Next Article in Journal
Chemical Characterization and Chemotaxonomic Significance of Essential Oil Constituents of Matricaria aurea Grown in Two Different Agro-Climatic Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
A Multiplex PCR System of Novel Microsatellite Loci for Population Genetic Application in Walnuts
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Growth, Yield, and Nutrient Uptake of Mediterranean Tomato Landraces in Response to Salinity Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Genus Pinnularia Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from the Transbaikal Area (Russia, Siberia): Description of Seven New Species on the Basis of Morphology and Molecular Data with Discussion of the Phylogenetic Position of Caloneis

1
K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology RAS, IPP RAS, 35 Botanicheskaya St., 127276 Moscow, Russia
2
Museum of Natural History, Henderson Building, 15th and Broadway, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(20), 3552; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203552
Submission received: 30 August 2023 / Revised: 8 October 2023 / Accepted: 9 October 2023 / Published: 12 October 2023

Abstract

:
Seven Pinnularia species from the Transbaikal area, Russia, are described as new for science. These are P. baicalgenkalii, P. baicalflexuosa, P. microfrauenbergiana, P. pergrunowii, P. siberiosinistra, P. baicalodivergens, and P. baicalislandica. All species are described by original LM and SEM microphotographs and molecular phylogeny. We provide comparisons between the taxa and document variability in the features found in the species. The number of Pinnularia species in the Transbaikal area is the largest number of species of the genus anywhere in the world.

1. Introduction

As is known, Lake Baikal is the world’s largest freshwater lake, famous for its high biodiversity in many groups of organisms and abundance of endemic species [1,2]. The research of microalgae was started in the 19th century, and the first works already demonstrated the high diversity and peculiarity of diatoms in the bottom sediments [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. According to Pomazkina et al. [12], already at the time about 800 diatom taxa had been found, 40% of which were endemic. In a review summarizing the results of long-standing research, Popovskaya et al. [13] indicate that diatoms comprise 49 taxa from 19 genera. Notably, the dominant taxa are exclusively endemic [13].
Pinnularia (1843) is one of the most diverse genera of diatoms and currently includes 861 accepted species names, 503 accepted varieties, and 126 accepted formae [14,15]. However, in the publications dedicated to Lake Baikal, information on representatives of this genus is limited. Among the literature sources from the beginning of the 20th century that are available to us, the most comprehensive list of taxa is provided in a review of works by Boris Skvortzov (Skvortzow), featured in vol. 23 of Iconographia Diatomologica [16]. A significant part of Skvortzov’s research was dedicated to the diatoms of Lake Baikal, including deepwater species (from the depth of 30–33 m). He described many new species and varieties. The author of the review Maria Gololobova studied about 60 publications and compiled a list of Skvortzov taxa that comprised 1562 diatom names [17]. From those, 333 taxa are noted for Lake Baikal, including only 21 Pinnularia taxa. Meanwhile, Navicula (58 taxa), Cymbella (35), and Didymosphaenia (25) are represented more diversely. Other works of that period mention no more than two to three taxa from this genus. For example, in the list of new and interesting diatoms from Baikal compiled by Vladislav Jasnitsky [10], only two taxa Pinnularia are noted, previously described by Skvortzov: P. hemiptera (Kützing) Cleve var. baicalensis Skvortzov and P. passargei Reich var. baicalensis Skvortzov. In a work dedicated to diatoms from the periphyton of the northern part of Lake Baikal, Alexander Skabichevsky (Skabichevskij) describes new species, three of which belong to Pinnularia: P. braunii (Grunow) Cleve var. scabrosa Skab., P. polyonca (Brebisson) O. Müller var. scabrosa Skab., and P. timofeevii Skab. It is worth noting that all of them are considered rare species and were found at the depth of 26 m [11]. The results of the processing of samples gathered by Niels Foged in 1975 were published posthumously [1], edited by Hannelore Håkansson. Out of 260 taxa, only 7 belong to Pinnularia (five species and two varieties). All were described as oligohalobous (indifferent), pH-circumneutral, and cosmopolitan. The taxa were found in samples from the Angara, which is the only river that drains out of the lake. Many taxa were observed from other genera: Navicula (37 taxa), Gomphonema (29), Nitzschia (20), and Cymbella (20). H. Håkansson notes that the samples were in general less diverse than those described earlier “by Skvortzow and Meyer (1928) and particularly by Skvortzow (1937)” [8,9].
Currently, the unique algal flora of Lake Baikal is being intensively studied. Several monographs were published during the last two decades, dedicated to the results of long-term studies of diatoms from plankton [18], the littoral zone [19,20], and benthos [21]. The results of the study of samples collected by Skabitschewsky in July 1965 and samples collected during a Darwin Initiative project in 1997 were presented in volumes 23 and 26 of Iconographia Diatomologica [22,23]. Only in these works, 22 new genera and 554 new species were described. Publications dedicated to descriptions of new taxa from Baikal come out regularly. However, representatives of Pinnularia are not mentioned in these works. Brief reports are presented in several works by Pomazkina et al. on microphytobenthos [24,25,26]. In south Baikal, P. microstauron (Ehrenberg) Cleve is mentioned among taxa that are dominant in winter, and P. brevicostata Cleve is often found [24]. During a study in Olkhon Gate and Maloe More straits, representatives of Pinnularia were reported only as single finds. Only four species were found: P. major var. hyalina (Hust.) Skab. and P. pectinalis var. rostrata Skvortzow, as well as the endemic P. braunii var. scabrosa Skab. and P. timofeevii Skab. [25]. In a publication on the microphytobenthos of Lake Baikal in areas close to rivers, the diversity of this genus is mentioned; however, there is no information on the number of species or list of taxa [26].
Research of diatoms from Baikal that includes the molecular genetic approach is still scarce. So far, only six new species from the genera Geissleria, Sellaphora, Placoneis, Cymbopleura, and Cymbella have been described with the use of molecular data [27,28,29,30,31]. For five more previously known species from the genera Planothidium, Stauroneis, Craticula, and Stephanodiscus, there are mentions of genetic sequences of strains from Baikal [32,33,34]. In the studies dedicated to the diversity of protist communities in Lake Baikal using metabarcoding, there are only brief reports on diatoms [35,36,37].
The aim of this publication is the molecular investigation and description of the morphology of seven new Pinnularia species from the Transbaikal area.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphology and Ultrastructure

The studies performed with light and scanning electron microscopy showed that the isolates belong to the new species Pinnularia baicalgenkalii, P. baicalflexuosa, P. microfrauenbergiana, P. pergrunowii, P. siberiosinistra, P. baicalodivergens, and P. baicalislandica.
Pinnularia baicalgenkalii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Description. LM (Figure 1A–D and Figure 2A,B). Valve outline elliptic with parallel sides and broadly rounded ends. Length 92–99 µm, width 19.5–20.0 µm. Axial area linear, narrow, tapering on the ends and widening towards the central area. Central area small, asymmetrically elliptic. Raphe complex, undulate. Striae weakly radiate at the center, becoming parallel to slightly convergent at the ends, 6 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 2C). Proximal raphe ends are drop-like and deflected to the same side, but to the opposite direction than the terminal ends. Terminal raphe fissures are externally hooked and unilaterally deflected, reaching the valve mantle at the apex. Striae alveolate, multiseriate (about 7–9 areolae rows).
SEM, internal view (Figure 2D). Central raphe ends are uninterrupted with knot and notch (shown by arrows), raphe branches end in polar simple helictoglossae, deflected to one side. Alveolar openings are covered 2/3 by an axial plate and 1/3 by a mantle plate, leaving an internal opening which is shorter than the entire alveolus. In LM, this covering gives the impression of two longitudinal lines. Striae are composed of areolae with irregularly rounded openings.
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 19179, Figure 1C, from oxidized culture strain no. B194, isolated from sample no. 34, deposited in herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 19179a, collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. B194, isolated from the sample no. 34, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Type locality. Russia, Kapustinskaja River, flowing into the Baikal Lake, near the cape Tolstoj, sample no. 34, benthos (52°38.484′ N 107°23.218′ E), collected by M. Kulikovskiy, 17 July 2011.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350092) and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM350002) for the strain B194.
Etymology. The species is named for the species locality, Lake Baikal, and the similarity with Pinnularia genkalii Krammer & Lange-Bertalot.
Distribution. As yet known only from the type locality.
Comments. P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. is similar to P. reichardtii Krammer, differing from it by wider valves (19.5–20.0 μm in new species vs. 14.7–18.8 μm in P. reichardtii) and lower stria density (6 in 10 μm in new species vs. 8–9 in 10 μm in P. reichardtii). The valve ends are blunter in our species, while in P. reichardtii they are wide and bluntly rounded. P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. is also similar to P. genkalii Krammer & Lange-Bertalot. They have the same stria pattern and structure of the axial and central areas, and the morphometric features overlap (75–130 μm length, 17–20 μm width, 6–7 striae in 10 μm in P. genkalii vs. 92–99 μm length, 19.5–20.0 μm width, 6 striae in 10 μm in the new species). P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. can be distinguished by the valve shape (elliptic with length-to-width ratio about 4.70–4.95 in P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. vs. linear with length-to-width ratio about 5.4 in P. genkalii). Another species that is morphologically similar to P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. is P. ilkaschoenfilderi Krammer (Table 1); however, the valves of the latter species are relatively narrow (length-to-width ratio 5.9 vs. 4.70–4.95 in P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov.), have differently shaped valve ends (cuneiform rounded vs. broadly rounded in the new species), and central areas (large, roundish vs. small, asymmetrically elliptic respectively).
Pinnularia baicalflexuosa Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Description. LM (Figure 3A–E, Figure 4A–E and Figure 5A,B). Frustule rectangular in girdle view (Figure 5B). Valve outline linear with parallel sides and broadly rounded ends. Length 109–116 µm, width 17.5–19.0 µm. Axial area linear, narrow, tapering on the ends and widening towards the central area. Central area small, asymmetrically elliptic. Raphe semicomplex, undulate. Striae radiate at the center, becoming convergent at the ends, 7–8 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 5C). Proximal raphe ends are drop-like and deflected to the same side but in the opposite direction than the terminal ends. Terminal raphe fissures are externally hooked and unilaterally deflected, reaching the valve mantle at the apex. Striae alveolate, multiseriate (about 5–6 areolae rows).
SEM, internal view (Figure 5D). Central raphe ends are uninterrupted with knot, raphe branches end in polar simple helictoglossae, deflected to one side. Alveolar openings are covered 2/3 by an axial plate and 1/3 by a mantle plate, leaving an internal opening which is shorter than the entire alveolus. In LM, this covering gives the impression of two longitudinal lines.
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 18959, Figure 3C, from oxidized culture strain no. B054–3, isolated from sample no. 40, deposited in herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 18959a, collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. B054–3, isolated from the sample no. 40, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Type locality. Russia, Selenga River, near the Brjansk Village, sample no. 40, benthos (52°03.376′ N 106°52.672′ E), collected by M. Kulikovskiy, 19.07.2011.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350068) and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM349984) for the strain B054–3.
Etymology. The species is named for the species locality, Lake Baikal, and the similarity with Pinnularia flexuosa P.T. Cleve.
Distribution. As yet known only from the type locality.
Comments. This species is close to P. flexuosa P.T. Cleve and differs from it by a lower length (109–116 μm in P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. vs. 173–270 μm in P. flexuosa), lower width (17.5–19.0 μm in P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. vs. 32–50 μm in P. flexuosa), and a higher stria density (7–8 in 10 μm in P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. vs. 4–5 in 10 μm in P. flexuosa) (Table 2). Pinnularia baicalflexuosa sp. nov. can be easily confused with P. neglectiformis Krammer; the morphometric features overlap in these species [39], (Table 2). They can be delineated by the shape of the valve ends (broadly rounded in P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. vs. cuneiform rounded in P. neglectiformis) and the shape of the valves themselves (P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. has valves with parallel sides, whereas the sides of P. neglectiformis are slightly convex or triundulate). Another morphologically similar species is P. torta (A.Mann) R.M.Patrick, especially the images provided in Liu et al. [40] (p. 149, plate 39, Figures 1–4). However, valves of P. torta are larger (length 127.5–189.0 μm, width 20–24 μm vs. 109–116 μm and 17.5–19.0 μm in P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. accordingly).
Pinnularia microfrauenbergiana Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. (Figure 6)
Description. LM (Figure 6A–U). Cells solitary, two parallel plastids on either side of the apical axis are present (Figure 6A–I). Frustule rectangular in girdle view (Figure 6G–I,U). Valve outline narrowly elliptical with rounded ends. Length 20–25 µm, width 4.5–5.0 µm. Axial area narrowly lanceolate, widening towards the central area. Central area is represented by a wide transverse fascia. Raphe weakly lateral, filiform, and well noticeable under LM. Striae radiate at the center, becoming convergent at the ends, 14–15 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 6V). Proximal raphe ends are drop-like and deflected to the same side but in the opposite direction than the terminal ends. Terminal raphe fissures are externally hooked and unilaterally deflected, reaching the valve mantle at the apex. Striae are alveolate, multiseriate; longitudinal lines are absent.
SEM, internal view (Figure 6W). Central raphe ends are uninterrupted with knot and notch, internal raphe branches end in polar simple helictoglossae, deflected in the same direction. On each of the interstriae there is a single small outgrowth of a rounded or rectangular shape.
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 18931, Figure 6O, from oxidized culture strain no. B025, isolated from sample no. 51.1, deposited in herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 18931a, collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. B025, isolated from the sample no. 51.1, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Type locality. Russia, Vydrinnaja River, sample no. 51.1, periphyton (51°29.383’ N 104°50.986′ E), collected by M. Kulikovskiy, 20 July 2011.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350062 and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM349979) for the strain B025.
Etymology. The species is named for the smaller size, and the similarity with Pinnularia frauenbergiana Reichardt.
Distribution. As yet known only from the type locality.
Comments. Pinnularia microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. is distinguished from P. frauenbergiana Reichardt by the outline, stria density, and axial area, differing in general by stria density (14–15 in 10 μm in P. microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. vs. 18–22 in 10 μm in P. frauenbergiana). P. microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. is also close to P. bullacostae Krammer et Lange-Bertalot in Lange-Bertalot & Genkal; however, new species differs by more radiate striae and less blunted valve ends, and its valve sides are not concave as in P. bullacostae (Table 3). Pinnularia microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. is close to P. pinseelliana Zidarova, Kopalová & Van de Vijver, described from the Antarctic [42]. However, P. microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. does not exhibit protracted valve ends at all, while this feature is present in P. pinseelliana. The valves of P. pinseelliana are more widened in the center part relative to the ends than in P. microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. Other morphological features are similar in these two species.
An interesting feature of Pinnularia microfrauenbergiana sp. nov., P. bullacostae, and P. pinseelliana is the presence of a morphological structure located on the inner side of the raised interstriae (virgae) that is described by researchers in various ways: “knopfartige höcker” [43], “papillae-like structures” [38], “elevated siliceous outgrowth” [42].
Table 3. Comparison of morphological features of P. microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. and related species.
Table 3. Comparison of morphological features of P. microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. and related species.
P. microfrauenbergiana sp. nov. P. frauenbergiana P. bullacostae P. pinseelliana
Outlinenarrowly ellipticallinear elliptic-lanceolate with weakly convex sideslinear with parallel up to slightly concave sidesnarrowly lanceolate with weakly but still markedly convex, never parallel margins
Endsroundedevenly tapered and not differentiatedbroadly cuneiform roundednon- to weakly protracted, never capitate nor rostrate, broadly rounded
Length, μm20–2517–3433–3424–30
Width, μm4.5–54.3–4.85.8–6.74.5–5.5
Striae in 10 μm14–1518–221513–15
Rapheweakly lateral, filiformfiliformnarrow, laterallateral, with straight to weakly curved branches
Axial areanarrowly lanceolate, widening towards the central areabroadly lanceolatenarrownarrow near the apices, gradually but distinctly widening towards the central area
Central arearepresented by a wide transverse fasciarepresented by a wide transverse fasciasmall fasciawedge-shaped (rarely rectangular) fascia
ReferencesThis study[38,44][38,43][42]
Pinnularia pergrunowii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. (Figure 7).
Description. LM (Figure 7A–E). Cells solitary, two parallel plastids on either side of the apical axis are present (Figure 7A–D). Frustule rectangular in girdle view (Figure 7D,M,N) with slightly undulating margins. Valve outline linear with capitate ends and shoulders that are broader than the central part. Length 49.5–51.0 µm, width of central part 7 µm, width of shoulders 8.0–8.5 µm. Axial area linear, narrow and widening towards the central area. Central area is represented by a wide transverse fascia. Raphe straight, filiform, and well noticeable under LM. Striae strongly radiate to radiate at the center, becoming convergent to strongly convergent towards the ends, 10–11 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 7F). Proximal raphe ends are drop-like and deflected to the same side but in the opposite direction than the terminal ends. Terminal raphe fissures are externally hooked and unilaterally deflected, reaching the valve mantle at the apex. Striae are alveolate, multiseriate, composed of areolae with irregularly rounded openings.
SEM, internal view (Figure 7G). Central raphe ends are continuous with knot; raphe branches end in polar simple helictoglossae. There is no covering over the alveoli. Longitudinal lines are absent.
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 18989, Figure 7H, from oxidized culture strain no. B162–3, isolated from sample no. 28.2, deposited in herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 18989a, collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. B162–3, isolated from the sample no. 28.2, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Type locality. Russia, Bolshaya Suhaya River near the Zarech’e Settlement, sample no. 28.2, benthos (52°33.418′ N 107°08.564′ E), collected by M. Kulikovskiy, 17.07.2011.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350084 and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM349996) for the strain B162–3.
Etymology. The species is named for the similarity with Pinnularia grunowii Krammer.
Distribution. As yet known only from the type locality.
Comments. Pinnularia pergrunowii sp. nov. is close to P. grunowii Krammer (Table 4); however, P. grunowii has distinctly triundulate sides of the valve, while new species has a small constriction at the center of the valve. The valve ends are less constricted in our species than in P. grunowii. The stria density in P. pergrunowii is generally lower than in P. grunowii (10–11 in 10 μm in P. pergrunowii vs. 11–14 in 10 μm in P. grunowii). Among similar species that are the same size, with capitate ends and a fascia, we should note P. rhombofasciata Krammer & Metzeltin and P. dicephala (Ehrenberg) W. Smith (Table 4). P. pergrunowii can be easily differentiated from these species by the concave sides. Biundulate valves of P. ferrophila Krammer are similarly shaped but can be differentiated by the valve width (8.0–8.5 μm in P. pergrunowii sp. nov. vs. 8.8–10 μm in P. ferrophila). Also, we should note the similarity of P. pergrunowii sp. nov. with illustrations of P. latarea Krammer provided by Siver et al. [45] (p. 581, plate 168, Figures 1–14). These species are similar in size and valve shape (linear with concave sides and capitate ends) (Table 4).
A clear difference is in the structure of the axial and central area. In P. latarea, they form together a wide, lanceolate space with a very broad fascia, whereas in P. pergrunowii sp. nov. the axial area is distinctly separated, narrow, linear. The valve sides in P. pergrunowii are more concave than in P. latarea. We also studied vouchers of strains (images and metadate on the culture collection website or in publications associated with the nucleotide sequence) close in phylogenetic position: P. anglica AT100Gel01, P. mesolepta AT_160Gel30, P. grunowii Pin 889 MG, P. termitina UTEX FD484. All of them are clearly different from the new species (Table 4).
Pinnularia siberiosinistra Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. (Figure 8).
Description. LM (Figure 8A–V). Cells solitary, two parallel plastids on either side of the apical axis are present (Figure 8A–F). Frustule rectangular in girdle view (Figure 8E,F,V). Valve outline narrowly elliptical with subcapitate ends. Length 25–29 µm, width 5 µm. Axial area narrowly lanceolate and widening towards the central area. Central area is represented by a wide transverse fascia. Raphe straight, filiform, and weakly noticeable under LM. Striae strongly radiate to radiate at the center, becoming convergent to strongly convergent towards the ends, 12–14 in 10 µm.
SEM, external view (Figure 8W). Proximal raphe ends are drop-like and deflected to the same side but in the opposite direction than the terminal ends. Terminal raphe fissures are externally hooked and unilaterally deflected, reaching the valve mantle at the apex.
SEM, internal view (Figure 8X). Central raphe ends are continuous with knot; internal raphe branches end in polar simple helictoglossae. There is no internal covering over the alveoli. Longitudinal lines are absent. Striae alveolate, multiseriate (about 5–6 areolae rows), composed of areolae with irregularly rounded openings.
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 18930, Figure 8H, from oxidized culture strain no. B024–1, isolated from sample no. 51.1 deposited in herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 18930a, Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. B024–1, isolated from the sample no. 51.1, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Type locality. Russia, Vydrinnaja River, sample no. 51.1, periphyton (51°29.383′ N 104°50.986′ E), collected by M. Kulikovskiy, 20.07.2011.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350061) and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM349978) for the strain B024–1.
Etymology. The species is named for the species locality—the extensive geographical region Siberia—and the similarity with Pinnularia sinistra Krasske.
Distribution. As yet known only from the type locality.
Comments. Pinnularia siberiosinistra sp. nov. is morphologically similar to P. sinistra Krammer (Table 5). It differs from the type population of the Krammer species by a stronger tapering of the valve ends and a more widened axial area than in P. sinistra (Table 5). New species could also be compared with the material illustrated by Souffreau et al. [39] (p. 867, Figure 1o) marked as “P. sp. (Tor4)r”. P. siberiosinistra sp. nov. differs from P. sp. (Tor4)r by a narrow elliptical valve shape, while P. sp. (Tor4)r has linear valves with slightly undulate ends. Other features are quite similar in these two species (Table 5).
Pinnularia baicalodivergens Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. (Figure 9 and Figure 10).
Description. LM (Figure 9A–N). Cells solitary, two parallel plastids on either side of the apical axis are present (Figure 9A,B and Figure 11A). Frustules rectangular in girdle view (Figure 9N and Figure 11H). Valve outline linear with parallel sides and subcapitate rounded ends. Length 46–50 µm, width 8–9 µm. Axial area linear, narrow, tapering at the ends and widening towards the central area. Central area is represented by an asymmetric transverse fascia. On the central area are often present irregular structures as diverse flecks, chaotic or united in a line. Raphe straight, filiform, and well noticeable under LM. Striae strongly radiate to radiate at the center, becoming convergent to strongly convergent at the ends; longitudinal lines are absent, 11–12 in 10 µm.
SEM, external views (Figure 10A–C). Proximal raphe ends are drop-like and deflected to the same side but in the opposite direction than the terminal ends. Terminal raphe fissures are externally hooked and unilaterally deflected, reaching the valve mantle at the apex. On the central area on either side of the central nodule grooves of different sizes and shapes are located. Striae alveolate, multiseriate (about 4–5 areolae rows), composed of areolae with irregularly rounded openings.
SEM, internal views (Figure 10D–F). Central raphe ends are continuous with knot; internal raphe branches end in polar simple helictoglossae, which are slightly deviated relative to the apical axis of the valve. There is no internal covering over the alveoli. Longitudinal lines are absent.
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 19170, Figure 9C, from oxidized culture strain no. B112 isolated from sample no. 4.5, (in collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy, Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 19170a, Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. B112, isolated from sample no. 4.5, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Type locality. Russia, unnamed Bay in 8 km from Jenhaluk, sample no. 4.5, benthos (52°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ E), leg. M. Kulikovskiy, 14.07.2011.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350075) and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM349990) for the strain B112.
Etymology. The species is named for the species locality, Lake Baikal, and the similarity with Pinnularia divergens W. Smith.
Distribution. As yet known only from the type locality.
Representative specimen. Strain B097, slide no. B097 (19248) (Figure 11), isolated from sample no. 4.5, collected by M. Kulikovskiy, 14 July 2011. Sequence data: partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350075) and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM349990).
Comments. Pinnularia baicalodivergens sp. nov. is distinguished from P. divergens W.Smith by the valve outline and dimensions. The most similarity in size and shape is with P. divergens var. media Krammer (Table 6). However, the valves of P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. are slightly narrower (8–9.4 µm in P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. vs. 10–13 μm in P. divergens var. media). Our species is also close to P. microstauron var. microstauron (Ehrenberg) P.T. Cleve, differing from it mostly by a lower valve width (8–9.4 μm in P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. vs. 10–12.4 μm in P. microstauron var. microstauron). Another morphometrically similar species is P. submicrostauron Liu, Kociolek & Q.X. Wang (Table 6). It can be delineated from the new species by the shape of the valve ends: subcapitate in P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. vs. rostrate in P. submicrostauron.
Pinnularia baicalislandica Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. (Figure 12 and Figure 13).
Description. LM (Figure 12A–O). Cells solitary, two parallel plastids on either side of the apical axis are present (Figure 12A–D). Frustule rectangular in girdle view (Figure 12D,O). Valve outline linear with parallel sides and cuneiform rounded ends. Length 54–60 µm, width 10–11 µm. Axial area linear, narrow, tapering on the ends and widening towards the central area. Central area asymmetric, rhomboid. Raphe straight, filiform, and well noticeable under LM. Striae strongly radiate to radiate at the center, becoming parallel to convergent at the ends, 10 in 10 µm.
SEM, external views (Figure 13A–D). Proximal raphe ends weakly extended and deflected to the same side but in the opposite direction than the terminal ends. Terminal raphe fissures are externally hooked and unilaterally deflected, reaching the valve mantle at the apex. Striae alveolate, multiseriate (about 4–5 areolae rows), composed of areolae with irregularly rounded openings.
SEM, internal views (Figure 13E–G). Central raphe ends are continuous with knot; internal raphe branches end in polar simple helictoglossae. There is no internal covering over the alveoli. Longitudinal lines are absent.
Holotype here designated: Slide no. 18997, Figure 12E, from oxidized culture strain B238, isolated from sample no. 11.2, deposited in herbarium of MHA, Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Isotype. Slide no. 18997a, Collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia.
Reference strain. B238, isolated from sample no. 11.2, deposited in the collection of Maxim Kulikovskiy at the Herbarium of the Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Type locality. Russia, Zagza River, sample no. 11.2, periphyton (52°31.656’ N 107°05.114′ E), collected by M. Kulikovskiy, 15 July 2011.
Sequence data. Partial 18S rDNA gene sequence comprising V4 domain sequence (GenBank accession number KM350101) and partial rbcL sequence (GenBank accession number KM350009) for the strain B024–1.
Etymology. The species is named for the species locality, Lake Baikal, and the similarity with Pinnularia islandica Østrup.
Distribution. As yet known only from the type locality.
Comments. This species is distinguished from P. islandica Østrup by the valve outline and the shape of axial and central areas (Table 7). New species has a lower valve width (10–11 μm vs. 12–14 μm in P. islandica). The axial area in P. baicalislandica sp. nov. is linear, distinctly separated from the central area, while in the valves of P. islandica this separation is not clear, and the axial area is wedge-shaped. New species is distinguished from P. subcommutata Krammer and P. subcommutata var. nonfasciata Krammer by the valve outline (in P. subcommutata the sides are slightly convex whereas in P. baicalislandica sp. nov. they are parallel). P. rupestris Hantzsch differs from P. baicalislandica sp. nov. by stria density (12–13 in 10 µm in P. rupestris vs. 10 in 10 µm in the new species). P. perspicua Krammer can be differentiated by the presence of crescent-like markings on the central area; in P. baicalislandica sp. nov. such markings are not found. It may be complicated to differentiate the new species from P. levkovii Metzeltin, Lange-Bertalot & Soninkhishig (Table 7); the structure of the axial area should be considered (it is expanded towards the central area in P. levkovii, while in P. baicalislandica sp. nov. it is linear, narrow). The central area is distinctly separated, asymmetric, rhomboid in P. baicalislandica sp. nov., and in P. levkovii it is variably shaped and is not clearly differentiated. The stria density is lower in P. levkovii than in P. baicalislandica sp. nov. (8–10 in 10 µm in P. levkovii vs. 10 in 10 µm in P. baicalislandica sp. nov.).

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

Our phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the genetic markers rbcL and 18S rDNA and included 76 strains of Pinnularia and 17 strains of Caloneis. It is these genes that are most often used in work with this group [39,52,53]. In this case, the largest number of nucleotide sequences is available for the rbcL gene, somewhat less for 18S rRNA. Significantly fewer sequences are available for 28S rRNA and cox1 genes. Therefore, we have chosen a strategy for using 18S rRNA and rbcL genes to minimize the loss of Pinnularia strains and species for which other genes are not available. Previous studies already showed that Pinnularia and Caloneis form a monophyletic group and there are three well supported clades within this group, designated as A, B, C by Souffreau et al. [39,52,53]. Our phylogeny confirms these findings and new strains are added to the clades and subclades. Strains of Caloneis amphisbaena, C. cf. westii SZCZCH1002 and C. sp. 21IV14_6A formed an additional clade. All new species described in this study occupy separate positions in the corresponding subclades (Figure 14).
Clade A includes subclades “divergens”, “stomatophora”, and three more subclades are formed by representatives of Caloneis (Figure 14).
Subclade “divergens” includes species that are morphologically close to P. divergens, with linear or linear-elliptic valves, capitate, subcapitate or rostrate valve ends, a fascia on the central area, and internally open alveoli. However, a specific feature of the P. divergens type is the presence of rounded thickenings at the margin of the fascia. These structures can only be supposedly confirmed for P. sp. B027–1 (this study, Figure 15A–C). On the LM image of the P. sp. 7 Tor1b voucher thickenings at the margin of the fascia cannot be seen; the LM and SEM images of P. sp. 1 Tor7c also do not show any structures on the central area [39] (p. 867, Figure 1a,b,e). On the contrary, in the new species P. baicalodivergens we have found crescent-shaped hollow markings on the central area (Figure 10A,B), which brings this species close to representatives of the “stomatophora” subclade.
The “stomatophora” subclade species are united by the presence of well discernible crescent-shaped or irregular hollow markings on the external surface of the central area (P. stomatophora, P. ministomatophora, P. valida).
Subclade “caloneis1” includes representatives of the eponymous genus C. fontinalis, C. silicula, and C. lewisii. The common morphological feature of these species is areolae that are almost fully covered. C. lauta AT 160Gel04 form separate line, C. sp. KSA2015 with C. cf. linearis 21IV14 3A form subclade “caloneis 2”.
Clade B includes subclades “subgibba”, “grunowii”, P. nodosa, and P. acrosphaeria form separate lines.
Most taxa belong to the “subgibba” subclade. A characteristic feature of this subclade for almost all of the taxa is the presence of ghost striae on the inner surface of the central area and fascia.
Vouchers are available and confirm the presence of ghost striae in P. parvulissima B028 (this study, Figure 15D–F), Pinnularia subgibba var. sublinearis B296–1 (this study, Figure 15N–Q), P. parvulissima Pin887, P. sp. (Tor7) f [39] (p. 867, Figure 1m), P. vietnamogibba, P. minigibba, and P. microgibba [53] (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). However, in the new species P. siberiosinistra, ghost striae are not found (this study, Figure 8W,X), on the LM image of P. sp. 6 Tor4r voucher ghost striae cannot be seen [39] (p. 867), and no image of P. sp. 8 PinnC7 is provided in Souffreau et al. [39]. These taxa are grouped in one lineage with maximum statistical support (BS 100, PP 1), and thus its position may change with further addition of data.
Taxa from the “grunowii” subclade do not have any differentiating features in their valve structure, they do not have any markings on the inner or outer surface of the central area. A common feature is an H-shaped chloroplast [39]. Two new species described in the current study are included in this subclade. P. pergrunowii occupies a stable position next to P. grunowii (Figure 14), and morphologically these species differ clearly (Table 4).
A small-celled species with an elliptic outline P. microfrauenbergiana supplements a high-supported lineage (BS 97, PP 1) of other small-celled species P. obscura AT 70Gel12b, P. cf. marchica Enrins4a., and P. insolita VP280.
P. nodosa and P. acrosphaeria form separate subclades. Subclade “nodosa” now includes only P. nodosa Pin855 TM with characteristic markings on the valve sufrace—heavily structured on the outer surface and smooth on the inside [38].
Subclade “acrosphaeria” includes only two strains of P. acrosphaeria and is defined by a mottled, distinct structured area on the outer surfaces and slightly structured on the inner surfaces.
In clade C three stable subclades are distinguished: “viridiformis” (BS 93, PP 1) “subcommutata” (BS < 50, PP 0.95), “borealis” (BS 100, PP 1). Several taxa form separate lineage and take up intermediate positions with low support (Figure 14).
Species from subclade “viridiformis” have a complex or semicomplex raphe and round central raphe endings (P. viridis, P. viridiformis, P. neomaior, P. neglectiphormis, and the new species P. baicalgenkalii, P. baicaloflexuosa), whereas species from the “subcommutata” subclade (P. cf. isselana Cal878TM, P. subcommutata var. nonfasciata Corsea10, P. sp. 10 Pin873TM and P. baicalislandica sp. nov.) are characterized by a filiform or lateral raphe with linear central raphe endings. A border lineage between these subclades is currently represented by P. substreptoraphe AT70.09 (complex raphe) and P. acuminata (lateral raphe, [39] p. 867, Figure 1s), but the support of this lineage is low.
Relatively small species P. brebissonii UTEX FD274, P. cf. microstauron B2c, and Caloneis budensis AT220.06 are joined into one group with low support. They differ from the representatives of the “viridiformis” and “subcommutata” subclades by the presence of a fascia. Separate lines between “viridiformis” and “subcommutata” are formed by P. sp. 4 (Wie)a and P. altiplanensis Tor11b. However, the node supports are quite low. Morphologically, P. sp. 4 (Wie)a is closer to the “subcommutata” subclade; it has linear-elliptical valves of medium size (45.8–47.7 µm length and 9.5–9.9 µm width) with a lateral raphe and no fascia [39] (p. 867, Figure 1u), whereas P. altiplanensis Tor11b is a small-celled species with a fascia (length 17.4–18.4 µm, width 4.2–4.8 µm, [39] (p. 867, Figure 1x) and thus is closer to the “microstauron” subclade.
Subclade “borealis” is formed by taxa with a characteristic morphotype similar to representatives of the P. borealis species complex. Currently the subclade includes taxa with relatively small linear or linear-elliptic valves, widely spaced coarse striae, and a lateral or fusiform raphe.
A new clade “caloneis 3”has been defined with high support, formed by five strains of Caloneis. Three strains are represented by the type species of the genus C. amphisbaena, they form a subclade with maximum support, and separate lines are formed by C. cf. westii SZCZCH1002 and C. sp. 21IV14–6A.

2.2.1. Phylogeny of the Genera Pinnularia and Caloneis

The issue of separating Pinnularia and Caloneis was repeatedly raised by algologists-taxonomists [54,55,56]. Pinnularia was described in 1843 by Ehrenberg with the type species P. viridis [57]. Caloneis was described later by Cleve in 1894 on the basis of longitudinal lines on the valve surface. Even then the unclear differentiation of small-celled forms and a close connection with “some marine, panduriform Pinnulariae” were noted [58]. Nevertheless, to this day, Caloneis remains a valid genus and diatomists identify its representatives in flora and describe new species [22,59,60,61]. Traditionally, the genera are delineated by stria density, species with finer and denser spaced striae being attributed to Caloneis. According to the opinion of Mann [56] (p. 33), “…there is no adequate basis for the traditional Pinnularia-Caloneis distinction…”, and more than 100 years “…people learn to recognize not the genus itself, but individual species and species complexes, which they then learn to associate with a particular genus name”. In his discussion of the closeness of Pinnularia and Caloneis and the great diversity of both genera, Mann from the first page quotes E. Cox, F. Round, and K. Krammer, who speak of the heterogeneity of these genera and of suggestions to divide them into many smaller units.
It would seem that the application of molecular methods would give a clearer picture of the relationship between Pinnularia and Caloneis. In the first work of Bruder et al., published in 2008 [52], it was shown that the assumptions summarized by David Mann [56] had been confirmed. Phylogenetic analysis does not support the traditional division Pinnularia-Caloneis; these genera form a single monophyletic clade. In turn, Caloneis turned out to be non-monophyletic, its representatives (C. lauta, C. budensis, C. amphisbaena) forming separate lines among Pinnularia. For a morphological feature that corresponded with the division of phylogenetic groups, the suggestion made by Krammer and Lange-Bertalot [54] of using the degree of alveoli closure (“nearly open alveoli”, “partially closed” and “nearly closed”) was confirmed at that moment.
In the study of Souffreau et al. [39], dedicated to a time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the Pinnularia, representatives of Caloneis are positioned in different clades (A and C), which confirms the heterogeneity of this genus. A more comprehensive phylogenetic analysis has been performed, and a third clade of Pinnularia-Caloneis has been added to the two defined by Bruder et al. [52]. The analysis of the morphological features of the obtained subclades discusses shapes of the valves and apices, external central raphe endings (linear or rounded), raphe fissures (straight or undulate), chloroplasts (H-shaped or elongated, with pyrenoids or not, etc.), and specific markings on the central area (ghost striae, fascia, wart-like bodies, etc.).
In our phylogenetic analysis, the range of Caloneis strains has been significantly expanded compared to previous studies and includes 17 strains. Their positions in the clades remain the same: in clade A C. lauta forms separate line; the suclades “caloneis1” and “caloneis2” are separated, but they have low external support (Figure 14); C. budensis forms lineage with P. brebissonii UTEX FD274 and P. cf. microstauron (B2)c in clade C; strains of C. amphisbaena together with two other representatives of the genus form a separate clade “caloneis 3” (Figure 14).

2.2.2. Morphological Features of Some Phylogenetical Groups

Currently, it is generally quite hard to connect division into clades with any kind of morphological patterns, since species in every clade are very variable in valve size and shape. For example, clade A contains both the large-celled, morphologically close to the viridis group P. valida and the small-celled Caloneis silicula, C. fontinalis. For the most part clade B includes taxa with linear valves and capitate or subcapitate ends, but there are exceptions, like the small-celled species with an elliptic valve outline P. microfraubergiana sp. nov. The presence of a fascia on the central area is characteristic for all species of clade B except P. acrosphaeria. Clade C also includes very different forms: large, elongated elliptical viridis-like valves in the species from “viridiformis” and “subcommutata” subclades and small-celled P. altiplanensis, Caloneis budensis, etc.
The connection of phylogenetic groups and morphological features is more defined at the subclade level. Our further discussion is based on a study of voucher images that can be openly accessed (Table S1). For the species that do not have accessible voucher images or the images do not contain the necessary morphological features (for example, there are only live cells pictured, there are no SEM images on which the ultrastructure of the central area or the degree of closure of the alveoli could be studied, etc.), we considered taxa descriptions and features given in the relevant literature and descriptions from [39,52]. In the end, we could not find images only for 8 unidentified taxa (less than 10%) (see Table S1).
To determine the significance of a specific morphological feature as a phylogenetic signal, we compiled a comparison table for the main morphological features mentioned in previous works [39,52] and compared them with the phylogenetic groups. Unique features, i.e., those that appear in one or two clade and can be used as differentiating, are highlighted in bold (Table 8). We do not, however, speak of a 100% conclusion, since our phylogeny only includes a small part of the whole Pinnularia-Caloneis diversity, we are only making a suggestion based on an analysis of a concrete set of taxa.
So, the structure of internal alveoli aperture can be used to define subclade “caloneis1” and a monospecies subclade “acrosphaeria”, which are characterized by nearly closed alveoli. A preliminary analysis indicates that nearly closed alveoli are a rare and specific feature, the importance of which is confirmed by our phylogeny. In the future it can be used as differentiating. Generally, we can conclude that for each subclade the structure of internal alveoli aperture is a unifying feature (Table 8). Markings on the valves surface are present in representatives of five subclades, however, the ultrastructure of these markings is distinctive in each subclade.
In the subclades “divergens” and “stomatophora”, the markings are crescent-shaped or irregular hollow on the external surface of the central area. However, among the representatives of “divergens”, the presence of such markings is confirmed only for P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. (this study, Figure 10A,B). After studying LM images of the P. divergens D31_023 voucher, we can also assume the presence of these structures. Note that on the voucher images of Caloneis representatives from clade A we did not find such structures on the central area (Table S1). However, according to literary data, crescent-shaped hollows are shown for Caloneis lewisii and C. silicula [62,63]. In any case these crescent-shaped or irregular hollows on the external surface of the central area have been found only in representatives of clade A.
Most of the taxa from subclade “subgibba” have the so-called ghost striae (slight thinnings of the valve that correspond in size and spacing to the normal striae [64] on the internal surface of the central area. The exception are the strains of Pinnularia sp. 6 Tor4r, on the voucher image ghost striae are not distinct [39], p. 867, Figure 1o), and in P. siberiosinistra (this study, Figure 8 W,X) ghost striae are absent.
The monospecies lines “nodosa” and “acrosphaeria” have a heavily structured central area; “nodosa” has a relief-like structure on the outer surface and “acrosphaeria” has mottled, wart-like structures on the outer surface and is slightly structured on the inner surface.
A fascia is a unifying feature for the vast majority of the subclades. Subclades “caloneis1” and “borealis” are the exception. In the first one, all taxa except Caloneis lewisii have a fascia. In the “borealis” subclade, all taxa except P. paradubitabilis have a fascia present. The presence of a fascia is generally characteristic for representatives of subclades “divergens”, “stomatophora”, “subgibba”, P. nodosa, “grunowii”. Taxa without fascia are combined in subclades “viridiformis”, “subcommutata”, and “caloneis 2”.
Subclade “viridiformis” clearly stands out by the raphe structure, because only this clade unites taxa with a complex or semicomplex raphe. Other subclades contain species with a lateral and/or fusiform raphe. The border lineage between subclades “viridiformis” and “subcommutata” includes P. substreptoraphe AT 70.09 with a complex raphe and P. acuminata Pin876 TM with a lateral raphe, but this lineage is poorly supported (Figure 14).
Concerning the structure of the chloroplasts, most species in our analysis have two plate-like chloroplasts. The two plate-like chloroplasts are widest in girdle view, with the small parts of each edge extending to valve view. Some species with one H-shaped chloroplast are united in the subclade “grunowii”. Also, H-shaped chloroplasts are present in P. sp. (Wie)a, P. cf. altiplanensis, P. cf. isselana (“subcommutata” subclade), P. microstauron (“microstauron” subclade), and one species in subclade “caloneis1”—Caloneis silicula (according to Bruder et al. [52] and Souffreau et al. [39]). Thus, the significance of chloroplast structure for phylogenetic differentiation is not yet clear.

3. Conclusions

Based on our analysis presented herein, with a greater degree of taxon sampling than past studies, we can say there is better resolution of the genera Caloneis and Pinnularia and a reason to continue to recognize them as distinct. The genera Caloneis and Pinnularia are each monophyletic but not with the composition of species traditionally assigned to them. For Caloneis, the generitype (C. amphisbaena) and other species form a strongly supported monophyletic group that is distinct from Pinnularia sensu lato. Small species traditionally assigned to Caloneis, such as C. silicula, C. lewisii, C. lauta, etc, however, are not part of this lineage; they fall out within a broader concept of Pinnularia. The genus Pinnularia s. l. is also a monophyletic group, but it is not strongly supported. Within Pinnularia, the three subgroups (A, B, and C) are monophyletic, though only one in our analysis (Clade B) has strong supporthowever, this group does not contain the generitype (P. viridis). The large number of taxa described in Pinnularia (with over 4200 named taxa; [15]) makes it tempting to begin recognizing subgroups within Pinnularia s.l. as distinct genera, and assigning morphological characters to these groups supports that approach. But, further analyses and better support for the groups may be a crucial next step in the direction of creating a refined, natural classification of the Pinnlariaceae.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sampling

The samples used in the present report were collected from Eastern Siberia, Russia, by Maxim Kulikovskiy. The samples were collected in deltas of rivers that drain into Lake Baikal (the rivers Kapustinskaja, Selenga, Zagza, Vydrinnaja, Bolshaya Suhaya) as well as in Lake Baikal itself (see Figure 16, Table 9). Water mineralization and temperature measurements were performed using the Hanna Combo (HI 98129) multiparameter probe (Hanna Instruments, Inc., Woonsocket, RI, USA). A list of all strains examined in this study with their GenBank accession numbers and geographic location of sampling sites with measured ecological parameters is presented in Table 9.

4.2. Culturing

A subsample of each collection was added to WC liquid medium [65]. Monoclonal strains were established by micropipetting a single cell under an inverted microscope Axio Vert. A1 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Non-axenic unialgal cultures were maintained in WC liquid medium at 22–25 °C in a growth chamber with a 12:12 h light:dark photoperiod. Strains were analyzed after one month of culturing.

4.3. Preparation of Slides and Microscope Investigation

Strains for LM and SEM investigations were processed by means of a standard procedure involving treatment with concentrated hydrogen peroxide. The material was washed with distilled water. Permanent diatom preparations were mounted in Naphrax® (Brunel Microscopes Ltd., Chippenham, UK; refractive index = 1.73). Light microscopic (LM) observations were performed using the microscope AxioScope A1 (Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an oil immersion objective (×100/n.a.1.4, DIC). Ultrastructure of the valves was examined with the scanning electron microscope JSM-6510LV (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan).

4.4. Molecular Study

Total DNA from the studied strains was extracted using Chelex 100 Chelating Resin, molecular biology grade (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol 2.2. Partial 18S rRNA (378–382 bp, including the highly variable V4 region), and partial rbcL plastid genes (978 bp) were amplified using primers D512for and D978rev from Zimmermann et al. [66] for 18S rDNA fragments and rbcL66+ and rbcL1255-from Alverson et al. [67] for rbcL fragments.
Amplifications were carried out using premade polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mastermixes (ScreenMix by Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). Amplification conditions for the 18S rRNA gene were as follows: initial denaturation for 5 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 94 °C, 30 s annealing at 52 °C, and 50 s extension at 72 °C, with the final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. Amplification conditions for the rbcL gene were as follows: initial denaturation for 4 min at 94 °C followed by 40 cycles of 50 s denaturation at 94 °C, 50 s annealing at 53 °C, and 80 s extension at 72 °C, with the final extension for 7 min at 72 °C.
PCR products were visualized by horizontal electrophoresis in 1.0% agarose gel stained with SYBRTM Safe (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The products were purified with a mixture of FastAP, 10× FastAP Buffer, Exonuclease I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and water. The sequencing was performed using a Genetic Analyzer 3500 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).
Editing and assembling of the consensus sequences were carried out by processing the direct and reverse chromatograms in Ridom TraceEdit ver. 1.1.0 (Ridom GmbH, Münster, Germany) and Mega ver. 7 software [68]. The reads were included in the alignments along with corresponding sequences of 89 diatom species downloaded from GenBank (taxa names and Accession Numbers are given in Figure 14). Five Sellaphora species were chosen as the outgroups.
The nucleotide sequences of the 18S rRNA and rbcL genes were aligned separately using the Mafft ver. 7 software (RIMD, Osaka Japan) and the E-INS-i model [69]. The final alignments were then carried out: unpaired sites were visually determined and removed from the beginning and the end of the resulting matrices. For the protein-coding sequences of the rbcL gene, we checked that the beginning of the aligned matrix corresponds to the first position of the codon (triplet). The resulting alignments had lengths of 450 (18S rDNA) and 1347 (rbcL) characters. After removal of the unpaired regions, the aligned 18S rDNA gene sequences were combined with the rbcL gene sequences into a single matrix Mega7.
The data set was analyzed using the Bayesian inference (BI) method implemented in Beast ver. 1.10.1 software (BEAST Developers, Auckland, New Zealand) [70] to construct a phylogeny. For the alignment partition, the most appropriate substitution model, shape parameter α, and a proportion of invariable sites (pinvar) were estimated using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) as implemented in jModelTest ver. 2.1.10 (Vigo, Spain) [71]. This BIC-based model selection procedure selected the following models, shape parameter α and a proportion of invariable sites (pinvar): TrN + I + G, α = 0.5040 and pinvar = 0.4060 for 18S rDNA; TPM1uf + I + G, α = 0.4570, and pinvar = 0.6910 for the first codon position of the rbcL gene; TVMef + I + G, α = 0.2830 and pinvar = 0.7030 for the second codon position of the rbcL gene; TVM + I + G α = 0.8250, and pinvar = 0.1270 for the third codon position of the rbcL gene. We used the HKY model of nucleotide substitution instead of TrN, the GTR model instead of TPM1uf, TVMef and TVM, given that they were the best matching model available for BI. A Yule process tree prior was used as a speciation model. The analysis ran for 5 million generations with chain sampling every 1000 generations. The parameter-estimated convergence, effective sample size (ESS), and burn-in period were checked using the Tracer ver. 1.7.1 software (MCMC Trace Analysis Tool, Edinburgh, UK) [70]. The initial 25% of the trees were removed, and the rest were retained to reconstruct a final phylogeny. The phylogenetic tree and posterior probabilities of its branching were obtained based on the remaining trees, having stable estimates of the parameter models of nucleotide substitutions and likelihood. The maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using RAxML ver. 8 on XSEDE software [72]. The nonparametric bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicas was used. FigTree ver. 1.4.4 (University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK) and Adobe Photoshop CC ver. 19.0 software (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA) were used for viewing and editing the trees. Sequences from Pinnularia species obtained in this study were deposited to GenBank (Table 9).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12203552/s1, Table S1: Strain list and reference to voucher or publication nucleotide sequence used in phylogenetic analysis. References [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81] are cited in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K., E.K. and A.G.; methodology, M.K., A.G. and Y.M.; validation, M.K., A.G. and Y.M.; investigation, M.K., A.G., E.K. and I.K.; resources, M.K. and A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K., E.K., A.G. and Y.M.; writing—review and editing, M.K. and J.P.K.; visualization, A.G., Y.M. and E.K.; supervision, M.K; funding acquisition, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Publication is based on research carried out with financial support by the Russian Science Foundation no. 19-14-00320∏ for LM, SEM, and molecular investigation and by framework of state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme 122042700045-3) for finishing the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the reviewers and academic editor for constructive comments, which helped to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Foged, N.; Håkansson, H.; Flower, R. Some diatoms from Siberia especially from Lake Baikal. Diatom Res. 1993, 8, 231–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Timoshkin, O.A. Lake Baikal: Diversity of fauna, problems of its immiscibility and origin, ecology and “exotic” communities. In Index of Animal Species Inhabiting Lake Baikal and Its Catchment Area; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2001; Volume 1, pp. 16–73. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gutwinski, R. Algarum e lacu Baykal et e peninsula Kamtschatka clariss. prof. Dr. B. Dybowski anno 1877 reportatarum enumeratio et diatomacearum lacus Baykal cum iisdem tatricorum, italicorum atque franco-gallicorum lacuum comparatio. Nova Notarisia 1891, 2, 1–27, 300–305, 357–366, 407–417. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dorogostaïskiy, V.C. Matériaux pour servir à l'algologie du lac Baikal et de son basin. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou 1904, 18, 229–265. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  5. Wislouch, S.M. Beitrage zur Diatomeenflora von Asien II. Neuer Untersuchungen uber die Diatomeen des Baikalsees. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 1924, 42, 163–173. [Google Scholar]
  6. Meyer, K.I.; Reinhardt, L.B. Contribution a la flore algologique du lac Baikal et de la Transbaikalie. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou 1925, 33, 201–243. [Google Scholar]
  7. Meyer, K.I. Einfuhrung in die Algenflora des Baicalsees. Biulleten Mosk. Obs. Ispyt. Prir. Otd. Biol. 1930, 39, 179–396. [Google Scholar]
  8. Skvortzow, B.W.; Meyer, K.I. A contribution to the diatoms of Baikal Lake. Proc. Sungaree River Biol. Stn. 1928, 1, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  9. Skvortzow, B.W. Bottom diatoms from Olhon Gate of Lake Baikal. Philipp. J. Sci. 1937, 62, 293–377. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jasnitsky, V. Neue und interessante Arten der Diatomeen aus dem Baikalsee. Bot. Zhurn. 1936, 21, 689–703. [Google Scholar]
  11. Skabichevskii, A.P. Neue und interessante Diatomeen aus dem nordlichen Baikalsee. Bot. Zhurn. 1936, 21, 705–719. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, E.V.; Sherbakova, T.A.; Williams, D. Petroplacus gen. nov. (Bacillariophyta): A new genus of diatom from Lake Baikal. Phytotaxa 2016, 272, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Popovskaya, G.I.; Likhoshway, Y.V.; Genkal, S.I.; Firsova, A.D. The role of endemic diatom algae in the phytoplankton of Lake Baikal. Hydrobiologia 2006, 568, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase; World-Wide Electronic Publication; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2023; Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 15 August 2023).
  15. Kociolek, J.P.; Blanco, S.; Coste, M.; Ector, L.; Liu, Y.; Karthick, B.; Kulikovskiy, M.; Lundholm, N.; Ludwig, T.; Potapova, M.; et al. DiatomBase. Available online: https://www.diatombase.org (accessed on 15 August 2023).
  16. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Gololobova, M.A. New and little fresh and brackish water diatoms chiefly from Eastern part of Asia and their geographical distribution. A hitherto unpublished article by Boris V. Skvortzov. In Lake Baikal: Hotspot of Endemic Diatoms I. Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2012; Volume 23, pp. 743–861. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gololobova, M.A. Checklist of Boris V. Skvortzov’s diatom taxa. In Lake Baikal: Hotspot of Endemic Diatoms I. Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2012; Volume 23, pp. 611–742. [Google Scholar]
  18. Popovskaya, G.I.; Genkal, S.I.; Likhoshway, Y.V. Plankton Diatoms of Lake Baikal: Key Atlas; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2002; 168p, (In Russian, English summary). [Google Scholar]
  19. Bukhtiyarova, L.N.; Pomazkina, G.V. Bacillariophyta of Lake Baikal. Volume 1. Genera Baikalia, Slavia, Navigeia, Placogeia, Grachevia, Goldfishia, Nadiya, Cymbelgeia; Lega-Pres: Lviv, Ukraine, 2013; 184p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, E.V. Diatoms of the Family Cymbellaceae of Lake Baikal; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2014; 241p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, E.V.; Sherbakova, T.A. Diatoms of the Family Naviculaceae of Lake Baikal; Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 2018; 313p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kulikovskiy, M.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Metzeltin, D.; Witkowski, A. Lake Baikal: Hotspot of Endemic Diatoms I: Iconographia Diatomologica; Koeltz Scientific Books: Oberreifenberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 23, 607p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kulikovskiy, M.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Kuznetsova, I. Lake Baikal: Hotspot of Endemic Diatoms II: Iconographia Diatomologica; Koeltz Scientific Books: Oberreifenberg, Germany, 2015; Volume 26, 656p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, Y.V. Benthic Bacillariophyta in Southern Baikal. Int. J. Algae 2003, 5, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, Y.V.; Makarevich, O.Y. Uniqueness of diatom flora from the strait of Olkhonskie Vorota and the gulf of Maloe More, lake Baikal (Russia). Algologia 2013, 23, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pomazkina, G.V.; Rodionova, E.V. Taxocenosis structure and diversity of diatoms in the littoral zone of Lake Baikal at the confluence of the rivers (Russia). Algologia 2016, 26, 248–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Gusev, E.; Andreeva, S.; Annenkova, N. Phylogenetic position of the diatom genus Geissleria Lange-Bertalot & Metzeltin and description of two new species from Siberian mountain lakes. Phytotaxa 2014, 177, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Andreeva, S.A.; Kociolek, J.P.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Dorofeyuk, N.I.; Kezlya, E.M.; Shkurina, N.A.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Gusev, E.S.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Sellaphora balashovae (Bacillariophyta), a new species from Siberian Mountain Lake Frolikha (Baikal region), Russia. Phytotaxa 2018, 371, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kezlya, E.; Glushchenko, A.; Maltsev, Y.; Gusev, E.; Genkal, S.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kulikovskiy, M. Three New Species of Placoneis Mereschkowsky (Bacillariophyceae: Cymbellales) with Comments on Cryptic Diversity in the P. elginensis—Group. Water 2021, 13, 3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Glushchenko, A.; Gusev, E.; Maltsev, Y.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kuznetsova, I.; Kulikovskiy, M. Cymbopleura natellia– a new species from Transbaikal area (Russia, Siberia) described on the basis of molecular and morphological investigation. PhytoKeys 2021, 183, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Glushchenko, A.M.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Kociolek, J.P.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Kulikovskiy, M.S. Molecular and Morphological Investigations of Two Giant Diatom Cymbella Species from the Transbaikal Area (Russia, Siberia) with Comments on Their Distributions. Plants 2022, 11, 2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jahn, R.; Abarca, N.; Gemeinholzer, B.; Mora, D.; Skibbe, O.; Kulilovskiy, M.; Gusev, E.; Kusber, W.-H.; Zimmermann, J. Planothidium lanceolatum and Planothidium frequentissimum reinvestigated with molecular methods and morphology: Four new species and the taxonomic importance of the sinus and cavum. Diatom Res. 2017, 32, 75–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kulikovskiy, M.S.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Andreeva, S.A.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Gusev, E.S.; Podunay, Y.A.; Ludwig, T.V.; Tusset, E.; Kociolek, J.P. Description of a new diatom genus Dorofeyukea gen. nov. with remarks on phylogeny of the family Stauroneidaceae. J. Phycol. 2019, 55, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kulikovskiy, M.; Genkal, S.I.; Maltsev, Y.I.; Glushchenko, A.M.; Kuznetsova, I.V.; Kapustin, D.A.; Gusev, E.S.; Martynenko, N.A.; Kociolek, J.P. Resurrection of the diatom genus Stephanocyclus (Coscinodiscophyceae: Stephanodiscaceae) on the basis of an integrated molecular and morphological approach. Fottea Olomouc 2022, 22, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yi, Z.; Berney, C.; Hartikainen, H.; Mahamdallie, S.; Gardner, M.; Boenigk, J.; Cavalier-Smith, T.; Bass, D. High throughput sequencing of microbial eukaryotes in Lake Baikal reveals ecologically differentiated communities and novel evolutionary radiations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fix073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mikhailov, I.S.; Zakharova, Y.R.; Bukin, Y.S.; Galachyants, Y.P.; Petrova, D.P.; Sakirko, M.V.; Likhoshway, E.V. Co-Occurrence Networks among Bacteria and Microbial Eukaryotes of Lake Baikal during a Spring Phytoplankton Bloom. Microb. Ecol. 2019, 77, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Annenkova, N.; Giner, C.; Logares, R. Tracing the Origin of Planktonic Protists in an Ancient Lake. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krammer, K. The Genus Pinnularia. Diatoms of Europe; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2000; Volume 1, pp. 1–703. [Google Scholar]
  39. Souffreau, C.; Verbruggen, H.; Wolfe, A.P.; Vanormelingen, P.; Siver, P.A.; Cox, E.J.; Mann, D.G.; Van de Vijver, B.; Sabbe, K.; Vyverman, W. A time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the diatom genus Pinnularia. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 2011, 61, 866–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, Y.; Kociolek, J.P.; Wang, Q.X.; Fan, Y. The diatom genus Pinnularia from Great Xing’an Mountains, China. In Bibliotheca Diatomologica; Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung: Stuttgart, Germany, 2018; Volume 65, pp. 1–298. [Google Scholar]
  41. Patrick, R.; Reimer, C. The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae, Naviculaceae. Monogr. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1966, 13, 1–688. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zidarova, R.; Kopalová, K.; Van de Vijver, B. Ten new Bacillariophyta species from James Ross Island and the South Shetland Islands (Maritime Antarctic Region). Phytotaxa 2016, 272, 37–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lange-Bertalot, H.; Genkal, S.I. Diatoms from Siberia I. Islands in the Arctic Ocean (Yugorsky-Shar Strait). In Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 1999; Volume 6, pp. 1–292. [Google Scholar]
  44. Reichardt, E. Diatomeen an feuchten Felsen des südlichen Frankenjuras. Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges. 1985, 56, 167–187. [Google Scholar]
  45. Siver, P.; Hamilton, P.; Stachura-Suchoples, K.; Kociolek, J.P. Diatoms of North America. The Freshwater Flora of Cape Cod. In Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2005; Volume 14, pp. 1–463. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jahn, R.; Kusber, W.-H.; AlgaTerra Information System. Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Freie Universität Berlin. Available online: https://www.algaterra.org (accessed on 5 September 2023).
  47. Metzeltin, D.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Tropical diatoms of South America I: About 700 predominantly rarely known or new taxa representative of the neotropical flora. In Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 1998; Volume 5, pp. 1–695. [Google Scholar]
  48. Metzeltin, D.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; García-Rodríguez, F. Diatoms of Uruguay. Compared with other taxa from South America and elsewhere. In Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2005; Volume 15, pp. 1–736. [Google Scholar]
  49. Krammer, K. Pinnularia eine monographie der europaischen taxa. In Bibliotheca Diatomologica; Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung: Stuttgart, Germany, 1992; Volume 26, pp. 1–353. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kulikovskiy, M.; Glushchenko, A.; Genkal, S.I.; Kuznetsova, I. Identification Book of Diatoms from Russia; Filigran: Yaroslavl, Russia, 2016; 803p. [Google Scholar]
  51. Metzeltin, D.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Soninkhishig, N. Diatoms in Mongolia. In Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2009; Volume 20, pp. 1–537. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bruder, K.; Sato, S.; Medlin, L.K. Morphological and molecular investigations of naviculoid diatoms IV. Pinnularia vs. Caloneis. Diatom 2008, 24, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kezlya, E.; Maltsev, Y.; Genkal, S.; Krivova, Z.; Kulikovskiy, M. Phylogeny and Fatty Acid Profiles of New Pinnularia (Bacillariophyta) Species from Soils of Vietnam. Cells 2022, 11, 2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Naviculaceae Neue und wenig bekannte Taxa, neue Kombinationen und Synonyme sowie Bemerkungen zu einigen Gattungen. In Bibliotheca Diatomologica; Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung: Stuttgart, Germany, 1985; Volume 9, pp. 1–230. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cox, E. Variation within the genus Pinnularia Ehrenb.: Further evidence for the use of live material in diatom systematics? In Proceedings of the 9th International Diatom Symposium, Bristol, UK, 24–30 August 1988; pp. 437–447. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mann, D. A discussion of Caloneis and related genera. Diatom 2001, 17, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ehrenberg, C.G. Mittheilungen Über Neue Asiatische Lager Fossiler Infusorien-Erden aus Dem Russischen Trans-Kaukasien (Grusien) und Sibirien; Bericht Über Die zur Bekanntmachung Geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin; Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 1843; pp. 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cleve, P.T. Synopsis of the Naviculoid Diatoms: Part I; Kongliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar Series 4; Norstedt: Stockholm, Sweden, 1894; Volume 26, pp. 1–194. [Google Scholar]
  59. Metzeltin, D.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Tropical Diatoms of South America II. In Iconographia Diatomologica; Gantner Verlag: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2007; Volume 18, pp. 1–877. [Google Scholar]
  60. Levkov, Z.; Williams, D.M. Observations on Caloneis Cleve (Bacillariophyceae) species from the ancient lakes Ohrid and Prespa. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 2014, 143, 141–158. [Google Scholar]
  61. Vidaković, D.; Krizmanić, J.; Gavrilović, B.; Dojčinović, B.P.; Levkov, Z.; Dimkić, I.; Ćirić, M. Artificial sandpit lake as a habitat of brackish diatom species. Bot. Lett. 2022, 169, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bishop, I.; Esposito, R.; Tyree, M.; Spaulding, S.A. A diatom voucher flora from selected southeast rivers (USA). Phytotaxa 2017, 332, 101–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Spaulding, S.; Potapova, M.; Bishop, I.; Lee, S.; Gasperak, T.; Jovanoska, E.; Furey, P.; Edlund, M. Diatoms. org: Supporting taxonomists, connecting communities. Diatom Res. 2021, 36, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kollár, J.; Pinseel, E.; Vyverman, W.; Poulícková, A. A time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny provides insights into the evolution, taxonomy and DNA barcoding of the Pinnularia gibba group (Bacillariophyta). Fottea 2021, 21, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guillard, R.R.L.; Lorenzen, C.J. Yellow-green algae with chlorophyllide c12. J. Phycol. 1972, 8, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zimmermann, J.; Jahn, R.; Gemeinholzer, B. Barcoding diatoms: Evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, in-cluding new primers and protocols. Org. Divers. Evol. 2011, 11, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alverson, A.J.; Jansen, R.K.; Theriot, E.C. Bridging the Rubicon: Phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonizations of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2007, 45, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Katoh, K.; Toh, H. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1899–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Drummond, A.J.; Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Carter, J.; Bailey-Watts, A. A taxonomic study of diatoms from standing freshwaters in Shetland. Nova Hedwig. 1981, 33, 513–629. [Google Scholar]
  74. Evans, K.; Wortley, A.; Simpson, G.; Chepurnov, V.; Mann, D. A molecular systematic approach to explore diversity within the Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyta) 1. J. Phycol. 2008, 44, 215–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lobban, C.; Majewska, R.; Ashworth, M.; Bizsel, N.; Bosak, S.; Kooistra, W.H.; Lam, D.W.; Navarro, J.N.; Pennesi, C.; Sato, S.; et al. Diatom genus Hyalosira (Rhabdonematales emend.) and resolution of its polyphyly in Grammatophoraceae and Rhabdonemataceae with a new genus, Placosira, and five new Hyalosira species. Protist 2021, 172, 125816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Krammer, K.; Lange-Bertalot, H. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa; Ettl, H., Gerloff, J., Heynig, H., Mollenhauer, D., Eds.; Gustav Fisher Verlag: Jena, Germany, 1986; 876p. [Google Scholar]
  77. Pinseel, E.; Janssens, S.B.; Verleyen, E.; Vanormelingen, P.; Kohler, T.J.; Biersma, E.M.; Sabbe, K.; Van de Vijver, B.; Vyverman, W. Global radiation in a rare biosphere soil diatom. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sabir, J.; Theriot, E.; Manning, S.; Al-Malki, A.; Khiyami, M.; Al-Ghamdi, A.; Sabir, M.J.; Romanovicz, D.K.; Hajrah, N.H.; El Omri, A.; et al. Phylogenetic analysis and a review of the history of the accidental phytoplankter, Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin (Bacillariophyta). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Souffreau, C.; Vanormelingen, P.; van de Vijver, B.; Isheva, T.; Verleyen, E.; Sabbe, K.; Vyverman, W. Molecular evidence for distinct Antarctic lineages in the cosmopolitan terrestrial diatoms Pinnularia borealis and Hantzschia amphioxys. Protist 2013, 164, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Witkowski, A.; Li, C.; Zgłobicka, I.; Yu, S.X.; Ashworth, M.; Dąbek, P.; Qin, S.; Tang, C.; Krzywda, M.; Ruppel, M.; et al. Multigene assessment of biodiversity of diatom (Bacillariophyceae) assemblages from the littoral zone of the Bohai and Yellow Seas in Yantai Region of Northeast China with some remarks on ubiquitous taxa. J. Coast. Res. 2016, 74, 166–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zimmermann, J.; Abarca, N.; Enk, N.; Skibbe, O.; Kusber, W.; Jahn, R. Taxonomic Reference Libraries for Environmental Barcoding: A Best Practice Example from Diatom Research. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Pinnularia baicalgenkalii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B194. Oxidized material, Slide No. 19179. (AE). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (C). Holotype. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 1. Pinnularia baicalgenkalii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B194. Oxidized material, Slide No. 19179. (AE). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (C). Holotype. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g001
Figure 2. Pinnularia baicalgenkalii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B194. Oxidized material, Slide no. 19179. (A,B). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (C). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (D). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (E). Scanning electron microscopy, external views, areolae. Scale bars (AD) =10 μm; (E) =1 μm.
Figure 2. Pinnularia baicalgenkalii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B194. Oxidized material, Slide no. 19179. (A,B). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (C). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (D). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (E). Scanning electron microscopy, external views, areolae. Scale bars (AD) =10 μm; (E) =1 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g002
Figure 3. Pinnularia baicalflexuosa Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B054–3. Oxidized material, Slide no. 18959. (AE). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (C). Holotype. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 3. Pinnularia baicalflexuosa Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B054–3. Oxidized material, Slide no. 18959. (AE). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (C). Holotype. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g003
Figure 4. Pinnularia baicalflexuosa Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B054–3. Oxidized material, Slide no. 18959. (AE) Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Pinnularia baicalflexuosa Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B054–3. Oxidized material, Slide no. 18959. (AE) Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g004
Figure 5. Pinnularia baicalflexuosa Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B054–3. Oxidized material, Slide no. 18959. (A,B). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (B). Frustule in girdle view. (C). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (D). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 5. Pinnularia baicalflexuosa Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B054–3. Oxidized material, Slide no. 18959. (A,B). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, size diminution series. (B). Frustule in girdle view. (C). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (D). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g005
Figure 6. Pinnularia microfrauenbergiana Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B025. Slide no. 18931. (AU). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (AI). Live cells with plastids structure. (JU). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (V). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (W). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (GI,U). Frustule in girdle view. (O). Holotype. Scale bars (AU) =10 μm; (V,W) =2.5 μm.
Figure 6. Pinnularia microfrauenbergiana Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B025. Slide no. 18931. (AU). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (AI). Live cells with plastids structure. (JU). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (V). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (W). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (GI,U). Frustule in girdle view. (O). Holotype. Scale bars (AU) =10 μm; (V,W) =2.5 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g006
Figure 7. Pinnularia pergrunowii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B 162–3. Slide no. 18989. (AN). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (AD). Live cells with plastids structure. (EN). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (O). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (P). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (D,M,N). Frustule in girdle view. (H). Holotype. Scale bars (AN) =10 μm; (O,P) =5 μm.
Figure 7. Pinnularia pergrunowii Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B 162–3. Slide no. 18989. (AN). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (AD). Live cells with plastids structure. (EN). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (O). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (P). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (D,M,N). Frustule in girdle view. (H). Holotype. Scale bars (AN) =10 μm; (O,P) =5 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g007
Figure 8. Pinnularia siberiosinistra Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B024–1. Slide no. 18930. (AV). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (AF). Live cells with plastids structure. (GV). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (W). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (X). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (E,F,V). Frustule in girdle view. (H). Holotype. Scale bars (AV) =10 μm; (W,X) =2.5 μm.
Figure 8. Pinnularia siberiosinistra Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B024–1. Slide no. 18930. (AV). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (AF). Live cells with plastids structure. (GV). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (W). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (X). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (E,F,V). Frustule in girdle view. (H). Holotype. Scale bars (AV) =10 μm; (W,X) =2.5 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g008
Figure 9. Pinnularia baicalodivergens Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B 112. Slide no. 19170. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (A,B). Live cells with plastids structure. (CN). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (N). Frustule in girdle view. (C). Holotype. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 9. Pinnularia baicalodivergens Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B 112. Slide no. 19170. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (A,B). Live cells with plastids structure. (CN). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (N). Frustule in girdle view. (C). Holotype. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g009
Figure 10. Pinnularia baicalodivergens Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Oxidized material, Strain B112. Scanning electron microscopy. (AC). External views. (DF). Internal views. (A,D). The whole valve. (B,E). Central area. (C,F). Valve end. Scale bars (A,D) =5 μm; (B,C,E,F) =2 μm.
Figure 10. Pinnularia baicalodivergens Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Oxidized material, Strain B112. Scanning electron microscopy. (AC). External views. (DF). Internal views. (A,D). The whole valve. (B,E). Central area. (C,F). Valve end. Scale bars (A,D) =5 μm; (B,C,E,F) =2 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g010
Figure 11. Pinnularia baicalodivergens Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Oxidized material, Strain B097. (AH). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (A). Live cell with plastids structure. (BH). Slide no. 19248, oxidized material, size diminution series. (I). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (J). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (H). Frustule in girdle view. Scale bars (AH) =10 μm.; (I,J) =5 μm.
Figure 11. Pinnularia baicalodivergens Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Oxidized material, Strain B097. (AH). Light microscopy, differential interference contrast. (A). Live cell with plastids structure. (BH). Slide no. 19248, oxidized material, size diminution series. (I). Scanning electron microscopy, external views. (J). Scanning electron microscopy, internal views. (H). Frustule in girdle view. Scale bars (AH) =10 μm.; (I,J) =5 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g011
Figure 12. Pinnularia baicalislandica Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B238. Slide no. 18997. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, (AD). Live cells with plastids structure. (EO). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (D,O). Frustule in girdle view. (E). Holotype. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Figure 12. Pinnularia baicalislandica Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B238. Slide no. 18997. Light microscopy, differential interference contrast, (AD). Live cells with plastids structure. (EO). Oxidized material, size diminution series. (D,O). Frustule in girdle view. (E). Holotype. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g012
Figure 13. Pinnularia baicalislandica Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B238, oxidized material. Scanning electron microscopy. (AD). External views. (EG). Internal views. Scale bars (A,E) =10 μm; (F) =5 μm; (BD,G) =2 μm.
Figure 13. Pinnularia baicalislandica Kulikovskiy, Glushchenko, Kezlya and Maltsev sp. nov. Strain B238, oxidized material. Scanning electron microscopy. (AD). External views. (EG). Internal views. Scale bars (A,E) =10 μm; (F) =5 μm; (BD,G) =2 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g013
Figure 14. Phylogenetic position of the new Pinnularia species (indicated in bold) based on Bayesian inference for the partial rbcL and 18S rRNA genes. The total length of the alignment is 1797 characters. Bootstrap supports (BS) from ML (constructed by RA × ML) and posterior probabilities (PP) from BI (constructed by Beast) are presented on the nodes in order. Only BS and PP above 50 and 0.9 are shown. Strain numbers (if available) and GenBank numbers are indicated for all sequences.
Figure 14. Phylogenetic position of the new Pinnularia species (indicated in bold) based on Bayesian inference for the partial rbcL and 18S rRNA genes. The total length of the alignment is 1797 characters. Bootstrap supports (BS) from ML (constructed by RA × ML) and posterior probabilities (PP) from BI (constructed by Beast) are presented on the nodes in order. Only BS and PP above 50 and 0.9 are shown. Strain numbers (if available) and GenBank numbers are indicated for all sequences.
Plants 12 03552 g014
Figure 15. Light micrographs of oxidized material of some strains of Pinnularia and Caloneis used in our study. (AC). P. sp., strain B027. (DF). P. parvulissima, strain B028. (GI). C. fontinalis, strain B182. (JM). P. sp., strain B026. (NQ). P. subgibba var. sublinearis, strain B296–1. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Figure 15. Light micrographs of oxidized material of some strains of Pinnularia and Caloneis used in our study. (AC). P. sp., strain B027. (DF). P. parvulissima, strain B028. (GI). C. fontinalis, strain B182. (JM). P. sp., strain B026. (NQ). P. subgibba var. sublinearis, strain B296–1. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Plants 12 03552 g015
Figure 16. Map showing the sampling locations.
Figure 16. Map showing the sampling locations.
Plants 12 03552 g016
Table 1. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. and related species.
Table 1. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. and related species.
P. baicalgenkalii sp. nov. P. genkalii P. ilkaschoenfilderi P. reichardtii
Outlineelliptic with parallel sideslinearlinearlinear
Endsbroadly roundedcuneiform roundedcuneate and broadly roundedlinear cuneate rounded
Length, μm92–9975–13075–10572–130
Width, μm19.5–2017–2013.4–1714.7–18.8
Striae in 10 μm66–76–78–9
Raphecomplex, undulatesemicomplex to broadly complexbroadly complexbroadly semicomplex
Axial arealinear, narrowlinear, narrow 1/5 width of the valvelinear 1/5–1/3 the width of the valvelinear 1/4–1/3 the width of the valve
Central areasmall, asymmetrically ellipticslight asymmetricallylarge, roundishsmall, asymmetrically rounded
ReferencesThis study[38][38][38]
Table 2. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. and related species.
Table 2. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalflexuosa sp. nov. and related species.
P. baicalflexuosa sp. Nov.P. neglectiformis Pin706F P. neglectiformis P. torta P. flexuosa
Outlinelinear with parallel sideslinear, sides parallel to slightly convex or triundulatelinear, sides parallel to slightly convex or triundulatelinearlinear, sides parallel
Endsbroadly roundedrounded to cuneiform roundedrounded to cuneiform roundedbroadly roundedbroadly rounded
Length, μm109–116101.4–109.280–130127.5–189173–270
Width, μm17.5–1918–1916–2020–2432–50
Striae in 10 μm7–87.9–8.38–96–74–5
Raphesemicomplex, undulatesemicomplexsemicomplexsemicomplexsemicomplex to complex
Axial arealinear, narrowlinear 1/5–1/4 width of valvelinear 1/5–1/4 width of valvelinear, near 1/4 width of valvelinear 1/4 to 1/3 width of valve
Central areasmall, asymmetrically elliptica little wider than the axial area, roundish or irregulara little wider than the axial area, roundish or irregularasymmetrical, rhombic-round, 1/3–1/2 width of valvea slight widening of the axial area, asymmetrical
ReferencesThis study[39][38][40,41][38]
Table 4. Comparison of morphological features of P. pergrunowii sp. nov. and related species.
Table 4. Comparison of morphological features of P. pergrunowii sp. nov. and related species.
Species, StrainsOutlineEndsValve Length, μmValve Width, μmStriae in 10 μmRapheAxial AreaCentral AreaReferences
P. pergrunowii sp. nov. B162linear, sides concavecapitate49.5–518.0–8.510–11straight, filiformlinear, narrow, widening towards the central areawide transverse fasciaThis study
P. anglicalinear, sides straightdistinctly small subcapitate30–7010–139–11filiform, key and slotlinear, narrowrhombic, irregular or a moderatly broad fascia[38]
P. mesolepta
AT_160Gel30
linear, triundulaterostrate43.8–46.18.3–8.911–13lateral, key and slot raphenarrow, slightly lanceolaterhombic, asymmetrical fascia[46]
P. grunowii
Pin 889 MG
linear, triundulatecapitate41.1–42.77.7–8.112.2–13.8straight, filiformlinear, narrowrhombic, fascia[39]
P. termitina UTEX FD484n/dn/dn/dn/dn/dn/dn/dn/dhttps://utex.org/products/utex-lb-fd-0484 (accessed on 25 September 2023)
P. termitinalinear, triundulatesubcapitate31–574.5–5.511–15straight, filiformlinear, narrowrhombic, wide fascia[41]
P. rhombofasciatalinearcapitate56–649–9.49–10straight, filiformlinear, narrowrhombic, fascia[47]
P. ferrophilalinear, triundulate to biundulatebroadly capitate to flatly rounded30–628.8–109–10moderately lateral1/4–1/5 of the width of the valvevery large, rhombic fascia[38]
P. dicephalalinearbroadly capitate44–506–6.710–11lateral, weakly undulate1/3 of the width of the valve expanded towards the centerrhombic-round, wide fascia[40]
P. latarealinear, sides concavecapitate with narrow neck and broad shoulders35–648–109–11narrowly, lateralform together a wide, lanceolate space with a very broad fascia[38,48]
Table 5. Comparison of morphological features of P. siberiosinistra sp. nov. and related species.
Table 5. Comparison of morphological features of P. siberiosinistra sp. nov. and related species.
P. siberiosinistra sp. nov.P. sinistraP. sp. (Tor4)r
Outlinenarrowly ellipticallinear with slightly convex, more rarely straight or weakly concave sideslinear with weakly undulate sides
Endssubcapitateindistinctly differentiated and broadly protractedsubcapitate
Length, μm25–2917–5242.6
Width, μm54–6.55.8
Striae in 10 μm12–1411–13 (14)12.4
Raphestraight, filiformfiliform, somewhat lateral in large specimensstraight, filiform
Axial areanarrowly lanceolate and widening towards the central arealinear, in large individuals lanceolatelanceolate and widening towards the central area
Central areapresented by a wide transverse fasciaan often slightly asymmetric fasciapresented by a wide transverse fascia
ReferencesThis study[38,49][39]
Table 6. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. and related species.
Table 6. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. and related species.
P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. B112P. baicalodivergens sp. nov. B097P. divergens var. mediaP. microstauron var. microstauronP. submicrostauron
Outlinelinearlinearlinearlinearlinear
Endssubcapitate roundedsubcapitate roundedsubcapitate roundedbroadly rostrate and wedge-shapedrostrate rounded
Length, μm46–5043.5–5040–7030–78(100)37–45
Width, μm8–98.4–9.410–1310–12.48–9
Striae in 10 μm11–1211–1210–119–11(15)12–13
Raphestraight, filiformstraight, filiformstraight, filiformstraight, filiformlateral
Axial arealinear, narrow, widening towards the central arealinear, narrow, widening towards the central arealinear, narrow (1/3), widening towards the central arealinear, narrowlinear
Central areaasymmetric transverse fasciaasymmetric transverse fasciarhombic-round, fasciaasymmetric transverse fascia, often absentrhombic-round, fascia
ReferencesThis studyThis study[38,48,50][38,40][40]
Table 7. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalislandica sp. nov. and related species.
Table 7. Comparison of morphological features of P. baicalislandica sp. nov. and related species.
Species, StrainsOutlineEndsValve Length, μmValve Width, μmStriae in 10 μmRapheAxial AreaCentral AreaReferences
P. baicalislandica sp. nov.linearbroadly rounded54–6010–1110straight, filiformlinear, narrowasymmetric, rhomboidThis study
P. subcomutatalinear-elliptic to linear-lanceolate, sides slightly convexbroadly rounded32–8310–13.49–12laterallinear, narrow (1/5)roundish-rhombic or orbicular, simefascia 1–2 striae on one side are absent[38]
P. subcomutata var. nonfasciatalinear-elliptic to linear-lanceolate, sides slightly convexbroadly rounded32–8310.0–13.49–12laterallinear, narrow (1/5)roundish-rhombic or orbicular, without fascia[38]
P. islandicalinear-ellipticbroadly rounded48–8412–149–10lateral, moderately broadup to 1/3 the width of the valverhombic to irregular roundish, sometimes crescent-like markings are present[38]
P. rupestrislinear-ellipticbroadly rounded40–909–12.412–13lateral narrow to moderately broadup to 1/4 the width of the valveround to elongated-elliptic[38,43]
P. levkoviilinear to linear-ellipticbroadly rounded36–608–108–10narrowly lateral1/4 the width of the valve extended towards a central areavariably shaped, narrowly[51]
P. perspicualinearbroadly cuneate, rounded40–6513–158–11lateral, moderately broadlinear 1/5–1/4 the width of the valverhomboidal with weakly developed crescent-like markings[38,50,51]
Table 8. Correlation of morphological features in phylogenetic clades and subclades of Pinnularia-Caloneis.
Table 8. Correlation of morphological features in phylogenetic clades and subclades of Pinnularia-Caloneis.
CladeSubcladeInternal Alveoli ApertureMarkings on the Valve SurfaceFasciaRaphe SystemChloroplasts Form
A“divergens”nearly opennone or crescent-shaped or irregular hollow markings on the external surface+lateraltwo plate-like
“stomatophora”nearly opencrescent-shaped or irregular hollow markings on the external surface *+lateraltwo plate-like
Caloneis lauta n/dno+fusiformtwo plate-like
“caloneis1”nearly closednone or not confirmed on the voucher images+/−fusiformtwo plate-like/H-shaped in C. silicula
“caloneis2”n/dn/dn/dn/dn/d
B“subgibba”partially closedghost striae on the internal surface of the central area **+lateraltwo plate-like
“nodosa”nearly openheavily structured by a relief-like structure on the outer surface+lateraltwo plate-like
“grunowii”nearly openno+lateral or fusiformH-shaped
“acrosphaeria”nearly closedmottled, wart-like structures on outer surfaces and slightly structured on inner surfaces-lateraltwo plate-like
C“viridiformis”partially closedno-complex or semicomplextwo plate-like
P. substreptoraphe AT 70.09partially closedno-complextwo plate-like
P. acuminata Pin876 TMn/dno-lateraltwo plate-like
“subcommutata”partially closedno-lateralH-shaped
P. sp. 4 (Wie)an/dno-lateralH-shaped
P. altiplanensis Tor11bn/dno+fusiformH-shaped
P. brebissonii UTEX FD274
P. cf. microstauron (B2)c
Caloneis budensis
partially closedno+lateral/ fusiformH-shaped/ two plate-like
“borealis”nearly openno−/+lateral or fusiformtwo plate-like
“caloneis 3”nearly openno-fusiformtwo plate-like
* Unique features highlighted in bold. ** There are exceptions.
Table 9. List of strains examined in this study, with their GenBank accession numbers. Geographic locality of samples and measured ecological parameters are indicated.
Table 9. List of strains examined in this study, with their GenBank accession numbers. Geographic locality of samples and measured ecological parameters are indicated.
StrainsSlide NoSample LocalityCollection of DateCoordinatest (°C)pHCond.
(μS cm−1)
SubstrateGenBank
Accession
Number,
rbcL, Partial
GenBank
Accession
Number, SSU
rDNA, Partial
P. baicalogenkalii B19419179Russia, Kapustinskaja River, flowing into Lake Baikal, near to the cape Tolstoj, sample no 3417 July 201152°38.484′ N 107°23.218′ E9.56.961benthosKM350002KM350092
P. baicaloflexuosa B054–318959Russia, Selenga River, near the Brjansk Village, sample no 4019 July 201152°03.376′ N 106°52.672′ E257.9202benthosKM349984KM350068
P. microfrauenbergiana B02518931Russia, Vydrinnaja River, sample no 51.120 July 201151°29.383′ N 104°50.986′ E7n/d14periphytonKM349979KM350062
P. pergrunowii B162–318989Russia, Bolshaya Suhaya River near to the Zarech’e Settlement, sample no 28.217 July 201152°33.418′ N 107°08.564′ E15.46.163benthosKM349996KM350084
P. siberiosinistra B024–118930Russia, Vydrinnaja River, sample no 51.120 July 201151°29.383′ N 104°50.986′ E7n/d14periphytonKM 349978KM 350061
P. baicalodivergens B11219170Russia, unnamed Bay in 8 km from Jenhaluk, sample no 4.514 July 201152°27.042′ N 106°53.215′ E257.5295benthosKM349992KM350078
P. baicalodivergens B09719248KM349990KM350075
P. baicalislandica B23818997Russia, Zagza River, sample no 11.215 July 201152°31.656′ N 107°05.114′ E148.540periphytonKM350009KM350101
P. sp., B027–119223Russia, Vydrinnaja River, sample no 51.120 July 201151°29.383′ N 104°50.986′ E7n/d14periphytonKM349981KM350064
P. parvulissima B02819222Russia, Vydrinnaja River, sample no 51.120 July 201151°29.383′ N 104°50.986′ E7n/d14periphytonKM349982KM350065
P. sp., B026–118941KM349980KM350063
P. subgibba var. sublinearis B296–118922Russia, Zagza River, sample no 11.215 July 201152°31.656′ N 107°05.114′ E148.540periphytonKM350013KM350110
C. fontinalis strain B18219015Russia, Kapustinskaja River, flowing into Lake Baikal, near to the cape Tolstoj, sample no 3417 July 201152°38.484′ N 107°23.218′ E9.56.961benthosKM349999KM350087
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulikovskiy, M.; Glushchenko, A.; Kezlya, E.; Kuznetsova, I.; Kociolek, J.P.; Maltsev, Y. The Genus Pinnularia Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from the Transbaikal Area (Russia, Siberia): Description of Seven New Species on the Basis of Morphology and Molecular Data with Discussion of the Phylogenetic Position of Caloneis. Plants 2023, 12, 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203552

AMA Style

Kulikovskiy M, Glushchenko A, Kezlya E, Kuznetsova I, Kociolek JP, Maltsev Y. The Genus Pinnularia Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from the Transbaikal Area (Russia, Siberia): Description of Seven New Species on the Basis of Morphology and Molecular Data with Discussion of the Phylogenetic Position of Caloneis. Plants. 2023; 12(20):3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203552

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulikovskiy, Maxim, Anton Glushchenko, Elena Kezlya, Irina Kuznetsova, John Patrick Kociolek, and Yevhen Maltsev. 2023. "The Genus Pinnularia Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta) from the Transbaikal Area (Russia, Siberia): Description of Seven New Species on the Basis of Morphology and Molecular Data with Discussion of the Phylogenetic Position of Caloneis" Plants 12, no. 20: 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203552

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop