation range (Figure 4). However, tuber production and tuber weight increased significantly when water application increased to 700 mm, supplied consistently using drip irrigation, and no problems of germination or seedling persistence occurred. Moreover, plants produced significantly greater number (Figure 4B) of substantially larger tubers (Figure 4A). Adding fertilizer to the irrigated water had only a small influence on the number of tubers (Figure 4B), but tuber size increased by more than 50% (Figure 4A). Thus, application of a basic agricultural practice gave rise to a 10-fold increase in the mean tuber yield of an individual HSB plant (Figure 4C). Finally, the difference in plant and crop performance between wild and agricultural environments is unexpected (Figure 5); the greater germination and survival rates, fortified by enhanced tubers’ growth and development have brought about the current yield potential of cultivated HSB to about 15 Mg ha−1.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Ecosystem and Plant Material

The HSB project took place at Ramat Negev Desert Agro-Research Center (RN-DARC), Israel (30°58′ N 34°42′ E), 305 m above sea level. Soil texture varies across short distances from sandy dunes to sandy-loam Loess—and consequently differ in water retention and cation exchange capacity. The natural life cycle of HSB occurs in the rainy season, germinating from November and dispersing seeds up to May. Mean annual precipitation is about 82 mm, but the amount of rain can substantially vary among years and locations, as well as the distribution and intensity of rain events. During the growing season, daily average temperatures decline from 17.8 °C in November to about 10 °C in January and then steadily rise to 23 °C in May (Figure S1).
Most of the trials with HSB employed ecotype RNDARC (Accession No. 309198), which was collected near the trial site several years ago. Additional seed sources were ecotype Revivim (Accession No. 309199), the seeds of which were collected yearly near Kibbutz Revivim and three other accessions (ecotypes 25525, 25493 and 26164), kindly received from the Israeli Gene Bank, ARO.

3.2. Field Experiments

Two separate field experiments were conducted from November 2017 to June 2018. The first examined HSB growth performance in response to distinct precipitation regimes, whereas the second experiment evaluated it under two different agricultural practices.

3.2.1. Simulated Precipitation Regimes

Treatments represent four principal scenarios of rainy seasons in the Negev Desert of Israel, differing in the intensity and frequency of rain episodes, as follows: A. low and concentrated (50 mm, comprised of two events); (B) low and scattered (50 mm, spread in ten events); (C) high and concentrated (200 mm, in four events); and, D. high and scattered (200 mm, in ten events) precipitation. Seeds were sown in loess soil at a density of eight seeds m−2, in 6 m2 plots. The experiment was organized in a random block design with four replicates. Irrigation was executed using computer-controlled sprinklers, and no fertilizer or soil amendments were used. The amount of water was monitored from germination and included rain. Plants were counted weekly. At harvest in June, tuber number and weight were determined per each surviving plant.

3.2.2. Agricultural Practice

Seeds were sown at late November 2017 in an open field on sandy soil beds. Water was supplied using two drip lines per bed (40 cm apart), with five 1.6 L h−1 emitters per 1 m of drip line. Two seeds were sown on either side of each emitter, resulting in a density of 16 plants m−2. Fresh water (0.7 dS m−1) was supplied at 6 mm day−1 until germination, which occurred about 2 weeks after sowing. After germination, irrigation was reduced to 4 mm day−1 to accomplish 700 mm until late May. An unfertilized control was tested against a fertigated treatment, which was applied using a liquid fertilizer (Shefer 4:2:6, 35% ammonium and 65% nitrate, Israel Chemicals, Ltd.) at 1.5 L m−3. The experimental design was of random blocks with four replicates (plot size was 2.4 m2). Bloom began in April and continued until June. Tubers began forming at a very early stage of plant growth and continued to form and develop throughout the season. Tuber harvest took place in June, toward seeds ripening. At harvest, tuber yield was determined; tubers were cleaned and stored at −20 °C until further examinations.

3.3. Evaluation of Tubers Nutrition Facts

To assess HSB tuber nutrition facts (Table 1), samples (2 kg each) were sent to BactoChem, Ltd., Ness Ziona, Israel, an officially certified laboratory, tightly committed to AOAC protocols.

3.4. Ethanolic Extract (EE)

HSB tubers were removed from cold storage (−20 °C) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen tubers were homogenized using an electrical blender and weighed. For each 1 g of fresh material, 4 mL of 70% ethanol were added immediately to the crushed tubers and incubated overnight at 28 °C with shaking at 180 rpm, after which the samples were centrifuged in 50-mL tubes for 5 min at 2500 rpm in an Eppendorf 5810R centrifuge with a 26 cm rotor (1820 RCF). The supernatant was transferred to new tubes and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo overnight. The remaining water content was lyophilized to powder and stored at −20 °C. From each gram of tubers, approx. 60 mg of lyophilized extract was obtained.
Just before further analysis, the lyophilized material was weighed and dissolved in 100 μL of 70% ethanol and then 900 μL of double distilled water (DDW), to obtain a 60 mg mL−1 sample, which was filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane.

3.5. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis

The filtered EE sample was separated using an Ultimate 3000 HPLC system coupled with a WPS-3000(T) Autosampler, HPG-3400 pump and DAD-300 detector. The separation was performed using a Purospher RP-18 endcapped column (250 mm × 4.6 mm I.D.; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) with a guard column (4 mm × 4 mm I.D.). Solvent gradients were formed by varying the proportion of solvent A [water with 0.1% acetic acid (v/v)] to solvent B (methanol) with a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Solvent B was maintained initially at 10% for 5 min and then increased to 100% in 25 min. This 100% of Solvent B was maintained for 10 min, then decreased to 10% in 10 min and equilibrated for 5 min (total run time 55 min). The compound peaks were detected at three different wavelengths: 220, 240 and 280 nm. The same program was used to obtain fractions in bulk using a preparative HPLC (11250 Infinity, Agilent Technologies) using reversed-phase C18 column (Kinetex 5u EVO C18-100A—250 × 21.2 mm). After collection, the fractions were lyophilized to powder. These lyophilized fractions were resuspended in 7% ethanol and checked for their effect on IL-8 levels, as described below. Further analyses were carried out to correlate the activity and peak profile for detecting the active compound peak(s).

3.6. GC–MS Analysis

Prior to GC–MS analysis, samples underwent derivatization; 200 µL of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA, Sigma-Aldrich, T-6381, USA) containing 1% of trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) was added to each completely dried extract and heated to 70 °C for 20 min.
GC-MS analyses were carried out using a HP7890 gas chromatograph coupled to a HP6973 mass spectrometer (electron multiplier potential 2 KV, filament current 0.35 mA, electron energy 70 eV and the spectra were recorded over the range m/z 45 to 1000). An Agilent 7683 autosampler was used for sample introduction. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow of 1.1 mL s–1. One μL of each sample was injected into the GC–MS using a 1:10 split ratio injection mode. An isothermal hold at 50 °C was kept for 2 min, followed by a heating gradient of 6 °C min−1 to 300 °C, with the final temperature held for 4 min. A 30 m, 0.25 mm ID 5% cross-linked phenylmethyl siloxane capillary column (HP-5MS) with a 0.25-μm film thickness was used for the separation, and the injection port temperature was 220 °C. The MS interface temperature was 280 °C. Peak assignments were carried out with the aid of library spectra (NIST 14.0) and compared with published data and MS data obtained from the injection of standards [(-)-Epigallocatechin, 08,108; catechin, U-49,040; gallic acid, 91,215] purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland or USA.

3.7. Human Cell Culture

HaCaT is a spontaneously transformed aneuploid immortal keratinocyte cell line from adult human skin [52], widely used in scientific research [53]. HaCaT (ATCC-HB-241) normal skin cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2–95% air atmosphere. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Biologic Industries, 01-055-1A, Beit-Haemek, Israel) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biological Industries, 04-007-1A, Israel) and penicillin (100 units mL−1)—streptomycin (100 μg mL−1) solution (Biologic Industries, 03-031-1B, Beit-Haemek, Israel).
Determination of Interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels in HaCaT cells
HaCaT cells were seeded into 24-well plates at 50,000 cells per well in triplicate in 500μL of media and then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2–95% air atmosphere. After incubation, cell excitation was performed with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, PeproTech, 300-01A, Cranbury, NJ, USA). Cultures in each well were treated with a final concentration of 50 ng mL−1 of TNFα and 50 µL plant extract. Three different controls were included in all experiments: (a) untreated cells, with neither TNF-α nor plant extracts, (b) cells treated with TNF-α alone, (c) cells treated with TNF-α and the solvent (7% ethanol). The supernatant was taken, and the level of IL-8 was measured 16 h posttreatment using the commercial Human CXCL8/IL-8 DuoSet ELISA kit (R&D Systems, DY208-05, McKinley Place MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. IL-8 is a common biomarker for inflammatory skin diseases [54,55]. The induction of detectable IL-8 levels requires a 16 h exposure to TNF-α [56]. Dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, D4902, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a positive control [57,58].

4. Conclusions

Wild plant species may hold immense potential resources of nutritional value and therapeutic substances. In the present study, the tubers of E. crassifolium, an ignored desert shrub, were shown to harbor significant nutritional values and anti-inflammatory capacities. The catechins found in the tubers’ ethanolic extract have well-established remedial effects in serious human ailments. Furthermore, indications exist suggesting that HSB tubers have a greater medicinal potential. While a demonstrated bioactive capacity is a prerequisite, high productivity is essential in realizing the potential of an underutilized species. The dramatic increase in HSB tubers yield in response to fertigation paves the way for this plant to become a potential industrial crop.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/9/1069/s1, Figure S1: Mean monthly maximum, average, and minimum temperatures at RNDARC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C., O.G. and H.K.; methodology, A.B., O.G., G.S. and M.S.; investigation, O.G., H.K., M.S., G.S. and M.M.; formal analysis, G.S., M.M., M.S. and O.G.; writing—Original draft preparation, A.B., H.K. and O.G.; writing—Review & editing, A.B., M.S., O.G. and S.C.; funding acquisition, O.G. and H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by KKL-JNF, the Israeli Ministry of Agriculture and ICA-Israel.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zohary, D.; Hopf, M.; Weiss, E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World, 4th ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Doebley, J.F.; Gaut, B.S.; Smith, B.D. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 2006, 127, 1309–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hardin, G. Extensions of “the tragedy of the commons”. Science 1998, 280, 682–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Massawe, F.; Mayes, S.; Cheng, A. Crop diversity: An unexploited treasure trove for food security. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zimmet, P.Z.; Alberti, K.G.M. Introduction: Globalization and the non-communicable disease epidemic. Obesity 2006, 14, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Martínez-González, M.A.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Estruch, R.; Corella, D.; Fitó, M.; Ros, E. Benefits of the Mediterranean diet: Insights from the PREDIMED study. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 58, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dogan, Y. Wild edible plants: From the past to the future. Austin Food Sci. 2016, 1, 1006. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shelef, O.; Guy, O.; Solowey, E.; Kam, M.; Degen, A.A.; Rachmilevitch, S. Domestication of plants for sustainable agriculture in drylands: Experience from the Negev Desert. Arid Land Res. Manag. 2016, 30, 209–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leonti, M.; Casu, L. Traditional medicines and globalization: Current and future perspectives in ethnopharmacology. Front. Pharmacol. 2013, 4, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Heinrich, M.; Jäger, A. Ethnopharmacolgy; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. De-Cortes Sánchez-Mata, M.; Tardío, J. (Eds.) Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants: Ethnobotany and Food Composition Tables; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Benvenuti, S.; Maggini, R.; Pardossi, A. Agronomic, nutraceutical, and organoleptic performances of wild herbs of ethnobotanical tradition. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2017, 23, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carvalho, A.M.; Barata, A.M. The consumption of wild edible plants. In Wild Plants, Mushrooms and Nuts: Functional Food Properties and Applications; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.P., Morales, P., Barros, L., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2017; pp. 159–198. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dwivedi, S.L.; Van Bueren, E.T.L.; Ceccarelli, S.; Grando, S.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Ortiz, R. Diversifying food systems in the pursuit of sustainable food production and healthy diets. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 842–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ceccanti, C.; Landi, M.; Benvenuti, S.; Pardossi, A.; Guidi, L. Mediterranean wild edible plants: Weeds or “new functional crops”? Molecules 2018, 23, 2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Renna, M. Wild edible plants as a source of mineral elements in the daily diet. Progr. Nutr. 2017, 19, 219–222. [Google Scholar]
  17. Barros, L.; Morales, P.; Carvalho, A.M.; Ferreira, I.C. Antioxidant potential of wild food plants. In Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants: Ethnobotany and Food Composition Tables; De-Cortez Sánchez-Mata, M., Tardio, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 209–232. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu, F.; Du, B.; Xu, B. Anti-inflammatory effects of phytochemicals from fruits, vegetables, and food legumes: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Küpeli, E.; Tatli, I.I.; Akdemir, Z.S.; Yesilade, E. Estimation of antinociceptive and antiinflammatory activity of Geranium pretense subsp finitum and its phenolic compounds. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lu, C.H.; Li, Y.Y.; Li, L.J.; Liang, L.Y.; Shen, Y.M. Anti-inflammatory activities of fractions from Geranium nepalense and related polyphenols. Drug Discov. Ther. 2012, 6, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Velázquez-González, C.; Cariño-Cortes, R.; De Lucio, J.; Ortiz, M.I.; Arciniega, M.D.O.; Altamirano-Baez, D.A.; Jimenez-Angeles, L.; Bautista-Avila, M. Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of Geranium bellumandits isolated compounds. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bilić, V.L.; Rodríguez, J.V.; Grubešić, R.J.; Kremer, D.; Juričić, Ž. Quantitative analysis of polyphenols and antioxidant activity of Croatian populations of Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Herit (Geraniaceae). Planta Med. 2016, 82, P498. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shim, J.U.; Oh, P.S.; Lim, K.T. Anti-inflammatory activity of ethanol extract from Geranium sibiricum Linne. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 126, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fecka, I.; Kowalczyk, A.; Cisowski, W. Phenolic acids and depsides from some species of the Erodium genera. Z. Naturforsch C 2001, 56, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lakhdari, W.; Dehliz, A.; Acheuk, F.; Mlik, R.; Hammi, H.; Doumandji-Mitiche, B.; Gheriani, S.; Berrekbia, M.; Guermit, K.; Chergui, S. Ethnobotanical study of some plants used in traditional medicine in the region of Oued Righ (Algerian Sahara). J. Med. Plants Stud. 2016, 4, 204–211. [Google Scholar]
  26. Busso, C.A.; Lobartini, J.C. Mineral composition of Medicago minima and Erodium cicutarium under various water regimes. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2004, 35, 2243–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lisbalchin, M.; Guittonneau, G.G. Preliminary investigations on the presence of alkaloids in the genus Erodium Lher (Geraniaceae). Acta Bot. Gall. 1995, 142, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Helmstadter, A. Ethnopharmacology in the work of Melville William Hilton-Simpson (1881–1938)—Historical analysis and current research opportunities. Pharmazie 2016, 71, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Brullo, S.; Giusso del Galdo, G.; Guarino, R. Phytosociological notes on Lygeum Spartum grasslands from Crete. Lazaroa 2002, 23, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bergmeier, E.; Kypriotakis, Z.; Jahn, R.; Böhling, N.; Dimopoulos, P.; Raus, T.; Tzanoudakis, D. Flora and phytogeographical significance of the islands Chrisi, Koufonisi and nearby islets (S Aegean, Greece). Willdenowia 2001, 31, 329–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. El-Mokasabi, F.M. Floristic composition and traditional uses of plant species at Wadi Alkuf, Al-Jabal Al-Akhder, Libya. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2014, 14, 685–697. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharawy, S.M.; Badr, A. Systematic revision of Erodium species in Egypt as reflected by variation in morphological characters and seed protein electrophoretic profiles. Int. J. Bot. 2008, 4, 225–230. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bidak, L.M.; Kamal, S.A.; Halmy, M.W.; Heneidy, S.Z. Goods and services provided by native plants in desert ecosystems: Examples from the northwestern coastal desert of Egypt. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2015, 3, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Abd El-Wahab, R.H. Condition assessment of plant diversity of Gebel Maghara, North Sinai, Egypt. Catrina 2008, 3, 21–40. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hand, R. Supplementary notes to the flora of Cyprus VIII. Willdenowia 2015, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Danin, A. Flora and vegetation of Israel and adjacent areas. In The Zoogeography of Israel; Springer: Drodrecht, The Netherlands, 1988; pp. 18–42. [Google Scholar]
  37. Osman, A.K.; Al-Ghamdi, F.; Bawadekji, A. Floristic diversity and vegetation analysis of Wadi Arar: A typical desert Wadi of the Northern Border region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 21, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Abbo, S.; Gopher, A.; Lev-Yadun, S. The domestication of crop plants. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences; Thomas, B., Murray, B.G., Murphy, D.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 3, pp. 50–54. [Google Scholar]
  39. USDA. Carrot. 2020. Available online: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/787522/nutrients (accessed on 20 July 2020).
  40. Yang, C.S.; Wang, H. Cancer preventive activities of tea catechins. Molecules 2016, 21, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mangels, D.R.; Mohler, E.R., III. Catechins as potential mediators of cardiovascular health. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bernatoniene, J.; Kopustinskiene, D.M. The role of catechins in cellular responses to oxidative stress. Molecules 2018, 23, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Choubey, S.; Goyal, S.; Varughese, L.R.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, A.K.; Beniwal, V. Probing gallic acid for its broad-spectrum applications. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grzesik, M.; Naparło, K.; Bartosz, G.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Antioxidant properties of catechins: Comparison with other antioxidants. Food Chem. 2018, 241, 480–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dludla, P.V.; Nkambule, B.B.; Jack, B.; Mkandla, Z.; Mutize, T.; Silvestri, S.; Mazibuko-Mbeje, S.E. Inflammation and oxidative stress in an obese state and the protective effects of gallic acid. Nutrients 2019, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Li, P.; Liu, A.; Xiong, W.; Lin, H.; Xiao, W.; Huang, J.; Liu, Z. Catechins enhance skeletal muscle performance. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Koltai, H.; Kapulnik, Y.; Fridlender, M.; Gati, E.M.; Ahmed, N.; Shemer, B.E.N. U.S. Patent Application No. 15/563,595, 2018. Erodium crassifolium L’Her plant extracts and uses thereof. Filing date: 31/03/2016.
  48. Yadav, R.P.; Tarun, G. Versatility of turmeric: A review the golden spice of life. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ladizinsky, G. Plant Evolution under Domestication; Springer: Drodrecht, The Netherlands, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  50. Purugganan, M.D.; Fuller, D.Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 2009, 457, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aronson, J.; Shmida, A. Plant species diversity along a Mediterranean-desert gradient and its correlation with interannual rainfall fluctuations. J. Arid Environ. 1992, 23, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Boukamp, P.; Petrussevska, R.T.; Breitkreutz, D.; Hornung, J.; Markham, A.; Fusenig, N.E. Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 106, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Schoop, V.M.; Fusenig, N.E.; Mirancea, N. Epidermal organization and differentiation of HaCaT keratinocytes in organotypic coculture with human dermal fibroblasts. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1999, 112, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lee, H.Y.; Stieger, M.; Yawalkar, N.; Kakeda, M. Cytokines and chemokines in irritant contact dermatitis. Mediators Inflamm. 2013, 916497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Turner, M.D.; Nedjai, B.; Hurst, T.; Pennington, D.J. Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2563–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zhang, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhao, B.; Wu, X.; Su, L.; Xie, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; et al. PKCζ as a promising therapeutic target for TNFα-induced inflammatory disorders in chronic cutaneous wounds. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 40, 1335–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mizuno, K.; Morizane, S.; Takiguchi, T.; Iwatsuki, K. Dexamethasone but not tacrolimus suppresses TNF-α-induced thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression in lesional keratinocytes of atopic dermatitis model. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2015, 80, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wufuer, M.; Lee, G.; Hur, W.; Jeon, B.; Kim, B.J.; Choi, T.H.; Lee, S. Skin-on-a-chip model simulating inflammation, edema and drug-based treatment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 09 01069 g001 550
Figure 1. Hairy stork’s-bill (E. crassifolium). (A) Shrub with flowers and seed pods; (B) flower; (C) seeds with typical hairy feather-like awns; (D) root tubers, connected to the root-shoot transition region (RSTR), the perennial plant organ.
Figure 1. Hairy stork’s-bill (E. crassifolium). (A) Shrub with flowers and seed pods; (B) flower; (C) seeds with typical hairy feather-like awns; (D) root tubers, connected to the root-shoot transition region (RSTR), the perennial plant organ.
Plants 09 01069 g001
Plants 09 01069 g002a 550Plants 09 01069 g002b 550
Figure 2. (A) HPLC profile of 70% ethanol extract (EE) of HSB tubers at 220 nm. Each fraction (F1–F11) was collected during 5 min out of the total 55 min of HPLC run; (B) levels of IL-8, an indicator of cell inflammatory status, in response to treatment with crude EE, EE fractions (F1–F11) and pooled fractions (PF) in in vitro trials using human cells. NT—non-treated control; TNF-α—an inflammation excitatory factor; DXM—dexamethasone (100 μM), positive control. Means of replicates were subjected to statistical analysis using Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments; ***, ** and *, indicate p < 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05, respectively. Bars indicate standard error.
Figure 2. (A) HPLC profile of 70% ethanol extract (EE) of HSB tubers at 220 nm. Each fraction (F1–F11) was collected during 5 min out of the total 55 min of HPLC run; (B) levels of IL-8, an indicator of cell inflammatory status, in response to treatment with crude EE, EE fractions (F1–F11) and pooled fractions (PF) in in vitro trials using human cells. NT—non-treated control; TNF-α—an inflammation excitatory factor; DXM—dexamethasone (100 μM), positive control. Means of replicates were subjected to statistical analysis using Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments; ***, ** and *, indicate p < 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05, respectively. Bars indicate standard error.
Plants 09 01069 g002aPlants 09 01069 g002b
Plants 09 01069 g003 550
Figure 3. In vitro indications of the anti-inflammatory activity in the ethanolic extract from tubers of various E. crassifolium ecotypes, compared to untreated (NT) and stimulated (TNF-α) human cells. Bars indicate standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatment at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. In vitro indications of the anti-inflammatory activity in the ethanolic extract from tubers of various E. crassifolium ecotypes, compared to untreated (NT) and stimulated (TNF-α) human cells. Bars indicate standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatment at p < 0.05.
Plants 09 01069 g003
Plants 09 01069 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Mean HSB tuber weight, (B) number of tubers and (C) mean tuber yield as affected by increased season water application at simulated natural precipitation patterns (50 and 200 mm) and at intensive agricultural environments (700 mm, drip irrigation and drip fertigation *); data were pooled from two different experiments conducted in the 2017–2018 season. Bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 4. (A) Mean HSB tuber weight, (B) number of tubers and (C) mean tuber yield as affected by increased season water application at simulated natural precipitation patterns (50 and 200 mm) and at intensive agricultural environments (700 mm, drip irrigation and drip fertigation *); data were pooled from two different experiments conducted in the 2017–2018 season. Bars indicate standard deviation.
Plants 09 01069 g004
Plants 09 01069 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Demonstration of an agricultural HSB cropping system at Ramat Negev with (C) representative tubers, compared to (B) the solitaire HSB phase in a wild niche, with (D) typical tubers’ size, form and age.
Figure 5. (A) Demonstration of an agricultural HSB cropping system at Ramat Negev with (C) representative tubers, compared to (B) the solitaire HSB phase in a wild niche, with (D) typical tubers’ size, form and age.
Plants 09 01069 g005
Table
Table 1. Nutritional profile of hairy stork’s bill (HSB) tubers compared to that of carrots (adopted from USDA, 2020 [39]).
Table 1. Nutritional profile of hairy stork’s bill (HSB) tubers compared to that of carrots (adopted from USDA, 2020 [39]).
Nutritional ProfileMeasure Units
/100 g		HSB TubersCarrot
Waterg90.688.3
Ash0.80.9
Caloric valueKcal2341
Carbohydratesg7.99.6
Sugars4.36
Polysaccharides3.02.8
Lipids0.10.24
Protein0.60.93
Potassiummg223.4320
Calcium74.333
Phosphorus28.035
Sulfur27.4
Magnesium20.012
Sodium18.969
Iron2.20.3
Zinc0.40.24
Vitamin Aμg<200835
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid)mg2.035.9
A-tocopherol (vitamin E)IU<1
Table
Table 2. Compounds identified by GC-MS from fraction 4 (F4) of 70% ethanol extract of E. crassifolium tubers. RT—retention time.
Table 2. Compounds identified by GC-MS from fraction 4 (F4) of 70% ethanol extract of E. crassifolium tubers. RT—retention time.
CompoundRT (min)Percentage (%) from Total Amount
Mannofuranose28.02417.2
α-D-xylopyranose29.0472.7
Gallic acid29.7665.7
Palmitic acid30.8536.4
Stearic acid33.8312.0
Trans-catechin42.16611.7
Cis-catechin42.43512.8
Epigallocatechin43.00741.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cohen, S.; Koltai, H.; Selvaraj, G.; Mazuz, M.; Segoli, M.; Bustan, A.; Guy, O. Assessment of the Nutritional and Medicinal Potential of Tubers from Hairy Stork’s-Bill (Erodium crassifolium L ’Hér), a Wild Plant Species Inhabiting Arid Southeast Mediterranean Regions. Plants 2020, 9, 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091069

AMA Style

Cohen S, Koltai H, Selvaraj G, Mazuz M, Segoli M, Bustan A, Guy O. Assessment of the Nutritional and Medicinal Potential of Tubers from Hairy Stork’s-Bill (Erodium crassifolium L ’Hér), a Wild Plant Species Inhabiting Arid Southeast Mediterranean Regions. Plants. 2020; 9(9):1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cohen, Shabtai, Hinanit Koltai, Gopinath Selvaraj, Moran Mazuz, Moran Segoli, Amnon Bustan, and Ofer Guy. 2020. "Assessment of the Nutritional and Medicinal Potential of Tubers from Hairy Stork’s-Bill (Erodium crassifolium L ’Hér), a Wild Plant Species Inhabiting Arid Southeast Mediterranean Regions" Plants 9, no. 9: 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop