Next Article in Journal
Vertical Strata and Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux in Cycas Trees
Next Article in Special Issue
Phytic Acid and Mineral Biofortification Strategies: From Plant Science to Breeding and Biotechnological Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Relationships between Nut Size, Kernel Quality, Nutritional Composition and Levels of Outcrossing in Three Macadamia Cultivars
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genotypic Differences in the Effect of P Fertilization on Phytic Acid Content in Rice Grain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gene Expression Pattern of Vacuolar-Iron Transporter-Like (VTL) Genes in Hexaploid Wheat during Metal Stress

1
Department of Biotechnology, National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Sector 81, Knowledge City, Mohali, Punjab 140306, India
2
University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Sector 25, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjab 160015, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(2), 229; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020229
Submission received: 29 November 2019 / Revised: 23 January 2020 / Accepted: 31 January 2020 / Published: 11 February 2020

Abstract

:
Iron is one of the important micronutrients that is required for crop productivity and yield-related traits. To address the Fe homeostasis in crop plants, multiple transporters belonging to the category of major facilitator superfamily are being explored. In this direction, earlier vacuolar iron transporters (VITs) have been reported and characterized functionally to address biofortification in cereal crops. In the present study, the identification and characterization of new members of vacuolar iron transporter-like proteins (VTL) was performed in wheat. Phylogenetic distribution demonstrated distinct clustering of the identified VTL genes from the previously known VIT genes. Our analysis identifies multiple VTL genes from hexaploid wheat with the highest number genes localized on chromosome 2. Quantitative expression analysis suggests that most of the VTL genes are induced mostly during the Fe surplus condition, thereby reinforcing their role in metal homeostasis. Interestingly, most of the wheat VTL genes were also significantly up-regulated in a tissue-specific manner under Zn, Mn and Cu deficiency. Although, no significant changes in expression of wheat VTL genes were observed in roots under heavy metals, but TaVTL2, TaVTL3 and TaVTL5 were upregulated in the presence of cobalt stress. Overall, this work deals with the detailed characterization of wheat VTL genes that could provide an important genetic framework for addressing metal homeostasis in bread wheat.

1. Introduction

Successful micronutrient biofortification of crops through biotechnology requires detailed knowledge of complex homeostatic mechanisms that tightly regulate the micronutrient concentrations in plants. Iron (Fe) is one of the important micronutrients that is involved in multiple important cellular and physiological processes in plants [1,2,3]. Some of the important functions include its importance in photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation and respiration [4,5]. Although Fe may be present in the soil, yet due to alkaline rhizospheric conditions or unfavorable circumstances, it is not being efficiently taken up by plants [6,7,8,9]. Moreover, the Fe is mobilized through a multistep process that overcomes transport bottlenecks and eventually is loaded in the developing grains [10,11,12,13]. Researchers worldwide are utilizing multiple approaches to either enrich Fe in grains or their storage with enhanced bioavailability [14,15,16,17]. To improve Fe content in cereal grains, multiple transporters and chelators have been targeted through multiple molecular approaches [14,15,18]. A number of additional micronutrient transporters have been identified, those are good candidates for micronutrient biofortification, including transporters belonging to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) gene family [19,20]. Limited evidences are available that have performed molecular characterization of wheat genes or gene families those which are specifically involved in Fe and Zinc (Zn) homeostasis. Recent reports are emerging for the identification of few functional gene families belonging to, yellow stripe like transporters [21], nicotianamine synthase (NAS), deoxymugineic acid synthase (DMAS) [22], yet many genes families remained to be characterized in hexaploid wheat. Similarly, other wheat genes including Zinc–Induced Facilitator-Like Family (ZIFL) transporters have been characterized for their role in mobilizing the uptake of micronutrient such as Fe and Zn [23]. Most of these gene families are highly upregulated in roots subjected to Fe starvation conditions [24,25]. These works identify some of the important candidate genes as an important resource to strategize approaches for micronutrient biofortification in wheat [26].
Fe storage in seeds gets compartmentalized in major subcellular organelles including chloroplasts and vacuoles. For example, 95% of the iron is stored in vacuoles in the Arabidopsis seeds [27]. Vacuoles are an important site for Fe mobilization wherein, they are bound to various chelators like phytic acid, nicotianamine and other organic acids etc. Therefore, uptake of Fe into vacuoles could be an alternate strategy to enhance total micronutrient content with a minimized tradeoff for its toxicity in the tissue. To design such strategy, the role of vacuolar transporters needs to be addressed and exploited [14,28]. Previously, vacuolar iron transporters (VIT) were shown to be play an important role in maintaining Fe in the optimal physiological range and prevent cellular toxicity [14]. VIT genes from multiple plant species have been characterized and assessed for their ability to enhance Fe content in cereal crops [15]. These VIT genes show high homology with a small family of nodulin like protein containing a CCC-1 (Ca2+-Sensitive Cross Complementer) like domain with yeast CCC1p1 [29]. CCC-1 like the domain was initially discovered in yeast encoded for the vacuolar iron transporter in yeast. Furthermore, mutant ccc1 cells show increased sensitivity to external iron [27,30] AtVIT1 is one of the early characterized genes showing the presence of CCC-1 like domain and transport of iron to vacuoles [27].
Utilizing the bioinformatics resources, subsequent studies led to the identification of many vacuolar iron transporters-like (VTL) proteins from different plant species. Model species, Arabidopsis genome encodes five VTL proteins and overexpression of the few genes have shown increased Fe content in seeds. AtVIT1 protein can transport iron into the vacuoles to counter the toxicity and support the seedling development under enhanced iron conditions [29,31].
Wheat is an important crop that is consumed in many developing countries, including India and is therefore being targeted for trait improvement for nutritional quality. Therefore, the characterization of vacuolar transporters in an important crop such as wheat becomes a prerequisite to address the global issue of biofortification. In the current work genome-wide identification of wheat VTL genes was performed. Further, expression studies during different regimes of Fe, Zn and multiple heavy metals was done to gain insight for the regulation of wheat VTL genes in a tissue-specific manner.

2. Results

2.1. Identification, Phylogenetic Analysis and Genomic Distribution of Wheat VTL Genes

Thirty-one wheat VIT family sequences were identified based on Ensembl Pfam search and bidirectional BLAST analysis (Table S1). Subsequently, to study the phylogenetic relationship among VIT and VTL family protein sequences from wheat, Brachypodium, maize, rice, Arabidopsis and S. cerevisiae, an unrooted neighbour-joining tree was constructed. This analysis separated the sequences into two distinct clades representing VTL and VIT proteins. This also led to the clustering of the wheat VIT family members into 8 VIT and 23 VTL sequences (Figure 1, Table S2). Due to the occurrence of homoeologs, the 23 VTL sequences were grouped into 4 VTL genes and named as TaVTL1, TaVTL2, TaVTL4 and TaVTL5 that corresponds to the rice orthologs followed by the chromosome number. None of the orthologs in wheat showed high confidence similarity with rice vacuolar iron transporter homolog 3. TaVTL1 and 4 were found to have three homoeologs, while TaVTL2 had four. In contrast, the phylogenetic analysis grouped 13 highly similar sequences together with rice vacuolar iron transporter homolog 5, these were named as TaVTL5 (Figure S1).
TaVIT1 and TaVIT2 have already been reported earlier [14]. Interestingly, another new wheat VIT with two homoeologs on chromosome 7 (sub-genomes A and D) was identified (referred as TaVIT3). VIT genes were located on chromosome groups 2, 5 and 7, while VTL genes were on chromosome groups 2, 4, and 6 with a maximum contribution from chromosome 2. Nine VTL genes were present in the B sub-genome, while seven each on A and D sub-genomes. The maximum number of VTL sequences were located on chromosome 2B (Figure 2A).

2.2. Gene, Protein Structure and Subcellular Localization

VIT genes in wheat have three and four intronic and exonic regions respectively, while VTL genes have a single exon each with the absence of any introns (Figure 2B), clearly dividing the VIT family into two sub-families based on gene structure also. CDS length was found to be varying from 657 to 747 nucleotides for wheat VIT genes. The CDS length for VTL genes was ranging from 549 to 810 nucleotides except for TaVTL5-2A_3 that was 378 nucleotides long. The short length of one VTL gene is due to the missing sequence information at the stop site. The length of TaVIT peptides ranged from 218 to 256 while TaVTL protein length varied from 125 to 269 amino acids. The division of VIT and VTL proteins was also evident from the sub-cellular localization (Table S2); while TaVIT proteins were predicted to be predominantly localized on the plasma membrane and chloroplast thylakoid membrane, maximum TaVTL proteins were predicted to be present on the vacuolar membrane (87%). TaVTL4-4A was predicted to be localized on plasma membrane. VIT proteins had 3–4 predicted trans-membrane (TM) domains. TaVTL1, 2 and 4 had five TM domains majorly, except for TaVTL4-4B which was predicted to have 6 TM domains. Only TaVTL5-2D_3 had five TM domains; other paralogs/homoeologs of TaVTL5 had lesser number of TM domains probably due to gene duplication events or missing information. To summarize, TaVTLs have five TM domains predominantly, which are depicted in Table S2. VIT1 from Eucalyptus grandis (EgVIT1) crystal structure was deciphered recently [32] that was used to confirm the VIT family protein topology prediction using Phobius [33]. EgVIT1 was predicted to have only three TM domains while the crystal structure stated the presence of five TM domains. Therefore, VIT, as well as VTL protein sequences from wheat, were aligned to EgVIT1 to see the possible TM domains in addition to those predicted by Phobius (Figure S2).

2.3. Conserved Domain and Motif Analysis

All the VIT and VTL genes were found to have the typical CCC1-like superfamily domains of yeast, which were demonstrated earlier for the iron and manganese transport from the cytosol to vacuole. Motif analysis using MEME webserver suggested that motifs 6, 9, and 10 are VIT specific with exceptions for motif 10 been absent in TaVIT3 and motif 6 absent in TaVIT3-7A. Similarly, motifs 5, 7, 8, 11 to 14 are VTL specific with the exception that motif 5 was absent in TaVTL5-2B_3 and TaVTL5-2B_5, where motif 7 was specific for TaVTL5 sequences except in TaVTL5-2A_3, TaVTL5-2B_6, TaVTL5-2D_3. Motif 8 was specific for TaVTL1, 2 and 4. Motif 11 for TaVTL1 and 2. Motifs 12 and 13 were unique for TaVTL2, whereas Motif 14 was present only in TaVTL1 (Figure 3, Table S3).

2.4. Expression of Wheat VTL Genes under Fe Deficiency and Surplus Condition

To check the regulation of VTL genes at the transcriptional level, the promoters for the wheat VTL genes were scanned for the cis-elements responsive for Fe and heavy metals. The analysis revealed the presence of multiple such sequences, including iron-deficiency-responsive element 1 (IDE1), metal response element (MRE), heavy metal responsive element (HMRE) and iron-related bHLH transcription factor 2 (IRO2) binding site (Table S4). In the most abundant category, iron-deficiency-responsive element 1 (IDE1) was predominant. Interestingly, the IRO2 binding site was present only in the regulatory region of TaVTL2B/D. These observations suggest that VTL expression could be regulated by the presence-absence of specific metals including micronutrients such as Fe and Zn.
Previously, VTL genes were reported to have differential expression patterns under the changing regimes of Fe and Zn [31]. Therefore, we tested if wheat VTL genes could respond at the transcript level when subjected to changing Fe concentration. The expression in roots and shoots of wheat seedlings was measured after subjecting them for three and six days of starvation. Our expression analysis suggests that in roots all the VTL genes (TaVTL1, TaVTL2, TaVTL4 and TaVTL5) were downregulated at both the days, whereas, only TaVTL5 was upregulated at six days of starvation (Figure 4A).
Similarly, in shoots also all the expression of wheat VTL genes was suppressed except for TaVTL2 that was upregulated only on six days post starvation (Figure 4B). These expression data demonstrate that under Fe deprivation VTL gene expression are negatively regulated in wheat seedling. Transcriptomic sequencing data from wheat seedlings after 20 days of Fe starvation (SRP189420) were also used to check expression response upon Fe starvation. Categorically, TaVTL5 group genes were seen to be upregulated upto 12-fold, with TaVTL5-2B_6 showing upregulation of ~60 fold, although the expression was not very high (Figure S3).
Next, we performed the gene expression analysis under the excess Fe regime. This was done to test if wheat VTL genes could be potentially involved in detoxification of excess Fe. Interestingly, we observed a significant up-regulation of all the TaVTL genes in roots at both the time points. Out of all, TaVTL4 showed the highest fold gene expression (~100 fold) when compared to its control (Figure 5A).
TaVTL2 show very early and high expression response, whereas both TaVTL1 and TaVTL5 were highly expressed at six days of treatment. At this time their gene expression level was more than ~14 fold compared to control. In contrast, in shoots most of the wheat VTL genes were expressed at the three days of treatment with TaVTL1 and TaVTL2 showing the transcript accumulation of 8–14 folds with respect to their control (Figure 5B).

2.5. Manganese, Zinc and Copper Deficiency Causes Differential Changes in VTL Expression

Wheat VTL genes showed high similarity to previously known VIT genes. In addition to Fe, VIT genes are known to be affected by the perturbed concentration of Mn [14]. Since many of these cation transporters are known for their reduced substrate specificity [34,35], therefore, expression of wheat VTL genes during Zn, Cu and Mn deprivation was also studied (Figure S4A). In general, during the changing regimes of Zn and Mn, wheat VTL genes showed specific expression in a tissue-specific manner (Figure 6). TaVTL2 was the only gene showing enhanced accumulation of its transcript under Zn deficiency in both root and shoot tissue, whereas TaVTL1 and TaVTL5 showed high expression in roots only under Zn deficiency (Figure 6A and B). No significant changes in the expression of TaVTL4 were observed for the studied time point under the changing Zn regime. In contrast, no induction of wheat VTL genes was observed in roots under Mn deficiency with respect to its control, whereas, in shoots, TaVTL2 and TaVTL4 showed high transcript accumulation (Figure 6A). Under Cu deficiency, all VTL genes showed an induced expression in shoots while only two of the genes, including TaVTL1 and TaVTL2 were upregulated in roots.

2.6. Heavy Metal (Ni, Cd and Co) Mediated Expression of VTL Genes

To check the effect of the heavy metal stress on the gene expression pattern, wheat seedlings were subjected to treatment with Ni, Cd and Co and expression of VTL genes was performed. In the treated plants, decreased growth of the shoot and root length was observed, suggesting that heavy metals could affect the plant performance (Figure S4A). In general, the presence of heavy metals led to significant retardation in the growth of roots and shoots, thereby impacting the total plant growth (Figure S4B). Interestingly, none of the wheat VTL genes showed enhanced expression in roots after 15 days of heavy metal exposure, but downregulation was observed for TaVTL1, TaVTL4 and TaVTL5 (Figure 7A). In shoots, only Co stress could influence the gene expression when compared to the control. Only, TaVTL2, TaVTL4 and TaVTL5 genes were upregulated during the Co stress as compared to control shoot samples (Figure 7B). Altogether, this suggests the metal-specific expression of VTL genes in a tissue-specific manner. The previously reported wheat VIT genes showed grain specific expression data. Surprisingly, VTL genes showed very low or no expression in grains or their tissue parts, suggesting their probable roles in the specific organs of the plants (Figure S5).

3. Discussion

Fluctuation in the nutrient availability in the soil results in suitable adaptations by the plants. In general, plants rely on different physiological and molecular processes to minimize nutrient stress [36]. In this regard, MFS gene family plays an important role to provide the tolerance as well as mobilization of important minerals, including micronutrient translocation to the foliar parts including seeds [19]. In this study, the characterization of VTL was done in the hexaploid wheat. Our data reinforce the importance of VTL genes for their roles during metal homeostasis and substantiated them as a good candidate for micronutrient biofortification in cereal crops such as wheat and rice.
MFS family has been widely explored for its role as metal transporters and providing the necessary support for multiple functions in plants [37]. Previously, five VTL genes were reported in Arabidopsis and rice for this sub-class. Our study in wheat resulted in the identification of a maximum number of VTL genes from any crop plants. The high number of genes is due to the presence of multiple homoeologous and occurrence of the duplication of multiple wheat VTL genes. Interestingly, chromosome 2 having the highest number of wheat VTL genes has been linked with multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL) for the high grain Fe and Zn content [38]. Further dissection is required in this direction to identify if any of the wheat VTL could be linked with the loading of micronutrient in grains. Based on our expression analysis and the support from the previous studies, it could be suggested that VTL genes could also be involved in providing the tolerance to high levels of Fe and Zn in the soils [31]. In fact, the predicted localization data indicate that VTL could be localized at either the plasma membrane or the vacuolar membrane (Table S2). AtVTL1 was reported to be localized in the vacuolar membrane and others been associated with the plasma membrane [31]. Our PSORT analysis suggests that most of the wheat VTL proteins are localized in the vacuolar membrane, thus making them a suitable candidate for sequestering micronutrients such as Fe and Zn. AtVTL1 also rescued Δccc1 function in yeast by catalysing Fe uptake [31]. Vacuoles are the prime sites for the sequestration of micronutrients such as Fe. Whether, any of these predicted vacuolar TaVTL proteins could perform similar function as TaVIT2 for Fe biofortification needs to be studied [14].
The substrate specificity of the metal transporters is a major bottleneck to achieve high Fe and Zn in grains. Manipulating the specificity of these metal transporters to enrich the Fe and Zn remains the major challenge [23,34,39]. Therefore, studying the expression pattern of VTL genes in the presence of heavy metals could provide preliminary clues for employing such strategies. Consequently, the study was undertaken to see the influence of other metals like Ni, Cd and Co. The expression of wheat VTL genes in roots and shoots suggested an interesting phenomenon, where no significant changes in the expression of their transcript was observed when exposed to either Ni or Cd. In contrast, only Co was able to induce the expression of TaVTL1, TaVTL2, TaVTL4 and TaVTL5 in shoots only (Figure 7B). These data suggest the controlled expression of wheat VTL genes in a tissue specific manner. Additionally, besides Fe homeostasis, the vacuolar transporters are also linked with the impaired activity of Zn and Mn transport [39]. In our study only, TaVTL2 was significantly induced by the Mn deficiency in shoots (Figure 6B). No such effects were observed in roots wherein, all the quantified wheat VTL showed downregulation under Mn deficiency (Figure 6A). Interestingly, TaVTL1 and TaVTL2 showed upregulation in roots under Zn deficiency (Figure 6A). The tissue dependent expression patterns of wheat VTL genes under the changing regimes of the metal exposure was observed. It has been observed that VTL genes from Arabidopsis showed transcriptional changes in response to Fe, Zn and Mn [31]. Based on the previous work and our results it could be suggested that regulation of the VTL genes at the transcript level could be conserved. Infact, wheat VIT genes can also transport Mn and Fe [14]. This suggest that VTL/VIT genes could be regulated only by Fe but also by other metals like Mn and Zn. Additionally, our gene expression data also corelate with the presence of multiple cis-elements in the promoter of wheat VTL genes. This indicated that primarily VTL genes could be involved during metal homeostasis related responses. Coupled with the localization information, it is possible that few wheat VTL proteins could sequester metals in an organelle specific manner.
Herein, a detailed inventory, structure and expression characterization of wheat VTL genes was performed. The expression analysis and analysis for the cis-elements in the promoters of wheat VTL genes implicated for their role in metals homeostasis including in Fe and Zn. Overall, the work presented here provide an important framework for identifying the molecular and physiological functions in bread wheat.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

For stress experiments, hexaploid wheat Triticum aestivum cv. C-306 (received from Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana) was used. Briefly, seeds were surface sterilized using 1.2% sodium hypochlorite prepared in 10% ethanol and then rinsed twice with autoclaved MQ. The seeds were kept on moist filter paper inside a Petri dish and stratified for 1 day at 4 °C in dark condition. Stratified seeds were further kept for germination for six days at room temperature. The remaining seed/endosperm were excised from seedlings at one leaf stage and was shifted to phytaboxes (10–12 seedling/phytabox) containing the Hoagland nutrient media for respective treatments. The standard composition of nutrient media for control includes 6 mM KNO3, 1 mM MgSO4, 2 mM Ca(NO3), 2 mM NH4H22PO4, 20 µM Fe-EDTA, 25 µM H3BO3, 2 µM MnSO4, 0.5 µM CuSO4, 2 µM ZnSO4, 50 µM KCl and 0.5 µM Na2MoO4. The variable concentrations used for treatments were excess Fe (+Fe; 200 µm), Fe starvation (-Fe; 2 µm), Zn deficiency (-ZnSO4; 0 µm), Mn deficiency (-MnSO4; 0 µm), Cu deficiency (-CuSO4; 0 µm), Cadmium stress (+Cd; 50 µm) [40], Cobalt stress (+Co; 50 µm) [41] and Nickel stress (+Ni; 50 µm) [42]. The aerobic condition was provided in hydroponics and the media was replaced every alternate day to avoid any contamination and drastic nutrient depletion. The respective roots and shoots samples belonging to iron deficient and sufficient plant groups were collected at three and six days after stress (D). For the rest of the treatments, root and shoot, samples were collected on the 15th Day of treatments. All the experiments were performed in a growth chamber under controlled environmental conditions at 22–24 °C temperature, 65%–70% humidity, at a photoperiod of 16 h day and 8 h night and 300 nm of light.

4.2. Identification of VIT Family and Classification of VTL Genes in Wheat

For the identification of wheat VTL genes, the Ensembl database was used to extract VIT family genes (Pfam ID: PF01988) for wheat. The identification was confirmed by bidirectional BLAST analysis. VIT family sequences from Arabidopsis, rice, maize, Brachypodium were also extracted using Pfam search. The identity of VIT family genes was further validated by confirming the presence of CCC1-like superfamily domain using NCBI-CDD domain search. CCC1 sequence for S. cerevisiae was also retrieved from its genome database. To separate out VTL genes from VIT genes and for further phylogenetic analysis, all the proteins were aligned through MUSCLE alignment and an unrooted neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates was constructed with all the retrieved sequences. The tree was constructed through MEGA-7 [43]. Rice vacuolar iron transporter homolog 1–5 from UniProt were used for the nomenclature of the 23 TaVTL sequences based on the closest orthologs. The naming of the genes indicates the chromosome number and the sub-genome on which they are present.

4.3. Conserved Domains and Motif Detection, Analysis of Gene, Promoter and Protein Structure

Wheat VIT family genes were searched for conserved domains using NCBI-CDD database [44]. MEME suite v5.1.0 was used for further analysis to identify the common conserved motifs for both VIT and VTL proteins. The maximum number of motifs was set to 15 for MEME analysis. Gene structure for VITs and VTLs was studied using (GSDS) (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [45] using genomic and CDS sequences. Sub-cellular localization and TM domains were predicted using web-based prediction programs Wolf PSORT and Phobius respectively [46]. For promoter analysis, ~2 Kb promoter elements of the corresponding wheat VTL genes were surveyed for the presence of the respective cis-elements. The promoter sequence was obtained for the respective genes using the IWGSC

4.4. Total RNA Isolation and cDNA Preparation

The collected root and shoot samples were ground separately in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA from respective samples was extracted by TRIZOL based method. The extraction was followed by the DNase treatment using Turbo DNAfree kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to remove any genomic DNA contamination in the RNA samples. Subsequently, RNA purity was checked and quantified for the preparation of the cDNA. 2 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using superScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cDNA quality was ascertained by using internal control and was further diluted 20X and used for gene expression studies.

4.5. Quantitative-Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Expression Analysis

To perform quantitative real time-PCR (qRT-PCR), forward and reverse primers of TaVTL genes were designed and used as listed in Table S5. The primers were designed from the conserved region of the all homoeolog of each gene. For TaVTL5 the primers were designed from the conserved region of nine sequences, the significant conserved region was not found for remaining four homoeologs (TraesCS2B02G454900, TraesCS2B02G610400, TraesCS2D02G431900, TraesCS2D02G588000). qRT-PCR was performed in 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using 1/20 times dilution of the respective cDNAs. All qRT-PCR reactions were performed using SYBR Green I (QuantiFast® SYBR® Green PCR Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) chemistry and ARF (ADP-Ribosylation Factor: TaARF1—AB050957.1) as an internal control [40]. The efficiency of the qRT-PCR was checked and melt curve analysis was performed for each of the PCR reactions as per the guidelines. Gene expression analyses was carried out with three biological replicates and 2–3 technical replicates. Relative fold expression of genes was determined based on delta-delta CT-method (2ΔΔCT) [47].

4.6. RNA-Seq Expression Analysis for VIT Family Genes

To get the transcript expression levels for VIT family genes under Fe stress, RNAseq data from SRA project ID SRP189420 were utilized to extract transcript expression values (as FPKM) from control as well as Fe starved wheat root samples using the cufflinks pipeline. Subsequently, for expression analysis of VTL and VIT genes in wheat grain tissue developmental time course [48], expression values as Transcripts Per Kilobase Million (TPM) were retrieved from expVIP database [49]. Expression values from both studies were then used to plot heatmaps using MeV software (mev.tm4.org).

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Excel was used for data analysis. The mean values were calculated form the standard deviation including three technical replicates from at least three biological replicates. Student t-tests were used to observe the significant differences between the mean values of treatment and control plants. The significance threshold used was #p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

The present work led to the identification of high number of VTL genes from hexaploid wheat. Because of polyploidization, a very high number of genes from this sub-family was identified. The presence of high number of VTL been restricted to only chromosome 2, 4 and 6 of the wheat genomes. The expression of these gene under metal stress including changes in the presence of Fe and Zn concentrations and exposure to heavy metals reinforce the importance of this gene-family during metal homeostasis. Our work will help in better understanding of the Fe transporters significance in metal homeostasis so as to biofortify wheat.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/2/229/s1, Table S1: List of 31 VIT family genes extracted from ensembl biomart using Pfam ID: PF01988. Table S2: Subcellular localization (WolfPsort). Table S3: Conserved motifs identified in VTL and VIT proteins using MEME suite. The color code, consensus sequence logo, E-value and the number of proteins in which each motif was found are listed in the table. Table S4: Metal-responsive cis-elements found in VTL and VIT gene promoter regions. Table S5: List of gene specific primers used for qRT-PCR for TaVTL genes. Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree for VIT family genes from Arabidopsis, Brachypodium, Oryza sativa, Zea mays and Triticum aestivum. Sequences were extracted using Pfam ID followed by alignment by Muscle and construction of NJ tree using MEGA software. Figure S2: Transmembrane domains in wheat VIT family proteins. Figure shows potential TM domains in TaVIT and TaVTL proteins, based on the alignment with EgVIT1 protein, using MUSCLE. Figure S3: Heatmap depicting the expression of VIT family genes (VIT and VTL genes) in Control (FPKM_Control) and Fe starved (FPKM_Fe) wheat roots. FPKM values were extracted using Cufflinks pipeline from SRA projectID SRP189420. Increasing intensity of blue colour shows increase in expression as shown by the colour bar above. Figure S4: Effect of different metals on the phenotype and growth of wheat seedlings. (A) Phenotype of wheat seedlings showing retarded growth of shoots and roots. (B) Impact of different metals on the growth (in cm) of roots and shoots. Figure S5: Heatmap depicting the expression of VIT family genes (VIT and VTL genes) in Control (FPKM_Control) and Fe starved (FPKM_Fe) wheat roots. FPKM values were extracted using Cufflinks pipeline from SRA project ID SRP189420. Increasing intensity of blue colour shows increase in expression as shown by the colour bar above.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S., A.K.P.; methodology, S.S., A.K., V.M. and A.K.P.; formal analysis, S.S., A.K.P., G.K. and H.R.; investigation, S.S., V.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.P., A.K., J.K.; writing—review and editing, A.K.P., A.K., G.K., and H.R.; visualization, A.K.P.; funding acquisition, A.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the institutional NABI-CORE grant to AKP.

Acknowledgments

All the authors thank Executive Director, NABI for facilities and support. Support from International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium for providing the high-quality wheat genome resources is highly appreciated. DBT-eLibrary Consortium (DeLCON) is acknowledged for providing timely support and access to e-resources for this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rout, G.R.; Sahoo, S. Role of Iron in Plant Growth and Metabolism. Rev. Agric. Sci. 2015, 3, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Briat, J.F.; Curie, C.; Gaymard, F. Iron utilization and metabolism in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Morrissey, J.; Guerinot, M.L. Iron Uptake and Transport in Plants: The Good, the Bad, and the Ionome. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4553–4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Miller, G.W.; Huang, I.J.; Welkie, G.W.; Pushnik, J.C. Function of iron in plants with special emphasis on chloroplasts and photosynthetic activity. In Iron Nutrition in Soils and Plants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 19–28. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tang, C.; Robson, A.D.; Dilworth, M.J. A split-root experiment shows that iron is required for nodule initiation in Lupinus angustifolius L. New Phytol. 1990, 115, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marschner, P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; ISBN 9780123849052. [Google Scholar]
  7. Krohling, C.A.; Eutrópio, F.J.; Bertolazi, A.A.; Dobbss, L.B.; Campostrini, E.; Dias, T.; Ramos, A.C. Ecophysiology of iron homeostasis in plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 62, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jeong, J.; Guerinot, M.L. Homing in on iron homeostasis in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Colangelo, E.P.; Guerinot, M.L. Put the metal to the petal: Metal uptake and transport throughout plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, S.A.; Guerinot, M.L. Mining iron: Iron uptake and transport in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2273–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. DiDonato, R.J.; Roberts, L.A.; Sanderson, T.; Eisley, R.B.; Walker, E.L. Arabidopsis Yellow Stripe-Like2 (YSL2): A metal-regulated gene encoding a plasma membrane transporter of nicotianamine-metal complexes. Plant J. 2004, 39, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bashir, K.; Inoue, H.; Nagasaka, S.; Takahashi, M.; Nakanishi, H.; Mori, S.; Nishizawa, N.K. Cloning and characterization of deoxymugineic acid synthase genes from graminaceous plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 32395–32402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kobayashi, T.; Nishizawa, N.K. Iron Uptake, Translocation, and Regulation in Higher Plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Connorton, J.M.; Jones, E.R.; Rodríguez-Ramiro, I.; Fairweather-Tait, S.; Uauy, C.; Balk, J. Wheat vacuolar iron transporter TaVIT2 transports Fe and Mn and is effective for biofortification. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 2434–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Aggarwal, S.; Kumar, A.; Bhati, K.K.; Kaur, G.; Shukla, V.; Tiwari, S.; Pandey, A.K. RNAi-Mediated Downregulation of Inositol Pentakisphosphate Kinase (IPK1) in Wheat Grains Decreases Phytic Acid Levels and Increases Fe and Zn Accumulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Singh, S.P.; Keller, B.; Gruissem, W.; Bhullar, N.K. Rice NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE 2 expression improves dietary iron and zinc levels in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Boonyaves, K.; Wu, T.Y.; Gruissem, W.; Bhullar, N.K. Enhanced grain iron levels in iron-regulated metal transporter, nicotianamine synthase, and ferritin gene cassette. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Masuda, H.; Ishimaru, Y.; Aung, M.S.; Kobayashi, T.; Kakei, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Higuchi, K.; Nakanishi, H.; Nishizawa, N.K. Iron biofortification in rice by the introduction of multiple genes involved in iron nutrition. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ricachenevsky, F.K.; Sperotto, R.A.; Menguer, P.K.; Sperb, E.R.; Lopes, K.L.; Fett, J.P. ZINC-INDUCED FACILITATOR-LIKE family in plants: Lineage-specific expansion in monocotyledons and conserved genomic and expression features among rice (Oryza sativa) paralogs. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Peng, H.; Han, S.; Luo, M.; Gao, J.; Liu, X.; Zhao, M. Roles of Multidrug Transporters of MFS in Plant Stress Responses. Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinform. 2011, 1, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, A.; Kaur, G.; Goel, P.; Bhati, K.K.; Kaur, M.; Shukla, V.; Pandey, A.K. Genome-wide analysis of oligopeptide transporters and detailed characterization of yellow stripe transporter genes in hexaploid wheat. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2019, 19, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Beasley, J.T.; Bonneau, J.P.; Johnson, A.A.T. Characterisation of the nicotianamine aminotransferase and deoxymugineic acid synthase genes essential to Strategy II iron uptake in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sharma, S.; Kaur, G.; Kumar, A.; Meena, V.; Kaur, J.; Pandey, A.K. Overlapping transcriptional expression response of wheat zinc-induced facilitator-like transporters emphasize important role during Fe and Zn stress. BMC Mol. Biol. 2019, 20, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kaur, G.; Shukla, V.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, M.; Goel, P.; Singh, P.; Shukla, A.; Meena, V.; Kaur, J.; Singh, J.; et al. Integrative analysis of hexaploid wheat roots identifies signature components during iron starvation. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 6141–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, M.; Kawakami, Y.; Bhullar, N.K. Molecular Analysis of Iron Deficiency Response in Hexaploid Wheat. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Connorton, J.M.; Balk, J. Iron Biofortification of Staple Crops: Lessons and Challenges in Plant Genetics. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 1447–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, S.A.; Punshon, T.; Lanzirotti, A.; Li, A.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Kaplan, J.; Guerinot, M.L. Localization of iron in Arabidopsis seed requires the vacuolar membrane transporter VIT1. Science 2006, 314, 1295–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martinoia, E. Vacuolar transporters -Companions on a longtime journey. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1384–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gollhofer, J.; Schläwicke, C.; Jungnick, N.; Schmidt, W.; Buckhout, T.J. Members of a small family of nodulin-like genes are regulated under iron deficiency in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, L.; Chen, O.S.; Ward, D.M.V.; Kaplan, J. CCC1 Is a Transporter That Mediates Vacuolar Iron Storage in Yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 29515–29519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gollhofer, J.; Timofeev, R.; Lan, P.; Schmidt, W.; Buckhout, T.J. Vacuolar-iron-transporter1-like proteins mediate iron homeostasis in arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kato, T.; Kumazaki, K.; Wada, M.; Taniguchi, R.; Nakane, T.; Yamashita, K.; Hirata, K.; Ishitani, R.; Ito, K.; Nishizawa, T.; et al. Crystal structure of plant vacuolar iron transporter VIT1. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Käll, L.; Krogh, A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 338, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Khan, M.A.; Castro-Guerrero, N.; Mendoza-Cozatl, D.G. Moving toward a precise nutrition: Preferential loading of seeds with essential nutrients over non-essential toxic elements. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Conte, S.S.; Chu, H.H.; Chan-Rodriguez, D.; Punshon, T.; Vasques, K.A.; Salt, D.E.; Walker, E.L. Arabidopsis thaliana yellow stripe1-like4 and yellow stripe1-like6 localize to internal cellular membranes and are involved in metal ion homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Morgan, J.B.; Connolly, E.L. Plant-Soil Interactions: Nutrient Uptake. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 2013, 4, 2. [Google Scholar]
  37. Haydon, M.J.; Cobbett, C.S. A novel major facilitator superfamily protein at the tonoplast influences zinc tolerance and accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1705–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Krishnappa, G.; Singh, A.M.; Chaudhary, S.; Ahlawat, A.K.; Singh, S.K.; Shukla, R.B.; Jaiswal, J.P.; Singh, G.P.; Solanki, I.S. Molecular mapping of the grain iron and zinc concentration, protein content and thousand kernel weight in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sinclair, S.A.; Kraemer, U. The Zinc homeostasis network of land plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823, 1553–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bhati, K.K.; Alok, A.; Kumar, A.; Kaur, J.; Tiwari, S.; Pandey, A.K. Silencing of ABCC13 transporter in wheat reveals its involvement in grain development, phytic acid accumulation and lateral root formation. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4379–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lwalaba, J.L.W.; Louis, L.T.; Zvobgo, G.; Richmond, M.E.A.; Fu, L.; Naz, S.; Mwamba, M.; Mundende, R.P.M.; Zhang, G. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of cobalt and copper interaction in causing phyto-toxicity to two barley genotypes differing in Co tolerance. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 187, 109866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Uruç Parlak, K. Effect of nickel on growth and biochemical characteristics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. NJAS-Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2016, 76, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, S.; Nei, M.; Dudley, J.; Tamura, K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Br. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Marchler-bauer, A.; Lu, S.; Anderson, J.B.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Deweese-scott, C.; Fong, J.H.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; et al. CDD: A Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J. Genome analysis GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Horton, P.; Park, K.; Obayashi, T.; Fujita, N.; Harada, H.; Nakai, K. WoLF PSORT: Protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 585–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pfeifer, M.; Kugler, K.G.; Sandve, S.R.; Zhan, B.; Rudi, H.; Hvidsten, T.R.; Mayer, K.F.X.; Olsen, O.A.; Rogers, J.; Doležel, J.; et al. Genome interplay in the grain transcriptome of hexaploid bread wheat. Science 2014, 345, 1250091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Borrill, P.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, R.; Uauy, C. expVIP: A customizable RNA-seq data analysis and visualization platform. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 2172–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis showing separation of vacuolar iron transporter (VIT) family in Arabidopsis, Brachypodium, Oryza sativa, Zea mays and Triticum aestivum into two distinct clades; vacuolar iron transporter-like (VTL) clade and VIT clade. The neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree was generated using MEGA. The numbers represent bootstrap values from 1000 replicates.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis showing separation of vacuolar iron transporter (VIT) family in Arabidopsis, Brachypodium, Oryza sativa, Zea mays and Triticum aestivum into two distinct clades; vacuolar iron transporter-like (VTL) clade and VIT clade. The neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree was generated using MEGA. The numbers represent bootstrap values from 1000 replicates.
Plants 09 00229 g001
Figure 2. Genomic distribution and exon intron arrangements of VTL genes. (A) VTL genes genomic distribution. Wheat VTL genes were present on chromosome groups 2, 4 and 6 with maximum VTL genes on chromosome group 2, which was selected to show the VTL gene distribution on 2A, 2B and 2D chromosomes. (B) Genomic structure for wheat VTL and VIT genes. The intron-exon arrangement was identified using Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS). Exons and introns are represented using pink boxes and cyan lines, respectively. The scale determines the size of the genomic regions.
Figure 2. Genomic distribution and exon intron arrangements of VTL genes. (A) VTL genes genomic distribution. Wheat VTL genes were present on chromosome groups 2, 4 and 6 with maximum VTL genes on chromosome group 2, which was selected to show the VTL gene distribution on 2A, 2B and 2D chromosomes. (B) Genomic structure for wheat VTL and VIT genes. The intron-exon arrangement was identified using Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS). Exons and introns are represented using pink boxes and cyan lines, respectively. The scale determines the size of the genomic regions.
Plants 09 00229 g002
Figure 3. Conserved motifs identified for TaVIT and TaVTL proteins using MEME suite 5.1.0. The colored rectangles on each sequence represent specific conserved motifs numbered 1 through 14, as depicted by the color codes in the box.
Figure 3. Conserved motifs identified for TaVIT and TaVTL proteins using MEME suite 5.1.0. The colored rectangles on each sequence represent specific conserved motifs numbered 1 through 14, as depicted by the color codes in the box.
Plants 09 00229 g003
Figure 4. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes during Fe deficiency (-Fe) and in the control (C) conditions. Wheat seedlings were subjected to Fe deficiency for three and six days represented as -Fe(3D) and -Fe(6D). The controls for the respective time points are represented as C(3D) and C(6D). (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA for the cDNA preparation. Relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to C(3D). Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to their respective control treatments.
Figure 4. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes during Fe deficiency (-Fe) and in the control (C) conditions. Wheat seedlings were subjected to Fe deficiency for three and six days represented as -Fe(3D) and -Fe(6D). The controls for the respective time points are represented as C(3D) and C(6D). (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA for the cDNA preparation. Relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to C(3D). Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to their respective control treatments.
Plants 09 00229 g004
Figure 5. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes during Fe surplus (+Fe) and in the control (C) conditions. Wheat seedlings were subjected to Fe surplus for three and six days represented as +Fe(3D) and +Fe(6D). The controls for the respective time points are represented as C(3D) and C(6D). (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA for the cDNA preparation and relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to C(3D). Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to their respective control treatments.
Figure 5. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes during Fe surplus (+Fe) and in the control (C) conditions. Wheat seedlings were subjected to Fe surplus for three and six days represented as +Fe(3D) and +Fe(6D). The controls for the respective time points are represented as C(3D) and C(6D). (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA for the cDNA preparation and relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to C(3D). Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to their respective control treatments.
Plants 09 00229 g005
Figure 6. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes during Mn (-Mn), Zn (-Zn) and Cu (-Cu) deficiency with respect to the control (C) conditions. (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA was used for the cDNA preparation and relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to control tissue (C). The Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to Control tissue.
Figure 6. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes during Mn (-Mn), Zn (-Zn) and Cu (-Cu) deficiency with respect to the control (C) conditions. (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA was used for the cDNA preparation and relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to control tissue (C). The Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to Control tissue.
Plants 09 00229 g006
Figure 7. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes upon heavy metal treatments. Wheat seedlings were exposed to Ni (+Ni, 50 µm), Cd (+Cd, 50 µm) and Co (+Co, 50 µm). Control seedlings (C) without any exposure to heavy metals were compared with the treated ones. (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA for the cDNA preparation and relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to control samples. Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to their respective control treatments.
Figure 7. Tissue-specific qRT-PCR expression analysis of wheat VTL genes upon heavy metal treatments. Wheat seedlings were exposed to Ni (+Ni, 50 µm), Cd (+Cd, 50 µm) and Co (+Co, 50 µm). Control seedlings (C) without any exposure to heavy metals were compared with the treated ones. (A) Fold expression analysis was performed in roots and (B) in shoots. 2 µg of total RNA for the cDNA preparation and relative fold expression levels were calculated relative to control samples. Ct values were normalized using wheat ARF1 as an internal control. Vertical bars represent the standard deviation. # represents the significant difference at p < 0.05 with respect to their respective control treatments.
Plants 09 00229 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, S.; Kaur, G.; Kumar, A.; Meena, V.; Ram, H.; Kaur, J.; Pandey, A.K. Gene Expression Pattern of Vacuolar-Iron Transporter-Like (VTL) Genes in Hexaploid Wheat during Metal Stress. Plants 2020, 9, 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020229

AMA Style

Sharma S, Kaur G, Kumar A, Meena V, Ram H, Kaur J, Pandey AK. Gene Expression Pattern of Vacuolar-Iron Transporter-Like (VTL) Genes in Hexaploid Wheat during Metal Stress. Plants. 2020; 9(2):229. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020229

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Shivani, Gazaldeep Kaur, Anil Kumar, Varsha Meena, Hasthi Ram, Jaspreet Kaur, and Ajay Kumar Pandey. 2020. "Gene Expression Pattern of Vacuolar-Iron Transporter-Like (VTL) Genes in Hexaploid Wheat during Metal Stress" Plants 9, no. 2: 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9020229

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop