Next Article in Journal
Photosystem II Extrinsic Proteins and Their Putative Role in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Higher Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Looking at Flavonoid Biodiversity in Horticultural Crops: A Colored Mine with Nutritional Benefits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Developmental Stage and Shape of Embryo Determine the Efficacy of Embryo Rescue in Introgressing Orange/Yellow Color and Anthocyanin Genes of Brassica Species

1
Department of Horticulture, Suncheon National University, 255 Jungang-ro, Suncheon, Jeonnam 57922, Korea
2
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
3
Center for Horticultural Seed Development of Golden Seed Project (GSP), Suncheon National University, 255 Jungang-ro, Suncheon, Jeonnam 57922, Korea
4
University-Industry Cooperation Foundation, Suncheon National University, 255 Jungang-ro, Suncheon, Jeonnam 57922, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Authors contributed equally.
Plants 2018, 7(4), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040099
Submission received: 16 October 2018 / Revised: 7 November 2018 / Accepted: 9 November 2018 / Published: 13 November 2018

Abstract

:
Vegetables in Brassica are some of the world’s most commonly cultivated plants and have a wide range of consumable plant organs. Improvement of this group of vegetables is limited at the species level due to limited genetic variability. Interspecies hybridization could be a powerful alternate tool for broadening the genetic variability of target traits. Embryo rescue technique is necessarily practiced in interspecies hybridization for protecting embryos from premature abortion. However, its success depends on the age of ovaries, shape of embryos, and the effect of female genotype. In this study, we carried out a wide range of interspecies crossing for introgressing target traits (orange/yellow color in cabbage and anthocyanin in Chinese cabbage) and optimizing the appropriate age of ovaries, the shape of embryo, and the suitable genotypes of such crosses. We observed that 15 DAP (days after pollination) was the best for embryo rescue in the diploid-diploid (Brassica rapa × B. oleracea) crosses, while 20 DAP was optimum for amphidiploid-diploid (B. napus/B. juncea × B. rapa) crosses. Cotyledonary shape of embryos and genotypes of amphidiploid species were the best for successful plant regeneration in interspecies crosses. We successfully selected plants with desired orange/yellow inner leaves for cabbage and higher anthocyanin in Chinese cabbage. The results of this study have the potential to be applied for the efficient production of interspecific hybrids and to develop Brassica vegetables with new traits, which could have potential for the enrichment of the human diet.

1. Introduction

Brassica is a genus, out of 51 of the tribe Brassiceae, belonging to the family Brassicaceae, containing 38 different species [1,2]. The Brassicaceae family includes a number of the world’s most commonly cultivated vegetables and oilseed species. Brassica vegetables comprise a large number of taxonomically closely related but morphologically diverse plants. These species have been cultivated over centuries and extensively crossed and hybridized to develop many cultivars worldwide from the tropics to the Arctic Circle [3].
The genome structures of Brassica were shaped by whole-genome triplication followed by extensive diploidization, which plays an important role in the speciation and morphotype diversification of Brassica plants [4]. The six species involved in “U-Triangle”, such as the diploid B. rapa (AA genome), B. nigra (BB), and B. oleracea (CC) as well as the allotetraploid species B. juncea (AABB), B. napus (AACC), and B. carinata (BBCC), are economically important and cultivated as vegetables, condiments, and sources of oilseed [2]. The amphidiploid species are the result of interspecies hybridization followed by natural chromosome doubling of the diploid species of relevant genome donor of “U-Triangle”. Improvements in Brassica are largely governed by the exploitation of the naturally occurring genetic variations in the species which are utilized in hybridization programs. Scientists are still trying to produce new morphotypes of Brassica or transfer traits of interest from one species to others following interspecific hybridization.
Interspecific hybridization is a powerful tool that plays an important role in transferring valuable traits between species of commercial interest [5,6,7]. Breeders have often attempted to hybridize close relatives of Brassica for introgressing novel traits in new and improved varieties. However, such interspecific hybridizations are often difficult as a result of pre- and post-fertilization barriers as well as the abortion of hybrid embryos [8,9]. With the advancement of biotechnological tools, especially in vitro culture and embryo rescue, it is now possible to achieve interspecific hybrids [10,11]. The rescuing of inherent weak, immature hybrids is also an important aspect of breeding programs in order to avoid genetic degeneration [12].
In Brassicaceae, due to the limited availability of variations within the species level, interspecific hybridizations are necessarily conducted for the modification of ecotypes with disease and insect tolerance and/or to alter nutritional quality [13]. In addition, embryo rescue followed by interspecific hybridization has been used for introgressing beneficial agronomic traits from wild species to cultivated crops [14,15,16]. Embryo rescue involves isolating and growing an immature or mature zygotic embryo under sterile conditions on an aseptic nutrient medium with the goal of obtaining a viable plant [17,18].
B. napus has been resynthesized successfully from the progenitor diploid species (B. oleracea and B. rapa) by interspecific hybridization and embryo rescue [19]. Interspecific hybrids were produced from the cross between B. juncea and B. campestris, and between B. juncea and B. napus employed embryo and ovary cultures [20,21,22]. The embryo rescue technique is a potential means in which to regenerate haploid plants in order to achieve a reduced breeding cycle [23]. In Brassica, the success of embryo rescue depends largely upon the maturation stage of embryos, composition of the medium, and, to some extent, on the genotype [24]. There are two basic growth stages in embryo development: heterotrophic and autotrophic [25]. In the heterotrophic stage, embryo development is controlled by the nutrient supply from the endosperm/cotyledon, while the later stage is not dependent on such nutrition supply [25]. In Brassica, it is recommended that embryo rescue techniques are applied as early as 10 to 30 days after pollination [18,26,27]. However, most of the results are reported on oilseed type Brassica plants, where B. napus or B. campestris were used as female parents and crossed with either wild or related taxa for their improvement. Limited reports are available on interspecific cross and embryo rescue in vegetable type Brassica plants for the purpose of their enrichment of secondary metabolites.
Anthocyanin and β-carotenes are two secondary metabolites and water-soluble pigments that are widely distributed in plants, accumulating in the leaves, petals, sepals, and fruits to yield purple and/or red to yellow-orange coloration [28,29,30]. Eating foods enriched with secondary metabolites might reduce inflammation and protect against certain cancers, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and various age-related diseases [31,32,33,34]. Red cabbage has a good amount of anthocyanins, while anthocyanins are lacking in Chinese cabbage. In contrast, recent reports have suggested the presence of orange/yellow (probably β-carotene) coloration in the leaves of Chinese cabbage [35,36,37], but such coloration is lacking in cabbage.
Therefore, interspecies hybridization with the aim to introgress such anthocyanin content in Chinese cabbage and orange/yellow coloration in cabbage was attempted. The main objectives of our study were to evaluate the crossability among B. rapa (AA), B. juncea (BBCC), resynthesized B. napus (AACC), and B. oleracea (CC) genotypes for enrichment of β-carotene and anthocyanins. In addition, this study sough to identify the optimum developmental stage and age of embryos for rescue in interspecific crosses and calculate the efficacy of embryo rescue.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

A group of β-carotene-enriched Chinese cabbage (B. rapa subsp. pekinensis) cultivars, namely Orange queen (with critso mutant), β-Flash (with—orange color (OR) mutant), and BRP-K-42 (natural yellow inner leaves), were crossed with eight white cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata) lines: ASC58, ASC61, ASC82, ASC47, ASC48, ASC117, J177, and J129 with the aim of transferring β-carotene (yellow/orange color) genes from Chinese cabbage to cabbage. For enriching anthocyanin in Chinese cabbage, the cultivars Anticancer, CR-langgawang, and CR-jungumi were crossed with anthocyanin-enriched amphiploid species B. juncea (cultivar Rogusa) and resynthesized B. napus line (Rs035; is the product of chromosome doubling followed by the interspecific cross between an inbred red colored Chinese cabbage line ‘Asia’ and a red cabbage cultivar ‘Rubea’). Backcross 1 (BC1) and backcross 2 (BC2) populations were developed by backcrossing with colchiploid F1 and cabbage lines for yellow/orange color transfer to cabbage, while Chinese cabbage lines were backcrossed for their anthocyanin enrichment.

2.2. Interspecific Hybridization Followed by Hand Emasculation

Interspecific hybridization was performed between Chinese cabbage and cabbage by using the Chinese cabbage cultivars as female parent, whereas Chinese cabbage cultivars (Anticancer, CR-langgawang, and CR-jungumi) were used as pollen parent in the crosses with amphiploid species (B. juncea and B. napus). Mature flower buds, which were ready to bloom within next 2–3 days, were selected for emasculation. Anthers of the selected flower buds were removed carefully with clean forceps by opening the buds while avoid the bursting of any anthers. Fresh pollen grains were collected from the recently opened flower of the target pollen parent and placed on the stigma of emasculated flower buds by dusting method. Two hundred buds were pollinated for each of the cross combinations. The pollinated buds were immediately covered with a crossing bag in order to avoid any unwanted pollination. Bags were removed carefully 5–7 days after pollination.

2.3. Embryo Rescue and Plant Regeneration

The siliquae were collected 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 days after pollination. The siliquae were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 3 min, rinsed with sterile distilled water under aseptic condition, and then sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl; bioWORLD, Dublin, OH, USA) mixed with a drop of Tween-20 and left to sit for 10 min, and then finally rinsed three times with sterilized distill water. Well-developed ovules containing the embryos were excised and isolated from the siliquae, which was opened longitudinally with the help of a scalpel. The isolated ovules were cultured on petri-dishes containing Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [38] with 30 g/L sucrose, 9 g/L agar, with the pH adjusted to 5.8. The cultured embryos were maintained under fluorescent light at 13 h/11 h (light/dark) with 23 ± 2 °C. Differently shaped embryos were generated from ovule after 8–10 days of culture. Embryos were germinated and produced shoot within 15–20 days of inoculation. True to type plants with sufficient root systems were achieved from the sub-cultured shoots on MS basal salts within 35–40 days of inoculation.

2.4. Chromosome Doubling, Selection of F1 and Amphidiploids Plants

Well-rooted plants were taken away from MS medium and washed to remove the medium attached to roots; thereafter, plants roots were submerged in 0.1% colchicine (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and kept for 4 h in the fluorescent light with 1000 lux. Plant roots were washed three times with fresh running tap water in order to remove colchicine from the roots; finally, plants were planted in multi-hole trays containing coco-peat soil, hardened by maintaining high humidity for one week, and then transferred to a greenhouse. Successfully crossed hybrid plants were identified by PCR amplification of A-, B-, and C-genome-specific bands from the DNA of plant leaves by using the Conserved Ortholog Set (COS) marker COS1078 [39].
DNA was isolated from 1 g of the leaves of the parental lines and the interspecies hybrids plants following the protocol described by Ishizawa et al. [40] with slight modifications. PCR was carried out for detecting the amplification of COS and OR mutant using 20 µL of PCR mix, which contained 1 μL DNA, 1 μL of both the forward and reverse primer (10 pmol), 8 μL Prime TaqPremix (2×) (GENETBIO Inc., Daejong, Korea), and 9 μL ultra pure H2O. The PCR protocol was fixed as follows: initial denaturation at 72 °C for 3 min, then 35 cycles of denaturation at 72 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 3 min, and for the last step, the final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. Finally, the PCR was cooled down and kept at 4 °C. The OR mutant, responsible for orange color, was confirmed by using the OR mutant-specific primers [41].
The genotypes of the allopolyploid plants with diploid chromosomes were confirmed using CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution (Sysmex, Norderstedt, Germany). Next, 1 cm2 of young leaf was taken from 1-month-old plants, finely chopped by a single edge blade (Dorco, Seoul, Korea), and placed in 500 µL DAPI solution. The DAPI solution containing the leaf cells was filtered using 30 µm CellTrics disposable filters (Sysmex, Goerlitz, Germany). The filtrate was mixed with 2.0 mL Cystain@ UV precise P staining buffer, placed into a 3.5-mL tubes, and loaded in the CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer (Cysmex Partec, Leipzig, Germany) panel. The filtrate injection rate was fixed 0.3 µL/s and the sharp pick of the cell line spectra was considered for detecting the ploidy level.

2.5. Cytological Observation

Anthers from the flower buds of embryo-rescued plants were used for cytological study. Inflorescence with immature flower buds was fixed in Carnoy’s solution (60% ethanol, 30% chloroform, 10% glacial acetic acid, and 1 g of ferric chloride) and maintained at 15 °C for 3 h. After fixation, one flower bud that was 3–4 mm in size was opened by forceps and its anthers were collected and placed on a clean microscopic slide. Thereafter, one anther was placed into a drop of 0.2% acetocarmine solution on a clean slide and squashed gently by the back of the needle. Visible anther wall was removed by needle and a coverslip (1.5 × 1.5 cm) was placed on the squashed anther; thereafter, chromosomes were stained and spread by tapping and warming the slide on a flame (sprit lamp). After staining, the chromosome spreads were observed under a light microscope (Leica DM750; Wetzlar, Germany) for chromosome counting [42].
For the pollen sterility test, anthers were dissected from the flower buds and stained with 0.2% acetocarmine, then pollen sterility was recorded as the ratio of fertile (dark stained) and sterile (pale yellow stained) pollen grains observed under the light microscope (Leica).

2.6. Estimation of Total Anthocyanin and Statistical Analysis

The total anthocyanin content was determined following a previously described protocol [43] with some modifications. Three leaves of each genotype were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground into powder, then 100 mg of each sample was transferred into an Eppendorf tube containing 1 mL acidic methanol (1% HCl, w/v). Samples were mixed overnight at room temperature by shaking at 50 rpm in the dark. After that, the mixtures were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min. The supernatants were collected and the absorbance of each sample was determined at 530 and 657 nm wavelengths. The total anthocyanin content was computed using the following equation: QAnthocyanins = (A530 − 0.25 × A657) × FW−1, where QAnthocyanins refers to the total anthocyanin content, A530 refers to the absorption at 530 nm, A657 refers to the absorption at 657 nm, and FW refers to the fresh weight of the leaf samples (g). The total anthocyanin content was quantified from three replicates of each biological sample. The anthocyanin content was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s pair-wise comparisons in Minitab v.17 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Days after Pollination (DAP) Contributes to the Success of Embryo Rescue

The ovaries of the interspecies crosses isolated and cultured at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 DAP on the regeneration medium showed various degrees of embryo germination capability. However, isolation of ovaries was tedious at 10 DAP due to their small size (Figure 1A). Therefore, only a small number of ovaries could be isolated at 10 DAP. In contrast, most of the ovaries dried out at 25 DAP and onwards, which also led to a smaller number of such ovaries being successfully isolated (Figure 1B). Ovaries isolated at 15 DAP had a higher tendency of embryo germination for most of the crosses (Figure 1B). In interspecies crosses between B. juncea (Rogusa) and B. rapa parents (Anticancer, CR-langgawang, and CR-jungumi), the highest number of germinated embryos were obtained at 20 DAP (Figure 2 and Table S1). The ovaries from the cross Rogusa × CR-langgawang were more effective in terms of embryo germination when isolated at 20 DAP compared to other time points, while isolated ovaries of the crosses BRP-K-42 × ASC 82 and Orange queen × ASC 82 showed better embryo germination performance at 15 DAP compared to other time points. No embryo germination was achieved for the ovaries isolated at 30 DAP in most of the crosses, with the exception of the crosses made with Rogusa. Some embryo germination occurred from the ovaries isolated at 25 DAP in the crosses of resynthesized B. napus (Figure 2 and Table S1), indicating that 15 DAP was the most suitable stage of embryo development for rescuing in diploid-diploid crosses. However, embryos could be successfully rescued up to 20–25 DAP in the crosses made with the genotypes of amphidiploid species. In terms of cross combination, the highest rate of embryo germination reached was 43.5% in the cross Rogusa × CR-langgawang at 20 DAP followed by 42% and 40.5% in the crosses BRP-K-42 × ASC 82 and Orange queen × ASC 82, respectively, at 15 DAP (Figure 2 and Table S1).

3.2. Genotypes Contribute to the Success of Embryo Rescue of Interspecies Crosses

Significant variation was observed among the crosses in response to embryo germination from isolated and cultured ovaries. The best response was found in the cross Rogusa × CR-langgawang, with embryo germination reaching 10.73%, followed by the crosses Rogusa × Anticancer and Rs 035 × Anticancer, each of which showed 10% embryo germination (Figure 3 and Table S2), while the cross BRP-K-42 × Cabbage resulted in 4.23% of embryo germination. Crosses made with amphiploid parents showed higher rates of embryo germination than the crosses between diploid species (Figure 3 and Table S2) This might be due to the presence of the counterpart of the A-genome donor parent (B. rapa; AA) in the amphiploid parents (B. juncea; AABB and Rys. B. napus; AACC). The presence of the counterpart of the donor parent assured high chromosome pairing among the homologs of the A-genome and also assured the production of a high number of embryos.

3.3. Effect of Embryo Shape on Plant Regeneration from Rescued Embryo

We investigated how the plant regeneration rate corresponded to the shape of the embryos, which were developed from in vitro ovary cultured on MS media. This was done in order to know whether embryo shape influenced the rate of plant regeneration. Four distinct types of embryos, namely torpedo, irregular, cotyledonary, and globular, were developed from the isolated and cultured ovaries of interspecies crosses at different days (Figure 4A). The embryos were most commonly cotyledonary in shape followed by irregular, globular, and torpedo in shape. By contrast, the highest plant regeneration rates were obtained from the cotyledonary-shaped embryos followed by globular-, torpedo-, and globular-shaped embryos (Figure 4B). The cotyledonary-shaped embryos showed significantly higher rates of plant regeneration in the interspecies crosses between two parents of diploid species. Moreover, plant regeneration was significantly higher for globular-shaped embryos in the crosses between parents of amphidiploid and diploid species (Table 1).

3.4. Confirmation of Embryo-Rescued Hybrid Plants

A wide range of interspecies crosses among genotypes of different Brassica species (detailed in materials and methods) was done. On the 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th, and 30th day after pollination, the young siliquae were harvested, their surfaces were sterilized, and then their ovules were dissected out and grown in MS medium. Seedlings were developed within 20–30 days after dissection from siliquae. PCR amplification of COS1078 marker using the DNA of hybrid plants confirmed the hybridity of B. rapa × B. oleracea and B. juncea × B. rapa (Figure 5). In addition to this, the intermediate type leaf morphology of the parents also confirmed the formation of hybrid plants, such as B. rapa × B. oleracea, B. napus × B. rapa, and B. juncea × B. rapa (Figure 6A). The hybrid plants of the cross between lines/cultivars of diploid species (B. rapa × B. oleracea) were treated with colchicines for chromosome doubling. The flowcytometry analysis showed peaks at tetraploid (4×) position for colchiploids of the crosses of B. rapa × B. oleracea. The peaks were in triploid (3×) position for the crosses of B. napus × B. rapa and B. juncea × B. rapa (Figure 6B). Morphologically, the inflorescences of the hybrid plants of the crosses were intermediate between the parents (Figure 6C). The hybrid plants were male sterile and produced no pollen of the crosses of diploid species (B. rapa × B. oleracea) before colchicine treatment. They produced functional pollen in the colchiploid after colchicine treatment. In contrast, the crosses between amphidiploid and diploid species showed partial pollen sterility (Figure 6D). In the case of the crosses of B. juncea × B. rapa, pollen sterility was higher than the crosses of B. napus × B. rapa. Chromosome analysis from the flower bud cells revealed that the hybrid cells contained 19, 29, and 28 chromosomes for B. rapa × B. oleracea (colchiploid), B. napus × B. rapa, and B. juncea × B. rapa, respectively (Figure 6D). In addition, one chromosome bridge with four chromosomes was observed in the case of B. juncea × B. rapa.

3.5. Determination of Orange Color and Anthocyanin in BC1 and BC2 Progeny

BC1 and BC2 progenies were developed to transfer the recipient parent’s genome to the hybrid background; for example, cabbage parents were crossed back with the hybrids of B. rapa × B. oleracea and Chinese cabbage parents were crossed back with the hybrids of amphidiploid × B. rapa. All of the BC1 plants were fertile, except the cross between β-flash (CMS) and cabbage. The BC1 plants segregated for OR mutant (please see the left panel of Figure 7A) and showed variation in anthocyanin content (please the right panel of Figure 7A) for the crosses of β-flash × cabbage and amphidiploid × B. rapa, respectively. Morphologically, the BC2 plants bore a stronger resemblance to the recipient parents (for example, more cabbage-like for cabbage recipient parents or more Chinese cabbage-like for Chinese cabbage recipient parents). Some of the plants of the BC2 progenies showed morphological features that indicated the successful introgression of target traits, such as yellow/orange inner leaves in cabbage and the total anthocyanin content in Chinese cabbage, but when compared to their parents the differences were non-significant (Figure 7B). The phenotypes of these hybrids presented evidence of the successful introgression of the secondary metabolites (orange/yellow color and anthocyanin) through interspecies hybridization. These interspecific hybridizations showed remarkable potential for improvement of cabbage and Chinese cabbage, which are both highly valued vegetables.

4. Discussion

Brassica species and allies contain useful genes that could be incorporated into breeding programs through interspecies hybridization. Interspecies hybridization is an important tool for the introgression of target traits into commercial cultivars [14,44]. It is often limited by pre- and post-fertilization barriers as well as the abortion of hybrid embryos [8,9]. To overcome this limitation, embryo rescue techniques are widely used in breeding programs for rescuing inherent weak, immature hybrids in order to avoid degeneration [12]. The success of embryo rescue depends on several factors, such as the age of the embryo, shape of embryo, genotypes, and media composition [23]. The experiment reported here showed that through ovary culture, embryos were produced and plantlets were regenerated from different types of interspecies crosses. It was observed that the embryo isolation time (days after pollination; DAP), cross combination, embryo shape, and genotypes were crucial factors influencing the rate of plant regeneration. The ovaries cultured on the 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th, and 30th day after pollination showed wide variations in success. The results indicated that the ovaries isolated at 15 DAP from the cross between parents of diploid species (B. rapa × B. oleracea) had a higher tendency of embryo formation (Figure 2 and Table S1). In addition, the ovaries isolated at 20 DAP from the cross between parents of amphidiploid and diploid species (B. napus/B. juncea × B. rapa) formed higher numbers of embryos. However, embryos could not be formed using the ovaries from 30 DAP. Similar results were found in the interspecific hybridization of B. napus × B. oleracea [45] and B. napus × B. juncea [46].
It was observed that there was significant variation among the response of the genotypes to embryo formation after interspecific hybridization and embryo rescue (Figure 3 and Table S2). In order to introgress the orange/yellow color trait, the isogenic lines of Chinese cabbage were used, whose adaptation to our growing condition was not so good, while locally adapted resynthesis B. napus and B. juncea lines/cultivars were used as a source of anthocyanin. Apart from this poor local adaptation, the cytological interactions might affect the growth, vigor, and compatibility of the hybrid ovaries of the crosses of B. rapa × B. oleracea. As a result, the efficiency of the crosses in terms of embryo formation varied within the cross combinations. However, once the embryos were germinated, their rate of plant regeneration was similar to the cross combinations of B. napus × B. rapa and B. juncea × B. rapa (Table 1), indicating the potential of using diverse germplasms in interspecific hybridization for trait introgression. Our results are in agreement with the observations associated with the resynthesizing of B. napus from interspecific hybridization between B. rapa and B. oleracea [23].
The shape of the embryos from cultured ovaries is crucial for plant regeneration in interspecific hybridization. Four types of embryo shape (globular, torpedo, cotyledonary, and irregular) were recorded. The present experiment showed that the types of embryo had influence on plant regeneration. Considering all types of interspecies crosses, the cotyledonary-shaped embryos presented a higher rate of plant regeneration compared to the other embryo types (Figure 4 and Table 1). The results were consistent with other reports of embryo rescue in different cross combinations of Chickpea and its wild relatives [47] and in banana [48].
The PCR amplicon of COS1078 marker, leaf morphology, flowcytometry peaks, inflorescence shape, and cytological analysis demonstrated that hybridization was successful (Figure 6A–D). The results showed that the chromosome number of all plants tested was 19, 29, and 28 for the crosses of B. rapa × B. oleracea, B. napus × B. rapa, and B. juncea × B. rapa, respectively. Cytological identification and the flow-cytometer analysis were able to directly determine the chromosome number (ploidy levels) of regenerated plants from the fresh leaves [49,50].
Chromosome doubling was attempted in the regenerated plants of the crosses of B. rapa × B. oleracea but did not do for the plants of the crosses of B. napus/B. juncea × B. rapa. Thereafter, plants were grown in the field for use as female parents in a backcrossing programme. The colchiploid plants of the cross B. rapa × B. oleracea did not show pollen sterility because of regular meiosis, while the interspecies hybrids of amphidiploids × diploid species showed different degrees of pollen sterility (Figure 6D), which might be the result of the uneven recombination of non-homologous chromosome segments. Among the hybrids of amphidiploid × diploid species, the hybrid plants of B. juncea × B. rapa showed higher pollen sterility due to presence of a chromosomal bridge in meiosis-1, which lowered the chances of separation of the homologous chromosomal segment. Sequencing results showed that the A-, B-, and C-genomes have many common homologous segments, therefore offering opportunities of recombination among them [51,52]. The BC1 progenies of the interspecies hybrids showed a wide range of variation at the molecular and morphological level. These variations are expected because Brassica genomes passed through a triplication event during their evolution in order to arrive at their final shape and subgenomes were produced in the process [53], which show plasticity for non-homologous recombination among them. BC2 progenies had less variation compared to BC1 because of enriching recipient genome.
Commercially important agronomy traits, like male sterility and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance have been introgressed to cultivars from relative taxa or wild species by interspecies hybridization [54,55]. However, variation within the species has sharply declined due to high selection pressure to produce homogenous commercial cultivars. Given that high valued crop innovation is prioritized, there is a great incentive to do interspecies hybridization and subsequent backcrossing for introgressing new traits.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that success in interspecific hybridization regarding plant regeneration is dependent on age of ovaries, shape of embryos, and the genotypes involved in such crosses. We found 15 DAP and 20 DAP are the optimum ages of ovaries for diploid-diploid and amphidiploid-diploid crosses, respectively. In addition, we found that the cotyledonary-shaped embryos and amphidiploid female parents are important factors for obtaining high frequency regeneration. The results of this study have the potential to be applied for the efficient production of interspecific hybrids in Brassica vegetables. In addition, the present study has generated new traits in Brassica vegetables that could have the potential to help enrich the human diet.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/7/4/99/s1, Table S1: Number of ovaries isolated from different interspecies crosses in Brassica species with their success in embryo germination from the isolated ovaries, Table S2: The rate of embryo germination (%) obtained by different cross combinations of ovary culture of interspecies crosses between diploid species and amphidiploids and diploid species in Brassica, lettering indicates the significance of mean comparison in Tukey’s method at p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

S.P. and S.S. managed the experimental plants, made the crosses, and rescued the embryos. U.K.N. performed the cytological-, statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. G.G. carried out anthocyanin extraction and quantification, J.-H.L. and H.-J.J. helped in DNA extraction, cytological slide preparation, chromosome counting and performed the flowcytometry analysis. H.-T.K. performed the flowcytometry analysis. J.-I.P. and I.-S.N. formulated and designed the research and assisted in improving the technical aspects of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Center for Horticultural Seed Development, Golden Seed Project (GSP), Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs in the Republic of Korea (MAFRA), grant number 213007-05-3-CG100 and The APC was funded by Ill-Sup Nou.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gómez-Campo, C. Morphology and Morpho-Taxonomy of the Tribe Brassiceae. Brassica Crops Wild Allies, Biology Breeding; Japan Scientific Societies Press: Tokyo, Japan, 1980; pp. 3–31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng, F.; Mandáková, T.; Wu, J.; Xie, Q.; Lysak, M.A.; Wang, X. Deciphering the diploid ancestral genome of the mesohexaploid Brassica rapa. Plant Cell 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Monteiro, A.; Lunn, T. Trends and perspectives of vegetable Brassica breeding world-wide. In Proceedings of the WCHR-World Conference on Horticultural Research, Rome, Italy, 17–20 June 1998; Volume 495, pp. 273–280. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, X. Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. Horticult. Res. 2014, 1, 14024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jiao, Y.; Wickett, N.J.; Ayyampalayam, S.; Chanderbali, A.S.; Landherr, L.; Ralph, P.E.; Tomsho, L.P.; Hu, Y.; Liang, H.; Soltis, P.S. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Barton, N.H. The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10, 551–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Niemann, J.; Olender, M.; Wojciechowski, A.; Tomkowiak, A. Interspecific hybridization between Brassica napus and Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis genotypes through embryo rescue and their evaluation for crossability. J. Biotechnol. Comput. Biol. Bionanotechnol. 2015, 96, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, G.; Zhou, W.; Yao, X.; Zhang, Z. Studies on distant hybridization in Brassica plants. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci. 2001, 29, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, H. Genetics and Breeding of Oilseed Rape; Shanghai Science and Technology Press: Shanghai, China, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  10. McNaughton, I. The scope and problems involved in synthesising new amphi-diploid and autotetraploid fodder brassicas in the group B. napus L., B. campestris L. and B. oleracea L. Rec. Scott. Plant Breed. Stn. Pentlandfleld Rosl. Midlothian 1963, 1963, 48–68. [Google Scholar]
  11. Agnihotri, A.; Lakshmikumaran, M.; Prakash, S.; Jagannathan, V. Embryo rescue of B. napus × Raphanobrassica hybrids. Crucif. Newsl. 1991, 14, 92–93. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sharma, D.; Kaur, R.; Kumar, K. Embryo rescue in plants—A review. Euphytica 1996, 89, 325–337. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaneko, Y.; Bang, S.W. Interspecific and intergeneric hybridization and chromosomal engineering of Brassicaceae crops. Breed. Sci. 2014, 64, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mei, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, X.; Qian, L.; Liu, L.; Yin, J.; Frauen, M.; Li, J.; Qian, W. Genomic relationships between wild and cultivated Brassica oleracea L. with emphasis on the origination of cultivated crops. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2010, 57, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Niemann, J.; Kaczmarek, J.; Wojciechowski, A.; Olejniczak, J.; Jędryczka, M. Hybrids within the genus Brassica and chemical mutants of Brassica napus–the potential sources of resistance to clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae) Formy mieszańcowe w obrębie rodzaju Brassica i mutanty chemiczne Brassica napus jako potencjalne źródła odporności na kiłę kapusty (Plasmodiophora brassicae). Prog. Plant Protect. 2015, 55, 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  16. Niemann, J.; Wojciechowski, A.; Janowicz, J. Broadening the variability of quality traits in rapeseed through interspecific hybridization with an application of immature embryo culture. BioTechnol. J. Biotechnol. Comput. Biol. Bionanotechnol. 2012, 93, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Torres, K.C. Application of Tissue Culture Techniques to Horticultural Crops. In Tissue Culture Techniques for Horticultural Crops; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1989; pp. 66–69. [Google Scholar]
  18. Inomata, N. Embryo rescue techniques for wide hybridization. In Breeding Oilseed Brassicas; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1993; pp. 94–107. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nishi, S. Differentiation of Brassica crops in Asia and the breeding of ‘Hakuran’, a newly synthesized leafy vegetable. In Brassica Crops Wild Allies, Biology and Breeding; Japanese Science Society Press: Tokyo, Japan, 1980; pp. 133–150. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mohapatra, D.; Bajaj, Y. Hybridization in Brassica juncea × Brassica campestris through ovary culture. Euphytica 1988, 37, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, G.; Zhou, W.; Gu, H.; Song, W.; Momoh, E. Plant regeneration from the hybridization of Brassica juncea and B. napus through embryo culture. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2003, 189, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.; Gao, M.; Yuan, Y.; Gen, J.; Wen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, G. Studies on artificially synthesized B. napus L. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2001, 2, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, G.; Tang, G.; Song, W.; Zhou, W. Resynthesizing Brassica napus from interspecific hybridization between Brassica rapa and B. oleracea through ovary culture. Euphytica 2004, 140, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rahman, M. Optimum age of siliques for rescue of hybrid embryos from crosses between Brassica oleracea, B. rapa and B. carinata. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 84, 965–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Raghavan, V.; Srivastava, P. Embryo culture. In Experimental Embryology of Vascular Plants; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1982; pp. 195–230. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen, B.; Heneen, W.; Jönsson, R. Resynthesis of Brassies napus L. through Interspecific Hybridization between B. alboglabra Bailey and B. campestris L. with Special Emphasis on Seed Colour. Plant. Breed. 1988, 101, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Quazi, M.H. Interspecific hybrids between Brassica napus L. and B. oleracea L. developed by embryo culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1988, 75, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Steyn, W.; Wand, S.; Holcroft, D.; Jacobs, G. Anthocyanins in vegetative tissues: A proposed unified function in photoprotection. New Phytol. 2002, 155, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin-Wang, K.; Bolitho, K.; Grafton, K.; Kortstee, A.; Karunairetnam, S.; McGhie, T.K.; Espley, R.V.; Hellens, R.P.; Allan, A.C. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor associated with regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Rosaceae. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Nisar, N.; Li, L.; Lu, S.; Khin, N.C.; Pogson, B.J. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mazza, G.; Kay, C.D.; Cottrell, T.; Holub, B.J. Absorption of anthocyanins from blueberries and serum antioxidant status in human subjects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7731–7737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. He, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L. Anthocyanin accumulation, antioxidant ability and stability, and a transcriptional analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis in purple heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 64, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Thomasset, S.; Teller, N.; Cai, H.; Marko, D.; Berry, D.P.; Steward, W.P.; Gescher, A.J. Do anthocyanins and anthocyanidins, cancer chemopreventive pigments in the diet, merit development as potential drugs? Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009, 64, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ruiz-Sola, M.Á.; Rodríguez-Concepción, M. Carotenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: A colorful pathway. In The Arabidopsis Book; American Society of Plant Biologists: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012; Volume 10. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Fei, Z.; Pogson, B.J.; Zhang, L.; Li, L. Molecular characterization and transcriptome analysis of orange head Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Planta 2015, 241, 1381–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, Q.; Li, H.; Liu, L.; Wang, F.; Gao, J. Transcriptome analysis of orange head Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) and molecular marker development. Int. J. Genom. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, S.; Lee, S.-C.; Byun, D.H.; Lee, D.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.O.; Sung, S.H.; Yang, T.-J. Association of molecular markers derived from the BrCRISTO1 gene with prolycopene-enriched orange-colored leaves in Brassica rapa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jeong, Y.-M.; Chung, W.-H.; Chung, H.; Kim, N.; Park, B.-S.; Lim, K.-B.; Yu, H.-J.; Mun, J.-H. Comparative analysis of the radish genome based on a conserved ortholog set (COS) of Brassica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 1975–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ishizawa, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Miyamura, T.; Matsuura, S. Simple procedure of DNA isolation from human serum. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991, 19, 5792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zou, C.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Feng, H. Fine mapping and characterization of the OR gene in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp pekinensis). Genet. Mol. Res. GMR 2016, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ji, D. Experiment of Genetics; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehrtens, F.; Kranz, H.; Bednarek, P.; Weisshaar, B. The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB12 is a flavonol-specific regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant. Physiol. 2005, 138, 1083–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Niemann, J.; Kotlarski, S.; Wojciechowski, A. The evaluation of self-incompatibility and crossability in choosen Brassica species based on the observation of pollen tubes growth and seed set. Acta Sci. Polonorum. Agric. 2014, 13, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen, Y.; Wojciechowski, A. Obtained interspecific hybrid of B. napus and B. oleracea var. italica by embryo and ovule in vitro culture. J. Huazhong (Cent. China) Agric. Univ. 2000, 19, 274–278. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bajaj, Y.; Mahajan, S.; Labana, K. Interspecific hybridization of Brassica napus and B. juncea through ovary, ovule and embryo culture. Euphytica 1986, 35, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Clarke, H.; Wilson, J.; Kuo, I.; Lülsdorf, M.; Mallikarjuna, N.; Kuo, J.; Siddique, K. Embryo rescue and plant regeneration in vitro of selfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and its wild annual relatives. Plant. Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2006, 85, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Uma, S.; Lakshmi, S.; Saraswathi, M.; Akbar, A.; Mustaffa, M. Embryo rescue and plant regeneration in banana (Musa spp.). Plant. Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. (PCTOC) 2011, 105, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, W.; Tang, G.; Hagberg, P. Efficient production of doubled haploid plants by immediate colchicine treatment of isolated microspores in winter Brassica napus. Plant. Growth Regul. 2002, 37, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gu, H.; Zhou, W.; Hagberg, P. High frequency spontaneous production of doubled haploid plants in microspore cultures of Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis. Euphytica 2003, 134, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Tong, C.; Edwards, D.; Parkin, I.A.; Zhao, M.; Ma, J.; Yu, J.; Huang, S. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Sun, R.; Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Bai, Y.; Mun, J.-H.; Bancroft, I.; Cheng, F. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Schranz, M.E.; Lysak, M.A.; Mitchell-Olds, T. The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: Building blocks of crucifer genomes. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sigareva, M.; Earle, E. Direct transfer of a cold-tolerant Ogura male-sterile cytoplasm into cabbage (Brassica oleracea ssp. capitata) via protoplast fusion. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1997, 94, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rygulla, W.; Snowdon, R.; Eynck, C.; Koopmann, B.; Von Tiedemann, A.; Lühs, W.; Friedt, W. Broadening the genetic basis of Verticillium longisporum resistance in Brassica napus by interspecific hybridization. Phytopathology 2007, 97, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) Developmental stages and size of the siliquae on different days after pollination (DAP) used for isolating ovaries; (B) Number of successfully isolated ovaries and total number of embryos germinated on that particular DAP for all the interspecies crosses.
Figure 1. (A) Developmental stages and size of the siliquae on different days after pollination (DAP) used for isolating ovaries; (B) Number of successfully isolated ovaries and total number of embryos germinated on that particular DAP for all the interspecies crosses.
Plants 07 00099 g001
Figure 2. Efficacy of the embryo germination from the isolated ovaries at different days after crossing in different cross combinations.
Figure 2. Efficacy of the embryo germination from the isolated ovaries at different days after crossing in different cross combinations.
Plants 07 00099 g002
Figure 3. The rate of embryo germination (%) obtained by different cross combinations of ovary culture of interspecies crosses between diploid species and amphidiploid and diploid species in Brassica. The lettering indicates the significance of mean comparison according to Tukey’s method at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. The rate of embryo germination (%) obtained by different cross combinations of ovary culture of interspecies crosses between diploid species and amphidiploid and diploid species in Brassica. The lettering indicates the significance of mean comparison according to Tukey’s method at p < 0.05.
Plants 07 00099 g003
Figure 4. Types of embryo formation and regeneration ability. (A) Different shapes of the embryos developed from the rescued ovaries of the interspecies crosses; (B) The plant regeneration ability of the cultured embryos isolated from the interspecies crosses.
Figure 4. Types of embryo formation and regeneration ability. (A) Different shapes of the embryos developed from the rescued ovaries of the interspecies crosses; (B) The plant regeneration ability of the cultured embryos isolated from the interspecies crosses.
Plants 07 00099 g004
Figure 5. Gel picture of genome-specific PCR amplicons for A-, B-, and C-genome in the hybrid plants of the crosses between Chinese cabbage and cabbage (upper panel) as well as between B. juncea and Chinese cabbage (lower panel). In the case of hybrids of the B. juncea × Chinese cabbage, the upper two bands could be due to the hybridity bands of the hybrid B. juncea parent.
Figure 5. Gel picture of genome-specific PCR amplicons for A-, B-, and C-genome in the hybrid plants of the crosses between Chinese cabbage and cabbage (upper panel) as well as between B. juncea and Chinese cabbage (lower panel). In the case of hybrids of the B. juncea × Chinese cabbage, the upper two bands could be due to the hybridity bands of the hybrid B. juncea parent.
Plants 07 00099 g005
Figure 6. Confirmation of hybrid plants of the interspecies crosses involving diploid species to diploid species (B. rapa × B. oleracea) and amphidiploid species to diploid species (B. napus × B. rapa) and (B. juncea × B. rapa); (A) Intermediate leaf morphology in hybrids between their parents; (B) Flowcytometry peaks of the hybrids and their parents; (C) Intermediate inflorescence type in hybrids of their parents; and (D) Meiotic chromosome number and behavior in metaphase 1 (left) along with the pollen sterility status (right) of the hybrid plants.
Figure 6. Confirmation of hybrid plants of the interspecies crosses involving diploid species to diploid species (B. rapa × B. oleracea) and amphidiploid species to diploid species (B. napus × B. rapa) and (B. juncea × B. rapa); (A) Intermediate leaf morphology in hybrids between their parents; (B) Flowcytometry peaks of the hybrids and their parents; (C) Intermediate inflorescence type in hybrids of their parents; and (D) Meiotic chromosome number and behavior in metaphase 1 (left) along with the pollen sterility status (right) of the hybrid plants.
Plants 07 00099 g006
Figure 7. Variation in target gene segregation and morphology of the target traits in the backcross 1 (BC1) and backcross 2 (BC2) generation of the interspecies crosses. (A) Segregation of the target OR mutant in BC1 progeny (left panel) and morphological variation in anthocyanin content; (B) Presence of yellow/orange color in inner cabbage leaves (left panel) and the variation of total anthocyanin content (right panel) in the selected plants of the BC2 of the interspecies crosses. The lettering on bar graph indicates the significance of mean comparison according to Tukey’s method at p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Variation in target gene segregation and morphology of the target traits in the backcross 1 (BC1) and backcross 2 (BC2) generation of the interspecies crosses. (A) Segregation of the target OR mutant in BC1 progeny (left panel) and morphological variation in anthocyanin content; (B) Presence of yellow/orange color in inner cabbage leaves (left panel) and the variation of total anthocyanin content (right panel) in the selected plants of the BC2 of the interspecies crosses. The lettering on bar graph indicates the significance of mean comparison according to Tukey’s method at p < 0.05.
Plants 07 00099 g007
Table 1. The rate of plant regeneration (%) obtained by different shapes of embryos developed from different cross combinations of interspecies crosses between diploid species and amphidiploid and diploid species in Brassica. The lettering indicates the significance of mean comparison according to Tukey’s method at p < 0.05.
Table 1. The rate of plant regeneration (%) obtained by different shapes of embryos developed from different cross combinations of interspecies crosses between diploid species and amphidiploid and diploid species in Brassica. The lettering indicates the significance of mean comparison according to Tukey’s method at p < 0.05.
Cross TypeCross CombinationEmbryo ShapeNo. of Embryos CulturedNo. of Plants RegeneratedRate of Plant Regeneration (%)
B. rapa × B. oleraceaOrange queen × CabbageTorpedo301860.00 b
Irregular251040.00 c
Cotyledonary352982.80 a
Globular403382.50 a
β-Flash × CabbageTorpedo402767.50 b
Irregular552240.00 c
Cotyledonary483675.00 b
Globular282071.50 a
BRP-K-42 × CabbageTorpedo201155.00 b
Irregular251248.00 c
Cotyledonary282071.43 a
Globular201575.00 a
Rys. B. napus × B. rapaRs 035 × AnticancerTorpedo10770.00 b
Irregular15960.00 c
Cotyledonary12975.00 b
Globular181583.33 a
Rs 035 × CR-langgawangTorpedo8337.50 c
Irregular7342.86 c
Cotyledonary10770.00 b
Globular6583.33 a
Rs 035 × CR-jungumiTorpedo7457.14 c
Irregular10330.00 d
Cotyledonary161275.00 b
Globular121083.33 a
B. juncea × B. rapaRogusa × AnticancerTorpedo10440.00 b
Irregular20840.00 b
Cotyledonary151280.00 a
Globular10880.00 a
Rogusa × CR-jungumiTorpedo11545.45 b
Irregular15640.00 b
Cotyledonary121083.33 a
Globular141178.57 a
Rogusa × CR-langgawangTorpedo4125.00 b
Irregular20630.00 b
Cotyledonary201680.00 a
Globular151280.00 a

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pen, S.; Nath, U.K.; Song, S.; Goswami, G.; Lee, J.-H.; Jung, H.-J.; Kim, H.-T.; Park, J.-I.; Nou, I.-S. Developmental Stage and Shape of Embryo Determine the Efficacy of Embryo Rescue in Introgressing Orange/Yellow Color and Anthocyanin Genes of Brassica Species. Plants 2018, 7, 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040099

AMA Style

Pen S, Nath UK, Song S, Goswami G, Lee J-H, Jung H-J, Kim H-T, Park J-I, Nou I-S. Developmental Stage and Shape of Embryo Determine the Efficacy of Embryo Rescue in Introgressing Orange/Yellow Color and Anthocyanin Genes of Brassica Species. Plants. 2018; 7(4):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pen, Sreyvatey, Ujjal Kumar Nath, Samnang Song, Gayatri Goswami, Ji-Hee Lee, Hee-Jeong Jung, Hoy-Taek Kim, Jong-In Park, and Ill-Sup Nou. 2018. "Developmental Stage and Shape of Embryo Determine the Efficacy of Embryo Rescue in Introgressing Orange/Yellow Color and Anthocyanin Genes of Brassica Species" Plants 7, no. 4: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop