Next Article in Journal
The Rootstock Genotypes Determine Drought Tolerance by Regulating Aquaporin Expression at the Transcript Level and Phytohormone Balance
Previous Article in Journal
Intercropping of Cyphomandra betacea with Different Ploidies of Solanum Sect. Solanum (Solanaceae) Wild Vegetables Increase Their Selenium Uptakes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Climate Change on the Potentially Suitable Distribution Pattern of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. in China

1
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Guangzhou Institute of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Guangzhou 510405, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(4), 717; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040717
Submission received: 11 January 2023 / Revised: 31 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 6 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Ecology)

Abstract

:
Climate warming poses a great threat to ecosystems worldwide, which significantly affects the geographical distribution and suitable growth area of species. Taking Castanopsis hystrix Miq. as the research object, the potentially suitable cultivation regions under present and future climatic emission scenarios in China were predicted based on the MaxEnt model with 360 effective individual distributions and eight environmental variables. The min temperature of coldest month (bio6), precipitation of driest month (bio14), and precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18) are three leading factors affecting the geographical distribution area of C. hystrix Miq. The suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq. range from 18°–34° N, 89°–122° E in central and southern China and cover an area of 261.95 × 104 km2. The spatial pattern of C. hystrix Miq. will migrate to the southern region of low latitudes with a decreasing suitable area when in ssp1-2.6, and to the southwestern region of low latitudes or expand to the northeast region at high latitudes in ssp5-8.5, with an increasing suitable area; no significant change on the spatial pattern in ssp2-2.4. For ssp1-2.6 or ssp2-4.5 climate scenarios, the southern region of high latitudes will be appropriate for introducing and cultivating C. hystrix Miq., and the cultivation area will increase. For ssp5-8.5, its cultivation will increase and expand to the northeast of high-latitude areas slightly.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In its fifth assessment report, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated that global warming has become a significant problem [1,2]. The most recent sixth assessment report on climate change in 2021 shows that climate change will continue for a short period, and it is anticipated that the global average surface temperature will rise by 1.5 °C in the next 20 years [3]. Dramatic changes in climate and the environment pose a great threat to the ecosystems of all regions of the world. At the macroscale, the geographical and spatial distribution of species is closely related to changes in climatic conditions and the natural environment [2,4,5,6,7]. Research shows that under climate change, especially with an increase in temperature and changes in precipitation, some plants would adapt by changing their own characteristics, resulting in changes in species composition, spatial distribution, and migration laws, leading to further damage to physiological characteristics and ecosystem functions [4,8,9,10]. Data have shown that because of a rise in temperature, the distribution of many tree species tends to migrate and expand to high altitudes or even polar regions [2,11,12,13,14,15]. Additionally, climate change may lead to the migration of some tree species to low altitudes [16]. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the potentially suitable cultivation regions for different species under climate change to conserve resources and stabilize ecosystems.
With the development of statistical modeling and geographic information systems (GIS), species distribution models (SDMs) have been widely used to evaluate the correlation between species sample information and environmental characteristics, including genetic algorithms for rule set prediction (GARP), ecological niche factor analysis (ENFA), maximum entropy models (MaxEnt), domain models (DOMAIN), and climate change experiments (CLIMEX), among other models. The MaxEnt model was first proposed by Phillips et al. [17]. It is a species geographic-scale spatial distribution model based on the principle of maximum entropy [18]. The theory of maximum entropy states that under known conditions, objects are closest to their true state when entropy is at a maximum [19]. The operational principle of the MaxEnt model is that the optimal estimation of the unknown distribution based on the known sample information should meet the known restrictions on the unknown distribution and make the distribution have the maximum entropy, to predict the habitat suitability distribution and climate suitability of the target species in the study area and present it in the form of a graph [19]. According to research, the MaxEnt model has a more stable operation, faster operation speed, and higher prediction accuracy than other models, and can also obtain better prediction results when there is a lack of species distribution points [17,20,21,22]. At present, many scholars have used the advantages of MaxEnt model to carry out a lot of research. Huang et al. [8] used the MaxEnt model to predict the potential area distribution of Toona ciliata var. pubescens and pointed out that the global potential area distribution pattern of Toona ciliata var. pubescens was continuous on the whole, but patchy in the high distribution area. Wang et al. [19] studied the climatic ecological suitability and potential distribution of Tricholoma matsutake on the Western Sichuan Plateau using the MaxEnt model and reported that the suitable areas of T. matsutake on the Western Sichuan Plateau were distributed in the southwest, south, middle, and east of the plateau at an altitude of 1900–3600 m. Sharma et al. [23] used a MaxEnt model to study the suitable habitat of Perilla frutescens in Uttarakhand and reported that the areas highly suitable for P. frutescens cultivation are the Dehradun, Tehri Garhwal, Uttarkashi, Rudraprayag, and Nainital districts of Uttarakhand, India.
C. hystrix Miq. is an excellent local timber tree, which has the characteristics of fast growth, good wood quality, and strong adaptability [24,25]. It is mainly distributed in eastern Fujian, southwestern Hunan, Guangdong, Hainan, Guangxi, Guizhou, and other areas in China [25]. As a national class II protected rare broad-leaved tree species with rapid growth in tropical and subtropical areas of China, it is often used as a mixed afforestation tree species in ecological public welfare forests to fully maximize its ecological benefits. Scholars and experts have conducted many studies on carbon storage, carbon sequestration characteristics, and distribution, which have confirmed that C. hystrix Miq. has good carbon sequestration capacity [19,26,27]. Climate change is closely related to the carbon cycle. The construction of pure and mixed forests of C. hystrix Miq. will help stabilize and even reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and slow the process of climate warming.
Nonetheless, in recent years, with global climate change, the distribution of C. hystrix Miq. has been gradually reduced and fragmented; coupled with unscientific cultivation management, unreasonable development and utilization, the survival and development of C. hystrix Miq. populations are highly threatened. Planting C. hystrix Miq. in China in the 1960s mainly focused on mixed experimental plantations [8], cultivation techniques [25], ecological benefits [8], and growth law [28], among others. There are few reports predicting the habitat suitability based on the SDM. Therefore, the potentially suitable cultivation regions for C. hystrix Miq. were simulated using the MaxEnt model and ArcGIS software under the present climatic conditions and three different emission scenarios for the years 2040 and 2060. We attempted to determine: (1) how climate and geographic factors affect the potentially suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq. and the dominant factors restricting its distribution; (2) division of potentially suitable cultivation regions for C. hystrix Miq. for the different suitability values; and (3) potentially suitable cultivation regions for C. hystrix Miq. in response to climate change during different periods. The solution to these problems can not only help us understand the biogeography of C. hystrix Miq. and implement conservation strategies to minimize the impacts of climate change but also provide a theoretical basis for effectively exerting the ecological functions of C. hystrix Miq. plantations, such as by regulating climate and enhancing carbon sequestration. These steps help to provide a scientific basis for the follow-up C. hystrix Miq germplasm resource protection, promotion and planting, forest transformation, ecological restoration and other issues.

2. Results

2.1. Model Prediction Accuracy Evaluation

Figure 1 shows the ROC curve evaluation results of the MaxEnt model after repeated operation ten times under the present climatic conditions, and the AUC value is the average value of the ten runs. The average AUC value and average standard deviation of the training set were 0.909 and 0.004, respectively, indicating that the MaxEnt model has an excellent simulation effect on the potentially suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq., and the result is highly reliable.

2.2. Importance Assessment of Environmental Variables

The results of the percent contribution and permutation importance evaluation method, which assesses the relative importance of the eight environmental variables in predicting the potential distribution of C. hystrix Miq. under the current climatic conditions, are listed in Table 1. Precipitation of driest month (bio14) and min temperature of coldest month (bio6) contributed 55.4% and 31.9% to the simulation of C. hystrix Miq. distribution, respectively, which were much higher than those of the other six environmental variables. The permutation importance of the min temperature of coldest month (bio6) and precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18) were 61.9% and 16.5%, respectively, ranking as the top two variables, reflecting the fact that precipitation of driest month (bio14), min temperature of coldest month (bio6), and precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18) are the key factors affecting the distribution of C. hystrix Miq.; the min temperature of coldest month (bio6) is dominant among the environmental factors.
Figure 2 shows the evaluation results of the jackknife method. It can be seen that when there is only precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18) variables, the AUC value is the highest (0.8772) among the variables, followed by the min temperature of coldest month (bio6) and precipitation of driest month (bio14), indicating that precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18), min temperature of coldest month (bio6), and precipitation of driest month (bio14) play an important role in the distribution of C. hystrix Miq.
Overall, the order of importance of environmental variables varied in different evaluation methods. However, Table 1 and Figure 2 show that the min temperature of coldest month (bio6), precipitation of driest month (bio14), and precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18) were the three leading factors affecting the potentially suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq.

2.3. Potentially Suitable Castanopsis hystrix Miq. Cultivation Regions under Present Climatic Conditions

Figure 3 shows potentially suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq. under the present climate conditions predicted by the model. These modeling results were consistent with the actual pattern, and the horizontal distribution range is 18°–34° N, 89°–122° E. The natural discontinuity classification method was used to classify the distribution regions of C. hystrix Miq. according to suitability into four grades: high-suitability regions (0.47–0.86), medium-suitability regions (0.29–0.47), low-suitability regions (0.10–0.29), and unsuitable regions (0–0.10). The total suitability area is approximately 261.95 × 104 km2 (Table 2), accounting for about 27.29% of the Chinese land area, mainly distributed in Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, and Yunnan in the south of China; Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou in central, south, and southwest China; and Anhui, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Fujian, and Jiangsu in east China. Additionally, Tibet, Gansu, Henan, and Shaanxi also have small potentially suitable cultivation regions.
The high-suitability area of C. hystrix Miq. in China is 101.78 × 104 km2 (Table 2), accounting for 38.86% of the total suitability distribution area and 10.60% of the total Chinese land area. The areas were mainly distributed in ten provinces and one autonomous region in China, including Yunnan, Guangdong, Fujian, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Chongqing, Hainan, and Guangxi. The medium-suitability area is 102.10 × 104 km2 (Table 2), accounting for 39.32% of the total suitability distribution area and 10.64% of the total Chinese land area. The medium distribution regions are closely linked to the high-suitability regions of C. hystrix Miq. and are surrounded by high-suitability regions. The low-suitability area is 57.17 × 104 km2 (Table 2), accounting for 21.82% of the total suitability distribution area and 5.95% of the total Chinese land area. The areas were distributed in strips and were located at the outermost edge of the total suitability distribution regions of C. hystrix Miq., mainly Yunnan, Sichuan, Gansu, Shanxi, Hubei, Henan, Anhui, Jangsu Province, and the Tibet Autonomous Region. The results revealed that the potentially suitable distribution regions for C. hystrix Miq. were relatively concentrated, mainly distributed in central and southern China, and more than half of the suitable regions were moderately and highly suitable cultivation regions.

2.4. Spatial Distribution Pattern Change of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. under Future Climate Scenarios

MaxEnt model simulations of the potential suitability distributions of C. hystrix Miq. in the 2040s and 2060s varied slightly, depending on the climate scenario. Compared with the prediction results under the present climatic conditions, most of the distribution regions of C. hystrix Miq. were retained. However, climate change could affect the spatial pattern and area of suitable cultivation regions (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Through a comparative analysis of the future with the present suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq., it was found that under the ssp1-2.6 scenarios, the potential suitability distribution ranges of C. hystrix Miq. in western China tend to migrate to low latitudes, while the C. hystrix Miq. in eastern China tend to migrate to low latitudes and expand to Taiwan (Figure 5). Under the ssp2-2.4 scenarios, except for the added potentially suitable cultivation region in Taiwan, other migration changes were not obvious (Figure 5). For the ssp5-8.5 scenarios, the potential suitability distribution ranges of C. hystrix Miq. in the west continued to shrink to low latitudes, while C. hystrix Miq. in eastern China expanded to high latitudes (Henan, Shandong, Liaoning, Jilin) and Taiwan (Figure 5). The high-suitability regions of C. hystrix Miq. have a tendency to migrate to high latitudes (Figure 3 and Figure 4). There was no obvious migration change in the northern margin of medium-suitability regions, while the southern margin appeared to migrate to high latitudes (Figure 3 and Figure 4). A small number of low-suitability regions occurred in low latitudes of southern China, distributed in Hainan, Guangdong, Guangxi (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
With climate change, the potentially suitable cultivation area for C. hystrix Miq. showed a change compared to the present distribution area. Under the ssp1-2.6 scenario, the total potentially suitable cultivation area of C. hystrix Miq. decreased by 4.82% and 3.66% in the 2040s and 2060s, respectively (Table 2). The area with high suitability decreased considerably, whereas the area with low suitability increased slightly. The area of medium suitability decreased by 4.72% in the 2040s and increased by 2.85% in the 2060s (Table 2). For the ssp2-4.5, the total potentially suitable cultivation area of C. hystrix Miq. did not significantly change. It will increase by 0.48% in the 2040s and decrease by 0.71% in the 2060s. However, the area of medium suitability decreased significantly, whereas that of low suitability increased slightly. The area of high suitability increased by 0.74% in the 2040s and decreased by 9.30% in the 2060s (Table 2). In the ssp5-8.5 scenario, the total distribution area of C. hystrix Miq. increased by 1.78% and 10.18% in the 2040s and the 2060s, respectively. The area of medium suitability decreased, while the area of low suitability increased in the next two periods (the 2040s and 2060s). The highly suitable area decreased by 3.86% in the 2040s and increased by 5.62% in the 2060s (Table 2). In general, with climate change, a potentially suitable cultivation area for C. hystrix Miq. is the largest under the ssp5-8.5 scenario, 266.61 × 104 km2 and 288.61 × 104 km2, respectively, in the 2040s and 2060s, followed by ssp2-4.5 and ssp1-2.6.

3. Discussion

3.1. Reliability of Model Simulation Results

The species distribution data collected in this study were combined with the long-term field survey data of the project team, research literature on CNKI, and various plant digital archive platforms. Information on C. hystrix Miq. distribution was comprehensive and accurate, and the sample size was large, so the MaxEnt model was particularly accurate in predicting and estimating the potentially suitable distribution. In this study, eight variables with a large contribution rate were reserved through pre-modeling, which avoided over-fitting of the model due to the high correlation among variables. The AUC value is recognized as the best measure of the model prediction accuracy [19]. The AUC value simulated by the model was in the range of [0.9, 1] in this study; therefore, the model had high precision and an excellent prediction effect. Under the present climatic conditions, the potentially suitable cultivation regions for C. hystrix Miq. in China basically covers the present geographical distribution, which fully shows that the MaxEnt model is highly reliable in predicting the potential distribution of C. hystrix Miq. under future climatic conditions.

3.2. Main Environmental Variables Affecting the Species Distribution of Castanopsis hystrix Miq.

The distribution characteristics of plant populations are the comprehensive result of biological and abiotic factors, as well as the final embodiment of plant responses to the environment [19]. Climate is an important factor that affects species distribution [29]. The response of species distribution to climate is derived from their own physiological characteristics. Our study identified that the min temperature of coldest month (bio6), precipitation of driest month (bio14), and precipitation of warmest quarter (bio18) were the main bioclimatic variables affecting the species distribution of C. hystrix Miq. Among the three bioclimatic variables, two were related to precipitation, and one was related to temperature. This is consistent with the physiological characteristics of C. hystrix Miq, which is more suited to regions with warmth and humidity and is not resistant to drought [30]. Temperature is one of the most important factors that affect plant growth, development, reproduction, morphology, quantity, and distribution. It restricts the growth and development of plants and all physiological and biochemical changes in the body. Precipitation is also affected by temperature and can decrease with climate change, thereby enhancing drought stress and reducing soil moisture. Thus, drought and temperature instability could affect the distribution of C. hystrix Miq., inducing shifts, reductions, and expansion of distribution ranges and eventually changing the suitability distribution pattern. The main three bioclimatic variables (bio6, bio14, and bio18) emphasize “the coldest”, “the driest”, and “the hottest”, respectively, which reflect the temperature and rainfall level under extreme conditions; this result emphasized that the extreme climate in different regions significantly affects the survival and distribution of C. hystrix Miq. In addition, the distribution of species is inevitably affected by other abiotic factors, such as light, air, and soil, as well as biological factors, such as human factors and the influence between species [31]. The environmental variables selected in this study could not fully represent the geographical distribution factors affecting C. hystrix Miq. Therefore, all types of biological and non-biological factors can be considered in the model in future research, which also shows an important direction for future model development [32].

3.3. Potentially Suitable Cultivation Regions of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. under Present Climatic Conditions

The results of this study showed that the potentially suitable distribution regions of C. hystrix Miq. are relatively concentrated and mainly distributed in central and southern China, and the horizontal distribution range is 18°–39° N, 91°–122° E. The central and southern regions of China have a tropical monsoon climate and subtropical monsoon climate. The tropical monsoon climate is hot all year round, annual average temperature is above 22 °C, coldest month is basically above 18 °C, dry and rainy season is obvious, precipitation is concentrated in the rainy season; the precipitation is large, monsoon is significant, and the tropical cyclone is prevalent. The summer subtropical monsoon climate has high temperatures and is rainy, winter is mild and less rainy and rich in thermal resources. It can be seen that the results predicted by MaxEnt model were consistent with the habitat suitability of C. hystrix Miq. to climate and geographical environments. The total suitability area of C. hystrix Miq. accounted for about 27.29% of the Chinese land area; the high-suitability area accounted for 38.86% of the total suitability distribution area, and the medium suitability area accounted for 39.32% of the total suitability distribution area. These results revealed that the potentially suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq. are relatively concentrated in China and that they have certain limitations.

3.4. Spatial Distribution Pattern of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. under Climate Change

This study adopted a new scenario framework composed of shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) and representative concentration pathways (RCPs) proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), combined with the actual social and economic situation of China, to study the effects of three climate scenarios (ssp1-2.6, ssp2-4.5, and ssp5-8.5) on the potentially suitable distribution and spatial pattern migration of C. hystrix Miq. As an important part of the new generation of climate change scenarios, SSPs describe different tracks of future socioeconomic system development and reflect the relationship between the development model of the socioeconomic system and climate change risk [33,34]. Compared with the previous single climate scenario model, the current new scenario framework considers the future population, economy, technology, and policy, compensates for the uncertainty of socio-economic activities in previous climate scenario studies, and provides a more diversified emission scenario of air pollutants for a more accurate prediction of the changes in the natural environment and species distribution caused by future climate change [35].
Through the research results under future climatic conditions, we found that most of the potentially suitable cultivation regions for C. hystrix Miq. still remain and are still highly concentrated in the central and southern regions of China, indicating that C. hystrix Miq. has certain adaptability to climate change. However, climate change inevitably affects species suitability. Different climate scenarios in different periods, migration directions, and area of C. hystrix Miq. suitable regions were different. Under the climate scenarios of ssp1-2.6, the range of suitable regions for C. hystrix Miq. shows the trend of migration to low latitudes. This may be because under the social and economic path of sustainable development (SSP1), the global CO2 emissions have dropped significantly, the global warming process is slowing down, and temperatures and precipitation in some areas have changed significantly due to the strengthening and advancing monsoon and airflow, resulting in the climate environment no longer being suitable for the survival of C. hystrix Miq. [1,36,37]. Under climate warming scenarios, summer precipitation in central and western China would decrease significantly [38], which is also probably the reason for the suitable regions for C. hystrix Miq. migrating to the south. Under the ssp2-4.5 climate scenario, the spatial pattern of cultivation regions change was not significant, possibly because the intermediate development path (SSP2) is where socio-economic factors follow their historical trend and CO2 emissions hover around current levels before the middle of the century [39]. Under the ssp5-8.5 climate scenario, C. hystrix Miq. tends to expand to the northeast region at high latitudes. SSP5 refers to the rapid growth of the global economy driven by the exploitation of fossil fuels and energy-intensive lifestyles; by 2050, the level of CO2 emissions will roughly double compared with the current level [36,37,38,39]. In this climate scenario, the potentially suitable distribution regions for C. hystrix Miq. expand to high latitudes. With the increase in greenhouse gas emissions and average annual temperature, the increase of suitable distribution range in northern China is greater than that in southern China [39]. Thus, the newly added potentially suitable distribution regions were distributed in Henan, Shandong, Liaoning, and Jilin provinces. Numerous studies have also confirmed the migration of many other species to high latitudes in response to climate change [40,41,42]. In addition, climate warming would lead to an increase in precipitation intensity in the middle and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere and in the number of drought days in the middle and low latitudes [4], which is another reason for C. hystrix Miq. distribution regions migrating from low latitudes (Sichuan and Gansu) to high latitudes (Liaoning and Jilin). This migration is consistent with the growth habit of C. hystrix Miq., which includes preference for warmth and humidity.
The migration and expansion of the potentially suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq further led to changes in the distribution area. By 2040 and 2060, compared with other climatic conditions, the distribution area of C. hystrix Miq. under the ssp5-8.5 climate scenario were the largest, 266.61 × 104 km2 and 288.61 × 104 km2, respectively, followed by ssp2-4.5 and ssp1-2.6, which reflects the fact that climate change under the socio-economic path of high greenhouse gas emissions gives C. hystrix Miq. a wider range of suitable areas. According to the statistical results, the areas of medium and high-suitability regions have reduction phenomena under different climatic conditions, which indicates that climate warming still has a certain negative impact on the cultivation area of C. hystrix Miq. This may be because climate warming in recent years has led to frequent extreme high-temperature weather in various regions across the country, resulting in high temperature, low rainfall, increased arid areas, and poor growth quality of C. hystrix Miq; thus, the distribution of C. hystrix Miq. in medium and high-suitability areas was further affected [4,43].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Species Distribution Data

Distribution data for C. hystrix Miq. were obtained from data platforms such as the Teaching Specimen Resource Sharing Platform (http://mnh.scu.edu.cn, accessed on 5 July 2022), Flora of China (www.iplant.cn/frps, accessed on 15 July 2022), the Global Biodiversity Information Network (http://www.gbif.org, accessed on 5 July 2022), the National Specimen Resource Sharing Platform (http://www.nsii.org.cn, accessed on 15 July 2022), the China Digital Herbarium (http://www.cvh.ac.cn, accessed on 15 July 2022), and field-investigation-related materials. In total, 1063 records of the distribution points were collected in China. The geographical coordinates of the distribution data were determined using the GAODE picker (https://lbs.amap.com/console/show/picker, accessed on 15 July 2022), and repeated records and uncertain distribution information were removed through Excel screening. Finally, 360 pieces of effective distribution data for C. hystrix Miq. were obtained from China (Figure 6). ArcGIS and Excel were used to process the data and the data were saved in (.csv) format. The converted file was used as the input to MaxEnt.

4.2. Environmental Data

A total of 22 initial environmental variables were used in this study, including 19 bioclimatic variables and the geographical variables (Table 3). The present climate data were retrieved by interpolating with anusplin4.36 software after being statistically sorted by the China Meteorological Data Network (http://data.cma.cn/, accessed on 26 July 2022) China monthly climate data set (1971–2021).
The IPCC had proposed a new scenario framework composed of socio-economic scenarios and climate scenarios in 2010 [35,36]. Among them, socio-economic scenarios are represented by Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (including the SSP1-sustainable path, SSP2-intermediate, SSP3-regional competition path, SSP4-unbalanced path, SSP5-fossil fuel-based development path). Climate scenarios are represented by Representative Concentration Pathways (including RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP8.5). SSP1-2.6, for example, indicates that under the sustainable shared socio-economic path, some climate mitigation/adaptation policies are implemented to achieve the 2.6 radiative forcing target. In this study, ssp1-2.6, ssp2-4.5, and ssp5-8.5 emission scenarios were chosen as future climate data, which were retrieved from the WorldClim Database (https://worldclim.org, accessed on 26 July 2022). Three geographical variables were retrieved from the Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.scloud.cn, accessed on 26 July 2022). Twenty-two initial environment variables were uniformly processed by ArcGIS software and saved as (.asc) format.
Since environmental variables have drawbacks associated with multiple collinearity and dimensionality, it was difficult to build and interpret a model that considered all the environmental variables or determined which of them were relevant [44]. Therefore, to improve the accuracy of the model, MaxEnt was used to pre-model 22 variables to obtain the contribution rate of all variables, and SPSS software was used to analyze their correlation. In combination with the contribution rate of the environmental variables, all variables with a correlation of less than 0.75 were retained, and only variables with a high contribution rate were retained for variables with correlation ≥ 0.75. Through comparative analysis, six bioclimatic variables and two geographical variables were chosen as the input data for the environmental variables of the MaxEnt model (Table 3).

4.3. MaxEnt Model Construction and Operation Method

The MaxEnt model was constructed using the filtered and processed 360 species distribution data and eight environmental variables. The specific model parameters were set as follows: the bootstrap operation method was selected to run the model 10 times; the “random seed” was set to make each run use 75% of the random samples in the distribution data as the training set, and the remaining 25% of the samples as the test set. The “create response curve“ function was used to create the response curve of each climate variable to obtain the relationship between distribution probability and climate factors. The “Make pictures of predictions” function was selected to draw the potential distribution prediction map. The “Do jackknife to measure variable importance” function was selected, and the jackknife method was used to test all climate variables to evaluate their importance. The model takes the average value of 10 simulation results as the final output saved in Logistic format.

4.4. Data Analysis

4.4.1. Model Prediction Accuracy Evaluation

In the MaxEnt model, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of the model, and the true positive rate and false positive rate were taken as the horizontal and vertical coordinates, respectively [29,30,31]. The area surrounded by the ROC curve and abscissa, namely the area under the curve (AUC), is often used as an indicator to evaluate the accuracy of the model because it is less affected by sample size and threshold [29,30,31]. The range of the AUC values was [0, 1]. Different AUC values indicate different model accuracies: poor [0.5, 0.6], fair [0.6, 0.7], good [0.7, 0.8], very good [0.8, 0.9], and excellent [0.9, 1].

4.4.2. Importance Assessment of Environmental Variables

The MaxEnt model has two methods to evaluate the importance of environmental variables for the distribution prediction of C. hystrix Miq.: the percent contribution and permutation importance assessment method, and the jackknife test method [45]. The percentage contribution rate is the contribution value of each variable to the geographical distribution of vegetation given by the MaxEnt model in the training process, and permutation importance refers to the reduction degree of the AUC value obtained from the model simulation results after randomly replacing the climate variables of the training sample points. The greater the reduction value, the more dependent is the model on this variable. The second method is the jackknife test method, which excludes one or more variables in each turn and then analyzes the importance of a single variable in establishing the distribution model. When the AUC value of “only this variable” is high, it indicates that this environmental variable occupies a dominant position in the model prediction and has a great impact on the prediction results of species distribution. “Except for this variable” refers to the removal of a certain variable and using the remaining variables for modeling. A low AUC value indicates that the removed environmental variable contains key information that is important for species distribution prediction. “All variables” means to use all variables to predict the model [46].

4.4.3. Classification of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. Potentially Suitable Cultivation Regions

Forecast results (.asc) were imported from the MaxEnt model into ArcGIS and converted into a grid data format (.tif). Then, the natural discontinuity classification method was used to reclassify the potentially suitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq. into four grades: high-suitability regions, medium-suitability regions, low-suitability regions, and unsuitability regions. Finally, the current and future potentially suitable distribution pattern map of C. hystrix Miq. was generated using ArcGIS 10.2.

4.4.4. Spatial Pattern Change of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. under Future Climate Scenarios

We compared and analyzed the potentially suitable distribution pattern of C. hystrix Miq. under different climate scenarios in different periods and graphed the spatial change trend map of suitable regions of C. hystrix Miq. The potentially suitable area of C. hystrix Miq. was calculated under different climate conditions and suitable levels to explore the spatial pattern change law of C. hystrix Miq. for each period under a climate scenario.

5. Conclusions

This study aimed to explore the habitat suitability of C. hystrix Miq. in China and its responses to climate change. The MaxEnt model was used to predict the potentially suitable distribution of C. hystrix Miq. under present and future climatic conditions. The simulation indicated that the temperature and precipitation conditions in the planting regions should be considered; furthermore, the temperature and precipitation conditions under extreme conditions should be emphatically analyzed when introducing and cultivating C. hystrix Miq. in a large area. A map of potentially suitable cultivation regions under the present climatic conditions can assist in the development of protection and restoration strategies. According to these results, the highly suitable cultivation regions for C. hystrix Miq. can be used as a breeding base for its excellent germplasm resources and is the best region for continued cultivation, popularization, and development of the C. hystrix Miq. industry to maximize its multi-benefit value. Medium-suitable cultivation regions for C. hystrix Miq. should be given attention, adhering to the principle of “suitable place to plant suitable trees,” planting, and popularizing C. hystrix Miq. scientifically, reasonably, and selectively. However, the low-suitability cultivation regions and unsuitable cultivation regions of C. hystrix Miq., should be reduced or avoided to prevent wasting human, material, and financial resources caused by blind introduction. A map of the spatial distribution of C. hystrix Miq. under future climatic conditions will help us to enact conservation strategies in advance for these regions to minimize the potential impacts of climate change. Our study identified that under the climate conditions of ssp1-2.6 and ssp2-4.5, the introduction and cultivation of C. hystrix Miq. should still focus on the southern region of high latitudes and appropriately reduce the planting area and distribution range at low latitudes. Its cultivation can be appropriately increased and expanded to the northeast of high-latitude areas by a small margin, under ssp5-8.5 climate conditions, on the premise of ensuring the normal growth of C. hystrix Miq.
Our study focused on the habitat suitability of vegetation and its response to global climatic change. The results mentioned above could aid in understanding the habitat suitability of C. hystrix Miq. and enacting a resource conservation policy to minimize the impact of climate change.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.S.; Data curation, L.S. and H.D.; Formal analysis, L.S.; Investigation L.S. and H.D.; Writing—original draft, L.S.; Formal analysis, H.D.; Supervision, G.Z.; Writing—review & editing, G.Z.; Investigation, A.M.; Conceptualization, X.M.; Funding acquisition, X.M.; Supervision, X.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Programs of China, China [grant number 2016YFD0600500]; Guangdong Forestry Science and Technology and Innovation Project [grant number 2018KJCX028].

Data Availability Statement

Data from data platforms such as the Teaching Specimen Resource Sharing Platform (http://mnh.scu.edu.cn, accessed on 15 July 2022), Flora of China (www.iplant.cn/frps, accessed on 15 July 2022), Global Biodiversity Information Network (http://www.gbif.org, accessed on 15 July 2022), National Specimen Resource Sharing Platform (http://www.nsii.org.cn, accessed on 15 July 2022), China Digital Herbarium (http://www.cvh.ac.cn, accessed on 15 July 2022), the GAODE picker (https://lbs.amap.com/console/show/picker, accessed on 15 July 2022), the China Meteorological Data Network (http://data.cma.cn/, accessed on 26 July 2022), WorldClim Database (https://worldclim.org, accessed on 26 July 2022), the Geospatial Data Cloud (http://www.scloud.cn, accessed on 26 July 2022). All data referred to or generated in this study are included in tables or figures and are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Shen, Y.P.; Wang, G.Y. Key findings and assessment results of IPCC WGI fifth assessment report. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2013, 35, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Walther, G.R.; Post, E.; Convey, P.; Menzel, A.; Parmesan, C.; Beebee, T.J.C.; Fromentin, J.M.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Bairlein, F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhou, T.J.; Chen, Z.M.; Chen, X.L. Interpreting IPCC AR6: Future global climate based on projection under scenarios and on near-term information. Clim. Chang. Res. 2021, 17, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fan, X.; Pan, J.; He, S. Prediction of the potential distribution of Rosa Roxburghii under the background of climate based on MaxEnt Model. Acta Bot. Boreal. Occident. Sin. 2021, 41, 0159–0167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Manthey, M.; Box, E.O. Realized climatic niches of deciduous trees: Comparing western Eurasia and eastern North America. Biogeography 2007, 34, 1028–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Scheffers, B.R.; De Meester, L.; Bridge, T.C.L.; Hoffmann, A.A.; Pandolfi, J.M.; Corlett, R.T.; Butchart, S.H.M.; Pearce-Kelly, P.; Kovacs, K.M.; Dudgeon, D.; et al. The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 2016, 354, aaf7671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Thuiller, W.; Lavergne, S.; Roquet, C.; Boulangeat, I.; Lafourcade, B.; Araujo, M.B. Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe. Nature 2011, 470, 531–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, H.L.; Zhang, L.; Jia, L.M.; Liang, Y.L.; Wen, T.; Chen, Z.S.; Liu, Y.S.; Gan, W.F. Prediction of global potential suitable distribution areas and attributes of Toona ciliata var. pubescens with MaxEnt. Acta Agric. Univ. Jiangxiensis 2018, 40, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Q.L.; Wang, R.L.; Zhang, L.P.; Han, Y.J.; Wang, M.T.; Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Guo, B. Climatic ecological suitability and potential distribution of Tricholoma matsutake in western Sichuan Plateau, China based on MaxEnt model. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 32, 2525–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, S.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, H.; Cao, Q.; Fan, P.; Yang, N.; Zheng, P.; Wang, R. The effect of climate change on the richness distribution pattern of oaks (Quercus L.) in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 744, 140786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, X.X.; Jiang, M.L.; Wang, J.Y. The climate change effects on boundaries of wood decayand termite hazard zones in china. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2015, 51, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kelly, A.E.; Goulden, M.L. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 11823–11826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Parmesan, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37, 637–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roberts, D.R.; Hamann, A. Predicting potential climate change impacts with bioclimate envelope models: A palaeoecological perspective. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thurm, E.A.; Hernandez, L.; Baltensweiler, A.; Ayan, S.; Rasztovits, E.; Bielak, K.; Zlatanov, T.M.; Hladnik, D.; Balic, B.; Freudenschuss, A.; et al. Alternative tree species under climate warming in managed European forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 430, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Crimmins, S.M.; Dobrowski, S.Z.; Greenberg, J.A.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Mynsberge, A.R. Changes in Climatic Water Balance Drive Downhill Shifts in Plant Species’ Optimum Elevations. Science 2011, 331, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, D.Q.; Hu, W.; Han, C.X.; Chen, L.D.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Zhong, A.W.; Wei, Z.X.; Peng, Y.S. Prediction of potential suitable distribution of Fokienia hodginsii (Dunn) Henry et Thomas based on MaxEnt model. Plant Sci. J. 2020, 28, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, R.J.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, T.W.; Tang, L.R.; Liu, X.S.; Huang, R.L. The Change of Soil Carbon Stabilization and Carbon Management Index in Different Mixed Plantations of Castanopsis hystrix in Subtropical Area of South China. For. Sci. Res. 2021, 34, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, S.M.; Zhang, M.L.; Zhang, H.X.; Meng, H.H.; Chen, X. Predicting potential geographical distributions and patterns of the relic plant Gymnocarpos przewalskii using Maximum Entropy and Genetic Algorithm for Rule-set Prediction. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2010, 34, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Graham, C.H.; Elith, J.; Hijmans, R.J.; Guisan, A.; Peterson, A.T.; Loiselle, B.A.; The Nceas Predicting Species Distributions Working Group. The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data used in distribution models. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Merow, C.; Smith, M.J.; Silander, J.A. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 2013, 36, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sharma, S.; Arunachalam, K.; Bhavsar, D.; Kala, R. Modeling habitat suitability of Perilla frutescens with MaxEnt in Uttarakhand—A conservation approach. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2018, 10, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, R.S. Discussion on planting and management technology of precious tree species Castanopsis. South China Agric. 2019, 13, 36–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liao, S.B. Analysis on the high-efficiency cultivation techniques of precious tree species in GuangXi- Castanopsis as an example. Farm Staff 2019, 07, 136–137. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, E.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.R. Characteristics of carbon storage and sequestration in different age beech (Castanopsis hystrix) plantation in south subtropical area of China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 23, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, Z.; Wen, Y.G.; Zhou, X.G.; Zhu, H.G.; Wang, L.; Cai, D.X.; Jia, H.Y.; Ming, A.G.; Lu, L.H. Carbon Stocks and Allocation Characteristics of Cunnighamia lanceolata and Castanopsis hystrix Plabtations in Southern China. Guangxi Sci. 2020, 27, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, J.X.; Bai, L.H.; Guo, W.F.; Zeng, J.; Cai, D.X. Preliminary study on growth regularity of Castanpsis hystrix plantation. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2012, 32, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Punyasena, S.W.; Eshel, G.; McElwain, J.C. The influence of climate on the spatial patterning of Neotropical plant families. Biogeography 2008, 35, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiu, X.J.; Zhu, J.Y.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, L.M. Study on natural distribution and adaptability of Castanopsis hystrix. J. Guangxi Agric. Biol. Sci. 2006, 25, 176–179. [Google Scholar]
  31. Boulangeat, I.; Gravel, D.; Thuiller, W. Accounting for dispersal and biotic interactions to disentangle the drivers of species distributions and their abundances. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 584–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kearney, M.; Porter, W. Mechanistic niche modelling: Combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12, 334–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Moss, R.H.; Edmonds, J.A.; Hibbard, K.A.; Manning, M.R.; Rose, S.K.; van Vuuren, D.P.; Carter, T.R.; Emori, S.; Kainuma, M.; Kram, T.; et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 2010, 463, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kriegler, E.; O’Neill, B.C.; Hallegatte, S.; Kram, T.; Lempert, R.J.; Moss, R.H.; Wilbanks, T. The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22, 807–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weng, Y.W.; Cai, W.J.; Wang, C. The application and futere directions of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). Clim. Chang. Res. 2020, 16, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: Future Global Climate: Scenario-42 Based Projections and Near-Term Information; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 1–195. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rides, A.; Qasmi, S.; Gillett, N.P. Making climate projections conditional on historical observations. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, abc0671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liang, Y.L.; Yan, X.D. Prediction of climate change over China and uncertainty analysis during the 21st century under RCPs. J. Trop. Meteorol. 2016, 32, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, J.H.; Cheng, Y.X.; Luo, L.Z.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, X.F. Maxent-based prediction of overwintering areas of Loxostege sticticalis in China under different climate change scenarios. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 4852–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dyderski, M.K.; Paz, S.; Frelich, L.E.; Jagodzinski, A.M. How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions? Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 1150–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Penuelas, J.; Boada, M. A global change-induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain). Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003, 9, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vessella, F.; Schirone, B. Predicting potential distribution of Quercus suber in Italy based on ecological niche models: Conservation insights and reforestation involvements. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 304, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, Z.C.; Luo, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, Y. Assessment and Prediction of Precipitation and Droughts, Floods Changes over the World and in China. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2008, 26, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  44. Graham, M.H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 2003, 84, 2809–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xiong, Q.L.; He, Y.L.; Deng, F.Y.; Li, T.Y.; Yu, L. Assessment of alpine mean response to climate change in Southwest China based on MaxEnt Model. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 9033–9043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shi, W.; Zhu, E.J.; Wang, Y.C.; Ma, F.Z.; He, Q.J.; Yi, C.H. Prediction of potentially suitable distribution area of Propomacrus davidi Deyrolle in China based on MaxEnt model. Chin. J. Ecol. 2021, 40, 2936–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The subject operating characteristic curve generated by MaxEnt model.
Figure 1. The subject operating characteristic curve generated by MaxEnt model.
Plants 12 00717 g001
Figure 2. Jackknife test of MaxEnt model.
Figure 2. Jackknife test of MaxEnt model.
Plants 12 00717 g002
Figure 3. Potentially suitable cultivations regions of C. hystrix Miq. in China under present climatic conditions.
Figure 3. Potentially suitable cultivations regions of C. hystrix Miq. in China under present climatic conditions.
Plants 12 00717 g003
Figure 4. Potentially suitable cultivations regions of C. hystrix Miq. in China under future climatic conditions: (a). ssp1-2.6 (2040); (b). ssp1-1.6 (2040); (c). ssp2-4.5 (2040); (d). ssp2-4.5 (2060); (e). ssp5-8.5 (2040); (f). ssp5-8.5 (2060).
Figure 4. Potentially suitable cultivations regions of C. hystrix Miq. in China under future climatic conditions: (a). ssp1-2.6 (2040); (b). ssp1-1.6 (2040); (c). ssp2-4.5 (2040); (d). ssp2-4.5 (2060); (e). ssp5-8.5 (2040); (f). ssp5-8.5 (2060).
Plants 12 00717 g004
Figure 5. Spatial pattern change of suitable distribution for C. hystrix Miq. under future climatic conditions: (a). ssp1-2.6 (2040); (b). ssp1-1.6 (2040); (c). ssp2-4.5 (2040); (d). ssp2-4.5 (2060); (e). ssp5-8.5 (2040); (f). ssp5-8.5 (2060).
Figure 5. Spatial pattern change of suitable distribution for C. hystrix Miq. under future climatic conditions: (a). ssp1-2.6 (2040); (b). ssp1-1.6 (2040); (c). ssp2-4.5 (2040); (d). ssp2-4.5 (2060); (e). ssp5-8.5 (2040); (f). ssp5-8.5 (2060).
Plants 12 00717 g005
Figure 6. Sample distribution of C. hystrix Miq. in China.
Figure 6. Sample distribution of C. hystrix Miq. in China.
Plants 12 00717 g006
Table 1. Contribution rate of each environmental factor in MaxEnt mode.
Table 1. Contribution rate of each environmental factor in MaxEnt mode.
Variable CodeDescribeContribution Rate (%)Permutation Importance(%)
Bio14Precipitation of driest month55.45.4
Bio6Min temperature of coldest month31.961.9
Bio18Precipitation of warmest quarter2.916.5
Bio3Isothermality2.72.2
Slope2.62.3
Bio8Mean temperature of wettest quarter2.26.3
Aspect1.32.6
Bio15SD of humidity seasonality12.7
Table 2. Potential suitable area of C. hystrix Miq. under different climate change scenarios (×104 km2).
Table 2. Potential suitable area of C. hystrix Miq. under different climate change scenarios (×104 km2).
Climatic ConditionsHigh
Suitability
Medium SuitabilityLow
Suitability
Unsuitability
Current climate101.78102.1057.17698.05
SSP1262040s84.7998.1466.40710.68
2060s86.71105.9459.72707.64
SSP2452040s102.5399.7960.90696.79
2060s92.31100.8966.88699.92
SSP5852040s97.8596.6372.13693.39
2060s107.5098.6782.45671.39
Table 3. Description of climate data variables.
Table 3. Description of climate data variables.
DescribeUnitChooseDescribeUnitChoose
Mean annual temperature (Bio1)°C Annual precipitation (Bio12)mm
Mean diurnal range (Bio2)°C Precipitation of wettest month (Bio13)mm
Isothermality (Bio3)PPrecipitation of driest month (Bio14)mmP
SD of temperature seasonality (Bio4)°C SD of humidity seasonality (Bio15)P
Max temperature of warmest month (Bio5)°C Precipitation of wettest quarter (Bio16)mm
Min temperature of coldest month (Bio6)°CPPrecipitation of driest quarter (Bio17)mm
Temperature annual range (Bio7)°C Precipitation of warmest quarter (Bio18)mmP
Mean temperature of wettest quarter (Bio8)°CPPrecipitation of coldest quarter (Bio19)mm
Mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio9)°C Demm
Mean temperature of warmest quarter (Bio10)°C AspectP
Mean temperature of coldest quarter (Bio11)°C Slope°P
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, L.; Deng, H.; Zhang, G.; Ma, A.; Mo, X. Effect of Climate Change on the Potentially Suitable Distribution Pattern of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. in China. Plants 2023, 12, 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040717

AMA Style

Shen L, Deng H, Zhang G, Ma A, Mo X. Effect of Climate Change on the Potentially Suitable Distribution Pattern of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. in China. Plants. 2023; 12(4):717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040717

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Linlin, Haiyan Deng, Ganglong Zhang, Anqi Ma, and Xiaoyong Mo. 2023. "Effect of Climate Change on the Potentially Suitable Distribution Pattern of Castanopsis hystrix Miq. in China" Plants 12, no. 4: 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040717

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop