Next Article in Journal
Nitric Oxide Participates in Aluminum-Stress-Induced Pollen Tube Growth Inhibition in Tea (Camelliasinensis) by Regulating CsALMTs
Next Article in Special Issue
Resistance to Snow Mold as a Target Trait for Rye Breeding
Previous Article in Journal
Draft Genome Sequence of Priestia sp. Strain TSO9, a Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Associated with Wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
100 Years of Chromosome Research in Rye, Secale L.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 17
10.3390/plants11172232
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Dietary Intake of Rye Affects Porcine Gut Microbiota in a Salmonella Typhimurium Infection Study

by
Julia Hankel
1,*,
Bussarakam Chuppava
1,
Volker Wilke
1,
Clara Berenike Hartung
1,
Uthayakumar Muthukumarasamy
2,3,
Till Strowig
2,3,
Knud Erik Bach Knudsen
4,
Josef Kamphues
1 and
Christian Visscher
1
1
Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30559 Hannover, Germany
2
Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
3
Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
4
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(17), 2232; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172232
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 25 August 2022 / Accepted: 25 August 2022 / Published: 28 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rye Genetics, Genomics and Breeding)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacterial fermentation of undigested carbohydrates in the hindgut has considerable potential for the stimulation or inhibition of the growth of distinct bacteria within microbiota. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether high levels of rye affect porcine gut microbiota composition with subsequent effects on the load of Salmonella Typhimurium, an intestinal pathogen with zoonotic relevance. Therefore, forty-two 25-day-old piglets were allocated to two groups and fed a diet containing either 69% wheat or 69% rye for 35 days. One week after introducing the two different diets, the piglets were experimentally infected with Salmonella Typhimurium. The microbiota composition of cecal and fecal samples of the piglets were evaluated 28 days after infection. In the cecum, promoted growth of Bifidobacterium, several lactic acid bacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were seen in pigs fed the diet containing 69% rye. Bacterial species belonging to the genera Bifidobacterium and Catenisphaera were associated with differing bacterial counts of Salmonella Typhimurium detected in the cecal contents of all piglets in both feeding groups via cultural cultivation. The high intake of rye instead of wheat seems to promote the growth of beneficial intestinal bacteria accompanied by impaired growth conditions for the foodborne pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium.

1. Introduction

Carbohydrates represent a diverse group of simpler monosaccharides and disaccharides to complex organized polysaccharides which form cell walls [1]. Depending on their chemical form (e.g., linkages between carbohydrate components), carbohydrates are degraded by either endogenous or microbial enzymes, thus having a great impact on the site of their digestion and how they influence the physiology of the gastrointestinal tract [2]. However, a classification based purely on chemistry does not allow a simple translation into nutritional properties, and terminology based on physiological properties would help to focus on the aforementioned potential nutritional properties [2]. As neither chemical nor physical description of carbohydrates directly reflects their physiological properties and health benefits, a number of terms to describe physiological functions of carbohydrates have been created, one of which is dietary fiber [3]. Dietary fiber is defined as carbohydrate polymers with a degree of polymerization not lower than three, which are neither digested nor absorbed in the small intestine [3]. This component has, compared to other dietary components, the main modulating effects on gastrointestinal microbiota and environment and on the production of fermentation products [2]. The bacterial fermentation of undigested carbohydrates depends on its physiochemical properties as well as the fiber dosage and the bacterial community composition of the individual consuming the fiber [4].
Cereal grains from different species differ significantly in several carbohydrate fractions, while rye has the highest concentrations of soluble arabinoxylans and fructans [5]. Cereal grains such as wheat and barley are frequently used as main ingredients in pig diets [6,7]. Comparing rye with wheat, the carbohydrate composition of rye is similar to wheat in many aspects, but rye has a higher content of fructans, arabinoxylans and mixed linked β(1→3,1→4)-D-glucan (β-glucan) than wheat. Arabinoxylans are the major part of dietary fiber polysaccharides and of soluble dietary fiber in rye [8]. The arabinoxylan molecules are broken down by enzymes that are not present in the endogenous digestive juice secreted in the gastrointestinal tract or present on the brush borders of the small intestine epithelium in monogastric species; however, intrinsic enzymes are present in the grain or can be produced by bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract [8]. This complex molecular structure of rye arabinoxylans makes them resistant against the degradation of the residing microbiota of the stomach and small intestine of monogastric species [8]. Arabinoxylans from rye as well as from wheat are almost completely recovered in ileal effluents and only modestly reduced in size during passage through the small intestine, therefore having a much higher influence on the viscosity in the small intestinal digesta [8]. The ileal digestibility of arabinoxylans fed a rye-based diet compared to a wheat-based diet to pigs is higher (19.2% vs. 8.2%) [9]. In addition, the ileal digestibility of starch and amino acids in growing pigs is greater when offered wheat compared to hybrid rye [10]. Dietary components that are not digested by endogenous enzymes in the small intestine become available as substrates for the microbiota present in the large intestine [2]. Finally, whole grains are a rich source of phytochemicals, and the most important classes of phytochemicals found in cereals of common wheat or rye differ [11,12]. Concentrated in the bran fraction, wheat has a high phenolic content, principally alkylresorcinols and hydroxycinnamic acids (ferulic, sinapic and ρ-coumaric acids) [12]. However, rye contains still more alkylresorcinols compared to wheat and the other cereal varieties, which is related to the high level of folate in this grain [12]. Other phytochemicals such as tocols, polyphenols and ferulic acid are found at lower levels in rye compared to wheat [12]. Phytochemicals undergo microbiotic metabolism before absorption and might also affect the composition of the microbiota [11,12].
As the consumption of dietary fiber promotes extensive metabolic interactions among intestinal bacterial species, there is considerable potential for the indirect stimulation of the growth of other microbes within the community through the utilization of by-products of other community members, a process called cross-feeding [4]. It seems that only a limited number of versatile polysaccharide-degrading bacterial species are present in the large intestine and degrade arabinoxylans to smaller molecules, which are cross-fed to lactobacilli and bifidobacteria [8]. In addition, bacterial fermentation of polysaccharides results in the production of acidic fermentation end products, primarily lactic acid and short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), which reduce intestinal chyme’s pH value [4]. SCFAs are being considered as potential prebiotic substances to control Salmonella enterica, but also have multiple effects on Salmonella enterica’s virulence genes [13]. Probiotics and prebiotics, for example, are proposed to reduce bacterial pathogens by increasing SCFA levels in the intestinal tract. Nevertheless, alterations in SCFA concentrations and ratios that favor acetate and decrease total amounts of propionate and butyrate might make the organisms more prone to invasion [14], as indicated by the invasion gene expression and virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium, which are altered by SCFA concentration and composition [14]. Thus, it is intended to favor the proportion of butyric acid among the SCFA. While pathogenic properties of Salmonella spp. have been studied quite extensively, it is only recently that the interactions of Salmonella spp. with gut microbiota, colonization resistance and ways to overcome this resistance have been the focus of investigation [15].
Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium (Salmonella Typhimurium) can be carried by pigs asymptomatically in their tonsils, gut and gut-associated lymphoid tissue for months [16]. Salmonella Typhimurium is a foodborne pathogen. Zoonosis monitoring activities carried out in 2019 in 36 European countries revealed 87,923 confirmed human salmonellosis cases, this being the second most commonly reported gastrointestinal infection in humans, and an important cause of foodborne outbreaks [17]. Pig meat and products thereof are one of the four most implicated food vehicles [17].
As the bacterial fermentation of undigested carbohydrates in the hindgut has considerable potential for influencing intestinal microbiota composition, we hypothesized that high dietary levels of rye affected porcine gut microbiota with subsequent effects on the intestinal load of Salmonella Typhimurium, which may clarify the underlying cause of the observed lower Salmonella counts in the gut when pigs were fed a diet with a high proportion of rye [18]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the intestinal microbiota composition of piglets under the implemented feeding measures and to highlight possible interactions between Salmonella Typhimurium and the gut microbiota. The overall objective of the investigation was to find new ways to reduce the Salmonella load in the intestines of pigs prior to slaughter, which should reduce the risk of contamination, thus being relevant in a food safety context.

2. Materials and Methods

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experiments of the Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, LAVES (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit; reference: 33.8-42502-04-19/3257, 27.11.2019).

2.1. Experimental Design

In three independent repetitions (Exp1, Exp2, Exp3), a total of forty-two weaned piglets (aged 24.9 ± 0.7 days at the start of the experiments) of one farm (Farm for Education and Research in Ruthe, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation) were allocated to two groups and housed individually in a biosafety level 2 animal facility (pen dimensions per animal: 1.1 m × 2.2 m). With the aim of creating comparable groups, the piglets were selected on the basis of their body weight (control groups: 7.48 ± 1.11 kg and experimental groups: 7.48 ± 1.20 kg), sex ratio (female/male castrated) and sow (siblings distributed in both groups). As a parental lines served db.Viktoria and db.77® of BHZP genetics (BHZP GmbH, Dahlenburg-Ellringen, Germany). The piglets were housed under a 12 h light, 12 h dark lighting schedule. The room temperature was recorded daily and amounted on average to 24.5 ± 0.8 °C (in a range of 28 °C initially and 21 °C at the end of the study). The piglets had ad libitum access to feed and water. They were fed a complete pelleted feed based on either 69% wheat (control diet) or 69% hybrid rye (variety Trebiano, KWS LOCHOW GmbH, Bergen, Germany; experimental diet).
After a seven-day adaptation period, all piglets were orally infected with 2 mL of a broth containing ~ 1 x 107 colony-forming units (CFU) of Salmonella Typhimurium. The used Salmonella serotype was obtained from a field study by Visscher et al. [19]: Salmonella Typhimurium 1,4,5,12:i:1,2; DT 193. The bacterium was grown aerobically onto Columbia blood agar (OxoidTM Deutschland GmbH, Wesel, Germany) at 37 °C for 16 to 24 h. An isotonic 0.9% sodium chloride solution was used as the basis for the infection bouillon. A defined density of Salmonella Typhimurium was adjusted (0.5 McFarland units) using a densitometer (DEN 1B, biosan SIA, Riga, Latvia), which already corresponded to the targeted challenge dose. The challenge dose was verified by plating dilutions of bacterial culture and quantifying colonies. After 28 days postinfection, piglets were dissected. Prior to the dissection, the piglets were anaesthetized with neuroleptanalgesia by means of a combination of ketamine (15 mg/kg body weight intramuscularly) and azaperone (2 mg/kg body weight intramuscularly). Subsequently the pigs were euthanized by intracardial injection of T 61 (0.6 mL/10 kg body weight). The abdominal cavity was opened along the linea alba. The caecum was preplaced, double-ligated and then removed. Cecal chyme and fecal samples (obtained per rectum) of the pigs were collected without delay. Within the same sample Salmonella counts and microbiota composition were determined. Until the microbiota analyses, the samples were stored at −80 °C.

2.2. Diet

The remaining 31% of both diets, the control (69% wheat) and the experimental diet (69% rye), mainly consisted of soybean meal, barley, potato protein, minerals, soybean oil and feed additives. Piglets had free access to water.
The chemical composition of the diets were analyzed by standard procedures in accordance with the official methods of the Association of German Agricultural Inspection and Research Institutes (Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten; VDLUFA) [20]. Carbohydrate and lignin content were analyzed at the Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Denmark by standardized methods as described in Jaworski et al. [21]. A detailed list of ingredients and the chemical composition of the diets can be taken from Table 1. The diets were comparable in their energy, crude protein and crude fiber contents, but differed in their contents of certain carbohydrate fractions.
The carbohydrate composition of the compound feeds is shown in Table 2. The concentration of insoluble noncellulosic polysaccharides (I-NCP) was greater than the concentrations of soluble noncellulosic polysaccharides (S-NCP) in both diets with values (percentage of total nonstarch polysaccharide (NSP)) in the order of the control diet (52.8%) and 53.3% for the experimental diet.
The concentration of S-NCP was higher in the experimental diet, reaching a value of 4.6% (dry matter basis) compared to the control diet (3.5% on dry matter basis). The major sugar monomers in S-NCP were arabinose, xylose and glucose. Xylose and arabinose mainly originate from soluble arabinoxylans, whereas the majority of glucose originates from soluble β-glucans [21]. As a percentage of total NSP, the control diet (28.4%) still contained less S-NCP compared to the experimental diet (32.8%). Similar to the diets based on wheat and rye breads used in the investigations of Bach Knudsen et al. [9], the diets of the present study were comparable in dietary fiber (control diet: 14.3% and experimental diet: 15.6%) but with different proportions of the main dietary fiber polymers: in wheat, cellulose and in rye, arabinoxylans (arabinose + xylose + uronic acids). The wheat-based diet had a higher total content (2.4%) and a higher proportion (cellulose accounted for 19.4% of total NSP) of cellulose compared to the experimental diet (1.8% and 13.0%). The rye-based diet had a higher content of arabinoxylans (8.1%) and glucose (= soluble β-glucan [21], 2.6%) compared to the control diet (7.2% and 1.5%). While the proportions of arabinoxylans were similar (arabinoxylans represented 57.7% of total NSP in the control diet and 58.1% in the experimental diet), the proportions of glucose differed between the diets (glucose represented 12.2% of total NSP in the control diet and 18.4% in the experimental diet).

2.3. Microbiological Analysis

Salmonella’s quantitative analysis of the fecal samples and cecal contents was performed following the DIN EN ISO 6579-2 guidelines [22] as described in Chuppava et al. [18]. In brief, Salmonella’s quantitative analysis was performed using the most probable number (MPN) method. One gram of homogenized feces or cecal contents and 9 mL of buffered peptone water (BPW) were vortexed. The bacterial count of the sample material was determined by further serial dilution with BPW in triplicate. After a 24 h incubation at 37 °C, the total volume of each well was transferred to a deep well block filled with modified semisolid Rappaport–Vassiliadis (MSRV) agar and incubated for 24 h at 41.5 °C. The results were confirmed by cultural cultivation on Brilliance Salmonella agar. Subsequently, the number of bacteria was calculated with the help of an MPN software program [23].

2.4. DNA Extraction, Sequencing and Data Processing

First, DNA was extracted from samples using the ZymoBIOMICS 96 MagBead DNA Kit (Zymo Research Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). The hypervariable region V4 of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified in accordance with previously described protocols [24]. The primer F515/R806 was used. Amplicons were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (PE300), while the Usearch8.1 software package was used to assemble, quality control and cluster the obtained reads. The command “fastq_mergepairs” with the argument “fastq_maxdiffs 30” was used to merge the reads. Chimeric sequences were identified and removed with the help of the command “cluster_otus” (-otu_radius_pct 3) and the Uchime command included in the Usearch8.1 workflow. Quality filtering was set up with “fastq_filter” (-fastq_maxee 1) according to a minimum read length of 200 bp. Reads were clustered into 97% ID operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The UPARSE algorithm [25] was used to determine the OTU clusters and representative sequences. Silva database v128 [26] and the RDP Classifier [27] were used for taxonomic assignment with a bootstrap confidence cut-off of 70%.
Samples with fewer than 999 total reads were removed. Chloroplast and mitochondria as well as OTUs that were not present in at least more than one sample and OTUs with an abundance <0.02% were pruned. After the filtering steps, all 84 samples were included in the statistical analyses. The dataset contained 1,517,733 reads (mean number of reads: 18,068; range: 9308–24,427) mapped to 319 operational taxonomic units (OTUs).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

R (version 4.0.2) and the R-package “phyloseq” (version 1.32.0, [28]) were used for data visualization and analyses. Selected alpha diversity indices (Observed, Chao 1, and Shannon) were also calculated with “phyloseq”. The means of alpha diversity estimates were compared, with the aim to evaluate the influence of the factor treatment (Table S1). Data were checked for normality by analyzing the model residuals with the Shapiro–Wilk normality test before pairwise comparisons were conducted, all implemented in the package “rstatix” (version 0.6.0, [29]). The statements of statistical significance were based upon p-values < 0.05. The total community structure and composition of samples were assessed for changes in relation to experimental repetition (Exp1, Exp2, Exp3) and diet by a permutational multivariate analysis of variance using the Bray–Curtis distance (PERMANOVA) via the adonis function of the “vegan” package (version 2.5.6, [30]). Ordination was performed using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity-based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). Differentially abundant OTUs between both treatment groups were identified with the help of the R package “DESeq2” (version 1.28.1), which uses tests based on the negative binomial distribution [31]. This evaluation was done over all consecutive identically performed repetitions and additionally separated for each trial. Raw p-values were adjusted using the method of Benjamini and Hochberg [32] to control a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5%. Additionally, a cut-off for the log2-fold change of ±1 was set. A Venn diagram was generated using the package “rstatix” to show significantly different OTUs between pigs fed the two different diets and those that were shared among sampling sites: cecal contents and feces. To evaluate whether the differences between the two feeding groups were related to Salmonella counts, all 42 piglets were divided into two new groups according to whether the Salmonella counts in cecal contents were above or below the average value: >3.2 log10 CFU/g sample (n = 20); <3.2 log10 CFU/g sample (n = 22). Afterwards, differentially abundant OTUs between both groups were identified with the help of the R package “DESeq2” as well and results were visualized with ggplot2 (version 3.3.5 [33]).

3. Results

Results related to animal performance have already been evaluated and published in Chuppava, et al. [18]. Feeding a diet containing 69% rye to young pigs was not associated with significant differences in performance, i.e., average body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio compared with pigs fed with generally high amounts of wheat. Neither experimental infection of pigs with Salmonella Typhimurium, nor the supply of rye instead of wheat resulted in visible abnormalities in fecal consistency.

3.1. Gut Microbiota Diversity and Microbial Community

The use of rye instead of wheat in the pigs’ diet had no influence on microbiota diversity, neither in cecal contents nor in fecal samples of pigs (Table S1, Figure 1).
The bacterial composition of the cecal contents and feces of pigs differed significantly (R2 = 0.07573, p = 0.001, Figure S1). The factor diet had a significant effect on the bacterial composition of the samples in cecal contents as well as in feces, while samples separated more clearly in cecal contents (R2 = 0.095) than in feces (R2 = 0.081) by this variable alone (Table S2, Figure 2).

3.2. Identification of Specific Taxa Associated with the Diet

Microbiota of cecal contents were dominated at the phylum level by Firmicutes (76.6% ± 13.0) and Bacteroidetes (20.6% ± 12.8), followed by Actinobacteria (1.2% ± 2.60). Fecal microbiota was dominated by Firmicutes (65.1% ±10.4) and Bacteroidetes (30.0% ± 11.4) as well, followed by Spirochaetae (2.27% ± 3.10) and Actinobacteria (1.14% ± 2.71). The relative abundances of bacterial phyla in every sample are shown in Figure 3.
A total of 21 differentially abundant OTUs were identified in the pairwise comparisons of pigs fed the two different diets in cecal contents, 15 OTUs in feces. All those differentially abundant OTUs in the pairwise comparisons of the groups that fulfilled the set criterion (Benjamini and Hochberg adjusted p-values <0.05 and cut-off for the log2-fold change of ±1) can be found in Table S3 (cecal contents) and Table S4 (feces).
Only in cecal contents, OTU_31 was enriched in pigs fed rye (Figure 4). This OTU represents a bacterial species that is assigned to the genus Bifidobacterium, within the phylum Actinobacteria (the relative abundance of OTU_31 in the cecal contents of pigs fed wheat was 0.56% ± 0.44 and 1.21% ± 2.59 in pigs fed rye). Besides this bifidobacterial strain, one strain belonging to the genus Catenisphaera of the family Erysipelotrichaceae (OTU_23) and four further bacterial strains belonging to the order Lactobacillales with genera comprising lactic acid bacteria [34] were enriched in the cecal samples of piglets fed the experimental diet: two of the genus Lactobacillus (OTU_115 and OTU_43) and two of the genus Streptococcus (OTU_959 and OTU_2). In addition, OTU_40 was significantly enriched in the samples of pigs fed the experimental diet (the relative abundance of OTU_40 in the cecal contents of pigs fed wheat was 0.65% ± 0.47 and 1.01% ± 0.73 in pigs fed rye). This OTU represents a bacterial species that is assigned to the genus Faecalibacterium, with one identified species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii that clusters in different genospecies [35].
A total of 36 OTUs differed between the feeding groups in cecal contents (21 OTUs) and in feces (15 OTUs). Six of those thirty-six OTUs already differed significantly in cecal contents between pigs fed different diets and continued to differ in further parts of the hindgut, as shown in fecal samples. Those six OTUs comprised OTU_101 (genus Romboutsia of the order Clostridiales), OTU_16 (genus Terrisporobacter of the order Clostridiales), OTU_6 (genus Turicibacter of the order Erysipelotrichales), and OTU_23 (genus Catenisphaera of the order Erysipelotrichales), OTU_2 (genus Streptococcus of the order Lactobacillales) and OTU_13 closely matching the family Prevotellaceae. Sequences of OTU_101, OTU_16 and OTU_6 were lower in the cecal contents and feces of pigs fed the experimental diet, while sequences of OTU_23, OTU_2 and OTU_13 were enriched. A total of 50% of the OTUs, which were previously different in the cecum, showed no more differences in the feces. However, nine additional OTUs in feces appeared to be different between pigs fed different diets (Figure 5).
Despite performing consecutive repetitions under the same conditions, the PERMANOVA test on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities revealed that the factor experimental replication contributed significantly to the differences in microbial composition in cecal contents as well as in feces (Table S2). When evaluating the trials separately, it became clear that OTU_31, which was found to be clearly enriched when comparing the feeding groups over all three trials together, differed significantly only in experiment two and experiment three. In contrast, OTU_23 differed significantly in all three independent repetitions (Tables S5–S7).
Salmonella counts in cecal contents (control: 3.34a ± 0.50 log10 CFU/g; experimental: 3.08b ± 0.56 log10 CFU/g) and feces (control: 3.02a ± 0.45 log10 CFU/g; experimental: 2.36b ± 0.57 log10 CFU/g) differed significantly between the piglets of both groups in the present study, 28 days after artificial infection [18]. A total of 13 differentially abundant OTUs (P-values <0.01; Figure 6) were identified in the pairwise comparisons of pigs having Salmonella counts above versus below 3.2 log10 CFU/g sample in cecal contents. Of all identified differentially abundant OTUs in cecal contents between both feeding groups, six appeared to be related to Salmonella counts as well, under them OTU_23 (genus Catenisphaera) and OTU_31 (genus Bifidobacterium, Table S8). Both OTUs were enriched in the cecal contents of piglets with Salmonella counts below 3.2 log10 CFU/g sample compared to piglets with Salmonella counts above 3.2 log10 CFU/g sample.

4. Discussion

4.1. Relation between Salmonella Typhimurium and the Differing Bacterial Species

OTU_31 (genus Bifidobacterium) and OTU_23 (genus Catenisphaera) seemed to be related to Salmonella Typhimurium counts in the present study. A high antagonistic activity of Bifidobacterium against Salmonella was already shown [36,37,38]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a relation between the genus Catenisphaera and Salmonella Typhimurium. The genus Catenisphaera was proposed as a member of the family Erysipelotrichaceae and has one known species, Catenisphaera adipataccumulans [39]. Even if the relative abundance of Catenisphaera was on average below 1% in cecal contents as well as in fecal samples of the present study, this genus seems to play a role within the intestinal ecosystem as Catenisphaera is found in association with several pig diseases. In F18-fimbriated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infected weaned pigs, Catenisphaera was decreased in the ascending colon [40], while the porcine circovirus type 3 infection caused a higher abundance of Catenisphaera [41]. So far, this genus has also been observed in connection with the alleviation of further inflammatory diseases in pigs. Besides increased SCFAs in feces, blood, cecal and colonic digesta, Catenisphaera was found to be enriched in the feces of pigs fed a fiber-rich diet (low fiber diet + inulin and cellulose) in association with reduced lung damage/promoted lung recovery [42]. In addition, Catenisphaera was identified as the bacterial genera associated with fecal microbiota transplantation that partially relieved the symptoms of postweaning diarrhea in piglets [43]. Catenisphaera produce lactate as a major end-product from glucose fermentation [39]. Major fermentation end products of bifidobacteria are acetate and lactate [4,44,45]. Besides the bifidobacterial strain and the strain belonging to the genus Catenisphaera, further bacterial strains belonging to the order Lactobacillales and genera comprising lactic acid bacteria [34] were enriched in cecal samples of piglets fed the experimental rye-based diet: two of the genus Lactobacillus (OTU_115 and OTU_42) and two of the genus Streptococcus (OTU_959 and OTU_2). Piglets aged about 47 days that received the same diets as offered in the present study showed significantly higher concentrations of lactic acid in the digesta of the stomach and small intestine, the main sites of lactic acid production [9,46,47], when fed the experimental diet (69% rye) compared to the control diet (69% wheat) [47,48]. In addition, with increasing lactic acid concentrations, the pH tended to be lower in the digesta of the small intestine [47]. Now, we could show in the present study several lactic acid producing bacteria were enriched when feeding the rye-based compared to the wheat-based diet.
The antibacterial activity of several lactobacilli species against Salmonella Typhimurium can be solely due to the production of lactic acid, while others inhibit it due to the production of lactic acid and (an) unknown inhibitory substance(s), which are only active in the presence of lactic acid [49,50]. In addition, the produced lactic acid was responsible for a significant inhibitory activity upon invasion of Salmonella Typhimurium into cultured human enterocyte-like Caco-2/TC7 cells [49]. However, a translocation of Salmonella in ileocecal lymph nodes was not affected by the two diets, as investigated and published by Chuppava, et al. [18] with the pigs of the present study. Even if bifidobacteria produce strong acids, and especially acetate gives a concentration-dependent inhibition of Salmonella Typhimurium in vitro [51,52], this SCFA is also known to increase the invasion gene expression and virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium [14,53]. SCFA synthesis by the microbiota can be used by the host to induce defense mechanisms but also by the bacterium itself to enhance the invasion of the intestinal epithelium [15]. In addition, a dysbiosis-associated increase in lactate levels also supports Salmonella Typhimurium growth, as Salmonella Typhimurium utilizes L-lactate as a nutrient during gut infection [54]. Lactate is seldom detected as a major fermentation product of mixed anaerobic communities neither in human feces under normal conditions [55,56], nor in piglet feces although high lactate levels were induced in the small intestine directly or indirectly by feeding measures [47,57]. Piglets that received the same diets as in the present study showed higher concentrations of lactic acid in digesta with decreasing concentrations, the more caudal in the digestive tract the lactate concentrations were examined [47] —an observation which is assumed to reflect absorption and lactate utilization by other bacterial species within a healthy microbiota [55].
Nevertheless, once entering the gastrointestinal tract, Salmonella enterica encounters host responses targeted towards pathogen clearance [13]. While the inflammatory response against Salmonella enterica has an important role in preventing infection, it also provides the bacteria with unique metabolites such as tetrathionate and is thus exploited by Salmonella enterica for its competitive advantage and its ability to outcompete the intestinal microbiota [13,15,58]. In mice, it could be shown that Salmonella Typhimurium was unable to colonize the intestine without inflammation [59]. Salmonella Typhimurium overcomes colonization resistance by abusing the host’s inflammatory immune response to gain an edge on the normal microbial community of the gut [59,60]. However, immune response is not the main determinant of Salmonella serovar Typhimurium levels within the colon, and the intestinal microbiota seem to be involved in the development of the supershedder phenotype [61]. In the natural porcine host as well, microbiota of communities of low and high Salmonella-shedding pigs differed [62]. The authors of that study discussed whether differences between the gastrointestinal microbiota of pigs producing a range of SCFA concentrations may influence the acute colonization potential of Salmonella, or whether later high shedders have an elevated inflammatory status in the gut that more readily leads to colonization with Salmonella, as inflammation is an important component of the pathogenesis strategy of Salmonella [62]. Further, studies have shown that the intestinal microbiota of pigs is affected upon exposure to Salmonella Typhimurium, and those evaluations revealed an influence on Faecalibacterium [63,64]. Besides Bifidobacterium, one bacterial species assigned to this genus Faecalibacterium was enriched in the cecal contents of piglets fed the experimental rye-based diet. A comparison of the microbiota in the pig colon of challenged pigs and nonchallenged pigs showed a decrease in Faecalibacterium at the genus level in Salmonella Typhimurium challenged pigs three weeks postchallenge [63]. In addition, the most remarkable difference reported in piglets infected with Salmonella Typhimurium compared with the naïve control group was an abundant presence of lactic acid producing bacteria and a reduction of SCFAs-producing bacteria, under them Ruminococcaceae including Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Butyrivibrio and Clostridium genera [64]. For this reason, it can be assumed that possible changes in microbiota composition induced by Salmonella Typhimurium exposure were mitigated by the experimental diet. However, a negative control group was not considered with the infected groups to be able to prove this effect of the experimental diet with the present study. Faecalibacterium has one identified species, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [35], a butyrate-, formate- and D-lactate-producing bacterium [65,66]. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is considered as a beneficial intestinal commensal, and its prevalence is often decreased in conditions of intestinal dysbiosis [65]. Still, little is known about the diversity and functional specificities that are linked to these phylogroups of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [35]. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii has been suggested to be a functionally important member of the microbiota and probably has an impact on the physiology and health of the host [35]. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an acetate-consuming bacterium potentially making a significant contribution to D-lactate and butyrate formation in the large intestine [65,66].
Finally, the microbiota of the large intestine degrade and metabolize dietary fiber not only to SCFAs and gases, but they also convert the phenolic compounds into a range of other metabolites with the ability to influence the metabolism at a cellular level [67]. Not only their metabolites but also the polyphenols themselves can influence and induce a modulation of the gut microbiota composition, thereby affecting the growth of pathogenic and beneficial bacteria and are described as being able to prevent diseases associated with oxidative stress such as inflammatory diseases [68,69].

4.2. Differences in Bacterial Composition between Sampling Sites Due to the Feeding Measures

The factor diet had a significant effect on the bacterial composition of the samples at both sampling sites. However, the samples of pigs fed the control or experimental diet separated more clearly in cecal contents (R2 = 0.095) with high and continuous supply of fermentable substrates compared to feces (R2 = 0.081), where the majority of fermentable substrates had been depleted.
Cereal grains from different species differ significantly in several carbohydrate fractions, while rye has the highest concentrations of soluble arabinoxylans and fructans and is furthermore a valuable source of several bioactive compounds [5,70]. Neither arabinoxylans nor fructans are degraded by endogenous enzymes but with microbial enzymes, thus having a great impact on the site of their digestion/fermentation and how they influence the physiology of the gastrointestinal tract [2]. The majority of soluble arabinoxylans is broken down between the ileum and the cecum [8,46], and arabinoxylans, characterized by a low degree of substitution and virtually no doubly substituted xylose, are slowly degraded at more distal locations, while the remaining arabinoxylans, characterized by a high degree of substitution, are not degraded at all [8]. In addition, a large part of the fructans is already absorbed in the small intestines and the majority disappears within the cecum of pigs [46]. The only bifidobacterial strain found within the porcine microbiota of the present study was significantly enriched only in the cecal samples of pigs fed a diet containing rye instead of wheat. In feces, this difference was no longer seen. The substrate utilization of bifidobacteria from human and animal origin is highly variable and considerable interspecies and interstrain differences exist [71,72,73]. Bifidobacteria are generally able to ferment arabinoxylans; nevertheless, utilization is again limited to only a few bifidobacterial strains [73,74,75]. In addition, cell walls of wheat and rye endosperms are both rich in arabinoxylans, but have structural differences in α-L-arabinofuranosyl substitution patterns and arabinoxylan hydrolysates originating from either rye or wheat as a substrate also induce a strain-dependent intensity and rapidity in growth [73]. Thus, if bifidobacteria had been present in the pigs in our study that were able to use arabinoxylans in the first place, this difference in the structure of arabinoxylans between rye and wheat, may have caused different growth conditions for the bacteria in the different feeding groups. Still, being aware of the limited ability of only a few bifidobacteria to degrade arabinoxylans, it is conceivable that other more versatile polysaccharide-degrading bacteria, such as bacteroides and clostridia, degrade arabinoxylan to smaller molecules, which are then cross-fed to bifidobacteria [8]. Further investigations studying the growth of bifidobacteria, especially on rye- or wheat-originating water-soluble polysaccharides (WSP), speak in favor of the use of other carbohydrates than arabinoxylans. When bifidobacteria were grown on wheat and rye WSP, xylose and arabinose concentrations remained constant, indicating the inability of the tested strains to use arabinoxylan as a carbohydrate source, while polyfructan and a polysaccharide fraction composed of glucose were degraded [44,76]. Fructooligosaccharides or oligofructose are short-chain fructans with a degree of polymerization (DP) lower than 10 [77]. Carbohydrates containing almost exclusively fructose monomers are referred to as fructans [77]. Fructans with β-2,1 glycosidic bonds, called inulin-type fructans, are easily degraded by enzymes, which are frequently found in bacteria of the genus Bifidobacterium [77]. Similar to the use of arabinoxylans, there is a specificity of Bifidobacterium to utilize short-chain fructooligosaccharides and oligofructose as well as short-chain, but not highly polymerized inulins, while highly polymerized inulins seem to be dependent on the presence and ability of other bacteria to initiate degradation, followed by the possible subsequent stimulation of Bifidobacterium‘s growth [78]. Under cereal grains, rye has not only the highest amounts of fructans [5,70], but the fructans of rye and wheat differ in their degree of polymerization. Rye has higher levels of high-molecular-weight fructans (DP > 5) [79], whereas wheat has higher concentrations of fructans of low DP (<5) [80]. Interestingly, bifidobacteria were nevertheless enriched in the cecal contents of pigs when offered the rye-based diet compared to the wheat-based diet. Considering the limited ability of only a few bifidobacteria to degrade arabinoxylans and their specificity to utilize not highly polymerized fructans, the enrichment of Bifidobacterium when fed the experimental diet could be explained by the presence of other bacteria within the microbiota that initiate degradation as previously discussed. However, it should also be considered that possibly the quantity of other substrates available for the bacteria within the intestinal tract of pigs differs depending on the diet. The substrates fermented by the largest number of bifidobacterial species were, besides D-galactosamine and D-glucosamine, the two components of starch, amylose and amylopectin [71]. The apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of starch in growing pigs is higher in wheat compared to hybrid rye [10]. However, all grains had high AID values for starch that were above 95% and the total starch contents of wheat were higher compared to that of hybrid rye [10]. Moreover, in the present study, the starch contents of the wheat-based control diet exceeded that of the experimental rye-based diet. Since the AID of starch was not determined in the present study, we cannot give a statement about how much starch entered the cecum and whether these amounts differed between the two different diets. Nevertheless, we already showed in other investigations that Bifidobacterium was favored insofar as a higher amount of starch escaped digestion and absorption in the small intestine and reached the large intestine, whereby it became available as a substrate for the present microbiota [57].
As acetate is produced by bifidobacteria when metabolizing carbohydrates originating from rye, this fermentation end-product can additionally be cross-fed. There are several indications of cross-feeding between bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [65,81,82]. Besides being net acetate utilizers, all Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains possessed the ability to hydrolyze fructose, fructo-oligosaccharide, starch and inulin, but none of the strains utilized arabinose, melibiose, raffinose, rhamnose, ribose and xylose [66]. Thus, the intake of fructan contained in rye may have also directly promoted the growth of this bacterial species. Cross-feeding between bifidobacteria and many other bacteria such as Faecalibacterium, which can now use these fermentation end-products and again produce other SCFAs, helps to explain the reported butyrogenic effects of certain dietary substrates [4,55]. In the presence of the bifidobacteria, there is an enhanced formation of butyrate by Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [82]. Nielsen et al. [83] observed a higher number of the butyrate-producing Faecalibacterium prausnitzii as well as of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in feces and a three- to fivefold higher pool size of butyrate in the cecum, proximal and mid colon after feeding rye flakes instead of wheat flour to pigs (body weight on average 63 kg) for three weeks. Significantly higher butyrate concentrations were found in the portal vein and mesenteric artery of pigs fed a rye-based instead of a wheat-based diet [9]. Besides those investigations in pigs [83], in human studies as well [84,85], Faecalibacterium was already associated with the dietary intake of rye.
In contrast to soluble arabinoxylans and a large part of fructans, NCP-glucose is still largely digested between cecum and feces and its disappearance is still high in the colon, while cellulose seems to disappear only in the colon of pigs fed whole rye [46]. This change in substrate availability between the different sites of the hindgut was reflected by the varying bacterial composition between the cecal contents and feces of the pigs (R2 = 0.07573, p = 0.001), regardless of the diet that was offered. At this point, it should be emphasized that the bifidogenic effect and growth promotion of several lactobacilli strains as well as of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in pigs fed a rye diet would not have been detected if only the feces had been analyzed. The results obtained in the present study might be of value for extrapolating to humans.
Nevertheless, there were still differences in bacterial composition of feces between the feeding groups of the present study. According to Bach Knudsen et al. [9], the difference in the fermentation pattern (carbohydrate-derived metabolites of bacterial fermentation) in the large intestine of pigs consuming rye compared to wheat are caused by the type rather than the amount of carbohydrate entering the large intestine. Comparable to the investigations of Bach Knudsen et al. [9], the most noticeable difference between the two diets was the nature of the NSP fractions. The wheat-based diet had a high proportion of NSP as cellulose, whereas the rye-based diet had a high content of total and soluble arabinoxylans as well as β-glucan. The digestibility of β-glucan before reaching the ileum of pigs offered a wheat-based diet was higher compared to a rye-based diet, whereas the disappearance of β-glucan between cecum and rectum was lower for the wheat-based than the rye-based diet, 34% for the wheat-based compared to 51% for the rye-based diet [9]. Almost none of the β-glucan offered with the rye-based diet was excreted via feces (fecal digestibility of 99.2%) [9]. In the case of cellulose, ileal digestibility did not differ between the rye-based and wheat-based diets (wheat: 25.7% ± 1.5 vs. rye: 26.8% ± 1.3). However, fecal digestibility of cellulose was numerically higher when wheat was offered (wheat: 36.3% ± 4.0 vs. rye: 28.5% ± 4.0) [9].

5. Conclusions

Dietary measures contributed significantly to the differences of microbial composition, while samples separated more clearly in cecal contents compared to feces by this variable alone. In the cecum, a promoted growth of Bifidobacterium, several lactic acid bacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were seen in pigs fed the experimental diet. The high intake of rye instead of wheat seems to promote the growth of beneficial intestinal bacteria accompanied by impaired growth conditions for the foodborne pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11172232/s1, Figure S1: Bray–Curtis dissimilarity-based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed on samples of pigs fed with either rye- or wheat-containing diets. Different colors represent samples obtained from different parts (cecal contents or feces). Lines connect samples obtained from the same site; Table S1: Alpha diversity (means ± SD) in samples using the species richness estimators Observed species, Chao1, and Shannon index; Table S2: Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) results based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities, Table S3: Differentially abundant OTUs in the pairwise comparisons of the groups in cecal contents, Table S4: Differentially abundant OTUs in the pairwise comparisons of the groups in fecal samples, Table S5: Differentially abundant OTUs in the pairwise comparisons of the groups in cecal contents of experiment 1, Table S6: Differentially abundant OTUs in the pairwise comparisons of the groups in cecal contents of experiment 2, Table S7: Differentially abundant OTUs in the pairwise comparisons of the groups in cecal contents of experiment 3, Table S8: Differentially abundant OTUs in the pairwise comparison of piglets with Salmonella counts above versus below 3.2 log10 CFU/g cecal content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K. and C.V.; methodology, J.H., B.C., U.M., T.S., K.E.B.K. and C.V.; validation, J.H., B.C., U.M., T.S. and C.V.; formal analysis, J.H.; investigation, B.C., V.W., and C.V.; resources, C.V.; data curation, J.H. and B.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H.; writing—review and editing, J.H., T.S., K.E.B.K., J.K. and C.V.; visualization, J.H.; supervision, C.V.; project administration, C.B.H. and C.V.; funding acquisition, J.K. and C.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL, Germany) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE, Germany) under the innovation support program (281B101016). This Open Access publication was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - 491094227 “Open Access Publication Costs” and the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experiments of the Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, LAVES (Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit; reference: 33.8-42502-04-19/3257, 27.11.2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets for this study can be found in the NCBI BioProject with the accession ID PRJNA841815.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Frances Sherwood-Brock for proofreading the manuscript to ensure correct English.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Lærke, H.N.; Jørgensen, H. Carbohydrates and carbohydrate utilization in swine. In Sustainable Swine Nutrition; Chiba, L.I., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 109–137. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach Knudsen, K.; Lærke, H.; Ingerslev, A.; Hedemann, M.; Nielsen, T.; Theil, P. Carbohydrates in pig nutrition–recent advances. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cummings, J.H.; Stephen, A.M. Carbohydrate terminology and classification. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, S5–S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Holscher, H.D. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut. Microbes. 2017, 8, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rodehutscord, M.; Rückert, C.; Maurer, H.P.; Schenkel, H.; Schipprack, W.; Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Schollenberger, M.; Laux, M.; Eklund, M.; Siegert, W. Variation in chemical composition and physical characteristics of cereal grains from different genotypes. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 70, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aumiller, T.; Mosenthin, R.; Weiss, E. Potential of cereal grains and grain legumes in modulating pigs’ intestinal microbiota–A review. Livest. Sci. 2015, 172, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung. Bericht zur Markt—und Versorgungslage Futtermittel 2018; Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung: Bonn, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Laerke, H.N. Rye arabinoxylans: Molecular structure, physicochemical properties and physiological effects in the gastrointestinal tract. Cereal Chem. 2010, 87, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Serena, A.; Bjørnbak Kjær, A.K.; Jørgensen, H.; Engberg, R. Rye bread enhances the production and plasma concentration of butyrate but not the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin in pigs. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 1696–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McGhee, M.L.; Stein, H.H. Apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of AA and starch in hybrid rye, barley, wheat, and corn fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 3319–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koistinen, V.M.; Hanhineva, K. Mass spectrometry-based analysis of whole-grain phytochemicals. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1688–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Belobrajdic, D.P.; Bird, A.R. The potential role of phytochemicals in wholegrain cereals for the prevention of type-2 diabetes. Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kim, H.B.; Isaacson, R.E. Salmonella in swine: Microbiota interactions. Ann. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2017, 5, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lawhon, S.D.; Maurer, R.; Suyemoto, M.; Altier, C. Intestinal short-chain fatty acids alter Salmonella Typhimurium invasion gene expression and virulence through BarA/SirA. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 1451–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ahmer, B.M.; Gunn, J.S. Interaction of Salmonella spp. with the intestinal microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verbrugghe, E.; Boyen, F.; Van Parys, A.; Van Deun, K.; Croubels, S.; Thompson, A.; Shearer, N.; Leyman, B.; Haesebrouck, F.; Pasmans, F. Stress induced Salmonella Typhimurium recrudescence in pigs coincides with cortisol induced increased intracellular proliferation in macrophages. Vet. Res. 2011, 42, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. EFSA; ECDPC. The European Union one health 2019 zoonoses report. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chuppava, B.; Wilke, V.; Hartung, C.B.; El-Wahab, A.A.; Grone, R.; von Felde, A.; Kamphues, J.; Visscher, C. Effect of a high proportion of rye in compound feed for reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in experimentally infected young pigs. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Visscher, C.; Klein, G.; Verspohl, J.; Beyerbach, M.; Stratmann-Selke, J.; Kamphues, J. Serodiversity and serological as well as cultural distribution of Salmonella on farms and in abattoirs in Lower Saxony, Germany. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 146, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naumann, C.; Bassler, R. Band III Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. In Methoden der Landwirtschaftlichen Forschungs- und Untersuchungsanstalt; VDLUFA-Verlag: Darmstadt, Germany, 2012; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jaworski, N.; Lærke, H.; Bach Knudsen, K.; Stein, H. Carbohydrate composition and in vitro digestibility of dry matter and nonstarch polysaccharides in corn, sorghum, and wheat and coproducts from these grains. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ISO 6579-2:2012; DIN: Microbiology of Food and Animal Feed—Horizontal Method for the Detection, Enumeration and Serotyping of Salmonella—Part 2: Enumeration by a Miniaturized Most Probable Number Technique. Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2013. Available online: https://dx.doi.org/10.31030/1856259 (accessed on 20 December 2019).
  23. MPN Software Programme. Available online: http://standards.iso.org/iso/ts/6579/-2/ (accessed on 20 December 2019).
  24. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Lozupone, C.A.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Fierer, N.; Knight, R. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4516–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glockner, F. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, Q.; Garrity, G.M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kassambara, A. Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests [R Package Rstatix Version 0.7.0]. 2021. Available online: https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/rstatix/ (accessed on 30 March 2022).
  30. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Minchin, P.; O’Hara, R.; Simpson, G.; Solymos, P. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.5-7. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 7 March 2022).
  31. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome. Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  34. Khalid, K. An overview of lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Biosci. 2011, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  35. Benevides, L.; Burman, S.; Martin, R.; Robert, V.; Thomas, M.; Miquel, S.; Chain, F.; Sokol, H.; Bermudez-Humaran, L.G.; Morrison, M. New Insights into the Diversity of the Genus Faecalibacterium. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bielecka, M.; Biedrzycka, E.; Biedrzycka, E.; Smoragiewicz, W.; Smieszek, M. Interaction of Bifidobacterium and Salmonella during associated growth. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 45, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Silva, A.; Barbosa, F.; Duarte, R.; Vieira, L.; Arantes, R.; Nicoli, J. Effect of Bifidobacterium longum ingestion on experimental salmonellosis in mice. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yasmin, H.M.; Zahoor, T.; Sagheer, A.; Nadeem, M.; Khaliq, A.; Iqbal, R.; Ahsan, S.; Ahmad, Z. Assessment of antagonistic activity of free and encapsulated Bifidobacterium bifidum against Salmonella. J. Food Saf. 2018, 38, e12546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kanno, M.; Katayama, T.; Morita, N.; Tamaki, H.; Hanada, S.; Kamagata, Y. Catenisphaera adipataccumulans gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Erysipelotrichaceae isolated from an anaerobic digester. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Smith, B.N.; Hannas, M.; Orso, C.; Martins, S.M.; Wang, M.; Donovan, S.M.; Dilger, R.N. Dietary osteopontin-enriched algal protein as nutritional support in weaned pigs infected with F18-fimbriated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hou, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Quan, R.; Wang, D.; Zhu, S.; Jiang, H.; Wei, L.; Liu, J. Dynamic alterations of gut microbiota in porcine circovirus type 3-infected piglets. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Cai, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Che, L.; Fang, Z.; Feng, B.; Lin, Y.; Xu, S. Deprivation of Dietary Fiber Enhances Susceptibility of Piglets to Lung Immune Stress. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 827509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Su, Y.; Li, X.; Li, D.; Sun, J. Fecal microbiota transplantation shows marked shifts in the multi-omic profiles of porcine post-weaning diarrhea. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Korakli, M.; Gänzle, M.G.; Vogel, R.F. Metabolism by bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria of polysaccharides from wheat and rye, and exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pokusaeva, K.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; van Sinderen, D. Carbohydrate metabolism in Bifidobacteria. Genes. Nutr. 2011, 6, 285–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Glitsø, L.; Brunsgaard, G.; Højsgaard, S.; Sandström, B.; Bach Knudsen, K. Intestinal degradation in pigs of rye dietary fibre with different structural characteristics. Br. J. Nutr. 1998, 80, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wilke, V.; Grone, R.; von Felde, A.; Abd El-Wahab, A.; Wolf, P.; Kamphues, J. Effects of increasing dietary rye levels on physicochemical characteristics of digesta and its impact on stomach emptying as well as the formation of ‘doughballs’ in stomachs of young pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 105, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wilke, V. Effects of Increasing Rye or Rye and Rapeseed Meal (Extracted) Levels in Diets for Young Pigs Regarding Digestibility and Performance as Well as Diverse Properties (Milieu/Substrate) of the Digesta in the Alimentary Tract. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hanover, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Makras, L.; Triantafyllou, V.; Fayol-Messaoudi, D.; Adriany, T.; Zoumpopoulou, G.; Tsakalidou, E.; Servin, A.; De Vuyst, L. Kinetic analysis of the antibacterial activity of probiotic lactobacilli towards Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium reveals a role for lactic acid and other inhibitory compounds. Res. Microbiol. 2006, 157, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Georgieva, R.; Yocheva, L.; Tserovska, L.; Zhelezova, G.; Stefanova, N.; Atanasova, A.; Danguleva, A.; Ivanova, G.; Karapetkov, N.; Rumyan, N. Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. intended for use as starter and probiotic cultures. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2015, 29, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Van Limpt, C.; Crienen, A.; Vriesema, A.; Knol, J. 134 Effect of Colonic Short Chain Fatty Acids, Lactate and PH on The Growth of Common Gut Pathogens. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 56, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Inturri, R.; Trovato, L.; Volti, G.L.; Oliveri, S.; Blandino, G. In vitro inhibitory activity of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 alone or in combination against bacterial and Candida reference strains and clinical isolates. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lamas, A.; Regal, P.; Vázquez, B.; Cepeda, A.; Franco, C.M. Short chain fatty acids commonly produced by gut microbiota influence Salmonella enterica motility, biofilm formation, and gene expression. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gillis, C.C.; Hughes, E.R.; Spiga, L.; Winter, M.G.; Zhu, W.; de Carvalho, T.F.; Chanin, R.B.; Behrendt, C.L.; Hooper, L.V.; Santos, R.L. Dysbiosis-associated change in host metabolism generates lactate to support Salmonella growth. Cell Host Microbe. 2018, 23, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Duncan, S.H.; Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Lactate-utilizing bacteria, isolated from human feces, that produce butyrate as a major fermentation product. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 5810–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ilhan, Z.E.; Marcus, A.K.; Kang, D.-W.; Rittmann, B.E.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R. pH-Mediated Microbial and Metabolic Interactions in Fecal Enrichment Cultures. mSphere 2017, 2, e00047-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bunte, S.; Grone, R.; Keller, B.; Keller, C.; Galvez, E.; Strowig, T.; Kamphues, J.; Hankel, J. Intestinal microbiota of fattening pigs offered non-fermented and fermented liquid feed with and without the supplementation of non-fermented coarse cereals. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Thiennimitr, P.; Winter, S.E.; Bäumler, A.J. Salmonella, the host and its microbiota. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stecher, B.; Robbiani, R.; Walker, A.W.; Westendorf, A.M.; Barthel, M.; Kremer, M.; Chaffron, S.; Macpherson, A.J.; Buer, J.; Parkhill, J. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Exploits Inflammation to Compete with the Intestinal Microbiota. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, e244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell 2014, 157, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lawley, T.D.; Bouley, D.M.; Hoy, Y.E.; Gerke, C.; Relman, D.A.; Monack, D.M. Host transmission of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is controlled by virulence factors and indigenous intestinal microbiota. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bearson, S.M.; Allen, H.K.; Bearson, B.L.; Looft, T.; Brunelle, B.W.; Kich, J.D.; Tuggle, C.K.; Bayles, D.O.; Alt, D.; Levine, U.Y. Profiling the gastrointestinal microbiota in response to Salmonella: Low versus high Salmonella shedding in the natural porcine host. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013, 16, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Borewicz, K.A.; Kim, H.B.; Singer, R.S.; Gebhart, C.J.; Sreevatsan, S.; Johnson, T.; Isaacson, R.E. Changes in the porcine intestinal microbiome in response to infection with Salmonella enterica and Lawsonia intracellularis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Drumo, R.; Pesciaroli, M.; Ruggeri, J.; Tarantino, M.; Chirullo, B.; Pistoia, C.; Petrucci, P.; Martinelli, N.; Moscati, L.; Manuali, E. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium exploits inflammation to modify swine intestinal microbiota. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 5, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Miquel, S.; Martín, R.; Bridonneau, C.; Robert, V.; Sokol, H.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Thomas, M.; Langella, P. Ecology and metabolism of the beneficial intestinal commensal bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Gut. Microbes. 2014, 5, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Duncan, S.H.; Hold, G.L.; Harmsen, H.J.; Stewart, C.S.; Flint, H.J. Growth requirements and fermentation products of Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and a proposal to reclassify it as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii gen. nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 2141–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Nørskov, N.P.; Bolvig, A.K.; Hedemann, M.S.; Laerke, H.N. Dietary fibers and associated phytochemicals in cereals. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1600518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hervert-Hernández, D.; Goñi, I. Dietary polyphenols and human gut microbiota: A review. Food Rev. Int. 2011, 27, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Duda-Chodak, A.; Tarko, T.; Satora, P.; Sroka, P. Interaction of dietary compounds, especially polyphenols, with the intestinal microbiota: A review. Eur. J. Nutr. 2015, 54, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Németh, R.; Tömösközi, S. Rye: Current state and future trends in research and applications. Acta Aliment. 2021, 50, 620–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Crociani, F.; Alessandrini, A.; Mucci, M.M.; Biavati, B. Degradation of complex carbohydrates by Bifidobacterium spp. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994, 24, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hopkins, M.; Cummings, J.; Macfarlane, G. Inter-species differences in maximum specific growth rates and cell yields of bifidobacteria cultured on oligosaccharides and other simple carbohdyrate sources. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 58, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pastell, H.; Westermann, P.; Meyer, A.S.; Tuomainen, P.; Tenkanen, M. In vitro fermentation of arabinoxylan-derived carbohydrates by bifidobacteria and mixed fecal microbiota. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 8598–8606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Crittenden, R.; Karppinen, S.; Ojanen, S.; Tenkanen, M.; Fagerström, R.; Mättö, J.; Saarela, M.; Mattila-Sandholm, T.; Poutanen, K. In vitro fermentation of cereal dietary fibre carbohydrates by probiotic and intestinal bacteria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2002, 82, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rivière, A.; Selak, M.; Geirnaert, A.; Van den Abbeele, P.; De Vuyst, L. Complementary Mechanisms for Degradation of Inulin-Type Fructans and Arabinoxylan Oligosaccharides among Bifidobacterial Strains Suggest Bacterial Cooperation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02893-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Slavin, J. Whole Grains and Digestive Health. Cereal Chem. 2010, 87, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zimmermann, A.; Visscher, C.; Kaltschmitt, M. Plant-based fructans for increased animal welfare: Provision processes and remaining challenges. Biomass. Conv. Bioref. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Biedrzycka, E.; Bielecka, M. Prebiotic effectiveness of fructans of different degrees of polymerization. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Karppinen, S.; Myllymäki, O.; Forssell, P.; Poutanen, K. Fructan Content of Rye and Rye Products. Cereal Chem. 2003, 80, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Henry, R.; Saini, H. Characterization of cereal sugars and oligosaccharides. Cereal Chem. 1989, 66, 362–365. [Google Scholar]
  81. Moens, F.; Weckx, S.; De Vuyst, L. Bifidobacterial inulin-type fructan degradation capacity determines cross-feeding interactions between bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 231, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Rios-Covian, D.; Gueimonde, M.; Duncan, S.H.; Flint, H.J.; de Los Reyes-Gavilan, C.G. Enhanced butyrate formation by cross-feeding between Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015, 362, fnv176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Nielsen, T.S.; Lærke, H.N.; Theil, P.K.; Sørensen, J.F.; Saarinen, M.; Forssten, S.; Bach Knudsen, K.E. Diets high in resistant starch and arabinoxylan modulate digestion processes and SCFA pool size in the large intestine and faecal microbial composition in pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 1837–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Prykhodko, O.; Sandberg, J.; Burleigh, S.; Björck, I.; Nilsson, A.; Fåk Hållenius, F. Impact of rye kernel-based evening meal on microbiota composition of young healthy lean volunteers with an emphasis on their hormonal and appetite regulations, and blood levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Laursen, M.F.; Laursen, R.P.; Larnkjær, A.; Mølgaard, C.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Frøkiær, H.; Bahl, M.I.; Licht, T.R. Faecalibacterium gut colonization is accelerated by presence of older siblings. MSphere 2017, 2, e00448-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 11 02232 g001a 550Plants 11 02232 g001b 550
Figure 1. Boxplots showing Observed species, Chao1 and Shannon index in (a) cecal contents and (b) feces of pigs depending on diet.
Figure 1. Boxplots showing Observed species, Chao1 and Shannon index in (a) cecal contents and (b) feces of pigs depending on diet.
Plants 11 02232 g001aPlants 11 02232 g001b
Plants 11 02232 g002a 550Plants 11 02232 g002b 550
Figure 2. A permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) on Bray–Curtis distances was used to quantify the contribution of the factors Experiment and Diet to the differences in microbial composition of the samples (above). A Bray–Curtis dissimilarity-based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed on (a) cecal contents and (b) feces of pigs fed with either rye- or wheat-containing diets. Different colors represent samples obtained from different experiments. Different point shapes represent samples of pigs receiving different diets. Lines connect samples obtained from the same groups (below).
Figure 2. A permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) on Bray–Curtis distances was used to quantify the contribution of the factors Experiment and Diet to the differences in microbial composition of the samples (above). A Bray–Curtis dissimilarity-based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed on (a) cecal contents and (b) feces of pigs fed with either rye- or wheat-containing diets. Different colors represent samples obtained from different experiments. Different point shapes represent samples of pigs receiving different diets. Lines connect samples obtained from the same groups (below).
Plants 11 02232 g002aPlants 11 02232 g002b
Plants 11 02232 g003 550
Figure 3. Bar charts represent the relative abundances of the dominant phyla in (a) cecal contents and (b) feces of pigs.
Figure 3. Bar charts represent the relative abundances of the dominant phyla in (a) cecal contents and (b) feces of pigs.
Plants 11 02232 g003
Plants 11 02232 g004 550
Figure 4. Volcano plot visualizing –log10 FDR-adjusted P-values versus log2-fold changes for all 319 OTUs. The horizontal lines show significance threshold for FDR < 0.05. Each open point represents a single OTU in: (a) cecal contents and (b) feces. Open points above the significance threshold and beyond the log2-fold change criterion of ±1 are indicated in red, while OTU names are labeled beyond the log2-fold change criterion of ±2.
Figure 4. Volcano plot visualizing –log10 FDR-adjusted P-values versus log2-fold changes for all 319 OTUs. The horizontal lines show significance threshold for FDR < 0.05. Each open point represents a single OTU in: (a) cecal contents and (b) feces. Open points above the significance threshold and beyond the log2-fold change criterion of ±1 are indicated in red, while OTU names are labeled beyond the log2-fold change criterion of ±2.
Plants 11 02232 g004
Plants 11 02232 g005 550
Figure 5. Venn diagram showing significantly different OTUs (selected with a criterion of FDR-adjusted P-values <0.05 and absolute log2-fold change >±1) between pigs fed different diets that are shared in cecal contents and feces.
Figure 5. Venn diagram showing significantly different OTUs (selected with a criterion of FDR-adjusted P-values <0.05 and absolute log2-fold change >±1) between pigs fed different diets that are shared in cecal contents and feces.
Plants 11 02232 g005
Plants 11 02232 g006 550
Figure 6. DESeq2 analysis of differentially abundant OTUs (significance threshold for alpha < 0.01) of piglets with Salmonella counts above versus below 3.2 log10 CFU/g cecal content. Each point represents a single OTU grouped by genus and by color according to which taxonomic phylum the OTU originates from.
Figure 6. DESeq2 analysis of differentially abundant OTUs (significance threshold for alpha < 0.01) of piglets with Salmonella counts above versus below 3.2 log10 CFU/g cecal content. Each point represents a single OTU grouped by genus and by color according to which taxonomic phylum the OTU originates from.
Plants 11 02232 g006
Table
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of compound feeds (g/kg dry matter basis).
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of compound feeds (g/kg dry matter basis).
IngredientsControl Diet (69% Wheat)Experimental Diet (69% Rye)
Wheat69.0%-
Rye-69.0%
Soybean meal11.5%11.5%
Barley10.0%10.0%
Potato protein5.10%4.90%
Calcium carbonate1.00%0.90%
Monocalcium phosphate0.90%1.00%
Soybean oil0.50%0.50%
Sodium chloride0.35%0.40%
Feed additives *1.65%1.80%
Chemical composition
Dry matter (g/kg as fed)897903
Crude ash51.454.2
Crude protein205213
Ether extract28.023.6
Crude fiber28.728.2
Starch530491
Metabolizable energy
(ME, MJ/kg DM)		15.615.5
* Feed additives (per kg as fed): vitamin A (12,000 IU), vitamin D3 (2000 IU), vitamin E (150 mg), copper from copper-(II)-glycinate chelate hydrate (4 mg) and copper-(II)-sulfate pentahydrate (110 mg), manganese from manganese glycine manganese chelate hydrate (35 mg), manganese from manganese-(II)-oxide (45 mg), zinc from glycine zinc chelate hydrate (40 mg) and zinc oxide (80 mg), iron from iron-(II)-sulfate monohydrate (200 mg), iodine from calcium iodate anhydrous (2.0 mg) and selenium from sodium selenite (0.40 mg); zootechnical additives: 5.0 × 109 CFU Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Table
Table 2. Carbohydrate composition of compound feeds (%, dry matter basis) 1.
Table 2. Carbohydrate composition of compound feeds (%, dry matter basis) 1.
Control Diet (69% Wheat)Experimental Diet (69% Rye)
Dry matter (% as fed)92.192.3
S-NCP 23.54.6
Arabinose0.81.2
Xylose1.01.5
Mannose0.10.2
Galactose0.50.4
Glucose0.81.0
Uronic acids0.30.3
I-NCP 36.57.5
Arabinose1.71.8
Xylose2.92.9
Mannose0.30.4
Galactose0.40.4
Glucose0.71.6
Uronic acids0.50.4
Cellulose2.41.8
NSP (total) 412.314.0
Klason lignin2.01.6
Soluble dietary fiber 53.54.6
Insoluble dietary fiber 610.810.9
Dietary fiber 714.315.6
1 Rhamnose and fucose in both compound feeds were not detected and therefore excluded from the table. 2 S-NCP = soluble noncellulosic polysaccharides. 3 I-NCP = insoluble noncellulosic polysaccharides. 4 NSP = nonstarch polysaccharides. Total NSP = S-NCP + I-NCP + cellulose. Smaller deviations in the sum after the decimal point are due to rounding. 5 Soluble dietary fiber = S-NCP. 6 Insoluble dietary fiber = I-NCP + cellulose + Klason lignin. Smaller deviations in the sum after the decimal point are due to rounding. 7 Dietary fiber = soluble dietary fiber + insoluble dietary fiber.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hankel, J.; Chuppava, B.; Wilke, V.; Hartung, C.B.; Muthukumarasamy, U.; Strowig, T.; Bach Knudsen, K.E.; Kamphues, J.; Visscher, C. High Dietary Intake of Rye Affects Porcine Gut Microbiota in a Salmonella Typhimurium Infection Study. Plants 2022, 11, 2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172232

AMA Style

Hankel J, Chuppava B, Wilke V, Hartung CB, Muthukumarasamy U, Strowig T, Bach Knudsen KE, Kamphues J, Visscher C. High Dietary Intake of Rye Affects Porcine Gut Microbiota in a Salmonella Typhimurium Infection Study. Plants. 2022; 11(17):2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hankel, Julia, Bussarakam Chuppava, Volker Wilke, Clara Berenike Hartung, Uthayakumar Muthukumarasamy, Till Strowig, Knud Erik Bach Knudsen, Josef Kamphues, and Christian Visscher. 2022. "High Dietary Intake of Rye Affects Porcine Gut Microbiota in a Salmonella Typhimurium Infection Study" Plants 11, no. 17: 2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop