Next Article in Journal
Allelopathy and Identification of Volatile Components from the Roots and Aerial Parts of Astragalus mongholicus Bunge
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysing a Group of Homologous BAHD Enzymes Provides Insights into the Evolutionary Transition of Rosmarinic Acid Synthases from Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:Shikimate/Quinate Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferases
Previous Article in Journal
Variability of the Main Economically Valuable Characteristics of Cyperus esculentus L. in Various Ecological and Geographical Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Do Abiotic Stresses Affect the Aroma of Damask Roses?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/plants13020315
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity Comparison of Wild-Type and Yellow-Leaf gl1 Mutant of Lagerstroemia indica

by
Sumei Li
,
Min Yin
,
Peng Wang
,
Lulu Gao
,
Fenni Lv
,
Rutong Yang
,
Ya Li
,
Qing Wang
,
Linfang Li
,
Yongdong Liu
and
Shuan Wang
*
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing Botanical Garden, Memorial Sun Yat-Sen, No. 1 Qianhu Houcun, Nanjing 210014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(2), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020315
Submission received: 6 December 2023 / Revised: 3 January 2024 / Accepted: 17 January 2024 / Published: 20 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Secondary Metabolites in Plants)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The yellow-leaf gl1 mutant of Lagerstroemia indica exhibits an altered phenylpropanoid metabolism pathway compared to wild-type (WT). However, details on the metabolites associated with leaf color variation, including color-specific metabolites with bioactive constituents, are not fully understood. Methods: Chemical and metabolomics approaches were used to compare metabolite composition and antioxidant capacity between the gl1 mutant and WT leaves. Results: The mutant exhibited an irregular xylem structure with a significantly lower phenolic polymer lignin content and higher soluble phenolic compounds. Untargeted metabolomics analysis identified phenolic compounds, particularly lignans, as key differential metabolites between gl1 and WT, with a significant increase in the mutant. The neolignan derivative balanophonin-4-O-D-glu was identified as a characteristic metabolite in the gl1 mutant. The soluble phenolic compounds of the gl1 mutant exhibited higher FRAP, ABTS, DPPH, and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity than in WT. Correlation analysis showed a positive relationship between antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds in L. indica. Conclusions: Metabolites associated with leaf color variation in the L. indica yellow-leaf gl1 mutant demonstrated high antioxidant capacity, particularly in scavenging hydroxyl radicals.

1. Introduction

The genus Lagerstroemia L., belonging to the family Lythraceae and order Myrtales, includes over 50 species of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs, widespread throughout Southeast Asia and Australia [1,2]. Lagerstroemia species mitigate symptoms of many serious diseases and health problems via bioactive processes by acting as antioxidants [3,4,5,6], anti-inflammatory [4,7], anti-aging [2], anti-obesity, and antidiabetic compounds [8,9,10]. The leaves of Lagerstroemia speciosa are used as traditional medicinal foods in Southeast Asia, including in the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and southern China [11]. Phytochemical investigations have demonstrated that Lagerstroemia contains diverse bioactive metabolites, including phenolic compounds [9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], terpenoids [9,12,17], and alkaloids [18,19]. As a result, the bark, leaves, flowers, and fruits of the plants have been analyzed to demonstrate the possibility of using Lagerstroemia species as a source of bioactive compounds for the pharmacological industry. The major active ingredients within Lagerstroemia species are triterpene acids such as corosolic acid and asiatic acid [9,10]. However, the phenolic compounds, including tannin, ellagic acid, myricetin, quercetin, and their derivates, are responsible for the various pharmacological functions in Lagerstroemia species, such as anti-aging potentials [2], antioxidative acitivity [3], and anti-human rhinovirus 2 activity [11].
The health benefits of plant products, including disease prevention, are often attributed to their high content of phenolic compounds [20,21]. Phenolic compounds are among the most widespread secondary metabolites, ubiquitously present throughout the plant kingdom. Phenylalanine is generated in the shikimate pathway, leading to phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Land plants have evolved multiple branches of phenylpropanoid metabolism, giving rise to more than 8000 metabolites with an extremely wide variation in structural diversity exhibiting a broad range of physiological roles in plants [22]. They can be classified into several classes based on the variations in their basic skeletons, including phenolic acids, lignans, lignins, flavonoids, stilbenes, anthraquinones, and others [23]. Phenylpropanoid metabolism is regulated via the redirection of metabolic flux, which exhibits extraordinary complexity and plasticity homeostasis among different branches in response to the changing environment [24]. Phenylpropanoid metabolism is, therefore, one of the most extensively investigated pathways [22]. Phenolic compounds are thus the characteristic bioactive compounds in plants due to their importance in the various interactions between plants and their environment, reproductive strategies, and defense mechanisms [25].
Lagerstroemia indica originated and has extensive cultivation history in China [26]. The extract of L. indica can alleviate several symptoms, including stretch marks [27] and allergic airway inflammation [7]. Based on the phytochemical profiling of bioactive metabolites, this species is clustered into the same group with L. speciosa among 17 different Lagerstroemia species [9]. The yellow-leaf mutant gl1 is cultivated from the naturally variable axillary bud in the L. indica ‘Fenjing’ wild-type (WT) variety via asexual cutting propagation [28]. Proteomics studies have shown that the protein abundance of photosynthesis, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and phenylalanine metabolism pathways in the gl1 mutant are significantly different compared to WT [29]. In the gl1 mutant, photooxidation is a major physiological process, with biological processes adapted for acclimation rather than growth. This results in significant differences in some physiological and biochemical processes, including primary and secondary metabolism [30]. The change in secondary metabolism results in a significantly higher level of phenolic compounds in the gl1 mutant [30], which is usually a common adaptation of plants in response to stress environments [23,31]. This change provides a stable internal environment for the growth and fitness of the yellow-leaf mutant gl1. It remains unclear whether changes in phenylpropanoid metabolism lead to specific bioactive metabolites linked to leaf color variation, as colored grains and fruits rich in phenolic compounds offer increased potential as functional foods [32,33]. Untargeted metabolic profiling involves the comprehensive screening of all metabolites in an assayed sample and allows further exploration of metabolites of interest. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the phytochemical characteristics of metabolites in the yellow-leaf mutant gl1 leaves based on chemical and metabolomics approaches. A comparative analysis of the metabolite composition and antioxidant capacity was performed to determine the potential value of the gl1 mutant as a functional food.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Chemicals

Six-year-old gl1 mutant and WT plants, derived from asexual cuttings, were cultivated in the same field at the Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Nanjing, China). The leaves in the same position from at least three different gl1 mutant or WT plants were collected as individual samples in May 2021 and dried at 70 °C until a constant weight was achieved. Each group of samples was repeated four times as an independent biological replicate. The dry samples were then ground and sifted through a 60-mesh sieve to a fine powder for subsequent use.
Mass spectrometric grade methanol (Merck Co., Darmstadt, Germany) was used for extraction and elution. All other chemicals including Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, ethanol, sodium phosphate bibasic, sodium carbonate, aluminum nitrate, sodium hydroxide, sodium nitrite, potassium persulfate, sodium acetate, ferric chloride (FeCl3), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydrochloric acid (HCl), sulfuric acid, ammonium persulfate, salicylic acid, hydroxylamine hydrochloride, sulfanilamide, α-naphthylamine, gallic acid, schizandrol A, rutin, 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azinobis (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid ammonium salt) (ABTS), 2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ), and N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) were analytical grade (Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Solid-phase extraction (SPE) was performed using Extract Clean™ C18 ProElut (American Chromatography Supplies, Vineland, NJ, USA).

2.2. Determination of Lignin Content

Lignin content was measured using the modified Klason method [34]. Briefly, a total of 0.1 g of ground samples was extracted first with 40 mL of water, 40 mL of 80% ethanol, and then 40 mL of acetone. The samples were then freeze-dried for two days. The dry samples were treated with 3 mL of 72% sulfuric acid for 16 h, stirring every 10 min at room temperature. The samples were then diluted to 4% sulfuric acid with 51 mL of nanopure water. The solutions were transferred to flasks and autoclaved at 121 °C for 60 min. The lignin was collected in preweighted filtering crucibles and washed with 200 mL of nanopure water to remove residual acid before drying at 70 °C to a constant weight.

2.3. Histological Analysis

The petiole base, after cutting, was immediately placed in 50 mL of FAA solution (70% ethanol, formaldehyde, and glacial acetic acid in 90:5:5 v/v/v) for 48 h. The samples were then dehydrated in an ethanol series and transversely sectioned (4 μm) on a Leica RM2016 microtome (Leica, Saarbrücken, Germany). The sections were stained with the Weisner reagent (1% phloroglucinol and 6 M HCl) and immediately observed under a Nikon Eclipse E100 microscope with images captured using a Nikon DS-U3 digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Other sections were stained with 0.1% toluidine blue, and microphotographs were taken with the microscope and digital camera above.

2.4. Extraction of Total Soluble Phenolic Compounds

Four individual sample replicates of the gl1 mutant and WT (0.5 g each) were extracted in 15 mL of 80% methanol (v/v) with a KQ-250DS ultrasonic apparatus (Kunshan ultrasonic instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 30 min at room temperature. The crude extracts were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. For the quantification of total soluble phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity, the extracts were then stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis. For the qualitative and quantitative analysis of the extracted phenolic compounds, equal amounts of extracts were purified and enriched using SPE C18 ProElut according to the manufacturer’s instructions and eluted with 0.5 mL of methanol. The eluents were then collected in an amber vial for future use.

2.5. Determination of Total Soluble Phenolic Compounds and Flavonoid Content

Total soluble phenolic content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent according to the previously described method [35] with some modifications. Briefly, 150 µL of appropriately diluted extracts or standard solutions were added to 150 µL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The mixture was vortexed and equilibrated for 5 min at room temperature. Then, 200 µL of 1 M sodium carbonate was thoroughly mixed and equilibrated for 10 min at room temperature, with 1 mL of H2O added. After a 1-h incubation at room temperature in the dark, the changes in the absorbance of the samples were recorded at 725 nm using a spectrophotometer. The concentrations were calculated according to the calibration curve built using standard solutions of gallic acid. The content was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in the dry weight of the sample (mg GAE g−1 DW).
The flavonoid content was determined using the previously described colorimetric method [36]. Briefly, 5 mL of the extract was mixed with 0.3 mL of 5% sodium nitrite and equilibrated for 5 min at room temperature. Then, 0.3 mL of 10% aluminum nitrate was added and incubated for another 5 min. A total of 4 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide was added, and the solution was finally filled up to 10 mL with 70% aqueous ethanol. The absorbance of the sample was measured using a spectrophotometer at 510 nm. The content was calculated from a calibration curve using standard rutin solutions and expressed as rutin equivalents (RE) in the dry weight of the sample (mg RE g−1 DW).

2.6. Antioxidant Activity Assay

The DPPH radical scavenging activity was measured by assessing the ability of antioxidant substances in the extract to capture single electrons from DPPH, reflected as a change in absorbance at 515 nm. These procedures were performed according to a previously described method [37] with minor modifications in the dilution of extracts. Briefly, 2 mL of extraction solution was mixed with 3.5 mL of 0.1 mM DPPH and incubated for 30 min in the dark at 25 °C to determine the absorbance. A standard curve was established using a plot of Trolox concentration against DPPH radical scavenging activity. The DPPH radical scavenging activity values were expressed as micromoles of Trolox equivalent (TE) in the dry weight of the sample (mmol TE 100 g−1 DW).
ABTS radical scavenging activity was performed based on the reduction of ABTS+ radicals to ABTS by the antioxidant substances in the extract, reflected in the absorbance change of the samples at 734 nm. The preparation and usage of ABTS+ radicals working solution were carried out using a previous method [32]. Briefly, the ABTS+ stock solution was prepared by mixing 5 mL of 7.4 mM ABTS with 5 mL of 2.6 mM potassium persulfate, followed by overnight incubation at room temperature in the dark. The ABTS+ working solution was then diluted with methanol to reach an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.02 at 734 nm before use. Then, 0.1 mL of extraction solution was mixed with 1.4 mL of ABTS+ working solution and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The absorbance was read at 734 nm. A series of Trolox standard solutions in 80% methanol was prepared and assayed under the same conditions to produce the standard curve. The ABTS radical scavenging activity values were expressed as mmol TE 100 g−1 DW.
The ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was carried out using the working solution prepared immediately prior to use by mixing 300 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 10 mM TPTZ in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3 at a ratio of 10:1:1 (v/v/v) as previously described [32]. FRAP was determined by measuring the change in absorbance at 600 nm. A series of Trolox concentrations were assayed under the same conditions to produce the standard curve. The FRAP of the sample was expressed as mmol TE 100 g−1 DW.
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was assessed by generating hydroxyl radicals via a Fenton reaction involving equal volumes of 6 mM FeSO4 and 24 mM H2O2. The methodology was carried out according to a previous report [32]. Ultrapure water was used instead of H2O2 as a control, and the absorbance at 510 nm was A0. The absorbance of different diluted extracts at 510 nm was successively recorded as A1. The scavenging activity was calculated in percent value as follows: scavenging activity (%) = (A0 − A1)/A0 × 100.
The superoxide radical (O2•−) scavenging activity was measured by introducing the superoxide anion to the extracts. The rest of the superoxide anion in the reaction system was determined using the Li et al. [30] method. Briefly, 50 µL of TEMED and 200 µL of 10% ammonium persulfate were thoroughly mixed with different diluted extracts and incubated at room temperature for 1 min. Then, 250 µL of 10 mM hydroxylamine hydrochloride was added to the mixture, vortexed, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Finally, 250 μL of 17 mM sulfanilamide and 250 μL of 7 mM α-naphthylamine were added to the incubation mixture for 20 min to end the reaction. The absorbance of the solution at 530 nm was recorded as A1. The absorbance of ultrapure water, serving as a control under the same conditions, was recorded as A0. The eliminating rate of superoxide anion was calculated in percent value according to the following formula: scavenging activity (%) = (A0 − A1)/A0 × 100.

2.7. Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis

Metabolites were identified using a high-resolution hybrid quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (QTOF-MS) with a dual electrospray ionization source coupled to an ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography system (UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS). The 1260 UHPLC chromatograph was equipped with a binary pump and a thermostated column coupled to a G6530A mass spectrometer detector with a MassHunter B0.05.0 workstation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The mass spectrometer was operated in a negative mode to acquire accurate masses in the 100–1700 m/z range, and the substance was monitored with dual ESI at 365 and 254 nm. Chromatographic separation was achieved in the reverse phase mode on an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 SB-AQ column (3.0 mm × 100 mm, i.d. 2.7 μm) under a water-acetonitrile gradient elution. The mobile phases labeled A (0.1% formic acid) and B (acetonitrile) were used with a column temperature maintained at 30 °C. The gradient elution was 90% A and 10% B (5 min), 82% A and 18% B (10 min), 75% A and 25% B (30 min), 10% A and 90% B (35 min), and 100% B (40 min) with a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1. The injection volume was 5 μL, and source conditions for the untargeted negative scan were as follows: nitrogen was used as the drying gas (10 L min−1 at 350 °C), the nebulizer pressure was 50 psig, the fragmentor voltage was 130 V, the capillary voltage was 3.5 kV, and the MS/MS collision energy was 25 V.
The raw data were processed using the Profinder 10.0 software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), employing the ‘find-by-formula’ algorithm based on accurate monoisotopic mass (accuracy threshold: 5 ppm) and isotopic pattern (ratio and spacing). The compounds were annotated using the Metlin database Metabolite Link (metlin.scripps.edu). The extracted ion current for the compounds with a score above 70% and a mass accuracy below 5 ppm was used, and the corresponding peak area was exported. Post-acquisition data pre-processing (mass and retention time alignment and compound filtering) was conducted using Mass Profiler Professional 15.1 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Only those compounds identified within 75% of replications in at least one genotype were used as minimum identification criteria. Finally, this processed dataset was used for further statistical analysis.

2.8. Data Analysis

A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the unsupervised multivariate metabolomic data to describe the relationships among the variables and the groupings among samples [38]. Compound abundance was normalized at baseline against the median value of all samples. The discriminant metabolites were then subjected to fold change (FC) cut-off analysis, which was Log2 transformed in the Mass Profiler Professional 15.1.
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three to four independent biological replicates, statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA in IBM SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Quantitative Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Obvious leaf color variation between WT and the gl1 mutant is due to significant differences in protein expression and physiological processes [29,30]. In the gl1 mutant, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and phenylalanine metabolism are key biological processes that significantly differ from WT and are underexplored beyond photosynthesis [29]. Significantly down-regulated proteins in the gl1 mutant, including Dirigent-like, peroxidase (POD), 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT), caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT), and shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) (Supplementary Table S1), are directly involved in the pathway from phenylalanine to the monolignols in lignin biosynthesis [39]. Lignin is an integral cell wall constituent of all vascular plants and is a cross-linked phenolic polymer (C6-C3 units) derived from typical polymerization of the hydroxycinnamyl alcohol, p-coumaryl, coniferyl, and sinapyl alcohol [39]. Lignin content was therefore determined and a significant decrease in DW was observed in the gl1 mutant (181.63 ± 14.26 mg g−1) compared to WT (223.75 ± 3.28 mg g−1) (Figure 1A). Furthermore, phloroglucinol stain, which reacts with conifer aldehyde groups in lignin, demonstrated a significantly lower number of stained xylem cells in the vascular bundles at the base of the mutant petiole (Figure 2A,B). Lignin distribution around the cell wall in the mutant was also irregular and disorderly compared to the WT (Figure 2C,D). Toluidine blue staining revealed similar morphological changes (Figure 2E,F). The decreased lignin content and irregular xylem structure in the gl1 mutant suggest a lower phenolic polymer lignin level than in WT.
Unlike the phenolic polymer lignin content trend, the soluble phenolic compounds content of methanol extract was significantly higher in the gl1 mutant (83.33 ± 5.44 mg GAE g−1 DW) compared to WT (62.05 ± 1.25 mg GAE g−1 DW) (Figure 1B). These results are consistent with the fresh weight results in a previous study [30]. Soluble phenolic compounds, comprising a heterogeneous group of molecules, are typically classified into flavonoids and non-flavonoids, including phenolic acids and lignans [40]. Furthermore, flavonoid content was significantly lower in the mutant leaves (24.87 ± 4.19 mg RE g−1 DW) compared to WT (35.17 ± 4.45 mg RE g−1 DW) (Figure 1C). These results suggest that the increased soluble phenolic compounds were not flavonoids and the decreased metabolic flux from the lignin did not shift to flavonoid biosynthesis. The influence of yellow-leaf variation on the metabolites of the gl1 mutant may be linked to non-flavonoid phenolic compounds. The accumulating soluble phenolic compounds in the gl1 mutant may be pathway intermediates and derivatives, a response to changed system-wide metabolome observed in plants with disturbed lignin biosynthesis [41].
Soluble phenolic compound content at different developmental leaf stages was assayed using the same method to further confirm the differences in soluble phenolic compounds between the gl1 mutant and WT. The soluble phenolic compound content of immature and mature leaves was 67.98 ± 5.21 and 91.37 ± 1.21 mg GAE g−1 DW in the gl1 mutant, respectively. This was significantly higher than at the same leaf developmental stage in WT (52.39 ± 8.46 and 65.82 ± 6.11 mg GAE g−1 DW, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S1). Furthermore, the soluble phenolic compounds in the mature leaves were significantly higher than in the immature leaves in both mutant and WT plants, consistent with the accumulation of increased metabolites in the mature leaves. The content of phenolic compounds in this study was comparable with previously reported data in L. speciosa leaves using the same extraction method, which was 71.06 ± 2.01 mg GAE g−1 DW [42] and higher than in the hot water extract of 35.36 ± 2.17 mg GAE g−1 DW [43]. The phenolic compound content in L. speciosa exceeded that in Morus alba (7.11 ± 0.21 mg GAE g−1 DW) and Thunbergia laurifolia (4.24 ± 0.15 mg GAE g−1 DW) [43]. Compared to 26 natural spices and herbs with previously reported antioxidants [44], the phenolic compound content in this study was higher than 18 of them. Therefore, L. indica is a plant with high content of soluble phenolic compounds and can be used as a healthy plant product resource, particularly the yellow-leaf gl1 mutant.

3.2. Metabolite Profiling

Systematic metabolomic profiling of the gl1 mutant and WT leaves was carried out using an untargeted metabolomics approach to investigate the metabolite changes associated with yellow leaves in the gl1 mutant. Metabolic compounds were eluted via chromatography (Supplementary Figure S2) and identified by analyzing fragmentation patterns from mass spectra in negative ionization mode. A total of 815 major and minor compounds were identified by matching the mass-to-charge ratios and retention times of peaks in the mass spectrum. Each metabolite was presented by a different response factor at the electrospray ion source exhibiting a specific peak area. The relative quantification of each compound was evaluated by the normalized FC of the peak area present in the mutant and WT. In the mutant-to-WT comparison, 193 differential metabolites, including 84 up-regulated and 109 down-regulated (p < 0.05 and FC > 2 or FC < −2), were identified via multivariate statistical analyses, which were classified into 10 known classes (Supplementary Table S2). Principal components 1 and 2 accounted for 91.90% and 2.04% of the total variance, respectively, illustrating distinct segregation patterns between the gl1 mutant and WT (Figure 3A). Among them, 102 differential metabolites exhibited a greater absolute normalization FC value than 4, that is |log2 FC| > 2, accounting for 52.85% of differential metabolites, revealing that the metabolite content of the gl1 mutant was significantly different from those of WT (Figure 3B). Following the merging of the data from the four replicates of each group and considering the RSD of replicates, 56 differential metabolites were finally screened, including 21 phenolic compounds, 15 terpenes, 10 alkaloids (Table 1), and others. Furthermore, the most differential metabolites with |log2 FC| > 15 were largely distributed in the phenolic compounds from the point of the comparison of FC in the peak area (bold type lines in Table 1). Coumarinic acid-β-d-glucoside, apigenin 7-O-glucoside, and 1-O,6-O-digalloyl-β-d-glucose were detected in the samples of both groups, while myricomplanoside and rhein-8-O-β-d-(6′-oxalyl)-glucopyranoside were only detected in the WT group, and balanophonin-4-O-d-glu and volkensiflavone were detected in higher occurrence frequency in the gl1 mutant group (Table 1).The difference in metabolite species and content between gl1 and WT suggested that the leaf color variation of the gl1 mutant was correlated with the accumulation or production of some specific phenolic compounds.
In the gl1 mutant, compared to WT, three lignans—balanophonin-4-O-d-glu, angeloylgomisin R, and Gomisin B—were identified as differentially up-regulated metabolites. Balanophonin-4-O-d-glu specifically demonstrated the highest |log2 FC| value among the metabolites (Table 1). Balanophonin is a dihydrobenzo[b]furan skeleton neolignan [45] found in different tissues of plants, including the stems [46,47], leaves [48], Hazelnut shells [49], seeds ([50], fruits [51], and callus [52]. The differences in substances downstream of phenylpropane metabolism may be related to the gene or protein expression at key transition points in the pathway. The differentially down-regulated proteins (Dirigent-like, POD, 4CL, CAD, COMT, CCoAOMT, and HCT) in the gl1 mutant prevented the upstream precursors from forming lignin, resulting in the accumulation of low molecular weight phenolic compounds such as coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols. These alcohols likely form lignans through oxidative coupling, a process wherein lignin (a polymer) and lignan/neolignan (a dimer) are produced by the coupling of C6-C3 phenoxy radicals [53]. Furthermore, the biochemical pathway of lignans is closely related to, although a distinct form of, lignin biosynthesis [53]. Therefore, the phenylpropane metabolism of the gl1 mutant was hypothesized to be regulated with the decreased metabolic flux from the polymer of phenolic compounds to lignin shifted to the bimolecular oxidative coupling of phenolic compounds to lignans. The accumulation of balanophonin-4-O-D-glu in gl1 confirmed that the lignin flux reductions were associated with the increase in various classes of 4-O- phenylpropanoids [41]. Since the occurrence frequency in WT was only one in four replicates, this suggests that balanophonin-4-O-D-glu may be a phenolic compound specific to the gl1 mutant. The specific metabolites might be the products of the mutant to maintain a dynamic balance for plant growth and fitness by reallocating the metabolic flow between different branches of the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway and between different sub-branches of the same branch.

3.3. Antioxidant Capacity

Antioxidant capacity reflects the ability to scavenge free radicals in food and other biological systems [54]. Phenolic compounds are generally regarded as one of the most desired antioxidants since they are highly active in reducing agents, hydrogen donors, and singlet oxygen quenchers [55]. Consequently, various methods were adopted to assess the antioxidant properties from different perspectives. In the present study, the FRAP and the scavenging activity of DPPH, ABTS, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide radicals were used to assess the antioxidant capacity of gl1 and WT leaves. The results demonstrated that the gl1 mutant exhibited significantly higher FRAP, DPPH, and ABTS values than WT (Figure 4A,B). Contrary to previous reports where FRAP values were higher than DPPH and ABTS [56,57], in L. indica, FRAP values were consistently lower than those for ABTS and DPPH. These results suggest that the bioactive compounds in L. indica leaves remove free radicals more efficiently compared to reducing ferric ions since FRAP, as measuring reducing power cannot detect compounds that act via radical quenching [58]. The scavenging efficiencies of the extracts differed for hydroxyl and superoxide radicals. The mutant exhibited a significantly higher scavenging efficiency for hydroxyl radicals compared to WT, while no significant differences were observed for superoxide radicals at the same diluted concentration (Figure 4C,D). In a previous report, gl1 demonstrated an extremely low level of H2O2 but a notably higher O2•− production rate than WT [30].
To better evaluate the antioxidant properties of the gl1 mutant, statistical analyses were conducted to assess correlations between antioxidant capacity, soluble phenolic compounds, H2O2, and O2•−. FRAP, DPPH, ABTS, and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity were positively linked with the soluble phenolic compounds (0.878 to 0.931; p < 0.05) (Table 2). Furthermore, a strong negative correlation was identified between FRAP, DPPH, ABTS, hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, and H2O2 content (−0.931 to −0.996; p < 0.01). Interestingly, no correlation was detected between phenolic compounds and superoxide radical scavenging activity (Table 2). While a significant positive correlation was detected between FRAP, DPPH, ABTS, hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, and O2•− content (0.829 to 0.971; p < 0.05). In plants, phenolic compounds can donate electrons to guaiacol-POD to detoxify H2O2 produced under stress conditions [31,59]. A significant increase in guaiacol-POD activity in the gl1 mutant can effectively promote the detoxification of H2O2 by phenolic compounds, resulting in a substantial decrease in the H2O2 content in gl1 leaves [30]. This suggests that phenolic compounds may contribute to the L. indica’s antioxidant activity. Taken together, the metabolites of the gl1 mutant exhibited high antioxidant capacity, selectively scavenging hydroxyl radicals rather than superoxide radicals.

4. Conclusions

The gl1 mutant exhibited an irregular xylem structure, significantly lower lignin content, and the accumulation of phenylpropanoid pathway intermediates and derivatives. Untargeted metabolomics analysis revealed that soluble phenolic compounds were the most significantly differing metabolites between the gl1 mutant and WT. Lignans, identified as the most differentially up-regulated metabolites, were associated with altered phenylpropanoid metabolism in the gl1 mutant. The mutant exhibited increased scavenging activity in FRAP, ABTS, DPPH, and hydroxyl radicals compared to WT. Correlation analysis showed that antioxidant capacity was positively correlated with soluble phenolic compounds and negatively correlated with H2O2 content. This study is the first to specifically address the metabolites associated with leaf color variation in the yellow-leaf gl1 mutant L. indica, highlighting characteristic metabolites with the changes in phenylpropanoid metabolism, which lay a foundation for its putative applications in the food industry.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13020315/s1, Table S1: The phenylpropanoid metabolism proteins with significant differentially down-regulated expression in the mutant gl1 compared with WT; Table S2: The list of 193 differential metabolites, including 84 up-regulated and 109 down-regulated (p < 0.05 and FC > 2 or FC < −2); Figure S1: The contents of soluble phenolic compounds in the immature and mature mutant gl1 and WT leaves. The vertical bars are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. The different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level between the mutant gl1 and WT using one-way ANOVA analysis; Figure S2: The total ion chromatogram of metabolites extract in WT and the gl1 mutant.

Author Contributions

S.L.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Visualization, Funding acquisition. M.Y.: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Visualization. P.W.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—review and editing. L.G.: Methodology, Resources, Data Curation. F.L.: Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Resources. R.Y.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Y.L. (Ya Li): Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision. Q.W.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Supervision. L.L.: Methodology, Investigation, Resources. Y.L. (Yongdong Liu): Methodology, Investigation, Resources. S.W.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Forestry Science and Technology Promotion Demonstration Fund Project of Chinese Central Finance (Grant No. Su[2021]TG07), and Jiangsu Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences (JSPKLB202054).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Graham, S.A.; Crisci, J.V.; Hoch, P.C. Cladistic analysis of the Lythraceae sensu lato based on morphological characters. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1993, 113, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kolakul, P.; Sripanidkulchai, B. Phytochemicals and anti-aging potentials of the extracts from Lagerstroemia speciosa and Lagerstroemia floribunda. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 109, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Unno, T.; Sakane, I.; Masumizu, T.; Kohno, M.; Kakuda, T. Antioxidative activity of water extracts of Lagerstroemia speciosa leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1772–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Priya, T.T.; Sabu, M.C.; Jolly, C.I. Free radical scavenging and anti-inflammatory properties of Lagerstroemia speciosa (L). Inflammopharmacology 2008, 16, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Saumya, S.M.; Basha, P.M. Antioxidant effect of Lagerstroemia speciosa Pers (Banaba) leaf extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2011, 49, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Tiwary, B.K.; Dutta, S.; Dey, P.; Hossain, M.; Kumar, A.; Bihani, S.; Nanda, A.K.; Chaudhuri, T.K.; Chakraborty, R. Radical scavenging activities of Lagerstroemia speciosa (L.) Pers. petal extracts and its hepato-protection in CCl4-intoxicated mice. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, E.J.; Lee, J.S.; Song, B.B.; Yun, C.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, I.S. Anti-inflammatory effects of ethanolic extract from Lagerstroemia indica on airway inflammation in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 136, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kakuda, T.; Sakane, I.; Takihara, T.; Ozaki, Y.; Takeuchi, H.; Kuroyanagi, M. Hypoglycemic effect of extracts from Lagerstroemia speciosa L. leaves in genetic diabetic KK-AY mice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1996, 60, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, M.; Lee, S.U.; Yuk, H.J.; Jang, H.; Lee, J.; Kwon, E.; Paik, J.-H.; Choi, S.; Nizar, A.; Bach, T.T.; et al. Metabolomics approach to identify the active substances influencing the antidiabetic activity of Lagerstroemia species. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 64, 103684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stohs, S.J.; Miller, H.; Kaats, G.R. A review of the efficacy and safety of banaba (Lagerstroemia speciosa L.) and corosolic acid. Phytother. Res. 2012, 26, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, J.H.; Park, K.S.; Kwon, D.H.; Choi, H.J. Anti-human rhinovirus 2 activity and mode of action of quercetin-7-glucoside from Lagerstroemia speciosa. J. Med. Food 2013, 16, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dou, H.; Zhang, R.; Lou, X.; Jia, J.; Zhou, C.; Zhao, Y. Constituents of three species of Lagerstroemia. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2005, 33, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bai, N.; He, K.; Roller, M.; Zheng, B.; Chen, X.; Shao, Z.; Peng, T.; Zheng, Q. Active compounds from Lagerstroemia speciosa, insulin-like glucose uptake-stimulatory/inhibitory and adipocyte differentiation-inhibitory activities in 3T3-L1 cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 11668–11674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vinod, K.N.; Puttaswamy; Ninge Gowda, K.N.; Sudhakar, R. Isolation of natural colorants from Lagerstroemia indica: Kinetic and adsorption studies. Chin. J. Chem. 2010, 28, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, G.; Zhan, Q.; Li, J.; Chen, C.; Huang, D.; Chen, W.; Sun, L. Chemical constituents from leaves of Lagerstroemia speciosa L. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2013, 51, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Choi, J.; Cho, J.Y.; Choi, S.J.; Jeon, H.; Kim, Y.D.; Htwe, K.M.; Chin, Y.W.; Lee, W.S.; Kim, J.; Yoon, K.D. Two new phenolic glucosides from Lagerstroemia speciosa. Molecules 2015, 20, 4483–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Woo, K.W.; Suh, W.S.; Subedi, L.; Kim, S.Y.; Choi, S.U.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, K.R. Phenolic derivatives from the stems of Lagerstroemia indica and their biological activity. Heterocycles 2015, 91, 2355–2366. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, H.J.; Lee, I.S.; Youn, U.J.; Chen, Q.C.; Ngoc, T.M.; Ha, D.H.; Ha, D.T.; Liu, H.; Min, B.S.; Lee, J.Y.; et al. Biphenylquinolizidine alkaloids from Lagerstroemia indica. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, I.S.; Youn, U.J.; Kim, H.J.; Min, B.S.; Kim, J.S.; Bae, K.H. Biphenyl and biphenyl ether quinolizidine N-oxide alkaloids from Lagerstroemia indica L. Planta Medica 2011, 77, 2037–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Michalak, M. Plant-derived antioxidants: Significance in skin health and the ageing process. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roleira, F.M.; Tavares-da-Silva, E.J.; Varela, C.L.; Costa, S.C.; Silva, T.; Garrido, J.; Borges, F. Plant derived and dietary phenolic antioxidants: Anticancer properties. Food Chem. 2015, 183, 235–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dong, N.; Lin, H. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant-environment interactions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 180–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cheynier, V.; Comte, G.; Davies, K.M.; Lattanzio, V.; Martens, S. Plant phenolics: Recent advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 72, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lanot, A.; Hodge, D.; Lim, E.K.; Vaistij, F.E.; Bowles, D.J. Redirection of flux through the phenylpropanoid pathway by increased glucosylation of soluble intermediates. Planta 2008, 228, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Báidez, A.G.; Gómez, P.; Río, J.A.D.; Ortuño, A. Dysfunctionality of the xylem in Olea europaea L. plants associated with the infection process by Verticillium dahliae Kleb. Role of phenolic compounds in plant defense mechanism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 3373–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Z.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, L.; Yang, R.; Ma, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Q. Global transcriptome analysis and identification of the flowering regulatory genes expressed in leaves of Lagerstroemia indica. DNA Cell Biol. 2014, 33, 680–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yeom, M.; Ji, H.; Shin, J.; Cho, E.; Ryu, D.H.; Park, D.; Jung, E. The alleviating effect of Lagerstroemia indica flower extract on stretch marks through regulation of mast cells. Molecules 2022, 27, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, S.; Yang, R.; Wang, P.; Wang, Q.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Yin, Z.F. ‘Jinhuang’ yellow-leaf crape myrtle. Hortscience 2016, 51, 595–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, P.; Gao, L.; Yang, R.; Li, Y. Label-free comparative proteomic and physiological analysis provides insight into leaf color variation of the golden-yellow leaf mutant of Lagerstroemia indica. J. Proteom. 2020, 228, 103942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, S.; Wang, S.; Song, Z.; Wang, P.; Lv, F.; Yang, R.; Li, Y. The oxidative damage of the Lagerstroemia indica chlorosis mutant gl1 involves in ferroptosis. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 280, 153886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ge, X.; Jing, L.; Zhao, K.; Su, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Han, L.; Yu, X.; Li, W. The phenolic compounds profile, quantitative analysis and antioxidant activity of four naked barley grains with different color. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sumczynski, D.; Kotásková, E.; Družbíková, H.; Mlček, J. Determination of contents and antioxidant activity of free and bound phenolics compounds and in vitro digestibility of commercial black and red rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eloy, N.B.; Voorend, W.; Lan, W.; Saleme, M.L.S.; Cesarino, I.; Vanholme, R.; Smith, R.A.; Goeminne, G.; Pallidis, A.; Morreel, K.; et al. Silencing CHALCONE SYNTHASE in maize impedes the incorporation of tricin into lignin and increases lignin content. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 998–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shekhar, S.; Mishra, D.; Buragohain, A.K.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakraborty, N. Comparative analysis of phytochemicals and nutrient availability in two contrasting cultivars of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Food Chem. 2015, 173, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, L.; Teng, H.; Xie, Z.; Cao, H.; Cheang, W.S.; Skalicka-Woniak, K.; Georgiev, M.I.; Xiao, J. Modifications of dietary flavonoids towards improved bioactivity: An update on structure-activity relationship. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lever, J.; Krzywinski, M.; Altman, N. Principal component analysis. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 641–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vanholme, R.; Meester, B.D.; Ralph, J.; Boerjan, W. Lignin biosynthesis and its integration into metabolism. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Santos-Buelga, C.; González-Paramás, A.M. Anthocyanins. In Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry; Melton, L., Shahidi, F., Varelis, P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vanholme, R.; Storme, V.; Vanholme, B.; Sundin, L.; Christensen, J.H.; Goeminne, G.; Halpin, C.; Rohde, A.; Morreel, K.; Boerjan, W. A systems biology view of responses to lignin biosynthesis perturbations in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3506–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nasrin, F.; Ahmad, S.; Kamrunnahar. Evaluation of antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of methanolic extracts of Lagerstroemia speciosa leaves and barks. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 2, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chan, E.W.C.; Lye, P.Y.; Tan, L.N.; Eng, S.Y.; Tan, Y.P.; Wong, Z. Effects of drying method and particle size on the antioxidant properties of leaves and teas of Morus alba, Lagerstroemia speciosa and Thunbergia laurifolia. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 2012, 18, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Embuscado, M.E. Spices and herbs: Natural sources of antioxidants—A mini review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yuen, M.S.M.; Xue, F.; Mak, T.C.W.; Wong, H.N.C. On the absolute structure of optically active neolignans containing a dihydrobenzo[b]furan skeleton. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 12429–12444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Woo, K.W.; Cha, J.M.; Choi, S.U.; Lee, K.R. A new triterpene glycoside from the stems of Lagerstroemia indica. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2016, 39, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chang, F.; Chao, W.; Wang, S.; Huang, H.; Sung, P.; Chen, J.; Cheng, M.J.; Huang, G.J.; Kuo, Y.H. Three new iridoid derivatives have been isolated from the stems of Neonauclea reticulata (Havil.) Merr. with cytotoxic activity on hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, S.; Zhang, H.; Niu, X.; Yao, P.; Sun, H.; Fong, H.H.S. Chemical constituents from Amentotaxus yunnanensis and Torreya yunnanensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1002–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Esposito, T.; Sansone, F.; Franceschelli, S.; Gaudio, P.D.; Picerno, P.; Aquino, R.P.; Mencherini, T. Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) shells extract: Phenolic composition, antioxidant effect and cytotoxic activity on human cancer cell lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xie, Y.; Ma, G.; Wei, H.; Yuan, J.; Wu, H.; Zhou, X.; Yang, J.; Xu, X. Three new phenolics and other constituents from the seeds of Lithocarpus pachylepis. Molecules 2013, 18, 10397–10403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Boldizsára, I.; Krasznib, M.; Tóthc, F.; Tóthb, G.; Sólyomvárya, A.; Noszálb, B.; Záray, G.; Molnár-Perl, I. The role of harmonized, gas and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in the discovery of the neolignan balanophonin in the fruit wall of Cirsium vulgare. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1264, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stojakowska, A.; Malarz, J. Bioactive phenolics from in vitro cultures of Lactuca aculeata Boiss. et Kotschy. Phytochem. Lett. 2017, 19, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Davin, L.B.; Jourde, M.; Patten, A.M.; Kim, K.W.; Lewis, N.G. Dissection of lignin macromolecular configuration and assembly: Comparison to related biochemical processes in allyl/propenyl phenol and lignan biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 1015–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pilerood, S.A.; Prakash, J. Evaluation of nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of Borage (Echium amoenum) and Valerian (Valerian officinalis). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Du, G.; Li, M.; Ma, F.; Liang, D. Antioxidant capacity and the relationship with polyphenol and Vitamin C in Actinidia fruits. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, Y.; Qi, Y.; Chen, X.; He, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, Y.; Ren, X. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in red- and in green-fleshed kiwifruits. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, B.; Wang, Z.; Yin, P.; Ma, B.; Ma, C.; Xu, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Yin, D.; Xia, T. Impact of prolonged withering on phenolic compounds and antioxidant capability in white tea using LC-MS-based metabolomics and HPLC analysis: Comparison with green tea. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Prior, R.L.; Xu, X.; Schaich, K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4290–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sakihama, Y.; Cohen, M.F.; Grace, S.C.; Yamasaki, H. Plant phenolic antioxidant and prooxidant activities: Phenolics-induced oxidative damage mediated by metals in plants. Toxicology 2002, 177, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 13 00315 g001
Figure 1. Lignin (A), soluble phenolic compounds (B), and flavonoid content (C) in gl1 mutant and WT leaves. The vertical bars are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. The asterisks * and ** indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively, between WT and gl1 mutant.
Figure 1. Lignin (A), soluble phenolic compounds (B), and flavonoid content (C) in gl1 mutant and WT leaves. The vertical bars are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. The asterisks * and ** indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively, between WT and gl1 mutant.
Plants 13 00315 g001
Plants 13 00315 g002
Figure 2. Transverse sections of vascular bundles at the base of the leaf petiole in WT (A,C,E) and gl1 mutant (B,D,F). Microphotographs of phloroglucinol-HCl staining under 10× objective (A,B) and 20× objective (C,D); Microphotographs of toluidine blue staining under 10× objective (E,F).
Figure 2. Transverse sections of vascular bundles at the base of the leaf petiole in WT (A,C,E) and gl1 mutant (B,D,F). Microphotographs of phloroglucinol-HCl staining under 10× objective (A,B) and 20× objective (C,D); Microphotographs of toluidine blue staining under 10× objective (E,F).
Plants 13 00315 g002
Plants 13 00315 g003
Figure 3. Metabolome analyses of gl1 mutant and WT leaves. (A): PCA plot showing a significant separation of samples from the mutant and WT; (B): Number of differential metabolites based on normalization FC value, and the percentage above the vertical bars is its proportion of the total.
Figure 3. Metabolome analyses of gl1 mutant and WT leaves. (A): PCA plot showing a significant separation of samples from the mutant and WT; (B): Number of differential metabolites based on normalization FC value, and the percentage above the vertical bars is its proportion of the total.
Plants 13 00315 g003
Plants 13 00315 g004
Figure 4. The antioxidant capacity of gl1 and WT at different concentrations. (A) Ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay; (B) DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity; (C) hydroxyl radical scavenging activity; (D) superoxide radical scavenging activity; The vertical bars are presented as mean ± SD, n = 4. Different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 between the gl1 mutant and WT.
Figure 4. The antioxidant capacity of gl1 and WT at different concentrations. (A) Ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay; (B) DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity; (C) hydroxyl radical scavenging activity; (D) superoxide radical scavenging activity; The vertical bars are presented as mean ± SD, n = 4. Different letters represent significant differences at p < 0.05 between the gl1 mutant and WT.
Plants 13 00315 g004
Table 1. The differential metabolites identified between yellow-leaf gl1 mutant and WT via the normalized fold change (FC) of peak area and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the four replicates.
Table 1. The differential metabolites identified between yellow-leaf gl1 mutant and WT via the normalized fold change (FC) of peak area and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the four replicates.
Class/SubclassCompoundFormulaRT (min)OF in gl1OF in WTRSD of gl1RSD of WTLog2 FCAccumulation
phenolic compounds
   lignans/neolignans
Balanophonin-4-O-d-gluC26H30O111.10412.782.7918.99up
Angeloylgomisin rC27H30O839.41441.153.7313.96up
Gomisin BC27H30O937.06445.103.9013.54up
   phenolic acids
1-O,6-O-Digalloyl-β-d-glucoseC20H20O1421.21421.373.0117.33up
(1R,2S,4S,5R,7R,9S,10R)-1-Benzoyloxy-2,15-diacetoxy-4-hydroxy-9-cinnamoyloxy-dihydroagarofuranC35H40O1014.17445.023.6414.75up
Mesuanic acidC35H48O636.55421.493.8613.49up
Albaspidin abC23H28O839.94443.393.7214.26up
Coumarinic acid-β-d-glucosideC15H18O86.70441.401.75−15.39down
AcrovestoneC32H42O839.47441.544.05−14.32down
2′-Hydroxybiphenyl-2-sulfinateC12H10O3S1.50041.673.85−13.14down
   flavonoids
VolkensiflavoneC30H20O1032.81415.203.2516.61up
DihydroisomorellinC33H38O714.67444.973.8913.65up
Anticancer flavonoid pmv70p691-114C19H18O735.37448.833.7614.72up
Hispaglabridin AC25H30O438.59442.393.6414.38up
MyricomplanosideC22H22O1313.60041.375.48−16.16down
Apigenin 7-O-glucosideC21H20O1015.98441.465.42−15.21down
Spinoside AC39H56O1237.14341.493.74−14.61down
Kuwanone GC40H36O1135.47441.649.75−13.60down
Gerronemin FC28H38O435.89441.579.24−14.16down
   anthraquinone
Rhein-8-O-β-d-(6′-oxalyl)-glucopyranosideC23H18O141.15041.301.39−16.57down
MorellinC33H36O741.44341.596.08−13.83down
terpenoid
Gibberellin A37C20H28O639.95444.053.7713.99up
YunnanxolC40H46O1439.51442.863.3315.88up
Taxuspine QC33H46O1339.51442.043.5014.95up
IsonuezhenideC31H42O1739.51440.843.5114.81up
Austroside aC19H30O938.23432.303.5814.70up
Cathidin DC32H37NO1137.22402.083.6114.52up
Alatenoside (C-7a-OH epimer)C34H50O2139.69444.893.6914.44up
Dehydroiridodialo-D-gentiobiosideC22H34O1236.86441.677.56−13.45down
trans-p-HydroxycinnamoylrutaevinC35H36O1137.30441.667.05−13.27down
AcevaltratumC24H32O1016.73441.654.46−13.18down
PaederosideC18H22O10S35.06441.766.66−12.44down
AilanthoneC20H24O714.22441.515.48−14.56down
10-(Z)-p-Coumaroyl-6,7-dihydromonotropeinC25H30O1330.65441.523.63−14.32down
6-O-(4′′-O-l-rhamnopy-ranosylvanilloyl)ajugolC29H40O1637.30441.524.21−14.32down
Jatamanvaltrate EC28H44O1237.43441.552.91−13.96down
alkaloid
LeptopineC20H18NO638.25443.123.7214.16up
SeneciphyllineC18H23NO535.96443.893.6014.73up
VoacamineC43H52N4O537.45141.534.56−14.18down
Methoxy-5-acetoxy-6-methyl-3-[(Z)-10′-pentadecenyl]-1,4-benzoquinoneC25H38O538.99041.495.75−14.90down
CorydamineC20H18N2O421.56441.546.23−14.48down
AquiledineC20H20N2O514.72441.625.68−13.63down
GelsamydineC29H36N2O639.65441.634.66−13.58down
Isobetanidin-6-O-rhamnosyl sophorosideC30H36N2O1739.48441.647.10−13.54down
ProtoverineC27H43NO935.77441.637.20−13.53down
N-MethylplatydesminC16H20NO312.83441.778.72−12.91down
RT: retention time; OF: occurrence frequency; FC: fold change, the normalized peak area ratio of gl1 mutant/WT groups. The compounds with |log2 FC| > 15 are shown in bold type.
Table 2. Pearson’s correlation of antioxidant capacity and contents of phenolic compounds, H2O2, and O2•− in the mutant and WT.
Table 2. Pearson’s correlation of antioxidant capacity and contents of phenolic compounds, H2O2, and O2•− in the mutant and WT.
Phenolic CompoundsH2O2O2•−
FRAP0.913 *−0.931 **0.829 *
ABTS0.878 *−0.961 **0.971 **
DPPH0.921 **−0.975 **0.937 **
Hydroxyl radical0.931 **−0.996 **0.957 **
Superoxide radical0.487−0.5690.569
* and ** denote significant correlation at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Yin, M.; Wang, P.; Gao, L.; Lv, F.; Yang, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.; et al. Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity Comparison of Wild-Type and Yellow-Leaf gl1 Mutant of Lagerstroemia indica. Plants 2024, 13, 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020315

AMA Style

Li S, Yin M, Wang P, Gao L, Lv F, Yang R, Li Y, Wang Q, Li L, Liu Y, et al. Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity Comparison of Wild-Type and Yellow-Leaf gl1 Mutant of Lagerstroemia indica. Plants. 2024; 13(2):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Sumei, Min Yin, Peng Wang, Lulu Gao, Fenni Lv, Rutong Yang, Ya Li, Qing Wang, Linfang Li, Yongdong Liu, and et al. 2024. "Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity Comparison of Wild-Type and Yellow-Leaf gl1 Mutant of Lagerstroemia indica" Plants 13, no. 2: 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop